D1.2 Project Management Plan PDF

Ref.
Ares(2017)3598066 - 17/07/2017
GASVESSEL – 723030
Compressed Natural Gas Transport System
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Project Management Plan
Project: GASVESSEL
Project No.: 723030
Deliverable No.:
D1.2
Document Version:
RV0
Document Preparation Date:
2017.06.30
Responsibility:
PARTNER No. 1 NAVALPROGETTI
Type of Deliverable
R Document, Report, Drawing X
DEM Demonstrator, pilot, prototype
DEC Websites, patent fillings, videos, etc.
OTHER
ETHICS Ethics requirements
ORDP Open Research Data Pilot
Dissemination Level
PU Public X
CO Confidential, only for Members of the Consortium (including the EU
Commission Services)
NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.1

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Version Management
Software used Microsoft Word

Filename D1.2 Project Management Plan.doc
Author(s) Spartaco Angelini
Reviewed by Spartaco Angelini
Approved by Silvio Stenta
Authorized by Loris Cok
Revision No. Date Modification description
RV 0 2017-06-30 First issue for Partners check
RV 1
RV 2
RV 3
EC Grant Agreement No.723030

Project Acronym GASVESSEL
Project Title Compressed Natural Gas Transport System
Instrument HORIZON 2020
Programme Smart, green and integrated Transport
Start Date of Project 2017-06-01
Duration 48 months
Organisation Name of Lead Contractor for NAVALPROGETTI Srl – TRIESTE - Italy
this Deliverable
Financial/Administrative Coordinator
Project Coordinator Name Loris COK
Project Coordinator Organization NAVALPROGETTI Srl
Name
Address Via dei Papaveri, 21
34151 TRIESTE (Italy)
Phone Numbers 0039 040 212918,
mob 0039 3356383587
Email loris.cok@navalprogetti.net; gasvessel@navalprogetti.net
Project web-sites & other Access www.gasvessel.eu
Points
The GASVESSEL Project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under
Grant Agreement no. 723030

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Contents
1. Executive Summary................................................................................................................................... 6
2. Foreword ................................................................................................................................................... 7
2.1 Definitions ......................................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Regulatory Framework ..................................................................................................................... 8
2.3 Project Management Objectives ...................................................................................................... 8
2.4 Consortium Governance Bodies ....................................................................................................... 9
2.5 General operational procedures for all Consortium Bodies.......................................................... 10
2.6 Relations between Partners in the PM (WP1) ............................................................................... 12
2.7 Communications ............................................................................................................................. 13
3. Project Management Overview ............................................................................................................. 14
4. Project Management Actions ................................................................................................................. 15
4.1 Team Building ................................................................................................................................. 15
4.2 Project Coordination ....................................................................................................................... 15
4.3 Level-out outputs ............................................................................................................................ 16
4.4 Consistency and Quality of Deliverables........................................................................................ 16
4.5 Deliverables Issuing Procedures ..................................................................................................... 17
4.6 Planning and Budget Monitoring ................................................................................................... 17
4.7 Monitoring the Procurement Management .................................................................................. 19
4.8 Addressing technical issues ............................................................................................................ 19
4.9 Reporting ......................................................................................................................................... 19
4.10 Risk Management ........................................................................................................................... 20
5. HSE ........................................................................................................................................................... 22
6. Proposals for Workshops and Dissemination ........................................................................................ 22

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Glossary, abbreviations and acronyms
EU The European Commission or in general Europe

INEA Innovation and Networks Executive Agency of European Commission
PO Project Officer assigned by INEA to GASVESSEL Project
Partner Company member of the GASVESSEL Project Consortium
Project The GASVESSEL no. 723030 Project
CNG Compressed Natural Gas
GA Grant Agreement
CA Consortium Agreement
PMS Project Management System
PM Project Management
TM Team Management
PA Project Administration
P&C Planning and Controls
PR Project Reporting
DC Document Control
HSEQ Health, Safety, Environment and Quality controls and assurance
PRM Procurement Management
MM Materials Management
WP Work Package
NP Navalprogetti Srl – Trieste – Italy – The Coordinator – Partner -Lead Beneficiary of
WP1 and WP5
DOW Dow Deutschland Anlaghengesellschaft mbH - Partner
DOWA DowAksa Deutschland GMBH - Partner
PNO PNO INNOVATION – Belgium – Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP9
VTG VNIPITTRANSGAZ – Kyiv – Ukraine – Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP6
SINTEF SINTEF OCEAN AS – Trondheim – Norway – Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP7
BMP BM Plus Srl – Buttrio – Italy – Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP4
CNGV CNGV d.o.o. – Izola – Slovenia – Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP3
CEN CENERGY Srl – Trieste – Italy - Partner
HLL Hanseatic Lloyd Schiffahrt GMBH & Co – Bremen – Germany - Partner
CHC Cyprus Hydrocarbon Company – Nicosia – Cyprus – Partner – Lead Beneficiary of
WP2
EST ESTECO S.p.A. – Trieste – Italy - Partner
ABS American Bureau of Shipping (Hellenic) – Athens – Greece – Partner – Lead
Beneficiary WP8
O&G Oil and Gas
WP1 Project Management
WP2 Scenario analyses
WP3 Prototyping activities, design of pressure cylinders and prototyping pilot line

_______________________________________________________________________________________
WP4 Prototyping of pressure cylinders. Procurement/construction/arrangement of
prototyping pilot line
WP5 Ship Design
WP6 Offshore & Onshore gas loading/unloading systems
WP7 Costs and Benefits Analysis
WP8 Class Design Review – Safety Assessments
WP9 Dissemination and Exploitation

_______________________________________________________________________________________
1. Executive Summary
Scope of this Project Management Plan is to provide a single point of reference for the management
process that will govern the GASVESSEL Project.
The present deliverable defines the Project organization, procedures, roles and responsibilities
related to the management activities that will be carried out and describes how the Project will be
controlled.
It describes management activities intended to ensure that processes and procedures are defined
and their execution is continuously monitored, corrected if necessary and implemented, based on
a common standard.
The document is based on the terms and conditions established in the Grant Agreement no.723030
and its Annexes, as well as in the Consortium Agreement.
The use of the present plan can ensure better collaboration among the Consortium Partners,
individuals and groups.
The Project Management Plan is the deliverable no. D1.2 of WP1, intended to be used by all
Partners, to ensure that Project processes and outputs are monitored and properly reported to
prevent possible deviations from the Work Plan in Attachment 1.
Time, budget and quality are the overall objectives and priorities of the Consortium.
Partners

_______________________________________________________________________________________
2. Foreword
Every project management technique and method can be used, but without appointing a leadership
to the project, it is unlikely to get anywhere.
Only if the designed Coordinator become and is acknowledged a leader and manager of the project,
the project may succeed.
As a leader, the Coordinator, together with the PM Team (see 2.6), thanks to the responsibilities it
assumed with EU, would have the command authority for guiding the project.
Partners will consider Coordinator and PM Team a trusted and reliable source of information for the
Project.
All people governing the Project are expected to be honest, competent, and inspirational. Main job
is to motivate the Partners and make sure that everybody is moving in the same direction - towards
the project goals and to its completion.
2.1 Definitions
Project Management System (PMS) is the formalization of the Project Management practice within
a set of documents, guidelines, and tools, to provide a formal mechanism for managing and
controlling activities on the Project.
Project Management (PM) is a practice required to optimally plan, execute and control the complex
and connected activities of the Development process. Its objective is to assure completion of the
Project in the specified time, within budget, in accordance with an agreed quality specification.
Project Management focuses on different areas:
• Team Management (TM), including both Project staffing (definition of adequate Project
organization and selection of appropriate resources) and Team Management (e.g. team motivation,
team building).
• Project Administration (PA) including interfaces between Project Team and other Company
functions, permits and consents, office administration and action tracking.
• Project Planning and Control (P&C), consisting of processes of planning and scheduling, cost
estimates, cost budgeting, progress monitoring and cost control.
• Project Reporting (PR), describing the processes required to collect and analyze data and to
produce and deliver reports on the status of the Project.
• Document and Data Management (DC), dealing with processes of planning, managing,
controlling, and filing of Project data and documentation and management of approval cycles.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
• HSEQ management (HSEQ), meaning the processes required to ensure that Project will satisfy
HSEQ needs.
• Procurement Management, describing the processes required to acquire goods and services from
outside the company. It includes procurement strategy, source selection and contracts
administration.
• Materials Management, dealing with the processes required to ensure that the necessary
materials are delivered to the right place, at the right time and are maintained damage free and in
a suitable condition of preservation.
2.2 Regulatory Framework

