Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Globalización desde un enfoque de derechos
Democracia y derechos humanos2023 •
Analiza las relaciones entre derechos y la creación y sostenimiento de las democracias.
Весела Трайкова-Йоанина
Русия и българският национален въпрос до Балканските войни. Проучване в един по-широк контекст.2024 •
Настоящата публикация представлява опит да се изясни проблема за отношението на Русия към българския национален въпрос до Балканските войни в контекста на други проблеми, имащи отношение към тази тема. Разглеждат се историческите процесите, съдействащи за превръщането на Русия във Велика сила, ролята и спецификата на Руската църква и взаимоотношенията ѝ с Цариградската патриаршия. Както и особеностите на руския национализъм и как това се отразява върху позицията на Петербург към българските национални тежнения и конкретно към българо-гръцката църковна разпра. Също се отбелязва ролята на Славянската идея в руската имперска политика, като се прави бегъл преглед на важни обществени течения в Северната сила, които индиректно се отразяват на отделни представители на руските елити. Обяснява се как и защо Русия поема ролята на защитник на поробеното православно население на Балканите и какво се крие зад това. Проследяват се промените на руската имперска политика спрямо балканските нации в епохата на национализма. В този контекст се излага политиката на империята към българския национален въпрос в неговите политически измерения, нейната двойнственост и причините за това. Привеждат се документи, свидетелстващи за тайни договорености на Петербург с българските управляващи, като се правят съответните изводи. Обръща се внимание и на отношението на българите към Русия и нейната роля за българската национална кауза преди и след Освобождението, както и на ролята на мита за Дядо Иван и на някои особености в мисленето и поведението на българските елити. Накрая се разглежда важният проблем за драстичното разминаване по отношение на целите и на стратегията за решаването на Македонския въпрос между българските управници и ВМОРО, което се оказва с фатално значение. Прави се извод, че не трябва да търсим вън от българските елити вината за катастрофата 1913 г. – нито в съюзниците, нито в Русия. Самите български управляващи с погрешните си и прибързани решения и действия – не стиковани с едни по-широк кръг от политически дейци и други важни национални фактори, са отговорниците за провала. Заключението на автора е, че ролята на Русия през разглеждания период по отношение на българските национални интереси е сложна, многопластова и нееднозначна и резките оценки – от крайно отрицателни до крайно възвеличаващи – са нереалистични. *** This publication is an attempt to bring clarity to the issue of Russia's attitude towards the Bulgarian national question before the Balkan Wars in the context of other issues related to this topic. The historical processes that contributed to the transformation of Russia into a Great Power, the role and specificity of the Russian Church and its relations with the Patriarchate of Constantinople are examined. And so are the peculiarities of Russian nationalism and how this affected St. Petersburg's stance on the Bulgarian national grievances and particularly on the Bulgarian-Greek ecclesiastical conflict. The publication also notes the role of the Slavic idea in Russian imperial politics, providing a cursory review of important social trends in the Northern Power, which indirectly affected individual representatives of the Russian elites. It is explained how and why Russia assumed the role of protector of the enslaved Orthodox population in the Balkans and what lay behind it. The changes in the Russian imperial policy towards the Balkan nations in the era of nationalism are traced. In this context, the empire's policy towards the Bulgarian national question is presented in its political dimensions, the ambivalence of this policy and the reasons for it are addressed. Documents testifying to St. Petersburg's secret arrangements with the Bulgarian rulers are cited and the relevant conclusions are drawn. Attention is also paid to the attitude of Bulgarians towards Russia and its role concerning the Bulgarian national cause before and after the Liberation, as well as to the role of the myth of Grandfather Ivan and the peculiarities in the mindset and behaviour of the Bulgarian elites. Finally, the important issue of the drastic divergence between Bulgarian rulers and the Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization (IMARO) in terms of the goals and strategy for the resolution of the Macedonian question, which proved to be of fatal significance, is discussed. It is concluded that one should not seek the guilt for the 1913 catastrophe outside the Bulgarian elites - either in the allies, or in Russia. The Bulgarian rulers themselves, with their wrong and hasty decisions and actions that were not in line with a wider circle of political actors and other important national factors, were responsible for the failure. The author's conclusion is that Russia's role in the period under review regarding the Bulgarian national interests was intricate, multi-layered and ambiguous. So drastic assessments – ranging from extremely negative to extremely glorifying – would be unrealistic.
ARCHIVI, DEPOSITI, MAGAZZINI PRESSO GLI ITTITI, M.E. Balza, M. Giorgieri, C. Mora eds.
