- Napoli
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Philosophy and Nome
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Philosophy and Nome
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
... SCHIEDER, Weltabenteuer Cortes. Die Gottesfrage bei Hans Jonas, Miinchen, Wien, Ziirich, Schòningh 1998. 25 Cfr. R. LÒw, Zur Wiederbegrùndung der organischen Naturphilosophie dnrch Hans Jonas, in: Ethik far die Zukunft. Im Diskurs mit... more
... SCHIEDER, Weltabenteuer Cortes. Die Gottesfrage bei Hans Jonas, Miinchen, Wien, Ziirich, Schòningh 1998. 25 Cfr. R. LÒw, Zur Wiederbegrùndung der organischen Naturphilosophie dnrch Hans Jonas, in: Ethik far die Zukunft. Im Diskurs mit Hans Jonas, op. cit., pp. 68 ss. ...
Research Interests: Philosophy and Art
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The essay offers a critique of the validity of the computer model of memory (“storage and recovery”) when applied to mental mnemonic phenomena. The critique is articulated in the following moments: 1) from the neurological standpoint,... more
The essay offers a critique of the validity of the computer model of memory (“storage and recovery”)
when applied to mental mnemonic phenomena. The critique is articulated in the following moments: 1) from
the neurological standpoint, based on the latest studies, it is clear that the brain does not function as a digital
device; 2) the mnemonic trace is not a datum or an information, but a symbol, which serves as a cue for the
re-narration of memories that occurs in the anamnesis; 3) the relationsh ip between hypnomesis and
anamnesis is not linear and unidirectional, but circular; 4) in this relationship, oblivion plays in several ways
an essential role. From this derives a conception of memory as a dynamic and creative activity: living
memory as narration and continuous regeneration of memories.
when applied to mental mnemonic phenomena. The critique is articulated in the following moments: 1) from
the neurological standpoint, based on the latest studies, it is clear that the brain does not function as a digital
device; 2) the mnemonic trace is not a datum or an information, but a symbol, which serves as a cue for the
re-narration of memories that occurs in the anamnesis; 3) the relationsh ip between hypnomesis and
anamnesis is not linear and unidirectional, but circular; 4) in this relationship, oblivion plays in several ways
an essential role. From this derives a conception of memory as a dynamic and creative activity: living
memory as narration and continuous regeneration of memories.