GASVESSEL Project execution shall comply with and governed by:
• Grant Agreement signed by the Coordinator with the European Commission-INEA and by all
the Partners in the Accession Forms. Grant Agreement number 723030 entering into force
on May 22nd, 2017
• Consortium Agreement signed between all Partners dated May 15th, 2017.
• National legislation frameworks, governing business administration, in the homeland of each
Partner
• National legislation frameworks, governing HSE and social issues, in the homeland of each
Partner
In case of conflict between the contents of Grant and Consortium Agreements, the Grant Agreement
statements shall prevail.
Project Management starts on month 1 (First of June 2017) and ends on month 48 (End of May
2021).
The 48 months assigned to the Project are considered sufficient for the performance of the foreseen
tasks.
2.3 Project Management Objectives

The aim of the PM is to manage and administrate efficiently the Project Consortium internal and
external affairs.
An adequate management structure is necessary in order to coordinate the work carried out in the
project, manage the quality control, the financial and thematic reporting as well as to organize
communication among project Partners.
O 1.1 Manage the communication in the Project Consortium and Executive Board
O 1.2 Give overall project governance and provide for quality management ensuring the timely
achievement of the project goals as outlined in the Work Plan (Attachment 1).
O 1.3 Be the central point of contact to the Project and interface with the European Commission
and Partners.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
O 1.4 Ensure coherence with all legal and EU requirements, rules and regulations and supervise
fulfilment of Consortium Agreement, including financial and legal management.
O 1.5 To coordinate the work in accordance with the objectives of the Project and to ensure that
all Project activities are conducted and deadlines met the satisfaction of the Project Work Plan and
the European Commission.
O 1.6 To manage the individual WPs activities ensuring adherence to the Work-Plan and to ensure
the achievement of all Project deliverables due-dates and milestones.
The Management & Coordination Work Package (WP1) will be carried out under the responsibility of the
Coordinator NP
2.4 Consortium Governance Bodies

The Consortium Governance bodies are:
The GENERAL ASSEMBLY (all beneficiaries) is the ultimate decision-making body of the
Consortium.
The ordinary General Assembly shall meet about twice a year according with the following agreed
calendar:
PROJECT DURATION
POS ITEM LOCATION 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M
1 Kick-off Trieste at NP
2 Periodic Meeting Cyprus at CHC
3 Periodic Meeting Germany at DOW
4 Periodic Meeting Trieste at NP
5 Periodic Meeting Buttrio at BMPlus
6 Periodic Meeting Buttrio at BMPlus
7 Periodic Meeting Athens at ABS
8 Periodic Meeting Bruxelles at PNO
The Representatives of the following Partners compose General Assembly:

Partner Partner Country Role
no. Short
Name
1 NP Italy Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP1 and WP5 - Coordinator
2 DOW Germany Partner
3 DOWA Germany Partner
4 PNO Belgium Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP9
5 VTG Ukraine Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP6
6 SINTEF Norway Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP7
7 BMP Italy Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP4
8 CNGV Slovenia Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP3
9 CEN Italy Partner
10 HLL Germany Partner
11 CHC Cyprus Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP2
12 EST Italy Partner
13 ABS Greece Partner – Lead Beneficiary WP8

_______________________________________________________________________________________
The EXECUTIVE BOARD is the supervisory body for the execution of the Project, which shall report
and be accountable to the General Assembly.
The representatives of Partners sitting in the Executive Board are:
Partner Partner Short Role
no. Name
1 NP Partner - Coordinator
3 DOWA Partner
4 PNO Partner
7 BMP Partner
8 CNGV Partner
Executive Board shall meet quarterly by default, according with the following calendar:
PROJECT DURATION
POS ITEM 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M
1 Ex. Board meetings
Additional Executive Board meetings shall be arranged on Partners request, if necessary, as ruled in
the Consortium Agreement and shown here below.
Executive Board is furthermore in charge to address controversies that will possibly arise between
the Partners.
The COORDINATOR (NP) is the legal entity acting as intermediary between the Partners and the
European Commission. The Coordinator shall perform, in addition to its responsibilities as a Partner,
the tasks assigned to it as described in the Grant Agreement and in the Consortium Agreement.
Apart the planned meetings of General Assembly and Executive Board each Partner is entitled to
call other Partners to attend separate meeting in web/call conferences on specific matters. The
Partner that called the meeting will issue a MoM and circulate it to all Partners and to
Coordinator.
2.5 General operational procedures for all Consortium Bodies
Representation in meetings
Any Partner which is a member of a Consortium Body:
• should be present or represented at any meeting;

• may appoint a substitute or a proxy to attend and vote at any meeting;
• shall participate in a cooperative manner in the meetings.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Preparation and organization of meetings

The chairperson of a Consortium Body shall convene meetings of that Consortium Body.
General Assembly
• Ordinary meeting: According with above calendar or at least once a year

• Extraordinary meeting: At any time upon written request of the Executive Board or 1/3 of the
Partners in the General Assembly
Executive Board
• Ordinary meeting: According with above calendar
• Extraordinary meeting: At any time upon written request of any Partner member of the
Executive Board
Notice of a meeting
The chairperson of a Consortium Body shall give notice in writing of a meeting, to each Partner of
the Consortium Body, as soon as possible and no later than the minimum number of days
preceding the meeting as indicated below.
General Assembly
• Ordinary meeting: 45 calendar days

• Extraordinary meeting: 15 calendar days
Executive Board
• Ordinary meeting: 14 calendar days
• Extraordinary meeting: 7 calendar days
Sending the agenda

The chairperson of a Consortium Body shall prepare and send each Member of that Consortium
Body a written agenda no later than the minimum number of days preceding the meeting as here
indicated:
• General Assembly: 21 calendar days, 10 calendar days for an extraordinary meeting
• Executive Board: 7 calendar days

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Adding agenda items
Any agenda item requiring a decision by the Partners in a Consortium Body, must be identified as
such on the agenda.
Any Partner in a Consortium Body may add an item to the original agenda by written notification to
all of the other Partners of that Consortium Body up to the minimum number of days preceding the
meeting as indicated:
• General Assembly: 14 calendar days, 7 calendar days for an extraordinary meeting
• Executive Board: 2 calendar days
During a meeting, the Partners of a Consortium Body, present or represented, can unanimously
agree to add a new item to the original agenda
Meetings of each Consortium Body may also be held by teleconference or other telecommunication
means.
2.6 Relations between Partners in the PM (WP1)

All Partners are engaged in the Project Management (Work Package 1) with a defined number of
persons/month and corresponding assigned budget, as follows:
Partner Number and WP1 Effort-

Short Name Person/month
1 - NP 18,00
2 – DOW 3,00
3 – DOWA 1,00
4 – PNO 2,50
- PNO NL 1,75
- CIAOTECH 0,75
5 - VTG 2,00
6 – SINTEF 2,00
7 – BMP 2,00
8 - CNGV 4,00
9 - CEN 3,00
10 - HLL 1,00
11 - CHC 4,00
12 - EST 1,00
13 – ABS 1,00
Total 47,00
The Project Management Team listed in the table here above, will assist the Coordinator in
performing the Project Management activities.
Each Partner to supply as soon as possible to the Coordinator at gasvessel@navalprogetti.net an e-
mail with the following data for the necessary contacts and exchange of information:

_______________________________________________________________________________________
• Name of the person in charge for the Project Management inside the Partner organization
• Phone number
• E-mail address
2.7 Communications
The efficiency and promptness of communication between the Partners is vital for the Project
success.
All queries and info from one Partner to another to be processed without undue delay having well
in mind the planned due dates of Deliverable and Milestones as per Grant Agreement and Work
Plan.
In order to allow the Coordinator to keep informed the Executive Board about the progress and
possible problems for the Project, and enable it to intervene and help or ease i.e.: for problem
solving, any correspondence exchanged about the GASVESSEL Project between Partners, to be
copied to Coordinator and shall be addressed exclusively to gasvessel@navalprogetti.net.
As far as practicable and if not stated otherwise, all communications between Partners will be
exchanged in written via e-mail.
Project language is English.
Matters of particular importance for the Project, even if previously discussed and agreed by phone
or in teleconference between a limited numbers of Partners, shall be confirmed in written via e –
mail to all Partners.
Information exchanged to be clear, transparent and well timed for the whole community of
Partners.
The Object of the communications shall clearly refer to:
723030 GASVESSEL – WP no… - Task no… – Deliverable no… – Specific topic object of the
communication

