- Turkish National Police Academy
Institute of Security Sciences
Anıttepe Yerleşkesi, Necatibey Cad. No: 108
Anıttepe 06570 Ankara Turkey - +90-532-7368216
Sule Toktas
Turkish National Police Academy, Institute of Security Science, Faculty Member
- Turkish and Middle East Studies, Turkish Foreign Policy, Modern Turkey, Turkish Nationalism, Islam in Turkey, Kurdish Question in Turkey, and 67 moreTurkish History, Turkish politics, Turkey And Europe, Turkey in World Politics, History of Turkish Republic, Minorities in Turkey, Turkish and European Union Relations, Political History of Turkey, Turkey (Anthropology), History of Turkey and Middle east, Turkey, Islam, and the West, Turkish migration, Non-Muslim Minorities in Turkey, Education in Turkey, Jewish history in Turkey, Women's Studies, Women's History, Gender, Gender Studies, Gender and Sexuality, Gender History, Migration Studies, Refugee Studies, Immigration, Political Science, International Relations, Comparative Politics, Jewish Studies, Human Trafficking, Minority Studies, Turkey, Political Science and public administration, Jewish Cultural Studies, Citizenship, Trafficking, Jewish History, Human Smuggling, Smuggling, Minority, Minorities, Jews in Turkey, History, Security, Peace, Conflict, Freedom, Multiculturalism, Ethnicity, Human Rights, Minority Rights, International Law, International organizations, Diplomacy, Nationalism, Culture, State, Religion, Migration, Displacement, Oral Traditions, Borders and Borderlands, Minorities, Language politics, Refugees, Immigration Status & Nationality, Critical Foreign Policy Analysis, Critical Geopolitics, and Culture and Politicsedit
- Sule Toktas is a professor of political science at the Institute of Security Sciences, Turkish National Police Academ... moreSule Toktas is a professor of political science at the Institute of Security Sciences, Turkish National Police Academy, Ankara, Turkey. She was formerly a visiting scholar at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Research on Gender and Women; and a Jean Monnet post-doctoral fellow at the Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute. She received her Ph.D. degree from Bilkent University (dissertation entitled “Citizenship, Minorities and Immigrants: A Comparison of Turkey's Jewish Minority and Turkish-Jewish Immigrants in Israel”) and master's degree from the Middle East Technical University (thesis entitled “Gender Awareness of Working Women in Turkey: Academics and Teachers Graduated from the Girls’ Institutes 1960-1970”).
Prof. Toktas’s research interests include women’s studies, migration studies, Turkish politics and Turkish foreign policy. She conducted research projects which were funded by TUBITAK (the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey), UN Population Fund and Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), American Research Institute in Turkey (ARIT), Chaim Herzog Center for Middle East Studies and University Scientific Projects programmes. Her publications appeared in scholarly journals lke Muslim World, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Third World Quarterly, Middle East Policy, European Journal of Women Studies, Political Science Quarterly and International Migration. She co-authored four books on documentation of immigration in Turkey, Syria-Afghanistan comparative politics, think-tanks and foreign policy making in Turkey, and women’s property rights in Turkey. Prof. Toktas is in the editorial board of the Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies (JBNES) as well as in the executive board of Migration Research Center at Koc University (Mirekoc).
Prof. Toktas was awarded the “Incentive Award for Social Scientists”__ by TUBITAK in 2009 and "Ten Outstanding Young Persons (TOYP) Award" in 2008 for 'Scientific Leadership’ delivered by the Junior Chamber International (JCI).
Prof. Dr. Sule Toktas teaches political science and international relations at the graduate level and since 2015, she is serving TUBITAK scientific board as an advisor to the disciplines of political science, women’s studies and international migration.
Her contact information: Prof. Dr. Sule Toktas, Institute of Security Sciences, Turkish National Police Academy, Necatibey Cad. No. 108, Anıttepe Çankaya Ankara 06570 Turkey
E-mail: suletoktas@yahoo.com;
Webpage: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/SuleToktas _edit
Book Editor, Yeni Güvenlik Tehditleri (New Security Threats), Ankara: Turkish National Police Academy Publications, 2023, (with Bayram Ali Soner and Orhan Çifçi). ISBN:978-625-99541-8-9
Research Interests:
KADINLARIN MÜLK VE MİRAS EDİNMESİ: KEMALİST AYDINLANMA VE İSLAMİ SOSYOLOJİK SÜREÇLER Son yıllarda yapılan araştırmalar, dünya ölçeğinde, genellikle erkeklerin kadınlardan daha fazla mülkiyete sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Benzer bir... more
KADINLARIN MÜLK VE MİRAS EDİNMESİ: KEMALİST AYDINLANMA VE İSLAMİ SOSYOLOJİK SÜREÇLER
Son yıllarda yapılan araştırmalar, dünya ölçeğinde, genellikle erkeklerin kadınlardan daha fazla mülkiyete sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Benzer bir durum Türkiye için de geçerlidir. Medeni Hukuk'ta ve ilgili yasalarda cinsiyet ayrımı yapılmamasına karşın, cinsiyete göre mal dağılımına ilişkin ulusal veriler, erkek ve kadın nüfus arasında mülkiyet oranları bakımından büyük bir farkın olduğunu göstermektedir. Evlilik ve miras düzenlemelerinin mülk edinmenin temel yollarından biri olduğu göz önünde bulundurulacak olursa, kadınların bu süreçlerdeki durumunu anlamak, mülkiyet ile kurdukları ilişkiye ışık tutacaktır. Araştırma, evlilik ve miras düzenlemelerinin kadınların mülkiyet edinmesini nasıl etkilediğini, kadınların mülkiyete erişiminde hangi toplumsal süreçlerin rol oynadığını ve bireysel düzlemde kadınların mülkiyet edinme süreçlerine hangi bağlam ve araçlarla dâhil olduğunu ve yine hangi bağlam ve araçlarla dışlandıklarını anlamaya çalışmıştır. Bu doğrultuda İstanbul’da gerçekleştirilen saha çalışmasında toplumsal cinsiyetin varlık paylaşım ve dağıtım süreçlerinin belirleyici faktörlerinden biri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Cumhuriyet ile birlikte eşit yurttaşlık çerçevesi çizen Medeni Kanunun yanı sıra İslam Hukuku kurallarının ve geleneklerin de toplumda hala etkili olduğu gözlenmiştir. Sağlar arası varlık aktarımı olarak adlandırılabilecek servetin ve varlığın mirasa tabi tutulmadan henüz sağken çocuklara devredilmesi uygulaması da sıklıkla pratik edilmektedir.
Son yıllarda yapılan araştırmalar, dünya ölçeğinde, genellikle erkeklerin kadınlardan daha fazla mülkiyete sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Benzer bir durum Türkiye için de geçerlidir. Medeni Hukuk'ta ve ilgili yasalarda cinsiyet ayrımı yapılmamasına karşın, cinsiyete göre mal dağılımına ilişkin ulusal veriler, erkek ve kadın nüfus arasında mülkiyet oranları bakımından büyük bir farkın olduğunu göstermektedir. Evlilik ve miras düzenlemelerinin mülk edinmenin temel yollarından biri olduğu göz önünde bulundurulacak olursa, kadınların bu süreçlerdeki durumunu anlamak, mülkiyet ile kurdukları ilişkiye ışık tutacaktır. Araştırma, evlilik ve miras düzenlemelerinin kadınların mülkiyet edinmesini nasıl etkilediğini, kadınların mülkiyete erişiminde hangi toplumsal süreçlerin rol oynadığını ve bireysel düzlemde kadınların mülkiyet edinme süreçlerine hangi bağlam ve araçlarla dâhil olduğunu ve yine hangi bağlam ve araçlarla dışlandıklarını anlamaya çalışmıştır. Bu doğrultuda İstanbul’da gerçekleştirilen saha çalışmasında toplumsal cinsiyetin varlık paylaşım ve dağıtım süreçlerinin belirleyici faktörlerinden biri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Cumhuriyet ile birlikte eşit yurttaşlık çerçevesi çizen Medeni Kanunun yanı sıra İslam Hukuku kurallarının ve geleneklerin de toplumda hala etkili olduğu gözlenmiştir. Sağlar arası varlık aktarımı olarak adlandırılabilecek servetin ve varlığın mirasa tabi tutulmadan henüz sağken çocuklara devredilmesi uygulaması da sıklıkla pratik edilmektedir.
Research Interests: Islamic Law, Gender Studies, Women's Studies, Women's History, Property Rights, and 38 moreProperty Law, Islamic Contemporary Studies, Gender, Gender Equality, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Women, Turkey, Islamic Studies, Women and Gender Issues in Islam, Gender and Development, Islamic History, Islam, Modern Turkey, Women and Gender Studies, Woman Studies, Sosyoloji, Türkiye, Hukuk, Türkiye ekonomisi, Kadinlarin Haklari, Kadın, Avrupa Birliği Türkiye, Kadınlar, Osmanlı Kadınları, Medeni Hukuk, Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Kadın çalışmaları, Miras hukuku, Hukuk Sosyolojisi, Sosyoloji, Felsefe siyaset bilimi ve uluslararası ilişkiler, İslamic Law/İslam Hukuku/Fıkıh/فقه, Türk Kadını, Kadının Yeri, Toplumsal Esitzlik, Mulkiyet, Osmanlı Kadın Hareketi, Mülki Idare, and Arsa ve Arazi Mülkiyet Sınır Ölçmeleri
"Kitabın İçeriği: Yakın bir zamana kadar Türkiye yurtdışına göç veren bir ülke olarak bilinirdi. Ancak, 1980’li yıllarla başlayarak ve özellikle 1990 sonrasında uluslararası göç hareketleri içinde Türkiye hem göç alan hem de transit göç... more
"Kitabın İçeriği:
Yakın bir zamana kadar Türkiye yurtdışına göç veren bir ülke olarak bilinirdi. Ancak, 1980’li yıllarla başlayarak ve özellikle 1990 sonrasında uluslararası göç hareketleri içinde Türkiye hem göç alan hem de transit göç için kullanılan bir ülke konumuna gelmiştir. Yılda, 160,000 yabancı ülke vatandaşının oturma izni ile yaşadığı Türkiye’nin uluslararası göç rejimleri içerisindeki bu yeni konumunu daha çok düzensiz, kayıt dışı ya da kaçak göç diye adlandırdığımız göç türü içinde gelen göçmenlerin sayılarında gözlemlenen artışlar belirlemiştir. Sığınmacı ve mülteci hareketleri ise ülkeye yönelen göçün bir başka türüdür. Türkiye’nin göç alan ve transit ülke konumunun önümüzdeki yıllarda da etkinliğini sürdüreceği düşünülmektedir. Genelde bütün dünyada güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği olan uluslararası göç verileri toplamak zordur. Bu çerçevede Türkiye’deki uluslararası göç verileri de oldukça yetersizdir. Yurtdışından Türkiye’ye yönelen göçün nicelik ve niteliklerinin tespitinde karşılaşılan sorunları irdeleyen bu kitap çalışması, ilk olarak Türkiye’ye yönelen uluslararası göçün yine son yıllar içindeki görüntüsünün bir özetini yapmakta ve ülkedeki uluslararası göç veri toplama sistemlerini incelemektedir. Kitap, Türkiye’ye yönelen uluslararası göç hareketleri üzerine veri toplanması ve bu verilen niteliklerinin ve niceliklerinin konuyla ilgili tartışmalar ve araştırmalar ışığında değerlendirilmesini temel almaktadır.
Yazarlar Hakkında Bilgi:
Prof. Dr. Ahmet İçduygu, Koç Üniversitesi Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü öğretim üyesidir. Uluslararası göç, insan hakları, sivil toplum, milliyetçilik, modernleşme ve globalleşme konularında çeşitli araştırma faaliyetleri bulunan İçduygu’nun bir çok yayınlanmış eseri bulunmaktadır. Eserlerinin bazıları International Migration, International Social Science Journal, Global Governance, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Human Rights Quarterly ve Doğu-Batı’da yayınlanmıştır. Araştırmaları bir çok kuruluş tarafından desteklenen İçduygu’nun “Yurtdışından Gelenlerin Nicelik ve Tespitinde Sorunlar” isimli çalışması Birleşmiş Milletler Nüfus Fonu’nun katkılarıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Şule Toktaş, Işık Üniversitesi Uluslararası İlişkiler bölümü öğretim üyesidir. Uluslararası göç, vatandaşlık, kadın çalışmaları ve Türk siyasal hayatı ve kurumları üzerine yayınları bulunan Toktaş’ın bazı çalışmaları European Journal of Women Studies, International Migration, Muslim World ve Middle East Studies’de yayınlanmıştır. Bekar ve 1 çocuk annesidir."
Yakın bir zamana kadar Türkiye yurtdışına göç veren bir ülke olarak bilinirdi. Ancak, 1980’li yıllarla başlayarak ve özellikle 1990 sonrasında uluslararası göç hareketleri içinde Türkiye hem göç alan hem de transit göç için kullanılan bir ülke konumuna gelmiştir. Yılda, 160,000 yabancı ülke vatandaşının oturma izni ile yaşadığı Türkiye’nin uluslararası göç rejimleri içerisindeki bu yeni konumunu daha çok düzensiz, kayıt dışı ya da kaçak göç diye adlandırdığımız göç türü içinde gelen göçmenlerin sayılarında gözlemlenen artışlar belirlemiştir. Sığınmacı ve mülteci hareketleri ise ülkeye yönelen göçün bir başka türüdür. Türkiye’nin göç alan ve transit ülke konumunun önümüzdeki yıllarda da etkinliğini sürdüreceği düşünülmektedir. Genelde bütün dünyada güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği olan uluslararası göç verileri toplamak zordur. Bu çerçevede Türkiye’deki uluslararası göç verileri de oldukça yetersizdir. Yurtdışından Türkiye’ye yönelen göçün nicelik ve niteliklerinin tespitinde karşılaşılan sorunları irdeleyen bu kitap çalışması, ilk olarak Türkiye’ye yönelen uluslararası göçün yine son yıllar içindeki görüntüsünün bir özetini yapmakta ve ülkedeki uluslararası göç veri toplama sistemlerini incelemektedir. Kitap, Türkiye’ye yönelen uluslararası göç hareketleri üzerine veri toplanması ve bu verilen niteliklerinin ve niceliklerinin konuyla ilgili tartışmalar ve araştırmalar ışığında değerlendirilmesini temel almaktadır.
Yazarlar Hakkında Bilgi:
Prof. Dr. Ahmet İçduygu, Koç Üniversitesi Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü öğretim üyesidir. Uluslararası göç, insan hakları, sivil toplum, milliyetçilik, modernleşme ve globalleşme konularında çeşitli araştırma faaliyetleri bulunan İçduygu’nun bir çok yayınlanmış eseri bulunmaktadır. Eserlerinin bazıları International Migration, International Social Science Journal, Global Governance, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Human Rights Quarterly ve Doğu-Batı’da yayınlanmıştır. Araştırmaları bir çok kuruluş tarafından desteklenen İçduygu’nun “Yurtdışından Gelenlerin Nicelik ve Tespitinde Sorunlar” isimli çalışması Birleşmiş Milletler Nüfus Fonu’nun katkılarıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Şule Toktaş, Işık Üniversitesi Uluslararası İlişkiler bölümü öğretim üyesidir. Uluslararası göç, vatandaşlık, kadın çalışmaları ve Türk siyasal hayatı ve kurumları üzerine yayınları bulunan Toktaş’ın bazı çalışmaları European Journal of Women Studies, International Migration, Muslim World ve Middle East Studies’de yayınlanmıştır. Bekar ve 1 çocuk annesidir."
