European Royalty

Recently, we have seen a lot of Princess Diana's sons on television as they have been remembering the anniversary of her untimely death. And, we hear about all the good that she had done. Granted, these things are true. But we have heard similar stories about people who were supposed to have been 'good', who, later, we found out to be less than the 'good' we thought that they were (Christopher Columbus, Mother Theresa, Father Serra, etc.). And we must also remember all of the popes who knew the truth about Christianity, but went on pretending that Christianity is 'good' and not a fraud. I'm not trying to say that the late Diana Spencer wasn't a good person, or that her sons are not. However, we do have to reexamine a lot of what we have been told, as well as what was presented to us in history and by whom.

The New Classical Scholarship: The New Forensic Study Of History (Roman Piso, 11-25-2016, edited & updated 03-22-2017) [Note: To fully understand this, it is recommended that other related papers be read as well, as this is a complex subject, and the study of this employs methodology not generally taught yet.] This paper is meant to introduce the subject of the forensic study of history. And therefore, a Summary. The reason for this new way of studying ancient history is the discovery of it in an entirely difference context; that of being written from within a closed or controlled environment, which consisted of royalty who comprised a sustained Oligarchy. That condition is now known as 'Royal Supremacy'. The New Classical Scholarship, or the NCS was developed and founded by Roman Piso. Some of the ideas for it originated from methodology by others who, through their work had managed to reach the conclusion of a Roman authorship for the New Testament texts. [a] However, the main procedures and methodology (as well as some terminology) was developed by the author of this paper. In the 1800's, Professor Bruno Bauer had reached the conclusion that the New Testament was authored by Romans. He was not able to go much further than was reflected within his papers and books, and so, he was not able to actually name just who those Romans were. But, he (Prof. Bruno Bauer) did identify "word usage" and phraseology, as well as conceptual and ideological comparisons between the gospels and the works of Seneca and Flavius Josephus. Thus, paving the way for further research into their probable association with the creation of Christianity. And our research, has now verified his suspicions. Particularly, that of Abelard Reuchlin, who was the very first to name the authors of the New Testament texts in his 'The True Authorship of the New Testament' (1st printing, 1979; 2nd printing, 1986). In the early part of the 20th century, several scholars of the time were making great strides in terms of word meanings and word usage in the New Testament; and in fact, the Bible as a whole. One of those scholars was James Ballantyne Hannay, a contributor to the 'Encyclopedia Biblica', which was produced by Oxford university and various scholars of the time. [b] There were several books written by scholars and researchers of the time, which shed light upon words and word usage in the Bible; many of which are very rare, out of print, and/or non existent today. [c] Much of that earlier work was destroyed by many people who did not like what it revealed or what it would do in terms of scholarship should it become more widely known. At the time, Christians destroyed copies of these books and many were destroyed due to two world wars. The Vatican hierarchy knew about various discoveries made by researchers both in and out of Academia, and likewise, did not want that material to get out to other scholars or the public in general. Hitler and his followers too, had destroyed many thousands of books which, of course, included anything that the Vatican did not like and/or which revealed Christianity in a bad light. Many rare and one-of-a-kind books and other materials were destroyed simply because some people did not like that material for whatever reason. One of the main things that has been wrong with academia for so long is that many of its members have always consisted of the religious and thus, it has been strongly "Christian" in nature. That has alarmed many of us who realize the problem that that has been to getting at the truth in history and religion.

Depicting the charged theme of a king’s imminent death, Delacroix’s work issued from a visual culture in which representation of the royal body was highly susceptible to attacks, slanderous interpretations, and seditious acts.  The artist’s choice of the legendary last king of Assyria, famous for his sensual indulgence, suggestively conjured up a carnal ruling body, not the sacral body envisioned by the Bourbons.  More specifically, French literary and political texts had long explicitly defined princely misrule as “sardanapalien.”  Delacroix’s image drew on traditional tropes of anti-royal protest evoking a disordered, irrational, perverse and gender-confused royal body, tropes that were revived in the Restoration, particularly during the crisis of Charles X’s reign.

Julius Calpurnius Piso, a son of Arrius Piso, was the author of The Revelation. He was married to Hadrian's sister and was father-in-law of Tacitus' son. He wanted his grandson to become emperor after Hadrian, and was killed by Hadrian in 137 CE along with his grandson. Instead, his descendants became bishops of Rome & Alexander Severus, emperor.

