Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

Eclipse Foundation and Broadcom are both solutions in the Java Frameworks category. Eclipse Foundation is ranked #3, while Broadcom is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Eclipse Foundation holds a 15.2% mindshare in JF, compared to Broadcom’s 38.1% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Eclipse Foundation users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Jakarta EE

Read 3 Jakarta EE reviews

3,214 Views
3,214 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Spring Boot

Read 41 Spring Boot reviews

7,705 Views
5,933 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Jakarta EE

Spring Boot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Spring Boot and Jakarta EE compete in the Java ecosystem. Spring Boot is often seen as having an advantage due to its ease of use and rapid development, while Jakarta EE is favored for its robust enterprise features.

Features: Spring Boot supports microservice architecture, offers quick setup, and includes embedded server capabilities. Jakarta EE provides a comprehensive standard for enterprise applications, strong integration capabilities, and compliance with industry standards.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spring Boot offers simplified deployment due to its embedded server and is suitable for cloud-native apps. Jakarta EE requires a dedicated application server but offers stability for enterprise environments. Spring Boot communities are responsive, while Jakarta EE benefits from robust vendor support.

Pricing and ROI: Spring Boot incurs lower initial costs as an open-source, lightweight framework, leading to fast ROI. Jakarta EE might involve larger upfront investments but offers ROI through reliable and scalable enterprise solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Java Frameworks Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Java Frameworks

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 875,455 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jakarta EE

Ranking in Java Frameworks

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spring Boot

Ranking in Java Frameworks

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Jakarta EE is 15.2%, down from 26.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Boot is 38.1%, down from 42.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Java Frameworks Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Spring Boot	38.1%
Jakarta EE	15.2%
Other	46.7%

Java Frameworks

Q&A Highlights

Netanya Carmi

Content Manager at PeerSpot

Nov 29, 2021

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers users a solution that makes it easy to scale up the application to whatever degree the situation demands. The product can be used on the cloud, which allows users to truly scale their application according to their needs. With this cloud feature you can scale your application horizontally and at the same time ensure that your resources are used in the most effective way possible. Throughout the scaling process, resources are shared across the application. Instead of simply throwing ever more resources at the application as it grows, the resources that are already there will be distributed in a way that ensures that they go where they are needed. This makes it a very valuable solution for resource-conscious companies. Another aspect of the solution that makes it so valuable is its ability to create and customize applications. The design of the program is such that applications can be created to your specifications rather quickly. They can then be customized within a short time. When these abilities are combined, what results is a versatile product that saves an organization much in terms of time and resources. Ease of use means that now a company can create whatever it needs to with the minimum level of expenditure possible. Jakarta EE allows users to have different kinds of interfaces depending on the type of application that is being created. This shows an acute sensitivity to the needs of their users. There is no one-size-fits-all solution so far as they are concerned. As far as its ability to customize is concerned, though, Jakarta EE falls short of the mark set by Spring Boot. The customizations that can be added to the system slow it down and make it less effective. This is a disadvantage that makes it less likely to be employed by companies who view time as something to be carefully guarded. Conclusion: While Jakarta EE offers a competent product, Spring Boot is by far the better product.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Mortaza Ghahramani

Senior Java Software Engineer at eDreams ODIGEO

Cloud-friendly but has problems with configuration

I primarily use Jakarta EE as a business enterprise product Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly. Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience.…

Read full review

reviewer2759913

Sr Software Developer at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees

Has improved application monitoring and supports modular development with built-in configuration features

Spring Boot has many valuable features. First, it requires less coding and less configuration. The configurations are already in-built. The security features in Spring Boot are in-built, so we don't need to use any external third-party applications for security. In Spring Boot, the robust configuration capabilities help in adapting to diverse deployment scenarios because there is a minimum configuration required for developing any applications. The auto-configuration feature is available in Spring Boot. When we start any application, there is a property file where we mention the keys, securities, DB connections, and all other configurations. When we start any application, it loads the application properties first, which include the credentials and security files. I am using Spring Boot starter projects. I assess Spring Boot's auto-configuration feature as highly efficient in managing application setup. The application.properties file allows us to specify the server settings, such as the port we want to start the server on. For example, the default is 8080, but we can configure it to 8081. Additionally, we can store connection details such as the driver class, data source URL, username, and password in the application.properties file.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."