Research Interests: Immigration, Immigration Studies, Migration, International Migration, Modern Turkey, and 22 moreMigration in Turkey, Uluslararası ekonomi Politik, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Kamu Yönetimi, Türkiye, Türkiye Dış Politikası, Göç, İkinci kuşak göçmen Türk, Avrupa Birliği Türkiye, Devlet, Kamu Yönetimi Reformları, Vize, Türk Kamu Yönetimi, Uluslararası Göç, Mülki Idare, Uluslarası Göç, Göçmen, Uluslararası Göçmen, ULUSLARARASI GÖÇ, Göç Sosyolojisi, Türkiye’ye Uluslararası Göç, and Uluslararası Kamu Hukuku
“Önsöz: Güvenliğin Değişen Gündemi ve Yeni Güvenlik Tehditleri (Preface: The Changing Agenda of Security and New Security Threats).“ In Bayram Ali Soner, Şule Toktaş and Orhan Çifçi, ed., Yeni Güvenlik Tehditleri (New Security Threats).... more
“Önsöz: Güvenliğin Değişen Gündemi ve Yeni Güvenlik Tehditleri (Preface: The Changing Agenda of Security and New Security Threats).“ In Bayram Ali Soner, Şule Toktaş and Orhan Çifçi, ed., Yeni Güvenlik Tehditleri (New Security Threats). Ankara: Turkish National Police Academy Publications, pp: 5-11, 2023, (Bayram Ali Soner ve Orhan Çifçi ile). ISBN:978-625-99541-8-9
Research Interests:
“Does Migration Contribute to Women’s Empowerment? Portrait of Urban Turkey and Istanbul.” In Kürşat Çınar, ed., Women’s Empowerment in Turkey and Beyond. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp: 200-221, 2020, reprint, (with Hasan Tekgüç and... more
“Does Migration Contribute to Women’s Empowerment? Portrait of Urban Turkey and Istanbul.” In Kürşat Çınar, ed., Women’s Empowerment in Turkey and Beyond. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp: 200-221, 2020, reprint, (with Hasan Tekgüç and Değer Eryar). ISBN:9780367441388
Research Interests:
Bu makale, Türkiye’de kadın sığınma evlerinin tarihi ve bugünkü yasal ve fiili durumu hakkında bilgi verirken, bu süreçleri belirleyen unsurlar üzerine gözlemlerimizi aktaracaktır. Kadın sığınma evleri açan ve işletenlerin karşılaştıkları... more
Bu makale, Türkiye’de kadın sığınma evlerinin tarihi ve bugünkü yasal ve fiili durumu hakkında bilgi verirken, bu süreçleri belirleyen unsurlar üzerine gözlemlerimizi aktaracaktır. Kadın sığınma evleri açan ve işletenlerin karşılaştıkları sorunlar üzerine yoğunlaşırken, bu kurumların sayısal ve nitel yetersizliği ve söz konusu yetersizliğin ve diğer birçok sorunun nedenlerine ışık tutacaktır. Aktarılan gözlem ve düşünceler, Türkiye’nin kadın sığınma evlerine dair politikalarının bir değerlendirmesi olarak okunabilir. Bahsedilen yetersizliklere rağmen, kadına yönelik şiddetle mücadelenin ve sığınma evlerinin daha etkin ve amacına uygun olarak düzenlenmesi için yapılmış olan yasal ve idari düzenlemelerin birçok olumlu yanı olduğunu söylemek mümkündür. Bu olumlu sürecin kadın hareketinin ve kadın örgütlerinin taleplerinden doğduğu söylenebilir. Ancak, Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliği üyelik sürecinde ilerlemeye niyet etmiş olmasının da bahsettiğimiz yasal düzenlemeler ile ilişkili olduğu göz ardı edilmemelidir.
Research Interests: Gender Studies, Women's Studies, Women's History, Sexual Violence, Turkish and Middle East Studies, and 31 moreEmergency Shelter, Women, Women and Gender Issues in Islam, Violence Against Women, Turkey And Europe, Modern Turkey, Gender And Violence, Turkish politics, Women and Gender Studies, Kamu Yönetimi, Türkiye, Hukuk, Feminizm, Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliği, Kadın, Eğitimde Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Avrupa Birliği Türkiye, Kamu Yönetimi Reformları, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Ve Iktidar, Osmanlı Kadınları, Türk Kamu Yönetimi, Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Kadın çalışmaları, şiddet, Kadına yönelik şiddet, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Ve Feminizm, Toplumsal Esitzlik, Kadına şiddet, Aile Içi şIddet, Yeni Toplumsal Hareketler, and Türk Kamu Yönetimi Ve Kalkınma Ajansları
İkinci Dünya Savaşı’nda yaşanan yıkımlar ve kayıplar neticesinde Avrupa nüfusu demografik değişimlere sahne olmuş; bu durum savaş sonrası Avrupa’nın yeniden yapılandırılması için sanayide çalışacak yerel işçi temininde sıkıntılara yol... more
İkinci Dünya Savaşı’nda yaşanan yıkımlar ve kayıplar neticesinde Avrupa nüfusu demografik değişimlere sahne olmuş; bu durum savaş sonrası Avrupa’nın yeniden yapılandırılması için sanayide çalışacak yerel işçi temininde sıkıntılara yol açmıştır. Batı Avrupa ülkelerinin refah politikaları ile desteklenmesi gereken yaşlılar, dul evkadınları, hastalar, gaziler ve kimsesiz çocuklardan oluşan niteliksiz ve üstelik sağlıksız bir kitleye dair sorunlarla karşılaşması kalkınmayı tekrardan harekete geçirebilecek ve diğerlerini destekleyebilecek işgücü temini arayışlarına sevk etmiştir. Bu sorunun kısa vadede çözümü açısından başvurulan yöntem, yurtdışından misafir işçi getirme olmuştur. Savaş sonrası oluşan kutuplaşmada Batı liginde yer alan Türkiye stratejik ortak olarak işgücü temininde önemli rol oynamıştır.
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Cultural Studies, Family studies, Family Law, Muslim Family Law, Identity (Culture), and 17 moreFamily, Turkey, Islamic Studies, Sociology of the Body, Religion in Turkey, History of the Family, Islam, Modern Turkey, Religion and Modernity, Family (Sociology), Socio-cultural, Family history, Islam and Modernity, family laws of Muslim states, Islamic Family Law, Gender and Muslim Family Laws, and Contemporary Muslim society
Turkey gives official recognition only to three minority groups — the non-Muslim communities of the Greeks, Jews and Armenians. Since 1923, the minority protection framework included in the Treaty of Lausanne has remained intact, and... more
Turkey gives official recognition only to three minority groups — the non-Muslim communities of the Greeks, Jews and Armenians. Since 1923, the minority protection framework included in the Treaty of Lausanne has remained intact, and special provisions that regulate the parameters of minority rights granted to the non-Muslim minorities still apply in Turkey. These rights include educational rights, religious freedom, equality with other citizens under the same citizenship and cultural rights.
Research Interests: European History, Middle East Studies, Race and Ethnicity, Turkish Nationalism, Turkish and Middle East Studies, and 12 moreMinority Studies, Turkey, Ethnic minorities, Turkish Foreign Policy, Middle East Politics, Modern Turkey, Minorities in Turkey, Minority Rights, Turkish politics, Central and Eastern Europe, Minorities, and Europe
ABSTRACT This paper empirically investigates the impact of internal migration on women’s empowerment in urban areas of Turkey. Based on data from a nationally representative household survey, we find that migration exerts its positive... more
ABSTRACT
This paper empirically investigates the impact of internal migration on women’s empowerment in urban areas of Turkey. Based on data from a nationally representative household survey, we find that migration exerts its positive impact through improvements in educational attainment and labor market outcomes in urban settings. Migration contributes to women’s empowerment by raising their education levels and lowering the schooling gap between men and women. Migration also allows migrants, both men and women, to access jobs and occupations in high wage regions like Istanbul, particularly for those with tertiary education. Unlike education, gender wage gap persists even after migration.
This paper empirically investigates the impact of internal migration on women’s empowerment in urban areas of Turkey. Based on data from a nationally representative household survey, we find that migration exerts its positive impact through improvements in educational attainment and labor market outcomes in urban settings. Migration contributes to women’s empowerment by raising their education levels and lowering the schooling gap between men and women. Migration also allows migrants, both men and women, to access jobs and occupations in high wage regions like Istanbul, particularly for those with tertiary education. Unlike education, gender wage gap persists even after migration.
Research Interests: Women's Studies, Immigration, Immigration Studies, Women's Rights, Urban Studies, and 15 moreEmpowerment, Turkey, Migration Studies, Work and Labour, Urban Sociology, Women's Empowerment, Modern Turkey, Internal migration, History of Istanbul, Women and Gender Studies, Immigrants, Employee Empowerment, Istanbul, Immigrant Women, and Urban Studies: Constantinople/Istanbul
This article uses a comparative approach to discuss women's access to property using evidence collected from field research conducted on two distinct communities of Istanbul: one secular and one Islamic. The two groups of women possess... more
This article uses a comparative approach to discuss women's access to property using evidence collected from field research conducted on two distinct communities of Istanbul: one secular and one Islamic. The two groups of women possess distinctly different views of the world and how it is organized. This is particularly the case concerning gender where secular women put forth a view rooted in the sameness of the genders where the Islamic women were clear in their commitment to the idea of difference. These attitudes toward the equality and difference of the genders structures the relations of these women to property and the process of inheritance.
Research Interests: Women's Studies, Women's History, Land and Property Development, Property Rights, Property Law, and 28 moreWomen's Rights, Property, Women, Women and Gender Issues in Islam, Women and Politics, Violence Against Women, Women Leadership, Land Law, Women And Globalization, Gender and religion (Women s Studies), Women's Empowerment, Women and Work, Feminist & Womanist Movements, Property Management, Women and Culture, Women and Gender Studies, Woman, Women and gender in Muslim societies, Woman Studies, Women's movement, Gender and Women's Studies, Property Ownership and Land Acquisition, Woman & Development, Women`s History and Gender History, Womens and Gender Studies, WOMEN'S RIGHT TO PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND INHERITANCE, Professional Women, and Poverty and Women
This paper gives a general picture of women’s shelters in Turkey with its history and current state, based on findings from a field work consisting of 40 in-depth interviews with administrators and staff of women’s shelters and counseling... more
This paper gives a general picture of women’s shelters in Turkey with its history and current state, based on findings from a field work consisting of 40 in-depth interviews with administrators and staff of women’s shelters and counseling centers. Thirteen of the interviewees are from NGOs that specialize in combating violence against women, sixteen of them are administrators at municipalities, and eleven of them are social workers and shelter directresses that are associated with the General Directorate of Social Services and Protection of Children. The study finds that municipality and NGO-run women’s shelters in Turkey need to rely on their own administrative and financial resources in order to provide services for women and children such as daycare centers, adult education or legal aid. There is no coordination or an institutionalized mechanism of information-sharing and resource pooling between the shelters
Research Interests: Gender Studies, Women's Studies, Domestic Violence, Violence, Sexual Violence, and 22 moreGender and Sexuality, Gender, Gender Equality, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Women, Turkish History, Turkey, Women and Gender Issues in Islam, Violence Against Women, Gender and Development, Turkey And Europe, Women's Empowerment, Modern Turkey, Gender And Violence, Women and Culture, Intimate Partner Violence, Women and Gender Studies, Woman, Sexual and Gender-Based Violence, Woman Studies, Shelters, and Abused Women Shelter
The article stems from empirical research conducted with a group of women living in Istanbul who have conservative life styles bounded by an Islamic worldview. It attempts illuminate the negotiation and contestation between official civil... more
The article stems from empirical research conducted with a group of women living in Istanbul who have conservative life styles bounded by an Islamic worldview. It attempts illuminate the negotiation and contestation between official civil law and Islamic law. The findings demonstrate that women inherit and bequeath property in a social setting where their gender roles are defined by their adherence to Islam. We argue that in Turkey women’s inheritance practices are not determined solely in accordance with the secular civil law, but rather are the result of a complex and intertwined combination of legal sources, where an Islamic worldview often leads to the adoption of Islamic law. In other words, the application of the secular civil law in Turkey is limited by the common practice of Islamic Law. Rather than follow the gender equality mandated by the civil law, the inheritance practices of many Islamic women are constituted with a deference to some aspects of Islamic law creating a situation of legal pluralism in Turkey.
Research Interests: Sociology of Religion, Islamic Law, Civil Law, Gender Studies, Islamic Economics, and 65 moreDevelopment Studies, Women's Studies, Sociology of Law, Women's History, Human Rights Law, Land and Property Development, Human Rights, Property Rights, Family Law, Property Law, Family Property Law, Common Property, Islamic Contemporary Studies, Muslim Family Law, International Human Rights Law, Islam and Human Rights, Kalam (Islamic Theology), Family, Property, Legal Pluralism, Gender, Gender Equality, Empowerment, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Resource Allocation, Turkey, Islamic Studies, Women and Gender Issues in Islam, Secularization, Gender and Development, Islam in Turkey, Human Rights Theory, Islamic History, Islam, Sociology of Money, Women's Empowerment, History of Human Rights, Modern Turkey, Property Law & Theory, Property Management, Women and Culture, Civil Society, Islamic History and Muslim Civilization, Women and Gender Studies, Land reform, Women and gender in Muslim societies, Land Rights, Women and Development, Property Development, Islamic Family Law, Islamic Pious Endowments (awqaf), Inheritance, Turkish Law, Common Law, Civil Law, law and government, Turkish civil society, Property Tax, Location Allocation, Inheritance Law, Property Ownership and Land Acquisition, Civil Procedural Law, Roman law and Civil Procedure, Turkish Constitutional Law, Land Law and Human Rights Aspects of Business and Foreign Direct Investments, Practice of Land Rights, and Contemporary Muslim society
This article takes Turkey as a case study, exploring marital and inheritance regimes with regards to their impact on women and their ability to protect women's property rights. The aim of the study is to bring to light the workings of the... more
This article takes Turkey as a case study, exploring marital and inheritance regimes with regards to their impact on women and their ability to protect women's property rights. The aim of the study is to bring to light the workings of the legal system that regulate the acquisition of property and to scrutinize the gap between the law and its practice in Turkish society. By taking this approach, the article does not only focus on laws but also on how these laws are adopted by society. Thus, two levels of analysis - de jure and de facto - are utilized for an investigation of women's property rights and hence their social and economic status.
Research Interests: Sociology, Political Sociology, Sociology of Religion, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, and 37 moreCivil Law, Gender Studies, Women's Studies, Women's History, Family studies, Marital research, Gender History, Family Law, Law and Society, Legal History, Law and Religion, Women's Rights, Muslim Family Law, Women and the Law, Family, Turkish Nationalism, Gender, Gender and the Law, Gender Equality, Political History, Socio-legal studies, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Turkish History, Turkey, Women and Gender Issues in Islam, Islam in Turkey, Political History of Turkey, Gender and religion (Women s Studies), Modern Turkey, History of Turkish Republic, Women and Culture, Turkish politics, Women and Gender Studies, Woman Studies, family laws of Muslim states, Islamic Family Law, and Contemporary Muslim society
This article employs Turkey as a case study to explore the relationship between property ownership, inheritance, and women's empowerment. In Turkey, as in much of the world, men dominate ownership of property. This is despite the fact... more
This article employs Turkey as a case study to explore the relationship between property ownership, inheritance, and women's empowerment. In Turkey, as in much of the world, men dominate ownership of property. This is despite the fact that women have had equal rights to own and inherit property since 1926. With the establishment of the Republic in 1923 came a series of reforms, one of which replaced Islamic Sharia law with a secular civil law that was based on the Swiss Civil Code. The new law, among other things, guaranteed equal rights of property and inheritance regardless of gender. In an attempt to understand the tangled relationship between property and women's empowerment, we conducted interviews regarding inheritance practices among ideologically secular, wealthy women in Istanbul. For these women and their families, the logic of wealth distribution is deeply informed by a commitment to equality between children with little regard for gender. Even in those cases where strict equality in terms of sameness was not employed, the goal was for an overall balance and fairness between recipients. Despite the fact that inheritance law provides for equality, most of the families employed intervivos transfer, gifts among the living, to distribute their family wealth. Perhaps most interesting, and in contrast to the literature, is the fact that these women do not express any sense of empowerment derived from their status as property owners. Rather education and career proved more important.
Research Interests: Sociology, Economic Sociology, Political Sociology, Sociology of Culture, Sociology of Religion, and 38 moreIslamic Law, Comparative Law, Civil Law, Gender Studies, Cultural Sociology, Women's Studies, Social Sciences, Sociology of Law, Women's History, Property Rights, Property Law, Women's Rights, Muslim Family Law, Property, Gender, Gender Equality, Socio-legal studies, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Women, Turkish History, Gender Roles, Turkey, Women and Gender Issues in Islam, Gender and Development, Islam in Turkey, Urban Sociology, Gender and religion (Women s Studies), Women's Empowerment, Modern Turkey, Civic Engagement, Women and Culture, Turkish politics, Civil Society, Women and Gender Studies, Woman Studies, Muslims, Inheritance Law, and Contemporary Muslim society
This article examines the role that think tanks have played in the formulation of national security and a culture of security through field research conducted on fourteen think tanks located in Istanbul and Ankara. In addition to... more
This article examines the role that think tanks have played in the formulation of national security and a culture of security through field research conducted on fourteen think tanks located in Istanbul and Ankara. In addition to participant observation at the think tanks, twenty-five in-depth interviews were conducted with administrators and specialists. The findings revealed that, in terms of their strategic attitudes about national security in Turkey, there are three groups of think tanks: critical think tanks; b) middle-position think tanks; and c) congruent think tanks. Based on the results of the data collected, we argue that the culture of national security in Turkey has begun to be impacted by a plurality of actors, both civilian and official, and that there is an emerging competition for influence over the definitions and conceptualizations of security as well as the identification of security issues within a securitization process which has led to their securitization. Although the think-tank sector in Turkey is still in its formative years, its roles and influence in the debates on national security have been on the rise.
