(PDF) 'The Imperial Republic of Velleius Paterculus'

Judged to be historically superficial, marred by an overbearing urge to please the emperor Tiberius, and a vehicle for imperial propaganda, Velleius' work has been given generally short shrift in or omitted from most discussions of Roman historical writing. This disdain, unfortunately reflected in the paucity of English translations of Velleius, has certainly been tempered in light of reevaluations of his work. Tony Woodman's magisterial commentaries on Book 2, in particular, represented a watershed moment, both restoring a measure of dignity to Velleius and signaling the profound importance of this historian to our understanding of the Augustan and Tiberian periods. One particularly interesting aspect of the brief Historia (contained in two books yet covering the period from the founding of Rome down to 29 CE) is in the manner it bridges and even masks the transition from republic to principate. In much the same way as the texts of Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus reflect the circumstances of their production, the value of Velleius lies in his place as one of the chief literary artefacts of the immediate post-Augustan era and thus a product of the emerging principate. His perspective is valuable, for it furnishes an antidote to the dark cynicism of the later Tacitus, who has few doubts that the Augustan principate sounded the death knell of the Roman republic. Modern readers, however, tend to find the cynical Tacitean view, which is admittedly expressed in a powerful and engrossing narrative, more attractive if not more credible, the generally cheery optimism of Velleius looking strained and suspicious in comparison with the detached stance and pessimism of Tacitus. Putting aside all cynicism, however, and reading Velleius in context rather than in hindsight, one hears the voice of a man who not only takes his task with some seriousness but also believes with equal seriousness that the republic survives under Tiberius – that the Tiberian period represents the true fulfillment of the Augustan Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_4_040 Page Proof page 411 19.2.2007 12:35pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban

Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_4_040 Page Proof page 411 19.2.2007 12:35pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban CHAPTER FORTY The Imperial Republic of Velleius Paterculus Alain M. Gowing Judged to be historically superficial, marred by an overbearing urge to please the emperor Tiberius, and a vehicle for imperial propaganda, Velleius’ work has been given generally short shrift in or omitted from most discussions of Roman historical writing. This disdain, unfortunately reflected in the paucity of English translations of Velleius, has certainly been tempered in light of reevaluations of his work. Tony Woodman’s magisterial commentaries on Book 2, in particular, represented a watershed moment, both restoring a measure of dignity to Velleius and signaling the profound importance of this historian to our understanding of the Augustan and Tiberian periods. One particularly interesting aspect of the brief Historia (contained in two books yet covering the period from the founding of Rome down to 29 CE ) is in the manner it bridges and even masks the transition from republic to principate. In much the same way as the texts of Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus reflect the circumstances of their production, the value of Velleius lies in his place as one of the chief literary artefacts of the immediate post-Augustan era and thus a product of the emerging principate. His perspective is valuable, for it furnishes an antidote to the dark cynicism of the later Tacitus, who has few doubts that the Augustan principate sounded the death knell of the Roman republic. Modern readers, however, tend to find the cynical Tacitean view, which is admittedly expressed in a powerful and engrossing narrative, more attractive if not more credible, the generally cheery optimism of Velleius looking strained and suspicious in comparison with the detached stance and pessimism of Tacitus. Putting aside all cynicism, however, and reading Velleius in context rather than in hindsight, one hears the voice of a man who not only takes his task with some seriousness but also believes with equal seriousness that the republic survives under Tiberius – that the Tiberian period represents the true fulfillment of the Augustan Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_4_040 Page Proof 412 page 412 19.2.2007 12:35pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Alain M. Gowing promise to ‘‘restore the republic,’’ not the creation of a separate, distinct political entity we call the principate. I have argued this particular point elsewhere (Gowing 2005: esp. 34–48). In the present chapter, however, I suggest that one especially valuable way to read Velleius is as a sort of freshly conceived ‘‘exemplary’’ history, one that rethinks the function of exempla. (On exempla and exemplary history see Chaplin 2000; with special reference to the present argument, David 1998b.) The notion that the bulk of Velleius’ Historia is essentially prolegomenal to his account of the reign of Tiberius is hardly new. But I am less interested in why that should be the case than in how certain elements – specifically, noteworthy historical personalities – anticipate Velleius’ characterization of the emperor. For rather than aiming his narrative at a reader imagined to be in need of moral edification, as Livy had done, Velleius uses the standards and models of the republican past as a foil for his main character, the emperor Tiberius. Thus I agree with those who stress the ‘‘moralizing’’ qualities of Velleius’ Historia (e.g., André 1966; Hellegouarc’h 1964) over the overtly political (e.g., Lana 1952), though for different reasons. In consequence Tiberius emerges not so much an ‘‘emperor’’ in the modern (or even Tacitean) sense as merely an exceptional princeps, the best sort of leading citizen the republic has to offer and a man who embodies and perfects all the virtues collectively exhibited by the personalities of the past – the optimus princeps, as Velleius calls him (2.126.5, discussed below). Tiberius therefore supplants Augustus as the paradigm of the good emperor: the work concludes with a prayer entreating the gods to make Tiberius, not Augustus, the model for all future emperors (2.131.2). Enumerating the virtues of Tiberius is in consequence central to Velleius’ task. As is true of most such endeavors, especially in a Roman context, a man’s virtues must be measured against the standards of the past. This drive to evaluate character and achievement through comparison and contrast with the great personalities and events of the past is of course the cornerstone of the Roman ethical system, manifested in the exempla tradition. As has often been discussed, republican exempla took on renewed significance under Augustus. But what meaning do the great men of the republic have for Augustus’ successor, Tiberius? To begin where Velleius ends: with Tiberius. Tiberius embodies myriad virtues (fully catalogued and discussed by Kuntze 1985) that conspire to delineate the ideal citizen and leader – a princeps, in other words, but in its republican sense as a ‘‘leading man in the state’’ (for princeps and related terms see Gowing 2005: 40; Timpe 1987: 74; Kuntze 1985: 164–166). When Tiberius first enters the narrative, in the year 24 BCE when the future emperor was elected quaestor, Velleius accords him a complete character sketch, where we learn the essential qualities of the future emperor: welleducated and handsome, a commanding presence, naturally gifted – a man who in his youth gave one reason to hope he would turn out to be as great as he in fact is (note the present tense est), the very sight of whom betokened his future role as princeps (2.94.2): Tiberius Claudius Nero [was] reared on teachings imparted through heavenly instruction, a young man of breeding, good looks, and imposing stature, splendidly equipped with the best education and tremendous natural talent, who early on had given promise of being as great as he is and in appearance had revealed a princeps . . . Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_4_040 Page Proof page 413 19.2.2007 12:35pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban The Imperial Republic of Velleius Paterculus 413 As the passage goes on to state, in the course of discharging his earliest duties – overseeing the grain supply as quaestor, traveling to Armenia in 20 BCE to deal with problems there, and then dispatched by Augustus in 15 BCE to subdue the Raeti and Vindelici – he revealed himself to be a capable administrator, diplomat, and general (2.94.3–95.2). As Christ (2001, esp. 190–192) has argued, one accomplishment of the Historia Romana is to connect the two periods of Tiberius’ career, that under Augustus, prior to his becoming emperor, and that of his early principate – two periods often unjustly decoupled in modern assessments of Tiberius. As Tiberius ages, these qualities merely become more apparent, more mature. A brief reference to his involvement in the Pannonian War of 13–9 BCE confirms Tiberius’ status as a ‘‘great general’’ (tanti imperatoris, 2.96.3). Similarly in Germany, in the wake of the disastrous defeat of Marcus Lollius and following the death in 9 BCE of his brother Drusus, to whom the war had originally been entrusted, Tiberius is given full scope to display his virtus and fortuna (2.97.4; cf. 2.121.1). The combination is unusual in Velleius, but links Tiberius with Octavian, the future Augustus, who also enjoys both virtus and fortuna (2.74.4); the only other character so credited