[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

One-loop corrections to the Higgs boson invisible decay in the dark doublet phase of the N2HDM

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 October 2021
  • Volume 2021, article number 44, (2021)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
One-loop corrections to the Higgs boson invisible decay in the dark doublet phase of the N2HDM
Download PDF
  • Duarte Azevedo1,
  • Pedro Gabriel1,
  • Margarete Mühlleitner2,
  • Kodai Sakurai2,3 &
  • …
  • Rui Santos1,4 

  • 264 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

The Higgs invisible decay width may soon become a powerful tool to probe extensions of the Standard Model with dark matter candidates at the Large Hadron Collider. In this work, we calculate the next-to-leading order (NLO) electroweak corrections to the 125 GeV Higgs decay width into two dark matter particles. The model is the next-to-minimal 2-Higgs-doublet model (N2HDM) in the dark doublet phase, that is, only one doublet and the singlet acquire vacuum expectation values. We show that the present measurement of the Higgs invisible branching ratio, BR(H → invisible < 0.11), does not lead to constraints on the parameter space of the model at leading order. This is due to the very precise measurements of the Higgs couplings but could change in the near future. Furthermore, if NLO corrections are required not to be unphysically large, no limits on the parameter space can be extracted from the NLO results.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Electroweak corrections to Higgs boson decays in a Complex Singlet extension of the SM and their phenomenological impact

Article Open access 20 November 2023

Higgs and dark matter physics in the type-II two-Higgs-doublet model inspired by E 6 GUT

Article Open access 05 June 2015

Simplified dark matter models with two Higgs doublets: I. Pseudoscalar mediators

Article Open access 25 May 2017
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].

  2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].

  3. ATLAS collaboration, Combination of searches for invisible Higgs boson decays with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 231801 [arXiv:1904.05105] [INSPIRE].

  4. I. Engeln, P. Ferreira, M. M. Mühlleitner, R. Santos and J. Wittbrodt, The Dark Phases of the N2HDM, JHEP 08 (2020) 085 [arXiv:2004.05382] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J. F. Oliver and M. H. G. Tytgat, The Inert Doublet Model: An Archetype for Dark Matter, JCAP 02 (2007) 028 [hep-ph/0612275] [INSPIRE].

  6. Q.-H. Cao, E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Observing the Dark Scalar Doublet and its Impact on the Standard-Model Higgs Boson at Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095011 [arXiv:0708.2939] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Agrawal, E. M. Dolle and C. A. Krenke, Signals of Inert Doublet Dark Matter in Neutrino Telescopes, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015015 [arXiv:0811.1798] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Hambye, F. S. Ling, L. Lopez Honorez and J. Rocher, Scalar Multiplet Dark Matter, JHEP 07 (2009) 090 [Erratum ibid. 05 (2010) 066] [arXiv:0903.4010] [INSPIRE].

  9. E. Lundstrom, M. Gustafsson and J. Edsjo, The Inert Doublet Model and LEP II Limits, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 035013 [arXiv:0810.3924] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Andreas, M. H. G. Tytgat and Q. Swillens, Neutrinos from Inert Doublet Dark Matter, JCAP 04 (2009) 004 [arXiv:0901.1750] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Arina, F.-S. Ling and M. H. G. Tytgat, IDM and iDM or The Inert Doublet Model and Inelastic Dark Matter, JCAP 10 (2009) 018 [arXiv:0907.0430] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Dolle, X. Miao, S. Su and B. Thomas, Dilepton Signals in the Inert Doublet Model, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 035003 [arXiv:0909.3094] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Nezri, M. H. G. Tytgat and G. Vertongen, e+ and \( \overline{p} \) from inert doublet model dark matter, JCAP 04 (2009) 014 [arXiv:0901.2556] [INSPIRE].