Many people today are “Woke” to the reality of the situation that the 99% had been born into. And that is that the world that we were born into had been rigged to work against us and to benefit the few who were born into the 1% and the Oligarchy. It is going to be a monumental task to change this. But it can and must be done. And that must begin by educating more people to this reality.

The True Context Of Ancient History And The Gordian Emperors (Roman Piso, 02-25-2017) This paper is about the Gordian Emperors; Gordian I, Gordian II, and Gordian III. However, it is also about much, much more. It is about their ancestors and their royal relatives, as well as statistical data and how they were related to a group of ancient authors known as the Philostratii. [I] I, and a few other researchers have discovered something which had never been considered within academia before, but which is now of extreme importance and must be considered because of what it means to research itself. Basically, what we have discovered is that there is an alternate version of history that exists, but that has not been known except to those few who did not want others to know. That other version of history changes the context in which we must now view it. And that is because what we contend, due to what has been discovered, means that only royalty had the privilege of writing anything for publication (under penalty of death); no matter what the subject matter. Most of us now know of at least some examples where history (or those recording history) had lied or deliberately misled us. And, we also now know of several examples of what we term "whitewashed" history. [II] Some of us have long wondered, how it was that there were so many people (i.e., the masses or non-royals) within such a great empire, who were illiterate. And yet, somehow, there were some people who lived an entirely different life within that empire than the majority did, people who had received a fantastic education, and who demonstrated great genius within their writings. And this, our discovery of the true nature of ancient history, gives us that answer.

Paper deals with the reality of the situation when royalty ruled the world, and when no one but royals were allowed to write under penalty of death. Thus, a 'closed'  or controlled environment with the created illusion of freedom & the unification of royalty to preserve that status quo.

The research that has been done on royalty in general is massive. And, the connections between royal lines once revealed can be amazing, as they will sometimes reveal connections that a) were not supposed to have existed, and even b) that actually contradict the information that was given to the general public by those very royals. This paper gives two different lines of descent of Kaiser Wilhelm II, from Arrius Calpurnius Piso. One is through Arrius Piso's son Justus Piso. And the second line of descent is via Arrius Piso's son Julius Piso. Now, even though these two lines are given here, it should be understood that in reality, these are but two of many extant genealogies extending from Arrius Piso and his family to Kaiser Wilhelm. I plan to write yet another paper giving some of the other lines as well. There are several things that I have noticed as I have researched and studied ancient history and genealogies; things that should provide any good (or with time, potentially great) researcher with valuable information. And, as in my case, perhaps answers to many very important questions, as well as a few epic discoveries. When I began to investigate fully, and with the time and attention required, ancient history and information given within those histories, with regards to particular individuals, I found that certain things appeared to be 'standard' with all of those ancient authors-and those things stood out to me, and appeared to have been missed by other researchers, as I had never seen those certain things ever being noted or mentioned in the work of other researchers. For one thing, I had noted that in the work of one ancient author after another, there were so many instances where those authors could have very easily gave answers and information in a direct and forthright manner; but deliberately chose not to. And, more often than not, avoided very skillfully, giving key information about certain individuals; mainly and particularly, the authors themselves. Also, those authors would make statements which either promised to give answers and/or further information about a particular subject, and then failed to do so. At least, in any known or public work. Now, some researchers have tried to answer this by giving excuses for some of those instances. But, in essence, those explanations or excuses are really simply guesses. And poor ones at that. My work has given some genuine answers. And the true context of the material that was being written and left to future generations by those ancient authors is key to getting at the truth and in finding valid answers to these and other questions. One of the main things to realize is that ancient history (and other material being produced by those authors), was being written within a tightly controlled environment. And that changes the context in which we must now examine that material in order to understand it correctly. It also means that because of this set of circumstances, other things were in play as well. And, one of those is the fact that the authors who were leaving us their works were in fact, all royalty. Which, in turn, means that these authors were related to each other and had the same common ancestry. It also, therefore, means that they had the same or similar vested interests. Because only royals or those of royal blood, were able to write for publication, it meant that what they

