Skip to main content
  • Christian Suhr is a filmmaker and professor of anthropology at Aarhus University. He is the PI of the ERC-project: “H... moreedit
This book and film provide an account of the invisible dynamics of possession and psychosis, and of how the bodies and souls of Muslim patients are shaped by the conflicting demands of Islam and the psychiatric institutions of European... more
This book and film provide an account of the invisible dynamics of possession and psychosis, and of how the bodies and souls of Muslim patients are shaped by the conflicting demands of Islam and the psychiatric institutions of European nation-states.

Over several years, Christian Suhr followed Muslim patients being treated in a Danish mosque and in a psychiatric hospital. His analysis reveals how both psychiatric and Islamic healing work not only to produce relief from pain, but also entail an ethical transformation of the patient and the cultivation of religious and secular values through the experience of pain. Creatively exploring the analytic possibilities provided by the use of a camera, both the book and film show how disruptive ritual techniques are used in healing to destabilise individual perceptions and experiences of agency, so as to allow patients to submit to the invisible powers of psychotropic medicine or God.

Descending with angels addresses several timely topics – Islam in the West, mental health, intercultural cohabitation – and provides new theoretical perspectives on the agency of the invisible in human life. It will be of particular interest to scholars and students of anthropology, psychiatry, film and media studies, and the study of religion and Islam.

Christian Suhr is a filmmaker, Associate Professor, and the coordinator of the Eye & Mind MSc Track in Visual Anthropology, Aarhus University.

REVIEWS

—a powerful contribution to anthropological understandings of spirit possession and Islamic exorcism and a groundbreaking work in the field of audiovisual anthropology. Exceptionally clear and well-written; a joy to read. In ethnographic approach as well as theoretical radicalism, this book sets new standards for contemporary visual anthropology.
MICHAELA SCHÄUBLE, University of Bern.

—a challenging, thought-provoking, and insightful piece of scholarship that reflects an unusually deep engagement with a difficult field of research. With a strong sense of purpose, and respect for his subject and collaborators, Suhr has produced an impressively rich ethnography, often of a highly intimate nature.
LAURA U. MARKS, Simon Fraser University.

—this is a must-read (and must-see!) not only for students and scholars of Islam, and of psychiatry, but also for all who want to think seriously about how form can be put to work conceptually—how montage, for instance, can become a mode of analysis.
AMIRA MITTERMAIER, University of Toronto.

—a huge contribution to medical anthropology and Islamic studies [and] to the development of film as a research method.
ANDY LAWRENCE, University of Manchester.

—this book and film plumb a boundary that counts above all others in Islam and arguably in every religion: the divide between the seen and unseen worlds. By focusing on jinn possession and exorcism, the author exposes the extent to which the ʿālam al-ghayb, or unseen world, informs the mundane, day-to-day existence of Muslims within it. Christian Suhr is a remarkably gifted auteur and a highly self-reflexive critic of audiovisual media. What he has to say regarding the possibilities and limitations of this medium for Islamic studies is far reaching. This book and film matter.
SIMON O’MEARA, SOAS University of London

PAPERBACK £25 // EBOOK £25 // HARDBACK £80

http://descendingwithangels.com
https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526145918/
“This is an ambitious and ground-breaking volume which takes a thoroughly interdisciplinary perspective on what the editors have branded as ‘transcultural montage.’ ...The total effect is a mesmerising and in many ways insightful... more
“This is an ambitious and ground-breaking volume which takes a thoroughly interdisciplinary perspective on what the editors have branded as ‘transcultural montage.’ ...The total effect is a mesmerising and in many ways insightful comparative endeavour that will do much to consolidate montage as a theme that goes to the heart of contemporary social theory.” (Martin Holbraad, University College London)

“This is an important, innovative, and timely collection. Edited by two creative Scandinavian anthropologists, and with contributions from an impressive mix of established and up-coming names within performative anthropology, visual anthropology, and museum anthropology among other disciplinary subfields, the volume offers a significant contribution to this and cognate disciplines, and it is bound to have a great and lasting impact.” (Morten Axel Pedersen, University of Copenhagen)

“Transcultural Montage contains an abundance of fresh ideas in many sub-disciplines of anthropology such as medical anthropology, cognitive anthropology, cultural and economic anthropology, but also semantics, museology and knowledge production not to mention visual anthropology, the main sub-discipline to which this publication is dedicated. As one flips through the pages of this aesthetically striking edition (300 pages with more than 70 color illustrations) one stumbles upon beautiful, almost poetic accounts, photo images, self-ethnographies and descriptions of religious rituals. While reading the book one has the feeling of having a nice, handpicked collection of anthropological ideas in one’s hands.”  (Maria Vivod, Somatosphere.net)


TRANSCULTURAL MONTAGE

The disruptive power of montage has often been regarded as a threat to scholarly representations of the social world. This volume asserts the opposite: that the destabilization of commonsense perception is the very precondition for transcending social and cultural categories. The contributors—anthropologists, filmmakers, photographers, and curators—explore the use of montage as a heuristic tool for comparative analysis in anthropological writing, film, and exhibition making. Exploring phenomena such as human perception, memory, visuality, ritual, time, and globalization, they apply montage to restructure our basic understanding of social reality. Furthermore, as George E. Marcus suggests in the afterword, the power of montage that this volume exposes lies in its ability to open the very “combustion chamber” of social theory by juxtaposing one’s claims to knowledge with the path undertaken to arrive at those claims.


ABOUT THE EDITORS

Christian Suhr is a filmmaker and a post-doctoral research fellow in anthropology at Aarhus University. He is the co-director of the award-winning films Unity through Culture (DER, 2011), Ngat is Dead (DER, 2009), as well as Want a Camel, Yes? (Persona Film, 2005). He is author of the forthcoming ethnographic film monograph Descending with Angels about Islamic exorcism and Danish psychiatry and the article “Can Film Show the Invisible?” (with Rane Willerslev, Current Anthropology, 2012).

