Civil Law Areas 2019
Civil Law Areas 2019
Civil Law Areas 2019
published at all. The purpose is to inform the public of its Art. 11. NCC Customs which are contrary to law, public
contents. order or public policy shall not be countenanced. (n)
Page 1 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
QUESTION
INFERIOR COURT DECISIONS Civil and Criminal
NOTE: Lower courts should take judicial notice of the cases I I. Administrative and civil
decisions of the Supreme Court. Decisions of the Court cases;
of Appeals, however, may have also binding (or at least II II. Civil then
guiding effect to lower courts. administrative cases;
III III. Civil and civil cases;
STARE DECISIS IV IV. Administrative and
The doctrine which requires the courts to follow the rule criminal (ULP case before Labor
established in earlier decisions of the SC. However, it is Arbiters before filing a Criminal
not inflexible, so that when in the light of changing case for ULP)
conditions, a rule has ceased to be beneficial to the V V. Criminal then civil
society, courts may depart from it. (Falsification and Probate of Will)
Effectivity of SC Interpretation:
A judicial interpretation becomes a part of the law as of Note: It is not in all cases that the decision (finding of
the date the law subject thereof took effect, subject only facts) in the administrative case will bind the civil case.
to the qualification that when a doctrine of this Court is
overruled and a different view is adopted, and more so
when there is a reversal thereof, the new doctrine should PERSONS
be applied PROSPECTIVELY and should not apply to CHANGE OF NAME
parties who relied on the old doctrine and acted in good NOTE: The law does not allow dropping of middle name
faith. (Tañada, eta al. vs Guingona, Jr., et al.,235 SCRA from registered name unless there are justifiable
507). reasons to do so. Mere convenience is not justifiable.
• Judicial decisions also have prospective Middle name serves to identify the maternal lineage of
application. filiation of a person as well as further distinguish him
from others who may have the same given name and
If the decision reversing a previous ruling of the court be surname as he has.
not given a prospective effect, the same would deprive
the law of its quality of fairness and justice, if there is no An illegitimate child whose filiation is not recognized by
recognition of what had transpired prior to such the father bears only a given name and his mother’s
adjudication. This is now known as the “doctrine of name, and he does ot have a middle name, unless
operative facts”. (Albino S. Co vs CA, et al., L-100776, legitimated or subsequently recognized by the father.
Oct. 28, 1993)
A child can use the surname of the mother instead of the
father if there are clear justifiable reasons to do so such
PREJUDICIAL QUESTIONS as to avoid confusion (In Re Petition for Change of
NOTES: Art. 36, NCC. Pre-judicial questions which must Name, Petitioner Julian Lin (Carulasan) Wang, GR No.
be decided before any criminal prosecution may be 159966, March 30, 2005).
instituted or may proceed, shall be governed by rules of
court which the Supreme Court shall promulgate and Note: clerical and typographical errors may be corrected
which shall not be in conflict with the provisions of this without judicial order under RA 9048.
Code.
PREJUDICIAL QUESTION Section 4. RA 9048. Grounds for Change of First
It is one which arises in a case, the resolution of which is Name or Nickname. – The petition for change of first
a logical antecedent of the issue involved therein and name or nickname may be allowed in any of the
cognizance of which pertains to another tribunal (Agpalo, following cases:
p. 137). (1) The petitioner finds the first name or nickname to be
Prejudicial question is based on a fact distinct and ridiculous, tainted with dishonor or extremely difficult to
separate from the crime but so intimately connected with write or pronounce.
it that it determines the guilt or innocence of the (2) The new first name or nickname has been habitually
accused. and continuously used by the petitioner and he has been
REASON: To avoid two conflicting decisions. publicly known by that by that first name or nickname in
WHERE TO FILE PETITION FOR SUSPENSION OF the community: or
CRIMINAL ACTION: (3) The change will avoid confusion.
1. Office of the Prosecutor;
2. Court where the case is filed for trial, at any time
before prosecution rests. JURIDICAL CAPACITY VS. CAPACITY TO
ACT
Section 7, Rule 111 of ROC: Elements of prejudicial Juridical capacity, which is the fitness to be the subject
question. — The elements of a prejudicial question are: of legal relations, is inherent in every natural person and
is lost only through death. Capacity to act, which is the
(a) the previously instituted civil action involves an issue power to do acts with legal effect, is acquired and may
similar or intimately related to the issue raised in the be lost. (Art. 37 NCC)
subsequent criminal action, and
(b) the resolution of such issue determines whether or Minority, insanity or imbecility, the state of being a deaf-
not the criminal action may proceed. mute, prodigality and civil interdiction are mere
restrictions on capacity to act, and do not exempt the
PREJUDICIAL PREVIOUS QUESTION incapacitated person from certain obligations, as when
Page 2 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
the latter arise from his acts or from property relations, everyone his due, and observe honesty and good faith.
