BBALLBC501
BBALLBC501
BBALLBC501
Rohit Mishra
Assistant Professor
• What is a QUESTIONNAIRE ?
1. There is low cost even when the universe is large and is widely spread
geographically.
• Researcher must invariably re-examine, and in case of need may revise the
rough draft for a better one. Technical defects must be identified and removed
if any.
• Questionnaire must contain simple but straight forward directions for the
respondents so that they may not feel any difficulty in answering the questions.
TYPES OF QUESTIONS IN QUESTIONNAIRE'S
1. Embarrassing questions
3. Hypothetical questions
STEPS TO DEVELOP A QUESTIONNAIRE
....................................................
2. Do you require a ready-made Company? Yes/No
* If "Yes", state the name of any ready-made Company which may have been
reserved for you.
.............................................LIMITED
3. Company Name
If you require a name of your own choice (i.e. a company incorporated to order or the
change of name of a ready-made one) enter your choice of names in order of
reference. Please clarify the meaning of any initials appearing in the proposed names.
1. ...............................................
2. ...............................................
3. ...............................................
4. Principal Objects
Our companies are normally incorporated using the standard clause 3 a(attached hereto) covering financial and property
investments, holding company and general trading activities. Is this clause suitable for your purposes?
Yes/No
If not, please state objects required.
.........................................................
5. Share Capital
Number of shares.............................
Currency and value....................................
Measurement scales
• Measurement can be defined as a process of
associating numbers to observations obtained in a
research study.
SAMPLING
A sample is a part of population, called the 'Universe',
'reference' or 'parent' population.
SAMPLE
TARGET POPULATION
Target vs. accessible populations
• The target population is the population a researcher
would like to generalize to. Often this isn’t possible, so
the accessible population is used. For example, a
researcher might want to target all male elementary
teachers in the India, but actually collects data from
the male elementary teachers in Delhi
Need for sampling
1. Complete enumeration may not be possible.
2. Resources: Lower cost, Lesser demand on personnel.
3. Speed: Faster results due to lesser coverage.
4. Reliable information: Due to small size - better trained personnel, more
accurate methods, better supervision.
• To draw conclusions about population from sample, there are two major
requirements for a sample.
– Firstly, the sample size should be large.
– Secondly, the sample has to be selected appropriately so that it is
representative of the population. Sample should have all the
characteristics of the population.
Disadvantages of sampling
1. Sampling entails an argument from the fraction to the whole.
Validity depends on representativeness of the sample.
Non-
Probability
probability
samples
samples
I.PROBABILITY SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
• It is a technique wherein the sample are gathered in a process that given all
the individuals in the population equal chances of being selected.
• The advantage of using a random sample is the absence of both systematic &
sampling bias.
• The entire process of sampling is done in a single step, with each subject
selected independently of the other members of the population
• It involves the selection of every Kth case from list of group, such as every
10th person on a patient list or every 100th person from a phone directory.
• The strata are divided according selected traits of the population such
as age, gender, religion, socio-economic status, diagnosis, education,
geographical region, type of institution, type of care, type of
registered nurses, nursing area specialization, site of care, etc.
Stratified random sampling(contd.)
• For example, if we draw a simple random sample from a population, a
sample of 100 may contain
– 10 to 15 from high socioeconomic group
– 20 to 25 from middle socioeconomic group
– 70 to 75 from low socioeconomic group
• To get adequately large representation for all the three socio economic
structures, we can stratify on socioeconomic class and select simple
random samples from each of the three strata.
4.Cluster sampling
• The population is divided into subgroups (clusters) like families. A
simple random sample is taken of the subgroups and then all
members of the cluster selected are surveyed.
From among the selected first stage units, a sub- sample of secondary
stage units is drawn by some suitable method of sampling which may be
same as or different from the method used in selecting first stage unit.
Multi-stage Sampling Continue
• In this method, the whole population is divided in first stage sampling
units from which a random sample is selected.
• The selected first stage is then subdivided into second stage units from
which another sample is selected.
• Third and fourth stage sampling is done in the same manner if necessary.
• Example:
– NFHS data is collected by multistage sampling.