Research Interests: Network Security, International Security, Security, National Security Culture, Security Studies, and 12 moreCritical Security Studies, European Security and Defence Policy, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Human Security, Turkey And Europe, Turkish Foreign Policy, Environmental Security, Turkish politics, National Security, Defense and National Security, Information Security Culture, and National Security of Turkey
Smuggling and trafficking in Turkey: An analysis of EU-Turkey cooperation in combating transnational organized crime by Sule Toktas and Hande Selimoglu Abstract Since the 1990s, there has been a global proliferation of transnational... more
Smuggling and trafficking in Turkey: An analysis of EU-Turkey cooperation in combating transnational organized crime
by Sule Toktas and Hande Selimoglu
Abstract
Since the 1990s, there has been a global proliferation of transnational organized crime (TOC). Turkey, as a transit site between the East and the West has been one of the routes through which organized crime groups transport illicit goods in collaboration with other networks of crime. This article investigates TOC in Turkey and maps out Turkey's role as a transit country in smuggling and trafficking. The paper also deals with Turkey's contribution to international efforts in combating TOC in light of its EU membership process. The European Commission's annual reports on Turkey's progress towards EU membership that highlight the achievements as well as the shortcomings of Turkey in combating TOC are presented. The article argues that Turkey has introduced successful reforms and expanded its institutional capacities due to the progress it has achieved in the specific area of combating TOC, as evidenced by the EU progress reports.
Working/Shorter Title: Transnational organized crime and EU-Turkey Relations
by Sule Toktas and Hande Selimoglu
Abstract
Since the 1990s, there has been a global proliferation of transnational organized crime (TOC). Turkey, as a transit site between the East and the West has been one of the routes through which organized crime groups transport illicit goods in collaboration with other networks of crime. This article investigates TOC in Turkey and maps out Turkey's role as a transit country in smuggling and trafficking. The paper also deals with Turkey's contribution to international efforts in combating TOC in light of its EU membership process. The European Commission's annual reports on Turkey's progress towards EU membership that highlight the achievements as well as the shortcomings of Turkey in combating TOC are presented. The article argues that Turkey has introduced successful reforms and expanded its institutional capacities due to the progress it has achieved in the specific area of combating TOC, as evidenced by the EU progress reports.
Working/Shorter Title: Transnational organized crime and EU-Turkey Relations
Research Interests: Eastern European Studies, European Studies, Police Science, International Relations, European integration, and 53 moreEuropean Law, International Law, Sociology of Crime and Deviance, International organizations, International Security, Security, Security Studies, EU External Relations Law, European Security and Defence Policy, Human Trafficking, Foreign Policy, Organized Crime, Police, European Foreign Policy, Turkish and Middle East Studies, European Politics, European Union, European and International Law, Turkey, Turkey And Europe, European Union Law, Political History of Turkey, Turkish Foreign Policy, Modern Turkey, EU Law, European Foreign and Security Policy, Prostitution & Trafficking, History of Modern Turkey, European Union Politics, Turkey in World Politics, External Relations of the EU, Transnational Organized Crime, European Union external relations, Turkish politics, Council of Europe, History of Customs and Smuggling, Crime, Europe, Police and Policing, State, Sex Trafficking, Drug Trafficking, Comparative Politics, Foreign and Security Policy, European Affairs, Smuggling, Politics and Terrorism in South Asia, Indian and Pakistani Foreign Policy, Drug Trafficking in South Asia, US role in South Asia, War on Terrorism etc., Sociology of Organized Crime, People Smuggling, Drug Smuggling, Drugs Trafficiking, Sociology of Violence and Crime, Human Trafficking and SMuggling, Turkey's Foreign Policy Towards Northern Iraq or Iraqi Kurdistan, and Trafficking Human Beings
This paper aims to describe the political issues surrounding the establishment and running of women’s shelters in Turkey. More specifically, we will look at the achievements of the women’s movement in this struggle as well as the points... more
This paper aims to describe the political issues surrounding the establishment and running of women’s shelters in Turkey. More specifically, we will look at the achievements of the women’s movement in this struggle as well as the points of contention between the state and feminists. Our theoretical goal in analyzing the case of struggle against violence towards women in Turkey is to reflect on how independent feminist organizations work with the state; what they demand from the state, and how they may be faced with accepting state intervention and erosion of principles as they receive the support of the state. In the first part of the paper, we will talk about the studies that aim to reveal the prevalence of violence against women in Turkey. Our goal in this part is to emphasize the importance of this social and political problem. In the second part, we will take the case of struggle with violence against women in Turkey in hand and give a brief history of this struggle, emphasizing the latest developments in the way in which the Turkish state approaches towards this issue. In the third part and fourth parts, we will review the literature on the relationship between the feminist movement, women’s civil society organizations, and the state. Here, we will lay out what feminist scholars have experienced, thought about, and debated while working closely with the state and/or with large, influential non-governmental organizations. After reviewing the debates between feminist scholars on the advantages and disadvantages of working closely with the state and with large, influential non-governmental organizations, we will take the case of women’s shelters Turkey in hand. Here, we will talk about some of the experiences and related criticisms and warnings of feminists in Turkey on the issue of working closely with the state. More specifically, we will present the critiques of feminists to the state in the way in which the latter governs women’s shelters. We will draw on sources such as women’s magazines, conferences organized by women’s organizations, and interviews with feminist activists to present this critique. In line with the international literature on the involvement of the feminist movement with the state and powerful NGOs has shown, we argue that the shelter movement in Turkey faces the possibility of co-optation and loss of independence as the Turkish state takes on the responsibility of providing services to battered women. On the one hand, the state provides funds, staff and training to support women’s shelters, on the other hand, it controls, disciplines and intervenes to the way in which shelters are run. It imposes its own rules, guidelines and principles. In such a context, the safe place that feminists have intended to set up to provide protection and a healing environment for the battered women faces the danger of looking just like another institution of the modern, welfare state with its bureaucratic and hierarchical structure.
Research Interests: Gender Studies, Development Studies, Women's Studies, Feminist Theory, Sociology of Violence, and 47 moreDomestic Violence, Violence, Women's History, Feminist Philosophy, Women's Rights, Sexual Violence, Human Resource Management, Gender, Gender Equality, Violence Prevention, Emergency Shelter, Women, Equality and Diversity, Feminism, Women and Gender Issues in Islam, Equality, Women and Politics, Violence Against Women, Postcolonial Feminism, Gender and Development, Women And Globalization, Women's Empowerment, Feminist activism, Gender And Violence, Transnational Feminism, Women and Work, Feminism(s), Intersectionality, Feminism and Social Justice, Intimate Partner Violence, Women and Gender Studies, Women's and gender history, Woman, Sexual and Gender-Based Violence, Woman Studies, Feminist Political Theory, Qualitative Methodologies, Women's movement, Gender and Women's Studies, Feministsviolence Against Women Turkey Shelters, Shelter, Shelters, Womens and Gender Studies, Turkish women gender resistance performance, Shelter Design and Development, Life Histories Methodology, and Employment Equity Policies
ALEVIS AND ALEVISM IN THE CHANGING CONTEXT OF TURKISH POLITICS: THE JUSTICE AND DEVELOPMENT PARTY'S ALEVI OPENING The Justice and Development Party (JDP), since coming to power in 2002, has launched several reform programmes which in... more
ALEVIS AND ALEVISM IN THE CHANGING CONTEXT OF TURKISH POLITICS: THE JUSTICE AND DEVELOPMENT PARTY'S ALEVI OPENING
The Justice and Development Party (JDP), since coming to power in 2002, has launched several reform programmes which in the previous decades were considered the red lines or bottle necks in Turkish politics. The JDP is the party that has made wide range of reforms necessary for the EU membership. This caused a complexity for students of political science as the party is the leading conservative party in the multiparty politics of Turkish party system accompanied by a wide discussion whether the JDP fell in the category of conservative parties or not. The JDP also started various policy initiatives in the sphere of international relations. The governing party aimed for Turkey’s greater involvement in Middle East, the Caucasian and Balkan affairs, mediation and arbitration role between the conflicting parties of the Middle East, peace making facilities towards Armenia and Azerbaijan and stability and security in Iraq. The Kurdish question has been another arena for the JDP to take important steps for its resolution. Last but not least, the Party, although mainly adheres to the Sunnite segments of the Turkish population, wants to attract votes from the Alevi minority and launch a rapprochement programme. This article tackles with the actors, dynamics and processes involved in the JDP’s Alevi rapprochement. Each subject group – the Alevis (the leftist and the conservative wings), the General Directorate of Religious Affairs, the JDP, the National View Movement, the conservative media writers and the EU officials – is constitutive of a specific discourse and hence holding a deliberate position in the Alevi question. Therefore, each discursive unit composes the sub-sections of the discussion delivered throughout the paper. We aim to make an inquiry of the Alevi rapprochement in light of the positions, arguments and perceptions developed by each agency involved in the question.
The Justice and Development Party (JDP), since coming to power in 2002, has launched several reform programmes which in the previous decades were considered the red lines or bottle necks in Turkish politics. The JDP is the party that has made wide range of reforms necessary for the EU membership. This caused a complexity for students of political science as the party is the leading conservative party in the multiparty politics of Turkish party system accompanied by a wide discussion whether the JDP fell in the category of conservative parties or not. The JDP also started various policy initiatives in the sphere of international relations. The governing party aimed for Turkey’s greater involvement in Middle East, the Caucasian and Balkan affairs, mediation and arbitration role between the conflicting parties of the Middle East, peace making facilities towards Armenia and Azerbaijan and stability and security in Iraq. The Kurdish question has been another arena for the JDP to take important steps for its resolution. Last but not least, the Party, although mainly adheres to the Sunnite segments of the Turkish population, wants to attract votes from the Alevi minority and launch a rapprochement programme. This article tackles with the actors, dynamics and processes involved in the JDP’s Alevi rapprochement. Each subject group – the Alevis (the leftist and the conservative wings), the General Directorate of Religious Affairs, the JDP, the National View Movement, the conservative media writers and the EU officials – is constitutive of a specific discourse and hence holding a deliberate position in the Alevi question. Therefore, each discursive unit composes the sub-sections of the discussion delivered throughout the paper. We aim to make an inquiry of the Alevi rapprochement in light of the positions, arguments and perceptions developed by each agency involved in the question.
Research Interests: Religion, Comparative Religion, Political Sociology, Social Movements, Sociology of Religion, and 77 morePolitical Participation, Social Sciences, Political Parties, Social Identity, Transnationalism, Religion and Politics, Political Science, Islamic Contemporary Studies, Global Citizenship, Identity (Culture), Race and Ethnicity, Identity politics, Turkish Nationalism, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Civil Society and the Public Sphere, Turkish History, Minority Studies, Cultural Identity, National Identity, Turkey, Islamic Studies, Muslim Minorities, Turkey And Europe, Transnational Social Movements, Islam in Turkey, Islamic History, Islam, Law and Justice in Developing Countries, Citizenship and Identity, Transnational migration, Citizenship And Governance, Turkish Culture, Political History of Turkey, Turkish Foreign Policy, History of Turkey and Middle east, Modern Turkey, History of Turkish Republic, Non-Muslim Minorities in Turkey, Minorities in Turkey, Ethnicity, Religious History, History of Modern Turkey, Anthropology of Alevism, Diaspora and transnationalism, Turkey in World Politics, Minority Rights, Political Islam, Turkish politics, Citizenship, Civil Society, Identity, Religious Studies, Political Identity, Alevis, Alevism and Sunnism in Turkey, Society, Human Rights, Alevis, European Union, Party Politics, Alevi Studies, Alevi Culture, Quran and Sunnah Studies, Social Conflict, Muslim Minority Affairs, History of Islamic Sects, Ethnicity and National Identity, Alewism, Citizenship identities, Alevi identity, Geleneksel Alevilik, Modern Alevilik, Sunni-Shi'i Relations, Alewite, Alewısm, Alevi Diaspora, and Contemporary Muslim society
ABSTRACT This article tackles with the question of Europeanization in Turkey’s civil-military relations and the extent and content of democratization that the EU as a factor or an anchor serves in the civilian control over the Turkish... more
ABSTRACT
This article tackles with the question of Europeanization in Turkey’s civil-military relations and the extent and content of democratization that the EU as a factor or an anchor serves in the civilian control over the Turkish Armed Forces. We argue that: the EU membership process has necessitated democratization in civil-military relations and has served as an external stimulus in empowering the civilian voices for the civilianization of the 1982 Constitution and the political elite’s standing vis-à-vis the military elite; this external support was not sufficient for a fully integrated democratic control of the armed forces (DECAF) as there are still problems in the democratization of civil-military relations; since the 2000s, there has been a DECAF reform process continuing; but due to historical deficiencies in Turkish polity like the civilian incapacity to change the priority given to the military’s role in the making of the security culture, the European norms of DECAF is formal. The article has four parts. In the first part, we aim to give background information to DECAF reforms in Turkey. We focus on the harmonization packages that Turkey has adopted as part of the requirements for EU membership which pinpoint how close Turkey gets to the norms and values of the EU or in a similar vein how far Turkey deviates from general understandings of DECAF as there are still issues awaiting Turkey’s Europeanization. The second part carries the discussion to the Justice and Development Party (JDP) – Turkish General Staff (TGS) relations between 2002-2007. The first JDP governmental term is significant for DECAF as most of the reforms occurred in this period. Yet, it is the same period when the tension between the JDP and the TGS reached levels that were hard to govern by the politicians. The third part makes an assessment on the civil-military relations in the period since 2007. This part is a political mapping of the contemporary situation as it makes an elaboration of key issues that dominate the agenda of Turkish politics recently. The last section draws a conclusion and identifies the boundaries as well as the shortcomings of DECAF in Turkey. The concluding remarks pay special attention to the significance of the question of a Turkish way to Europeanization especially in the field of civil- military relations.
This article tackles with the question of Europeanization in Turkey’s civil-military relations and the extent and content of democratization that the EU as a factor or an anchor serves in the civilian control over the Turkish Armed Forces. We argue that: the EU membership process has necessitated democratization in civil-military relations and has served as an external stimulus in empowering the civilian voices for the civilianization of the 1982 Constitution and the political elite’s standing vis-à-vis the military elite; this external support was not sufficient for a fully integrated democratic control of the armed forces (DECAF) as there are still problems in the democratization of civil-military relations; since the 2000s, there has been a DECAF reform process continuing; but due to historical deficiencies in Turkish polity like the civilian incapacity to change the priority given to the military’s role in the making of the security culture, the European norms of DECAF is formal. The article has four parts. In the first part, we aim to give background information to DECAF reforms in Turkey. We focus on the harmonization packages that Turkey has adopted as part of the requirements for EU membership which pinpoint how close Turkey gets to the norms and values of the EU or in a similar vein how far Turkey deviates from general understandings of DECAF as there are still issues awaiting Turkey’s Europeanization. The second part carries the discussion to the Justice and Development Party (JDP) – Turkish General Staff (TGS) relations between 2002-2007. The first JDP governmental term is significant for DECAF as most of the reforms occurred in this period. Yet, it is the same period when the tension between the JDP and the TGS reached levels that were hard to govern by the politicians. The third part makes an assessment on the civil-military relations in the period since 2007. This part is a political mapping of the contemporary situation as it makes an elaboration of key issues that dominate the agenda of Turkish politics recently. The last section draws a conclusion and identifies the boundaries as well as the shortcomings of DECAF in Turkey. The concluding remarks pay special attention to the significance of the question of a Turkish way to Europeanization especially in the field of civil- military relations.
Research Interests: Military History, European Studies, Military Science, Comparative Politics, European integration, and 46 moreMiddle East Studies, Sociology of the Military, Political Science, Democratization, Politics, European Foreign Policy, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Turkish History, European Union, Turkey, Middle Eastern Studies, Turkey And Europe, European/EU Politics, Democracy, Turkish Foreign Policy, Europeanization, History of Turkey and Middle east, Middle East Politics, Participatory Democracy, Military and Politics, Modern Turkey, Civil-military relations, Civil Procedure, Ottoman Military History, Turkey in World Politics, Europeanisation, Military, Turkish politics, Civil Society, Middle East, Armed Forces, Turkey EU relations, civil-military relations Turkey, Civil-Military cooperation, Party Politics, Army, Civil Military Turkey European Union Democracy Decaf, Democratic consolidation, Democratic Transitions, Democratic Control of the Armed Forces, Armed Forces and Society, Turkish military, Turkish military history, Turkish Democracy, Military-Civilian Relations, and Party System
Turkey has been under a constant change since the 2000s. Turkey has been accepted as a candidate country to the EU in 1999. It is in the same year that the leader of the Kurdish terrorist organization PKK, Abdullah Öcalan, was captured in... more
Turkey has been under a constant change since the 2000s. Turkey has been accepted as a candidate country to the EU in 1999. It is in the same year that the leader of the Kurdish terrorist organization PKK, Abdullah Öcalan, was captured in 1999. The National View Movement split in 2000 and the Justice and Development Party (JDP) was formed by younger leaders who denied the legacy of a pro-Islamic establishment and opted for a more neo-conservative ideology with a liberal economic model. Since 2002, the Party has been winning the majority of the votes both in the national and local elections and rules the country. Under the JDP government, Turkey has gone through a liberalization process, some of whom refer to as a ‘silent revolution’.