such as easements. (Art. 38 NCC) PRINCIPLE OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS
It is when the right is exercised for the purpose of
Birth determines personality; but the conceived child prejudicing or injuring another.
shall be considered born for all purposes that are Requisites:
favorable to it, provided it be born later with the 1. There is a legal right or duty;
conditions specified in the following article. (Art. 40 NCC) 2. Which is exercised in bad faith;
3. For the sole intent of prejudicing or injuring another.
For civil purposes, the fetus is considered born if it is
alive at the time it is completely delivered from the DOCTRINE OF VOLENTI NON FIT INJURIA
mother's womb. However, if the fetus had an intra- Pertains to self-inflicted injuries or to the consent to
uterine life of less than seven months, it is not deemed injury which precludes the recovery of damages by one
born if it dies within twenty-four hours after its complete who has knowingly and voluntarily exposed himself to
delivery from the maternal womb. (Art. 41, NCC) danger, even if he is not negligent in doing so.
DEATH; EFFECTS; SIMULTANEOUS Art. 20. NCC Every person who, contrary to law, willfully
or negligently causes damage to another, shall
DEATH indemnify the latter for the same.
Art. 43. NCC If there is a doubt, as between two or more Art. 21. NCC Any person who willfully causes loss or
persons who are called to succeed each other, as to injury to another in a manner that is contrary to morals,
which of them died first, whoever alleges the death of good customs or public policy shall compensate the
one prior to the other, shall prove the same; in the latter for the damage.
absence of proof, it is presumed that they died at the ACTS CONTRA BONUS MORES
same time and there shall be no transmission of rights Presupposes loss or injury, material or otherwise, which
from one to the other. one may differ as a result of such violation.
Requisites:
Note: This applies only to cases involving succession. If 1. There is an act which is legal;
it is not involving succession, sec. 3 (jj), Rule 131, of the 2. But which is contrary to morals, good customs, public
Rules of Court governs. (Survivorship Rules). order or public policy;
• The proof of death must be established by 3. And it is done with intent to injure.
positive evidence. Proof of death can never be
established from mere inference arising from another Under arts. 19 and 21, the act must be done
inference or from presumptions or assumptions. intentionally. However, art. 20 does not distinguish, the
act may be done either intentionally or negligently, as
long as the act is contrary to law.
WAIVER OF RIGHTS While breach of promise to marry is, generally, not
Rights may be waived, unless the waiver is contrary to
actionable, it has been held that to formally set a
law, public order, public policy, morals, or good customs,
wedding and go through and spend for all the wedding
or prejudicial to a third person with a right recognized by
preparations and publicity, only to walk out of it when the
law.
matrimony was about to be solemnized is a different
REQUISITES FOR A VALID WAIVER OF RIGHTS:
matter. Such act is palpably and unjustifiably contrary to
1. The person making the waiver must have the right he
good customs for which the defendant must be held
is waiving (existence of right);
answerable for damages in accordance with art. 21,
2. He must know the existence of such right;
NCC.
3. He must have the capacity to make the waiver;
4. The waiver must be made in a clear and unequivocal
Damages are also available when breach promise to
manner;
marry is attended with deceit or moral seduction.
5. Waiver must intelligently made;
6. Waiver must not be contrary to law, public order,
Art. 23. NCC Even when an act or event causing
public policy, morals or good customs or prejudicial to a
damage to another's property was not due to the fault or
3rd person with a right recognized by law (or contract);
negligence of the defendant, the latter shall be liable for
7. In certain instances; in the formalities required by law
indemnity if through the act or event he was benefited.
(like waiver of the right to counsel which must be in
NOTE: This is the Principle of Unjust Enrichment.
writing and in the presence or assistance of a lawyer).
• Take note that theft is likewise committed by any
person who, after having maliciously damaged the
SOME RIGHTS THAT CANNOT BE WAIVED
property of another, shall remove or make use of the
1. Right to support (ART. 301, NCC);
fruits or objects of the damaged caused by him (art. 308
2. Right of action against future fraud (art. 1171, NCC);
[2], RPC).
3. Right to future inheritance (art. 1043, NCC);
4. Right to counsel during arraignment of the accused
(sec. 6, Rule 116, Rules of Court); CONFLICT OF LAWS
5. Future prescription cannot be waived (art. 1112, LAW ON NATIONALITY
NCC).
Laws relating to family rights and duties, or to the status,
6. Right to set up defense of illegality of contracts (art.
condition and legal capacity of persons are binding upon
1409, NCC).
citizens of the Philippines, even though living abroad.
