في الطريق إلى الألفة الإسلامية
في الطريق إلى الألفة الإسلامية
ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺑﻦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻗﹸﺪﻳﺶ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﻲ
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﲪﺪ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﱐ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﱄ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻏﺸﻲ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺎ
ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺭﺟﺐ ﺩﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﲪﻮﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﺆﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻓﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩﺓ )ﺇﺷﺎﺩﺓ(
ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﲏ ﺑﻦ ﻗﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺟﱯ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺳﻲ
ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺼﺎﻡ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﲑ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺪﺍﺏ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﳊﻤﺶ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻔﻴﻆ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﻦ ﻧﺎﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﻘﻲ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﺍﱐ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﺟﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﻳﺶ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺠﻼﻥ
ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻨﺒﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳛﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﻼ ﺍﻷﺣﺴﺎﺋﻲ
1
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﺴﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ
اﻹھﺪاء
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻋـﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ
ﺇﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﺿﺎﻟﺘﻬﻢ
ﺇﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻣﺒﺘﻐﺎﻫﻢ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺘﺠﺮﺩﻳﻦ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻔﲔ
2
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺷﻜﺮ واﻋﺘﺬار
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺀ ﺃﺷﻜﺮ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻭﺃﻧﻌﻢ ،ﻭﺳﺪﺩ ﻭﺃﳍﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻋﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﺴﺮ ﻭﺗﻜﺮﻡ ،ﻓﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﺭﰊ ﻭﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺸﻜﺮ ،ﲪﺪﺍ ﻭﺷﻜﺮﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻃﻴﺒﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻛﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﻭﻋﻤﻼ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ )ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻻ ﻳﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﷲ( ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻴﻞ ،ﺃﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﳉﺰﻳﻞ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻜﺮﻣﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺪﱘ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﻗﺎﻢ ،ﻓﺠﺰﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﺎ ﺧﲑ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺒﺸﺮﻭﺍ
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺷﺎﺭﻛﻮﺍ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻭﺃﺧﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳎﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻣﻜﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ
ﺃﺑﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳﺦ.
ﻭﺃﻋﺘﺬﺭ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﰎ ﺇﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﱂ ﺗﺼﻠﲏ ﺗﻘﺪﳝﺎﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺣﲔ ﻃﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﳌﺸﺎﻏﻠﻬﻢ
ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﳍﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺇﳊﺎﺡ ﺍﶈﻠﲔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻌﺠﻴﻞ ﺑﻄﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻃﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﳌﺪﺓ ﺑﲔ
ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﻃﺒﻌﻪ ﻓﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﻒ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺃﻋﺘﺬﺭ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻟﻌﻠﻬﻢ ﺃﺭﺳﻠﻮﺍ ﺗﻘﺪﳝﺎﻢ
ﺑﺎﻟﱪﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﱐ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﱪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﺃﻭ ﻋﱪ ﺃﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﻭﱂ ﺗﺼﻠﲏ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﳝﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﱐ ﳌﺎ ﺍﺗﺼﻠﺖ
ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺃﺧﱪﱐ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺭﺳﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﱘ ﻋﱪ ﺍﻹﳝﻴﻞ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﺼﻠﲏ ،ﻭﺃﺧﱪﱐ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ
ﺃﺭﺳﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﱘ ﻋﱪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺼﻠﲏ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺗﻘﺪﳝﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻟﺘﺮﻓﻖ
ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ
ﰒ ﺃﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﳉﺰﻳﻞ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ﰲ ﲝﺜﻪ ﲟﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﳌﺼﺪﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺄﻳﻴﺪ ﺃﻭ
ﺷﺪ ﺃﺯﺭ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﺧﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺃﻣﲔ ﺑﻦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺍﳊﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻜﺮﻡ ﲟﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﺇﺑﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﻭﺇﺳﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺣﱴ ﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺩﺃﺑﻪ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﲝﺎﺙ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ،ﻓﺠﺰﺍﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﺎ
ﺧﲑ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻭﺃﺟﺰﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻷﺟﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﺜﻮﺑﺔ .
3
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻤﺎت اﻟﻤﺸﺎﯾﺦ ﺑﺤﺴﺐ ﺣﺮوف اﻟﮭﺠﺎء
4
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎ ﻳﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺐ ﻭﻛﻠﻨﺎ ﻧﺪﻋﻮ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺷﺮﻓـــﺎ
ﺃﻭ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻟﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﳏﺠــﻮﺏ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﰉ ﻓﺈﳕــﺎ ﻟﻌــﻠﺔ
ﺑﺸﺮﻃﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ ﻭﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭ ﺎ
***
ﻃﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺪﻯ ﻭﺍﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻹﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ
ﺣﺮﺑﺎ ﺿﺮﻭﺳﺎ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺏ ﻣﺎﱄ ﺃﺭﻯ ﻋﻠﻮﻣﻨﺎ ﲢــﻮﻟﺖ
ﺃﻭﺩﺕ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻷﺳﻮﺃ ﺍﻟﻨــﺪﻭﺏ ﺣﱴ ﻓﺘﺤﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻌﺪﻭ ﺛﻐـــﺮﺓ
ﺳﻌﻴﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺬﻭﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺟﻨﻮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴــﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﺐ ﺣﱴ ﻏﺪﺕ ﺃﺟﻴﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﻧﺔ
ﻣـﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻟﻌﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺒﻴﺐ ﻭﻟﻮﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﳛﻠﻮ ﳍـــﺎ
ﻧﻌﺎﰿ ﺍﳉــﺮﺍﺡ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﺐ ﻫﻼ ﻓﻘﻬﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﻭﺭﻩ
ﻧﺴﻌﻰ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻟﻠﻬﺪﻯ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻳﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﻨﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﺘﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧــﺎ
ﳛﻴﻄﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺭﻳﺐ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺪﺭﺝﹴ ﻣﻨﺴـﻖﹴ
ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊــﻖ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﳋﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﺧﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻋﺎ
ﻭﺗﺎﺑـﻊ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻬــﺞ ﺍﳌﺼﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻵﻝ ﻭﺍﻷﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﻔﺎ
5
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ /أﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻤﺪ اﻟﺨﻠﯿﻠﻲ
ﻣﻔﱵ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺔ ﻋﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﻷﺥ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻴﺐ ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺑﻦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻗﺪﻳﺶ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﻲ -ﺍﶈﺘﺮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻭﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺑﺮﻛﺎﺗﻪ ...ﻭﺑﻌﺪ:
ﻟﻘﺪ ﺳﺮﱐ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲝﺜﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻦ ﺭﻏﺒﺔ ﺃﻛﻴﺪﺓ ﰲ ﲨﻊ ﴰﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﺭﺃﺏ ﺻﺪﻋﻬﺎ
ﻭﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻛﻠﻤﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ –ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ -ﻫﻮ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﺼﲔ ﻭﺳﻌﻲ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﲔ ﻭﻗﺮﺓ ﻋﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﺣﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻓﻬﻨﻴﺌﺎ
ﻟﻜﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﻌﻰ ،ﻭﺭﺯﻗﻜﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻓﻬﻤﺖ ﺍﶈﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻗﻤﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﲝﺜﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ )ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ – ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺗﺄﺻﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ( ،ﻭﺇﻧﲏ ﺃﺗﻔﻖ ﻣﻌﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻖ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﶈﺎﻭﺭ
ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻓﺒﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻳﺼﺒﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ،ﻭﺑﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺣﺴﻨﺔ ﺑﲔ
ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ..
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ،ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﱂ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻍ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﻟﻴﺪﺓ ﻇﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﻴﺌﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ
ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﲢﻮﻻﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﻧﻮﺍﻳﺎ ﻗﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻷﺣﺪ ،ﻓﺠﺮﻯ ﻗﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﲟﺎ
ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺘﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺸﻴﺌﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ،ﻭﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻛﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﱳ
ﻭﺍﶈﻦ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺒﺘﻠﻲ ﺍﷲ ﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﺿﺔ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺃﺎ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻗﻌﺔ ﺳﻨﻨﻴﺎ ،ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﷲ
ﺇﺫ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻭﻟﻮ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺭﺑﻚ ﳉﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻭﻟﻮﻥ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ٠ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺣﻢ ﺭﺑﻚ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ
ﺧﻠﻘﻬﻢ ﻭﲤﺖ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺭﺑﻚ ﻷﻣﻸﻥ ﺟﻬﻨﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﲨﻌﲔ( ﻫﻮﺩ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺇﻧﲏ ﺃﺩﻋﻮ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻤﻖ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﲤﺜﻞ ﻛﻴﻨﻮﻧﺔ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﺎﻕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱂ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﻈﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﺬﺍﺎ ﲤﺜﻞ ﻫﻮﻳﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﳌﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻨﻘﻬﺎ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺘﻈﻬﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻬﻢ
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻵﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﺮﺯﻩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺭﺑﺎﱐ ﻳﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻷﺿﺪﺍﺩ ،ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﺜﻞ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﳌﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻭﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ،ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳉﺎﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻤﺔ ﻭﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻗﺮﺁﻧﻴﺔ ﳌﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ،ﺗﻌﻴﺪ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
6
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺳﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﲤﺜﻞ ﻭﺳﻄﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ،
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻤﻮﻳﺔ...ﺇﱁ.
ﺃﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻴﻊ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﳚﻤﻊ ﴰﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻳﻮﺣﺪ ﺻﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻌﻠﻲ ﺭﺍﻳﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻣﺔ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ
ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺧﻼﺹ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ،ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﲟﺎ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻋﻼﺀ ﻛﻠﻤﺘﻪ ﻭﻧﺸﺮ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﲪﺎﻳﺔ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻪ ،ﺇﻧﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﺑﺎﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ،ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﳌﻮﱃ ﻭﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﲑ
ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﲪﺪ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻠﻲ
ﺍﳌﻔﱵ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻟﺴﻠﻄﻨﺔ ﻋﻤﺎﻥ
ﺧﺘﻢ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺆﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ
7
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر /أﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ اﻟﺪﻏﺸﻲ
ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ – ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ
8
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﺍﻙ ﻗﺪ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺇﻻ ﻷﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ –ﻭﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﷲ– ﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ –ﻭﻻ ﻧﺰﻛﻴﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ– ﻣﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﲝﺜﻪ ﳛﻮﺯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻗﻲ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺼﻪ :ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﰲ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﲝﺜﻪ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻬﺎ ،ﻣﻊ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻚ ﻭﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ
ﻭﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﺇﳝﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﺷﻌﻮﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻖ ﺑﻔﺪﺍﺣﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺐ ﻭﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ
ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺩﻯ ﳌﻌﺎﳉﺘﻪ ،ﺑﺼﺪﻕ ﻭﺇﺧﻼﺹ ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﺗﻮﺍﺿﻊ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﺑﺮﻭﺯﺍ ﰲ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻒ –
ﻭﻫﻲ ﳏﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻱ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ– ﻓﻬﻲ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﺩﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﺒﺎﻻﺗﻪ ﺑﺮﺿﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺃﻭ ﺫﺍﻙ ﺃﻭ ﻏﻀﺒﻪ ،ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻌﻰ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻦ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ!.
ﺇﻳﻪ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﳉﺴﻮﺭ ﻭﻣﺰﻳﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱪﻳﺰ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﰲ ﺃﻃﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ
ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺪﻓﻌﻨﻚ ﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﻮﺹ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﱪﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﻄﻂ ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ،
ﻭﺣﺴﺒﻚ ﺃﻧﻚ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻚ )ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺪﻳﺪﻱ( ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﳎﺴﺪﻱ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﺍﷲ –ﺟﻞ ﰲ ﻋﻼﻩ– ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ ﲜﻬﺪﻙ ﺑﻞ ﺑﻨﻈﺮﻳﺘﻚ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺣﻘﺎ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ
ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻌﺰﻳﺰ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻨﻌﻤﺘﻪ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﺎﺕ
9
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر /ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﻲ اﻷھﺪل
ﻋﻤﻴﺪ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ
ﻭﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ
10
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر /ﻣﺤﻤﺪ اﻟﺤﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ اﻟﺒﻐﺎ
ﻋﻤﻴﺪ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ – ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺩﻣﺸﻖ
11
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﺘﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺁﺭﺍﺀﻧﺎ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺻﺎﺋﺒﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺮﲟﺎ ﻧﻘﻀﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺀ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﺎﺡ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺣﲔ..
ﺇﻥ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻗﻮﱘ "ﺧﲑﻛﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺄﻟﻒ ﻭﻳﺆﻟﻒ" ﻻ ﻳﻘﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﺍ ﺑﺎﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﰲ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺧﻼﻕ ﻓﺎﺿﻠﺔ.
ﺃﻳﻦ ﺣﻠﻢ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻟﻴﻪ؟ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﻮﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﺃﺩﻋﻴﺎﺋﻪ؟
ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺛﻮﺏ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﰊ ﰲ ﻋﻨﻘﻪ ،ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﺒﺘﺴﻢ ﻟﻪ ،ﻳﻜﺬﺏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﰊ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻤﻞ ..ﻳﺒﻄﺶ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺑﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻳﺮﻏﺪ ﻭﻳﺰﺑﺪ ﻭﻳﺸﺘﻢ ،ﻭﻳﻀﻊ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺣﺮﺍﻛﺎﹰ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ..ﺗﺄﰐ ﻓﺎﻃﻤﺔ ﻟﺘﺰﻳﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻗﺬﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻛﲔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﻴﻬﺔ..ﺇﻢ ﻣﺸﺮﻛﻮﻥ ..ﻭﺛﻨﻴﻮﻥ ..ﺃﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﺑﺪﺍﻩ ..ﻓﻴﺎ ﻟﻌﺎﺭ
ﻣﺘﺤﻀﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺃﺳﻦ ﻗﻠﻮﻢ ..ﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺟﻬﻠﻬﻢ..ﺃﻻ ﺗﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻗﻠﻮﻢ ﻵﻻﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺏ ﻭﺩﻣﺎﺋﻬﺎ
ﻭﺃﺣﺰﺍﺎ ﻭﺫﻫﺎﺏ ﺭﻳﺢ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ.
ﺇﻧﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻈﺮﺕ ﰲ ﺃﺿﻴﻖ ﻓﺞ ﻭﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻟﺮﺃﻳﺖ ﺗﻨﺎﺣﺮﺍﹰ ﺗﺰﻛﻢ ﺭﺍﺋﺤﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﻑ ،ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻨﻘﻌﺎﹰ ﺁﺳﻨﺎﹰ ﺗﻨﻔﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﺍﳊﺸﺮﺍﺕ ..ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺠﺐ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺰﻋﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺣﺮﺻﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﻭﺭﻋﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺻﻴﺎﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻞ
ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻜﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﻳﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﺥ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻬﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﱪ ﻷﺟﻠﻬﺎ..
ﻟﻦ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺇﻻ ﲟﺎ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻭﳍﺎ ..ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻸﻟﻔﺔ ﺃﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ..ﺇﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ
ﺷﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺳﲑﻩ ﻭﻓﻘﻬﻪ ﻭﻗﺮﺁﻧﻪ ﻭﺳﻨﺘﻪ ﰒ ﺇﺎ ﺃﺧﻼﻕ ﻭﳏﺎﺳﻦ ﻭﺷﻴﻢ ﻭﺷﻬﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﳔﻮﺓ ﻭﺃﻧﻔﺔ ..ﺇﺎ
ﺃﻧﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﻡ ﻭﺷﻬﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺷﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﳔﻮﺓ ﰲ ﲪﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻭﺍﶈﺎﻓﻈﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻄﺮﺓ ﻋﺮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ..ﺇﺎ ﺇﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﻭﺗﻮﻛﻞ ﻭﺻﱪ ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ..
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﺃﻟﻒ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﻔﻘﺖ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻠﻮﻢ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﷲ
ﺃﻟﻒ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ( ﻭﻫﻮ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻓﻴﻪ) :ﻓﺒﻤﺎ ﺭﲪﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﷲ ﻟﻨﺖ ﳍﻢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺎ ﻻﻧﻔﻀﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻮﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﻋﻒ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻐﻔﺮ ﳍﻢ ﻭﺷﺎﻭﺭﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻋﺰﻣﺖ ﻓﺘﻮﻛﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻥ ﺍﷲ ﳛﺐ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻛﻠﲔ(
ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺟﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ..ﺇﱃ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﻟﻶﺧﺮ ،ﻭﳓﻦ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ! ﻭﷲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻭﻳﻮﻣﺌﺬ ﻳﻔﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻳﻨﺼﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ .ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﺃﲨﻌﲔ ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ.
12
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ /ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ اﻟﺼﻔﺎر
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻲ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ
13
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻟﻘﺪ ﺷﻌﺮﺕ ﺑﺴﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺻﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﲪﺪﺕ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ،ﻭﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﻟﻠﻤﺆﻟﻒ ﺑﺎﳌﺰﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﰲ ﺧﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺔ.
ﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ ﺑﻪ ،ﻟﻴﺸﻜﻞ ﺯﲬﺎﹰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍﹰ ﺩﺍﻓﻌﺎﹰ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻹﻟﻔﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ،ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ.
14
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر /رﺟﺐ دﯾﺐ
ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﲏ ﰲ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﻓﺘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻣﺸﻖ
15
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﻨﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﱂ
ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻨﻒ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺃﺳﻒ.
ﻭﺇﻧﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺮﻯ ﺍﳍﻮﺓ ﺗﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ )ﻛﻞ ﺣﺰﺏ ﲟﺎ
ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﻓﺮﺣﻮﻥ( ،ﻭﺇﳍﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻧﺒﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻛﺘﺎﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺒﻠﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭ ...ﻭﺇﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺂﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﻤﻌﻬﻢ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﺘﻮﻓﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻢ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻻ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ
ﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ،ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﳊﻈﻮﻅ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﺎﱀ ﺗﻠﻌﺐ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﺧﺒﻴﺜﺎ ﺟﺪﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﺰﻳﻖ ،ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻨﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﺔ ﻷﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻓﺈﱃ ﻣﱴ
ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ؟ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺳﺒﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﺹ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ؟ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﺣﺪ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺎ ﻭﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﺎ
ﻭ..؟
ﺇﻥ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺂﻟﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﺪ ﻣﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﻨﺔ ﻧﺒﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﻌﺮ ﺃﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺃﻭ
ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺔ ﺃﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺣﺎﺩﻭﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺴﻌﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺭﺃﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻉ ﻭﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻓﺈﻢ
ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﻬﻢ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻏﺪﺍ
ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺍﳋﺰﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﻧﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﰲ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ.
ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺷﺮﺕ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺜﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻠﻮﺏ ﳏﺘﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﻧﻔﻮﺱ ﻣﺘﻠﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺩﻳﻨﻴﺎ ﻭﻓﻘﻬﻴﺎ ﻭﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪﻳﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻗﺔ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﺥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺑﻦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻗﺪﻳﺶ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﻲ – ﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﻋﺎﻩ – ﻷﻧﻪ ﺿﻤﻦ
ﲝﺜﻪ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ،ﺃﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ – ﺗﻌﺎﱃ – ﺳﲑ ﺣﺜﻴﺚ ﻣﺘﻘﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﻰ ﺑﺎﲡﺎﻩ
ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﺎ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ،ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻄﻮﺓ ﺟﺮﻳﺌﺔ ﻭﺣﻜﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﻓﻘﺔ،
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﺍﻻﻃﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﺭﺍﺋﻪ ،ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺬﺭ
ﻟﻠﺨﻄﺄ ﻟﻮ ﻭﺟﺪ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ )ﳒﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻌﺬﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ( ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ،ﻷﻢ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﻴﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺭﺣﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺇﺫ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﱐ ﻟﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﱂ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ،ﻷﻢ ﻟﻮ ﱂ
ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺭﺧﺼﺔ( ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﳛﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ) :ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻔﺘﻮﻥ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﻥ
ﻓﻴﺤﻠﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﳛﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﻴﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ(
ﻭﻭﺭﺩ) :ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻣﱵ ﺭﲪﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ( ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻟﺴﻨﺔ )ﻛﺸﻒ
ﺍﳋﻔﺎﺀ ١:٦٤ ،ﺭﻗﻢ ،(١٥٣ﻭﻛﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺍﺋﻊ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ) :ﻭﻟﻮ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺭﺑﻚ ﳉﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻟﻮﺍ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ .ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺣﻢ ﺭﺑﻚ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﻬﻢ ﻭﲤﺖ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺭﺑﻚ ﻷﻣﻸﻥ ﺟﻬﻨﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ
16
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺃﲨﻌﲔ( ،ﻓﻬﻞ ﺧﻠﻘﻬﻢ ﻟﲑﲪﻬﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ؟ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺭﺣﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﲪﲔ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺷﺮﻳﻄﺔ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﻟﻠﺘﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻘﺎﻕ.
ﻭﺃﺧﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ :ﺟﺰﻯ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻷﺥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺧﲑ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻋﻦ ﲝﺜﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺃﻗﺮ ﻋﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻣﺒﺘﻐﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺣﻀﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ.
ﻭﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺸﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺃﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪ ﻭﺍﳊﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺮﺅﻩ ﺷﺒﺎﺏ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺸﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻹﻧﺘﺮﻧﺖ ،ﻋﺴﺎﻩ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﻋﻘﻮﻻ ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻭﻗﻠﻮﺑﺎ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺔ
ﻭﻧﻔﻮﺳﺎ ﳐﻠﺼﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺴﺎﺕ ﲪﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻌﺰﻳﺰ ،ﻭﺣﺒﺬﺍ
ﻟﻮ ﻳﺼﺤﻮ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺻﺤﻮﺓ ﻗﺮﺁﻧﻴﺔ ﻧﺒﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﻔﻮﺍ ﻭﻗﻔﺔ ﺗﺪﺑﺮ ﻭﺗﺄﻣﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺸﺄﻥ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ،ﻓﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻣﺪﻋﻮﻭﻥ ﳉﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻤﻼ ،ﻭﺇﻻ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﲔ ﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﷲ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺭﺣﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺰ ﺇﺫ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ:
ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ﺑﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻤﻠﻦ ﻣﻌﺬﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻋﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻦ
ﻭﺭﺣﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻌﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺒﺎﱐ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻷﻭﻻﺩﻩ:
ﻛﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺑﲏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﻯ ﺧﻄﺐ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺘﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﺁﺣﺎﺩﺍ
ﺗﺄﰉ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﺡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﻦ ﺗﻜﺴﺮﺍ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﻗﻦ ﺗﻜﺴﺮﺕ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩﺍ
ﻭﻫﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺧﻄﺐ ﺃﺷﺪ ﳑﺎ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ؟ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﻻ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺋﻦ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ
ﻋﻦ ﺩﻳﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﻛﻠﻤﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺴﻤﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ﻭﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻭﺭﺟﻞ ﻭﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﻭﻛﺒﲑ ﻭﺻﻐﲑ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﺓ
ﻳﺄﻣﺮﻧﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ) :ﻭﻗﻞ ﺍﻋﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﻓﺴﲑﻯ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﻢ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﻭﺳﺘﺮﺩﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ
ﻓﻴﻨﺒﺌﻜﻢ ﲟﺎ ﻛﻨﺘﻢ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ(.
ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ
17
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر /ﺳﻠﻤﺎن ﺑﻦ ﻓﮭﺪ اﻟﻌﻮدة
ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ
ﺗﻮﺍﺻﻠﺖ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩﺓ ﺭﻋﺎﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﺭﺳﻠﺖ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﻃﻠﺒﺖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺪﱘ ﻟﻪ
ﻓﺠﺎﺀﺗﲏ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺼﻬﺎ :
18
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
19
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ /ﺷﻤﺲ اﻟﺪﯾﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺷﺮف اﻟﺪﯾﻦ
واﻟﺸﯿﺦ /ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ اﻟﻤﻨﺼﻮر
واﻟﺸﯿﺦ /ﺣﻤﻮد ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎس اﻟﻤﺆﯾﺪ
20
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺃﺳﺎﻟﺖ ﳍﻢ ﺟﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﻧﻌﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺖ ﺍﳌﻠﺔ ﻢ ﰲ ﻋﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﺑﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﺄﺻﺒﺤﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻧﻌﻤﺘﻬﺎ ﻏﺮﻗﲔ ﻭﰲ ﺧﻀﺮﺓ
ﻋﻴﺸﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﻬﲔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺮﺑﻌﺖ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻢ ﰲ ﻇﻞ ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﺁﻭﻢ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻨﻒ ﻋﺰ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻭﺗﻮﻃﻨﺖ
ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺫﺭﻯ ﻣﻠﻚ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ ﻭﻣﻠﻮﻙ ﰲ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﲔ ﳝﻠﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻠﻜﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﳝﻀﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻀﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻻ ﺗﻐﻤﺰ ﻢ ﻗﻨﺎﺓ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺮﻉ ﳍﻢ
ﺻﻔﺎﺓ(
..ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﳐﺎﻃﺒﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺓ) :ﺃﻻ ﻭﺇﻧﻜﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻧﻔﻀﺘﻢ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺛﻠﻤﺘﻢ ﺣﺼﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳌﻀﺮﻭﺏ
ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺑﺄﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﻴﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻣﱳ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﻘﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺒﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻠﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻇﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﺄﻭﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻨﻔﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﻌﻤﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﻮﻗﲔ ﳍﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻷﺎ ﺃﺭﺟﺢ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﲦﻦ ﻭﺃﺟﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺧﻄﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻜﻢ ﺻﺮﰎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳍﺠﺮﺓ ﺃﻋﺮﺍﺑﺎ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻻﺓ ﺃﺣﺰﺍﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ
ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻘﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﲰﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺭﲰﻪ ،ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭ ،ﻛﺄﻧﻜﻢ
ﺗﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻔﺌﻮﺍ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻛﺎ ﳊﺮﳝﻪ ﻭﻧﻘﻀﺎ ﳌﻴﺜﺎﻗﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺣﺮﻣﺎ ﰲ
ﺃﺭﺿﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﻨﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﻜﻢ ﺇﻥ ﳉﺄﰎ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺣﺎﺭﺑﻜﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﰒ ﻻ ﺟﱪﻳﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻴﻜﺎﺋﻴﻞ ﻭﻻ
ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﻳﻨﺼﺮﻭﻧﻜﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻋﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻴﻒ ﺣﱴ ﳛﻜﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻴﻨﻜﻢ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻛﻢ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﺄﺱ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﺭﻋﻪ ﻭﺃﻳﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﻭﻗﺎﺋﻌﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺴﺘﺒﻄﺌﻮﺍ ﻭﻋﻴﺪﻩ ﺟﻬﻼ ﺑﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻭﺎﻭﻧﺎ ﺑﺒﻄﺸﻪ ﻭﻳﺄﺳﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺄﺳﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻠﻌﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻜﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻟﺘﺮﻛﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮ ﻓﻠﻌﻦ ﺍﷲ
ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻬﺎﺀ ﻟﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﻲ ﻭﺍﳊﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻟﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻌﲏ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺷﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺪ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ)ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﻭﺗﺒﻮﻳﺒﺎ ﻭﲝﻮﺛﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ( ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﻌﻰ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻢ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﻟﻴﻜﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻤﻨﻴﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺡ.
ﻭﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻭﲝﻤﺪﻩ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ
ﺧﺎﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ /ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
/٢٤ﳏﺮﻡ١٤٣٠/ﻫـ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻖ ٠٠٩/١/٢١ﻡ
ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻤﻌﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺷﻜﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﻟﺪ
ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﻋﻴﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﺏ ﻭﻧﺒﺬ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﻮﻧﺖ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻫﻮﺓﹰ ﺳﺤﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﻄﻮﰉ ﳍﻤﺎ
21
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻨﻴﺔ ﲡﺎﻭﺯ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ
ﻭﻭﻗﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﲪﻮﺩ ﺑﲔ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﺆﻳﺪ
22
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻭﻓﻮﻩ ﺣﻘﻪ .ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺐ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﺐ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻭﻓﺎﺀ ﺣﻘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻃﻮﻝ ﳑﺎﺭﺳﺔ
ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﱃ ﲡﺎﺭﺏ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺣﻨﻜﺔ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻻ ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﺑﻪ ،ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﺎﺏ ﻧﺎﺷﺊ ﱂ ﺗﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ .ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﷲ
ﻳﺆﰐ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﺆﺕ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻭﰐ ﺧﲑﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ.
ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺇﻥ ﺩﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ ﺑﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺑﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ.
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻃﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻋﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻀﻠﻌﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺍﺛﺔ ﺳﻨﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺣﻜﻤﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻭﻓﻮﺭ ﻋﻘﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺳﻌﺔ ﺗﻔﻜﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻧﻀﻮﺝ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ.
ﻣﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﰲ ﻋﻤﺮﻩ ﻭﺑﺎﺭﻙ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻭﻓﻘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﻠﺔ .ﻭﺟﺰﺍﻩ ﺧﲑ
ﻣﺎ ﳚﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﲔ ﻭﺭﺯﻗﻪ ﺍﳊﺴﲎ ﻭﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ .ﺁﻣﲔ.
23
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر /ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﻐﻨﻲ ﻗﺎﺳﻢ اﻟﺸﺮﺟﺒﻲ
ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ – ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ
24
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ ﻋﺪاب ﺑﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﻮد اﻟﺤﻤﺶ
25
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮ :ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻤﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭ
ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﻊ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺤﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﻴﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻜﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺮﺃﺕ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﺎﺿﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺷﺎﺩﻭﺍ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻭﺃﺷﺎﺩﻭﺍ ﺑﻜﺎﺗﺒﻪ
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﺃﺟﺪﱐ ﰲ ﺃﺩﱏ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ،ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﻭﻣﺰﻳﺪﺍﹰ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻖ ،ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮﻻ ﺃﺩﺑﻪ ﻭﺣﺮﺻﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ؛ ﳌﺎ ﻋﻨﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺑﺈﺭﺳﺎﻝ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺗﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺸﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻴﻘﺮﺅﻭﻩ ،ﻭﻃﻠﺐ ﳑﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺗﻘﺪﳝﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ!
ﺇﻧﻨﺎ ﲨﻴﻌﺎﹰ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﻴﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺸﺄﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐﹴ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ؛ ﻻ ﻧﻌﺪﻭﻩ ﻭﺣﺒﺴﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﰲ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ،ﲞﲑﻩ ﻭﺷﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺧﻄﺌﻪ ﻭﺻﻮﺍﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﺑﺮﺓ.
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ:
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ )ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ( ﻟﻜﺎﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﻲ– ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ -ﻣﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﻟﻮ
ﻗﹸﺪﺭ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﻴﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ؛ ﻷﺳﻬﻢ ﺇﺳﻬﺎﻣﺎﹰ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎﹰ ﰲ ﺭﺩﻡ ﺍﳍﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺗﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ
ﺍﳌﺘﺮﺑﺼﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﺣﺮﺓ.
ﺟﺰﻯ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﺧﲑ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻧﻔﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺼﲑﺓﹰ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ،ﻭﳍﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺃﻣﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎﹰ ﺑﺮﺃﺏ ﺻﺪﻋﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﺣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺤﺔ.
ﻭﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﺔﹰ ﺻﺎﳊﺔ ﰲ ﺭﻛﺎﻡﹴ ﻛﺜﻴﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﻲ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﻲ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻴﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺳﺘﺒﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﻈﻠﹶﻤﺔ ﻳﺪﻭﺳﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻗﺎﺏ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻭﻋﺰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ!
26
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر /ﻋﺼﺎم ﺑﻦ أﺣﻤﺪ اﻟﺒﺸﯿﺮ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﱐ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ
27
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ! ﻟﻌﻞ ﺍﷲ ﻳـُـﺤـﺪﺙ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﹰ ..ﻓﺘﺘﻮﺣـﺪ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﻌﻬﻢ :ﺩﻧﻴﺎ
ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻳﺮﺗﻘﻲ ﻢ :ﻀـﺔﹰ ﻭﻋﻤﺮﺍﻧﺎﹰ ،ﻭﳚﻌﻠﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺼﺎﻑ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺭﺍﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﻮﱃ ـ ﺗﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﱃ
ـ» :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﻣﺘﻜﻢ ﺃﻣـﺔﹰ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓﹰ ..ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺭﺑﻜﻢ ﻓﺎﻋﺒﺪﻭﻥ« )ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ،ﺍﻵﻳﺔ » ،(٩٢ﻭﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺃﻣﺘﻜﻢ ﺃﻣـﺔﹰ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓﹰ ..ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺭﺑﻜﻢ ﻓﺎﺗﻘﻮﻥ« )ﺳﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ،ﺍﻵﻳﺔ !(٥٢
*** ***
ﺇﻧﲏ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪ ﺍﻷﺥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﻭﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﱄ ﻭﻟﻪ ﻭﻟﻠﻘﺎﺭﺋﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ
ﻋﻠﻤـﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﻓﻘﻨﺎ ﻭﻳﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳍﺪﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺷﺎﺩ..
ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺃﻭﻻﹰ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﺍﹰ .
28
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ/ﻋﻤﺎر ﺑﻦ ﻧﺎﺷﺮ اﻟﻌﺮﯾﻘﻲ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﲜﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﲑﻳﺔ
29
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ /ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻔﯿﻆ
ﻋﻤﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ -ﺣﻀﺮﻣﻮﺕ – ﺗﺮﱘ
ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻛﺮﻡ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳊﻜﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﱘ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺻﻮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺭﺑﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ) :ﻭﺇﻧﻚ ﻟﻌﻠﻰ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ( ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻪ
ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﻭﻻﺋﻪ ﻭﻗﺮﺑﻪ ،ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ:
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﺼﻔﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ) :ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ( ﻟﻸﺥ ﺍﳌﻨﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻮﻓﻖ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻹﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺇﻧﻘﺎﺫ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﺰﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺳﻮﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ )ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺑﻦ ﺻﺎﱀ
ﻗﺪﻳﺶ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﻲ( ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺻﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ،
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﲔ ﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ،ﻭﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﺿﺒﻄﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﺒﺔ ﳊﻔﻆ ﺣﺮﻣﺔ
ﺍﻟﻐﲑ ،ﻭﻛﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﻆ ﻭﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﺬﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺟﻬﺪﺍ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻛﺎ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺎ ،ﺃﹸﻣﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺩﻋﻮﺓ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻤﺴﺎﻙ
ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﻭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻴﻘﺔ ،ﻓﺂﺟﺮﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺟﺰﺍﻩ ﺧﲑ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻳﺴﺮ ﻧﺸﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻴﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﻭﲨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ.
30
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر /ﻣﺎﺟﺪ ﺑﻦ أﺣﻤﺪ اﻟﺪروﯾﺶ
ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﻥ )ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ( ﻭﻋﻀﻮ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﺔ ﺃﺩﺑﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ
31
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺟﺰﺀ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﻂ ،ﻓﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻳﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻗﻴﻤﺖ ،ﻭﰲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻳﻼﺕ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ،ﻭﺍﳋﻮﻑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺠﺢ ﺍﳌﺆﺍﻣﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺎﻙ ﺿﺪ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻨﻔﺮﻁ ﻋﻘﺪ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻛﻠﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺑﻘﻌﺔ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺭﺽ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺃﻳﺪﻱ
ﺍﻷﻗﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﳍﺎ ﻛﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ.
ﻭﻛﻨﺖ ﻗﺪﳝﺎﹰ ﻛﺘﺒﺖ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎﹰ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﻀﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻷﺥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ )ﺍﳋﻼﻑ
ﻭﺃﺛﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ( ﲝﺜﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺆﺛﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺩﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺯﺭﻉ ﺑﺬﻭﺭ
ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺸﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺣﱴ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻴﲔ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻓﻮﻗﻮﺍ ﺇﱄ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﻳﻊ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻀﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻓﺎﻋﺘﱪﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺻﻠﺖ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺥ ﻋﺒﺪ
ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ :ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺳﻬﺎﻣﺎﹰ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻔﹶﻮﻕ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻬﻮﻟﻨﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻚ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﺃﺻﺒﻌﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﱂ ﻓﺠﺰﺍﻙ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻛﻞ ﺧﲑ ﻭﺳﺪﺩ ﺧﻄﺎﻙ ،ﻭﻧﻔﻊ ﺑﻚ.
32
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ /ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ إﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ اﻟﻌﻤﺮاﻧﻲ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﻹﻓﺘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﺭﺱ ﲟﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ )ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ(
33
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ /ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺠﻼن
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻟﻠﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲏ ﻟﻺﺻﻼﺡ )ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ(
34
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﻃﻠﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻷﺥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﶈﻘﻖ /ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺑﻦ
ﺻﺎﱀ ﻗﺪﻳﺶ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﻲ -ﻭﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﻠﻪ ﺁﻣﲔ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻛﺔ
)ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ( ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﲝﻖ ﻣﺴﺎﳘﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﰲ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ،ﻭﺧﻄﻮﺓ
ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﰲ ﲢﻤﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺐﺀ ،ﻭﺗﻨﺒﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﺼﻴﻔﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﲪﻠﺔ
ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ،ﻭﻋﺮﺿﺎ ﳏﻘﻘﺎ ﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ
ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﰲ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ،ﻭﺃﺩﺑﺎ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻴﺎ ﺭﻓﻴﻌﺎ ﳓﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ
ﺑﺄﻣﺲ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺮﲰﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻨﻪ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﳌﺴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﱵ ﻭﺍﻃﻼﻋﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻪ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺪ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻭﲢﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺀ ﺛﻘﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻭﻣﺎ
ﺭﺟﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻭﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻭﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﺳﻌﺔ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻪ ﻭﺣﺮﺻﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﲔ ﻟﻺﺳﻼﻡ،
ﻭﻻ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺼﻮﺭ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻘﺺ ،ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻻﻃﻼﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻃﻠﺒﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺿﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﺃﱏ ﻭﺟﺪﻫﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺎ.
ﺃﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺰﻝ ﳌﺆﻟﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺟﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻗﺼﺪﻩ ﻭﲨﻴﻞ ﺻﻨﻌﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ
ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺎ ﻟﻮﺟﻬﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﺷﺮ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻫﻮﺍﺋﻨﺎ ،ﻭﳚﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻫﺪﺍﺓ ﻣﻬﺘﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﳚﻤﻊ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺿﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻳﺆﻟﻒ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﺇﻧﻪ ﻭﱄ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ
ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﻌﻬﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ .
35
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ /ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ اﻟﻤﻨﺼﻮر
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﺎﺀ
36
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﻹﻋﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻭﻛﺎﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻹﻓﻄﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻔﻄﺮ،
ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻮﺗﻪ ﰲ ﻣﲑﺍﺙ ﺍﳉﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻔﲔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﻝ ﻭﻣﺘﻌﺔ ﺍﳊﺞ ﻭﺳﻜﲎ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻘﺔ
ﺑﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻷﺫﺍﻥ ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻬﺪ ﻭﺍﻻﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺇﺧﻮﺓ
ﻣﺆﺗﻠﻔﻮﻥ ﻳﺘﺒﺎﺩﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻭﻳﺘﻌﺎﻭﻧﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺟﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ.
ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻟﻒ ﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻳﺴﻌﻰ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺒﺬ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻭﺳﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﺪﻋﻮ ﻣﻌﻪ
ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﳛﻤﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ ﻣﱴ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻟﻠﺴﻼﻣﺔ ﳏﻤﻞ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻒ ﳕﺎﺫﺝ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﻋﱪﺓ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻌﺘﱪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺬﻛﺮﻯ ﳌﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻟﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ.
ﺣﻘﻖ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻵﻣﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺃﺻﻠﺢ ﺑﻔﻀﻠﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﻛﺮﻣﻪ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ،ﺇﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ
ﻗﺪﻳﺮ ،ﻭﻻ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻭﻣﻮﻻﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﻷﻣﲔ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻫﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﳍﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﲔ.
37
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮر /ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ اﻟﺸﺮﯾﻒ
ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﲜﺪﺓ
38
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ /ﯾﺤﻲ ﺑﻦ أﺑﻲ ﺑﻜﺮ اﻟﻤﻼ اﻷﺣﺴﺎﺋﻲ
39
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﲣﻠﻴﺼﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺰﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺣﻞ ﺎ ،ﺍﻣﺘﺜﺎﻻ ﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻻ ﺗﻨﺎﺯﻋﻮﺍ
ﻓﺘﻔﺸﻠﻮﺍ ﻭﺗﺬﻫﺐ ﺭﳛﻜﻢ(.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻷﺥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺑﻦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻗﺪﻳﺶ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲰﺎﻩ
)ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ( ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﳘﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﱂ ﴰﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﻧﺒﺬ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺩﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩﺓ ﺇﱃ ﱂ ﴰﻠﻬﻢ
ﺗﻜﻤﻦ ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﻭﻓﺘﺢ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺍﺑﺖ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻹﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ.
ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺝ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻟﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺗﺪﻋﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺎﻣﻦ
ﻭﺍﻻﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺪﺍ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻳﻌﺬﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﳚﺘﻤﻌﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺰﻝ ﺍﳌﺜﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺟﺮ ﳌﺆﻟﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺻﻨﻴﻌﻪ ﻭﻧﺒﻞ ﻣﻘﺼﺪﻩ ﻭﺃﻥ
ﳚﻌﻞ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺔ ﻟﻮﺟﻬﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﳚﻨﺒﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﱳ ﻣﺎ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻄﻦ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻫﺪﺍﺓ
ﻣﻬﺘﺪﻳﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺿﺎﻟﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻀﻠﲔ .ﻭﻓﻘﻚ ﺍﷲ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﺴﺮ.
ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ .
40
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ/ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﯾﻮﻧﺲ ﺑﻦ اﻟﺸﯿﺦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﻤﺮ اﻟﺒﺎﻟﻨﺒﻮري
41
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻤﻘﺪﻣﺔ
ﺑﺴﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ
ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﰎ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺳﻠﲔ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﺃﲨﻌﲔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﻌﻬﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ:
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﹶﺮﺕ ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺘﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺩﻫﺎ ) (٧٩٠ﺃﻥ ﺭﻳﺘﺸﺎﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺘﺸﻞ ﺫﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﻪ ﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﳋﺪﻣﺔ
ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻜﻴﺔ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﺎﺕ ﻟﻐﺰﻭ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﻜﺮﻳﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻـﻴﺎﺕ:
ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻀﺨﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺫﻫﺎﻢ( ﺍﻫـ
ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ -ﻭﻻ ﺯﺍﻟﺖ -ﻫﻲ) :ﻓﺮﻕ ﺗﺴﺪ( ،ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﻓﻠﺢ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
ﰲ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﰲ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﳐﻄﻄﺎﻢ (١) ،ﻓﻼ ﳜﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔـﺮﻕ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﺫﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﺰﻕ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺣﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻌﺪﺓ:
-ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻲ :ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﲬﺴﲔ ﺩﻭﻟﺔ ،ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺧﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﻧﺰﺍﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺑﻞ
ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﺏ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺗﻔﻪ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﺗﺘﺤﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺓ ﺿﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺓ ..ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ.
-ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻱ :ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻓﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻨـﺎﻙ ﲨﺎﻋـﺎﺕ
ﺩﻋﻮﻳﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻋﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻳﺼﻞ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﻀﻬﻢ
ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﺘﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻻ ﳜﻔﻰ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﻋﻨﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﻴﺪ.
-ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ :ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ :ﻗﺒﺎﺋﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺣﺮﺓ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﺑﺮﺓ ﻭﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ
ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺗﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﺳﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﳒﺪ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳋﺼﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﻡ ﻭﺳﺎﻕ،
ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﺃﻱ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺷﺮﻃﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻱ ﻣﺒﲎ ﳏﻜﻤﺔ.
ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﺪﻣﻰ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﻳﻨﻔﻄﺮ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺆﺍﺩ ،ﻭﺗﺒﻜﻲ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺪﻯ ﳍﺎ ﺍﳉﺒﲔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳊﺘﻤﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ
ﺑﻼ ﺷﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺸﻞ ﻭﺫﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺢ )ﻭﻻ ﺗﻨﺎﺯﻋﻮﺍ ﻓﺘﻔﺸﻠﻮﺍ ﻭﺗﺬﻫﺐ ﺭﳛﻜﻢ( ﻓﺄﺩﻯ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﺎﻟـﺐ
ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺻﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﻧﺴﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺣﺬﺭﻧﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ) (٢ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻻﺧـﺘﻼﻑ ،ﰲ ﺁﻳـﺎﺕ
ﻭﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﻻ ﺩﺍﻋﻲ ﻟﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻷﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺼﺮ ﻭﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ.
) ( ١ﻟﺴﺖ ﺃﺅﻣﻦ ﺑﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﺍﻣﺮﺓ ﻭﻟﻜﲏ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺃﺷﻚ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻷﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
ﻭﲤﺰﻳﻘﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ
42
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺎﻝ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻜـﺮﻱ ﻓﺈﻧـﻪ ﺃﻛﺜـﺮ
ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎ ) ،(٣ﻓﺎﳋﻼﻑ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﻡ ﲟﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻭﺑﻐﲑ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺗﺒﺬﻝ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ
ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻀﺨﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻮ ﺑﺬﻟﺖ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺃﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﻜﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻳﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻫـﻮ ﺍﳊـﻖ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻖ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺠﻬﻞ ﺩﻭﺭ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺳﻴﻊ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ) (٤ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ
ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺹ) :٩٢ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻻ ﻳﺼﱪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻠﻪ ﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻳﻨﻜﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ﻟﻘﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ(ﺍﻫـ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺳـﻘﺮﺍﻁ:
)ﻟﻮ ﺳﻜﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﺴﻘﻂ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ( ﺍﻩ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﲰﻲ ﺹ٣٨٩
)ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﻋﺠﲏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺼﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻭ ﲨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ،ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻪ ﰲ ﺧﺪﻣﺔ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﲔ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ،ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﲢﺪﻳـﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺳـﺎﺋﻞ
ﻭﻣﺮﺍﺣﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ.
ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺰﻋﺠﲏ ﻭﻳﺆﺭﻗﲏ ﻭﻳﺬﻳﺐ ﻗﻠﱯ ﺣﺴﺮﺍﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻯ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﻭﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﺮﺏ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻴﺪ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﺳﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ( )(٥
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﻟﺘﺄﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺗﺄﺻﻴﻼ ﻋﻠﻤﻴـﺎ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﺣﺎﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺘﺴﲎ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﻜﻞ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻭﳓﻦ ﰲ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺿﻌﻔﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳍﻤـﻢ،
ﻭﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﳐﻼ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﺯﻋﻢ ﺃﱐ ﺳﺄﻋﻄﻲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺣﻘﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻣﻌﺸﺎﺭ ﺫﻟـﻚ،
) (٢ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻣﺖ ﰲ ﲝﺜﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﻝ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻷﻣﺮﻩ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺍﻹﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭﳑﺎ ﳚﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﱐ ﺃﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﻝ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﻜﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻮﻝ
ﺣﱴ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﻝ.
) ( ٣ﺣﱴ ﺇﻧﻚ ﻟﺘﺠﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺤﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻗﻴﺲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺼﲔ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺷﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﺍﺑﻨﺔﹲ ﺣﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﻣﻌﺘﺰﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﺧﺖ ﻣﺮﺟﺌﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺳﲏ ﲨﺎﻋﻲ،
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﳍﻢ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻳﻮﻡ :ﺃﺭﺍﱐ ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻛﻢ ﻃﺮﺍﺋﻖ ﻗﺪﺩﺍ( ﺍﻩ ﲦﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﺹ ،٣١٣ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻳﻌﻴﺪ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ.
) (٤ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ :ﻛﻨﺖ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻟﻘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﺄﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﺜﻼ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﺠﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﱄ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﺃ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﻓﻼﻧﺎ ﺑﻠﻘﺐ ﻛﺬﺍ ﻭﱂ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻓﻼﻧﺎ ﺑﻠﻘﺐ ﻛﺬﺍ؟ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻣﺖ ﰲ ﲝﺜﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺇﺳﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻷﻟﻘﺎﺏ ﺇﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞﹺ ﻏﲑﻱ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﺃﺛﲑ ﲢﺴﺲ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻟﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺐ،
ﻭﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻷﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻷﻟﻘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ.
) (٥ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ )ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺬﻣﻮﻡ( ﻟﻠﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ ﺹ ٥ﺑﺘﺼﺮﻑ.
43
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺜﺔ ﻣﺼﺪﻭﺭ ﻭﺁﻫﺔ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻊ ﻭﻟﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﺘﺄﱂ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻭﺣﺴﱯ ﺃﱐ ﺧﻄﻮﺕ ﺧﻄـﻮﺓ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ) ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﻳﺔ (
)ﻭﺳﺄﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﺭﺍ ،ﻟﻴﺲ ﲢﺮﺭ )ﻣﻮﺿﺔ( ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﲢﺮﺭ ﺳـﺎﻛﻦ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴـﻲ ﻭﺭﻭﺣـﻲ..
ﻣﻨﻄﻠﻘﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻠﻄﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﻊ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺘﺞ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺋﺴﺔ ﻭﺍﲡﺎﻫﺎﺕ
ﺭﺛﺔ ..ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻱ) :ﺍﻣﻨﺤﲏ ﺣﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﻣﻨﺤﻚ ﻓﻜﺮﺍ ﺭﺍﻗﻴﺎ( ..ﺇﺫﻥ ﻟﻨﺘﺤﺮﺭ ﻭﳓﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ( )(٦
ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻟﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ -ﻭﻫﻢ ﻣﻘﺼﺪﻱ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻛﺜﹸﺮ -ﺳﲑﺣﺒﻮﻥ ﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﻳﻀﻌﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺳﲑﻓﻀﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﻭﺳﻴﺸﻨﻌﻮﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﳍﻢ ﺣﺴﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ..ﻛﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﻳﺪ ﻟﻠﺨﲑ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻛﻪ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﲰﻲ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺹ) :٤ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﰲ ﺳﻨﻦ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻗﻮ
ﻱ
ﺷﺄﺎ ﻭﻛﺜﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺧﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻄﺮﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﱄ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺴﺎﻣﺢ ،ﻭﻗﺪ
ﻭﺟﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺻﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﱄ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﺻﺪﻯ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻭﻣﻦ
ﳛﺮﺹ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻭﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻮ ﻓﻤﺸﺮﺏ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺭﻏﻴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭﺟﺖ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ( ﺍﻫـ
ﻭﻛﺄﱐ ﺑﺎﳌﺘﻌﺼﺒﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ -ﳑﻦ ﺳﻴﻄﻠﻌﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ – ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺴﲏ ﻣﻨـﻬﻢ ﺇﱐ
ﺭﺍﻓﻀﻲ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﱐ ﻧﺎﺻﱯ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﱐ ﺣﻠـﻮﱄ ،ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ ﻋـﲏ
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﰲ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﱐ ﻭﻫﺎﰊ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﲏ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﱄ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻱ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﱐ ﺟﱪﻱ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﲏ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﱐ
ﺟﻬﻤﻲ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﲏ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﱐ ﺣﺸﻮﻱ ..ﺇﱁ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺼﺒﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻃﺮﻕ ﺁﺫﺍﻢ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻟﻔﻮﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﲤﺜﻞ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﻄﺔ:
) ﻋﺠﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﱄ ﰲ ﺳﻔﺮﻱ ﻭﺣﻀﺮﻱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺑﲔ ﻣﲏ ﻭﺍﻷﺑﻌﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻓﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻜـﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻓـﺈﱐ
ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﲟﻜﺔ ﻭﺧﺮﺍﺳﺎﻥ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻛﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻘﻴﺖ ﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ ﺃﻭ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺎ ﺩﻋﺎﱐ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺗﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻪ:
-ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺻﺪﻗﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺕ ﻟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻣـﺎﻥ ﲰـﺎﱐ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ
-ﻭﺇﻥ ﻭﻗﻔﺖ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﲰﺎﱐ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺎ
) ( ٦ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ )ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﺐ ﰲ ﺭﺣﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ( ﻹﺩﺭﻳﺲ ﺍﳊﺴﻴﲏ ﺹ ١٤ﺑﺘﺼﺮﻑ
44
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﰲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﲰﺎﱐ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﺮﺃﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﲰﺎﱐ ﻣﺸﺒﻬﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﲰﺎﱐ ﺳﺎﳌﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﲰﺎﱐ ﻣﺮﺟﺌﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﲰﺎﱐ ﻗﺪﺭﻳﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﲰﺎﱐ ﻛﺮﺍﻣﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﻋﻤﺮ ﲰﺎﱐ ﻧﺎﺻﺒﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﲰﺎﱐ ﺭﺍﻓﻀﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺳﻜﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺃﺟﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻤﺎ ﲰﺎﱐ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻳﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺟﺒﺖ ﺑﻐﲑﳘﺎ ﲰﺎﱐ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺟﺒﺖ ﺑﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﲰﺎﱐ ﺃﺷﻌﺮﻳﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺣﺠﺪﻤﺎ ﲰﺎﱐ ﻣﻌﺘﺰﻟﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻦ -ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ -ﲰﺎﱐ ﺷﻔﻌﻮﻳﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻨﻮﺕ ﲰﺎﱐ ﺣﻨﻔﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﲰﺎﱐ ﺣﻨﺒﻠﻴﺎ -
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﺭﺟﺤﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺒـﺎﺭ -ﺇﺫ ﻟـﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ -
ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﳏﺎﺑﺎﺓ -ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻃﻌﻦ ﰲ ﺗﺰﻛﻴﺘﻬﻢ
ﰒ ﺃﻋﺠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻢ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻧﲏ -ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺮﺀﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ -
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ -ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺘﻬﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻣﻲ!
-ﻭﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﺎﺩﺍﱐ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺩﺍﻫﻨﺖ ﲨﺎﻋﺘﻬﻢ ﺃﺳـﺨﻄﺖ ﺍﷲ ﺗﺒـﺎﺭﻙ
ﻭﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﻟﻦ ﻳﻐﻨﻮﺍ ﻋﲏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻭﺇﱐ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺃﺳـﺘﻐﻔﺮ ﺍﷲ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ( ﺍﻩ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺼﺎﻡ ﻟﻠﺸﺎﻃﱯ ﺝ(٧) ٢٩-٢٨/١
ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺃﲤﺜﻞ ﲝﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻃﱯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻓﺘﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺗﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮﻁ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘـﺎﺩ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﳓﻮ ﳑﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺃﻫﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻻ ﺳﻮﺍﻫﺎ ...ﻓﺄﺧﺬﺕ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻓﻘﺎﻣﺖ ﻋﻠـﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣـﺔ
) ( ٧ﳛﻜﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﲑ ) (٣٥١/١٨ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ) :ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎﱐ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﲰﻌﺖ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺑﻦ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﺍﳋﻼﻝ ،ﲰﻌﺖ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻗﺪ ﻋﺠﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﱄ( ...ﺍﻩ
45
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺗﻮﺍﺗﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﻼﻣﺔ ﻭﻓﹶﻮﻕ ﺇﱄﹼ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺎﺏ ﺳﻬﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻼﻟﺔ ﻭﺃﻧﺰﻟﺖ ﻣﱰﻟﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺒﺎﻭﺓ
ﻭﺍﳉﻬﺎﻟﺔ ...ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺃﳌـّﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻬﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺟﻬﱵ ﲟﺎ ﺗﺸﻤﺌﺰ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ،ﺃﻭ ﺧﺮﺟﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ
]ﱄ[ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺳﺘﻜﺘﺐ ﻭﻳﺴﺄﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ:
-ﻓﺘﺎﺭﺓ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺀ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ ﻭﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺰﻯ ﺇﱄ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺴـﺒﺐ
ﺃﱐ ﱂ ﺃﻟﺘﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺀ ﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﰲ ﺃﺩﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ...
-ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﺾ ﻭﺑﻐﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﱐ ﱂ ﺃﻟﺘﺰﻡ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﳋﻠﻔـﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻄﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﺼﻮﺹ...
-ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺿﻴﻒ ﺇﱄ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﲜﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺿﺎﻓﻮﻩ]ﺇﱄ[ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺫﻛﺮﻱ ﳍﻢ ﰲ
ﺍﳋﻄﺒﺔ...
-ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﲪﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺍﳊﺮﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻄﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﲪﻠﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺃﱐ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻣـﺖ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺘﻴﺎ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﻻ ﺃﺗﻌﺪﺍﻩ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻭﻧﻪ ﻭﻳﻔﺘـﻮﻥ ﲟـﺎ
ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﻳﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻫﻮﺍﻩ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﺫﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﻠﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺑﺴﻂ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ
-ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﺍﺓ ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﱐ ﻋﺎﺩﻳﺖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ
ﻟﻠﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺼﺒﲔ ﺑﺰﻋﻤﻬﻢ ﳍﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ .ﻭﺗﻜﻠﻤﺖ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ
ﻧﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﺸﺒﻬﻮﺍ ﻢ
-ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺇﱃ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﺗﺒﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻭﻫـﻲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ :ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ (ﺍﻩ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺼﺎﻡ ﺝ/١ﺹ٢٧
ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ:
* ﺭﻭﺍﻓﺾ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ( . ) ﺇﻥ ﳓﻦ ﻓﻀﻠﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﺎ ﻓﺈﻧﻨــﺎ
* ﺭﻣﻴﺖ ﺑﻨﺼﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻱ ﻟﻠﻔﻀﻞ ( . ) ﻭﻓﻀﻞ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ
ﲝﺒﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﱴ ﺃﻭﺳﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻣــﻞ ( . ) ﻓﻼ ﺯﻟﺖ ﺫﺍ ﺭﻓﺾ ﻭﻧﺼﺐ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ *
ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﻋﻖ ﺍﶈﺮﻗﺔ )ﺝ / ١ﺹ (١٩٣
ﻭﻣﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻭﻣﻘﺼﺪﻱ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺠﺮﺩﻭﻥ ،ﻻ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺼـﺒﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻻ ﺍﳌﺘﺠـﺮﺩﻭﻥ
ﺍﳋﺎﻣﻠﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻻ -ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺃﻭﱃ -ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺼﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﻠﻮﻥ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺘﻴﺒﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻻﺧـﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﺹ ) :١٠ﻭﺳﻴﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻗﻮﱄ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ:
-ﺭﺟﻼ ﻣﻨﻘﺎﺩﺍ ﲰﻊ ﻗﻮﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻋﻮﻱ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﻷﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﻨﻈﺮ
ﻓﲑﺟﻊ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﻨﻈﺮ
46
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﻭﺭﺟﻼ ﺗﻄﻤﺢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺰﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺳﺔ ﻭﻃﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻹﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮﺓ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﺰﺗـﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳـﺜﲏ
ﻋﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ،ﻷﻥ ﰲ ﺭﺟﻮﻋﻪ ﺇﻗﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻠﻂ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﻪ ﺑﺎﳉﻬﻞ ﻭﺗـﺄﰉ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﺍﻷﻧﻔﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺗﺸﺘﺖ ﲨﻊ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻘﺪﻢ ﻟـﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻠـﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ﻻ ﺗﻄﻴﺐ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﻤﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﳒﺎﻩ
-ﻭﺭﺟﻼ ﻣﺴﺘﺮﺷﺪﺍ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻪ ﻻ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻮﻣﺔ ﻻﺋﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺪﺧﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻕﹴ ﻭﺣﺸﺔ ﻭﻻ
ﺗﻠﻔﺘﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻧﻔﺔ ،ﻓﺈﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﺼﺪﻧﺎ ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻩ ﺃﺭﺩﻧﺎ!( ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
47
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ھﯿﻜﻠﺔ اﻟﺒﺤﺚ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﳏﺎﻭﺭ:
ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺒﺤﺜﺎﻥ:
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﻋﺎﻥ:
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺘﺎﻥ:
ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ:
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﲤﺤﻴﺺ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺟﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻂ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﻋﺎﻥ:
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻟﻨﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻻ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺘﺎﻥ:
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ
48
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ )ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ(
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻫﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ؟
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻣﱴ ﻳﻌﺬﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ؟
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ:
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻓﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺪ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺘﺎﻥ:
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﻭﺿﻮﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﲏ ﻭﺿﻮﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺘﺎﻥ:
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ:
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﺋﺮﺓ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺘﺎﻥ:
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺸﺄ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﻭﺇﳚﺎﺑﺎ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﺣﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺒﻊ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺧﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ:
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﰲ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ
49
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﻣﻦ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ؟
ﰒ ﺍﳋﺎﲤﺔ:
50
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ:
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ :ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ :ﻧﺪﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ ﻭﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
51
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﯿﻦ ﯾﺪي اﻟﺒﺤﺚ :وﻻ ﯾﺰاﻟﻮن ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﯿﻦ
ﺇﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ -ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ -ﺃﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻭﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﻌﺪ
ﺳﻔﺴﻄﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻧﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺩﻋﺎﺀ ﺃﺎ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﺮﻋﻴـﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻧـﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻗﻨﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ )ﻓﻘﻬـﻲ ﺃﻭ
ﻋﻘﺪﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺩﻋﻮﻱ( ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﻓﻬﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘـﻮﻝ،
ﻭﻷﻥ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻹﳍﻴﺔ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺖ ﺃﻧﻪ ) :ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻟﻮﻥ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ (...ﺍﻵﻳﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ) :ﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﲑ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻣـﺬﻫﺐ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ،ﻭﺗﺼﻮﺭ !ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﲨﻌﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﲨﻌﻬـﺎ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ( ﺍﻩ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺹ٥٣
ﻭﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﻋﻖ ﺍﳌﺮﺳﻠﺔ ﺝ/٢ﺹ) :٥١٩ﻭﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ
ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻢ ﻭﺃﻓﻬﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﻭﻗﻮﻯ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﺑﻐﻲ ﺑﻌﻀـﻬﻢ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺑﻌـﺾ
ﻭﻋﺪﻭﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺰﺏ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨـﺘﻠﻔﲔ
ﻗﺼﺪﻩ ﻃﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻀﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ(...ﺍﻩ
ﺑﻞ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﳝﺮ ﺑﺜﻼﺙ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ:
ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ :ﺑﺄﻥ ﻧﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ -ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ -ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﻷﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺼﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ :ﺑﺄﻥ ﳓﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﻠـﻰ ﺃﺻـﺤﺎﺎ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﱂ ﳛﻜﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ :ﺑﺄﻥ ﻧﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻷﻧﻨـﺎ ﰲ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻧﺎ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻓﺴﻴﺘﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴـﺒﺔ ﺃﺻـﻼ ،ﻭﺃﻥ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﺳﻲﺀ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﻱ ﻻ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﺴﻴﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻛﻨﺎ ﻧﻈﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺎ
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺴﻴﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺳﺄﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻔﻨـﺎ ﺍﳌﻨـﻬﺞ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﱐ ﻭﺍﳍﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ
52
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺃﻋﻴﺪ ﻭﺃﻛﺮﺭ ﻓﺄﻗﻮﻝ :ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺭﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ،ﻭﻻ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﺀ ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ،
ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺗﺼـﻮﺭ ﺗﻠـﻚ
ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺭﻕ ﻭﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺎ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻨـﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺤـﺚ:
ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﺩ ،ﻭﱂ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻷﻥ
ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ،ﺇﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﻻ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ
ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ:
53
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
54
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ:
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺒﺤﺜﺎﻥ:
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
55
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻤﺤﻮر اﻷول :ﺗﺼﺤﯿﺢ اﻟﺘﺼﻮر ﻋﻦ اﻵﺧﺮ
اﻟﻤﺒﺤﺚ اﻷول :ﺗﺼﺤﯿﺢ اﻟﻨﻘﻞ
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻟﻪ ﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ :ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻨﺒﺪﺃ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﻦ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ )ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ( ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ:
56
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ،١٨٦/١ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺯﺍﻋﻲ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺃ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﰊ ﺣﻨﻔﻴـﺔ
ﻭﺟﺎﻟﺴﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻣﺪﺣﻪ ﻭﺃﺛﲎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻜﺜﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﱐ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﺒﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﻷﺣـﺪ ﻭﻗﺒـﻞ
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ) :ﻳﺎ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﺇﻥ ﺟﺎﺀﻛﻢ ﻓﺎﺳﻖ ﺑﻨﺒﺄ ﻓﺘﺒﻴﻨﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻴﺒﻮﺍ ﻗﻮﻣـﺎ ﲜﻬﺎﻟـﺔ
ﻓﺘﺼﺒﺤﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﺘﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﻣﲔ ( ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺒﺄ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻔﺎﺳﻖ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺼﺪﺭﻩ ﻓﺎﺳﻖ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﻬﻮﻝ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺿﺎﺑﻂ ﻟﻠﺨﱪ ...ﺍﱁ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺍﳋﱪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺫﺏ ﻭﻳﺸﺘﻬﺮ ﻭﻳﺘﺤﺪﺙ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺸﺮﻛﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻛﺎﻫﻦ ﻭﺳﺎﺣﺮ ،ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺍﳋﱪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺫﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﺎﻁ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﺘﺤﺪﺙ ﺑـﻪ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﲔ ﻋﻦ ﻏﻔﻠﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺍﻹﻓﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻧﺰﻟﺖ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﻋﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﺒﺖ ﻭﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺸﺎﻉ )ﻟﻮﻻ ﺇﺫ ﲰﻌﺘﻤﻮﻩ ﻇﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨـﻮﻥ
ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﺎﺕ ﺑﺄﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﺧﲑﺍ( )ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺇﺫ ﲰﻌﺘﻤﻮﻩ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺬﺍ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻚ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﺘـﺎﻥ
ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻳﻌﻈﻜﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻮﺩﻭﺍ ﳌﺜﻠﻪ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺇﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﻢ ﻣﺆﻣﻨﲔ( ..ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﱪ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ.
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺑﻼ ﺷﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﺑﻼ ﺷﻚ ﻳـﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ
ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ )ﻓﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻓﺮﻉ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻩ( ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﺑﻼ ﺷﻚ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻳﻌﻴﺪ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ )ﺍﻷﻭﺯﺍﻋﻲ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ( ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﻋﲔﹴ ﺷﺎﺫﺓ ﻭﻧﺎﺩﺭﺓ ،ﺑﻞ ﲤﺜـﻞ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﺮﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﺮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﲤﺮ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺇﺻﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻣـﻦ ﻗﺒـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺰﻋﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺣﺘﻤـﺎ
ﺗﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻓﺘﺘﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﱰﺍﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳋﺼﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺑـﻞ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﺘـﺎﻝ
ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ.
57
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﻠﺖ ]ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ[ :ﻭﱂ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻛﺮﻫـﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺭﺟﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ!!! (ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺘﺎﺑﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ،
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺼﺪﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻲ ﳒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺣﻜﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﻋﺮﰊ ﺍﳌﺎﻟﻜﻲ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﻜﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﻄﺌﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺘـﻪ
ﺹ ) :٢٠٥ﻭﻗﺪ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ﺍﳌﺎﻟﻜﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲰﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻮﺍﺻﻢ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﺻﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺑﺸﺮﻉ ﺟﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻏﻠﻂ ﲪﻠﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﻠﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﻹﻣـﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻝ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺪﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺘﻪ ﻭﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻗﺘﺎﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ؟!( ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ
ﻓﺎﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻠﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻀﺪﻩ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻠﻌﻦ ﻭﻳﺴﺐ ،ﻛﻞ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ ،ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﻗﺪﺭ ﻛﻔﹼﻴﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺴﺞﹺ ﺍﻷﺑﺎﻃﻴﻞﹺ ﻫﺪﺍﻙ ﺍﷲ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻷﺿﺎﻟﻴﻞﹺ
ﲢﹸﺎﰊ ﺍﳊﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻈﻠﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧـﺎ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﻚ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﻥﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭﹺ ﻣﻮﺗﺎﻧـﺎ )(٨
ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﻬﻴﺜﻤﻲ ﻗﺮﺃ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ﺍﶈﻜﻲ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﻴﻤـﺎ
ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻓﻈﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻘﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺣﺴﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎﻗﻞ ،ﻓﺤﻖ ﻟﻨـﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻧﺘﺄﻣﻞ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﺻﻢ ) :٢٠٩/٥ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻘﻠﺖ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻓﺎﺗﻖ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻂ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ
ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻀﺮ -ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺘﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺑﻌﺪﻙ -ﻗﻮﻟﹶﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻧﻜﺘـﺐ ﻣـﺎ ﻗـﺪﻣﻮﺍ
ﻭﺁﺛﺎﺭﻫﻢ( ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﺘﺐ ﺑﻜﻔﻚ ﻏﲑ ﺷﻲﺀ *** ﻳﺴﺮﻙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﺍﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻟﻘﺪ ﺣﻨﻖ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﻭﲢﺎﻣﻠﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻤﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ
ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺘﻪ ﺹ- ٧٣ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﲔ) :-ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﳋﻔـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻔﻠـﺔ ﻋـﻦ
) (٨ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﻦ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ) ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﲏ ( ﺹ) :٢٠٧ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
)ﺑﻮﻝ ﻓﲑﻱ( ﻣﺘﺸﺎﺋﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ -ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ -ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﻭﺧﻔﺎﻳﺎﻩ ﻭﻣﺪﺭﻛﺔ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺠﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺃﺧﻄﺮ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻧﺘﺠﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ :ﻳﻬﻴﺞ ﺍﻷﺣﻼﻡ ﻭﻳﺜﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺏ ﻭﻳﻮﻟﺪ ﳍﻢ ﺫﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﻣﺔ
ﻭﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺭﺩﻭﺩ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﻢ ﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻳﻐﺬﹼﻱ ﺟﺮﺍﺣﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﺔ ﻭﻳﻌﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺻﻔﻮ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﺩﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳍﺬﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺪ ﺃﻭ
ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﻬﺎﺩ ﻭﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﺗﺸﻌﺮ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺠﺐ ﻭﻳﺼﲑﻫﺎ ﻻ ﲢﺘﻤﻞ ﺯﻫﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺣﻜﻰ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺹ ١٩١ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻴﲏ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ) :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺏ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﺮﺿﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ(ﺍﻩ
58
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻗﺐ ،ﺣﱴ ﺇﻢ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﺕ ﺳﻨﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﻢ ،ﻭﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﺂﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳـﻮﺍﻗﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﻣـﺎ
ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺐ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺋﺒﻬﻢ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻛﻞ
ﻭﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﺧﻔﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﲔ ﻟﻠﻘـﺪﺡ
ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻤﻊ ﺟﻼﻟﺔ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﳒﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺒﻴﺸﻲ -ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﰲ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻹﺻﺮ -٣٤٤/٢ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ) :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ] ﺃﻱ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ [ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺗـﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻏﺮﻧﺎﻃـﺔ ﻭﱂ
ﻳﺼﻔﻪ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﻧﻴﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ،ﻭﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻈﻤﻪ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﻫﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻏﺮﻧﺎﻃﺔ ٤٩٨/٣ﳒﺪﻩ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ) :ﺍﻟﺮﺟـﻞ
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ،ﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﻝ ،ﺭﻓﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ،ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺀ ،ﺃﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﺪ ،ﻭﻗﻮﺭ ﺍﻠﺲ،
ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﻱ ،ﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﳍﻤﺔ ،ﻋﺰﻭﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻢ ،ﺻﻌﺐ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﳉﺄﺵ ،ﻃﺎﻣﺢ ﻟﻘـﻨﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺳـﺔ،
ﺧﺎﻃﺐ ﻟﻠﺤﻆ ،ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻧﻘﻠﻴﺔ ،ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﻳﺎ ،ﺳﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳊﻔﻆ ،ﺻـﺤﻴﺢ
ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ،ﺑﺎﺭﻉ ﺍﳋﻂ ،ﻣﻐﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺠﻠﺔ ،ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﺓ ،ﻣﺒﺬﻭﻝ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ،ﻣﻘﻴﻢ ﻟﺮﺳـﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﲔ ،ﻋﺎﻛﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻋﻲ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻣﻔﺨﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ (.ﺍﻩ ﻗﺎﺭﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺒﻴﺸﻲ
ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ) ﺿﺤﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﳌﺆﺭﺧﲔ ..ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﺎﻑ ﺃﳕﻮﺫﺟﺎ ( ﻟﻮﺿﺎﺡ ﺑـﻦ ﻋﺒـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﻝ ،ﻃﺒﻊ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻱ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ – ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ )(٩
( ٩ﲡﺪﺭ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﱐ ﻻ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﰲ ﲝﺜﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻻ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺸﺘﻬﺮ
59
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻨﻤﻮج اﻟﺨﺎﻣﺲ :زﯾﻨﻲ دﺣﻼن و ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﻮھﺎب
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺯﻳﲏ ﺩﺣﻼﻥ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺹ) :١٣٧ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒـﺪ
ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﳜﻄﺐ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻌﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺧﻄﺒﺔ :ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﱯ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﻔﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺹ) :١٤٢ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ]ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ[ ﻳﻨﻬﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻳﺘﺄﺫﻯ ﻣﻦ ﲰﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻨﻬﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺎ ﻟﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺮ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺋﺮ ...ﻭﺃﺣـﺮﻕ
ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺍﳋﲑﺍﺕ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺹ) :١٦١ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺪﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻗـﺪﺭ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻣﻮﻟﻌﺎ ﲟﻄﺎﻟﻌﺔ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ﻛﺎﺫﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﺴـﻴﻠﻤﺔ ﻭﺳـﺠﺎﺡ
ﻭﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩ ﻭﻃﻠﻴﺤﺔ ﻭﺃﺿﺮﺍﻢ ﻓﻜﺄﻧﻪ ﻳﻀﻤﺮ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺩﻋﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻣﻜﻨﻪ ﺇﻇﻬـﺎﺭ ﻫـﺬﻩ ﺍﻟـﺪﻋﻮﺓ
ﻷﻇﻬﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻷﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ :ﺇﱐ ﺃﺗﻴﺘﻜﻢ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻻ ﻳﺸﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺯﻳﲏ ﺩﺣﻼﻥ ﻏـﲑ ﺻـﺤﻴﺢ
ﻭﻋﺬﺭﻧﺎ ﻟﺪﺣﻼﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺮﺡ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺧﻼﻓﻴﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻞ) :ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ! ) (١٠ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻜﺮﻭﻩ ،ﻓﻼ ﻧﻨﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺹ٦٩-٦٨
ﻟﻜﻦ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺯﻳﲏ ﺩﺣﻼﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﻤﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﺎﺛﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌـﺒﲑﺍﺕ
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺗﺄﰐ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻭﻫـﻲ
ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺤﺎﺕ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺎﺋﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻻ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺎﺋﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺴـﻤﻊ،
ﻓﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻓﻬﻤﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻭﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺣﺮﻕ ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺍﳋﲑﺍﺕ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﻪ
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ) :ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺇﱐ ﻣﺒﻄﻞ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺘﻤﺎﺋﺔ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻟﻴﺴـﻮﺍ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺷﻲﺀ؛ ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﺩﻋﻲ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﻭﺇﱐ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻧﻘﻤﺔ؛ ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﻛﻔﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺎﳊﲔ؛ ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺻﲑﻱ ،ﻟﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﻛﺮﻡ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ؛ ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻟﻮ ﺃﻗﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻫﺪﻡ ﻗﺒﺔ
ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﳍﺪﻣﺘﻬﺎ؛ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻗﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺒﺔ ﻷﺧﺬﺕ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﺎ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻠـﺖ ﳍـﺎ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﺑﺎﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺸﺐ؛ ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﹸﺣﺮﻡ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺓ ﻗﱪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺓ ﻗﱪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ؛ ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﻛﻔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﷲ؛ ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺽ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﰊ؛ ﻭﺇﱐ ﺃﺣـﺮﻕ ﺩﻻﺋـﻞ
) ( ١٠ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﻟﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﲝﺚ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ) ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻴﺰﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﻧﻌﲔ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ (
60
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳋﲑﺍﺕ ،ﻭﺭﻭﺽ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺣﲔ ،ﻭﺃﲰﻴﻪ ﺭﻭﺽ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺎﻃﲔ .ﺟﻮﺍﰊ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﺃﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺳـﺒﺤﺎﻧﻚ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ(...ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﺝ/١ﺹ٣٤
( ١١ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ) ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ( ﻟﻠﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﱄ
61
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﺹ ٩ﻋﻦ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ) ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ( ) :ﻭﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻷﺫﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ :ﻻ ﻣﻌﺒﻮﺩ ﲝﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺰ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺹ) :١١ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺒﺔ ﷲ ﺗﻌـﺎﱃ) :ﻓـﺈﻥ
ﺍﻷﻟﻮﻫﻴﺔ ﺗﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻘﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﻮﺩﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﺼﻒ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﺳﻲ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺹ ) :٣٣ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﺳﺘﺔ:
-ﺷﺮﻙ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭﻫﻮ :ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺇﳍﲔ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﲔ ،ﻛﺸﺮﻙ ﺍﻮﺱ
-ﻭﺷﺮﻙ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾ ﻭﻫﻮ :ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺇﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺁﳍﺔ ،ﻛﺸﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ
-ﻭﺷﺮﻙ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻟﻴﻘﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺯﻟﻔـﻰ ،ﻛﺸـﺮﻙ
ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻣﻲ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﻴﺔ
-ﻭﺷﺮﻙ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﹰ ﻟﻠﻐﲑ ،ﻛﺸﺮﻙ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﻱ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﻴﺔ
-ﻭﺷﺮﻙ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﻫﻮ :ﺇﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻟﻸﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻳﺔ ،ﻛﺸﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﺎﺋﻌﻴﲔ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﻌﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ
-ﻭﺷﺮﻙ ﺍﻷﻏﺮﺍﺽ ﻭﻫﻮ :ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻟﻐﲑ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻷُﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﺈﲨـﺎﻉ،
ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺠﻮﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﱳ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻮﺳﻴﺔ ﺹ) :٤٢ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ :ﺍﳌﻌﺒﻮﺩ ﲝﻖ ...ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﲎ
ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ :ﻻ ﻣﻌﺒﻮﺩ ﲝﻖ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﺩﻟﱯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ) :ﻓﻬﻞ ﳛﺬﺭ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﺃﻭ ﻻ؟! ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳـﺬﻛﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴـﺪ
ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ـ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺇﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻮﻫﻴﺔ ـ ﺃﻭ ﻻ؟!!!.