Rane Willerslev has his PhD from the University of Cambridge (2003) and is Professor of Anthropology at Aarhus University. He is the author of Soul Hunters: Hunting, Animism, and Personhood among the Siberian Yukaghirs (University of California Press, 2007) and On the Run in Siberia (University of Minnesota Press, 2012). He is the co-editor of Taming Time, Timing Death: Social Technologies and Ritual (Ashgate Publishing, 2013). In addition, he has written extensively on topics related to vision, visuality, and filmmaking.
The suspension of verbal and perceptive judgments on lived experience is the common ground of both phenomenology and meditative practice. But how does one suspend judgment? How does it feel? What kinds of understanding of ourselves and... more
The suspension of verbal and perceptive judgments on lived experience is the common ground of both phenomenology and meditative practice. But how does one suspend judgment? How does it feel? What kinds of understanding of ourselves and our relation to others and to the world may unfold through this particular operation?

In May 2019, 40 phenomenologists and meditators met near Loire valley to form a living laboratory. Their purpose was to investigate the experience of épochè; a central concept in phenomenology, often referred to as the act of suspending judgment.

This film documents how new understandings emerge in interactions between phenomenologists and experienced meditators. Through microphenomenological interviews and meditation they come to see the contours of specific micro-acts and micro-events that appear to be key to our ability of suspending judgment.

Ethnographic film, 58 min
Directed by: Christian Suhr and Claire Petitmengin
Filmed by: Christian Suhr; Edited by: Mette Bahnsen
Produced by: Christian Suhr, Mette Bahnsen, Claire Petitmengin, Natalie Depraz, and Michel Bitbol

The workshop was sponsored by Mind & Life Europe
© Mind & Life Europe and Persona Film

TRAILER: https://vimeo.com/369014148
"Best Documentary Feature," Berlin Independent Film Festival (February 2015) “Special Student Film Award," Göttingen International Ethnographic Film Festival (May 2014) A film by Christian Suhr, Persona Film, 75 min, Nov. 2013... more
"Best Documentary Feature," Berlin Independent Film Festival (February 2015)
“Special Student Film Award," Göttingen International Ethnographic Film Festival (May 2014)

A film by Christian Suhr, Persona Film, 75 min, Nov. 2013

SYNOPSIS
Islamic exorcism or psychotropic medication?
"Descending with Angels" explores two different solutions to the same problem: namely Danish Muslims who are possessed by invisible spirits, called jinn. A Palestinian refugee living in the city of Aarhus has been committed to psychiatric treatment after a severe case of jinn possession which caused him to destroy the interior of a mosque, crash several cars, and insult a number of people. He sees no point in psychotropic medication since his illness has already been treated with Quranic incantations. A psychiatrist and nurse try to understand his point of view but find that even further medication is needed. In the meantime a local imam battles a stubborn jinn-spirit of Iraqi origin and tries to explain the Muslims of Aarhus that they should stop worrying so much about jinn, magic, and other mundane affairs since nothing can harm anyone except by the permission of God. The film compares two systems of treatment that despite vast differences both share a view of healing as operating through submission of faith to an external non-human agency—namely God or biomedicine.

FESTIVAL SCREENINGS
• SIEF Zagreb (June 2015)
• Trento Film Festival, EURORAMA (May 2015)
• Ethnocineca (Vienna, May 2015)
• International Festival of Ethnographic Film (Sofia, May 2015)
• Ethnografilm (Paris, April 2015)
• World Film Festival (Tartu, March 2015)
• Days of Ethnographic Film (Ljubljana, March 2015)
• Berlin Independent Film Festival (February 2015)
• SVA Film and Media Festival (AAA, Washington, Dec 2014)
• American Academy of Religion – Screening at the Annual Meeting (San Diego, November 2014)
• Athens Ethnographic Film Festival (November 2014)
• Munich International Ethnographic Film Festival (November 2014)
• Sardinia International Ethnographic Film Festival (Nuoro, Italy, September 2014)
• Göttingen International Ethnographic Film Festival (May 2014)
• Beeld voor Beeld (Amsterdam, Dec 2013)
• CPH:DOX (Copenhagen, Nov. 2013)
• NAFA Film Festival (Bilbao, October 2013).
• RAI International Ethnographic Film Festival (Edinburgh, June 2013)

ADDITIONAL SCREENINGS
• University of California, Berkeley, USA
• University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
• University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
• University of Manchester, UK
• University of Heidelberg, Germany
• Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
• KU Leuven, Belgium
• Atlas Stad Antwerpen, Free Hands, Belgium
• James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
• Aarhus University, Denmark
• Anatomisk Teater in Oslo, Norway
• A number of psychiatric hospitals and cultural centers in Europe

Directed, filmed, and edited by: Christian Suhr
Produced by Persona Film (November 2013)
Distribution: Documentary Educational Resources (DER, Watertown)
Running time: 75 min
Orginal format: XDCAM 1080p
Screening format: DCP / Blu-ray / ProRes / Mpeg4 / DVD / DV SP
Languages: Arabic, Danish, English
Subtitles: English
“The Intangible Culture Film Prize”, RAI International Festival for Ethnographic Film, London 2011 “Richard Werbner Award for Visual Ethnography”, RAI International Festival for Ethnographic Film, London 2011 Directed by Christian... more
“The Intangible Culture Film Prize”, RAI International Festival for Ethnographic Film, London 2011

“Richard Werbner Award for Visual Ethnography”, RAI International Festival for Ethnographic Film, London 2011

Directed by Christian Suhr and Ton Otto
Ethnographic film, 59 min, Moesgaard Film 2011

Soanin Kilangit is determined to unite the people and attract international tourism through the revival of culture on Baluan Island in the South Pacific. He organizes the largest cultural festival ever held on the island, but some traditional leaders argue that Baluan never had culture and that culture comes from the white man and is now destroying their old tradition. Others, however, take the festival as a welcome opportunity to revolt against '70 years of cultural oppression' by Christianity. A struggle to define the past, present and future of Baluan culture erupts to the sound of thundering log drum rhythms.