(Art. 15, NCC)
ABUSE OF RIGHTS
Every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in Intestate and testamentary successions, both with
the performance of his duties, act with justice, give respect to the:
Page 3 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
1. order of succession Article 15 of the NCC specifically provides that Philippine laws
2. amount of successional rights relating to legal capacity of persons are binding upon citizens
3. the intrinsic validity of testamentary provisions, of the Philippines no matter where they are.
shall be regulated by the national law of the
person whose succession is under DIVORCE
consideration, whatever may be the nature of Divorce obtained abroad by the alien spouse, or the
the property and regardless of the country Filipino spouse which capacitates the alien spouse to
wherein said property may be found. (Art. 16, marry, when valid abroad shall also be valid here in the
NCC) Philippines. The same has the effect of capacitating the
4. Capacity to succeed is governed by the law of the Filipino spouse to marry. (Manalo case)
nation of the decedent. (Art. 1039.NCC)
Remedy of the Filipino spouse is to file a Petition for
LEX REI SITAE Correction of Entry in the civil status with Recognition of
Real property as well as personal property is subject to the Divorce Decree which was obtained abroad.
the law of the country where it is situated. (Art. 16 NCC)
LONG-ARM STATUTE
LEX LOCI CELEBRACIONES Long arm statutes – statutes allowing the courts to
The forms and solemnities of contracts, wills, and other exercise jurisdiction when there are minimum contacts
public instruments shall be governed by the laws of the between the non-resident defendant and the forum.
country in which they are executed.
DOMICILIARY THEORY
When the acts referred to are executed before the Domiciliary theory – in general, the status, condition,
diplomatic or consular officials of the Republic of the rights, obligations, and capacity of a person should be
Philippines in a foreign country, the solemnities governed by the law of his domicile.
established by Philippine laws shall be observed in their
execution.
FORUM NON CONVENIENS
Prohibitive laws concerning persons, their acts or A forum may resist imposition upon its jurisdiction even
property, and those which have, for their object, when jurisdiction is authorized by law on the ground that
public order, public policy and good customs shall the forum is inconvenient or the ends of justice would be
not be rendered ineffective by laws or judgments best served by trial in another forum or the controversy
promulgated, or by determinations or conventions may be more suitably tried elsewhere.
agreed upon in a foreign country.
Page 4 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
WHO MAY BE ADOPTED (sec. 5): A child under the Inter-Country Adoption Act is defined
1. Any person below 18 years of age who has been as any person below 15 years of age.
judicially declared available for adoption OR voluntarily
Page 5 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
marry, when valid abroad shall also be valid here in the twenty-one, or by the parent or guardian or person
Philippines. The same has the effect of capacitating the having legal charge of the minor, at any time before such
Filipino spouse to marry. (Manalo case) party has reached the age of twenty-one;
(2) For causes mentioned in number 2 of Article 45, by
This ruling, in effect, modified the Nationality Theory the same spouse, who had no knowledge of the other's
under Article 15, NCC which originally restrict Filipino insanity; or by any relative or guardian or person having
nationals from obtaining abroad a divorce decree, but legal charge of the insane, at any time before the death
with qualification that their marriage is a mix-marriage. of either party, or by the insane spouse during a lucid
interval or after regaining sanity;
GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT (3) For causes mentioned in number 3 of Article 45, by
Art. 45. FC. A marriage may be annulled for any of the injured party, within five years after the discovery of
the following causes, existing at the time of the the fraud;
marriage: (4) For causes mentioned in number 4 of Article 45, by
(1) That the party in whose behalf it is sought to have the the injured party, within five years from the time the
marriage annulled was eighteen years of age or over but force, intimidation or undue influence disappeared or
below twenty-one, and the marriage was solemnized ceased;
without the consent of the parents, guardian or person (5) For causes mentioned in number 5 and 6 of Article
having substitute parental authority over the party, in that 45, by the injured party, within five years after the
order, unless after attaining the age of twenty-one, such marriage. (87a)
party freely cohabited with the other and both lived
together as husband and wife; VOID MARRIAGE VOIDABLE
(2) That either party was of unsound mind, unless such MARRIAGE
party after coming to reason, freely cohabited with the Inexistent from the time of Valid until annulled
other as husband and wife; performance
(3) That the consent of either party was obtained by No community of property, Absolute community
fraud, unless such party afterwards, with full knowledge only co-ownership exists unless another
of the facts constituting the fraud, freely cohabited with system is agreed upon
the other as husband and wife; in marriage settlement
(4) That the consent of either party was obtained by Children are illegitimate, Children are legitimate
force, intimidation or undue influence, unless the same except art. 36 and art. 53 if conceived before
having disappeared or ceased, such party thereafter decree of annulment
freely cohabited with the other as husband and wife; Cannot be ratified Can be ratified by free
(5) That either party was physically incapable of cohabitation or
consummating the marriage with the other, and such prescription
incapacity continues and appears to be incurable; or
(6) That either party was afflicted with a sexually-
• •
transmissible disease found to be serious and appears
directly or collaterally but for attack collaterally, only
to be incurable. (85a)
purposes of remarriage, directly.
there must be judicial •
Art. 46. FC Any of the following circumstances shall declaration of nullity. longer be impugned
constitute fraud referred to in Number 3 of the • after the death on one
preceding Article: impugned even after death of the parties.