_______________________________________________________________________________________
3. Project Management Overview

To reach Project objectives, PM actions will move across the normal activities performed by the
Partners, as shown in the figure here below, while Partners go through the relevant Work Packages
in order to satisfy the objectives, perform the agreed tasks and issue the relevant deliverables.
It is not in the scope of the PMS to interfere with the normal management process of each Partner.
LEAD BENEFICIARIES
WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 WP9
OBJECTIVES
TASKS
WP1 PROJECT
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
OBJECTIVES
DELIVERABLES
Partners are free to apply their usual internal management practice for accounting, planning,
quality, risk management, HSE, reporting, etc.
The PMS, instead, shall provide to:
• Team building
• Coordination of activities between the Partners
• Level out the outputs of our research programme
• Verify consistency and quality of deliverables and revert to the Lead Beneficiary accordingly
• Monitoring of the overall budget and resources consumption
• Monitoring the general planning and propose remedial actions, to keep the due dates of
deliverables and milestones unchanged

_______________________________________________________________________________________
• Monitoring the Procurement Management
• Address possible technical issues
• Help Partners, on request, in the correct interpretation of the Grant and Consortium
Agreements
• Help and coordinate Partners in the preparation of reporting to European Commission on
months 18, 36 and 48
• Request to Partners periodical internal reporting, to be submitted to the Executive Board at
every Executive Board meeting (see 2.4)
• Overall Risks management associated to the research Project activities.
• Highlight, during the research, the items of interest and consequently propose for
conferences and dissemination.
• Project Ethics
Final scopes of PMS are:
• Completing the project on time

• Completing the project within the assigned budget and with the available resources
• Completing the project by achieving the desired level of quality
4. Project Management Actions
4.1 Team Building

Roles and goals for each Partner are already defined in detail in the Grant Agreement and in the
Work Plan (Planning of activities) – See Attachment 1.
Over Project time, the Team building is intended by PMS to improve performance in a partnership
environment. Team building is fundamental for organizational development of Partners’ tasks.
Team-building includes:
• Aligning Partners around project goals

• Building effective working relationships between Partners
• Reducing ambiguity in Partners’ role
• Finding solutions to Partners’ problems
4.2 Project Coordination

Project coordination generally refers to planning and managing multiple tasks simultaneously in the
Project.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Coordination is essential for GASVESSEL Project that deals with a number of Partners with related
objectives, tasks and deliverables, clearly detailed in the Grant Agreement.
In point 2.4 is reported the division of responsibilities between Consortium Governance Bodies.
In addition, all Partners, by signing the Grant and Consortium Agreements, have recognized to the
Coordinator the authority and skill to achieve the Project objectives.
According with the above, the Coordinator expects from the Partners a sound commitment and
spirit of cooperation, loyalty and transparency each other, as proven up to now, to realize the
necessary synergies for the success of the Project. PM coordination activity will proceed on this path
during its monitoring actions.
Expediting is another important aspect of the Coordination activity. It will be performed by the PM,
that will monitor, examine the progress of research activities, verify the correct interface and get in
touch with the Partners proposing and agreeing remedial actions when needed.
4.3 Level-out outputs

As far as practicable, all Deliverables shall be levelled-out according with a common standard
suitable for the GASVESSEL Project and in line with other EU granted projects.
In the Deliverable D1.3 Quality Management Plan a number of standard forms will be made
available to Partners for the documents having EU and Project web site as final destinations, i.e.:
• Documents numbering procedure

• Standard EU form for time sheets
• Deliverables front page
• Etc.
4.4 Consistency and Quality of Deliverables

Each Lead Beneficiary is responsible for performing its activities among the following constrains:
• Completing the project/tasks on time, as planned

• Completing the project/tasks within the specified budget and with the available resources
• Completing the project/tasks by achieving the desired quality
PM will verify that Consistency and Quality of Deliverables characteristics are ensuring that it is “fit
for the purpose”.
To measure consistency and quality of a deliverable, first of all it will be checked that each Partner
- consulting a Deliverable prepared by another Partner - has to find in it, clearly presented and easy
to understand, all the information needed to progress in its own research activity, along the planned
duration of each WP.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
4.5 Deliverables Issuing Procedures

Responsible Partner (Lead Beneficiary of each WP) is in charge of the deliverable consistency, quality
and timely issuing within the budget.
One month before the deliverable due date (see Grant Agreement), the deliverable will be
circulated to all Partners for comments.
Partners to submit comments to Lead Beneficiary within 2 weeks at the latest.
Deliverables not commented within the two weeks are considered “Approved”.
Responsible Partner will forward final version of deliverable to Coordinator within 1 week from
Partners comments receipt.
Coordinator will upload the deliverables on EU portal and on GASVESSEL web site.
4.6 Planning and Budget Monitoring

Progress Control
Executive board meetings dates (see 1.4) represent the checkpoints for progress control.
Each Executive Board meeting is considered, in addition to what specifically present in the agreed
agenda of meeting, as a “Phase Review” of the Project for monitoring the progress and fairly prepare
the Consortium for the official reporting to EU on months 18, 36 and 48.
Status Reports presented by Partners to the Executive Board quarterly are a fundamental
monitoring tool to identify progress and problems.
Partners are encouraged to take Status Reports seriously.
Each Partner shall complete Status updates one week in advance to each Executive Board meeting
date. Partners Status updates will be gathered and summarized by the PMS.
Partner Status Reports, for each WP of competence, shall briefly contain:
• Detail of the actions completed in the reporting period

• Cumulated progress of budget and resources consumed up to the closing date of the
reporting period (see below in the Cost Control section)
• Detail of actions foreseen in the next reporting period
• Risk assessment and possible mitigation actions
• HSE assessment

_______________________________________________________________________________________
A standard form for Status Reports will be part of Project Quality Management Plan (Deliverable
D1.3 of WP1).
A suggested way to monitor Status is to use two columns in a table and compare the current
schedule with the original plan (see Attachment 1 Work Plan which is integral part of this Project
Management Plan) When visualizing it in a chart Partner might get an even more powerful tool to
envision the progress of the Project.
Cost Control
To review the project cost it is useful to compare the actual cost to date with the budget plan (see
Attachment 1 Work Plan).
Partner might use the cumulated budget plan for the planned costs and compare it to the actual
costs to the reporting date.
Always consider the project's progress when doing an evaluation. As in the example below, the
actual costs might be a lot less than the planned ones, while at the same time the project's progress
might be weeks behind its planned status.
DELAY
Changes
To grant a fair progress to the Project, no substantial changes are allowed. Objectives, tasks,
deliverables, milestones, due dates to EU remain as defined in detail in the Grant Agreement.
Small modifications in internal procedures, Consortium management aspects, technical aspects are
acceptable. Partner proposing modifications, with written justifications, shall address them to the
Executive Board and Coordinator. Executive board reserves itself the final decision on the proposed
change, or otherwise decide to ask by e-mail for the approval of all other Partners, that may accept
or reject the proposed change.
The budget granted by EU, globally to the project and to each Partner, cannot be exceeded.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Partners to expect some budget downgrading due to the foreseen EU auditors actions or for
inconsistency of their cost reporting to Europe.
Force Majeure
Force Majeure is governed by Section 4 – Article 51 of the Grant Agreement.
4.7 Monitoring the Procurement Management

Each Partner to perform its procurement actions freely, but in line with EU and national legislation
on the matter.
Partners to document Coordinator and Executive Board that value of procured goods is “best for
money”, that quality is as necessary to satisfy Project needs and that delivery time will not affect
Project schedule.
4.8 Addressing technical issues

Each partner is in charge to address technical issues as it will be necessary and/or discovered
during Project progress, or requested by another Partner.
Coordinator team remain available anytime to address technical issues if so requested by Partners
4.9 Reporting
As already mentioned above in this document there are two aspects of reporting:
• Reporting to EU
• Internal reporting
Reporting to EU, requiring many preparatory works, will be made ready in due time by each Partner.
Coordinator team will assists Partners in this activity as far as practicable.
During kick-off meeting, PO suggested Partner to register costs on a monthly basis, at least.
According to previous experiences, Coordinator suggest Partners to provide internal costs
accounting on a weekly basis, for prompt references to events, or not to lose documents/papers for
costs justification.
Nearly all articles of the Grant Agreement, at the end of each section, foresee a paragraph named
“Consequences of non-compliance”. Partners are invited to monitor carefully this warning not to
fall in non-compliances.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
For internal reporting see 4.6 Planning and Budget Monitoring
4.10 Risk Management

