• The United States feels that the only way to move forward is to have the North Korean regime to give up its nuclear weapons. The fact that North Korea was already possessed nuclear weapons while being party to the NPT, clearly... more
• The United States feels that the only way to move forward is to have the North Korean regime to give up its nuclear weapons. The fact that North Korea was already possessed nuclear weapons while being party to the NPT, clearly implicates the North. It therefore renders all the nuclear weapons obtained thereafter illegal. • The North Korean constitution guarantees under Article 64 that the State shall effectively guarantee democratic rights and liberties as well as the material and cultural wellbeing of its people. While the United States appreciates the subject of this article, it notes with grave concern that the Kim regime is not guaranteeing anything of the sort.
Article X allows a state to leave the treaty if "extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country", giving three months' (ninety days') notice. The state is required... more
Article X allows a state to leave the treaty if "extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country", giving three months' (ninety days') notice. The state is required to give reasons for leaving the NPT in this notice. NATO states argue that when there is a state of "general war" the treaty no longer applies, effectively allowing the states involved to leave the treaty with no notice. This is a necessary argument to support the NATO nuclear weapons sharing policy, but a troubling one for the logic of the treaty. NATO's argument is based on the phrase "the consequent need to make every effort to avert the danger of such a war" in the treaty preamble, inserted at the behest of U.S. diplomats, arguing that the treaty would at that point have failed to fulfill its function of prohibiting a general war and thus no longer be binding. [32] Many states do not accept this argument. See United States–NATO nuclear weapons sharing above.
Delegates, the situation is Korean Peninsula has its control, country which has inadequate food supply is now rich in nuclear weapons and armaments… Way back… it all started since DPRK government has conducted its first nuclear test in... more
Delegates, the situation is Korean Peninsula has its control, country which has inadequate food supply is now rich in nuclear weapons and armaments… Way back… it all started since DPRK government has conducted its first nuclear test in the year 2006… A long period of 18 years… North Korea has progressed with leaps and bounds in terms of possessing nuclear weapons…To sum up, it has Conducted 6 long threatening nuclear tests…Launched 2 intercontinental ballistic missiles…Hydrogen bombing on US base GUAM which resulted in property damage and injuries to lives…It was US at the first and who knows it may be UK, France and any of the US allies…Would you not consider this if an Nuclear Bomb comes and takes away your home and family under the explosion…It has become very difficult to analyse the next step by DPRK government and this put US in Kim's trajectory for the first time…If this continues United States president Donald Trump won't look back to defend US mainland and other allies…If this so happens there would be a World War III which would interrupt the world peace… The delegate of United Kingdom and Northern Island requests the delegates to cooperate in keeping a full stop to this growing Korean Peninsula Crisis…