(1) Non-disclosure of a previous conviction by final of parties. •
judgment of the other party of a crime involving moral • prescribes.
turpitude; does not prescribe
(2) Concealment by the wife of the fact that at the time of
the marriage, she was pregnant by a man other than her
husband;
(3) Concealment of sexually transmissible disease, GROUNDS FOR DECLARATION OF
regardless of its nature, existing at the time of the NULLITY
marriage; or VOID MARRIAGES
(4) Concealment of drug addiction, habitual alcoholism Art. 35. FamCode The following marriages shall be
or homosexuality or lesbianism existing at the time of the void from the beginning:
marriage. (1) Those contracted by any party below eighteen years
No other misrepresentation or deceit as to character, of age even with the consent of parents or guardians;
health, rank, fortune or chastity shall constitute such (2) Those solemnized by any person not legally
fraud as will give grounds for action for the annulment of authorized to perform marriages unless such marriages
marriage. (86a) were contracted with either or both parties believing in
good faith that the solemnizing officer had the legal
PRESCRIPTION OF ANNULMENT CASE authority to do so;
(3) Those solemnized without license, except those
ANNULMENT PROPER PARTY covered the preceding Chapter;
Art. 47. FamCode The action for annulment of marriage
(4) Those bigamous or polygamous marriages not failing
must be filed by the following persons and within the
under Article 41;
periods indicated herein:
(5) Those contracted through mistake of one contracting
(1) For causes mentioned in number 1 of Article 45 by
party as to the identity of the other; and
the party whose parent or guardian did not give his or
(6) Those subsequent marriages that are void under
her consent, within five years after attaining the age of
Article 53. (liquidation, partition and distribution of the
Page 7 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
properties of the spouses, the custody and support of ACP/CPG shall be liquidated. Spouse who contracted
the common children, and the delivery of their the marriage in bad faith, his/her share in the net
presumptive legitimes. TAKE NOTE HOWEVER, this profits of the community property shall be forfeited in
requirement is not needed when declaration of nullity of favor of common children or if there are none, children
marriage is under Article 36 of FC. Article 53 is required of the guilty spouse by previous marriage or in default,
only in relation to Article 40 and 45) the innocent spouse.
PSYCHOLOGICAL INCAPACITY Donations Propter Nuptias
Art. 36. FC. A marriage contracted by any party who, at Shall remain VALID except:
the time of the celebration, was psychologically a. If donee contracted the marriage in bad
incapacitated to comply with the essential marital faith, donations propter nuptias made to the donee
obligations of marriage, shall likewise be void even if are revoked by operation of law.
such incapacity becomes manifest only after its b. If both spouses acted in bad faith,
solemnization. (As amended by Executive Order 227) donations propter nuptias made by one in favor of the
NOTES: other are revoked by operation of law.
PSYCHOLOGICAL INCAPACITY
Has no exact definition but is restricted to psychological Insurance
incapacity to comply with the essential marital If one spouse acted in bad faith, innocent spouse may
obligations of marriage. In involves a senseless, revoke his designation as beneficiary in the insurance
protracted, and constant refusal to comply with the policy even if such designation be stipulate
essential marital obligations by one or both of the irrevocable
spouses although he or she, or they are physically Succession
capable of performing such obligations (Chi Ming Tsoi If one spouse contracted the marriage in bad faith, he
vs. CA, 266 SCRA 234, [1997]). shall be disqualified to inherit from the innocent
• Note that in this case, there is refusal to have spouse both testate and intestate.
sex by the husband to the wife.
Page 10 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
WITHOUT MARRIAGE; COMMON LAW child which share must be taken from the free portion.
UNION If the property of decedent is not sufficient to satisfy the
above computation, reduce the share in the free portion
NOT MARRIED BUT WITHOUT LEGAL IMPEDIMENT so as not to impair the legitime.
Art. 147. FC When a man and a woman who are
capacitated to marry each other, live exclusively with Art. 1002. NCC. In case of a legal separation, if the
each other as husband and wife without the benefit of surviving spouse gave cause for the separation, he or
marriage or under a void marriage, their wages and she shall not have any of the rights granted in the
salaries shall be owned by them in equal shares and the preceding articles.
property acquired by both of them through their work or
industry shall be governed by the rules on co-ownership.