  14. L. Lopez Honorez and C. E. Yaguna, A new viable region of the inert doublet model, JCAP 01 (2011) 002 [arXiv:1011.1411] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Lopez Honorez and C. E. Yaguna, The inert doublet model of dark matter revisited, JHEP 09 (2010) 046 [arXiv:1003.3125] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Miao, S. Su and B. Thomas, Trilepton Signals in the Inert Doublet Model, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 035009 [arXiv:1005.0090] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J.-O. Gong, H. M. Lee and S. K. Kang, Inflation and dark matter in two Higgs doublet models, JHEP 04 (2012) 128 [arXiv:1202.0288] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Gustafsson, S. Rydbeck, L. Lopez-Honorez and E. Lundstrom, Status of the Inert Doublet Model and the Role of multileptons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075019 [arXiv:1206.6316] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Swiezewska and M. Krawczyk, Diphoton rate in the inert doublet model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035019 [arXiv:1212.4100] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann and O. Stål, Dark matter in the Inert Doublet Model after the discovery of a Higgs-like boson at the LHC, JHEP 09 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1303.3010] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Arhrib, Y.-L.S. Tsai, Q. Yuan and T.-C. Yuan, An Updated Analysis of Inert Higgs Doublet Model in light of the Recent Results from LUX, PLANCK, AMS-02 and LHC, JCAP 06 (2014) 030 [arXiv:1310.0358] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Krawczyk, D. Sokolowska, P. Swaczyna and B. Swiezewska, Constraining Inert Dark Matter by Rγγ and WMAP data, JHEP 09 (2013) 055 [arXiv:1305.6266] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura and H. Yokoya, Reconstruction of Inert Doublet Scalars at the International Linear Collider, Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 302 [arXiv:1303.6191] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Garcia-Cely and A. Ibarra, Novel Gamma-ray Spectral Features in the Inert Doublet Model, JCAP 09 (2013) 025 [arXiv:1306.4681] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. N. Blinov, J. Kozaczuk, D. E. Morrissey and A. de la Puente, Compressing the Inert Doublet Model, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 035020 [arXiv:1510.08069] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. A. Díaz, B. Koch and S. Urrutia-Quiroga, Constraints to Dark Matter from Inert Higgs Doublet Model, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016 (2016) 8278375 [arXiv:1511.04429] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Ilnicka, M. Krawczyk and T. Robens, Inert Doublet Model in light of LHC Run I and astrophysical data, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 055026 [arXiv:1508.01671] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann, S. Kraml and D. Sengupta, Dilepton constraints in the Inert Doublet Model from Run 1 of the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 115011 [arXiv:1503.07367] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. F. S. Queiroz and C. E. Yaguna, The CTA aims at the Inert Doublet Model, JCAP 02 (2016) 038 [arXiv:1511.05967] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Hashemi, M. Krawczyk, S. Najjari and A. F. Żarnecki, Production of Inert Scalars at the high energy e+ e− colliders, JHEP 02 (2016) 187 [arXiv:1512.01175] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. C. Garcia-Cely, M. Gustafsson and A. Ibarra, Probing the Inert Doublet Dark Matter Model with Cherenkov Telescopes, JCAP 02 (2016) 043 [arXiv:1512.02801] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Belyaev, G. Cacciapaglia, I. P. Ivanov, F. Rojas-Abatte and M. Thomas, Anatomy of the Inert Two Higgs Doublet Model in the light of the LHC and non-LHC Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 035011 [arXiv:1612.00511] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. P. Poulose, S. Sahoo and K. Sridhar, Exploring the Inert Doublet Model through the dijet plus missing transverse energy channel at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 765 (2017) 300 [arXiv:1604.03045] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi and M. Raidal, Dark Matter through the Higgs portal, Phys. Rept. 842 (2020) 1 [arXiv:1903.03616] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. B. Eiteneuer, A. Goudelis and J. Heisig, The inert doublet model in the light of Fermi-LAT gamma-ray data: a global fit analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 624 [arXiv:1705.01458] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. A. Ilnicka, T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, Constraining Extended Scalar Sectors at the LHC and beyond, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33 (2018) 1830007 [arXiv:1803.03594] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, T. Robens, D. Sokolowska and A. F. Żarnecki, Benchmarking the Inert Doublet Model for e+ e− colliders, JHEP 12 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1809.07712] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. T. Abe and R. Sato, Quantum corrections to the spin-independent cross section of the inert doublet dark matter, JHEP 03 (2015) 109 [arXiv:1501.04161] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, J. El Falaki and A. Jueid, Radiative corrections to the Triple Higgs Coupling in the Inert Higgs Doublet Model, JHEP 12 (2015) 007 [arXiv:1507.03630] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi and K. Sakurai, Testing the dark matter scenario in the inert doublet model by future precision measurements of the Higgs boson couplings, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 115011 [arXiv:1605.08520] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi, K. Mawatari, K. Sakurai and K. Yagyu, Full next-to-leading-order calculations of Higgs boson decay rates in models with non-minimal scalar sectors, Nucl. Phys. B 949 (2019) 114791 [arXiv:1906.10070] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. H. Abouabid et al., One-loop radiative corrections to e+ e− → Zh0/H0A0 in the Inert Higgs Doublet Model, JHEP 05 (2021) 100 [arXiv:2009.03250] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. S. Banerjee, F. Boudjema, N. Chakrabarty and H. Sun, Relic density of dark matter in the inert doublet model beyond leading order for the low mass region: 1. Renormalisation and constraints, arXiv:2101.02165 [INSPIRE].

  44. S. Banerjee, F. Boudjema, N. Chakrabarty and H. Sun, Relic density of dark matter in the inert doublet model beyond leading order for the low mass region: 2. Co-annihilation, arXiv:2101.02166 [INSPIRE].