CARD GAMES AND DIPLOMACY AT THE COURT OF KING CAROL I OF ROMANIA. Card games are part of parlour games, commonly defined as activities involving several people and having entertainment as their main aim. Card games were present at the court of King Carol I, together with other activities that can be considered, at least partially, as parlour games: billiards, cotillion, tableaux vivants, seances. AlI of these were cultivated by the members of the Romanian royal household during the reign of Carol I, either at the residences in the country (in the palace in Bucharest, at Cotroceni or in Sinaia), or during the visits to Germany, in Sigmaringen (the residence of the King's parents) and in Neuwied (the residence of Queen Elisabeta's parents). Card games are the most typical of parlour games, as long as they are not played for any material gain. Oftentimes, the games of piquet and whist - only these two games were played at the court - involved people from outside the restricted circle of the royal household: politicians, army officers, diplomats, members of other royal or princely courts. An analysis of documentary sources (letters, memoirs, diaries) points to the conclusion that parlour games were encouraged at the court of King Carol I not just for entertainment, but also as a means of communication and socialisation. The King used the atmosphere of the games in order to collect information, to send messages of his own, or merely to consolidate relationships.

This paper describes the time the Bosnian King spent outside of his Kingdom during 1435 and 1436. The author questions the prevailing chronology existing in contemporary historiography and presents data about the King’s activities and other events in Vienna where he was hosted by Herzog Albrecth of Habsburg and his father in law, Holy Roman Emperor and King of Hungary Sigismund of Luxemburg. The paper offers a contribution to the observation and analysis of cultural and social exchanges between the Bosnian and Hungarian court within the developed cultural forms of the late Middle Ages.

Until now not much was known about the several months long activities of King Tvrtko II outside of Bosnia at the beginning and end of 1435, and during the beginning of 1436. Due to a lack of preserved sources it is extremely difficult to find out more about what made Tvrtko leave for Hungary and Austria, but it can be assumed that these were reasons of genuine importance. Apart from the Ottoman presence in Bosnia, one of the factors which could have influenced Tvrtko to turn to the Hungarian King was the intensified activity of Radivoj, the pretender to the Bosnian throne. Despite King Tvrtko’s long absence from his Kingdom, Radivoj was still not able to ensure a permanent recognition neither in the country nor abroad. Another problem were the successes of Stjepan Vukčić, who, aided by the Ottomans, managed to strengthen and consolidate the possessions he inherited from his uncle Sandalj Hranić.

On the basis of scattered, fragmentary and irregular data, as well as the examples presented in this paper, an impression can be gained that the itinerary of the Bosnian rulers and nobles was much more extensive than the preserved documents show us. This data allows us to think that their trips abroad were much more frequent than it is assumed. These journeys, conducted under the conditions of medieval transport, must have been adventurous, whereby encountering new landscapes, persons, things and customs, left a deep impression on the travellers. Their attendance on occasions of significance, such as banquets, parties, feasts, knightly tournaments, large congresses, audiences at foreign courts etc., implied the gathering of new and important experiences which they could then bring back to their homeland and share with their countrymen. These impressions further opened the door to cultural and civilizational influences through their acceptance and application or through their adjustment in the domestic environment.

Paper subject: All Roman Emperors from Antoninus Pius on were descendants of the Piso family of Rome. Also gives links to relevant papers and other information. And, shows supporting information by demonstrating that other leaders were likewise descended from the same common ancestors.

Свесни незнатности својих caзнања и недостојности за овакво бављење, у њега се упуштамо, јер смо, такође, свесни и невероватне оскудице у познавању порекла нашег Краљевског Дома у народу српском. Нека би овај скромни труд послужио само томе да се побуди интересовање за ову тему међу нашим људима. Чудимо се, наиме, томе да се ауторитети из ове области (којих, срећом, у Срба има!) нису детаљније позабавили пореклом Карађорђевића у овој форми и на овај начин. Због одсуства такве литературе, заинтересовани за детаљније податке о ширем кругу сродника и предака Карађорђевића, принуђени су да консултују прилично велики број наслова. У овоме раду, свакако, има пропуста, али се надамо да ће они, упућенији и изображенији, начинити комплетнији и квалитетнији преглед од оног, којег овде предочавамо.