BARRIER BETWEEN ILLEGITIMATE &
In the absence of proof to the contrary, properties LEGITIMATE RELATIVES
acquired while they lived together shall be presumed to Art. 992. NCC. An illegitimate child has no right to inherit
have been obtained by their joint efforts, work or ab intestato from the legitimate children and relatives of
industry, and shall be owned by them in equal shares. his father or mother; nor shall such children or relatives
For purposes of this Article, a party who did not inherit in the same manner from the illegitimate child.
participate in the acquisition by the other party of any (943a)
property shall be deemed to have contributed jointly in
the acquisition thereof if the former's efforts consisted in
the care and maintenance of the family and of the
COLLATION
household. Is the act by virtue of which, the persons who concur in
Neither party can encumber or dispose by acts inter the inheritance bring back to the common hereditary
vivos of his or her share in the property acquired during mass the property which they may have received from
cohabitation and owned in common, without the consent him, so that a division may be effected according to law
of the other, until after the termination of their and the will of the testator
cohabitation. “To Collate” – is to bring back or return to the
hereditary mass, in fact or by fiction, property which
When only one of the parties to a void marriage is in came from the estate of the decedent, during his lifetime,
good faith, the share of the party in bad faith in the co- but which the law considers as an advance from the
ownership shall be forfeited in favor of their common inheritance.
children. In case of default of or waiver by any or all of
the common children or their descendants, each vacant DISINHERITANCE VS. PRETERITION
share shall belong to the respective surviving
descendants. In the absence of descendants, such
PRETERITION DISINHERITANCE
share shall belong to the innocent party. In all cases, the
forfeiture shall take place upon termination of the Deprivation of a Deprivation of the
cohabitation. (144a) compulsory heir of his compulsory heir of his
NOT MARRIED AND WITH LEGAL IMPEDIMENT legitime is tacit legitime is express
Art. 148.FC. In cases of cohabitation not falling under May be voluntary but law Always voluntary
the preceding Article, only the properties acquired by presumes that it is
both of the parties through their actual joint contribution involuntary
of money, property, or industry shall be owned by them Law presumes that there Done with legal cause
in common in proportion to their respective contributions. has been a mistake or
In the absence of proof to the contrary, their oversight on the part of
contributions and corresponding shares are presumed to the testator
be equal. The same rule and presumption shall apply to Omitted heir gets not only If disinheritance is
joint deposits of money and evidences of credit. his legitime but also his unlawful, compulsory
If one of the parties is validly married to another, his or share in the free portion heir is merely restored to
her share in the co-ownership shall accrue to the not disposed of by way of his legitime
absolute community or conjugal partnership existing in legacies and devises
such valid marriage. If the party who acted in bad faith is
not validly married to another, his or her shall be
forfeited in the manner provided in the last paragraph of
the preceding Article.
The foregoing rules on forfeiture shall likewise apply HEIRS; INTESTATE HEIRS; RESERVA
even if both parties are in bad faith. (144a) TRONCAL
Art. 891. NCC. The ascendant who inherits from his
SUCCESSION LAW descendant any property which the latter may have
acquired by gratuitous title from another ascendant, or a
AMOUNT OF SUCCESSIONAL RIGHT; brother or sister, is obliged to reserve such property as
PRESUMPTIVE LEGITIME he may have acquired by operation of law for the benefit
Legitimate children: entitled to the legitimate which is of relatives who are within the third degree and who
equivalent to half of the estate of the decedent belong to the line from which said property came. (871)
Illegitimate children: entitled to equivalent of one half of
the share of the legitimate children which share must be RESERVA TRONCAL
taken from the free portion Art. 891 is the provision on Reserva Troncal.
Spouse: entitled to equal of the share of each legitimate PURPOSE:
Page 11 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
1. To reserve certain properties to certain persons; follow ISRAI. If the Institution fails, Substitution
2. To prevent person outside a family from acquiring, by occurs. If there is no substitute, right of Representation
some chance or accident, property which otherwise occurs in the direct descending line to the legitime if the
would have remained with the said family; vacancy is caused by predecease, incapacity, or
3. To maintain separation between paternal and disinheritance. The right of Accretion applies to the free
maternal lines. portion when the requisites in art. 1016 are present. If
there is no substitute, and the right of representation or
REQUISITES OF RESERVA TRONCAL: accretion does not apply, the Rule of Intestacy shall
1. The property should have been acquired by operation take over.
of law by an ascendant (RESERVISTA) from his
descendant (PROPOSITUS), upon death of the latter;
INTESTATE SUCCESSION; INTESTATE
Note: by operation of law means that the property is PROCEEDINGS; JURISDICTION
acquired by succession, either by legitime or intestacy. Real action: any action involving title to, or possession of
2. The property should have been acquired by the real property or any interest therein, except unlawful
propositus by gratuitous title from another ascendant or detainer and forcible entry, the jurisdiction is based on
from a brother or sister (ORIGINITOR). the assessed value of the real property.
Note: Gratuitous title encompasses succession and Sction 1 of Rule 73, settlement of Estate of deceased
donation. person, does not relate to jurisdiction but venue. Hence,
3. The propositus should have died without any it can be waived if an action is filed in a court of wrong
legitimate issue in the direct descending line who could venue, and there is no motion to dismiss filed on such
inherit from him. ground of wrong venue. (Uriati vs. CFI, L-21938 May 29,
1970)
NOTE: All the relationships must be legitimate (Nieva vs.