ﻭﻟﻌﻠﻚ ﺗﺪﺭﻙ ـ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ـ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﺭﻛﺰﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺣﻴـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺩﻻﺋﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﱂ ﺗﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻟﻮﻫﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﺑﺮﺁﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﻤﺔ ﺍﻟـﱵ
ﺣﺎﻭﻟﺖ ﺇﻟﺼﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻻ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﻢ ،ﻻ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻻ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻚ ﲡﺰﻡ ﺬﺍ !!! (.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻹﺩﻟﱯ
62
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﰲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺘﲔ ﻧﻮﺭﺍ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻇﻠﻤﺔ ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻜﻠﻒ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺭ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﳒﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺯﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻷﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻗﻴﺪﺕ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﲜﺴﻢ ﻓﻴﻮﺯﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻁ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﻻ ﳒﻮﺯ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﺗﻪ ﻭﺻﻌﻮﺑﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺟﻮﺯﻧﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ،ﻓﻨﺆﻣﻦ ﲟﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ...ﻭﻻ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ(ﺍﻩ
63
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻧﻤﻮذج آﺧﺮ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﯿﺔ
ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﺭﺗﺪﻭﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻧﻔﺮﺍ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﺪﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﳒﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺳـﻌﻴﺪ ﺃﻳـﻮﺏ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺹ -١٧٥ﺹ ٢١٣ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﻗﺮﺍﺑﺔ ﻣﺎﺋﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﳑﻦ ﻳﺘﺮﺿـﻮﻥ
ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﳑﻦ ﻋﺎﺷﻮﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟـﺐ
ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﻗﻔﻮﺍ ﻣﻌﻪ ﰲ ﻗﺘﺎﻟﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻢ ﺑﺄﲰﺎﺋﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﲦﺎﳕﺎﺋﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﲦﺎﻧﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺑﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻬﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺹ – ٢٦٣ﺹ ٣٠٨ﻓﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﻗﺮﺍﺑﺔ ﺛﻼﲦﺎﺋﺔ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﲔ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺣﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﺠـﻢ،
ﻭﰲ ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺭﺟﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻟﻠﺨﻮﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﲏ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺭﺩﺓ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩ ﻭﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺳﻲ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺫﺭ
ﺍﻟﻐﻔﺎﺭﻱ (ﺍﻩ ﺭﻭﺿﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ،٢٤٦/٨ﻭﻫﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃـﺎ
ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﻭ ﳍﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺸﻲ ﰲ ﺭﺟﺎﻟﻪ
ﺹ ) :٤ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ]ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ[
ﺇﻻ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ :ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺩ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺫﺭ ﻭﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ ،ﰒ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻳﺴﲑ(ﺍﻩ
64
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺃﺧﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ،ﺍﻻﻛﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺗﺒﻴﲔ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻗﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻋﺪﺍﺋﻬﻢ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﺍﺀ ﻋﻢ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺭﺧﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ( )(١٢
ﻭﺃﻧﺖ ﺇﻥ ﻗﺮﺃﺕ ﺗﺮﺍﺙ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ ﲢﺴﺐ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻫـﻞ ﺍﻹﳝـﺎﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﻯ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻻ ﺗﺸﻚ ﺑﺄﻢ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﻧﺖ ﻗﻠﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ ﻭﻗﺮﺃﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﲣﻠﺺ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﻭﺃﻢ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ )(١٣
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻳﻜﺘﺒﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺘﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺆﺭﺥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﳝﺰﺝ ﻓﻜﺮﻩ ﻭﻣﺸﺎﻋﺮﻩ ﺑﺘﺎﺭﳜﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ
ﻣﻘﺼﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺡ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﱰﻟﻖ ﺧﻄﲑ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻬﺎ ﺗﺪﻋﻮﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻻ
ﻧﺴﻠﹼﻢ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﺮﺃﻩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺟﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺤﻴﺺ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﺪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﺴﺪ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﺭﺧﲔ ﺹ) :٥٩ﺇﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺭﻳﺦ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﺎﺱ ﻭﺭﻓﻌﻮﺍ ﻣـﻦ
ﺃﻧﺎﺱ ،ﺇﻣﺎ ﻟﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﺃﻭ ﳉﻬﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺮﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺛﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻐﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳـﺒﺎﺏ،
ﻭﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺆﺭﺧﲔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﻗﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻴﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻴـﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻳﺆﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻭﻓﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻋﻴﺎﻥ :١٢/١ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺑﺊ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﺋﻞ
ﻛﺎﺗﺐ ﺍﻹﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﺑﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻔﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻋﻀﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻳﻬﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻨﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑـﺎﹰ ﰲ ﺃﺧﺒـﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻌﻤﻞ ﻟﻪ )ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺟﻲ( ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﻜﺎﻥ :ﺃﻥ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﺎ ﻟﻠﺼﺎﺑﺊ ﺩﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻩ ﰲ
ﺷﻐﻞ ﺷﺎﻏﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺴﻮﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴﻴﺾ ﻓﺴﺄﻟﻪ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺃﺑﺎﻃﻴـﻞ ﺃﳕﻘﻬـﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺎﺫﻳـﺐ
ﺃﹸﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺤﻴﺺ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﲰﻲ ) :ﺇﻥ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﶈﻘﻘﲔ ﻫﻲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺖ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺗـﺎﺭﳜﻲ
ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻓﻪ ﻭﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺃﺳﻔﺎﺭ ﻟﻠﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻨﻬﻪ ﻭﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻏﺜـﻪ
ﻭﲰﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﺯﻧﻪ ﲟﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﻣـﺎﻡ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺘﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺭ ٣٠/١/١٦
ﻭﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﺎﻭﻱ ﰲ ﺗﺮﲨﺘﻪ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﻟﺸﻴﺨﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :٦٨٦/٢ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻗﻞ ﻟﻠﺠﺮﺡ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ) :ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﲢﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﻴﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻟﻠﻨـﺎﺱ
ﺃﻏﺮﺍﺿﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﺔ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻗﻞ ﻟﻠﺠﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ:
65
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺛﻘﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﺘﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻠﻴﻌﺘﻤﺪﻩ ﻭﺇﻥ ﲰﺎﻩ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺑﺮﺃ ﻟﺴﺎﺣﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺷﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻘﺘﺼـﺮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﻻ ﳚﺰﻡ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺘﺮﺩﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺮﻳﺾ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻗﻞ ﻟﻪ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻨﺴـﺐ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﺎﺯﻓﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺣﻆ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻓﻠﻴﺠﺘﻨﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺿﻄﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﺸﻒ
ﻋﻨﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ )ﺝ /١ﺹ (٤٢٧ﰲ ﺳﻴﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻜﺮﻣﺔ ) :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﺮﺃﻩ ﺃﲪـﺪ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺠﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ] ﺃﻱ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ [ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ ﻟﻪ :ﻋﻜﺮﻣﺔ ﻣﻮﱃ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻜﻲ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻲ ﺛﻘﺔ ﺑﺮﺉ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺮﻣﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺮ :ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺩﻳﺌﺔ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺩﻋـﻰ ﺑـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻘﻄﺖ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻪ ﻭﺑﻄﻠﺖ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﺰﻡ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳏﺪﺛﻲ ﺍﻷﻣﺼﺎﺭ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﻪ
ﻗﻮﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻏﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ )ﺝ /١ﺹ ) :(٣٨٢ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻣﻦ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻌـﻦ ﰲ
ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺇﻻ ﲝﻖ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺃﺩﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻠﺐ ﺹ) :١١٧ﺩﻉ ﻋﻨﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﻘﺪﺍﺕ
ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻋﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﻠﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻓﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺘﻔﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻲﺀ ﳑـﺎ
ﻳﻘﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﺎﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﰲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ )ﺝ / ٣ﺹ ) :(٦ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻔﻘﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﺭﺡ ﻭﺍﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﺮﲟﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﳉـﺎﺭﺡ ﺍـﺮﻭﺡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴـﺪﺓ
ﻓﺠﺮﺣﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻌﻲ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺰﻛﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺁﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺧﻮﻓﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻤﻠﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺮﺡ ﻋﺪﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﺳﻖ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤـﺔ
ﺟﺮﺣﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﺌﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﺼﻴﺐ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺳﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﺡ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ:
ﺃﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻗﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻔﲑﻫﺎ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ :ﺍﶈﺪﺛﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ.
ﻗﻠﺖ ] ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ [ :ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪﻣﻨﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ :ﺗﺮﻛﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﺭﻋﺔ ﻭﺃﺑـﻮ
ﺣﺎﰎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ،ﻓﻴﺎﷲ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺃﳚﻮﺯ ﻷﺣﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺘﺮﻭﻙ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻮﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ،ﰒ ﻳﺎﷲ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺃﺗﺠﻌﻞ ﳑﺎﺩﺣﻪ ﻣﺬﺍﻣﺎ؟! ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺮﻳﺐ ﻋﺎﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﻮﻗﲔ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﻔﻈﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻟﺒﺸﺎﻋﺔ ﻟﻔﻈﻬﺎ
66
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﺴﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺃﰉ ﺣﺎﰎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ :ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺩﻳﻦ ﳓﻦ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺠﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺍﳊﺪ ﷲ ،ﻓﻴﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﻖ ﺑﺎﻹﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﻣﻦ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺭﺑﻪ ﳏﺪﻭﺩﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻣـﻦ ﻳﱰﻫـﻪ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ؟!(ﺍﻩ
67
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻳﻨﺎﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺭﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﻼﻑ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻭﺡ ﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻳﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻭﻳﺄﺑﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ( ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﺑﺘﺼﺮﻑ ﻳﺴﲑ ،ﻭﻻﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ
ﻭﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﳌﻠﻴﻜﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗـﻪ
ﻭﻓﻜﺮﻩ ( ﺹ ) :٢٠٠ﻭﺩﻋﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ –ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ– ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻫﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻀﻤﻨﺘﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻷﺟـﻨﱯ( ) ﺍﳌﻨـﺎﺭ
( ٣٩٠/٢
ﻭﺣﺚ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻓﺈﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻹﺣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺩﻭﺩﺓ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﳍﻢ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﻭﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺗﺜﺒﺖ ) ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ( ٥٠٤
ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﳛﻜﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻋﻦ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﻭﻳﻜﺘﻢ ﺍﳋﲑ ﺑﻞ ﻳﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻬﺖ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧـﺎ ) ﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻢ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ( ٤١٤
ﻭﻛﺮﺭ ﲢﺬﻳﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻭﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﺆﺧـﺬ ﻣﻨـﻪ
ﻭﻳﺘﺮﻙ ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﻤﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺩﺕ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺿﻲ ﰲ ﳏﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﺪﺍﺀ
ﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ) ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ( ٣٨٥
ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﺒﺎﻻﻢ ﺑﺄﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺰﻣـﻮﺍ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻓﻴﺠﻬﻠﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﻓﻴﺠﻬﻠﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ) ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ﺹ ( ٢٢٩
ﻭﺣﺾ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻱ ﰲ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﺣﻜﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛـﺜﲑﺍ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﳌﺼـﻨﻔﲔ
ﻳﺘﺼﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﶈﻜﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﲔ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻟﻠﻤﺤﻲ ﻋﻨـﻬﻢ
ﻓﻘﻂ ) ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺭ ( ١٢٨/١
ﻭﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻤﻘﻮﻥ ﺣﺠﺠﻬﻢ ﻭﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﺣﺠﺞ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﻬﻢ ﻭﳚﺮﻭﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻀﻌﻔﻬﺎ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﻭﻳﺘﺮﻛﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﺼﻮﻡ ) ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺭ ١٢٥/٢ﻭ( ٣٦٨/١
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻃﻠﻌﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﱪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻋﱪﺓ ﲟﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺐ
ﺃﻥ ﲡﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﺬﹼﺏ ﺍﻷﺻﻞﹶ ﻭﻳﺮﺩ ﺧﺒﺮﻩ ﻭﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻂ ﻣﻊ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞﹺ ﳌﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻂ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺼﻞ
ﻟﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱄﹼ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﱂ ﺃﻗﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻂ ﻣﻊ ﻧﻔﻴﻲ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴﺒﺔ ﲡﺴﺪ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ) :٣٩٤/٥ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ
ﺃﲪﺪ :ﳌﺎ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺮﺍﺳﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﺀﱐ ﻓﺴﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻓﺴﻠﻤﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﱄ :ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺷﺪﺓ
ﳏﺒﱵ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻭﻟﻠﺸﻴﺦ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻐﻪ ﻋﲏ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻓﺄﺣﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺬﺭﱐ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﺇﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﱵ ﺃﻭ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻚ .ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﻻ ﺗﺮﻳﺪ؟ ﻓﺄﰉ!
68
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﺪﺧﻠﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺃﰊ ﻓﺄﺧﱪﺗﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺃﻧﻜﺮ .ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺟﺌﲏ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻹﺿﺒﺎﺭﺓ
]ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ[ ﻓﺄﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳛﲕ ﺍﻟﻨﻴﺴﺎﺑﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﻓﻴـﻪ ﺃﻧـﻪ -ﻳﻌـﲏ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ
ﺍﻷﺻﺒﻬﺎﱐ -ﺃﺣﻞ ﰲ ﺑﻠﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﶈﻞ .ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳏﺪﺙ ،ﻓﻘﻠﺖ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻜـﺮ
ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳛﲕ ﺃﺻﺪﻕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻻ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻋﺪﻭ ﺍﷲ!!!(ﺍﻩ
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻳﻜﺬﺏ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻭﻳﺮﺩ ﺧﱪﻩ ﻭﻳﻐﻠﻆ ﰲ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻴﻪ ﻋﺪﻭ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺩﺭﻯ ﲟﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻣﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳛﻲ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺤﺎﻣﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ
ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﰲ ﳏﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ
69
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﱪﺋﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳـﻢ ٣٠٦/٢ﰲ
ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ) :ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻇﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻳﻨﺠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ
ﺍﻟﻜﻞﹼ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﻠﺖ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺡ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ } ،ﻭﻻﹶ ﺗﺰﹺﺭ
ﻭﺍﺯﹺﺭﺓﹲ ﻭﹺﺯﺭ ﺃﹸﺧﺮﻯ { ﻭﷲ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ(.ﺍﻩ
70
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﻭﺑﺸﺮ ﺍﳌﺮﻳﺴﻲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫـﻢ
ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﻟﻪ .ﻭﺫﻫﺐ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﳉﺒﺎﺋﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺸﻤﲑﻱ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ) :٤٥٠/٢ﻭﻧﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺃﻢ ﻳﻨﻜﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﱪ،
ﻭﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ...ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻜﺮﻩ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﻭﺑﺸﺮ ﺍﳌﺮﻳﺴﻲ ،ﻭﺇﱐ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺘﺮﺩﺩ
ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﺗﺮ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﻤﺎ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻱ ﺗﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻟﻜﺸﻤﲑﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ،٤٣٧/١ﻧﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﱪ ،ﻟﻜﻨﻪ
ﻧﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻔﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺘﺒﲔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻒ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﱪ ﺇﻻ ﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻋـﻦ ﻋﺒـﺪ
ﺍﳉﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ
71
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻤﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻄﻼﺎ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺸﻮﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﲑﺍ ﻭﻧﻘﺼﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺧﻼﻓﻪ( ﳎﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ١٥/١
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺳﻲ -ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ -ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ
ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺷﻴﺦ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﰲ ﲝﺚ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺁﻥ ﻣـﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑـﻪ
)ﻛﺸﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﻄﺎﺀ ( ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺨﻮﺋﻲ ﺹ ٢٠٠
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺸﻬﺎﱐ ﰲ ﲝﺚ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ) ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻘﻰ ( ﻭﻧﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌـﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳـﻒ ﺇﱃ
ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﶈﺪﺙ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﲑ ﺍﳌﻮﱃ ﳏﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﺎﱐ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻴﻪ ) ﺍﻟﻮﺍﰲ ( ٢٧٤/٥ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻢ
ﺍﻟﻴﻘﲔ ﺹ ،١٣٠ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻩ ) ﺁﻻ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ (
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﺴﺐ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺎﻇﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻬﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﻭﺃﺿﺮﺍﻢ )ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺨﻮﺋﻲ ﺹ ( ٢٠٠ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺩ.ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻋﻲ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ) :٣٥٤ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻋﻨﺪ ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻤـﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸـﻴﻌﺔ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﺔ ﳏﻔﻮﻅ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﻳﻞ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻭﺩ
ﻏﲑ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻻ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﲢﺮﻳﻔﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻭﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴـﲑﻩ
)ﳎﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ( ﻭﺍﳌﻼ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﲏ ﻭﺍﳊﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ) ﻣﺼﺎﺋﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ( ﻭﳑﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ) :ﻣﺎ ﻧﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗـﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﻐـﻴﲑ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳑﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺫﻣﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻻ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻢ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺳﻲ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻩ ) ﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ( ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻄﻬﺮ
ﺍﳊﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﻬﻨﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺹ١٢١
ﻭﻻ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻣﻴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳏﻔﻮﻅ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﻭﻗﺪ
ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ) :ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ (
ﻟﻠﺨﻤﻴﲏ ١٦٥/٢ﻭ) ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻬﻤﺔ ( ﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺹ ٢٤٢ﻭ) ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻴﺰ ( ﻟﻌﻠﻲ ﺁﻝ
ﳏﺴﻦ ﺹ ١٣٦ﻭ) ﻣﻊ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺧﻄﻮﻃﻪ ( ﻟﻠﻄﻒ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﰲ ﺹ ،٤٤ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻄﺒـﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴـﲑﻩ
)ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ( ١٠١/١٢
ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻲ ﲢﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ) :ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﰲ ﻧﻔـﻲ
ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ( ﻟﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﻴﻼﱐ )ﻭﺻﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ( ﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﶈﻤﺪﻱ ،ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ )ﻋـﺪﻡ
ﲢﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ( ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺻﺪﺭﻩ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺍﳊﺴﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪﻳﺔ ﺹ ٤٠ﻭﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ) :ﻭﻟـﻮ
72
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺳﻠﹼﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ]ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ[ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻻ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻛﻞﹼ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻋـﻦ ﺭﺃﻱ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ،ﻛﻨﺎ ﻧﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻮﺀ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ،ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺿـﻮﺀ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ،ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ،ﻭﺇﻻﹼ ﻟﺬﻛﺮﺕ ﲬﺴﲔ ﻋﺎﳌﺎﹰ ﻛﺒﲑﺍﹰ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛـﱪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ(.ﺍﻩ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻔﻆ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﻋﺪﺩﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺃﻭﺻﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺍﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﲔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺁﻝ ﳏﺴﻦ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﺍﻟـﻮﺟﻴﺰ
ﺹ) :١٣٧ﻭﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﲑﺯﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺬﻝ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺟﻬﺪﻩ ﰲ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ]ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ[ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﺹ ٢٥ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﲔ ﻧﻔﺴـﺎ ﻣـﻊ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻻ ﺗﺼﺢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻧﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺎﳌﻔﻴﺪ) (١٤ﻭﻏـﲑﻩ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﻪ ﺇﱃ ﳎﺎﻫﻴﻞ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﳛﻜﻲ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺑﲏ ﻧﻮﲞﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻦ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻜﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻓﻘﻬﺎﺋﻬﻢ
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ) :ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻣﻪ ]ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ[ ﻭﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﲰﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲏ
ﻧﻮﲞﺖ ﺭﲪﻬﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻜﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ
ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ(ﺍﻩ ﺃﻭﺍﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺹ٩٣
ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﻧﻌﻤﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻱ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮﺓ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻃﺒﻘﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻـﺤﺘﻬﺎ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺎ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ) :ﺇﻥ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺗﻮﺍﺗﺮﻫﺎ -ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻊ -ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻲ ﺍﻹﳍﻲ ،ﻭﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻗﺪ
ﻧﺰﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻷﻣﲔ ﻳﻔﻀﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻔﻴﻀﺔ ﺑﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻟﺔ ﺑﺼﺮﳛﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻗـﻮﻉ
ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﺎﹰ ﻭﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺇﻋﺮﺍﺑﺎﹰ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺭﺿﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻃﺒﻘـﻮﺍ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺻﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺎ ( ﺍﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ٣٥٧ / ٢
( ١٤ﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻭﺍﺋﻞ
ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺹ) :٩ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﻼﻝ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻋﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻞ
ﻭﺳﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻭﻳﺔ ٧٨/٧ﻣﻦ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪ) :ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺗﱰﻳﻠﻪ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﱰﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﳑﺎ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﺍﷲ
ﻗﺮﺁﻧﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻔﻆ ﻟﻠﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﺩﻉ ﻟﻸﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﱂ ﻳﻀﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲨﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺘﲔ ﺍﻵﻥ ﱂ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ
ﰲ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﺎ ﲨﻊ ﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺩﻋﺘﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ(ﺍﻩ
73
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻴﻊ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ:
) ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺻﺤﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ ﲝﻴﺚ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻴﻊ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﻏﺼﺐ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ( ﺍﻩ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﺹ٤٩
ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﳎﻠﺴﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ) :ﻻ
ﳜﻔﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺻﺮﳛﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺗﻐﻴﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮﺓ ﻣﻌﲎ ،ﻭﻃﺮﺡ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺭﺃﺳﺎﹰ .ﺑﻞ ﻇﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺼﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻮﺎ ﺑﺎﳋﱪ(ﺍﻩ ﻣﺮﺁﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ .٥٢٥ /١٢
ﺑﻞ ﻭﻳﻘﺼﺮ ﻧﻌﻤﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﻣﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﺃﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﳌﺼﺎﱀ ﺭﺃﻭﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ) :ﻧﻌﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺪﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺳﻲ ﻭﺣﻜﻤﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻣـﺎ
ﺑﲔ ﺩﻓﱵ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺼﺤﻒ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﳌﱰﻝ ﻻ ﻏﲑ ...ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻷﺟـﻞ
ﻣﺼﺎﱀ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﺪ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﻦ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﺯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻘﻮﺍﻋـﺪﻩ
ﻭﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﳊﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ .٣٥٧ /٢
ﻭﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ،ﺑﻞ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ -ﲡﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﻟـﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻘـﻮﻝ
ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﻴﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺬﻭﺫ
وأﺟﺪﻧﻲ ھﻨﺎ ﻣﻀﻄﺮا ﻟﻠﻘﻮل ﺑﺄن أھﻞ اﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺗﺠﺎه اﻹﻣﺎﻣﯿﺔ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ أﺻﻨﺎف ):(١٥
ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﻳﻐﻠﻮ ﻭﻳﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺪ ﻓﻴﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ
ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﻣﺘﻌﻤﺪﺍ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻭﻇﻠﻢ )ﻭﻻ ﳚﺮﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺷﻨﺂﻥ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻻ
ﺗﻌﺪﻟﻮﺍ( ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ ﻭﻟﻸﺳﻒ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺮﺩﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻣﻦ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺫﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺤﻲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﺑﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰒ ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻪ ﻣـﻊ
ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﲰﻊ ﻓﻴﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺩﺓ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻋﻜﺴﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻈﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻴﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﲤﺤﻴﺺ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ ﻣﻔﹶﺮﻁ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻔﹾﺮﹺﻁ
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻫﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻨﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻭﻳﻘﺒﻠﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ
( ١٥ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﲡﺎﻩ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ
74
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻧﻤﻮذج آﺧﺮ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﯿﺔ :
ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺘﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﳉﻤﻴﻌﻬﻢ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻟﺒﻌﻀﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ -ﻣﻊ ﺷﻨﺎﻋﺘﻪ -ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺃﻭﺍﺋﻞ
ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺹ ٧٩ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺿﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ:
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﻞ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﻞ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻓﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻟﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﲔ ﻭﻗﻄﻌﻮﺍ ﺑﺘﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺳﻠﲔ ﻛﻠـﻬﻢ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻟﻠﻤﻔﻴﺪ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺳﻠﲔ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺳـﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤـﺪ
ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ:
-ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻤﻴﻬﻢ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻨـﻪ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻄـﻊ
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ
-ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳـﺎﺕ ﻭﻃﺒﻘـﺔ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﳌـﺘﻜﻠﻤﲔ
ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ
-ﻭﻭﻗﻒ ﻗﺒﻴﻞﹲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﳑﻦ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﺃﻡ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﺎ ﳍﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺩﻭﻢ
-ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺁﺧﺮ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻡ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻞ ﻓﺈﻢ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ
75
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺷﺮﻫﺎ :ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻭﺿﻼﻝ ﻣﺒﲔ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘـﱪﻳﻦ
ﻭﺣﺎﺷﺎﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺑﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻳﻨﺒﻬﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻀﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺗﻜﻔـﲑﻩ
ﻭﳛﺬﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﻴﺎﺀ ( ...ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﻴﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺩﻓﻪ ﺑﻜﻼﻡ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻀﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺗﻜﻔـﲑ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﻴﺎﺽ ) :ﺃﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺴـﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻛﻔـﺮ
ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﻭﻛﻔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺣﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﻛﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌـﺾ ﺍﳌﺘﺼـﻮﻓﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﻣﻄﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ﺹ) :١٠٦ﻓﺎﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻮﻓﺔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ ﻣﻨـﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻛﻠـﻬﻢ
ﺣﺎﺷﺎﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ
ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻛﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﺩ :ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﱰﻩ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺗﻌـﺎﱃ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ( ...ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ﺹ) :١٢٤ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻹﺑﺎﺣﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘـﱪﻳﻦ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ ،ﺯﻋﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﺎﺀ ﺳﻘﻂ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻭﺃﺑﻴﺤﺖ ﻟﻪ
ﺍﶈﺮﻣﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻄﻼﱐ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﻗﺔ ﻭﻛـﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛـﻼﻡ ﺃﻱ
ﻧﻌﻴﻢ(...ﺍﻩ ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ
76
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ ﻋﱪ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﳒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼـﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺛﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻛﺄﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺰ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﺑـﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣـﺔ ﻭﺍﺑـﻦ ﺍﻟﻘـﻴﻢ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ...ﺇﱁ ﻭﻻ ﳜﻔﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺎﻟﻊ ﺗﺮﺍﲨﻬﻢ
ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﻣﻨﺘﺴﱯ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﳍﻨـﺪ ﻭﺃﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴـﺎ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺛﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ.
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺳﻠﺒﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺳﻠﺒﻴﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ،
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻧﺼﻒ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :١٧/١١ﺗﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻬﻢ:
-ﻓﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺫﻣﺖ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻑ ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺃﻢ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻋﻮﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺗﺒﻌﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ
-ﻭﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻏﻠﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺩﻋﻮﺍ ﺃﻢ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﺃﻛﻤﻠﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﻛﻼ ﻃﺮﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺫﻣﻴﻢ
-ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻢ ﳎﺘﻬﺪﻭﻥ ﰲ ﻃﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻃﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﷲ ،ﻓﻔـﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴـﺎﺑﻖ
ﺍﳌﻘﺮﺏ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻭﰱ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻔﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪ ﳚﺘﻬﺪ
ﻓﻴﺨﻄﺊ ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺬﻧﺐ ﻓﻴﺘﻮﺏ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻮﺏ
-ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺴﺒﲔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻇﺎﱂ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻋﺎﺹ ﻟﺮﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫـﻞ ﺍﻟﺒـﺪﻉ
ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻗﺔ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﶈﻘﻘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻑ ﻟﻴﺴﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻟﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﲝﺚ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ) :ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ( ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛـﻼﻡ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻑ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﲔ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻭﺗﻔﺮﻳﻂ ﻭﻭﺳﻂ ،ﻭﻟﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﲝـﺚ ﻣﻔـﺮﺩ
ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ) :ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻑ( ﻋﺠﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻄﺒﻌﻪ
77
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻨﻤﻮذج اﻟﺴﺎدس :اﻹﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻠﯿﺔ )اﻟﻔﺎﻃﻤﯿﻮن–اﻟﻌﺒﯿﺪﯾﻮن( ):(١٦
ﳑﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻃﻤﻴﲔ–ﺍﻟﻌﺒﻴﺪﻳﲔ( ﺃﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺘﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻭﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺚ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ
ﻭﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻧﺴﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﲑ ﳑﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﲤﺤﻴﺺ
ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﳍﻢ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻻ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﲪﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻣﺎﱐ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ )ﺣﻲ ﺳﻨﺔ
٤١١ﻫـ( ﺃﺣﺪ ﺩﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻃﻤﻴﲔ ،ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺹ ٣٦٤ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻣﺜﻞ
ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺳﺦ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻔﺲ ﳍﺎ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﺷﺨﺎﺻﻬﺎ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﳍﺎ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻨﺤﻮﻥ ﳓﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﺇﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ
ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺃﺷﺨﺎﺻﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﺇﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺗﺘﺮﺩﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻴﺎﻛﻞ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺎﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻔﻮ ﻭﺗﻌﻮﺩ ،ﻓﻘﺪ
ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑـ»ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ« ﻭ»ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ« ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻐﲏ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺘﺺ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑـ»ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ« ﺭﺩﺍﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ ﻭﺃﺷﺒﺎﻫﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻴﻨﺎﺑﻴﻊ ﺹ) :١٦ﻭﻳﺬﻫﺐ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺒﻮﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ﺑﺄﻥﹼ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺘﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ،
ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺕ ﺗﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺮﺍﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺫﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﲑﻳﺔ ﻣﺜﻼﹰ ،ﻭﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﻨﺎ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻨﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ،ﺃﻥ
ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻳﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎﹰ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻨﺎﺳﺦ ،ﺑﻞ ﺫﻫﺒﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻮﺗﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻋﻨﺼﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﰊ
)ﺟﺴﻤﻪ( ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺎﻧﺴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺏ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻋﻨﺼﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺣﻲ )ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ( ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻼﹶ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻣﺆﻣﻨﺎﹰ ﺑﺎﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻓﻬﻲ ﲢﺸﺮ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﲔ ﻭﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﻣﻠﻜﺎﹰ ﻣﺪﺑﺮﺍﹰ!!،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺷﺮﻳﺮﺍﹰ ﻋﺎﺻﻴﺎﹰ ﻹﻣﺎﻣﻪ ﺣﺸﺮﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﺑﺎﻟﺴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺎﻃﲔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ.
(١٦ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ )-ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻫﻢ ﻫﻢ ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ( -ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮﻁ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺷﺮﻃﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﻛﻔﺮﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻺﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﻊ
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺑﲔ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ
ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﺔ ...ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺮﺩﺩﺕ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻟﻜﲏ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻘﻬﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺼﻮﺭﻫﻢ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺍ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﳓﺮﺍﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ) ..ﻭﻻ ﳚﺮﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺷﻨﺂﻥ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻻ ﺗﻌﺪﻭﺍ(...
78
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﳚﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺴﺪﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﳚﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺕ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﺤﻠﹼﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻗﺴﻢ
ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺒﻪ ،ﻓﺎﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﰊ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺏ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻔﺔ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺎﻧﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻨﺎﺳﺒﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺘﺼﺒﺢ
ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻘﻼﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺪﺑﺮﺓ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﱂ!! ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺘﻼﺷﻰ ﺃﻱ ﺗﺘﻘﻤﺺ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻣﺎﱐ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺹ) :٣٦٩ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﻠﺒﻌﺚ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ
ﳛﺪﺙ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻼﺫ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﱂ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺬﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻢ،
ﻭﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻣﺎﱐ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺹ ٣٧٩ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ) :ﺇﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺮﻣﺪ ﻭﺍﻷﺑﺪ
ﻭﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﻼﺫ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﲨﻊ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﺘﻐﲑ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻄﺮﺃ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﺘﺒﺪﻝ(ﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ
ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﳉﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺤﺎﱐ ﺿﻤﻦ ﲝﻮﺛﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ﺝ /٨ﺹ٢٣٠-٢٢٩
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻭﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ،ﺑﻞ
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻌﻼ
ﻭﳑﺎ ﳚﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﺎ :ﺃﻧﲏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﻭﰲ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺘﺒﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻃﻠﻌﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ،
ﻭﺃﹸﺧﻠﻲ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﱵ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﳑﺎ ﱂ ﺃﻃﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻗﻴﻞ ﺗﻘﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻷﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ
ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳓﻦ ﺑﺼﺪﺩﻩ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ
ﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﻻ ﺗﻀﺮ ﺑﺎﻷﺻﻞ.
79
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺑﺄﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻠﻮﻥ ﺩﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﳌﺎ ﺭﺃﻭﺍ ﻣﻦ -
ﺳﻔﻚ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﺎﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺮﺏ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻳﺮ ﺍﻟـﱵ -
ﺗﺼﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﺎﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺮﺏ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌـﺬﻛﺮﺍﺕ -
ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﲔ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺑﺄﻢ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﺑﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻷـﻢ ﺭﺃﻭﺍ ﺑﻌـﺾ -
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﺑﻞ ﺭﲟﺎ ﲟﺠﺮﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺻـﻮﰲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻜـﺲ ﺻـﺎﺭﻭﺍ
ﻳﺘﻬﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﺎﻟﺔ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﺑﺄﻢ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﺑﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻷـﻢ ﺭﺃﻭﺍ ﺑﻌـﺾ -
ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﺑﻞ ﺭﲟﺎ ﲟﺠﺮﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺳﻠﻔﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻜـﺲ ﺻـﺎﺭﻭﺍ
ﻳﺘﻬﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﺎﻟﺔ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﺄﻢ ﺻﻨﻴﻌﺔ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺔ ،ﻭﳚﺘﻬﺪﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻛـﺮ -
ﺑﻌﺾ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻪ -ﰲ ﺭﺃﻳﻬﻢ -ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﻛﺘﺒﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﲝﺎﺛﺎ ﲢـﺖ
ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ) :ﺃﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻪ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ(
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﺑﺄﻢ ﺻﻨﻴﻌﺔ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺔ ،ﻭﳚﺘﻬﺪﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻛـﺮ -
ﺑﻌﺾ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻪ -ﰲ ﺭﺃﻳﻬﻢ -ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﻛﺘﺒﻮﺍ ﺃﲝﺎﺛﺎ ﲢﺖ ﻋﻨـﺎﻭﻳﻦ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ) :ﺃﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ(
ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ، -
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺼﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻊ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﱰﻟﻖ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻠـﻢ
ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﲜﺮﻳﺮﺓ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ) ﻭﻻ ﺗﺰﺭ ﻭﺍﺯﺭﺓ ﻭﺯﺭ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ (
) (١٧ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺻﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ )ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ( ﻷﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺘﻬﻢ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ
80
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺃﺷﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻓﻼﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﺩ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻼﻧﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟـﺔ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺃﺻـﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻮﳍﻢ ﺍﳋﻤﺴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺭﺃﻱ -ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ -ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻫﻮ ﺃـﺎ
ﲣﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ -ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮﻩ -ﻓﻴﻀﻌﻔﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺆﻭﳍﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ
81
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺓ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺷﺮﻙ ،ﻭﻻﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻳﻄﻠﻘﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺼـﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺣـﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟـﺬﻳﻦ
ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺼﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺔ...
ﻭﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻄﻠﻘﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫـﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴـﺪ ﻓﻬـﻢ
ﻳﻘﺼﺪﻭﻥ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻮﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻄﻠـﻖ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺔ ﻭﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺎﻕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻬـﻮ
ﻣﻌﲎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ(...ﺍﻩ ﺍﻻﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻮﻛﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﺍﳊﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻻﹸﻭﱃ ٨٩ـ٩٢
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﺰ ﺹ ١١٧ﻋﻦ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺔ ) :ﲢﺮﱘ ﻗﺘﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻫﻢ ﱂ ﻳﻈﻬـﺮﻭﺍ
ﻧﻔﺎﻗﻬﻢ ﻭﲢﺮﱘ ﺍﻟﺴﱯ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻨﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺎﺋﺢ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻛﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﺭﺛﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﺍﻓﻨﺔ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ،ﻭﲡـﺮﻳﺢ
ﺷﻬﺎﺩﻢ ﻭﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﳊﻀﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿـﻴﺔ
ﻟﻠﺠﻐﺒﲑﻱ ﺹ٥٢٠
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﻤﺮ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ) ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﺪﻝ ( ﺹ ) : ٥٤ﻣﺮﺗﻜﺐ ﺍﻟﻜـﺒﲑﺓ ...ﻻ
ﳛﻜﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻖ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﳌﺮﺗﻜﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ ﰲ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻌﺼﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺇﺻﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺐ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺃﻋﻨﻒ ﺍﳋﺼﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺑـﲔ
ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺃﺛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﻓﻊ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻷﺯﺭﻕ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻲ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺹ) :٤٥ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﻫـﻮ
ﺍﳌﻮﰲ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻘﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺘﺎﻗﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ) :٢١٠/٢ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ :ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺼﻐﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻧﻮﺏ ﺃﻭ ﻛـﺒﲑ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺃﺻﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺣﺒﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺟﺒﺖ ﻟﻪ ﻧﺎﺭ ﺟﻨﻬﻢ ﺧﺎﻟﺪﺍ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺑﻄﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﲨﻴـﻊ
ﺇﺣﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﺑﺴﺎﻟﻒ ﺇﳝﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﺫﺍﺏ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﺗﻌﺒﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﻔﻖ ﻣﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﺫﻫﺒﻪ ﱂ
ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻘﻠﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻧﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﻳﺘﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ( ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ) ﺍﻟﺒﻌـﺪ
ﺍﳊﻀﺎﺭﻱ ﻟﻠﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ( ﻟﻠﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻐﺒﲑﻱ ﺹ٥٩١
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻃﻼﻕ ﻟﻘﺐ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ،ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻷﻧﻪ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻳﺘﱪﺃﻭﻥ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ،ﻭﻛﻼﻣﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ،ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﻷﻢ ﳜﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ
ﰲ ﺃﺧﺺ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺼﻬﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﺮﺗﻜﱯ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ ﻭﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻴﻬﻢ؛ﻛﻔﺮﺍ ﺃﻛﱪ ﳐﺮﺟﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻠـﺔ ﻣـﻊ
ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻼﻝ ﺩﻣﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻣﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﻭﺃﻋﺮﺍﺿﻬﻢ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﻜﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻭ
ﻣﻦ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻴﻬﻢ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺍ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻧﻌﻤﺔ ﻭﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﳝﺎﺛﻞ )ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﺻـﻐﺮ
ﻭﻛﻔﺮ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻛﻔﺮ( ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ..ﻫﺬﺍ ﻃﺒﻌﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ
82
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻳﻮﺍﻓﻘﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﻴﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨـﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻋـﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﻓﻌﻞ ﻋﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻜﻴﻢ ،ﻭﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﻱ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻠﻄﻒ
ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ..ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﺣﺴﻦ!
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺇﻢ ﻣﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ،ﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺘﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﳍﻴﺔ ﰲ
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻢ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻀﺪ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﻓﺎﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ
ﻳﻨﻔﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻟﻘﺎ ﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻞ
ﺷﻲﺀ ﺑﻘﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﻗﺪﺭﻩ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺐ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻴﻞ -ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﺑﺎﺿـﻲ-
) :٧٢٧/١٧ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻻ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﻓﺎﷲ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﻻ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺐ
ﻻ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻃﻔﻴﺶ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻴﻞ ) :٧٢٧/١٧ﻓﺎﷲ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﻻ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺐ ﻻ ﺧـﺎﻟﻖ(
ﻓﻴﺜﺎﺏ ﻭﻳﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳜﻠﻘﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻗﺼﺪﻩ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻛﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺒﺎ ﻟﻪ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺎ ﷲ
ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﻟﻔﻌﻠﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺜﺎﺏ ﻭﻳﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣﺮ ﺭﺩﻩ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﺍﳉﱪﻳﺔ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺪ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺁﻟﺔ ﳏﻀﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺴﻜﲔ ﰲ ﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻃﻊ...
ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺑﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻘـﺪﺭﻢ
ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﺟﺮﻯ ﻋﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺃﻭﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺎ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺎ ﷲ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﻋﺎ ﻭﺇﺣـﺪﺍﺛﺎ ﻭﻣﻜﺴـﻮﺑﺎ
ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺪ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻜﺴﺒﻪ ﺇﻳﺎﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺘﻪ ﻟﻘﺪﺭﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺭﺍﺩﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺃﻭ ﻣـﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﳏﻼ ﻟﻪ!(ﺍﻩ
83
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻨﻤﻮذج اﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :اﻟﻨﺼﯿﺮﯾﺔ )اﻟﻌﻠﻮﯾﻮن(
ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﲔ) ﺍﻟﻨﺼﲑﻳﺔ( ﺇﱃ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺘﻬﻢ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ
ﺑﺘﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﲏ ﻟﻠﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺼﲑﻳﺔ ﺇﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﺔ
ﻭﻟﻴﺴﻮﺍ ﺑﺈﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﻢ ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ
ﳛﻜﻰ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺯﻛﻲ ﺗﻔﺎﺣﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﲔ ﻭﻋﻘﻴﺪﻢ( ﺹ٤٧ـ ٤٨ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﲔ ﺃﻢ:
ﻳﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ -ﺻﻠﹼﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﹼﻢ -ﻭﻻ ﻳﺸﻜﹼﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﻪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ
ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺣﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻠﺒﻪ -ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ-
ﻭﻳﻨﻄﻘﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺗﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺇﳝﺎﻥ ﻓﺤﺼﻨﻬﻢ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻﹼ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ -ﺻﻠﹼﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﹼﻢ -ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﻻﺓ ﻵﻝ ﺑﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﳊﺞ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﻛﺘﺎﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﻩ ﻭﻻ ﺠﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﺎﹰ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻪ ،ﻭﳍﻢ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺩﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﺮﻓﻮﺍ ﺑﺘﻤﺴﻜﻬﻢ
ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺷﻌﺎﺋﺮﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻄﺮﺣﻮﻥ ﻛﻞﱠ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﱂ ﻳﺸﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﺎﺀ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺎﹰ ﻟﻪ،
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻭﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻳﺆﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺼﺤﺔ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲝﻖ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﺁﻝ ﳏﻤﺪ -ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ-
ﻭﳛﺘﺮﻣﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺪﺳﻮﻥ ﻛﻞﱠ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺸﻜﹼﻮﻥ ﺑﺼﺤﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺃﹸﻧﺰﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﻭﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻭﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﻁ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﹸﻭﰐ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻭﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺒﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺑﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﻟﻠﹼﻪ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌﺼﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻭﱂ ﳜﺎﻟﻔﻮﻩ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻝ!!
ﻭﳛﺼﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺑﺄﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻭﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ -ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ -ﰲ
ﺃﲝﺎﺛﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ ،ﻓﻼ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﻻ ﺣﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻲ ﻭﻻ ﺣﻨﻔﻲ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ،
ﻭﻛﻠﹼﻬﻢ ﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﺣﻨﻔﺎﺀ ﻣﺘﺒﻌﻮﻥ ﻣﻠﹼﺔ ﺃﺑﻴﻬﻢ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲰﺎﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻳﻌﺒﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻻ
ﻳﺸﺮﻛﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﹰ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﳋﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺙ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻢ ﰲ ﺃﹸﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻓﺮﻭﻋﻪ) :ﺃﹸﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﲬﺴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ :ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ :ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺇﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻲ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻲ ،ﻻ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﻣﺘﺼﻒ
ﺑﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ،ﻣﱰﹼﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺺ ﻭﺍﶈﺎﻝ" :ﻟﹶﻴﺲ ﻛﹶﻤﺜﹾﻠﻪ ﺷﻲﺀٌ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﹾﻟﺴﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﹾﺒﺼﲑ"
)ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺭﻯ|.(١١
ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ :ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄﻥﹼ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﻣﱰﹼﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻋﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺚ ،ﻻ ﻳﻜﻠﹼﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻌﻬﻢ ﻭﻃﺎﻗﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺄﻣﺮﻫﻢ ﺇﻻﹼ ﲟﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺻﻼﺣﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﻬﺎﻫﻢ ﺇﻻﹼ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺴﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺟﻬﻞ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻭﻴﻪ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ.
84
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ :ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄﻥﹼ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺧﲑﺓ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﲔ ﺭﺳﻼﹰ ﻹﺑﻼﻍ ﺭﺳﺎﻻﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ،
ﻟﲑﺷﺪﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺻﻼﺣﻬﻢ ﻭﳛﺬﹼﺭﻭﻫﻢ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺴﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ.
ﻭﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄﻥﹼ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﻭﻥ ،ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﲬﺴﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻧﺒﻴﺎﹰ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻻﹰ ،ﺃﻭﳍﻢ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ
ﺁﺩﻡ -ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ -ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ -ﺻﻠﹼﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﹼﻢ -ﻭﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻪ ﻫﻲ ﺁﺧﺮ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻹﳍﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﻛﻤﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﺎﳊﺔ ﻟﻜﻞﹼ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ.
ﻭﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻌﺼﻤﺔ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻮ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﺭﺗﻜﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻧﻮﺏ ﻋﻤﺪﺍﹰ ﻭﺧﻄﺄ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺜﺔ،
ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﱰﹼﻫﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺎﺋﺺ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﺃﻛﻤﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺯﻣﺎﻢ ﻭﺃﻓﻀﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﲨﻌﻬﻢ
ﻟﻠﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪﺓ ،ﺻﻠﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﻭﺳﻼﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﲨﻌﲔ.
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ :ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄﻥﹼ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﻨﺼﺐ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﳍﻴﺔ ﳌﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﰲ ﻣﺆﺍﺯﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﺑﻨﺸﺮ
ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﳍﻴﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﶈﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻭﺑﺼﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ.
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻒ ﺍﻹﳍﻲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﺑﻨﺺ ﺇﳍﻲ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﺎﹰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ
ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﺴﻮﺍﺀ ﻟﻴﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﺍﻟﻪ.
ﻭﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄﻥﹼ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ -ﺻﻠﹼﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﹼﻢ -ﻫﻮ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﺍﺑﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﲔ ،ﰒﹼ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺫﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ -ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،-ﺁﺧﺮﻫﻢ
ﺍﳌﻬﺪﻱ ﻋﺠﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﻓﺮﺟﻪ ،ﻭﻋﺠﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺝ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ.
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩ :ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄﻥﹼ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺕ ﻟﻠﺤﺴﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻴﺠﺰﻱ ﺍﶈﺴﻦ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻲﺀ
ﺑﺈﺳﺎﺀﺗﻪ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﻭﻧﻮﻣﻦ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﻭﲟﺎ ﺣﺪﺙ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ -ﺻﻠﹼﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﹼﻢ-
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺚ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺬﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻌﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻁ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﻪ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ :ﻓﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺃﳘﹼﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﺞ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﺎﺩ(.ﺍﻩ )ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﺍﳋﲑ :ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻨﺎ
ﻭﻭﺍﻗﻌﻨﺎ ﳓﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﲔ٢٠:ـ ٢٣ﻣﻠﺨﺼﺎ( ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﳌﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ﻟﻠﺴﺒﺤﺎﱐ )ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ(
ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﲑﻳﺔ ﳜﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ :
-ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻧﺼﲑ ﻓﺎﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻳﺬﻣﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﲑﻳﺔ ﻳﻌﻈﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻫﻮ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ
ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﶈﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﻜﺮﻱ
-ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻮ ﰲ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﲑﻳﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﱪﻭﻧﻪ ﻣﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻠﻲ ﺍﻹﳍﻲ ﻭﻣﻊ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﻻ ﻧﻌﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ
85
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺘﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﲏ ﻟﻠﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﲡﺪ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻳﺸﻨﻌﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﳌﺰﻳﺪ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ:
)ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﲏ( ﻷﲪﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﻦ
وﺑﺎﻟﻤﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻓﮭﺬا ﺟﺪول ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﻓﯿﮫ أھﻢ اﻟﻔﺮوق ﺑﯿﻦ اﻟﻤﺬاھﺐ اﻟﻌﻘﺪﯾﺔ اﻹﺳﻼﻣﯿﺔ :
ـﺎﺣﺐ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ
ﺻــ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ
ﺭﲟﺎ ﻏـﻼ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻫﻞ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻓﺎﺳﻖ ﺍﻹﺛﺒـــﺎﺕ ﻗﺪﱘ ﻏـﲑ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﺑـﻼ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ
ـﺾ ﺑﻌــ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺶ ـﺔ ﷲ ﻭﻋﻤـــﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔــﻮﻳﺾ ﳐﻠــﻮﻕ .ﻛﻴﻒ ﻭﻻ ﳐﻠﻮﻗـ
ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠــﺔ ﻭﺗﺼــﺢ ﻣﻜﺴــﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤـــﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻪ ﻋﻦ ﲝـــﺮﻑ ﲡﺴﻴﻢ
ﰲ ﺇﻣﺎﻣـــﺔ ﻛﻤــﺎﻝ ، ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻭﺻــﻮﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ
ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻭﻳﻨﻘﺺ ﻗﺪﳝﲔ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻫﻞ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻓﺎﺳﻖ ﻗﺪﱘ ﻏـﲑ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﺑـﻼ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺼـﺪﻳﻖ ) ﺍﻹﺛﺒـــﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ
ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺶ ـﺔ ﷲ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓـــﺔ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﺑﻼ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻭﻻ ﳐﻠﻮﻗـ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻳﺾ ﺃﻭ
ﺷﺮﻁ ﰲ ﻭﺗﺼــﺢ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻭﻻ ﲡﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻜﺴــﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺫﻋﺎﻥ ( ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳـــﻞ
ﺇﺟــﺮﺍﺀ ﺇﻣﺎﻣـــﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤـــﻞ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺻﻮﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻪ ﻋﻦ
ﺃﺣﻜــﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻛﻤــﺎﻝ ، ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻭﻳﻨﻘﺺ
ﺍﻹﺛﺒـــﺎﺕ ﻗﺪﱘ ﻏـﲑ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﺑـﻼ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺼـﺪﻳﻖ ) ﰲ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻫﻞ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻓﺎﺳﻖ ﺍﳌﺎﺗﺮﻳﺪﻳﺔ
ـﺔ ﷲ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓـــﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺶ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻳﺾ ﺃﻭ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﺑﻼ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻭﻻ ﳐﻠﻮﻗـ
ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳـــﻞ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻭﻻ ﲡﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻜﺴــﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺫﻋﺎﻥ ( ﻭﺗﺼــﺢ
86
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻻ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻭﻻ ﺇﻣﺎﻣـــﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺻﻮﺕ
ﺍﳌﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻳﻨﻘﺺ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ
ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﳏـــﺪﺙ ﻣﻨﻔﻴـــﺔ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻫﻞ ﻣﱰﻟﺔ ﺑـﲔ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟـــﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﳐﻠـــﻮﻕ ﻻﺳﺘﻠﺰﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠـﻖ ﻭﻋﻤـــﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺶ ﺍﳌﱰﻟــﺘﲔ ﰲ ـﺎ
ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻬــ
ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠــﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﳐﻠـﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤـــﻞ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ـﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ
ﲝـــﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴـ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺇﻣﺎﻣــﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨــﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺭﻛﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﺻﻮﺕ ـﻔﺎﺕﺍﻟﺼــ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻪ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ
ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﻣﱰﻟﺔ ﺑـﲔ ﳏـــﺪﺙ ﻣﻨﻔﻴـــﺔ ﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻫﻞ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟـــﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﳌﱰﻟــﺘﲔ ﰲ ﳐﻠـــﻮﻕ ﻻﺳﺘﻠﺰﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻭﻋﻤـــﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ـﺎ
ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻬــ
ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠــﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﳐﻠـﺪ ـﻴﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﳏﺪﺛﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤـــﻞ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍﲝـــﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴـ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨــﺎﺭ ﰲ ﰲ ﺻﺤﺔ ﺷﺮﻁ ﳍﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﺻﻮﺕ ـﻔﺎﺕﺍﻟﺼــ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﺇﻣﺎﻣـــﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻪ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﳌﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ
ﳏـــﺪﺙ ﻣﻨﻔﻴـــﺔ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻫﻞ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﻛﻔـﺮ ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ
ـﺔ ﷲ ﻭﻋﻤـــﻞ ﻣــــﻦ ﻧﻌﻤﺔ ،ﳐﻠﺪ ﺍﻟـــﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﲝـــﺮﻑ ﻻﺳﺘﻠﺰﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﳐﻠﻮﻗـ ـﺎ
ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻬــ
ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠــﺔ ـﻠﻤﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ
ـﻴﻢ ﻣﻜﺴــﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤـــﻞ ﺍﳌﺴـ ﻭﺻــﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴـ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﺗﺼــﺢ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻭﻳﺘﺤﺎﺷﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ـﻔﺎﺕﺍﻟﺼــ
ﺇﻣﺎﻣـــﺔ ﻟﻔﻆ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻪ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﳌﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ
ـﲏ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻓﺎﺳﻖ
ﰲ ﺍﻹﺛـ ﺍﻟﺘﺼـﺪﻳﻖ ) ﳏـــﺪﺙ ﻣﻨﻔﻴـــﺔ ﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﺍﷲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ
ﻋﺸﺮ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓـــﺔ ﲝـــﺮﻑ ﻻﺳﺘﻠﺰﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ـﺎ
ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻬــ
ﻭﻻ ﺗﺼﺢ ﻭﺍﻹﺫﻋﺎﻥ ( ـﻴﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﳏﺪﺛﺔ ﻭﺻــﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴـ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﰲ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤـــﻞ ﳍــﻢ ) ﻻ ﻭﻳﺘﺤﺎﺷﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ـﻔﺎﺕﺍﻟﺼــ
ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺟــﱪ ﻭﻻ ﻟﻔﻆ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻪ ﻋﻦ
ﺗﻔﻮﻳﺾ ( ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﻄﻦ ﻣﺆﻣﻦ ـﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺛﺎﺑﺘـــﺔ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣـﻊ ﳏـ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻣﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ـﺔ ﷲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻜﻴــﻒ ﳐﻠﻮﻗـ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ
ﻋﻨــﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﻜﺴــﻮﺑﺔ ﻏﲑ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ .ﻭﲡﺴﻴﻢ
ﻣﺆﻣﻦ !! ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﲝـــﺮﻑ
ﳐﻠــﺪ ﰲ ﻭﺻﻮﺕ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ
ﻣﺆﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﳉﻨـــﺔ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﳏـــﺪﺙ ﻣﻨﻔﻴـــﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒـــﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ
ـﺎﺭ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨــ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳐﻠـــﻮﻕ ﻻﺳﺘﻠﺰﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﳎﺒــﻮﺭﻭﻥ
ﺳﺘﻔﻨﻴﺎﻥ ـﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﳍﻢ
ﺗﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﲝـــﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴـ
ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﺻﻮﺕ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ
87
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻡ ﻟﺬﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺣﻜﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﳜﺎﻟﻔﲏ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﰲ ﺷـﻲﺀ ﻣـﻦ
ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﳌﺎ ﺗﻠﻘﻮﻩ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺩﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻤﺔ ﳌﺎ ﺣﻜﻴﺖ ﺑﻞ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺒﻠﻎ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﻣﺪﻯ ﻓﻬﻤﻲ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﺎﻥ ﱄ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﱐ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺸﺘﻬﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻢ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺹ) :٧٦ﺇﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻓﻪ ،ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺯﻋﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ – ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ – ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻓﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺑﺎﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻓﻠﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﲝﺚ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ) :ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺴﻤﺔ ﻭﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﳍﻴﺔ( ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺗﱰﻳﻪ
ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﰒ ﻋﻘﺪﻧﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻳﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮﻧـﺎ
ﻛﻴﻒ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﺴﻤﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻣﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺠﺴـﻴﻢ ﻣـﻦ ﻃﻮﺍﺋـﻒ
ﻭﺃﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺴﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ
88
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻳﺜﻨﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﰊ ،ﻓﻨﺠﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺜﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﰊ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻓﻴﻘﺎﻝ
ﻟﻪ :ﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺃﺛﲎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﰊ ﰲ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺃﻡ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺁﺧﺮ؟ ﰒ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﻋﺮﰊ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺃﻡ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺪﺳﻮﺱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؟ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﰊ ﺑﺄﻗﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻓﹸﻬﻤﺖ ﺧﻄﺄ ؟ ...ﺇﱁ ) (١٨ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ.
(١٨ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﰊ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ :ﻓﻤﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ ﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﺹ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﻋﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ
ﲰﺎﻫﺎ) :ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﱯ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﰊ( ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻪ ﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﻳﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻋﺼﺮﻩ ﻓﻤﻦ
ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﺹ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻣﺪﺳﻮﺳﺔ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻏﲑ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻥ
ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻠﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲰﺎﻫﺎ) :ﺗﻨﺒﺄﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﱯ ﺑﺘﱪﺃﺓ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﰊ( ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﻻﻳﺘﻪ
ﻭﻻ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ ﻭﻳﻜﻞ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻪ :ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﳛﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﳛﺮﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﰊ
ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﻣﻄﻮﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺷﺬﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ.
89
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻼ ﻧﻔﻬﻤﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺘﻤﻼ ﻟﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ
ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺘﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻮ ،ﻭﻻ ﻧﻔﺴﺮﻩ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻮﻯ ﳓﻦ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ) :٤٠٤ﻗﺪ ﻳﺪﻕ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻭﳜﻔﻲ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻭﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻒ ﻓﻴﻔﺴـﺮ ﲟـﺎ ﱂ
ﻳﻘﺼﺪﻩ ...ﻭﻛﻢ ﻳﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪﻩ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺼﺪﻩ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﳜﹸﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﻛـﺜﲑ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ...ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﻘﺮﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺐ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻛﺜﲑ ﳑﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺮﺳﺦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﺍ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﺬﻩ! ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻘﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻮﻥ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺣﺴﻨﺎ ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻗﺒﻴﺤﺎ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻫﻮ ﲪﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﶈﺎﻣﻞ ﻣـﺎ
ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻔﺼﺢ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﺢ ،ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺴﺎﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻪ ٣٥٩/٤٤ﺑﺴـﻨﺪﻩ :ﻋـﻦ
ﻋﻜﺮﻣﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ) :ﻻ ﺗﻈﻨﻦ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﻴﻚ ﺳﻮﺀﺍ ﻭﺃﻧﺖ ﲡﺪ ﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳋﲑ
ﻣﺪﺧﻼ ،ﻭﺿﻊ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺃﺧﻴﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺴﻨﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻚ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻐﻠﺒﻚ(ﺍﻩ
90
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩﳘﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺯ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻻ ﺣﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺴـﺎﺎ
ﺑﻞ ﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﺪﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺒﺔ ﻳﻨﺘﺠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﰎ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻭﺣﺎﺷﺎﻩ(ﺍﻩ
91
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﻲ ،ﻭﺗﻌﺬﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺸﺎﺀ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺫﻧﺐ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻻ ﻟﻐﺮﺽ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﺢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺎﺋﺢ
ﺑﻘﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﻗﺪﺭﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺝ/١ﺹ ٤٩ﻭﰲ ﻏﲑﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﱪﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠـﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﳛﻲ ﺑﻦ ﲪﺰﺓ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻭﺳﻌﺔ ﺍﻻﻃﻼﻉ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﺇﻢ ﺟﱪﻳﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺯﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺹ ٢٦٧ﺑﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺷﻴﺨﻨﺎ ﻣﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺩﻋﻲ
ﻭﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻟﻠﺸﺮﰲ ) :١٤٣/١ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﺸﻮﻳﺔ ...ﻭﺃﲨﻌﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﱪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺒﻴﻪ ﻭﺟﺴﻤﻮﺍ
ﻭﺻﻮﺭﻭﺍ ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻗﺪﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺘﲔ !!! ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺃﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ...ﻭﻣﻦ ﺭﺟﺎﳍﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻭﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻭﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻟﻨﺪﻉ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﺎﱐ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺄﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻭﻻ ﺣﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺼـﺎﻑ ﺩﻋـﺎﺓ
ﻟﻠﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻢ ١٥٨/١ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ) :ﺍﺒﺮﺓ( ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲜﱪﻱ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ( ...ﺍﻩ ،ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻤﻦ ﺍﻤﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﳉﱪ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻬﲔ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ:
ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﱪ ،ﻭﺑﻴﻨـﺎ ﻧﺼـﻮﺹ
ﺃﺋﻤﺘﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻹﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﳉﻮﻳﲏ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﹼﺎﰊ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ،ﻭﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪ
ﳑﻦ ﻗﺪﻣﻨﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﺃﻋﺮﻑ ﲟﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﻢ
ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﺍﻫﻢ؛ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻔﺼﺤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﱪﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﺟـﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻃﹼﺮﺍﺣﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﲟﺎ
ﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ.
ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ :ﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﻟﺰﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﳎـﺮﺩ
ﺇﻟﺰﺍﻡ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﺃﻟﺰﻣﻮﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻗﺒﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﻘﻞ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺗﻜﺒﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺒﻪ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺮﺽ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﹼﺍﺏ ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻏﺮﺿﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﻘـﺪ
ﺻﺤﺔ ﺑﺎﻃﻠﻪ ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﻛﺬﺑﻪ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﹰ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﺪ ﺑﻜﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺫﺏ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﺮﺃﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺮﺍﻫﻴﺘﻪ ﻟﻸﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ؛ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻋﻤﻞ ﲟﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ،
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻻ ﳚﺮﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺷﻨﺌﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻻ ﺗﻌﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﺍﻋﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﻮﻯ( ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻃﻤﻌﺎﹰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻮﻳﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺼﻤﻪ ،ﻓﺄﺩﱏ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﻘـﺪ ﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌـﺎﱃ
ﻳﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﺍﳌﻄﻴﻊ ﻭﻳﺜﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺻﻲ ( ...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻗﺎﱐ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺎﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺝ/٢ﺹ) :٣٣ – ٢٩ﻭﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻠﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺘﲔ ﻟـﻮ
ﺃﻧﺼﺘﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﻧﺼﻔﺔ ﻻﺟﺘﻤﻌﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﻤﻊ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻭﻋﻠـﻰ
92
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺆﻟﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻮﺩ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻟﻜـﻞ ﺷـﺮﻋﺔ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎﺟﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
ﻭﻟﻨﻘﻒ ﺑﺮﻫﺔ ﲜﺎﻧﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ :ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻟﻴﺘﻀﺢ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻭﻟﻨﻘﺲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﺋﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﺒﺎﻩ ﻋﻨـﺪ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﺍﻻﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻭﻟﻨﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﻟﻮﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺧﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺗﻈﻠﻬﻢ ﺭﺍﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻳﻀﻤﻬﻢ ﻟﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻳﺔ ﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﻛﻞ
ﺷﻲﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﺿﻼﳍﻢ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ ...ﻭﻳﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻧﺎﻃﻘﺔ
ﺑﻮﺣﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻘﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺎﻟﻘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ...
ﲜﺎﻧﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺗﻨﺴﺐ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﻌﻠﻦ ﺭﺿـﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﷲ ﻭﺣﺒﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺤﺴﻨﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻦ ﻏﻀﺒﻪ ﻭﺑﻐﻀﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻴﺌﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ...ﻭﻳﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺼـﻮﺹ ﺃﺩﻟـﺔ
ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﺑﻌﺪﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺣﻜﻤﺘﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﺪﺍ ﳌﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﲦـﺔ
ﻭﺟﻪ ﻻﺳﺘﺤﻘﺎﻗﻪ ﺍﳌﺜﻮﺑﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﺑﺔ...
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺮﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲜﺎﻧﺒﻬﺎ ﻓﺮﺟﺤﻮﻫﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻻ ﳜﻠـﻖ
ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ؟ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﻞ ﳍﻢ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺜﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺮﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﱂ ﻳﻮﺟﺪﻩ ﻫﻮ؟ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺣﻜﻤﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ؟
ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ -ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﻘﲔ ﻷﻋﻤﺎﳍﻢ -ﻛﺎﺳﺒﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺐ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻴـﻒ
ﻭﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺏ ﻭﺑﻪ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻋﺪﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺣﻜﻤﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺷﺮﻉ ﻟﻠﻤﻜﻠﻔﲔ
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﲪﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﲪﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺐ ﲨﻌﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ،ﰒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﻞ ﳍﻢ:
ﻣﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺐ؟ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺗﺮﻳﺪﻱ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺃﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﺃﻡ ﻫـﻮ
ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻡ ﺍﳌﺼﻤﻢ؟ ﻭﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻳﻄﻮﻝ ﺷﺮﺣﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻬﺎ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺮﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻈﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻓﺮﺟﺤﻮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒـﺪ
ﳜﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﻞ ﳍﻢ :ﺃﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ؟
ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺑﻠﻰ ﺇﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺣﱴ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻳﺔ ،ﺑﻴﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺑﻼ ﻭﺍﺳـﻄﺔ
ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻭﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻜﻠﻔﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺧﻠﻘﻬﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻮﺳﺎﻃﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺁﻻﺎ ﻓـﻴﻬﻢ
ﻭﺁﻻﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣـﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ
ﻗﻮﺓ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻠﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻭﺟﻬﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﻣﺎ ﲝﺴﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺑﺴﻮﺀ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ،ﰒ ﻻ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻧـﻪ ﺧـﺎﻟﻖ ﺃﺳـﺒﺎﺎ
ﻭﻭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻬﺎ
93
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﻞ ﳍﻢ :ﺇﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻜﻢ ﻳﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﷲ ﺷﺮﻛﺎﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﻭﻥ ﰲ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﳌﻜﻠﻔﻮﻥ ﻭﻫـﺬﺍ
ﻳﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻭﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻻ ﻧﺴﻠﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ
ﻧﻔﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺻﻔﺎﺗﻪ
ﺃﻭ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻻ ﲤﻨﻌﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﻻ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﻻ ﲤﻨﻌﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﻻ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ
ﺻﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﻓﻠﻢ ﲤﻨﻌﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻻ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻷﻋﻤﺎﳍﻢ ﻓﺈﺎ
ﻻ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﲝﺎﻝ
ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﲡﺪ ﻟﻜﻠﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺘﲔ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺗﺄﻭﻳﻼ ﺳﺎﺋﻐﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﺆﻭﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺼﻮﺹ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺮﺎ ﻓﺮﺟﺤﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﳒﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻠﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺘﲔ ﻻ ﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺍﶈﻈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺇﻳﺎﻩ
ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻭﺍﳉﺪﺍﻝ ﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺭﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎ ﻳﻨﺄﻯ ﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﶈﻈـﻮﺭ ،ﰒ ﳒـﺪ ﻛﻠﺘـﺎ
ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺘﲔ ﻳﺘﻼﻗﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﺧﲑﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻑ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻮﺣﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺣﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺎﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﺝ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ
ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﺮﺿﻰ ﻣﻨﺼﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﺘﺠﺮﻳﺢ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻭﺭﻣﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﺷﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺷﺮﻙ ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮﻯ ،ﻭﻣﺎﺫﺍ
ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﺟﺢ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺮﺟﺢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺗﺴﻔﻴﻪ ﻟﻠﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ؟! ﺑﻞ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻧﻠﻮﺫ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻤﺖ ﻭﻧﻌﺘﺼﻢ
ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻼ ﳔﻮﺽ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﻳﺼﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪﺓ؟ ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﺎ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻔﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ...
ﳍﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺗﺮﺍﱐ ﻻ ﺃﺫﻫﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﻫﺒﲔ ﰲ ﺗﻀﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻔﻴﻪ ﺃﺣﻼﻣﻬﻢ ﻭﻧﺒﺰﻫﻢ ﺑﺄﻟﻘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻔـﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺴﻮﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺫﻫﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﻫﺒﲔ ﰲ ﲡﻬﻴﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﲢﻘﲑﻫﻢ ﻭﻧﺒﺰﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﳉﻬﺎﻟـﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤـﻮﺩ
ﻭﺍﳍﻮﻯ( ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻗﺎﱐ
ﻗﺪ ﻧﻌﺬﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻓﻬﻤﻬﻢ ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻋﻨـﺪ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺑﲔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﻟﻠﺠﱪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻌﺬﺭﻫﻢ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺴـﻠﻴﻢ ﳍـﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻟـﺔ
)ﺍﳋﻠﻖ– ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺴﺐ( ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﻌﺬﺭﻫﻢ ﰲ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﻟﻠﺠﱪ ﻣﻊ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ
ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﱪ ،ﻭﺗﺸﻨﻴﻌﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﱪﻳﺔ ) ،(١٩ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻱ ﻗـﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﰲ
(١٩ﺇﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﻤﻦ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ ﷲ
ﺣﱴ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺗﻪ؟ ﻭﳍﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ :ﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﳜﻠﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻭﻣﻦ ﰒ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺳﲑﻳﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻳﻔﻌﻠﻪ) ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻻ ﺳﺎﺋﻖ( ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺗﻜﻤﻦ ﰲ ﻋﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﳌﺼﻤﻢ! ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ
ﻣﺴﺆﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺗﻜﻤﻦ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺳﺐ!!! ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﻭﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻠﹼﻢ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ.
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻣﻞ ﰲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ )ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ – ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ – ﺍﳌﺎﺗﺮﻳﺪﻳﺔ – ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ( ﻭﰲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ) ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ – ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ – ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ( ﻧﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ :ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﻟﻴﻒ ﻭﳚﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ
94
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﻋﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺟﻼ ﺳﺄﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ
ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ) :ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻻ ﺗﺴﺄﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ( ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﲪـﺪ ﺑـﻦ
ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ) :ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﺬﺏ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ ،٢٩١ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ) :ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳊﺴﲏ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻭﺷﻴﻌﺘﻬﻢ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻭﱂ ﻳـﺬﻛﺮ
ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻷﺣﺪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻧﻌﻢ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ :ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﳉﱪ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﺹ) :٣١٢ﺇﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺴـﻤﻰ
ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻓﻔـﺎﺭﻗﻮﺍ ﺍﳉﱪﻳـﺔ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻗﺔ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﻗﺎﺭﺑﻮﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺣﱴ ﻏﻠﻂ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺴـﺒﺐ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻭﻧﺴﺒﻮﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﱪ ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﳑﻦ ﻳﻨﺼﺮ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﲡﻨﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﱪﻳﺔ ﻟﻴﺘﻢ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﺰﺍﻫﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺟﱪﻱ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻌﺘﺰﱄ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻐﻠﻂ ﺑﺴﺒﺒﻬﺎ ﻋﺎﻣﻲ
ﻭﻻ ﺳﲏ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺑﺴﺒﺒﻬﺎ ﺧﺒﻂ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻭﻏﻠﻂ ﻓﺎﺣﺶ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﺍ ﺭﺍﻋﻨﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﻟـﻮﺍ
ﺍﻧﻈﺮﻧﺎ( ﳌﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺴﺪﺓ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑـﺎﳉﱪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺷـﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﻘـﻮﳍﻢ
ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺴﺐ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﺭﺍﺩﻭﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺴﺐ ﻓﺬﻟﻜﺔ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌـﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﻟﺰﻣﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﳉﱪ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ -ﻛﻤـﺎ ﻫـﻲ
ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺘﻬﻢ – ﺍﻛﺘﻔﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻹﲨﺎﻝ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻟﻮﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻠﺘﻔﺘـﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿـﺎﺕ
ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻓﺤﺎﻭﻟﻮﺍ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﻓﺄﺗﻮﺍ ﲟﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺐ ﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ
ﻣﺴﺆﻭﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﱂ ﳚﱪﻩ ،ﻭﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ -ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ -ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﻞ
ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﳋﺬﻻﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺪ
ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﳋﺬﻻﻥ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﻘﻼ ﻻ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﺍﷲُ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺑﺎﳋﺬﻻﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﺍﷲُ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺑﺎﳋﺬﻻﻥ ﻻ ﻋﻘﻼ ﻭﻻ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﺬﻻﻥ
ﻋﻘﻮﺑﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ )ﺍﳌﻌﺼﻴﺔ( ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﻧﻘﺎﺫ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﱪ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺹ ٢٣٢ﺿﻤﻦ
ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ) :ﻭﻛﻞ ﺇﺿﻼﻝ ﺃﺿﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻘﻮﺑﺔ ﳍﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻔﺮﻫﻢ ﻭﻓﺴﻘﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻨﺎ
ﻓﺰﻋﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﻱ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﻼﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻤﻞ(ﺍﻩ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﺬﻻﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺳﻠﱯ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺇﳚﺎﺑﻴﺎ ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺳﻠﺒﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻲ ﺹ ،٥٩ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻋﻘﻼ ﻭﺷﺮﻋﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻣﺜﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ
95
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻼﺯﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﺍﳉﱪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﺹ) :٢٨٧ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺷـﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻓﺮﺍﻣـﻮﺍ
ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎﺕ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻛﺎﳌﻔﺴﺮﻳﻦ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ( ﺍﻩ
96
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﳌﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﻇﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓـﺔ
ﺍﺮﺩﺓ )ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ( ﻭﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﻯ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻠﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺭﻛﻨﲔ ﳘﺎ :ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺫﻋﺎﻥ،
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺠﻮﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﺓ ﺹ) :٦٢ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ:
ﺍﻹﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﳌﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺇﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﻭﻻ
ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ ،ﺣﱴ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺈﳝﺎﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻧﺒﻮﺗﻪ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ) :ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺀﻫﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴـﺖ
ﺷﺮﻃﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺭﻛﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ
97
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻣﻜﺎﻥ؟ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻏﺎﺋﺐ ﻋﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻐﻴﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻐﻴﺐ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻗﺮﺏ
ﺃﻭ ﻧﺄﻯ ...ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻗﻮﻟﻨﺎ :ﺍﷲ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺷﺎﻥ ) ...ﺍ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﳒﻮﻯ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻫﻮ ﺳﺎﺩﺳﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺃﺩﱏ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺇﻻ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﻬـﻢ
ﺃﻳﻨﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﲔ ﻟﻸﺷﻌﺮﻱ )ﺝ/١ﺹ) :(٤٠ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ :ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ
ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺉ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﺑﺮ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﺑﲑﻩ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘـﺎﺋﻠﻮﻥ ـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳍﺬﻳﻞ ﻭﺍﳉﻌﻔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﻜﺎﰲ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﺒﺎﺋﻲ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺉ ﻻ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺰﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﻃﻲ ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺩ ﺑـﻦ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﰊ ﺯﻓﺮ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ(ﺍﻩ
98
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ )ﺇﻧﻘﺎﺫ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﱪ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ( ﺿﻤﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌـﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴـﺪ
ﺹ ) :٢٠٢ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺜﻠﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ...ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﳜﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺠﺰﻩ
ﺷﻲﺀ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﳊﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﳝﻮﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﱂ ﻳﺰﻝ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﲰﻌﻴﺎ ﺑﺼﲑﺍ
ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻏﻨﻴﺎ ...ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻒ ﺍﳋﺒﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ...ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻛﻠـﻬﺎ
ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﺣﺪﺛﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﱂ ﻳﺰﻝ ﺎ ﻗـﺎﺩﺭﺍ
ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﺣﻴﺎ ﲰﻴﻌﺎ ﺑﺼﲑﺍ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﱂ ﻳﺰﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳉﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﱄ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ )ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ( ﺹ ٣٢٩ﺿﻤﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ) :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺃﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻘﺪﺭﺓ ؟ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ :ﻻ ،ﺑﻞ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﻮ ﻋـﺎﱂ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺣﻲ ﲰﻴﻊ ﺑﺼﲑ ﻗﺪﱘ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻷﺟﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ،
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﺎ...