• Rural areas – 2 stage sampling – Villages from list by PPS,
Households from village
• Urban areas – Wards (PPS) – CEB (PPS) – 30 households from each
CEB
6.Sequential Sampling
• This method of sample selection is slightly different
from other methods.
• Here the sample size is not fixed. The investigator
initially selects small sample & tries out to make
inferences; if not able to draw results, he or she then
adds more subjects until clear-cut inferences can be
drawn.
II.NONPROBABILITY SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
• It is a technique wherein samples are gathered in a process that does not
give all the individual in the population equal chances of being selected.
• Most researchers are bound by time, money, & workforce, & because of
these limitations, it is almost impossible to randomly sample the entire
population & it is often necessary to employ another sampling
technique, the nonprobability sampling technique.
Purposive/judgmental sampling
Convenience/grab/availability sampling
Consecutive sampling
Quota sampling
Snow ball sampling
1.Purposive/deliberate sampling
• It is more commonly known as ‘judgmental’ or ‘authoritative
sampling’.
• In this type of sampling, subjects are chosen to be part of the
sample with a specific purpose in mind.
• In purposive sampling, the researcher believes that some
subjects are fit for research compared to other individual. This
is the reason why they are purposively chosen as subject.
• In this sampling technique, samples are chosen by choice not by
chance, through a judgment made the researcher based on his
or her knowledge about the population
• For example, a researcher wants to study the lived experiences of post
disaster depression among people living in earthquake affected areas of
Gujarat.
In this study, the researcher selected only those people who fulfill the
criteria as well as particular subjects that are the typical & representative
part of population as per the knowledge of the researcher.
2.Convenience/haphazard Sampling
• It is probably the most common of all sampling techniques because
it is fast, inexpensive, easy, & the subject are readily available.
• It is a non probability sampling technique where subjects are
selected because of their convenient accessibility & proximity to
the researcher.
• The subjects are selected just because they are easiest to recruit
for the study & the researcher did not consider selecting subjects
that are representative of the entire population
• It is also known as an accidental sampling.
• Subjects are chosen simply because they are easy to recruit.
For example, if a researcher wants to conduct a study on the older
people residing in Bhopal, & the researcher observes that he can
meet several older people coming for morning walk in a park
located near his residence in Bhopal, he can choose these people
as his research subjects.
These subjects are readily accessible for the researcher & may
help him to save time, money, & resources.(man on the streets)
3.Consecutive Sampling
• It is very similar to convenience sampling except that it seeks to include
all accessible subjects as part of the sample.
• This nonprobability sampling technique can be considered as the best of
all nonprobability samples because it include all the subjects that are
available, which makes the sample a better representation of the entire
population.
• It is also known as total enumerative sampling.
• In this sampling technique, the investigator pick up all the
available subjects who are meeting the preset inclusion &
exclusion criteria.
• This technique is generally used in small-sized populations.
• For example, if a researcher wants to study the activity pattern
of post kidney-transplant patient, he can selects all the post
kidney transplant patients who meet the designed inclusion &
exclusion criteria, & who are admitted in post-transplant ward
during a specific time period.
4.Quota Sampling
• It is nonprobability sampling technique wherein the researcher
ensures equal or proportionate representation of subjects,
depending on which trait is considered as the basis of the quota.
• The bases of the quota are usually age, gender, education, race,
religion, & socio-economic status.
• For example, if the basis of the quota is college level & the research
needs equal representation, with a sample size of 100, he must select
25 first-year students, another 25 second-year students, 25 third-
year, & 25 fourth-year students.
5.Snowball/networking Sampling
• It is a nonprobability sampling technique that is used by researchers to
identify potential subjects in studies where subjects are hard to locate such
as drug abusers, HIV/AIDS etc.
• In this situation, snowball sampling is the best choice for such studies to
select a sample.
• This type of sampling technique works like chain referral. Therefore it is also
known as chain referral sampling.
Errors of Observation
• Interview error- interaction between interviewer and person
being surveyed
The process of doing a field research study is more flexible and less
structured than qualitative research.
Step 1 : Design the field work.
Step 2 : Selection of cities/centres.
Step 3 : Organising field work
Step 4 : Quotas
Step 5 : Selection of respondents.