Risk management is the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks.
Risks are defined as the effect of uncertainty on objectives.
Risks are followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor,
and control the probability and/or impact of unfortunate events.
Risk management’s objective is to assure uncertainty does not affect the endeavor from the Project
goals.
For the time being, Risks identified are:
Project External Risks
Likelihood
Risks Contingency/Opportunities
(0-5)
Unforeseen too low gas sale price and in 2 Alternative market opportunities e.g. CNG as a more
consequence less demand from Oil and Gas flexible and less risky solution compared to LNG
companies to exploit stranded and exploitation
associated gas off-shore
Storage facilities offshore and onshore 2 Depending on the local development plans and
require specific considerations regarding urgency to adopt alternative energy supply. Risk and
space and safety safety constraints will be evaluated from the
beginning i.e., scenario analyses with multiple
potential users (Greek and Italian Islands)
Technology breakthrough in alternative 2 Gas will continue to be a raw material for

sources of energy petrochemical industry. Alternative logistics and
storage solutions for petrochemical plants.
Oil and Gas continue to be down in a cost 4 Demonstrating cost effectiveness and positive
cycle and O&G companies are reluctant to business case of CNG solution for short distances
invest into new technologies and solutions delivery will actually provide an alternative for more
risky (e.g. LNG) exploitation routes and offer
additional turnover resources
O&G companies are reluctant to guarantee 2 Involve local Governments for long-term demands
long term take or pay contracts for logistics/ commitments. Involve whole value chain into
ship owners commitment including final gas users

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Project internal Risks
Description of risk Likelihood Level WP(s) involved Proposed risk-mitigation measures

Technology applied for the Pressure Design the whole process (material &
Cylinders does not confirm the 3 3, 4, 7 equipment) as close as possible to the
technical and economic benefits original consideration.
New resin system development unmet Dow broad Epoxy resin system portfolio is
specific needs regarding technology 1 4 assumed to be appropriate for one of the
selection technologies
Translation of properties between Newly developed sizing agent will be used

Carbon Fibre & Epoxy resin is not for the process. Design of experiment will
1 4
sufficient to meet mechanical be run early on to test Inter laminar shear
performance of the composite and impregnation properties
Proper use and management of

Participants’ non-performance in
Consortium Agreement clauses. For these
terms of quality and timing of
cases, Consortium Agreement will provide
deliverables submittal. Budget is not Low All
tools for the Coordinator and the
spent correctly or contributors do not
Consortium to react on time and
deliver according to the plan
redistribute work and/or budget.
Increase of procurement costs for
Efficient Procurement Policy Design to
prototyping machinery and equipment Low 3
cost
due to market changes
Work has to be stringently and
efficiently managed, planned and
monitored. This will be done e.g. through
Delay issuing work packages and a close follow-up by the Coordinator and
Low 3
deliverables he review meetings with the work
package leaders. The compliance has to
be followed up through quality
management.
Prototyping phases split in two: deficiency
Prototyping results not in line with
Low 4 discovered during the 1st phase will be
expectations and calculations
tuned during the 2nd phase.
As pointed out in 4.6, each Partner shall submit to the Executive Board in the periodic reports the
detail of risks discovered while performing tasks and the mitigation actions proposed, together with
the proposal of cancellation of risks in the meantime expired.
Technical Risks
Technical Risks relevant to the waterborne transportation of CNG are part of the WP8 and will be
dealt separately there, as directed by ABS.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
5. HSE
Each Lead Beneficiary/Partner is fully responsible and in charge for the respect of the HSE laws, rules
and regulations in force in its Country.
Every Partner is committed to improve health, safety and wellbeing of researchers in the
workplaces, encouraging researchers’ involvement to enable them to better understand the health
risks, consequences and control measures associated with the GASVESSEL Project activities.
In association with the nature of GASVESSEL Project, that foresee pressure testing, fatigue testing
and burst tests, it is necessary to raise awareness of the potential consequences of pressure
systems failures and the importance of implementing and sustaining robust control measures.
Partners to ensure that researchers have right to the Social Security as per national and EU laws.
Partners to provide Environment protection as per national and EU directives, which scopes are
summarizes in:
• to protect, conserve and enhance the European Union’s natural capital

• to turn the Union into a resource-efficient, green, and competitive low-carbon economy
• to safeguard the Union's citizens from environment-related pressures and risks to health
and wellbeing
6. Proposals for Workshops and Dissemination

Aside the foreseen and planned Dissemination and workshop actions in WP9, it could be of interest,
on Project completion, a document reporting the cumulated experience in the GASVESSEL Project
Management.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment 1 to
PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
WORK PLAN
NAVALPROGETTI SRL DELIVERABLE D1.2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN 23

WP 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
LEAD BENEFICIARY: NAVALPROGETTI
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

WP TASK TASK DESCRIPTION PARTNER €
month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
REPORTING AND COSTS JUSTIFICATION TO EU
BENEFICIARIES GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETINGS
Trieste at NP
Cyprus at CHC
Germany at DOW
Trieste at NP
Buttrio at BMPlus
Buttrio at BMPlus
Athens at ABS
Bruxelles at PNO
EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETINGS (web meeting)
DELIVERABLES
D1.1 Executive Board minutes of meeting, Consortium Agreement document NP
D1.2 Project Management plan NP X

D1.3 Quality management plan NP X
D1.4 Project final report NP X
D1.5 “Web-based Knowledge Management” manual NP X
D2.1 Scenario description and characterization CHC X
D2.2 Decision support model EST X
Platform for Pressure Vessel Optimization, validation of the design process,
D3.1
optimisation software and design basis document.
EST X
D3.2 Scenario analysis performed with the decision supporting model CHC X
1 Technical specifications and executive plans of the installations and
D3.3 equipment necessary for the design of Pressure Vessels, Pilot Line and CNGV X
prototyping equipment
Test procedures on prototypes and experimental support tests with strain
D4.1 gauges to validation of the software simulations models (FEM analysis), BMPlus X
safety factor validations tests.
Production procedures with the winding pattern, the winding parameters,
validation of the tension control systems, the system of impregnation,
D4.2
viscosity and processing temperatures, issue of quality assurance and
BMPlus X
quality control documents
Final report by the entity independently with the issuance of the results of
all the validation tests and the issuance of the final document of
D4.3
homologation of the Pressure Vessels and the production process
BMPlus X
(Production Quality Manual)
D5.1 Basic design and Naval Architecture Package NP X

D5.2 Reports on towing tank experimental tests results NP X
D5.3 Functional Design, engineering Package and safety report NP X
Technical proposals for the construction and equipment of a Loading /
D6.1
unloading modules
CEN X
Software tool for the design and operation of the loading / unloading
D6.2
facilities
CEN X
D6.3 Report on the offshore loading/unloading operation analyses MTEK X
D7.1 CBA database MTEK X
Report on Comparative / sensitivity analysis (for each scenario) of CNG-
D7.2
GASVESSEL versus LNG, FLNG, Pipeline
MTEK X
Profitability assessment of the GASVESSEL concept (socio-economic and
D7.3
financial analysis)
MTEK X
Documentation providing safeguards solutions for the system as identified
D8.1
in the HAZID analysis
ABS X
Documentation providing a master hazard register and a framework for
D8.2
quantitative risk assessment (ABS)
ABS X
General (Basic) Design Approval Letter for the whole CNG carrier design
D8.3
and its associated systems (if meeting requirements)
ABS X
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
D9.1 Dissemination and Exploitation plan PNO X

D9.2 Promotion material, including brochures, articles, presentations. PNO X
D9.3 Public and internal website (First, Full version ) PNO X
D9.4 Reports of the 3 workshops PNO X
D9.5 Business plan for the project results and 6 business cases PNO X
1 D10.1 NEC - Requirement n°1 NP X
D10.2 EPQ - Requirement n°2 NP X
D10.3 NEC - Requirement n°3 NP X
TOTAL WP1 333 900
MS1 MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 MS6 MS7 MS9

MS8
Direct personnel
X Circulaqtion between Partners Short name Total PM
costs (Euro)
Due date to EU NP
18 134460
3 22500
DOW
1 6500
DOWA
5 42750
PNO
2 13500
VTG
2 19000
MTEK
2 10000
BMP
4 29840
CNGV
3 14400
CEN
1 7500
HLS
4 22000
CHC
1 5450
EST
1 6000
ABS
WP 2 SCENARIOS ANALYSIS
LEAD BENEFICIARY: CYPRUS HYDROCARBON COMPANY
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
T2.1 SCENARIOUS DEFINITION
Collection of information and data for the following regions: North sea
2.1 A CHC 12.00 2.40 65 000 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0
(Barents Sea), West and East Mediterranean area
Overview of the available gas reserves and identification of the gas fields in
2.1 B MTEK 4.00 1.00 40 000 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.5
the areas mentioned in T2.1A
Connecting the supply and demand to creating the Scenarios for the CNG VTG 1.00 0.25 6 750 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2
2.1 C
conpert in the areas mentioned in T2.1A
NP 0.65 0.16 1 980 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
DEVELOPMENT OF A DECISION SUPPORT MODEL FOR SCENARIO COST

