- Middle East Politics, Middle Eastern Studies, Iran, International Security, Iranian Studies, Critical Theory, and 15 moreInternational Relations, Middle East Studies, Ethnicity and National Identity, Human Rights, Multiculturalism, Peace and Conflict Studies, Conflict, International organizations, Conflict Resolution, Political Violence and Terrorism, Nationalism, Identity (Culture), Ethnicity, Minority Rights, and Ethnic Studiesedit
- Senior Lecturer in Middle Eastern Studiesedit
The Struggle to Define a Nation: Rethinking Religious Nationalism in the Contemporary Islamic
Research Interests:
Tehran's complicated relationship with its ethnic sub-groups has been a pressing security concern since the formation of modern Iran in 1925. This concern is intimately linked with issues related to citizenship, democracy, and democratic... more
Tehran's complicated relationship with its ethnic sub-groups has been a pressing security concern since the formation of modern Iran in 1925. This concern is intimately linked with issues related to citizenship, democracy, and democratic political processes, which remain fundamental to Iran's political structure and the Iranian political sphere. This book argues that, while the Islamic Republic has employed various strategies to mitigate the worst excesses of inter-ethnic tension while still securing a Shi'a-Persian dominated state, the systematic neglect of ethnic groups by both the Islamic Republic and its predecessor regime has resulted in the politicization of ethnic identity in Iran.
Research Interests:
Iran’s new nuclear policy between deterrence and pragmatism
Research Interests:
International power is under profound transition, marked by a move towards deep pluralism in the international system whereby a range of middle powers have begun to stake a greater claim to regional power. This shift is escalating the... more
International power is under profound transition, marked by a move towards deep pluralism in the international system whereby a range of middle powers have begun to stake a greater claim to regional power. This shift is escalating the power struggle between the United States and China. Both Beijing and Tehran share a strategic plan to undermine US global hegemony, and both have encountered tensions, sanctions, and pressures originating from Washington. A relatively strong and independent Iran in the Persian Gulf would help China not only to ensure its interests in the region, but also to guarantee its energy security and embed its footprint in the Middle East. Consequently, in the age of relative decline of United States’ power, and the rise of regional powers, the Sino-Iranian strategic partnership is changing the Middle East’s security architecture. Iran’s look East and China’s march West strategic visions will meet in the Persian Gulf region. As such, this article seeks to explore such confluence, and its implications.
Research Interests:
‘the power vacuums resulting from de-Westernization are leading to an Asianization of the Persian Gulf. China is seeking to fill the gap with strategic precision.’
Research Interests:
Iran’s new membership of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation is another step toward the postWest world order.
Research Interests:
To overcome the structural challenges that Iran has faced ever since the 1979 revolution, substantive changes to the fundamental political system are needed, but Raisi has the hypothetical capability to catalyse more systematic reform by... more
To overcome the structural challenges that Iran has faced ever since the 1979 revolution, substantive changes to the fundamental political system are needed, but Raisi has the hypothetical capability to catalyse more systematic reform by engaging in meaningful nuclear talks and signing a nuclear deal.
Research Interests:
In this era of tense confrontation between China and the U.S., Iran's alignment of interests with those of China will act as a "counter-hegemonic" move that will undermine the U.S.'s strategic position in the Middle East, and its... more
In this era of tense confrontation between China and the U.S., Iran's alignment of interests with those of China will act as a "counter-hegemonic" move that will undermine the U.S.'s strategic position in the Middle East, and its symbolic power elsewhere, to an as yet unknown degree.
Research Interests:
Yet again we are expecting a long and frustrating diplomatic marathon to be held in Vienna between Iran and the global powers over Tehran’s nuclear programme. This will, however, be the last of its kind.
Research Interests:
The Sino-Iranian Comprehensive Strategic Partnership is another move by Beijing to extend its power across the globe. For Iran, it is about further strengthening the country’s position in the Middle East.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
President Donald Trump is correct in expressing that Iran’s growing power is concerning.[1] He is also right that the administration of President George Bush has worsened the power and stability of Iran, not least because of its... more
President Donald Trump is correct in expressing that Iran’s growing power is concerning.[1] He is also right that the administration of President George Bush has worsened the power and stability of Iran, not least because of its strategically disabling mistake of invading Iraq, which resulted in power vacuum that enabled and empowered Iran since 2003. Trump is quite right in positing that Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran has strengthened Iran and entrenched its political stance.[2] These factors are undermining Trump’s anti-Iranian policies in contemporary foreign relations, and the double-faceted strengthening of Iranian influence challenges Trump’s attempt to demonise Iran and thereby justify US military action against the Islamic Republic. Today Trump is left with few options on the table except for the further imposition of economic sanctions designed to confront Iran’s growing power in the region. These sanctions are arguably important constraints on Iran but are simply insufficient to compel Tehran to reverse its increasing desire for influence in regional politics.
Research Interests: Middle East Studies, Middle East & North Africa, Gulf Studies, International Security, Iranian Studies, and 12 moreThe Persian Gulf, History of Iran, Middle East Politics, Iranian Modern History, Middle East, Security of the Persian Gulf, Securty Studies, Iran's Nuclear Programme and Its Implications for the Gulf States, Security in the Persian Gulf + GCC states, Donald Trump, Maritime Trade In the Gulf, and US- Iran nuclear deal
The United States has yet again attempted to resolve issues in the Middle East. This time it is by firing missiles on a Syrian military airfield, sending a ‘strong message’ to a dictator.
