International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)

Volume 84 – No 17, December 2013

Enterprise Resource Planning: An Open Source System

Anand Kr. Shukla Ajay Indian
Assistant .Prof Associate Prof
IICA Dept Invertis University, Bareilly IICA Dept Invertis University,Bareilly

ABSTRACT 2). Empirical research.

Over the last decade, ERP systems have assumed great The theoretical research includes a comprehensive review of
importance in the IT sector because it offers myriad benefits academic work to be done to build the model that will form
which include sales forecasting, centralization of data, order the basis of the empirical study. The theoretical research
tracking, decision support, competitive edge, and many more. identifies selection criteria for SMEs and large organizations.
To achieve all such kinds of benefits, FOSS (Free and Open The empirical research serves as a guiding model for
Size Systems) are gaining importance in the IT industries. The application of Open Source ERP to SMES.
main objective of this research paper is to study how well
Open ERP Systems can be implemented on SMEs.
Literature
This research paper aims to throw light on how ERP systems
can be implemented on SME’S(Small and Mid Size Review
Enterprises, carefully analyzing three things ; one :The model
of Free and Open Source Systems has been refined over the
years , how that change will affect the future development of
ERPs ,two : The business environment for SME’s has become
more complex through globalization, resulting in a need to Dimensions Features The Model
develop more advanced technology , three :challenges faced
by the ERP vendors while developing such an ERP for SMEs.

Keywords Qualitative Evaluation

SMEs, FOSS Evaluation following a The
Binary Logic Empirical
1. INTRODUCTION Study
BACKDROP
The backbone of this research paper lies on the ERP systems
and FOSS(free and open source system).Due to the
advancement of technologies in the IT sector, ERP systems
have been widely used because of their benefits which include Analysis and
efficiency, cost saving, flexibility and majorly competitive Conclusion
advantage. The most popular proprietary ERP vendors
include:
Fig: 1 The methodology
 Oracle
 Microsoft 3. ERP SYSTEMS AS AN OPEN
 SAP
SOURCE SOFTWARE
 The SAGE Group In general, Open Source refers to any program or software
 PeopleSoft whose source code and some other rights are made available
for use or modification by others, under a software license
The dominants of open source ERP market are Adempiere , that meets the Open Source definition of the Open Source
Compiere , ERP5, Open ERP and Blue ERP. It has been Initiative (OSI) or that is in the public domain. Open source
observed that the big vendor dominated market of ERP software is usually developed as a public collaboration and
applications will start adopting non -proprietary technology. made freely available. The origin of open source software can
Open source ERPs are gaining an upper hand over proprietary be traced back to the 1950’s. According to a study carried out
applications and SMEs are using Open Source ERPs because by the Standish group (2000) discussing proprietary ERPs
they are easily affordable to SMEs. implementation, 28% of the implementations respect the
budget, the time and while satisfying the needs of the
1). Open source ERP vendors offer affordable price for the enterprise, 49% are a failure in terms of budget, time and
development of the systems. functionalities, and 23% are abandoned before they finish.
2). Open source ERPs are suitable for SMEs as well as large Mentioning this fact, the numerous benefits of Open Source
organizations. ERP are as follows:

2. METHODOLOGY  Low cost of implementation

To choose an open source ERP system for an organization,  Free license
two studies have to be done-  Services for free
 No pre-sales cost hence free
1). Theoretical research.  Few days of implementation