"... the various disputes that come forth during the film will provide an excellent teaching tool and springboard for myriad discussions associated with issues involving kastom, tradition, change, authenticity, performance, identity, cultural politics, exchange, and the impact of the West on traditional societies."
— Karen Stevenson, American Anthropologist, September 2012

Screened at 15 international film festivals and conferences. Broadcast twice on TITV, Taiwan. Distribution: Documentary Educational Resources (DER, Watertown)

https://store.der.org/unity-through-culture-p287.aspx
“Prix du PATRIMOINE CULTUREL IMMATÉRIEL”, Jean Rouch International Film Festival, Paris 2008. What do anthropologists mean when they claim to study the cultural traditions of others by participating in them? This film follows the Dutch... more
“Prix du PATRIMOINE CULTUREL IMMATÉRIEL”, Jean Rouch International Film Festival, Paris 2008.

What do anthropologists mean when they claim to study the cultural traditions of others by participating in them? This film follows the Dutch anthropologist Ton Otto, who has been adopted by a family on Baluan Island in Papua New Guinea. Due to the death of his adoptive father, he has to take part in mortuary ceremonies, whose form and content are passionately contested by different groups of relatives. Through prolonged negotiations, Ton learns how Baluan people perform and transform their traditions and not least what role he plays himself. The film is part of long-term field research, in which filmmaking has become integrated in the ongoing dialogue and exchange between the islanders and the anthropologist.

"Straddling the permeable genres of ethnographic, participatory, and narrator-driven documentary, this one-hour DVD will be an extremely useful teaching resource. It presents anthropological insights prompted by filmmaking grounded in long-term familiarity and involvement with a community. It also demonstrates the benefits of an anthropologically trained film crew. ... As an ethnographic film that demonstrates the value and developing insights of long-term fieldwork, this is excellent."
—Mike Poltorak, University of Kent, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, December 2010

Screened at 22 international film festivals and conferences. Broadcasted many times at national television in Papua New Guinea (EMTV). Distribution: Documentary Educational Resources (DER, Watertown)

https://store.der.org/ngat-is-dead-p585.aspx
"Want a Camel, Yes?" explores the interaction between cameldrivers and tourists at the Pyramids Plateau in Giza, Egypt. Through price negotiations, conversations and interviews, we get an insight into how they imagine and understand each... more
"Want a Camel, Yes?" explores the interaction between cameldrivers and tourists at the Pyramids Plateau in Giza, Egypt. Through price
negotiations, conversations and interviews, we get an insight into how
they imagine and understand each other and what they think constitute
a good trip to the pyramids. 2004. 36 min.
Distribution: Persona Film
Christian Suhr and Steffen Dalsgaard, 5 min. Moesgaard Film. Short film awarded Second Prize in ActionAid Denmark and Politiken’s annual video competition on the theme of youth culture in developing countries (Copenhagen, 2011).
In 2014, an Egyptian friend gave me the following advice: “Stop focusing on the darkness in this world: Look at the light”; an approach he himself had learned after having been in and out of Salafism as well as through two failed... more
In 2014, an Egyptian friend gave me the following advice: “Stop focusing on the darkness in this world: Look at the light”; an approach he himself had learned after having been in and out of Salafism as well as through two failed revolutions before he found relief in a different form of religious devotion, a form that appears to be rising in post-revolutionary Egypt. I took his advice and together with Egyptian filmmaker Muhammad Mustafa, the photographer Amira Mortada, and the philosopher Omar Rakhawy, I embarked on a search for the light in the Egyptian capital. Recorded between 2014-19, this film documents our journey through the lights of the city, the Nile, and the desert. In addition the film documents an inner search for answers; what is the light, what does it do, how can there be so much darkness and light in this world and inside ourselves, what is the meaning of these beings of light that sometimes present themselves in the midst of rituals, in our everyday lives, and in our dreams?