"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."

"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."

"The setup is straightforward."

"It is a very scalable solution."

"The most valuable features of Spring Boot include being able to check all the logs and doing health checks for applications. We can also do monitoring more quickly, and use Spring Boot for production support, so when production goes up or down, we can bring up the application very quickly through Spring Boot."

"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is it reduces the configuration needed. The configuration is handled by the solution. For example, if you're going to develop a web service, we needed to have a Tomcat web server and had to deploy the services and do tests. However, with Spring Boot, the default server comes with Spring Boot which reduces the task of doing all the configuration."

"The configuration setup in Spring Boot is pretty simplified compared to Hibernate ORM."

"The platform is easy for developers to download."

"Spring Boot's most valuable functionalities include inversion of control, dependency injection, and the ability to gather all services, models, and controllers together for easy connectivity to your REST API, as well as the ability to build a modular response and request system. It seamlessly integrates with various backends, such as SQL, events, and messaging systems, making it a user-friendly and efficient Java tool. Additionally, it functions as a reliable business transaction layer, providing excellent support for front-end and back-end visual tools."

"Spring Boot is much easier when it comes to the configuration, setup, installation, and deployment of your applications, compared to any kind of MVC framework. It has everything within a single framework."

More Spring Boot pros

Cons

"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."

"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."

"All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."

"Perhaps an even lighter-weight, leaner version could be made available, to compete with alternative solutions, such as NodeJS."

"Nothing really comes to mind in terms of areas of improvement."

"The cloud packaging is not very straightforward."

"The cross framework compatibility has some shortcomings. With JUnit Test Runner and Spring Boot, it's really tedious to make them both work to write the test cases."

"We'd like to have fewer updates."

"Building a new product in Spring Boot can take a long time since the solution uses reflection. This is one area the solution could be improved."

"We have specific algorithms for our Load Balancer or API gateway. So those things, if they could make it more precise, that would be beneficial. Sometimes when we are under pressure or any new person who looks into that stuff, we'll get confused or scared because of some difficulties in understanding Which algorithm needs to be used to implement a Load Balancer. When when we Yeah. Because when we say circuit breaker, we need to use it, and then the user gets a blank circuit breaker. This means we are saying the circuit breaker needs to be moved, and then that circuit breaker needs to be elaborated more. What type of algorithm should I do, and what exactly do I need to get done so that this circuit breaker can help me to resolve my issue? Because, you know, because if you go for the circuit breaker, it will ask to open the new tab, you know, since it will check. If the service is not responding, it will wait and go for another connection. So in similar words, if they can explain it a bit more, that will be helpful. Everyone could do their own Google stuff, and they will get it, but they need help understanding how this could help them to resolve the issue. It will be good if Spring Boot provides information about real-time use cases."

"Spring Boot could improve the interface, error handling, and integration performance."

More Spring Boot cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."

"This solution is free unless you apply for support."

"Spring Boot is an open-source solution."

"The solution is free."

"As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free."

"Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use."

"It's an open-source solution."

"I am using a free version of Spring Boot."

"This is an open source solution."

More Spring Boot pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

875,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?

See all answers

What do you like most about Spring Boot?

1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...

See all answers

Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?

Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spring Boot?