Alcala, 41 Phil. 495). WILLS; CODICIL; INSITUTION OF HEIR;
SUBSTITUTION
INTESTATE SUCCESSION A MODAL INSTITUTION is the institution of an heir made for a
INTESTATE HEIRS: certain purpose or cause (Arts. 871 and 882, NCC).
1. Legitimate children/descendants; SUBSTITUTION is the appointment of another heir so that he
may enter into the inheritance in default of the heir originality
2. Illegitimate children/descendants; instituted. (Art. 857, NCC).
3. Legitimate parents/ascendants;
4. Illegitimate parents; In a SIMPLE SUBSTITUTION of heirs, the testator designates
5. Surviving spouse; one or more persons to substitute the heirs instituted in case
6. Brothers and sisters, nephews and nieces; such heir or heirs should die before him, or should not wish or
7. Other collateral relatives up to the 5th degree; should be incapacitated to accept the inheritance.
8. State.
In a FIDEICOMMISSARY SUBSTITUTION, the testator
BASIC PRINCIPLES IN INTESTATE SUCCESSION: institutes a first heir and charges him to preserve and transmit
the whole or part of the inheritance to a second heir. In a
1. Intestate heirs always related by blood. simple substitution, only one heir inherits. In a fideicommissary
substitution, both the first and second heirs inherit. (Art. 859
Except: and 869, NCC)
a. Spouse;
b. Adoptive relation;
c. State. WILLS; FORMALITIES
LAWS GOVERNING VALIDITY OF A WILL:
2. Proximity rule applies – relative nearest in degree 1. Formal Validity—
excludes the more distant ones. a. If the testator is a Filipino and the will is executed in
3. Direct line is always preferred over collateral relatives. the Philippines, then its formal validity is governed by the
4. Descending line is always preferred than ascending NCC.
line and collateral lines. b. If the testator is a Filipino and will is executed in a
5. Rule of equal division – relatives in same degree foreign country, then its formal validity is governed
(same class) shall inherit in equal shares. either—
I. By the law of the place where the will was
Exception: made; or
a. Descending line – difference in class in the II. By the NCC.
cases of legitimate or illegitimate filiation. c. If the testator is a foreigner and the will is executed in
I. In case of paternal/maternal lines. a foreign country—
II. Collateral – half or full blood. I. Law of the place where will was executed;
II. Law of his own country;
b. Ascending line – the shares are divided III. By the NCC
equally between paternal and maternal lines which could
result to unequal shares when there is only one d. If testator is a foreigner and will is executed in the
grandparent in the maternal line while both grandparents Philippines—
survived in the paternal line. I. Law of his country;
II. By the NCC.
NOTE: I.S.R. R.A.I Rule (Paras)
In all cases where there has been institution of heirs, 2. Substantive Validity—by the National law of the
Page 12 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
WHO MAY ACCEPT DONATIONS: NOTE: This process of natural action of the river causing
1. natural and juridical persons which are not specifically loss to other’s estate does not violate the indefeasibility
Page 14 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
of titile issued under Torrens Title. Reason: Natural LO = GF; owner of the reimbursement
Expropriation. (Viajar vs. CA, 168 SCRA 405, [1988]). Or material but he (provided he
OM = BF must pay for does not remove
Dried up river bed is not considered as alluvium. The LO = BF (as their value. them).
dried up river bed is a property of public domain. Unless if both in Exception: 2. Entitled to
there is a positive act of the state which makes the land GF) When they can removal
as alienable and disposable, the same cannot be subject be removed (provided no
of acquisitive prescription. without substantial injury
destruction to is caused)
the work made
ACCRETION;AVULSION or to the plants.
AVULSION
In such case,
Is the process whereby a portion of a land is segregated
the owner of
from an estate by the current of a river, creek or torrent
the material
and transferred to another estate.
can remove
Requisites:
them.
1. The segregation and transfer must be caused by the
LO = BF He becomes Entitled to the
current of a river, creek or torrent;
OM = GF the owner of absolute right of
2. Sudden or abrupt;
the materials removal and
3. Portion of land must be identifiable.
but he must damages
pay: (whether or not
Note: Removal is not necessarily physical removal.
1. Their value; substantial injury
and would be
BUILDER and PLANTER IN GOOD FAITH 2. Damages. caused).
VS. BAD FAITH
OBLIGATIONS: Exception:
when the
owner of the
1. Gathered fruits.
materials
Planter Owner
decides to
Planter in GF Keeps fruits No necessity
remove them
to reimburse
whether or not
the planter for
destruction
expenses
would be
since he
caused. In this
retains the
case, the
fruits
materials would
Planter in BF Reimbursed Gets fruits,
still belong to
of expenses pay planter
the owner of
for expenses
the materials
production,
who in addition
gathering,
will still be
and
entitled to
preservation
damages
Page 18 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
c. Without preventing the other co-owners except when the land has been previously acquired by
from making use thereof; prescription by a natural person and subsequently
3. Right to change the purpose of the co-ownership transferred to a juridical entity (in this case, a corporation
by agreement; may apply for judicial confirmation of title).
