Velasco v. Belmonte
Velasco v. Belmonte
Velasco v. Belmonte
1 respondent Locsin; on Motion for Reconsideration the COMELEC en banc set aside the order of its Second Division and
"(i) that she is a resident of Brgy. Lupac, Boac, Marinduque; (ii) that she is a natural-born Filipino citizen; (iii) that she
ordered the proclamation of the petitioner. The Decision of the COMELEC en banc has not been challenged before this
is not a permanent resident of, or an immigrant to, a foreign country; (iv) that her date of birth is July 3, 1964; (v) that her Court by respondent Locsin and said Decision has become final and executory.”
civil status is single; and finally (vi) that she is eligible for the office she seeks to be elected to.
2
“The facts are settled and beyond dispute: petitioner garnered 71,350 votes as against respondent Locsin who only got
53,447 votes in the May 14, 2001 elections. The COMELEC Second Division initially ordered the proclamation of
(1) W/N HoR Speaker Belmonte Jr. (R) may be compelled by way of a writ of Representative of the Lone District of the Province of Marinduque. And public
mandamus to administer the oath in favor of P? (YES) respondent Hon. Marilyn B. Barua-Yap, Secretary General, House of
Representatives, shall register the name of petitioner Lord Allan Jay Q. Velasco in
The Court ruled that: the Roll of Members of the House of Representatives after he has taken his oath
• On the basis of the final and executory decisions of the COMELEC and SC, the of office. This Decision shall be IMMEDIATELY EXECUTORY.
administration of oath and the registration of Velasco in the Roll of Members
of the House of Representatives for the Lone District of the Province of
Marinduque are no longer a matter of discretion or judgment on the part of
Speaker (R) Belmonte, Jr.
• They are legally duty-bound to recognize Velasco as the duly elected Member
of the House of Representatives for the Lone District of Marinduque.
• This is because Reyes’ CoC were CANCELLED and Velasco was declared the
winner by the COMELEC.
• Thus, the petition for mandamus lies in favor of Velasco.
NOTE:
Distinction between a ministerial and discretionary act:
• Ministerial: One which an officer or tribunal performs in a given state of facts,
in a prescribed manner, in obedience to the mandate of legal authority, without
regard to or the exercise of his own judgment upon the propriety or
impropriety of the act done.
• Discretionary: One where the law imposes a duty upon a public officer and
gives him the right to decide how or when the duty shall be performed.
(2) W/N the HRET has jurisdiction over Reyes? (NO)
Reyes cannot assert that it is the HRET which has jurisdiction over her since she is
not yet considered a Member of the House of Representatives, but rather it is
Velasco who is a member thereof.
• - This is because COMELEC cancelled Reyes’ CoC and such decision became
final and executory.
This Court explained that to be considered a Member of the HoR, there must be a
concurrence of the following requisites:
(i) a valid proclamation
(ii) a proper oath,
and (iii) assumption of office
DISPOSITIVE
WHEREFORE,the Petition for Mandamus is GRANTED. Public respondent Hon.
Feliciano R. Belmonte, Jr., Speaker, House of Representatives, shall administer
the oath of office of petitioner Lord Allan Jay Q. Velasco as the duly-elected