Step 6 : Control procedure on the field.
Step 7 : Briefing
Step 8 : Debriefing
Step 1: Design the Field Work
There are 3 aspects of preparing for the field.
• Be flexible
• Organize yourself
• Be self aware
Step 2:Selection of Cities/Centres
• Select a site
a natural location where a researcher conducts field
research.
Research question guide to select a site
The factors are relevant
i. Richness of data
ii. suitability
Step 3: Organising Field Work
Once the centres for the field work are finalised, it has
to be organised in each of these places.
The researchers or agency may or may not have its
own offices in each of the centres.
If it has an office, a field supervisor from the office is
sent a written brief and a copy of questionnaire, and
asked to recruit a field force and conduct a briefing of
them.
Step 4: Quotas/Group
Most large consumer marketing research studies have
quotas or group like age,income gender etc.of the
respondent. Because the output has to be analysed by
these characteristics.
Step 5:Selection of Respondents
The field supervisor actually leads the team of field
workers on the field, and instructs them on how to
select a household.
Absorb and experience
Watch and listen
Record the data
Notes
Step 6:Control Procedures On The Field
• To ensure that a field worker is doing his job, the field
supervisor can randomly go back to a few addresses
and talk to the respondent to ensure that they were
interviewed accurately.
Step 7:Briefing
• Before the field workers are sent on the field to do
interviews, they are given a thorough briefing by the
field supervisors and also clear their doubts if any.
Step 8: Debriefing
• After returning from field work on Day One or at the
end of survey in a city in a given centre, there is usually
a debriefing session where any problem in the field are
discussed, and solutions found by the supervisors.
Notes of field research
• JOTTED NOTES-Are written in the field. They are short,
temporary memory triggers such as words, phrases ,or
drawings taken inconspicuously, often scribbled on any
convenient item. They are incorporated into direct
observation notes but are never substituted for them.
• Direct observation notes- Field research notes that
attempt to include all details and specifics of what the
researcher heard or saw in a field site ,and are written
to permit multiple interpretations later.
• The notes should be ordered chronologically with the
data ,time ,and place on each entry.
• Researcher inference notes- A researcher should listen
to members in order to “climb into their skin” “or walk
in their shoes”. RIN involves three step process:
• Listen without applying analytical categories
• Compare what is heard to what was heard at other
times and to what others say
• Then apply your own interpretation to infer or figure
out what it means.
• Analytic Memos- Analytic memos are part of the
theoretical notes. They are systematic digressions into
theory , where a researcher elaborates on ideas in depth
, expands on ideas while still in the field , and modifies
or develops more complex theory by reading and
thinking about the memos.
• Personal notes- A researcher keeps a section of notes
that is like a personal diary. He or she records personal
life events and feelings in it (I am tense today)
• Personal notes provide a way to cope with stress. For
example, if you were in a good mood during
observations , it might color what you observed.
• Maps and diagrams- Field researchers often make maps
and draw diagrams or pictures of the features of a field
sites. FR find three types of maps helpful: spatial , social ,
and temporal.
• A spatial map locates people , equipment ,and
geographical physical space to show where activities occur.
• A social map shows the number or variety of people and
the arrangements among them of power , influence ,
friendship ,division of labor.
• Interview notes- A researcher conducts field
interviews , he or she keeps the interview notes
separate.
• In addition to recording or answers , he or she creates a
face sheet.
• This is a page at the beginning of the notes with
information such as the data, place of interview,
characteristics of interviewee, content of the interview,
and so on.
Methods of field research
There are main three types of methods use in field
research:
• Direct observation
• Participant observation
• Qualitative interviews
Direct observation
• Data is gathered primarily through close visual inspection of a
natural setting
• Rather than actively engaging members of a setting in
conversations or interviews, the direct observer strives to be
unobtrusive and detached from the setting
• Direct observation is not necessarily an alternative to other types
of field methods, such as participant observation or qualitative
interviews. Rather, it may be an initial approach to understanding
a setting, a group of individuals, or forms of behavior prior to
interacting with members or developing interview protocols.
