Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Mechanical & Industrial Department
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Mechanical & Industrial Department
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Mechanical & Industrial Department
PROJECT REPORT
We would like to express our deepest appreciation to all those who provided
us the responsibility to complete this report. A special gratitude to Dr. Avinash
Parashar, whose contribution in simulating suggestions and encouragement,
helped us to complete this project.
Secondly, we would like to thank our team members for their immense
support and coordination during the whole timeline of preparation of this
project report.
CONTENTS
1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Modelling Detail
4. Results And Discussion
5. Conclusion
6. References
1. Abstract
The aim of this project is to model and assemble the connecting rod
and crankshaft for a 150cc Engine by theoretical calculation & the
structural analysis of Crankshaft and Connecting rod. The scientific
calculations prove the conditions required for the optimised size of
the connecting rod.
2. Introduction
Internal combustion engines are seen every day in automobiles, trucks, and buses. Spark
ignition engines take a mixture of fuel and air, compress it, and ignite it using a spark
plug. The name `reciprocating' is given because of the motion that the crank mechanism
goes through. The piston-cylinder engine is basically a crank-slider mechanism, where
the slider is the piston in this case. The piston is moved up and down by the rotary
motion of the two arms or links. The crankshaft rotates which makes the two links
rotate. The piston is encapsulated within a combustion chamber. The bore is the
diameter of the chamber. The valves on top represent induction and exhaust valves
necessary for the intake of an air-fuel mixture and exhaust of chamber residuals. In a
spark-ignition engine, a spark plug is required to transfer an electrical discharge to ignite
the mixture.
3. Modelling
3.1 Software used: Dassault Solidworks (2016/2018)
S.no. Parameters(mm)
1. The thickness of the connecting rod = 3.4
2. Width of the section (B = 4t) = 12.8
3. Height of the section (H = 5t) = 16
4. Height at the big end = 1.1H to 1.125H = 17.6
5. Height at the small end = 0.9H to 0.75H = 14.4
6. The inner diameter of the small end = 17.94
7. The outer diameter of the small end = 31.94
8. The inner diameter of the big end = 23.88
9. The outer diameter of the big end = 47.72
Connecting Rod 3D CAD Model
4. Analysis
We get, Ixx = 4*Iyy (The value is usually taken between 3 and 3.5.)
Let the thickness of flange & web of the section = t
Width of section B= 4t
Since the value of Ixx/Iyy lies between 3 and 3.5 m therefore I-section chosen is quite
satisfactory.
4.3 Material selection and manufacturing
In mass-produced automotive engines, the connecting rods are most usually made of steel.
Other materials include T6-2024 aluminium or T651-7075 aluminium alloy, which are used
for lightness and the ability to absorb high impact at the expense of durability. Titanium is a
more expensive option which reduces the weight. Cast iron can be used for cheaper, lower
performance applications such as motor scooters. In our analysis of this project, we have
used forged steel due to its high strength to weight ratio compared to other steels and
low cost compared to titanium.
In high-performance applications, "billet" connecting rods can be used, which are machined
out of a solid billet of metal, rather than being cast or forged.
Properties of forged steel
PV = (m/M) *R*T
= (0.11/0.114228) *8.314*288.85
P = 2312.61/149.5*10-6
= 15.469 MPa
F = (π/4)*572*15.469 = 39473.156 N
4.5 Ansys Details
5. Results
The material used for connecting rod and crankshaft analysis –
Forged steel
Maximum Pressure on Piston – 15.469 MPa
Maximum Force applied by gas on Piston – 39473.156 N
The factor of safety of Connecting Rod (Von Misses criteria) – 1.411
The factor of safety of Connecting Rod (Tresca criteria) – 1.384
The factor of safety of Crank Shaft (Von Misses criteria) – 1.7509
The factor of safety of Crank Shaft (Tresca criteria) – 1.517
6. Conclusion
We analysed the different shapes of the connecting rod as well as that of
the crankshaft and concluded that I cross-section gives the value that is
suitable for use.
We concluded that titanium is too costly a metal to
be used and aluminium is too weak a metal to be used. We, thus settled
for different types of steel and out of them forged steel was chosen for
analysis based on its favourable properties.
We also analysed how a
little amount of change in the thickness of the connecting rod has a
notable effect on the factor of safety of the material.
7. References