[go: up one dir, main page]

Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Lambda vs Apache NiFi comparison

 
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025
Review summaries and opinions
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Categories and Ranking
Apache NiFi
Ranking in Compute Service
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
AWS Lambda
Ranking in Compute Service
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
90
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 Mindshare comparison
As of November 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Apache NiFi is 9.3%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Lambda is 16.6%, down from 20.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Compute Service Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS Lambda16.6%
Apache NiFi9.3%
Other74.1%
Compute Service
 Featured Reviews
Bharghava Raghavendra Beesa - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Developer at Infosys
The tool enables effective data transformation and integration
There are some areas for improvement, particularly with record-level tasks that take a bit of time. The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process. Enhancing features related to alerting would be helpful, including mobile alerts for pipeline issues. Integration with mobile devices for error alerts would simplify information delivery.
Rajaraman Ramachandran - PeerSpot reviewer
Co-Founder and CTO at Gamucopia Creatives
Has enabled us to manage compute resources efficiently while supporting multiple languages
AWS Lambda needs to improve cold start time. Some AWS Lambda functions require a cold start, and if you need AWS Lambda to provide quick responses, you need some of the AWS Lambdas to be always on, which is risky. We need AWS Lambda's cold start time to be reduced so that we can use it much faster than now. We need a better way to handle the cold start. We should be able to start AWS Lambda much before in a predictable way instead of just calling and then having it start.
Quotes from Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Pros
"It is highly effective for handling real-time data by working with APIs for immediate and continuous data extraction."
"Visually, this is a good product."
"The initial setup is very easy. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one point is difficult, and ten points are easy."
"We can integrate the tool with other applications easily."
"The most valuable features of this solution are ease of use and implementation."
"The user interface is good and makes it easy to design very popular workflows."
"The most valuable feature has been the range of clients and the range of connectors that we could use."
"It's an automated flow, where you can build a flow from source to destination, then do the transformation in between."
"Lambda is trigger-based, which means it only activates when accessed, ensuring cost savings."
"The support from AWS Lambda is very good, they are responsive."
"Lambda allows you to focus on the code itself."
"The solution offers good performance."
"It is easy to use."
"AWS Lambda is cost-effective, providing noticeable cost savings."
"AWS Lambda is entirely stable."
"The fact that it is serverless is really important."
 Cons
"The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process."
"There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible."
"There should be a better way to integrate a development environment with local tools."
"More features must be added to the product."
"The use case templates could be more precise to typical business needs."
"There are some claims that NiFi is cloud-native but we have tested it, and it's not."
"I think the UI interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"The tool should incorporate more tutorials for advanced use cases. It has tutorials for simple use cases."
"The 60 seconds limitation with the consumption of the service is really restrictive for a service and the solution can be improved by eliminating that."
"AWS Lambda should improve its compatibility with the language used to write the code."
"There are sometimes issues following an update."
"Security needs to be improved."
"I have seen some drawbacks with certain integrations."
"Having a better preview would be helpful."
"The execution time could be better. One of the major limitations is the time period because it doesn't give you more than seven minutes. So, before thinking about Lambda, you should think through your use case and ensure it's a good fit. Otherwise, you can use batch, step functions, or other methods. Reports and the monitoring board could also be improved in terms of alerts. The threshold alerts are there but can be improved. It takes some time to get used to these methods and get the hang of them."
"I would like to see more integration with other platforms."
 Pricing and Cost Advice
"I used the tool's free version."
"We use the free version of Apache NiFi."
"The solution is open-source."
"It's an open-source solution."
"It costs maybe less than $10 per month in my use case."
"The price of the solution is reasonable and it is a pay-per-use model. It is very good for cost optimization."
"AWS Lambda is a very inexpensive solution. They charge for the number of times we run it. If you run AWS Lambda for one time, they charge around 50 cents or 25 cents for the use. I don't know the exact price, but it's less than a dollar."
"The cost is based on runtime."
"AWS Lambda's cloud version isn't expensive, and I'd rate its pricing as five out of five."
"AWS Lambda license is paid on a monthly basis."
"You're not paying for a server if you're not using it, which is another reason I like it. So, you're not paying if you're not using it. It scales, and you're charged based on usage. It all depends on the use case. Some can be extremely inexpensive if you have very low volume transaction rates. That way, you don't have to fire up and absorb the cost of the servers just sitting there waiting for a transaction to come through. You're only paying when you use it. So, depending upon the use model, Lambda could be highly efficient relative to an EC2 solution. You don't have to have things reallocated."
"Price-wise, AWS Lambda is a five out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
875,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 Top Industries
By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
 Company Size
By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise43
 Questions from the Community
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache NiFi?
Apache NiFi is open-source and free. Its integration with systems like Cloudera can be expensive, but Apache NiFi itself presents the best pricing as a standalone tool.
What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?
The logging system of Apache NiFi needs improvement. It is difficult to debug compared to Airflow ( /products/apache-airflow-reviews ), where task details and issues are clear. With Apache NiFi, I ...
What is your primary use case for Apache NiFi?
I am implementing the ETL workflow using Apache NiFi ( /products/apache-nifi-reviews ) to prepare data and upload it to the cloud. Our use case involves importing data from on-premise and private s...
Which is better, AWS Lambda or Batch?
AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use...
What do you like most about AWS Lambda?
The tool scales automatically based on the number of incoming requests.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Lambda?
The pricing of AWS Lambda is reasonable. It's beneficial and cost-effective for users regardless of the number of instances used.
 Comparisons
 Overview
 Sample Customers
Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group
Netflix
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: October 2025.
875,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.