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﳏﺪﺛﺎ ﻷﺩﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﺛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻌﺎﱂ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻌـﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﻟﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﺪ ﻭﻓﺎﻋﻞ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻭ ﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻮﻫﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻠﻞ ﺝ/٢ﺹ) :١٠٩ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﳏﻤﺪ :ﻭﺃﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﲟﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺺ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﲰﻴﻊ ﺑﺼﲑ ،ﰒ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ:
ﻓﻘﺎﻟﺖ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﻫﺸﺎﻡ ﺍﺑـﻦ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ ﻭﲨﻴـﻊ
ﺍﺴﻤﺔ :ﻧﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﲰﻴﻊ ﺑﺴﻤﻊ ﺑﺼﲑ ﺑﺒﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻫﺒﺖ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻨـﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺸـﺎﻓﻌﻲ!
ﻭﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ! ﻭﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﺎﱐ! ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﲰﻴـﻊ
ﺑﺼﲑ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺴﻤﻊ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺒﺼﺮ ﻷﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﲰﻴﻊ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﺑﺼﲑ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﳏﻤﺪ :ﻭﺬﺍ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺇﻃﻼﻕ ﲰﻊ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺼﺮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﱂ ﻳﺄﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺺ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻱ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ) :٥٥٥/١ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ:
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻭﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﻦ :ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺩﺧﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ
ﻭﻛﻞ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ...ﺗﻘﻮﻝ :ﻋﺎﱂ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺣـﻲ
ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲝﻲ ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﲰﻴﻊ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺴﻤﻴﻊ ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ،ﻭﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻓﻌـﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻘﻮﻝ :ﻳﺮﺯﻕ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﺯﻕ ﻭﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﻭﻳﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﺣﻢ ﺗﺮﻳـﺪ ﻳـﺮﺣﻢ ﺍﳌـﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻳـﺮﺣﻢ
ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﻘﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﱄ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻲ ﰲ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺹ) :٥٢ﻓﻤﻌﲎ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺣﻴﺎ ﺑﺬﺍﺗـﻪ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻠﺰﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻗﺪﳝﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻤـﺔ ﺑـﻪ
99
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻴﺔ ﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﺗﻨﻜﺸﻒ ﳍﺎ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﻜﺸﺎﻓﺎ
ﺗﺎﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻗﺪﳝﺔ ﻣﺘﻘﺘﻀﻴﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﻜﺸﺎﻑ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﱄ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻧﻴﺔ) :ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻛﺎﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ
ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﳌﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻥ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ...ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﺇﺣﺎﻃﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻧﻜﺸﺎﻓﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻇﻬﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﻟﻪ ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻪ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ )ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﳊﻀﺎﺭﻱ ﻟﻌﻘﻴـﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿـﻴﺔ(
ﺹ٢٣٠
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻣﻞ ﳒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﻭﻳﺒﺼﺮ ﻭﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻳﻘﺪﺭ...ﺇﱁ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔـﻮﺍ ﰲ
ﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻥ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻻ؟ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﳒﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻠﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﺎﻥ
ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻲ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻟﻠﺸﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻱ :٣٧١/١ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﳛﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﻞ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﻗﺴﻤﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ :ﻣـﻦ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ )ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ( ...ﻣﻌﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﳝﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔـﺲ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭﻳﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ،ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﳛﻲ) :ﻓﺄﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﺮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﻴﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻟﻔﻈﻴﺎ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺣﻜﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺘﺴﻨﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﱵ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺮ
ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﻭﺍﺑﻨﻪ ﳛﻲ ﻭﻟﻄﻒ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺎﺙ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ
ﺃﻥ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﻭﺣﻜﻰ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟـﻚ،
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻜﻲ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻖ
ﻭﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ )ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟـﺔ( ﺹ) :١٤٢ﻭﻻ
ﺧﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻑ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﺣﻴﺎ ...ﺇﱁ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺣﲔ ﳓﺎﻭﻝ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺑـﲔ
ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻘﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ
ﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﺑﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ؟ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ
ﻗﺪﳝﺔ ﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻗﺪﳝﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪﺣﺎ ﰲ ﻭﺣﺪﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ؟
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﺖ ﻭﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻭﺗﻌﺪﺩﺕ ﺃﺭﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﺖ ﻭﺇﻥ
ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻳﻬﺪﻓﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻭﺗﻔﺴﲑﻩ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺟـﺎﺀ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺁﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ(ﺍﻩ
100
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻨﻤﻮذج اﻟﺨﺎﻣﺲ :اﻟﺼﻮﻓﯿﺔ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ) :ﻣﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﻪ( ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ،ﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﺄﻟﻨﺎﻫﻢ ﻋـﻦ ﻣﻘﺼـﺪﻫﻢ ـﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜـﻼﻡ
ﻓﺴﻴﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﳓﻦ ﻻ ﻧﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﳛﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺘﺤﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺑـﻞ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻧـﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﷲ ﺗﺘﺠﻠﻰ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻓﻜﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﺘﺠﻠﻰ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺇﻣﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺇﺗﻘﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻗﻴﻮﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﷲ
...ﺇﱁ
ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺘﻪ )ﺍﻟﺮﺷﻔﺎﺕ( ﳓﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻗـﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﻓﻌـﺎ
ﻟﺘﻮﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺹ ١٢٦ﻣﻊ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﺩﺍﻥ:
ﻭﻻ ﺣﻠﻮﻝ ﻗﻂ ﰲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘــﺎﺩﻱ * ﻻ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺫﻱ ﺍﻹﳊﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﲢﺎﺩ
ﻋﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﻎ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻼﻝ ( ﺍﻩ * ﻓﺠﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺳﺎﱂ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺍﺋﺮ ﺹ ) : ٣٠ﻷﻢ ]ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻓﻮﻥ[ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻈﺮﻭﻥ
ﺇﱃ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺇﻻ ﺷﻬﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻻ ﳛﻞ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﻻ ﳛﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ
ﻟﻴﺶ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ) (٢٠ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺗﻨﻈﺮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﻝ ،ﻓﻮﺍﷲ ﰒ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﻜﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻔﺘﺨﺮ:
ﻣﺎ ﺷﻬﹺﺪﺕ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻈﹶﺮﺕ ﻋﻴﲏ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺷﻬﺪﺕ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ) :٣٢٢/٤ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﺼﲑﺗﻪ ﻭﱂ ﺗﻀﻌﻒ
ﻣﻨﺘﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ﺇﻻ
ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺛﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻪ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻟﻠﻮﺍﺣـﺪ
ﺍﳊﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ
ﻭﻳﺬﻫﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻧﻪ ﲰﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﺭﺽ ﻭﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺷﺠﺮ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣـﺪ
ﺍﳊﻖ(ﺍﻩ
(٢٠ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ) :ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﻤﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻟﻮﻻﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ(ﺍﻩ
101
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ) :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﱯ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﺑﻜﺴﺒﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺍﳉﱪﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ:
ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﲟﻮﺟﺐ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻮ ﻓﻮﺽ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﳍﻢ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻛﻔﺎﺭﺍ ﻋﺼﺎﺓ(ﺍﻩ
102
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻭﻕ ﺹ ...) :٢٥ﻓﺎﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﳜﺘﺺ ﲟﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻃﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺰﳝﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺰﳝﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻈـﺎﳌﻮﻥ ﻋﻠـﻮﺍ
ﻛﺒﲑﺍ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺳﻲ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ) :٢٩/٢ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺿﻴﻔﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻤﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺇﻃﻼﻗـﻪ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ،ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻃﻼﻕ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺿﺮﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻊ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﳛﻤﻞ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻗﹶﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﻀـﻤﻨﺔ
ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺳﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺒﺔ ﺹ ...) :٢٦٤ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻼ ﳝﺘﻨـﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺑﻼ ﺷﺮﻁ! ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻻ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﻳﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭﻧﺎ ﺍﳌﺘﻀﻤﻨﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻭﻳﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻩ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ
ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻐﲑ ﺷﺮﻭﻃﻬﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻬﺎ ﺍﳋﱪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺷﱪ ﰲ ﻣﺼﺎﺑﻴﺢ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺭ ) :٣٣/١ﻟﻠﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻌﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﻭﺍﳌﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑـﻪ ﺑﻌـﺪ ﺍﳉﻬـﻞ
ﻭﺍﺗﻔﻘﺖ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻧﺴﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﻯ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻛﺬﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﺪﺩ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ
ﺍﻟﻈﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺟﺎﺭ ﺍﷲ ﺹ ) :١٠٣-١٠١ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻫﻨـﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ
ﻳﻨﻘﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺽ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺽ! ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﶈﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﺎﺋﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻔـﺮ
ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ )ﳝﺤﻮ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﺜﺒﺖ( ...ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ
ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ،ﲡﻮﺯﻭﺍ ﰲ ﺇﻃﻼﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺃﺟﺮﻯ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟـﱵ
ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻈﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﺄﻭﻗﻌﻬﺎ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﳌﺎ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻻﺋﻞ...
ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﲟﺼﲑﻫﺎ ﻭﻣﺼﲑ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﺬﺍ ﻗﺪﱘ ﺃﺯﱄ ﻟﻜﻦ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﳌﺼﲑ
ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﻷﻭﳍﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﳌﺼﲑ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ
ﳎﺎﺯﺍ ...ﻓﺎﻟﱰﺍﻉ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻜﺮﻭﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﺗﱪﺃ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﳑﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ...
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻴﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﺀ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﺀ ﻓﺎﻟﱰﺍﻉ
ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻄﻠـﻖ
103
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﳎﺎﺯﺍ ﻻ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﺘﺒﲔ ﳍﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺣﱴ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻷﻥ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﻋﻨـﺪ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺁﻏﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺮﺍﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﺭﻳﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺼﺎﻧﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ) :٥١/٣ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺃﻱ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻻﺳﺘﻠﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ!! ﺑﻪ ﺃﻭﻻ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻣﱰﻩ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺰﳒﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻭﺍﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺹ ) : ٩٤ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻣﻌﻨـﻴﲔ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻫﻮ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺰﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺰﻡ ﲝﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ
ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺣﺎﺻﻼ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﻪ ﰲ ﺣـﻖ ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﺭﻱ ﻻﺳـﺘﻠﺰﺍﻣﻪ
ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﲔ ﻣﻜﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ ﺹ ) : ٤٦ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻟﻐﺔ ﻭﻋﺮﻓﺎ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﱂ
ﻳﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺴﺒﺎﻥ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺣﻖ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﻮﻗﲔ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﱂ ﳛﻴﻄﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﲟﺎ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﻭﲟـﺎ
ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺎﺋﻦ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒـﺪﺍﺀ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﳌﻦ ﻳﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﻔﺎﻩ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺤﺎﱐ ﰲ ﳏﺎﺿﺮﺍﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﺎ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﻱ ﺹ ٥٠ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ،
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺤﺎﱐ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺹ ) : ٥٨ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﺒﻪ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻜﺘﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻌـﻴﲔ ﻣﻮﺿـﻊ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻡ ﻓـﻼ
ﻳﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻭﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺫﻟﻚ :ﺃﻥ ﷲ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﲔ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻖ ،ﻓﺎﻷﻭﻝ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒـﺪﺍﺀ ﻭﻻ
ﻳﺘﻐﲑ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻐﲑ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﳊﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﺣﻜﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺘﻤﻲ ﻭﻣﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺹ ) :٦٥ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ
ﻣﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺭ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﰲ ﻟﻮﺡ ﺍﶈﻮ ﻭﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻥ ﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻟﻮﺣﲔ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺡ ﺍﶈﻔﻮﻅ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ...ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻟﻮﺡ ﺍﶈﻮ ﻭﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻈﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﻐﲑﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺃﻣـﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻘـﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻭﺣﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺡ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ) :ﳝﺤﻮ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﺛﺒﺖ ﻭﻋﻨـﺪﻩ ﺃﻡ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ( ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻻ ﳝﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻹﳍﻲ ﺍﻷﺯﱄ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﺣﻜﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺤﺎﱐ ﺹ ٨٣ﻋﻦ ﺍﻠﺴﻲ ﰲ ﲝﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ١٣٠/٤ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ) :ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺗﺪﻝ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻮﺣﲔ ﺃﺛﺒﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺡ ﺍﶈﻔﻮﻅ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺗﻐﲑ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺃﺻﻼ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻟﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ :ﻟﻮﺡ ﺍﶈﻮ ﻭﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﺜﺒﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﰒ ﳝﺤﻮﻩ ﳊﻜﻢ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻻ
ﲣﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎﺏ(ﺍﻩ
104
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺤﺎﱐ ﺹ) :٨٦ﻓﺴﻮﺍﺀ ﺻﺤﺖ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﻣﻲ ﺇﻟﻴـﻪ ﺍﻟﺸـﻴﻌﺔ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻏﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻋﺘﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﺔ ـﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗـﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﺒﻌﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﻉ
ﻭﺍﻷﺑﺮﺹ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻤﻰ) :ﺑﺪﺍ ﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺘﻠﻴﻬﻢ( ﻓﺒﺄﻱ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻓﺴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻳﻔﺴﺮ ﺑـﻪ
ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﻭﺻﻴﺎﺋﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺤﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻃﻼﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺎﺯ ،ﻓﺒﺪﺍ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﲟﻌﲎ ﻗﻀﻰ ﺃﻭ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ،ﻭﻓﺴﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﻴﺪﻱ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﺱ )ﺹ ) : (٨٢٨٨ﻭﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﻉ ﻭﺍﻷﺑﺮﺹ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻤﻰ ) :ﺑﺪﺍ ﷲ ﻋـﺰ
ﻭﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺘﻠﻴﻬﻢ ( ﺃﻱ ﻗﻀﻰ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻻﺛﲑ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺒـﺪﺍﺀ
ﺍﺳﺘﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻏﲑ ﺟﺎﺋﺰ ...ﻭﻗﺪ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺪﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ
ﻛﺬﺍ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ،ﻭﺑﻪ ﻓﹸﺴﺮ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺇﻃﻼﻗـﻪ ﺇﻻ
ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻓﺎﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫـﻮ ﰲ
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﺃﻢ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﻔﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺟﻬﻞ ،ﺃﻣـﺎ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻓﻔﻴﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﰲ ﻣﻈﺎﻧﻪ .
105
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺫﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﲡﻞ ﳐﺼﻮﺹ ﻻ ﺗﻨﻜﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺑـﺎﻟﻌﻠﻢ
ﻭﳓﻦ ﻻ ﻧﻨﻜﺮﻩ ﻭﻻ ﻧﺄﺑﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﲔ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺘﻤـﺪﺓ
ﺃﺻﻼ ﻭﺃﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ :ﻭﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻟﻔﻈﻴﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻟﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻨﻌﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻫﻮ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﳝﻨﻌﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ
ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﻴﻠﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ.ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﻠﻲ ﳛﲕ ﻣﻌﻤﺮ) :ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ( ٢٩١/١ـ.٢٩٢
106
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
.١ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺔ .٢ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ .٣ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ .٤ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ .٥ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ
ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘﻜﺎﻑ .٦ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺞ .٧ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺩ .٨ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ .٩ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﳝﺎﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺬﻭﺭ .١٠ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷَﺷﺮﺑﺔ .١١ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻃﻌﻤﺔ .١٢.ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺐ .١٣ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﺒﺎﺱ
ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺐ .١٤ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ .١٥ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺎﺋﺢ .١٦ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﺎﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﻖ .١٧ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎﺡ .١٨ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻼﻕ .١٩ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﻖ .٢٠ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻳﺎ .٢١ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﺎﻳﺎ.٢٢ .
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺋﺾ .٢٣ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎﺕ .٢٤ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ .٢٥ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺍﻕ ﻭﺍﶈﺎﺭﺑﲔ.٢٦ .
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ .٢٧ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻱ .٢٨ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺩﻳﻌﺔ .٢٩ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻘﻴﻄﺔ ﻭﺍﻵﺑﻖ .٣٠ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺎﻥ .٣١ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ .٣٢ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﻯ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺎﺕ .٣٣ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺁﺩﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻲ ﻣﻨﺬ ﻋﻬﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﺰ ﺣﱴ ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻃﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ
ﰲ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﻊ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﻊ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻟﻠﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺹ ،ﻟﻜﻦ
ﻻ ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻟﱠﻒ -ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﻋﺎﺋﻢ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ– ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎﹰ ﺣﺎﻭﻝﹶ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺒﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﲏ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ،ﺃﲰﺎﻩ ﺑـ)ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺋﻢ( ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻉ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻬﻲ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻴﺔ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺇﲤﺎﻣﻪ ﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ
ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ .ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺋﻢ ١٦١/١ﰲ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﳊﻴﺾ) :ﺍﳊﻴﺾ
ﻋﻠﹼﺔ ﺗﺼﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ـﻜﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨـ ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺠﻴﺒﲔ.
ﻓﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺾ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ،ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﹼﺔ ﻭﻓﺴﺎﺩ ،ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺠﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ،ﳛﺮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﲰﺎﻉ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻻ ﳛﻞﹼ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺃﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺎﺿﺖ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻠﹼﻲ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺠﺪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳛﻞ ﳌﻔﻴﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺠﻴﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻴﺌﺎﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺃﺣﺪﺙ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺪﺙ ،ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﻄﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱰﻭﻉ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻼﻉ ،ﻭﻳﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ﰲ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺋﻢ ) :١٦٧/١ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ -ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ :-ﺇﺫﺍ ﻃﻬﺮﺕ ﺍﳌﺮﺃﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﻀﻬﺎ
ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺻﻼﺓ ،ﻓﻀﻴﻌﺖ ﺍﻟﻐﺴﻞ ،ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻀﺎﺀ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ.
ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻠﻪ :ﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﳌﻘﺘﺮﹺﻑ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﺼﻞ ﳑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﻓﻪ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﻄﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻭﺻﻔﻨﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺘﻄﻬﺮ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻌﻰ ﰲ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺇﻗﻼﻋﻪ ﻋﻤﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﻓﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ) :ﻓﺎﻓﻬﻤﻮﺍ ﻣﻌﺸﺮ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺒﺪﻛﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍﹰ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻨﺎﹰ،
ﻓﺈﻥﹼ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ،ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﻛﻞﹼ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻄﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻭﻳﻮﺍﻓﻘﻪ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻭﻧﻈﲑﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ،ﻻ ﳚﺰﻱ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻻ ﳛﻞﱡ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ،ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻛﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻤﻴﻠﻜﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ،
107
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﲢﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﶈﺮﻓﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺷﺒﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺎﻃﲔ ،ﻓﺈﻥﹼ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞﹼ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ) :ﻭﺫﹶﺭﻭﺍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻹﰒ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ،(ﻭﻗﺎﻝ:
)ﻗﹸﻞﹾ ﺇﹺﻧﻤﺎ ﺣﺮﻡ ﺭﺑﻲ ﺍﻟﹾﻔﹶﻮﺍﺣﺶ ﻣﺎ ﻇﹶﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻄﹶﻦ ،(ﻭﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻭﺃﹶﺳﺒﻎﹶ ﻋﻠﹶﻴﻜﹸﻢ ﻧﹺﻌﻤﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓﹰ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻨﺔﹰ(ﺍﻩ
ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﳉﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺤﺎﱐ ﺿﻤﻦ ﲝﻮﺛﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ
،٢٧٤-٢٧٣/٨ﰒ ﺍﻃﻠﻌﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺋﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺝ/١ﺹ ١٦٧ﻃﺒﻌﺔ
ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻤﻲ ،ﻓﺄﻧﺖ ﺗﺮﺍﻩ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻻ ﳚﺰﻱ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻻ ﳚﺰﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳛﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻭﻻ ﳛﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻣﺎ
ﺣﺮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ
ﺗﺬﻛﹼﺮ ﺃﺧﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﺑﺼﺪﺩ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋـﻒ ﻣـﻦ ﺧـﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻤـﺎﺫﺝ
ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ،ﺑﻞ ﳓﻦ ﰲ ﺻﺪﺩ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻠﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﺤﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻬـﻢ
ﳌﺮﺍﺩﻫﻢ ﺃﻥ ﲢﻜﻢ ﲟﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﻩ ،ﻭﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻣﻔﺼﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ
ﻭﺬﺍ ﻧﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻘﲔ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﺪﻗﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻧﺼﻔﻨﺎ ﰲ
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺍﺗﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ )ﻋﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ(
ﻟﺴﻘﻂ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﻠﺚ )-ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻠﺚ ﻛﺜﲑ ( -ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ –ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ -ﺳﻴﺘﺒﲔ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺻﺤﺔ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﺍ
ﺃﻭ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻭﺳﻴﺘﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻓﻬﻤﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻗﺪ
ﻋﻤﻤﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ.
108
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ:
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ:
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻫﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ؟
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻣﱴ ﻳﻌﺬﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ؟
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ
109
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻤﺤﻮر اﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :ﺗﺼﺤﯿﺢ اﻟﺤﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻵﺧﺮ
اﻟﻤﺒﺤﺚ اﻷول :أﻧﻮاع اﻟﺨﻼف
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﻢ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﻛﻞ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﺑﺎﷲ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ :ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ :ﺧﻼﻑ ﺗﻨﻮﻉﹴ ﻭﺧﻼﻑ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﻭﺧﻼﻑ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ،ﻭﻟﻨﺘﺤﺪﺙ ﻋﻦ ﻫـﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ:
110
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺴﺒﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺹ ) : ٤٠ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲰﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻣﺼﻴﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻼ ﺗﺮﺩﺩ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻐﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺩﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﲪﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺘﲔ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺑﻐﻲ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼـﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﳌﺴـﺘﻘﻴﻢ
ﺹ ) : ٣٥ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﺭﺙ ﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﲡﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺏ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻪ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﳐﻄﺌﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺋﹶﲔﹺ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﳐﻄﺌﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻛﺜـﺮ
ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺤﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻷﻥ ﺇﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺜﺒﺘـﻪ
ﺃﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺣﺎﻃﺘﻪ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﻴﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺹ) :٤٠ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺆﻭﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺁﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻔﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺒﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻐﻀﺎﺀ ﻷﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ
ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺘﲔ ﻻ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﻟﻸﺧﺮﻯ ﲟﺎ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻨﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﺑﻞ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﳊـﻖ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ(ﺍﻩ
111
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ -ﻣﺘﻔﻘﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ
ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻧﻮﺏ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻮﻥ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺬﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻴﺪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﻌﺰ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺹ) :٣٣١ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺃﰊ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﲔ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺻﻮﺭﻱ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺭﺡ ﻻﺯﻣﺔ ﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻣـﻊ
ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﻜﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ ﻻ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻣﺸﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﻋﺬﺑﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﻋﻔﺎ
ﻋﻨﻪ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺹ) :٣١٠ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﲨﻌﻮﺍ -ﺃﻱ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺑﻘﻠﺒﻪ ﻭﺃﻗﺮ ﺑﻠﺴـﺎﻧﻪ
ﻭﺍﻣﺘﻨﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﲜﻮﺍﺭﺣﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﺎﺹ ﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻴﺪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﱂ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻧﻚ ﲡﺪ ﻣﻦ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻲ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﱰﺍﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺣﺮ ،ﻭﻳﺼﻮﺭﻩ
ﻷﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ -ﺇﻣﺎ ﺟﻬﻼ ﺃﻭ ﲡﺎﻫﻼ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺃﺻﻠﻲ
112
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻭﻫﻮ :ﻭﻣﺎ ﺿﺎﺑﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻣﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻛﻪ؟ ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﺿﺎﰲ ﻭﻧﺴﱯ ﻓﻤﺎ
ﻳﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻙ ﺭﲟﺎ ﺭﺁﻩ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻙ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ) :ﻭﻻ
ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺧﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻙ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻨﺎ ﺿﺎﺑﻂ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺩﻗﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ ﻫﻮ :ﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻧﺼﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺇﲨﺎﻋـﺎ ﺃﻭ
ﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎ ﺟﻠﻴﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﳎﻤﻌﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ) :١٠٩/٢ﻛﻞﱡ ﺷﻲﺀٍ ﺃﻓﱴ ﻓﻴـﻪ ﺍﺘﻬـﺪ
ﻓﺨﺮﺟﺖ ﻓﺘﻴﺎﻩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﳉﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﱂ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻌـﺎﺭﺽ
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ،ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﳌﻘﻠﱢﺪﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﻪ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﱵ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺿﺔ ) :١٥٠/١١ﺇﻥ ﺗﺒﲔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺎ ﻛﻨﺺ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺳـﻨﺔ ﻣﺘـﻮﺍﺗﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ
ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﺃﻭ ﻇﻨﺎ ﳏﻜﻤﺎ ﲞﱪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﳉﻠﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻧﻘﺾ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺹ:١٧
) ﺧﺎﲤﺔ :ﻭﻳﻨﻘﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﰲ * ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻓﺄﻧﻘﻀﻪ ﺇﻥ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ
ﻏﲑ ﺧﻔﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ * ﻟﻠﻨﺺ ﺃﻭ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﺃﻭ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ
* ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﳏﻜﻴﺔ ( ﺍﻩ ﺃﻭ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﰲ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ) :ﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ( ﻫﻮ :ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻳﲔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻈـﺎﻫﺮ
ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻭﻝ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ،ﻭﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ -ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ -ﻫـﻮ:
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﳎﺘﻬﺪﻱ ﺃﻣﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﺑﻂ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺑﻂ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﻫﻮ ﺿﺎﺑﻂ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ ﻭﺿﺎﺑﻂ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻇﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻓـﺮﻕ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻫﻮ -ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻳﺔ -ﻧﺺ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ -ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻳﺔ -ﻫﻮ ﻧﺺ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﻓﺎﻃﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻭﺍﳊﺴـﲔ ﺭﺿـﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨـﻬﻢ،
ﻭﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻫﺮﺓ
ﻭﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺿﺎﺑﻂ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺣﺎ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ
ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﲢﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳒﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺯﻋﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﺘﻘﺎﻃﻌﻮﻥ ﺑﻞ ﺭﲟﺎ
ﻛﻔﺮ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻻ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﲢﺖ ﺿﺎﺑﻄﻬﻢ ﻫﻢ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳒﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻨﺪﻋﻮ
ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺃﻭﻻﹰ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎﹰ
113
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ھﻞ ﺧﻼف اﻟﻤﺒﺘﺪع ﯾﻨﻘﺾ اﻹﺟﻤﺎع ؟
ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ :ﻫﻞ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﺘﻬﺪ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﻣﻌﺘﱪ؟ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ
ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﺍﺘﻬﺪ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ؟
ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﻜﻰ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﺍﶈﻴﻂ
:٤٢١-٤١٨/٦ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻻ:
-ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﻱ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻭﻛـﻼﻡ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﺎﱐ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ
-ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﲞﻼﻓﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﻭﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﲰﺎﻫﻢ
-ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﺃﰊ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﰊ
ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﲑﰲ ﻭﺯﺍﺩ :ﺇﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻌﺘﱪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ
-ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻳﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻟﻪ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﺍﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ
ﺃﺩﺍﻩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻷﺣﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻠﺪﻩ ،ﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﺍﻵﻣﺪﻱ ﻭﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻭﻥ
-ﻭﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻓﺎﻟﺪﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﻴﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ،ﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺣﺰﻡ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﻋﻦ ﲨﺎﻫﲑ ﺳﻠﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻓﺎﺳـﺪ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻋﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﺘﻬﺪ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺼـﻔﻰ ﺹ١٤٥
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ) :ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ :ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺰﺩﻭﻱ ٢٣٨/٣ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﻴﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻉ
ﺑﻘﻴﻮﺩ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ) :ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺩﺍﻋﻴﺎ ﺇﻟﻴـﻪ ﺃﻭ
ﻣﺎﺟﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺮﺭ ) :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻷﻣـﺔ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻴﺔ،
ﻻﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻞ ﻭﻫﻮﻯ( ﻩ ﺍﳌﻨـﺎﺭ ٤٤٩/٢ﻭﺍﻧﻈـﺮ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ )ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻓﻜﺮﻩ( ﻟﻠﻤﻠﻴﻜﻲ ﺹ١٩٨
ﺑﻞ ﻗﺮﺭ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﻌﻔﺮﻳﺔ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺷﺪﺗﻪ ﰲ ﻧﻘـﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌـﺾ
ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻛﺮﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ) (٢١ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ
ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺭ ٤٤٧/٢ﻭ٤٤٩ﻭ٤٦٢ﻭ٤٦٥
(٢١ﺑﻞ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ) :ﻗﺪ ﺍﺗﻀﺢ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻠﻮﻝ ﻭﺃﺿﺮﺍﺑﻪ ﺣﱴ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻭﻋﻮﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﺠﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻹﳝﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ
114
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺹ ) : ٧٦ﺇﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺈﲨﺎﻉ
ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ :ﺍﳌﺒﺘـﺪﻉ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧـﺎﻟﻒ ﱂ
ﻳﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻮﻳﺢ ﻟﻠﺘﻔﺘﺎﺯﺍﱐ ) :١٠٣/٢ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﺠﺔ ﺃﺧﺺ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻮﻣﺎ
ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺣﺠﺔ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺮﺓ ﺣﺠﺔ ،ﻭﳓﻦ ﻻ ﻧﻜﺘﻔﻲ ﺬﺍ ﺑﻞ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺮﺓ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ ،ﻓﺄﺩﻟﺘـﻬﻢ ﺗـﺪﻝ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻨـﺎ
ﻭﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ(ﺍﻩ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻃﺒﻌﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ :ﻓﺎﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺪﻭﻥ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻻ
ﻳﻌﺘﺪﻭﻥ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﺔ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺷﺮﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻟﻠﺤﻠﻲ ) :١١٦/٤ﻛﻞ ﳐﺎﻟﻒ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣـﻦ
ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ،ﺗﺮﺩ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺗﻪ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ .ﻭﻻ ﺗـﺮﺩ ﺷـﻬﺎﺩﺓ
ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻱ ﺍﳊﻖ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻹﲨـﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﺴـﻖ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﳐﻄﺌـﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﲏ ﻳﺴﺎﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺑﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻃﺮﺍﺡ
ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ( ﺍﻩ ﺍﻹﲢﺎﻑ ﻕ ١٥٣ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﻴﻜﻲ ﺹ ٢٢٤
115
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺗﻨﺎﺯﻋﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻛﺴﻤﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﻴﺖ ﺻﻮﺕ ﺍﳊﻲ ﻭﺗﻌﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﳌﻴﺖ ﺑﺒﻜﺎﺀ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻭﺭﺅﻳـﺔ
ﳏﻤﺪ ﺭﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ( ﺍﻩ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﲪﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣـﺔ ﻗـﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻃﱯ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ) :١٢٥/٤ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ :ﻟﻘﺪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻـﻠﻰ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﳍﻢ ،ﻻ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻌﻤﻞ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺳـﻌﺔ ﻭﺭﺃﻯ ﺃﻥ
ﺧﲑﺍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ :ﺃﻱ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺧﺬﺕ ﺑﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻚ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ
ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﺮﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺮﱐ ﺃﻥ ﱄ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﲪﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ:
ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﻋﺠﺒﲏ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ :ﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﱂ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻻ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺿﻴﻖ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٨٠/٣٠ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻘﺾ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻏﲑﻩ
ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﱵ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﳌﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﻴﺪ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ )ﻣﻮﻃﺌﻪ( ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻨﻌﻪ ﻣـﻦ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺼﺎﺭ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻠﻐﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺻﻨﻒ ﺭﺟﻞ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﲪﺪ :ﻻ ﺗﺴﻤﻪ )ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ( ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﲰﻪ )ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ( ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﲨﺎﻋﻬﻢ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﺭﲪﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﳌﺰﻳﺪ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ) ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺬﻫﺐ :ﺩﺭﺍﺳـﺔ ﺗﺄﺻـﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧـﺔ
ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻤﺬﻫﺐ( ﻃﺒﻊ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻧﺎﺷﺮﻭﻥ
اﻟﻤﺒﺤﺚ اﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :ھﻞ ھﻨﺎك ﻓﺮق ﺑﯿﻦ اﻟﺨﻄﺄ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻤﺴﺎﺋﻞ اﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎدﯾﺔ واﻟﺨﻄﺄ ﻓﻲ
اﻟﻤﺴﺎﺋﻞ اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺔ ؟
ﻟﻌﻠﻚ ﻻﺣﻈﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﻣﻨـﻬﺎ
ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺎ ﻟﻸﺻﻮﻝ ﺃﻭ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﺺ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﳉﻠﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻤﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺘﱪ ﻭﻣﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﳐﺎﻟﻒ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻌﺘﱪ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻋﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻐﲑ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺧﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺧﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٣٤٦/٢٣ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﲔ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻦ
116
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﳍﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻻ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ...ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻓﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﳌﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﲔ :ﻣﺎ ﺣﺪ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﺊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ؟ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ؟
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ،ﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ :ﻓﺘﻨﺎﺯﻉ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻫﻞ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺭﺑﻪ ﺃﻡ ﻻ؟ ﻭﰱ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ؟ ﻭﰱ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻮﺏ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻴﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﳊﺞ ﻭﲢﺮﱘ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺣﺶ ﻭﺍﳋﻤﺮ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮ ﳍﺎ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ،
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ :ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴـﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :٥٦/٦ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳋﱪﻳﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻥ ﲰﻴﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﻓﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﳏﺪﺛﺔ ﻗﺴﻤﻬﺎ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﻤﲔ ...ﺑـﻞ ﺍﳊـﻖ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﳉﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻔﲔ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ...
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﺇﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲟﱰﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ :ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺎ ﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﻭﻇﲏ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺼـﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻥ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻓﺎﳌﺨﻄﺊ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻔﻮﺍ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺬﻧﺒﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺎﺳﻘﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﳌﺨﻄﺊ
ﰲ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ...
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻄﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﺳﻮﻍ ﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻳﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻍ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ﺹ ) : ٤٢٩ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﳎﺮﺩ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻳﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻏﺮﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻭﻮﻳﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ،ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺴـﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮﻟﻴﺔ
ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻮﻉ ﺷﺄﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻻ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺗﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻔﻴﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻔﺴﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺗﻜـﻮﻥ ﺑﻌـﺾ ﺍﳌﺴـﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺼﻐﺮﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻔﺴﺪﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺳﺪ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﺜﻼ ﳌﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻈﻤﻮﻩ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ )ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ( ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﺸﺄﺎ ﻭﻋﺪ
ﺇﻳﻐﺎﳍﻢ ﻭﺗﻌﻤﻘﻬﻢ ﰲ ﲝﺜﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ!!! ،ﻭﰲ ﺹ ٣٦٧ﺫﻛﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻭﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﳌﺎ ﺟﺮﻯ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨـﻬﻢ
ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ) :ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻨﺘﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻛـﻮﻥ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﺒﺎ
ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﳒﺎﺓ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﲔ ،ﻭﰲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺎﻋﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺃﻓﻬﻤﻪ
ﻭﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺻﺢ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺼﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﺨﻄﺊ ﻟﻪ
ﺃﺟﺮ ﻻ ﳜﺘﺺ ﲟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻭﻻ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ
117
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺍﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐـﻲ ﺑـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﺖ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻭﻇﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ(ﺍﻩ ﻳﻘﻈـﺔ ﺃﻭﱄ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺝ/١ﺹ ٢٠٩ﻟﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺧﺎﻥ
ﺇﺫﻥ ﻓﻤﻨﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ:
ﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻡ ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺔ؟! ﻓﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺎ ﻓﺎﳋﻼﻑ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺘﱪ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧـﺖ ﻣـﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺃﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺎ ﻓﺎﳋﻼﻑ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﱪ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺃﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﻋﺪﻣﻪ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻋﺬﺍﺭ ﻭﻋﺪﻣﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻹﻋﺬﺍﺭ ﻭﻋﺪﻣﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ:
118
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﻭﲝﺴﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻪ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻻﺳـﺘﺪﻻﻝ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻇﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻣﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﺯﻉ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺻﻔﺔ ﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻇﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳑـﺎ
ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ( ﺍﻩ
ﻓﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﺫﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﳐﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻤﻨﺎﻁ ﺍﻹﻋﺬﺍﺭ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﰒ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭ ﻭﻟـﻮ ﻛﺎﻧـﺖ
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺔ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻡ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺎ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﺒﺎ ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺤﺒﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻇﻨﻴﺔ ﰒ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﺑـﻞ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﻌﺬﺭ ﻏﲑﻩ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ،
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ) :١٣٨/٣ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻘﺪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ
ﺑﻨﺺ ﺃﻭ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﺀ ﻓﻼ ،ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺑﻘﻮﻝﹴ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ،ﺇﻻ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ
ﺻﺢ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﺠﻴﺰ ﺧـﻼﻑ ﺍﷲ
ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺧﻼﻑ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻋﻘﺪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﳓﻠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻓﺘﻴـﺎ،
ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺻﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻨﻘﻮﻻﹰ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﺗﻮﺍﺗﺮ ﺃﻭ
ﻧﻘﻞ ﺁﺣﺎﺩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺑﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﻋﺬﺍﺭ :ﻣﻦ ﺑﺬﻝ ﺟﻬﺪﻩ ﻣﺘﺠـﺮﺩﺍ ﻟﻠﻮﺻـﻮﻝ
ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﰒ ﱂ ﻳﺼﺐ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻡ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺼﺮ ﰲ ﺑﺬﻝ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﺃﻭ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺪﻩ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﻖ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻡ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ
ﻭﺑﺬﻝ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﻓﺠﻬﺪ ﺍﺘﻬﺪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺠﻬﺪ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺪ ،ﻭﺟﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺠﻬﺪ
ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻞ ،ﻭﺟﻬﺪ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺠﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻲ ،ﻭﺟﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺸﺄ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺠﻬﺪ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺸﺄ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ..ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ،ﻓﺄﺻﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺇﺫﻥ -ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ -ﻫﻮ :ﻫﻞ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻜﻞ
ﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ؟ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﻓﺎﺟﺘﻬﺪ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻔﺮﻍ ﻭﺳﻌﻪ ﻓﻠـﻢ
ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﻣـﺮ ،ﻫـﻞ
ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﺃﻡ ﻻ؟ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ( ﺍﻩ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ٢٠٣/١٩
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻃﺮﺣﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ) :٣٤٦/٢٣ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﳎﺘﻬـﺪﺍ
ﰲ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﺃﺧﻄﺄ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺧﻄﺄﻩ ﻛﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﲨﺎﻫﲑ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ(ﺍﻩ
119
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺝ/٧ﺹ) :٢١٨ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﻨﺘﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﲔ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻘﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻭﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻘﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺆﻣﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻛﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻄﺆﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :٢٠٧/١٩ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻭﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ ﻛﺄﰊ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ :ﻻ ﻳﺆﲦﻮﻥ ﳎﺘﻬﺪﺍ ﳐﻄﺌﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺣﺰﻡ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ(ﺍﻩ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :٢١٠/١٩ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﺊ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻇﻨﻴﺔ ﻳﺄﰒ ﻓﻘﺪ
ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ] ) :[١٢٥ / ١٣ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻭﱂ
ﻳﻔﺮﻕ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﻓﺮﻭﻉ
ﺑﻞ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﺃﺻﻮﻻ ﻭﻓﺮﻭﻋﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘـﻞ ﺃﺣـﺪ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﺇﻥ ﺍﺘﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺮﻍ ﻭﺳﻌﻪ ﰱ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻳﺄﰒ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ
ﰱ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺃﺩﺧﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :٣١٧/٣ﻓﻤﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻄﺆﻩ ﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻄﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳚﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺃﻭ
ﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻰ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻻﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﻫﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻫﺪﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﱂ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻪ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻴﺪ ،ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﺘﻬﺪ ﰲ ﻃﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﺎ ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺑﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﻐﻔﻮﺭ ﻟﻪ ﺧﻄﺆﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :١٨٠/١٢ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ :ﻓﺎﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻧﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻓﺄﺧﻄﺄ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺧﻄﺆﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻓﺸﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳍﺪﻯ ﻭﺍﺗﺒﻊ ﻏﲑ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﻊ ﻫﻮﺍﻩ ﻭﻗﺼﺮ ﰲ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﳊـﻖ
ﻭﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﺑﻼ ﻋﻠﻢ :ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﺎﺹ ﻣﺬﻧﺐ ،ﰒ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺎﺳﻘﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺗﺮﺟﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﺌﺎﺗﻪ(ﺍﻩ
120
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻲ ﺣﻖ ﺃﻡ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ؟ ﺃﻡ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻘﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻃﻼ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻭﻏﺎﻟﺐ
-ﰒ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺗﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻔﻴﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻼ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺳـﻠﻚ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻚ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻗﻮﻻ ﻭﻋﻤﻼ ﻭﻋﺮﻑ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﺇﺣﻘﺎﻗﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ:
ﺃﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺸﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻚ ﺗﺰﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻮﺟـﻪ ﻟﻜـﻞ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ) :ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﻳﺔ( ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ
ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ؟!
ﻭﻟﻠﺠﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ:
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﹼﻤﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﻜﻔﻴﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ) ،(٢٢ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒـﻞ
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ) :ﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻣـﻦ ﻗـﺎﻝ(،
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺼﻒ ﺳﻴﺠﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻭﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭﻋﻘﻼﱐ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺩﻟﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺩﻟـﺔ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻠﻒ ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺳﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤـﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤـﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘـﺎﻭﻯ
) :١١٦/١٩ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﱪ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻠﻒ ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺳﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻘﻮﻟـﻪ) :ﻻ
ﻳﻜﻠﻒ ﺍﷲ ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺳﻌﻬﺎ( ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﺎﺕ ﻻ ﻧﻜﻠـﻒ ﻧﻔﺴـﺎ ﺇﻻ
ﻭﺳﻌﻬﺎ( ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ) :ﻻ ﺗﻜﻠﻒ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺳﻌﻬﺎ( ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ) :ﻻ ﻳﻜﻠﻒ ﺍﷲ ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﺁﺗﺎﻫﺎ(
ﻭﺃﻣﺮ ﺑﺘﻘﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﺎﻋﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ) :ﻓﺎﺗﻘﻮﺍ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻌﺘﻢ ( ﻭﻗﺪ ﺩﻋﺎﻩ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﻮﳍﻢ ) :ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﻭﻻ
ﲢﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﺻﺮﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﲪﻠﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻨﺎ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﻭﻻ ﲢﻤﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﺎﻻ ﻃﺎﻗﺔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ( ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻗﺪ ﻓﻌﻠﺖ
(٢٢ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﺳﻒ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ
ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻛﺎﻟﻮﺣﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﲑ ،ﻓﻌﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﲑ
ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻳﺼﻴﺐ ﻭﳜﻄﺊ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻧﱯ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺇﱐ ﻷﺳﺘﻐﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺜﲑﻳﻦ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ
ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻠﻘﻮﻥ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ -ﺑﻘﻮﳍﻢ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ،
ﰒ ﻳﺮﺩﻓﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻭﻛﺄﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻲ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻮ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ،ﻓﺎﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ..ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻲ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ
ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﺎﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻠﻢ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﳒﺪ ﻏﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻀﺎﺩﺍ ﰲ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺇﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻄﺒﻊ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﻁ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ )ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ( ﻋﻨﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ!!! ﻓﻘﻠﺖ ﻟﻪ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻓﺄﺻﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮﻃﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻓﺎﺧﺘﺮﺕ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻊ
121
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﺪﻟﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻠﻒ ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺠﺰ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻠﺠﻬﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﱪﺓ! ،ﻭﺩﻟﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻻ ﻳﺆﺍﺧﺬ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﺊ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ!
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ :ﻓﺎﺘﻬﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﻭﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻭﻋﻼﻡ ﻭﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﻭﻣﻔﺖ ﻭﻏـﲑ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻓﺎﺗﻘﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻉ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﻠﻔﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻳﺎﻩ ﻭﻫـﻮ ﻣﻄﻴـﻊ ﷲ
ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﻟﻠﺜﻮﺍﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺗﻘﺎﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻉ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺎﻗﺒﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﻼﻓﺎ ﻟﻠﺠﻬﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﱪﺓ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺼﻴﺐ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻄﻴﻊ ﷲ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻤـﻪ ،ﺧﻼﻓـﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﺪﺭﻳـﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ :ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺮﻍ ﻭﺳﻌﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳊﻖ ،ﻓﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺮﻍ
ﻭﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺍﺏ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ -ﺃﻱ ﺇﻋﺬﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺬﻝ ﺟﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﺘﺠﺮﺩ– ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻛﺜﲑ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﺑﻞ ﻭﳛﻜﻴﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗـﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼـﻞ :١٣٨/٣
)ﻭﺫﻫﺒﺖ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﺴﻖ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺘﻴﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪ
ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺪﺍﻥ ﲟﺎ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻣﺄﺟﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻓﺄﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺇﻥ
ﺃﺧﻄﺄ ﻓﺄﺟﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺃﰊ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠـﻲ ﺭﺿـﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋـﻦ
ﲨﻴﻌﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻻﹰ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ
ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻼﻓﺎﹰ ﺃﺻﻼﹰ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺳﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) :٣٨/٢٢ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻔﻄﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﺪﻱ :ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ.
ﻗﻠﺖ ] ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ [ :ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺧﲑﺍ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﳛﺐ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳋﲑ ،ﻭﺷﺎﻫﺪﺕ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺘﻴﺎ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﲑ ﻭﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﺟﻴﺪ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﲣﺎﻟﻒ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ،ﻓﻠﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻔﻄﻲ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﻨﺒﻠـﻲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻗﺪ ﺳﻤﺞ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻓﺎﷲ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻪ ،ﺃﻋﺎﺫﻧﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ) :٣٩٣ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﺎﺛﺮﺕ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺃﺧﻄﺄﻭﺍ ﻭﻻ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺘﻌﻤﺪﻫﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ
ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﰲ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ) :ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﺧﻄﺄﰎ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﺪﺕ ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻜﻢ( ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺆﺍﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻧﺴﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺧﻄﺄﻧﺎ( ﻭﺻﺢ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺪ ﻓﻌﻠﺖ(ﺍﻩ
122
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺮﺭ ) :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺮﻣﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﲔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﺪﻋﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﳍﺬﺍ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻭﻳﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﺗﺘﺪﻧﺲ ﻓﻄﺮﺗﻪ ﻭﻧﺰﻫﻪ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﱯ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﻰ ﻭﺍﺗﺼﻒ ﺑﺎﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ،ﺑﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻗـﺔ ﻭﻣـﺬﻫﺐ
ﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺧﻄﺄ ﻭﺣﻖ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻭﺳﻨﺔ ﻭﺑﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻠﺔ ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻭﺻﻐﺮﺍ ﻭﻛﱪﺍ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﱂ
ﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﻬﻢ ﻭﷲ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﻓﻌﻨﺪ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻃﻠﺒﻪ ﻭﺟﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌـﺎﱃ ﺇﱃ
ﺧﲑ ﺇﻥ ﺣﺴﻨﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺳﻠﻤﺖ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺻﺪ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ﺹ ٣٦٩ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ) ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗـﻪ
ﻭﻓﻜﺮﻩ ( ﺹ١٩٨
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻻ ﻣﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﺑﲔ ﳒﺎﺓ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﻞ
ﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻨﺠﺎﻢ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ...ﻭﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺻﺢ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺻـﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺼﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﺨﻄﺊ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺟﺮ ﻻ ﳜﺘﺺ ﲟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻭﻻ
ﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ( ﺍﻩ ﻳﻘﻈﺔ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺝ/١ﺹ ٢٠٩ﻟﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺧﺎﻥ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ ﻭﺷﻴﺨﻪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺭ ١٤١/١ﺿﻤﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴـﺄﻟﺔ) :ﺇﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺭﻣﻲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺴﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻛﻞﹴ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻖ ﲟﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻮﺍ ﺟﻬﺪﻫﻢ ﻟﺘﺄﻳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺎﺘﻬﺪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻹﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ) ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻬﻤﺔ
ﰲ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ( ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻻ ﻣﻘﺮﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﺴﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﻴﻌﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫـﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ
ﻭﻳﻨﺒﺬﻭﺍ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺪﺩﺓ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﲰﻲ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ( ﺹ) : ٧٧ﻭﺟﻠﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻌﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺬﻝ
ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻈﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻌﺚ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻭﺧﻠﻖ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ ﳌﺎ ﺗﺸﺎﺖ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺁﻩ ﺃﻭﻓﻖ ﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ
ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﻟﻴﻖ ﺑﻌﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺛﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻜـﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻟـﺬﻟﻚ
ﳎﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻣﺄﺟﻮﺭﻭﻥ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺹ) :٨٠ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻓﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﳎﺘﻬﺪﺓ ﳍﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺠﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻻ
ﻳﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺼﻒ ،ﻭﺍﺘﻬﺪ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭ ﺑﻞ ﻣﺄﺟﻮﺭ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺧﻄﺎ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﻰ ﺍﻹﰒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺘﻬﺪ ﻓﺄﱏ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻧﺒﺰﻩ
ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺀ ﻭﺍﳊﻔﻴﻈﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﺟﻌﻬﺎ ﺷﻴﻌﺎ ﻭﺃﺫﻫﺐ ﺭﳛﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺑﺰ ﻭﺍﻹﺯﺭﺍﺀ
ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺐ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ؟(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﻱ ) :٣٣ / ٣ﻗﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻻﱐ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺃﺗﺮﻯ ﳍﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ]ﻳﻌﲏ ﻣﻦ ﳛﺎﺭﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳉﻤﻞ[ ﺣﺠﺔ ﰲ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻃﻠﺒﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ
123
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ]ﺃﻱ ﺩﻡ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ[ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺃﺭﺍﺩﻭﺍ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺘﺮﻯ ﻟﻚ ﺣﺠـﺔ
ﺑﺘﺄﺧﲑﻙ ﺫﻟﻚ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﻓﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺣﻮﻃﻪ ﻭﺃﻋﻤﻪ ﻧﻔﻌﺎ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻤـﺎ
ﺣﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﺣﺎﻟﻜﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻏﺪﺍ ]ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺘﺎﻝ[؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﱐ ﻷﺭﺟﻮ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻧﻘﻰ ﻗﻠﺒﻪ ﷲ ﻣﻨﺎ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ
ﺃﺩﺧﻠﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ(ﺍﻩ
124
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴﺒﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ :ﻣﺎ ﻧﻼﺣﻈﻪ –ﻭﻟﻸﺳﻒ -ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴـﻖ ،ﻓﻌﻨـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﲑ ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺇﻋﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﳒﺪ ﻛﻼﻣﺎ ﲨﻴﻼ ﻭﻟﻄﻴﻔﺎ ﻭﺗﺄﺻﻴﻼ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻻ) ..ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺲ ﻷﺧﻴﻚ ﺳﺒﻌﲔ ﻋﺬﺭﺍ،
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﱂ ﲡﺪ ﻓﻘﻞ ﻟﻌﻞ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﺬﺭﺍ ﻻ ﺃﻋﺮﻓﻪ( ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﳒﺪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺷﻨﻴﻌﺎ ﻭﻋﻨﻴﻔﺎ ،ﻭﻧﺴﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻨﺎﺳـﻴﻨﺎ
ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﲑ ..ﻓﺼﺎﺭ ﻫﺒﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﺜﻮﺭﺍ) ..ﻛﺴﺮﺍﺏ ﺑﻘﻴﻌﺔ ﳛﺴﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻈﻤﺂﻥ ﻣﺎﺀﺍ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﺀﻩ ﱂ ﳚﺪﻩ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ(
125
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻻﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﳉﱪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﱪﻳﺔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﻨﻜﺮﻭﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﺍ
ﳌﻦ ﺃﻟﻘﻰ ﺇﻟﻴﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻟﺴﺖ ﻣﺆﻣﻨﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻪ ﺑﻴﻘﲔ ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻴﻘﲔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴـﻴﻞ ﺍﳉـﺮﺍﺭ
ﺝ/٤ﺹ) :٥٧٨ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﲞﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺩﺧﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔـﺮ ﻻ
ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﺃﻭﺿﺢ ﻣﻦ ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺛﺒﺖ
ﰲ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻷﺧﻴﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﺎﺀ ﺎ
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻭﰲ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺁﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﲔ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ :ﻣﻦ ﺩﻋﺎ ﺭﺟﻼ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺪﻭ
ﺍﷲ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﺣﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻱ ﺭﺟﻊ ،ﻭﰲ ﻟﻔﻆ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ :ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ
ﻓﻔﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺯﺍﺟﺮ ﻭﺃﻛﱪ ﻭﺍﻋﻆ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗـﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ) :ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺻﺪﺭﺍ( ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﻃﻤﺄﻧﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠـﺐ ﺑـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﺍﺭﻕ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﲟﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺼﺪﻭﺭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻛﻔﺮﻱ ﱂ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻪ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻠـﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻔـﺮ ﻭﻻ
ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﻠﻔﻆ ﺗﻠﻔﻆ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٢٨٢/٣ﻭﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﺍﳌﺎﺭﻗﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟـﻨﱯ ﺑﻘﺘـﺎﳍﻢ
ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻬﻢ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺘﺎﳍﻢ ﺃﺋﻤـﺔ ﺍﻟـﺪﻳﻦ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﻭﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻭﻗﺎﺹ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺑﻞ ﺟﻌﻠﻮﻫﻢ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺘﺎﳍﻢ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﺎﺗﻠﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﱴ ﺳﻔﻜﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﻡ ﻭﺃﻏﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺃﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﻘﺎﺗﻠﻬﻢ ﻟﺪﻓﻊ ﻇﻠﻤﻬﻢ ﻭﺑﻐﻴﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻷﻢ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺐﹺ ﺣﺮﳝﻬﻢ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻐﻨﻢ ﺃﻣﻮﺍﳍﻢ
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺿﻼﳍﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺺ ﻭﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﻘﺘﺎﳍﻢ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ
ﺑﺎﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺷﺘﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻏﻠﻂ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻓـﻼ ﳛـﻞ
ﻷﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻞ ﺩﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﺎﳍﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ﳏﻘﻘـﺔ،
ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻜﻔﺮﺓ ﳍﺎ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ؟! ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﺃﻢ ﲨﻴﻌـﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﲝﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻟﺌﻦ ﳜﻄﺊ ﺍﳌﺮﺀ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺧﲑ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻄﺊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﻛﺘـﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻗﺔ) :ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﺯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺳﺒﻴﻼ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺎﺣﺔ ﺩﻣﺎﺀ
ﺍﳌﺼﻠﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺧﻄﺄ ،ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺃﻟﻒ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺃﻫﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺳـﻔﻚ ﺩﻡ
ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ(ﺍﻩ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺝ/١٢ﺹ٣٠٠
126
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ) :٤٠٣ﻓﺎﻟﺘﺎﺭﻙ ﻟﻠﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺇﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﻧﺎ ﺧﻄﺄﻩ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﺃﺧﻞ ﲝﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻘـﻮﻕ
ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﻬﻨﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺮﻛﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺟﻮﺍﺯﻩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﲢﻘﻖ ﺍﳌﻮﺟـﺐ
ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻜﻔﺮ ﺇﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﻧﺎ ﺧﻄﺄﻩ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺧﻞ ﲝﻖ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺑﻞ ﺗﻌﺪﻯ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻇﻠﻤﻪ ﺃﻛﱪ ﺍﻟﻈﻠـﻢ
ﻭﺃﻓﺤﺸﻪ ﻓﺄﺧﺮﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺃﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳏﻤﺪﺍ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻞ ﺍﳉﺮﺍﺭ ﺝ/٤ﺹ) :٥٧٩ﻓﺤﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺗﻨﺠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﺓ ﺍﳋﻄﺮ ﻭﺗﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻉ ﰲ
ﺍﶈﻨﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻹﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺒﺄﺱ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺸﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﻤﺢ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻋﺎﺋﺪﺓ ،ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳜﺸﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﲰﺎﻩ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ
ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺍ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ(ﺍﻩ
ﺑﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻌﲔ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﺋﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ
ﺑﺎﳌﺎﺋﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳋﻄﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺣﺎﺷـﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺷـﺮﺡ
ﺍﳊﺼﻜﻔﻲ ) :٢٣٠/٤ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ )ﻻ ﻳﻔﱴ ﺑﻜﻔﺮ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﲪﻞ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﻤﻞ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﰲ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ ﺧﻼﻑ ،ﻭﻟﻮ( ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ )ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ( ﻛﻤﺎ ﺣﺮﺭﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤـﺮ ،ﻭﻋـﺰﺍﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷـﺒﺎﻩ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮﻯ .ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺭ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺗﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﳝﻨﻌﻪ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻔﱵ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ
ﳌﺎ ﳝﻨﻌﻪ ،ﰒ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻤﺴﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﻌﻪ ﲪﻞ ﺍﳌﻔﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻓﻪ(ﺍﻩ
127
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﻲ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﻝ ﻗﺪ
ﺗﺴﻠﻄﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺗﻀﻠﻴﻠﻬﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤـﻮﻉ ﻓﺘﺎﻭﻳـﻪ :١٠٠/٣٥
)ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﻤﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﲟﺠﺮﺩ ﺧﻄﺄ ﺃﺧﻄﺄﻩ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺣﺴﻦ ﲡﺐ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻂ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻈـﻢ
ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮﺍﺕ...
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺗﻜﻔﲑﻫﻢ ﲟﺠﺮﺩ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺍﶈﺾ؛ ﺑﻞ
ﻛﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻳﺆﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻳﺘﺮﻙ ﺇﻻ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﳋﻄﺄ ﺃﺧﻄﺄﻩ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﺴﻖ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺄﰒ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺝ/٢٨ﺹ) :٤٩٧ﻓﻬﺆﻻﺀ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺿﻼﳍﻢ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺃﺋﻤـﺔ
ﺍﳍﺪﻯ ﻭﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺃﻢ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﺃﻢ ﺿﺎﻟﻮﻥ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ...،
ﰒ ﻳﻌﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻛﻔﺮﺍ ،ﰒ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﻋﻮﻫﺎ ﻓﻬـﺬﻩ ﺛـﻼﺙ
ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺭﻗﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﲡﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺑﻠﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻼﺯﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺘﺰﻣﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ،
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﲨﺎﻫﲑ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ) :١٣٨/٣ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﳏﻤـﺪ:
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﲟﺎ ﺗﺆﻭﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﻓﺨﻄﺄ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻛﺬﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﺼﻢ ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻳﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ
ﻟﺰﻣﻪ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻔﺮﺍﹰ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻓﺮ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔـﺮ،
ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺧﺼﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﰲ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻃﺮﺩﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﲡﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﲏ ﳌﻦ ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﻛﻮﺎ ﻛﻔﺮﺍ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻜﻔﱢـﺮ
ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﻔﻆ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﳍﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻄﺶ ﻟﺴﻔﻚ ﺩﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ
ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ) :٤٠٥ﺇﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﳌﹸﺨﺘﻠـﻒ ﰲ
ﻛﻔﺮﻫﻢ ﻣﻔﺴﺪﺓ ﺑﻴﻨﺔ ﲣﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺳﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺎﺑﻮﺍ! ،ﻭﺇﺳﻘﺎﻁ ﲨﻴـﻊ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﻮﻗﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ! ،ﻭﺇﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﻓﺮﻭﺝ ﻧﺴﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻮﺑﻮﺍ! ،ﻭﺳﻔﻚ ﺩﻣﺎﺋﻬﻢ
ﻣﻊ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ:
-ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﺴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﲝﺚ ﰲ )ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺴـﻤﺔ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ( ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺖ
-ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻟﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﲝﺚ ﰲ )ﺣﻜـﻢ
ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ( ﻋﺠﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻨﺸﺮﻩ
128
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﻟﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﲝﺚ ﰲ )ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺳـﺐ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ( ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺖ
-ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺗﺎﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻭﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻠﺒﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻴﺐ..
ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ
129
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﰲ ﺃﺳﲎ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻟﺐ ) :١٢٢/٤ﻭﻳﺘﻮﻻﻩ( ﺃﻱ ﻗﺘﻠﻪ )ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ( ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﻨﺎﺋﺒﻪ
)ﺑﻀﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻻ ﺍﻹﺣﺮﺍﻕ( ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻩ ﳌﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺔ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺗﻮﻻﻩ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺿﺮﺏ
ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻋﺰﺭ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﺒﺎﱐ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﰲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻰ ) :٢٨٩/٦ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺎﺋﺒﻪ( ﺣـﺮﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺒﺪﺍ؛ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﺘﻞ ﳊﻖ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ؛ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﱐ ﺍﶈﺼﻦ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﺣـﺪﻳﺚ:
"}ﺃﻗﻴﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻠﻜﺖ ﺃﳝﺎﻧﻜﻢ{ ﻷﻥ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺪ ﻟﻜﻔﺮﻩ ﻻ ﺣﺪﺍ )ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺘﻠـﻪ(؛ ﺃﻱ :ﺍﳌﺮﺗـﺪ
)ﻏﲑﳘﺎ(؛ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺎﺋﺒﻪ )ﺑﻼ ﺇﺫﻥ( ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ )ﺃﺳﺎﺀ ﻭﻋﺰﺭ( ﻻﻓﺘﺌﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻀﻰ )ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻱ( ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﺧﺎﺭ ) :١٠٨/٦ﻭﺣﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ،ﻟﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻓﻼ ﻗﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻛﻔﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﺫ ﻫﻮ ﻫﺪﺭ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﻌﺰﻳﺮﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺘﻴﺔ ) :٢٨٠/٥ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﳊﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺎﺋﺒـﻪ،
ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺣﻘﺎ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻛﺤﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﱏ ،ﺃﻭ ﻵﺩﻣﻲ ﻛﺤﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺬﻑ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺟﺘـﻬﺎﺩ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﻴﻒ ،ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻮﺽ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﻳﻘـﻴﻢ
ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺧﻠﻔﺎﺅﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ .ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻧﺎﺋﺐ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻪ ...ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌـﻞ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺰﻳﺮ ،ﻹﺳﺎﺀﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﻓﺘﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻛﺄﱐ ﺑﺒﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﲏ ؟ ﺑﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ!!
ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺳﻠﻚ ،ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻚ ،ﻭﺃﺟﺒﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺷﺨﺺ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻣﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﻬﻞ
ﻳﻜﻔﺮ؟ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻧﺺ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ )ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﺮﻩ ﻭﻗﻠﺒﻪ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﺑﺎﻹﳝﺎﻥ( ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔـﺮ
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺘﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻛﺮﺍﻩ
ﻭﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﱯ ﻭﺍﻨﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺋﻢ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻫﻞ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻭﻥ؟ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ
ﻧﺺ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ )ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ :ﺍﻟﺼﱯ ..ﻭﺍﻨﻮﻥ ..ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺋﻢ( ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔـﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﻘـﺪ ﺃﻗـﺮ
ﺑﺎﺷﺘﺮﺍﻁ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻋﻮﺍﺭﺿﻬﺎ
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﻧﻊ :
-ﻓﺤﻤﺰﺓ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ -ﻗﺒﻞ ﲢﺮﱘ ﺍﳋﻤﺮ -ﺳﻜﺮ ﺣﱴ ﲦﻞ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﻫﻞ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﻷﰊ؟! ﻓﺘﺮﻛﻪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﳌﹼﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﲦﻞﹲ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺎﳍﺎ ﲪﺰﺓ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻟﻮﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺮ ﻭﻋـﺪﻡ
ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﻬﺎ
130
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﰲ ﺧﻼﻓﺔ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﳋﻤﺮ ﻣﺘﺄﻭﻟﲔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻟـﻴﺲ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻃﻌﻤﻮﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﻘﻮﺍ (..ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻼﳍﻢ ﻟﻠﺨﻤﺮ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻟـﻮﻻ ﻣـﺎﻧﻊ
ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ
-ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻀﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺮﻗﻮﻩ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﻟﺌﻦ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻟﻴﻌـﺬﺑﲏ ..ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﺍﷲ
ﻏﻔﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻮﻓﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ،ﻓﺸﻜﹼﻪ ﰲ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﷲ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻟﻮﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ
ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ ) : ٣٩٤ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺭﺟﻰ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﳋﻄـﺄ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻭﻳﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ]ﻣﻦ ﺇﻋﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻝ[ ﲝﺪﻳﺚ :ﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻇﻦ ﻋﺒﺪﻱ ﰊ ﻓﻠﻴﻈﻦ ﰊ ﻣـﺎ
ﺷﺎﺀ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺝ/٣ﺹ) :٢٣١ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺷﻚ ﰲ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﷲ
ﻭﰱ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺫﺭﻯ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺎﺩ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺑﺎﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟـﺎﻫﻼ ﻻ
ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺆﻣﻨﺎ ﳜﺎﻑ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺎﻗﺒﻪ ﻓﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫـﻞ ﺍﻻﺟﺘـﻬﺎﺩ
ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺎﳌﻐﻔﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ(ﺍﻩ
-ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﺪ ﺩﺍﺑﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻟﺔ) :ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺃﻧﺖ ﻋﺒﺪﻱ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺭﺑﻚ( ،ﺃﺧﻄﺄ ﻣـﻦ
ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺡ ،ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻟﻮﻻ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌـﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻟـﻴﺲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﺧﻄﺄﰎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﺪﺕ ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻜﻢ( ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ) :ﺭﻓﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻣﱵ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﺎﻥ(...
-ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﻧﻊ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﺃﻣﺜﻠـﺔ
ﻣﺸﺎﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺒﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﻭﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺿﻤﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺹ٩١؛ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﻣـﻮﺭ
ﳚﺐ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﲟﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ:
-١ﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻋﻦ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺃﻡ ﻻ؟ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﻞ ﻓﻬﻞ ﻫـﻮ
ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺃﻡ ﻻ؟ ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﳍﲔ ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﳊﺎﺫﻕ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﺮ
ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﺃﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ
-٢ﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﺪﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮ ﺃﻡ ﺁﺣﺎﺩ ﺃﻡ ﻫﻮ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﳎﺮﺩ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷـﺮﻃﻪ؟
ﻓﺮﲟﺎ ﻇﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻔﻴﺾ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮﺍ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻏﻤﺾ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ
-٣ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻫﻞ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﳋﱪ ﺃﻭ ﻫﻞ ﺑﻠﻐﻪ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ؟ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻻ ﻳﻮﻟﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻞ
ﳛﺼﻞ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻓﺸﻴﺌﺎ
-٤ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻋﺚ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮﺍﺋﻂ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺃﻡ ﻻ؟
-٥ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻫﻞ ﻳﻌﻈﻢ ﺿﺮﺭﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻡ ﻻ؟ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻈﻢ ﺿﺮﺭﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﻴـﻪ
ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺷﻨﻴﻌﺎ ﻛﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﳐﺘﻒ ﰲ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺏ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻳﻨﺘﻈﺮﻭﻧﻪ(ﺍﻩ
131
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ) :٣٩٥ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺻﺪﺭﺍ( ﻳﺆﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻟﲔ ﻏﲑ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ
ﻷﻥ ﺻﺪﻭﺭﻫﻢ ﱂ ﺗﻨﺸﺮﺡ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻇﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﲡﻮﻳﺰﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﳍﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﻣﲑ
ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﳌﺼﺪﻭﻕ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺳﺌﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺍ ،ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﻠﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻭﻗﻌﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺃﻓﺤﺶ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺎﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﺹ) :٣٩٦ﻭﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﻓﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﱐ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ
ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺇﻛﺮﺍﻩ ﻭﻻ ﺟﻬﻞ ﻻ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻭﻻ ﻋـﺬﺭ
ﺃﺻﻼ؛ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺑﺄﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﰲ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺷﻌﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴـﺎﺀ ﻭﳏﺒﺘـﻬﻢ
ﻭﳏﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﺻﺮﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺀ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺐ ﻭﲢﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳـﻞ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ...ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﲨﻌﺖ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﲟﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻛﺮﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴـﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻜـﺬﻟﻚ
ﺃﺧﻮﳘﺎ ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺃﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺍ ﻭﺷﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻠﻮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺧﺼﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻮﻯ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎ ) :ﻻ ﺗﻜﻔﺮ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻗﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺗﲔ ﻭﻋﻤﻞ ﲟﻘﺘﻀﺎﻫﺎ ﻭﺃﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺋﺾ ﺑـﺮﺃﻱ ﺭﺁﻩ ﺃﻭ
ﲟﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺒﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺇﻥ ﺃﻗﺮ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ،ﺃﻭ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ،ﺃﻭ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
ﺃﻭ ﻓﺴﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻻ ﲢﺘﻤﻠﻪ ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﲝﺎﻝ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻻ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻼ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ(ﺍﻩ ﻣـﻦ
ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﶈﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﺹ٢٢٣
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ :ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺈﻋﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻗﻞ ﻫﻞ ﺃﻧﺒﺌﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺴﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻻﹰ
ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺿﻞ ﺳﻌﻴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻫﻢ ﳛﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺃﻢ ﳛﺴﻨﻮﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺎﹰ( ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺧـﱪ ﺗﻌـﺎﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻫـﺆﻻﺀ
ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻟﲔ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻷﺧﺴﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻻ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻢ ﳛﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺃﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻖ
ﻓﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ:
-١ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ) :ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﺂﻳﺎﺕ ﺭﻢ ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻪ (...ﻓﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ :ﺍﻧﻄﹶﻠﹶﻘﹸﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺁﻳـﺎﺕ
ﻧﺰﻟﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻓﺠﻌﻠﻮﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ( ﺍﻩ ﺻـﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺨـﺎﺭﻱ ،٢٥٣٩/٦ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻀﺤﺎﻙ ) :ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻛﺄﻫﻞ ﺮﻭﺍﻥ –ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ -ﺗﺄﻭﻟﻮﺍ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻞ
ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻧﺰﻟﺖ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺟﻬﻠﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻤﻬﺎ ﻓﺴﻔﻜﻮﺍ ﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻬﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻷﻣـﻮﺍﻝ
ﻭﺷﻬﺪﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﻼﻟﺔ(ﺍﻩ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻮﻱ ٣٣٤/١
132
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-٢ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻ ﺇﻋﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻣﻨﺎ
ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ
-٣ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﺍ ﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻈﻨـﻬﺎ ﺣﻘـﺎ
ﻓﺘﺼﺪﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ) :ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﻈﻨﻮﻥ ﺃﻢ ﳛﺴﻨﻮﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺎ(
ﻭﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺭﺍﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ) :١٤١/٣ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﳏﻤﺪ :ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﻫـﺬﻩ
ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻣﺒﻄﻞ ﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻠﻬﻢ ﻷﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﻭﺻﻞ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﳛﺴﻨﻮﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺎﹰ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ) :ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﺂﻳﺎﺕ
ﺭﻢ ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻪ (...ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﺪﻳﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﲨﻠﺔ
ﰒ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﳍﻢ :ﻟﻮ ﻧﺰﻟﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻟﲔ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺰﻋﻤﻮﻥ ﻟﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﲨﻠﺘـﻬﺎ
ﻛﻞ ﻣﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﳐﻄﺊ ﰲ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﰲ ﻓﺘﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻷﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ،
ﻭﺑﻴﻘﲔ ﻧﺪﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻣﺮﺉ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺼﻴﺐ ﻭﳜﻄﺊ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻷﻢ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻻ ﺑـﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻴﺐ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻣﺮﺉ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﳜﻄﺊ
ﺑﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﻟـﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺻﺢ(ﺍﻩ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﺹ) :٣٩٧ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳﺢ ]ﻛﺎﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ[ ﻓـﻼ
ﻧﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻔﺮﻫﻢ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻟﻮﺟﻬﲔ:
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﳋﻄﺄ ﻫﻮ ﺧﻄﺄ ﳐﺼﻮﺹ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﲢﺮﻱ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺗﻌﻤﺪﻭﺍ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺭﺳﻠﻪ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﻌﻮﺍ
ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﱪ ﺭﺳﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﻌﻨﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻘﺎﻗﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻝ
ﻣﺮﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ :ﻛﻤﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺆﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﺮﺓ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻵﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﻓﻔـﻲ ﺻـﺤﻴﺢ
ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ) :ﻋﻦ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻭﻗﺎﺹ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﺄﻟﺖ ﺃﰊ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ) :ﻗـﻞ ﻫـﻞ ﻧﻨﺒـﺌﻜﻢ
ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺴﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻻ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺿﻞ ﺳﻌﻴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ( ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻻ ،ﻫﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺬﺑﻮﺍ ﲟﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻓﻜﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﺎﳉﻨﺔ
ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻃﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﻻ ﺷﺮﺍﺏ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ )ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻨﻘﻀﻮﻥ ﻋﻬﺪ ﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﻱ )ﺝ / ١٨ﺹ ) :(١٢٦ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﲬﻴﺼﺔ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻗﻴﺲ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﲰﻌﺖ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ) ﻗﹸﻞﹾ ﻫﻞﹾ ﻧﻨﺒﺌﹸﻜﹸﻢ ﺑﹺﺎﻷﺧﺴﺮﹺﻳﻦ ﺃﹶﻋﻤﺎﻻ ( :ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻫﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺣﺒﺴﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﻣﻊ(ﺍﻩ
133
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﻱ )ﺝ / ١٨ﺹ ) :(١٢٦ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺰﻳﻊ :ﺳﺄﻝ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﺎﻙ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ) :ﻗﹸﻞﹾ ﻫﻞﹾ
ﻧﻨﺒﺌﹸﻜﹸﻢ ﺑﹺﺎﻷﺧﺴﺮﹺﻳﻦ ﺃﹶﻋﻤﺎﻻ( ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻴﺴﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻫﺒﺎﻥ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﶈﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻴﺰ )ﺝ/٤ﺹ}) :(٣٤٤ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺿﻞ ﺳﻌﻴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﳛﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺃﻢ ﳛﺴﻨﻮﻥ
ﺻﻨﻌﺎﹰ{ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻭﻗﺎﺹ :ﻫﻢ ﻋﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ،ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎﺭﺍﺕ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻠـﻲ
ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ :ﻫﻢ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻥ ﺻﺢ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﺿﻞ ﺳﻌﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﳛﺴﺐ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳛﺴﻦ ،ﻭﺭﻭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺍﺀ ﺳﺄﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ} :ﺍﻷﺧﺴﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻻﹰ{ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ ﻟـﻪ :ﺃﻧـﺖ
ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻚ ،ﻭﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ} :ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﺂﻳﺎﺕ ﺭﻢ ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋـﻪ{
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﻠﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻣﺸﺮﻛﻲ ﻋﺒﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﺛﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺎﲡﻪ ﺬﺍ ﻣـﺎ
ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭﻻﹰ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺃﺿﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ )ﺝ/ ٣ﺹ) :(٤١٤ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻧﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ
ﺃﻥ ﻛﻔﺮﻫﻢ ﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺣﻖ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺭﺿﻰ ﺭﻢ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﺛﺎﻥ} :ﻣﺎ ﻧﻌﺒﺪﻫﻢ ﺇﹺﻻﱠ ﻟﻴﻘﹶﺮﺑﻮﻧﺂ
ﺇﹺﻟﹶﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺯﻟﻔﻰ{ ]ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺮ ،[٣ :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ} :ﻭﻳﻘﹸﻮﻟﹸﻮﻥﹶ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺷﻔﹶﻌﺎﺅﻧﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﷲ{]ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ،[١٨ :ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻫﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺘﻘﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺮﻉ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ} :ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻳﻮﻣﺌﺬ ﺧﺎﺷﻌﺔﹲ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﹶﺔﹲ ﻧﺎﺻﺒﺔﹲ ﺗﺼﻠﻰ
ﻧﺎﺭﺍﹰ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺔﹰ{ ]ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺷﻴﺔ [٤-٢ :ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ } :ﺇﹺﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﲣـﺬﻭﺍ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺎﻃﲔ ﺃﹶﻭﻟﻴﺂﺀَ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻳﺤﺴﺒﻮﻥﹶ ﺃﹶﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﻬﺘﺪﻭﻥﹶ { ]ﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﻑ [٣٠ :ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ} :ﻭﺇﹺﻧﻬﻢ ﻟﹶﻴﺼﺪﻭﻧﻬﻢ
ﻋﻦﹺ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻞ ﻭﻳﺤﺴﺒﻮﻥﹶ ﺃﹶﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﻬﺘﺪﻭﻥﹶ{ ]ﺍﻟﺰﺧﺮﻑ [٣٧ :ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺰﻭﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺗﺼﺮﳛﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻳﻠﻴﻪ} :ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﹶﻔﹶﺮﻭﺍﹾ ﺑﹺﺂﻳﺎﺕ ﺭﺑﻬﹺﻢ ﻭﻟﻘﹶﺎﺋﻪ ﻓﹶﺤﺒﹺﻄﹶﺖ ﺃﹶﻋﻤﺎﻟﹸﻬﻢ] {ﺍﻟﻜﻬـﻒ:
[١٠٥ﺍﻵﻳﺔ.
ﻓﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻫﺒﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮﻭﻥ
ﺑﺎﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﺸﻤﻠﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ(ﺍﻩ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ
ﺑﻞ ﺣﱴ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﱪﻧﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺬﻢ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ )ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻣﻌﺬﺑﲔ
ﺣﱴ ﻧﺒﻌﺚ ﺭﺳﻮﻻ( )ﺭﺳﻼ ﻣﺒﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻣﻨﺬﺭﻳﻦ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺣﺠﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻞ( ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺮﻛﻮﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺬﺑﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻞ ﻋﻨﺎﺩﺍ ﻭﺣﺴﺪﺍ ﻭﺣﺮﺻﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﱀ ﻛﻤـﺎ ﺃﺧـﱪ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨـﻬﻢ
)ﻭﺟﺤﺪﻭﺍ ﺎ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻴﻘﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻇﻠﻤﺎ ﻭﻋﻠﻮﺍ( )ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺀﻫﻢ( )ﻟﻘﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧـﺰﻝ
ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺇﻻ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ(
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ )ﻭﻫﻢ ﳛﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺃﻢ ﳛﺴﻨﻮﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺎ(؟ ﻓﻈـﺎﻫﺮ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺃﻢ ﱂ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﺍ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﳌﺮﺳﻠﲔ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ
134
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺇﻥ ﻛﻮﻢ ﳛﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺃﻢ ﳛﺴﻨﻮﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﳏﺎﻓﻈﺘﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻷﺟﺪﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ
ﺟﻬﺔ ﳏﺎﻓﻈﺘﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺻﻔﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﳏﺎﻓﻈﺘﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺼﺎﳊﻬﻢ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻬﻢ ﳛﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﶈﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﺳﺐ –ﺯﻋﻤﻮﺍ– ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺑﻠﻐﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﱂ ﺗﺒﻠﻐﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﱂ ﺗﻘﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻠﻐﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ
ﺿﻤﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺹ) :٩٦ﺑﻞ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻧﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻙ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﻤﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﺔ
ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺃﻗﺎﺻﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻙ ﻭﱂ ﺗﺒﻠﻐﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻓﺈﻢ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﺻﻨﺎﻑ:
-ﺻﻨﻒ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻠﻐﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﻢ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﻌﺬﻭﺭﻭﻥ
-ﻭﺻﻨﻒ ﺑﻠﻐﻬﻢ ﺍﲰﻪ ﻭﻧﻌﺘﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺠﺰﺍﺕ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﺎﻭﺭﻭﻥ ﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
ﻭﺍﺎﻭﺭﻭﻥ ﳍﻢ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻠﺤﺪﻭﻥ
-ﻭﺻﻨﻒ ﺛﺎﻟﺚ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺘﲔ ﺑﻠﻐﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﻢ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺒﻠﻐﻬﻢ
ﻧﻌﺘﻪ ﻭﺻﻔﺘﻪ ،ﺑﻞ ﲰﻌﻮﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺬﺍﺑﺎ ﻣﻠﺒﺴﺎ ﺍﲰﻪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ،ﻛﻤﺎ
ﲰﻊ ﺻﺒﻴﺎﻧﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺬﺍﺑﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳌﻘﻔﻊ ﺑﻌﺜﻪ ﺍﷲ ﲢﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺒﻮﺓ ﻛﺬﺍﺑﺎ ،ﻓﻬﺆﻻﺀ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﰲ
ﺃﻭﺻﺎﻓﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﺈﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻢ ﱂ ﻳﺴﻤﻌﻮﺍ ﺍﲰﻪ ﲰﻌﻮﺍ ﺿﺪ ﺃﻭﺻـﺎﻓﻪ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳛﺮﻙ ﺩﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻠﺐ(ﺍﻩ
ﺑﻞ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻃﻮﺍﻟﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺹ:٢٢٣
)ﻭﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ﻟﻠﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻎ ﰲ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﻟﻠﻬﺪﻯ ﺑﻔﻀﻠﻪ ﻭﻟﻄﻔﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﲏ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ،ﻭﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻧﻊ ..ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ؛ ﳚﺮﻱ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﻔﺴﻖ
ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻓﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﻮﺭﹴ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻛﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﺎﺱ ﻭﻗﻌﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺑﻌـﺾ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ﻓﺤﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﻉ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻧﻊ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﻌـﻴﲏ
ﻳﺘﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜـﺎﺭ
ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﺹ) :٤١١ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﺟﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﳊﻜـﻢ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺃﺧﻄﺮ(ﺍﻩ
135
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻔﺮع اﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :اﻟﺘﻜﻔﯿﺮ ﻓﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ اﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ
ﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻔﺎﺭﻳﻊ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻏﻤﻮﺿﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺴـﺄﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺝ/٢ﺹ) :٥٠ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ
ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﶈﻘﻘﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﺌﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻏﻼﺓ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻔﻮﻫﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺳﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ) :ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﳌـﻦ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ،ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻫﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﳋﻄﺮ ،ﻷﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺷﺨﺼﺎﹰ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ،
ﻓﻜﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﺧﱪ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺎﻗﺒﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﺍﳋﻠﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺃﺑﺪ ﺍﻵﺑﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﻝ ،ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﻣﻦ ﻧﻜﺎﺡ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﳚﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻻ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﳑﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺃﻟﻒ
ﻛﻔﺮ ﺃﻫﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺳﻔﻚ ﳏﺠﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻣﺮﺉ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ " :ﻷﻥ ﳜﻄﺊ ﺍﻹﻣـﺎﻡ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ﺃﺣﺐ ﺇﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻄﺊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﺑﺔ "
ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻔﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻤﻮﺽ ،ﻟﻜﺜـﺮﺓ ﺷـﺒﻬﻬﺎ،
ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﻭﺍﻋﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺳـﺎﺋﺮ ﺻـﻨﻮﻑ ﻭﺟﻮﻫـﻪ،
ﻭﺍﻻﻃﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻭﺷﺮﺍﺋﻄﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻣﻜﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﶈﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺍﶈﺘﻤﻠﺔ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻋﻲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻃﺮﻕ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﻗﺒﺎﺋـﻞ ﺍﻟﻌـﺮﺏ ﰲ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻘﻬـﺎ ،ﻭﳎﺎﺯﺍـﺎ،
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺩﻗﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ،ﻭﻏﻮﺍﻣﻀﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛـﺎﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻤـﺎﺀ
ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ،ﻓﻀﻼﹰ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺠﺰ ﻋﻦ ﲢﺮﻳﺮ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻩ ﰲ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﳛﺮﺭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻪ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺇﻻ ﳌﻦ ﺻﺮﺡ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ،ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺟﺤﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺗﲔ ،ﻭﺧﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻳـﻦ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻡ
ﲨﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﻗﻮﻋﻪ ،ﻓﺎﻷﺩﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ(...ﺍﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻮﺍﻗﺢ ﺍﻷﻧـﻮﺍﺭ
ﻟﻠﺸﻌﺮﺍﱐ ﺹ٢٣
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ) :ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳏﻤﺪﺍﹰ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻓﺘﻜﻔﲑﻩ
ﺻﻌﺐ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﰲ ﻗﻠﺒﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻣﻀﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻀﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ
ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﻏﻔﻠﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻩ ﻟﻠﺸﻬﺎﺩﺗﲔ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﻓﺄﺭﺟﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻔﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﻠﺔ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﺭﺗﺪ ﰒ ﺃﺳﻠﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﰲ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﺑﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ.
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﳏﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻜﱠﻔﺮ ﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻫﺎ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺣﲔ ﲝﺜﻪ ﻳﻮﻣﺎﹰ ﻟﺸﺒﻬﺔ
ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻭ ﳎﺎﺩﻟﺔ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ ﻭﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻳﻐﻔﻞ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺫﺍﻛﺮ ﻟﻠﺸﻬﺎﺩﺗﲔ ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﳌﻮﺕ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﺜﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻟﻠﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ ٩٣/٣
136
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻋﻤﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) :٧٦/٤ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺳﺒﺒﻪ ﺣﱴ
ﺻﻨﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍﹰ .ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺂﻝ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻭﻻﹰ ؟ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﻣﺂﻝ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺴﻤﺔ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﻷﻢ ﻋﺒﺪﻭﺍ ﺟﺴﻤﺎﹰ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻋﺎﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻟﻐﲑ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ
ﻏﲑ ﺍﷲ ﻛﻔﺮ ..ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺈﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺗﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻬﺎ
ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺬﺑﺎ ﻟﻠﺸﺮﻉ .ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻃﻊ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﺍﹰ ﻟﻠﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻌﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺎﹰ ﻭﺩﻻﻟﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :١٨٠/١٢ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸـﺨﺺ
ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻛﻞ ﳐﻄﺊ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﻭﻻ ﺟﺎﻫﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺿﺎﻝ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺍ؛ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻓﺎﺳﻘﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻋﺎﺻـﻴﺎ ﻻ
ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ "ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ" ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻏﻠﻂ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻓﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻢ
ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻳﺔ ]) :[ ٢٣٩/ ٥ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺼﺪﻩ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺑـﻞ ﻭﻻ
ﻳﻔﺴﻖ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪ ﻓﺄﺧﻄﺄ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻓﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﺌﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻋـﻦ ﺃﺣـﺪ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﳍﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﻋﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻳﻜﻔﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻛﺎﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻭﻗﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛـﺜﲑ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻛﺒﻌﺾ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﻠﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻤﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﰒ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﺑﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﳛﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﻋـﻦ
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻟﻴﺤﺬﺭ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠـﺰﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻛﻔﺮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﰲ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﳌﻌﲔ
ﻛﺜﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻪ ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺿﻤﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺭﺳـﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺹ) :٧٧ﻓﻄﺎﻟـﺐ
ﻧﻔﺴﻚ ﻭﺻﺎﺣﺒﻚ ﲝﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﱄ
ﺃﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺑﻠﻴﺪ ﻗﺪ ﻗﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻋﻤﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﻓـﻼ ﺗﻀـﻴﻊ
ﺑﺈﺻﻼﺣﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﺣﺠﺔ ﰲ ﺇﻓﺤﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﺪﻋﻮﻯ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﳚﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺳـﺎﺋﺮ
ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺮﻗﺎ ﻭﻓﺼﻼ
137
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﳝﻴﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻭﻳﺰﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻭﺻﺪﺭ ﻛﻔﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﳉﻠﻲ ،ﻓﺎﺳﺄﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﻗﻔﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻗﻀﻰ ﺑﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﺇﺫ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻪ
ﰲ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺯﻋﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺻﻔﺎ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ؟ ﻭﱂﹶ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﺃﻭﱃ
ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﲟﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﲟﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ؟
ﻭﱂﹶ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﻗﻔﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ؟ ﺃﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ؟ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ
ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺃﻡ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ؟ ﻓﺒﺄﻱ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻭﻣﻜﻴﺎﻝ
ﻗﺪﺭ ﺩﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺣﱴ ﺑﺎﻥﹶ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﺒﻮﻋﻪ ﻭﻣﻘﻠﹶﺪﻩ؟
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭﺧﺺ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﰲ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺣﺠﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑﻩ؟ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔـﺮﻕ ﺑـﲔ ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴـﻲ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻼﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ؟ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﺼﺔ؟
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻻ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﺴﻒ ﺑﺘﻜﻠﻔﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺼـﺒﲔ
ﺯﺍﻋﻤﺎ ﺃﻤﺎ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺻـﻒ
ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺪﻳﺪ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻪ ﻳﺸﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﱄ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼـﻔﺎﺕ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﺎﱂ ﳏﻴﻂ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺇﳕـﺎ ﳜـﺎﻟﻒ
ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻭﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﲔ ﻭﺃﻱ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻭﺃﺧﻄﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﺛﺒﺎﺎ؟
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﱄ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺰﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﻴـﺎﺓ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪ ﻭﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺻﻒ ﺑﺎﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺒﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﺬﺍﺕ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻣﻊ
ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻮﺭﺍﺓ ﻭﺃﳒﻴﻞ ﻭﺯﺑﻮﺭ ﻭﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻭﻲ ﻭﺧﱪ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺨﺒﺎﺭ؟ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﳐﺘﻠﻔـﺔ،
ﻛﻴﻒ ﻻ ﻭﺣﺪ ﺍﳋﱪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ؟ ،ﻓﻜﻴـﻒ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻳﺘﻄﺮﻕ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﻄﺮﻕ؟! ﻓﻴﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﺛﺒـﺎﺕ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﲣﺒﻂ ﰲ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺠﺰ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﻄﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﻠﺪ
ﻭﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻜﺖ ﻭﻳﺴﻜﺖ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﺻﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻫﻼ ﻟﻪ ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﻣﺴﺘﺘﺒﻌﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﺎ ﻭﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﻣﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺧﺎﺽ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺪ ﰲ ﺍﶈﺎﺟﺔ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺘﻐﻞ ﺑـﻪ ﺻـﺎﺭ
ﻛﻀﺎﺭﺏ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩ ﻭﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﻟﺼﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺮ؟
138
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻟﻌﻠﻚ ﺇﻥ ﺃﻧﺼﻔﺖ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﻗﻔﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﻬـﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻔـﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﻧﺰﻟﻪ ﻣﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻟﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺜﺒـﺖ ﺍﻹﳝـﺎﻥ ﺇﻻ
ﲟﻮﺍﻓﻘﺘﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺇﻻ ﲟﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﺭ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ،ﻭﺃﻻ ﺗﺮﻯ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﻙ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣـﺎ
ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻪ ﺣﺠﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻱ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﻠﺪﱐ ﰲ ﳎﺮﺩ ﻣﺬﻫﱯ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﻠﺪﱐ ﰲ ﻣﺬﻫﱯ ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻠـﻲ
ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ؟!(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺃﺏ ﺍﶈﻘﻘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻋﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺳﺒﻴﻼ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٢٠٧/١٩ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻮﻥ
ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﻻ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﺼﺤﺤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺧﻠﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﻻ ﺗﻘﺒـﻞ ﺷـﻬﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﻰ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ]ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻛﻔﺎﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻮﺍ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺻﻠﻮﺍ ﺧﻠﻔﻬﻢ[
ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﳍﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﻻ
ﻳﻔﺴﻘﻮﻥ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺆﲦﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﺌﲔ ﻻ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :١١٢/١٩ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻻ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﻋﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻻ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪ ﻓﺎﺧﻄـﺄ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺎ ﳍﻢ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻼ ﻟﺪﻣﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻣﻊ ﺗﻜﻔﲑﻫﻢ ﻟﻌﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻻﳘﺎ
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻼﳍﻢ ﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﳍﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺳﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) :٨٨/١٥ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻟﻸﺷـﻌﺮﻱ
ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺃﻋﺠﺒﺘﲏ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﺭﻭﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻬﻘﻲ ]ﻗﺎﻝ[ :ﲰﻌﺖ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪﻭﻱ ﲰﻌﺖ ﺯﺍﻫـﺮ ﺑـﻦ ﺃﲪـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺧﺴﻲ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﳌﺎ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﻋﺎﱐ ﻓﺄﺗﻴﺘـﻪ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ:
ﺍﺷﻬﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺃﱐ ﻻ ﺃﻛﻔﺮ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻳﺸﲑﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺒﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﻛﻠـﻪ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺔ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ) :ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻛـﺬﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﺨﻨﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺃﻳﺎﻣﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﻛﻔﺮ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ) :١٩ﻭﺃﻋﺠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺑﻌﻀـﻬﻢ ﻟـﺒﻌﺾ
ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﶈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﻮﻓﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﻴـﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺯﻥ) :ﻻ ﻧﻜﻠﻒ ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺳﻌﻬﺎ( ﻣﻊ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺍﻟﻮﻓﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺇﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ،ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺪﻕ
ﻭﻳﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ؟!(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ) :٣٣٦/٢ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺻﻐﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﰲ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﻗﻮﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﳜﺘﺺ ﺑﺎﳉﺎﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻜﺎﻓﺮ(ﺍﻩ
139
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻬﺎﱐ ﰲ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﳊﻖ ) :ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﱐ ﻻ ﺃﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺑﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣـﻦ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ ،ﻻ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻭﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﲡﻤﻌﻬﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ
ﺑﺴﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﳌﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ،ﺑﻞ ﺣﱴ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸـﻴﻌﺔ ﻓﻬـﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻀـﻰ
)ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻱ( ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﺧﺎﺭ ) :٨٩/١ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ( ﻭﻳﻮﺻﻒ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠـﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻭﻗﻴﻞ :ﻻ !!! .ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﻗﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ ﻭﻫـﻮ ]ﺃﻱ
ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻝ[ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺳﻲ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻲ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﻓﻌﻪ ﺿﺎﻻ ﳐﻄﺌﺎ .ﻭﻓﻴﻪ
ﺗﻀﻠﻴﻞ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺘﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ
ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﻻ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺩﻓﻌﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﻬﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ :ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻓﻌـﻪ
ﺣﺴﺪﺍ ﻭﻃﻠﺒﺎ ﻟﻸﻣﺮ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﻓﻈﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺩﻓﻌﻮﻩ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻓﻌﻮﻧﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﻬـﺪ ﻣـﻦ
ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﻣﺮ ﻋﺮﻓﻮﻩ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﳍﻢ )ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺶ( ﻇﻨﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﻓﺘﺮﻛﻮﺍ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺑﻘﻲ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻓﻼ ﳚﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﺴـﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﺜـﺮ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻀﻼﻝ( ﺍﻩ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺹ٣٣٨
140
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺑﻂ ﻋﺎﺋﻢ ﳎﻤﻞﹲ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻔﺮ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﺗﺰﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺎﺑﻂ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺩﻗﺔ .ﻭﺃﺟﺪﱐ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺍ ﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻜﺎﻩ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﻱ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻗﺴﻤﺎﻥ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻀـﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻻ
ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ) :ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﺑﲔ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﻱ ﺃﺻـﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ
ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺇﱃ :ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻭﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻣﺮﺍﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻀﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﲨﻌﺖ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﺞ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺘﻪ ﺑﺄﻫـﻞ
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﳐﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻛﺘﺤﺮﱘ ﺍﳌﺴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻔﲔ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺘﲔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺿـﺮﻭﺭﺗﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ
ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻓﺈﻧﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﳑﻦ ﻋﺎﺻﺮﻧﺎﻫﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺑﻴﻨﻨـﺎ ﻭﺑﻴﻨـﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ
ﺫﻟﻚ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻗﺐ ﰲ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﺹ ٨٤ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ )ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ( ﻟﻠـﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ
ﻭﻣﻴﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﲨﻴﻞ ﻭﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺭﻓﻀﻪ ﻭﺯﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤـﺔ
ﻣﺴﺘﻔﻴﻀﺔ ﺑﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺣﻞ ﺩﻣﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻣﻮﺍﳍﻢ! ،ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻹﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺹ ٢٥٧ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ )ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻗﺐ( ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫـﻮ ﺃﻳﻀـﺎ ﺭﺃﻱ
ﺷﻴﺨﻪ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺹ ٢٤١ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﻭﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻪ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺿﺎﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﺼـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺹ ٨٤-٧٨ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺼﺪﻳﻘﻪ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺮﺍﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﳘﻲ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ
ﻟﺘﻜﺬﻳﺒﻬﻢ ﻟﻠﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ...
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﺇﺫ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺇﺑﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻣﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﻻ ﻋﻘﻠﻲ ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﺟﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﻳﻘﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﻟﱪﺍﳘﺔ
ﻭﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺗﻜﻔﺮ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻨﺴﺒﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻓﺎﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﻳﻜﻔـﺮ
ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﺯﺍﻋﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﻕ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺷـﻌﺮﻱ
ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﺯﺍﻋﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺸﺒﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺜﻠﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻳﻜﻔـﺮ
141
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﱄ ﺯﺍﻋﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼـﻔﺎﺕ ﻟـﻪ،
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﱄ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﺯﺍﻋﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻟﻠﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﺠﻴﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻃﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﻭﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻨﻜﺸﻒ ﻟﻚ ﻏﻠﻮ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺇﺳﺮﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ
ﻓﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ :ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺧﱪ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺑﻮﺟـﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ
ﻟﻠﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﲬﺲ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﻠﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺬﻳﺐ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ :ﺫﺍﰐ
ﻭﺣﺴﻲ ﻭﺧﻴﺎﱄ ﻭﻋﻘﻠﻲ ﻭﺷﺒﻬﻲ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺧﱪ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﳋﻤﺴﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﲟﻜﺬﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻃﻼﻕ(ﺍﻩ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ
ﰒ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻤﺴﺔ:
ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ :ﻣﺎ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﳊـﺲ ﻭﺍﳋﻴـﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﻟﺴـﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺍﳊﻴـﻮﺍﻥ -
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ...ﺇﱁ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳊﺴﻲ :ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺋﻢ ﻭﻛﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺍﻩ -
ﺍﳌﻬﻠﻮﺱ ...ﺇﱁ ﻭﲰﻲ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺣﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻭﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﱄ :ﻣﺎ ﳚﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﰲ ﳐﻴﻠﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺮﺱ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻴﻞ ...ﺇﱁ -
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻭﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﻓﺎﻟﻴﺪ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳊـﺲ -
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓﹶ ﻭﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞﹸ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﺶ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﻲ :ﺃﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺸﻲﺀ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﻭﻻ ﰲ -
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻳﺸﺒﻬﻪ ﰲ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺗﻪ
ﰒ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ:
ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ :ﻛﺄﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ -
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳊﺴﻲ :ﻛﺤﺪﻳﺚ) :ﻳﺬﺑﺢ ﺍﳌﻮﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺒﺶ ﺃﻣﻠﺢ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ( ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ -
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﺃﺟﺴﺎﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ )ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺭ ﻋﻠـﻲ ﰲ
ﻋﺮﺽ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ( ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﻻ ﺗﺘﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﱄ :ﻛﺤﺪﻳﺚ) :ﻛﺄﱐ ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺀﺗﺎﻥ ﻗﻄﻮﺍﻧﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﻠـﱯ ﻭﲡﻴﺒـﻪ -
ﺍﳉﺒﺎﻝ(
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ :ﻛﻤﻦ ﺗﺄﻭﻝ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ) :ﻳﻌﻄﻰ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺕ( ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ -
ﻋﺸﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻋﻘﻠﻲ ﻻ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻭﻻ ﺧﻴﺎﱄ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﺓ
ﺃﺿﻌﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺱ ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﳌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻛﻤﻦ ﺗﺄﻭﻝ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ) :ﲬﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻃﻴﻨﺔ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﺻﺒﺎﺣﺎ( ﻓﻤﻦ
142
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﺎﻡ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﺭﺣﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﻴﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘـﻬﺎ
ﻭﺭﻭﺣﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﺶ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﻲ :ﻛﺎﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﱪ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻮﻕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫـﺎ، -
ﻓﻤﺜﻼ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻪ ﻏﻠﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻔﻲ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﱂ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﻗﺎﻡ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﱪﻫـﺎﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﷲ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﺣﺴﻴﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﻼ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺎ ﺑﻞ ﺍﳌـﺮﺍﺩ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻘـﺎﺏ،
ﻭﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻻ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺃﺛﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻳﻼﻡ
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ) :ﻓﻤﻦ ﻧﺰﻝ ﻗﻮﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟـﺪﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﻓﻬـﻮ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﳌﺼﺪﻗﲔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﻳﺰﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺬﺏ ﳏﺾ ﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﺒﻴﺲ ﺃﻭ
ﻣﺼﺤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﶈﺾ
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻟﲔ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﻮﺍ ﻣﻠﺘﺰﻣﲔ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻀﻄﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ؟ ﻓﺄﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﺎﺯﺍﺕ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﻣﻀﻄﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺇﻥ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺻـﺮﺡ
ﺑﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ:
ﺣﺪﻳﺚ :ﺍﳊﺠﺮ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩ ﳝﲔ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ -
ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺚ :ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺻﺒﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ -
ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺚ :ﺇﱐ ﻷﺟﺪ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ -
ﻓﺎﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﻘﺮﺑﺎ ﻟﺼﺎﺣﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺮ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺗﻘﺮﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻻ ﰲ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ
ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﻋﺎﺭﺽ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻓﺎﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺍﺿﻄﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﺑﻌـﺪ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗـﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﺑﻜﺜﲑ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﺹ) :٣٧٦ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻔـﺮ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻤﺪ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻷﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺳﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ
ﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺅﻭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﳌﻜﺬﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﻭﻻ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻜﻠﻔﺎ ﳐﺘﺎﺭﺍ ﻏﲑ ﳐﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘـﻞ ﻭﻻ
ﻣﻜﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺧﻼﻑ ﰲ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺤﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﻭﺗﺴﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
143
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻠﻪ ﻛﺎﳌﻼﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺴﲎ ﺑﻞ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﻊ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺧـﺮﻭﻱ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﺄﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﳋﻤﺴﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻡ ـﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﻌﺾ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻸﻛﺜﺮ ﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺗﺄﻭﻳﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﻦ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﺃﻧـﻪ ﻣـﺎ
ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻪ ﻭﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴـﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺐ
ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺣﺶ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﻣﻀﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻘﻼ ﻭﲰﻌﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎﺩﻗﺔ
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻛﺎﱪﺓ ﺍﳋﻠﺺ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻓﲔ ﺑﺎﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﶈﻘﻘﲔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﺒﻬﺔ(...ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
144
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺐ ﺍﻷﺑﺮﺍﺭ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺻﻠﻲ) :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺎﺽ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻳﺎﻙ ﻭﳎﺎﻟﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀ ﻓﺈﻢ ﺇﻥ
ﺃﺣﺒﻮﻙ ﻭﺻﻔﻮﻙ ﲟﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻚ ﻓﻐﻄﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﻋﻴﻮﺑﻚ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺑﻐﻀﻮﻙ ﺟﺮﺣﻮﻙ ﲟﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻚ ﻭﻗﺒﻠـﻪ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ( ﺍﻩ ﻟﻮﺍﻗﺢ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺹ ،١٣ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﻪ
اﻟﺘﻘﻲ اﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ
ﻭﺷﻬﺪﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺭﺍﹰ ﻣﻊ ﲤﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﳎﺎﻫﺪﺍﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺍﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ ﻟﻠﺴﻨﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺣﲔ ﻭﻓﺎﺗﻪ،
ﺣﱴ ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳛﺒﻪ ﺷﻬﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﳉﻨﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺎﹰ ﳋﻼﺻﻪ!! ،ﻓﺄﺩﺧﻠﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥ!! ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺑـﻮ
ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺯﻣﻲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ :ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﷲ ﺟﻬﻨﻢ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳜﻠﻖ ﺟﻬﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺴـﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺴـﺒﻜﻲ ،ﺃﻱ
ﳜﻠﻘﻬﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﺫﻭﻩ ﻭﺃﻧﻜﺮﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻛﻔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻘـﺐ
ﺫﻟﻚ :ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻓﻤﻦ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻬﺎ ؟!( ﺍﻩ ﻟﻮﺍﻗﺢ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺹ٢٨
145
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻗﺔ ﻭﻃﻌﻨﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﺒﻮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺑﺮ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﰲ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺝ/٣ﺹ:٢٩٨
) ...ﻓﺄﻧﻜﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻛﻔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭﺑﺪﻋﻮﻩ ،ﻓﺎﺩﻯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﺟﻲ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﺍﻹﻛﺜﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺝ/٧ﺹ) :٥٠٣ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻛﺘـﺐ
ﺑﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳛﺴﻦ ﻳﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﺸﻨﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟﺲ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺭﻣﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻧﺪﻗﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ
ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﳐﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺣﱴ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻬﻢ:
ﺑﺮﺋﺖ ﳑﻦ ﺷﺮﻯ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺂﺧﺮﺓ * ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺒﺎ
ﻓﺠﻤﻌﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﻣﲑ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﲟﺎ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻵﻟﻮﺳﻲ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺝ/٢١ﺹ ) :٥ﻭﳌﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻃﻌﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺭﻣـﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻧﺪﻗـﺔ
ﻭﺳﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﰒ ﻋﻘﺪ ﻟﻪ ﳎﻠﺲ ﻓﺄﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻩ ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﺑـﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻤـﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻃـﺮﺍﻑ
ﻓﺄﺟﺎﺑﻮﺍ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻮﺍﻓﻘﻪ(ﺍﻩ
146
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺣﱴ ﺻﺎﺭ ﳜﺸﻰ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﺬﺕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻭﺃﻗﻌﺪﻩ ﺍﳍﺮﻡ ﻭﺃﻓﻠﺠﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺨﻮﺧﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍﺣﻢ ﻭﻻ
ﻣﻨﺼﻒ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﺃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ﺗﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ،ﻓﻤﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﺘﻪ ﻭﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺣﻠﺲ ﺑﻴﺘـﻪ ﻳﺘـﺄﺑﻂ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ ﺑﺼﺤﺔ ﺇﳝﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺑﺮﺍﺀﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺭﻳﻘﺖ ﺩﻣﺎﺀ ﳏﺮﻣﺔ ﻭﻋﺬﺑﺖ ﺃﺑﺮﻳﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺠﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﻫﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺭﻭﻋﺖ ﺷـﻴﻮﺥ
ﻭﺷﺒﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﻮﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺳﻨﲔ ﺣﱴ ﻋﺞ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﳍﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻋﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻓﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﺑﻜﺸـﻒ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﻤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﻠﻤﺎﺕ(...ﺍﻩ ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺭ٣٠/١/١٦
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﳍﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺩﻋﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ) :ﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻳﻜﻔـﺮ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺣﱴ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻖ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ!!!(ﺍﻩ
147
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻨﻤﻮذج اﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :اﻟﺰﯾﺪﯾﺔ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﳛﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﱪﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺣﺮﺏ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃﻢ ﻳﻘﺼـﺪﻭﻥ
ﺑﺎﱪﺓ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﻱ ﺹ ) :٦٢٠ﺳﺌﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟـﺬﺑﺎﺋﺢ ﺍﶈﺮﻣـﺔ
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﳛﺮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺎﺋﺢ ﺳﺖ :ﺫﺑﻴﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩﻱ ...ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺮﺍﱐ ﻭﺍﻮﺳﻲ ﻭﺫﺑﻴﺤﺔ ﺍﱪ ...ﻭﺫﺑﻴﺤـﺔ
ﺍﳌﺸﺒﻪ ﻭﺫﺑﻴﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﺊ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﲪﺰﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺹ) :١٠٨ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﻭﺍﳍﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺮ
ﺑﺄﻥ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﱪﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺣﺮﺏ!!! ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻭﺿﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺹ) :١٠٩ﻭﻻ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍـﱪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﻳـﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﺍﳉﱪﻳﺔ ﻭﻳﻐﺰﻭﻢ ﻟﻴﻼ ﻭﺎﺭﺍ ﻭﳜﺘﻄﻔﻮﻥ ﺫﺭﺍﺭﻳﻬﻢ ﺳﺮﺍ ﻭﺟﻬـﺎﺭﺍ ﻭﻳﺒﻴﻌـﻮﻢ ﰲ ﺃﺳـﻮﺍﻕ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ!!!(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻷﻛﻮﻉ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﺠﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻗﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ : ٠٧٥/٢ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻟﻒ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﲰﺎﻩ
)ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺍﻓﻊ( ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ) :ﺇﻧﲏ ﺃﺧﺸﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺄﻟﲏ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻤﺎ ﺃﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﰲ
ﺃﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﻝ(ﺍﻩ
148
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻟﻜﻮﺎ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﺎﺭ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻓﺈﺎ ﻻ ﲣﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌـﺪﺍﺋﻦ ﻭﻻ
ﻗﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺫﺍﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺎﺗﺮﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪﺕ ﻛـﻞ
ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻛﻔﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﹴ ﲰﺎﻋﻪ
ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻂ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻓﺨﺬﻫﺎ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺗﻨﺞ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺑﻘﺎﺕ
ﻻ ﲢﺼﻰ ﻭﻣﻬﻠﻜﺎﺕ ﻻ ﲢﺼﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻧﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸـﻴﻌﺔ ،ﻗـﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺹ) :٩٤ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ
ﱂ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻗﺼﺪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺎﷲ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ،ﺃﻻ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﷲ ﺃﺷﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ
ﺑﺎﷲ ،ﻓﻨﻌﻮﺫ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﰲ ﺭﺑﻮﺑﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﲟﺎ ﺗﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺣﺪﺍﻧﻴﺘﻪ ...ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﻭﺻﻴﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳍﻨﺪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﳍﻢ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﳘﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﳛﺘﺎﻁ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﻌﺠﻞ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﳛﻲ ﺑﻦ
ﲪﺰﺓ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ -ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﺎ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨـﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻼﻓـﺔ:-
)ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﻖ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻣﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘـﻢ ﺍﻟﱪﻫـﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺴـﻖ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺑﻴﻨﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻬﻼ ﻭﺟﺮﺃﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺇﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻄﺮ
ﺑﻐﲑ ﺑﺼﲑﺓ
ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ﻧﲑ ﻭﺟﺐ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺭﻉ ﳛﺠﺰﻩ ﻭﻻ ﺧﻮﻑ ﳝﻨﻌﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﳛـﺎﻓﻆ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺒﲔ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺯﻋﺔ ﺹ ١٠٢ﺑﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺷﻴﺨﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺩﻋﻲ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﳛﻲ ﺑﻦ ﲪﺰﺓ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ) :٥٦٤/٣ﻭﺣﻜﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺈﻛﻔﺎﺭ
ﺍﱪﺓ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﲞﻄﺌﻬﻢ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﳏﻜﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﺃﻢ ﻟﻴﺴﻮﺍ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ...
ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﱪﺓ ﱂ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻮﺍ ﻗﺒﻴﺤﺎ ﻭﺃﺿﺎﻓﻮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﻔﻮﺍ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻓـﻼ
ﻗﺒﻴﺢ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﻣﺮ ﰲ ﺣﻖ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻻ ﻲ ﻓﻠﻬﺬﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻘﻞ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭﻻ ﻗﺒﺢ،
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺍ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﳐﻄﺊ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ،
ﻷﻥ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﻪ ﻳﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺇﻛﻔﺎﺭ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺼﻠﺖ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻧﻘﻠﻬﺎ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻃﺒﻊ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ )ﺫﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ( ﻃﺒﻌﺘﻪ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺒﲑﻭﺕ ﺑﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺔ
149
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
١٩٨٣ﻡ ﻭﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺹ :١٢٨ﺃﻥ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﻮﺩ ﺃﺭﺳﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﻛﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ
ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ) :ﻓﻴﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺑﺎﻥ ﻟﻚ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﺒﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ!!! ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻀﺮ ﻓﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ
ﻭﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ...ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻭﻓﻌﻞ ...ﻧﺴﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﺮﺡ ﺻﺪﺭﻙ ﻟﻺﺳـﻼﻡ!!! ﻭﺃﻥ
ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ!!(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ) :ﻭﻣﺎ ﶈﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﻮﻟﺖ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻚ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻬـﻮ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺭﺳﻠﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﻭﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﻋﻮﺓ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﺭﻫﻢ
ﻭﺗﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﻭﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺃﻧﺴﺎﻢ ﻭﲣﺎﻟﻒ ﺃﻧﺴﺎﻢ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﻴﻞ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻮﻳﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﺷﻌﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﻃﺮﺍﺋﻘﻬﺎ
ﻭﱂ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺘﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺘﻠﻮﻳﺢ ﻭﻻ ﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺈﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ
ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﻮﻥ ﻭﺗﺎﺑﻌﻮﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻻ
ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺣﺪﻭﺛﻬﺎ ﻭﻫـﺬﺍ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺐ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ...
ﻓﺎﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻠﺔ ﺍﶈﻤﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺬ ﺷﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻨـﺎ ﻭﻋﻠـﻴﻜﻢ
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻭﻧﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﻟﻜـﺎﻓﺮﻳﻦ
ﳒﺎﻫﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﷲ ﺣﻖ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺩ ﻭﳒﺎﻟﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻏﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻷﳒﺎﺩ ﺃﺑﻠﻎ ﺟﻼﺩ(..ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﳌـﺄﻣﻮﻡ ﻓﺎﻹﻣـﺎﻡ
ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺴﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ) :١١٢/١ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﺎﻥ )ﰲ ﺍﳌـﺬﻫﺐ( ﰲ ﻣﺴـﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﳓﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻣﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻔﺴﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻑ ﻻ
ﻳﻨﻘﺾ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻘﻀﻪ ﺃﻭ ﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻥ )ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻓﻴﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼـﻠﻲ
ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﲞﻼﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﻡ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﰲ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺟﺪﻫﻢ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ(ﺍﻩ
150
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺸﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ ) :١٢١/١ﻳﺴﺘﺜﲎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﻜﻔـﺮﻩ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﻔـﺮﻕ
ﻛﺎﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﱯ ﻭﺍﺴﻢ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀﻩ ﳋﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺣﻘﻴﻘـﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﻃﻠـﻖ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ) :ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺨﺎﻟﻔﻮﻫﻢ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻬﻤﺔ ﺹ٣٢٥
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻭﻕ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﺎﺑﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﻲ) :ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻧﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﺟﺤﺪ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﻠـﻲ ﺑـﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟـﺐ
ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﻤﻦ ﺟﺤﺪ ﻧﺒﻮﺓ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻧﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﺃﻗﺮ ﺑﺄﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻭﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﺮ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﻧﺒـﻮﺓ ﻧﺒﻴﻨـﺎ ﳏﻤـﺪ(ﺍﻩ )ﺭﺳـﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﰲ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺹ(١٠٣
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪ ) :ﺍﺗﻔﻘﺖ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥﹼ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﺟﺤﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭﺟﺒﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌـﺎﱃ
ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﺿﺎﻝ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ(ﺍﻩ )ﲝﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﻟﻠﻤﺠﻠﺴﻲ(٣٩٠/٢٣
ﻭﰲ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ٤٦٣/١٨ﻭﲝﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ٢٣١/٢٧ﻭﻋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﻊ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺑﺎﺑﻮﻳﻪ ﺹ) :٢٠٠ﻋﻦ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ
ﺑﻦ ﻓﺮﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﻠﺖ ﻷﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ :ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺐ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺣﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ،ﻭﻟﻜﲏ ﺃﺗﻘﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ،
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﺎﺋﻄﺎﹰ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻐﺮﻗﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺎﺀ ﻟﻜﻴﻼ ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﻓﺎﻓﻌﻞ(ﺍﻩ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺹ) :٤٧ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ –ﺑﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻏﲑﻫـﺎ–
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﰎ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﺮﺡ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﻡ
ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺩﻢ ﻭﻭﻻﺋﻬـﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻈـﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺼـﺐ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﶈﺴﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻢ
ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺑﻞ ﺣﱴ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﱂ ﺗﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﺎﳍﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻓﺮ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻠﺴﻲ ﰲ ﲝﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧـﻮﺍﺭ ) :٣٤/٣٧ﻛﺘـﺐ
ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭﻧﺎ ﻣﺸﺤﻮﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﳍﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻔﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ
ﺍﳌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻭﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﻋﺼﻤﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺻﻔﺎﻢ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻔﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﻟﻠﻜﻠﻴﲏ ) :٢٣٥/٨ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻐﲑﺓ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﻠﺖ ﻷﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴـﻼﻡ :ﺇﻥ ﱄ ﺟـﺎﺭﻳﻦ
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻧﺎﺻﺐ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺷﺮﳘﺎ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻋﺎﺷﺮ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﳘﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺑﺂﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧﺒﺬ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﻇﻬﺮﻩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻜﺬﺏ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺳﻠﲔ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺼﺐ ﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻱ ﻧﺼﺐ ﻟﻨﺎ(ﺍﻩ
151
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻣﻦ ھﻮ اﻟﻨﺎﺻﺒﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ اﻹﻣﺎﻣﯿﺔ ؟
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﱯ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻲ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﰲ ﻣﺼﲑﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺧـﺮﺓ
ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ:
-ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﱯ ﺻﻨﻔﺎﻥ :ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻧﺎﺻﱯ ﻛـﺎﻓﺮ ﳐﻠـﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺭ
ﻭﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﳒﺲ ﻭﺣﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ...ﺇﱁ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻌـﺪﺍﻭﺓ
ﻵﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼـﺎﺩﻕ .ﻭﺍﻟﺼـﻨﻒ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻧﺎﺻﱯ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﳐﻠﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﺼﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﻭﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻃﺎﻫﺮ...ﺇﱁ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺼـﻨﻒ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ،
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺰﺍﺭ ﻭﻳﺼﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺧﻠﻔﻪ
-ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺸﺪﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﺠﻌﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻧﺎﺻﱯ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺍ ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ
ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﻭﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳎﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ
-ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﱯ ﻛﻤﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ!!
ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﺃﻭ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺁﺧﺮ )ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﲔ( ﻭﰲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﺹ٥٣٧
ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻇﻢ :ﻫﻢ ) ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﺗﺮﻓﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺣﺠﺔ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﲟﺴﺘﻀﻌﻒ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﰲ ﺷﺮﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
) (٥٢٤/٢ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﳊﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻀﻌﻒ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ) :ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﻌﻨﺎﺩ(ﺍﻩ .ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ
ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺹ) :٣٧٥ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺇﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ،ﰲ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﺪ ،ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﺪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻫﻼ
ﺑﺎﻹﳝﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺎﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺻﺮ ﳝﺘﺤﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ!(ﺍﻩ
-ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻧﺎﺻﱯ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﳐﻠﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳎﻬﺎﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ!
152
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻛﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﰊ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻫﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺛﲏ ،ﻓﻤﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﻣﻨـﻬﻢ ﺍﳉﺰﻳـﺔ،
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﺎﻛﺢ ﻭﺗﺆﻛﻞ ﺫﺑﻴﺤﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﺗﺆﻛﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﺘﻨـﻊ
ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻈﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺗﲔ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﳐﺎﻟﻒ ﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟـﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸـﺒﻬﺔ
ﻭﺍﱪﺓ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﳛﻜﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﻜﻔﺮﻫﻢ ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﲡﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺹ٣٥٨
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳋﻮﺋﻲ) :ﻓﺎﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻠﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺇﺳﻼﻣﻬﻢ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺑـﻼ
ﻓﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻛـﺎﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻫـﻢ ﺍﻟـﺬﻳﻦ
ﲰﻴﻨﺎﻫﻢ ﲟﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ(ﺍﻩ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻘﻰ ٨٧/٢
ﻭﲡﺪ ﳓﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳋﻮﺋﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﲝﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﻟﻠﻤﺠﻠﺴﻲ ،٣٦٦/٨ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻠﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺹ) : ٣ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﲔ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﺋﻨـﺎ ﻣـﻦ ﻣﻌـﲎ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ،ﻭﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔـﺔ ﺍﶈﻘـﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻬـﺬﻳﺐ
ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﺼﺎﺭ -ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻧﺒﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻛﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ
ﺍﻻﻛﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺑﺈﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ -ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺎﺓ ﺑﺄﻥ :ﻣﻦ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ
ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟـﺬﺑﺎﺋﺢ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ
ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺛﻘﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻓﺼﻞ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺋﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ
ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺃﺗﻰ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎﺡ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ :ﺑﺎﺏ ﻧﻜﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺸـﻜﺎﻙ ﰒ
ﺫﻛﺮ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﺮﺓ :ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻭﺳﺐ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿـﻊ
ﺁﺧﺮ :ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻐﺾ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ...
ﻭﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﺒﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺎﻏﻮﺕ!!! ﻓﻬﻮ ﻧﺎﺻﺐ ،ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺻﺤﺎﺏ ،ﺇﺫ
ﻻ ﻋﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﳑﻦ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﻂ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﺮﻁ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻏﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳉﻬـﺎﻝ!!!
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﻨﻢ ﺃﻭﺝ ﺍﻹﺟﻼﻝ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺹ) :١٣٥ﺛﺒﺖ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﻏﺴﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻜﻔﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ
ﺑﻨﺺ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻣﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺃﹸﳊﻖ ـﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻐـﺎﺓ
ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺗﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ( ﺍﻩ
153
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺽ) :ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴـﺖ ﺃﻭ ﻷﺣـﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﺃﻇﻬـﺮ
ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻀﺎﺀ ﳍﻢ ﺻﺮﳛﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﻜﺮﺍﻫﺔ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻢ ﻭﻧﺸﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻹﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺒـﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌـﺪﺍﻭﺓ
ﶈﺒﻴﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﳏﺒﺘﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﳊﺪﺍﺋﻖ ١٧٧/٥
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻴﺪ ﰲ ﻣﺒﺤﺚ ﻧﻜﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻟﻚ ) :ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻁ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻊ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻـﺐ
ﺇﻋﻼﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﺑﻞ ﻣﱴ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺾ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻧﺎﺻﱯ ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻠﻦ ﺑﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺹ٣
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﻨﻌﺔ ﺹ) :٥٧٩ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺮﺑﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﲢﻞ ﺫﺑﻴﺤﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ :ﲢﺮﻡ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺬﻱ
ﲢﻞ ﺫﺑﺎﺋﺤﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﳌﻮﺩﺓ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻭﺫﺭﻳﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﺑﺮﺍﺭ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺟﻬﻠﻮﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻘـﻮﻗﻬﻢ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﲢﺮﻡ ﺫﺑﺎﺋﺤﻬﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺿﺎﺭﻋﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻭﻋﺘﺮﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﻃﻬﺎﺭ ،ﻷـﻢ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻻﺣﻘﻮﻥ ﲟﻦ ﲰﻴﻨﺎﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﰲ ﲢﺮﱘ ﺫﺑﺎﺋﺤﻬﻢ ﻷﻢ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺓ
ﻓﺈﻢ ﲝﻜﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﺪﺍﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ( ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﶈﺴﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻢ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﺰﺍﺋﺮﻱ ) :٣٠٦/٢ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﱯ ﻭﺃﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﱯ -ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳒﺲ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﺷﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻬـﻮﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼـﺮﺍﱐ
ﻭﺍﻮﺳﻲ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﳒﺲ ﺑﺈﲨﺎﻉ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺭﺿﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ –ﻓﺎﻟـﺬﻱ ﺫﻫـﺐ ﺇﻟﻴـﻪ ﺃﻛﺜـﺮ
ﺍﻷﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻵﻝ ﺑﻴﺖ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺗﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﺒﻐﻀﻬﻢ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺮ ﻭﺭﺗﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ
ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎﺡ ﻭﻋﺪﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺋﺮﻱ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ) :٣٠٧/٢ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻼﻣـﺔ
ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺷﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻻ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ،ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺭﺟﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﻟﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﻮﻥ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﳝﻬﻢ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻧﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺋﻬﻢ! ﻭﺁﺑﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﺳﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﳍﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻃﻼﻉ
ﻭﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺬﺍ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ(ﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﶈﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻴﺰ ﺹ١٦٢
ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﻡ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﲡﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺪﻣﻮﺍ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﲡﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ -ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ -ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺣﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﻵﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﺸﻤﻠﻬﻢ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺨﺒﺔ ﺹ) :٥٦ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﺍﻟـﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻨﺼـﺒﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺍﺀ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﻃﺎﻫﺮﻭﻥ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻣـﻮﺍ ﻳﻨﺴـﺒﻮﻥ
ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻟﻺﺳﻼﻡ(ﺍﻩ
154
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ :
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﺎﳌﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ،ﻭﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻟﻠﻤﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ
ﺇﺷﺎﻋﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻭﻫﺐ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﻠﺖ ﻟﻪ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻨﻊ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻣﻨﺎ
ﻭﺑﲔ ﺧﻠﻄﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﳑﻦ ﻟﻴﺴﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﺮﹺﻧﺎ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺗﻨﻈﺮﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺋﻤﺘﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺘﺪﻭﻥ ﻢ ﻓﺘﺼﻨﻌﻮﻥ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺼﻨﻌﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺍﷲ ﺇﻢ ﻟﻴﻌﻮﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﺮﺿﺎﻫﻢ ﻭﻳﺸﻬﺪﻭﻥ ﺟﻨﺎﺋﺰﻫﻢ ﻭﻳﻘﻴﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﳍﻢ ﻭﻋﻠـﻴﻬﻢ
ﻭﻳﺆﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﻟﻠﻜﻠﻴﲏ ٦٣٦/٢
ﻭﰲ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﲰﻌﺖ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻻ ﲢﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺱ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺃﻛﺘﺎﻓﻜﻢ ﻓﺘﺬﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻮﺍ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﺣﺴﻨﺎ( ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻋﻮﺩﻭﺍ ﻣﺮﺿﺎﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﺷﻬﺪﻭﺍ
ﺟﻨﺎﺋﺰﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﺷﻬﺪﻭﺍ ﳍﻢ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺻﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺟﺪﻫﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ ٣٨٢/٥
ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﶈﺴﻦ ) ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻴﺰ ﺹ(١٤٤
ﻭﰲ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺝ/١٦ﺹ ١٦٠ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﲝﻀﺮﺗﻪ :ﺇﻧﺎ ﻟﻨﱪﺃ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻻ
ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ :ﻳﺘﻮﻟﹼﻮﻧﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ،ﺗﱪﺅﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ؟! ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﻫﻮ ﺫﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻨﺪﻛﻢ ،ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﱪﺃ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ".
ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻓﺘﻮﻟﻮﻫﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﱪﺅﻭﺍ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ :ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺳﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺳﻬﻤﺎﻥ ..ﻓﻠﻴﺲ
ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻤﻞ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﲔ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ) (٧٩٢ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ ) :ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺒﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ) :ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﺑﲔ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﻱ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺗﻘﺴـﻴﻢ
ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺇﱃ :ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻭﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻣﺮﺍﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻀﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﲨﻌﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﺞ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺘﻪ ﺑﺄﻫﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ
ﳐﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻛﺘﺤﺮﱘ ﺍﳌﺴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻔﲔ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺘﲔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺿـﺮﻭﺭﻳﺘﻪ ﻣـﻦ
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ
ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴـﻞ ﺍﻟﺜـﺎﱐ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﺈﻧﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﳑﻦ ﻋﺎﺻﺮﻧﺎﻫﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﻴﻨـﻬﻢ
ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻗﺐ ﰲ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﺹ٨٤
155
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ ﻋﻦ ﺷﻴﺨﻪ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ...) :ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺮﺩﺕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ
ﺑﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻭﳒﺎﺳﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻛﻮﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ!!! ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜـﺮ ﺃﺻـﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ
ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻓﻘﻬﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻗﺐ ﺹ٢٤١
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺁﻝ ﻛﺎﺷﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﻄﺎﺀ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﺻـﻮﳍﺎ() :ﻓﻤـﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘـﺪ
ﺑﺎﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻷﺧﺺ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠـﻚ ﺍﻷﺭﻛـﺎﻥ
ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ )ﺃﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﻛﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ( ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻷﻋﻢ ﺗﺘﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻣﺔ ﺩﻣﻪ ﻭﻣﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﻋﺮﺿﻪ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﻭﺣﺮﻣﺔ ﻏﻴﺒﺘﻪ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺑﻌـﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘـﺎﺩ
ﺑﺎﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﹰ )ﻣﻌﺎﺫ ﺍﷲ(( ﺍﻩ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﺹ.١٣٥
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﺍﻋﻆ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﳋﺮﺍﺳﺎﱐ) :ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻝ :ﺃﻧﻬﻢ ﺃﻣﺔ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻥﹼ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﺇﺧﻮﺓ ﻭﺃﻢ ﲨﻴﻌﺎﹰ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺩﻣﺎﺀﻫﻢ ﻭﺃﻣﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﻭﺃﻋﺮﺍﺿﻬﻢ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﲝﺮﻣﺔ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﳚﺐ ﺍﳊﻔﺎﻅ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﳛﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ .ﻭﺗﺆﻛﻞ ﺫﺑﻴﺤﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﻝ ﻣﻨـﻬﻢ،
ﻭﳚﻬﺰ ﻣﻮﺗﺎﻫﻢ ﻭﻳﺪﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﺮﻫﻢ ،ﻭﻳﺼﺎﺩﻗﻮﻢ ﰲ ﻋﻘﻮﺩﻫﻢ ﻭﲡﺎﺭﺍﻢ ﻭﻣﻌـﺎﻣﻼﻢ ﻭﻳﺰﻭﺟـﻮﻢ
ﻭﻳﺘﺰﻭﺟﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻥﹼ ﺃﻭﻻﺩﻫﻢ ﲨﻴﻌﺎﹰ ﻃﻴﺒﻮﻥ.
ﻭﺃﻥ ﺑﻼﺩﻫﻢ ﺷﺮﻗﺎﹰ ﻭﻏﺮﺑﺎﹰ ﻫﻲ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﳍﺎ ﺣﺮﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﳚـﺐ ﺍﳊﻔـﺎﻅ ﻋﻠﻴﻬـﺎ ﻭﺑﺜﺮﻭﺍـﺎ،
ﻭﺑﺎﺳﺘﻘﻼﳍﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺒﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﲡﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻗﺘﺘﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ
ﺑﻌﻀﺎﹰ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺢ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺘﺎﻝ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻏﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ.
ﻭﺃﻥﹼ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺎﹰ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺻـﺢ
ﻭﺃﻭﺛﻖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﻳﺎﹰ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺋﻤﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ.
ﻭﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﹼﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺞ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺗﺒﺎﻋﻬﻢ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﻚ،
ﻭﳚﻮﺯ ﺑﻞ ﳚﺐ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﰲ ﺻﻠﻮﺍﻢ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﺳﻜﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺸـﺮﻭﻋﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺳـﻴﻤﺎ
ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﻳﺚ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ.
ﻭﻳﻌﺘﱪﻭﻥ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻗﻴﺔ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻳﻬﺘﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﻴﺔ.
ﻭﻳﺘﺮﲨﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻟﻔﲔ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﻢ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺑﻜـﻞﹼ ﺇﺟـﻼﻝ
ﻭﺗﺒﺠﻴﻞ .ﻭﻳﻘﻔﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﹼﺎﺭ،ﻭﻳﺪﺍﻓﻌﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﺓ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻡ
ﺷﺮﻗﺎﹰ ﻭﻏﺮﺑﺎﹰ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎﹰ ﺑﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻋﻤﻼﹰ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﻧﺒﻴﻬﻢ »ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺑﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﻠـﻴﺲ
ﲟﺴﻠﻢ«(.ﺍﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ )ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ( ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﰲ ﳎﻠﺔ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
/ ٤٦ﲨﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﲨﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ١٤٢٥ﻫـ ٢٠٠٤ﻡ
156
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﳌﲑﺯﺍ ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﱪﻳﺰﻱ) :ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻨﺎ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻞ )ﻭﺟﺎﺩﳍﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ( ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﻜﻔﺎﺭ
ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻗﺎﺻﺮﻭﻥ ،ﻭﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺬﺑﻮﻥ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ﻷﻥ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ...
ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻮﻥ ﺟﻬﻨﻢ ،ﻭﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺎ(ﺍﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻭﻻﺋﻴﺔ .ﺩﺍﺭ
ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻴﺪﺓ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺺ ﳏﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﻼﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﰲ ﻗﻢ ﺳﻨﺔ ١٤١٨ﻫـ.
ﻟﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ:
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺗﺄﻣﺮ ﺑﺘﻮﱄ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺨﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻡ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﲑﻭﻱ ﺍﻠﺴـﻲ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺳﻲ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻷﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ) :ﺃﻭﺻﻴﻜﻢ ﰲ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ،
ﻻ ﺗﺴﺒﻮﻫﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻢ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻧﺒﻴﻜﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﻋﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺷﻴﺌﺎﹰ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻮﻗﺮﻭﺍ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ
ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻧﻌﻢ! ﺃﻭﺻﺎﱐ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ( ﺍﻩ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﻟﻠﻤﺠﻠﺴﻲ ﺝ ٢ﺹ٦٢١
ﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﺍﻹﺭﺑﻠﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﻛﺸﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ( ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺃﻧـﻪ:
)ﻗﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌـﺮﺍﻕ ﻓﻘﺎﻟـﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ
ﻛﻼﻣﻬﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﳍﻢ :ﺃﻻ ﲣﱪﻭﱐ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ } ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺟﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻳـﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﻭﺃﻣــﻮﺍﳍﻢ
ﻳﺒﺘﻐﻮﻥ ﻓﻀﻼﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠـﻪ ﻭﺭﺿﻮﺍﻧﺎﹰ ﻭﻳﻨﺼﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻗﻮﻥ {؟ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻻ
157
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺄﻧﺘﻢ } ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﻮﺃﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﻢ ﳛﺒﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﺟﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﳚﺪﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺻـﺪﻭﺭﻫﻢ
ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﳑﺎ ﺃﻭﺗﻮﺍ ﻭﻳﺆﺛﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻢ ﺧﺼﺎﺻﺔ {؟ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻻ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺗﱪﺃﰎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺷﻬﺪ ﺃﻧﻜﻢ ﻟﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ
ﻓﻴﻬﻢ } ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﺅﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﺍﻏﻔﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻹﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﻘﻮﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﻻ ﲡﻌﻞ ﰲ
ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻨﺎ ﻏﻼﹰ ﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ { ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻮﺍ ﻋﲏ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻜﻢ ( ﺍﻩ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﻤﺔ ﺝ ٢ﺹ) (٢٩١ﲢﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
)ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺯﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ( .ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻷﺿﻮﺍﺀ ـ ﺑﲑﻭﺕ ـ ﻁ١٤٠٥ .ﻫــ ـ ١٩٨٥ﻡ .ﻭﻫـﻮ ﰲ
ﺝ٢ﺹ ٧٨ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﻌﺔ ﺗﱪﻳﺰ
ﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﰲ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﻤﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ :١٤٧/٢ﺃﻧﻪ )ﺳﺌﻞ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻒ :ﻫﻞ
ﲡﻮﺯ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﻗﺪ ﺣﻠﻰ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺳﻴﻔﻪ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻱ :ﺃﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ؟ ﻓﻮﺛﺐ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻦ
ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻖ ،ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻖ ،ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻖ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻟﻪ :ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻖ ،ﻓﻼ ﺻـﺪﻕ ﺍﷲ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ) :ﷲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻼﻥ ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻗﻮﻡ ﺍﻷَﻭﺩ ،ﻭﺩﺍﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻗـﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻗﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ،ﺫﻫﺐ ﻧﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺏ ،ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺐ ،ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﺧﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺳـﺒﻖ ﺷـﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺃﺩﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ
ﻃﺎﻋﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺍﺗﻘﺎﻩ ﲝﻘﻪ ،ﺭﺣﻞ ﻭﺗﺮﻛﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻣﺘﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘﺪﻱ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻴﻘﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﺘـﺪﻱ ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻔﻼﻥ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺘﺎﺭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭﺣﲔ ،ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ -ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻠـﻰ
ﳐﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭﺣﲔ :ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﻭﻕ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﻟﻠﻄﱪﺳﻲ ﺹ) :٢٣٠ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﻟﺴﺖ ﲟﻨﻜﺮ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﻟﺴﺖ ﲟﻨﻜﺮ
ﻓﻀﻞ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺇﺣﻘﺎﻕ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻟﻠﺸﻮﺷﺘﺮﻱ ) :١٦/١ﺃﻥ ﺭﺟﻼ ﺳﺄﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﻋﻤـﺮ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ:
ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﺩﻻﻥ ﻣﻘﺴﻄﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﻣﺎﺗﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻌﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ) :ﺍﻟﺪﺭ ﺍﳌﻨﺜﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﺙ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ( ﻟﻠﺴـﻴﺪ
ﻋﻼﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺱ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﳏﺒﺔ ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺔ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﻜـﺎﻡ ﺝ:١٨٧/٦
)ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﻠﱯ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ )ﻉ( :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ )ﻉ( ﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳋﻄـﺎﺏ:
"ﺛﻼﺙ ﺇﻥ ﺣﻔﻈﺘﻬﻦ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﻦ ﻛﻔﺘﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻫﻦ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﺘﻬﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﻌﻚ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺳﻮﺍﻫﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻦ
ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺿـﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺴـﺨﻂ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﲪﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩ" ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ :ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﻭﺟﺰﺕ ﻭﺃﺑﻠﻐﺖ( ﺍﻩ
158
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻧﺼﺢ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻟﺴﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻤﺮ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻧﺼﺤﻪ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺈﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﻭﻟﻮ
ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻟﻠﺨﻼﻓﺔ ﳌﺎ ﻧﺼﺤﻪ ﺑﺈﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ
ﻭﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﲏ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺎﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ )ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ( ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺳﺄﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺃﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﰲ ﻋﻨـﻬﺎ
ﺯﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﺘﺪ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺷﺎﺀﺕ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﺑﻞ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺷﺎﺀﺕ ،ﺇﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﺎ )ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ( ﳌﺎ ﺗﻮﰲ ﻋﻤـﺮ
ﺃﺗﻰ ﺃﻡ ﻛﻠﺜﻮﻡ ﻓﺄﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻴﺘﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ )ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﰱ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﺎ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺘﺪ
(٢/٢١١ﻭﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻟﻠﻄﻮﺳﻲ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺎﺭ ) ﺑﺎﺏ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ (١٤٨/٨ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﺼﺎﺭ
ﻟﻠﻄﻮﺳﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ )ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﰱ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺟﻬﺎ (٣٥٦/٣
ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻴﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺁﺑﺎﺋﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ) :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺑﻜـﺮ
ﻣﲏ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﲏ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﲏ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺆﺍﺩ (ﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﻋﻴـﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺒـﺎﺭ
٢٨٠/١ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ،٤٢٠/٢ﻧﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻠﲔ ١٦٤/٣ﻭﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ ٣٨٧
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ) :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻌﺚ ﳏﻤﺪﺍ ﻓﺄﻧﻘﺬ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻼﻟﺔ ﻭﻧﻌﺶ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﲨﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﰒ ﻗﺒﻀﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺩﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺱ ﺃﺑـﺎ ﺑﻜـﺮ ﰒ
ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻓﺄﺣﺴﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﲑﺓ ﻭﻋﺪﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺩﻭﻧﻨﺎ ﻭﳓﻦ
ﺁﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﺣﻖ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﻐﻔﺮﻧﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳍﻤﺎ ( ﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﻈﺮ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺎﺭ ٤٥٦/٣٢ﻭ٥٦٩،٥٦٨/٣٣
ﻭﰲ ﻣﻮﻃﻦ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ ) :ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﺃﻣﲑﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺻﺎﳊﲔ ﺃﺣﻴﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺴـﲑﺓ ﻭﱂ
ﻳﻌﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ( ﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﲝﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﺭ ٥٣٥/٣٣
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ) :ﻓﺘﻮﱃ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻭﺳﺪﺩ ﻭﻗﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﺍﻗﺘﺼﺪ ،ﻭﺗﻮﱃ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺿﻲ
ﺍﻟﺴﲑﺓ ﻣﻴﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻴﺔ( ﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺎﺭ ٥٦٨/٣٣
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻟﺴﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ :ﺃﻻ ﺗﻮﺻﻲ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭﺻﻰ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ )ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ
ﺳﻠﻢ( ﻓﺄﻭﺻﻲ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺧﲑ ﲨﻌﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﲑﻫﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﲨﻌﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﺒـﻴﻬﻢ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺧﲑﻫﻢ( ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﰲ ﺹ ١٧١ﻃﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻒ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ) :ﻓﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ )ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻـﻠﻰ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ( ﺭﺟﻼ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﺳﺪﺩ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﻑ ﻭﺟﺪ(ﺍﻩ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺞ
ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﻴﺜﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﺍﱐ ﺹ.٤٠٠
ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮﻱ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺆﻟﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻹﻋﺮﺍﺽ
ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻀﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﳌﻦ ﻋﺪﺍﻫﻢ ﻭﺳﻮﺀ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺘﻬﻢ
ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﻱ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﺤﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﻰ ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺁﻝ ﻛﺎﺷﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﻄﺎﺀ ﻳﻘـﻮﻝ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﺻﻮﳍﺎ( ﺹ ) :١٢٢ﻭﻻ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟـﺬﻳﻦ ﱂ
159
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻳﺘﺴﻤﻮﺍ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ) ﺃﻱ ﲰﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻴﻊ (؛ ﻗﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ )ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ( ﻭﱂ ﻳﺄﺧـﺬﻭﺍ
ﺑﺈﺭﺷﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻛﻼ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﺫ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻦ ﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺧﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻳﻮﻣﺌﺬ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻌﻞ ﺗﻠـﻚ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﱂ ﻳﺴﻤﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﲰﻊ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻠﺘﻔﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺻﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻡ ﺃﲰﻰ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲢﻠﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻭﺝ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻐﺎﺙ ﺍﻷﻭﻫﺎﻡ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ) :ﻭﺣﲔ ﺭﺃﻯ )ﺃﻱ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ( ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻔﺘﲔ –ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ– ﺑﺬﻻ ﺃﻗﺼـﻰ
ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﰲ ﻧﺸﺮ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻭﲡﻬﻴﺰ ﺍﳉﻨﻮﺩ ﻭﺗﻮﺳﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﺡ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺴﺘﺄﺛﺮﻭﺍ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺴﺘﺒﺪﺍ ،ﺑﺎﻳﻊ ﻭﺳـﺎﱂ
ﻭﺃﻏﻀﻰ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﺍﻩ ﺣﻘﺎﹰ ﻟﻪ ﳏﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺼﺪﻉ ﻭﺣﺪﺗﻪ ﻭﺗﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻛﻠﻤﺘﻪ ﻭﻳﻌـﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ
ﺟﺎﻫﻠﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ( ﺍﻩ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﺹ.١٢٤-١٢٣
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻲ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﻨﺌﻲ ﻓﺘﻮﻯ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﱘ ﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﺣﺐ
ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻲ ﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻧﺺ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺣﻴﺐ:
ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﻳﺮﺣﺐ ﺑﻔﺘﻮﻯ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﺌﻲ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﱘ ﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ
- ٢٠٠٦-١١-٢٤ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ -ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ
ﺭﺣﺐ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻲ ﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺻﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﻨﺌﻲ ﻣﺮﺷﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺔ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﱘ ﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺍﻋﺘﱪﻫﺎ ﺧﻄﻮﺓ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻛﺪ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﺌﻲ ،ﺭﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷـﺪﻳﻦ :ﺃﻥ ﺃﻱ
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﺭﻳﻌﺔ ﻟﻸﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ.
ﻭﺃﺷﺎﺭﺕ ﺻﺤﻴﻔﺔ "ﺍﻷﻫﺮﺍﻡ" ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﳋﻤﻴﺲ ٢٠٠٦-١١-٢٣ﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻃﺎﻟﺒـﺖ
ﺑﺘﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ ﻭﺇﺭﺳﺎﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ.
ﻭﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺍﻋﺘﱪ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻟﻼﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻲ ﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴـﻠﻤﲔ ،ﰲ
ﺗﺼﺮﳛﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﳌﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ ٢٠٠٦-١١-٢٤ﻡ ،ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺧﻄﻮﺓ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻃﺎﳌـﺎ
ﻧﺎﺩﻱ ﺎ ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ،ﻻﻓﺘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺎ ﺳﺘﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺇﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﲔ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ.
ﻭﺩﻋﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﺍﻹﺧﻮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺣﺮﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﺡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ
ﺗﻜﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ ،ﻣﻌﺮﺑﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺩﺍﻧﺘﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺃﻣﺲ ﺍﳋﻤﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ
160
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻔﺠﲑﺍﺕ ﺃﻭﺩﺕ ﲝﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﺍﺕ ،ﻭﺃﻋﺮﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻌﺎﺯﻳﻪ ﻷﺳﺮ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﺎﻳﺎ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﺳﺎﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺼﺎﺑﲔ ،ﻣﺘﻤﻨﻴـﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﻷﻟﻴﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﻖ.
ﺟﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ،ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻲ ﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ -ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ،ﻭﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴـﻪ
ﻧﻮﺍﺏ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ -ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺩﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻭﺃﹾﺩ ﺃﻱ ﻓﺘﻨﺔ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﰲ ﻣﻬﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﺗﺒﺎﻋﻬـﺎ ،ﻭﻣـﻦ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺬﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ( ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ
ﻭﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﱴ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﻨﺌﻲ ﺃﻓﱴ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﲔ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﷲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨـﺖ
ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺣﺴﲔ ﺍﳌﺆﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺖ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻭﺑﻨﺤﻮﻩ ﺃﻓﱴ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﻜﺮﻱ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺮﺕ »ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﳉﺴﻮﺭ« ﰲ ﻋﺪﺩﻫﺎ )ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻊ( -ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ -ﺭﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ١٤٢٥ﻫـ ،ﺣﻮﺍﺭﺍﹰ ﻣﻊ
ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ؛ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺳﺐ ﻭﺷﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ؟
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ...) :ﺍﻟﺴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺘﻢ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﳑﺎﺭﺳﺔﹰ ﻗﺪﳝﺔﹰ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﺑﻌـﺾ
ﺭﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻻ ﳝﺎﺭﺳﻮﻥ ﺳﺒﺎﹰ ﻭﻻ ﺷﺘﻤﺎﹰ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﺬﺍ؟
ﻭﺳﺌﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ :ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﻋﻤﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ؟
ﻓﺄﺟﺎﺏ :ﻟﻠﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻖ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻛﺮﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺟﻬـﻪ
ﺑﻨﺺ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ .ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﺎﹰ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﻊ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺨﲔ ﻭﺑﺎﻳﻊ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﻤﻞ ﲢﺖ ﻇﻞ ﺧﻼﻓﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺒﻨﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺎﺀ ﳍﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺷﺨﺼـﻴﺎﹰ
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ .ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﺎﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ(.ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﳓﻮ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ( ﺹ) :٤٥ﺇﻧﲏ ﺃﺩﻋﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺃﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﻲ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺒﻂ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﻣﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﲟﻨﻊ ﺃﻱ ﺇﺳﺎﺀﺓ ﻷﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﺟﻼﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻫﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺘﺤﻮﺍ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ،
ﻭﻳﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯﻭﺍ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻜﻔﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻐﻼﻕ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺭ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻮﺍﺭ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺇﻳﻼﻑ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺹ) :٥٣ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻉ
ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻘﺒﺔ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ؟! ﲝﻴﺚ
ﻳﻨﺸﻐﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺑﺈﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﺃﻳﻬﻢ ﺃﻭ ﳛﺮﺹ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ
161
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺇﻧﻨﺎ ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﳐﲑﻳﻦ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺧﻼﻓﺔ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﺧﻼﻓﺔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﱴ ﺘﻢ ﺑﺈﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺑﺄﺣﺪ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﺭﻳﻦ،
ﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻔﺮﻕ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩﻧﺎ ﻭﻛﺮﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ،ﻓﻬﻞ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ؟ ﻭﻣﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ؟ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﺸﻐﻞ ﺑﻪ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻪ ﲝﻴﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻨﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺹ ) :٥٣ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﻢ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻗﻨﺎﻋﺘـﻬﻢ
ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻘﻬﻢ ﺍﻹﺳﺎﺀﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻣﻮﺯ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﺇﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﳓﺮﺍﻓﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﻭﺁﺩﺍﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﱳ ﻭﲣﺮﻳﺐ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ.
ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻹﺳﺎﺀﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺘﻢ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻼ ﳏﺮﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺎ ،ﻻ ﻳﺼﺪﺭ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺎﻫﻞ
ﻣﻐﺮﺽ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﲢﺪﺙ ﺿﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺌﺔ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ) :ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ﺍﻟﺴﲏ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﳊﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﺞ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﱯ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻌﱪ
ﻋﻦ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺎ ﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﺒﻴﺌﺎﻢ ﻭﻋﺼﻮﺭﻫﻢ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﺎﺭﻯ ﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ؟! ﻭﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﳛﺎﻛﻢ
ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺃﺳﻼﻓﻪ؟!
ﺇﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺮﺭ ﲡﺎﻭﺯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﳌﻈﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﱯ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﺛﻨﺎ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻭﺷﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﻧﺮﻛﺰ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧـﺐ
ﺍﳌﻀﻲﺀ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﰊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺻﻼﺡ ﺃﻣﻮﺭﻧﺎ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﳉﺔ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻠﻨﺎ ﻭﺗﺪﻋﻴﻢ ﻭﺣﺪﻧﺎ ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺘﻨﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ) :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺑﻮﺻﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﻠﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻨﲑﺓ ،ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻭﺃﺻﻞ ﺑـﺬﺭﺓ
ﻟﻨﺸﻮﺀ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﻴﺔ ،ﺣﱴ ﺇﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﱂ ﻳﺸﻬﺪ ﺟﻴﻼ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪﻳﺎ ﺃﺭﻭﻉ ﻭﺃﻧﺒﻞ ﻭﺃﻃﻬﺮ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﳉﻴـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﻧﺸﺄ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﺪ(ﺍﻩ )ﲝﺚ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺔ ،ﺍﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ (٤٨
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺋﻠﻲ ) :ﺃﻭﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻟﻔﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺃﻧﻲ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺎﰐ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﱂ ﺃﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺮﺓ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﺘﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﻓﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺣﱴ ﺎﻳﺔ ﺧﻼﻓﺔ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺘﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻹِﻣﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﻭﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻹِﻣﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺣﱴ ﰲ ﺃﺷﺪ ﲨﺤﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺀ ﱂ ﳒﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺸﺘﻢ ﺃﺣﺪﺍﹰ ﳑـﻦ
ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻹِﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳋﻼﻓﺔ ﻳﻀﺎﻑ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﱴ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﻋﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﻳﲔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ
ﻳﺘﻮﺭﻋﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺷﺘﻢ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ(ﺍﻩ )ﻫﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻴﻊ.(٣٩
162
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ) :ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻨﺎ -ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻠﻮﻍ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﻴﺪﺓ -ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺪﻱ ﻭﻭﺻﻒ ﻣﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ :ﻣﻦ ﺳﻔﻜﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﻭﺒﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﲡﺮﻳـﻪ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻗﺘـﻞ
ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﺎﻻﻏﺘﻴﺎﻝ ﻭﺗﻜﻔﲑﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﶈﻤﺪﻳﺔ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻗﻄﺎﺭ
ﻓﺒﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺮﺩﺩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺣﱴ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﺮﺑﺪ ﻭﻟﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻫﺔ ﻭﺃﻭﺻﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺭﺳـﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲨﻌﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺗﻜﻔﲑﻩ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﺒﻬﻢ ﻭﺣﻘﻖ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﺍﻟـﻪ
ﻭﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﺮﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﺷﻄﺮﺍ ﻭﱂ ﳝﻌﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻭﻻ ﻗﺮﺃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻬﺪﻳﻪ ﺞ
ﺍﳍﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﻳﺪﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﻳﻔﻘﻬﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ...
ﻭﳌﺎ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﺮﺑﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺒـﻬﺎ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻛﺘﺒﺖ ﺃﺑﻴﺎﺗﺎ ﻭﺷﺮﺣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﺷﻴﺨﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ
ﻷﻤﺎ ﻋﻤﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ(...ﺍﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﺭﺟﻌﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﻠﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺪﻱ * ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﺢ ﱄ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﻳـﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ،ﻭ) ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﲑ ﻭﻋﺼﺮﻩ ( ﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻔﲔ ﺹ ١٧٥ﻭ) ﺃﲜﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠـﻮﻡ ( ﻟﺼـﺪﻳﻖ ﺧـﺎﻥ
١٩٥/٣ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﻭﻟﻠﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ )ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺪﻳﺔ(
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻞ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﱪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺔ ﺿﻤﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺪﻳﺔ )ﺝ/١ﺹ (٣٠٢ﺃﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺃﻟﺰﻡ ﻋﻠﻤـﺎﺀ
ﻣﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﺒﻮﺍ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﳌﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺩﻋﻮﺗﻪ ﻭﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ) :ﻧﺸﻬﺪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﺩﻋﺎﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ :ﺳﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻣـﻦ
ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ ﻭﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺭﻳﺐ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ :ﻣﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺍﻥ ،ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﻥ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧـﻮﺍﻉ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ،ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺃﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﺒﻴﺢ ﻟﻠﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ،
ﻭﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻩ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻛﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﻔﺮﺽ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺩ ،ﻭﻗﺘﺎﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺩ .
ﻭﻛﻞ :ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻳﻨﻬﻢ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﻣﺸﺮﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻪ ،ﻭﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ) (٢٣ﻭﺇﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸـﺮﻙ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺼﻠﺖ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻧﻘﻠﻬﺎ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ
ﻃﺒﻊ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ )ﺫﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ( ﻃﺒﻌﺘﻪ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺒﲑﻭﺕ ﺑﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺻـﺎﱀ ﺭﻣﻀـﺎﻥ ﺳـﻨﺔ
163
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
١٩٨٣ﻡ ﻭﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺹ :١٢٨ﺃﻥ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﻮﺩ ﺃﺭﺳﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺘﻮﻛﻞ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ
ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ...) :ﻓﻴﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺑﺎﻥ ﻟﻚ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﺒﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ!!! ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻀﺮ ﻓﻨـﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ...ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻭﻓﻌﻞ ...ﻧﺴﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﺮﺡ ﺻﺪﺭﻙ ﻟﻺﺳﻼﻡ !!!