is Scipio Aemilianus (on whom see further below; cf. also Woodman 1977 on 2.97.4; Schmitzer 2000: 205–206 with notes; Lana 1952: 221–231; Kuntze 1985: 69–70; Christ 2001: 181; Hellegouarc’h 1964: 676–678). Even Tiberius’ retirement to Rhodes in 6 BCE , a potentially embarrassing moment (tactfully configured as a ‘‘more honorable leisure,’’ 2.99.4) and therefore given relatively short shrift, serves as an opportunity to stress the value of the soonto-be-emperor to the state (2.99.1–2): Shortly thereafter Tiberius Nero, having now completed two consulships and the same number of triumphs, made the equal of Augustus by sharing tribunician power, the most eminent of citizens save for one (and this, because he wished it), the greatest of leaders, distinguished in fame and fortune, and truly the second light and head of the republic, moved by some wondrous, incredible, and ineffable piety, had sought from him who was father-in-law as well as stepfather leave to rest from his continuous labors. The reason for this proposal was concealed, though soon detected: since Gaius Caesar had already donned the toga virilis as likewise Lucius shortly would, [Tiberius worried] that his own lustre would obscure the early careers of these rising young men. Apart from a continuing assertion of Tiberius’ military talent, this passage features a new side, his ability to be an emperor. Thus he is ‘‘equated’’ with Augustus, yet Velleius carefully insists that Tiberius himself was content to be ‘‘second best’’ (see Schmitzer 2000: 230–231). Despite that, the qualities ascribed to Tiberius in this passage set him quite apart from Augustus. For example, while Tiberius is identified as the ‘‘second light and head of the republic,’’ the only other characters to whom a similar phrase is applied are Pompey the Great and Julius Caesar (2.52.3), not Augustus. Pietas is almost exclusively a Tiberian quality, never, as one might expect, associated with Augustus; and Tiberius’ pietas is without exception extravagantly qualified: rectissima, incredibilis, inenarrabilis (2.105.3, 125.5, 99.2; for pietas in Velleius, see Woodman 1977 on 2.105.3; Kuntze 1985: 124–129). The same is true of maiestas, credited to Tiberius later in this passage (2.99.4) Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_4_040 Page Proof 414 page 414 19.2.2007 12:35pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Alain M. Gowing as well as on three other occasions (2.124.1, 126.2, 129.3), never to Augustus and rarely to anyone else. Tiberius returned from Rhodes in 2 CE and in the wake of the deaths of Lucius and Gaius Caesar was adopted two years later in 4 CE by Augustus, an event that ushered in a new era of hope, ultimately realized, for prosperity and stability (2.103.3–5). In that same year, 4 CE , Velleius began a nine-year period of service in the army under Tiberius. As general, Tiberius continues to garner praise for a litany of rare virtues, several peculiar to Tiberius alone – felicitas (only of Tiberius; see Kuntze 1985: 66–67), cura (2.106.3), prudentia (2.111.4 bis, a quality he shares with Pompey, on which see below), temperamentum (2.111.4, cf. 2.2.130.1, only of Tiberius), humanitas (2.114.1) – and yet he emerges a man who showed himself to be as great a general during war as he was a princeps in peace (2.113.1). For the most part these observations about Tiberius’ soldierly expertise begin to seem repetitive, but here too we encounter a quality that differentiates Tiberius, providentia, a word that appears on only two other occasions (2.66.5, 112.4; cf. Woodman 1977 on 2.115.5; Kuntze 1985: 77–82). With the death of Augustus in 14 CE (2.123), Tiberius’ political acumen comes to the fore. In the few remaining chapters Velleius sketches the general character of Tiberius’ reign down to the point at which the work concludes (29 CE ; for the organization of the account of Tiberius’ reign proper, and the concluding date, see Woodman 1977: 234 and on 2.126.1 respectively; cf. Elefante 1997 on 2.126.) For our purposes, the most significant moment comes in the panegyrical 2.126 summarizing the Tiberian period. I would draw particular attention to the last sentence: the emperor – not merely princeps, but the optimus princeps (implying that there are other principes, an important though seldom noted point) – leads by example: exemplo maior est (2.126.5). As Shipley renders it, Tiberius is ‘‘still greater in the example in which he sets,’’ but the phrase admits a slightly different interpretation as well: Tiberius is ‘‘greater than an exemplum.’’ In sum, he has surpassed all those who have come before. Woodman (1977 on 2.126.5) notes that the ‘‘leader being an example to the rest’’ is a common notion in ancient political thought (cf. Elefante 1997 on 2.126.5), but Velleius’ application of maior to Tiberius suggests that he is without precedent or equal (for optimus princeps, see Wirszubski 1968: 153–154). Considered collectively, Tiberius’ traits constitute an impressive if not wholly unprecedented list. It is instructive to observe that Tiberius possesses virtually all of the qualities identified by Litchfield 1914: 28 as integral to the Roman exempla tradition. Moreover, while Tiberius’ virtues may be largely generic, especially in an imperial context (and thus readily paralleled), within the text of Velleius itself Tiberius outstrips everyone else in the extent and number of his qualities and the nature of his achievements. It must further be borne in mind that Tiberius and the passages I have discussed occur in the final quarter or so of the second book, at the very end of the Historia. Prior to 2.94, when Tiberius enters the narrative, we will have encountered numerous luminaries from republican history. Velleius spends a considerable amount of time describing these individuals; many receive full-fledged introductions (Woodman 1977: 41). While no one individual ever matches Tiberius Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_4_040 Page Proof page 415 19.2.2007 12:35pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban The Imperial Republic of Velleius Paterculus 415 in all of his qualities, many display at least some of them. Here I focus on three representative paradigms: Scipio Aemilianus, Pompey the Great, and Cato the Younger. It should be noted that Velleius himself constantly thinks in terms of historical comparisons and pairs, inviting the reader to reflect on shared personality traits, particularly between father and son or between brothers, or simply between men in comparable positions (cf. 1.11.6–7, 2.2.1–2, 15.3–4, 3.1, 21.1, 29.1, 26.1, 35.1–2, 6.1); such comparative thinking informs how Velleius approaches his task (see Schmitzer 2000: 81–85). A key to the rationale behind such comparisons – and a key to interpreting the Historia Romana generally – is found in one of the several digressions in his work, on the nature of the arts. In this famous passage he observes the absolute necessity of aemulatio (‘‘emulation’’) to the fostering of ingenia (‘‘talent’’: 1.17.6–7; cf. Schmitzer 2000: 72–74; Alfonsi 1966). This encourages the reader to think comparatively as well, to assess one character in terms of another. Inevitably, therefore, we compare Tiberius, the ‘‘last’’ character of the work (and the character with whom the work literally concludes), with his antecedents. Augustus, of course, offers an obvious point of comparison, and in certain respects we are induced to think comparatively about this pair too. But Augustus is not necessarily the paradigm against whom we are to measure Tiberius. Rather, as I have suggested, each of the many republican personalities we encounter exhibits qualities that collectively constitute the ideal, the best princeps, ultimately instantiated in Tiberius (cf. Kuntze 1985: 40 and passim). Thus, to pursue one instance of a comparative exemplum, Scipio Aemilianus, the man who would destroy Carthage in 146 BCE , is one of the several characters who prefigure Tiberius, as is apparent from Velleius’ brief character sketch (1.12.3): P. Scipio Aemilianus, with respect to his virtues very much like his grandfather P. Africanus and his father L. Paulus, equipped with all the qualities suitable for both war and politics, the most eminent man of his time in terms of talent and learning, who neither did nor said nor felt anything at all in his life that was not praiseworthy. . . This Scipio is rendered still more distinctive by the insertion of a comparatively lengthy eulogy, where he is identified as having led what was ‘‘undoubtedly the most distinguished life, surpassed in renown by no man up until that time save by the life of his grandfather’’ (2.4.2–7; cf. Kuntze 1985: 40). He shares with Tiberius the distinction of being a man fit for both war and politics (cf. 2.113.1, cited above), but most significantly he is singled out as ‘‘the most eminent man of his time.’’ Velleius identifies only two other men as eminentissimus: Tiberius Gracchus pe`re (2.2.1) and the emperor Tiberius (2.99.1). And, of course, like Tiberius (at least in Velleius’ Historia), Scipio enjoyed an impeccable reputation as a general (1.12.4–6), sharing with only Tiberius and Augustus the distinction of possessing both virtus and fortuna (2.4.2, see above). Scipio was a relatively unproblematic character, with mostly positive associations; Pompey the Great was another matter (Woodman 1983 on 2.49.3). On the one hand, he was the arch-rival of Julius Caesar, a man ultimately configured as Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_4_040 Page Proof 416 page 416 19.2.2007 12:35pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Alain M. Gowing the failed champion of the republic (and thus by definition an opponent of the principate), on the other, indisputably one of Rome’s greatest generals, even accorded a place among the summi viri in the Forum of Augustus. Space precludes quoting Velleius’ long introduction (2.29), but his respect is considerable. Pompey clearly has a good deal in common with Tiberius: he possesses magnitudo (here, and also at 2.48.2), a rare quality attributed only to Augustus (2.36.1) and Tiberius (2.120.1). Tiberius’ magnitudo, however, assumes a unique function, for it establishes the standard by which the emperor ‘‘measures’’ his accomplishments (2.120.1); he becomes, in effect, the only suitable model for himself, surpassing in ‘‘greatness’’ even those few who before him possessed magnitudo. Pompey is similarly credited with prudentia, another quality used almost exclusively of Tiberius, as we have seen (2.111.4 [bis], discussed above; 2.129.1). Like Scipio before him and Tiberius after him, he is equally at home in war and in peace (cf. Scipio at 1.12.3, Tiberius at 2.113.1). ‘‘Moderation’’ (modestissimus) is a quality shared by the republican general and the emperor (singularis moderatio, 2.122.1 [the only occurrence of this word: see Woodman ad loc.]; 2.94.3, 126.3); both are good-looking (cf. 2.94.2, quoted above); both capable generals. Pompey, in fact, operates as a sort of proto-princeps when entrusted in 67 BCE with an authority that looks distinctly imperial (2.31.3). Significantly, Velleius uses this occasion to ruminate on the potential drawbacks of ‘‘one-man rule,’’ suggesting that the republic can accommodate such a circumstance, provided the right man is in place (further discussion in Gowing 2005: 37–38). Pompey, it turns out, is not that man, as Quintus Catulus shortly remarks in a reported speech delivered in opposition to Pompey’s command (2.32.1). Thus while Pompey does have certain qualities in common with Tiberius, he is obviously the lesser man. This perhaps explains why Velleius’ introduction of Pompey features many qualities attributed exclusively to Pompey: he possesses innocentia and sanctitas, is tenax amicitiae and exorabilis. Some apparent similarities are tweaked in favor of Tiberius: Pompey receives power rather than takes it (2.29.3), which anticipates a similar statement made about Tiberius (‘‘to him alone did it befall to refuse the principate longer than others fought by arms to seize it’’: 2.124.1–2) – the difference is that Tiberius is never said to have ‘‘coveted’’ that power, whereas Pompey does (2.29.3). A salient characteristic of Tiberius is equality with other citizens (2.124.2); Pompey, by contrast, is ‘‘greater than a citizen’’ (2.31.1), a man who cannot abide living in a society of equals (2.29.4), the Tiberian ideal (2.126.2, 4). This, Velleius implies, was Pompey’s undoing and why he really did not represent the interests of the republic after all (2.48.4). A still more problematic character, and another opponent of Julius Caesar as well as the man with whom the republican opposition under the principate would most closely identify, is Cato Uticensis. Like Pompey, he receives a formal introduction (2.35.1–4), the most striking aspect of which is Velleius’ emphasis on Cato’s virtus. While many characters in Velleius’ Historia display virtus, its appearance three times in this brief section is dramatic, especially in light of the unusual assertion that Cato was ‘‘a man most like Virtue itself’’ (2.35.2). He embodies virtus, the only apparent instance of its personification in the text (cf., however, 1.12.3). Tellingly, Velleius Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_4_040 Page Proof page 417 19.2.2007 12:35pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban The Imperial Republic of Velleius Paterculus 417 ascribes to Cato both virtus and fortuna, a collocation recurring in descriptions of Tiberius (2.97.4, 2.121.1) yet, as we have already had occasion to observe, exceptionally rare in those of other individuals, appearing most notably in connection with Octavian, the future Augustus. And as Tiberius was perceived to have done (2.124.1), Cato here saves the republic from ruina. Yet as was true of Pompey, Velleius does locate a flaw in Cato, the quality that ultimately if only implicitly points to his political failure. As war breaks out between Caesar and Pompey in 48 BCE , Cato, as consul, expresses his opinion that they should fight to the death rather than give in to one-man rule (2.49.3). Velleius does not miss the chance to editorialize: ‘‘An old-fashioned, serious man would praise the faction of Pompey more, the wise man would follow that of Caesar, and would recognize that the former carried with it greater glory, the latter greater fear,’’ 2.49.3). Clearly, Cato lacks prudentia – a quality Tiberius has in abundance as, ironically, did Cato’s choice, Pompey. * Even if he had wanted to, Velleius could not reject outright the value system of the republic. In this respect it is essential to recognize that Velleius shares with his coeval Valerius Maximus a heightened interest in republican exempla. The work of both writers attests a deep desire to reconcile the present with the past, to suggest unbroken connections rather than disengagement. But writing history – especially a history that encompassed a degree of contemporary history – rendered Velleius’ task more problematic than that of Valerius, who for the most part eschews reference to the present. (For further discussion and comparison of the two, see Gowing 2005: ch. 2; see also André 1966, esp. 299, 308–309 and Jacquemin 1998.) Velleius had to find a means to accommodate the republican value system while at the same time formulate a new way to describe the virtues of a man who, despite being inclined to self-deprecation, was in an unparalleled position of power. The Tiberian period represented for Velleius not so much the perfection of a political system as the perfection of the princeps. Velleius’ Historia in effect narrates the genesis, therefore, not of the principate but of the princeps in a republic imagined to be fully restored. In the service of this ‘‘imperial republic’’ he recuperates from the past essentially positive qualities embodied in its most notable personalities, often glossing over or mitigating the negative. In the end, the Historia becomes proof of its own proposition that exempla do not stop where they begin, but rather may wander freely on a road they build for themselves (2.3.4). If Velleius would be loathe to concede that Tiberius had now left the republic behind in favor of something new called the principate, his use of exempla nevertheless reveals just how much the political and cultural landscape had been altered. In his directorial hands, exempla cease to furnish paradigms in imitation of which the reader will become a good citizen of the republic, and merely substantiate the unparalleled greatness of the emperor, the princeps. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_4_040 Page Proof 418 page 418 19.2.2007 12:35pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Alain M. Gowing FURTHER READING In large part my approach in this chapter is in line with the ‘‘narrative strategy’’ persuasively explored by Schmitzer, who demonstrates that Velleius’ work was oriented from the first line on towards the reign of Tiberius in the year 30 (2000: 287; cf. Elefante 1997: 36). He focuses less, however, on the force of personality as a factor in this program. See also Lana 1952: 231–241, explaining Velleius’ concentration on various principes from the republic as an attempt to ‘‘project the principate of Tiberius into a bygone era.’’ In many important respects Kuntze 1985 anticipates how I read Velleius. Modern scholarship on Velleius is comparatively limited in scope. By far the most important contributions are the magisterial commentaries of Woodman 1977 and 1983; while these will be of use chiefly to those reading Velleius in Latin, the Introduction (1977: 3–56) covers all of the basic textual, biographical, and literary issues associated with Velleius. Similarly, readers will find a good general introduction in English in Woodman 1975a and Sumner 1970. Mention should also be made of the edition of Elefante 1997, which includes an introduction to and commentary on Velleius in Italian that are of high quality and reflect the many advances in the study of Velleius over the previous three decades (see the important review of Potter 1997). The treatment by Duff and Duff 1964: 67–81, though dated, is still worth reading. Apart from Lana 1952 (in Italian), a study that in many respects set the stage for subsequent work on Velleius, the most important book-length discussions are in German, Kuntze 1985 and especially Schmitzer 2000. For those who read German, the latter is perhaps the best overall study of Velleius currently available. A thorough bibliography of the scholarship on Velleius prior to 1984 may be found in Hellegouarc’h 1984; see also the substantial bibliography of Schmitzer 2000. The chief English translations remain those of Shipley 1924 and Watson 1852. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 582 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography NB: The bibliography does not include works listed in the Abbreviations. Aarne, A. and Thompson, S. 1961. The Types of the Folktale: A Classification and Bibliography, 2nd edition. Helsinki. Aalders, G. J. D. 1978. Die Meroper des Theopomp. Historia 27: 317–327. Accame, S. 1964. L’ispirazione della Musa e gli alberi della critica storica nell’età arcaica. RFIC 92: 129–156, 257–287 (¼ Scritti minori. II. Rome, 1990. 629–673). Adams, C. and Laurence, R. (eds.). 