4. Right to bring an ejectment suit in behalf of the
other co-owner;
5. Right to compel other co-owner to contribute to
ADVERSE CLAIMS; NOTICE OF LEVY
While an adverse claim duly annotated at the back of a title
necessary expenses for preservation of the thing under Section 7O of P.D. 1529 is good only for 30 days,
and taxes; cancellation thereof is still necessary to render it ineffective,
6. Right to be exempt from obligation of paying otherwise, the inscription thereof will remain annotated as a
necessary expenses and taxes by renouncing lien on the property. While the life of adverse claim is 3O days
his share but may do so only if such is not under P.D. 1529, it continuous to be effective until it is
prejudicial to the co-ownership; canceled by formal petition filed with the Register of Deeds.
7. Right to make repairs for the preservation of the
thing and receive reimbursement therefrom;
8. Right to full ownership of his part and fruits;
NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS
Annotation of a lis pendens can only be done in cases
9. Right to alienate, assign or mortgage own share, involving recovery of possession of real property, or to quiet
except personal rights like right to use and title or to remove cloud thereon, or for partition or any other
habitation; proceeding affecting title to the land or the use or occupation
10. Right to ask partition anytime, subject to some thereof.
exceptions;
11. Right of pre-emption; The purpose of the notice of lis pendens is to
12. Right of redemption; constructively advise, or warn all people who deal with
the property that they so deal with it at their own risk,
Redemption of the whole property by a co- and whatever rights they may acquire in the property in
owner does not vest in him sole title over the any voluntary transaction are subject to the results of the
said property. Redemption within the period action, and may well be inferior and subordinate to those
prescribed by law by a co-owner will inure to which may be finally determined and laid down therein
the benefit of all co-owners. Hence, it will not (Heirs of Marasigan vs. IAC, 152 SCRA 253 [1987]).
put an end to existing co-ownership NOTE: It merely creates a contingency and not a lien.
(Mariano vs. CA, 222 SCRA 736).
FORESHORE LANDS; RECLAMATION;
REAL VS. PERSONAL PROPERTY LIMITATIONS
TESTS TO DETERMINE WHETER THE PROPERTY IS Foreshore lands is that strip of land that lies between the
REAL OR PERSONAL: high and low water marks and alternately wet and dry
1. Rule of Exclusion—not included in art 415; according to the flow of the tide belong to the public
2. Rule of Description—if the property can be domain, and can only be acquired by lease if not needed
transported from one place to another, and no by the government for public or quasi-public purposes.
injury would be suffered by it, then it is personal
property. (1) Under Chapter IX of C .A, No. 141, otherwise known
3. Test of Destruction. as the Public Land Act, foreshore lands are disposable
for purposes, and only by lease when not needed by the
LAND TITLES AND DEEDS government for public service.
(2) If the land is suited or actually used for fishpond or
ACQUISITION OF LANDS AND aquaculture purposes, it comes under the Jurisdiction of
CITIZENSHIP REQUIREMENT the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR)
WHO MAY APPLY IN ORDINARY REGISTRATION and can only be acquired by lease. (P.D. 705)
PROCEEDING UNDER PD 1529
1. Those who by themselves or through their
predecessors-in-interest have been in open,
INNOCENT PURCHASER FOR VALUE
As a rule, an innocent purchaser for value acquires a
continuous, exclusive, notorious possession of
good and a clean title to the property. However, it is
alienable and disposable lands of public domain
settled that one who closes his eyes to facts that should
under a bona fide claim of ownership since June
put a reasonable man on guard is not an innocent
12, 1945 or earlier.
purchaser for value.
2. Those who acquired ownership of private land
by prescription under provisions of existing laws.
3. Those who acquired ownership of private land or MIRROR DOCTRINE
abandoned river beds by right of accession or Under the Torrens System, as a rule, a person is not
accretion under existing laws. required to go beyond the face of the certificate of title
4. Those who have acquired ownership of lands in when upon its face, the person can see that it is free
any manner provided by law. from encumbrances.
Page 20 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
Nature:
1. Transfers the right to collect the full value of the
DOUBLE SALE
REQUISITES: (double sale)
credit, even if he paid a price less than such
1. Two or more sales transactions must constitute
value.
valid sales;
2. Transfers all accessory rights.
2. Two or more sales transactions must pertain to
3. Debtor can set up against the assignee all
the same object or subject matter;
defenses he could have set up against the
3. Two or more buyers at odds over the rightful
assignor.
ownership of the subject matter must each
represent conflicting interest; and
CONVENTIONAL ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS 4. Two or more buyers must have bought from the
SUBROGATION very same seller.