Research Interests: Eastern European Studies, European Studies, Comparative Politics, International Relations, Globalization, and 30 moreReligion and Politics, Political Science, Politics, Foreign Policy, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Turkish History, European Politics, International Politics, European Union, Turkey, Turkey And Europe, Islam in Turkey, Turkısh Politics, European/EU Politics, Political History of Turkey, Turkish Foreign Policy, Middle East Politics, Military and Politics, Modern Turkey, History of Modern Turkey, Turkey in World Politics, Turkish Studies, Turkish politics, Party Politics, Party Systems, Politics, Internal Relations, Contemporary History of Turkey, Party System, Political Parties and Party Politics, and Domestic Policy
The interest in the security of Afghanistan is largely dominated by the fear that the instability of the country will cause shock waves and trigger conflicts in neighboring regions from Kashmir to Chechnya. It is often argued that the key... more
The interest in the security of Afghanistan is largely dominated by the fear that the instability of the country will cause shock waves and trigger conflicts in neighboring regions from Kashmir to Chechnya. It is often argued that the key to providing security is to fortify the US led international troop positions located in Afghanistan and to increase the number of Afghan security personnel. In a similar vein, it is estimated that the national and international security personnel needed would be around 200,000-250,000. Considering the US military involvement in Iraqi quagmire, the deployment of such a great number of troops is neither realistic nor possible. Even in a scenario that assumes the previously mentioned troops are deployed in Afghanistan, it is highly questionable that the security problem would be resolved. This point brings to the surface the fact that a change in the security paradigm is needed.
Research Interests: Comparative Politics, International Relations, International Regimes, Terrorism, International Terrorism, and 35 moreMiddle East Studies, International Security, Security, Political Science, State Formation, Afghanistan, Security Studies, Political Violence and Terrorism, Politics, Post-Soviet Regimes, Political Regimes, Nationalism And State Building, State Theory, Middle Eastern Studies, Middle East Politics, History of Afghanistan, Stability, Afghanistan's history, War on Terror, Opium War, Middle East, Afghanistan Society and Politics, History of Narcotics and Drugs, State, Critical Terrorism Studies, Narcotrafficking, Drug Addiction, Opium Trade, Opium, Narcotics, International Anti-Narcotics Policy, Sociology of the State, Heroin, India Pakistan Afghanistan Relations, and Nation building and State making
CULTURAL IDENTITY, MINORITY POSITION AND IMMIGRATION: TURKEY’S JEWISH MINORITY VS. TURKISH-JEWISH IMMIGRANTS IN ISRAEL Abstract The foundation of the state of Israel attracted masses of Jewish immigrants from all over the world.... more
CULTURAL IDENTITY, MINORITY POSITION AND IMMIGRATION: TURKEY’S JEWISH MINORITY VS. TURKISH-JEWISH IMMIGRANTS IN ISRAEL
Abstract
The foundation of the state of Israel attracted masses of Jewish immigrants from all over the world. Turkey’s Jews joined in these waves of migration and there remained only a small minority community in today’s Turkey. The migratory flow of Jews from Turkey to Israel resulted in the formation of a distinct immigrant community in Israel – namely the Turkish Jews – who has maintained their cultural ties with the home country. Cultural identity formation, in these cases of a specific minority and an immigrant group, is relevant to ethnic and immigrant studies especially with respect to nation-state formations and constructions of national identities in Turkey and in Israel. This article highlights on the complexity of cultural identity for minority and immigrant groups in the processes of assimilation/integration comparatively. It deals with the identity questions that Turkey’s Jews and Turkish Jews in Israel face with regards to the definitions imposed by the nation building structures in both countries respectively. The discussion utilizes the results of field research composed of in-depth interviews with Turkish Jews in Turkey and in Israel. It also makes a comparative assessment of the interviewees’ interplay with their identities from the pool of ‘Turkish’, ‘non-Muslim’, ‘Jewish’, ‘Israeli’, ‘El Turco’, ‘Sephardim’ or ‘Oriental’ categories.
Keywords: Turkish Jews, Jewish, Minority, Immigrant, Identity, Israel
Abstract
The foundation of the state of Israel attracted masses of Jewish immigrants from all over the world. Turkey’s Jews joined in these waves of migration and there remained only a small minority community in today’s Turkey. The migratory flow of Jews from Turkey to Israel resulted in the formation of a distinct immigrant community in Israel – namely the Turkish Jews – who has maintained their cultural ties with the home country. Cultural identity formation, in these cases of a specific minority and an immigrant group, is relevant to ethnic and immigrant studies especially with respect to nation-state formations and constructions of national identities in Turkey and in Israel. This article highlights on the complexity of cultural identity for minority and immigrant groups in the processes of assimilation/integration comparatively. It deals with the identity questions that Turkey’s Jews and Turkish Jews in Israel face with regards to the definitions imposed by the nation building structures in both countries respectively. The discussion utilizes the results of field research composed of in-depth interviews with Turkish Jews in Turkey and in Israel. It also makes a comparative assessment of the interviewees’ interplay with their identities from the pool of ‘Turkish’, ‘non-Muslim’, ‘Jewish’, ‘Israeli’, ‘El Turco’, ‘Sephardim’ or ‘Oriental’ categories.
Keywords: Turkish Jews, Jewish, Minority, Immigrant, Identity, Israel
Research Interests: Cultural History, Cultural Studies, Sociology of Culture, Ethnic Studies, Jewish Studies, and 76 moreMiddle East Studies, Social Identity, Israel Studies, Social and Cultural Anthropology, Immigration, Immigration Studies, Migration, Identity (Culture), Sociology of Identity, Race and Ethnicity, Immigration Law, Identity politics, Jewish History, Culture, Immigration And Integration In Europe, Culture Studies, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Cultural Identity, National Identity, Jewish - Christian Relations, Turkey, International Migration, Immigration and Emmigration, Ethnic minorities, Middle Eastern Studies, Muslim Minorities, Immigration History, Migration Studies, Turkısh Politics, Sociology of Migration, Transnational migration, Contemporary International Migration, Turkish Foreign Policy, Middle East Politics, Migration (Anthropology), Modern Turkey, Muslim-Christian Relation, Jewish historiography, Emigration Research, Non-Muslim Minorities in Turkey, Minorities in Turkey, Ethnicity, History of Modern Turkey, Modern Jewish History, Jewish Cultural Studies, Israel, Migration, Emigration and Immigration, Turkish politics, Citizenship, Israel and Zionism, Middle East, Identity, International Migration and Immigration Policy, Religious Studies, Political Identity, Migrant workers, Immigrants, Turkish Jews, Mizrahi Jews, Emigration, Cultura, Religious Minorities, Jews, Jewish Minority Immigrants, Migrant Education, Ethnicity and National Identity, Jewish Religion, History, Society and Culture in the Middle East, Ethnicty, Turkey and Israel relations, Ethnicity and Developmnet, Ethnicity and Identity Politics, Jews In Islamic Lands, Muslim/Non Muslim Relations, Immigrant Students and Families, Contemporary Muslim society, and Jewish Migration
Within the politics of nationalism and nation-building, the emigration of ethnic and religious minorities, whether voluntary or involuntary, appears to be a commonly occurring practice. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the... more
Within the politics of nationalism and nation-building, the emigration of ethnic and religious minorities, whether voluntary or involuntary, appears to be a commonly occurring practice. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the early twentieth century, modern Turkey still carried the legacy of a multi-ethnic, multi-religious diversity in which its Armenian, Greek and Jewish communities had official minority status based upon the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne. However, throughout the twentieth century, Turkey’s non-Muslim minority populations have undergone a mass emigration experience in which thousands of their numbers have migrated to various countries around the globe. While in the 1920s the population of non-Muslims in the country was close to three per cent of the total, today it has dropped to less than two per thousand. This article analyses the emigration of non-Muslim people from Turkey and relates this movement to the wider context of nation-building in the country.
Research Interests: International Relations, International Relations, Statistics, Multiculturalism, International Studies, and 56 moreData Mining, International Law, Human Rights, International organizations, Immigration, Conflict, Applied Statistics, Data Analysis, Security, Security, Immigration Studies, Migration, State Formation, Immigration Law, Nationalism, Turkish Nationalism, Immigration And Integration In Europe, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Turkish History, Minority Studies, Diplomacy, National Identity, Nationalism And State Building, Turkey, International Migration, Immigration History, Turkey And Europe, Forced Migration, Migration Studies, Migration History, Sociology of Migration, Transnational migration, Political History of Turkey, Migration (Anthropology), Modern Turkey, Minorities in Turkey, Ethnicity, History of Modern Turkey, History of Nationalism and Nation-Building, Minority Rights, Immigration and identity (Anthropology), Turkish politics, Citizenship, Peace, International Migration and Immigration Policy, Immigrants, State, Freedom, Nation-State, Census, Emigration Migration Turkey Minorities History Minority, Ethnicity and National Identity, National government, Sociology of the State, Immigration Status & Nationality, and Nation building and State making
CITIZENSHIP AND MIGRATION FROM TURKEY TO ISRAEL: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TURKISH JEWS IN ISRAEL ABSTRACT Having moved from Turkey to Israel, Turkish Jewish immigrants portray a distinct immigrant community in today’s Israel. The... more
CITIZENSHIP AND MIGRATION FROM TURKEY TO ISRAEL:
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TURKISH JEWS IN ISRAEL
ABSTRACT
Having moved from Turkey to Israel, Turkish Jewish immigrants portray a distinct immigrant community in today’s Israel. The migration experience to Israel influenced the Turkish Jews’ perception of citizenship. This article is about Turkish Jewish immigrants living in Israel and tackles with the interface between international migration and citizenship. It tries to analyze the experiences and perceptions of Turkish Jews regarding their former citizenship identities in the home country and latter citizenship experience in the host country. This study mainly discusses the field research results conducted with a sample group of Turkish Jews in Israel. In light of the excerpts drawn from the in-depth interviews, the article tries to reflect on the respondents’: a) comparison and contrast between Turkish citizenship and Israeli citizenship; b) assessment of the advantages and disadvantages with the current citizenship status; and c) political participation in the Israeli public sphere.
The research indicated that the respondents’ views and experiences differentiated according to their year of arrival in Israel. The immigrants who arrived in Israel in the great wave of 1948-51 were not only different in profile than the immigrants who arrived in subsequent years up until 1980, but were also distinguished in their views about citizenship as well as their experiences regarding immigration. the interviews conducted with Jews from Turkey in Israel pointed out that despite long years of residence in Israel, the immigrants have preserved the political sensibility they grew up with and learned when they were in Turkey. However, moving into a country where they became members of the majority group seems to have impacted their perceptions and experiences regarding citizenship and played roles in: a) the appropriation of democratic norms defined by majoritarian terms; b) efforts to maintain their Turkish identity in cosmopolitan Jewish-Israeli society in the identity aspect; and c) the preference for complying with the general norms of Jewish-Israeli society and conversely excluding a proactive understanding of political participation.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TURKISH JEWS IN ISRAEL
ABSTRACT
Having moved from Turkey to Israel, Turkish Jewish immigrants portray a distinct immigrant community in today’s Israel. The migration experience to Israel influenced the Turkish Jews’ perception of citizenship. This article is about Turkish Jewish immigrants living in Israel and tackles with the interface between international migration and citizenship. It tries to analyze the experiences and perceptions of Turkish Jews regarding their former citizenship identities in the home country and latter citizenship experience in the host country. This study mainly discusses the field research results conducted with a sample group of Turkish Jews in Israel. In light of the excerpts drawn from the in-depth interviews, the article tries to reflect on the respondents’: a) comparison and contrast between Turkish citizenship and Israeli citizenship; b) assessment of the advantages and disadvantages with the current citizenship status; and c) political participation in the Israeli public sphere.
The research indicated that the respondents’ views and experiences differentiated according to their year of arrival in Israel. The immigrants who arrived in Israel in the great wave of 1948-51 were not only different in profile than the immigrants who arrived in subsequent years up until 1980, but were also distinguished in their views about citizenship as well as their experiences regarding immigration. the interviews conducted with Jews from Turkey in Israel pointed out that despite long years of residence in Israel, the immigrants have preserved the political sensibility they grew up with and learned when they were in Turkey. However, moving into a country where they became members of the majority group seems to have impacted their perceptions and experiences regarding citizenship and played roles in: a) the appropriation of democratic norms defined by majoritarian terms; b) efforts to maintain their Turkish identity in cosmopolitan Jewish-Israeli society in the identity aspect; and c) the preference for complying with the general norms of Jewish-Israeli society and conversely excluding a proactive understanding of political participation.
Research Interests: Cultural Studies, Ethnic Studies, Jewish Studies, Middle East Studies, Middle East History, and 45 moreIsrael Studies, Immigration, Immigration Studies, Migration, Race and Ethnicity, Immigration Law, Israel/Palestine, Jewish History, Culture, Immigration And Integration In Europe, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Minority Studies, Jewish - Christian Relations, Turkey, International Migration, Immigration and Emmigration, Middle Eastern Studies, Immigration History, Migration Studies, Diaspora Studies, Minority Languages, Sociology of Migration, Transnational migration, Contemporary International Migration, Israeli Hebrew, Middle East Politics, Modern Turkey, Ethnicity, Diaspora and transnationalism, Modern Jewish History, Minority Rights, Immigration and identity (Anthropology), Jewish Cultural Studies, Israel, Israel and Zionism, Middle East, Immigrants, Minorities, Jewish-Christian-Muslim relations in the Middle Ages, Second Generation Immigrants, Citizenship Minority Jewish Turkey, Jewish Minority Immigrants, Hebrew and Jewish studies, Immigration Status & Nationality, and Jewish Minority
EU ENLARGEMENT CONDITIONS AND MINORITY PROTECTION: A REFLECTION ON TURKEY’S NON-MUSLIM MINORITIES This article aims to review the EU’s urge on Turkey to fulfil the Copenhagen criteria, hence the condition of ‘respect for and protection... more
EU ENLARGEMENT CONDITIONS AND MINORITY PROTECTION:
A REFLECTION ON TURKEY’S NON-MUSLIM MINORITIES
This article aims to review the EU’s urge on Turkey to fulfil the Copenhagen criteria, hence the condition of ‘respect for and protection of minorities’ in the case of non-Muslim minorities. In light of the documents released by the EU institutions - such as the Commission regular reports, the Council decisions and the Accession Partnership with Turkey, and the oral and written questions discussed in the European Parliament, - the article tries to outline and analyze how the EU develops a stance vis-à-vis Turkey’s treatment towards its non-Muslim minorities. The article utilizes the result of a research on the essential documents released by the EU.
A REFLECTION ON TURKEY’S NON-MUSLIM MINORITIES
This article aims to review the EU’s urge on Turkey to fulfil the Copenhagen criteria, hence the condition of ‘respect for and protection of minorities’ in the case of non-Muslim minorities. In light of the documents released by the EU institutions - such as the Commission regular reports, the Council decisions and the Accession Partnership with Turkey, and the oral and written questions discussed in the European Parliament, - the article tries to outline and analyze how the EU develops a stance vis-à-vis Turkey’s treatment towards its non-Muslim minorities. The article utilizes the result of a research on the essential documents released by the EU.
Research Interests: European History, Eastern European Studies, European Studies, Human Rights Law, Human Rights, and 31 moreImmigration, International Human Rights Law, Minority Studies, European Politics, European Union, Ethnic minorities, Muslim Minorities, Turkey And Europe, Muslims in Europe, European Convention of Human Rights, Turkish and European Union Relations, Minority Languages, Turkish Foreign Policy, Europeanization, Modern Turkey, Non-Muslim Minorities in Turkey, Minorities in Turkey, Minority Rights, Europeanisation, EU, Human Rights and Minority Rights, Minority language rights, Minorities, Jewish-Christian-Muslim relations in the Middle Ages, State-building and minorities in the Middle East, Minority Protection, Muslim-non-Muslim relations, Non-Muslim Minorities in Late Ottoman Empire, Muslim/Non Muslim Relations, Minority and Language Rights, and Contemporary Muslim society
The current study gives an historical account of Jewish migration from Turkey to Israel. It examines not only the specificity of the movement in terms of size, scope, group characteristics of the immigrants and push/pull factors that... more
The current study gives an historical account of Jewish migration from Turkey to
Israel. It examines not only the specificity of the movement in terms of size, scope,
group characteristics of the immigrants and push/pull factors that motivate
migration, but also the legislative and administrative measures taken by both
countries in handling the movement of thousands from one to another.
Israel. It examines not only the specificity of the movement in terms of size, scope,
group characteristics of the immigrants and push/pull factors that motivate
migration, but also the legislative and administrative measures taken by both
countries in handling the movement of thousands from one to another.
Research Interests: Jewish Law, Jewish Studies, Israel Studies, Immigration, Immigration Studies, and 30 moreMigration, Eastern European and Russian Jewish History, Israel/Palestine, Jewish History, Labor Migration, Jewish - Christian Relations, Turkey, International Migration, Turkey And Europe, Migration Studies, Migration History, Sociology of Migration, Transnational migration, Contemporary International Migration, Return Migration, Political History of Turkey, Israeli Hebrew, Modern Turkey, Jewish historiography, Minorities in Turkey, Modern Jewish History, Turkey in World Politics, Jewish Cultural Studies, Israel, Israel and Zionism, Jewish-Christian-Muslim relations in the Middle Ages, Migrations, Great Migration period, Jewish Minority Immigrants, and Contemporary Jewish Migration
Citizenship in Turkey is one of the major instruments of nation-building. The legal framework that Turkish citizenship rests on is universal and equal. The non-Muslim minorities – the Armenians, the Greeks and the Jews – however are... more
Citizenship in Turkey is one of the major instruments of nation-building.
