Skip to main content
Nous examinons l’influence de l’extreme droite sur la formation de la politique symbolique du gouvernement Fidesz dans le contexte du regime politique hongrois. Depuis 2010, la politique culturelle hongroise ne peut etre consideree comme... more
Nous examinons l’influence de l’extreme droite sur la formation de la politique symbolique du gouvernement Fidesz dans le contexte du regime politique hongrois. Depuis 2010, la politique culturelle hongroise ne peut etre consideree comme un secteur gouvernemental independant de la conception du pouvoir du premier ministre Viktor Orban et de sa politique symbolique. La vision du monde autoritaire et la culture politique nationaliste representees par son regne sont etroitement liees a ce que ses subordonnes accomplissent dans la rubrique « politique culturelle ». Apres avoir explique et interprete les piliers fondamentaux du regime, les politiques culturelles du premier gouvernement Orban (1998-2002) sont comparees avec son deuxieme gouvernement marque par le tournant illiberal (depuis 2010). Cette derniere epoque peut etre caracterisee par la domination du discours nationaliste et de la politique symbolique se referant au passe precommuniste. En se referant constamment a la culture nationale, les campagnes de propagande identifient la culture comme etant au service de la nation. Dans le meme temps, les initiatives culturelles alternatives, non etatiques, sont marginalisees et meme ghettoisees. Le gouvernement d’Orban dans la Hongrie contemporaine vise a coloniser la culture, bien qu’il ne puisse pas atteindre le controle monopolistique, en raison de la diversite et de la resistance inherentes a cette sphere.
Located in East-Central Europe, Hungary has often found itself at a crossroads of political influences of greater powers as well as of different cultures. Although Hungary enjoyed independence for centuries in its early history, the... more
Located in East-Central Europe, Hungary has often found itself at a crossroads of political influences of greater powers as well as of different cultures. Although Hungary enjoyed independence for centuries in its early history, the experience of foreign domination over the last five centuries is one of the defining features of Hungarian public consciousness. Most notably, Hungary was under the control of the Ottoman Empire in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries the Habsburgs in the eighteenth, nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries and the Soviet Union from 1945 until the regime change in 1989. Therefore, Hungarians had to master the techniques of survival under foreign domination. They learned how to operate informally, under and within formal, rigid rules, which represented the interests of the dominant foreign power. Nonetheless, during its twentieth-century history, Hungary made some genuine albeit short-lived attempts to achieve democracy. First, there was the brief liberal-democratic government of Count Mihaly Karolyi in late 1918. A second attempt was made during the semi-democratic coalition government between 1945 and 1947. Finally, Hungary operated as a democracy for twelve remarkable days during the anti-totalitarian revolution of October 1956. The Hungarian revolution was internally successful but was crushed by the intervention of the Soviet Red Army. These shining moments of recent Hungarian history cannot hide the fact that throughout the twentieth century Hungary enjoyed democracy for one decade only, the 1990s.
Rhetoric of Action: The Language of the Regime Change in Hungary ANDRÁS BOZÓKI Introduction The title of this chapter is an oblique reference to Albert O. Hirsch-man's book The Rhetoric of Reaction, an outstanding study of... more
Rhetoric of Action: The Language of the Regime Change in Hungary ANDRÁS BOZÓKI Introduction The title of this chapter is an oblique reference to Albert O. Hirsch-man's book The Rhetoric of Reaction, an outstanding study of dif-ferent types of conservative argument against ...
This chapter investigates the ways in which the post-2010 Fidesz government under Viktor Orbán used antisemitic tropes to configure George Soros—once hailed as a champion of market reform, freedom, and democracy—as an ontological threat... more
This chapter investigates the ways in which the post-2010 Fidesz government under Viktor Orbán used antisemitic tropes to configure George Soros—once hailed as a champion of market reform, freedom, and democracy—as an ontological threat to the Hungarian nation that should therefore be expunged from the country, together with “his networks,” including the Open Society Institute and Central European University. To show the government’s communication strategy in action, we combined an analysis of antisemitic discourse on the far right with a media content analysis of Sorosozás in government-backed online news portals from 2015 to 2020. We show that, from 2010, Orbán and his media allies discursively interpellated specific individuals and states as “financiers” and “global powers” as cogs in a global “Soros network.” In doing so, they drew upon well-established fifth-column narratives originally constructed and refined by ideologists from the Kádár era who employed a latent antisemitic ...
Dans le sillage de la seconde guerre mondiale, la Hongrie s'est trouvée plus de quarante ans durant en situation d'« État membre » du bloc soviétique. Pour survivre, les Hongrois durent apprendre à évoluer dans les réseaux... more
Dans le sillage de la seconde guerre mondiale, la Hongrie s'est trouvée plus de quarante ans durant en situation d'« État membre » du bloc soviétique. Pour survivre, les Hongrois durent apprendre à évoluer dans les réseaux informels cachés sous la structure glacée d'un « ...
Page 160. Chapter 9 Intellectuals and democratization in Hungary András Bozóki This chapter analyses the political role of the Hungarian critical intelligentsia in the recent past and after the change of system, employing the ...
Das folgende Kapitel analysiert verschiedene Gruppen der demokratischen Opposition in der Volksrepublik Ungarn. Dabei liegt der Schwerpunkt auf strategischen Konzepten, den Diskursen sowie Identitaten und Selbstreflexionen der... more
Das folgende Kapitel analysiert verschiedene Gruppen der demokratischen Opposition in der Volksrepublik Ungarn. Dabei liegt der Schwerpunkt auf strategischen Konzepten, den Diskursen sowie Identitaten und Selbstreflexionen der ausgewahlten Gruppierungen.

And 55 more

Thinking through Transition is the first concentrated effort to explore the most recent chapter of East Central European past from the perspective of intellectual history. Post-socialism can be understood as a period of scarcity and... more
Thinking through Transition is the first concentrated effort to explore the most recent chapter of East Central European past from the perspective of intellectual history. Post-socialism can be understood as a period of scarcity and preponderance of ideas, the dramatic eclipsing of the dissident legacy (aswell as the older political traditions), and the rise of technocratic and post-political governance. This book, grounded in empirical research sensitive to local contexts, proposes instead a history of adaptations, entanglements, and unintended consequences. In order to enable and invite comparison, the volume is structured around major domains of political thought, some of them generic (liberalism, conservatism, the Left), others (populism and politics of history) deemed typical for post-socialism. However, as shown by the authors, the generic often turns out to be heavily dependent on its immediate setting, and the typical resonates with processes that are anything but vernacular.

"It is impossible, after reading this volume, to still give any credit to those who claimed that 1989 was a revolution without ideas, or could not be a revolution because it offered no ideas. We should be grateful that a new generation of scholars—most of whom not burdened by the assumptions and affinities that have inhibited participants and contemporary observers—can look with a cool eye both at the thinking that accompanied radical change and at the sometimes bizarre amalgams that have furnished political language in the last quarter-century in East Central Europe." - Padraic Kenney, Professor of History and International Studies, Indiana University

"This is the most comprehensive and balanced intellectual history so far available of post-communist East Central Europe, and it is particularly instructive on the diversity of the field. The book is essential reading for those who want to know how the multiple transformations of the region were understood from within." - Jóhann P. Árnason, Professor Emeritus of Sociology, La Trobe University,Melbourne