In "Light mediations". Birgit Meyer and Jeremy Stolow, eds. Special issue. Material Religion 16(1): planned for publication Spring 2020.
Book chapter in the forthcoming edited volume "Når medierne sætter dagsordenen" [When the media set the agenda]. Vibeke Borberg, Christian Suhr, Niels Valdemar Vinding, Hjarn von Zernichow Borberg (Eds). Copenhagen: DJØF-forlaget. In... more
Book chapter in the forthcoming edited volume "Når medierne sætter dagsordenen" [When the media set the agenda]. Vibeke Borberg, Christian Suhr, Niels Valdemar Vinding, Hjarn von Zernichow Borberg (Eds). Copenhagen: DJØF-forlaget. In prod. Scheduled for publication 2020.
Dada Docot takes us into a world where certain human beings must carry so-called “alien cards” to be able to demonstrate their legality when the gazes of other human beings—undercover police officers—single them out as potential “illegal... more
Dada Docot takes us into a world where certain human beings must carry so-called “alien cards” to be able to demonstrate their legality when the gazes of other human beings—undercover police officers—single them out as potential “illegal migrants,” or subjects for detention or deportation. Her film is recorded at the Shinagawa railway station in Tokyo, but the world depicted is not confined to this locality. It is our world: a peculiar place in which human existence has been separated into categories of legal and illegal, separations that more often than not trail the markers of skin color, dress, or other signs of perceived racial, ethnic, cultural, or religious difference. Docot’s film provokes us to reflect upon the extent to which we have come to live in such a world. It draws our attention to the ways that national borders are enacted within cosmopolitan cities and what it means to have the privilege and freedom of mobility or to be deprived of it. In her article, Docot courageously analyzes how her film materialized in a political and aesthetic disagreement between herself and her cameraman, Jong Pairez, who initially hoped to be involved as a collaborator or coauthor. She details how the urge to “own” the project and appear as authors of the film prevented the recognition of their “shared identity” and “unity,” both attempting to confront the challenges of being Filipino migrants in Japan. Docot’s discussion highlights how we need to carefully consider the struggles we want to invest ourselves in and who we want to conceive of as our opponents. If the struggles we have with each other over intellectual and aesthetic preferences do not enhance but rather obstruct our ability to address issues of wider concern—issues such as the brutality of the system of surveillance, control, and illegalization that Docot critically addresses in her film—then they are not trivial but rather deeply problematic.
I denne artikel diskuterer Christian Suhr sine oplevelser med som antropolog at deltage i offentlige debatter om islam, danske muslimer, såkaldt “integration” og “radikalisering”. Han diskuterer også, hvorfor han til sidst blev træt af... more
I denne artikel diskuterer Christian Suhr sine oplevelser med som antropolog at deltage i offentlige debatter om islam, danske muslimer, såkaldt “integration” og “radikalisering”. Han diskuterer også, hvorfor han til sidst blev træt af disse debatter og besluttede sig for at lave et nyt projekt om guddommeligt lys i Cairo.
Cameras always seem to capture a little too little and a little too much. In ethnographic films profound insights are often found in the tension between what we are taught socially to perceive and the peculiar non-social perception of... more
Cameras always seem to capture a little too little and a little too much. In ethnographic films profound insights are often found in the tension between what we are taught socially to perceive and the peculiar non-social perception of the camera. Ethnographic filmmakers study the worlds of humans while leaning on, and sometimes being inspired, obstructed and even directed by the particular non-human and monologic forms of seeing and hearing that a camera can produce. But how would a camera perceive the footage it produces, and what would it think of the various ways we use it? In this textual experiment, I imagine what different cameras might reply to these questions if they could speak. In doing so, I call attention to ethnographic filmmaking as a more-than-human, more-than-collaborative and more-than-dialogical mode of cultural critique.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08949468.2018.1497332
The key questions of the research project Camera as Cultural Critique, in which all contributors to this section of the issue participated, are outlined here. The overall purpose of the project was to explore how the use of audiovisual... more
The key questions of the research project Camera as Cultural Critique, in which all contributors to this section of the issue participated, are outlined here. The overall purpose of the project was to explore how the use of audiovisual media in ethnographic research may contribute to sustained cultural critique. Grounding that critique in a certain understanding of the temporality of the present—as always in a state of emergence and involving images of past and future—the researchers explore the potential of audiovisual media for the critical (re)imagining of pasts and futures, in creative collaborations with their interlocutors. To create platforms for such collaboration different interventionist methods are used, including video feedback, the use of film archives in provocative museum installations, and the use of photo archives in intercultural dialogue and collaborative re-enactment. Another focus of attention is the particular affordances of the camera as technology. Here we explore the resistance that the camera, as a mechanical eye, exerts on the filmmakers’ intentions, thus prompting reflection on ways of seeing. The camera can also act as a mediator between people and their different ways of perceiving. Finally, we see the camera as a context-triggering device that can unsettle deep-seated cultural ways of seeing and understanding. In short, we conclude that audiovisual media have great potential for a cultural-critical and collaborative research practice.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08949468.2018.1497328
Montage as an analytic tool was introduced to anthropology in the late 1970s and 1980s in response to the so-called crisis of representation (Marcus 1994). As a destabilizing heuristic in ethnographic analysis, montage was applied to... more
Montage as an analytic tool was introduced to anthropology in the late 1970s and 1980s in response to the so-called crisis of representation (Marcus 1994). As a destabilizing heuristic in ethnographic analysis, montage was applied to allow for a greater openness to other perspectives than those of the ethnographic observer and as a way of accommodating inconsistencies and tensions that would otherwise easily be left out in more traditional modes of academic argument. Montage was proposed as a manner of "interruptedness" and a device for provoking "sudden and infinite connections between dissimilars … which on account of its awkwardness of fit, cracks, and violent juxtapo-sitionings can actively embody both a presentation and a counterpresentation" (Taussig 1986, 441-43; see also Trinh 1982). Hence, anthropologists applied montage to produce analytic zones of vacuity where traditional claims to ethnographic authority and the hierarchical relations between scholars and ethnographic others could be turned upside down and made strange. Within realist schools of anthropological writing and filmmaking, montage has often been regarded with suspicion because of its potential to obstruct the correspondence between scholarly representations and the social world and the ability of scholarly representations to adequately describe and translate the meaning of social interaction across cultural boundaries. Proponents of montage have claimed the opposite; namely that in order to expand and enhance cross-cultural understanding and communication, anthropologists need to shatter commonsense understandings of what constitutes the real and that montage is an effective means to this end (Suhr and Willerslev 2012). In recent years, montage has also been applied as a way of describing global interconnect-edness and the simultaneity of social processes (Kiener 2008; Marcus 1994; Willerslev and Ulturgasheva 2007).
What is the relation between religious faith and the kinds of knowledge that anthropologists produce? We began writing our article more than four years ago as an attempt to find possible answers to this question. We shared an urge to deal... more
What is the relation between religious faith and the kinds of knowledge that anthropologists produce? We began writing our article more than four years ago as an attempt to find possible answers to this question. We shared an urge to deal theoretically with somewhat strange experiences of a religious or spiritual nature that had occurred during our fieldworks and that have had significant impact on our ways of thinking, yet were hard to come to grips with or conceptually contain. Initially the so-called “ontological turn” offered an invitation to take such experiences seriously and not to simply turn away from them as matter out of place. Yet eventually “ontologizing” such encounters with intractable otherness—what we in our article have called the divine— was unsatisfying, in the end appearing to be just another way of conceptually taming it. We began by scrutinizing the anthropological literature, which is saturated with examples of anthropologists who have had their ways of understanding the world al- tered in epistemic, existential, ontological, or moral terms through such encounters (see, e.g., Evans-Pritchard 1970; Stoller 1984; E. Turner 2006). As pointed out by Jacob Copeman and John Hagström, our article might indeed be seen as a contribution to what Andrew Apter (2017) has adequately called the “ethnographic X-files.” After submitting a first version of the article in 2014, we received supportive reviews as well as criticisms, the latter arguing that what we had presented was in fact directly antithetical to the project of anthropology. After several revisions, we arrived at the current version.

RESPONSE TO REJOINDERS
Anthropological insights are not produced or constructed through reasoned discourse alone. Often they appear to be given in "leaps of faith" as the anthropologist's conceptual grasp upon the world is lost. To understand these peculiar... more
Anthropological insights are not produced or constructed through reasoned discourse alone. Often they appear to be given in "leaps of faith" as the anthropologist's conceptual grasp upon the world is lost. To understand these peculiar moments, we adopt the Kierkegaardian concept of religious faith, not as certitude in some transcendental principle, but as a deeply paradoxical mode of knowing, whose paths bend and twist through glimpses of understanding, doubt, and existential resignation. Pointing to the ways in which such revelatory and disruptive experiences have influenced the work of many anthropologists, we argue that anthropology is not simply a social science, but also a theology of sorts, whose ultimate foundation might not simply be reason but faith.
In this article I apply film theory as an analytic prism through which to examine the ritual mechanisms of a particular kind of Islamic exorcism (al-ruqya al-sharʿiyya). I show how these exorcisms operate as a ritual montage that conjures... more
In this article I apply film theory as an analytic prism through which to examine the ritual mechanisms of a particular kind of Islamic exorcism (al-ruqya al-sharʿiyya). I show how these exorcisms operate as a ritual montage that conjures the absent presence of al-ghayb—a hidden world of power that only God can see in its totality and to which the possessed patients and the jinn spirits must succumb. These exorcisms thus provide healing, not in the sense of immediate “well-being” or “relief from pain” but in the sense of moral witnessing, an opportunity to testify to the limits of human seeing and action and to the ways in which invisible and divine forces give shape to the tangible world.
The concept al-ghayb refers to the hidden, the unseen, the invisible. The term encompasses a range of important phenomena in Islam and in the everyday experiences of Muslims. The dominion of the unseen (alam al-ghayb) includes those parts... more
The concept al-ghayb refers to the hidden, the unseen, the invisible. The term encompasses a range of important phenomena in Islam and in the everyday experiences of Muslims. The dominion of the unseen (alam al-ghayb) includes those parts of reality that cannot be seen simply because they are covered by other visible objects. It also refers to those phenomena that by their nature cannot be perceived (e.g. the face or throne of God, paradise, hell, the past, or the future), as well as those objects that are blocked from view by one’s perspective (Drieskens 2006; Mittermaier 2011; Suhr 2013). Al-ghayb is important to the notion of barzakh, the intermediary realm between life and death; to the issue of veiling; to visions of deceased saints or dreams about the Prophet Muhammad as well as to the uncontrollable powers of jinn, angels, magic, the evil eye, and omens (Pandolfo 1997; Rothenberg 2004; Khan (Cultural Anthropology, 21(6), 234-264, 2006); El-Zein 2009; Rytter (The Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 16(1), 46-63, 2010); Edgar 2011; Taneja (HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(3), 139–65, 2013); Bubandt 2014a; Suhr (Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society, 21(1), 96–112, 2015). The unseen, in other words, is in Islam infused with power and potential, but the lure of the territories of the unseen is also disturbing, troublesome, even dangerous. The seven contributions in this special issue trace invisibility as both wondrous potential and vexed problem in the lives of people in the modern Muslim world. They seek to enrich the study of Islam by discussing what it means to live with al-ghayb, and how this concept is reshaped through people’s experiences of the invisible in their lives. The contributions demonstrate how al-ghayb constitutes an entrenched, but also highly contested, part of Islamic experience. For the domain of al-ghayb evokes a series of paradoxical tensions. While al-ghayb is a marker of the unseen domains of reality, for the adept it signifies a supremely visible reality. Al-ghayb is also an all-determining locus of power; yet, due to its inaccessibility, it is often also a great source of indeterminacy in the lives of Muslims. While full of danger, al-ghayb is also a potential source of healing, protection, and resurrection. And lastly, while it is an all-determining omnipresence, al-ghayb nevertheless remains essentially unknowable, a consummate “Elsewhere” (Pandolfo 1997; Mittermaier (Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(2), 247–265, 2012); Bubandt 2014b; Suhr (Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society, 21(1), 96–112, 2015); Rytter (Ethnography, 17(2), 229-249, 2016). The special issue explores these paradoxes in order to make a broader contribution to the study of invisibility in social studies. It argues that a focus on the ambiguities of al-ghayb within Islam offers an analytical point of departure for a wider exploration of the sensual, existential, spiritual and political interfaces and contradictions of visibility and invisibility within other religious and secular traditions as well. To this end, the contributions trace the contradictory poetics and politics of the invisible, suggesting that the realm of al-ghayb constitutes an alternative methodological and analytical entry point into an investigation of the contemporary politics of the gaze. The study of al-ghayb, we propose, entails an important critique of conventional notions of modernity as the “empire of the gaze”.
Mediernes forenklede dækning af islam, voldelig ekstremisme og integrationsproblemer har gennem de seneste år resulteret i en række ukonstruktive politiske tiltag. I denne artikel ser vi nærmere på mediernes dækning og den politiske debat... more
Mediernes forenklede dækning af islam, voldelig ekstremisme og integrationsproblemer har gennem de seneste år resulteret i en række ukonstruktive politiske tiltag. I denne artikel ser vi nærmere på mediernes dækning og den politiske debat i kølvandet på terrorangrebet i København i februar 2015 og TV2’s serie af dokumentarprogrammer om forholdene i danske moskeer fra marts 2016. Disse to eksempler illustrerer, hvordan mediernes dækning ikke blot har skabt en voldsom, følelsesbetonet og forplumret politisk debat, men også har medvirket til at eskalere de problemer, man har ønsket at afdække. Som forskere er vi bekymrede for denne udvikling, hvor vi ser en stigende tendens til, at både private og licensbetalte nyhedsmedier prioriterer sensation, drama og frygt over saglighed. Desuden vækker det vores bekymring, at landets lovgivere tilsyneladende lader sig diktere af mediernes dækning. De to eksempler, vi diskuter- er i denne artikel, har således både resulteret i nye lovtiltag og ændringer af eksisterende lovgivning. Ikke desto mindre er det svært at se, hvordan politikere skulle reagere anderledes. Politikerne bliver ligesom almindelige borgere påvirket af mediernes dækning og er nødt til at vise handlekraft i forhold til de problemer, medierne skildrer. Men hvis mediernes dækning af væsentlige samfundsproblemer både er mangelfuld og forenklet og samtidig definerer den politiske udvikling, så har vi et alvorligt demokratisk problem.
What does the use of cameras entail for the production of cultural critique in anthropology? With the launch of the Eye & Mind Graduate Program in Visual Anthropology at Aarhus University and the inauguration of the new 10,000 meter... more
What does the use of cameras entail for the production of cultural critique in anthropology? With the launch of the Eye & Mind Graduate Program in Visual Anthropology at Aarhus University and the inauguration of the new 10,000 meter culture-­historical Moesgaard Museum in Aarhus, Denmark, a group of six scholars, filmmakers, and exhibition designers, headed by Professor Ton Otto, have taken up the challenge to rethink how cultural critique might be produced through the use of different forms of audiovisual media.

