8000 DOC: use notebook-style for plot_svm_anova.py by jayasuryajsk · Pull Request #22555 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

DOC: use notebook-style for plot_svm_anova.py #22555

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 456 commits into from

Conversation

jayasuryajsk
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

glemaitre and others added 30 commits October 25, 2021 11:37
…n#21389)

Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
scikit-learn#21413)

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
…ikit-learn#21405)

Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <thomasjpfan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
…kit-learn#21338)

* FIX set docstrings on sklearn.utils.fixes.threadpool_limits/info

* Skip threadpool_info/threadpool_limits docstring checks for now
Co-authored-by: ciku <maggie@hellotractor.com>
…-learn#21411)

* DOC Ensures that SpectralEmbedding passes numpydoc validation

* Trim trailing whitespace

* Add space

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>

* Remove space

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
…n#21424)

* DOC numpydoc removed linkage_tree from FUNCTION_DOCSTRING_IGNORE_LIST

* DOC numpydoc fixed linkage_tree func docstring
…validation_cross_val_predict (scikit-learn#21433)

Co-authored-by: iofall <50991099+iofall@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: arisayosh <15692997+arisayosh@users.noreply.github.com>
…dation (scikit-learn#21423)

Co-authored-by: Juan Martin Loyola <jmloyola@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
… validation (scikit-learn#21429)

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
…alidation (scikit-learn#21431)

Co-authored-by: miwojc <miwojc@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
…kit-learn#21439)

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
lesteve and others added 22 commits December 25, 2021 12:26
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
…#22050)

Co-authored-by: Christian Lorentzen <lorentzen.ch@gmail.com>
…learn#21915)

Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
scikit-learn#21991)

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
# Create a feature-selection transform, a scaler and an instance of SVM that we
# combine together to have a full-blown estimator
# %%
# Create a feature-selection transform, a scaler and an instance of SVM that we combine together to have a full-blown estimator
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line is too long. Try to follow the PEP 8 convention, i.e. try to limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.

# Import some data to play with
# ------------------------------------------------
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# ------------------------------------------------
# ------------------------------------------------

Try to leave a blank line below this delimiter and the ones below

@cmarmo
Copy link
Contributor
cmarmo commented Feb 26, 2022

Hi @jayasuryajsk, thanks for your pull request. Something went wrong with your branching or pull request creation.
Do you mind opening a pull request to the main branch of the scikit-learn repo and not to the 1.0.X as it is done now?
You did it right in your previous pull request #22534.

@glemaitre glemaitre changed the base branch from 1.0.X to main March 9, 2022 10:39
@glemaitre
Copy link
Member

I was wondering if changing the branch tagged would be enough but it seems that it is not.
@jayasuryajsk Feel free to open a new PR to main.

@glemaitre glemaitre closed this Mar 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0