2001. Travel and Geography in the Roman Empire. London and New York. Adams, J. N. 1973. The vocabulary of the speeches in Tacitus’ historical works. BICS 20: 124–144. Adcock, F. E. 1952. A note on Res gestae Divi Augusti, 34.3. JRS 42: 10–12. Adcock, F. E. 1956. Caesar as Man of Letters. Cambridge. Adler, W. 1989. Time Immemorial: Archaic History and its Sources in Christian Chronography from Julius Africanus to George Syncellus. Washington, DC. Adler, W. 1992. Eusebius’ chronicle and its legacy. In H. Attridge and G. Hata (eds.), Eusebius, Christianity and Judaism. Leiden. 467–491. Adler, W. and Tuffin, P. 2002. The Chronology of George Synkellos: A Byzantine Chronicle of Universal History from the Creation. Oxford. Ager, S. 1996. Interstate Arbitrations in the Greek World, 337–90 BC . Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Albertus, J. 1908. Die PAPAK LHTIKOI in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Strasbourg. Alcock, S. E., Cherry, J. F., and Elsner, J. (eds.). 2001. Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece. New York and Oxford. Alessandrı̀, S. 1994. Le ambascierie ad Alessandro del 323 a.C. Il problema storiografico. In S. Alessandrı̀ (ed.), Historiē. Studi offerti dagli allievi a Giuseppe Nenci. Galatina. 21–36. Alexander, M. 1993. How many Roman senators were ever prosecuted? The evidence from the late republic. Phoenix 47: 238–255. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 583 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 583 Alföldi, A. 1965. Early Rome and the Latins. Ann Arbor. Alföldy, G. 1995. Eine Bauinschrift aus dem Colosseum. ZPE 109: 195–226. Alfonsi, L. 1966. La dottrina dell’ ‘‘aemulatio’’ in Velleio Patercolo. Aevum 40: 375–378. Allen, P. 1981. Evagrius Scholasticus: The Church Historian. Louvain. Alonso-Núñez, J. M. 1983. Die Abfolge der Weltreiche bei Polybios und Dionysios von Halikarnassos. Historia 32: 411–426. Alonso-Núñez, J. M. 1987. An Augustan world history: The Historiae Philippicae of Pompeius Trogus. G&R 34: 56–72. Alonso-Núñez, J. M. 1990. The emergence of universal historiography from the 4th to the 2nd centuries BC . In Verdin et al. 1990: 173–192. Alonso-Núñez, J. M. 2002. The Idea of Universal History in Greece: From Herodotus to the Age of Augustus. Amsterdam. Ambaglio, D. 1980. L’opera storiografica di Ellanico di Lesbo. Ricerche di Storiografia antica 2: 59–102. Pisa. Ambaglio, D. 1995. La Biblioteca storica di Diodoro Siculo: problemi e metodo. Como. Amidon, P. R. 1997. The Church History of Rufinus of Aquileia Books 10 and 11. Oxford. Amory, P. 1997. People and Identity in Ostrogothic Italy 489–554. Cambridge. Anderson, J. K. 1974. Xenophon. London and New York. Anderson, W. 1993. Barbarian Play: Plautus’ Roman Comedy. Toronto. André, J.-M. 1966. L’otium chez Valère-Maxime et Velleius Paterculus. REL 43: 294–315. Anson, E. M. 1980. Discrimination against Eumenes of Cardia. AncSoc 3: 55–59. Anson, E. M. 2004. Eumenes of Cardia: A Greek among Macedonians. Boston and Leiden. Antonetti, C. 1990. Les étoliens: Image et religion. Paris. Appleby, J., Hunt, L., and Jacob, M. (eds.). 1994. Telling the Truth about History. New York and London. Arafat, K. W. 1996. Pausanias’ Greece: Ancient Artists and Roman Rulers. Cambridge. Argoud, G. and Guillaumin, J. Y. (eds.). 1998. Sciences exactes et sciences appliquées à Alexandrie. Actes du coll. intern. Saint Etienne 6–8 juin 1996. Saint Etienne. Armayor, O. K. 1985. Herodotus’ Autopsy of the Fayoum: Lake Moeris and the Labyrinth of Egypt. Amsterdam. Arnaud-Lindet, M.-P. 1994. Festus: Abrégé des hauts faits du peuple romain. Paris. Ash, R. 1999a. Ordering Anarchy: Armies and Leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. London and Ann Arbor. Ash, R. 1999b. An exemplary conflict: Tacitus’ Parthian battle narrative (Annals 6.34–35). Phoenix 53: 114–135. Ash, R. 2002. Epic encounters? Ancient historical battle narrative and the epic tradition. In Levene and Nelis 2002: 253–272. Asheri, D. 2004. Simonide, Achille e Pausania figlio di Cleombroto. QUCC 77: 67–73. Assmann, J. 2002. The Mind of Egypt: History and Meaning in the Time of the Pharaohs. New York. Trans. from 1996 German edition. Atkinson, J. E. 1980. A Commentary on Q. Curtius Rufus’ Historiae Alexandri Magni Books 3 and 4. Amsterdam. Atkinson, J. E. 1994. A Commentary on Q. Curtius Rufus’ Historiae Alexandri Magni Books 5 to 7.2. Amsterdam. Atkinson, J. E. 1998–2000. Curzio Rufo: Storie di Alessandro Magno. 2 vols. Turin. Attridge, H. 1984a. ‘‘Historiography’’ and ‘‘Josephus and his Works.’’ In M. E. Stone (ed.), Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period: Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Qumran Sectarian Writings, Philo, Josephus. Assen and Philadelphia. 157–232. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 584 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 584 Bibliography Attridge, H. 1984b. Josephus and his works. In M. E. Stone (ed.), Jewish Writings of the Second Temple Period: Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Qumran Sectarian Writings, Philo, Josephus. Assen and Philadelphia. 185–232. Attridge, H. 1986. Jewish historiography. In R. A. Kraft and G. W. E. Nickelsburg (eds.), Early Judaism and its Modern Interpreters. Philadelphia and Atlanta. 311–343. Aujac, G. 2001. Eratosthène de Cyrène, le pionnier de la géographie: Sa mesure de la circonférence terrestre. Paris. Aune, D. 1987. The New Testament in its Literary Environment. Philadelphia. Avenarius, G. 1956. Lukians Schrift zur Geschichtsschreibung. Meisenheim am Glan. Avery, H. 1979. A poetic word in Herodotus. Hermes 107: 1–9. Aymard, A. 1938. Les premiers rapports de Rome et de la confédération achaienne (198–189 avant J.C.). Bordeaux. Bäbler, B. and Nesselrath, H.-G. (eds.). 2001. Die Welt des Sokrates von Konstantinopel. Munich and Leipzig. Badian, E. 1964. Studies in Greek and Roman History. Oxford. Badian, E. 1965. The date of Clitarchus. PACA 8: 5–11. Badian, E. 1966. The early historians. In T. A. Dorey (ed.), Latin Historians. London and New York. 1–38. Badian, E. 1972. Tiberius Gracchus and the beginning of the Roman revolution. ANRW I.1: 668–731. Badian, E. 1975. Nearchus the Cretan. YCS 24: 147–170. Badian, E. 1990. Thucydides and the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War: A historian’s brief. In From Plataea to Potidaea: Studies in the History and Historiography of the Pentecontaetia. Baltimore and London. 1993. 125–162, 223–236. Badian, E. 1992. Thucydides on rendering speeches. Athenaeum 80: 187–190. Badian, E. 1993. Livy and Augustus. In Schuller 1993: 9–38. Badian, E. 2003. Plutarch’s unconfessed skill: The biographer as a critical historian. In T. Hantos (ed.), Laurea internationalis. Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken. Stuttgart. 26–44. Badian, E. 2004. Xenophon the Athenian. In Tuplin 2004: 33–53. Bagnall, R. 1997. Decolonizing Ptolemaic Egypt. In Cartledge et al. 1997: 225–241. Baker, A. R. H. 1992. Period and Place: Research Methods in Historical Geography. Cambridge. Baker, A. R. H. 2003. Geography and History: Bridging the Divide. Cambridge. Bakker, E. J. 2002. The making of history: Herodotus’ historiēs apodexis. In Bakker et al. 2002: 3–32. Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees H. (eds.). 2002. Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne. Baldini, A. 1984. Ricerche sulla Storia di Eunapio di Sardi. Bologna. Baldini, A. 2004. Ricerche di tarda storiografia (da Olimpiodoro di Tebe). Bologna. Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1971. Dionysius on Romulus: A political pamphlet? JRS 61: 18–27. Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1979. Romans and Aliens. London and Chapel Hill. Banaji, J. 2001. Agrarian Change in Late Antiquity: Gold, Labour, and Aristocratic Dominance. Oxford. Banchich, T. 2000. Epitome de Caesaribus: A Booklet About the Style of Life and the Manners of the Imperatores. Trans. T. Banchich. Canisius College Translated Texts. Buffalo, NY. Banchich, T. and Meka, J. 2001. Festus: Breviarium. Trans. T. Banchich and J. Meka. Canisius College Translated Texts. Buffalo, NY. Baratin, M. and Jacob, C. (eds.). 1996. Le pouvoir des bibliothèques: La mémoire des livres en Occident. Paris. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 585 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 585 Barber, E. L. 1935. The Historian Ephorus. Cambridge. Barchiesi, A. 1997. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Barchiesi, A. 2001. The crossing. In S. J. Harrison (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature. Oxford. 142–163. Barclay, J. 1996. Jews in the Mediterranean Diaspora from Alexander to Trajan (323 BCE –117 C E ). Edinburgh and Berkeley. Bar-Kochva, B. 1996. Pseudo-Hecataeus, On the Jews: Legitimizing the Jewish Diaspora. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Bardon, H. 1961–1965. Quinte-Curce: Histoires. 2 vols. Paris. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. 1997. Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford. Barnes, T. D. 1970. The lost Kaisergeschichte and the Latin historical tradition. Bonner Historia Augusta Colloquium 1968/1969. 13–43. Barnes, T. D. 1984. The composition of Cassius Dio’s Roman history. Phoenix 38: 240–255. Barnes, T. D. 1998. Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality. Ithaca and London. Barnes, T. D. 2004. Review of Paschoud 2001. CR 54: 120–124. Barnes, T. D. 2005. The sack of the Temple in Josephus and Tacitus. In Edmondson et al. 2005: 129–144. Barratt, C. 1932. The chronology of the eponymous archons of Boeotia. JHS 52: 72–115. Barthes, R. 1970. Historical discourse. In M. Lane (ed.), Introduction to Structuralism. New York. 145–155. Trans. by P. Wexler of ‘‘Le discours de l’histoire.’’ Social Science Information 6 (1967): 65–75. Barthes, R. 1974. An introduction to the structural study of narrative. NLH 6: 237–272. Trans. by L. Duisit of ‘‘Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits.’’ Communications 8 (1966): 1–27. Bartolucci, A. 1960. I ‘‘nomina culta’’ dei plebei urbani in Ammiano. SCO 9: 147–160. Bartsch, S. 1994. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Barwick, K. 1928. Die Gliederung der narratio in der rhetorischen Theorie und ihre Bedeutung für die Geschichte des antiken Romans. Hermes 63: 261–287. Batstone, W. W. 1988. The antithesis of virtue: Sallust’s synkrisis and the crisis of the late republic. ClAnt 7: 1–29. Batstone, W. W. 1990. Intellectual content and mimesis in Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. In J. W. Allison (ed.), Conflict, Antithesis and the Ancient Historian. Columbus, Ohio. 112–132. Batstone, W. W. and Damon, C. 2006. Caesar’s Civil War: A Literary Introduction. Oxford. Baudy, G. 1996. Der Thesauros des Rhampsinit. Ein religionswissenschaftlicher Deutungsversuch zu Herodot 2, 121–123. In Lenaika: Festschrift . . . C. W. Müller. Stuttgart and Leipzig. 1–20. Baynham, E. 1998. Alexander the Great: The Unique History of Quintus Curtius. Ann Arbor. Baynham, E. 2003. The ancient evidence for Alexander the Great. In J. Roisman (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Alexander the Great. Leiden and Boston. 3–29. Baynham, E. and Yardley, J. Forthcoming. A Translation and Commentary to the Metz Epitome and the Liber de Morte. Oxford. Beard, M. 2003. The triumph of the absurd: Roman street theatre. In C. Edwards and G. Woolf (eds.), Cosmopolis. Cambridge. 21–43. Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. 1998. Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 586 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 586 Bibliography Bearzot, C. 2002. Filisto di Siracusa. In Vattuone 2002d: 91–136. Beatrice, P. F. 2001. De Rufin à Cassiodore: La réception des Histoires ecclésiastiques grecques dans l’Occident latin. In Pouderon and Duval 2001: 237–257. Beck, H. 2003. ‘‘Den Ruhm nicht teilen wollen’’: Fabius Pictor und die Anfänge des römischen Nobilitätsdiskurses. In Eigler et al. 2003: 72–92. Beetham, F. and Stewart, S. 1998. The battle of Mons Graupius – somewhere in Caledonia. Omnibus 36: 24–26. Begbie, C. 1967. The Epitome of Livy. CQ n.s. 17: 332–338. Begg, C. 2005. Judean Antiquities 5–7. Flavius Josephus: Translation and Commentary, Vol. 4. Leiden. Begg, C. and Spilsbury, P. 2005. Judean Antiquities 8–10. Flavius Josephus: Translation and Commentary, Vol. 5. Leiden. Belke, K. 2000. Byzanz als Raum: Zu Methoden und Inhalten der historischen Geographie des östlichen Mittelmeerraumes. Vienna. Bell, A. 1987. Josephus and Pseudo-Hegesippus. In L. Feldman and G. Hata (eds.), Josephus, Judaism, and Christianity. Detroit. 349–361. Bell, B. 1995. The contribution of Julius Caesar to the vocabulary of ethnography. Latomus 54: 753–767. Bellemore, J. 1984. Nicolaus of Damascus: Life of Augustus. Bristol. Bentley, M. (ed.). 1997. Companion to Historiography. London and New York. Benvéniste, E. 1948. Noms d’action et noms d’agents. Paris. Bercovitch, S. (ed.). 1995. The Cambridge History of American Literature, Volume 2: Prose Writing, 1820–1865. Cambridge. Berkhofer, R. 1995. Beyond the Great Story: History as Text and Discourse. Cambridge, Mass. Bertelli, L. 2001. Hecataeus: From genealogy to historiography. In Luraghi 2001c: 67–94. Berthier, A. 1976. La géographie du Bellum Iugurthinum. Annales Latini Montium Arvenorum 3: 3–10. Berve, H. 1926. Das Alexanderreich auf prosopographischer Grundlage. 2 vols. Munich. Bianchetti, S. 2002. Eutimene e Pitia di Massalia: geografia e storiografia. In Vattuone 2002d: 439–485. Bickerman, E. 1976–1986. Studies in Jewish and Christian History. 3 vols. Leiden. Bickerman, E. 1988. The Jews in the Greek Age. Cambridge, Mass. Bicknell, P. 1990. Thucydides, 1.22: A provocation. AC 59: 172–178. Biersack, A. (ed.). 1991. Clio in Oceania. Washington, DC. Bigwood, J. M. 1976. Ctesias’ account of the revolt of Inaros. Phoenix 30: 1–25. Bigwood, J. M. 1978. Ctesias as historian of the Persian wars. Phoenix 32: 19–41. Bigwood, J. M. 1983. The ancient accounts of the battle of Cunaxa. AJPh 104: 340–357. Bilde, P. 1988. Flavius Josephus Between Jerusalem and Rome: His Life, His Works and their Importance. Sheffield. Bing, P. 1988. The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. Göttingen. Biraschi, A. M. 1984. Strabone e la difesa di Omero nei Prolegomena. In Prontera 1984b: 127–153. Biraschi, A. M., Desideri, P., Roda, S., and Zecchini, G. (eds.). 2003. L’uso dei documenti nella storiografia antica. Atti del convegno, Gubbio 22–24 maggio 2001. Naples. Bird, H. 1984. Sextus Aurelius Victor: A Historiographical Study. Liverpool. Bird, H. 1993. Eutropius: Breviarium. Liverpool. Bird, H. 1994. Aurelius Victor: De Caesaribus. Liverpool. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 587 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 587 Birley, A. R. 1976. The date of Mons Graupius. LCM 1: 11–14. Birley, A. R. 1994. Hadrian’s farewell to life. Laverna 5: 176–205. Birley, A. R. 1997. Hadrian: The restless emperor. London and New York. Birley, A. R. 2003. The ‘‘Historia Augusta’’ and pagan historiography. In Marasco 2003b: 127–149. Blasius, A. and Schipper, B. (eds.). 2002. Apokalyptik und Ägypten. Leuven. Bleckmann, B. 1992. Die Reichskrise des III Jahrhunderts in der spatantiken und byzantinischen Geschichtsschreibung. Munich. Bleicken, J. 1962. Der politische Standpunkt Dios gegenüber der Monarchie. Hermes 90: 444–467. Bloch, H. 1940. Studies in historical literature of the fourth century BC . HSCPh Supp. 1: 303–376. Bloch, R. S. 2002. Antike Vorstellungen vom Judentum. Historia Einzelschriften 160. Stuttgart. Blockley, R. C. 1985. The History of Menander the Guardsman. Leeds. Blockley, R. C. 1998. Ammianus and Cicero: The epilogue of the History as a literary statement. Phoenix 52: 305–314. Blockley, R. C. 1999. Ammianus, the Romans and Constantius II: Res gestae XIV.6 and XVI.10. Florilegium 16: 1–15. Blockley, R. C. 2003. The development of Greek historiography: Priscus, Malchus, Candidus. In Marasco 2003b: 289–316. Bloomer, W. 1992. Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. Chapel Hill and London. Boedeker, D. (ed.) 1987. Herodotus and the Invention of History. Arethusa special volume 20. Boedeker, D. 1988. Protesilaos and the end of Herodotus’ Histories. ClAnt 7: 30–48. Boedeker, D. 1995. Simonides on Platea: Narrative, elegy, mythodic history. ZPE 107: 217–229. Boedeker, D. 1996. Heroic historiography: Simonides and Herodotus on Plataea. Arethusa 29: 223–242 (¼ Boedeker and Sider 2001: 120–134). Boedeker, D. 2000. Herodotus’ genre(s). In Depew and Obbink 2000: 97–114. Boedeker, D. 2002. Epic heritage and mythical patterns in Herodotus. In Bakker et al. 2002: 97–116. Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds). 2001. The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire. New York and Oxford. Boissevain, U. Ph. (ed.) 1885–1931. Cassii Dionis Cocceiani historiarum Romanarum quae supersunt. 5 vols. Vol. IV, Index Historicus, comp. H. Smilda; Vol. V, Index Graecitatis, comp. W. Nawijn. Berlin. Bommeljé, L. S. 1999. Collected Essays on Aetolia and Aetolian History, Antiquities, and Topography. Amsterdam. Bommeljé, L. S. et al. (eds.) 1987. Aetolia and the Aetolians. Utrecht. Bonfante, L. 2003. Etruscan Dress, 2nd edition. Baltimore. Borca, F. 1996. Adversus ipsam rerum naturam: Note on Tacitus, Agricola 33. Britannia 27: 337–340. Borza, E. N. 1983. The symposium at Alexander’s court. Ancient Macedonia 3: 45–55. Borzsák, S. P. 1968. Cornelius Tacitus, Der Geschichtsschreiber. RE Suppl. XI: 373–512 (also issued separately). Bosworth, A. B. 1970. Aristotle and Callisthenes. Historia 19: 407–413. Bosworth, A. B. 1971. The death of Alexander the Great: Rumors and propaganda. CQ 21: 112–136. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 588 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 588 Bibliography Bosworth, A. B. 1972a. Arrian’s literary development. CQ 22: 163–185. Bosworth, A. B. 1972b. Asinius Pollio and Augustus. Historia 21: 441–473. Bosworth, A. B. 1976. Arrian and the Alexander Vulgate. In Alexandre le Grand: Image et réalité. Entretiens Hardt XXII; Vandoeuvres-Genève. 1–33. Bosworth, A. B. 1980. Alexander and the Iranians. JHS 100: 1–21. Bosworth, A. B. 1987. Nearchus in Susiana. In Zu Alexander der Grösse: Festschrift . . . G. Wirth. Amsterdam. I.541–566. Bosworth, A. B. 1988. From Arrian to Alexander: Studies in Historical Interpretation. Oxford. Bosworth, A. B. 1990. Plutarch, Callisthenes and the Peace of Callias. JHS 110: 1–13. Bosworth, A. B. 1992. History and artifice in Plutarch’s Eumenes. In P. A. Stadter (ed.), Plutarch and the Historical Tradition. London and New York. 56–89. Bosworth, A. B. 1996. Alexander and the East: The Tragedy of Triumph. Oxford. Bosworth, A. B. 2000a. Ptolemy and the will of Alexander. In A. B. Bosworth and E. J. Baynham (eds.), Alexander the Great in Fact and Fiction. Oxford. 207–241. Bosworth, A. B. 2000b. The historical context of Thucydides’ funeral oration. JHS 120: 1–16. Bosworth, A. B. 2003. Plus ça change: Ancient historians and their sources. ClAnt 22: 167–197. Bosworth, A. B. 2004. Mountain and molehill? Cornelius Tacitus and Quintus Curtius. CQ 54: 551–567. Bowersock, G. W. 1965a. Augustus and the Greek World. Oxford. Bowersock, G. W. 1965b. Review of Millar 1964. Gnomon 37: 469–474. Bowersock, G. W. 1989. Herodotus, Alexander, and Rome. The American Scholar 58: 407–414 ¼ Bowersock 1994: 345–352. Bowersock, G. W. 1994. Studies on the Eastern Roman Empire. Goldbach. Bowersock, G. W. 2001. Recapturing the past in late antiquity. Mediterraneo Antico 4: 1–15. Bowersock, G. W., Brown, P., and Grabar, O. (eds.). 1999. Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Bowie, A. M. 1997. Tragic filters for history: Euripides’ Supplices and Sophocles’ Philoctetes. In Pelling 1997c: 39–62. Bowie, E. L. 1986. Early Greek elegy, symposium, and public festival. JHS 106: 13–35. Bowie, E. L. 2001. Ancestors of historiography in early Greek elegiac and iambic poetry. In Luraghi 2001c: 45–66. Braccesi, L. 1978. Problemi di archaiologhia: Sicani, Siculi, Elimi. Bologna. Bradley, A. C. 1905. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Macbeth. London and New York. Bradley, K. R. 1991. The imperial ideal in Suetonius’ ‘‘Caesars.’’ ANRW II.33.5: 3701–3732. Branch, T. 1988. Parting the Waters: America in the King Years 1954–63. New York. Branch, T. 1998. Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963–65. New York. Brandstaeter, F. A. 1844. Die Geschichten des ätolischen Landes, Volkes und Bundes, nebst einer historiographischen Abhandlung über Polybios. Berlin. Braun, T. 2004. Xenophon’s dangerous liaisons. In Lane Fox 2004b: 97–130. Braund, D. 1993. Dionysiac tragedy in Plutarch’s Crassus. CQ 43: 468–474. Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.). 2003. Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. Studies . . . T. P. Wiseman. Exeter. Braund, S. M. 1996. The Roman Satirists and their Masks. Bristol. Braund, S. M. and Gill, C. (eds.). 1997. The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 589 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 589 Bravo, B. 2006. Felix Jacoby, Arnaldo Momigliano e l’erudizione antica. In C. Ampolo (ed.), Atti del Primo Seminario Arnaldo Momigliano. Pisa. 227–258. Breebaart, A. B. 1966. Weltgeschichte als Thema der antiken Geschichtsschreibung. Acta Historiae Neerlandica 1: 1–21. Breglia Pulcia Doria, L. 1996. Eforo: l’ottica cumana di uno storico universale. In Carlier 1996: 41–55. Breitenbach, H. R. 1950. Historiographische Anschauungsformen Xenophons. Freiburg. Briant, P. 1989. Table du roi, tribut et redistribution chez les Achéménides. In P. Briant and C. Herrenschmidt (eds.), Le Tribut dans l’Empire perse. Paris. 35–44. Briant, P. 1996. Histoire de l’Empire perse. Paris. Briessmann, A. 1955. Tacitus und das flavische Geschichtsbild. Wiesbaden. Brillante, C. 1990. History and the historical interpretation of myth. In L. Edmonds (ed.), Approaches to Greek Myth. Baltimore. 91–138. Bringmann, K. 1977. Weltherrschaft und innere Krise Roms im Spiegel der Geschichtsschreibung des zweiten und ersten Jahrhunderts v.Chr. A&A 23: 28–49. Briscoe, J. 1981. A Commentary on Livy Books XXXIV to XXXVII. Oxford. Briscoe, J. (ed.). 1998. Valeri Maximi Facta et Dicta Memorabilia. 2 vols. Stuttgart and Leipzig. Brock, R. 1995. Versions, ‘‘inversions’’ and evasions: Classical historiography and the ‘‘published’’ speech. PLLS 8: 209–224. Brodersen, K. 1988. Appian und Arrian. Klio 70: 461–467. Brodersen, K. 1990. Die Buchtitelverzeichnisse, das Lexicon peri synt ajevB und der Aufbau von Appians Werk. WS 103: 49–55. Brodersen, K. 1993. Appian und sein Werk. ANRW II.34.1: 339–363. Brodersen, K. 1994. Pomponius Mela De chorographia – Kreuzfahrt durch die Alte Welt. Darmstadt. Brodersen, K. 2001a. The presentation of geographical knowledge for travel and transport in the Roman world: Itineraria non tantum adnotata sed etiam picta. In Adams and Laurence 2001: 7–21. Brodersen, K. 2001b. Neue Entdeckungen zu antiken Karten. Gymnasium 108: 137–148. Brodersen, K. 2003a. Terra Cognita: Studien zur römischen Raumauffassung, 2nd edition. Hildesheim and New York. Brodersen, K. 2003b. Die Tabula Peutingeriana: Gehalt und Gestalt einer ‘‘alten Karte’’ und ihre antiken Vorlagen. In D. Unverhau (ed.), Geschichtsdeutung auf alten Karten: Archäologie und Geschichte. Wiesbaden. 289–297. Brodersen, K. 2004. Mapping (in) the ancient world: Review article. JRS 94: 183–190. Brodka, D. 2004. Die Geschichtsphilosopie in der spätantiken Historiographie. Studien zu Prokop von Kaisareia, Agathias von Myrina und Theophylaktos Simokattes. Bern. Broshi, M. 1982. The credibility of Josephus. In G. Vermes and J. Neusner (eds.), Essays in Honor of Yigael Yadin. Totowa, NJ, and New York. 379–384. Brosius, M. (ed.). 2000. The Persian Empire from Cyrus II to Artaxerxes. Lactor 16. London. Brown, P. 1971. The World of Late Antiquity. New York and London. Brown, T. S. 1949a. Onesicritus: A Study in Hellenistic Historiography. Berkeley. Brown, T. S. 1949b. Callisthenes and Alexander. AJPh 70: 225–248. Brown, T. S. 1950. Clitarchus. AJPh 71: 134–155. Brown, T. S. 1958. Timaeus of Tauromenium. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Brown, T. S. 1973. The Greek Historians. Lexington, Mass. Bruce, I. A. F. 1967. An Historical Commentary on the ‘‘Hellenica Oxyrhynchia.’’ Cambridge. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 590 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 590 Bibliography Bruce, I. A. F. 1970. Theopompus and classical Greek historiography. H&T 9: 86–109. Bruce, I. A. F. 1987. Theopompus, Lysander and the Spartan empire. AHB 1: 1–5. Bruns, I. 1898. Die Persönlichkeit in der Geschichtsschreibung der Alten. Berlin. Brunt, P. A. 1974. Notes on Aristobulus of Cassandria. CQ 24: 65–69. Brunt, P. A. 1980. On historical fragments and epitomes. CQ 74: 477–494. Brunt, P. A. 1990. Laus Imperii. In P. A. Brunt, Roman Imperial Themes. Oxford. 288–323. Brunt, P. A. 1979. Cicero and historiography. In Philias charin: Miscellanea in onore di E. Manni. Rome. 311–340 (¼ Brunt 1993: 181–209). Brunt, P. A. 1993. Studies in Greek History and Thought. Oxford. Bruun, C. 2000. (ed.). The Roman Middle Republic: Politics, Religion, and Historiography c. 400–133 B C . Rome. Bucher, G. S. 1987. The Annales Maximi in the light of Roman methods of keeping records. AJAH 12: 2–61. Bucher, G. S. 1995. Appian BC 2.24 and the trial De Ambitu of M. Aemilius Scaurus. Historia 44: 396–421. Bucher, G. S. 1997. Prolegomena to a Commentary on Appian’s Bellum Civile, Book 2. Diss., Brown University. Bucher, G. S. 2000. The origins, program, and composition of Appian’s Roman History. TAPhA 130: 411–458. Bucher, G. S. 2005. Fictive elements in Appian’s Pharsalus narrative. Phoenix 59: 50–76. Buckler, J. 1980. The Theban Hegemony, 371–362 B C . Cambridge, Mass. Buckler, J. 1982. Xenophon’s speeches and the Theban hegemony. Athenaeum 60: 180–204. Buckler, J. 1989. Philip II and the Sacred War. Leiden. Buckler, J. 1992. Plutarch and autopsy. ANRW II.33.6: 4788–4830. Buckler, J. 1993. Some thoughts on Ploutarkhos’ approach to history. Boeotica Antiqua 3: 69–77. Buckler, J. 2003. Aegean Greece in the Fourth Century BC . Leiden. Bunbury, E. H. 1879. History of Ancient Geography. 2 vols. London. Burck, E. 1934. Die Erzählungskunst des T. Livius. Berlin. Burckhardt, J. 1998. The Greeks and Greek Civilization. Ed. O. Murray and S. Stern. London. Burde, P. 1974. Untersuchungen zur antiken Universalgeschichtsschreibung. Munich. Burgess, J. S. 2001. The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle. Baltimore and London. Burgess, R. W. 1993. The Chronicle of Hydatius and the Consularia Constantinopolitana: Two Contemporary Accounts of the Final Years of the Roman Empire. Oxford. Burgess, R. W. 1995. On the date of the Kaisergeschichte. CPh 95: 111–128. Burgess, R. W. 1997. The dates and editions of Eusebius’ Chronici canones and Historia Ecclesiastica. JTS 48: 471–504. Burgess, R. W. 2000. Jerome explained: An introduction to his chronicle and guide to its use. AHB 16: 1–32. Burgess, R. W. 2001a. The Gallic Chronicle of 452: A new critical edition with a brief introduction. In Mathisen and Schanzer 2001: 52–84. Burgess, R. W. 2001b. The Gallic Chronicle of 511: A new critical edition with a brief introduction. In Mathisen and Schanzer 2001: 85–100. Burgess, R. W. 2004. Review of Marasco 2003b. BMCR 2004.03.49 (electronic publication). Burgess, R. W. 2005. A common source for Jerome, Eutropius, Festus, Ammianus, and the Epitome de Caesaribus between 355 and 378, along with further thoughts on the date and nature of the Kaisergeschichte. CPh 100: 166–192. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 591 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 591 Burgess, R. W. and Kulikowski, M. (eds.). Forthcoming. Mosaics of Time: The Origins and Development of the Latin Chronicle Traditions from the First Century BC to the Sixth Century AD . Burgess, R. W. with Witakowski, W. 1999. Studies in Eusebian and Post-Eusebian Chronology. Stuttgart. Burgess, T. C. 1902. Epideictic Literature. (¼ University of Chicago Studies in Classical Philology 3 [1902]: 89–261). Burkert, W. 1983. Homo Necans. Trans. Peter Bing. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Burn, A. R. 1984. Persia and the Greeks, 2nd edition, with a postscript by D. M. Lewis. London. Burridge, R. A. 1992. What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. Cambridge. Burstein, S. M. 1978. The Babyloniaca of Berossus. Malibu. Burstein, S. M. 1992. Hecataeus of Abdera’s history of Egypt. In Johnson 1992: 45–49 ¼ Burstein 1995: 19–27. Burstein, S. M. 1995. Graeco-Africana: Studies in the History of Greek Relations with Egypt and Nubia. New Rochelle. Bury, J. B. 1909. The Ancient Greek Historians. London and New York. Butti de Lima, P. 1996. L’inchiesta e la prova. Immagine storiografica, pratica giuridica e retorica nella Grecia classica. Turin. Buxton, R. 1994. Imaginary Greece: The Contexts of Mythology. Cambridge. Buxton, R. 1999. From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford. Cagniart, P. F. 1995. Strategy and politics in Caesar’s Spanish campaign, 49 BC . AncW 26: 29–44. Calame, C. 1999. The rhetoric of muthos and logos: Forms of figurative discourse. In Buxton 1999: 119–143. Calame, C. 2000. Poétique des mythes dans la Grèce ancienne. Paris. Calame, C. 2003. Myth and History in Ancient Greece: The Symbolic Creation of a Colony. Trans. D. W. Berman. Princeton. Callu, J.