The legal framework that Turkish citizenship rests on is universal and equal. The
non-Muslim minorities – the Armenians, the Greeks and the Jews – however are
granted special group rights in the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne. Despite the protection
of minorities and their rights in the treaty, the non-Muslim minorities, from
time to time, had been superceded by the universal norms of citizenship in Turkey.
This study discusses the history of the Jewish minority with a focus on the development
of citizenship in Turkey. The history of the Jews as a minority group and
as citizens is illustrated by way of a chronological methodology encompassing a
broad range of events, laws, ideas and movements spanning Early Republican
Period up to present-day Turkey. In line with the conventional classification utilized
by many studies of Turkish politics, the historical projection developed on the
citizenship and minority status of Jews in Turkey is categorized into three periods:
the Early Republican Period (1923–1945), the Multi-Party Democracy Period
(1945–1980) and the Post-1980 Period covering more recent developments.
The legal framework that Turkish citizenship rests on is universal and equal. The
non-Muslim minorities – the Armenians, the Greeks and the Jews – however are
granted special group rights in the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne. Despite the protection
of minorities and their rights in the treaty, the non-Muslim minorities, from
time to time, had been superceded by the universal norms of citizenship in Turkey.
This study discusses the history of the Jewish minority with a focus on the development
of citizenship in Turkey. The history of the Jews as a minority group and
as citizens is illustrated by way of a chronological methodology encompassing a
broad range of events, laws, ideas and movements spanning Early Republican
Period up to present-day Turkey. In line with the conventional classification utilized
by many studies of Turkish politics, the historical projection developed on the
citizenship and minority status of Jews in Turkey is categorized into three periods:
the Early Republican Period (1923–1945), the Multi-Party Democracy Period
(1945–1980) and the Post-1980 Period covering more recent developments.
Research Interests: Religion, History, Ethnic Studies, International Relations, International Relations, and 44 moreMulticulturalism, Jewish Studies, Human Rights Law, International Law, Human Rights, International organizations, Conflict, Security, Security, Migration, International Human Rights Law, Nationalism, Jewish History, Gender, Culture, Oral Traditions, Minority Studies, Diplomacy, Minority Languages, Modern Turkey, Minorities in Turkey, Ethnicity, History of Modern Turkey, Minority Rights, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Jewish Cultural Studies, Refugees, Turkish politics, Citizenship, Peace, Human Rights and Minority Rights, Minority language rights, Minorities, Ethnic Conflict and Human Rights, Language politics, State, Jewish, Freedom, Displacement, Jews in Turkey, Borders and Borderlands, Minority, Minorities, Refugee memory, and Minority and Language Rights
In this article, the results of a qualitative study on gender awareness of Turkish women mirrored through regrets in the course of life are discussed. The study composed of life history interviews and focus groups interviews with... more
In this article, the results of a qualitative study on gender awareness of Turkish women
mirrored through regrets in the course of life are discussed. The study composed of life history interviews
and focus groups interviews with Turkish women, who were 1960–1970 graduates of various Girls’
Institutes and working as schoolteachers and academics showed that the women reflect on their lives in
gendered terms. The women’s regrets arose mainly in relation to three domains: work, marriage and
motherhood, which revealed that women separate their feelings of regret regarding marriage from the
satisfaction they derive from motherhood. In the evaluations of the past, an ignored women’s history
surfaces within the context of modernization reforms in Turkey, which provided women the means of
‘‘standing on our own feet’’ without depending on men.
mirrored through regrets in the course of life are discussed. The study composed of life history interviews
and focus groups interviews with Turkish women, who were 1960–1970 graduates of various Girls’
Institutes and working as schoolteachers and academics showed that the women reflect on their lives in
gendered terms. The women’s regrets arose mainly in relation to three domains: work, marriage and
motherhood, which revealed that women separate their feelings of regret regarding marriage from the
satisfaction they derive from motherhood. In the evaluations of the past, an ignored women’s history
surfaces within the context of modernization reforms in Turkey, which provided women the means of
‘‘standing on our own feet’’ without depending on men.
Research Interests: Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Emotion, Gender Studies, and 27 moreSex and Gender, Women's Studies, Gender History, Emotional intelligence, Sociology of Emotion, Sexuality, Gender and Sexuality, Anthropology of Gender, Gender, Women, Emotions (Social Psychology), Gender Discourse, Theories of Gender and Transgender, Emotion Regulation, Modern Turkey, Affect/Emotion, Psychology of Women, Women and Culture, Emotions, Life Stories, Women and Gender Studies, Woman Studies, Women and Men Psychology (and Gender Differences), Regret, Schooling, Women and Education, and Social Psychology and Gender Studies
Political Parties, Elections and Democracy: A Close-Up on the Political History of Turkey ABSTRACT In this paper, the political history of Turkey is presented with a focus on the process of democratization. Usually Turkish political... more
Political Parties, Elections and Democracy:
A Close-Up on the Political History of Turkey
ABSTRACT
In this paper, the political history of Turkey is presented with a focus on the process of democratization. Usually Turkish political history is categorized into periods marked by the party systems and the constitutions. The classical periodization of Turkish political history is the Single Party Period, the Multi-Party Period and the Post-1980 Period. In light of this classical approach, the article follows a chronological format. The first part covers the Single Party Period through the years 1923-1945. The second part continues with the Multi-Party Period and summarizes the events between 1945-1980. The third part mainly deals with the Post-1980 Period and makes an overview by reflecting on the events that dominate the contemporary situation. The Single Party Period is dominated by the reform programmes taken for Turkey’s advancement to the level of contemporary civilizations – that is the western civilization (i.e. The abolition of the Caliphate, the adoption of the Republican Constitution, the adoption of the Hat and Clothing Law, the western calendar and timing system, the Civil Law, the women’s right to elect and be elected in general elections and etc.). These reforms known as the Kemalist reforms initiated by the single party at the time – the Republican People’s party - aimed specifically the policies regarding a) nation-building; b) secularization; c) modernization and westernization; d) democratization; and e) state formation. The Multi-Party Period is dominated by the transition to multi-party politics and the entrance of difference parties within the ideological spectrum to Turkish public life. Yet, the consolidation of democracy, in the Turkish context, also brought by the chances taken by the Turkish military to intervene in politics for three times, first in 1960 and then in 1971 and 1980 in response to the political chaos, instability, fragmentation and polarization all of which threatened security. The Post-1980 Period is marked by the adoption of a new constitution – the 1982 Constitution. Furthermore, due to the process of globalization and the rise of the New Right in the 1980s and 1990s, liberalization policies backed the accession process in the European Union were introduced. The contemporary period, however, is marked by the ascendance of Conservative, Secularist, Nationalist and Kurdish nationalist politics.
A Close-Up on the Political History of Turkey
ABSTRACT
In this paper, the political history of Turkey is presented with a focus on the process of democratization. Usually Turkish political history is categorized into periods marked by the party systems and the constitutions. The classical periodization of Turkish political history is the Single Party Period, the Multi-Party Period and the Post-1980 Period. In light of this classical approach, the article follows a chronological format. The first part covers the Single Party Period through the years 1923-1945. The second part continues with the Multi-Party Period and summarizes the events between 1945-1980. The third part mainly deals with the Post-1980 Period and makes an overview by reflecting on the events that dominate the contemporary situation. The Single Party Period is dominated by the reform programmes taken for Turkey’s advancement to the level of contemporary civilizations – that is the western civilization (i.e. The abolition of the Caliphate, the adoption of the Republican Constitution, the adoption of the Hat and Clothing Law, the western calendar and timing system, the Civil Law, the women’s right to elect and be elected in general elections and etc.). These reforms known as the Kemalist reforms initiated by the single party at the time – the Republican People’s party - aimed specifically the policies regarding a) nation-building; b) secularization; c) modernization and westernization; d) democratization; and e) state formation. The Multi-Party Period is dominated by the transition to multi-party politics and the entrance of difference parties within the ideological spectrum to Turkish public life. Yet, the consolidation of democracy, in the Turkish context, also brought by the chances taken by the Turkish military to intervene in politics for three times, first in 1960 and then in 1971 and 1980 in response to the political chaos, instability, fragmentation and polarization all of which threatened security. The Post-1980 Period is marked by the adoption of a new constitution – the 1982 Constitution. Furthermore, due to the process of globalization and the rise of the New Right in the 1980s and 1990s, liberalization policies backed the accession process in the European Union were introduced. The contemporary period, however, is marked by the ascendance of Conservative, Secularist, Nationalist and Kurdish nationalist politics.
Research Interests: Military History, Comparative Politics, Political Science, Politics, Political History, and 14 moreTurkish and Middle East Studies, Turkish History, Turkey, Turkısh Politics, Political History of Turkey, Military and Politics, Modern Turkey, History of Turkish Republic, Civil-military relations, Political Parties in Turkish History, Turkish politics, Türkiye, Avrupa Birliği Türkiye, and Turkish Political History
50 YEARS OF EMIGRATION FROM TURKEY TO GERMANY - A SUCCESS STORY? Şule Toktaş It has been fifty years since the guest worker agreement was signed between Turkey and Germany on October 30, 1961. In subsequent years, although Turkey... more
50 YEARS OF EMIGRATION FROM TURKEY TO GERMANY - A SUCCESS STORY?
Şule Toktaş
It has been fifty years since the guest worker agreement was signed between Turkey and Germany on October 30, 1961. In subsequent years, although Turkey has signed similar agreements with such countries as Austria, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Sweden, and Australia, in terms of scope and volume emigration to Germany has been the hallmark of contemporary Turkish immigration in contemporary Europe, and it has constituted the backbone of the 'Euro-Turk' phenomenon. The first group of workers needed by Germany for the reconstruction efforts following World War II landed in Munich from a train which departed from the Sirkeci station in Istanbul. Since then, several other waves have followed. The guest agreement allowed for temporary migration, which included work permits valid for one year; however, as migration theory tells us, temporary migration can easily be transformed into permanent settlement, which was what happened in the Turko-German case. Today, in consequence of the waves of migration which have encompassed a wide range of types, from labour migration and family re-unions to refugee and asylum seeking, immigrants in Germany from Turkey demographically represent a community of over 2.5 million individuals. The influence of these mass influxes expanded to include social, cultural, political and economic life, with diverse and pervasive impacts on the transnational communities of Germany and Turkey, as well as on Euro-Turks themselves.
Şule Toktaş
It has been fifty years since the guest worker agreement was signed between Turkey and Germany on October 30, 1961. In subsequent years, although Turkey has signed similar agreements with such countries as Austria, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Sweden, and Australia, in terms of scope and volume emigration to Germany has been the hallmark of contemporary Turkish immigration in contemporary Europe, and it has constituted the backbone of the 'Euro-Turk' phenomenon. The first group of workers needed by Germany for the reconstruction efforts following World War II landed in Munich from a train which departed from the Sirkeci station in Istanbul. Since then, several other waves have followed. The guest agreement allowed for temporary migration, which included work permits valid for one year; however, as migration theory tells us, temporary migration can easily be transformed into permanent settlement, which was what happened in the Turko-German case. Today, in consequence of the waves of migration which have encompassed a wide range of types, from labour migration and family re-unions to refugee and asylum seeking, immigrants in Germany from Turkey demographically represent a community of over 2.5 million individuals. The influence of these mass influxes expanded to include social, cultural, political and economic life, with diverse and pervasive impacts on the transnational communities of Germany and Turkey, as well as on Euro-Turks themselves.
Research Interests: Labor Economics, Immigration, Migration, Turkish and Middle East Studies, European Union, and 7 moreTurkey, Turkey And Europe, Modern Germany, German, Globalization and Gender, Labor market regulation and workers’ rights, Empowerment and inequality, Social and welfare policy, Emigration, and TURKISH
Celal Bayar, a prominent figure in Turkish politics who had hold various offices and positions last one being Republic Presidency, contributed to the Turkish nation-building process and took part in its various proceedings and... more
Celal Bayar, a prominent figure in Turkish politics who had hold various offices and positions last one being Republic Presidency, contributed to the Turkish nation-building process and took part in its various proceedings and institutions. This article discusses the views of Celal Bayar on nationalism, more specifically on Turkish nationalism. The discussion reflects on Bayar’s conception of ‘Turkish nation’, ‘national state’, ‘the Eastern question’, ‘Democrat Party nationalism’ and ‘the non-Muslim minorities’. The public speeches of him clearly point out that Celal Bayar understood and even promoted a type of Turkish nationalism which is very much close to civic nationalism.
Keywords: Celal Bayar, Turkish nationalism, nation, state, civic.
TÜRKİYE’DE SİVİL MİLLİYETÇİLİK:
CELAL BAYAR’IN SİYASİ PROFİLİ ÜZERİNE BİR ÇALIŞMA
Özet: Celal Bayar, Türk siyasal yaşamının ve tarihinin önemli simalarından biri olmuştur. Cumhurbaşkanlığı dahil olmak üzere bir çok görevde bulunan Bayar, siyasal ve devlet eliti konumlarından kaynaklı olarak Türk ulus-devletinin inşasına bilfiil katkıda bulunmuştur. Bu makale Celal Bayar’ın genel olarak milliyetçilik kavramı, özel olarak da Türk milliyetçiliği üzerine görüşlerini değerlendirmektedir. Bununla birlikte, ‘Türk ulusu’, ‘ulusal devlet’, ‘Doğu sorunu’, ‘Demokrat Parti milliyetçiliği’ ve ‘gayri-Müslim azınlıklar’ gibi çeşitli temalar üzerinden Bayar’ın milliyetçilik anlayışının çözümlemesine yer verilmektedir. Bayar’ın bir çok demeci milliyetçilik anlayışının daha çok sivil milliyetçiliğe yakın olduğuna işaret etmektedir.
Anahtar kelimeler: Celal Bayar, Türk milliyetçiliği, ulus, devlet, sivil.
Keywords: Celal Bayar, Turkish nationalism, nation, state, civic.
TÜRKİYE’DE SİVİL MİLLİYETÇİLİK:
CELAL BAYAR’IN SİYASİ PROFİLİ ÜZERİNE BİR ÇALIŞMA
Özet: Celal Bayar, Türk siyasal yaşamının ve tarihinin önemli simalarından biri olmuştur. Cumhurbaşkanlığı dahil olmak üzere bir çok görevde bulunan Bayar, siyasal ve devlet eliti konumlarından kaynaklı olarak Türk ulus-devletinin inşasına bilfiil katkıda bulunmuştur. Bu makale Celal Bayar’ın genel olarak milliyetçilik kavramı, özel olarak da Türk milliyetçiliği üzerine görüşlerini değerlendirmektedir. Bununla birlikte, ‘Türk ulusu’, ‘ulusal devlet’, ‘Doğu sorunu’, ‘Demokrat Parti milliyetçiliği’ ve ‘gayri-Müslim azınlıklar’ gibi çeşitli temalar üzerinden Bayar’ın milliyetçilik anlayışının çözümlemesine yer verilmektedir. Bayar’ın bir çok demeci milliyetçilik anlayışının daha çok sivil milliyetçiliğe yakın olduğuna işaret etmektedir.
Anahtar kelimeler: Celal Bayar, Türk milliyetçiliği, ulus, devlet, sivil.
Research Interests: History, Comparative Politics, Republicanism, Political Science, Politics, and 28 moreNationalism, Turkish Nationalism, Political History, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Turkish History, National Identity, Turkey, Elites (Political Science), Political Elites, History of Elites, Turkey And Europe, Turkısh Politics, Political History of Turkey, Modern Turkey, History of Turkish Republic, Minorities in Turkey, History of Nationalism, Leadership (Political Science), History of Modern Turkey, History of Nationalism and Nation-Building, Turkish politics, Elites and Society, Elites, Political elite, Sociology of elites, Nation-State, Political leadership, and Nation building and State making
Anti-Semitism It is commonly believed that there is little or no anti-Semitism in Turkey; for this reason, the Jewish community there is considered to be fortunate. Even the Thrace Incidents of 1934, the 1942 Capital Tax or the 6-7... more
Anti-Semitism
It is commonly believed that there is little or no anti-Semitism in Turkey; for this reason, the Jewish community there is considered to be fortunate. Even the Thrace Incidents of 1934, the 1942 Capital Tax or the 6-7 September Events in 1955 are considered to be examples of discrimination against all non-Muslim minorities in Turkey and not only against the Jews even if the Jews were the main targets of violence like in the Thrace Incidents. This study investigates the validity of this optimistic view with the help of empirical research conducted on a sample group of Turkish Jews. More precisely, it deals with the question of how Jews living in Turkey perceive anti-Semitism with a perspective that prioritizes the voices of the Jews themselves and gives an account of their experience regarding their status as a religious minority in a Muslim majority society. This paper discusses the results of the research based on in-depth interviews with Jewish respondents and reflects on the nature, sources and extent of anti-Semitism in contemporary Turkey in the eyes of Turkey’s Jews themselves.
