" "
saeedaloddadi@kku.edu.sa
"
"
. .
38
.
:
.
) (204
) (%60 .
:
:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
:
Management
Quality
! Education
Total "#$%
Summary
The overall goal of this research is to identify the obstacles that prevent the application
of TQM in institutions of higher education. The previous studies have been reviewed.
Then, the field study has been made which include hypotheses and the results. The
third Section contains of summary of the results and the recommendations.
A questionnaire is prepared that consist of two parts. The first part represents 38
element that limit the application of TQM in institutions of higher education, while
the second section deals with information from primary investigator.
Research population have been identified four faculty members at King Khalid
University, namely: Faculty of Shariah and Fundamentals of Religion, Faculty of
Humanities, Faculty of Business Administration and Finance, Faculty of Education.
The total valid questionnaires for analysis is (204), where the percentage of responses
suitable for analysis is (60%) of the total sample.
The most important results from the field study are:
The main obstacles facing the application of TQM in institutions of higher education
are:
1. Weak understanding of the concept of lifelong learning.
2. Weak financial support for scientific research.
3. weak capacities of libraries.
4. Increase the teaching load.
There is a difference between the major groups of constraints according to the
specialization.
there is difference in assessing the degree of importance of the regulatory constraints
and community service according to the experience of a faculty members, while in the
rest of the sides.
There are some proposed a number of recommendations including:
promote a culture of quality.
should start the public and administrative services.
much attention to incentives for faculty.
interest in supporting scientific research.
select leadership that have experience in implementation of Total Quality
Management.
.1
.
) .(2005
.
.
.
"
"
.
.
)" (Taylor and Bogdan, 1997
".
.
2000
.
) (
.
.
.
.2
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
.1
.2
.3
.3
:
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.4
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.5
:
:
:
.
: : .
: .
: :
:
.
.
.
.
.1
:
Quality
)
.(2004
Quality Assurance
.
)(2004
Quality Control
)
.(2004
).(2004
Quality Improving
).(2004
Quality Management System
)
.(2004
Total Quality Management
) (Witcher, 1990 : Total
. Quality
. Management
.
) (Harvey and Knihght, 1996
:
.
.
).(Crawford 1991
.
.
) (Mukhopachyay, 2001
:
.
) (2004 "
".
.2
) (1996
.
.
) (1998
) (9000 .
) (Kanji and Tambi, 1999
: .
.
.
) (2003,
.
48
.
.
) (2004
.
.
) (2004
.
.
.
.
) (2004
.
) (2004
.
) (2004 .
.
: .
) (2004 "
"
:
.
) (2005 :
.
) (2005
.
.
.
) (.
) (2007
: .
:
" "
. :
.
(2007) Venkatraman
.
.
Deming's wheel of Plan-Do-
Check-Act cycle .
) (2008
. :
.
:
.
(Hergner and Reeves, 2000), (McAdam :
and Welsh, 2000).
.3
) (1998
.
) (1998
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
) (1998
)(
.
) (%76.19
.
) (2002
.
.
) (2005
.
.
) (2005
.
.
.
) (2005
.
10
.
) (2005
.
) Ahmed and Hamdoon (2007
.
.
.
) (2007
:
.
.
.
.
.
) (2007
.
:
.
.
.
) (2009
.
.
)Tian, Xiushu; Liu, Yingna; Liu, Dongmei; Li, Yuhong; Yang, Ming (2010
.
:
11
:
.
.
.
:
.1
:
"
"
"
)("
"
"
.2
2-1
) (
:
. :
5.
.
.
.3
12
:
.
:
.
.
.
.4
1-4
:
:
. . 38
:
.
2-4
)(Pre-
Test
) 1 (5 (1) : (2) (3) 4 (5) .
.
3-4
"" 47
).(1
1
89
) (1
4
3
2
68
68
26
5
85
89
.
.5
) (207
.
13
) (3
) (204 ) (%60
. ) (2
.
) (2
72
47.52
163
68
21.57
74
42
20.40
70
22
10.49
36
204
100
343
%
35.29
33.33
20.58
10.78
100
.6
.SPSS
:
"" ANOVA ""
.independent t-test
.7
1-7
"
" )( One- Sample T-Test
SPSS ) (3 :
) (3 ""
1.13
3.78
1
000
6.94
1.02
3.93
2
000
9.15
1.20
3.80
3
000
6.70
0.96
3.96
4
000
10.06
000
19.13
9.06
3.86
0.89
4.00
000
11.20
1
1.12
3.89
000
8.01
2
14
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1
2
) (
3
4
5
1
2
3
3.81
3.99
1.04
0.98
7.80
10.10
000
000
3.64
1.11
5.82
000
4.00
3.81
1.03
1.18
9.76
6.89
000
000
3.84
1.13
7.46
000
3.79
1.05
7.59
000
3.52
1.36
3.90
000
4.14
3.82
0.90
1.16
12.79
7.14
000
000
3.81
1.21
6.75
000
3.95
1.00
9.51
000
3.88
1.07
8.20
000
3.77
1.13
6.90
000
3.79
1.42
5.60
000
3.85
4.07
0.144
0.92
24.27
11.71
000
000
4.44
5.14
2.82
000
3.92
1.15
8.03
000
3.85
0.98
8.69
000
4.08
0.85
12.82
000
4.07
4.12
0.228
0.90
10.51
12.53
000
000
4.00
0.91
11.11
000
4.16
0.92
12.75
000
0.88
11.30
000
3.99
15
5
6
7
2
3
4
5
4.10
0.94
11.76
000
3.71
0.96
7.48
000
3.91
0.85
10.74
000
3.99
3.75
0.154
0.92
17.15
8.22
000
000
3.87
1.03
8.46
000
3.95
0.90
10.61
000
4.00
0.99
10.15
000
3.80
3.87
3.93
1.08
0.103
9.59
7.44
18.95
21.68
000
000
000
) .( 3
) (3.93 ) .(3
. "
) (" ) (4.44
) (4.07
.