Research Interests:
Every time Iran has an election, its minority groups are suddenly the center of attention - and then they are quickly forgotten again.
Research Interests:
This article explores Egyptian Salafis’ attempts to securitize Shi‘ism since the 2011 uprising. Taking into account the sectarian dynamics of the new Middle East, Salafis in Egypt have instrumentally used the specter of Shi‘ism in their... more
This article explores Egyptian Salafis’ attempts to securitize Shi‘ism since the 2011 uprising. Taking into account the sectarian dynamics of the new Middle East, Salafis in Egypt have instrumentally used the specter of Shi‘ism in their politico-religious rhetoric to further their political ends. This article examines the rationales behind this discourse by assessing interacting internal and external dynamics amid identity conflicts in the region, which have subsequently affected Egypt.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
چکیده دیدگاه های سنتی سالها پارادایم مسلط در روابط بین الملل بوده اند. این دیدگاه ها با تاکیدات خود بر دولت محوری، نقش قدرت در روابط بین الملل و توجه بیش از اندازه به ابعاد نظامی و نادیده گرفتن سایر زوایای امنیت، در توضیح شرایط کشورهای... more
چکیده
دیدگاه های سنتی سالها پارادایم مسلط در روابط بین الملل بوده اند. این دیدگاه ها با تاکیدات خود بر دولت محوری، نقش قدرت در روابط بین الملل و توجه بیش از اندازه به ابعاد نظامی و نادیده گرفتن سایر زوایای امنیت، در توضیح شرایط کشورهای خاورمیانه، بویژه وقایع مربوط به بیداری اسلامی ناکام مانده اند. از حدود دهه 1980 مجموعه دیگری از نظریات با انتقاد از دیدگاههای سنتی بویژه نگاه تک بعدی آن ها به امنیت در مطالعات امنیتی ظهور یافتند. تاکید ویژه ی این گروه به گسترش مباحث امنیتی در سایر حوزه ها و مرجع قرار دادن فرد در این مطالعات بود. دیدگاه های انتقادی نیز با کم اهمیت جلوه دادن نقش متغیر دولت بویژه در حوزه ی خاورمیانه نمی توانند پاسخ مناسبی برای شرایط خاص آن ارائه دهند. این پژوهش تلاش می کند با بهره گیری از نظریه ی پسا استعماری که بر خصوصیات منحصر به فرد تاریخی، سیاسی، اقتصادی، جمعیت شناسی و جغرافیایی در هر منطقه توجه دارد، پیچیدگی های امنیتی خاورمیانه را از این دریچه مورد واکاوی قرار داده و ضعف های مطالعات امنیتی در تبیین
آنچه بر خاورمیانه می گذرد را آشکار سازد.
دیدگاه های سنتی سالها پارادایم مسلط در روابط بین الملل بوده اند. این دیدگاه ها با تاکیدات خود بر دولت محوری، نقش قدرت در روابط بین الملل و توجه بیش از اندازه به ابعاد نظامی و نادیده گرفتن سایر زوایای امنیت، در توضیح شرایط کشورهای خاورمیانه، بویژه وقایع مربوط به بیداری اسلامی ناکام مانده اند. از حدود دهه 1980 مجموعه دیگری از نظریات با انتقاد از دیدگاههای سنتی بویژه نگاه تک بعدی آن ها به امنیت در مطالعات امنیتی ظهور یافتند. تاکید ویژه ی این گروه به گسترش مباحث امنیتی در سایر حوزه ها و مرجع قرار دادن فرد در این مطالعات بود. دیدگاه های انتقادی نیز با کم اهمیت جلوه دادن نقش متغیر دولت بویژه در حوزه ی خاورمیانه نمی توانند پاسخ مناسبی برای شرایط خاص آن ارائه دهند. این پژوهش تلاش می کند با بهره گیری از نظریه ی پسا استعماری که بر خصوصیات منحصر به فرد تاریخی، سیاسی، اقتصادی، جمعیت شناسی و جغرافیایی در هر منطقه توجه دارد، پیچیدگی های امنیتی خاورمیانه را از این دریچه مورد واکاوی قرار داده و ضعف های مطالعات امنیتی در تبیین
آنچه بر خاورمیانه می گذرد را آشکار سازد.
Research Interests:
پرسش اصلی این نوشته این است که آیا ایدئولوژی اسلامی تهران توانایی تطبیق با ملیگرایی را دارد؟ بری بوزان (Barry Buzan) استدلال میکند که هویت اجتماعی، بخش کانونی مسئلهی امنیت است. با توجه به این مسئله آیا ایران اسلامی در حفظ و ایجاد... more
پرسش اصلی این نوشته این است که آیا ایدئولوژی اسلامی تهران توانایی تطبیق با ملیگرایی را دارد؟ بری بوزان (Barry Buzan) استدلال میکند که هویت اجتماعی، بخش کانونی مسئلهی امنیت است. با توجه به این مسئله آیا ایران اسلامی در حفظ و ایجاد هویت ملیِ منسجم، موفق بوده است؟