19
 International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)
Volume 84 – No 17, December 2013

 Take comparatively less time in training servers. Equally companies relying on OSS component based
 Available source code developments will face a similar situation, but arguably there
 High level customization is a better basis for this co-dependent development amongst
 Flexibility to the customer in choosing projects in the OSS community.
vendor
 High security 6. DISCUSSION
 Responsive This chapter summarizes the findings that we’ve been
discussing so far.
4. STATUS OF OPEN SOURCE ERP It is a well known fact that ERPs have high cost which
Source forge (hosts open source projects) is the world’s prevents it from spreading to SMEs. Most of the ERPs are
largest Open Source Software development website. A difficult to be customized by end-users thus it prevents
research was made in September 2007 and a similar one was developers to further innovatively improve the system.
made in November. The search showed that 336 Open Source
ERPs were registered in September and by November there - Today’s Open Source ERP systems are suitable for SMEs.
was a rise in registration of Open Source ERPs by 20 (within - Today’s Open Source ERP systems are suitable for large
10 weeks).This clearly shows how much importance organizations.
companies are giving to Open Source ERPs.
For large organizations:
The other way of calculating the importance of Open Source - Large organizations value the aspects related to the
ERPs is by counting the number of downloads of the software flexibility and process improvement that the ERP software is
as such. The consultants of the ERP sector made supposed to bring into the organization more than SMEs (e.g.
recommendations to the SMEs for downloading the software increased organizational flexibility, process improvement and
and giving it a look. The following table describes about improved innovation capabilities)
downloads from six open source ERPs projects. It shows the
interest towards Open Source ERP software has increased 7. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE
owing to the huge amounts of downloads by the companies RESEARCH
Table 1: for Downloads of Open Source ERP’s Several needs came out of this study, and here is aquick
summary of them:
OPEN COMP OPENB OPEN FACTUR WEB TINY
SOUR IERE RAVO TAPS ALUX ERP ERP
For large organizations:
CE
ERP - Large organizations value the aspects related to the
flexibility and process improvement that the ERP software is
Novem 1,296,0 401,262 311,96 235,897 149,0 21,116 supposed to bring into the organization more than SMEs (e.g.
ber 27 98 4 10 increased organizational flexibility, process improvement and
improved innovation capabilities).
Septem 1,267,1 300,716 284,42 231,031 138,0 6,953 - Internationality of the software and customer and supplier
ber 13 60 9 64 needs
- Stability and history of the supplier. This includes also the
Dowon +28,938 +100,546 +27,535 +4,866 +10,94 +14,16 current market position of the vendor.
loads 6 3
during - Upgradeability and improvement in ERP packages,
10 including stability of the product and functionality as well as
weeks
improved innovation capabilities.
Start of 8/6/ 9/3/ 2006 10/8/ 1/9/ 2006 7/1/ 25/3/2005 - Short implementation time.
the 2001 2005 2003
project - Good support, this includes implementation support
- Integration.

5. FREE AND OPEN SOURCE SYSTEM - Scalability abstract as the conclusion. A conclusion might
elaborate on the importance of the work or suggest
OSS ERP: ERP FOR SMEs applications.
Because of the high complexity associated with large
corporations’ business processes, OSS ERP might never be For SMEs:
suitable for them. Instead, SMEs are more suitable candidates - Adaptability and flexibility of the software. This includes
for it. This observation has been verified by surveying OSS technical upgradeability and incorporation of latest
ERP packages available in open source repositories. Almost technologies.
all of them are geared towards the SMEs market. Unlike large
companies, SMEs can more easily adapt themselves to ever- - A short implementation time.
changing business environments. This business agility is one - Lower costs.
of the major strengths that SMEs have.
- Fit with business procedures.
There is another reason why OSS ERP development is
currently viable. The maturity of OSS in general has made it - User-friendliness of the system.
possible that many components, i.e., building blocks, of an - Focus on product characteristics such as the functionality
ERP system can be open-sourced, e.g., DBMS, OS, and web and quality of the products and services, rather than on