" " ) (4.16
) .(3.99
" " ) (4.14
).(3.85
" " ) (4.12
"
" ) (4.12
).(3
" "
) (3.64 " " ) (3.52
.
) .(2007
. ) (2007
16
. ) (2007
.
.
"
".
2-7
"
)("
) (ANOVA ) (4 .
) (4 ) (ANOVA
18.64
3
55.92
0.20
1.56
11.89
98
1165.53
0.017
3.56
340.44
3
1021.32
95.45
95
9068.51
39.45
3
118.35
0.418
0.954
41.35
97
4011.80
59.31
3
177.95
0.008
4.18
14.18
97
1376.00
50.21
3
150.53
0.002
5.18
9.68
98
949.45
1638.90
3
4916.70
0.02
3.42
478.99
94
45025.75
) (4
)( :
) (59.31 ) (50.21
) (39.45
17
) (340.44 ) (18.64 . ""
) (0.05
) (0.05 ).(4
) (2004
.
"
".
3-7
"
" )( independent t-test
).(5
) (5 independent t-test
0.136
1.50
4.22
14.91
46
20
2.66
15.94
56
20
0.043
2.05
10.21
63.19
46
20
9.78
67.32
53
20
0.237
1.19
3.73
19.56
46
20
7.98
21.09
55
20
0.106
1.63
4.59
27.32
46
20
3.23
28.60
55
20
0.004
2.97
4.04
18.34
46
20
2.23
20.23
56
20
)
( . .
) (2004
.
"
"
:
.1
.
18
1-1 .
2-1 :
) ("
.
" .
"
"
"
" "
" "
3-1
)(.
4-1
)
( .
.2
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
)( .
" " "
".
) (
.
.
19
. "
" .
.
.
.
:
o .
o .
o
.
.3
:
.1
.
.
.2
.
.3
.
20
:
)" (2004 "
.
)" (1998 "
15-13 1998.34-1 :
)" (2004 "
.
)" (2005 "
30 1.2005
)" (2009 "
vBulletin
3.8.1
www.arabsys.net TranZ by alfatemy
)" (2007
"
) " (2005 :
"
10 12
1426
)" (2005 -
"
10 12 1426 .
)" (2004 : "
21
.
) "(2007 "
.
)" (2008 "
-.2332 :
)" (2005
" )
( .
)" (2004
" .
)" (2002 "
15 -3
.200227
)" (2005
" 1 -1
.66
)" (1996 "
20 .49-9
)" (1998 "
1.
)" (2004 "
.
)" (1998
" .61
) " (2005
- "
10 12
1426 .
22
" : " (2004)
.37 9 2004 26
" (2004)
"
-3
2004/7/5
" : " (2004)
.
" " (2003)
.118 -89 : (67)
.(2004 )
:
Ahmed, Abdel Moneim, and Hamdoon, Bashar, (2007) "The Challenges and
obstacles of TQM Implementation in the Higher Education Institutions: The Case of
Sharjah", working paper series are produced by the E-TQM College University in
UAE
Crawford (1991), "Total Quality Assurance in Higher Education", the Flamer press,
London."
Harvey and Knight (1996) "Transforming Higher Education", SRHE and Open
University press, Buckingham.
Hazzard (1993) "The strengths and weaknesses of Total Quality management
in higher education", (ERIC Doc . No . 364148).
Hergner and Reeves (2000) "Going against the National Culture in Turkish Higher
Education", Total Quality Management, Abingdon:, Vol. 11, Iss, pp. 45-56.
Kanji and Tambi (1999) "TQM in UK Higher Education Institutions", Total Quality
Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 53 129.
McAdam and Welsh (2000) "A Critical Review of Business Excellence Quality Model
Applied to further Education Colleges", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 8, No. 3,
pp. 120-130.
Mukhopachyay (2001) "Total Quality Management in Education", National Institute of
Education anal planning and Administration, New Delhi.",
23
Paunder (1994) "Institutional Performance in Higher Education: is quality a relevant
concept", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 14 22.
Tian, Xiushu; Liu, Yingna; Liu, Dongmei; Li, Yuhong; Yang, Ming (2010)
"Construction of Quality Guarantee System in Higher Education in China",
International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 323-325, 2010
Third International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2010.
Venkatraman, Sitalakshmi, (2007) "A framework for implementing TQM in higher
education programs", Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 15 Iss: 1, pp.92 112.
Witcher (1990) "Total Marketing: Total Quality and Marketing Concept", the
Quarterly Review of Marketing.
24