Keywords: Anti-Semitism, Jews, Turkey, Jewish Minority, non-Muslim
It is commonly believed that there is little or no anti-Semitism in Turkey; for this reason, the Jewish community there is considered to be fortunate. Even the Thrace Incidents of 1934, the 1942 Capital Tax or the 6-7 September Events in 1955 are considered to be examples of discrimination against all non-Muslim minorities in Turkey and not only against the Jews even if the Jews were the main targets of violence like in the Thrace Incidents. This study investigates the validity of this optimistic view with the help of empirical research conducted on a sample group of Turkish Jews. More precisely, it deals with the question of how Jews living in Turkey perceive anti-Semitism with a perspective that prioritizes the voices of the Jews themselves and gives an account of their experience regarding their status as a religious minority in a Muslim majority society. This paper discusses the results of the research based on in-depth interviews with Jewish respondents and reflects on the nature, sources and extent of anti-Semitism in contemporary Turkey in the eyes of Turkey’s Jews themselves.
Keywords: Anti-Semitism, Jews, Turkey, Jewish Minority, non-Muslim
Research Interests: Jewish Studies, Israel Studies, Antisemitism (Prejudice), Jewish History, Turkish and Middle East Studies, and 19 moreTurkish History, Turkey, Anti-Semitism, Islam in Turkey, Antisemitism/Racisms, Political History of Turkey, Turkish Foreign Policy, Modern Turkey, Minorities in Turkey, Turkey in World Politics, Israel, Turkish politics, Anti-Racism, antisemitism and Islamophobia, Antisemitism, Antisemitism in modern Europe, Istanbul, Anti Semitism, and History of Antisemitism
Transit and Receiving Countries: Refugee Protection Policies in Belgium, Slovenia, Greece, and Turkey Şule Toktaş, Aspasia Papadopoulou, Mila Paspalanova, and Natalija Vrecer This article aims to provide and overview of the refugee... more
Transit and Receiving Countries: Refugee Protection Policies in Belgium, Slovenia, Greece, and Turkey
Şule Toktaş, Aspasia Papadopoulou, Mila Paspalanova, and Natalija Vrecer
This article aims to provide and overview of the refugee protection systems in Belgium, Slovenia, Greece and Turkey. Through contributions from four different authors, the article presents the way in which asylum and reception systems operate in each country and the type of provisions available for asylum seekers and refugees. The first section on Belgium explains the reasons that lead this traditional immigration country to also become an increasingly popular refugee destination and makes an assessment of the trends in number and origin of asylum seekers and the gradually increasing stock of undocumented migrants. The section on Slovenia tackles with the question of how the refugee protection policies have changed after achieving independence in 1991. In addition, it focuses on the dynamics of the country’s reception systems and mechanisms that play role in managing migration directed to and from the country, especially after the collapse of the Yugoslavian state system. The section on Greece explains how the country is both a destination and a transit country for asylum seekers coming to Europe from the East and South. The author presents the main refugee trends in Greece in recent years and analyses the implications of transit migration for the refugees, the country and the Union as a whole. The last section, which makes a case analysis of Turkey, reflects on the immigrant sending and receiving characteristics of the country. Arguing that Turkey is one of the major transit areas for migration to Europe, this section makes an assesment of the issue of refugees, asylum seekers and transit migrants construing one of the crucial aspects fo the Turkish-European Union (EU) relations.
Şule Toktaş, Aspasia Papadopoulou, Mila Paspalanova, and Natalija Vrecer
This article aims to provide and overview of the refugee protection systems in Belgium, Slovenia, Greece and Turkey. Through contributions from four different authors, the article presents the way in which asylum and reception systems operate in each country and the type of provisions available for asylum seekers and refugees. The first section on Belgium explains the reasons that lead this traditional immigration country to also become an increasingly popular refugee destination and makes an assessment of the trends in number and origin of asylum seekers and the gradually increasing stock of undocumented migrants. The section on Slovenia tackles with the question of how the refugee protection policies have changed after achieving independence in 1991. In addition, it focuses on the dynamics of the country’s reception systems and mechanisms that play role in managing migration directed to and from the country, especially after the collapse of the Yugoslavian state system. The section on Greece explains how the country is both a destination and a transit country for asylum seekers coming to Europe from the East and South. The author presents the main refugee trends in Greece in recent years and analyses the implications of transit migration for the refugees, the country and the Union as a whole. The last section, which makes a case analysis of Turkey, reflects on the immigrant sending and receiving characteristics of the country. Arguing that Turkey is one of the major transit areas for migration to Europe, this section makes an assesment of the issue of refugees, asylum seekers and transit migrants construing one of the crucial aspects fo the Turkish-European Union (EU) relations.
Research Interests: Refugee Studies, Immigration, Immigration Studies, Asylum Law, Migration, and 24 moreLabor Migration, Asylum, International Migration, European Immigration and Asylum Law, Forced Migration, Migration Studies, Sociology of Migration, Transnational migration, Contemporary International Migration, European/EU Politics, International Refugee Law, EU Law, Asylum seekers, Refugees, International Migration and Immigration Policy, EU Foreign Policy, Development, Sustainability, Social Justice, Poverty, Equity,gender Equality, Migration, International Affairs, Geopolitics, Refugees and Forced Migration Studies, Refugee Law, Asylum and refugees studies, migration and integration, Refugees, migration and immigration, Asylum Seekers and Refugees, Refugee memory, and Immigration Status & Nationality
Contemporary liberal democracies confront governance problems elicited by the discord between the principles of equality and difference, and between the concepts of majority and minority. Citizenship came to be recognized as a vital... more
Contemporary liberal democracies confront governance problems elicited by the discord between the principles of equality and difference, and between the concepts of majority and minority. Citizenship came to be recognized as a vital governance tool in response to this challenge evidenced by growing academic and political interest in the concept. The basic precept that citizenship refers to is a constitutionality based relationship between the individual and the state implying a unique, reciprocal and unmediated bond between the individual and the political community.
Research Interests: Religion, Ethnic Studies, Jewish Studies, Israel Studies, Race and Ethnicity, and 30 moreNationalism, Eastern European and Russian Jewish History, Jewish History, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Minority Studies, National Identity, Jewish - Christian Relations, Turkey, Secularization, Ethnic minorities, Muslim Minorities, Turkey And Europe, Anti-Semitism, Islam in Turkey, Citizenship and Identity, Minority Languages, Citizenship And Governance, Political History of Turkey, Modern Turkey, Minorities in Turkey, Ethnicity, Modern Jewish History, Minority Rights, Citizenship, Religious Studies, Minorities, Secularism, Religious Minorities, Etnicity, and Ethnicity and National Identity
Research Interests: Military History, Military Science, Strategy (Military Science), Gender Studies, Women's Studies, and 19 moreSociology of the Military, Women's Rights, Gender and Work, Women, Women's Empowerment, Military and Politics, Civil-military relations, Military, Armed Forces, Women and Gender Studies, Women in the Military, civil-military relations Turkey, Women Soldiers, Women in the Military Service, Military-Civilian Relations, History of Women In the Military, Women In the Army, Sociology, Women in the Military, and Women Issues In the Military Workplace
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Military History, Military Science, Gender Studies, Women's Studies, Gender History, and 32 moreSociology of the Military, Nationalism, Women and War Studies, Human Resource Management, Turkish Nationalism, Gender, Gender Equality, Turkish and Middle East Studies, National Identity, Nationalism And State Building, Women and Gender Issues in Islam, Women and Politics, Women And Globalization, Military and Politics, Modern Turkey, Civil-military relations, Women and Work, Intersectionality, Armed Forces, Women and Gender Studies, Women in the Military, Qualitative Methodologies, Militarization, Nation-State, Women Soldiers, Women Military Army War, Women in the Military Service, Ethnicity and National Identity, Officers, Life Histories Methodology, Employment Equity Policies, and Women In the Army
This study investigates the migration of the Jews from the Ottoman Empire from the 1860s onward and from modern Turkey to the American continent. It provides a picture of the process of Jewish migration to and Jewish integration in the... more
This study investigates the migration of the Jews from the Ottoman Empire from the 1860s onward and from modern Turkey to the American continent. It provides a picture of the process of Jewish migration to and Jewish integration in the destination countries in the continent. Country-by-country analyses of the integration processes and the profile of immigrants disclose parallels and differences of the integration of Jewish people in different countries in the American continent. The article finds that Jewish immigrants established communities around religious, educational , and philanthropic organizations that facilitated the preservation of their distinct culture and their integration in the host nations.
Research Interests: Immigration, Immigration Studies, Migration, Irregular Migration, Labor Migration, and 13 moreInternational Migration, Forced Migration, Migration Studies, Migration History, Sociology of Migration, Transnational migration, Contemporary International Migration, Migration (Anthropology), Transnational Labour Migration, International Migration and Immigration Policy, Refugees and Forced Migration Studies, International Migrations, Social Integration of Immigrants, and International Immigration
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
National Security Culture in Turkey: A Qualitative Study on Think Tanks Şule Toktaş Bülent Aras Abstract This article examines the role that think tanks have played in the formulation of national security and a culture of security... more
National Security Culture in Turkey:
A Qualitative Study on Think Tanks
Şule Toktaş
Bülent Aras
Abstract
This article examines the role that think tanks have played in the formulation of national security and a culture of security through field research conducted on fourteen think tanks located in Istanbul and Ankara. In addition to participant observation at the think tanks, twenty-five in-depth interviews were conducted with administrators and specialists. The findings revealed that, in terms of their strategic attitudes about national security in Turkey, there are three groups of think tanks: critical think tanks; b) middle-position think tanks; and c) congruent think tanks. Based on the results of the data collected, we argue that the culture of national security in Turkey has begun to be impacted by a plurality of actors, both civilian and official, and that there is an emerging competition for influence over the definitions and conceptualizations of security as well as the identification of security issues within a securitization process which has led to their securitization. Although the think-tank sector in Turkey is still in its formative years, its roles and influence in the debates on national security have been on the rise.
Keywords
Think-tank, securitization, Turkey, national security, research center, security studies.
A Qualitative Study on Think Tanks
Şule Toktaş
Bülent Aras
Abstract
This article examines the role that think tanks have played in the formulation of national security and a culture of security through field research conducted on fourteen think tanks located in Istanbul and Ankara. In addition to participant observation at the think tanks, twenty-five in-depth interviews were conducted with administrators and specialists. The findings revealed that, in terms of their strategic attitudes about national security in Turkey, there are three groups of think tanks: critical think tanks; b) middle-position think tanks; and c) congruent think tanks. Based on the results of the data collected, we argue that the culture of national security in Turkey has begun to be impacted by a plurality of actors, both civilian and official, and that there is an emerging competition for influence over the definitions and conceptualizations of security as well as the identification of security issues within a securitization process which has led to their securitization. Although the think-tank sector in Turkey is still in its formative years, its roles and influence in the debates on national security have been on the rise.
Keywords
Think-tank, securitization, Turkey, national security, research center, security studies.
Research Interests: Political Sociology, Comparative Politics, International Relations, International Relations, Multiculturalism, and 40 moreGlobalization, Foreign Policy Analysis, International Law, Human Rights, Global Civil Society, International organizations, International Security, Conflict, Security, Security, Political Science, Security Studies, Critical Security Studies, Politics, Nationalism, Securitization, Energy Security, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Civil Society and the Public Sphere, Diplomacy, Turkey, Copenhagen School/Securitization, Modern Turkey, Ethnicity, Minority Rights, Civil Society, Middle East, Peace, Think Tanks, National Security, Freedom, TURKISH, Non-Traditional Security, Social Conflict, THINK TANKS & POLICY FORMULATION, Public Administration and Policy, Research Centers, Democracy and Citizenship Education: Citizenship Identities, Xenophobia and Racism, and Transmigration and Immigration
ABSTRACT This paper empirically investigates the impact of internal migration on women’s empowerment in urban areas of Turkey. Based on data from a nationally representative household survey, we find that migration exerts its positive... more
ABSTRACT
This paper empirically investigates the impact of internal migration on women’s empowerment in urban areas of Turkey. Based on data from a nationally representative household survey, we find that migration exerts its positive impact through improvements in educational attainment and labor market outcomes in urban settings. Migration contributes to women’s empowerment by raising their education levels and lowering the schooling gap between men and women. Migration also allows migrants, both men and women, to access jobs and occupations in high wage regions like Istanbul, particularly for those with tertiary education. Unlike education, gender wage gap persists even after migration.
Keywords: Migration, Internal Migration, Women, Empowerment, Istanbul
This paper empirically investigates the impact of internal migration on women’s empowerment in urban areas of Turkey. Based on data from a nationally representative household survey, we find that migration exerts its positive impact through improvements in educational attainment and labor market outcomes in urban settings. Migration contributes to women’s empowerment by raising their education levels and lowering the schooling gap between men and women. Migration also allows migrants, both men and women, to access jobs and occupations in high wage regions like Istanbul, particularly for those with tertiary education. Unlike education, gender wage gap persists even after migration.
Keywords: Migration, Internal Migration, Women, Empowerment, Istanbul
Research Interests: Gender Studies, Women's Studies, Immigration, Immigration Studies, Migration, and 15 moreLabor Migration, Gender and Development, Migration Studies, Sociology of Migration, Migrant labour, Internal migration, Women and Gender Studies, Migrant workers, Immigrants, Women and Migration, Gender and Migration, Development Economics, Migration, Cooperatives, The Economics of Migration, Socio-Economic Impact of Rural-Urban Migration, and Gender and Family Migration
It has been fifty years since the guest worker agreement was signed between Turkey and Germany on October 30, 1961. In subsequent years, although Turkey has signed similar agreements with such countries as Austria, the Netherlands,... more
It has been fifty years since the guest worker agreement was signed between Turkey and Germany on October 30, 1961. In subsequent years, although Turkey has signed similar agreements with such countries as Austria, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Sweden, and Australia, in terms of scope and volume emigration to Germany has been the hallmark of contemporary Turkish immigration in contemporary Europe, and it has constituted the backbone of the 'Euro-Turk' phenomenon. The first group of workers needed by Germany for the reconstruction efforts following World War II landed in Munich from a train which departed from the Sirkeci station in Istanbul. Since then, several other waves have followed. The guest agreement allowed for temporary migration, which included work permits valid for one year; however, as migration theory tells us, temporary migration can easily be transformed into permanent settlement, which was what happened in the Turko-German case. Today, in consequence of the waves of migration which have encompassed a wide range of types, from labour migration and family re-unions to refugee and asylum seeking, immigrants in Germany from Turkey demographically represent a community of over 2.5 million individuals. The influence of these mass influxes expanded to include social, cultural, political and economic life, with diverse and pervasive impacts on the transnational communities of Germany and Turkey, as well as on Euro-Turks themselves.
Research Interests: Immigration, Migration, Turkish Nationalism, Labor Migration, Immigration And Integration In Europe, and 25 moreIntra-European Migration, Turkish and Middle East Studies, International Migration, Migration Studies, Migration History, Sociology of Migration, Transnational migration, European/EU Politics, Turkish Foreign Policy, Migration (Anthropology), Transnational Labour Migration, Modern Turkey, Asylum seekers, Refugees, Turkish politics, Migrations, Great Migration period, İkinci kuşak göçmen Türk, European Migration Policy, European Asylum and Migration Policies, Uluslararası Göç, Immigration Status & Nationality, Göçmen, Uluslararası Göçmen, and Göç Sosyolojisi
Als land dat bijna 3 miljoen Syrische vluchtelingen onderdak biedt, heeft Turkije het gevoel dat zijn ruimhartige vluchtelingenbeleid door de internationale gemeenschap, en zeker door de Europese landen, te weinig wordt gewaardeerd.
Research Interests:
The armed forces have always occupied a central place in Turkey’s political agenda. The military has long enjoyed the privilege of an autonomous position because of its role as guardian of the unitary Republic, secularism and Kemalism. On... more
The armed forces have always occupied a central place in Turkey’s political agenda. The military has long enjoyed the privilege of an autonomous position because of its role as guardian of the unitary Republic, secularism and Kemalism. On the basis of its definition of ‘national security’ and ‘threats,’ the Turkish military sets the agenda of security, and enlists internal and external mechanisms to support that agenda.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Review of Measuring Global Migration: Towards Better Data For All by Frank Laczko, Elisa Mosler Vidal and Marzia Rango (London and New York: Routledge, 2024). Book review appeared at International Migration, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp: 137-139,... more
Review of Measuring Global Migration: Towards Better Data For All by Frank Laczko, Elisa Mosler Vidal and Marzia Rango (London and New York: Routledge, 2024). Book review appeared at International Migration, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp: 137-139, April 2024, available at DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13270
Research Interests:
This documentary illustrates the economic situation in a small town in Macedonia by pinpointing the complexity of labor dynamics.
Research Interests:
Heroin, Organized Crime and the Making of Modern Turkey is a book on organized crime in Turkey with a historical approach that covers the period starting from the Ottoman Empire ending in the 1970s with a short elaboration of the... more
Heroin, Organized Crime and the Making of Modern Turkey is a book on organized crime in Turkey with a historical approach that covers the period starting from the Ottoman Empire ending in the 1970s with a short elaboration of the contemporary era in the conclusion section. The author of the book, Ryan Gingeras, is an academic at the Naval Postgraduate School in the U.S.A.