T2.2
SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION
Elaboration of a MTF platform for optimization of p. vessels - ships
D2.2
2.2 A EST 14.00 1.56 76 300 0.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0
characteristics according to the Market demands
2 NP 1.35 0.23 12 960 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1
2.2 B Coordination and supply to ESTECO of the results form T2.1 CHC 6.00 1.50 32 500 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0
MTEK 1.60 0.40 18 000 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3
T2.3 SCENARIO ANALYSIS

D2.1
Comparison of the GASVESSEL concept against conventional technologies CHC 10.00 2.00 56 500 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
2.3 A
based on ESTECO developed decision support model
MTEK 3.40 0.68 27 500 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.0 0.5
2.3 B Results analysis for dissemination PNO 1.00 0.20 8 550 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2
TOTAL WP2 346 040

MS8
MS1 - Scenario description and characterization; Decision Support Model definition (Leader:CHC) NP PNO VTG MTEK CHC EST
MS2 - Scenario analyses performed with the Decision support model (Leader:CHC) 2.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 28.00 14.00
WP 3 DESIGN OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PILOT LINE
LEAD BENEFICIARY: CNGV
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
T3.1 PRESSURE VESSEL DESIGN & MFD PLATFORM SOFTWARE
D3.3
CNGV 18.00 1.00 134 400 0.2 0.4 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.2
3.1 A Preliminary and final design of cylinder and hydroforming mould & plants
NP 5.00 1.00 36 600 0.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.5
D3.2
D3.1
3.1 B Development of the MFD platform relevant to pressure vessels design EST 17.00 1.13 81 750 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5
3.1 C Technological tests on steel pates (Mech. Coeff. Determination) BMP 1.90 0.48 11 000 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3
3.1 D Technological tests on composite material (Mech. Coeff. Determination) DOWAKSA 4.00 0.80 26 000 0.2 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.3
3.1 E Procurement and supply of First cylinder by Gortani (1 pc) BMP 0.30 0.10 0.1 0.1 0.1
3.1 F Hydroformig of the First cylinder for testing speciments (1 pc) BMP 1.00 1.00 5 000 1.0
3.1 G Technological tests on cylinder welded joints (Mech. Coeff. Determination) BMP 2.80 0.93 14 000 0.8 1.0 1.0
3
T3.2 PILOT LINE DESIGN
3.2 A Design of Pilot line - winding machine, curing, autofrattage, test plant CNGV 15.00 2.14 110 000 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
3.2 B Detailed design of the winding machine CNGV 27.00 3.86 203 200 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
3.2 C Detailed design of curing and autofratage plants & test NP 9.00 1.80 67 980 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0
3.2 D ABS Survey ABS 2.00 1.00 12 000 1.0 1.0
TOTAL WP3 701 930

MS8
MS3 -MFD Platform (Leader: ESTECO) NP DWAK BMP CNGV EST ABS
14.00 4.00 6.00 60.00 17.00 2.00

WP 4 PRE-INDUSTRIAL PROTOTYPING OF PRESSURE VESSELS
LEAD BENEFICIARY: BMPlus
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
T4.1 CONSTRUCTION PROTOTYPING PILOT LINE & ARRANGEMENT
4.1 A Electrical and automation design for Pilot line CNGV 18.00 2.00 137 000 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0
4.1 B Pilot line working procedures CNGV 7.50 1.25 55 000 0.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0
4.1 C Pilot line components specification for orders CNGV 5.50 0.39 41 000 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2
4.1 D Hydroforming mould and relevant plants construction and installation BMP 4.20 0.84 21 000 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5
4.1 E Winding machine construction and installation BMP 7.80 1.11 39 000 0.4 0.4 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0
4.1 F Curing and autofattage plants contrustion and installation BMP 2.60 0.65 13 000 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.5
D4.1
4.1 G Testing of single components of the pilot line BMP 6.00 0.86 30 000 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5
4.1 H Design of Pilot line arrangement NP 14.00 2.33 104 580 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
4.1 I Installation Workshop BMP 1.80 0.45 9 000 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4
CNGV 4.40 1.47 31 000 1.4 1.6 1.4

4.1 L Pilot line commissioning
BMP 0.30 0.10 1 000 0.1 0.1 0.1
T4.2 & T 4.3 CONSTRUCTION AND TESTS ON PRESSURE VESSEL PROTOTYPES
4.2 A Order and Supply of n°5 liners "Gortani" BMP 0.50 0.13 2 500 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
4
4.2 B Resin impregnation advisor DOW 2.00 1.00 15 000 1.0 1.0
CNGV 0.70 0.70 5 000 0.7

4.2 C Vessel Propotypes production (5 pcs)
D4.2
BMP 0.30 0.30 1 500 0.3
CNGV 4.00 1.00 30 000 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.5

4.2 D Tests on n°5 liners
BMP 0.80 0.20 3 500 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
4.2 E Tunning of firts test results CNGV 0.90 0.30 7 080 0.3 0.3 0.3
4.2 F Order and supply for n°10 vessels "Gortani" BMP 0.50 0.13 2 500 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
CNGV 3.00 1.00 22 000 1.0 1.0 1.0

4.2 G Production of n°10 vessels
BMP 0.60 0.20 3 500 0.2 0.2 0.2
CNGV 4.00 1.00 30 000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

4.2 H Final tests on n°5 vessels (of total 10 vessels, see second order)
D4.3
BMP 0.60 0.15 3 500 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1
4.2 I Survey and test reports assessment for Product Design Approval (PDA) ABS 8.00 1.00 48 000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL WP4 655 660

MS8
MS4 - Pressure Vessels - Pilot Line ready even (Leader: BM Plus) NP DOW BMP CNGV ABS
MS5 - Results of PV pilot productions and Tailored Ship design and (on/off) loading system (Leader: NP) 14.00 2.00 26.00 48.00 8.00
WP 5 SHIP DESIGN
LEAD BENEFICIARY: NAVALPROGETTI
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
T5.1 BASIC DESIGN
CHC 1.00 0.17 5 500 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1
Information about scenarious definition (see WP2)
EST 3.00 0.21 16 350 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
Ship design and naval architecture for CCNG ship sailing in North sea NP 13.50 0.96 100 000 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.2
Loading and unloading plant design CEN 10.00 1.43 48 000 0.5 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.0
Supervision of ship design under logistic/operativity point of view HLS 5.50 1.10 40 000 0.5 1.5 2.0 1.0 0.5
D5.1
Conceptual design for n°2 different ships sailing in Maditerranean sea NP 4.00 0.80 30 190 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.2
T5.2 TOWING TANK TESTS
D5.2
Test organisation and assistance (*) NP 4.00 0.80 30 000 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5
Anchor/mooring investigation according with seakeeping results (SAL, STL) MTEK 4.00 0.67 38 000 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.5
T5.3 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN FOR CLASS APPROVAL
Structural ship design NP 7.50 0.94 56 000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5
Ship collision structural analysis NP 4.70 0.67 35 000 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2
5
Hull outfitting design NP 5.60 0.93 42 000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.6
D5.3
Accommodations and thermal plant design NP 4.70 0.94 35 000 0.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.4
Hull and main engine piping plants design NP 12.60 0.97 94 000 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.8
Electrical plants NP 17.40 1.24 130 500 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5
Engine room and compressors room arrangement NP 3.00 1.00 22 500 1.0 1.0 1.0
Functional design of loading / unloading plant and gas compression system CEN 10.00 0.91 47 000 0.3 0.3 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.4
Analysis of the loading / unloading electrical energy supply ( Electrical

CEN 4.00 1.00 20 000 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.5
plant)
Analysis of loading / unloading operation time CEN 1.00 1.00 5 000 1.0
Technical analysis and comments of the functional design under owner
HLS 6.50 0.54 50 500 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.4
point of view
Design review and comments ABS 15.00 0.79 90 000 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Ship design CAPEX and OPEX calculation according to WP2 results HLS 3.00 1.00 22 000 1.0 1.0 1.0
TOTAL WP5 957 540
(*) 30000 KSRC + 30000 Budget EU