-P. 2001. Écrire l’histoire à la fin de l’Empire. In Leclant and Chamoux 2001: 205–222. Cameron, Alan. 1964. The Roman friends of Ammianus. JRS 54: 15–28. Cameron, Alan. 1980. Poetae novelli. HSCPh 84: 127–175. Cameron, Alan. 2004. Greek Mythography in the Roman World. New York and Oxford. Cameron, Alan. Forthcoming. The Last Pagans of Rome. Cameron, Averil. 1970. Agathias. Oxford. Cameron, Averil. 1985. Procopius. Berkeley and London. Cameron, Averil. 1999. Remaking the past. In Bowersock et al. 1999: 1–20. Cameron, Averil. 2003. Ideologies and agendas in late antique studies. In L. Lavan and W. Bowden (eds.), Theory and Practice in Late Antique Archaeology. Leiden and Boston. 3–21. Cameron, Averil and Hall, G. Stuart. 1999. Eusebius, Life of Constantine: Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Oxford. Campbell, B. 2000. The Writings of Roman Land Surveyors. London. Campbell, B. 2002. War and Society in Imperial Rome 31 BC –AD 284. London and New York. Canfora, L. 1971. Il ciclo storico. Belfagor 26: 653–670 (¼ Canfora 1999: 61–91). Canfora, L. 1972. Totalità e selezione nella storiografia classica. Bari. Canfora, L. 1990. Le but de l’historiographie selon Diodore de Sicile. In Verdin et al. 1990: 313–322 (discussion 351–359). Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 592 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 592 Bibliography Canfora, L. 1999. La storiografia greca. Milan. Canfora, L. 2003. Storici e storia. Turin. Capelle, W. 1932. Griechische Ethik und römischer Imperialismus. Klio 25: 86–113. Capelle, W. 1935. Nearchos. RE XVI.2: 2132–2154. Cardelle de Hartmann, C. 2000. Historie und Chronographie. Entstehung und Frühzeit Lateinischer Chronistik. Minerva 14: 107–127. Cardelle de Hartmann, C. 2002. Victoris Tunnunensis Chronicum cum reliquiis ex Consularibus Caesaraugustanis et Iohannis Biclarensis Chronicon. Turnhout. Carlier, P. (ed.). 1996. Le IV e siècle av. J.-C. Approches historiographiques. Nancy. Carlson, K. T. (ed.). 2001. A Sto:lo Coast Salish Historical Atlas. Chilliwack, Vancouver, and Seattle. Carter, J. M. 1991. Julius Caesar: The Civil War Books I and II. Warminster. Carter, J. M. 1993. Julius Caesar: The Civil War Book III. Warminster. Carter, J. M. 1996. Appian: The Civil Wars. Harmondsworth. Cartledge, P. 1997a. Deep plays: Theatre as process in Greek civic life. In P. E. Easterling (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. Cambridge. 3–35. Cartledge, P. 1997b. Historiography and ancient Greek self-definition. In Bentley 1997: 23–42. Cartledge, P., Garnsey, P., and Gruen, E. (eds.). 1997. Hellenistic Constructs. Berkeley. Cary, E. 1914–1927. Dio’s Roman History. 9 vols. London and Cambridge, Mass. Cary, E. 1937–1950. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Roman Antiquities. 7 vols. London and Cambridge, Mass. Cataudella, M. R. 2003. Historiography in the East. In Marasco 2003b: 391–447. Cawkwell, G. 1966. Introduction. In Xenophon: A History of My Times (Hellenica). Trans. R. Warner. Harmondsworth. 7–46. Chambers, M. H. 1993. Hellenica Oxyrhynchia. Stuttgart and Leipzig. Champion, C. B. 1996. Polybius, Aetolia, and the Gallic attack on Delphi (279 BC ). Historia 45: 315–328. Champion, C. B. 1997. Polybius. In Dictionary of Literary Biography, Vol. 176: Ancient Greek Authors. Detroit, Washington, DC, and London. 330–334. Champion, C. B. 2000. Aetolia. In G. Speake (ed.), Encyclopedia of Greece and the Hellenic Tradition, Vol. 1. London and Chicago. 30–31. Champion, C. B. 2004a. Cultural Politics in Polybius’ Histories. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Champion, C. B. 2004b. Polybian demagogues in political context. HSCPh 102: 199–212. Champlin, E. 1980. Fronto and Antonine Rome. Cambridge, Mass. Chaniotis, A. 1988. Historie und Historiker in den griechischen Inschriften. Epigraphische Beiträge zur griechischen Historiographie. Wiesbaden and Stuttgart. Chaniotis, A. 1997. Theatricality beyond the theater: Staging public life in the Hellenistic world. Pallas 47: 219–259. Chaplin, J. D. 2000. Livy’s Exemplary History. Oxford. Chapman, H. 2000. ‘‘A myth for the world’’: Early Christian reception of cannibalism in Josephus, Bellum Judaicum 6.199–219. Society of Biblical Literature 2000 Seminar Papers. Atlanta. 359–378. Chapman, H. 2005a. Spectacle in Josephus’ Jewish War. In Edmondson et al. 2005: 289–313. Chapman, H. 2005b. By the waters of Babylon: Josephus and Greek poetry. In J. Sievers and G. Lembi (eds.), Josephus and Jewish History in Flavian Rome and Beyond. Leiden. 121–146. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 593 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 593 Charlesworth, J. P. 1983–1985. Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2 vols. London and Garden City, NY. Chassignet, M. 1986. Cato: Les Origines (Fragments). Paris. Châtelet, F. 1962. La naissance de l’histoire: La formation de la pensée historienne en Grèce. Paris. Chausserie-Laprée, J.-P. 1969. L’Expression narrative chez les historians latins. Paris. Chiasson, C. C. 1982. Tragic diction in Herodotus: Some possibilities. Phoenix 36: 156–161. Chiasson, C. C. 2003. Herodotus’ use of Attic tragedy in the Lydian logos. ClAnt 22: 5–36. Christ, K. 2001. Velleius und Tiberius. Historia 50: 180–192. Christ, K. 2003. Geschichtsbild und Zeitgeschichte bei Velleius Paterculus. In T. Hantos (ed.), Laurea Internationalis. Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag. Stuttgart. 61–80. Christ, M. R. 1993. Theopompus and Herodotus: A reassessment. CQ 43: 47–52. Church, A. J. and Brodribb, W. J. 1884. Annals of Tacitus. London. Civil, M. 1969. The Sumerian Flood story. In Lambert and Millard 1969: 138–172. Cizek, E. 1985. Les genres de l’historiographie latine. Faventia 7.2: 15–33. Claassen, J.-M. 1990. Ovid’s poetic Pontus. PLLS 6: 65–94. Clark, E. A. 2004. History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Clarke, K. 1999a. Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World. Oxford. Clarke, K. 1999b. Universal perspectives in historiography. In Kraus 1999b: 249–279. Clarke, K. 2001. An island nation: Re-reading Tacitus’ Agricola. JRS 91: 94–112. Clarke, K. 2003. Polybius and the nature of the late Hellenistic historiography. In J. Santos Yanguas and E. Torregaray Pagola (eds.), Polibio y la penı´nsula ibérica. Vitoria. 69–87. Classen, J. and Steup, J. 1892–1922: Thukydides, 3rd–5th editions. 8 vols. Berlin. Classen, J.-M. 1993. Sallust’s Jugurtha: Rebel or freedom fighter? CW 86: 273–297. Clauss, J. 1997. Domestici hostes: The Nausicaa in Medea, the Catiline in Hannibal. MD 39: 165–185. Cleland, L., Harlow, M., and Llewellyn-Jones, L. (eds.). 2005. The Clothed Body in the Ancient World. Oxford. Cline, E. 2004. Jerusalem Besieged: From Ancient Canaan to Modern Israel. Ann Arbor. Clinton, K. 1974. The Sacred Officials of the Eleusinian Mysteries. Philadelphia. Coarelli, F. 1983. Il foro romano: periodo arcaico. Rome. Cobet, J. 1988. Herodot und mündliche Überlieferung. In J. von Ungern-Sternberg and H. Reinau (eds.), Vergangenheit in mündlicher Überlieferung. Stuttgart. 226–233. Cobet, J. 2002. The organization of time in the Histories. In Bakker et al. 2002: 387–412. Cogan, M. 1981. The Human Thing: The Speeches and Principles of Thucydides’ History. Chicago. Cohen, N. 1976. The theological stratum of the Martha b. Boethus tradition: An explanation of the text in Gittin 56A. HTR 69: 187–195. Cohen, S. J. D. 1979. Josephus in Galilee and Rome: His Vita and Development as a Historian. Leiden. Cohen, S. J. D. 1982. Josephus, Jeremiah, and Polybius. H&T 21: 366–381. Cohen, S. J. D. 1999. The Beginnings of Jewishness. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Colautti, F. 2002. Passover in the Works of Josephus. Leiden. Cole, T. 1991. The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore and London. Collatz, C. F., Gützlaf, M., and Helms, H. (eds.). 2004. Polybios-Lexikon III.2. Berlin. Collingwood, R. G. 1946. The Idea of History. Oxford. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 594 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 594 Bibliography Comber, M. 1997. Re-reading the Roman historians. In Bentley 1997: 43–56. Combes-Dounous, J.-I. 1993. Appien: Les Guerres civiles à Rome livre I. With notes and introduction by P. Torrens and C. Voisin. Paris. Combes-Dounous, J.-I. 1994. Appien: Les Guerres civiles à Rome livre II. With notes and introduction by P. Torrens. Paris. Connor, W. R. 1967. History without heroes: Theopompus’ treatment of Philip of Macedon. GRBS 8: 133–154. Connor, W. R. 1968. Theopompus and Fifth-Century Athens. Cambridge, Mass. Connor, W. R. 1977. A post-modernist Thucydides? CJ 72: 289–298. Connor, W. R. 1979. Pausanias 3.14.1: A sidelight on Spartan history, c.400 BC ? TAPhA 109: 21–27. Connor, W. R. 1984. Thucydides. Princeton. Connor, W. R. 1993. The histor in history. In Rosen and Farrell 1993: 3–15. Conte, G. B. 1992. Empirical and theoretical approaches to literary genre. In K. Galinsky (ed.), The Interpretaton of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? Frankfurt. 104–123. Conte, G. B. 1994. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia. Trans. G. Most. Baltimore and London. Original edition: Generi e lettori: Lucrezio, L’elegia d’amore, L’enciclopedia di Plinio. Milan. 1991. Corcella, A. 2003. Echi di documenti sulle guerre persiane in Erodoto. In Biraschi et al. 2003: 125–149. Cordano, F. 1992. La geografia degli antichi. Rome and Bari. Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c.1000–264 BC ). London and New York. Cornford, F. M. 1907. Thucydides Mythistoricus. London. Cotton, H. and Geiger, J. with Thomas, J. D. 1989. Masada II: The Yigael Yadin Excavations 1963–1965 Final Reports: The Latin and Greek Documents. Jerusalem. Cracco-Ruggini, L. 2003. Rome in late antiquity: Clientship, urban topography, and prosopography. CPh 98: 366–382. Crampa, J. 1972. Labraunda: Swedish Excavations and Researches. Vol. III, Part 2. The Greek Inscriptions Part II: 13–133. Stockholm. Crawford, M. H. et al. (ed.). 