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ!!!( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺹ :١٣٦ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻓﺾ ﺩﻋﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ
ﲪﻮﺩ ﻟﻠﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ) :ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻨﺎ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻚ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺸـﺮﻳﻒ،
ﻫﺪﺍﻧﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻣـﻦ ﻛـﻞ ﺑـﺎﺏ،
ﻭﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳍﻨﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﻨﻮﻧﺖ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﱰﻫﺖ ﻋﻨـﻪ
ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﻞ ﱂ ﺗﺄﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﻨﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏـﲑ
ﻣﺜﻨﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻓﺼﻢ ﺻﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﻗﻢ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻗﻢ ﻓﺎﻧﻌﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺯﺍﻝ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻭﺑﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻃﻤﻊ ﺇﺑﻠﻴﺲ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻠﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻳﻌﺎﻣﻠﻬﻢ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ
ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻛﲔ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻗﺮﺭﰎ ﻋﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﺳﺨﻄﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﻭﻭﻗﻌﺘﻢ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﳋﺬﻻﻥ ﻭﺃﻗﺪﻣﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﱂ
ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ...ﻓﻴﺎ ﷲ ﺃﺑﻮﻙ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻈﻦ ﲟﺜﻠﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺨﺪﻉ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺑﺎﻃﻴﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻨﺘﻈﻢ
ﰲ ﺳﻠﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻓﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻋﲔ ﺍﻷﺿﺎﻟﻴﻞ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺹ :١٦٢ﺃﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺃﺭﺳﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﺘﻮﻛﻞ ﻣﻠـﻚ ﺍﻟـﻴﻤﻦ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻭﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ) :ﻭﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺳﻊ ﺍﷲ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻋﺎﺩ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺟـﺰﺉ ﻳﻨﺠﺰﻭﻧـﻪ ﺇﻻ
ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻃﻮﺍﺭﻗﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻣﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻃﻤﻊ! ﰲ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻚ!!!) (٢٤ﻭﺭﺟﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﳚﻌﻠـﻚ
ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻛﻞ ﲜﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻧﺸﺄﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺧﱪ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﳑﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ) :ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺛﺒﺘﻨـﺎ ﺍﷲ
ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻙ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺢ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ )ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺤﺔ( ﻭﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺤﺔ ﺃﻥ ﳔﱪﻙ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻐﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ
( ٢٤ﻗﺎﺭﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﲟﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﺎﻑ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﺹ ٥١٦ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﺑﺎﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﳛﻲ ﲪﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺳﻌﻰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺢ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﳛﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺁﻝ ﺳﻌﻮﺩ
ﻣﺆﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ) :ﻟﻘﺪ ﻓﻮﺿﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺢ ﻓﺎﻛﺘﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺌﺖ
ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﺎﻹﻣﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻴﺪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺷﺌﺖ ﺃﻣﻀﻴﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻕ ﺃﻭﻻ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﺗﻜﺘﺐ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻄﻊ
ﺑﺎﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ(
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ) :ﻭﳌﺎ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﺖ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ )١٣٥٤ﻫـ( ﺑﺪﺃﱐ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎ
ﳌﺎ ﲢﺪﺙ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱄ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﺴﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﱄ :ﺇﻧﲏ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺑﺮﻗﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻭﻟﺪﻱ ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳉﻼﺀ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺃﺟﺎﺑﲏ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭ ﺃﻫﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺄﺟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭﻙ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻠﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻴﻔﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﲔ ،ﰒ ﻫﻮ ﻫﲔ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺣﻘﻦ ﺩﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺺ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﱄ ﲟﺮﺃﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻟﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﻭﻣﺴﻤﻊ(ﺍﻩ
164
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳌﺘﻐﻠﺒﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺃﻢ ﻳﻈﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺎ ﻇﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺴﻠﻘﻮﻥ ﻷﻣﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺫﺭﻳﻌﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺼﺒﻮﻥ
ﻻﻗﺘﻨﺎﺹ ﺃﻣﺎﳍﻢ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺮﺿﻴﻚ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﺿﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻟﺪﻳﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ
ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺳﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﻳﺴﻨﻮﻥ ﳍﻢ ﺳﻨﻨﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﺛﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﻻ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻛﺤﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻭﺱ ﻭﲢﺮﱘ ﺑﻌـﺾ
ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﱂ ﻳﺄﺕ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﳝﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺻﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﻳﻄﻠﻘﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻃﺎﳊﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﻭﺟﺎﻫﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻄﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﺻﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﺮﻗﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﻳﺌﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻠﺒﺴﺎ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺎﺻﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﺣﺎﻟﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻳﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻃﻲ ﺑﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺘﺪﻝ ﰲ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒـﺪ
ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺪﻳﺔ )) :(٢٤٢ /١٣ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﳍﻤﻚ ﺍﷲ
ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺍﺏ ،ﻭﺃﺯﺍﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻠﺒﻚ ﻇﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻚ ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺗﻴﺎﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﶈﻘﻘﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ،ﺃﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ
ﻛﺎﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺟﺌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻭﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺈﻧﻜﺎﺭ
ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ(.ﺍﻩ
165
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-٢ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻗﺒﻞ ﳏﻨﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﶈﻜﻲ ﻳﺸﻌﺮ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﶈﻨﺔ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻓـﻼ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻟﻪ
–٣ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲ) :ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﻐﺾ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻋﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻟﺴـﻨﺔ ...ﺇﱁ(
ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﻠﹼﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺪﻳﻬﺔ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺟﻼﻟﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻩ
ﻭﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ؛ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻟﻮ ﺻﺢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺮﺩﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻮ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﻐﺾ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻛﺎﻓﺮﺍ؟!!! ﻫﻞ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺃﻭ ﻧﱯ؟! ﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻬﻮ ﻓﺎﺳﻖ
ﳍﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﻐﻀﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﲤﺴﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﳍﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺃﲪـﺪ
ﻭﺑﲔ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻱ ،ﻭﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﳌﺘﺒﺎﺩﻝ ،ﻭﻟﻐﲑﻫﻢ ﺣﺼﻞ
ﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺃﲪﺪ ،ﻓﻌﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﺫﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻔﺮ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﻟﻠﺒﻐﺾ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻓﺘﺤﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻟﻔﺘﺤﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻓﻜﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺳﺘﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺭﻣﻮﺯﻫﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ
ﻭﻛﺄﱐ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻳﻄﺒﻖ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ :ﻛﻼﻣﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻐـﺾ
ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺑﻐﻀﻪ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻓﺄﻧﺖ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ!!! ،ﺇﻥ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻨﺎ ..ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﻮﺳﻨﺎ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳊـﻖ
ﺃﺣﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻋﺰ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱪﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚـﺐ
ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﲢﺮﱘ ﺭﺩ ﺃﻱ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﻧﺸﺮﻩ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﱪﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺷـﺮﺡ
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺹ) :١٢٥ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻗﺮ ﲟﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﰊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺁﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﲣﺬﻩ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺸﻚ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﱂ ﳚﺤﺪ
ﺣﺮﻓﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻭﲨﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻤﻠﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺣﺠﺪ ﺣﺮﻓﺎ ﳑﺎ ﰲ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺷﻚ ﻭﻭﻗﻒ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻫﻮﻯ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺹ) :١٠٠ﻓﺎﺗﻖ ﺍﷲ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻳﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﲟﺎ ﰲ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻜﺘﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﻻ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ
ﻓﺤﻜﺎﻳﺘﻪ ﺗﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻖ
166
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﻫﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻄﺒﻌﻬﺎ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻼ ﺧﻼﻑ ﰲ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ
ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻋﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺠﻮﺭﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻡ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﻫﲔ) :ﻓﻼ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻟﻸﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺒﺒﺎﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻕ
ﻭﻻ ﻟﻠﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻊ ﻭﻻ ﻟﻠﺴﻜﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﰲ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳـﺆﺛﺮ ﺑﻘـﻮﺓ
ﺃﻭﺩﻋﻬﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻓﺎﺳﻖ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻉ ،ﻭﰲ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ ﻗﻮﻻﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ ،ﻛﻤﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒـﺪ
ﳜﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺑﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺃﻭﺩﻋﻬﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻣﺴﺒﺒﺎﺎ ﺗﻼﺯﻡ ﻋﻘﻠﻲ ﻓﻤﱴ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻭﺟﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﻕ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺟﺎﻫﻞ ﲝﻘﻴﻘﺔ
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺟﺮﻩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ – ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ -ﻛﻼﻡ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻋﻦ ﻛـﺜﲑ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻷﺷـﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﰲ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ
167
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳌﻬﻢ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﺞ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺗﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺻﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻘﻀﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻏﻀﺒﺎﻥ!!!
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲨﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺃﰊ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻴﻌﺎﺩ ﻓﻐﻴﺮ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﻣﺮﻗـﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﻔـﺎﺗﻴﺢ
ﺝ/١ﺹ) :٧٩ﻭﻣﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﻮ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻓﺎﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻋﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻓﺠﺎﺀ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻡ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﻭﺃﻛﺮﻣﻪ ﻭﺃﻗﻌﺪﻩ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﻗﻌﺪ ﺑﲔ ﻳﺪﻳﻪ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ :ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻌﻠﺖ ﺷﻴﺌﺎﹰ
ﻋﺠﻴﺒﺎﹰ! ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﲟﻜﺎﻥ(ﺍﻩ
أﺣﻤﺪ واﻟﻜﺮاﺑﯿﺴﻲ
ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﺝ/٨ﺹ) :٦٥ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﳌﺎﻭﺭﺩﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺟﺎﺀ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﰊ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻓﻘﺎ :ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ :ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻏﲑ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ:
ﻓﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺴﲔ :ﻟﻔﻈﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ
168
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻤﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻓﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﺇﻥ ﻟﻔﻈﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻓﺄﻧﻜﺮ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﻫﻲ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ
ﻓﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺴﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻓﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ،
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺴﲔ :ﺗﻠﻔﻈﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻏﲑ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ! ﻓﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻓﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﺣﺴﲔ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﺗﻠﻔﻈﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻏﲑ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ! ﻓﺄﻧﻜﺮ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ
ﻓﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﰊ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻓﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﲔ :ﺃﻳﺶ ﻧﻌﻤﻞ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﱯ؟! ﺇﻥ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻏﲑ ﳐﻠـﻮﻕ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻓﺒﻠﻎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻐﻀﺐ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﺘﻜﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺣﺴﲔ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ
ﺣﺴﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻤﺰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) :٢٨٩/١١ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﺣﺴﲔ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ...ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﻭﺫﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺺ :ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﻷﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻏﲑ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﻪ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻘـﻞ
ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ :ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ ﻗﺎﺗﻠﻪ ﺍﷲ!!! ﻭﺃﻱ ﺷـﻲﺀ ﻗﺎﻟـﺖ
ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻴﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻫﺬﺍ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ) :٦٢/١ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﻭﺫﻱ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻷﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻟﻔﻈﻪ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ!!! ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ]ﺃﲪﺪ[ :ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮ!!!(ﺍﻩ
ﻋﺠﺒﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻭﻋﺠﺒﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ :ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻛﻔﺮ
ﺃﲪﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ
ﻟﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ) :ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ( ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﻏﲑﻫـﻢ ﻭﻣﻨـﻬﻢ:
ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺛﻮﺭ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻧﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺭﺙ ﺍﶈﺴﱯ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﻼﺏ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻣﻞ ﻓـﺈﻥ
ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺻﻮﺍﺏ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺧﺸﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺫﺭﻳﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﲞﻠﻖ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﲑ ) :٨٢/١٢ﻭﻻ ﺭﻳﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﻋﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴـﻲ ﻭﺣـﺮﺭﻩ ﰲ ﻣﺴـﺄﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻔﻆ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻫﻮ ﺣﻖ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﺑﺎﻩ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺘﺬﺭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﻓﺴـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﱂ ﻳﺮﺗﻀﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻓﺎﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﳎﺎﺯﻓﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﲑ ) :\ ٥١٠/١١ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺍﻹﻣـﺎﻡ ﺃﲪـﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳊـﻂ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺛﺒﺖ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻴﺔ ﺟﻬﻤﻴﺔ(ﺍﻩ
169
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺍﻋﺘﺬﺭ ﻷﲪﺪ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺻـﻔﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻗـﺪ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻋﻨﻪ) :ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ( ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻛﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻋﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺮﺡ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺻﺮﺡ ﺑﺄﻧـﻪ
ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻻ ﻏﲑ
ﻭﻣﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺔ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳏﻞ ﺇﲨـﺎﻉ ﻣـﻦ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺧﻼﻓﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ
ﻓﻤﺜﻼ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻜﻔﺮ ،ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻛﺜﲑ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳏﻞ ﺇﲨﺎﻉ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﲝﺚ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ) :ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ( ﺗﻘﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﺠﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻨﺸﺮﻩ
170
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﰲ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ) :١٧٠/١ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻇﻠﻢ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﺍﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﰲ ﺗﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻳﻘﺪﻣﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﺰﳝﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﳛﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻻ ﻧﺴﻠﹼﻢ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻳﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ،ﻧﻌﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺃﲨﻌﺖ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﻌﲔ
ﻓﺬﺍﻙ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﲝﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ
ﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺸﺮ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﺎﻁ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺪﺩﺓ ،ﺣﱴ ﺇﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﺎﻁ ﻳﻈﻨﻮﻥ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ
171
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻠﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻧﺸﺄﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﻜﻤﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺣﻖ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺇﳝـﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ
ﻛﻔﺮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻷﻧﻨﺎ ﺗﻠﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺸﺄﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺗﻠﻘﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺸﺄﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻖ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺃﻥ ﲡﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺄ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺗﻠﻘﺎﻩ ﻭﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﳋﻄـﺄ ،ﺭﺣـﻢ ﺍﷲ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻗﻮﱄ ﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﻏﲑﻱ ﺧﻄﺄ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ( ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺇﻳﻘﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ) :ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺗﺒﻊ ﳌﺎ ﺃﻟﻔﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺀ ﲟﺠﺮﺩ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻭﻫﻮﻯ ،ﻭﻣﻦ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻓﻬﻮ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍﻛﺪﻱ ﺍﳍﻤﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﺼﺮ ﻧﻈﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﺃﺳﻼﻓﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ...ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻇﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﳍﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻄﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺂﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻖ
ﻣﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﺎ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺑﺎﺀ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﺝ/٢ﺹ) :٥٣٧ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﺮﰉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻌﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﻣﺎ
ﻓﻴﻪ -ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﳛﺴﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ -ﻻ ﻳﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻭﺗﻠﻘﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﲝﻴﺚ ﳚﺐ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭ ﻳﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﻻ
ﻳﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﱂ ﳛﺴﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻗﻠﲔ ﻷﻗـﻮﺍﻝ
ﻏﲑﻫﻢ(ﺍﻩ
172
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺳﻨﻨﻪ ) :٣٦٤/٤ﻋﻦ ﺣﺬﻳﻔﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﺇﻣﻌﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﺣﺴﻨﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻇﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﻇﻠﻤﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻭﻃﻨﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻜﻢ
ﺇﻥ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺴﻨﻮﺍ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺳﺎﺀﻭﺍ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻈﻠﻤﻮﺍ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺳﻨﻨﻪ ) :٥١/٥ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻫﺮﻳﺮﺓ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ:
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﺿﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﻓﺤﻴﺚ ﻭﺟﺪﻫﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺣﻖ ﺎ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﻪ ١٣٩٥/٢
ﻭﰲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ) :٢٤٦/١ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺪﻱ ﺑﻦ ﺧﻴﺎﺭ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺩﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﳏﺼﻮﺭ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﺄﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺳﺎﺅﻭﺍ ﻓﺎﺟﺘﻨﺐ ﺇﺳﺎﺀﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﺃﺧﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ:
-ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺛﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺑﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻠﻘﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﳜﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ
ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺻﻒ ﺍﳌﻐﻤﻮﺭ ﻻ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺥ ) ،( ٢٥ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ
) ( ٢٥ﰲ ﺍﻵﺩﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻣﻔﻠﺢ ) :١١٠/٢ﻓﺼﻞ :ﰲ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺻﻐﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ:
-ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﲪﺪ :ﺑﻠﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻡ ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺛﻘﺔ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﲏ :ﻷﻥ ﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻓﻴﻔﺘﻴﲏ ﺃﺣﺐ ﺇﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺎﺻﻢ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ -
ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ،ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻦ
-ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﳋﻼﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻌﻤﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﻋﻦ ﺣﺪﺍﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻭﻻ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻳﻀﻌﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺸﺎﺀ
-ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻭﻛﻴﻊ :ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﳑﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺳﻦ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﲪﺪ...
-ﻭﰲ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ :ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻴﻖ ﳏﻘﻖ؛ ﺃﻥ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺳﺖ
ﻭﺛﻼﺛﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻓﻌﺠﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺼﻮﺭ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻠﻮﻏﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻤﻨﻬﻢ :ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭ ﺫﻭ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﲔ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﳋﺮﺍﺳﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻔﻊ ﻭﺳﻴﺒﻮﻳﻪ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻧﺪﻱ ...ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻛﻼﻣﻪ
-ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻛﻬﻮﻻﹶ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺷﺒﺎﻧﺎﹶ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻓﺎﹶ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻭﻏﲑﻩ.
-ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﻗﺮﺉ ﺭﺟﺎﻻﹶ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺟﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ
ﺑﻦ ﻋﻮﻑ.
-ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻞ :ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺻﻐﺮﺕ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻗﻠﺖ
ﺃﻗﺪﺍﺭﻫﻢ.
173
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻻ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻱ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻐﲏ...ﺇﱁ ﻓﺎﳊﻖ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺷﻬﺮﺓ ﻭﻻ ﺧﻔﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻻ ﺻﻐﺮﺍ ﻭﻻ
ﻛﱪﺍ ،ﻭﻻ ﺿﻌﻔﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻻ ﻏﲎ ﻭﻻ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ..ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺇﻻ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ
ﺃﺧﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ:
ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﺿﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻭﺟﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﺧﺬﻫﺎ ﻭﻋﻤﻞ ﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺃﻭ ﺷـﻴﺦ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻱ
ﺃﺣﺪ)..ﺁﻣﻨﺘﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺁﺫﻥ ﻟﻜﻢ( ﻓﺎﳊﺬﺭ ﺍﳊﺬﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﻠﻢ ﻋﻘﻠﻚ ﻟﻐﲑﻙ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﻖ
ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻼﻝ ﺹ) :٥٢ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺿﻌﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﻳﻌﺮﻓـﻮﻥ
ﺍﳊﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻻ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﻖ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻗﻞ ﻳﻘﺘﺪﻱ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻻ
ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ( ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻗﻞ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻈـﺮ ﰲ ﻧﻔـﺲ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﻣﺒﻄﻼ ﺃﻭ ﳏﻘﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﻋﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ) :ﺇﱐ ﺃﺧﺎﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺪﻝ ﺩﻳﻨﻜﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ(
ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻠﻄﻔﻴﻞ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺳﻲ) :ﺍﺣﺬﺭ ﳏﻤﺪﺍ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﻤﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺤﺮﻙ ﻭ (...ﻭﱂ ﻳﺰﺍﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﱴ
ﺣﺸﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺫﻧﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻒ )ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ( ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ) ..ﻭﺍﷲ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ(
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﲑ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺳﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻀﲑ ﻭﻟﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ :ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻜﻤـﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻨـﺎ
ﺗﺴﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﺿﻌﻔﺎﺀﻧﺎ؟ ﺍﻋﺘﺰﻻﻧﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻟﻜﻤﺎ ﺑﺄﻧﻔﺴﻜﻤﺎ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ) :ﺃﻭ ﲡﻠﺲ ﻓﺘﺴﻤﻊ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺭﺿﻴﺖ ﺃﻣﺮﺍ ﻗﺒﻠﺘﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺮﻫﺘﻪ ﻛﻔﻔﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﺮﻩ(
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺭﺩﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺹ...) :٣٩ﻟﻜﻦ ﳒﺪ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣﻖ ﻣﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺣﻘﺎ ﻣﺎ ،ﻓﲑﺩ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺒﻄﻼ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﺒﻄﻼ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻪ ﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺴـﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺝ/٦ﺹ) :٢٦ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﳌﺜﺒﺘﺔ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ
ﺑﺈﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻧﻔﺮﺓ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﳊﻖ ﻭﻧﻔﻴﻬﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﻌﺮﺿﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻨﻔﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﺬﺑﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺼﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺘﺴﻨﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺿﻪ ﻋﻦ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻳﻐﻠﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ
-ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﺍﻡ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﺫ ﺑﻦ ﺟﺒﻞ ،ﻓﻘﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ :ﺗﻘﺮﺃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻡ ﺍﳋﺰﺭﺟﻰ؟! ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﳕﺎ
ﺃﻫﻠﻜﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﱪ(ﺍﻩ
174
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ﺝ/١ﺹ...) :٤٨ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﺗﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﺒﻠﻬﺎ،
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﱄ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺴﻲﺀ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻪ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻃﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻃﺒﻊ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺴﻤﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺳـﺨﲔ
ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺭﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺣﻘﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﰲ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺹ) :٨٠ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻥ ﻭﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﺩ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺠـﺔ
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻷﻧﻚ ﺗﺴﻲﺀ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ،ﺃﻭ ﻷﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﻢ ﳜﺎﻟﻔﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﻳﺪﻋﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳜـﺎﻟﻒ
ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺪﻭﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﺪﻭﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊـﻖ ﺃﻳﻀـﺎ ﻷﻥ
ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻄﻠﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻓﺘﺮﻛﺖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻋﺪﻭﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻷﻧﻚ ﻇﺎﱂ ﳍﺎ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲡﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﳛﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﺑﺸﺨﺺ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻻ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﺧﻄﺄ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻼﻝ ﺹ) :٥٤ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﺃﺳﻨﺪﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻗﺒﻠﻮﻩ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻃﻼ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺳـﻨﺪﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﺩﻭﻩ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﻼﻝ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺹ ) :٧٦ﹶﻃﺒﻊ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﻑ ﰲ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺃﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﻋﺮﻑ ﰲ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺴـﺄﻟﺔ
ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﺴﺮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﳍﻢ
ﺣﺠﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺘﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺎﺋﻔـﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻢ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻂ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺇﻧﲏ ﻷﺳﺄﻟﻚ ﺃﺧﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻭﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﻭﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﺻﺮﳛﺎ :ﻫـﻞ
ﳓﺘﻤﻞ ﰲ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻨﺎ )ﻋﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ( ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺄ؟ ﺃﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻛـﻼﻡ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻨﺎ ﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ؟
ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳍﺠﺮﺗﲔ ﺹ) :٥٨٢ﻭﻻ
ﻧﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ،ﺑﻞ ﻧﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﳔﺎﻟﻔﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﳊﻖ ،ﻻ ﻧﺴﺘﺜﲎ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻧﺮﺟﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﳓﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﳕﻮﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﻧﻠﻘﻲ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﷲ(ﺍﻩ
175
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺇﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻌﲔ ﺝ/٣ﺹ) :٩٤ﻓﻮﺭﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻣﻨﺼﺒﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻭﺃﻻ ﳝﻴـﻞ
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﻪ ﻭﺫﻭﻱ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻭﻃﺎﺋﻔﺘﻪ ﻭﻣﺘﺒﻮﻋﻪ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻪ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺑﺴﲑﻩ ﻭﻳﱰﻝ ﺑﱰﻭﻟﻪ
ﻳﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻭﳛﻜﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ) :ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺮﻓﻀﻪ ﻭﻳﺮﻓﻀﻪ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﺀ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺴﺐ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ
ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻩ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳚﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﲨﻮﺩﺍ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻀﺮ ﺑﺎﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻛﻠـﻪ ﻭﻳﺼـﺪﻉ
ﻭﺣﺪﺗﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺹ٩٣
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺹ) :٩٨ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺒﻴﻨﻮﺍ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﺩﻭﻥ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻥ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻈﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺣﻜﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻜﻬﻢ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﳉﺎﺟﺔ ﻭﻣﻐﺎﺿﺒﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ
ﺍﻟﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﳝﺰﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻳﻮﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻗﺎﱐ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺎﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺝ/٢ﺹ) :٢٧ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩﺍ ﺑـﻞ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻣـﺎ
ﺗﻌﺼﺒﻮﺍ ﻵﺭﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻭﺯﻋﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻋﺎ ﻣﺘﺒﻌﺎ ﳍﻮﺍﻩ ﻭﻟﻮ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺄﻭﻻ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻼ ﺳﺎﺋﻐﺎ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ،ﻛﺄﻥ ﺭﺃﻳﻬﻢ ﻭﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺄﻧﻪ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺰﳍﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﻋﻤﺎﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﺭ
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﳒﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻴﻌﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺷﻴﻌﺎ ﻭﺃﺣﺰﺍﺑﺎ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺣﺮﺑـﺎ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻋﺪﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻏﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺃﻭﺳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻭﺁﺭﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ
ﻭﺁﺭﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﺃﺿﻴﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺃﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﻨﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺤﺔ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﺎ ﳊﺮﻳـﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﻜـﺎﺭ
ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﻧﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻣﻌﺘﺼﻤﺎ ﲝﺒﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ
ﰒ ﻏﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺼﻤﻮﺍ ﲝﺒﻞ ﺍﷲ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﻭﺍﺫﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﻧﻌﻤﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺇﺫ
ﻛﻨﺘﻢ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﻓﺄﻟﻒ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻜﻢ ﻓﺄﺻﺒﺤﺘﻢ ﺑﻨﻌﻤﺘﻪ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﺎ( ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺟﻞ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ) :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﺩﻳﻨـﻬﻢ
ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺷﻴﻌﺎ ﻟﺴﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ( ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺗﻘﺪﺳﺖ ﺃﲰﺎﺅﻩ) :ﻭﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻛﺎﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﳍﻢ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺗﺒﻴﺾ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻭﺗﺴﻮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ(
ﳌﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺭﺑﺄ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺑﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﻯ ـﺮﺩ ﺃﻧـﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻨـﺎ ﰲ ﺭﺃﻱ
ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻨﻊ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺭ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺅﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤـﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻌﲔ ﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﰒ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﻠﺖ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﲪﻠﺖ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺃﺣﺴـﻦ
ﺍﶈﺎﻣﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻔﺮﻭﻍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﻔﺖ ﰲ ﻋﻀﺪﻧﺎ ﻏﻔﻠﺔ ﻛﺜﲑ
ﻣﻦ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﳛﻤﻲ ﺍﻷﺧﻮﺓ ﻭﻳﻈﻬـﺮ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﺍﳊﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮ ﻭﺍﺗﺴﺎﻋﻪ ﻟﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻓـﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳـﺔ
176
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﺖ ﻣﻌﺘﺼﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﺘﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﻴﺪ...
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻚ ﺳﺘﻘﻀﻲ ﺍﻷﺳﻒ ﺣﲔ ﺗﺮﻯ ﲜﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻓﺌﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﺷﻘﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺗﺮﺍﻣﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮﻙ
ﻭﺗﻘﺎﺫﻓﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﺮﺩ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻳﺴﺘﺴﻴﻐﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻭﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻪ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰒ ﺍﺗﺴﻊ ﺍﳋـﺮﻕ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻈﺮﻭﻑ ﺣﱴ ﺩﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﻃﺎﺣﻨﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻔﻮﻑ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺔ ﻭﺃﺭﻳﻘﺖ ﺩﻣـﺎﺀ
ﺯﻛﻴﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﻧﺸﻬﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻄﻊ؛ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻣـﺎ ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﺃﻏﻨﺎﻧﺎ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺮﺍﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﳊﺬﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﳚﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ )ﻋﻘﺪﻱ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﻲ( ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻃﻖ
ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻲ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻳﻜﹾﻔﹸﻮﻥ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﺋﺾ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ،
ﺑﻞ ﻛﻞﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻐﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺣﻖ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ،ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀ -ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ -ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺍﳌـﺬﻫﺐ
ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺃﻭ ﻷﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺧﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺎﻝ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ
ﰲ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ) :٧ / ٤ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻗﺪ ﻗﻀﻴﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺎﳉﱪ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘـﺮﺍﻉ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺴﺐ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻊ ﺻﺪﻗﻪ ﻗﺎﺻﺮ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ ،ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺇﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻓﻬﺎﻡ ﲟﺜﺎﻝ؟
ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﲰﻌﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﺓ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻗﻂ
ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻭﺍ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﻭﻻ ﲰﻌﻮﺍ ﺍﲰﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﺗﻪ ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻄﻠﺒﻮﻩ
ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻭﺻﻠﻮﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﳌﺴﻮﻩ ،ﻓﻮﻗﻊ ﻳﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻭﻗﻊ ﻳﺪ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺎﺑـﻪ ﻭﻭﻗـﻊ ﻳـﺪ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺫﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﻓﻮﺍ
ﻓﺴﺄﳍﻢ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺧﺘﻠﻔﺖ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺘﻬﻢ:
-ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳌﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﹺﺟﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃﺳﻄﻮﺍﻧﺔ ﺧﺸﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻟﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
-ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳌﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺏ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺻﻠﺐ ﻻ ﻟﲔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﻠﺲ ﻻ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻟـﻴﺲ ﰲ
ﻏﻠﻆ ﺍﻷﺳﻄﻮﺍﻧﺔ ﺃﺻﻼ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﺩ
-ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳌﺲ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻟﲔ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺔ ﻓﺼﺪﻕ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﺩ
ﻭﻻ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺍﻧﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺟﻠﺪ ﻋﺮﻳﺾ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ
177
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺇﺫ ﺃﺧﱪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻋﻤﺎ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻭﱂ ﳜـﺮﺝ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﰲ ﺧﱪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﲝﻤﻠﺘﻬﻢ ﻗﺼﺮﻭﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﺑﻜﻨﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﺒﺼﺮ
ﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﱪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻌﲔ )ﻋﻘﺪﻱ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﻲ( ﻟﻴﺴﺘﻐﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻤﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌـﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺧـﺮﻯ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﺍﻧﺘﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﱂﹶ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻣـﺬﻫﱯ؟ ﻭﻣـﺎ ﺩﺭﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻤـﻲ
ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺳﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) :١٧٢/٢٢ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺷﺎﻣﺔ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺻﻨﻒ ﻛﺘﺒﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ
ﻋﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻓﺴﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻼﻟﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﲟﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻷﺧﺒﺎﺭ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﺠﺐ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﻜﻢ ﻭﺫﻛﺎﺋﻜﻢ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻗـﺔ
ﺗﺘﻌﺠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻻ ﻋﺠﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻧﺮﺟﻮ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺬﻝ ﺟﻬﺪﻩ ﰲ ﺗﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﳊﻖ-ﻣﻦ ﻫـﺬﻩ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻮﻣﺔ -ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺿﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﻼﻝ ﻣﺒﲔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻃﱯ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ﺝ/٤ﺹ) :٢٢٣ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﻊ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺷﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼـﻔﺎﺕ
ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﻔﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺎﻫﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻈﺮﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺣﺎﺋﻤﺎ ﺣﻮﻝ ﲪﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻪ ﻭﻧﻔـﻲ
ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺎﺋﺺ ﻭﲰﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺙ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ،ﻓﺎﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﳜﻞ ـﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺼـﺪ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﻣﻌﺎ ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﺕ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻓﻔﻲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻃﱯ ﲡﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻵﳍﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻴﻪ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﳌﺜﺒﺘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴـﺔ
ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺗﺮﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳉﺤﻮﺩ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺛﺒﺘـﻪ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﺑﻼ ﻣﺴﻮﻍ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﱰﻳﻪ ﻟﻠﺮﺏ
ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻓﺘﺠﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌـﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﳚﱪ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﻲ ﰒ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻮﻩ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﺎﻡ
ﺍﷲ ﺑﺎﻟﻈﻠﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﲞﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺗﺮﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊـﺪﻳﺚ
ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻟﻘﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ
ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﱰﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ
178
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
)ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻗﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﰲ ﻧﻘﻴﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﻤﺎ
ﻫﻲ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻱ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺇﳌﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺭﺍﺳﺨﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴـﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳـﺔ،ﺇﻥ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺤﺘﺎﺭ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﳊﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﺫ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺁﻳﺔ
ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻛﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﺍﻹﳚﺎﺩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻭﻋﻜﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ
ﻫﻞ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺃﻣﺮﺍ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ؟ ﺃﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻜﺸﻒ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺩﺭﺱ ﰲ ﺟﻮ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭﻳﻜﺸﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﻴﺔ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﻭﻋﻮﳉﺖ
ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ )(٢٦
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘـﺮﺭﻩ
ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺧﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﺘﺐ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٤٦٨/١٢ﻭﻧﺰﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﻨﺔ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺒﻌﲔ ﳍﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺋﺎﺳﺔ
ﺃﻭ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺘﺒﻌﲔ ﻟﻈﻦ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﺝ/٢ﺹ ) :٥٣٧ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻷﺣﺪ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺣﺪ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻟﱰﺍﻉ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻭﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻞﹲ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺒﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻻ ﺑﺄﻗﻮﺍﻝ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﳛﺘﺞ ﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳌﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺜـﻖ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻨـﻪ
ﻭﻳﺜﻖ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﰒ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺫﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﺘﺎﻩ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻊ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻠـﻒ
ﺍﷲ ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺳﻌﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﻴﻞ) :ﻣﻦ ﻗﻠﺪ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﻟﻘﻲ ﺍﷲ ﺳﺎﳌﺎ(
) (٢٦ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺤﺎﱐ ﰲ ﳏﺎﺿﺮﺍﺗﻪ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﺎ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﻱ ﺹ ٩-٨ﺑﺘﺼﺮﻑ
179
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﲑ ﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻧـﺖ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺒﺎﱄ ﲝﻈﻮﻅ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺎﳋﻠﻖ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ:
ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ) :٣٠٨/١٠ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺟﻨﺎﺯﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﺮ ﺟﻠﺲ ﻭﺟﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺣﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺴﺄﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻓﻐﻠﻂ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ،
ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﺃﺻﻠﺤﻚ ﺍﷲ ،ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻛﺬﺍ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺇﻻ ﺃﱐ ﱂ ﺃﺭﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﺭﺩﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺭﻓﻌﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻓﺎﻃﺮﻕ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﰒ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺟﻊ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺻﺎﻏﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺟﻊ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺻﺎﻏﺮ ،ﻷﻥ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﺫﻧﺒـﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﺣﺐ ﺇﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﺭﺃﺳﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﺯﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻈﻢ ٢٩٨/٦ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ
ﺍﳌﺰﻱ ﰲ ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ٢٥/١٩ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ١٥١/١٠
ﻭﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺹ) :١٠ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻝ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﳊﺪﺍﺩ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﻨﺖ
ﻣﻊ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻱ ﰲ ﺟﻨﺎﺯﺓ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺩﻓﻦ ﺍﳌﻴﺖ ﺟﻠﺲ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺿﺮﻳﺮ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﱪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺃﲪﺪ :ﻳﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﱪ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ
ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺧﺮﺟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﻷﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻣﺒﺸﺮ ﺍﳊﻠـﱯ؟
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺛﻘﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺒﺖ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﻓﺄﺧﱪﱐ ﻣﺒﺸﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﺠﻼﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻴـﻪ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻭﺻﻰ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﻓﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺑﻔﺎﲢﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﺧﺎﲤﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﲰﻌﺖ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻳﻮﺻﻲ ﺑـﺬﻟﻚ
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺃﲪﺪ :ﻓﺎﺭﺟﻊ ﻭﻗﻞ ﻟﻠﺮﺟﻞ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ!!(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ) :٢١٤/٨ﺣﻜﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﺰ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﳍﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻄﻴﺐ
ﺍﻷﴰﻮﻧﲔ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨﻒ ﻟﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺳﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺰ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺰ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻓـﱴ
ﻣﺮﺓ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﰒ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻓﻨﺎﺩﻯ ﰲ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﱴ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻼﻥ ﺑﻜـﺬﺍ ﻓـﻼ
ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺧﻄﺄ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺗﺮﻛﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺧﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﻃﺎﻟﺔ
180
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ -ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ -ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ) :ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗـﺔ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻫﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ( ﻟﻴﺨﺮﺟﻮﺍ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ،ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﳌﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺿـﻲ
ﻋﻴﺎﺽ ) :٩١/١ﻋﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﺯﻟﻨﺎ ﻧﻠﻌﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻭﻳﻠﻌﻨﻮﻧﻨﺎ ﺣﱴ ﺟـﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻓﻤﺰﺝ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻴﺎﺽ) :ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﲤﺴﻚ ﺑﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﰒ ﺃﺭﺍﻫﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴـﻪ ﻭﺗـﺒﲎ
ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﻭﻣﻨﺘﺰﻉ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﺭﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻬـﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠـﻖ ﺑﻌﻠﻠـﻬﺎ
ﻭﺗﻨﺒﻴﻬﺎﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﹼﻢ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻓﺮﻉ ﻟﻸﺻﻞ ،ﻭﻋﻠﹼﻢ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻓﺮﻉ
ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻏﲎ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻦ ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ ﺃﻭﻻ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻟﻨﺘﺤﺪﺙ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ:
181
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﺻﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﺻﻢ ١٨٦/١ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻳﺪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ) :ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻙ ﻭﺍﻻﻏﺘﺮﺍﺭ ﺑـ)ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻫﺎﻟﻜﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪﺓ( ﻓﺈـﺎ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﺎﺳﺪﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺇـﺎ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﻗﻮﻓﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺔ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺫﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺟﺌﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺷـﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻓﺈـﺎ
ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ١٧٠/٣ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ) :ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺷـﺮﻁ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﳜﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺨﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺃﰊ ﻫﺮﻳﺮﺓ ﻣـﻦ ﻃﺮﻳـﻖ
ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻘﻤﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ )ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ( ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻳـﺎﺩﺓ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺭ ﺍﳌﻨﲑ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ) :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻀﻌﻴﻔﺔ ،ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺎ ﺣﺠﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺷـﺮﻋﻲ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻜﻠﻔﲔ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﳍﻼﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣـﺔ
ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺷﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺼﻬﺎ ﲞﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﱂ ﻳﺸﺎﺭﻛﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﺯﺍﺩﻫـﺎ ﺷـﺮﻓﺎ
ﻭﺗﻌﻈﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﲡﻠﻴﻼ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺷﻬﺪﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺃﻱ ﺧﲑ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺗﻔﺘﺮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻭﺳﺒﻌﲔ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﻠﻚ
ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻨﺠﻮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻔﺎﻅ ﺣﲔ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ) :ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻫﺎﻟﻜﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ( ﻓﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﺃﻇﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺛﺒﻮﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺟﺎﺩ ﻇﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻇﻦ ﺃﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎﺩﻗﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﻮﻳﻒ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻻ ﻳﻘﺪﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﻩ ،ﻓﺘﺤﺼﻞ ﻟﻮﺍﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻃﻠﺒﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣـﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻮﻣـﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﲑ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻈﺔ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺝ/١ﺹ-٢٠٦ﺹ٢٠٧
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﳌﻠﻴﻜﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻓﻜﺮﻩ( ﺹ ٢٣٧ﺃﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﻟـﻪ
ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﻭﻫﻲ ﳐﻄﻮﻃﺔ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﺑﺼﻨﻌﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻟﻠﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﻛﻼﻡ
ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﺮ ] ) :[٨٥/٢ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻛـﺮﻩ ﳍـﺬﺍ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻔﻈﻪ :ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻀﻊ ﻭﺳﺒﻌﲔ ﻣﺮﻭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫـﺎ ﰲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻛﻮﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺿﻌﻔﻬﺎ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﺇﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﺴـﺎﺑﻖ ﺃﻧـﻪ
ﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻭﱂ ﺃﻗﻒ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺁﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﰒ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﺍﳌﻠﻴﻜﻲ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ
182
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﻧﻔﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻟﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺭ
ﺍﳌﻨﲑ ﰒ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰒ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ
-ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺗﻪ) :ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺭ( ﻋﻜـﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳـﺔ
ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺤﺤﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﻭﺿﻌﻔﻬﺎ ﻏﲑﻩ
-ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻛﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﲣﺮﺝ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ:
ﻓﻔﻲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺗﻪ ) :ﺃﻋﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﱵ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻳﻘﻴﺴﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺃﻳﻬﻢ!!!( ﺭﻭﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺎ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ
ﻭﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ) :ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺑﺬﻧﺐ!!!( ﻭﻫـﺬ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳـﺔ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺎ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﳋﻮﺭﺍﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ
ﻭﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ) :ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﰊ( ﻭﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ) :ﻫﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ( ﻭﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳـﺔ:
)ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ( ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑـﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳـﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ
183
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻧﺰﺭ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﻫﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﻒ ﻭﺳﺒﻌﲔ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﺷﺨﺎﺻﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻟﻒ ﻓﺮﻗـﺔ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠـﻲ
ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻟﻠﻤﻠﻴﻜﻲ) (٢٧ﺹ٢٤١
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ) :ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ:
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﶈﻜﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳍﻼﻙ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻼﻙ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ(ﺍﻩ ﻳﻘﻈﺔ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺝ/١ﺹ٢٠١
ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ:
) ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﺎﳍﻼﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻇـﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﳍـﺎ
ﻭﺗﻔﺮﻳﻄﻬﺎ ،ﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﻗﻴﻞ) :ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻫﺎﻟﻜﺔ( ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﳍﺎ ﳏﻜﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳍﻼﻙ ﻭﻛﻮﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﰱ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻮﺎ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﳍﺎ ﻭﺷﻔﺎﻋﺔ ﺻﺎﳊﻬﺎ ﻟﻄﺎﳊﻬﺎ...
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﻋﻘﺎﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺩﻝ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻘﺎﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﱳ
ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻻﺯﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻼﻳﺎ...
ﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻧﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻤﺔ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺑﺎﳍﻼﻙ ﺩﺍﺋﻤـﺔ...
ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﻴﺔ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﻟﻸﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳍﻼﻙ ﳌﻦ ﻳﻬﻠﻚ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻭﺯﻣﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺯﻣﺎﻥ ...ﻭﻻ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺭﺩﺕ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳـﺚ
ﺑﻔﺴﺎﺩﻩ ﻭﻓﺸﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ﻭﺧﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻖ ( ...ﺍﻩ ﻳﻘﻈﺔ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺝ/١ﺹ-٢٠٣ﺹ٢٠٢
(٢٧ﰒ ﻭﻗﻔﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﰲ
ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ) :ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﺃﲝﺎﺙ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ( ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﳛﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﳛﻲ
ﲨﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﶈﻘﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺭﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻣﻄﲑ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻭﻗﻔﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻗﺪ ﻧﻘﻠﺘﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ
184
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ٢١٩/١ﻭﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ١٣/١٧ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻮﻑ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻛﻨﺎ
ﻗﻌﻮﺩﺍﹰ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺠﺪﻩ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻟﺘﺴﻠﻜﻦ ﺳﻨﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻜﻢ ﺣـﺬﻭ
ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻌﻞ ،ﻭﻟﺘﺄﺧﺬﻥ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃﺧﺬﻫﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺷﱪﺍﹰ ﻓﺸـﱪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺫﺭﺍﻋﺎﹰ ﻓﺬﺭﺍﻉ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺑﺎﻋﺎﹰ ﻓﺒﺎﻉ ،ﺣـﱴ ﻟـﻮ
ﺩﺧﻠﻮﺍ ﺟﺤﺮ ﺿﺐ ﺩﺧﻠﺘﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﺇﻻ ﺇﻥ ﺑﲏ ﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﻗﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﻭﺳـﺒﻌﲔ ﻓﺮﻗـﺔ،
ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺿﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﲨﺎﻋﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺇﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﻗﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺮﱘ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺇﺣـﺪﻯ
ﻭﺳﺒﻌﲔ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ،ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺿﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﲨﺎﻋﺘﻬﻢ ،ﰒ ﺇﻧﻜﻢ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ ﻭﺳﺒﻌﲔ
ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ،ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺿﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﲨﺎﻋﺘﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﺪﻳﻖ ﺧﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻘﻈﺔ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺝ/١ﺹ ) : ٢٠٠ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﻣﺸـﻜﻼ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻻ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺣﺪﺍﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻔﺘﺮﻗﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻣﻦ ﲟﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ
ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﻼ ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻝ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﲑ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺣﺴﻦ (...ﺍﻩ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻌﺎﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ
185
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻨﺎﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻃﻼﻕ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﻉ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻔﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺎﻟﺒﻬﻢ ،ﻭﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳـﺔ) :ﻛﻠـﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨـﺔ ﺇﻻ
ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎﺩﻗﺔ( ﻭﻫﻲ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ
ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ :ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳍﺎﻟﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲣﻠﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳍﺎﻟﻚ
ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻤﻦ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﻴﺄﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻼﺣﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺋﺲ ﻻ ﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳍﻼﻙ ﺧﲑ
ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻔﺎﻋﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﻗﺶ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻓﻘﺪ
ﻋﺬﺏ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻨﺎﺝ ﺇﺫﻥ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﻠﺸﻔﺎﻋﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻟﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻨﺎﺝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻃﻼﻕ ﻭﻫﺬﺍﻥ
ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺎﻥ ﻭﳘﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺷﺮ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﺧﲑ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺘﲔ ( ﺍﻩ
186
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻋﺼﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ – ﺻﺎﻢ ﺍﷲ– ﺑﺎﳍﻼﻙ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺜﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺳﻬﻢ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻬﻢ ﻭﳛﻜﻤﻮﻥ ﻟﻨﻔﻮﺳﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻢ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﻧﺸﻜﻮ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻤﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﻃﻠﺨﻤﺖ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠـﻲ
ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻓﻜﺮﻩ ﺹ٢٢٨
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٣٤٦-٣٤٧ / ٣ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﳜﱪ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﲝﻜﻢ
ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﻓﻴﺠﻌﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺘﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺘﺒﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﳚﻌـﻞ ﻣـﻦ
ﺣﺎﻟﻔﻬﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺿﻼﻝ ﻣﺒﲔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺒﻮﻋﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻄﻖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﺇﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺣﻲ ﻳﻮﺣﻰ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﺐ ﺗﺼﺪﻳﻘﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻞ
ﻣﺎ ﺃﺧﱪ ﻭﻃﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﱰﻟﺔ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ
ﺑﻞ ﻛﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻳﺆﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻳﺘﺮﻙ ﺇﻻ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺷﺨﺼﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﻏﲑ
ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺒﻪ ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒـﺪﻉ
ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻼﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ) :ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ( ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﻠﺤﻆ ﺣـﺮﺹ
ﻛﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻀﻢ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ
ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪﻫﻢ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻤﻞ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺇﺩﺧﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ
ﰲ ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻜﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻬﻤﻬﻢ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﲡﻨﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻭﻴﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٢٣٧/١٢ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺺ ﻭﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ
ﻭﻣﻨﻌﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﻗﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣـﻦ
ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﻕ ﺹ ٧٣ﻣﻦ ﺍﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ) :ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ
)ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺘﻐﻠﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺎﺕ( ..ﻻ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻢ ﳌﺎ
ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺭﺟﻊ ﻛﻞﹲ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻓﺮﻭﻋﻪ ﻟﻈﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ
ﻓﻔﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺭ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺡ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﻬﺘﻬﻢ ﳌﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻭﺫﻡ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺭﲟﺎ
ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺗﺄﻣﻞ(ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
187
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ) :ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺑﺬﻧﺐ!!!( ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﺌﺔ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻓﺮﺽ ﺻﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ) :ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﰊ( ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣـﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﰲ
ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ؟!
ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ :
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ -ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ -ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﻭﻥ ﻭﺗﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱰﺍﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﻫﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﻡ ،ﻓﺘﺠﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳـﺪﻋﻲ
ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ -ﻷﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﻩ -ﻳﻬﻤﻞ ﻋﻼﻗﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺑﻪ ﻭﺗﺰﻛﻴﺘﻪ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﲝﺠﺔ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﺃﻫﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﲡﺪﻩ ﻳﻬﻤﻞ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿـﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣـﻞ ﻣـﻊ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﻭﺃﻱ ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺹ...) :١٣٤ﺗﺼﻮﺭ !ﺃﻥ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳـﺪﺭﺱ
ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﻡ ﺭﺯﻕ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﻥ ،ﻓﻴﻈﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﻣﺒﺎﱐ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻄﻮﻱ ﻓﺆﺍﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﻭﳛﺴﺐ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﻤﻞ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ،ﰒ ﻳﻔﺮﻁ ﰲ ﻛـﺜﲑ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﺎﺕ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻬﲔ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﻷﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻥ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪﻩ ﻭﻷﻥ ﺇﳘﺎﳍﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻀﺮﻩ ﺿﺮﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﲨﻊ ﻣﻌﺎﻗﺪ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻴﻠﻴﺔ!!! ﻭﺃﺿﺮﺍﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑـ)ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﰊ( ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ:
ﻓﻜﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺗﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺻـﺤﺎﺑﻪ،
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ) :ﻗﺪ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﺭﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻭﻱ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻭﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﱐ ،ﻓﻜﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﺍﺋـﻒ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺗﺪﻋﻰ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺃﺎ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺃﺎ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻓﺮﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﻢ
ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻳﻦ(ﺍﻩ ﻳﻘﻈﺔ ﺃﻭﱄ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺝ/١ﺹ٢٠٨
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ﺹ) :٥١٣ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺻﻨﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﻭﺃﺧﺬﻭﺍ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ
ﻟﻴﺒﻠﻐﻮﺍ ﺎ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻭﺳﺒﻌﲔ ﰒ ﳛﻜﻢ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﻨﻌﻮﻥ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻﺩﻋﺎﺀ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ(...ﺍﻩ
188
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ -ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺼﻨﻔﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺣﻜﻤﻬـﻢ
ﻷﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺩﻋﺎﺀ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻـﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺑﺄﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﻭﳐﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﺑﺄﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻡ
ﻭﺟﺰﻡ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻌﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻭﺃﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻻ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺟﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻴـﺐ
ﻭﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺭﻓﺾ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺑﺎﳍﻼﻙ ﻭﺍﲣﺎﺫﻫﺎ ﻋﺪﻭﺍ ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ:
)ﻣﻦ ﺗﺄﻣﻞ ﻭﺧﱪ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺃﻯ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﻻ ﻭﻋﻤﻼ ﻭﻭﺍﺯﻥ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﲟـﺎ
ﺍﺑﺘﺪﻋﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻣﻨﻌﻪ ﻋﻘﻠﻪ ﻭﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﺣﻴﺎﺅﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻼﻡ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﺮﻣﺘـﻬﺎ ﺑـﺎﳍﻼﻙ
ﻭﻳﺘﺨﺬﻫﺎ ﻋﺪﻭﺍ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﲔ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﻓﺾ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺑﺄﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ) :ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻘﻲ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺰﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟـﻮﻉ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺭﺑﺎ ﻭﺑﺎﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺩﻳﻨﺎ ﻭﲟﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ ﻧﺒﻴـﺎ
ﻭﺑﺎﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﺎ ،ﻭﳏﺎﺫﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﹸﺮﻗﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺪﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺆﺛﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﱂ
ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﳌﻠﻴﻜﻲ ) ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻓﻜﺮﻩ ( ﺹ ٢٣٧
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻒ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻋﻘﺪﻱ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺯﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻤﻞ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﰲ
ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ
189
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ -ﺑﻌﺪ ﲢﺪﻳﺪﻫﻢ– ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻤﻌﻮﺍ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﲨﻌـﻮﺍ
ﻓﺈﲨﺎﻋﻬﻢ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻓﺎﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﺭﲪﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﲝﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ:
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻫﻮ ﺇﲨﺎﻋﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻻ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ،ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺴﺘﻮﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻭﻏﲑ
ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺣﺠﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﺳﻌﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺼﺮ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﻗﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺇﺫﻥ؟!
ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﺎﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﺍﺴـﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺟﺌـﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ...ﺇﱁ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ )ﺯﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ( ،ﻓﺈﻥ
ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻻ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻘﺎﻝ :ﻛﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺗﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ
ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﻭﻫﻞ ﳜﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ؟ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ ﻭﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ ﻓﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ
190
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٤٢٣/٣ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻮﻗﺐ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻭﺃﻛﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﻮﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺮﺿﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻗﺎﺭﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﱪﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺹ) :١١٤ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺭﺩﻱﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ
ﻭﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻓﺎﺳﻘﺎ ﻓﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﻲ ﺿﺎﻻ!!! ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﺎﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﻭﺍﺟﻠﺲ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟـﻴﺲ
ﻳﻀﺮﻙ ﻣﻌﺼﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﳎﺘﻬﺪﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺘﻘﺸﻔﺎ ﳏﺘﺮﻗﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻫـﻮﻯ ﻓـﻼ
ﲡﺎﻟﺴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﻌﺪ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺴﻤﻊ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻭﻻ ﲤﺶ ﻣﻌﻪ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻳﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻀﻤﻨﺘﻪ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻟﻠﻤﺘﻘﲔ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔﹸ) :ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻭﺃﺻـﺤﺎﰊ(
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺎﳍﻢ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ )ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﺃﺧﻼﻗﺎ ﻭﺳﻠﻮﻛﺎ( ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﻢ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻤﻞ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻜﺮﻫﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻭﻳﻨﻬﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻭﳎﻤﻞ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻳﻘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻞ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲤﲎ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻮﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻄﺎﺣﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻣﺮﻫﻢ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺘﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ :ﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﺖ- ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻤﻞ ﻭﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ -ﳉﻬﻠﻚ ﺑﺘﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﻞ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻋﺎﺩﺍ!!
ﻓﺄﻗﻮﻝ –ﻭﺑﻼ ﳝﲔ :-ﻣﺎ ﻛﺘﺒﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﻃﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﳌـﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻴﺔ،
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﹶﻠﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟـﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻـﺮﺓ
ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﺃﺗﻴﺢ ﻟﻠﻔﻘﲑ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻠﺲ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ،ﻓﻤﺎ
ﺍﺯﺩﺩﺕ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﻗﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﲟﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻞ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻣﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻬﻤﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺼﺼﻮﻥ ﻭﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻨـﻬﺎ
ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﺭ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺎﺭ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻴﻤـﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜـﺎﺭ ﺍﳊـﻖ
ﺹ) :١٦ﺇﻥ ﺧﻮﺽ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﻤﲔ ﰲ ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪﻫﻢ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻳﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻏﺎﻟﺒـﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ،ﻭﲨﻴﻊ!! ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﻻﺧـﺘﻼﻑ ﺑـﲔ
ﺃﺫﻛﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﻓﺤﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺩﻉ ﻋﻨﻚ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺟﻠﻰ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻚ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻭﻝ ،ﻓﻠﻴﻨﻈﺮ ﺑﺈﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻣـﻦ
ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﺿـﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸـﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸـﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻔﺔ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺍﳋﻼﺻﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ )ﻋﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺩﻋﻮﻳﺔ( ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺬﻝ ﺟﻬﺪﻩ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺑﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻭﺇﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻡ ﺃﺧﻄﺄﻩ
191
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ،ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺳﻌﻪ ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻄﺎﻋﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﻯ )ﻓﺎﺗﻘﻮﺍ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻌﺘﻢ( )ﻻ ﻳﻜﻠـﻒ ﺍﷲ
ﻧﻔﺴﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺳﻌﻬﺎ(
ﻭﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺒﺬﻝ ﺟﻬﺪﻩ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺤﻖ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺬﻟﻪ ﺑﻼ ﲡﺮﺩ ﻭﺇﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﻭﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻫـﻮﻯ ﻏـﲑ
ﻣﺘﻘﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻧﺎﺝ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻡ ﺃﺧﻄﺄﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ )ﻭﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﺁﺗﻴﻪ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﺮﺩﺍ(
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ :ﺟﻌﻠﺘﻢ ﻣﻨﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺟﻲ ﻃﺎﺋﻔـﺔ،
ﻓﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻫﻮ :ﺃﻥ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﻮﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﻛﻮﻢ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ -ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ -ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻧﺎﺝ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺃﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ﺃﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺴﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺎﻫﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻡ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺣﲔ ﺃﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺃﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭ ...ﺇﱁ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺝ/١٣ﺹ:٦٧
)ﻭﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺷﺠﻌﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺗﻠﻮﻥ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﳏﺪﺛﻮﻥ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺯﻫﺎﺩ ﻭﺁﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﻧﺎﻫﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﲑ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠـﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﲔ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﲔ ﰲ ﺃﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ( ﺍﻩ ،ﻓﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﰲ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻄﺎﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﻯ.
ﻭﰲ ﺧﺘﺎﻡ ﻣﺒﺤﺚ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻟﻮ ﺻﺪﻗﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻧﺼﻔﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻵﺧـﺮﻳﻦ
ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ( ﻟﺴﻘﻂ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﻠﺚ )ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻠﺚ ﻛﺜﻲ (
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ،ﻭﻟﺴﻘﻂ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﳊﺎﺻـﻞ ﺑـﲔ ﺃﺗﺒـﺎﻉ
ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﻘﻂ ﺛﻠﺚﹲ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻓﻬﺬﺍﻥ ﺛﻠﺜﺎﻥ ﻭﺑﻘﻲ ﺛﻠﺚ
ﻭﺳﻴﺴﻘﻂ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ
192
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ:
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ:
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻻ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﺸﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻈﻠﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﻫﻮ ﲰﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﻟﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ :ﲡﻨﺐ ﺍﻹﺭﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻭﺭﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ
193
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻤﺤﻮر اﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺗﺼﺤﯿﺢ اﻟﻤﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻣﻊ اﻵﺧﺮ
اﻟﻤﺒﺤﺚ اﻷول :ﻻ إﻧﻜﺎر ﻓﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ اﻻﺟﺘﮭﺎد
(٢٨ﻭﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻤﲔ ﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻋﻘﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲡﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﳎﺎﻻ ﺧﺼﺒﺎ ﻟﻠﺨﺼﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ
ﻭﺍﻟﱰﺍﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﻏﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﺑﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ!!!
194
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺻﺢ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺪﻯ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺟﺰﹺﻳﻞ ﺍﳌﹶﻮﺍﻫﺐ ﰲ ﺍﺧـﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌـﺬﺍﻫﺐ
ﻟﻠﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ )ﺹ(٢
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻈﺮﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻟﻮﺟﺪﻧﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﲤﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ:
-ﻓﻔﻲ ﺭﺟﺐ ﺗﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﺟﺐ ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﺻﻮﻣﻪ
-ﻭﰲ ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻬﺎ
-ﻭﰲ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﻭﻳﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻨﻮﺕ ﻭﺍﳋﺘﻢ
-ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﺻﻴﻎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺒﲑ
-ﻭﰲ ﺫﻱ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﺗﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺫﻱ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﳊﺞ
-ﻭﰲ ﳏﺮﻡ ﺗﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻋﺎﺷﻮﺭﺍ
-ﻭﰲ ﺭﺑﻴﻊ ﺗﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ
-ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ...ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻙ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳـﺒﺎﺕ
ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ،ﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﺬﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻀﺨﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻮ ﺑﺬﻟﺖ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﻜﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻳﺪﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ..ﺇﱃ ﻣﱴ؟!
ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺗﺄﰐ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺇﲤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﲟﲎ ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺼﻠﻰ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻭﻳﺘﻢ ﻓﻘـﺎﻟﻮﺍ
ﻟﻪ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﲣﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﰒ ﺗﺘﻢ ﻣﻌﻪ؟ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ) :ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺷﺮ(ﺍﻩ ﺳﻨﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻬﻘﻲ ١٤٤/٣
ﻭﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻨﻮﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻨـﺖ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻨﺖ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﺮﺻﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ،ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻘﻨﺎﻉ ٤٢١/١
ﻭﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺝ/٢٢ﺹ-٢٦٧ﺹ) :٢٦٨ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﻯ ﺍﳌﺄﻣﻮﻡ ﲟﻦ ﻳﻘﻨﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ
ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻗﻨﺖ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻗﻨﺖ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﻮﻉ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ]ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ[ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻨﺖ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻨﺖ ﻣﻌﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺒﺎﺏ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺄﻣﻮﻣﻮﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﺒﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﺘﺮﻛﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻻﺋـﺘﻼﻑ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﻗـﺪ
ﺃﺣﺴﻦ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻟﻠﺪﻫﻠﻮﻱ ﺹ) :٧٣ﻭﺭﻭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻳﻜﱪﺍﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﺒﲑ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳛﺐ ﺗﻜﺒﲑ ﺟﺪﻩ ،ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﺢ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﱪﺓ ﺃﰊ
ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻘﻨﺖ ﺗﺄﺩﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺝ/٢ﺹ) :٤٥٤ﻭﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻳﺼﻠﻲ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺎ:
195
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻳﺼﻠﻮﻥ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ
ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺮﺃﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻤﻠﺔ ﻻ ﺳﺮﺍ ﻭﻻ ﺟﻬﺮﺍ
-ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﻴﺪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﻢ ﻭﺃﻓﺘﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻮﺿﺄ ﻓﺼﻠﻰ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﺃﺑـﻮ
ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌﺪ
-ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻑ ﻓﻘﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻗـﺪ
ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﻮﺿﺄ ﺗﺼﻠﻲ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﻻ ﺃﺻﻠﻲ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺑـﻦ ﺍﳌﺴـﻴﺐ
ﻭﻣﺎﻟﻚ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺘﱪ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﻧﺎ ) :(٢٩ﻓﺎﳋﻄﻮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﲔ ﻟﻠﻤﺨﺎﻟﻒ )ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ
ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ( ﻗﺒﻞ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺧﻼﻓﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻄﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﲪﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ
ﱂ ﻳﺘﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻓﻼ ﺇﻛﺮﺍﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺄﺱ ﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﲔ ﺧﻄﺄﻩ )ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ( ﻟﻶﺧﺮﻳﻦ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻓﻖ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ
ﻧﺴﻲﺀ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺘﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻭﰲ ﺃﺧﻼﻗﻨﺎ ﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺑﻞ ﻧﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ،ﻭﻟﻨﻨﻈـﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﱐ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ:
(٢٩ﻭﺍﳌﻬﻢ -ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ -ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﲡﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺇﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻭﲝﺚ ﻭﲡﺮﺩ ﻻ ﻋﻦ
ﻫﻮﻯ ،ﻭﻻ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﲢﻜﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻻ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﻢ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺘﱪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ
ﺃﻭ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ
(٣٠ﻃﺒﻌﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻔﺮ ﲟﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺍﻹﺟﺤﺎﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﺖ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ
196
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻟﻨﺠﺮﻱ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﺓ ﻋﺎﺑﺮﺓ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﱐ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨـﺎﻟﻒ ﺿـﻤﻦ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ:
197
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻔﺮع اﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :اﻟﻤﻨﮭﺞ اﻟﻨﺒﻮي ﻓﻲ اﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺼﻔﺤﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﻓﺴﻨﺠﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ
ﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ -ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻘﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ -ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﻨﺄﺧـﺬ ﺑﻌـﺾ
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ:
198
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺇﱐ ﻷﺳﺄﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺇﺧﻮﺍﱐ )ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ( ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ :ﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﺒﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺷﺌﺘﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻃﺒﻖ ﺟﺒﺎﻝ
ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻠﻬﺎ ﻟﻔﻌﻠﺖ ،(٣١) ﻓﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻨﺎ؟!!!
ﻫﻞ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﺎ ﳍﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﻻ ..ﺇﻧﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺮﺟﻮ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ ﺍﷲ ﻣـﻦ
ﺃﺻﻼﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻮﺣﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺸﺮﻙ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ؟ ﺃﻡ ﺳﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺪ؟
ﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻘﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻨﺎ –ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ -ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﳋﻠـﻞ ﰲ
ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺋﻨﺎ ﺑﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺩﻋﻮﺗﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺩﺧﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻮﺕ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ،ﺑﻞ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺒﻜﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺟﻨﺎﺯﺓ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻔـﺮﻩ
ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ :ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻜﻴﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ؟ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻧﻔﺲ ﺗﻔﻠﺘﺖ ﻣﲏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ) ،(٣٢ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺀﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺪﻭﺗﻨﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﺔ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ؟
)ﺇﻥ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻫﻮ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﻭﺍﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﻋﻈﺔ ﺍﳊﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﺎﺩﻟﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻭﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ
ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﲑ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﲪﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﺹ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻭﺇﻧﻘﺎﺫﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻜﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﻉ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻛﻲ
ﻳﻬﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﻭﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻘﻠﻮﻢ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻀﺨﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺣﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﻉ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺧﻠﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ﻓﻬﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍ ﰲ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﺃﻡ ﰲ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﻢ(ﺍﻩ)(٣٣
ﺩﻋﻮﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ،ﻭﻟﻨﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌـﺬﻫﺐ )ﺍﻟﻌﻘـﺪﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬـﻲ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻲ( ﺑﺎﻟﺮﲪﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻛﲔ ،ﻭﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﺑﺎﷲ ﻭﺗﺎﷲ
ﻟﻮ ﺭﺣﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﺮﺣﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻟﻜﲔ ﺝ/٢ﺹ) :٣٤٥ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻓﻠﻴﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ
ﺳﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﳚﺪﻫﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻷﺣﺪ ﺳﻮﺍﻩ ،ﰒ ﻟﻠﻮﺭﺛـﺔ ﻣﻨـﻬﺎ
(٣١ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻃﺒﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻘﺘﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳍﺠﺮﺓ ﻳﻘﺎﺗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺎﺗﻠﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ
ﻭﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﺎﻣﺘﻬﻢ
(٣٢ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﻊ ﺷﻬﺮﺗﻪ ﱂ ﺃﺳﺘﻄﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻗﻒ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﳌﺴﻨﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﲔ ﻳﺪﻱ
( ٣٣ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ )ﻓﻚ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺒﺎﻛﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻮﻣﺎﺕ( ﻟﺮﺟﺐ ﻣﺪﻛﻮﺭ ﺹ٦
199
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﲝﺴﺐ ﺳﻬﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻗﻂ ﺃﲨﻊ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻗﺪﺱ
ﺍﷲ ﺭﻭﺣﻪ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺑﺮ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﺩﺩﺕ ﺃﱐ ﻷﺻﺤﺎﰊ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻷﻋﺪﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﻣﻪ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻪ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻗﻂ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﳍﻢ ،ﻭﺟﺌﺖ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻣﺒﺸﺮﺍ ﻟﻪ ﲟﻮﺕ ﺃﻛـﱪ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺋـﻪ
ﻭﺃﺷﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻭﺃﺫﻯ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻨﻬﺮﱐ ﻭﺗﻨﻜﺮ ﱄ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺮﺟﻊ ،ﰒ ﻗﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﺭﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻴﺖ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻓﻌﺰﺍﻫﻢ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ:
ﺇﱐ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺃﻣﺮ ﲢﺘﺎﺟﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺳﺎﻋﺪﺗﻜﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﳓﻮ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﺴﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺩﻋﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﻮﺍ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﺮﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺿﻲ ﻋﻨﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻮﺍ) :ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ
ﲨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﻭﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻭﺻﻼﺡ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﲔ...
ﻭﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺑﺪﺃ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﰊ ﻓﺘﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ -ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻜﻢ -ﺃﱏ ﻻ ﺃﺣﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﺫﻯ ﺃﺣﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻻ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ،ﻭﻻ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻋﺘﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣـﺪ
ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻻ ﻟﻮﻡ ﺃﺻﻼ ﺑﻞ ﳍﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺟﻼﻝ ﻭﺍﶈﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺃﺿﻌﺎﻑ ﺃﺿﻌﺎﻑ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻛﻞﹲ ﲝﺴﺒﻪ
ﻭﻻ ﳜﻠﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺘﻬﺪﺍ ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺎ ﺃﻭ ﳐﻄﺌﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺬﻧﺒﺎ ،ﻓﺎﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﺄﺟﻮﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣـﻊ
ﺃﺟﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﻓﻤﻌﻔﻮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻐﻔﻮﺭ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻓﺎﷲ ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻟﻪ ﻭﻟﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ،ﻓﻨﻄﻮﻯ ﺑﺴـﺎﻁ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻛﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﻼﻥ ﻗﺼﺮ ..ﻓﻼﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ..ﻓﻼﻥ ﺃﻭﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺑﺴـﺒﺒﻪ..
ﻓﻼﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ..ﻓﻼﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻴﺪ ﻓﻼﻥ ..ﻭﳓﻮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺬﻣﺔ
ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻹﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺄﱏ ﻻ ﺃﺳﺎﻣﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺫﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﻻ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﷲ(ﺍﻩ
ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ٥١/٢٨
ﻭﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺝ/٣ﺹ) :٢٧١ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻃﻔﺎﺀ ﻛﻞ ﺷﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﰲ
ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻭﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺧﲑ ،ﻭﺑﻦ ﳐﻠﻮﻑ ﻟﻮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻗﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﲑ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺃﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻌـﻪ،
ﻭﻻ ﺃﻋﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﺪﻭﻩ ﻗﻂ ،ﻭﻻ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻧﻴﱵ ﻭﻋﺰﻣﻲ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻓﺈﱐ
ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻳﱰﻍ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻭﻟﻦ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﻋﻮﻧﺎ ﻟﻠﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﱐ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ(ﺍﻩ
200
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﰒ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻨﺪﻕ ﺃﻟﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﺄﺻﻠﻮﺍ ﺷﺄﻓﺘﻪ ،ﰒ ﺻﺪﻭﻩ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻜﺔ ﰒ ﻧﻘﻀﻮﺍ ﻋﻬﺪﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺃﺑﺮﻣﻮﻩ ﻣﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺒﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺫﻯ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻣﻜﺔ ﻭﲤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺫﻯ ﻓﻴﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻫﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ؟!
ﻟﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﳍﻢ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﻣﻦ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺁﻣﻦ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺠﺪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺁﻣﻦ ﻭﻣـﻦ
ﺩﺧﻞ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺃﰊ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺁﻣﻦ ،ﰒ ﺧﻄﺒﻬﻢ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﺗﻈﻨﻮﻥ ﺃﱐ ﻓﺎﻋﻞ ﺑﻜﻢ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺃﺥ ﻛﺮﻡ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﺥ
ﻛﺮﱘ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﺍﺫﻫﺒﻮﺍ ﻓﺄﻧﺘﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﻠﻘﺎﺀ ،ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻـﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻠـﺐ
ﺍﻟﺮﺀﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ
201
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﰒ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ )ﻋﻘﺪﻱ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﻲ( ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻓﻤﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ
ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﳚﺐ -ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺃﻭﱃ -ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺎ ﻣـﻊ ﺍﳌﺴـﻠﻤﲔ
ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﻫﻲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﻡ
202
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺃﻧﻪ ﳛﺐ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ،ﺣﱴ ﻳﻌﻠﹼﻤﻬﻢ –ﺃﻭﻻ -ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﻣﻠﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺓ ،ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜـﻮﻥ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺃﺩﻋﻰ ﰲ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺻﻲ ﳌﻌﺼﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺩ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍﻣﺘﺜـﺎﻝ
ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻟﻠﺸﺪﺓ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﻭﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺓ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﳎﻠﺲ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﺄﻗﺒﻞ ﺷﺎﺏ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ
ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻴﺢ ﱄ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎ ،ﻓﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻓﺴﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﺍﺟﻠـﺲ،
ﻫﻞ ﺗﺮﺿﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎ ﻷﻣﻚ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻻ ﻳﺮﺿﻮﻧﻪ ﻷﻣﻬﺎﻢ ..ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺧﺘﻪ ﻭﺑﻨﺘـﻪ
ﻭﻋﻤﺘﻪ ﻭﺧﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﰒ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻳﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺪﺭﻩ ﻭﺩﻋﺎ ﻟﻪ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ؟ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺏ :ﻟﻘﺪ
ﻗﻤﺖ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺃﺑﻐﺾ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻠﱯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺎ ،ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺀﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻻ ﲣﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﲑ )ﻭﺫﻛـﺮ ﻓـﺈﻥ
ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮﻯ ﺗﻨﻔﻊ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ( )ﻓﺬﻛﺮ ﺇﻥ ﻧﻔﻌﺖ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮﻯ ﺳﻴﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻦ ﳜﺸﻰ ﻭﻳﺘﺠﻨﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺷﻘﻰ( ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﺑﻌﺪﻧﺎ
ﻋﻦ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺟﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ
203
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺬﻳﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺪﺩ ﺍﳌﺘﻄﺮﻑ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊـﻖ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﳋﻠـﻖ ﺹ :٣٩٩
)ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﺍﻋﺪﻝ ﻳﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺎ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻜﻠـﻢ
ﺑﻜﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﻇﻦ ﻇﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻮﺃ ﺍﻟﻈﻨﻮﻥ ﱂ ﳛﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﱮ ﺑﻜﻔﺮﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟـﻮ ﻛﻔـﺮ
ﻟﻮﺟﺐ ﻗﺘﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺩﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﺏ ﻭﱂ ﺗﻨﻘﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﻞ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﺎ ﲣﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺌﻀﺌﻪ
ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﳏﻤﺪﺍ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟـﻮﺯ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺬﻧﺐ ﻛﺬﻧﻮﺏ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻋﺼﻰ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺭﺑﻪ ﻓﻐﻮﻯ( ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﻈـﻴﻢ ﺣﺮﻣـﺔ
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺗﲔ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ(ﺍﻩ
204
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﳎﻤﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﺮﳝﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻣﻘﻮﻳﺎﺗﻪ ﻓﻜﻠﻤـﺎ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﺃﻗـﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺭﺟﺢ ،ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺇﺛﺎﺭﺗﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻓﺴﺪ ﻭﺃﺑﻄﻞ(ﺍﻩ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ -ﻭﻣﻦ ﺯﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﺳﻒ -ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎﺟﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﻒ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻷﺗﻔﻪ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﻮﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﻬﺎﺟﺮﻭﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻮﻧﻪ ﳐـﺎﻟﻒ
ﻟﻠﺸﺮﻉ ﻭﺃﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺟﺮ ﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﻧﻔﻮﺳﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﻗﻠﻮﻢ ﳍﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﻫﻲ
ﺃﻢ ﻳﺰﻋﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺟﺮ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٢٠٧/٢٨ﻓﻤﻦ
ﻫﺠﺮ ﳍﻮﻯ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻫﺠﺮ ﻫﺠﺮﺍ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ﻣـﺎ
ﻮﺍﻩ ﻇﺎﻧﺔ ﺃﺎ ﺗﻔﻌﻠﻪ ﻃﺎﻋﺔ ﷲ ﻭﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺣﻆ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻼﺙ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻼﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻠﹼﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻱ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻟﻪ ،ﺑﻞ
ﺭﲟﺎ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ،ﻭﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻼﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﳐﺎﻟﻒ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ :ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﻠﻤﻚ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﻻ ..ﻭﻻ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﻥ
ﺃﻥ ﻓﻼﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻱ ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ :ﻻ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﲡﻠـﺲ
ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺴﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ...ﺇﱁ
ﺇﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺰﻣﺎﻢ ﳌﺎ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮﻩ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺰﻣﺎﻧﻨﺎ .ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﺸﺮﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻌـﺎﻣﻼﺕ
ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺘﻨﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﺮﻛﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻤـﺎﺫﺝ
ﺍﳌﻈﻠﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﻨﻨﺸﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻧﻌﻤﻞ ﺎ ،ﻭﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺑﻌـﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﻤـﺎﺫﺝ
ﺍﳌﻈﻠﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻫﺠﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ
ﲣﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻏﺰﻭﺓ ﺗﺒﻮﻙ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﲔ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ :
-١ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺎﺑﻮﺍ ﺗﻮﺑﺔ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﲬﺴﲔ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻬﻞ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﺠﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻧﺒﻪ؟! ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳍﺠﺮﺍﻥ ﻟﻠﺜﻼﺛـﺔ ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﻋﻘﺎﺑﺎ ﺇﳍﻴﺎ ﳍﻢ ﻟﻴﻄﻬﺮﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻧﺐ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺇﺫﻥ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻤﻪ
-٢ﺃﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻘﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﻬﺠﺮﻫﻢ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﻨﻬﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺫﻱ ﺍﳋﻮﻳﺼـﺮﺓ
ﻋﻨﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﻴﺪ
205
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻘﲔ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ -٣
ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻬﻢ ﻭﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﲣﻠﻒ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻏﺰﻭﺓ ﺗﺒﻮﻙ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺃﻢ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻮﺑﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﱂ ﻳﻬﺠﺮﻫﻢ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺄﻣﺮ ﺠﺮﻫﻢ ﻭﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﷲ ﺠﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺎﺏ!!