MS8
MS6 - Functional Ship Design Ready (Leader: NP) NP MTEK CEN HLS CHC EST ABS
77.00 4.00 25.00 15.00 1.00 3.00 15.00

WP 6 OFFSHORE & ONSHORE GAS LOADING/UNLOADING SYSTEMS
LEAD BENEFICIARY: VTG
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
DESIGN PARAMETERS AND COSTS OF ON-SHORE AND OFF-SHORE
T6.1
LOADING/UNLOADING SYSTEMS
According to information from WP2, VTG will be able to propose a suitable
VTG 14.00 1.00 94 500 0.5 0.5 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
mooring design for three operativity scenarious
Preliminary technical information to VTG for loading/unloading ship system
D6.1
CEN 3.50 0.88 16 400 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5
for connectiong ship plant to on-shore loading/unloading system
Review and comments ABS 1.80 0.30 10 000 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
IMPLEMENTATION OF A SOFTWARE TOOL FOR THE DESIGN AND

T6.2
OPERATION OF THE LOADING AND UNLOADING PLANTS
D6.2
Software tool development CEN 10.50 0.75 50 000 0.3 0.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.2
Interface inputs for development of the task CHC 6.00 0.75 33 000 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
6
THE LIMITING WEATHER ANALYSIS DURING LOADING/UNLOADING
T6.3
OPERATION
Sea State limit during loading/unloading operativity in various
D6.3
MTEK 13.00 0.93 123 500 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5
onshore/offshore operations
According to experimental data NP will provide to MRTK suitable
NP 2.00 0.50 14 940 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
information
Mechanical verification of gas flexible connections to loading/unloading
CEN 4.00 0.50 20 000 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1
onshore/offshore structures
Review and comments ABS 3.20 0.29 20 000 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2
382 340

MS8
NP VTG MTEK CEN ABS CHC
2.00 14.00 13.00 18.00 5.00 6.00

WP 7 COST - BENEFIT ANALYSIS
LEAD BENEFICIARY: SINTEF OCEAN - MARINTEK
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
T7.1 DATA IDENTIFICATION AND COLLECTION
D7.1
data collection, identification, + database MTEK 4.00 0.20 38 000 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
data from WP2 + data identification for T7.2 and T7.3 CHC 2.00 0.29 11 000 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2
data from WP3 + data identification for T7.2 and T7.3 CNGV 3.00 0.43 22 380 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2
T7.2 COMPARATIVE AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
D7.2
MTEK 6.00 0.50 57 000 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
ABS 5.00 0.50 30 000 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Task resonsible CHC 14.00 1.17 77 000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
VTG 4.00 0.40 27 000 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
T7.3 PROFITABILITY ASSESSEMENT (SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL)
T7.3.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFITABILITY
D7.3
MTEK 2.00 0.20 19 000 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NP 5.00 0.50 37 350 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4
7
CNGV 6.00 0.60 44 760 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
DOWAKSA 5.00 0.50 32 500 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
HLS 5.00 0.50 37 500 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
CHC 7.00 0.41 38 500 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
VTG 5.00 0.50 33 750 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
T7.3.2 FINANCIAL VIABILITY
MTEK 2.00 0.20 19 000 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NP 6.00 0.60 44 820 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
CHC 7.00 0.70 38 500 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Task resonsible CNGV 11.00 1.00 82 060 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 2.0
PNO 2.00 0.20 17 100 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
TOTAL WP7 707 220

MS8
MS7 - Proof-of-concept (Tool for CNG cost simulation validated by means of verification Results of CBS, Enviromental assessment and safety NP DOWA PNO VTG MTEK CNGV HLS CHC ABS
assessment) (Leader: MARINTEK)
11.00 0.00 2.00 9.00 14.00 20.00 5.00 30.00 5.00
WP8 CLASS DESIGN REVIEW - SAFETY ASSESSMENT
LEAD BENEFICIARY: ABS GREECE
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
T8.1 SPECIAL STUDIES - (CONSEQUENCE MODELLING)
ModeFRONTIER input data preparation relative to ship design NP 10.60 0.71 80 000 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2
ModeFRONTIER input data preparation relative to pressure vessel design CNGV 6.80 0.68 50 000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Automatic process integration workflow in modeFRONTIER to manage and

evaluate the following failure cases:
- Gas dispersion analysis
- Smoke and gas ingress analysis for the potential impact on
accommodation speces
EST 14.00 0.78 76 300 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
- Explosion analysis
- Fire propagation and effects on ship structures
Thermal radiation effects
Joule - Thompson effects
Coordination and assessment of CFD application ABS 6.70 0.42 42 000 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2
T8.2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION (HAZID) ANALYSIS
HAZID analysis with reference to the following design:
- Ship arrangement
- Ship safety systems NP 6.80 0.49 50 000 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2
- Ship systems (Structure/propulsion/steering,…)
- Power system BMP 2.00 0.67 10 000 0.5 1.0 0.5
- Containment system CNGV 3.80 0.54 25 000 D8.1 & D8.2 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.3
- Cargo handling system CEN 0.00 #DIV/0! X X X
Coordination , partecipation and reporting Task 8.2 ABS 4.20 1.05 25 000 0.6 1.3 1.3 1.0
HAZOP ANALYSIS
(Following the indications from T8.2 HAZID, in this task the safety aspects
T8.3 will be analysed and technical measures necessary to increase the safety of
the ship and gas cylinder will be identified for operativity phase of CNG
ship)
HAZOP development relevant to the following systems:
- Gas cylinders CNGV 3.10 0.39 24 200 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2
- System of loading and discharging CEN 0.00 #DIV/0! X X X X X
MTEK 0.00 #DIV/0! X X X X X

- System of station keeping
VTG 0.00 #DIV/0!
- Safety system on ship NP 3.00 0.33 21 000 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Coordination , partecipation and reporting Task 8.3 ABS 3.20 0.80 20 000 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.0
T8.4 BASIC DESIGN APPROVAL REVIEW
Quality manual preparation for gas cylinders construction CNGV 6.30 0.70 50 000 0.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.3
Assistance to ABS final approval NP 2.60 0.15 20 810 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Preparation and final delivery of classification documents ABS 7.90 0.66 45 000 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.2
D8.3
TOTAL WP8 539 310

MS8
NP BMP CNGV EST ABS
23.00 2.00 20.00 14.00 22.00

WP9 DISSEMINATION AND EXPLOITATION
LEAD BENEFICIARY: PNO INNOVATION
Pers / Mean 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

month value 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5
T9.1
COMMUNICATION, DISSEMINATION AND EXLOITATION PLAN
NP 5.0 37350 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
DOW 1.0 7 500 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 D9.1
DOWAKSA 4.0 26 000 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
PNO 2.0 17 100 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2
CNGV 2.0 14 920 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2
HLS 1.0 7 500 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
CHC 4.0 22 000 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 D9.3 D9.2
ABS 2.0 12 000 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2
T9.2
GASVESSEL WEBSITE AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES
NP 5.0 37350 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
PNO 2.0 17 100 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ABS 1.0 6 000 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
T9.3 DISSEMINATION AND EXPLOITATION ACTIVITIES
NP 4.0 29880 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
DOW 1.0 7 500 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
9 D9.4
DOWAKSA 1.0 6 500 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
PNO 10.0 85 500 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2
VTG 1.0 6 750 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
MTEK 2.0 19 000 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
BMP 1.0 5 000 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
CNGV 2.0 14 920 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
CEN 1.0 4 800 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
HLS 1.0 7 500 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
CHC 1.0 5 500 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
EST 1.0 5 450 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
D9.5
ABS 1.0 6 000 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
T9.4 FINAL CONFERENCE WITH POLICY MAKERS
NP 2.0 14940 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2
PNO 1.0 8 550 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
TOTAL WP9 432 610

MS8
MS8 - Dissemination, Communication, Exploitation Plan NP DOW DOWA PNO VTG MTEK BMP CNGV CEN HLS CHC EST ABS
MS9 - Workshops and Conferences 16.00 2.00 5.00 15.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 5.00 1.00 4.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
PERSON / MONTH DISTRIBUTION
Persons/month 0.9 2.0 2.6 3.3 2.7 4.1 5.8 6.9 6.7 5.6 5.1 5.7 3.6 3.7 3.2 2.7 2.2 2.2 3.0 3.5 4.3 5.3 6.1 7.5 8.0 8.2 7.7 6.7 5.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.0 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.5 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.8
Progress 1 3 5 9 12 16 21 28 35 41 46 51 55 59 62 64 67 69 72 75 79 85 91 98 106 114 122 129 134 138 141 145 148 150 153 155 158 161 164 166 168 170 171 173 174 175 176 177
Percentage (%) 0 2 3 5 7 9 12 16 20 23 26 29 31 33 35 36 38 39 41 42 45 48 51 56 60 65 69 73 76 78 80 82 83 85 86 88 89 91 92 94 95 96 97 98 98 99 100 100
NAVALPROGETTI - Persons / month NAVALPROGETTI - Progress