The evolution and role of administration in Anatolia: a mirror of different degrees and models of centralisation2012 •
Actes du 42 e colloque du GIREA, tenu à l Université de Wrocław, à la mémoire d Iza Bieżuńska-Małowist Les lectures contemporaines de l' esclavage : problématiques, méthodologies et analyses depuis les années 1990, ed. A. Pałuchowski
Global slavery for Greek historians: Prospects and pitfalls2022 •
Abstract: Recent years have seen repeated calls urging historians of ancient slavery to engage more closely with the trend for global studies of slavery, and historians of ancient Greece are increasingly meeting that challenge. These developments affect two kinds of historiography: comparative history and global (or world) history. This article takes stock of these developments, and asks how the global turn may best be harnessed to improve our understanding of Greek slavery and its place in global history. But it also pinpoints several pitfalls of this approach, and discusses how they might be navigated. Résumé : Ces dernières années les historiens de l’esclavage ancien se voient régulièrement et avec insistance invités à s’engager plus étroitement dans les études globales de l’esclavage, de plus en plus d’historiens de la Grèce ancienne entreprenant un tel effort. La tendance s’applique à deux catégories de l’historiographie, à entendre histoire comparée et histoire globale (ou mondiale). On a donc l’intention de faire le point sur ces évolutions et de s’interroger comment exploiter au mieux ce tournant pour améliorer notre appréhension de l’esclave grec et de sa place dans l’histoire globale. Mais on pointera également plusieurs écueils de l’approche et s’intéressera à la manière d’y naviguer avec succès. The full PDF is under embargo, but I can supply a copy on request, so do pop me an email if you want the whole paper.
2011 •
In studies of the Iron Age and Early Roman periods the concept of the ‘tribe’ has long been a social framework upon which to hang the archaeological record. Yet, despite widespread recognition of the complex social processes and shifting identities during Rome’s expansion, the nature of ‘tribes’ in Late Iron Age Britain and the suitability of this term for describing societies at this time has been largely ignored. This article examines why the term ‘tribe’ has retained its prominence in archaeological studies despite being widely critiqued by anthropologists. Through an examination of the historiography of the term I argue that the traditional tribal model was born of nineteenth-century perceptions of social systems and that neither archaeological evidence nor classical sources support many of its current connotations. The names in classical sources should instead be regarded as reflecting the emergence of new social and political entities in the later Iron Age.
Mount Athos in the Fifteenth Century: Crisis and the Beginning of Recovery, in Tο Άγιον Όρος στον 15ο και 16ο αιώνα. Πρακτικά ΣΤ' Διεθνούς Επιστημονικού Συνεδρίου Αγιορειτικής Εστίας (Thessalonike: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 2012), 33-55
Mount Athos in the Fifteenth Century: Crisis and the Beginning of RecoveryLoading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Veredas: Revista da Associação Internacional de Lusitanistas
Leitura e literatura nas redes: seis casos sobre criar, existir e resistir2021 •
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
The Renin–Angiotensin System Modulates Dopaminergic Neurotransmission: A New Player on the Scene2021 •
Literasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Inovasi
Pelatihan Pembuatan Tempe Daun Singkong Sebagai Cemilan Bernutrisi Untuk Ibu Hamil Dan Anak-Anak Sebagai Pencegahan Stunting Di Kota Padang PanjangJournal of gastroenterology and hepatobiliary disorders
The Benefit of Separate Bulb Biopsy in Children Undergoing an Esophagogastroduodenoscopy2015 •
Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience
Financial Performance of Malaysian Steel Industry2017 •
Ανδρονίκη Διαλέτη, Ρίκα Μπενβενίστε, Γιώργος Πλακωτός (επιμ.) Τοπικό, Διεθνικό και Παγκόσμιο στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ιστορία, Κινητικότητες, Συναντήσεις, Ιεραρχήσεις, εκδόσεις Θεμέλιο Ιστορική Βιβλιοθήκη 2023
Η ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΗΣ ΒΡΕΤΑΝΙΚΗΣ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑΣ: «ΠΑΛΑΙΑ/ΝΕΑ» ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΑΚΑ ΕΓΧΕΙΡΙΔΙΑ2023 •
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
Análise de atividades não realizadas pela equipe de enfermagem para o diagnóstico padrão respiratório ineficaz em idosos2012 •
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Medical treatment of craniosynostosis: recombinant Noggin inhibits coronal suture closure in the rat craniosynostosis model2009 •