20
 International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)
Volume 84 – No 17, December 2013

characteristics of the ERP supplier of the product. - Regarding domain knowledge of suppliers, both OpenERP
and OpenBravo seemed to be more ready than Adempiere
- Integration or in other words the possibility of the product to Regarding common needs between large organizations and
interface with other applications. SMEs:
- Good support from supplier and training. When it comes to upgradeability and improvement in ERP
- Domain knowledge of suppliers. packages, it can be said that all three can meet this need.
When it comes to scalability, all three systems present some
For large organizations limitations. There are still some doubts about the ability of
- Regarding the fact that large organizations value the those systems to handle big volumes or requests because of
flexibility that the ERP software is supposed to bring into the the use of high level of abstraction.
organization, it can be said that all three systems can satisfy
this need. 8. REFERENCES
- When it comes to the internationality of the software, all [1] M. Aladwani, ‘Change Management Strategies for
three systems support multicurrency and multiple languages. Successful ERP Implementation’, Business Process
Management Journal , Vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, pp.266-275
However a gap was found in the accounting support of
the three systems. Indeed while most of the systems have an [2] A Gupta, ‘Enterprise Resource Planning: the Emerging
inbuilt support for the accounting principles used in large and Organizational Value Systems’, Industrial Management
developed countries, they lack support for the accounting & Data Systems , Vol. 100, No. 3, 2000, pp. 114-18
principles of less industrial countries. This can be a large issue
[3] Baki & K. Cakar, ‘Determining the ERP Package-
for international and large public organizations.
Selecting Criteria’, Business Process Management
- Regarding history, stability and market position of the Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2005, p. 75-86
vendor, relatively all open source don’t have a long history,
[4] B.Hecht, ‘Choose the Right ERP Software’, Datamation,
many are recent players that haven’t been in the market for
Vol. 43, No. 3, 1997, pp.56-8
many years.
[5] E. Bernroider & S. Koch, ’ERP Selection Process in
For SMEs
Midsize and Large
- Customization and fit to business procedures: very small
organizations many times don’t even afford the extra cost of [6] Organizations’, Business Process Management Journal,
specific development needed on occasions. For this reason, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, pp. 251-257
their choice of an ERP system will go for the one that can be
easily configured and maintained without the need for [7] E.M. Shehab, M.W. Sharp, L. Supramaniam & T.A.
development skills. All three systems can answer this need. Spedding, ‘Enterprise Resource
Open ERP in particular, who is based on a very modular and [8] Planning An Integrative Review’, Business Process
flexible technology can offer a very good choice for a Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2004, pp. 359-386
smal/mediuml organization. It can adapt easily to the
company’s business processes through its integrated BPM [9] E. Van Stijn & A. Wensley, ‘Organizational Memory and
module, which doesn’t require any specific development. This the Completeness of Process Modeling in ERP Systems
is also possible with OpenBravo however this comes at the Some Concerns, Methods and Directions for Future
expense of specific development (there is no BPM included in Research’, Business Process Management Journal, Vol.
OpenBravo). OpenERP seems to offer the most appropriate 7, No. 3, 2001, pp. 181-194
choice regarding the “fit to business procedures” aspect. [10] F. Fui-Hoon Nah, J. Lee-Shang Lau & J. Kuang, ‘Critical
- Cost: Open Source ERPs are intended to be available to Factors for Successful Implementation of Enterprise
organizations with the least of amount of cost possible, and Systems’, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 7,
regarding this aspect all three systems are practically similar, No. 3, 2001, pp. 285-296
devoted to remain purely Open Source. For example, in the [11] F. Robert Jacobs & F.C. Weston, Jr., ‘Enterprise
OpenERP case, very small organizations which do not want to Resource Planning (ERP)—A Brief
invest neither in the integrating specific developments nor in
the maintenance of their server, can invest in the hosted [12] History’, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25,
solutions offered by OpenERP at very competitive prices. No. 2, March 2007, pp. 357- 363
- Ergonomics and user friendliness: both OpenBravo and [13] Fabien, B. (2008). Forrester : l'adoption de l'Open Source
OpenERP seem to offer a very good choice in this category, est souvent égoïste (online). generation-nt. Available
even though OpenERP takes the prize in this category. from : http://www.generation-nt.com/open-
OpenBravo made the choice to offer a web interface since its sourceadoption-europe-amerique-nord-entreprises-etude-
split from Compiere in 2002. This web interface is available forrester-actualite-121081.html (accessed 10/3/2009).
for all the functional modules that this OpenSource ERP
system offers, for free and under the Mozilla Public License [14] Farber, D. (2004). Six Barriers to Open Source Adoption
(MPL). On the other hand, with Adempiere, this possibility is (online). ZD Net. Available from:
not totally in place yet, and the work being carried out by http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/Six_
some specialized integrators is still in its early stages and not barriers_to_open_source_adoption.html (accessed
completely reliable. 5/2/2009)

IJCATM : www.ijcaonline.org 21