Research Interests: State Formation, Drugs and drug culture, Organized Crime, Turkish and Middle East Studies, Turkey, and 15 moreTurkey And Europe, Political History of Turkey, Turkish Foreign Policy, Modern Turkey, History of Turkish Republic, History of Modern Turkey, Transnational Organized Crime, Organized Crime, Drugs and Crime, Cybercrime, Crime, Mafia, State, Heroin Dependence, Heroin, Transnational Organized Crime Groups, and Border Violence and Drug Trafficking/organized Crime
The book, written by Ömer Çaha who is a professor of political science and who has been working on women’s issues and women’s movement for many years, is an in-depth summary of the development of the civil society in Turkey and the role... more
The book, written by Ömer Çaha who is a professor of political science and who has been working on women’s issues and women’s movement for many years, is an in-depth summary of the development of the civil society in Turkey and the role that women’s organizations and feminist movements played in this growing civil sphere. Students of political science, women’s studies and sociology might specifically benefit from the book. Since the title is Women and Civil Society in Turkey: Women’s Movements in a Muslim Society, one also wonders about the development of civil society and feminist ideas in other Muslim societies. Turkey is a country of at times contradictory worldviews – one more oriented towards the west and European mode of enlightenment and life style and the other being more oriented towards Islam and the Middle East. A comparative analysis of civil society and women’s activism in Turkey with experiences in other countries and regions would definitely necessitate the substantial data provided by the author through his wide and historical coverage and exploration of the subject matter.
Research Interests:
Technology and National Identity in Turkey: Mobile Communications and the Evolution of a Post-Ottoman Nation, written by Burçe Çelik, is a study of the use of mobile phones in Turkey and the impact of mobile technologies on national... more
Technology and National Identity in Turkey: Mobile Communications and the Evolution of a Post-Ottoman Nation, written by Burçe Çelik, is a study of the use of mobile phones in Turkey and the impact of mobile technologies on national identity. In Turkey, conceptualizations of national self have been impacted by the country’s Ottoman past as well as its quest for modernity since the founding of the Republic in 1923. The book informs us that cellular phone technology was introduced to the Turkish public in 1994 and since then has been a growing sector. As the book gives us the numbers, in 2010, there were 67 million users and 100 million phones (p. 1). At the outset, the sector was run as a monopoly, but with the entrance of other carriers which was made possible by a relaxing of regulations there now operate three major firms supplying GSM networks. Due to such widespread use of cellular phones, the author attempts to explain why and how the cellular telephone has become so well received in Turkey. She raises questions about how cellular telephony is imagined and what has underpinned its popularity. In other words, the author investigates the social, political, economic, historical and cultural conditions within which cellular telephony has become an object of collective attachment or addiction and has emerged as a social practice.
Research Interests:
Ethnicity, Migration and Enterprise By Prodromos Panayiotopoulos Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, 237 pp., ISBN 978-0-333-71047-0 Under the impact of globalization, as claims that call for diversity to be recognized increase,... more
Ethnicity, Migration and Enterprise
By Prodromos Panayiotopoulos
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, 237 pp., ISBN 978-0-333-71047-0
Under the impact of globalization, as claims that call for diversity to be recognized increase, universal citizenship rights that safeguard individual rights and freedoms fall short of grasping diversity. International migration and minority issues are contributory facets of this process. Citizenship has become susceptible to international migration and minority issues and the relationship established with the nation-state in the form of membership or belonging has gotten disrupted. States are now compelled to develop new policies to deal with the consequences of international migration and the challenge of minority groups.
Citizenship, which is an operative arena of these new policies, is functional to counter the challenges posed by globalization and the incorporation of individuals and groups, including immigrants and minorities, into the society. For minority groups, not only legal rights and constitutional provisions but also a wide range of public policies are required in the process of recognition and accommodation of distinctive identities and needs of ethnic, cultural and religious groups. The meaning of citizenship for the immigrants, on the other hand, is closely related to “life strategies” like sequential plans and actions in the process of migration. There are several factors at play in determining the nature of life strategies which include whether the receiving society is for permanent or temporary settlement, duration of stay, kinship ties with countries of origin, documented or undocumented status of immigrants and their qualifications and positions in the labor market.
The enterprises established by ethnic/racial minority and migrant groups, with their growing numbers are illustrative of the new facets of the urbanization process in many city and metropolitan settings. Thus, they are at the center of the discussions on ‘globalization from below’ and ‘globalization from above’ and ethnic adaptation in local markets and informal economies. “Ethnicity, Migration and Enterprise” is an exploration of these discussions by use of case studies on enterprises founded by minority and migrant groups.
The book is an in-depth investigation of ethnicity, migration and enterprise which incorporates the mega-meta-theories of modernization and globalization, and thereof their critiques to the sample cases of Turkish immigrants in Germany, Chinese entrepreneurs in Europe and the USA, Cuban and Mexican Hispanic minority groups in the USA, and the Polish and Central and Eastern European immigrants in the UK. There are several ethnic groups – either immigrant or minority; newcomer or old settler – under scrutiny in the study. The author presents a critical review of the academic and institutional research on migration and emergent enterprise among these different groups. Each chapter of the book is allocated to a single migrant/minority group under investigation together with an introduction and a conclusion on the relevance and explanatory capacity of mega-meta theories to explain the phenomenon of the rising ethnic migrant enterprises in local economies both in terms of growing numbers and potential contribution. The author, successfully in a considerably short book, makes an overview of the impact of ethnicity on the (re)distribution of wealth across borders of territorial, mental, ethnic and cultural in nature.
The study illustrates that far from the nationalistic and xenophobic jargons of ‘immigrants/minorities take our jobs!’, the actual situation evidenced by several academic and institutional research is the contrary: the enterprises of ethnic groups albeit minority or immigrant, create job opportunities and are a push forward on the local economies. What’s more, the study shows that entrepreneurship has become a form of life strategy for among ethnic groups in globalized economies. Employment in informal economies via enterprises are side effects or with a different formulation economics of multiculturalism. Another major contributions that the study makes to the literature on migration, minorities and citizenship is its focus from ‘below’. The local circumstances such as relating different minority and migrant groups to each other rather than exclusively focusing on their vulnerable relationship to the majority/ groups are a substantial divergence from the conventional studies on migration and minorities.
The author brings further light on relationship between class and ethnicity which are the two major sociological determinants of social mobility and their interrogation under the influence of international migration and minority issues. Citizenship debate encompasses the enterprises founded by migrant and minority groups. Yet, one cannot keep him/herself from thinking about the relationship between gender, ethnicity and class in the situations of international migration and minority. In other words, the functioning of the asset gap between different ethnic groups and economic classes, as shown by the author, might be indicative of a parallel gap between genders of the same ethnicity. The discrepancies between women and men both among the same ethnic group and between various ethnic groups, might be contributive to our understanding of the relationship between ethnicity, migration and enterprise in addition to the valuable data that the author provides on the experiences of ‘new immigrants’ and ‘old immigrants’.
By Prodromos Panayiotopoulos
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, 237 pp., ISBN 978-0-333-71047-0
Under the impact of globalization, as claims that call for diversity to be recognized increase, universal citizenship rights that safeguard individual rights and freedoms fall short of grasping diversity. International migration and minority issues are contributory facets of this process. Citizenship has become susceptible to international migration and minority issues and the relationship established with the nation-state in the form of membership or belonging has gotten disrupted. States are now compelled to develop new policies to deal with the consequences of international migration and the challenge of minority groups.
Citizenship, which is an operative arena of these new policies, is functional to counter the challenges posed by globalization and the incorporation of individuals and groups, including immigrants and minorities, into the society. For minority groups, not only legal rights and constitutional provisions but also a wide range of public policies are required in the process of recognition and accommodation of distinctive identities and needs of ethnic, cultural and religious groups. The meaning of citizenship for the immigrants, on the other hand, is closely related to “life strategies” like sequential plans and actions in the process of migration. There are several factors at play in determining the nature of life strategies which include whether the receiving society is for permanent or temporary settlement, duration of stay, kinship ties with countries of origin, documented or undocumented status of immigrants and their qualifications and positions in the labor market.
The enterprises established by ethnic/racial minority and migrant groups, with their growing numbers are illustrative of the new facets of the urbanization process in many city and metropolitan settings. Thus, they are at the center of the discussions on ‘globalization from below’ and ‘globalization from above’ and ethnic adaptation in local markets and informal economies. “Ethnicity, Migration and Enterprise” is an exploration of these discussions by use of case studies on enterprises founded by minority and migrant groups.
The book is an in-depth investigation of ethnicity, migration and enterprise which incorporates the mega-meta-theories of modernization and globalization, and thereof their critiques to the sample cases of Turkish immigrants in Germany, Chinese entrepreneurs in Europe and the USA, Cuban and Mexican Hispanic minority groups in the USA, and the Polish and Central and Eastern European immigrants in the UK. There are several ethnic groups – either immigrant or minority; newcomer or old settler – under scrutiny in the study. The author presents a critical review of the academic and institutional research on migration and emergent enterprise among these different groups. Each chapter of the book is allocated to a single migrant/minority group under investigation together with an introduction and a conclusion on the relevance and explanatory capacity of mega-meta theories to explain the phenomenon of the rising ethnic migrant enterprises in local economies both in terms of growing numbers and potential contribution. The author, successfully in a considerably short book, makes an overview of the impact of ethnicity on the (re)distribution of wealth across borders of territorial, mental, ethnic and cultural in nature.
The study illustrates that far from the nationalistic and xenophobic jargons of ‘immigrants/minorities take our jobs!’, the actual situation evidenced by several academic and institutional research is the contrary: the enterprises of ethnic groups albeit minority or immigrant, create job opportunities and are a push forward on the local economies. What’s more, the study shows that entrepreneurship has become a form of life strategy for among ethnic groups in globalized economies. Employment in informal economies via enterprises are side effects or with a different formulation economics of multiculturalism. Another major contributions that the study makes to the literature on migration, minorities and citizenship is its focus from ‘below’. The local circumstances such as relating different minority and migrant groups to each other rather than exclusively focusing on their vulnerable relationship to the majority/ groups are a substantial divergence from the conventional studies on migration and minorities.
The author brings further light on relationship between class and ethnicity which are the two major sociological determinants of social mobility and their interrogation under the influence of international migration and minority issues. Citizenship debate encompasses the enterprises founded by migrant and minority groups. Yet, one cannot keep him/herself from thinking about the relationship between gender, ethnicity and class in the situations of international migration and minority. In other words, the functioning of the asset gap between different ethnic groups and economic classes, as shown by the author, might be indicative of a parallel gap between genders of the same ethnicity. The discrepancies between women and men both among the same ethnic group and between various ethnic groups, might be contributive to our understanding of the relationship between ethnicity, migration and enterprise in addition to the valuable data that the author provides on the experiences of ‘new immigrants’ and ‘old immigrants’.
Research Interests:
International Migration and Citizenship Today By Niklaus Steiner London and New York: Routledge, 2009, 150 pp., ISBN 0-415-77299-0. “International Migration and Citizenship Today” is a coherent and informative study of... more
International Migration and Citizenship Today
By Niklaus Steiner
London and New York: Routledge, 2009, 150 pp., ISBN 0-415-77299-0.
“International Migration and Citizenship Today” is a coherent and informative study of international migration with a specific focus on the reception of migrants in the West, in the words of the author ‘the wealthier’ countries, particularly in the Unites States. Niklaus Steiner, the author, introduces two questions that constitute the focus of the study. First is regarding the selection process in the immigrants’ admission to the country followed by a second concern over the criteria for citizenship of those admitted. The author uses the term ‘we’ when stating “what criteria should we use to admit migrants who want to come to our country?” and explains that the goal of the book is to “to help citizens engage thoughtfully in discussions over and admission and citizenship”. The uses of the terms like ‘we citizens of democracies’ and ‘our country’ distances the study from a scientific language and subject-free jargon. Furthermore, it reflects a stance point of insiders (citizens) and outsiders (immigrants). The book is primarily targeting undergraduate students as audience for their courses on international migration at North American universities; therefore one might think of an author’s attempt for building up a sincere tone that would encourage learning. Yet, the same jargon/language preference that puts the western university students as the noun subject at the center might distance those readers who do not belong to this category of the ‘citizens of democracies’ or the ‘wealthier countries’. Still, students from everywhere might understand the complexity of admission, reception and naturalization in international migration and learn about different factors involved in these processes.
The author limits the scope of the study to international migration by excluding the topics of internal migration and human trafficking. The author justifies this distinction by setting forth internal migration as a population movement within a given country which would not “be debated by others in another country”. With regards to human trafficking, the author identifies human trafficking as a criminal act and argues that the debates revolving around human trafficking are on usually preventing people from being moved across borders for exploitative purposes. Neither of the arguments or justifications are sufficient for explaining the limitation of the study’s scope. The author puts ‘debates’ as the norm of the study and if issues are debated then they are relevant for international migration and if they are not debated then they are not included in the book. What are these debates, who make these debates, the actors, the institutions involved are a total ambiguity. Furthermore, what about those voices of the silenced? Or those opinions or positions of people who do not talk? The book centers around a discursive categorical presumption of ‘citizens’ voices’ which sounds like the voice of the holder of single citizenship status. It is evident that some countries and some citizens hold dual citizenship; the status of citizenship might not provide a satisfying criterion for getting involved in debates as there might be various other people affected by international migration such as ‘denizens’ who are not citizens but have settlement rights and participation rights in local elections; and the internal movement, in some cases, might have relevance for people outside the borders such as some countries in the past, some eastern European and Balkan countries applied settlement restrictions to mobile populations such as the Roma which would affect the Roma nomads moving across borders.
The author treats international migration as a movement across borders. Theoretically, such a definition is definitely correct. Yet, it is also reflective of a political position that put the state and its boundaries as the norm. The categorization of who passes the boundaries of a state is an international immigrant and who is not passing s/he is not an international migrant is a simplistic approach. There might be complex cases that would alter the states’ presence. The literature on nationalism, the configuration of nation state and the development of the modern state instrument all point out to the fact that boundaries of a state are fictive in the sense that it divides one state from another but it does not refer to a division between villages, communities or societies. There is circle migration, short term seasonal migration or event undocumented irregular migration forth and back between two different places and regions. Existence of a legal border between these two places would not necessitate a reserved place to the states instead of the human collectivities. The cover picture of the book which has a straight line dividing the U.S. and Mexico symbolizes not only the legal boundary but also the worlds apart between the countries. Yet, society wise, one might argue that in North America there are several societies which are integrated to one another sometimes with overlapping minorities, ethnicities and/or cultures. One might also think of the continent as a habitus with a human population circulating over it.
The author, successfully in a considerably short book, makes an overview of the phenomenon of international migration with its various aspects. The admission criteria for different types of immigrants, to motives for migration and family reunification among economic migrants, the restrictions and discouragements on incoming immigration flows and the efforts for establishing asylum seeking and refugee protection systems are some topics that are discussed in the book. In the last two chapters the discussion is centered around the processes after reception which are merely citizenship and naturalization. The book is designed for university education most probably in the United States or Canada and can easily be used as course material at the undergraduate level. The use of language and style of expression rightly target university students as they are simplified and plain. Prof. Steiner who has been teaching international migration in American universities seems to gather all his expertise in teaching that he attained over years in the textbook. The book is highly recommended for educational purposes. Yet, the book has certain aspects which are quiet troublesome in terms of a subject or opinion free language which is necessary for a neutral approach to citizenship and international migration matters.
By Niklaus Steiner
London and New York: Routledge, 2009, 150 pp., ISBN 0-415-77299-0.
“International Migration and Citizenship Today” is a coherent and informative study of international migration with a specific focus on the reception of migrants in the West, in the words of the author ‘the wealthier’ countries, particularly in the Unites States. Niklaus Steiner, the author, introduces two questions that constitute the focus of the study. First is regarding the selection process in the immigrants’ admission to the country followed by a second concern over the criteria for citizenship of those admitted. The author uses the term ‘we’ when stating “what criteria should we use to admit migrants who want to come to our country?” and explains that the goal of the book is to “to help citizens engage thoughtfully in discussions over and admission and citizenship”. The uses of the terms like ‘we citizens of democracies’ and ‘our country’ distances the study from a scientific language and subject-free jargon. Furthermore, it reflects a stance point of insiders (citizens) and outsiders (immigrants). The book is primarily targeting undergraduate students as audience for their courses on international migration at North American universities; therefore one might think of an author’s attempt for building up a sincere tone that would encourage learning. Yet, the same jargon/language preference that puts the western university students as the noun subject at the center might distance those readers who do not belong to this category of the ‘citizens of democracies’ or the ‘wealthier countries’. Still, students from everywhere might understand the complexity of admission, reception and naturalization in international migration and learn about different factors involved in these processes.
The author limits the scope of the study to international migration by excluding the topics of internal migration and human trafficking. The author justifies this distinction by setting forth internal migration as a population movement within a given country which would not “be debated by others in another country”. With regards to human trafficking, the author identifies human trafficking as a criminal act and argues that the debates revolving around human trafficking are on usually preventing people from being moved across borders for exploitative purposes. Neither of the arguments or justifications are sufficient for explaining the limitation of the study’s scope. The author puts ‘debates’ as the norm of the study and if issues are debated then they are relevant for international migration and if they are not debated then they are not included in the book. What are these debates, who make these debates, the actors, the institutions involved are a total ambiguity. Furthermore, what about those voices of the silenced? Or those opinions or positions of people who do not talk? The book centers around a discursive categorical presumption of ‘citizens’ voices’ which sounds like the voice of the holder of single citizenship status. It is evident that some countries and some citizens hold dual citizenship; the status of citizenship might not provide a satisfying criterion for getting involved in debates as there might be various other people affected by international migration such as ‘denizens’ who are not citizens but have settlement rights and participation rights in local elections; and the internal movement, in some cases, might have relevance for people outside the borders such as some countries in the past, some eastern European and Balkan countries applied settlement restrictions to mobile populations such as the Roma which would affect the Roma nomads moving across borders.