9.0 120
8.0
100
7.0
NP 6.0 80
Persons / month
5.0
Progress
60
4.0
3.0 40
2.0
20
1.0
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 2.4 3.9 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.9 10.4 9.3 7.1 4.0 3.0 3.9 3.1 2.9 2.0 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.7 1.7 1.5 2.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.2 0.7 2.3 2.6 3.2 4.2 3.9 4.4 3.4 3.2 2.8 2.3 1.2 1.4 1.1 2.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Progress 2 6 16 28 41 52 63 72 79 83 86 90 93 96 98 100 102 104 105 106 107 108 109 111 113 114 116 117 117 118 120 123 126 130 134 138 142 145 148 150 151 153 154 156 156 156 156 156
Percentage (%) 2 4 10 18 26 34 40 46 51 53 55 58 60 62 63 64 65 67 68 68 69 69 70 71 73 73 74 75 75 75 77 79 81 83 86 89 91 93 95 96 97 98 98 100 100 100 100 100
CNGV - Persons / month CNGV - Progress

14.0 120
12.0
100
10.0
CNGV Persons / month
80
8.0
Progress
60
6.0
40
4.0
20
2.0
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 3.0 4.7 5.0 4.7 3.0 1.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Progress 0 0 1 2 4 5 6 8 11 16 21 26 28 30 30 30 31 31 31 31 32 32 32 33 33 33 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 35 36 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37
Percentage (%) 0 0 1 5 9 13 18 22 30 43 56 69 77 80 82 82 83 84 85 85 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 92 92 92 93 93 93 94 97 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 100
BMP - Persons / month BMP - Progress

6.0 120
5.0 100
BMP 4.0 80
Persons / month
Progress
3.0 60
2.0 40
1.0 20
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.5 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.7 3.2 3.2 4.2 3.2 2.3 2.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Progress 1 2 4 6 8 12 15 19 22 25 27 28 29 31 32 33 34 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 47 48 48 49 49 50 50 50 50
Percentage (%) 1 4 7 11 17 23 29 38 44 49 54 56 59 61 64 66 68 69 69 69 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 89 91 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 100 100 100
ESTECO - Persons / month ESTECO - Progress

4.5 120
4.0
100
3.5
EST 3.0 80
Persons / month
2.5
Progress
60
2.0
1.5 40
1.0
20
0.5
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 2.1 1.4 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.6 2.6 2.6 3.1 3.6 3.1 2.1 1.5 2.3 1.3 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Progress 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 5 8 11 13 15 16 17 19 22 24 27 30 34 37 39 40 43 44 45 45 45 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47
Percentage (%) 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 11 18 24 29 32 33 36 40 46 52 57 64 71 78 83 86 91 94 95 96 97 97 98 98 98 98 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100
CENERGY - Persons / month CENERGY - Progress

4.0 120
3.5
100
3.0
CEN 80
2.5
Persons / month
Progress
2.0 60
1.5
40
1.0
20
0.5
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.1 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Progress 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Percentage (%) 2 5 8 12 14 17 19 21 22 23 24 25 41 56 57 59 60 62 63 65 67 68 70 71 73 75 76 78 79 81 83 84 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 96 97 98 99 100
DOW - Persons / month DOW - Progress

1.2 120
1.0 100
DOW 0.8 80
Persons / month
Progress
0.6 60
0.4 40
0.2 20
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.5 2.0 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Progress 1 1 2 2 4 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
Percentage (%) 3 7 10 15 25 39 49 54 55 55 55 55 55 56 56 56 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 60 61 61 62 62 63 67 70 74 78 81 85 88 92 95 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 100
DOWAKSA - Persons / month DOWAKSA - Progress

2.5 120
100
2.0
DOWAK
80
SA
Persons / month
1.5
Progress
60
1.0
40
0.5
20
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3
Progress 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 8 9 9 10 11 11 12 12 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 19 19 19 20 20 20 21 21 22 22 22 23 23
Percentage (%) 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 17 19 22 23 25 28 30 33 36 38 41 44 47 49 52 54 57 59 61 64 66 69 71 73 76 78 81 82 84 85 87 88 90 92 94 96 97 99 100
PNO - Persons / month PNO - Progress

0.7 120
0.6
100
0.5
PNO 80
Persons / month
0.4
Progress
60
0.3
40
0.2
20
0.1
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.7 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Progress 0 0 1 1 2 3 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 14 15 15 16 16 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27
Percentage (%) 0 1 2 5 8 12 19 27 35 38 42 46 50 52 54 56 59 59 59 60 61 63 65 67 69 71 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 89 91 93 95 97 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100
VTG - Persons / month VTG - Progress

2.5 120
100
2.0
VTG 80
Persons / month
1.5
Progress
60
1.0
40
0.5
20
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.0 0.5 1.5 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.8 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Progress 0 1 2 4 5 6 6 6 7 8 10 10 11 11 11 13 14 15 17 18 20 22 24 26 28 29 31 33 35 36 38 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 42 43 43 43 44 44 44 44 44 44
Percentage (%) 0 1 5 9 11 13 13 14 16 19 22 24 24 25 26 29 32 35 38 42 46 50 54 59 63 67 71 75 79 83 86 89 91 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 99 100 100 100 100 100
MTEK - Persons / month MTEK - Progress

2.0 120
1.8
100
1.6
1.4
MTEK 80
Persons / month
1.2
Progress
1.0 60
0.8
40
0.6
0.4
20
0.2
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.6 2.1 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.9 2.4 2.1 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Progress 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 6 7 8 8 8 9 10 10 11 13 16 18 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23
Percentage (%) 1 1 2 3 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 9 16 25 30 33 34 36 38 42 46 49 58 68 77 81 86 88 90 92 95 97 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 100 100
HLS - Persons / month HLS - Progress

2.5 120
100
2.0
HLS 80
Persons / month
1.5
Progress
60
1.0
40
0.5
20
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 2.7 2.7 3.9 4.9 4.7 2.7 1.6 2.6 3.1 1.1 2.1 2.1 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.6 2.6 2.6 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Progress 3 5 9 14 19 22 23 26 29 30 32 34 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 43 45 47 48 50 51 52 53 55 57 60 60 61 61 61 62 63 65 66 67 69 70 71 72 74 74 74 74 74
Percentage (%) 4 7 13 19 25 29 31 35 39 40 43 46 47 47 48 50 51 52 55 58 61 64 65 67 68 70 71 74 77 81 82 82 83 83 84 86 87 89 91 93 94 96 98 100 100 100 100 100
CHC - Persons / month CHC - Progress

6.0 120
5.0 100
CHC 4.0 80
Persons / month
Progress
3.0 60
2.0 40
1.0 20
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
Persons/month 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 2.0 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.7 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.1 2.9 2.7 2.4 0.8 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.2
Progress 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 5 6 8 10 12 14 16 17 19 22 24 27 30 31 33 35 36 38 41 44 46 47 49 50 52 54 56 57 58 60 61 62 62
Percentage (%) 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 6 7 8 8 9 13 16 20 22 25 28 30 35 39 44 48 51 54 56 59 62 67 71 75 76 78 81 84 87 90 92 94 96 98 100 100
ABS - Persons / month ABS - Progress

3.5 120
3.0
100
2.5
ABS 80
Persons / month
2.0
Progress
60
1.5
40
1.0
20
0.5
0.0 0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Month Month
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Work Plan
APPENDIX 1
Detail of activities of the Prototyping
Pilot line and construction of the liners
Project: GASVESSEL
Project No.: 723030
Deliverable No.:
Document Version: revision no.7
Document Preparation Date: date 2017-06-14
Responsibility: PARTNER No.1
PARTNER No.1 – Navalprogetti - Work Plan [Page No.17]