Governed by arts. Governed by arts. 1624 –
1300 – 1304 1627 If not all the elements are present for art. 1544 to apply,
Page 22 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
the principle of “prior tempore, potior jure” (he who is first (2) Cancel the sale, should the vendee's failure to
in time is preferred in right) should apply (Consolidated pay cover two or more installments;
Rural Bank vs. CA, Jan. 17, 2005).
(3) Foreclose the chattel mortgage on the thing
sold, if one has been constituted, should the
Good faith must concur with registration. To be entitled vendee's failure to pay cover two or more
to priority, the 2nd purchaser must not only establish prior installments. In this case, he shall have no
recording of his deed, but must have acted in good faith further action against the purchaser to recover
(Gabriel vs. Mabanta, et al. [2003]). any unpaid balance of the price. Any agreement
to the contrary shall be void.
EQUITABLE MORTGAGE
Art. 1602. The contract shall be presumed to be an OPTION CONTRACT
equitable mortgage, in any of the following cases: Discussion, supra.
(1) When the price of a sale with right to
repurchase is unusually inadequate; EARNEST MONEY
(2) When the vendor remains in possession as
lessee or otherwise;
(3) When upon or after the expiration of the right OPTION MONEY EARNEST MONEY
to repurchase another instrument extending the Money given as distinct
period of redemption or granting a new period is consideration for an Part of purchase price
executed; option contract
(4) When the purchaser retains for himself a part Applies to sale not Given when there is
of the purchase price; perfected already a sale
(5) When the vendor binds himself to pay the Not required to buy When given, buyer is
taxes on the thing sold; bound to pay the
(6) In any other case where it may be fairly balance
inferred that the real intention of the parties is
that the transaction shall secure the payment of REDEMPTION
a debt or the performance of any other Supra
obligation.
In any of the foregoing cases, any money, fruits, or other
benefit to be received by the vendee as rent or otherwise RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL
shall be considered as interest which shall be subject to RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL
the usury laws. Creates a promise to enter into a contract of sale and it
has no separate consideration. Generally not subject to
specific performance because there is no contractual
MACEDA LAW relationship here and it is not an obligation to give.
The MACEDA LAW (R.A. 655) is applicable to sales of
immovable property on installments. The most important The right of first refusal is only subject to specific
features are (Rillo v. CA, 247 SCRA 461): performance insofar as it is attached to a valid written
principal contract (e.g. lease). The right of first refusal
(1) After having paid installments for at least two years, becomes one of the considerations [conditions/terms] in
the buyer is entitled to a mandatory grace period of one the contract (Equatorail Realty Dev’t Inc. vs. Mayfair
month for every year of installment payments made, to Theater).
pay the unpaid installments without interest.
If the contract is cancelled, the seller shall refund to the TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP; RISK OF
buyer the cash surrender value equivalent to fifty percent LOSS
(50%) of the total payments made, and after five years of WHO BEARS THE RISK OF LOSS:
installments, an additional five percent (5%) every year 1. Before Perfection –
but not to exceed ninety percent (90%) of the total a. Res perit domino
payments made. b. Seller is the owner, so seller bears the
risk of loss.
(2) In case the installments paid were less than 2 years,
the seller shall give the buyer a grace period of not less 2. At Perfection –
than 60 days. If the buyer fails to pay the installments a. Res perit domino.
due at the expiration of the grace period, the seller may b. Contract is inefficacious because loss of
cancel the contract after 30 days from receipt by the the subject matter does not affect the
buyer of the notice of cancellation or demand for validity of the sale.
rescission by notarial act. c. Seller cannot anymore comply, so buyer
cannot anymore be compelled.
RECTO LAW
Art. 1484. In a contract of sale of personal property the 3. After perfection but before delivery –
price of which is payable in installments, the vendor may a. Loss – conflicting
exercise any of the following remedies: I. Paras – buyer
(1) Exact fulfillment of the obligation, should the II. Tolentino – seller
vendee fail to pay;
b. Deterioration and fruits – buyer bears
Page 23 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
Page 25 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
Page 27 of 29
Civil Law Areas in the 2019 Bar
Atty. Genesis M. Auza - #auzalawreview - 09207025338
negligent or wrongful act of the person for whom “Believe that all your dreams will come
they are responsible but also because of their own
negligence (like he is negligent in the selection and true. You will be rewarded of your
supervision of his employees). hardwork and devotion by the will of the
Exception: respondeat superior applies in – Greatest, the Supreme and Divine.”
a. Liability of employers under article 103,
RPC;
b. Liability of a partnership for the tort -Atty. Genesis M. Auza
committed by a partner.
SPECIAL AGENT
A public officer performing acts foreign to his
ordinary duties.
TEACHER’S LIABILITY
The basis of the teacher’s liability is the principle of loco
parentis (stand in place of parents). So long as the
students remain in the protective and supervisory
capacity of teachers, the latter shall be deemed to have
custody over the students. It is not necessary for the
students to board and live with the teachers so that there
can be custody over them
Page 29 of 29