The Identity of the Ṣābi'ūn: An Historical Quest
by Christopher Buck.
The Muslim World 74.3/4 (July/Oct. 1984): 172–186.
[Published online 3 April 2007, Wiley Online Library.]
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1984.tb03453.x.
Electronic Database (full text available): ATLA Religion Database; Wiley.
ABSTRACT
One of the mysterious and unsolved Qur'anic problems surrounds the identity of the Sabians, al-Ṣābi'ūn. As Jane McAuliffe has shown in her study published in an earlier volume of this journal, Muslim exegetes reflect uncertainty on this point from the very start. Over time the term so diversified in meaning that it became even more difficult to determine to whom it referred. Yet one would assume that in the Qur'ān al-Ṣābi'ūn denotes a specific historical community. Placed alongside Jews, Christians, and "the Believers" (Muslims) in Q. 2:62, one is tempted to regard the Sabians as a fourth monotheistic community. This association is all the more inviting when once again, in Q. 5:69, the same four religions are distinguished following an address to the "possessors of scripture" several verses earlier. This sense of parallelism would appear in Q. 22:17 to extend to the Majūs—who are called into question by the obtrusion into the context of "those who associate" (gods with God). Whatever the solution, these groups constitute a significant internal witness to the religious demography, so to speak, within the Qur'anic universe.
To make sense of the demographic puzzle in which the Sabians figure as the least familiar piece, a fresh methodological "angle" is suggested by the inconclusive data obtained from the study of Muslim commentators. Their indecisive witness is itself a problem which may need to be explained in other ways than simply as resulting from educated speculation. Complementary to McAuliffe's illustrative exegetical survey, the present study employs, therefore, an historical methodology which enables us to place history alongside tradition. A comparison will be drawn between the prominent religious communities Islam encountered during its first two centuries of expansion and the groups identified as Ṣābi'ūn by Arabic and Persian authorities, primarily of the tenth century. Moreover, data gleaned from pre-Islamic sources will offer an independent witness, especially crucial for determining who the Qur'anic Sabians originally were.
The hypothesis we want to test in this article is that the tenth-century identifications of the Ṣābi'ūn which will be considered here reflect the first wave of Muslim expansion after the Prophet's death, especially the encounter with the groups listed by Waardenburg under numbers 5–9. In the case of the Sabians, an interpretation which accounts for diverse identifications would show the validity of data which otherwise would simply be dismissed as contradictory and therefore wrong.
It was natural in the course of time for Muslim authors to extend the application of the term Sabian to cover not only communities from a far distant past, but also contemporary communities with which they themselves came in contact, including some in Africa. Clearly, the term Sabian had by now proved to be the most meaningful and attractive nomenclature for comprehending foreign religiosities within what could still be considered a Qur'anic worldview.
Our study has shown that the issue of the apparent confusion among Muslim exegetes over the identity of the Sabians is resolved once the historical circumstances are grasped. Exactly because it was imprecise, the word Ṣābi'ūn functioned as a term of great legal importance by contributing to an attitude of toleration towards minority religions under Muslim rule. The term evolved from a once-specific designation to a classification which, adapted to ever new historical contexts, expanded its meaning to embrace peoples of otherwise uncertain standing, giving them a place of security within a Qur'anically sanctioned framework.
As far as the original Qur'anic Ṣābi'ūn are concerned, special attention was paid to the Cologne Mani Codex (CMC) which confirms the assertion found in the Fihrist that Sabians were Elchasaites, an identification which may also be implied in Hippolytus. On the basis of evidence to date, it seems justifiable to reaffirm Chwolsohn's conclusion that the Qur'anic Sabians were persons known for their emphasis on ritual purifications, predominantly Mandaeans and Elchasaites.