  45. S. Banerjee, F. Boudjema, N. Chakrabarty and H. Sun, Relic density of dark matter in the inert doublet model beyond leading order for the low mass region: 3. Annihilation in 3-body final state, arXiv:2101.02167 [INSPIRE].

  46. S. Banerjee, F. Boudjema, N. Chakrabarty and H. Sun, Relic density of dark matter in the inert doublet model beyond leading order for the low mass region: 4. The Higgs resonance region, arXiv:2101.02170 [INSPIRE].

  47. C.-Y. Chen, M. Freid and M. Sher, Next-to-minimal two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 075009 [arXiv:1312.3949] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski, J. F. Gunion and Y. Jiang, Extending two-Higgs-doublet models by a singlet scalar field — the Case for Dark Matter, JHEP 11 (2014) 105 [arXiv:1408.2106] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Y. Jiang, L. Li and R. Zheng, Boosted scalar confronting 750 GeV di-photon excess, arXiv:1605.01898 [INSPIRE].

  50. M. Mühlleitner, M. O. P. Sampaio, R. Santos and J. Wittbrodt, The N2HDM under Theoretical and Experimental Scrutiny, JHEP 03 (2017) 094 [arXiv:1612.01309] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev and L. B. Okun, Cosmological Consequences of the Spontaneous Breakdown of Discrete Symmetry, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67 (1974) 3 SLAC-TRANS-0165 [INSPIRE].

  52. T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings, J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. T. W. B. Kibble, Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition, Phys. Rept. 67 (1980) 183 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. A. Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls, Phys. Rept. 121 (1985) 263 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. S. A. Abel, S. Sarkar and P. L. White, On the cosmological domain wall problem for the minimally extended supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 454 (1995) 663 [hep-ph/9506359] [INSPIRE].

  56. N. G. Deshpande and E. Ma, Pattern of Symmetry Breaking with Two Higgs Doublets, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 2574 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. M. Krause, R. Lorenz, M. Mühlleitner, R. Santos and H. Ziesche, Gauge-independent Renormalization of the 2-Higgs-Doublet Model, JHEP 09 (2016) 143 [arXiv:1605.04853] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. M. Krause, D. Lopez-Val, M. Mühlleitner and R. Santos, Gauge-independent Renormalization of the N2HDM, JHEP 12 (2017) 077 [arXiv:1708.01578] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. A. Denner, Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200, Fortsch. Phys. 41 (1993) 307 [arXiv:0709.1075] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and M. M. Weber, Precise predictions for the Higgs-boson decay H → WW/ZZ → 4 leptons, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 013004 [hep-ph/0604011] [INSPIRE].

  61. A. Sirlin, Radiative Corrections in the SU(2)L × U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 971 [INSPIRE].

  62. J. Fleischer and F. Jegerlehner, Radiative Corrections to Higgs Decays in the Extended Weinberg-Salam Model, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2001 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Y. Yamada, Gauge dependence of the on-shell renormalized mixing matrices, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 036008 [hep-ph/0103046] [INSPIRE].

  64. J. R. Espinosa and Y. Yamada, Scale independent and gauge independent mixing angles for scalar particles, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 036003 [hep-ph/0207351] [INSPIRE].

  65. M. Sperling, D. Stöckinger and A. Voigt, Renormalization of vacuum expectation values in spontaneously broken gauge theories, JHEP 07 (2013) 132 [arXiv:1305.1548] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. F. Bojarski, G. Chalons, D. Lopez-Val and T. Robens, Heavy to light Higgs boson decays at NLO in the Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, JHEP 02 (2016) 147 [arXiv:1511.08120] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. M. Krause, M. Mühlleitner, R. Santos and H. Ziesche, Higgs-to-Higgs boson decays in a 2HDM at next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 075019 [arXiv:1609.04185] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. A. Denner, L. Jenniches, J.-N. Lang and C. Sturm, Gauge-independent \( \overline{MS} \) renormalization in the 2HDM, JHEP 09 (2016) 115 [arXiv:1607.07352] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. L. Altenkamp, S. Dittmaier and H. Rzehak, Renormalization schemes for the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model and applications to h → WW/ZZ → 4 fermions, JHEP 09 (2017) 134 [arXiv:1704.02645] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi, K. Sakurai and K. Yagyu, Gauge invariant one-loop corrections to Higgs boson couplings in non-minimal Higgs models, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 035014 [arXiv:1705.05399] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. M. Fox, W. Grimus and M. Löschner, Renormalization and radiative corrections to masses in a general Yukawa model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (2018) 1850019 [arXiv:1705.09589] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and J.-N. Lang, Renormalization of mixing angles, JHEP 11 (2018) 104 [arXiv:1808.03466] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. V. Dūdėnas and M. Löschner, Vacuum expectation value renormalization in the Standard Model and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 076010 [arXiv:2010.15076] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  74. J. M. Cornwall and J. Papavassiliou, Gauge Invariant Three Gluon Vertex in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 3474 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. J. Papavassiliou, Gauge independent transverse and longitudinal self energies and vertices via the pinch technique, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 5958 [hep-ph/9406258] [INSPIRE].

