Valtazar Bogišić

Cilj je ovog rada prikazati odnos Carla Schmitta spram Balda Bogišića. Carl Schmitt (1888-1985), jedan od najznačajnijih europskih pravnika i filozofa prava i politike u prošlom stoljeću nije se mogao susresti sa Baldom Bogišićem (1834- 1908), znamenitim cavtatskim pravnikom i polihistorom te tvorcem Opšteg imovinskog zakonika za Knjaževinu Crnu Goru (OIZ) (1888) za vrijeme života ovog potonjeg. Međutim, stjecajem obiteljskih okolnosti, Schmitt 1925. godine ljetuje u Cavtatu gdje se dublje upoznao i nedvojbeno ostao fasciniran Bogišićevim likom i djelom. Pisani tragovi o Schmittovim cavtatskim danima sačuvani su u tri različita izvora: njegovoj korespondenciji, njegovom dalmatinskom putopisu te konačno u njegovim dnevnicima iz tog vremena. Schmitt je smatrao kako je Bogišić jedan od malobrojnih „Velikih Ilira“ tijekom cjelokupne povijesti tog prostora, tj. onih epohalnih osobnosti koje su utjelovile genius loci Ilirije: njeno jedinstvo u različitosti tradicija množine religija, naroda i jezika. Pored toga, Schmitt je Bogišića, uz Švicarca Eugena Hubera (1849-1923), smatrao najvećim kodifikatorom civilnog prava uopće. U radu će se nastojati objasniti razlozi ovakva Schmittova laudativnog odnosa prema Bogišiću te pokazati zbog čega nam Schmittova razmatranja otvaraju nova vrata za produbljeno čitanje i razumijevanje lika i djela Balda Bogišića.

Franc Miklošič was undoubtedly one of the most educated, internationally renowned and influential Slovene intellectuals of the second half of the nineteenth century and is foremost regarded as a philologist, linguist and one of the founders of Slavic studies. However, Miklošič's intellectual versatility also led to his engagement with history, ethnography, anthropology and law, predicated on interdisciplinary and comparative approaches. Apart from a few translations of Austrian legislation into Slovene, Miklošič did not devote himself to legal matters, with the exception of blood feud in Die Blutrache bei den Slaven (1887), one of the key works on the topic at the time. Although he agreed with the evolutionist and legal positivist views of his time on the State as the pinnacle of civilization, compared to the supposed chaos of prior societies (which continue to remain popular), in Blutrache Miklošič also presented the characteristics of the customary system of conflict resolution in kinship-based societies, which attest to the complexity of social relations in premodern Europe. It is with the help of Miklošič's work that this paper reconstructs the customary ritual of conflict resolution, which was known to all premodern European societies, and presents the attitude of his and later times towards blood feud.

V článku je vůbec poprvé uveřejněna část korespondence mezi Valtazarem Bogišićem a známým českým právníkem a historikem Karlem Kadlecem. Jedná se o 41 dopisů, které Bogišić let 1889–1907 Kadlecovi zaslal. Korespondence je uchovávána v Masarykově ústavu AV ČR pod signaturou „Karel Kadlec, karton 1, inv. č. 31“ a obsahuje celkem 68 dopisů adresovaných Kadlecovi.

Franc Miklošič was undoubtedly one of the most educated, internationally renowned and influential Slovene intellectuals of the second half of the nineteenth century and is foremost regarded as a philologist, linguist and one of the founders of Slavic studies. However, Miklošič's intellectual versatility also led to his engagement with history, ethnography, anthropology and law, predicated on interdisciplinary and comparative approaches. Apart from a few translations of Austrian legislation into Slovene, Miklošič did not devote himself to legal matters, with the exception of blood feud in Die Blutrache bei den Slaven (1887), one of the key works on the topic at the time. Although he agreed with the evolutionist and legal positivist views of his time on the State as the pinnacle of civilization, compared to the supposed chaos of prior societies (which continue to remain popular), in Blutrache Miklošič also presented the characteristics of the customary system of conflict resolution in kinship-based societies, which attest to the complexity of social relations in premodern Europe. It is with the help of Miklošič's work that this paper reconstructs the customary ritual of conflict resolution, which was known to all premodern European societies, and presents the attitude of his and later times towards blood feud.