The move toward considering ethnographic film, photography, or exhibitions in terms of their culture-­critical potential raises central questions about the kinds of impact that these modes of analysis have for anthropology. How do the various forms of mechanical and digital perception facilitated by modern cameras impact on ethnographic analysis? What kinds of understanding and dialogue might be facilitated between researchers and their collaborators through the use of such media? In what ways does the use of different forms of audiovisual media change the traditional hierarchical roles of informants, knowledge producers, and knowledge recipients?

The joint research project at Aarhus University and the Moesgaard Museum attempts to address these questions through six individual case studies.
This paper asks whether an exploration of responses to visual media in neo‐orthodox Islam could provide new answers to the recurrent queries regarding the value of images in visual anthropology. It proposes that the photographic image... more
This paper asks whether an exploration of responses to visual media in neo‐orthodox Islam could provide new answers to the recurrent queries regarding the value of images in visual anthropology. It proposes that the photographic image shares a curious resemblance to the bodies of people possessed by invisible spirits called jinn. The image as a failed example or model of reality works like the possessed body as an amplifier of invisibility pointing towards that which cannot be seen, depicted visually, or represented in writing. This suggests a negative epistemology in which images obtain their value not from the adequacy of their correspondence to perceived reality, but rather from the ways they fail to exemplify that which they appear to depict.
The medium of film has long been hailed for its capacity for producing shocks of an entertaining, thought-provoking, or even politically emancipative nature. But what is a shock, how and when does it occur, how long does it last, and are... more
The medium of film has long been hailed for its capacity for producing shocks of an entertaining, thought-provoking, or even politically emancipative nature. But what is a shock, how and when does it occur, how long does it last, and are there particular techniques for producing cinematic shocks? In this text we exchange personal experiences of cinematic shocks and ponder over these questions as related to wider theories on human trauma, emancipation, and enlightenment. In conclusion we argue for a revision of anthropological notions of validity in terms of the efficacy of the cinematic shock rather than the perceived correspondence between cinema and the real.

Published in: "Experimental Film and Anthropology," edited by Arnd Schneider and Caterina Pasqualino. 2014. London: Bloomsbury.
This chapter describes the efforts of young neo-orthodox Muslims seeking to protect and purify themselves from the contaminating influence of the secular school system in Denmark. In this endeavor concepts such as brainwashing and... more
This chapter describes the efforts of young neo-orthodox Muslims seeking to protect and purify themselves from the contaminating influence of the secular school system in Denmark. In this endeavor concepts such as brainwashing and deprogramming are turned upside down and reapplied as a critique of the attempts of the Danish welfare state of submitting Islamic practices to secular ideals. The chapter contributes to the current debate about religious self-cultivation and proposes that it is precisely due to ambiguous, multiple, and often contradictory demands of complicity and submission that young Muslims in Europe may seek refuge in strict Islamic discipline.

Published in "Making European Muslims: Religious Socialization Among Young Muslims in Scandinavia and Western Europe," Mark Sedgwick, ed. London: Routledge.
This article suggests that film can evoke hidden dimensions of ethnographic reality, not by striving for ever more realistic depictions—a position often associated with observational cinema—but rather by exploiting the artificial means... more
This article suggests that film can evoke hidden dimensions of ethnographic reality, not by striving for ever more realistic depictions—a position often associated with observational cinema—but rather by exploiting the artificial means through which human vision can be transcended. Achieved particularly through the use of montage, such disruptions can multiply the perspectives from which filmic subject matter is perceived, thus conveying its invisible and irreducible otherness. This, however, is an argument not to dismiss the realism of much ethnographic filmmaking, but rather to demonstrate how montage can and must be used to break with the mimetic dogma of the “humanized” camera. The effective image, we argue, depends crucially on maintaining a tension between a strong sense of reality and its occasional, and therefore only then effective, disruption through montage.
Christian Suhr, Hjarn von Zernichow Borberg, Kirstine Sinclair, Niels Valdemar Vinding. January 5, 2017, kronik, Politiken [opinion article in national Danish newspaper]. Tvivlsom tv-dokumentar resulterer i dybt kritisabel lovgivning... more
Christian Suhr, Hjarn von Zernichow Borberg, Kirstine Sinclair, Niels Valdemar Vinding.

January 5, 2017, kronik, Politiken [opinion article in national Danish newspaper].

Tvivlsom tv-dokumentar resulterer i dybt kritisabel lovgivning og er nu nomineret til landets fornemste journalistpris. TV 2 skylder fortsat svar på 8 spørgsmål om udsendelsen.
Christian Suhr, Hjarn von Zernichow Borberg, Kirstine Sinclair, Niels Valdemar Vinding. January 7, 2017, Politiken [opinion article in national Danish newspaper]. TV 2 bør påtage sig det særlige ansvar, som følger af at facilitere en... more
Christian Suhr, Hjarn von Zernichow Borberg, Kirstine Sinclair, Niels Valdemar Vinding.

January 7, 2017, Politiken [opinion article in national Danish newspaper].

TV 2 bør påtage sig det særlige ansvar, som følger af at facilitere en så omfattende offentlig debat, som dokumentaren "Moskeerne bag sløret" har skabt.
Kronik, Berlingske, 21 maj, 2016 [opinion article in national Danish newspaper]. Kultur- og kirkeminister Bertel Haarder (V) sortlister »rabiate imamer, som spreder dødskult«. Martin Henriksen (DF) vil kriminalisere rådgivning i sharia.... more
Kronik, Berlingske, 21 maj, 2016 [opinion article in national Danish newspaper].

Kultur- og kirkeminister Bertel Haarder (V) sortlister »rabiate imamer, som spreder dødskult«. Martin Henriksen (DF) vil kriminalisere rådgivning i sharia. Pia Olsen Dyhr (SF) vil frigøre nydanske kvinder ved at fratage dem kontanthjælpen. Men har vi over- hovedet forstået, hvad imamernes sharia er for noget? Det paradoksale i hele denne debat er, at ikke engang muslimer er enige om, hvad sharia består i. Hvis vi spørger i Grimhøj- moskeen, hvor jeg har foretaget en stor del af min forskning, får vi besked om, at sharia skal forstås som en form for lovgivning, der dækker både store og små aspekter af livet, inklusiv måden man beder på, klæder sig, bevæger sig, taler, sover og spiser på. Ikke desto mindre indeholder sharia et centralt påbud om, at man skal underordne sig majoritetens lovgivning, hvis man bor i et ikke-muslimsk land. Grimhøjmoskeens muslimer vil derfor hævde, at sharia netop påbyder muslimer i Danmark at følge dansk lovgivning. Dog vil de sige, at hvis dansk lovgivning påbød dem at gøre ting, der var i direkte modstrid med islamisk sharia – såsom et lovkrav om at spise svinekød – vil det være nødvendigt at bryde med denne lov. Hvis vi spørger imamer fra andre islamiske traditioner, vil nogle sige, at sharia snarere skal forstås som en form for spirituel og etisk livsvejledning, og at der ikke er nogen tvang – at det er en form for guide, som man kan vælge at knytte sig til. Fra min forskning blandt unge sufier i Cairo ved jeg, at de vil sige: Nej, sharia har slet ikke noget at gøre med hverken lov eller leveregler. Sharia i deres fortolkning betyder »vejen til kilden«. »Haram« og »halal«, som normalt oversættes til forbudt og tilladt, handler for dem overhovedet ikke om regler. Der er ingen regler, siger de, kun kærlighed.

I DEN OFFENTLIGE debat er der et stort antal kommentatorer, som udtaler sig i faste vendinger om, hvad muslimernes sharia- lov består i, og hvorvidt sharia er årsagen til, at muslimer skulle være særligt voldelige, kriminelle og middelalderlige. Vi hører eksempelvis påstande om, at islams regelsæt forbyder muslimer at fortolke deres religiøse tekster. Har man brugt blot et par dage i en moske, vil man vide, at fortolkningen af Koranen og fortællin- gerne om profeten konstant er til debat, og at muslimer indbyrdes er uenige om, hvad sharia er, og hvordan sharia skal udfoldes. Som antropolog og islamforsker kan jeg derfor alene udtale mig om, hvordan sharia bliver fortolket af forskellige muslimer, og hvad sharia bliver brugt til i konkrete situationer. Bliver sharia brugt til at undertrykke kvinder? Svaret er ja, i mange tilfælde. Vi har set grelle eksempler på kvindeundertryk- kelse legitimeret med sharia i lande som Saudi-Arabien, Afghanistan og Iran. Men bliver sharia brugt til kvindeundertrykkelse i danske moskeer?
Debatindlæg, Politiken, 24 marts, 2016 [opinion article in national Danish newspaper]. På baggrund af TV2s dokumentar om danske moskeer fremsatte Dansk Folkeparti med støtte fra Socialdemokraterne og de Konservative i denne uge et... more
Debatindlæg, Politiken, 24 marts, 2016 [opinion article in national Danish newspaper].

På baggrund af TV2s dokumentar om danske moskeer fremsatte Dansk Folkeparti med støtte fra Socialdemokraterne og de Konservative i denne uge et beslutningsforslag om stramning af religionsfriheden samt fratagelse af statsborgerskabet for radikale imamer, herunder specifikt Grimhøjmoskeens imam Abu Bilal. Samtidig påviser Radio 24syv i denne uge, at TV2 i to centrale scener fra den omdiskuterede dokumentar har fraklippet lange passager, som giver et markant anderledes indtryk af, hvad den udskaeldte imam i virkeligheden siger, når han taler om emner såsom stening, utroskab og hustruvold. Konsekvensen af denne forenklede fremstilling er, at vi har fået en ophedet politisk debat, som i vaerste fald vil resultere i yderligere polarisering og ekstremisme.
Kronik, Politiken, 10 marts, 2016 [opinion article in national Danish newspaper]. TV 2 skildrer i øjeblikket en række problematiske forhold i otte danske moskeer. Men livet i moskeerne er langt mere, end hvad vi ser i tv. Den... more
Kronik, Politiken, 10 marts, 2016 [opinion article in national Danish newspaper].

TV 2 skildrer i øjeblikket en række problematiske forhold i otte danske moskeer. Men livet i moskeerne er langt mere, end hvad vi ser i tv. Den forenklede fremstilling
er godt i gang med at producere forhastede beslutninger.

De seneste 10 dage har politikere fra venstre til højre stået i kø for at fordømme formørkede og middelalderlige imamer. Borgmesteren i Aarhus har tilbagekaldt godkendelsen af et stort moskebyggeri, som har været undervejs i 17 år, Venstres medlem af Folketingets Integrationsudvalg Britt Bager har foreslået massiv overvågning af samtlige 150 moskeer i Danmark, og integrationsministeren har udtalt, at hun helst så miljøet på Grimhøjvej jævnet med jorden. Disse forhastede beslutninger, kommentarer og forslag er imidlertid baseret på en meget spinkel forståelse af, hvad der egentlig foregår i de danske moskeer. Den politiske debat risikerer derfor at forværre de integrationsproblemer, TV 2 har forsøgt at belyse i den aktuelle dokumentar om livet i 8 danske moskeer.

Fra 2009 til 2012 udførte jeg et 18 måneder langt forskningsprojekt blandt muslimer i Danmark med særligt fokus på Grimhøjvej samt muslimske patienter i den danske psykiatri. Som del af mit feltarbejde deltog jeg i en lang række aktiviteter såsom undervisning i islamisk moral og teologi, fredagsbøn og islamiske eksorcismeritualer. På baggrund af min forskning giver jeg her mit bud på årsagerne til de meget problematiske forhold, vi ser i TV 2’s dokumentar.

http://politiken.dk/debat/kroniken/ECE3108023/livet-i-moskeerne-er-langt-mere-end-hvad-vi-ser-i-tv/
Kronik, Politiken, 16 januar 2015 [opinion article in national Danish newspaper]. Vi bliver nødt til at forstå, hvordan ekstremismen opstår, for at bekæmpe den Onsdag mødtes Folketinget for at diskutere radikalisering og muligheden... more
Kronik, Politiken, 16 januar 2015 [opinion article in national Danish newspaper].

Vi bliver nødt til at forstå, hvordan ekstremismen opstår, for at bekæmpe den

Onsdag mødtes Folketinget for at diskutere radikalisering og muligheden for at lukke moskeer, som forkynder anti-demokratiske holdninger. Flere politikere har udtalt, at når det kommer til islamisk ekstremisme, er det nytteløst at lede efter forklaringer. Ud fra min forskning og mit feltarbejde blandt muslimer i Århus, må jeg erklære mig helt uenig. Lad mig her forsøge at forklare, hvordan en gruppe unge muslimer, der kom i den meget omtalte Grimhøjmoské, gradvist udviklede deres holdninger.

http://politiken.dk/debat/kroniken/ECE2513130/hjernevask-og-radikalisering-i-grimhoejmoskeen/#tocomment
Research Interests:
This paper asks whether an exploration of responses to visual media in neo-orthodox Islam could provide new answers to the recurrent queries regarding the value of images in visual anthropology. It proposes that the photographic image... more
This paper asks whether an exploration of responses to visual media in neo-orthodox Islam could provide new answers to the recurrent queries regarding the value of images in visual anthropology. It proposes that the photographic image shares a curious resemblance to the bodies of people possessed by invisible spirits called jinn. The image as a failed example or model of reality works like the possessed body as an amplifier of invisibility pointing towards that which cannot be seen, depicted visually, or represented in writing. This suggests a negative epistemology in which images obtain their value not from the adequacy of their correspondence to perceived reality, but rather from the ways they fail to exemplify that which they appear to depict.

Keywords: Islam, Exorcism, Jinn Possession, YouTube, Visual Anthropology
Research Interests:
In this article I apply film theory as an analytic prism through which to examine the ritual mechanisms of a particular kind of Islamic exorcism (al-ruqya al-sharʿiyya). I show how these exorcisms operate as a ritual montage that conjures... more
In this article I apply film theory as an analytic prism through which to examine the ritual mechanisms of a particular kind of Islamic exorcism (al-ruqya al-sharʿiyya). I show how these exorcisms operate as a ritual montage that conjures the absent presence of al-ghayb—a hidden world of power that only God can see in its totality and to which the possessed patients and the jinn spirits must succumb. These exorcisms thus provide healing, not in the sense of immediate "well-being" or "relief from pain" but in the sense of moral witnessing, an opportunity to testify to the limits of human seeing and action and to the ways in which invisible and divine forces give shape to the tangible world.