  76. A. Pilaftsis, Resonant CP-violation induced by particle mixing in transition amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 61 [hep-ph/9702393] [INSPIRE].

  77. S. Kanemura, Y. Okada, E. Senaha and C. P. Yuan, Higgs coupling constants as a probe of new physics, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 115002 [hep-ph/0408364] [INSPIRE].

  78. F. Staub, From Superpotential to Model Files for FeynArts and CalcHep/CompHEP, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 1077 [arXiv:0909.2863] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. F. Staub, Automatic Calculation of supersymmetric Renormalization Group Equations and Self Energies, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 808 [arXiv:1002.0840] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. F. Staub, SARAH 3.2: Dirac Gauginos, UFO output, and more, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1792 [arXiv:1207.0906] [INSPIRE].

  81. F. Staub, SARAH 4: A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1773 [arXiv:1309.7223] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. F. Staub, Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015 (2015) 840780 [arXiv:1503.04200] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Scalar One Loop Integrals, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 365 [INSPIRE].

  84. N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules — Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1614 [arXiv:0806.4194] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  85. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer and T. Reiter, UFO — The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201 [arXiv:1108.2040] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].

  87. J. Kublbeck, M. Böhm and A. Denner, Feyn Arts: Computer Algebraic Generation of Feynman Graphs and Amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 60 (1990) 165 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  88. T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].

  89. R. Mertig, M. Böhm and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64 (1991) 345 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  90. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207 (2016) 432 [arXiv:1601.01167] [INSPIRE].

  91. T. Hahn and M. Pérez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 (1999) 153 [hep-ph/9807565] [INSPIRE].

  92. G. J. van Oldenborgh and J. A. M. Vermaseren, New Algorithms for One Loop Integrals, Z. Phys. C 46 (1990) 425 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  93. XENON collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [arXiv:1805.12562] [INSPIRE].

  94. I. Engeln, M. Mühlleitner and J. Wittbrodt, N2HDECAY: Higgs Boson Decays in the Different Phases of the N2HDM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 234 (2019) 256 [arXiv:1805.00966] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski and M. Spira, HDECAY: A program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998) 56 [hep-ph/9704448] [INSPIRE].

  96. A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, M. Muehlleitner and M. Spira, HDECAY: Twenty++ years after, Comput. Phys. Commun. 238 (2019) 214 [arXiv:1801.09506] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. R. Coimbra, M. O. P. Sampaio and R. Santos, ScannerS: Constraining the phase diagram of a complex scalar singlet at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2428 [arXiv:1301.2599] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  98. M. Mühlleitner, M. O. P. Sampaio, R. Santos and J. Wittbrodt, ScannerS: Parameter Scans in Extended Scalar Sectors, arXiv:2007.02985 [INSPIRE].

  99. P. Bechtle et al., HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1211 [arXiv:2006.06007] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  100. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein and J. Wittbrodt, HiggsSignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 145 [arXiv:2012.09197] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  101. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 367 [hep-ph/0607059] [INSPIRE].

  102. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [INSPIRE].

  103. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Goudelis, A. Pukhov and B. Zaldivar, MicrOMEGAs5.0: Freeze-in, Comput. Phys. Commun. 231 (2018) 173 [arXiv:1801.03509] [INSPIRE].

  104. Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [Erratum ibid. 652 (2021) C4] [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Física Teórica e Computacional, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Edifício C8, 1749-016, Lisboa, Portugal

    Duarte Azevedo, Pedro Gabriel & Rui Santos

  2. Institute for Theoretical Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Wolfgang-Gaede-Str. 1, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Margarete Mühlleitner & Kodai Sakurai

  3. Institute for Astroparticle Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Kodai Sakurai

  4. ISEL — Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1959-007, Lisboa, Portugal

    Rui Santos

Authors
  1. Duarte Azevedo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro Gabriel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Margarete Mühlleitner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kodai Sakurai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kodai Sakurai.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Address after April 2021: Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan (Kodai Sakurai).

ArXiv ePrint: 2104.03184

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azevedo, D., Gabriel, P., Mühlleitner, M. et al. One-loop corrections to the Higgs boson invisible decay in the dark doublet phase of the N2HDM. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)044

Download citation

  • Received: 23 April 2021

  • Revised: 10 August 2021

  • Accepted: 02 September 2021

  • Published: 06 October 2021

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2021)044

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Higgs Physics
  • Beyond Standard Model
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature