Understanding Connectors
Understanding Connectors
Understanding Connectors
UNDERSTANDING
CONNECTORS
Overview
SolidWorks® helps you move through the design cycle smarter. With fast and accurate virtual connectors,
your team will be able to focus on the behavior of the design as a whole, instead of wasting precious
time modeling and remodeling hundreds of pins, bolts, springs, and welds.
www.solidworks.com
Introduction
Trying to understand how a design works without studying its connectors is When solving a structural problem,
like trying to read an essay without its conjunctions. “And” versus “but” makes a the system breaks the model down
major difference—so does a pin versus a bolt. In the past, you could spend days into many discrete elements, which
modeling the connections for an assembly analysis, only to find that a modification are then solved.
in the design meant going right back to square one and starting all over again.
But what if you didn’t have to? What if the software were smart enough to do
the tedious parts for you?
SolidWorks Simulation is. SolidWorks has made working with connectors quick
and easy, replacing the geometry of the “real” hardware with idealized virtual
connectors. These simulated connectors impose the behavior of their “real”
counterparts on the rest of the design without requiring the painstaking analysis
of each pin or bolt. SolidWorks Simulation takes no shortcuts in accuracy with
its virtual connectors. Yet by putting many of the tasks formerly performed by
analysts into the software, it speeds up the simulation process, leaving you more
time to do what you do best: designing.
Background Information
In order to understand how connectors work, it is worth recapping a fundamental
part of FEA theory. When solving a structural problem, the system breaks the
model down into many discrete elements, which are then solved. There are many
classes of elements that can be used, but SolidWorks Simulation connectors use
only a small subset.
Spring connectors can join flat parallel faces, concentric cylindrical faces, or two
point locations (vertices). For the two face-defined spring connectors, the springs
appear only on the common areas of projection to prevent unintended moments
from forming (Figure 1).
component 1
FACE 1
common area
of projection
FACE 2
component 2
Figure 1. The springs between components with these faces appear to be placed
in the same way, not differently.
The stiffness can be defined as either a total (i.e., a total force per unit length)
or distributed (i.e., “stiffness density,” or a pressure per unit length) value. A total
stiffness value is useful for parallel faces, while a distributed setting is more
valuable when the connecting faces have different shapes and sizes. In this case,
you may have to run several iterations based on area calculations to make sure that
the overall desired stiffness is achieved.
Figure 2. An actuator with an elastic support (the small cones and the rod appear in red)
Elastic Supports
The elastic support is a type of fixture which acts much like a spring connector: it
resists tension and compression between two surfaces. The main difference is that
spring connectors connect two parts or assemblies together whereas the elastic
support connects a face of the part or assembly to the virtual ground. In other words,
the elastic support attaches a flexible part or assembly to an infinitely stiff location.
A simple example of an actuator with this connector is shown in Figure 2 above.
Surface connections are another major difference. Although spring connectors join Spring-damper connectors are, in fact,
overlapping projections of faces, spring-damper connectors join individual vertices. spring elements, but they differ in a
This is somewhat like the link versus the rigid connector (see page 13). few ways from the more common
spring connectors.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, spring dampers can be used only in linear
dynamic (modal time history) studies. Springs are very versatile and can be
implemented in a wide variety of studies, but the role of damping is most useful in
linear dynamics. A section view of a part with spring-damper connectors is shown in
Figure 3 below.
Bearing connectors can be defined as “rigid”, or “flexible” with their radial and
axial stiffness values defined. Rigid bearing connectors prevent some motion,
while flexible bearing connectors allow for limited local flexibility. Figure 5 more
explicitly demonstrates how the bearing connector behavior is modeled.
Figure 4. The gearbox bearings (pink) can be replaced by bearing connectors (blue) tO accelerate the simulation solution.
Figure 5 shows how typical bearing behavior compares with three possible
models. A ball bearing or roller bearing normally provides little resistance to
rotation up until some specified angle. At that point, the resistance to rotation
increases dramatically. Figure 5 shows this in red, where the stiffness slope K1 is
much less than K2. It is clear why bearings are actually like spring elements: this
behavior is much like a spring with two linear regions of spring constants.
1
General Types of Bearings and How They Work. Retrieved August 5, 2009, from the ThomasNet website:
http://www.thomasnet.com/articles/machinery-tools-supplies/bearing-types
K2
K=∞
K1
K=0
Off-Axis Rotation, α
Figure 5. Actual bearing behavior (red) compared with three linear models that can be defined in SolidWorks.
The bearing fixture is related to the bearing connector, the difference being that
the part or assembly to be analyzed is connected to the virtual ground. So a
bearing fixture attaches a flexible part or assembly to an infinitely stiff location.
The major benefit of using the bearing connector instead of modeling a bearing
within SolidWorks Simulation is the amount of time saved. Engineers and
designers are interested in bearings mostly for the behavior that they induce in
the rest of the system. In other words, if bearings are placed between the handles
and the handle rods of the crankshaft, what can someone do with it? Bearings are
often assumed to be strong enough if made with the proper material, so modeling
a connector avoids unnecessarily analyzing the stresses on the bearing.
Bolts can be difficult to simulate because of bolt pretension and shear, two
factors that do not affect other connectors. But SolidWorks Simulation simplifies
the analysis by replacing the bolt with a bolt connector made up of a beam and
rigid bars instead of a complete, intricate part. A tension-only beam (i.e., it resists
tension but not compression) is used for the bolt’s shank, which allows preloading
to be modeled as an axial force on the beam. If the shank tightly fits with the
holes (i.e,. they have the same diameter), the software connects bar elements
between the shank and the hole to model the shear effect.
Figure 6. A pipe route contains many bolted flanges, modeled with bolt connectors shown in blue (right).
Because of those rigid bars that connect the beam with flange faces, stresses
close to the area of the bolt/nut may not be accurate. However, errors
significantly decrease a short distance (approximately one bolt diameter) from the
bolt. SolidWorks Simulation also calculates axial and shear reactions at the bolt
to determine bolt sizing, or whether the clamping force generated by the bolt size
and the tightening torque is sufficient to overcome the external loads.
After defining what type of bolt is to be created, the shank diameter, head
diameter, material, and preload conditions are required. The bolt strength data—
including pitch, bolt strength, and factor of safety—can be set for the in creation
of results plots.
All these inputs can be defined in a single dialog. After reaching the solution,
SolidWorks Simulation provides the resultant axial force, shear force and bending
moments acting on the bolt. A check plot shows bolt connectors that are below
(passed) or above (failed) the defined bolt strength, allowing for rapid review of the
possible failure of the bolt connectors.
Virtual bolt connectors don’t provide data about the stress distribution on the bolt/
nut, but rather the effect of the bolt on the parts adjacent to it, or on the overall
assembly. If the stress distribution on the bolt/nut is important, you can model bolt
behavior by including the solid model of the bolt and nuts and then using contact
conditions rather than the virtual bolt connector.
As with other connectors, saving time is the primary benefit of using bolt
connectors in SolidWorks Simulation. Specifically designing and defining these
bolt parameters would take even an expert engineer a significant amount of time.
Though full-scale modeling of a bolt may improve accuracy very near the bolt itself,
through this approach, the effects on the general structure and the bolt’s behavior
can be predicted quickly and fairly accurately with only a few inputs.
Figure 8. A pair of pliers modeled in SolidWorks. A pin connector is shown (in red)
toward the center.
In conventional FEA, the analyst typically simulates the pin behavior by modeling
the pin part in a finite element mesh and then defining contact between the pin
and the cylindrical faces of the pliers’ arms. In a SolidWorks simulation study, a pin
connector is used (Figure 8) to join the two arms of the pliers about one axis. You
simply select the cylindrical face of the hole in each arm in the pliers. SolidWorks
Simulation allows you to define strength and connection characteristics. You also
need to select the desired movement; the pin connector can simulate pins that
rotate, slide back and forth, or both rotate and slide. Obviously, in the case of a
set of pliers, the faces are free to rotate against the pin but not slide. When the
simulation is complete, the red marks denote where the pin connection is placed.
Designers and engineers usually want to know the effect of the pin on the parts
adjacent to it or on the overall assembly, rather than the stress distribution on
the pin itself. The virtual pin connector in SolidWorks Simulation was designed for
just such scenarios, and makes analysis faster and easier. With this capability, you
can learn the forces and moments acting on the pin, and use the information to
determine the size of the pin.
Another advantage of pin connectors in SolidWorks Simulation is repeatability.
While an expert designer doing hand calculations may once have done separate
models for each pin, SolidWorks designers can place multiple pins and need only
define some simple features such as tensile strength and connection limitations.
In doing this, you can save many hours and improve productivity.