ﺇﺫﻥ ﻓﻘﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﻋﲔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ ﻭﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﺑـﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ -٤
ﻧﻌﻤﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﻧﻠﻐﻲ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺎﺛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ :ﻗﺪ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻫﺠﺮ ﻧﺴﺎﺀﻩ ﺷﻬﺮﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ
ﻳﻬﺠﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺗﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺣﺪﺛﺖ ﺫﻧﺒﺎ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺮﺟﻊ ﻋﻨﻪ
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻫﻮ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺋﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ،ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ ﻏﲑﻩ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ،ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ ﰲ ﻋﻼﺝ ﺍﳌﻬﺠﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﺊ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﺳﻴﺆﺩﻱ ﺑـﺎﳌﻬﺠﻮﺭ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻏﻠﺐ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ -ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ -ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺮﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺝ/٢٨ﺹ) :٢٠٦ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ
ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳍﺎﺟﺮﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻢ ﻭﺿﻌﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﻗﻠﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻛﺜﺮﻢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺟﺮ ﺍﳌﻬﺠﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﺄﺩﻳﺒﻪ ﻭﺭﺟﻮﻉ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻓﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﺍﺟﺤﺔ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻔﻀﻰ ﻫﺠﺮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺿـﻌﻒ ﺍﻟﺸـﺮ
ﻭﺧﻔﻴﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻ ﺍﳌﻬﺠﻮﺭ ﻭﻻ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻳﺮﺗﺪﻉ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﻞ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﳍﺎﺟﺮ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ
ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺴﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﺍﺟﺤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺘﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺸﺮﻉ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ،ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺱ
ﺃﻧﻔﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺝ/٢٨ﺹ) :٢١٢ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﰲ ﻫﺠﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺰﺟﺎﺭ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﺀ ﺍﺣﺪ
ﺑﻞ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺎ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻫﺠﺮﺓ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭﺍ ﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﺑﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﻟﻠﺤﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﻟﻠﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳌﻬﺠﻮﺭ ﻗـﺎﻝ
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ) :ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺭﺳﺨﺖ ﰲ ﻗﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊـﻖ
ﺃﻇﻬﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﻻﺀ ﻭﻧﻈﺮﻭﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺿﻌﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﺼﻮﻡ ﺑﻌـﲔ ﺍﻟـﺘﺤﻘﲑ ﻭﺍﻻﺯﺩﺭﺍﺀ
ﻓﺜﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻮﺍﻃﻨﻬﻢ ﺩﻭﺍﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺭﺳﺨﺖ ﰲ ﻗﻠﻮﻢ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻭﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻠﻄﻔﲔ ﳏﻮﻫﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﺴﺎﺩﻫﺎ(ﺍﻩ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻃﱯ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ﺝ/٤ﺹ٢٦٥
206
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻤﺒﺤﺚ اﻟﺮاﺑﻊ :ﻧﻤﺎذج ﻣﺸﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ اﻟﺘﺎرﯾﺦ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻟﻒ وأﺧﺮى ﻣﻈﻠﻤﺔ
207
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻄﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳜﻄﺐ
ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺃﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻭﻻ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺇﻻ ﷲ ﻓﺘﻨﺎﺩﻭﺍ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻻ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺇﻻ ﷲ ﻻ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺇﻻ ﷲ ﻓﺠﻌﻞ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻫﺬﻩ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺣﻖ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺎ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻟﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﳕﻨﻌﻜﻢ ﻓﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﺖ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻜﻢ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻ ﳕﻨﻌﻜﻢ ﻣﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻ
ﻧﺒﺪﺃﻛﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺘﺎﻝ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺒﺪﺅﻧﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﻣﺼﻨﻒ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ) :١٥٠/١٠ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﳌﺎ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻣﻦ
ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻳﺎ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﺃﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺍ ،ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻓﻤﻨﺎﻓﻘﲔ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻘﲔ ﻻ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﻥ
ﺍﷲ ﺇﻻ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﻭﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ،ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﻮﻡ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﺘﻬﻢ ﻓﺘﻨﺔ ﻓﻌﻤﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺻﻤﻮﺍ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ ) :٣٣٥/٢٣ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﻭﻃﺎﺭﻕ ﺑﻦ ﺷﻬﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ
ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﲟﻌﲎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺳﺌﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﺃﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺍ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺼﻔﻰ ) :٢٩٧/١ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺄﺫﻧﻮﻩ ]ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﺄﺫﻧﻮﺍ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﺎ[ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻫﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﻓﺄﻣﺮﻫﻢ ﺑﻘﺒﻮﳍﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻞﹶ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ ﻷﻢ ﺣﺎﺭﺑﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻭﰲ ﺭﺩ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﻢ ﺗﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﲡﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﻼﻑ(ﺍﻩ
208
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ) (٣٤ﺑﻌﺪ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ) :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﳉﻨﺔ ﳌﻦ ﺷﻬﺪ ﺑﺪﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﳌﻦ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺛﺮ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻔﻚ ﺩﻣﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﲏ ﻳﺄﰉ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺼﺤﺢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺛﺮﺍ(ﺍﻩ
ﻻﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﲏ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺳﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
(٣٤ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺳﺎﻗﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺍﶈﻘﻘﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻏﺪﺓ ﰲ
ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺹ١٨
209
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻧﻤﺎذج ﻃﺮﯾﻔﺔ ﺣﻜﺎھﺎ اﺑﻦ ﺣﺰم
ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻔﺔ )ﻧﻘﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﺱ( ﻭﻫﻲ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ) (١١٣/٢ﲢﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ) :ﻭﻣـﻦ
ﻃﺮﺍﺋﻒ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ(:
-ﳏﺎﺭﺏ ﺑﻦ ﺩﺛﺎﺭ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻄﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋـﻮﺍﺭﺝ
ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﲔ ﳐﻠﺼﲔ ﺯﻣﻴﻠﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺞ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﻗﻂﹼ.
-ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﺎﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻜﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﲔ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﻗﻂ ،ﻭﻣﺎﺗﺖ ﺃﻡ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﻓﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﻋﻜﻴﻢ.
-ﻃﻠﺤﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻭﺯﺑﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺼﺎﻓﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻃﻠﺤﺔ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺯﺑﻴﺪ
ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﻗﻂ.
-ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﺻـﺪﻳﻘﲔ ﻣﺘﺼـﺎﻓﻴﲔ
ﲬﺴﲔ ﺳﻨﺔ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﻗﻂ
-ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻤﻲ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺎﺷﻲ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﺻـﺪﻳﻘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎﺗـﺎ
ﻣﺘﺼﺎﻓﻴﲔ ،ﻭﺗﺰﻭﺝ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ
-ﺍﻟﻜﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻳﺪ ﻣﻀﺮﻱ ﻋﺼﱯ ﻛﻮﰲ ﺷﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺮﻣﺎﺡ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ ﳝـﺎﱐ ﻋﺼـﱯ ﺷـﺎﻣﻲ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ،ﻭﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﺷﺎﻋﺮ ﻣﻔﻠﻖ ،ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﲔ ﻣﺘﺼﺎﻓﻴﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺗﻀﺎﺩﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺟﻪ
-ﻫﺸﺎﻡ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ ،ﻭﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﺎﻥ ﳐﻠﺼﺎﻥ ﰲ
ﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﺣﺪ ،ﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﻗﻂ(ﺍﻩ
210
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻣﻮﻗﻒ اﺑﻦ ﺗﯿﻤﯿﺔ ﻣﻦ اﻟﺨﻼف ﺑﯿﻦ اﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮة واﻟﺤﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ
ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﻣـﻦ
ﻳﺆﻟﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺑﲔ ﻭﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤـﻮﻉ
ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٥٣/٦ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﺮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺘﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
ﳛﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ ﻓﺮﻉ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻭﻗﻌﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻓﺘﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﲑﻱ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :١٧/٤ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺴﺎﻛﺮ :ﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻗﺪﱘ
ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻔﺘﺮﻗﲔ ﺣﱴ ﺣﺪﺛﺖ ﻓﺘﻨﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﲑﻱ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :٢٢٧/٣ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺣﺸﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻓﺮﺓ
ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎ ﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻃﻠﺒﺎ ﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻛﻠﻤﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺗﺒﺎﻋﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﻣﺮﻧﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺼﺎﻡ ﲝﺒﻞ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﺯﻟﺖ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :٢٢٩/٣ﻭﳌﺎ ﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻭﺭﺁﻩ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﲑ ﻣـﻦ
ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﳌﻮﻓﻖ ،ﻭﻓﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻭﺃﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺴﺎﻛﺮ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺒﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ
ﺗﺰﻝ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﲑﻱ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ ﺟﺮﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻨﺔ ﺑﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ) :٢٦٩/٣ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﺻﻄﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﺭﺃﻯ
ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﳌﻮﻓﻖ ،ﻭﺯﺍﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠـﻮﺏ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺿﻐﺎﻥ ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ(ﺍﻩ
أﺑﻮ اﻟﺤﺴﻦ وأﺑﻮ اﻟﻔﻀﻞ اﻟﺘﻤﯿﻤﯿﺎن رأﺳﺎ اﻟﺤﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ واﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﻧﻲ رأس اﻷﺷﻌﺮﯾﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺴﺎﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﰲ ﺗﺒﻴﲔ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﻔﺘﺮﻱ ﺹ) :٢٢١ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴـﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤـﻲ
ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻷﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ :ﲤﺴﻜﻮﺍ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ]ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ[ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻟﻠﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻏﲎ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﲰﻌﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑـﻦ ﻋﺒـﺪ
ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﺙ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﺭﺃﺳﻲ ﻭﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ]ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ[ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺪﺓ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺳﺒﻊ ﺳﻨﲔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ :ﻭﺣﻀﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻭﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﺍﺀ ﺣﺎﻓﻴﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺧﻮﺗﻪ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ
ﻭﺃﻣﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﲔ ﻳﺪﻱ ﺟﻨﺎﺯﺗﻪ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺬﺏ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺻﻨﻒ ﺳﺒﻌﲔ ﺃﻟﻒ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻠﺤﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻗﻌﺪ ﻟﻠﻌﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﻊ
ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﱪﺡ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺰﻭﺭ ﺗﺮﺑﺘﻪ ﻛﻞ ﻳﻮﻡ ﲨﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ(ﺍﻩ
211
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏﻞ ﺗﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ :٥٥٨/١٧
) ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ -ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺒـﺎﻗﻼﱐ:-
ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﺧﱪﱐ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺫﺭ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻓﺴﺄﻟﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﱐ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﺎ ﺑﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ
ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻗﻄﲏ ﻓﻠﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﻓﺎﻟﺘﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻗﻄﲏ ﻭﻗﺒـﻞ
ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻭﻋﻴﻨﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻓﺎﺭﻗﻨﺎﻩ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻟﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﺃﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻧﻚ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻪ ﻭﺃﻧـﺖ ﺇﻣـﺎﻡ
ﻭﻗﺘﻚ
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ،ﻗـﺎﻝ
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺫﺭ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺗﻜﺮﺭﺕ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺃﰊ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﺑﻠﺪ ﺩﺧﻠﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺧﺮﺍﺳﺎﻥ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺸـﺎﺭ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻭﻃﺮﻳﻘﻪ
ﻗﻠﺖ ] ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ [ :ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﻳﻨﺎﻇﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺑﺎﳉﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫـﺎﻥ
ﻭﺑﺎﳊﻀﺮﺓ ﺭﺅﻭﺱ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ﻭﳍﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﻭﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻳﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﻛـﺎﻥ
ﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﺎﻣﺮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻗـﺪ ﳜﺘﻠﻔـﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﻠﻬﺬﺍ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻗﻄﲏ ﺑﺎﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ(ﺍﻩ
اﻟﺸﺮﯾﻒ أﺑﻮ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ رأس اﻟﺤﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ وأﺑﻮ إﺳﺤﺎق اﻟﺸﯿﺮازي رأس اﻷﺷﻌﺮﯾﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺟﺐ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ) :١٨/١ﻭﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻭﺳﺘﲔ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﻤﺎﺋـﺔ :ﺍﺟﺘﻤـﻊ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﻭﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺃﺩﺧﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ
ﻭﻃﻠﺒﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﻗﻠﻊ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺧﲑ ﻭﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺍﳌﻔﺴﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﺴﺪﺍﺕ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﺒﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻴﺬ ،ﻭﺿﺮﺏ ﺩﺭﺍﻫﻢ ﺗﻘﻊ ـﺎ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺿﺔ .ﻓﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻔﺔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﻔﺴﺪﺍﺕ ﻭﻛﹸﺒﹺﺴﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﻭﺃﺭﻳﻘـﺖ ﺍﻷﻧﺒـﺬﺓ.
ﻭﻭﻋﺪﻭﺍ ﺑﻘﻠﻊ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺧﲑ ﻭﻣﻜﺎﺗﺒﺔ ﻋﻀﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺑﺮﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻀﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺎ .ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻘﻨﻊ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﻭﻻ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﺪ(..ﺍﻩ
ﺗﺄﻣﻞ ..ﳌﺎ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺫﻳﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻋﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﲑﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺮﻳﺾ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
212
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺟﺪﺍ) (٣٥ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺟﺌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻭﺍﺴﻤﺔ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺘﻠﻤﺬ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻭﻳﺘﻤﺸﻴﺦ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ،ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧﻚ ﲡﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻮﺭ
ﺑﻞ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻋﻬﺪ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ،ﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻻ ﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﺱ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﺟﺪﺭ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﲰﻲ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺹ) :١١ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺨﲔ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﹸﺒـﺪﻋﲔ ﺗﻨـﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺂﻟﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺗﻨﺒﺬ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻭﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﺂﻥ ﻭﺍﶈﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻀﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻷﻥ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﶈﺎﺭﺑﲔ ﺍﶈﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻻ ﰲ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﲡﻤﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻒ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﻔﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﳊﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻔﻞ ﻭﻳﺪﻫﺶ ﻟﺴﻤﺎﻋﻪ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺼﺒﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﳉﺎﻣﺪﻭﻥ..
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ :ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﺍﻢ ﻓﻨﺮﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺍﻭ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘـﺪﻳﻦ
ﺑﺒﻐﻀﻪ ﻭﻋﺪﺍﻭﺗﻪ ،ﻓﻨﺠﻴﺐ ﻋﻨﻪ :ﺑﺄﻧﺎ ﻻ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻫـﺐ ﺇﻟﻴـﻪ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ...ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺄﻣﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻴﺢ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﺩﻳﻨﻚ ﻭﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻚ ﻭﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻚ ﻋﻨﻪ(ﺍﻩ
اﻟﺴﻨﺔ واﻟﺸﯿﻌﺔ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ٧٧/١٢ﰲ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺳﻨﺔ ٤٤٢ﻫـ) :ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻓﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺑﺒﻐـﺪﺍﺩ،
ﻭﺫﻫﺒﻮﺍ ﻛﻠﻬﻢ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﺸﻬﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﻣﺸﻬﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ،ﻭﺗﺮﺿﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼـﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻛﻠـﻬﻢ،
ﻭﺗﺮﲪﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺟﺪﺍ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ!!) (٣٦ﻭﺭﺧﺼﺖ ﺍﻷﺳﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﺒﻐـﺪﺍﺩ
ﺟﺪﺍ(ﺍﻩ
(٣٥ﺳﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ﰲ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻱ ﺹ ٢١٩ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺧﺮﺝ ﳍﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﳑﻦ ﺭﻣﻮﺍ
ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻓﺒﻠﻐﻮﺍ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺳﺒﻌﲔ ﺭﺍﻭﻳﺎ ،ﻭﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺹ ٣٨١ﻋﻘﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﻓﺼﻼ ﰲ ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻌﻦ
ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ،ﻭﰲ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻌﻦ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺆﺛﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﻦ ﻓﺒﻠﻐﻮﺍ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ
ﻭﺳﺘﲔ ﺭﺍﻭﻳﺎ!.
(٣٦ﻓﻌﻼ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺣﺎﺟﺰﺍ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻷﻱ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ
ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺗﻘﻴﺔﹰ ﺧﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻴﺊ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻭﺩ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﻋﺠﺒﺘﲏ ﳌﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻲ ﺣﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻧﺪﻭﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺒﻮﻝ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﻴﻊ) :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻜﺮﻭﺍ
ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻧﺎﻫﻴﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲤﺮ ﲞﻠﺪﻫﻢ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﻧﺒﺜﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻋﻮﺟﺎﺝ ﻭﲢﺮﻳﻒ ﻭﺑﺪﻋﺔ
ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﰲ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻨﺎ ﳓﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻓﺒﺎﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﺴﺮﻧﺎ) :ﻻ( ﺑـ)ﻧﻌﻢ( ﻭ)ﻧﻌﻢ( ﺑـ)ﻻ( ،ﻭﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ
ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺍﻃﻨﺎ ﻭﻟﻈﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻣﻌﺎﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺼﺪﻩ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﻬﺎ .ﻭﺬﺍ ﻗﻀﻴﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺠﻴﺔ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
213
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ)ﺝ / ١٢ﺹ (١٨٣ﰲ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺳﻨﺔ ٤٨٨ﻫـ) :ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻠﺢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜـﺮﺥ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﹶﺤﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺗﺰﺍﻭﺭﻭﺍ ﻭﺗﻮﺍﺻﻠﻮﺍ ﻭﺗﻮﺍﻛﻠﻮﺍ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺎﺋﺐ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺁﺓ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﻥ ٢٨/٣ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪ )ﺕ ٤١٣ﻫـ() :ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺇﻣـﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀـﺔ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺎﻧﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ،ﺷﻴﺨﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﻴﺪ ﻭﺑﺎﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜـﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﳉـﺪﻝ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺎﻇﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻛﻞﹼ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳉﻼﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻳﻬﻴﺔ ( ﺍﻩ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ) :١٥/١٢ﻛﺎﻥ ﳎﻠﺴﻪ ﳛﻀﺮﻩ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ(ﺍﻩ
اﻟﺒﺨﺎري واﻟﺬھﻠﻲ
ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻠﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﺒﻮﻻ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﰲ ﻗﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻮﺗﻪ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﻗﺪﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺎﺑﻮﺭ ﺣﺚﹼ ﺍﻟـﺬﻫﻠﻲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻉ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺃﺛﲎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺧﲑﺍ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻟﺒﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﻀﻮﺍ ﻋﻦ ﳎﻠﺴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﳎﻠﺲ
ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻓﺄﺭﺳﻞ ﻣﻦ ﳝﺘﺤﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ،
ﻓﺮﺍﺟﻌﻮﻩ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ ﺃﺭﺟﻊ ﺇﻻ ﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ ﻭﺷﻨﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺑﺪﻋﻪ
ﺑﻞ ﻭﻛﻔﺮﻩ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺟﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﻟﻨﻜﺘﻒ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ
ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ﻓﻔﻲ ) :٤٦٣ /١٢ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ :ﲰﻌﺖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﳌﺎ
ﻗﺪﻡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﲞﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺼﺐ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺳﺦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﻠﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪ ﺣﱴ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻖ
ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺇﻻ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﻠﻪ ﻭﻧﺜﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﺎﻧﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) :٤٥٤/١٢ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺟﺎﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻨﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ
ﳛﲕ ﳌﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺎﺑﻮﺭ :ﺍﺫﻫﺒﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﻓﺎﲰﻌﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻗﺒﻠﻮﺍ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻉ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﰲ ﳎﻠﺲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳛﲕ ﻓﺤﺴﺪﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ...
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺪﻱ :ﺫﻛﺮ ﱄ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺃﻥ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﳌﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺎﺑﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺟﺘﻤـﻊ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﺴﺪﻩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﻧﻴﺴﺎﺑﻮﺭ ﳌﺎ ﺭﺃﻭﺍ ﺇﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺱ ﺇﻟﻴـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﻭﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﻭﻓﺴﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﳛﺔ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻭﺭﻏﺒﺘﻨﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ )ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ( ﺹ١٣٠
214
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻷﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ :ﺇﻥ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺍﻟﻠﻔـﻆ ﺑـﺎﻟﻘﺮﺍﻥ ﳐﻠـﻮﻕ
ﻓﺎﻣﺘﺤﻨﻮﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻠﺲ!!(ﺍﻩ
ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺣﻀﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺍﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ
ﻫﻮ ﺃﻡ ﻏﲑ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ؟ ﻓﺄﻋﺮﺽ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﱂ ﳚﺒﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻓﺄﻋﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺍﻟﻘـﻮﻝ
ﻓﺄﻋﺮﺽ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻔﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻏﲑ ﳐﻠـﻮﻕ ﻭﺃﻓﻌـﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻓﺸﻐﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻭﺷﻐﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻭﺗﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻗﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻣﱰﻟﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ٤٥٤/١٢
ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ :ﺗﺮﺟﻊ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺣﱴ ﻧﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ ﺃﻓﻌﻞ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻴﺌﻮﺍ ﲝﺠﺔ ﻓﻴﻤـﺎ
ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺠﱵ(ﺍﻩ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ٤٥٤/١٢
ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ :ﻣﻦ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﻻ ﳚﺎﻟﺲ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻠﻢ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺷﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ!!! ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﱃ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻓﺎﻤﻮﻩ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳛﻀﺮ ﳎﻠﺴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ٤٥٥ /١٢
ﻭ٤٥٩/١٢
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺳﻪ :ﺃﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻓـﻼ
ﳛﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻀﺮ ﳎﻠﺴﻨﺎ ﻓﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺭﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻋﻤﺎﻣﺘﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺅﻭﺱ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ ﻣﺎ
ﻛﺘﺐ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ ﲨﺎﻝ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﺘﻤﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﺳـﲑ ﺃﻋـﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨـﺒﻼﺀ
٤٥٩/١٢
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ ﻭﻟﻨﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﺜﻞ ﺃﻡ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻭﲰﺎ؟ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎﰎ :ﺃﺗﻰ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻥ ﻓﻼﻧﺎ ﻳﻜﻔﺮﻙ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ:
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻷﺧﻴﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﻟﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻓﻴﻚ ،ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺎ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻠﻮ ﺃﻳﻀـﺎ:
)ﻭﻻ ﳛﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺊ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺄﻫﻠﻪ(.
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﻻ ﺗﺪﻋﻮ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻈﻠﻤﻮﻧﻚ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻮﻧﻚ ﻭﻳﺒﻬﺘﻮﻧﻚ؟
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ) :ﺍﺻﱪﻭﺍ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻠﻘﻮﱐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻮﺽ( ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ) :ﻣﻦ ﺩﻋﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﳌﻪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺮ(ﺍﻩ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ٤٦٠/١٢
ﱂ ﻳﻜﺘﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﱴ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻟﻸﻣﲑ ﺑﺈﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺎﺑﻮﺭ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨـﺒﻼﺀ
) :٤٦٣ /١٢ﻓﻜﺘﺐ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳛﲕ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺃﻣﲑ ﲞﺎﺭﻯ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ
215
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﺪ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﻘﺮﺃ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻞ ﲞﺎﺭﻯ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻻ ﻧﻔﺎﺭﻗﻪ ﻓﺄﻣﺮﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﲑ ﺑﺎﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻠـﺪ
ﻓﺨﺮﺝ(ﺍﻩ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ :ﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺭﺟﻞ ]ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ[ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﲞﺮﺍﺳﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﰿ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﻘـﺪﺭ
ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻠﻤﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ؟ ،ﻓﻘﺒﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳊﻴﺘﻪ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﺃﻓﻮﺽ ﺃﻣـﺮﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺼـﲑ
ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ ،ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻧﻚ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﱐ ﱂ ﺃﺭﺩ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻡ ﺑﻨﻴﺴﺎﺑﻮﺭ ﺃﺷﺮﺍ ﻭﻻ ﺑﻄﺮﺍ ﻭﻻ ﻃﻠﺒﺎ ﻟﻠﺮﺋﺎﺳﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﺑـﺖ ﻋﻠـﻲ
ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻭﻃﲏ ﻟﻐﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺼﺪﱐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺣﺴﺪﺍ ﳌﺎ ﺁﺗﺎﱐ ﺍﷲ ﻻ ﻏـﲑ ،ﰒ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﱄ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺇﱐ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻏﺪﺍ ﻟﺘﺘﺨﻠﺼﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﻷﺟﻠﻲ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺄﺧﱪﺕ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﻓﻮﺍﷲ ﻣﺎ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻏﲑﻱ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﲔ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪ ﻭﺃﻗﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﻹﺻﻼﺡ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ(ﺍﻩ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ٤٥٩/١٢
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻞ ﺿﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ ﻟﻪ؟ ﻛﻼ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻛﺮﻡ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫـﻮ
ﺃﺻﺢ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺎﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﻳﺜﲏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻳﺘﺮﺿﻰ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺟﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟـﺬﻫﻠﻲ ﻻ
ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﻗﺼﺘﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺀﻭﺍ ﳑﺎ ﺻﻨﻌﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻭﻏﻠﻮ ﻛﺒﲑ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔـﻆ ﻛﻤـﺎ ﰲ
ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٤٣١/١٢ﻭﻳﻘﻊ ﺑﺴﺒﺒﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻼﻋﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﺮﺡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸـﻴﻄﺎﻥ
ﻭﻳﻐﻀﺐ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﻭﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻤﺎ
ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﻻﺋﺘﻼﻑ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺘﻴﺒﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ( ﺹ ١٠ﻋﻤﺎ ﺟﺮﻯ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ) :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺧﺺ ﺑﺄﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ...ﻛﺎﺩﻫﻢ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﲟﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﱂ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﺻﻼ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻻ ﻓﺮﻋﺎ ،ﻭﰲ ﺟﻬﻠﻬﺎ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺎ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ
ﻓﻨﻤﻰ ﺷﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺷﺄﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻓﺮﻗﺖ ﲨﺎﻋﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺷﺘﺘﺖ ﻛﻠﻤﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻭﻫﻨﺖ ﺃﻣﺮﻫﻢ ﻭﺃﴰﺘﺖ ﺣﺎﺳﺪﻳﻬﻢ
ﻭﻛﹶﻔﹶﺖ ﻋﺪﻭﻫﻢ ﻣﺆﻣﻨﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻟﺴﻨﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺩﺍﺋﺐ ﻳﻀﺤﻚ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻬﺰﺉ ﻢ ﺣﲔ
ﺭﺃﻯ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻳﻠﻌﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻭﺭﺁﻫﻢ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻭﻣﺘﺒﺎﻳﻨﲔ ﻭﻫﻢ
ﻛﺎﺘﻤﻌﲔ ﻭﺭﺃﻯ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﺭ ﳍﻢ ﺳﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﺑﺎ(ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺹ ٥٠ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ) :ﰒ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﻏﺎﻳﺘﻨﺎ ،ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻫﻞ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺗﺸﺎﻧﺌﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ .ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ
ﻭﻻ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﺔ ﻷﻢ ﳎﻤﻌﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻏﲑ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
216
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻉ ﱂ ﻳﻔﻬﻤﻮﻩ ﻟﻐﻤﻮﺿﻪ ﻭﻟﻄﻒ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺁﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﻭﻻ ﻓﺤﺺ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ(..ﺍﻩ
ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﻭﺃﺷﺒﺎﻫﻬﺎ ﺗﺪﻋﻮﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻧﺴﻠﻢ ﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻛـﺜﲑ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ) :ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻄﻮﻯ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﻭﻯ( ،ﻭﺍﳊﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﳜﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﲢﺼﻰ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺫﺋﺐ ﰲ ﺣﻖ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺣﻖ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﻣﻌﲔ ﰲ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺃﰊ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨـﺪﻩ ﻭﺑـﲔ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺨﺎﻭﻱ ...ﺇﱁ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ﺝ/١٧ﺹ) :٤٦٢ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ
ﻣﻨﺪﺓ ﻳﻘﺬﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺃﰊ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ،ﻭﻧﺎﻝ
ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻭﻫﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﻓﺴﲔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﻧﺴﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺡ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﲟﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺭﺩﻫﻢ ﺝ/١ﺹ) :٢٤ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣـﻦ
ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻄﻮﻯ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺮﻭﻯ ﻭﻳﻄﺮﺡ ﻭﻻ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻃﻌﻨﺎ ﻭﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺟـﻞ
ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺴﻂ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻧﻪ ﺝ/١ﺹ) :١١١ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺒﺄ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻻﺡ
ﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻭ ﳊﺴﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺠﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﻢ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻤـﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺼـﺮﺍ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻹﻋﺼﺎﺭ ﺳﻠﻢ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻴﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻘﲔ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺷﺌﺖ ﻟﺴﺮﺩﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺮﺍﺭﻳﺲ ،ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﻓﻼ
ﲡﻌﻞ ﰲ ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻨﺎ ﻏﻼ ﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﻧﻚ ﺭﺅﻑ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ ﰲ ﲦﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺝ/١ﺹ ) :١٢٥ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻀﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋـﺪ ﻻ
ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﻋﺪﺍﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺗﻌﺼﺒﺎﺕ ﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﻤﺔ ﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ) :ﺍﺳﺘﻤﻌﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺼﺪﻗﻮﺍ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻮﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ
ﺑﻴﺪﻩ ﳍﻢ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺗﻐﺎﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻮﺱ ﰲ ﺯﺭﻭﺎ(ﺍﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻓﻀﻠﻪ ﻭﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ
ﻟﻪ) :ﺧﺬﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻭﺟﺪﰎ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺒﻠﻮﺍ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ؛ ﻓﺈﻢ ﻳﺘﻐـﺎﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺗﻐـﺎﻳﺮ
ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻮﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻳﺒﺔ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﺮﻓﻮﻋﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ
ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻠﻴﺔ) :ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﻦ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﺭ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﲡﻮﺯ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺷـﻲﺀ ﺇﻻ ﺷـﻬﺎﺩﺓ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﺈﻢ ﺃﺷﺪ ﲢﺎﺳﺪﺍﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻮﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﺏ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻓﻀﻠﻪ ) :١٥٢/٢ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺳـﺒﻖ ﻣـﻦ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻛﺜﲑ ،ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﲪﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺴﺪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒـﺎﺱ
217
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﻦ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﺯﻡ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﲪﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻴﻒ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻼ ﻭﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ﻭﺣﺠـﺔ
ﺗﻮﺟﺒﻪ ،ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﻮﺭﺩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺓ ،ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻠﺘﻔﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﺝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ(...ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻭﻣﻦ ﱂ ﳛﻔﻆ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌـﺾ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﳊﺴﺪ ﻭﺍﳍﻔﻮﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﻔﻀﺎﺋﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺒﻬﻢ ﺣﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻭﺩﺧﻞ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺒﺔ ﻭﺣﺎﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻙ ﳑﻦ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﺘﺒﻊ ﺃﺣﺴﻨﻪ(ﺍﻩ
218
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻱ ]ﻛﺬﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ[ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻭﻳﺮﻣﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﺋﻢ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺮﻓﺾ(ﺍﻩ
ﳓﻦ ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﻱ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ :ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﲞﻼﻓﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ،
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺷﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻷﲪﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﺖ ﰲ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﺃﻓﻘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ،ﻭﻛﻔﻰ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻟﻜﻦ
ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﱪﻱ ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺻﻨﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ
ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻟﻪ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﳍﻢ ﻷﺟﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻠﻮﻩ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﳜﺎﻟﻔﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﻘﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻴﻬﻢ ﺣﱴ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤـﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘـﺎﻭﻯ
) :١٨٦/٢٠ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ؛ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻭﺑﺪﻋﺘـﻬﻢ ﻏﺎﻟﺒـﺎ ﰲ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺣﻖ ﺍﷲ ﻭﰲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻹﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ(ﺍﻩ
219
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻛﺄﻥ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﻫﻴﺪﻱ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺲ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺯﺑﺎﱐ ﺹ) :٥٦ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻞ ﺑﻦ
ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﻫﻴﺪﻱ :ﻗﺪﻣﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺃﻳﻲ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻓﺠﻠﺴﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﲤﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﺘﻴﺎﱐ،
ﻓﺴﻤﻌﺘﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺩﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﺳﺘﺎﺫﻙ ﻓﺠﺎﻟﺲ ﻏﲑﻩ! ﻓﻈﻨﻨﺖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﻨﻴﲏ ،ﻓﻠﺰﻣﺘﻪ ﻓﻨﻔﻌﲏ ﺍﷲ
ﺑﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﰒ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻞ ﻳﺮﺩﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﺪ ) :٧٨/٢ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳋﹶﻠﻴﻞ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ :ﺇﻧﻚ ﻻ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ
ﺧﻄﺄ ﻣﻌﻠﹼﻤﻚ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻏﲑﻩ.ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻞﹸ ﻗﺪ ﻏﹶﻠﺒﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺟﺎﻟﺲ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ(ﺍﻩ
220
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﻧﺎﺑﻠﺲ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻣﺸﻖ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻓﻄﻠﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳌﺎﻟﻜﻲ ﻓﺘﻮﺩﺩ ﻭﺻﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ
ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﺗﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﺳﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪﻩ ﻓﻘﺒﻞ ﺗﻮﺑﺘﻪ ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﺈﺳﻼﻣﻪ!!! ﻭﺣﻘﻦ ﺩﻣـﻪ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌـﺰﺭﻩ
ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺢ ﺗﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺼﲏ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺷﺒﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺒﻪ ﻭﲤﺮﺩ ﺹ) :١٢٢ﰒ ﺃﺣﻀﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﳉﻮﺯﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﲟـﺎ
ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﻭﰲ ﻧﺎﺑﻠﺲ ﻓﺄﻧﻜﺮ ﻓﻘﺎﻣﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻨﺔ ﲟﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﺄﺩﺏ ﻭﲪﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻞ ﰒ ﺃﻋﻴﺪﻭﺍ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺠﻦ
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺎﺀ ﺃﺣﻀﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﳉﻮﺯﻳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﳎﻠﺲ ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﻟﻜﻲ ﻭﺃﺭﺍﺩﻭﺍ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻋﻨﻘﻪ ﻓﻤﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﲝﻘﻦ ﺩﻣﻲ ﻭﺑﺈﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﺑﱵ ،ﻓﺄﻋﻴـﺪ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳊﺒﺲ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﻀﺮ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ﻓﺄﺧﱪ ﲟﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﺄﺣﻀﺮ ﻭﻋﺰﺭ ﻭﺿﺮﺏ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﺓ ﻭﺃﺭﻛﺐ ﲪﺎﺭﺍ ﻭﻃﻴﻒ ﺑﻪ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺩﻭﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺒﺲ!!!(ﺍﻩ
221
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺯﺍﻋﻲ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻮﻥ!!! ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺛﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻟﲑﺩﻭﺍ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ
-ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻗﻮﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﻘﺾ ﻟﻌﺮﻯ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﻜﺔ ...ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻤﺮ :ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺷﻬﺎﺏ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻃﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﻜﺔ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺃﻢ ﻳﻨﻘﻀﻮﻥ ﻋﺮﻯ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﲎ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ
ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﺧﻔﺎﺀ ﳉﻼﻟﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
-ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺶ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺫﻛﺮ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﻌﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﱯ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺫﺍﻙ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﱵ
ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﳚﻠﺲ ﻳﻔﱵ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻬﺎﺭ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺬﻛﺮﺕ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻹﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺏ ﱂ
ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺮﻭﻕ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ...ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻤﺮ :ﻣﻌﺎﺫ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﱯ ﻛﺬﺍﺑﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ
ﺟﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺨﻌﻲ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﺟﻼﻟﺔ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭﺩﻳﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻇﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﱯ ﻋﻮﻗﺐ ﻟﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺙ ﺍﳍﻤﺪﺍﱐ،
ﺣﺪﺛﲏ ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺙ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺍﺑﲔ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﺒِﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺙ ﻛﺬﺏ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻧﻘﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻃﻪ ﰲ
ﺣﺐ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺗﻔﻀﻴﻠﻪ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻛﺬﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﱯ؛ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻟﺸﻌﱯ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻠﻢ
-ﻭﻋﻦ ﻫﺸﺎﻡ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﻭﺓ ،ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻴﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ :ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﺲ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ،
ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﳋﺪﺭﻱ ﲝﺪﻳﺚ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻏﻼﻣﲔ
ﺻﻐﲑﻳﻦ
-ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﺟﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﻛﻼﻡ
ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻠﻔﺘﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻢ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻳﻐﻀﺒﻮﻥ
ﻭﻳﺮﺿﻮﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ ،ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ :ﻻ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳊﻜﻴﻢ ﺇﻻ
ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ
-ﻭﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﻳﺲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻓﺬﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ،
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻫﺎﺗﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﺑﻴﻄﺎﺭﻩ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﻳﺲ :ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﳌﺎﻟﻚ!! ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺫﺍﻙ ﺩﺟﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺟﺎﺟﻠﺔ ،ﳓﻦ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ
-ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﻣﻊ ﺃﰊ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺶ ﻧﻌﻮﺩﻩ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ:
ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻟﻮﻻ ﺍﻟﺘﺜﻘﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﻟﺘﺮﺩﺩﺕ ﰲ ﻋﻴﺎﺩﺗﻚ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻟﻌﺪﺗﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳑﺎ ﺃﻋﻮﺩﻙ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ
ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺶ :ﻭﺍﷲ ﺇﻧﻚ ﻟﺜﻘﻴﻞ ﻭﺃﻧﺖ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺘﻚ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﻋﻠﻲ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ :ﻓﻠﻤﺎ
ﺧﺮﺟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺶ ﱂ ﻳﺼﻢ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻗﻂ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻐﺘﺴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﺔ!!
-ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻭﻫﺐ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ :ﺃﻧﺰﻟﻮﻫﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻛﻢ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻻ ﺗﺼﺪﻗﻮﻫﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻜﺬﺑﻮﻫﻢ( ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪﻻﱐ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺩﺧﻞ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ
222
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﻦ ﺃﻧﺲ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻓﺴﻤﻌﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺣﻜﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻭﻫﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﰒ ﺭﻓﻊ
ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻓﻨﻈﺮ ﻣﲏ ﻓﻜﺄﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻴﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻛﺮﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻴﺒﺔ ،ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﺩﺭﻛﺖ
ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ
-ﻭﻋﻦ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﻨﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﻦ ﺃﻧﺲ ﻓﺄﻗﺒﻞ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ:
ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮ ﻳﻜﺎﺩﻭﻥ ﻳﺴﻄﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺘﻠﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺁﻳﺎﺗﻨﺎ
-ﻭﻋﻦ ﺟﺒﲑ ﺑﻦ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﲰﻌﺖ ﳛﲕ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﹴ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺑﻘﻰ
ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻗﺘﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﲰﻌﺖ ﻗﺘﺎﺩﺓ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻣﱴ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻛﲔ؟!! ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﺑﻴﺤﲕ
ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺑﻴﺘﻪ ﲰﺎﻛﲔ
-ﻭﺭﻭﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺎﺭ ﻗﺺ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﳕﺎ ﺳﺮﻕ
ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻛﻮﰲ ،ﻓﺒﻠﻎ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭﺍ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺯﻧﺪﻳﻖ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺗﺮﻭﻧﻪ ﻻ
ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺮﻩ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳌﻮﺕ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻓﺒﻠﻎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ :ﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻋﻆ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎ * ﺇﺫ ﻋﺒﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻣﻮﺭﺍ ﺃﻧﺖ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ * ﻛﺎﳌﻠﺒﺲ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺏ ﻣﻦ
ﻋﺮﻱ ﻭﻋﻮﺭﺗﻪ * ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻳﻮﺍﺭﻳﻬﺎ * ﻭﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻹﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻙ ﻧﻌﻠﻤﻪ * ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻧﻔﺲ
ﻋﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﻬﺎ * ﻋﺮﻓﺎﺎ ﺑﻌﻴﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺗﺒﺼﺮﻫﺎ * ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺒﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ .
ﻓﻠﻢ ﲤﺾ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﺣﱴ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺎﺭ ،ﻓﻮﻗﻒ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﱪﻩ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :
ﻳﻐﻔﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻚ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺭﻣﻴﺘﲏ ﺑﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻤﺮ :ﺗﺪﺑﺮﺕ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﲨﻌﻲ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻮﺟﺪﺕ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺚ ﻭﺍﺎﺯﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺏ
-ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺘﺎﻡ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻠﻴﻘﺒﻞ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺭﺿﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﲨﻌﲔ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﻞ ﺿﻼﻻ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻭﺧﺴﺮ ﺧﺴﺮﺍﻧﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﰲ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻴﺐ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻋﻜﺮﻣﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﱯ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺯ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﻜﺔ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﺔ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻭﰲ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ
ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻭﻟﻦ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺪﺍﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﳍﻤﻪ ﺭﺷﺪﻩ ﻓﻠﻴﻘﻒ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺮﻃﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻻ
ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﺻﺤﺖ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺎﺋﺮ ﻭﻟﺰﻡ ﺍﳌﺮﻭﺀﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺼﺎﻭﻥ
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﲑﻩ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻭﺷﺮﻩ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﳊﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ
223
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ اﻟﺜﺎﻧﯿﺔ :ﻧﻤﺎذج ﻓﻲ اﻟﻄﻮاﺋﻒ
ﺑﻌﺾ اﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﯿﺔ وﺑﻌﺾ اﻟﺤﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ ﺍﳊﻨﺒﻠﻲ ) :ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻻ ﳝﻨﻌﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻠﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﺑـﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤـﺎﺀ،
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻣﺒﺴﻮﻃﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻠﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻐﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸـﺎﻓﻌﻲ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺣﱴ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻮﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺴﻤﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻨﻮﺕ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ
ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﻭﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﺷﻮﻛﺔ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﺻـﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸـﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺍﺳـﺘﻄﺎﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻃﲔ ﺍﻟﻈﻠﻤﺔ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻌﺪﻭﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺠﻦ ﻭﺁﺫﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻌﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺒﺰ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ
ﻓﺘﺪﺑﺮﺕ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻢ ﱂ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺁﺩﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺎﺩ ﻳﺼـﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺑﻄﺎﻟﺘﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﲰﻲ ﰲ ﺹ٣٤
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ )ﺝ/٤ﺹ ) :(٢٦٩ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ]ﺃﻱ ﺳﻨﺔ [٤٤٧ﻭﻗﻌﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻨﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬـﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺑﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤﻲ ،ﻭﺗﺒﻌﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳉـﻢ
ﺍﻟﻐﻔﲑ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻜﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﳉﻬﺮ ﺑﺒﺴﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻌﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴـﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺫﺍﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻨـﻮﺕ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ،ﻭﻭﺻﻠﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻔﺔ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺃﺗﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺑﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﲑ ،ﻓﻨﻬﻮﺍ
ﺇﻣﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺴﻤﻠﺔ ،ﻓﺄﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﺼﺤﻔﺎﹰ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﺯﻳﻠﻮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺤﻒ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﺃﺗﻠﻮﻫﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻷﺛﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺝ/٧ﺹ ) :١١٣ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ]ﺃﻱ ﺳﻨﺔ [٣٢٣ﻋﻈﻢ ﺃﻣـﺮ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠـﺔ
ﻭﻗﻮﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﻛﺘﻬﻢ ...ﻭﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﺮﻫﻢ ﻭﻓﺘﻨﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻈﻬﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺄﻭﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻣﺮ ﻢ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻏﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻀﺮﺑﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻌﺼﻴﻬﻢ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ ﳝﻮﺕ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ )ﺝ/٥ﺹ ) :(١١٥ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ]ﺃﻱ ﺳﻨﺔ [٥٦٧ﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﺗﻔﻘﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳛﲕ ،ﻭﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﻭﻭﻋﻆ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺬﻡ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ ،ﻓﺄﺻﺎﺑﻪ ﺇﺳﻬﺎﻝ ،ﻓﻤﺎﺕ
ﻫﻮ ﻭﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻘﻴﻞ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺃﻫﺪﻭﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺣﻠﻮﻯ ﻓﻤﺎﺕ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ
224
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﻌﺾ أﺗﺒﺎع اﻟﻤﺬاھﺐ اﻟﻔﻘﮭﯿﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﻓﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٢٥٤ /٢٢ﻭﺑﻼﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻂ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺘﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ
ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﱳ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﺣﱴ ﲡﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻳﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﳌﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ
ﺃﰉ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﺣﱴ ﳜﺮﺟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺃﰉ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻳﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﳌﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ
ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﺣﱴ ﳜﺮﺟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﲪﺪ ﻳﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﳌﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﰲ
ﺍﳌﻐﺮﺏ ﲡﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﳌﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ
ﻭﻛﻞ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺼﺒﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﺒﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺘﺒﻌﲔ ﻷﻫﻮﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻫﺪﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ
ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻘﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺬﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺏ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﻻ ﲢﺘﻤﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻴﺎ ﻟﺒﺴﻄﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺼﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ
ﻭﺍﻻﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﳋﻔﻴﺔ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺑﻘﺪﺡ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﲝﻔﻆ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ(ﺍﻩ
225
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺼﺒﲔ ﻟﻠﻘﺸﲑﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮﺥ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺟﺮﺕ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺘﲔ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ(ﺍﻩ
اﻟﺴﻨﺔ واﻟﺸﯿﻌﺔ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ﺝ/١٢ﺹ ٦٢ﰲ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﻤﺎﺋﺔ) :ﻭﰲ ﺻﻔﺮ ﻣﻨـﻬﺎ ﻭﻗـﻊ
ﺍﳊﺮﺏ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻓﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﻘﺘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺜﲑ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻓﺾ ﻧﺼﺒﻮﺍ ﺃﺑﺮﺍﺟﺎ ﻭﻛﺘﺒﻮﺍ
ﻋﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻫﺐ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﻋﻠﻲ ﺧﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺭﺿﻲ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺷﻜﺮ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﰉ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﻔﺮ ،ﻓﺄﻧﻜﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺇﻗﺮﺍﻥ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻊ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻨﺸﺒﺖ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻘﺘﻞ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻫﺎﴰﻲ ﻓﺪﻓﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺭﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻓﻨﻪ
ﻓﻨﻬﺒﻮﺍ ﻣﺸﻬﺪ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺑﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﻭﺃﺣﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﺿﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺩ ﻭﻗﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﲏ ﺑﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻗﺒﻮﺭ ﻣـﻦ
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﺭﺍﺀ ﻭﺃﺣﺮﻕ ﻗﱪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﲔ ﻭﺃﻣﻪ ﺯﺑﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﻗﺒﻮﺭ ﻛـﺜﲑﺓ ﺟـﺪﺍ،
ﻭﺍﻧﺘﺸﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻨﺔ ﻭﲡﺎﻭﺯﻭﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻬﻢ ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﲟﻔﺎﺳﺪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﺑﻌﺜﺮﻭﺍ ﻗﺒـﻮﺭﺍ
ﻗﺪﳝﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺸﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ) :١٣٩/١ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻖ( ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ )ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ( ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ )ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ( ﺗﻜﺒﲑﺍﺕ )ﻭﻳﻠﻌﻨﻪ( ﻋﻘﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﰲ ﻭﺟﻮﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺏ!!! ،ﻭﺭﺟﺢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺱ ﻋﺪﻣﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺟﻊ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﺹ :١٦٩ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﻴـﺎ،
ﻭﰲ ﺹ :٢٠٤ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﻴﺎ.
ﻗﺎﺭﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﲟﺎ ﰲ ﺇﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺘﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺟﻊ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﻨﺌﻲ ١٧٠-١٦٩/١ﲢﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ) :ﺍﻻﻗﺘـﺪﺍﺀ
ﺑﺄﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ( ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﻌﺪﺓ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﳔﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ:
ﺱ :ﻫﻞ ﲡﻮﺯ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ؟
ﺝ :ﲡﻮﺯ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺧﻠﻔﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻟﻠﺤﻔﺎﻅ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ!!
ﺱ :ﳏﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻳﻘﻊ ﰲ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫـﻮ
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻢ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﲡﻮﺯ ﻏﻴﺒﺘﻬﻢ؟
ﺝ :ﻻ ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﰲ ﲨﻌﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﲨﺎﻋﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺒﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺠﺘﻨﺐ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ!
ﺱ :ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻳﺼﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻐﺮﺏ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﺫﺍﻥ ﺍﳌﻐﺮﺏ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﻣﻮﺳﻢ ﺍﳊﺞ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻫﻞ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺪﺍﺀ ـﻢ
ﻭﺍﻻﻛﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ؟
226
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺝ :ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ ﺃﻢ ﻳﺼﻠﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﳛﺮﺯ ﺍﳌﻜﻠﻒ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﱂ ﻳﺼـﺢ ﻣﻨـﻪ
ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺖ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﺾ،ﺍ ﻓﻼ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺣﻴﻨﺌـﺬ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﲟﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺟﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺟﻊ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺴﺘﺎﱐ ﺹ ٢٧ﺣﻴﺚ ﺳﺌﻞ :ﻫﻞ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﻻﺋﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺈﻣﺎﻡ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ ﺃﻡ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺳﻢ ﺍﳊﺞ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺗﻘﻴﺔ؟ ﻭﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻗﺮﺃ ﻣﻊ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻓﺤﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻫﻞ ﻳﻨﺎﻟﻪ ﺛﻮﺍﺏ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ؟
ﻓﺄﺟﺎﺏ ﲟﺎ ﻧﺼﻪ" :ﺗﺴﺘﺤﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﳌﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺂﻟﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻣﺎ ﱂ
ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﲟﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺄﻣﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺋﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ
ﻟﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﻹﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺼﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ!! ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ"(ﺍﻩ ،ﻭﲜﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﻓﱴ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ
ﳏﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﲔ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﷲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻧﺘﺮﻧﺖ
ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ) :٤٤٥/١ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺰﺏ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻝ ]ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ[ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺘﻔﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻝ ﳌﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻐﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺴﻮﻕ ﻭﺍﶈﺎﻝ ،ﻓﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ
ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻛﺎﺫﺑﻮﻥ ﻭﳍﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﳍﻢ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﻫﺮﻭﳘﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺼﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﲤﺮﺩﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻐﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻐﻴﺎﻥ
ﻭﺃﻇﻬﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺠﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﺑﺎﺣﻮﺍ ﻋﻼﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺣﺶ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﺭ
ﻭﻧﺎﺻﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻵﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﳊﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻄﻬﺮﻳﻦ
ﻭﻫﺘﻜﻮﺍ –ﻳﺎﳍﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻳﻞ -ﺍﳊﺮﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻣﺎﻃﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﺎﺕ ﻭﺣﺮﺿﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻣﺎﺗﺔ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺴﻖ
ﻭﺿﺎﺩﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺃﺑﺎﺣﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﺝ ﻭﻭﻟﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﻭﺍﳍﺮﻭﺝ ...ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻡ ﱂ ﻧﺒﺰ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﳍﻢ
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺩﺭﻛﺘﻬﻢ ﻓﺎﻗﺘﻠﻬﻢ ﻗﺘﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻓﺈﻢ ﻣﺸﺮﻛﻮﻥ!!!(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ ﻟﻠﻄﻮﺳﻲ ٥٣/٤ﻭﺭﺟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺸﻲ ) :١٩٨ﻋﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺳﺄﻟﺖ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻻ ﺗﺘﺼﺪﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺴﻘﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺇﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻌﺖ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺏ(ﺍﻩ
227
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺇﺧﻮﺓ ﻓﺄﺻﻠﺤﻮﺍ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺧﻮﻳﻜﻢ -
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺘﻞ ﻣﺆﻣﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﻤﺪﺍ ﻓﺠﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﺟﻬﻨﻢ -
ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﺾ -
ﻭﺍﺧﻔﺾ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻚ ﻟﻠﻤﺆﻣﻨﲔ -
ﺇﳕﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ -
ﻳﺎ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺒﻮﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ...ﻭﻻ ﲡﺴﺴﻮﺍ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻐﺘﺐ ﺑﻌﻀﻜﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ -
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺆﺫﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﺎﺕ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﺘﺎﻧﺎ ﻭﺇﲦﺎ ﻣﺒﻴﻨﺎ -
ﻭﻻ ﲡﻌﻞ ﰲ ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻨﺎ ﻏﻼ ﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ -
ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ -
ﰒ ﺗﺄﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﻲ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ:
-ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﻳﺪﻩ )ﻣﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ(
-ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﺧﻮ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻈﻠﻤﻪ ﻭﻻ ﳜﺬﻟﻪ ﻭﻻ ﳛﻘﺮﻩ )ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ(
-ﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﺩﻣﻪ ﻭﻣﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﻋﺮﺿﻪ )ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ(
-ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺍﺩﻫﻢ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﻃﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﺮﺍﲪﻬﻢ ﻛﻤﺜﻞ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ )ﻣﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ(
-ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﻟﻠﻤﺆﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﺸﺪ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ )ﻣﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ(
-ﺣﻖ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﲬﺲ) ...ﻣﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ(
-ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ
ﻫﻞ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﲝﺴـﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤـﺎﺀ
ﺍﳌﺬﻫﱯ )ﻋﻘﺪﻱ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﻲ(؟! ﻛﻼ ﻭﺍﷲ ،ﺑﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﻁ ﺍﳊﻘﻮﻕ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﺎﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﻤﻦ ﲢﻘـﻖ
ﺑﺎﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﻠﻪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ) :ﻣﻦ ﺷﻬﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ
ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﻗﺒﻠﺘﻨﺎ ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﺻﻼﺗﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻛﻞ ﺫﺑﻴﺤﺘﻨﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴـﻠﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺘﺠﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻵﻥ -ﻭﻣﻦ ﺯﻣﻦ -ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀ
ﺍﳌﺬﻫﱯ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٤١٨/٣ﺇﳕﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ( ﻓﻘـﺪ
ﺃﺧﱪ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻭﱄ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺎﻡ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺆﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻑ ﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻧﺴﺒﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻠﺪﻩ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺘﻪ ﺃﻭ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ
ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﺾ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ﺹ ٥٢٠ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ) :ﰲ ﻛﻞﹴ ﺧﲑ ﻗﺪ ﴰﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﻫـﻮ ﻛﻠﻤـﺔ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﺎﻋﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﳍﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﻉ ﺣﻘﻬﺎ -ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺻﻌﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ– ﻭﻻ ﺗﻈﻠﻤﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﲑ -ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ
228
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﳍﻢ -ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻭﻻ ﲢﺒﻄﻬﺎ ﲜﻨﺐ ﺷﺮﻭﺭﻫﻢ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ،ﻭﺍﺑﺮﺃ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺑﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻭﺭﻫﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺴﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﺜﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺮﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ...ﻭﺇﻥ ﺯﻋﻤﺖ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﱂ ﳝﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺷﱪ ﻓﻘـﺪ
ﺟﻬﻠﺖ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﺪﻗﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﺗﺪﺭﻱ ﻣﻘـﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺏ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺑﻚ(ﺍﻩ
ﻟﻘﺪ ﲰﺎﻧﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ )ﻫﻮ ﲰﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ( ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻄﻐﻰ
ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻡ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﺎﺩﺍﻣﺖ ﻻ ﺗﻀﺮ ﺑﺎﻷﺻﻞ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﻭﻱ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺷﺮﻃﺘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ) :ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟـﱵ ﻓﻴـﻪ
ﻛﻤﺜﻞ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺋﺮ ،ﻓﺎﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺋﺮ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜـﻦ
ﳌﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﱪﺗﻘﺎﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺑﺎﺕ...ﺇﱁ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ :ﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ،ﻧﻌﻢ ﻣﺎ
ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻟﺬﻳﺬ -ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﺫﻭﺍﻕ -ﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺄﺧﻮﺫ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ
ﺟﻬﻞ ﺃﻭ ﲡﺎﻫﻞ(ﺍﻩ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﳜﻄﺊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺻﺎﻧﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﲑ ﻓﻴﺨﻠﻂ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﲑ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﺒﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻏـﲑﻩ ﻻ
ﳛﺒﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﳜﻠﻂ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﲑ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺌﺔ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﺪﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻇﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺎ ﺣﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ ﳜﻠـﻂ
ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﲑ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻢ !! ﻋﻤﺪﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻏﻔﻠﺔ
ﻣﻌﺎﺷﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ :ﻟﻨﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻨﺒﻘﻰ ﺇﺧﻮﺓ ..ﻟﻨﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻨﺘﺄﺩﺏ ﺑﺄﺩﺏ ﺍﳋـﻼﻑ ..ﻟﻨﺨﺘﻠـﻒ
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﻧﻔﺘﺮﻕ ..ﻟﻨﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻨﺘﻌﺎﻳﺶ ..ﺃﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻧﺘﻔﻖ ﰲ ﻣﺴـﺄﻟﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ..ﻗﺎﻝ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﰲ :ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺃﻋﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺗﻪ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﰒ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﻗﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻘـﻴﲏ
ﻓﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﻴﺪﻱ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻧﺘﻔﻖ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ(ﺍﻩ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋـﻼﻡ
ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ،١٧/١٠ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ) :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﻭﻓﻘﻪ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺯﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﺍﺀ
ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﻥ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ) :٤٠٠ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻭﺗﻮﻫﲔ
ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ...ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﻻ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﳎﺮﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻷﻗـﻮﺍﻝ ﻣـﻊ ﻋـﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺩﻱ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻸ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺭﺳﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺹ) :٣٧٥ﺇﻥ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﺍﻟﱵ ﺩﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ،
ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻔﺮ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺪﻝ
ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ...
229
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻰ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺣﺬﺭ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳍﻼﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺗﻌﺎﺩ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻗﺮﻫﻢ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺃﻻ ﺗﺮﺍﻩ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻼﻛﻤﺎ ﳏﺴﻦ ﺣﲔ ﺃﺧﱪﻩ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﰒ ﺣﺬﺭﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ،ﻓﺎﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﶈﺬﺭ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﶈﺴﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﺎﶈﺬﺭ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﻏﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﺫﺏ ﺍﳌﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﲔ ﻭﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
ﻭﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﶈﺴﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﲟﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﺍﺓ ﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻌﻦ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :١٧٢/٢٤ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ
ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻇﺮﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﺓ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﺻﺤﺔ ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻣـﻊ
ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﻤﺔ ﻭﺃﺧﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ...ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻖ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻋﺼﻤﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺃﺧﻮﺓ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﺌﻞ ﻋﻦ) :ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻴﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻮﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﺎﺛﺔ! ﺑﺎﻟﻨﱯ ﺻـﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﻔﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻟﺪ() :ﺃﺣﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻟﻔﺘﻜﻢ! ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﻫﺎﻣﺔ:
-١ﺃﺭﺟﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻼﺣﻈﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻋﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ...
-٢ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺮﻫﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻰ ﻋﻨﻪ ...ﳍﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﺼﺢ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﱐ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻡ ﻭﺃﺭﺟﻮﻫﻢ ﺃﻻ ﻳﻘﻌﻮﺍ ﲢﺖ ﻃﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻴـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺃﻻ ﳜﺎﻟﻔﻮﺍ ﻧﱯ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺎﳌﺪﺍﻭﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺘﺮﻙ ﻛﻞ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻷﺧﻴﻪ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ،
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻭﺣﺴﺒﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺤﺪ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪ
ﻭﳏﻤﺪﺍ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺣﻖ ﻓﻤﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺥ ﳓﺒﻪ ﻭﳒﻠﻪ ﻭﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﻟـﻪ ﺣـﻖ
ﺇﺧﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺔ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﺃﺿﺮﺍﺎ ﻣﺜﺎﺭ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﺪ ﺍﻟﺴـﺎﺑﻘﻮﻥ -٣
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻣﻊ ﺷﺪﺓ ﲝﺜﻬﻢ ﻭﺧﻠﻮﺹ ﻧﻴﺎﻢ ﻭﺗﻔﺮﻏﻬﻢ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ،
ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﻈﻠﻮﻥ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺴﺎﻣﺢ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻣـﻊ ﺑﻌـﺾ ﻭﻳﺴـﻠﻢ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻨﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﺨﲑ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺪﻉ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻳﺒﲔ ﻛﻞ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﻨﻊ ﺃﺧﻮﻩ ﻭﺇﻻ ﺗﺮﻛﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻭ ﺇﲦﺎ ﺃﻭ
ﻋﺼﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺷﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﻭﻛﻔﻰ.
ﳓﻦ ﺣﲔ ﻧﻔﱵ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺆﻭﻥ ﻧﺒﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺪﺍﻧﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ -٤
ﻭﻻ ﻧﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻨﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻧﺰﻛﻲ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﺑﻞ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻛﻨﺎ ﳐﻄـﺌﲔ ﻭﳓـﻦ ﻻ ﻧﺸـﻌﺮ
230
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻤﺮﺣﺒﺎ ﲟﻦ ﻳﺪﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺺ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺮﺷﺪﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺍﻃﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ .ﻧﻘﺮﺭ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻭﳓﺘﺮﻡ ﺭﺃﻱ
ﻏﲑﻧﺎ ﻭﻻ ﳒﺮﺡ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻨﺎ ﻭﲡﻤﻌﻨﺎ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﻹﺧﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ( ﺍﻩ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻧﺸﺮﺗﻪ ﺻﺤﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ /١٤ﺻـﻔﺮ١٣٥٥/ﻫــ.
/٥ﻣﺎﻳﻮ١٩٣٦ /ﻡ ﻧﻘﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ )ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﳊﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﻘﻮﺩﺓ( ﻟﻌﻮﱐ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻭﻣﻲ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻓﺄﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﳊﺐ ﰲ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻐﺾ ﰲ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﻲ؟
ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺀ ﻭﺍﳊﺐ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﻩ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺳﻘﺎ ﲟﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ،ﻧﻌﻢ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻩ
ﻭﺍﻟﱪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ:
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﺍﺧﻔﺾ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻚ ﳌﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﻌﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ ﻓﻘﻞ ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﺉ ﳑﺎ
ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ( ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻟﻪ :ﻓﻘﻞ ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﺉ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ ،ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻤﲑ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ( ﻋﺎﺋﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻷﻢ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ،ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻌﺸﲑﺓ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺑﲔ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﺍﶈﻴﻂ ﺝ/٧ﺹ) :٤٤ﻭﻗﻴﻞ :ﺍﻟﻀﻤﲑ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﺃﻱ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ ﻳﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺼﺪﻳﻘﻚ ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﻚ ﻓﹶﻘﹸﻞﹾ ﺇﱐ
ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﻣﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﹸﻮﻥﹶ ﻻ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﺿﺎﻙ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭﻙ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﱪﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﻘﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﺎﹰ ﻟﻠﻌﺼﺎﺓ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺴﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ:
-ﻓﻔﻲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﻭﻱ ﺝ/٤ﺹ) :٢٥٥ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻓﻮﻥ ﻟﻺﳝﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺼﺪﻗﻮﻥ
ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ )ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ( ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﺒﻌﻮﻙ )ﻓﻘﻞ ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ( ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻜﻢ(ﺍﻩ
-ﻭﰲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺝ/٤ﺹ) :١٢٠ﻭﺍﺧﻔﺾ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻚ ﳌﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﻌﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ( ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺧﻔﺾ
ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻻﻧﻪ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺣﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺃﻟﻦ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻚ ﻭﺗﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﳌﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﻌﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ
ﻭﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﳍﻢ ﺍﶈﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻣﺔ ﻭﲡﺎﻭﺯ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ )ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ( ﺃﻱ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻮﺍ ﺃﻣﺮﻙ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﺒﻌﻮﻙ )ﻓﻘﻞ ﺇﱐ
ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ( ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ
ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻓﻮﻥ ﻟﻺﳝﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺼﺪﻗﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﺍﳋﻠﺺ ﻻﻳﻌﺼﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﻻﳜﺎﻟﻔﻮﻧﻪ( ﺍﻩ
-ﻭﰲ ﻇﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ )ﺝ/٥ﺹ } :(٣٦٥ﻭﺍﺧﻔﺾ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻚ ﳌﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﻌﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ {...
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻃﻮﺍﻝ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ .ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﲨﺔ ﺍﳊﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﲔ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻪ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺓ ﻓﻴﻜﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻢ ،ﻭﻳﱪﺃ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ }:ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ ﻓﻘﻞ :ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ {(ﺍﻩ
231
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﻭﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺪﻱ ﺝ/١ﺹ) :٥٩٩ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ( ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺘﱪﺃ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺘﺮﻙ
ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺘﻬﻢ ﲞﻔﺾ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺡ ﻭﻟﲔ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺑﻞ ﺗﱪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻬﻢ ﻓﻌﻈﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﺼﺤﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺑﺬﻝ
ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻚ ﰲ ﺭﺩﻫﻢ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺗﻮﺑﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ) :ﻋﻦ ﻋﻮﻑ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺷﺠﻌﻲ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﲰﻌﺖ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺃﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻭﱄ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻝ ﻓﺮﺁﻩ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﺮﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﷲ
ﻭﻻ ﻳﱰﻋﻦ ﻳﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺎﻋﺔ(ﺍﻩ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﺮﻫﻪ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻼ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﻣﺮﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺗﻴﺢ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺑﻴﺢ )ﺝ/١١ﺹ) :(٣٠٧ﻓﺮﺁﻩ( ﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﻮﱃ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﱄ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﺮﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ ﻓﻘﻞ
ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ) :ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﱐ ﺃﺑﺮﺃ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ
ﳑﺎ ﺻﻨﻊ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ( ﺍﻩ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ :ﺃﺑﺮﺃ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻳﺔ )ﺝ/٤ﺹ ) :(٢٨١ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﱐ ﺃﺑﺮﺃ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﳑﺎ ﺻﻨﻊ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ،ﻷﻧﻪ
ﺧﺎﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺍﷲ ﲟﺎ ﺟﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻥ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ ﻓﻘﻞ ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﻯﺀ ﳑﺎ
ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ )ﺝ/ ٣ﺹ ) :(٩ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ ﻓﻘﻞ ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﻓﺄﻣﺮﻩ
ﺑﺎﻟﱪﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﻻ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﱪﺃ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﳑﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﱂ ﻳﱪﺃ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻞ ﱂ
ﻳﻌﺰﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻣﺎﺭﺗﻪ( ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ :ﻓﻔﻲ ﻣﺼﻨﻒ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ )ﺝ/١١ﺹ ) :(١٨ﺃﺧﱪﻧﺎ ﻣﻌﻤﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﻗﻼﺑﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺩﺍﺀ ﻣﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺻﺎﺏ ﺫﻧﺒﺎ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺴﺒﻮﻧﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺃﺭﺃﻳﺘﻢ ﻟﻮ ﻭﺟﺪﲤﻮﻩ ﰲ ﻗﻠﻴﺐ
ﺃﱂ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﺨﺮﺟﻴﻪ؟ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺑﻠﻰ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻼ ﺗﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﺃﺧﺎﻛﻢ ،ﻭﺍﲪﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﺎﻓﺎﻛﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺃﻓﻼ
ﺗﺒﻐﻀﻪ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﺑﻐﺾ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺮﻛﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺧﻲ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ:
ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺮﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺗﻴﺢ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺑﻴﺢ )ﺝ/٨ﺹ) :(١٩٢ﻋﻘﺪ ﺍﻷﺧﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺼﻴﺤﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺃﻭﱃ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺒﺔ ﻟﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ ﻓﻘﻞ ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ
ﺣﻴﺚ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﻓﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ )ﺝ/٣ﺹ) :(٤٦٨ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ } :ﻟﻜﻢ ﺩﻳﻨﻜﻢ ﻭﱄ ﺩﻳﻦ { ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﻟﻜﻞ
ﻛﺎﻓﺮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ .ﻓﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻳﺌﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻏﻔﺮﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ
232
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻨﺒﻴﻪ } ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺼﻮﻙ ﻓﻘﻞ ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ { ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﻲ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﺎﺑﻮﺍ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻚ ﰲ ﻃﺒﺎﺋﻊ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ )ﺝ/١ﺹ (٧٨ﻻﺑﻦ ﺍﻷﺯﺭﻕ) :ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺎﺀ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻣﻦ
ﺟﻠﻴﺴﻚ ﺃﻣﺮﺍ ﺗﻜﺮﻫﻪ ،ﻭﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﲢﺒﻪ ،ﻭﺻﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﻋﻮﺭﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻫﻔﻮﺓ ﻏﱪﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﻘﻄﻊ ﺣﺒﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻻ
ﺗﺼﺮﻡ ﻣﻮﺩﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺩﺍﻭ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺮ ﻋﻮﺭﺗﻪ ..ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭﺟﻊ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻓﺎﺗﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﺑﺮﺃ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ" :ﻓﺈﻥ
ﻋﺼﻮﻙ ﻓﻘﻞ ﺇﱐ ﺑﺮﻱﺀ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ" .ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺄﻣﺮ ﺑﻘﻄﻌﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﱪﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺀ(ﺍﻩ
233
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻬﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺖ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺠﻮﻧﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻬﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ ﺃﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺋﱵ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﲬﺴﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻬﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺑﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺬﻛﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺃﺷﺒﺎﻫﻪ ﰒ ﻗﺮﺃ) :ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﳏﻜﻤﺎﺕ ﻫﻦ ﺃﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺎﺏ
ﻭﺃﺧﺮ ﻣﺘﺸﺎﺎﺕ .(ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻬﻞ ﺗﺪﺭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺍﶈﻜﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺎﶈﻜﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﺷﺪ ﻧﻴﺘﻚ ﰲ ﺍﶈﻜﻢ ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻙ ﻭﺍﳋـﻮﺽ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ :ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺭﺷﺪﱐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪﻳﻚ ﻓﻮﺍﷲ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻗﻤﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ﻭﺇﱐ ﳊﺴـﻦ
ﺍﳊﺎﻝ؛ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺪﻋﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺃﺛﲎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ...
ﻭﺷﻬﺪﺕ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﻳﻮﻣﺎﹰ -ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﻟﻘﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺃﻋﻘﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﺩﻳﻨﻬﻢ -ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﺗﻌﺼﺐ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻓﺄﺷﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠـﺔ ﻓﻬـﻢ
ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ(ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻟﺪ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺧﻼﻓﺔ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺗﻮﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ ١١٦ﻫـ ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺘﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻫﺪ ﻓﻔﻲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ) :٣١٥/٦ﻋﻦ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ :ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺻـﻼﺓ ﺇﻻ
ﻇﻨﻨﺖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺼﺮﻑ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﺘﺠﺎﺏ ﻟﻪ ...ﻭﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻴﺴﺮﺓ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺟﻨﺎﺯﺓ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑـﻦ
ﻣﺮﺓ :ﺇﱐ ﻷﺣﺴﺒﻪ ﺧﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺷﻬﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻱ )ﺕ١٣٤١ﻫـ( ﰲ ﻗﺼﻴﺪﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﻀـﺎﺀ
ﻧﺪﻭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻨﺪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﻪ:
ﻟﺬﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺋﻢ ﻻ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﺠﺎﻥ ﻛﹶﻠﻢ ﻳﻘﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﻲﺀ ﺍﳉﺎﱐ
ﺃﺩﺭﻯ ﻭﺃﺣﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻔﺜﺎﺕ ﻣﺼﺪﻭﺭ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺎ
ﺇﱃ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﻌﺎﻥ ﻫﺒﻮﺍ ﻭﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﺷﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ
ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺑﺼﺪ ﻃﻮﺍﺭﻕ ﺍﳊﺪﺛﺎﻥ ﻀﻮﺍ ﻟﻨﻔﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺑﻨﺸﺮﻫﺎ
ﺇﱃ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﺿﻴﻢ ﺍﳍﻀﻴﻤﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻥ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺃﺫﺍﻗﻬﻢ
ﲞﻤﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﲏ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺮﺍﱐ ﻭﻫﻨﺖ ﻋﺰﺍﺋﻤﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻫﺎﺯﺋﺎ
ﰲ ﻫﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﳘﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﳋﺬﻻﻥ ﻓﻌﻼﻡ ﻓﺮﻗﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻟﻘﺖ ﺑﻨﺎ
ﻭﺍﳊﻘﺪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﻭﱂ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻓﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﻏﺾ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ
ﻋﻨﺔ ﺑﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻷﻛﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﺬ
234
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻹﻟﻪ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻧﺎﱐ ﻭﺑﺄﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﳊﺒﻴﺐ ﳏﻤﺪﺍ
ﺃﺧﺬﺍ ﻭﺭﺩﺍ ﳏﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ
ﱂ ﻳﺘﺼﻒ ﺑﺎﳋﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﳍﻨﺎ ﻭﻧﺒﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺑﻨﺎ
ﻗﺎﺻﻲ ﺍﳊﺠﻴﺞ ﻟﻨﺴﻜﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﻡ ﻳﺆﻣﻬﺎ
ﺣﺘﻢ ﻭﺻﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻭﺻﻼﺓ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻄﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﺯﻛﺎﺗﻪ
ﻧﺰﻍ ﻟﻴﻔﺘﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﺃﻓﺒﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻳﺼﻴﺒﻨﺎ
ﺧﲑ ﺍﻟﱪﻳﺔ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻓﺬﺍﻙ ﻋﻦ
ﻭﺃﻣﱵ ﻓﺮﻗﺎ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺗﻔﺘﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩ
ﺇﻻ ﻓﺮﻗﺔ ﱂ ﲣﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻌﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺺ ﰲ ﺁﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺑﻞ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺟﻨﺔ ﻭﻋﺪﻭﺍ ﺎ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺣﺪ ﰲ ﲪﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺗﻈﺎﻓﺮﺕ
ﻓﺎﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺩﺕ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻩ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺳﺎﻃﻊ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺃﺗﻰ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺸﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴـﻞ
ﺇﺣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ﻭﺷﺄﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﺌﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﻓﺎﺩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻼﺷﻲ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ
ﻨﻮﺍ ﻓﺮﺏ ﺍﳋﻴﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺍﱐ ﺇﻳﻪ ﺭﺟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺪﻭﺓ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪﻭﺍ ﻭﻻ
ﲣﺸﻮﺍ ﻣﻌﺮﺓ ﻓﺎﺳﺪﻱ ﺍﻷﺫﻫﺎﻥ( ﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻣﻀﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﻠﻮﺍﺋﻜﻢ ﻗﺪﻣﺎ ﻭﻻ
ﻭﻳﻌﺠﺒﲏ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ﺹ ٧ﳌﺎ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌـﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻴﺔ:
)ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﱄ ﺇﻻ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻓﻤﻦ ﴰﻠﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺻﺎﺣﱯ ﻭﺃﺧﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﻭﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ
ﻟﻪ ﺣﻘﻪ ﻭﺷﻜﺮﺕ ﻟﻪ ﺻﻨﻌﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻏﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ...ﻳﻜﻔﻴﲏ ﺃﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﳉﺄﱐ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﷲ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺒﻖ ﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻢ ﺑﺪ ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﺆﻣﻦ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺰﻗﻮﺍ ﺃﺩﳝﻲ ﻭﺃﻛﻠﻮﺍ ﳊﻤﻲ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻐﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺫﻯ
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺬﺍ ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻻ ﻧﺒﺘﻐﻲ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺝ/٣ﺹ) :٤١٥ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻗﺪ ﲰﺎﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﳌﺴـﻠﻤﲔ
ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻼ ﻧﻌﺪﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲰﺎﻧﺎ ﺍﷲ ﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﺃﺣﺪﺛﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻭﲰﻮﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺁﺑﺎﺅﻫﻢ
ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ(ﺍﻩ
235
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻤﺒﺤﺚ اﻟﺴﺎدس :ﻟﻨﺘﻌﺎون ﻓﯿﻤﺎ اﺗﻔﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﯿﮫ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻳﺎ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﻨﻮﺍ ...ﻭﺗﻌﺎﻭﻧﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﱪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻧﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﰒ ﻭﺍﻟﻌـﺪﻭﺍﻥ( ،ﺇﻥ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻟﻴﺘﻌﺎﻭﻧﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﲑ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺴﺘﺜﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻓـﻼ
ﳚﻮﺯ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﱯ )ﻋﻘﺪﻱ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﻲ(
ﻻ ﺗﻘﻞ ﱄ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺃﺗﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻉ؟! ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﱪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﻯ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺣﱴ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ
ﻋﻘﺪﺗﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺶ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻨﺼﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻈﻠﻮﻡ) :ﻟﻘﺪ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺪﻋﺎﻥ ﺣﻠﻔﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺑـﻪ
ﲪﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺩﻋﻴﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻷﺟﺒﺖ( ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻭﻱ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺻـﻠﺢ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺒﻴﺔ) :ﻟﺌﻦ ﺩﻋﺘﲏ ﻗﺮﻳﺶ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻄﺔ ﻳﻌﻈﻤﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﺮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﷲ ﻷﺟﺒﺖ( ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻓـﺈﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻟﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻭﻣﺮﻏﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ؛ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤـﺎﻟﻒ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ؟! ،ﺇﺫﻥ ﻓﻠﻨﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺍﻗـﻊ ﻭﻟﻨﺘﺨـﺬ
ﺍﳋﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ
ﻟﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﺷﻴﺨﻪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺗﻜﺘﺐ ﲟﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ﻳﻨﺒﻐـﻲ ﺃﻥ ﳒﻌﻠـﻬﺎ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎﺟﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻫﻲ) :ﻟﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﺬﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ(
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ :ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻻ ﺗﺼﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻧﻌﺬﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻼﻓـﻪ ﻏـﲑ
ﻣﻌﺘﱪ؟ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺬﻝ ﺟﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻓﺄﺧﻄﺄ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﺬﺭ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻼﻓﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺴـﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻧﻀﻴﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻻﻩ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ) :ﻭﻟﻴﻨﺼﺢ ﻭﻟﻴﺤﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ
ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ( ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺗﺸﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺬﻭﺭ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻌﺬﻭﺭ ..ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻭﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﳍـﻮﻯ،
ﻧﺴﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ.
