[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
68 views5 pages

Finite Element Analysis of Connecting Rod Using Ansys: Nikhil U.Thakare, Nitin D. Bhusale, Rahul P.Shinde, Mahesh M.Patil

Uploaded by

aravindan476

1. A finite element analysis was conducted on a connecting rod using ANSYS software to analyze stresses and displacement. 2. Two materials were considered - aluminum 360 and aluminum 6061 reinforced with 9% silicon carbide and 15% fly ash. 3. The analysis found that the new composite material had 43.36% less maximum stress, 64.75% less displacement, 39.96% lower weight, and 64.23% higher stiffness compared to the aluminum 360 material.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt

Finite Element Analysis of Connecting Rod Using Ansys: Nikhil U.Thakare, Nitin D. Bhusale, Rahul P.Shinde, Mahesh M.Patil

Uploaded by

aravindan476
68 views5 pages
1. A finite element analysis was conducted on a connecting rod using ANSYS software to analyze stresses and displacement. 2. Two materials were considered - aluminum 360 and aluminum 6061 reinforced with 9% silicon carbide and 15% fly ash. 3. The analysis found that the new composite material had 43.36% less maximum stress, 64.75% less displacement, 39.96% lower weight, and 64.23% higher stiffness compared to the aluminum 360 material.

Original Description:

jk;k

Original Title

Balajm

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

1. A finite element analysis was conducted on a connecting rod using ANSYS software to analyze stresses and displacement. 2. Two materials were considered - aluminum 360 and aluminum 6061 reinforced with 9% silicon carbide and 15% fly ash. 3. The analysis found that the new composite material had 43.36% less maximum stress, 64.75% less displacement, 39.96% lower weight, and 64.23% higher stiffness compared to the aluminum 360 material.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
68 views5 pages

Finite Element Analysis of Connecting Rod Using Ansys: Nikhil U.Thakare, Nitin D. Bhusale, Rahul P.Shinde, Mahesh M.Patil

Uploaded by

aravindan476
1. A finite element analysis was conducted on a connecting rod using ANSYS software to analyze stresses and displacement. 2. Two materials were considered - aluminum 360 and aluminum 6061 reinforced with 9% silicon carbide and 15% fly ash. 3. The analysis found that the new composite material had 43.36% less maximum stress, 64.75% less displacement, 39.96% lower weight, and 64.23% higher stiffness compared to the aluminum 360 material.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 5

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF CONNECTING ROD USING ANSYS

NIKHIL U.THAKARE, 2NITIN D. BHUSALE, 3RAHUL P.SHINDE, 4MAHESH M.PATIL


1,3,4

B.E., Babasaheb Naik College of Engineering, Pusad, Maharashtra, India,


2
Research Scholar

Abstract- Connecting rod is the intermediate link between the piston and the crank. And is responsible to transmit the push
and pull from the piston pin to crank pin, thus converting the reciprocating motion of the piston to rotary motion of the
crank. Generally connecting rods are manufactured using carbon steel and in recent days aluminium alloys are finding its
application in connecting rod. In this work connecting rod is replaced by aluminium based composite material reinforced
with silicon carbide and fly ash. And it also describes the modeling and analysis of connecting rod. FEA analysis was carried
out by considering two materials of connecting rod for 180cc engine. The parameters like von misses stress and
displacement were obtained from ANSYS software. Compared to the former material the new material foundto have less
weight and better stiffness. It resulted in reduction of 39.48% of weight, with 64.23%reduction in displacement.
Keywords- Connecting Rod, Ansys, Composite, Silicon Carbide, Fly Ash, Analysis

small end of theconnecting rod are greater than the


stresses induced at the bigger end, therefore the
chances of failure of the connectingrod may be at the
fillet section of both end.

I. INTRODUCTION
Connecting rod is the intermediate link between the
piston and the crank. And is responsible to transmit
the push anpull from the piston pin to crank pin, thus
converting the reciprocating motion of the piston to
rotary motion of thecrank. Connecting rod,
automotives should be lighter and lighter, should
consume less fuel and at the same time theyshould
provide comfort and safety to passengers, that
unfortunately leads to increase in weight of the
vehicle. Thistendency in vehicle construction led the
invention and implementation of quite new materials
which are light and meet design requirements. Lighter
connecting rods help to decrease lead caused by
forces of inertia in engine as it does not require big
balancing weight on crankshaft. Application of metal
matrix composite enables safety increase and
advances that leads to effective use of fuel and to
obtain high engine power. Honda Company had
already started the manufacturing of aluminum
connecting rods reinforced with steel continuous
fibers. By carrying out these modifications to engine
elements will result in effective reduction of weight,
increase of durability of particular part, will lead to
decrease of overall engine weight, improvement in its
traction parameters, economy and ecological
conditions such as reduction in fuel consumption and
emission of harmful substances into atmosphere.
K. Sudershankumar et al, described modeling and
analysis of Connecting rod. In his project carbon
steelconnecting rod is replaced by aluminium boron
carbide connecting rod. Aluminium boron carbide is
found to haveworking factory of safety is nearer to
theoretical factory of safety, to increase the stiffness
by 48.55% and to reducestress by 7.84%.

Pushpendrakumar Sharma et al, performed the static


FEA of the connecting rod using the software and
saidoptimization was performed to reduce weight.
Weight can be reduced by changing the material of
the current forgedsteel connecting rod to crackable
forged steel (C70). And the software gives a view of
stress distribution in the wholeconnecting rod which
gives the information that which parts are to be
hardened or given attention during manufacturing
stage.
Ram bansal et al, in his paper a dynamic simulation
was conducted on a connecting rod made of
aluminium alloyusing FEA. In this analysis of
connecting rod were performed under dynamic load
for stress analysis and optimization.Dynamic load
analysis was performed to determine the in service
loading of the connecting rod anFEA was conducted
to find the stress at critical locations.
II. THEOROTICAL CALCULATION OF
CONNECTIG ROD
1.Pressure calculation :
Consider a 180cc engine
Engine type air cooled 4-stroke
Bore Stroke(mm) = 63.556.4
Displacement=178.6 cm
Maximum Power = 17.03bhp at 8500rpm
Maximum torque= 14.72 Nm at 6500rpm
Compression Ratio=9.38/1
Density of petrol at 288.855 K - 737.22*10-9
kg/mm3
Molecular weight M - 114.228 g/mole
Ideal gas constant R 8.3143 J/mol.k

Vivek. C. Pathade et al, he dealt with the stress


analysis of connecting rod by finite element method
using pro-ewild fire 4.0 and ansys work bench 11.0
software. And concluded that the stress induced in the

Proceedings of Third IRF International Conference on 8th February 2015, Cochin, India, ISBN: 978-93-84209-88-9
18

Finite Element Analysis of Connecting Rod Using Ansys

From gas equation,


PV=m. Rspecific. T
Where, P = Pressure
V = Volume
m = Mass
Rspecific= Specific gas constant
T = Temperature
But, mass = density * volume
m =737.22E-9*180E3
m = 0.1326 kg
Rspecific= R/M
Rspecific= 8.3143/0.1326
Rspecific= 62.702
P = m.Rspecific.T/V
P = 0.1326*62.702*288.85/180E3
P = 13.34MPa
P ~ 13 MPA.
2. Design Calculation of connecting rod:

Length of Connecting Rod = 2stroke=


256=112mm
Equivalent length of the connecting rod for both
ends hinged, L= l = 112 mm
1.For AL360 MATERIAL
Now according to Rankines formula, we know that
buckling load (WB),

95007.65=

= 5.13 mm

( = 0.002)

Thus, the dimensions of I-section of the connecting


rod are:
Thickness of flange and web of the section = t =5.13
mm Width of the section, B = 4 t = 4 5.13 =20.52
mm Height of the section,H = 5 t = 5 5.13 = 25.63
mm Depth near the big end,
H1 = 1.2H = 1.2 25.65= 30.78 mm
and depth near the small end,
H2 = 0.85H = 0.85 25.65 = 21.80 mm
2.ForAluminium 6061-9%Sic-15%Fly Ash

In general

30187.6=

= 3.82 mm

Width of the section, B = 4 t = 4 3.82 =15.28 mm


Height of the section,H = 5 t = 5 3.82 = 19.1 mm
Depth near the big end,
H1 = 1.2H = 1.2 25.65= 16.235 mm
depth near the small end,
H2 = 0.85H = 0.85 25.65 = 22.92 mm
TABLE 1
MATERIAL PROPERTIES USED FOR ANALYSIS
III. FEA OF CONNECTING ROD
Fig.1: I Section for connecting rod

From standards,
Thickness of flange and web of the section = t
Width of the section B = 4t
Height of the section H = 5t
Area of the section A = 11t
Moment of inertia about x axis Ixx= 34.91t4
Moment of inertia about y axis Iyy= 10.91t4
Therefore Ixx/Iyy= 3.2
So, in the case of this section (assumed section)
proportions shown above will be satisfactory.
Length of the connecting rod (L) = 2 times the stroke
L = 56 mm
Fp= ( d2/4) * gas pressure
Fp= 38003.56 N

Fig 2. Model of connecting rod

WB = FC F. S.= 38003.061.78 = 95007.65 N


We know that radius of gyration of the section about
X-axis,
Kxx=

Radius of crank,
r=
=

= 1.78 t

= 28 mm

Fig 3. Meshed model of connecting rod


th

Proceedings of Third IRF International Conference on 8 February 2015, Cochin, India, ISBN: 978-93-84209-88-9
19

Finite Element Analysis of Connecting Rod Using Ansys

Fig 4. All DOF constrained at crank end

Fig 6. Compressive load applied at piston end

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


ANALYSIS
For the finite element analysis, 13MPa of pressure is
used. The analysis is carried out using ANSYS
software. The pressure is applied at the small end of
connecting rod keeping big end fixed. The
maximum and minimum von-misses stress,
displacement are noted from ANSYS.

Fig 5. Tensile load applied at piston end

TABLE 2
COMPARISON OF STRESS AND DISPlACEMENT FOR DIFFERENT MATERIALS
Sr
Material
Tensile load
Compressive load
no
Stress Displacement
Stress
Displacement(mm)
(MPa) (mm)
(MPa)
1
Old material
79.637 0.0349
42.882
0.059
2
AL6061-9%SiC114.17 0.123
60.019
0.0214
15% fly ash
3
percentage
43.36
64.75
39.96
63.72
1.VON-MISES STRESS PLOTS:

From fig 7.the maximum stress occurs at the piston


end of the connecting rod is 79.637 Mpa. From the
fig 8 the maximum stress occurs at the pistonend of
the connecting rod is 114.17 Mpa.

Fig 7. Von-mises stress for tensile load Al-360


Fig 9.Von-Mises Stress For Compressive Load,Al360

Fig 8.Von mises stress for tensile load,ALFASiC

Fig 10.Von mises stress for compressrive load, ALFASiC

Proceedings of Third IRF International Conference on 8th February 2015, Cochin, India, ISBN: 978-93-84209-88-9
20

Finite Element Analysis of Connecting Rod Using Ansys

From fig 9.the maximum stress occurs at the piston


end of the connecting rod is 42.882 Mpa. From the
fig 10 the maximum stress occurs at the pistonend of
the connecting rod is 60.019 Mpa.

From the fig 13 the maximum displacement occurs in


the connecting rod is 0. 059 mm. From the fig 14 the
maximum displacement occurs in the connecting rod
is 0. 0214 mm.

2.DISPLACEMENT PLOTS

3. VOLUME, WEIGHT AND STIFFNESS OF THE


CONNECTING ROD.
a) Weight of the Connecting Rod.
For aluminium 360:
The volume of the connecting rod used is 137650
mm. Therefore the mass of the connecting rod for
respective materials are:
Weight = volume * density
Weight = 137650 *2.8e-3
Weight = 385.42 grams
For aluminium 6061-9%SiC-15%fly ash
The volume of the connecting rod used is
89306.72mm . Therefore the mass of the connecting
rod for respective
materials are:
Weight = volume * density
Weight = 89306.72* 2.61161e-3=233.233 grams
Therefore there is net difference of 152.19 grams in
the new connecting rod for the same volume, i.e., is
39.48 % reduction in weight.

Fig 11.Displacement For Tensile Load Al-360

Fig 12.Displacement For Tensile Load ALFASiC

b) Stiffness of the Connecting Rod


1.Foraluminium 360
Weight of the connecting rod = 385.42grams
Deformation = 0.0349 mm
Stiffness = weight / deformation
Stiffness = 385.42/0.0349
Stiffness = 11043.55 g/mm

From the fig 11 the maximum displacement occurs in


the connecting rod is 0.0349 mm. From the fig 12 the
maximum displacement occurs in the connecting rod
is 0. 0123 mm.

1.Foraluminium 6061-9%SiC-15%fly ash


Weight of the connecting rod = 233.233grams
Deformation = 0.0123 mm
Stiffness = weight / deformation
Stiffness = 233.233/0.0123
Stiffness = 18962.03 g/mm
CONCLUSION
Weight can be reduced by changing the material of
the current al360 connecting rod to hybrid
Alfasic composites.
the optimised connecting rod is 39.48% lighter
than the current connecting rod.
the new optimised connecting rod is comparatively
much stiffer than the former.

Fig 13. Displacement For Compression Load Al-360

REFERENCES

Fig 14. Displacement For Compression Load,, ALFASiC

[1]

K. Sudershan Kumar, Dr. k. Tirupathi Reddy, Syed


AltafHussan Modeling and analysis of two Wheeler
connecting rod, International Journal of Modern
Engineering Research, Vol -2, Issue- 5, pp-3367-3371, SepOct-2012.

[2]

Vivek.c.pathade, BhumeshwarPatle, Ajay N. Ingale Stress


Analysis of I.C. Engine Connecting Rod by FEM,

Proceedings of Third IRF International Conference on 8th February 2015, Cochin, India, ISBN: 978-93-84209-88-9
21

Finite Element Analysis of Connecting Rod Using Ansys


International Journal of Engineering and Innovative
Technology, Vol-1, Issue-3, pp-12-15, March2012.
[3]

in Science and Engineering, Vol. No.1, Issue No. I, pp3367-3371, September 2012.

Pushpendra Kumar Sharma1, BorseRajendra R, fatigue


analysis and optimisation of connecting rod using finite
element analysis, International Journal Of advance research

[4]

Ram Bansal, Dynamic simulation of connecting rod made


of aluminium alloy using finite element analysis approach,
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Volume
5, Issue 2, PP 01-05, Jan. - Feb. 2013.

Proceedings of Third IRF International Conference on 8th February 2015, Cochin, India, ISBN: 978-93-84209-88-9
22

You might also like