Spot Welds
Spot welds can be used to join two very thin pieces of metal—they function best
when the parts are less than 3 mm thick. A SolidWorks spot weld connector is
modeled as a beam element that is shear-flexible. The two required parameters are
the user-defined weld diameter and the distance between the parts being welded.
Ultimately, this model mimics the functionality of spot welds in real life. After all,
spot welds are formed by melting metal pieces together without any “filler.” 2 The
same effect is true here:
there is no filler. Spot
weld connectors in a
model car are shown
below in Figure 9 in blue.
Creating spot welds is
easy in SolidWorks
Simulation.
Figure 9. Spot welds (in blue) join the roof to the sides of
a model car.
2
Srikunwong, C., Dupuy, T. , and Bienvenu, Y. Numerical Simulation of Resistance Spot Welding Process using FEA Technique
In hand calculations, it is important for the engineer to know the material’s thickness SolidWorks automatically alerts
and melting point, among other properties. Calculating the strength of the weld you when there is a problem with a
according to its size is another large undertaking. SolidWorks keeps all the material proposed weld.
data within its databases. The software alerts you when there is a problem with
the proposed weld and provides a detailed description of the stresses and strains
around the weld, provided proper mesh refinement is implemented.
Edge Welds
Edge weld connectors simulate how a weld would behave if applied between a
face and an edge or between two edges. The software accomplishes this through
bonded contacts: all the nodes within the projection of face set 1 onto face set 2
are bonded together. Edge welds are very common features in engineering designs,
like in the brace shown in Figure 10 below.
Figure 10. Edge welds (dark blue) join parts of a brace together
FEA software utilizes the throat shear method to evaluate edge welds. Rather than With finite element analysis, your
rely solely on stresses—which can be unreliable and difficult to obtain near welds in evaluation relies on more than Stress.
any FEA software—the program computes normal, bending, and shear forces when
estimating the welds as lines. Then, SolidWorks can determine an appropriate weld
size for the forces attained in accordance with industry standards. In SolidWorks
Simulation, the edge weld sizes follow the guidelines set forth by the American
Welding Society, Section D1.1. 3 Other standards are currently
being investigated.
SolidWorks Simulation can provide you with data that compare the minimum
required weld size and the current weld size at all points on the seam. An
example is shown in Figure 11 below based on a static study of a weld on the
aforementioned brace.
Figure 11. A sample plot comparing required weld size (blue) and the current weld size (red).
Based on these results, you should take care that the weld is at least as thick
as the largest required thickness. This will ensure that the entire weld is
structurally sound.
3
Structural Welding Code-Steel., American Welding Society, (D1.1), 2006.
Figure 12. A rigid connector keeps the two middle surfaces fixed with respect to one another
even after significant loading
Here, the square on the right is fixed while pressure (purple) is applied to the left
square. Note that these surfaces neither translate nor rotate with respect to one
another. The rest of the square deforms, but these two faces do not. This is more
extreme than the bonded contact simulation setting which still allows for some
localized bending. The stiffness here is infinite. You should be aware when applying
this idealized setting that infinite stiffness can significantly affect the results in the
rest of the system and may inappropriately model some real-life cases. Be careful!
Figure 13. Two rods connected via a link, before testing (left) and after testing (right). A link joins the two end vertices no circle.
These points maintain the same distance apart in testing.
Here, a link joins the two top corners in between the bars. The right bar and the
base of the left bar are fixed (left, in green). A small force (left, purple) is exerted
on one edge. The picture on the right demonstrates how the link works within
the no circle region: the two linked corners remain equidistant before and after
the load is applied. The unlinked area on the bottom (colored yellow and red)
moves more, as expected—after all, the link does allow rotation of other points on
the bodies.
The major caveat with the link connector is that it can be used only for small
displacements. SolidWorks Simulation may not solve correctly if displacements
are too large. Moreover, it is important for you to recognize that the link, like
the rigid connector, is highly idealized. It can cause unpredictably high stresses if
implemented improperly, so exercise caution and use it sparingly.
Dassault Systèmes
SolidWorks Corp.
300 Baker Avenue
Concord, MA 01742 USA
Phone: 1 800 693 9000
Outside the US: +1 978 371 5011
Email: info@solidworks.com
www.solidworks.com
SolidWorks is a registered trademark of Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corp. All other company and product names are trademarks
or registered trademarks of their respective owners. ©2011 Dassault Systèmes. All rights reserved. MKDATAMIGRATTPENG0311