) -ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻷﺣﺪ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﺼﻒ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﱰﻩ ﻋـﻦ
ﻛﻞ ﻧﻘﺺ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺴﲎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳏﻤﺪﺍ ﺭﺳـﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ؟،
ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺮﺱ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﺔ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻤـﺎ ﺃﺩﺧﻠـﻪ
ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﳊﺎﺩ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻳﻬﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻋﺰ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﺎﺎ؟ ،ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ
ﺇﺫﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﺼﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺑﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﳊﺎﺩ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻮﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟـﱵ
ﺗﺰﻋﺰﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﺗﻠﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ
236
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﺭﻛﻦ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻـﺎ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻡ؟،
ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﻭﻟﻨﻄﺎﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻚ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﻐﻞ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﳋﻤﺴﺔ؟ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﻧﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻬـﺎ
ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﲣﺎﺫ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﻟﺪﻋﻮﻢ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﺓ؟
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻋﺎﺋﻢ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺖ؟ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﻧﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲡﻠﻴﺘـﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺜﺒﻴﺘـﻬﺎ
ﻭﺇﻳﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻗﻠﻮﻢ ﺑﻠﻐﺔ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﺗﻼﺋﻢ ﻳﺴﺮ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ
ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻙ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺜﲑﻫﺎ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﻮﻥ؟
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻜﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ
ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻤﻬﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ؟ ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺷﺎﻋﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﺗﺮﺳﻴﺦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺸﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﻭﻳﻬﺮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻭﻟﻨﻄـﺎﺭﺩ
ﺍﻟﺮﺫﺍﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﳌﺪﻣﺮﺓ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﺘﻤﻊ
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﲨﻌﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬـﺎ ﺍﻷﻣـﺔ
ﻓﻐﺪﺕ ﲤﺜﻞ ﻭﺣﺪﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻛﻴﺔ؟ ﻓﻠﻨﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﻦ
ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﻭﲪﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺑﺜﲔ
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺔ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺩﺍﻫﻢ )ﺧﻄﺮ ﺩﻳﲏ ﻭﻋﺴـﻜﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﺘﺼـﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﺃﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭﺛﻘﺎﰲ ﻭﺣﻀﺎﺭﻱ( ﻭﺃﺎ ﺗﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﺪﻡ ﺍﻷﻗﺼﻰ ﻭﲣﻄـﻂ
ﻭﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﻘﻘﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﻼﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻭﺍﺎ ﻭﺃﺎ ﲢﺎﺭﺑﻨـﺎ ﻣـﻦ
ﻣﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﺩﻳﲏ؟ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﻧﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﳓﺎﺭﻢ ﲟﺜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺎﺭﺑﻮﻧﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻒ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻪ
ﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﻛﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺃﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﻭﺁﺳﻴﺎ
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺏ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﺭ ﺣﱴ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻴﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﻣـﺎ
ﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﲢﻜﻢ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﺮﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﲔ ﻭﺍﳊﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﺋﻊ ﺷﱴ؟ ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ
ﺇﺫﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻱ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺑﺄﺳﻠﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺼﲑ ﻳﻐﺰﻭ ﻋﺎﳌﻨﺎ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﲟﺎ ﳝﻠﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺘﻄـﻮﺭﺓ
ﻭﻃﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺟﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻐﻞ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺽ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﻉ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺸﺮﺓ ﻭﻟﻸﺳـﻒ
ﰲ ﺃﻣﺘﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻭﺃﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﳒﺢ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻗﻄﺎﺭ؟ ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻛﻠﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ
ﰲ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﲏ ﻭﻟﻨﺒﺬﻝ ﻟﻨﺼﺮﺓ ﺣﻘﻨﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺒﺬﻟﻮﻥ ﻟﻨﺼﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻃﻠﻬﻢ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ
ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺬﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﺬﻟﻮﻧﻪ
237
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﲢﺎﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ؟ ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺰﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺴﻜﺮﻱ ﻭﻟﻨﺤﻢ ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺀﻧـﺎ
ﻭﺩﻳﺎﺭﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﺣﻒ ﺍﻷﲪﺮ
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻼﻳﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﳚﻬﻠﻮﻥ ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﺎﺩﻭﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺍﲰﻪ؟ ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺏ ﺃﻟﻒ
ﺑﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺃﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬـﺎ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﻮﺩ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺗﻨﺴﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﺠﺎﺩﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴـﺎﺋﻞ
ﻫﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻣﻠﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ
ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ؟ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺸﻮﻫﺔ ،ﻓﻬﺆﻻﺀ ﱂ ﺗﺒﻠﻐﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺑﻠﻮﻏﺎ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺎ ﻭﳓﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺇﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳔﺎﻃﺐ ﻛـﻞ
ﻗﻮﻡ ﺑﻠﺴﺎﻢ ﻭﻧﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﻧﺰﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺎﺕ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﻧﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ
ﻭﳒﻨﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﻝ
-ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺗﺒﺬﻝ ﺟﻬﻮﺩﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﻴﺘﺔ ﻹﻳﻘﺎﻑ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ
ﻭﺗﺸﻮﻳﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ؟ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﺴـﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﲟﺨﺘﻠـﻒ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺳـﻬﻢ
ﻭﻓﺼﺎﺋﻠﻬﻢ ﻟﻠﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﺻﻔﺎ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﱐ ﺍﳌﺆﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﻺﺳﻼﻡ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺏ؟
-ﻭﺃﺧﲑﺍ ﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﻧﺘﻨﺎﺳﺎ ﺧﻼﻓﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻀﺎﻡ ﺟﻬﻮﺩﻧﺎ ﻭﺗﻠﺘﺌﻢ ﺻـﻔﻮﻓﻨﺎ ﻭﺗﺘﻮﺣـﺪ
ﺟﺒﻬﺘﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻀﺨﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺮﺑﺼﺔ ﺑﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ؟ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺟﻬﻮﺩ
ﺗﺸﻐﻞ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﻧﺎ ﻭﺃﻭﻗﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﻭﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺎﺗﻨﺎ ،ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺪﻉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻐﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﳍﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺋﺐ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ
ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻗﲔ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺩ.ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﺧـﺘﻼﻑ
ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺬﻣﻮﻡ( ﺹ٩٩ﺑﺘﺼﺮﻑ
238
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻮﻓﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺫﻳﺔ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ ) :٤٦٢ /١٢ﻋـﻦ
ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﳌﺎ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﻠﻪ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﻠﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ
ﺃﲪﺪ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﳓﻦ ﻻ ﳔﺎﻟﻔﻚ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ!!! ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ]ﺃﻱ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﶈـﺪﺛﲔ[ ﻻ ﲢﻤـﻞ ﺫﺍ
ﻣﻨﻚ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ :ﺇﱐ ﺃﺧﺸﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ،ﺃﺳﺄﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺃﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﺣﻘﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻓﺎﻧﺼﺮﻑ ﻋﻨـﻪ
ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺭ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎﰎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ :ﻗﺪﻡ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻱ ﺳﻨﺔ ﲬﺴﲔ ﻭﻣـﺎﺋﺘﲔ
ﻭﲰﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﰊ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﺭﻋﺔ ﻭﺗﺮﻛﺎ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳛﲕ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺑﻨﻴﺴﺎﺑﻮﺭ
ﺃﻥ ﻟﻔﻈﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ :ﻗﻠﺖ ﺇﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﺎ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﺃﻭ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺮﻛﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺛﻘﺔ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﻥ ﳏﺘﺞ
ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺘﻴﺒﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻆ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻬﻤﻴﺔ( ﺹ) :٥١ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺤﻞ ﳓﻠﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺰﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺤﻞ ..ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺒﺼﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺮﺷﺪ
ﻭﺑﺈﻋﻨﺎﻢ ﻭﺇﻏﻼﻇﻬﻢ ﳌﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﻛﻔﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﺇﻛﻔﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻚ ﰲ ﻛﻔﺮﻩ
ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﳌﺼﺮ ﻓﻘﻌﺪ ﻟﻠﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﻏﻔﻞﹲ ،ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺇﻻ
ﺗﻘﺎﺩﻡ ﺳﻨﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻼﻥ ﻭﻓﻼﻥ ﻓﻴﺒﺪﺃﹸﻭﻧﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﶈﻨﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻮﻳﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺗﻠﻌﺜﻢ ﺃﻭ ﲤﻜﺚ ﺃﻭ
ﺳﻌﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻨﺤﻨﺢ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ،ﻓﻴﺤﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﳋﻮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺣﻬﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺇﺳﻘﺎﻃﻬﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﻓﻴﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻓﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻴﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻣﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺘﻬﻢ ﺳﺎﻡ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺒﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﻜﺘﺒﻮﺍ ﻋﻨﻪ
ﻭﺇﻥ ﺭﺃﻭﺍ ﺣﺪﺛﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﺮﺷﺪﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻬﻼ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻤﺎ ﺳﺄﻟﻮﻩ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ ﳍﻢ :ﺃﻧﺎ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻭﺃﺳﺄﻝ
ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺼﺢ ﱄ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺑﻌﺪ -ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺻﺪﻗﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺬﺭ ﺑﻌﺬﺭﹴ ﺍﷲ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺻﺪﻗﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻠﻔﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺄﻝ ﻭﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﻟﻴﻌﻠﻢ-؛ ﻛﺬﺑﻮﻩ ﻭﺁﺫﻭﻩ ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﺧﺒﻴﺚ ﻓﺎﻫﺠﺮﻭﻩ
ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺎﻋﺪﻭﻩ
ﺃﻓﺘﺮﻯ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻬﻠﻮﻩ ﻭﻗﺪ
ﲰﻌﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺸﺎﻓﻬﺔ؛ ﺃﻛﺎﻥ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ؟!(ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺹ ) :١٩ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻟﻠﻤﺨﻄﺊ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﺋﻖ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﳌﻔﺴﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺟﺴﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻇﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻷﺎ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻻﺗﻀﺢ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﺋﻖ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻭﺍﺋﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻻﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺼﺮﻭﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ
239
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺃ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺒﻖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﻔﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻛﺘﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺗﻜﻠـﻒ ﺑﻌﻀـﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘـﺔ
ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﻭﻓﺴﺪ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮﻭﻥ(ﺍﻩ
ﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﺍﻹﺭﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻱ؟! ﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﻧﺪﻉ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ؟! ﻭﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﻧﺪﻉ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺇﺑـﺪﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ؟! ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻨﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﻡ ،ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻧﻨﺎﻗﺸﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺁﺭﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﳓﺎﻭﺭﻫﻢ ﺣﻮﳍﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﺍ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺿﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﻌﻀـﻬﻢ
ﻭﺳﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﲰﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺹ) :٣٧ﺩﻉ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻚ -ﺇﻥ ﻛﻨﺖ
ﲢﺐ ﺍﳊﻖ -ﻳﺼﺮﺡ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻨﻌﻚ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻨﻌﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺴﺮ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺮ ﻓﻜـﺮ
ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻨﻒ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﻗﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﻴﺶ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻋﻮﻧﺔ...
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻨﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺭﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﻓﻜﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻄﻒ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻻ ﳚﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﲔ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﻮﺳﲔ ﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻟﲔ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺩ.ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ...) :ﻭﺃﻟﱠﻒ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺯﻫﺮ )ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻮﻳﺲ( ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻧﻪ:
)ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺳﻠﻔﻴﺎ!( ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻳﺾ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﺎﻕ ﲨﻠﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻳﺾ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ
ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻔﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﻕ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻄﺒﻊ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺣﺎﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺴﺨﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺃﻓﻠﺢ،
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻟﻘﻴﺖ ﻣﺆﻟﱢﻔﻪ -ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻋﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ -ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎ ﻭﺧﻄﻴﺒﺎ ﻷﺣﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ،
ﻓﺴﺄﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻔﺖ ﳝﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﴰﺎﻻ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﱄ :ﺃﺭﺟﻮﻙ ﻻ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ
ﻋﻴﺸﻲ ،ﻓﻬﻨﺎ ﻓﺌﺔ ﻟﻮ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺃﱐ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﱂ ﺗﺮﺽ ﺑﺒﻘﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪ ﻳﻮﻣـﺎ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪﺍ،
ﻭﻫﻴﺠﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ.
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺟﻮ ﺍﻹﺭﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻱ ،ﺣﲔ ﺗﻄﻐﻰ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﺱ ،ﻭﺗﺨـﺮﹺﺱ
ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺗﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ،ﻷﺎ ﻣﺴﻨﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻳﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ...
ﻭﻛﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻋﺎﻭﻯ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺯﻋﻢ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺎ ﺃﺎ ﲤﺜﱢﻞ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻧﻘﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ﻋﻠﻴﻬـﺎ،
ﻭﻫﺎﲨﻮﺍ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﳍﺠﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺃﻱ ﳐﺎﻟﻒ .ﻭﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻧﻔﺴـﻪ ﺿـﺤﻴﺔ ﻫـﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﻀﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺗﻬﻤﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﻬﻤﻪ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﻭﰲ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﺮﻕ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ،ﻭﺧﺮﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ،ﺑﺂﺭﺍﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺠﻦ ﻭﻣﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ.
240
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﻋﱪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻻ ﻧﻘﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺧﺼـﻮﻣﻪ
ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﺑﻞ ﻧﺪﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﺎ ﻟﻜﻞﱢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻀﻊ ﻟﺒﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺻﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ :ﻟـﻴﺲ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻛﺒﲑ( ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻮﻳﺾ ﻟﻠﺸﻴﺦ ﺳﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮﻱ
ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻮﺍﺟﺬ ﻭﺃﻻ ﻳﺘﺮﻛﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﲞﻼﻓﻪ ﺧﻮﻓﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﺳﻨﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ) :٤٨٣/٤ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﳋﺪﺭﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﻮﻣـﺎ
ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﺑﻨﻬﺎﺭ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺧﻄﻴﺒﺎ ...ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻻ ﻻ ﳝﻨﻌﻦ ﺭﺟﻼ ﻫﻴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﲝﻖ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﺒﻜﻰ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻗﺪ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻓﻬﺒﻨﺎ!(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺇﺭﺿﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻻ ﺗﺪﺭﻙ ﻓﺈﻧﻚ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﺿﻴﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺳﺨﻄﺖ ﺫﺍﻙ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﺿﻴﺖ ﺫﺍﻙ ﺃﺳﺨﻂ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻤﺎ
ﺑﻘﻲ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ،ﻭﰲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ) :٥١٠ / ١ﻋﻦ ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨـﻬﺎ
ﻗﺎﻟﺖ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ) :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺲ ﺭﺿﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺴﺨﻂ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺭﺿـﻲ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺃﺭﺿﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺲ ﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺴﺨﻂ ﺍﷲ ﺳﺨﻂ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﻭﺃﺳـﺨﻂ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﺴﺨﻂ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﻛـﻞ ﺍﳌـﺬﺍﻫﺐ )ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳـﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴﺔ( ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺳﲑﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﺍﳌﺘﺠﺮﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﷲ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ.
ﻭﺣﺴﱯ ﺃﱐ ﺃﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺮﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ )ﻻ ﺧﲑ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﳒﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻣﺮ ﺑﺼﺪﻗﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺻﻼﺡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ( ) ،(٣٧ﺣﺴﱯ ﺍﻟﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺑﻮﺏ ..ﺣﺴﱯ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﳌﺨﻠﻮﻕ ..ﺣﺴﱯ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺯﻭﻕ ..ﺣﺴﱯ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ ..ﺣﺴﱯ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻬـﻮﺭ..
(٣٧ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﺬﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻏﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻫﻴﺐ ) :ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻗﺔ ﺇﺻﻼﺡ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﲔ( ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺰﺍﺭ ﻭﰲ ﺇﺳﻨﺎﺩﻩ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﻦ ﺃﻧﻌﻢ
ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺴﻦ ﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻡ
ﻭﺭﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻧﺲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻷﰊ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ :ﺃﻻ ﺃﺩﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲡﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺑﻠﻰ،
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺻﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻔﺎﺳﺪﻭﺍ ﻭﻗﺮﺏ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪﻭﺍ( ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺰﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻩ) :ﺃﻻ ﺃﺩﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻳﺮﺿﺎﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺑﻠﻰ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺻﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻔﺎﺳﺪﻭﺍ ﻭﻗﺮﺏ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪﻭﺍ( ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ
ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻭﺍﻷﺻﺒﻬﺎﱐ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﱄ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ ﺃﻻ
ﺃﺩﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﳛﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﺎﻏﻀﻮﺍ ﻭﺗﻔﺎﺳﺪﻭﺍ(ﺍﻩ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ ،ﻭﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻷﺻﺒﻬﺎﱐ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﺃﻻ ﺃﺩﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﳛﺐ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ ،ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺑﺄﰊ ﺃﻧﺖ ﻭﺃﻣﻲ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺗﺼﻠﺢ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﺈﺎ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﳛﺐ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ
241
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺣﺴﱯ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺗﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﺭ ..ﺣﺴﱯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺴﱯ ..ﺣﺴﱯ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺰﻝ ﺣﺴﱯ ..ﺣﺴﱯ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ
ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ..ﺣﺴﱯ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻛﻴﻞ
ﻭﳑﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺑﻪ -ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ -ﺭﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻨﻀﺒﻄﺔ ،ﻭﻛﻢ ﻗـﺪ
ﺣﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ :ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺼﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺩﺓ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻴﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﱄ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﺭﺩﺓ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻠﻮ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﳍﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺩﺓ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺿـﺪ
ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻮ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻄﻴﻞ ..ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ ،ﻭﺍﳉﱪ ﺭﺩﺓ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺿﺪ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ..ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ ...ﺇﱁ
ﻭﻻ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ) :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ﺃﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺟﺎﺟﺔ؟( ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻬﻤﻨﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ )ﺝ/٨ﺹ ) :(٢٢٠ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺳﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ! ﰲ ﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﺑﲏ ﺑﻮﻳﻪ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﻤﺎﺋﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺣﻮﳍﺎ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﺑﺎﺩﺏ )ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻮﻝ( ﺗﻀﺮﺏ ﺑﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﰲ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻋﺎﺷﻮﺭﺍﺀ،
ﻭﻳﺬﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﱭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﻮﺍﻕ ،ﻭﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺍﳌﺴﻮﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺎﻛﲔ ،ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﳊـﺰﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻜﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻻ ﻳﺸﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﻠﺘﺌﺬ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﺴﲔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﻄﺸﺎﻧﺎ.
ﰒ ﲣﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﺣﺎﺳﺮﺍﺕ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﻦ ﻳﻨﺤﻦ ﻭﻳﻠﻄﻤﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﻬﻦ ﻭﺻﺪﻭﺭﻫﻦ ،ﺣﺎﻓﻴﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺍﻕ ﺇﱃ
ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻴﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻈﻴﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳍﺘﺎﺋﻚ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺮﻋﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ـﺬﺍ ﻭﺃﺷـﺒﺎﻫﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺸﻨﻌﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﺑﲏ ﺃﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﺘﻞ ﰲ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻬﻢ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺎﻛﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻋﺎﺷﻮﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺻﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻋﺎﺷـﻮﺭﺍﺀ
ﻳﻄﺒﺨﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺒﻮﺏ ﻭﻳﻐﺘﺴﻠﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﺘﻄﻴﺒﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﻠﺒﺴﻮﻥ ﺃﻓﺨﺮ ﺛﻴﺎﻢ ﻭﻳﺘﺨﺬﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻋﻴﺪﺍ ﻳﺼﻨﻌﻮﻥ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻷﻃﻌﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻭﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺡ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻓﺾ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻛﺴﺘﻬﻢ(ﺍﻩ
242
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺧﺎﲤﺔ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻑ:
ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ:
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ :ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ :ﻧﺪﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ
ﻭﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
243
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺧﺎﺗﻤﺔ اﻟﻤﻄﺎف
ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
244
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻓﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﺪ ﻇﺎﱂ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺳﻔﻴﻪ ﻋﺎﺑﺚ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﳉﻬﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻈﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﺍﻥ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺩ.ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺬﻣﻮﻡ( ﺹ:١٢٦
) ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺌﺎﺕ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﻤﻲ ﻭﻳﺼﻢ ﻭﻳﺼﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳌﺴﺘﻪ ﰲ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺩﻳﲔ ،ﻓﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﻐﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ
ﻧﻌﻢ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺯﻳﺪ ﺯﻋﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻜـﺮ ﻗﺎﺋـﺪﺍ،
ﻭﻳﻈﻦ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺫﺍﻙ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻐﺎﱎ ﻭﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﻮﺭ
ﺃﻭ ﺍﳉﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﺭ...
ﻭﺇﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﺳﻒ ﻟﻪ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻒ ﺃﻥ ﳒﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻴﺔ
ﻳﺘﻌﺎﻭﻧﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ ﲨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺻﺮﳛﺔ ﺿﺪ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﲔ ﻟﻺﺳـﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻛـﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ
ﲨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺃﻗـﻮﺍﻝ
ﺳﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﳍﺪﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﲔ ﰲ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺭ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺣﻢ ﺭﰊ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ
ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺝ/٣ﺹ ٣٩٦ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻋﻴﺎﺀ ...) :ﻭﻳﺼﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺣﺮﺻﺎ،
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻋﻦ ﳎﻠﺴﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻀﺎﻗﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﲟﺎ ﺭﺣﺒﺖ ،ﻭﻳﺰﻋﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺮﺿـﻪ
ﺇﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺻﻠﺤﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﳌﺎﺕ ﻏﻤﺎ ﻭﺣﺴﺪﺍ ،ﻭﻟﻮ
ﺃﺛﲎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺮﺩﺩﻳﻦ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﻐﺾ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﷲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺗﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺠﺎﺑﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺮﺀ ﻭﺭﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻼﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣـﻦ
ﺗﺴﻌﺮ ﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺳﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺣﻴـﺚ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﺘﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﺎﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﺑﺪ:
ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ﺑﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻤﻠﻦ * ﻣﻌﺬﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻋﺒﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻦ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺗﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﻗﺴﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﻭﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻨـﺒﻼﺀ :١٨٣/٧
)ﻋﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻓﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﰊ ﺷﺮﻳﺢ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻜﺜﺮﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻗﺪ ﺩﺭﻧـﺖ
ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻜﻢ ﻓﻘﻮﻣﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺑﻦ ﲪﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻠﻮﺍ ﻗﻠﻮﺑﻜﻢ ﻭﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻏﺎﺋﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻗﺎﺋﻖ ﻓﺈـﺎ
245
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﲡﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺗﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﲡﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺍﻗﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻗﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺈﺎ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺰﻝ ﺗﻘﺴـﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠـﺐ
ﻭﺗﻮﺭﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺍﻭﺓ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺻﺪﻕ ﻭﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻓﻀﻠﻪ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ )ﺝ/٣ﺹ (٢٦٨ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑـﻦ ﻋﺒـﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑـﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﻠﺖ ﻷﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺎﺵ :ﺣﺪﺛﹾﻨﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ) :ﺩﻋﻮﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ؛ ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻛﱪﻧﺎ ﻭﻧﺴـﻴﻨﺎ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ،ﺟﻴﺌﻮﻧﺎ ﺑﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﺮ(...ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻓﻀﻠﻪ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ )ﺝ/٣ﺹ :(٢٨٦ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﳛﲕ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻥ ﻗـﺎﻝ:
ﲰﻌﺖ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻳﺼﺪﻛﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻓﻬﻞ ﺃﻧـﺘﻢ ﻣﻨﺘـﻬﻮﻥ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ٢١٧/١ﺑﻠﻔﻆ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺏ
ﻭﰲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ )ﺝ/١ﺹ ) :(٩٨ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺧﻠﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻤﺤﻲ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻷﲪـﺪ ﺑـﻦ
ﺣﻨﺒﻞ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﲰﻌﺖ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻳﺼﺪﻛﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻋـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﻋﻦ ﺻﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﻬﻞ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻮﻥ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺄﻃﺮﻕ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻓﻼ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎﹰ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻓﺸﻌﺒﻪ ﳛﻜﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﻞ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﻘﻮﻕ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﲪـﺪ ﱂ
ﻳﺸﻐﻠﻪ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﺘﻤﲔ ﺎ
ﻭﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻓﻀﻠﻪ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ )ﺝ/٣ﺹ :(٢٦٤ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﰊ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺍﻷﲪﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻳـﺄﰐ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﻄﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺣﻒ ،ﻻ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻳﻄﻠﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﻟـﺮﺃﻱ ،ﰒ ﻗـﺎﻝ :ﺇﻳـﺎﻛﻢ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ؛ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺼﻔﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﻳﺸﻐﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻓﻀﻠﻪ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ )ﺝ/٣ﺹ (٢٧١ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﺎﻙ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻳﺄﰐ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﻠﻘﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺼﺤﻒ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻌﺸﺶ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻜﺒﻮﺕ ،ﻻ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﲟﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻤـﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻓﻀﻠﻪ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ )ﺝ/٣ﺹ :(٢٩٦ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﲪﺰﺓ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﺎﱐ
ﻗﺎﻝ» :ﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺋﱵ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﳓﻮ ﻣـﺎﺋﱵ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ،ﺷﻚ ﺃﺑﻮ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺪﺍﺧﻠﲏ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺡ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺃﻋﺠﺒﺖ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺮﺃﻳﺖ ﻟﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﱄ ﳛﲕ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻡ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ ﻟﻪ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺯﻛﺮﻳﺎ ﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺋﱵ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺴﻜﺖ ﻋﲏ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﺧﺸﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳـﺪﺧﻞ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﲢﺖ ﺃﳍﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﺛﺮ(ﺍﻩ
246
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺗﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﱪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺠﺐ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺪ ..ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ) :ﻣﻦ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺀ
ﰲ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻄﺮ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻗﻠﺒﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﻮﺩ
ﺍﶈﻤﺪﻳﺔ ﺹ٢٧٣
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻛﻌﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﺒﺎﺭ) :ﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻢ ﺟﻬﺎﳍﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻳﺘﻐﺎﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻐﺎﻳﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﻈﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﻬـﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﶈﻤﺪﻳﺔ ﺹ٢٧٣
ﺇﺫﻥ ﻓﺎﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﻬﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ:
-ﳛﺠﺰﻩ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﺭﻋﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻭﻳﺪﻋﻮﻩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﺘﺜﺒﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ
-ﻭﳛﺠﺰﻩ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﺭﻋﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻋﱪ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻂ ﻭﻳـﺪﻋﻮﻩ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﻟﻠﺒﺤـﺚ
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ
-ﻭﳛﺠﺰﻩ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﺭﻋﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﺳﻮﺀﺍﹰ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻭﻳﺪﻋﻮﻩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳊﺴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻈﻦ
-ﻭﳛﺠﺰﻩ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﺭﻋﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻔﻬﻤﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻭﻳـﺪﻋﻮﻩ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﻳﺴﺘﻔﺴﺮ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ
-ﻭﳛﺠﺰﻩ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﺭﻋﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﺎ ﻟﻠﻬﻮﻯ ﻛﺤﺴـﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻛـﱪ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺼـﻠﺤﺔ
ﻭﻳﺪﻋﻮﻩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻺﻧﺼﺎﻑ
-ﻭﳛﺠﺰﻩ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﺭﻋﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮﺥ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺫﻟـﻚ
ﻭﻳﺪﻋﻮﻩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
-ﻭﳛﺠﺰﻩ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﻭﺭﻋﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺊ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺑﻐﻠﻈﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺃﻭ ﺳﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺷﺘﻢ ...ﻭﻳـﺪﻋﻮﻩ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺎﱄ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﻭﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻓﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﲪﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ...
ﺇﻥ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﻥ )ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﻭﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﻥ
ﰲ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﻮﻕ( ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ،ﻭﺍﳌﹸﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺍﷲ -
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺋﺾ -ﻫﻮ ﳎﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﻓﻞ )ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﻋﺒﺪﻱ ﻳﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺇﱄ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻮﺍﻓﻞ ﺣﱴ ﺃﺣﺒﻪ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ
ﺃﺣﺒﺒﺘﻪ ﻛﻨﺖ ﲰﻌﻪ ﻭﺑﺼﺮﻩ ﻭﻳﺪﻩ ﻭﺭﺟﻠﻪ (..ﻭﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﻓﻞ ﺗﺰﻛﻴﺔﹰ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻛﺜﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﷲ )ﺇﻥ
ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﻟﺘﺼﺪﻯ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺼﺪﻯ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺪ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻓﻤﺎ ﺟﻼﺅﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﷲ(ﺍﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﺷﺎﻫﲔ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺪﻱ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﳉﻮﺯﻳﺔ) :ﻭﻻ ﺭﻳﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻳﺼﺪﺃ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺼﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻀﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ،ﻭﺟـﻼﺅﻩ
ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳚﻠﻮﻩ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺪﻋﻪ ﻛﺎﳌﺮﺁﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺻﺪﺉ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺟﻼﻩ ،ﻭﺻـﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠـﺐ
247
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﺄﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻔﻠﺔﻭﺍﻟﺬﻧﺐ؛ ﻭﺟﻼﺅﻩ ﺑﺸﻴﺌﲔ :ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻐﻔﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﻠﺔ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺃﻭﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺃ ﻣﺘﺮﺍﻛﻤﺎﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻠﺒﻪ ،ﻭﺻﺪﺅﻩ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻏﻔﻠﺘﻪ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﺪﺉ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﱂ ﺗﻨﻄﺒﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؛ ﻓﲑﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊـﻖ،
ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﳌﱠﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺃ ﺃﻇﻠﻢ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺍﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺃ ﻭﺍﺳﻮﺩ ﻭﺭﻛﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻥﹸ ﻓﹶﺴﺪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻩ ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺣﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﺑﺎﻃﻼﹰ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻋﻘﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ .ﻭﺃﺻﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ،ﻓﺈﻤﺎ ﻳﻄﻤﺴـﺎﻥ ﻧـﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻠـﺐ
ﻭﻳﻌﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺼﺮﻩ .ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ} :ﻭﻻ ﺗﻄﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻏﻔﻠﹾﻨﺎ ﻗﻠﺒﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻛﺮﹺﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﺗﺒﻊ ﻫﻮﺍﻩ ﻭﻛـﺎﻥ ﺃﻣـﺮﻩ ﻓﹸﺮﻃـﺎﹰ{
]ﺍﻟﻜﻬﻒ ([٢٨ :ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﺐ ﺹ٥٢
ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﻫﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺫﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﺣﻀـﻮﺭ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋـﺎﺕ
ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻮﺧﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﺇﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺇﻳﻘﺎﻇﻪ ﻟﻠﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﲣﻠﻴﺼﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺿﻪ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﳓﻦ ﺑﺼﺪﺩ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﱪﻭﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺃﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﺩﺍﻢ ﻭﺗﺼﻮﺭﻭﻩ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﲟـﻦ
ﻧﺸﻂ ﻟﻠﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ..
ﺇﻧﻪ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻭﻣﺆﺳﻒ ﺳﺒﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﺑـﲔ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﳌـﺬﺍﻫﺐ
ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﺍﻓﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﳎﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺗﺮﻛﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻮﺍﻩ ﻭﺗﻄﻤـﺢ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ)(٣٨
ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﺤﺪﺙ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﳊﻖ ..ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ
ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻻ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺮﻓﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺒﻴﻠﻪ ،ﻓﺎﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﳎﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺣﱴ ﺇﻥ
ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻟﻴﺤﻘﺮ ﺻﻼﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻼﻢ ﻭﺻﻴﺎﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻴﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﻭﻗﻴﺎﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﻭﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﻢ ﻛﻤـﺎ
ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﻧﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺮﻑ؟
ﻓﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻫﻮ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺑﺎﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﺴﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺣﻖ ،ﻭﻣـﻦ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺣﻨﻘﺎ ﻭﻏﻠﻈﺔ ﻭﺷﺪﺓ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﺴـﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺳـﻠﻮﻙ
ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ..ﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻖ ﻭﺗﻮﺍﺿﻌﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﺴﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺣﻖ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺳﻮﺀ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻖ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﺴﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ
248
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻭﺗﺰﻛﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪ ﺷﻴﺦ ﻣﺮﰊ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺮﰊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳـﺪ ﺷـﻴﺦ..
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺰﻛﻲ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﻪ) :ﻭﻳﺰﻛﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﻳﻌﻠﻤﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺎﺏ
ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ( ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻭﻳﺘﺰﻛﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﺘﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ،ﰒ ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ
ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ..ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﹸﻛﺮ -ﰲ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺃﲪﺪ -ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺧﻲ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻀﺮﻩ :ﻫﻮ ﻗﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ
ﺍﲪﺪ :ﺃﻣﺴﻚ ﻋﺎﻓﺎﻙ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ
ﻭﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﻠﺖ ﻷﰊ :ﻫﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﱄ:
ﻳﺎ ﺑﲏ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺧﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ(ﺍﻩ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ٣٨٢/١
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﺘﺰﻛﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻤﻮﺍ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤـﺮ
ﻭﺟﻨﺪﺏ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ﺃﻢ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ) :ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﺯﺩﺩﻧﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺇﳝﺎﻧﺎ ﻭﺇﻧﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ(ﺍﻩ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ٩١/١ﻭﺳﻨﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻬﻘﻲ ١٢٠/٣
ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺃﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ) :ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺳﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﻓﻴﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﲏ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺍﳌﺪﺓ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﺩﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﱄ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ :ﻳﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﺟﻌﻞ ﻋﻠﻤﻚ ﻣﻠﺤﺎ ﻭﺃﺩﺑﻚ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ(ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﶈﻤﺪﻳﺔ ٢٧٨
ﺇﻥ ﺳﻨﺪ ﺍﳋﻮﺭﺍﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﻓﻠﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﻌﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﻌﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ -ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺧـﺬ ﻋﻨـﻬﻢ-
ﺳﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﻓﻠﺬﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻬﻢ ،ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﺪ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﳌﺮﰊ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﻀﻠﻞ
ﻓﻠﻦ ﲡﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﺮﺷﺪﺍ( ﻓﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﺇﺿﻼﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﱄ ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﻭﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﻓﻖ
ﻟﻮﱄ ﻣﺮﺷﺪ ،ﻭﺗﺄﻣﻞ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﺮﺷﺪﺍ ،ﲡﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻭﻟﻴﺎ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻛﺎﻑ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻓﻴـﻪ،
ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﱄ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺮﺷﺪﺍ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﳌﺮﰊ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ) :٥١٠/١١ﻻ ﺭﻳﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﳛﺘﺎﺟﻮﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﻠﻘﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ]ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ[ ﻭﺗﻠﻘﺎﻩ
ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﻮﻥ ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﲔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﲔ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺀ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺁﻥ
ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺎﻧﻴﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻑ ﺿﻤﻦ ﳎﻤـﻮﻉ ﺭﺳـﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺹ:١١٢
)ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺮﺷﺪ ﻭﻣﺮﺏ ﻟﻴﺪﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﳌﺬﻣﻮﻣﺔ ﻭﻳﻀﻊ ﻣﻜﺎﺎ
ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﶈﻤﻮﺩﺓ.
ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﰉ ﻛﺎﳌﺰﺍﺭﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﰊ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻉ ﻓﻜﻠﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺣﺠﺮﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎ ﻣﻀﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﺭﻉ ﻗﻠﻌﻪ
ﻭﻃﺮﺣﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﻭﻳﺴﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻉ ﻣﺮﺍﺭﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻤﻮ ﻭﻳﺘﺮﰉ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻏـﲑﻩ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻤـﺖ ﺃﻥ
249
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻉ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﰊ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺷﺪ ﻣﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﺭﺳﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺳـﻞ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻖ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻼ ﳍﻢ ﻳﺮﺷﺪﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺼـﻄﻔﻰ
ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺍﷲ ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﺎﻟﺴﺎﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﲎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ
ﻭﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻺﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ
ﺻﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ ،ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﻋﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻝ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻋﻲ
ﺍﻹﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﲑ
ﻓﺎﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﻫﻮ:
-ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ﺣﺐ ﺍﳌﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﳉﺎﻩ
-ﻭﺗﺄﺳﺲ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺷﺪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﻠﻢ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟـﻨﱯ
ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ
ﻭﺫﺍﻕ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﺎﺕ ﻛﻘﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻡ ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺪﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﻡ -
ﻭﺍﻗﺘﺒﺲ ﻧﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ -
ﻭﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﲑﺓ ﺍﳊﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﶈﻤﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺻﱪ ﻭﺷﻜﺮ ﻭﺗﻮﻛﻞ ﻭﻳﻘﲔ ﻭﻃﻤﺄﻧﻴﻨﺔ -
ﻭﺳﺨﺎﺀ ﻭﻗﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺣﻠﻢ ﻭﺗﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﻭﻭﻗﺎﺭ ﻭﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺗﺄﻥ
ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﳍﺎ
ﻭﺗﻄﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻣﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻜﱪ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺨﻞ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﺪ ﻭﺍﳊﻘﺪ ﻭﺍﳊـﺮﺹ ﻭﺍﻷﻣـﻞ -
ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻴﺶ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺼﺒﲔ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻐﲎ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻜﻠﻔﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﺘﻠﻘﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ -
ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ
ﻓﺎﻻﻗﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﲟﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﻔﺮ ﲟﺜﻠﻪ ﻧﺎﺩﺭ ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﻳﺪﻋﻰ ﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻮ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻠﺤﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﲟﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﻭﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻏﻠﺒﺔ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﳌﺪﻋﲔ ﺍﺧﺘﻔﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﻳﺎ
ﻭﲟﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ،ﺣﱴ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻘﺎ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺷـﺪﻳﻦ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻘﺎ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻋﲔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﻭﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﺍﳌﺮﺷـﺪ
ﻭﺟﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻣﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻨﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮﺍﺋﻊ ﻳﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﶈﻤﺪﻳﺔ ﺹ ٣٦٩ﺣﻴﺚ
ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﲨﻊ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺻﺢ ﻟﻌﺒﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺑﺎﳌﺄﻣﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ
250
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺧﻠﻞ ﳌﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻴﺦ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺼﺢ ﳍﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﺎﺟﻮﺍ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺒﲔ ﳍﻢ
ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﳊﻖ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳚﻨﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﺰﻛﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪ ﺷﻴﺦ ﻣﺮﰊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ:
-ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﳎﺮﹺﺏ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺮ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﺴﻠﻜﻪ ﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﺮﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻓـﻼ
ﻣﻔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺳﻔﺮﻩ ،ﻋﺼﻤﻨﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻴﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻗـﺎﻝ ﺳـﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ) :ﻋﺒﺪﺕ ﺍﷲ ﺳﻨﲔ ﰒ ﻟﻘﻴﺖ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺯﻳﺪ ﻓﺒﺎﻥ ﱄ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺒﺎﺋﺮ ﱂ
ﺃﻛﻦ ﺃﻋﻠﻤﻬﺎ(
-ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻳﺮﺑﻴﻪ ﲝﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮ )ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﻭﺓ( ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ) :ﺇﱐ ﻷﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺷﻴﺨﻲ ﻓﺄﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺷﻬﺮﺍ ﻓﻜﻴـﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺃﻳﺘـﻪ
ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲰﻌﺖ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ؟!(
-ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻠﺖ ﻭﺍﳍﺮﻭﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﻟﻴﻒ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﺎﺑﻌﻪ
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺃﺩﻋﻰ ﻟﻼﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻜﺎﻟﻴﻒ
-ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﲢﻄﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪ ﺷﻴﺦ ﻣﺮﺏﹴ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻜﱪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺠﺐ
ﻭ)ﺍﻷﻧﺎ( ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﳌﺮﰊ ﻫﻮ ﲝﺪ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺃﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮﺥ ﺍﳌﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺰﻛﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺳﻨﺎ ﻭﻳﺄﺧﺬﻭﻥ ﺑﺄﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ؟ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻣﻦ ﺟﺪ ﻭﺟﺪ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﷲ ﺻﺪﻗﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ) :ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ(ﺍﻩ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺎﱐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﱐ ) :١٠٤٤/٢ﻓﻴﺎ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﳋﲑ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻇﻔﺮﺕ ﻳﺪﺍﻙ ﺑﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫـﺆﻻﺀ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺻﻔﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻮﺓ ﻭﺧﲑﺓ ﺍﳋﲑﺓ ﻓﺎﺷﺪﺩﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﺆﺛﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻫﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳـﺐ
ﻭﺍﳊﺒﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻃﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻜﻦ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﰲ ﺧﺘﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺃﺣﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻃﻲ ﰲ ﺭﺳـﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺑـﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻹﰒ ﺹ) :١٥٣ﺇﻥ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﻳﺸﻜﹸﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﺑﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﻳﺘﺴﺎﺀﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﳉﻤﻊ ﻛﻠﻤﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺗﻮﺣﻴـﺪ
ﺳﺒﻴﻠﻬﻢ
ﻭﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺟﺰ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻮﺳﻬﻢ ﻭﻣـﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺯﻭﺍﻝ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺟﺰ ﻻ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﳍﻢ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﳍﻢ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺟﺰ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﺷﺄﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺎﻟﺲ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌـﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻘﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻓﺮﻏﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺟﺰ ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﻬﺎ ﻭﺁﺛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﳋﻄﲑﺓ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺬﻳﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺟﺰ ﻭﳝﺤﻮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ
251
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺩﻧﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻠﻨﻖ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﺾ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺬﻳﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺟﺰ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﳕـﺎ ﻫـﻮ
ﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﻮﻓﺮ ﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ ﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ :ﺯﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﱪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻣﻜﺎﻧـﻪ،
ﻭﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﻷﺣﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻐﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺣﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺋﺎﻡ ﻣﻜﺎﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺯﺍﻝ ﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻄﻠﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻨﺎﺻﺒﻬﺎ
ﻭﻣﻐﺮﻳﺎﺎ ﻭﺣﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻠﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺿﺎﺓ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻘﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻭﻋﻴﺪﻩ ،ﻭﺯﺍﻟـﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﺼـﺒﻴﺔ
ﺑﺄﻟﻮﺍﺎ ﻭﺃﺷﻜﺎﳍﺎ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻭﺣﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺀ ﻟﻺﺳﻼﻡ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻮ
ﻭﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺣﺒﻴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻮﺏ ﻣﻄﺮﺑﺔ ﻟﻸﲰﺎﻉ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻌـﺎﱐ
ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﺛﺮﺍ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﺎ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﺎ ﻓﻘﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﳘﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺄﺛﲑﻫﺎ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺎﺟﺮ
ﺎ ﺍﳌﺪﻋﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﺎ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﻏﺔ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮ ﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺤﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻓﻴﻀﺤﻲ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﺺ ﲟﺼـﺎﳊﻪ ﻭﺁﻓﺎﺗـﻪ
ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﳊﻖ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺸﻜﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳚﺪ ﺳﺒﻴﻼ ﻟﻠﺘﻀﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻭﺽ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺤﻴﺔ ﲟﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻻ ﺫﺍﻙ ﻓﻠﻴﻘﻠﻊ ﻋﻦ
ﺩﻋﻮﻯ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻒ ﻋﻨﺎ ﺿﺠﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﱂ ﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﺗﺪﺍﺑﺮﻫﻢ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻼﻋﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﳌﻨﺼﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻌﻴﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻮﻯ ﻧﻔﺴـﻲ ﻻ
ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺮ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﺗﺪﺍﺑﺮﻫﻢ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺑﻼﺋﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﻗﻠﺒﻪ ﻋﻠـﻴﻬﻢ
ﺗﻮﺟﻊ
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻟﲑﰊ ﻛﱪﻳﺎﺀﻩ ﻭﻳﻐﺬﻱ ﺃﻧﺎﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﻳﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺼﺒﻴﺘﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺒﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴـﻪ
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﺨﻠﻂ ﺍﻟﻐﲑﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﲑﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﱪﻳﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﳜﻠﻂ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺼﺒﻴﺘﻪ
ﺃﻭ ﻋﺼﺒﻴﺘﻪ
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﺒﺘﻞ ﻭﻋﺒﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﻳﻔﻴﺾ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻗـﺖ
ﻭﺩﻋﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﺟﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺳﺤﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻗﻮﻻ ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﲣﻄﻴﻄﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻻ ﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﻋـﻦ ﻣﻌـﺎﱂ
ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﻨﺔ ﺭﺳﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﺑـﲔ ﺃﺭﺑـﺎﺏ
ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ(ﺍﻩ
252
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ...) :ﻭﺟﺎﺩﳍﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ( ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ) :ﻭﻻ ﲡﺎﺩﻟﻮﺍ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺇﻻ
ﺑﺎﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ( ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ) :ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﳛﺎﻭﺭﻩ (...ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ) :ﺃﱂ ﺗﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ
ﺣﺎﺝ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺭﺑﻪ(...
ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻋﻄﻰ ﺃﻭﺳﻊ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻟﻠﺤﻮﺍﺭ ﻓﺄﻣﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ ﺑـﺄﻥ ﻳﻘـﻮﻝ
ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺮﻛﲔ) :ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺇﻳﺎﻛﻢ ﻟﻌﻠﻰ ﻫﺪﻯ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺿﻼﻝ ﻣﺒﲔ( ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ :ﻭﺇﻧﻜﻢ ﻟﻌﻠﻰ ﻫﺪﻯ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺿﻼﻝ
ﻣﺒﲔ ،ﺑﻞ) :ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺇﻳﺎﻛﻢ( ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﻜﻰ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﳏﺎﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻟﻸﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ
ﻣﻊ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻣﻬﻢ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﲣﻠﻮ ﻗﺼﺔ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺼﻠﺢ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺎﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﺼﻬﺎ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ
ﺑﻞ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ..ﺣﻜﻰ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳏﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻜﺔ ﻟﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ ﺑﺸﺄﻥ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ
)ﻭﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺑﻚ ﻟﻠﻤﻼﺋﻜﺔ ﺇﱐ ﺟﺎﻋﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺧﻠﻴﻔﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺃﲡﻌﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﺴﻔﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ
ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﺴﺒﺢ ﲝﻤﺪ ﻭﻧﻘﺪﺱ ﻟﻚ(...
ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ :ﻟﻴﺲ ﲞﺎﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ﳏﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﳌﺸﺮﻛﻲ ﻣﻜﺔ ﻭﻳﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ
ﻭﻧﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﳒﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻳﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ﻻ ﺩﺍﻋﻲ
ﻟﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻷﺎ ﺃﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺼﺮ
ﻭﰲ ﺳﲑ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ :ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳏﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺮﻛﲔ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﲑ ﻣﻊ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺃﺳﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻀﲑ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﳏﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻮﺍﺭﺝ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ،ﻭﳏﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﰊ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻫﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺍﶈﺎﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻣـﺎ
ﺍﶈﺎﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ﲢﺼﻰ ﻛﺜﺮﺓﹰ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻨﻈﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻓﻼﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻼﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ـﻴﻬﻢ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳐﺎﻟﻒ ﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺻﺒﻴﻎ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ
ﻓﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺃﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲝﺠﺔ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺻﺒﻴﻎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﺣﺜﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻏﺮﺽﹴ ﰲ ﺑﺚ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻬﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺟﻬﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ
ﻧﻌﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺸﺘﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ) :ﺃﻧﺎ
ﺯﻋﻴﻢ ﺑﺒﻴﺖ ﰲ ﺭﺑﺾ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﳌﻦ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏﻘﺎ(ﺍﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ،٦٦٨/٢ﻓﺎﳌﺮﺍﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﻝ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺎﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﻞ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻨﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﺑﺮﺃﻳﻪ ﺑﺄﻱ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ:
)ﻭﺇﻥ ﺟﺎﺩﻟﻮﻙ ﻓﻘﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﲟﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ( ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻵﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﲟﺠﺎﺩﻟﺘﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﰲ ﰲ
253
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﳍﻴﺔ ) :٤٢/٣ﱂ ﻳﺆﻣﺮ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﲟﺠﺎﺩﻟﺘﻬﻢ ﻟﻌﻨﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻭﺷﻐﺒﻬﻢ ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ
ﻛﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﺐ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻪ ﻣﻔﺴﺪﻩ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺕ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻗﻂ ﻓﺄﺣﺒﺒﺖ ﺃﻥ
ﳜﻄﺊ( ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ٤٩٦/٥ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ) :ﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺕ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻗﻂ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺤﺔ( ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﻳﻀـﺎ:
)ﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺕ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻗﻂ ﺇﻻ ﺃﺣﺒﺒﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﻓﻖ ﻭﻳﺴﺪﺩ ﻭﻳﻌﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺣﻔﻆ ،ﻭﻣـﺎ
ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺕ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﺇﻻ ﻭﱂ ﺃﺑﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﺴﺎﱐ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﻪ(ﺍﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﳘﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻠﻴـﺔ١١٨/٩
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺕ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﻗﻂ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﺒﺔ( ﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﰲ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﻓﻴﺎﺕ ٢٢٣/١ﺭﺣﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺟﻨﺎ
ﳌﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ -ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ -ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﻗﺮﺁﱐ ﻧﺒـﻮﻱ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤـﺎ
ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﻯ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ..ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﻐﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻓﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﻯ ﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ،ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ -ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻱ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻻﺣﻘﺎ -ﻳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﺑـﺎﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﻳﻘـﻮﻝ:
ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﻗﺮﺁﱐ ﻧﺒﻮﻱ
ﻭﲡﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ )ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ( ﻳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﺪﺩﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺓ ﻭﻳﺴـﺘﺪﻝ
ﻟﻠﺤﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻋﺪﺩﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺓ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﳓﻦ
ﻻ ﳒﺎﺩﻝ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻨﻨﺎ!! ﻭﻻ ﳒﺎﺩﻝ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ!!
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻕ ﰲ ﻧﺪﺍﺀﻩ ﻟﻠﺤﻮﺍﺭ ﻻ ﳛﻴﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺎ ﺃﻡ ﻗﻮﻳﺎ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭﺍ ﺃﻡ
ﻣﻐﻤﻮﺭﺍ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ ﺃﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ،ﻭﺧﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﺑﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﻏﺮﺍﺽ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺪﺍﺀﺍﺕ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﶈﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ) :ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣـﻦ
ﳚﺎﺩﻝ ﰲ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻋﻠﻢ( ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﰲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﳍﻴﺔ ) :٣٥/٣ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻕ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺫﻡ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﺑﻐـﲑ
ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻬﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ -ﺣﱴ ﰲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ -ﺑﻌﻠﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻔﻬﻤﻚ ﻭﺗﻔﻬﻤﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﺃﻧﺖ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺔ ﻣﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻞ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﺼﺪﻕ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ) :ﻟﻮ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﱐ ﺃﻟﻒ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻟﻐﻠﺒﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﱐ ﺟﺎﻫﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﻐﻠﺒﲏ( ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻞ ) :ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺘﻐﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﺎﺭ ﻛﻀﺎﺭﺏ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩ ﻭﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﻟﺼﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺮ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﻼﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﰲ ﺣﻮﺍﺭ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ) :ﻭﻻ ﲡﺎﺩﻟﻮﺍ ﺃﻫﻞ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻮﺍ ﺁﻣﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻜﻢ ﻭﺇﳍﻨﺎ ﻭﺇﳍﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ(
254
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﻼ ﺷﻚ ﻳﺴﻬﻢ ﺇﺳﻬﺎﻣﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﺩﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ ،ﺭﻭﻯ
ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻪ ،١١/١٥٨ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻴﻤﺮﻱ ﰲ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﰊ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﺹ :١٢٨ﻋﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﲰﺎﻋﺔ ﻗـﺎﻝ:
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﺑﻦ ﺃﺑﺎﻥ ﻳﺼﻠﻲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﺩﻋﻮﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﰐ -ﳎﻠﺲ -ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ :ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻗﻮﻡ
ﳜﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﳊﻔﻆ ﻟﻠﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻓﺼﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﺢ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻮﻡ ﳎﻠﺲ ﳏﻤﺪ
ﻓﻠﻢ ﺃﻓﺎﺭﻗﻪ ﺣﱴ ﺟﻠﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻠﺲ
ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﻍ ﳏﻤﺪ -ﻣﻦ ﺍﻠﺲ -ﺃﺩﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﻠﺖ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﺧﻴﻚ ﺃﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﺻﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﻭﻣﻌﻪ ﺫﻛـﺎﺀ
ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺩﻋﻮﻩ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﻓﻴﺄﰉ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻧﺎ ﳔﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻓﺄﻗﺒﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ -ﳏﻤﺪ -ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ:
ﻳﺎ ﺑﲏ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﳔﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻻ ﺗﺸﻬﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺴﻤﻊ ﻣﻨﺎ
ﻓﺴﺄﻟﻪ ﻳﻮﻣﺌﺬ ﻋﻦ ﲬﺴﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻓﺠﻌﻞ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﳚﻴﺒﻪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﳜﱪﻩ ﲟﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻭﻳﺄﰐ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻻﺋﻞ .ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻔﺖ ﺇﱄﹼ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺧﺮﺟﻨﺎ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﲏ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨـﻮﺭ ﺳـﺘﺮ
ﻓﺎﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﻋﲏ ،ﻣﺎ ﻇﻨﻨﺖ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻠﻚ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻳﻈﻬﺮﻩ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﻟﺰﻡ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﺎ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻔﻘﻪ ﺑﻪ(ﺍﻩ
255
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎت ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼم ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺸﺎﯾﺦ اﻟﻔﺮﯾﻘﯿﻦ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻀﯿﺔ اﻟﺘﻘﺮﯾﺐ
ﻭﺃﺣﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑـﲔ
ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ:
-ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ
-ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ
-ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻏﺸﻲ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ:
-ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲑﻱ
-ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
-ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﺍﻋﻆ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﳋﺮﺍﺳﺎﱐ
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻧﻘﻠﻲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﻧﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛـﺎﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ
256
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻳﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ؛ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻤﻞ ﺣـﺎﻝ
ﻏﲑﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﶈﺎﻣﻞ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺗﺼﻮﺭﺍ ﺁﺧﺮ...
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ :ﺇﻥ ﺳﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﲔ ،ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﲟﻨﻈﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﰎ ﺃﺳﻮﺩ ﳜﻔـﻲ
ﻣﺰﺍﻳﺎﻫﻢ ﻭﺣﺴﻨﺎﻢ ،ﻭﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻴﻮﻢ ﻭﺳﻴﺌﺎﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭﺳﻜﻮﺏ ﻭﻳﻀﺨﻤﻬﺎ؛ ﻓﻴﺠﻌﻞ ﺍﳊﺒﺔ
ﻗﺒﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ...
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻟﻴﻢ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﲢﺬﺭ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺬﻳﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺼﻠﺘﲔ :ﺳﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﺑﺎﷲ ،ﻭﺳﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺃﺻـﻞ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﻻﺯﺩﺭﺍﺀ ﻟﻠﻐﲑ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻣﻌﺼﻴﺔ ﺇﺑﻠـﻴﺲ،
ﻭﺃﺳﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﱪ )ﺃﻧﺎ ﺧﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ(...
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺣﻜﻴﺖ ﻷﺣﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺪﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ،ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻕ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘـﺪﺍﻝ
ﻭﺍﻹﺧﻼﺹ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺥ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺗﻘﻴﺔ! ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﲏ.
ﻭﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﳌﺘﺸﺪﺩ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺯﺭﻢ ﻗﺪﻣﻮﱐ ﻷﺻﻠﻲ ﻢ ﺇﻣﺎﻣﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻧـﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺭﻫـﻢ،
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ! ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺴﺖ ﳑﻦ ﻳﺮﺟﻰ ﻭﳜﺸﻰ ،ﻭﱂ ﺃﻃﻠﺐ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﻭﱂ ﺃﺗﻮﻗﻌﻪ؟ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﳒﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ
ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﺃﻗﻮﻳﺎﺀ .ﺇﻥ ﲪﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻃﻴﺐ ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ
)ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ( ﻫﻮ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ،ﻻ ﻣﱪﺭ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺩﺍﻋﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ.
ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻟﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ:
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﻛﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ،ﻻ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ،ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺇﻻ
ﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺎﻁ ]ﺃﻱ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ[:
-ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﰎ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻴﲔ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻢ ﺭﺳﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺀ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺭﺳﻞ ﺍﷲ...
ـ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳌﺒﲔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳊﻜﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﳌﺴـﺘﻘﻴﻢ
ﻭﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺼﺤﻒ ﻭﺁﻳﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎﺗﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻇﺮﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ،ﻭﳛﺘﺞ ﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻨﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﻟﻸﺣﻜﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻳﺮﺟﻊ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ...
ـ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ :ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﺄﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺗﲔ ،ﻭﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ،ﻭﺇﻳﺘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ،
ﻭﺻﻮﻡ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺣﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ .ﻓﺎﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﺎﻥ –ﺳﻨﺔ ﻭﺷﻴﻌﺔ -ﻳﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺋﺾ...
ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻭﺭ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ:
257
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ )ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺭ( ﻭ)ﺗﻔﺴـﲑ ﺍﳌﻨـﺎﺭ( ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻣﻦ )ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻠﺔ( ﲰﺎﻫﺎ )ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ( ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ) :ﻟﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻓﻴﻤـﺎ
ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴﻌﺬﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ( ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﲎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﺩﺩ ﻫـﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤـﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻌـﺾ ﺭﺳـﺎﺋﻠﻪ
ﻭﳏﺎﺿﺮﺍﺗﻪ ،ﺣﱴ ﺣﺴﺒﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻋﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ...
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﺣﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺜﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻓﺠﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ) :ﻧﺘﻌـﺎﻭﻥ ﻓﻴﻤـﺎ
ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻧﺘﺤﺎﻭﺭ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ( .ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻋﺪﳍﺎ ﺃﺧﻮﻧﺎ ﻭﺻﺪﻳﻘﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﳌﺪﻗﻖ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻠﻴﻢ ﳏﻤﺪ
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺷﻘﺔ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ،ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ )ﲢﺮﻳﺮ ﺍﳌﺮﺃﺓ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ( .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ :ﺃﻥ ﻛـﻞ
ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻟﻠﺤﻮﺍﺭ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺟﺎﺩﺍ ﻭﳐﻠﺼﺎ ﰲ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ،ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻐﻼﻕ.
ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺗﻼﻗﺢ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺗﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻼﺀ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﻏﺎﻣﻀﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻌﻴـﺪﺓ ،ﺃﻭ
ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﺑﺘﻔﺴﲑ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺭﺃﻳﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﻛﺰ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ )ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ( ﻭﻧﺆﺟﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺪﻳﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻐﺎﻟـﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻣﺜﻞ )ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ( ﻓﺎﳋﻼﻑ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ –
ﻣﻨﻬﻢ!! ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﻌﻔﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ -ﺧﻼﻑ ﻗﺪﱘ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺪﺍﻝ ﺣﻮﻟﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺆﺧﺮ؛
ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺘﺸﺒﺚ ﺑﺮﺃﻳﻪ ،ﻣﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﻪ...
ﻭ)ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ( ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺷﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺪﻭﻯ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﺼﺪ ﺎ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ:
ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﲟﻮﺍﻗﻔﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ؛ ﲝﻴﺚ ﳒﺘﻤﻊ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻫﺪﻑ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻧﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻧﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﻄﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﺑﺈﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ...
ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ؛ ﻓﺎﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻳﺴﺮ ﻭﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻻﹰ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤـﺚ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻴﺔ .ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﺋﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ .ﻭﻻ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺪ ﺣـﻼ
ﻟﻠﻤﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ،ﻻ ﺑﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﳌﻨﻐﻠﻖ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺘﺢ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ ﻟﻠﺘﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ...
ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﲡﻨﺐ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺰﺍﺯ:
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻬﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌـﺬﺍﻫﺐ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﲡﻨﺐ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺰﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﻟﻶﺧﺮ ،ﻓﺎﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻨﺸﻮﺩ –ﺃﻭ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﲰﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ -ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺠﻨﺐ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﰲ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌـﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤـﺎﺕ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻔﺰﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺪﺙ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺗﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻐﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻭﺭ ،ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟـﱵ ﺗﻘـﺮﺏ ﻭﻻ
ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪ ،ﻭﲢﺒﺐ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺒﻐﺾ ،ﻭﲡﻤﻊ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ.
258
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ :ﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﻷﻟﻘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﳛﺒﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ :ﻛﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ – ﺑـ)ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻀﺔ( ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺑـ
)ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﺒﺔ( .ﻭﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺌﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺴﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻻﹶ ﺗﻠﹾﻤﺰﻭﺍ ﺃﹶﻧﻔﹸﺴﻜﹸﻢ ﻭﻻﹶ
ﺗﻨﺎﺑﺰﻭﺍ ﺑﹺﺎﻷﻟﹾﻘﹶﺎﺏﹺ( ]ﺍﳊﺠﺮﺍﺕ [١١:ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﺏ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻟﻘﻲ ﺃﺧﺎﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻩ ﺑﺄﺣﺐ ﺍﻷﲰـﺎﺀ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻣﺜﻞ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺣﻔﺺ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺑﺎ
ﺫﺭ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ :ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺛﲑﺕ ﺍﺷـﺘﻌﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﻨـﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺍﺭﺗﻔـﻊ
ﺍﻟﺪﺧﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﺎﺀﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺁﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺩﺭ –ﺑﻞ
ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺫ -ﺃﻥ ﳝﺲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺁﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻵﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﱰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺏ ﻣـﺎ
ﳚﻌﻠﻬﻢ ﳏﺒﺒﲔ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻠﺐ ،ﳑﺪﻭﺣﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻻ ﳛﺐ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﺎ
ﻛﺮﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ،ﻭﻓﺎﻃﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮﺍﺀ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﺑﻨﻴﻬـﺎ
ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺳﺒﻄﻲ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﺷﺒﺎﺏ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ؟!
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﰲ )ﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ( ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ...ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄـﺔ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺳـﺔ ،ﺑـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ،ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﻭﻧﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻧﺎ
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻧﺖ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻟﻌﻨﻪ ﺍﷲ!! ﻓﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺿﻲ
ﻋﻦ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻭﻗﺬﻓﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻌﻨﺔ؟!
ﻭﻗﺪ ﲢﺪﺛﺖ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﳑﻦ ﺃﻋﺮﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻗﻠﺖ ﳍـﻢ :ﺇﻥ ﻫـﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺰ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻠﻌﻘﻼﺀ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺎﺻﺮﻭﻫﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ ﳜﻔﻔـﻮﺍ ﻣـﻦ
ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ،ﻓﺈﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺮﻛﺖ ﻟﻐﺮﺍﺋﺰ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﺤﻮﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻀﺐ ﻭﺍﳊﻘﺪ ﺟﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺄﻛﻞ ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺎﺑﺲ،
ﻭﻻ ﺗﺪﻉ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﺮﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ.
ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﺀ -ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﺔ ﺍﷲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺴـﺨﲑﻱ ،ﻭﺁﻳـﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﻋـﻆ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ -ﻭﺍﻓﻘﻮﱐ ﲤﺎﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺪﻭﺍ ﱄ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻓﺸـﻴﺌﺎ،
ﺣﱴ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻫﺞ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻴﺔ ﻷﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﻋﻤـﺮ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﲤﺠﻴﺪ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻭﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ...ﻭﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﲑﺓ ﰲ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﲤﺤﻴﺺ ﻭﻣﺼﺎﺭﺣﺔ؛
ﻟﺘﺼﻔﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻼﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ ﻟﻠﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﺎ ﺇﳚﺎﺑﻴﺎ ﺣﻜﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺃﺣﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺿﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﱐ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ،ﻻ ﺃﻗﺼﺪ ﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺍﺑﺘﻐﺎﺀ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺧﺪﻣﺔ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭﲨـﻊ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ..
-ﺃﻭﻻ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺣﺪﺙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻑ -ﻭﺇﻥ ﺩﺧﻠﺘﻪ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﻟﻐﺎﺕ ﻭﻟﻮﺛﺘـﻪ ﺍﻷﻫـﻮﺍﺀ،
ﻭﺿﺨﻤﺘﻪ ﺃﺟﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﱳ -ﻗﺪ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻭﻃﻮﻳﺖ ﺻﻔﺤﺎﺗﻪ ﲝﻠﻮﻩ ﻭﻣﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺧـﲑﻩ ﻭﺷـﺮﻩ،
259
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺳﻴﺴﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﳚﺰﻳﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻋﻤﺎﳍﻢ ﻭﻧﻴﺎﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺪﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻜﻠﻒ ﺃﻧﻔﺴـﻨﺎ
ﺣﺴﺎﻢ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﺗﻠﹾﻚ ﺃﹸﻣﺔﹲ ﻗﹶﺪ ﺧﹶﻠﺖ ﻟﹶﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﹶﺴﺒﺖ ﻭﻟﹶﻜﹸﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻛﹶﺴﺒﺘﻢ ﻭﻻﹶ ﺗﺴﺄﹶﻟﹸﻮﻥﹶ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻛﹶﺎﻧﻮﺍ
ﻳﻌﻤﻠﹸﻮﻥﹶ(...
ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ -ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ -ﺃﻥ ﻧﺸﺘﻐﻞ ﲝﺎﺿﺮﻧﺎ ،ﺑﺪﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸـﻐﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﺎﺿـﻴﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺣﺎﺿـﺮﻧﺎ ﻣﻠـﻲﺀ
ﺑﺎﳌﺼﺎﻋﺐ ﻭﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻒ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ ﻭﺍﺪﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬـﻮﺩ
ﻣﻀﻨﻴﺔ ،ﻛﻔﻴﻠﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺸﻐﻞ ﻋﻘﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻗﻠﻮﺑﻨﺎ ﻭﺳﻮﺍﻋﺪﻧﺎ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﲰﻌﺖ ﺷﻴﺨﻨﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻞ ﳚﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ،ﻭﻳﺜﲑ ﺳﺆﺍﻻ
ﻻ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻟﻪ :ﺃﻳﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﻖ ﺑﺎﳋﻼﻓﺔ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺃﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ :ﻟﻘﺪ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﺫﻫﺐ
ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﻭﺫﻫﺒﺖ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺜﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻟﻐﻴﺖ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ﺎﺋﻴﺎ ﻣـﻦ ﺩﻳـﺎﺭ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺘﺤﻜﻤﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻨﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺟﺎﻧﺐ ،ﻻ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻲ ..ﻓﺈﱃ ﻣـﱴ
ﻧﻈﻞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺿﻼﺕ ﺍﳊﻤﻘﺎﺀ؟!
-ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ "ﺍﻟﺴﺐ" ﰲ ﺫﺍﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﳏﻤﻮﺩﺓ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ؛ ﻓﺎﳌﺆﻣﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺳﺒﺎﺑﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻟﻌﺎﻧﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘـﺮﺁﻥ
ﻳﻨﻬﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻡ ،ﺧﺸﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺜﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻛﲔ ،ﻓﻴﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺁﳍﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻻﹶ ﺗﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻥﹶ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﷲِ ﻓﹶﻴﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﷲَ ﻋﺪﻭﺍ ﺑﹺﻐﻴﺮﹺ ﻋﻠﹾﻢﹴ( .ﻭﺃﻭﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻧﺼﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺮﺻﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻤﻊ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﻭﻻ
ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﺰﺭﻉ ﺍﶈﺒﺔ ﻻ ﺍﻷﺣﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻀﺎﺀ؛ ﻓﺈﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﻘﺔ ،ﻻ ﲢﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻭﻟﻜـﻦ ﲢﻠـﻖ
ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ.
ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺭﺣﺔ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻤﺔ:
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﺎﺭﺡ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤـﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﺋﻖ ﺍﳌﺎﻧﻌﺔ ،ﻭﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﻭﺽ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ.
ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻥ ﳔﻔﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ،ﺃﻭ ﻧﺴﻜﺖ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻧﺆﺟﻠﻪ ﻭﻧﺪﻋﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻘﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﳒﺮﺅ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺇﺛﺎﺭﺗﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ؛ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳛﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻼﺟﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﺧﻄﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ.
ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ ﻟﻺﺧﻮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺣﲔ ﺯﺭﻢ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﺍﻋﻲ )ﻓﻘـﻪ
ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺯﻧﺎﺕ( ﻭ)ﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻮﻳﺎﺕ( ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺑﻌﻀﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ .ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﺘﺮﺍﺀﻯ ﻟﻠﺒﻌﺾ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺸـﺮ ﺍﳌـﺬﻫﺐ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﻥ ،ﻭﺭﺃﻳﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺿﺮﺭﻩ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻌـﻪ؛
ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺜﲑ ﻓﺘﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﻠﺒﻠﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﺗﻮﺗﺮﺍ ﻭﻏﻀﺒﺎ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ،ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﻻ
260
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻜﺴﺐ ﻟﻠﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩﺍ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﰲ ﻏﲎ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ .ﻓﺄﻳﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺭﺟﺢ ﰲ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﱀ
ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ :ﺇﺛﺎﺭﺓ ﺷﻌﺐ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻓﺌﺎﺗﻪ ﺿﺪ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻡ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ؟
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ :ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﱐ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﺖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲑﻱ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ ،ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ:
ﺻﺪﻗﺖ ﻭﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ ﺣﻴﺔ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻼﻗﺘﻨﺎ ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﻣﻊ )ﺛﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﻧﻘـﺎﺫ( ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴـﻮﺩﺍﻥ،
ﻭﻓﺘﺤﻨﺎ ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺐ ﺗﺼﺮﻓﺎ ﺃﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻹﺧﻮﺓ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﺑﺄﻥ ﻭﺯﻉ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﺌﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻧﻪ )ﰒ ﺍﻫﺘﺪﻳﺖ( ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﻴﺎ ﰒ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺧـﻮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺮﻃـﻮﻡ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ
ﺃﻏﻠﻘﻮﺍ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺐ ﺎﺋﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻃﺮﺩﻭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻟﻠﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺃﻻ ﳛﺎﻭﻟﻮﺍ ﻧﺸﺮ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻲ ﰲ ﺑﻼﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺸﺮﻭﺍ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻲ ،ﺇﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺩ ،ﻭﺍﺗﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻔﺘﻨﺔ.
ﻭﳑﺎ ﺻﺎﺭﺣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻹﺧﻮﺓ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻷﻗﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﳊﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻴﺔ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻗﻠﺘﻪ ﻟﻺﺧﻮﺓ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺃﻗﻠﻴﺔ ﻗﺒﻄﻴﺔ ،ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﻳﺮﺍﻋﻰ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﳍﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ.
ﻭﰲ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺃﻗﻠﻴﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻛﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻮﺵ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺣﻨﻔﻴﺔ،
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﻻ ﳝﺜﻠﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻮﻣﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺑﻮﺯﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﺍﶈﺎﻓﻈﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ .ﻓﻘﻴﻞ
ﱄ :ﻫﻢ ﳑﺜﻠﻮﻥ ﰲ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺭﻯ ،ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻋﺪﺩﻫﻢ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺷـﻲﺀ،
ﻭﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﺭﺍﺀ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ.
ﻭﳑﺎ ﻗﻠﺘﻪ ﻟﻺﺧﻮﺓ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﰲ ﻃﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻘﺪﺭﻭﻥ ﲟﻠﻴﻮﻧﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﻄﺎﻟﺒﻮﻥ
ﻣﻨﺬ ﺳﻨﲔ ﺑﺈﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﳍﻢ ،ﳚﺘﻤﻌﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﺮﻳﻀﺔ ﺻﻼﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﺔ ،ﻭﻳﺸﺎﺭﻛﻬﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﺗﺴﺘﺠﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﺎﺕ ﳍﻢ ﺣﱴ ﺍﻵﻥ...
ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ :ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺷﻄﻂ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ:
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﺐ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺒﻌـﺪ
ﻋﻦ ﺷﻄﻂ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺜﲑﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﱳ ﰲ ﺣـﺪﻳﺜﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲢـﺪﺛﻮﺍ ،ﻭﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺘﻬﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺘﺒﻮﺍ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻨﺔ ﻧﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻳﻘﻈﻮﻫﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﻮﻫﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﺗﱪﻋﻮﺍ ﳍﺎ ﻣـﻦ
ﺩﻣﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﺣﱴ ﲢﻴﺎ ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻯ.
ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻢ :ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻟﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﲑﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺸﻨﺠﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﻨﻄﻌـﻮﻥ،
ﻭﻳﻨﻈﺮﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺪﻭﺀ ﻭﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﻭﺳﻄﻴﺔ ،ﻻ ﻳﻨﻈﺮﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﺑﻞ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ
ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﺘﻔﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ،ﺑﻞ ﳛﺎﻭﻟﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﻮﺻﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻕ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠـﻰ
261
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ،ﺑﻞ ﳝﺘﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺒﺼﺮﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ،ﻭﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺭﺯﻗﻮﺍ )ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ( ﲟﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳﻊ ﻭﻧﻌﲏ ﺑﻪ:
ﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻦ ،ﻭﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺻﺪ ،ﻭﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﳌﺂﻻﺕ ،ﻭﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺯﻧﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻮﻳﺎﺕ...
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﻣﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺠﺘﻨﺐ :ﺍﻟﺴﻘﻮﻁ ﰲ ﻫﺎﻭﻳﺔ )ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ( .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻣـﺮ ﺧﻄـﲑ،
ﺗﺘﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﺎﺋﻠﺔ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ :ﺃﻧﻚ ﺣﻜﻤﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻹﻋﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﳌـﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭﺍﻷﺩﰊ :ﺃﻱ ﺃﻫﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﻣﻪ ،ﻭﺃﺧﺮﺟﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺣﺮﻣﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻻﺀ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺮﺓ ،ﺣﱴ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻢ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺩﺓ؛ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻴﺖ ﺃﺩﺑﻴﺎ ﻭﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺎ ...
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺃﻧﺎﺱ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺼﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ :ﺳﻨﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺷﻴﻌﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻋـﺮﺑﻴﻬﻢ
ﻭﻋﺠﻤﻴﻬﻢ ،ﺃﺣﻴﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻣﻮﺍﻢ؛ ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺌﺔ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺼﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺃﺿﺎﻓﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ...
ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻮﺍﺭﻧﺎ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺆﰐ ﲦﺮﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻣـﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺸـﻴﻊ
ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻟﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﻐﺾ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻬﻴﺠﲔ ،ﺍﻟـﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺮﻳـﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺆﺟﺠﻮﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻻ ﺗﺒﻘﻲ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺬﺭ ،ﻛﺄﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺳﻘﺮ ،ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺍﺣﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺸﺮ...
ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ :ﺍﳊﺬﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺳﺎﺋﺲ:
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﰲ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﳌﻬﻤﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺬﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻴﺪ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ،ﻭﺩﺳﺎﺋﺴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﲨﻌﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻳﺸﺘﺘﻮﺍ ﴰﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﳝﺰﻗﻮﺍ ﺻﻔﻮﻓﻬﺎ؛ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺘﻮﺣﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﲡﺘﻤـﻊ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﻔﻈﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺑﺪﺃ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﻟﺒﻼﺩﻧﺎ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﻌـﱪﺓ ﻋـﻦ
ﻏﺎﻳﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻃﺮﻳﻘﺘﻬﻢ )ﻓﺮﻕ ﺗﺴﺪ( .ﻓﻬﻢ ﳚﺘﻬﺪﻭﻥ ﻛﻲ ﻳﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﻛﻠﻤﺘﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻜﻤﻮﻧﺎ ﻭﻳﺴﻮﺩﻭﻧﺎ...
ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻊ :ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﺣﻢ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﺓ:
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﺯ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﻭﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻓﻴـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺧـﺎﺀ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼﺮ؛ ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﳍﻢ ﲝﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺳﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺴﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﶈﻨﺔ؛ ﻓﺎﳌﻔﺮﻭﺽ ﺃﻥ ﺍﶈﻦ ﲡﻤﻊ
ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺮﻗﲔ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺋﺐ ﲡﻤﻊ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺑﲔ ،ﻭﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻋﺮ :ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﺍﺋﺪ ﺗﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﻘﺎﺩ.