The author treats international migration as a movement across borders. Theoretically, such a definition is definitely correct. Yet, it is also reflective of a political position that put the state and its boundaries as the norm. The categorization of who passes the boundaries of a state is an international immigrant and who is not passing s/he is not an international migrant is a simplistic approach. There might be complex cases that would alter the states’ presence. The literature on nationalism, the configuration of nation state and the development of the modern state instrument all point out to the fact that boundaries of a state are fictive in the sense that it divides one state from another but it does not refer to a division between villages, communities or societies. There is circle migration, short term seasonal migration or event undocumented irregular migration forth and back between two different places and regions. Existence of a legal border between these two places would not necessitate a reserved place to the states instead of the human collectivities. The cover picture of the book which has a straight line dividing the U.S. and Mexico symbolizes not only the legal boundary but also the worlds apart between the countries. Yet, society wise, one might argue that in North America there are several societies which are integrated to one another sometimes with overlapping minorities, ethnicities and/or cultures. One might also think of the continent as a habitus with a human population circulating over it.
The author, successfully in a considerably short book, makes an overview of the phenomenon of international migration with its various aspects. The admission criteria for different types of immigrants, to motives for migration and family reunification among economic migrants, the restrictions and discouragements on incoming immigration flows and the efforts for establishing asylum seeking and refugee protection systems are some topics that are discussed in the book. In the last two chapters the discussion is centered around the processes after reception which are merely citizenship and naturalization. The book is designed for university education most probably in the United States or Canada and can easily be used as course material at the undergraduate level. The use of language and style of expression rightly target university students as they are simplified and plain. Prof. Steiner who has been teaching international migration in American universities seems to gather all his expertise in teaching that he attained over years in the textbook. The book is highly recommended for educational purposes. Yet, the book has certain aspects which are quiet troublesome in terms of a subject or opinion free language which is necessary for a neutral approach to citizenship and international migration matters.
Research Interests:
BOOK REVIEW Ahmet İçduygu and Kemal Kirişçi, eds., Land of Diverse Migrations: Challenges of Emigration and Immigration in Turkey, Istanbul: Bilgi University Publications, 2009. In the late 1970s, the focus of migration research in... more
BOOK REVIEW
Ahmet İçduygu and Kemal Kirişçi, eds., Land of Diverse Migrations: Challenges of Emigration and Immigration in Turkey, Istanbul: Bilgi University Publications, 2009.
In the late 1970s, the focus of migration research in Turkey was not particularly broad-based. Only a small number of social scientists, mainly from the disciplines of economy, sociology and demography, contributed to the field, and worker remittances and the political economy of rural-to-urban migration and urbanization were the most frequently studied topics. It was only when Turkey turned into a “land of diverse migrations” and posed an interesting scene for a variety of internal and international migrations (regular, irregular, transit, forced, internal, return, labor, and undocumented immigration; emigration, asylum-seeker and refugee movements; and so forth) that migration research in and on Turkey boomed.
More recently, new destination countries for labor migration from Turkey (such as Australia and the oil-producing countries of the Middle East) and new reasons for emigration to European countries (such as family unification, and asylum-seeking due to the ethnic conflict in the Kurdish-populated areas of Turkey) have emerged. From the 1980s onwards, in addition to its identity as a sending country for the international migration market within the borders of the EU, Turkey has achieved the status of a migrant-receiving and migratory transit country for immigrants coming from other countries. There has been an inflow of foreign nationals, especially since the 1990s. Besides the migration of ethnic Turks, there are now transit migration flows, illegal labor migration, asylum-seekers, and registered migration of non-nationals coming to Turkey. It is in this context that governmental and non-governmental funding opportunities for migration research in and on Turkey have increased and Turkish universities have started to launch migration research centers. The field of immigration studies has begun to attract researchers from disciplines as diverse as political science, international relations, law, history, communications and social psychology. Research results in the form of policy proposals or publications circulate among variant circles of immigration researchers. Land of Diverse Migrations: Challenges of Emigration and Immigration in Turkey, edited by Ahmet İçduygu and Kemal Kirişçi, is a manifestation of this growing interest in migration studies in Turkey.
The volume compiles eight research reports by scholars from various disciplines, based on studies funded by Mirekoç, the Migration Research Program at Koç University, İstanbul. The volume not only underlines Turkey’s role as a country of emigration, immigration and transit, but also illustrates the complex dynamics and sometimes overlapping webs of migration in and through Turkey. The research results also elaborate on migration as an experience from the migrants’ viewpoints. In addition to primary data collected by way of field research, each research report includes discussion of state policies or societal attitudes towards different migrant groups. Therefore, the data produced and distributed in the volume reflect analysis at the individual, society and state levels.
The volume is divided into two parts. The authors of the first part dwell on emigration from Turkey: they examine the Karamanlis (a Turkish-speaking Orthodox community from Central Anatolia) in the population exchange between Turkey and Greece, the brain drain from Turkey to the USA, Turkish immigrants’ identity in the city of Berlin, Turkish mothers’ socialization goals for their children in relation to their migration experience, and estimations on emigration trends in light of the 2000 Census results. The common ground of these different research reports is that, in one way or another, they all touch upon boundary formation and tackle the question of who is in and who is out. As one of the key signifiers of belonging, religion, operative in the Turkish-Greek population change agreement, was instrumentalized to exclude the Orthodox Karamanlis from Anatolia due to the nationalistic ideals of the newly-founded Turkish state and the demographic Islamization of Turkish society. After emigration to Greece, another yet more visible signifier of belonging, language, constituted a cultural deficiency when the Turkish-speaking Karamanlis encountered problems of reception in the Greek-speaking host society. In the case of Turkish professionals in the USA, however, human capital becomes the determinant of who is accepted and who is not. For the “Berliner” Turks, the city as a space generates spectacles of identity and in/out group formations. In the case of mothers who attribute great value to their children’s education for purposes of socialization and upward class mobility, social capital is a reservoir for boundaries and group identification.
The authors of the second part contemplate recent immigration flows into Turkey and provide substantial field research data on different immigrant groups with diverse agendas, such as those from Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Moldova, Somalia, Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Sudan. The research on these different types of irregular immigration underlines once more the fact that it is impossible to simplify irregular migration through clear-cut immigrant groups and/or immigration categories. A Ghanaian immigrant might fall in and out of the categories of asylum-seeker, transit immigrant or irregular worker over a short period of time. Likewise, even for Iraqi Turkmens or Gagauz domestic workers from Moldova who have kinship ties with ethnic Turks and thus relatively easier access to visas, the experience of migration is as difficult as for a Sudanese apprehended at the Turkish-Greek border. Thus, one should not forget that there is always a certain degree of vulnerability in each and every immigrant group.
It is also very interesting that immigrants themselves play with categories of boundary definition. For immigrants from Africa, race is not only a category of exclusion, but also inclusion. For example, when a Nigerian is apprehended at the border, s/he can claim to be from Ghana and misinform the authorities in Turkey because s/he believes that the authorities will more likely grant asylum-seeker status to those coming from Ghana. Since no one can at first sight identify the difference between a Nigerian and a Ghanaian, the categories of nationality and race provide African immigrants with an arena for manipulation in a context of absolute powerlessness.
Land of Diverse Migrations also provides evidence for Istanbul becoming a specific site for migratory movements, be they irregular or transit. Istanbul, once the capital of the Ottoman Empire, is generally portrayed as a cosmopolitan city that historically has hosted a multiplicity of cultural, religious and ethnic minorities. The volume sheds light on Istanbul’s historical notion of hosting a variety of immigrant groups. For instance, Ottoman Istanbul received Jewish refugees from the Iberian Peninsula fleeing the Catholic Inquisition. Equally, modern Istanbul is a checkpoint for international migration as it receives African migrants, asylum-seekers and Moldovan domestic workers, all of whom constitute immigrant groups under study in this volume.
Şule Toktaş
Kadir Has University
Ahmet İçduygu and Kemal Kirişçi, eds., Land of Diverse Migrations: Challenges of Emigration and Immigration in Turkey, Istanbul: Bilgi University Publications, 2009.
In the late 1970s, the focus of migration research in Turkey was not particularly broad-based. Only a small number of social scientists, mainly from the disciplines of economy, sociology and demography, contributed to the field, and worker remittances and the political economy of rural-to-urban migration and urbanization were the most frequently studied topics. It was only when Turkey turned into a “land of diverse migrations” and posed an interesting scene for a variety of internal and international migrations (regular, irregular, transit, forced, internal, return, labor, and undocumented immigration; emigration, asylum-seeker and refugee movements; and so forth) that migration research in and on Turkey boomed.
More recently, new destination countries for labor migration from Turkey (such as Australia and the oil-producing countries of the Middle East) and new reasons for emigration to European countries (such as family unification, and asylum-seeking due to the ethnic conflict in the Kurdish-populated areas of Turkey) have emerged. From the 1980s onwards, in addition to its identity as a sending country for the international migration market within the borders of the EU, Turkey has achieved the status of a migrant-receiving and migratory transit country for immigrants coming from other countries. There has been an inflow of foreign nationals, especially since the 1990s. Besides the migration of ethnic Turks, there are now transit migration flows, illegal labor migration, asylum-seekers, and registered migration of non-nationals coming to Turkey. It is in this context that governmental and non-governmental funding opportunities for migration research in and on Turkey have increased and Turkish universities have started to launch migration research centers. The field of immigration studies has begun to attract researchers from disciplines as diverse as political science, international relations, law, history, communications and social psychology. Research results in the form of policy proposals or publications circulate among variant circles of immigration researchers. Land of Diverse Migrations: Challenges of Emigration and Immigration in Turkey, edited by Ahmet İçduygu and Kemal Kirişçi, is a manifestation of this growing interest in migration studies in Turkey.
The volume compiles eight research reports by scholars from various disciplines, based on studies funded by Mirekoç, the Migration Research Program at Koç University, İstanbul. The volume not only underlines Turkey’s role as a country of emigration, immigration and transit, but also illustrates the complex dynamics and sometimes overlapping webs of migration in and through Turkey. The research results also elaborate on migration as an experience from the migrants’ viewpoints. In addition to primary data collected by way of field research, each research report includes discussion of state policies or societal attitudes towards different migrant groups. Therefore, the data produced and distributed in the volume reflect analysis at the individual, society and state levels.
The volume is divided into two parts. The authors of the first part dwell on emigration from Turkey: they examine the Karamanlis (a Turkish-speaking Orthodox community from Central Anatolia) in the population exchange between Turkey and Greece, the brain drain from Turkey to the USA, Turkish immigrants’ identity in the city of Berlin, Turkish mothers’ socialization goals for their children in relation to their migration experience, and estimations on emigration trends in light of the 2000 Census results. The common ground of these different research reports is that, in one way or another, they all touch upon boundary formation and tackle the question of who is in and who is out. As one of the key signifiers of belonging, religion, operative in the Turkish-Greek population change agreement, was instrumentalized to exclude the Orthodox Karamanlis from Anatolia due to the nationalistic ideals of the newly-founded Turkish state and the demographic Islamization of Turkish society. After emigration to Greece, another yet more visible signifier of belonging, language, constituted a cultural deficiency when the Turkish-speaking Karamanlis encountered problems of reception in the Greek-speaking host society. In the case of Turkish professionals in the USA, however, human capital becomes the determinant of who is accepted and who is not. For the “Berliner” Turks, the city as a space generates spectacles of identity and in/out group formations. In the case of mothers who attribute great value to their children’s education for purposes of socialization and upward class mobility, social capital is a reservoir for boundaries and group identification.
The authors of the second part contemplate recent immigration flows into Turkey and provide substantial field research data on different immigrant groups with diverse agendas, such as those from Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Moldova, Somalia, Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Sudan. The research on these different types of irregular immigration underlines once more the fact that it is impossible to simplify irregular migration through clear-cut immigrant groups and/or immigration categories. A Ghanaian immigrant might fall in and out of the categories of asylum-seeker, transit immigrant or irregular worker over a short period of time. Likewise, even for Iraqi Turkmens or Gagauz domestic workers from Moldova who have kinship ties with ethnic Turks and thus relatively easier access to visas, the experience of migration is as difficult as for a Sudanese apprehended at the Turkish-Greek border. Thus, one should not forget that there is always a certain degree of vulnerability in each and every immigrant group.
It is also very interesting that immigrants themselves play with categories of boundary definition. For immigrants from Africa, race is not only a category of exclusion, but also inclusion. For example, when a Nigerian is apprehended at the border, s/he can claim to be from Ghana and misinform the authorities in Turkey because s/he believes that the authorities will more likely grant asylum-seeker status to those coming from Ghana. Since no one can at first sight identify the difference between a Nigerian and a Ghanaian, the categories of nationality and race provide African immigrants with an arena for manipulation in a context of absolute powerlessness.
Land of Diverse Migrations also provides evidence for Istanbul becoming a specific site for migratory movements, be they irregular or transit. Istanbul, once the capital of the Ottoman Empire, is generally portrayed as a cosmopolitan city that historically has hosted a multiplicity of cultural, religious and ethnic minorities. The volume sheds light on Istanbul’s historical notion of hosting a variety of immigrant groups. For instance, Ottoman Istanbul received Jewish refugees from the Iberian Peninsula fleeing the Catholic Inquisition. Equally, modern Istanbul is a checkpoint for international migration as it receives African migrants, asylum-seekers and Moldovan domestic workers, all of whom constitute immigrant groups under study in this volume.
Şule Toktaş
Kadir Has University
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
ABSTRACT Having moved from Turkey to Israel, Turkish Jewish immigrants portray a distinct immigrant community in today’s Israel. The migration experience to Israel influenced the Turkish Jews’ perception of citizenship. This article is... more
ABSTRACT Having moved from Turkey to Israel, Turkish Jewish immigrants portray a distinct immigrant community in today’s Israel. The migration experience to Israel influenced the Turkish Jews’ perception of citizenship. This article is about Turkish Jewish immigrants living in Israel and tackles with the interface between international migration and citizenship. It tries to analyze the experiences and perceptions of Turkish Jews regarding their former citizenship identities in the home country and latter citizenship experience in the host country. This study mainly discusses the field research results conducted with a sample group of Turkish Jews in Israel. In light of the excerpts drawn from the in-depth interviews, the article tries to reflect on the respondents’: a) comparison and contrast between Turkish citizenship and Israeli citizenship; b) assessment of the advantages and disadvantages with the current citizenship status; and c) political participation in the Israeli public sphere. The research indicated that the respondents’ views and experiences differentiated according to their year of arrival in Israel. The immigrants who arrived in Israel in the great wave of 1948-51 were not only different in profile than the immigrants who arrived in subsequent years up until 1980, but were also distinguished in their views about citizenship as well as their experiences regarding immigration. the interviews conducted with Jews from Turkey in Israel pointed out that despite long years of residence in Israel, the immigrants have preserved the political sensibility they grew up with and learned when they were in Turkey. However, moving into a country where they became members of the majority group seems to have impacted their perceptions and experiences regarding citizenship and played roles in: a) the appropriation of democratic norms defined by majoritarian terms; b) efforts to maintain their Turkish identity in cosmopolitan Jewish-Israeli society in the identity aspect; and c) the preference for complying with the general norms of Jewish-Israeli society and conversely excluding a proactive understanding of political participation.
Research Interests: Cultural Studies, Ethnic Studies, Immigration, Immigration Studies, Immigration Law, and 15 moreCulture, Immigration And Integration In Europe, International Migration, Immigration and Emmigration, Immigration History, Diaspora Studies, Contemporary International Migration, Israeli Hebrew, Ethnicity, Diaspora and transnationalism, Israel, Israel and Zionism, Immigrants, Citizenship Minority Jewish Turkey, and Hebrew and Jewish studies
ABSTRACT Since the 1990s, there has been a global proliferation of transnational organized crime (TOC). Turkey, as a transit site between the East and the West has been one of the routes through which organized crime groups transport... more
ABSTRACT Since the 1990s, there has been a global proliferation of transnational organized crime (TOC). Turkey, as a transit site between the East and the West has been one of the routes through which organized crime groups transport illicit goods in collaboration with other networks of crime. This article investigates TOC in Turkey and maps out Turkey's role as a transit country in smuggling and trafficking. The paper also deals with Turkey's contribution to international efforts in combating TOC in light of its EU membership process. The European Commission's annual reports on Turkey's progress towards EU membership that highlight the achievements as well as the shortcomings of Turkey in combating TOC are presented. The article argues that Turkey has introduced successful reforms and expanded its institutional capacities due to the progress it has achieved in the specific area of combating TOC, as evidenced by the EU progress reports.