Advantages & disadvantages
Advantage of direct observation:
• It offers contextual data on settings, interactions, or
individuals
Disadvantage of direct observation:
• Behaviors observed during direct observation may be
unusual or atypical
Participant observation
• A field research method whereby the researcher
develops an understanding of the composition of a
particular setting or society by taking part in the
everyday routines and rituals alongside its members
• Originally developed in the early 20th century by
anthropologists researching native societies in
developing countries; now employed by researchers
studying a range of issues.
Advantages & disadvantages
Advantages:
• The ethnographer develops a rich, "thick" understanding
of a setting and of the members within a society
Disadvantages:
• The researcher must devote a large amount of time (and
money) to develop this complex understanding.
• An ethnographer's objectivity may decline as he or she
spends more time among the members.
Qualitative interviews
• Qualitative interviews are a type of field research method that elicits
information and data by directly asking questions of members.
There are three primary types of qualitative interviews: informal,
conversational; semi-structured; standardized, and open-ended.
• Informal, Conversational Interview:
• The researcher begins conversing with a member from a setting. As
the conversation unfolds, the researcher formulates specific
questions, often spontaneously, and begins asking them informally
• Appropriate when the researcher wants maximum flexibility to
pursue topics and ideas as they emerge during the exchange.
Advantages & disadvantages
Advantage:
• Allows researcher to be responsive to individual
differences and to capture emerging information
Disadvantage:
• May generate less systematic data, which are difficult
to classify and analyze.
UNIT-5
DATA ANALYSIS
HYPOTHESIS
• A hypothesis is an assertion that variables (measured concepts) are related
in a specific way such that this relationship explains certain facts or
phenomena. From a practical standpoint, hypotheses may be developed to
solve a problem, answer a question, or imply a possible course of action.
Outcomes are predicted if a specific course of action is followed.
• Hypotheses must be empirically testable. A hypothesis is often stated as a
research question when reporting either the purpose of the investigation or
the findings.
• The hypothesis may be stated informally as a research question, or more
formally as an alternative hypothesis, or in a testable form known as a null
hypothesis. The null hypothesis makes a statement that no difference exists
Null Hypothesis (H0)
• Statements identifying relationships that are statistically testable
and can be shown not to hold (nullified).
• The logic of the null hypothesis is that if we hypothesize no
difference, and we “reject” the hypotheses if a difference is
found.
• If, however we confirm that no difference exists, then we
"tentatively accept" the null hypothesis. We may only accept the
null on a "tentative" basis because another testing of the null
hypothesis using a new sample may reveal that sampling error
was present and that the null hypothesis should be rejected.
Alternative hypothesis
• Alternative hypotheses may be considered to be the
opposite of the null hypotheses.
• The alternative hypothesis makes a formal statement
of expected difference, and may state simply that a
difference exists or that a directional difference exists,
depending upon how the null hypothesis is stated.
• Because population differences may exist, even if not
verified by the current sample data, the alternative
form is considered to be empirically non-testable.
Testing hypothesis
• Testing hypotheses is the broad objective that
underlies all decisional research.
• Sometimes the population as a whole can be
measured and profiled in its entirety. Often,
• however, we cannot measure everyone in the
population but instead must estimate the population
using a sample of respondents drawn from the
population
Acceptable Error in Hypothesis Testing
• A question that continually plagues analysts is, what
significance level should be used in hypothesis testing? The
significance level refers to the amount of error we are willing
to accept in our decisions that are based on the hypothesis
test. Hypotheses testing involves specifying the Value , which
is the allowable amount of Type I error.
• In hypothesis testing the sample results sometimes lead us to
reject H0 when it is true. This is a Type I error. On other
occasions the sample findings may lead us to accept H0 when
it is false. This is a Type II error. The
• A Type I error occurs when we incorrectly conclude
that a difference exists. This is sometimes called the
hypothesis of no difference.
• 2. A Type II error occurs when we accept a null
hypothesis when it is in reality false (we find no
difference when a difference really does exist).
Comparing means
• Correlation and regression look for relationships
between variables
• Tests comparing means look for differences between
the means of two or more samples
• General null hypothesis: the samples come from the
same population
• General research hypothesis: the samples come from
different populations
Choosing a statistical test: normality