ﻭﳓﻦ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻧﻌﺎﱐ ﳏﻨﺎ ﻗﺎﺳﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻗﻮﺍﺭﻉ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ،ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﻃﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﻃﺎﻧﻨﺎ ،ﻭﰲ ﺃﻣﺘﻨـﺎ ﺑﺼـﻔﺔ ﻋﺎﻣـﺔ،
ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﺣﺪﺍﺙ ١١ﺳﺒﺘﻤﱪ ٢٠٠١ﻡ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺮﻗﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻐﺮﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻣﺘﺤـﺎﻥ
ﻋﺴﲑ ،ﻭﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺧﻄﲑ ،ﻳﺴﺘﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﻭﺩﻋﺎﺎ ﻭﻓﺼﺎﺋﻞ ﺻﺤﻮﺎ ﺧﺎﺻـﺔ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻨﺴﻮﺍ ﺧﻼﻓﺎﻢ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻌﺎﺭﻛﻬﻢ ﺍﳍﺎﻣﺸﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﺘﺮﺍﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻛـﺔ ﺍﻟـﱵ
ﻳﻮﺍﺟﻬﻬﺎ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺃﻫﻠﻪ؛ ﻓﻌﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻛﺔ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻼﺣﻢ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺴﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻮ ﺻـﻮﺕ
ﺤﺐ ﺍﻟﱠﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻘﹶﺎﺗﻠﹸﻮﻥﹶ ﻓﻲ ﺳـﺒﹺﻴﻠﻪ ﺻـﻔﺎ
ﻧﺸﺎﺯ ،ﻳﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺮ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﺇﹺﻥﱠ ﺍﷲَ ﻳ
ﻛﹶﺄﹶﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥﹲ ﻣﺮﺻﻮﺹ (ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻣﻠﺨﺺ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ
262
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺛﺎﻧﯿﺎ :ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎت ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼم اﻟﺸﯿﺦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ اﻟﻐﺰاﻟﻲ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺹ) :١٣٩ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻭﺛﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﻓﺠﻮﺍﺕ ﻣﻸﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻬﺖ ﻭﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﺀ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﲔ ﻭﺍﳊﲔ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺃﻥ
ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﻃﻔﻴﺔ ﲣﻔﻰ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ،ﺑﻴﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻠﺴﻴﺎﺳﺔ ﻭﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺃﺳـﺒﺎﺑﺎ
ﺃﺿﺮﻯ ﻭﺃﳕﻰ(ﺍﻩ
ﰒ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺎﱀ ﻭﺍﻹﺧﺎﺀ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﻭﺧﻼﺻﺘﻬﺎ:
-١ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺆﲤﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺪ ﺍﳌﺼﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﺼـﺪﺭ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﺸﺮﻳﻊ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺺ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺼﺮ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺼﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻟﻠﺘﺸﺮﻳﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺛﺒﻮﺎ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ -٢
ﻓﺮﻋﻴﺔ
ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻳﺪﺭﺱ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﱪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﳜﻴـﺔ ﻭﻻ -٣
ﻳﺴﻤﺢ ﺑﺎﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻬﻢ ﺑﻞ ﳚﻤﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﲡﻤﻴﺪﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﺎ ﻭﻳﺘـﺮﻙ
ﺣﺴﺎﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﷲ ) ﺗﻠﻚ ﺃﻣﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﺖ(...
-٤ﻳﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻋﻢ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﺮﻭﻧﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﺎﻣﺢ ﰲ ﺷﱴ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﻭﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺹ) :١٤٠ﻭﻻ ﺃﺳﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺳﻄﻮﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺗﺮﺍﺧﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻮﺭ ﻟﻜـﲏ ﺃﻟﻔـﺖ
ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭﻫﺎﻣﺎ ﻭﺃﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﲤﻼ ﺍﳉﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻴﻎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﺀ ﺑﻘﺎﺀﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻟـﻮ
ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﰲ ﺣﺠﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﺃﻏﻠﻘﺖ ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﻤﺮﺉ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﻓﻚ ﻟﺘﻼﺷﺖ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻻ ﻣﺴﺎﻍ ﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ( ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ
263
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-١ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﻀﻤﺮ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﳓـﻮ
ﺍﺣﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﺇﻗﻨﺎﻋﻪ ﺑﺄﺣﻘﻴﺔ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻫﻮ ،ﺍﺑﺘﻐﺎﺀ ﺇﻧﻘﺎﺫﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻼﻝ ﻭﺯﻳﻎ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﰲ ﺯﻋﻤﻪ
-٢ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺁﺧﺮ ﳑﻦ ﺃﻭﻛﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺃﻏﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺅﻝ ﻭﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﻦ ﳊﺪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻘﺒـﻮﻝ،
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﺳﺎﺋﻐﺎ ﻭﻣﺸـﺮﻭﻋﺎ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﱰﺍﻉ ﳏﺪﻭﺩﺓ ،ﺑﻞ ﺗﻄﺮﻑ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻟﻴﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺎ ﺧﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﻋﻴـﺔ ﻻ ﺃﻛﺜـﺮ
ﻛﺎﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻄﻴﺤﻲ ﻟﻠﺨﻼﻑ ﳐﻞﹲ ﺣﻘﺎ ﻓﺎﳋﻼﻑ ﺑـﲔ
ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﺃﺻﻠﻲ ﻋﻘﺪﻱ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ :ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﺼﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻭﺭﺟﻌﺔ ! ﳏﻤﺪ
ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﻜﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻌﻦ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ﻷﻢ ﺍﻏﺘﺼﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨـﻪ ،ﺇﻥ
ﺗﺴﻄﻴﺢ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﳍﻮ ﺧﺪﺍﻉ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻟﻠﺬﺍﺕ ،ﻗﻤﲔ ﺑﻔﺸﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ،ﻭﻟﺌﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺡ ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ
ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺎﻭﺭﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﳝﺜﻠﻮﻢ
-٣ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﻓﻊ ﺑﻌﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ،ﻓﻴﺘﻔﺎﺀﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﱂ ﺗﺘـﻮﻓﺮ
ﺍﳌﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻮﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻮﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻗﻔﻪ ﻓﻴﺆﺩﻱ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺻﺪﻣﺔ ﻋﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺎﺋﻠﲔ
ﲢﻴﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺎﺅﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺄﺱ..
ﰒ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻏﺸﻲ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﺞ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﺍ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺗﻄﺒﻴـﻊ
ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ ﻭﻃﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﺼﺎﻡ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻠﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺸـﻨﻴﻊ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﺃﹶ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺎﺫﻑ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺑﺈﺻﺪﺍﺭ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻑ ﺩﻭﻝ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﺞ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﰲ ﺣﺮﺑﻪ ﺿﺪ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻟﻔﻴﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺠﻢ ﻟﻠﻜﺸـﻒ
ﻋﻦ ﺧﻄﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻤﻴﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ..ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﺖ
ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﻢ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﰊ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻧﻘﻴﺼﺔ ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ
ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺎﺭﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﻭﺑﺎﺣﺘﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﻟﻠﻜﻮﻳﺖ ﻭﻧﺸﻮﺏ ﺣﺮﺏ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﺪﺃﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺗﺘﺤﺴﻦ ﺑﲔ ﻃﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳـﺎﺽ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺪ ﻭﺟﺰﺭ ..ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﺗﺴﺎﺭﻋﺖ ﺧﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﻳﻦ ﲟﺎ ﺃﺛﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺸﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ ..ﰒ ﺗﻮﺟﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﺈﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﲨﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺍﻗﺔ ﺍﻹﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴـﺔ
ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﺭﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﻘﻲ ﺑﻈﻼﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺘﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻘﻌﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺣﺮﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ
ﺇﺫ ﳘﺎ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﰊ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﺙ ..ﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺳﺘﺨﺮﺝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻌﺒﺌﺔ
ﻣﻀﺎﺩﺓ ﻃﻴﻠﺔ ﳓﻮ ﻋﻘﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻦ؟! ..ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺷﺮﺍﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻳﻘﺎﻑ ﺃﺣـﺪ
264
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺧﻄﺒﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺠﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺧﻄﺒﺔ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻲ ﺗﺰﺍﻣﻨﺎ ﻣـﻊ ﺯﻳـﺎﺭﺓ ﺭﻓﺴـﻨﺠﺎﱐ
ﻟﻠﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﻣﺔ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻀﲑ ﳌﻨﺎﺷﻂ ﺪﻑ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺰﻉ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺟﺰ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳـﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ..ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻛﺪﺕ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺷﻬﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ ﰲ ﻋـﺎﻡ ١٤٢٤ﻫــ
ﺇﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻟﻠﺤﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﲏ ﻭﴰﻞ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺳـﻨﺔ ﺑﻜـﻞ
ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ ..ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻘﺎﻡ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﺳﺎﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﺘﺘـﺎﺑﻊ
ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻭﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﳎﺎﻟﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ
ﺇﻥ ﺛﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﻮﺩ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻭﺳﻴﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳍﻢ ﺩﻭﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ..ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺪﺭ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﳌﻀـﻲ
ﻓﺴﻴﺠﺪ ﲨﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﺳﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﺮﻳـﺐ ..ﻭﺃﻥ ﻋﻠـﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼـﺪﻗﻮﺍ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﺴﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻠﻤﺴﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﺴﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﺩ..
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﻟﻠﺘﻔﺎﺅﻝ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﻫﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﲔ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﳍـﻢ ﻣـﻦ ﻣﺼـﺎﱀ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺷﻌﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺳﻴﻬﺪﺩ ﻣﺼﺎﳊﻬﻢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﻌﻜﺲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺣﺘﻤـﻲ ،ﻭﻟﺘـﺬﻫﺐ
ﺣﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺤﻴﻢ ﻭﻟﺘﺤﺘﺮﺏ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺳﻼﺡ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ
265
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﰒ ﺩﻋﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﰲ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﻭﺃـﺎ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺎﻻﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ
-٣ﺇﻳﻘﺎﻑ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻣﻴﺔ :ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻒ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﻦ ﲪﻼﺗﻪ ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻋـﱪ ﻭﺳـﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻋﱪ ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ..ﻭﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻣﻊ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺘﻢ ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﻘﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺴـﻔﻴﻪ
ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺘﻘﺪﺍﺕ ﻓﺎﳊﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﺤﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﲝﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ..ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺃﻱ ﻃـﺮﻑ
ﻟﻶﺧﺮ ﺑﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺿﻼﻝ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻬﺠﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ..ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻘﻼﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺬﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻘﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺌﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﲔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﻘﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﲜﺮﺓ ﻗﻠﻢ ﺃﻭ ﲞﻄﺒﺔ ﳎﻠﺠﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻣـﻦ
ﺯﻣﻦ ﺳﺤﻴﻖ ..ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻔﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻄﺄﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﻹﻋﻼﻣﻴﺔ:
-١ﻓﺎﳋﻄﺄ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ :ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺼﻮﻣﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺑﻠﻎ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺸـﻴﻌﺔ
ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻟﺒﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﲨﻬﻮﺭﻫﻢ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻـﺮﻳﻦ ﻻ
ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﺳﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺣﻮﺯﺍﻢ ﻭﻣﺪﺍﺭﺳﻬﻢ ﻭﻣﺆﺳﺴﺎﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺍﳌﺼﺤﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﺜﻤﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳـﺮﺩ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻘﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻗﻠﻬﻢ..
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴﺒﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻳﻌﺪﻭﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺇﳚﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺗﻘﻴـﺔ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ
ﲢﺼﻞ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳓﺮﺍﻑ ﻛﺒﲑ ،..ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺗﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻻ ﳜﺮﺟﻮﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻖ ﺍﻻﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻬﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻋﱪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ؟! ..ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺻﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻔﺴـﲑ ﻛـﻞ
ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺇﳚﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﻤﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻏﻼﻕ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺜﻘﻮﺍ ﺑﺘﻮﺑﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﻱ ﺷﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ..
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﻢ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻞ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻣﻠﺰﻣﺔ ﳍﻢ ﻷﻥ ﳍﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﺎ ﰲ
ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﻢ ﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ..ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻹﻗﺮﺍﺭ ..ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﲪﻠﻨﺎ ﻣـﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟـﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻟﻮﻗﻌﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺮﺝ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺳﻨﺔ ﻭﺷﻴﻌﺔ .
-٢ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ :ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﳍﻢ ﻟﺘﺄﻳﻴﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﰲ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻭﻳﻈﻨﻮﻥ ﺃﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻮﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴـﻨﺔ ﲟﻀـﻤﻮﺎ،
ﻭﺗﻨﺎﺳﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﰲ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ﻓﻸﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ
ﻭﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺎ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺗﻜﻠﻒ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴـﻨﺔ ﰲ
ﲪﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﳍﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ
266
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-٤ﺇﻳﻘﺎﻑ ﺗﺼﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ :ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺒﺘﻌﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﺪﻳﺮ ﻓﻜﺮﻩ ﻟﻶﺧﺮ ..ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻌﻲ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻟﺘﺴﻨﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻟﺘﺸﻴﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻲ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺳـﺘﻨﻔﺎﺭ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺷﺪﻩ ..ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺠﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻔﻜﲑ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧـﺬ ﲞـﻼﻑ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ
-٥ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻷﻗﻠﻴﺎﺕ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺗﻀﻤﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﺍﻷﻗﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻗﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻴﺔ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻬﻢ
ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ
267
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺳﺎﺩﺳﺎ :ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻷﺧﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺷﺮﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﺎ ﺁﺛﺮﻧـﺎ -
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺟﺰﺀ ،ﻭﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻈﻢ ﳎﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ...
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺒﻴﻮﻥ:
ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ،ﻭﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺃﻋﻠﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺒﻴﻮﻥ؛ ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﺪﻋﻮ ﻟﻠﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻣﻌﺘـﱪﻳﻦ
ﺇﻳﺎﻫﺎ ﺧﻄﻮﻃﹰﺎ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺍﻋﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳋﻂ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﱯ ﻟﻴﺤﻘﻖ ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻓﻪ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻮﺓ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ :ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺟﺪﺍ ،ﻓﻠﻠﻤﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ -
ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪﻳﺔ ﺃﻡ ﰲ ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﻌﻴﺔ )ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺎ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ %٩٠ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ( ،ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻗﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻼﹰ...
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺬﻳﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ :ﻓﻤﺎ ﺩﻣﻨﺎ ﻧﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ -ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ -
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﻏﻼﻗﻬﺎ ﺑﻘﺮﺍﺭ -ﻭﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﺖ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ..ﻓﻤﻌـﲎ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻫﻨﺎ :ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻻ ﳒﺪ ﻴﺎ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻴﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﰲ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﹸﺬﻫﺐ ﻟﻠﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺰﺏ ﺍﳌﻤﺰﻕ،
ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﱪ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺘﻪ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﲡﻨﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻻﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﻉ :ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﻌﺘﱪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺋﺐ -
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﺑﺘﻠﻲ ﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻨﺎ ،ﻓﺮﻏﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺪﺩ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻭﲤﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﳊﻈﻨﺎ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺣﺠﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺃﻱ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺃﻭ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺆﺍﺧﺬﺓ ﺑﻠﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ ﻭﻳﻨﺎﻗﺶ ﺑﻜﻞ -
ﺩﻗﺔ ﻭﺃﻧﺎﺓ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺎﺕ ﺗﺒﺘﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘـﺎﱄ ﻳـﺄﰐ ﺍﻟـﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻭﺍﻻـﺎﻡ
ﺑﺎﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﻉ ،ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻼﺯﻣﺔ ...ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﺋـﺔ ﺃﻣـﺮ
ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﻭﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺇﻏﻼﻕ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﹰﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻓﺘﺤﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻨـﺎ ﻧـﺪﻋﻮ
ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ...
ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ :ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻴﻢ -
ﰲ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺭﺍﺋﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ
ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﻇﺮﻭﻓﻪ ﻭﺃﻫﺪﺍﻓﻪ ﻭﻟﻐﺘﻪ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻻ ﻣﺜﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻟـﻶﺭﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﺗﺒـﺎﻉ
ﺃﺣﺴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺢ...
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﲡﻨﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﺎﺀﺓ ﳌﻘﺪﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ :ﻭﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﺒﻊ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ، -
ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻨﻪ؛ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳜﻠﻖ ﺟﻮﺍ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﻴﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻛﺴﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻔﻘﺪ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ
268
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻳﻨﻬﻰ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻻ ﺗﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﱠﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻥﹶ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ ﻓﹶﻴﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻪ ﻋﺪﻭﺍ ﺑﹺﻐﻴ ﹺﺮ
ﻋﻠﹾﻢﹴ ﻛﹶﺬﹶﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﻨﺎ ﻟﻜﹸﻞﱢ ﺃﹸﻣﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﹶﻬﻢ ﺛﹸﻢ ﺇﹺﻟﹶﻰ ﺭﺑﻬﹺﻢ ﻣﺮﺟﹺﻌﻬﻢ ﻓﹶﻴﻨﺒﺌﹸﻬﻢ ﺑﹺﻤﺎ ﻛﹶـﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻌﻤﻠﹸـﻮﻥﹶ( ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺼـﻮﺹ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻌﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺔ...
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ :ﺍﳊﺮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ :ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻧﺎ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﲰـﺢ -
ﺎ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺳﺒﻼ ﻣﻄﺮﻭﺣﺔ ﻟﻺﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺿﺎﺓ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ .ﻭﺣﲔ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻓـﺈﻥ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺭﺱ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﲑﻩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳـﺆﻣﻦ ـﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟـﱵ
ﻳﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺑﺮﺃ ﺫﻣﺘﻪ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﺩﻯ ﺃﻣﺎﻧﺘﻪ ﻭﻋﻬﺪﻩ .ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻷﺣﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﻮﻣﻪ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻩ ﺣﱴ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻳﺮﺗﺢ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻹﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﳑﺎ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ .ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﺅﻛﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺁﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﺩﻋﻤﻬﺎ ،ﺩﻭﳕﺎ ﺗﻌﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻮﻳﻞ ﺃﻭ ﲡﺮﻳﺢ ،ﻓـﻼ ﻧـﺪﻋﻮ ﺇﱃ
ﺇﻏﻼﻕ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻧﺮﻓﺾ ﳏﺎﻭﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺊ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻀﻌﺎﻑ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺪﺍﻝ
ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻓﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺎ :ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ:
ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺐﺀ ﺍﻷﻛﱪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺎﺗﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳـﺐ ﻭﻧﻘﺘـﺮﺡ
ﺑﺎﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻣﻮﺍ ﺎ:
-١ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻤﻖ ﰲ ﺃﺳﺲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﻗﻴﻤﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺗﺄﺻﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻮﺳﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻋﻜﺴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﲝﻮﺛﻬﻢ
ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﻢ ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎﻢ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﺃﺧﺬﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻃﺎﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ
-٢ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻘﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳉﻤـﺎﻫﲑﻱ ،ﻓـﻼ
ﻳﺸﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺸﻌﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﺧﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ،ﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﱯ ،ﻭﺗﺘﺴـﻊ
ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻭﺭ ﻟﻠﻤﻤﺎﺭﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻔﻲ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺣﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﳜﻴﺔ...
-٣ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﳌﺘﻀﺎﻓﺮ ﻻﲣﺎﺫ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﳌﺼﲑﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﻗﺒﻴﻞ- :ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ- .ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻃﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﲏ- .ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻌـﺪﻭ
ﻭﺧﻄﻄﻪ ﰲ ﳏﻮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻫﻮﻳﺘﻬﺎ- .ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻧﺒﺬ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ- .ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﳌﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ.
-٤ﺗﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ- :ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ- .ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺩﻱ
ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ- .ﺍﳌﻌﺴﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺒﻴﺔ ﰲ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺆﻭﻥ- .ﺇﳚﺎﺩ ﲨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﰲ ﺷـﱴ
ﺃﻣﺎﻛﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ،ﻭﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﲤﺮﺍﺕ ،ﻭﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻭﻋﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻤـﺎﺩ ﺍﻹﻋـﻼﻡ
ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻝ ،ﻭﻧﻔﻲ ﻣﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻧﺸﺮ ﺛﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﻣﺢ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﱯ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ(.ﺍﻩ
269
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺧﺎﻣﺴﺎ :ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎت ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼم اﻟﺸﯿﺦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﮭﺪي ﺷﻤﺲ اﻟﺪﯾﻦ
ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﳌﺆﲤﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ:
)ﳓﻮ ﻣﻴﺜﺎﻕ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﻲ ﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ(
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﺜﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺳﻴﺴﻲ ﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑـﲔ
ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ:
ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻳﻮﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻋﻠـﻰ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻳﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻛﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﺰﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻟـﻪ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻜﻠﻴﻔﻴﺔ .ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺍﺑﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﲨﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﺎ ﻭﺍﻻﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻢ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺰﻡ ﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﺃﻭ
ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﻓﺎﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ .ﻭﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻤﻲ ﻟﻸﻣﺔ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ.
ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺛﻘﺎﰲ ﺣﻀﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮﺓ .ﺇﻧﻨﺎ
ﻻ ﻧﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﲤﺰﻗﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﻓﻬﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﻙ
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺅﻯ ﰲ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻹﻃﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ .ﺇﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌـﻲ ،ﻭﻫـﻲ ﻧﺎﺷـﺌﺔ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﰲ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﰲ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ،ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻭﺭ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴـﺚ
ﺍﻟﻈﻬﻮﺭ.
ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﰲ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻭﺭﺅﻳﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺠﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺋﻤـﺔ
ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻄﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﻭﺭﲰﻲ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺫﺓ ﻣﻨـﻪ،
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻭﺋﻮﻩ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ .ﻭﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﰲ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ.
ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﲢﺮﱘ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺸﲑ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻟﻠﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻣﻮﺍ ﺑﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺗﺒﺸﲑﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺫﺍﻙ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻨﺸـﺎﻁ ﺗﺒﺸـﲑﻱ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒـﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﻛﺘﻠـﺔ
ﻋﻘﺎﺋﺪﻳﺔ ﺑﺄﻧﺸﻄﺔ ﺗﺒﺸﲑﻳﺔ ﻣﱪﳎﺔ ﻭﳑﻨﻬﺠﺔ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺻﻌﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺆﻭﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺷﺨﺺ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻗﻨﺎﻋﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻜﻮﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﺗﻔﻜﲑﻩ
ﺍﳋﺎﺹ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺮﺭ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻌﲔ ،ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺭﻏﺒﺘﻪ
ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺘﺮﻡ ،ﻭﺗﻄﺒﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﲝﺮﻳﺔ ﺿﻤﲑﻩ.
270
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟـﻮﻃﲏ ﰲ ﺃﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺔ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﻠﻪ ،ﺇﱃ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻱ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺃﻗﻠﻴﺔ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻤﺘﻊ
ﲝﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺘﻤﻊ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺑﻞ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﳉﻤﻴـﻊ
ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻃﻨﺔ ﻭﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎﺎ.
ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﻓﺘﺢ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ :ﻧﺪﻋﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺍﷲ
ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ.
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ،ﲝﻴﺚ ﺇﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺃﺋﻤـﺔ
ﻭﻓﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻳﻌﻤﻠﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﰲ ﻧﻄﺎﻕ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﻭﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ
ﺣﺴﻦ ﰲ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳜﺪﻡ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﺰﺯ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴـﺔ ﰲ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳌﻌﲔ ﺑﺎﳋﺼﻮﺹ.
ﳓﻦ ﻧﺪﻋﻮ -ﰲ ﻧﻄﺎﻕ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﺗﺄﺻﻴﻞ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ -ﺇﱃ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﻣﻨـﻬﺞ
ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺰﺯ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﲨﻴـﻊ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ،ﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﳎﺘﻬﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻛﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻌﲔ.
ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ :ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﱯ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﱯ ﺣﺎﺟـﺔ ﺃﺗﺒـﺎﻉ
ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻳﻠﱯ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﰲ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ .ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻃﺎﺭ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ
ﳎﺎﻣﻊ ﻓﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﲡﺎﻫﺎﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻣـﺮ
ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻘﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﲤﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﻧﺪﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻧﺄﻣﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺆﺻـﻞ
ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺇﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﲝﺜﻴﺔ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﳎﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺸﲑ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﺭﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺛﺒﺖ ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﳘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﲏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ /ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺟﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻛﻨﲔ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﺈﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻠﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﳊﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺑﻨﺺ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻠﲔ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﺇﱐ ﺗﺎﺭﻙ ﻓﻴﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻠﲔ :ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ
ﻭﻋﺘﺮﰐ".
ﻭﻳﺘﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺟﺮﺩﻱ" :ﺃﻥ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ﻻ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻵﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤـﺚ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ ﻣﺜـﺎﺭ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﻋﻬﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﻓﻼ ﺩﺍﻋﻲ ﻟﻠﺨﻮﺽ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
271
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﺮﺟﻌﺎ ﻟﻸﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﲣﺘﺺ ﺑﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﺘﻔـﻲ ﰲ ﲝـﺚ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﺔ ﺬﻩ ،ﻭﻧﺴﻜﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﻻ ﺿﲑ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ" .
ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺟﺮﺩﻱ ﺗﻜﺸﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺒـﺎﺭ ﻭﺣـﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻣـﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﻇﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻃﺮﻭﺣﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﻘﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﻟﻸﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ (.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
272
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ اﻟﺮاﺑﻌﺔ :دور اﻟﺤﻜّﺎم واﻟﺴﺎﺳﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻷﻟﻔﺔ واﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ
ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ -ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ -ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ )ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﻲ( ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﻠﻚ ،ﻓﺘﺠﺪﻫﻢ ﻳـﺪﻧﻮﻥ
ﻭﻳﻘﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻷﻥ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﻬﻢ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﻠﻚ ،ﻭﲡﺪﻫﻢ ﻳﻘﺼﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﺒﻌـﺪﻭﻥ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻷﻥ ﰲ ﺇﻗﺼﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﺑﻌﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﻠﻚ ،ﻭﲡﺪﻫﻢ ﻳﺴـﺘﺨﺪﻣﻮﻥ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻟﻀﺮﺏ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﳍﻢ :ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ ..ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻮﻥ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﻟﻴﺴﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ...ﺇﱁ ﰒ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ -ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧـﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺘـﻞ-
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻭﺗﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻴﺎﱄ ﻭﺗﺘﻐﲑ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺯﻳﻦ ﻓﺘﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻓﺘﺠﺪﻫﻢ
ﻳﻘﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﻌﺪﻭﻩ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﻭﻳﺒﻌﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﺑﻮﻩ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺲ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ
ﻭﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺲ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺗﺴﺘﺨﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄـﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﻘـﺮﺏ
ﻟﻀﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺘﻠﻬﻢ ...ﺇﱁ ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺣﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻟﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﻴﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻧﺴﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻓﻴﺔ
ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﳉﻬﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺻﻔﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺮﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲏ ﺃﻣﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻟﻘـﺪ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺆﺩﺑﺎ ﳌﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻌﺪ ﺣﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻟﺒﺚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ
ﻗﺘﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﱄ ﺑﲏ ﺃﻣﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﺮﻱ -ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﱯ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﱂ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻭﺻـﻔﻪ ﺍﻟـﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ -٦٣٣/١ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺼﻠﻰ ﻓﺠﻌﻠﻪ ﺃﺿﺤﻴﺘﻪ ،ﲝﺠﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻌﺪ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ
ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺪﻋﺔ ﺑﻼ ﺷﻚ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﺮﻱ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳘﹼﻪ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﳘﻪ ﺇﺭﺳﺎﺀ ﺩﻋﺎﺋﻢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ،
ﻓﺎﳉﻌﺪ ﳌﺎ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻕ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﺿﲔ ﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﺔ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﲏ ﺃﻣﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﳌﺆﻳﺪﻳﻦ ﻟﺜﻮﺭﺓ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻄـﱪﻱ ٣٣٨/٥ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳـﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ،٢٤٦/٩ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﺿﲔ ﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﻦ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺣﱴ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻫـﻮ ﻣـﻦ ﻗـﺎﻝ
ﻟﻠﺤﺠﺎﺝ :ﺃﺳﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﺏ ﻧﻌﺎﻣﺔ...ﺇﱁ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳـﺔ ،٣٨٣/٩ﻓﻮﺟـﺪ
ﻫﺸﺎﻡ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺮﺻﺔ ﻟﻘﺘﻠﻪ ﲢﺖ ﻣﻈﻠﺔ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻓﺄﻣﺮ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﺮﻱ ﺑﻘﺘﻠﻪ
ﻭﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﳉﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﻳﺘﻜﺮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻳﻌﻴﺪ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻓﻤﱴ ﻳﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﲑﺑﺄﻭﺍ ﺑﺄﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﻟﻠﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﻟﻌﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﻴﺎﺳﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺝ/٢ﺹ) :٣٥٧ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﺎ ﺑﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻠﻮﻙ ﺑﻔﺴـﺎﺩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻴﻼﺀ ﺣﺐ ﺍﳌﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﳉﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﱃ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺴﺒﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺭﺍﺫﻝ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﺍﻷﻛﺎﺑﺮ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ(ﺍﻩ
273
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ﰲ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ) : ٤١-٤٢ / ١ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺗﻮﻻﻫﺎ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﻬﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻴﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺇﻻ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺎﺋﻊ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﲎ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﻓﺘﻔﺮﻍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﻭﲡﺮﺩﻭﺍ ﳍﺎ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺘﺪﺍﻓﻌﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺄﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺃﻗﺒﻠﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺑﻜﻨﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺳﲑﻫﻢ
ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻓﻀﺖ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺗﻮﻟﻮﻫﺎ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻘﺎﻕ ﻭﻻ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺘـﺎﻭﻯ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﻜـﺎﻡ
ﺍﺿﻄﺮﻭﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﺘﺼﺤﺎﻢ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﻻﺳﺘﻔﺘﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﰲ ﳎﺎﺭﻱ ﺃﺣﻜـﺎﻣﻬﻢ
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﻣﻼﺯﻡ ﺻﻔﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻣﻮﺍﻇﺐ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﲰﺖ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻃﻠﺒﻮﺍ ﻫﺮﺑﻮﺍ ﻭﺃﻋﺮﺿﻮﺍ ﻓﺎﺿﻄﺮ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﳊﺎﺡ ﰲ ﻃﻠﺒﻬﻢ
ﻟﺘﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻮﻣﺎﺕ
ﻓﺮﺃﻯ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺭ ﻋﺰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻻﺓ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺇﻋﺮﺍﺿﻬﻢ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﺎﺷﺮﺃﺑﻮﺍ ﻟﻄﻠﺐ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺗﻮﺻﻼ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺰ ﻭﺩﺭﻙ ﺍﳉﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺓ ﻓﺄﻛﺒﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﻭﻋﺮﺿﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺓ ﻭﺗﻌﺮﻓﻮﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﻃﻠﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺕ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻡ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﳒﺢ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺠﺢ ﱂ
ﳜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻠﺐ ﻭﻣﻬﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻻﺑﺘﺬﺍﻝ ﻓﺄﺻﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﲔ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﲔ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ
ﺃﻋﺰﺓ ﺑﺎﻹﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻃﲔ ﺃﺫﻟﺔ ﺑﺎﻹﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ
ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﷲ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻹﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﻭﺍﻷﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﻳـﺎﺕ
ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﰒ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻭﺭ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻗﻮﺍﻋـﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋـﺪ
ﻭﻣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲰﺎﻉ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻤﺖ ﺭﻏﺒﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻇﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺎﺩﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﺄﻛﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻭﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺎﻧﻴﻒ ﻭﺭﺗﺒﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺟﻮﺍ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻻﺕ
ﻭﺯﻋﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺮﺿﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻀﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻗﻤﻊ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺯﻋﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ
ﻏﺮﺿﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻻﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺘﺎﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺗﻘﻠﱡﺪ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺇﺷﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻧﺼﻴﺤﺔ ﳍﻢ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﻥ ﲡﺮﺅ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺑـﻞ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧـﺎ
ﺑﺈﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻣﺦ ﺹ) :٤٠٦ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﳌﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﻗﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ
ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ ﻭﺯﻋﻤﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳍﻤﺔ ﺭﺩ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺗﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻗﻬﻢ ﺗﻘـﻮﱘ
ﻛﻞﹴ ﻟﻌﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﻘﺎﻕ ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﻛﻞﹲ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﺘﺰ ﲟﻦ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻠﻮﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺼﻤﺔ ،ﻓﺼـﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺀ ﳍﻢ ﺣﲔ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻘﻮﺍ ﻳﺪﺍ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺻﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﻣﻨﻜﺮﺍ ﻭﻻ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﻣﺮ ﲟﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﰒ ﺗﺪﺭﺟﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺻﲑﻭﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺎ ﻭﺻﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﳛﺴـﻨﻮﻥ ﻟﻸﻣـﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻠـﻮﻙ
274
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺃﻫﻮﺍﺀﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﻢ ﳘﺘﻪ ﻣﺼﺮﻭﻓﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻘﻮﱘ ﺃﻫﻮﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﺇﺷﺎﻋﺔ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﻝ ﻣﻌﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺄﻋﺪﻭﺍ
ﻟﻠﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﳏﻜﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﺭﺟﻮﻫﻢ ﻟﻴﺘﻢ ﳍﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺭﺍﺩﻭﺍ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﻷﻣﲑ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﺑﺈﺩﻧﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﻭﻳﺒﺴﻂ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﳑﺎ ﲨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﺖ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻌﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﻭﻟﺮﲟﺎ ﺃﺳﻨﺪ ﺇﻟـﻴﻬﻢ ﺃﻛـﻞ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺃﻗﺤﻤﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻤﻮﺍ ﰲ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﺇﻟﻴﻜﻢ ﻣﻌﺎﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ –ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﺮﺍﺩ -ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻔﺔ ﻭﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﱪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻀـﻞ
ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﻊ) :ﺣﺞ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﻴﺪ ،ﻓﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻧﺎﺋﻢ ﻟﻴﻠﺔ ﺇﺫ ﲰﻌﺖ ﻗﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﻣﻦ ﻫـﺬﺍ؟ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ:
ﺃﺟﺐ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ! ﻓﺨﺮﺟﺖ ﻣﺴﺮﻋﺎﹰ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ،ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺭﺳـﻠﺖ ﺇﱄ
ﺃﺗﻴﺘﻚ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻭﳛﻚ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻙ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻻ ﳜﺮﺟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻋﺎﱂ ،ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﱄ ﺭﺟﻼﹰ ﺃﺳﺄﻟﻪ .ﻓﻘﻠﺖ ﻟـﻪ:
ﻫﻬﻨﺎ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ .ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻣﺾ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ.
ﻓﺄﺗﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻘﺮﻋﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ؟ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﺃﺟﺐ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ! ﻓﺨﺮﺝ ﻣﺴﺮﻋﺎﹰ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﻣﲑ
ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺭﺳﻠﺖ ﺇﱄ ﺃﺗﻴﺘﻚ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺧﺬ ﳌﺎ ﺟﺌﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ .ﻓﺤﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺩﻳﻦ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌـﻢ.
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﻗﺾ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ،ﰒ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﻓﻨﺎ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﺃﻏﲎ ﻋﲏ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻚ ﺷﻴﺌﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺎﻧﻈﺮ ﱄ ﺭﺟﻼﹰ ﺃﺳﺄﻟﻪ.
ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﻫﻬﻨﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﺑﻦ ﳘﺎﻡ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺍﻣﺾ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺄﺗﻴﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻓﻘﺮﻋﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ؟
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺃﺟﺐ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ،ﻓﺨﺮﺝ ﻣﺴﺮﻋﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺭﺳﻠﺖ ﺇﱄ ﺃﺗﻴﺘﻚ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺧﺬ ﳌﺎ
ﺟﺌﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﺤﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ،ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﺃﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺩﻳﻦ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﻗﺾ ﺩﻳﻨﻪ ،ﰒ ﺍﻧﺼـﺮﻓﻨﺎ.
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﺃﻏﲎ ﻋﲏ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻚ ﺷﻴﺌﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺎﻧﻈﺮ ﱄ ﺭﺟﻼﹰ ﺃﺳﺄﻟﻪ
ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﻫﻬﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺎﺽ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺍﻣﺾ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺄﺗﻴﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﻳﺼﻠﻲ ﰲ ﻏﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻳﺘﻠـﻮ
ﺁﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﺩﺩﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺮﻋﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ؟ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﺃﺟـﺐ ﺃﻣـﲑ
ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ! ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﱄ ﻭﻷﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ؟ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﻃﺎﻋﺘﻪ؟ ]ﻓﻘﺎﻝ[ :ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻗـﺪ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻠﻤﺆﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺬﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ؟
ﻓﱰﻝ ﻓﻔﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﰒ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻓﺔ ﻓﺄﻃﻔﺄ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺍﺝ ﰒ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺄ ﺇﱃ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻓﺔ ،ﻓﺠﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﳒﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺑﺄﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﻓﺴﺒﻘﺖ ﻛﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﻴﺪ ﻛﻔﻲ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺃﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻒ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻟﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﻥ ﳒﺖ ﻏﺪﺍﹰ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﷲ! ﻓﻘﻠﺖ
ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ :ﻟﻴﻜﻠﻤﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺑﻜﻼﻡﹴ ﻧﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺗﻘﻲ.
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺧﺬ ﳌﺎ ﺟﺌﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻳﺮﲪﻚ ﺍﷲ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻭﻓﻴﻢ ﺟﺌﺖ؟! ﺣﻄﹶﺒﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻚ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻚ ﺣﻄﺒﻮﺍ
ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ،ﺣﱴ ﻟﻮ ﺳﺄﻟﺘﻬﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻜﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻐﻄﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﻚ ﻭﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﻋﻨﻚ ﺷﻘﺼﺎﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻧﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻮﺍ،
ﻭﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﺷﺪﻫﻢ ﺣﺒﺎﹰ ﻟﻚ ﺃﺷﺪﻫﻢ ﻫﺮﺑﺎﹰ ﻣﻨﻚ.
275
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻭﱄ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ،ﺩﻋﺎ ﺳﺎﱂ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻛﻌﺐ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻇﻲ ﻭﺭﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻴﻮﺓ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﳍﻢ :ﺇﱐ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﻠﻴﺖ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺀ ﻓﺄﺷﲑﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﻲ؛ ﻓﻌﺪ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺔ ﺑﻼﺀ ﻭﻋﺪﺩﺎ
ﺃﻧﺖ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻚ ﻧﻌﻤﺔ.
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺳﺎﱂ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻏﺪﺍﹰ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﷲ ﻓﺼﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﺇﻓﻄﺎﺭﻙ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ
ﺍﳌﻮﺕ .ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻛﻌﺐ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻏﺪﺍﹰ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻦ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ﺃﺑﺎﹰ،
ﻭﺃﻭﺳﻄﻬﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ﺃﺧﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺃﺻﻐﺮﻫﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ﻭﻟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﱪ ﺃﺑﺎﻙ ﻭﺍﺭﺣﻢ ﺃﺧﺎﻙ ﻭﲢﻨﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻟﺪﻙ .ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺭﺟﺎﺀ
ﺑﻦ ﺣﻴﻮﺓ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ﻏﺪﺍﹰ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﷲ ﻓﺄﺣﺐ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺐ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻚ ،ﻭﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﳍﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﺮﻩ
ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻚ ،ﰒ ﻣﱴ ﺷﺌﺖ ﻣﺖ.
ﻭﺇﱐ ﻷﻗﻮﻝ ﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺃﺧﺎﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﳋﻮﻑ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺗﺰﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻬﻞ ﻣﻌﻚ ﺭﲪﻚ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺄﻣﺮﻙ ﲟﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ؟ ﻓﺒﻜﻰ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺑﻜﺎﺀً ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍﹰ ﺣﱴ ﻏﺸﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ ﻟﻪ :ﺍﺭﻓﻖ ﺑﺄﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ!
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﻊ ﻗﺘﻠﺘﻪ ﺃﻧﺖ ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺑﻚ ﻭﺃﺭﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﺎ؟
ﰒ ﺃﻓﺎﻕ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺯﺩﱐ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ! ﺑﻠﻐﲏ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻼﹰ ﻟﻌﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺷﻜﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻜﺘﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﻋﻤﺮ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺧﻲ ﺍﺫﻛﺮ ﺳﻬﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﺧﻠﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﺑﺪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻄﺮﺩ ﺑﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺑـﻚ ﻧﺎﺋﻤـﺎﹰ ﺃﻭ
ﻳﻘﻈﺎﻧﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻙ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺰﻝ ﻗﺪﻣﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻚ ﻭﻣﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻚ .ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﺮﺃ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﺣﱴ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮ :ﻣﺎ ﺃﻗﺪﻣﻚ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﺧﻠﻌﺖ ﻗﻠﱯ ﺑﻜﺘﺎﺑﻚ ،ﻻ ﻭﻟﻴﺖ ﻟﻚ
ﻭﻻﻳﺔ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﹰ ﺣﱴ ﺃﻟﻘﻰ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ! ﻓﺒﻜﻰ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺑﻜﺎﺀ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍﹰ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺯﺩﱐ.
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ ﻋﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﺀﻩ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻣـﺮﱐ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻣﺎﺭﺓ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ :ﻳﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻳﺎ ﻋﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ،ﻧﻔﺲ ﲢﻴﻴﻬﺎ ﺧﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻣـﺎﺭﺓ ﻻ
ﲢﺼﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺇﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﺭﺓ ﺣﺴﺮﺓ ﻭﻧﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻌﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻣﲑﺍﹰ ﻓﺎﻓﻌﻞ.
ﻓﺒﻜﻰ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺑﻜﺎﺀ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍﹰ.ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺯﺩﱐ ﻳﺮﲪﻚ ﺍﷲ! ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ! ﺃﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴـﺄﻟﻚ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻌﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﻓﻌﻞ ،ﻭﺇﻳﺎﻙ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﻭﲤﺴﻲ
ﻭﰲ ﻗﻠﺒﻚ ﻏﺶ ﻟﺮﻋﻴﺘﻚ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺁﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﳍﻢ ﻏﺎﺷﺎﹰ ﱂ ﻳﺮﺡ ﺭﺍﺋﺤﺔ
ﺍﳉﻨﺔ .ﻓﺒﻜﻰ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺑﻜﺎﺀ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍﹰ
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ﺩﻳﻦ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻟﺮﰊ ﱂ ﳛﺎﺳﺒﲏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻮﻳـﻞ ﱄ ﺇﻥ ﺳـﺄﻟﲏ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻳـﻞ ﱄ ﺇﻥ
ﻧﺎﻗﺸﲏ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻳﻞ ﱄ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻠﻬﻤﲏ ﺣﺠﱵ! ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺩ .ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺭﰊ ﱂ ﻳﺄﻣﺮﱐ ﺬﺍ ،ﺃﻣﺮﱐ
ﺃﻥ ﺃﺻﺪﻕ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﻭﺃﻃﻴﻊ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭﻣﺎ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﺍﳉﻦ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺲ ﺇﻻ ﻟﻴﻌﺒﺪﻭﻥ " ﻣﺎ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣـﻦ
ﺭﺯﻕ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻄﻌﻤﻮﻥ " ﺇﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﲔ( ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺭﻳﺎﺕ.٥٨-٥٦ :
276
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﻟﻒ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﺭ ﺧﺬﻫﺎ ﻓﺄﻧﻔﻘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻴﺎﻟﻚ ﻭﺗﻘﻮ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺓ ﺭﺑﻚ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ! ﺃﻧﺎ
ﺃﺩﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺓ ،ﻭﺗﻜﺎﻓﺌﲏ ﲟﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﺳﻠﻤﻚ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻭﻓﻘﻚ .ﰒ ﺻﻤﺖ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﻓﺨﺮﺟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﱄ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﻟﻠﺘﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻓﺪﻟﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﺳﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ!
ﻓﺪﺧﻠﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺴﺎﺋﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﺖ :ﻳﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ؟ ﻓﻠﻮ ﻗﺒﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺎﻝ
ﻟﻔﺮﺟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﺎ .ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﳕﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﻲ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻜﻢ ﻛﻤﺜﻞ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳍﻢ ﺑﻌﲑ ﻳﺄﻛﻠﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺴﺒﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﱪ ﳓﺮﻭﻩ
ﻓﺄﻛﻠﻮﺍ ﳊﻤﻪ ،ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺍ ﻳﺎ ﺃﻫﻠﻲ ﺟﻮﻋﺎﹰ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺬﲝﻮﺍ ﻓﻀﻴﻼﹰ.
ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﲰﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﻴﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﺩﺧﻞ ﻓﻌﺴﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﳌﺎﻝ .ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﺪﺧﻠﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻴﻞ ﺧﺮﺝ
ﻭﺟﻠﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ،ﻓﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻓﺠﻌﻞ ﻳﻜﻠﻤﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﳚﻴﺒﻪ ،ﻓﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﳓـﻦ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫ ﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﺟﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺳﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﻘﺎﻟﺖ :ﻳﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺫﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻠﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻧﺼﺮﻑ ﻳﺮﲪـﻚ ﺍﷲ!
ﻓﺎﻧﺼﺮﻓﻨﺎ(.ﺍﻩ
ﺫﻛﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻃﻮﺷﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺳﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﳌﻠﻮﻙ( ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﲔ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺯﺭﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻃﲔ ﺹ ،٢٢ﻭﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﲪﺪﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺑﺸﻴﻬﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴـﺘﻄﺮﻑ
ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ
ﻓﻤﱴ ﻳﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ،ﻭﻣﱴ ﻳﻌﻲ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﻟﻌﻮﺑﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﺮ -ﻭﺇﻥ ﻃﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻥ-
ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺣﺮ ..ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺃﻋﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟـﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﻭﺍﻻﻣﺘﺜﺎﻝ ﻟﻘﻮﳍﻢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺿﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻬﻢ
ﻭﻣﱴ ﻳﻌﻲ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻹﻗﺼﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺗﻀـﺮ ـﻢ ﻫـﻢ
ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﱳ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﻔـﺘﺢ
ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﺭ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﳎﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺭ )ﺝ/٣٦ﺹ) :(٨ﻭﳑـﺎ ﻳﺰﻋـﺰﻉ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﳌﹸﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺾ ﺃﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ :ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺩﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻭﳍـﺬﺍ
ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺻﻌﺒﺖ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳍﻴﺎﺝ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺴﻜﻴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺣﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒـﺎﻉ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺍﺕ ،ﻭﻣﱴ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﺘﻐﺎﻳﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻳﻨﺔ ﺟﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱰﺍﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠـﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨـﺎﻓﺲ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﺔ ،ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﱴ ﻭﺟﺪﻭﺍ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼـﺒﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺂﻟﻒ ﳛﻤﻠﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻋﺔ ﻷﻗﻞ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻭﺃﻭﻫﻰ ﺣﺠﺔ...
ﻓﻼﺑﺪ ﻟﻠﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﺍﻗﻴﺔ ﺃﻭﺟﺎ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻧﻴـﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩﻫـﺎ
ﺑﺎﻟﻐﲔ ﻣﺒﻠﻐﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﳍﺪﺍﻳﺔ ،ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺘﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﳍﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻬﻢ ﺃﻢ ﺑﺎﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻬﻢ ﲢﺖ ﺭﺍﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﻮﺍ ﻳﺪﺍ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻳﻬﻤﻬﻢ ﺍﶈﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺗﻠـﻚ
277
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻳﺔ؛ ﻷﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻴﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻮﺍﺭﺙ ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺮ ﻭﻋﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺃﻢ ﻣﱴ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻘﻄﻨﻮﻥ ﺃﺭﺿﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻓﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺸﺔ ﲢﻮﺟﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﲢﺴﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺗﻠـﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗـﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻃﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺪﻭﻡ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﻭﻳﺼﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺎﻳﺘﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻪ
ﻭﺃﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻟﻮ ﺭﺟﻌﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻛﻞ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻟﺮﺃﻭﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻮﺟﺪﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺰﻝ
ﺇﻻ ﻷﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻫﻮ ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﲢﺴﲔ ﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻦ ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻜﻞ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺗﻰ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳـﺔ،
ﺣﺚﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﺣﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻓﻬﻤﺖ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺩﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻧﺸﺄ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺗﺒﺎﻏﺾ ،ﻭﻻ ﺣﺪﺙ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺮ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ:
]ﻭﻟﹶﻮ ﺷﺎﺀَ ﺭﺑﻚ ﻟﹶﺠﻌﻞﹶ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺃﹸﻣﺔﹰ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓﹰ[)ﻫﻮﺩ (١١٨:ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺿﻞ ﺃﻧﺎﺱ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻘـﺪﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻫﻠﻪ ﻭﻳﺄﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻤﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﲣﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﲑ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠـﻪ
ﺳﺒﺒﻪ ﺍﳉﻬﻞ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻘﺼﲑ ﺃﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺃﻣﺔ ﻓﺈﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﻠﺰﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜﺘﺺ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﻳﺎﻥ(ﺍﻩ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ ،ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻘﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﻳﺘﺨﺬ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﻟﻘﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﳜﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ )ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻲ( ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﺼﻔﻴﺔ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻗﺪﳝﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳋﺼﻮﻡ ،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻌﺒﺔ ﺑﻴﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﺖ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﲰﻲ ﰲ ﺭﺳـﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﰲ
ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺹ) :٢٢ﺳﻨﺔ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻮﻡ ﺃﻧﺴﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﻢ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﺳﻠﻄﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﻟﺒﺚﹼ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ
ﻭﻧﺸﺮﻩ ﻫﻴﻤﻨﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﻭﺳﻴﻄﺮﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺎﻛﻠﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺴﺘﺒﺪ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ
ﳝﻀﻴﻪ ﻓﺤﺪﺙ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﻻ ﺣﺮﺝ(ﺍﻩ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ) :ﻭﺑﺪﻳﻬﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻓﺲ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺒـﻬﻢ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﻜﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻣﺜﲑﺓ ﻋﻦ ﲪﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻟﻚ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﺎﻥ ﺭﲟﺎ ﺯﺍﻏﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨـﻬﺞ
ﻭﺧﺪﺷﺖ ﻗﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺃﻛﺎﺑﺮ(ﺍﻩ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺹ١١٩
ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺼﺒﺎ -ﺑﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﻘﺼﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻗﺼـﺪ -ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻭﻓﺘﺢ ﺁﻓﺎﻕ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﻭﻋﻘﺪ ﺍﳌﺆﲤﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﳋﻄﻂ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ
ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﲑﺍ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻟﻮﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺟﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳـﻼﻣﻴﺔ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﺎﺭﻛﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﺗﺒﻨﻮﻫﺎ ﻓﺈﺎ ﺗﺆﰐ ﲦﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ
278
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ اﻟﺨﺎﻣﺴﺔ :ﻧﺪاء إﻟﻰ اﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎء واﻟﺪﻋﺎء واﻟﻤﻔﻜﺮﯾﻦ
ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻭﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﺎﻡ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻣﻮﺍ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻭﻉ -ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣـﻦ
ﺧﲑ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﳍﻢ ﻭﻟﻸﻣﺔ -ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﻮﺭﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟـﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤـﺎﺀ
ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻔﲔ ،ﻭﺇﻧﲏ ﻷﻏﺘﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺻﺔ ﻓﺄﺩﻋﻮﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻀﻮﺍ ﻭﳚﺪﻭﺍ ﻭﳚﺘﻬـﺪﻭﺍ ﰲ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﻭﺃﻻ
ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻈﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﺎﳌﺸﺎﺭﻳﻊ ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﺑﺄﻓﻜﺎﺭ ..ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﻟﻒ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﲞﻄﻮﺓ ..ﻭﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺭ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻟـﺪﺭﺏ
ﻭﺻﻞ ..ﻭﺇﻥ ﻏﺪﺍ ﻟﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ..ﻭﻟﺌﻦ ﻧﺼﻞ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻻ ﻧﺼﻞ ..ﳓﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﹸﻟﹾﻔﹶﺎﹰ ﺃﻭ ﳕﻮﺕ ﻓﻨﻌﺬﺭﺍ.
ﻭﺃﻏﺘﻨﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺻﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﺄﻗﻮﻝ :ﺃﺭﺟﻮﺍ ﳑﻦ ﻳﻄﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﺿﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸـﺮﻋﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ:
-ﺍﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻲ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻊ ﳌﻨﻈﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﲤﺮ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ
-ﳎﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﺮﺍﺑﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻲ
-ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻲ ﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
-ﺍﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻲ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ
-ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ
-ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺯﻫﺮ
-ﳎﻠﺲ ﺍﻹﻓﺘﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﻭﰊ
-ﻣﺆﲤﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ
-ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﶈﻠﻴﺔ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻣﻨـﻬﻢ
ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﻟﻠﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻭﷲ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ )ﻋﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﺮﻛﻴﺔ(
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻻﻟﻜﺘـﺮﻭﱐ
ﺍﳌﺒﲔ ﰲ ﺧﺎﲤﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ -ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ :ﺗﺄﻳﻴﺪﺍ ﻭﻣﺆﺍﺯﺭﺓ ﺃﻡ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﺎ ﻭﺗﺼﻮﻳﺒﺎ ﺃﻡ ﻧﻘﺪﺍ ﻭﺭﺩﺍ،
ﻭﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﲑﺍﻋﻰ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺄﻳﻴﺪ ﻭﻣﺆﺍﺯﺭﺓ ﻓﺴﻴﻨﺸﺮ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﻣﺔ ،ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺩﻋﻮﺓ ﻟﻄﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ
ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻠﺤﲔ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﻘﺘﻨﻌﲔ ﺑﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﻣﺆﻳﺪﻳﻦ ﻟـﻪ ﰲ
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺳﻠﻮﺍ ﺗﺄﻳﻴﺪﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﻬﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ﻟﻴﻨﺸﺮ ﰲ ﻃﺒﻌﺔ ﻗﺎﺩﻣﺔ ،ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻤﻠـﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻻ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ﺍﳊﻘﲑ ﺭﺍﻗﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﺳﺎﳘﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴـﻠﻤﲔ،
ﻭﺍﷲُ ﻟﻦ ﻳﻨﺴﻰ ﳍﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻟﻦ ﺗﻨﺴﺎﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻟﻦ ﻳﻨﺴﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ
279
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻛﺎﺗﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺒﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤـﺚ ﳏﺎﺿـﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ
ﳏﺎﺿﺮﺍﺕ ﻟﻄﻼﻢ ﻭﲨﻬﻮﺭﻫﻢ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺸﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺛﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﳑﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻧﺸﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺪﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴـﺔ ﺃﻻ
ﻳﺒﺨﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺴﻴﺠﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺃﺟﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ -ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ
ﺍﷲ -ﻟﺒﻨﺔ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ
ﻭﻻ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ﺭﺍﻗﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﳌﻦ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻌﻪ
ﳎﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻴﻌﻪ ﺑﺴﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻔﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﲝﻲ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ
ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﲡﺘﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺪﺏ ﻭﺻﻮﺏ
ﻭﺭﻣﻮﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻮﺱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺃﻋﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺔ) :ﻓﺮﻕ ﺗﺴﺪ( ﻭﳓﻦ ﻭﻟﻸﺳﻒ ﻧﺒﺬﻝ ﺍﳉﻬﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻷﻣـﻮﺍﻝ
ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜﺪﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺝ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻭﺑﺬﻝ ﺍﳉﻬﻮﺩ
ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ) :ﺇﻥ ﺇﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﻫﻲ
ﲡﺘﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﻛﱪﻯ ﳍﺎ( ﺍﻩ ﻭﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ) :ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﻷﻣﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ
ﻧﻐﺮﻗﻬﺎ ﰲ ﲝﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺎﻣﺶ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴـﺪﺓ ﺍﺧﺘﻠـﻒ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﻮﻥ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻼﺣﻘﻮﻥ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻣﻞ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﻧﻨﺴﻰ ﻣﺸـﻜﻼﺕ
ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ﻭﻣﺂﺳﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﺼﺎﺋﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻛﻨﺎ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻭﻗﻮﻋﻬﺎ( ﺍﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ )ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻮﺓ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺬﻣﻮﻡ( ﺹ٩١
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻟﻴﻌﺘﺼﺮ ﺃﳌﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ،ﻓﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻨﺎ ﳐﻄﻄﺎﻢ ﳒﺪ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﻟﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺻﺮﺍﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﻟﻮﺍ ﻏﺮﻗﻰ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺰﻧﻄﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺑﻮﺍﺏ،
ﻓﻬﻞ ﻧﻌﻲ ﻭﻧﺪﺭﻙ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﳛﺎﻙ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﺑﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻧﻠﺘﻔﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ
ﻭﻧﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﳋﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻧﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭ ﺍﻷﻛﱪ؟! ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺃﻛﻠﺖ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺃﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭ
ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩ
ﻓﺎﺭﺑﺄ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﻋﻰ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳍﻤﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻫﻴﺌﻮﻙ ﻷﻣﺮ ﻟﻮ ﻓﻄﻨﺖ ﻟﻪ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﻔﻘﺖ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻠﻮﻢ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻟﻒ ﺑﻴﻨـﻬﻢ( ﻓﻨﺴـﺄﻝ ﺍﷲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﻟﻒ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻠﻮﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﳚﻤﻊ ﻛﻠﻤﺘـﻬﻢ،
280
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻭﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺪﺩ ﺧﻄﺎﻧﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﻬﻤﻨﺎ ﺭﺷﺪﻧﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﺄﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺭﺿﺎﻩ ،ﺁﻣﲔ
ﻳﺎ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ ،ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤـﺪ ﻭﺁﻟـﻪ
ﻭﺻﺤﺒﻪ ﺃﲨﻌﲔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﻌﻬﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
http://www.manarahnet.net/subPage.aspx?Page=CyHIOOVTbNeDWcOXDJVT
Tw==&CatID=444&SubID=%201231&co=443
281
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﺘﻌﺮﯾﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺆﻟﻒ
282
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻘﻲ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺣﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳍﺠﺎﺀ:
-١ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺳﻲ )ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ( )ﺻﻌﺪﺓ(
-٢ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺇﻟﺒﻮ ﻭﻟﺪ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻘﻴﻄﻲ )ﺍﻟﺼﺮﻑ( )ﻗﻄﺮ(
-٣ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻗﻲ )ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ–ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ( )ﻗﻄﺮ(
-٤ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻷﲰﺮﻱ )ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ–ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ–ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ( )ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ(
-٥ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﻣﺮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﱐ )ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ– ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ( )ﻋﺪﻥ(
-٦ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﺪﻱ )ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ( )ﻋﺪﻥ(
-٧ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﺎﺭﻭﻳﺲ )ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ( )ﻋﺪﻥ(
-٨ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺩﻱ )ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ( )ﻗﻄﺮ(
-٩ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻔﻴﻆ )ﺗﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﻭﺳﻠﻮﻙ( )ﺣﻀﺮﻣﻮﺕ(
-١٠ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺎﱄ )ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ( )ﺻﻌﺪﺓ(
-١١ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻨﻜﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﻠﻜﻨﻮﻱ )ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺣﻔﺺ( )ﻗﻄﺮ(
-١٢ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺠﻮﻳﲏ )ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ–ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻇﺮﺓ–ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏـﺔ(
)ﻗﻄﺮ(
-١٣ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺩﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺎ )ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ–ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ( )ﺩﻣﺸﻖ(
-١٤ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻦ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺩﻋﻲ )ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ–ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ( )ﺻﻌﺪﺓ–ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ(
-١٥ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ
283
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺳﺎﱂ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻃﺮﻱ )ﺣﻀﺮﻣﻮﺕ( -١٠
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺳﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﲰﻲ )ﺍﳍﻨﺪ( -١١
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪﺭﻭﺱ )ﺣﻀﺮﻣﻮﺕ( -١٢
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﺒﻮﺭﻱ )ﺍﳍﻨﺪ( -١٣
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻏﺪﺓ )ﺟﺪﺓ( -١٤
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﲏ ﺍﻟﻨﺪﻭﻱ )ﺍﳍﻨﺪ( -١٥
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﺎﺭﻧﻔﻮﺭﻱ )ﺍﳍﻨﺪ( -١٦
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺳﻲ )ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺎ( -١٧
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺾ )ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ( -١٨
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻷﲰﺮﻱ )ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ( -١٩
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻃﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻮﺑﻨﺪﻱ )ﺍﳍﻨﺪ( -٢٠
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺎﻗﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﺎﺭﻧﻔﻮﺭﻱ )ﺍﳍﻨﺪ( -٢١
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺷﻠﻲ )ﺎﻣﺔ( -٢٢
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﴰﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﻝ )ﺎﻣﺔ( -٢٣
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪﺭﻭﺱ )ﻛﻴﻨﻴﺎ( -٢٤
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺧﱯ )ﺟﺪﺓ( -٢٥
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻮﻱ ﺑﻦ ﺷﻬﺎﺏ )ﺣﻀﺮﻣﻮﺕ( -٢٦
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﻝ ) ﺎﻣﺔ ( -٢٧
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﻠﻌﻲ )ﺎﻣﺔ( -٢٨
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﺎﺡ )ﺎﻣﺔ( -٢٩
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻔﻴﻆ )ﺣﻀﺮﻣﻮﺕ( -٣٠
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﻀﻮﱐ )ﺎﻣﺔ( -٣١
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﻲ )ﺎﻣﺔ( -٣٢
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﻝ )ﻣﻜﺔ–ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ( -٣٣
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﳉﻴﻼﱐ )ﻣﻜﺔ( -٣٤
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻔﻴﻆ )ﺣﻀﺮﻣﻮﺕ( -٣٥
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻗﺎﺳﻢ ﲝﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﻲ )ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ( -٣٦
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﺎﺟﺪ ﺭﲪﺖ ﺍﷲ )ﺍﳌﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻟﺘﻴﺔ-ﻣﻜﺔ( -٣٧
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳎﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻣﻜﻲ )ﺟﺪﺓ( -٣٨
284
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﺍﱐ ) ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ ( -٣٩
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺾ )ﻛﻴﻨﻴﺎ( -٤٠
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺴﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﻲ )ﻣﻜﺔ( -٤١
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺁﻝ ﺭﺷﻴﺪ )ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ( -٤٢
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻃﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭﻱ )ﺑﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ( -٤٣
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻨﻜﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﻠﻜﻨﻮﻱ )ﻗﻄﺮ( -٤٤
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺰﻱ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﻝ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﻳﺴﻲ )ﺎﻣﺔ( -٤٥
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺠﻼﻥ )ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ( -٤٦
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﺔ )ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ( -٤٧
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻓﻘﲑﺓ )ﺎﻣﺔ( -٤٨
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﳕﺮ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ )ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ( -٤٩
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﲑ )ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﻥ( -٥٠
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺩﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺎ )ﺩﻣﺸﻖ( -٥١
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻴﻞ ﺑﻦ ﻫﺎﺷﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﻤﺮﻱ )ﻣﻜﺔ( -٥٢
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻧﻌﻤﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻤﻲ )ﺍﳍﻨﺪ( -٥٣
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻧﺼﲑ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺧﺎﻥ )ﺍﳍﻨﺪ( -٥٤
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻭﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻓﺞ ﺍﻷﺣﺴﺎﺋﻲ )ﺍﻷﺣﺴﺎﺀ( -٥٥
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳛﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﻝ )ﺎﻣﺔ( -٥٦
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳛﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﻼ ﺍﻷﺣﺴﺎﺋﻲ )ﺍﻷﺣﺴﺎﺀ( -٥٧
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﳛﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﺍﻟﻐﻮﺛﺎﱐ )ﺟﺪﺓ( -٥٨
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﺍﳉﻨﻔﻮﺭﻱ )ﺍﳍﻨﺪ( -٥٩
ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ -٦٠
285
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺷﺪﻱ )ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ( -٦
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻤﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﳝﻲ )ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ( -٧
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﺍﱐ )ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ( -٨
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺎ )ﺩﻣﺸﻖ( -٩
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺩﻭ )ﻣﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ( -١٠
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﱐ )ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ( -١١
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻛﺮﱘ ﺭﺍﺟﺢ )ﺩﻣﺸﻖ( -١٢
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﻄﺼﻔﻰ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻱ )ﻣﺄﺭﺏ( -١٣
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﳋﻦ )ﺩﻣﺸﻖ( -١٤
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﳛﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺤﻲ )ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ( -١٥
ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ -١٦
286
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
-١٦ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻑ )ﻋﺠﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻄﺒﻌﻪ(
-١٧ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ )ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻉ–ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳉﻴﻞ-ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ(
-١٨ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ
287
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻟﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻌﺒﺎﻥ ﻭﻟﻴﻠﱵ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺪ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ )ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺖ( -٢٥
ﻣﺴﺢ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺀ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ )ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺖ( -٢٦
ﻧﺴﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻓﻘﻬﻴﺔ )ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺖ( -٢٧
ﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺷﺮﻁ ﰲ ﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﻹﳝﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ؟ )ﻋﺠﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺈﲤﺎﻣـﻪ -٢٨
ﻭﻧﺸﺮﻩ(
ﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮﺓ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ؟! ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺗﺄﺻﻴﻠﻴﺔ )ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺖ( -٢٩
ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ -٣٠
ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﻳﺔ:
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ:
ﺻﻨﻌﺎﺀ– ﻋﺪﻥ – ﺣﻀﺮﻣﻮﺕ – ﺻﻌﺪﺓ – ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺪﺓ – ﺇﺏ – ﳊﺞ – ﻳﺎﻓﻊ – ﺃﺑﲔ – ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻭﻋﺔ – ﺯﺑﻴﺪ
– ﺑﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴﻪ – ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻲ – ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ – ﻣﺄﺭﺏ – ﺫﻣﺎﺭ – ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﺀ – ﺗﻌﺰ – ﺣﺠﺔ -ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ:
ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ) :ﻣﻜﺔ–ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ–ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺽ–ﺟﺪﺓ–ﺍﻷﺣﺴﺎﺀ( – ﻗﻄﺮ– ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ – ﺑﻨﺠﻼﺩﺵ -ﺍﳍﻨﺪ) :ﺩﻳﻮﺑﻨﺪ-
ﺳﻬﺎﺭﻧﻔﻮﺭ-ﺩﳍﻲ-ﻛﺎﻟﻜﺘﺎ-ﺍﳌﻴﻮﺍﺕ( -ﺃﻧﺪﻭﻧﻴﺴﻴﺎ – ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺰﻳﺎ ..ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ
288
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
اﻟﻔﮭﺮس
ﺍﻹﻫﺪﺍﺀ ٢ ..................................................................................
ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺷﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺬﺍﺭ ٣ .......................................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﳝﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺣﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳍﺠﺎﺀ ٤ .....................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﱐ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ٤ ...............................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﲪﺪ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻠﻲ ٦ .........................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ /ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻏﺸﻲ ٨ ......................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ /ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﱄ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﻝ ١٠ .............................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ /ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺎ ١١ .............................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺭ ١٣ ....................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ /ﺭﺟﺐ ﺩﻳﺐ ١٥ ..............................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ /ﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻓﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩﺓ١٨ .....................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ٢٠ ............................................
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ ٢٠ ..........................................................
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﲪﻮﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﺆﻳﺪ ٢٠ ...........................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺳﻲ ٢٢ .................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ /ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﲏ ﻗﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺟﱯ ٢٤ ..................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﺪﺍﺏ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﳊﻤﺶ ٢٥ .....................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ /ﻋﺼﺎﻡ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﲑ ٢٧ .....................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ/ﻋﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﻦ ﻧﺎﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﻘﻲ ٢٩ .......................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺳﺎﱂ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻔﻴﻆ ٣٠ ............................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ /ﻣﺎﺟﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﻳﺶ ٣١ .................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﺍﱐ ٣٣ ...................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺠﻼﻥ٣٤ .......................................................
289
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺠﻼﻥ٣٤ .......................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻮﺭ ٣٦ ......................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ /ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ٣٨ ..................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ /ﳛﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﻼ ﺍﻷﺣﺴﺎﺋﻲ ٣٩ ..............................................
ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ/ﳏﻤﺪ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻨﺒﻮﺭﻱ ٤١ ....................................
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ٤٢ .................................................................................
ﻫﻴﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ٤٨ ..........................................................................
ﺑﲔ ﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ :ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻟﻮﻥ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ٥٢ .....................................................
ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ٥٦ ...................................................
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ٥٦ ............................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ٥٦ .....................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ٥٦ ........................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻭﺯﺍﻋﻲ ٥٦ .....................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ٥٧ .....................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺼﺮﻭﻥ٥٩ ..............................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﳐﻠﻮﻑ ٥٩ ...................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺯﻳﲏ ﺩﺣﻼﻥ ﻭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ٦٠ .....................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ٦١ ..........................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ٦١ ................................ ................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ٦٢ .................................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ )ﺍﳉﻌﻔﺮﻳﺔ( ٦٣ ......................................................
ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ٦٤ ..................................... ................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ٦٤ ..........................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﲤﺤﻴﺺ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺟﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ٦٤ ...........................
290
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻋﲔ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻂ ٦٧ .....................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ :ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ٦٩ ...............................
ﻭﻟﺘﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﺻﻮﺭ٦٩ ...................................................................:
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ٦٩ ......................................................................... :
ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ٦٩ ................................................................ :
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ٦٩ ................................................................ :
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ٧٠ ................................ ................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ٧٠ ................................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ٧١ ................................. ................................
ﻭﺃﺟﺪﱐ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺍ ﻟﻠﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﲡﺎﻩ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﺻﻨﺎﻑ )(٧٤ ...................... :
ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ٧٥ ................................... ................................ :
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ٧٥ ..............................................................
ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ٧٦ .....................................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻃﻤﻴﻮﻥ–ﺍﻟﻌﺒﻴﺪﻳﻮﻥ( )(٧٨ ................................... :
ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﲢﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ٧٩ ........................................... :
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ٨٠ ................................................... :
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ٨١ .............................................. :
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ٨١ ...................................................... :
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ٨١ ................................ ................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ٨٣ ................................. ................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﻟﻨﺼﲑﻳﺔ )ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﻮﻥ( ٨٤ .....................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ٨٦ ............................... ................................
ﻭﺑﺎﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ٨٦ ................. :
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ٨٩ ............................................................
291
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﺮﺽ ٨٩ ..............................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ٩٠ ....................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ٩٠ ......................................................
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ٩٠ ....................................................................... :
ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺒﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ٩١ ............................................................... :
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ٩١ ........................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺗﺮﻳﺪﻳﺔ ٩١ ........................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ٩٦ ............................... ................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ٩٧ ................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ٩٨ .......................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴﺔ ١٠١ .............................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﺍﳉﱪﻳﺔ ١٠١ .............................. ................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ :ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ١٠٢ ..............................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ :ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ١٠٥ ......................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻊ :ﺍﻟﻨﺼﲑﻳﺔ ) ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﻮﻥ ( ١٠٦ ..................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺷﺮ :ﺍﻹﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺔ )ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻃﻤﻴﻮﻥ–ﺍﻟﻌﺒﻴﺪﻳﻮﻥ( ١٠٦ .......................................
ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ١١٠ ..................................................
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ١١٠ ...........................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﻉ ١١٠ ............................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻠﻲ )ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻲ( ١١١ ..................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ١١٢ ......................... ................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ )ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ( ١١٢ ..........................................
ﻫﻞ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻉ ﻳﻨﻘﺾ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻉ ؟ ١١٤ .....................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪ )ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ( ١١٥ ...............................................
292
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻫﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ؟ ١١٦ .....
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻣﱴ ﻳﻌﺬﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻴﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ؟ ١١٨ ..................................
ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ) :ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﺔ(!! ١٢٤ .........................................................
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ١٢٥ ...........................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻓﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺪ ١٢٥ .............................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ١٢٧ ...........................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ١٢٧ .........................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﲏ ١٢٩ ............................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ١٣٦ .................................................
ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺇﺫﻥ ؟ ١٤٠ .........................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ١٤٤ ...........................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ١٤٤ .....................................................
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻣﺼﺮ ١٤٤ ..................................................................
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﻴﺎﺽ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ١٤٥ .................................................................
ﺍﻟﻌﺰ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺍﻷﻋﺰ ١٤٥ .....................................................
ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ١٤٥ .........................................................................
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ١٤٥ ......................................................................
ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﻗﻀﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﻟﻜﻴﺔ ١٤٦ ............................................................
ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ ١٤٦ .................................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ١٤٧ .......................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﻟﺔ ١٤٧ ................................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ١٤٨ ................................................................
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺪﻳﺔ ١٤٨ ............................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ١٥٠ ..............................................................
293
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺻﱯ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ؟ ١٥٢ ........................... ................................
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺗﻜﻔﲑﻫﻢ ﻟﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ ١٥٧ ........................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻔﻴﺔ ١٦٢ ...............................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ١٦٥ .............................. ................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ١٦٦ ............................................................
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ١٦٧ .........................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺟﺎﺋﺮﺓ )ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ( ١٦٧ ...........................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ١٦٧ ......................................................
ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ١٦٧ ............................................................. :
ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﳜﻲ ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﻫﻴﺪﻱ ١٦٨ .............................................................
ﺃﺳﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻭﺍﺳﻂ١٦٨ ........................................................
ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺍﺑﻴﺴﻲ ١٦٨ ......................................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ١٧٠ .........................................................
ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ) ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ( ١٧٠ .........................................................
ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺿﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ١٧٠ ................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺸﺄ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ١٧١ ......................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﺣﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺒﻊ ١٧٢ ........................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺧﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻞ ١٧٩ .................................
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻷﻣﺔ ١٨٠ ....................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ١٨١ ..............................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﻳﺎﺕ ١٨٣ .......................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻒ ١٨٩ ......................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﻣﻦ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺟﻴﺔ؟ ١٩٠ .....................................................
ﺍﶈﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ١٩٤ ..................................................
294
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻻ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ١٩٤ ..............................................
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ١٩٦ .....................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ١٩٧ ........................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ١٩٨ .........................................
ﺍﳍﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺭ ١٩٨ ......................................................
ﺍﳍﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻘﲔ ٢٠٢ .....................................................
ﺍﳍﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﺓ ٢٠٢ ......................................................
ﺍﳍﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﻋﺔ ٢٠٣ ......................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ٢٠٤ ...........................................
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﺸﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻈﻠﻤﺔ ٢٠٧ ..............
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﺸﺮﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ٢٠٧ .......................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ٢٠٧ ......................................................
ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳉﻤﻞ ٢٠٧ ................................ ................................
ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﳋﻮﺍﺭﺝ٢٠٧ ...................................................................
ﺍﻟﻨﻈﹼﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰﱄ ﻭﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ٢٠٨ ....................................................
ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻭﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﲏ ٢٠٨ ..........................................................
ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻣﻊ ﺷﻴﻌﻲ ٢٠٩ ..............................................................
ﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻷﻫﻮﺍﺀ ٢٠٩ ...............................................................
ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻃﺮﻳﻔﺔ ﺣﻜﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ ٢١٠ ...........................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ٢١٠ .......................................................
ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ٢١٠ .....................................................................
ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ٢١١ ........................................
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺃﺳﺎ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻼﱐ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ٢١١ ......................
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﺍﺯﻱ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ٢١٢ .......................
295
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪﻱ ٢١٢ .................................
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ٢١٣ .........................................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻣﻈﻠﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ٢١٤ .......................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﺨﺎﺹ ٢١٤ .....................................................
ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻫﻠﻲ ٢١٤ ......................................................................
ﺍﻟﻄﱪﻱ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ٢١٨ .................................................................
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ٢١٩ ................................ ................................
ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ٢١٩ ................................. ................................
ﺃﻳﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﺘﻴﺎﱐ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻨﻴﻔﺔ ٢١٩ ............................................................
ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺙ ﺍﶈﺎﺳﱯ ﻭﺃﺑﻮﻩ ٢٢٠ ..................................................................
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﲏ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺳﻲ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ ٢٢٠ ........................................................
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺓ ٢٢٠ ................................................................
ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺰﻡ٢٢١ ..................................................................
ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﱪ ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ٢٢١ ........................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺋﻒ ٢٢٤ .......................................................
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ٢٢٤ ........................... ................................
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴﺔ ٢٢٤ ............................................................
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻬﻴﺔ ٢٢٥ .............................................................
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺷﺎﻋﺮﺓ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻨﺎﺑﻠﺔ ٢٢٥ ..........................................................
ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﺔ ٢٢٦ .........................................................................
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﻫﻮ ﲰﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ٢٢٧ ....................................................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ٢٢٧ ............................
ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻛﺜﲑ ٢٣٣ ........................................
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﻟﻨﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ٢٣٦ .................................................
296
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ :ﻻ ﻟﻺﺭﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻭﻻ ﻟﺮﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ٢٣٨ ...................................
ﺧﺎﲤﺔ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻑ ٢٤٤ ..........................................................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺰﻛﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ٢٤٤ ...................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺭ ﻭﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﰲ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﻣﻠﺔ ٢٥٢ .......................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ٢٥٥ .......................................
ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﻘﲔ ﰲ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ٢٥٦ ................................
ﺃﻭﻻ :ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭﻱ ٢٥٦ .............................................
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ :ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺰﺍﱄ ٢٦٣ ............................................
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺎ :ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻏﺸﻲ ٢٦٣ .........................................
ﺭﺍﺑﻌﺎ :ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲑﻱ ٢٦٧ ........................................
ﺧﺎﻣﺴﺎ :ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ٢٧٠ ...............................
ﺳﺎﺩﺳﺎ :ﻣﻘﺘﻄﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻭﺍﻋﻆ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﳋﺮﺍﺳﺎﱐ ٢٧٢ .............................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ :ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﳊﻜﹼﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻗﺔ ٢٧٣ .....................................
ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ :ﻧﺪﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮﻳﻦ ٢٧٩ ........................................
ﺻﻔﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ٢٨١ ..............................................................
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺎﳌﺆﻟﻒ ٢٨٢ ....................................... ................................
ﺍﻟﻔﻬﺮﺱ ٢٨٩ ...............................................................................
297
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com