I have not evaluated such scenarios because what we currently have allows us to use it effectively. We always face one challenge with Spring Boot applications when libraries are updated, libraries ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon Corretto vs Jakarta EE

Compared 10% of the time

Spring MVC vs Jakarta EE

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Application Development Framework vs Jakarta EE

Compared 6% of the time

Vert.x vs Jakarta EE

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Spark vs Jakarta EE

Compared 4% of the time

More Jakarta EE Competitors

IBM Open Liberty vs Spring Boot

Compared 31% of the time

Helidon vs Spring Boot

Compared 17% of the time

Apache Spark vs Spring Boot

Compared 11% of the time

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Spring Boot

Compared 10% of the time

Vert.x vs Spring Boot

Compared 6% of the time

More Spring Boot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Java Frameworks

November 2025

Download Jakarta EE product report

Buyer's Guide

Spring Boot

November 2025

Download Spring Boot product report

Overview

Jakarta EE is a powerful platform for developing enterprise-level Java applications. It provides a set of specifications and APIs that enable developers to build scalable, secure, and portable applications. Jakarta EE is built on the foundation of Java EE, which has been widely adopted by organizations around the world.

One of the key features of Jakarta EE is its support for distributed computing. It includes APIs for building distributed applications, such as remote method invocation (RMI) and message-driven beans. This allows developers to create applications that can run on multiple servers and communicate with each other seamlessly.

Another important aspect of Jakarta EE is its focus on security. It provides a comprehensive set of security APIs and features, including authentication, authorization, and encryption. This ensures that applications built with Jakarta EE are robust and protected against potential security threats.

Portability is also a major advantage of Jakarta EE. It allows developers to write applications that can run on any Jakarta EE-compliant server, regardless of the underlying operating system or hardware. This makes it easier to deploy and maintain applications across different environments.

In addition, Jakarta EE offers a wide range of APIs and specifications for various enterprise-level services, such as database access, messaging, and web services. This simplifies the development process and allows developers to focus on building business logic rather than dealing with low-level details.

Eclipse Foundation

Spring Boot is a tool that makes developing web applications and microservices with the Java Spring Framework faster and easier, with minimal configuration and setup. By using Spring Boot, you avoid all the manual writing of boilerplate code, annotations, and complex XML configurations. Spring Boot integrates easily with other Spring products and can connect with multiple databases.

How Spring Boot improves Spring Framework

Java Spring Framework is a popular, open-source framework for creating standalone applications that run on the Java Virtual Machine.

Although the Spring Framework is powerful, it still takes significant time and knowledge to configure, set up, and deploy Spring applications. Spring Boot is designed to get developers up and running as quickly as possible, with minimal configuration of Spring Framework with three important capabilities.

Autoconfiguration: Spring Boot applications are initialized with pre-set dependencies and don't have to be configured manually. Spring Boot also automatically configures both the underlying Spring Framework and any third-party packages based on your settings and on best practices, preventing future errors. Spring Boot's autoconfiguration feature enables you to start developing Spring applications quickly and efficiently. With Spring Boot, you reduce development time and increase the overall efficiency of the development process.
Opinionated approach: Spring Boot uses its own judgment for adding and configuring starter packages for your application, depending on the requirements of your project. (These are defined by filling out a simple web-form during the initialization process.) Spring Boot chooses which dependencies to install and which default values to use according to the form’s values.
Standalone applications: Spring Boot allows developers to create applications that can run on their own without relying on an external web server, by embedding a web server inside the application. Spring Boot applications can be launched on any platform simply by hitting the Run command.

Reviews from Real Users

Spring Boot stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its autoconfiguration feature, which allows users to start developing applications in a minimal amount of time.

A system analyst and team lead at a tech services company writes, “Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated. For data analysis and data mining, you can use a custom API and integrate your application. That's an advanced feature. For data managing and other things, you can get that custom from a third-party API. That is also a free license.”

Randy M., A CEO at Modal Technologies Corporation, writes, “I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products. Spring Security facilitates the handling of standard security measures. The Spring Boot annotations make it easy to handle routing for microservices and to access request and response objects. Other annotations included with Spring Boot enable move away from XML configuration.”

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Apache, Eclipse Foundation and others in Java Frameworks. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

875,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.