TASK ACTIVITY RESPONSABILITY 2017 2018 2018
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
G L A S O N D G F M A M G L A S O N D G F M A M G L A S O N D G
Procurement by Gortani BMPlus
Ricezione della specifica da CNGV per fornitura Gortani CNGV
Emissione richiesta di offerta a Gortani per:
a ‐ materiali saldati per esecuzione prove tecnologiche,
b ‐ fornitura di un cilindro, secondo indicazioni definitive CNGV,
c ‐ fornitura di 5 cilindri, dopo prove sul primo,
d ‐ completamento fornit. 10 cilindri su indicazioni definitive di CNGV BMP‐CNGV
Verifica offerta Gortani con CNGV BMP‐CNGV
Emissione ordine quadro a Gortani BMP
3.1.C Technological tests on steel plates (Mech. Coeff. Determination) BMPlus 0,4 0,6 0,6 0,3

Ricezione della specifica da CNGV per preparazione provini CNGV
Preparazione dei provini secondo specifica CNGV BMP
Scelta Laboratorio tecnologico, in accordo e secondo specifiche CNGV BMP‐CNGV
Emissione ordine a Laboratorio tecnologico BMP
Esecuzione prove di laboratorio BMP
Valutazione risultati di laboratorio CNGV
3.1.E Procurement and supply of First cylinder by Gortani BMPlus 0,1 0,1 0,1

Conferma caratteristiche primo serbatoio a Gortani BMP‐CNGV
Fornitura e ricezione del primo serbatoio da Gortani BMP‐Gortani
3.1.F Hydroforming of the First cylinder for testing speciments(1 pc) BMPlus 1,0

Assistenza a CNGV per esecuzione idroformatura BMP
3.1.G Technological tests on cylinder welded joints (Mech. Coeff. Determ.) BMPlus 0,8 1,0 1,0

Preparazione dei provini secondo specifica CNGV BMP
Emissione ordine a Laboratorio tecnologico BMP
Esecuzione prove di laboratorio BMP
4.1.D Hydroforming mould and relevant plants construction and installation BMPlus 0,7 1,0 1,0 1,0 0,5

Ricezione della specifica da CNGV per studio di fattibilità impianto CNGV
Studio fattibilità impianto su specifiche CNGV BMP‐CNGV
Scelta parti make/buy e programmazione attività interne/esterne BMP
Richieste di offerta per buy BMP
Emissioni ordini buy con benestare CNGV BMP‐CNGV
Forniture parti BMP
Lavorazioni interne parti BMP
(4.1.I) Studio fondazioni impianto su istruzione CNGV BMP‐CNGV
(4.1.I) Predisposizione area per montaggio impianto BMP
Assiemaggio impianto in sito BMP
Impianto pronto per collaudo BMP
(4.1.I) Studio layout campate per impianto di ricerca su indicazioni CNGV BMP‐CNGV
Definizione ed acquisto attrezzature specifiche per impianto ricerca BMP
Definizione ed acquisto impianti di campata non specifici BMP
4.1.E Winding machine construction and installation BMPlus 0,4 0,4 1,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0
Scelta parti make/buy e programmazione attività interne/esterne BMP
Forniture parti BMP
4.1.F Curring and autofrattage plants construction and installation BMPlus 0,5 0,8 0,8 0,5

Scelta parti make/buy BMP
Forniture parti BMP
4.1.G Testing of single component of pilot line BMPlus 0,5 1,0 1,5 1,0 1,0 0,5 0,5
Collaudo hydroforming mould and relevant plants BMP‐CNGV
Collaudo winding machine BMP‐CNGV
Collaudo curing and autofattage plants BMP‐CNGV
4.1.I Installation workshop BMPlus 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,4
4.1.L Pilot line commissioning BMP‐CNGV

Assistenza a CNGV per commissioning BMP 0,1 0,1 0,1
4.2.A Procurement and supply of nr. 5 cylinders by Gortani BMPlus 0,2 0,1 0,1 0,1

Conferma caratteristiche nr. 5 serbatoi a Gortani BMP‐CNGV
Fornitura e ricezione di nr. 5 serbatoi da Gortani BMP‐Gortani
4.2.C Vessel Prototype production (5 pcs) BMP‐CNGV

Assistenza a CNGV per produzione nr. 5 contenitori BMP 0,3
4.2.D Tests on nr. 5 liners BMP‐CNGV

Assistenza a CNGV per produzione nr. 5 contenitori BMP 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2
4.2.E Tuning of first test result CNGV
4.2.F Procurement and supply of nr. 10 cylinders by Gortani BMPlus 0,1 0,2 0,1 0,1

(4.2.E) Conferma caratteristiche nr. 10 serbatoi a Gortani BMP‐CNGV
Forniturae ricezione di nr. 10 serbatoi da Gortani BMP‐Gortani
4.2.F Production of nr. 10 vessels BMP‐CNGV

Assistenza a CNGV per produzione nr. 10 contenitori BMP 0,2 0,2 0,2
4.2.G Final tests on nr. 5 vessels (of total 10 vessels, see second order) BMP‐CNGV

Assistenza a CNGV per test BMP 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,1
4.2.H Survey for final approval ABS

Assistenza a CNGV per approvazione finale da parte di ABS BMP
G L A S O N D G F M A M G L A S O N D G F M A M G L A S O N D G
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
MS3 MS4 MS5
BMPlus - PROGETTO GASVESSEL. PROGRAMMA ORDINI E FORNITURE GORTANI
TASK ACTIVITY RESPONSABILITY 2017 2018 2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
G L A S O N D G F M A M G L A S O N D G F M A M
Procurement by Gortani BMPlus
Ricezione della specifica da CNGV per fornitura Gortani CNGV
Richiesta di offerta a Gortani per: a
- materiali saldati per esecuzione prove tecnologiche,
b - fornitura di un cilindro, secondo indicazioni definitive CNGV,
c - fornitura di 5 cilindri, dopo prove sul primo,
d - completamento fornit. 10 cilindri su indicazioni definitive di CNGV BMP-CNGV
Verifica offerta Gortani con CNGV BMP-CNGV
Emissione ordine quadro a Gortani BMP-GORTANI
3.1.C Technological tests on steel plates (Mech. Coeff. Determination) BMPlus

Conferma a Gortani delle caratteristiche delle piastre per provini BMP-CNGV
Lavorazione e fornitura delle piastre da parte Gortani BMP-GORTANI
3.1.E Procurement and supply of First cylinder by Gortani BMPlus

Conferma caratteristiche primo serbatoio a Gortani BMP-CNGV
Lavorazione e fornitura del primo serbatoio da parte Gortani BMP-Gortani
4.2.A Procurement and supply of nr. 5 cylinders by Gortani BMPlus

Conferma caratteristiche nr. 5 serbatoi a Gortani BMP-CNGV
Lavorazione e fornitura di nr. 5 serbatoi da parte Gortani BMP-Gortani
4.2.F Procurement and supply of nr. 10 cylinders by Gortani BMPlus

(4.2.E) Conferma caratteristiche nr. 10 serbatoi a Gortani BMP-CNGV
Lavorazione e fornitura di nr. 10 serbatoi da parte Gortani BMP-Gortani
MS3 MS4
31/05/2017

D1.2 Project Management Plan PDF

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

D1.2 Project Management Plan PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

D1.2 Project Management Plan PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ref.

Project Management Plan

Project No.: 723030

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.1

Software used Microsoft Word

EC Grant Agreement No.723030

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.2

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.3

Glossary, abbreviations and acronyms

EU The European Commission or in general Europe

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.4

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.5

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.6

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.7

2.2 Regulatory Framework

2.3 Project Management Objectives

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.8

2.4 Consortium Governance Bodies

The Representatives of the following Partners compose General Assembly:

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.9

2.5 General operational procedures for all Consortium Bodies

• should be present or represented at any meeting;

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.10

Preparation and organization of meetings

• Ordinary meeting: According with above calendar or at least once a year

• Ordinary meeting: 45 calendar days

Sending the agenda

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.11

2.6 Relations between Partners in the PM (WP1)

Partner Number and WP1 Effort-

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.12

Project language is English.

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.13

3. Project Management Overview

The PMS, instead, shall provide to:

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.14

• Completing the project on time

4. Project Management Actions

4.1 Team Building

• Aligning Partners around project goals

4.2 Project Coordination

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.15

4.3 Level-out outputs

• Documents numbering procedure

4.4 Consistency and Quality of Deliverables

• Completing the project/tasks on time, as planned

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.16

4.5 Deliverables Issuing Procedures

4.6 Planning and Budget Monitoring

• Detail of the actions completed in the reporting period

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.17

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.18

4.7 Monitoring the Procurement Management

4.8 Addressing technical issues

NAVALPROGETTI Srl WP No.1 Deliverable No.D1.2 Page No.19

For internal reporting see 4.6 Planning and Budget Monitoring

4.10 Risk Management

Technology breakthrough in alternative 2 Gas will continue to be a raw material for