This peer reviewed study uncovers the history of one of the major objects in Fabergé's production - the Renaissance Style Nephrite Presentation Tray given to Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands for her wedding in 1901 - that disappeared from the Dutch royal collection due to a secret, and likely unauthorised sale by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. In 1980 it was auctioned for the last time, and consequently never seen in public again.

OBRENOVICH (TEODOROVICH-OBRENOVICH) - THE EXTINCT SERBIAN DYNASTY

Teodorovich-Obrenovich Dynasty consisted of: Milosh - Prince of Serbia, his brothers Lord Jovan and Lord Jevrem, as well as their legitimate direct descendants (with their wives). Forming of this Dynasty was completed, when Milosh was confirmed as the Prince of Serbia, by Turkish Sultan (in December 1830). By tragic death of King Aleksandar Teodorovich-Obrenovich and his wife, Queen Draga (28th– 29th May 1903), this Serbian Dynasty completely died out. Dozens of families, members of hundreds of households, and thousands of persons, are distant relatives of the extinct Teodorovich-Obrenovich Dynasty, either by male, or by female line. Everyone of them can, and should be proud by their distant relationship with this Dynasty, but non of them has the right to pretend to any of the Royal or noble titles of the extinct Teodorovich-Obrenovich Dynasty.

(The English summary at page 106)

*

Књига се бави настанком, развојем и нестанком Династије Обреновић, даљим сродницима ове фамилије по мушкој и женској линији, који не припадају племству, као и неутемељеним претензијама појединаца на име и титуле ове Династије.

This paper gives the interpretation
of female fashion in the 19th century
Serbia and its connection to political
changes, based on the analysis of
governesses’ costumes. As fashion
icons of the nation, Serbian governesses
set the main trends and were
the initiators of changes and Europeanization,
both privately and in
the public sphere. This paper will
demonstrate to what extent this depended
on the personal taste of these
great women, and to what extent to
the general condition of the state.

Genealogical chart showing the descent of King James (of the King James version of the Bible) from Arrius Calpurnius Piso, the main author of the gospels & creator of Christianity. Also see the paper 'The Audacity Of King James' in AcademiaEdu as well as related papers RE: the Roman creation of Christianity.

The story of the death of Tsar Nicholas II (and his family) in 1917 has been  told and retold. It is a story that has capitivated the  interest of many people for over a century.

Of  keen  interest, is ... what is the YDNA of the Tsar Nicholas II (who is from the ancient Oldenburg Dynasty)? Part of the YDNA STRs have been published, but not all.

This paper reviews the case of a Kaye who believes it is possible that her Grandfather was an Oldenburg - if true, then the YDNA of the Oldenburg line has now been published.

The  Oldenburg line is also the paternal line of Prince Charles of Great Britian (and his sons and father).

Artigo publicado na revista L+arte, n.75, Setembro de 2010.
Neste artigo foi pela primeira vez levantada a possibilidade, hoje confirmada, das safiras do Tesouro Real Português (PNA, inv. 4782) terem pertencido à Infanta D. Maria Francisca Benedita (1746-1829) e não à sua irmã e sogra, a rainha D. Maria I (1734-1816), como até aí se acreditava.
A compra destas jóias pela sua sobrinha-neta, a Infanta D. Isabel Maria (1801-1876) em 1830, aqui explicada, acabou por se revelar fundamental para a subsequente investigação, uma vez que é aos herdeiros desta última infanta que, em 1879, o rei D. Luís I (1838-1889) adquire, para os Bens da Coroa, estas três peças.

"Prima dată când am întâlnit-o pe Majestatea Sa a fost cu prilejul lansării CD-ul Muzica Regelui, în 2011. De atunci, nu m-a putut abandona gândul că a te înfățișa Custodelui Coroanei însemna și să te expui în fața unei Doamne care a moștenit, de la mama Majestății Sale, calitatatea de Profesionistă a Nobleții. Privirea Reginei este, pentru mine, o neîncetată sursă de inspirație și, adesea, de mister. De cele mai multe ori, am avut impresia unui surâs care păzește, înțelept, tradițiile regale vechi de sute de ani."

Review of the Biography of Late Queen Juliana of The Netherlands, by Jolande Withuis. The authors writing is impeccable, but I question her understanding of role of Religion in the queens life, and the importance of tradition, in particular the Nineteenth Century setting she was brought up in.