1996. Roman Statutes. BICS Supplement 64. 2 vols. London. Cristofani, M. (ed.). 1990. La grande Roma dei Tarquini. Rome. Croke, B. 1983a. The origins of the Christian world chronicle. In Croke and Emmett 1983b: 116–131 (¼ Croke 1992: 116–131). Croke, B. 1983b. AD 476: The manufacture of a turning point. Chiron 13: 81–119 (¼ Croke 1992: 81–119). Croke, B. 1990. The early development of Byzantine chronicles. In Jeffreys with Croke and Scott 1990: 27–38. Croke, B. 1992. Christian Chronicles and Byzantine History. London. Croke, B. 1995. The Chronicle of Marcellinus. Sydney. Croke, B. 2001a. Count Marcellinus and his Chronicle. Oxford. Croke, B. 2001b. Chronicles, annals and ‘‘consular annals’’ in late antiquity. Chiron 31: 291–331. Croke, B. 2003. Latin historiography in the Barbarian kingdoms. In Marasco 2003b: 349–389. Croke, B. 2005a. Jordanes and the immediate past. Historia 54: 473–494. Croke, B. 2005b. Procopius’ secret history: Rethinking the date. GRBS 45: 405–432. Croke, B. and Emmett, A. M. 1983a. Historiography in late antiquity. In Croke and Emmett 1983b: 1–12. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 595 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 595 Croke, B. and Emmett, A. M. (eds.). 1983b. History and Historians in Late Antiquity. Sydney and Oxford. Csapo, E. and Miller, M. 1998. Democracy, empire, and art: Toward a politics of time and narrative. In D. Boedeker and K. A. Raaflaub (eds.), Democracy, Empire, and the Arts in Fifth-Century Athens. Cambridge, Mass., and London. 87–126. Cuff, P. J. 1967. Prolegomena to a critical edition of Appian B.C. I. Historia 16: 177–188. Cuff, P. J. 1983. Appian’s Romaica: A note. Athenaeum 61: 148–164. Cunliffe, B. 2002. The Extraordinary Voyage of Pytheas the Greek: The Man who Discovered Britain. London and New York. Cuntz, O. 1902. Polybius und sein Werk. Leipzig. Curty, O. 1995. Les parentés légendaires entre cités grecques : catalogue raisonné des inscriptions contenant le terme ‘‘syngeneia’’ et analyse critique. Geneva. Cusset, C. (ed.). 2003. La météorologie dans l’antiquité entre science et croyances. Actes du coll. international interdisciplinaire de Toulouse 2, 3–4 mai 2002. Saint Etienne. Cusumano, N. 1991. Ordalia e soteria nella Sicilia antica: I Palici. Mythos 2: 1–187. Dalley, S. 1998. The Legacy of Mesopotamia. Oxford. Dalley, S. 1999. Sennacherib and Tarsus. Anatolian Studies 49: 73–80. Dalley, S. 2003. Why did Herodotus not mention the hanging gardens of Babylon? In Derow and Parker 2003: 171–189. Dalzell, A. 1955. C. Asinius Pollio and the early history of public recitation at Rome. Hermathena 86: 20–28. Damon, C. 2003. Tacitus: Histories I. Cambridge. Darbo-Peschanski, C. 1987. Le discours du particulier : Essai sur l’enquête hérodotéenne. Paris. Darbo-Peschanski, C. 1998. L’historien ou le passé jugé. In Loraux and Miralles 1998: 143–187. Darbo-Peschanski, C. 2000. Historia et historiographie grecque: ‘‘Le temps des hommes.’’ In C. Darbo-Peschanski (ed.), Constructions du temps dans le monde grec ancien. Paris. 89–114. Darbo-Peschanski, C. 2001. Se construire un devenir: Enquête sur les catégories grecques de l’historicité. In G. Cajani and D. Lanza (eds.), L’antico degli antichi. Palermo. 17–29. Darbo-Peschanski, C. 2003. Historicité, historia, genre historique: Propositions pour une étude de l’historiographie grecque. In Lachenaud and Longrée 2003: 53–61. David, J.-M. 1998a. Les enjeux de l’exemplarité à la fin de la République et au début du principat. In David 1998b: 9–17. David, J.-M. (ed.). 1998b. Valeurs et Mémoire à Rome. Valère Maxime ou la vertu recomposée. Paris. Davidson, J. 1991. The gaze of Polybius’ Histories. JRS 81: 10–24. Davies, G. 2005. What made the Roman toga virilis? In Cleland, Harlow, and Llewellyn-Jones 2005: 121–130. Davies, I. 1998. Alexander’s Itinerary. AHB 12: 29–54. Davies, J. K. 1971. Athenian Propertied Families, 600–300 BC . Oxford. De Blois, L. 1997. Volk und Soldaten bei Cassius Dio. ANRW II.34.3: 2650–2676. De Bruecker, G. 2003. Berossos and the construction of a Near Eastern cultural history in response to the Greeks. In Hokwerda 2003: 25–34. De Jong, I. J. F. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam. De Jong, I. J. F. 2004. Herodotus. In De Jong, Nünlist, and Bowie 2004: 101–114. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 596 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 596 Bibliography De Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. (eds.). 2004. Narrators, Narratees and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative I. Leiden and Boston. de Lacy, P. 1952. Biography and tragedy in Plutarch. AJPh 73: 159–171. de Romilly, J. 1977. The Rise and Fall of States according to Greek Authors. Michigan. de Ste. Croix, G. E. M. 1972. The Origins of the Peloponnesian War. London and Ithaca. de Ste. Croix, G. E. M. 1983. The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World. London and Ithaca. De Sanctis, G. 1916. Storia dei Romani. III.1. Turin. De Sanctis, G. 1951. Studi di storia della storiografia greca. Florence. De Sanctis, G. 1958. Ricerche sulla storiografia siceliota. Appunti da lezioni accademiche. Palermo. de Souza, P. 1999. Piracy in the Graeco-Roman World. Cambridge. Debnar, P. 1996. The unpersuasive Thebans (Thucydides 3.61–67). Phoenix 50: 95–110. Debnar, P. 2001. Speaking the Same Language: Speech and Audience in Thucydides’ Spartan Debates. Ann Arbor. Deffner, A. 1933. Die Rede bei Herodot und ihre Weiterbildung bei Thukydides. Munich. Demandt, A. 1965. Zeitkritik und Geschichtsbild im Werk Ammians. Bonn. Demandt, A. 1982. Geschichte in der spätantiken Gesellschaft. Gymnasium 89: 255–272. den Boeft, J., den Hengst, D., and Teitler, H. C. (eds.). 1992. Cognitio Gestorum: The Historiographic Art of Ammianus Marcellinus. Amsterdam. Dench, E. 1995. From Barbarians to New Men: Greek, Roman, and Modern Perceptions of Peoples from the Central Apennines. Oxford. Dench, E. 2005. Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford. Denis, A.-M. 2000. Introduction à la littérature religieuse judéo-hellénistique. 2 vols. Turnhout. Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.). 2000. Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Derow, P. S. 1970. Polybios and the embassy of Kallikrates. In Essays Presented to C. M. Bowra. Oxford. 12–23. Derow, P. S. 1994. Historical explanation: Polybius and his predecessors. In Hornblower 1994e: 73–90. Derow, P. S. and Parker, R. (eds.). 2003. Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest. Oxford. Desai, G. and Nair, S. (eds.). 2005. Postcolonialisms. New Brunswick. Desideri, P. 1996. Scrivere gli eventi storici. In S. Settis (ed.), I Greci. Storia, Cultura, Arte, Società, I: Noi e i Greci. Turin. 955–1013. Detienne, M. 1967. Les Maıˆtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaı̈que. Paris. Detienne, M. 1974. Le mythe: Orphée au miel. In J. Le Goff and P. Nora (eds.), Faire de l’histoire, III: Nouveaux objets. Paris. 56–75. Develin, R. 1983. Tacitus and techniques of invidious suggestion. Anthichthon 17: 64–95. Devine, A. M. 1994. Alexander’s propaganda machine: Callisthenes as ultimate source for Arrian, Anabasis 1–3. In I. Worthington (ed.), Ventures into Greek History. Oxford. 89–104. Dewald, C. 1987. Narrative surface and authorial voice in Herodotus’ Histories. Arethusa 20: 147–170. Dewald, C. 1997. Wanton kings, pickled heroes, and gnomic founding fathers: Strategies of meaning at the end of Herodotus’ Histories. In Roberts et al. 1997: 62–82. Dewald, C. 1998. Introduction. In Herodotus: The Histories. A New Translation by Robin Waterfield. Oxford. ix–li. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 597 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 597 Dewald, C. 1999. The figured stage: Focalizing the initial narratives of Herodotus and Thucydides. In A. Falkner, N. Felson, and D. Konstan (eds.), Contextualizing Classics. Lanham, Md. 229–261. Dewald, C. 2002. I didn’t give my own genealogy: Herodotus and the authorial persona. In Bakker et al. 2002: 267–289. Dewald, C. 2005. Thucydides’ War Narrative: A Structural Study. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.). 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus. Cambridge. Dietz, D. 1995. Historia in the commentary of Servius. TAPhA 125: 61–97. Dihle, A. 1955. Velleius Paterculus (5). RE VIIIA.1: 637–659. Dihle, A. 1970. Studien zur griechischen Biographie, 2nd edition. Göttingen. Dilke, O. A. W. 1985. Greek and Roman Maps. London and Ithaca. Dillery, J. 1995. Xenophon and the History of his Times. London and New York. Dillery, J. 1999. The first Egyptian narrative history: Manetho and Greek historiography. ZPE 127: 93–116. Dillery, J. 2005. Cambyses and the Egyptian Chaosbeschreibung tradition. CQ 55: 387–406. Dionisotti, A. C. 1988. Nepos and the generals. JRS 78: 35–49. Dodds, E. R. 1960a. Euripides: Bacchae, 2nd edition. Oxford. Dodds, E. R. 1960b. Morals and politics in the Oresteia. PCPhS 186: 19–31 (¼ Dodds 1973: 45–63). Dodds, E. R. 1973. The Ancient Concept of Progress and Other Essays on Greek Literature and Belief. Oxford. Dodington, P. M. 1980. The Function of the References to Engineering in Caesar’s ‘‘Commentaries.’’ Diss. Iowa. Doran, R. 1987. The Jewish Hellenistic historians before Josephus. ANRW II.20.1: 246–297. Dorati, M. 1993. Cultura tradizionale e tematiche dell’ inganno in Erodoto. QS 38: 65–84. Dorey, T. A. (ed.). 1965. Cicero. London. Drews, R. 1962. Diodorus and his sources. AJPh 83: 383–392. Drews, R. 1963. Ephorus and history written kat a genoB. AJPh 84: 244–255. Drews, R. 1973. The Greek Accounts of Eastern History. Cambridge, Mass. Drews, R. 1976. Ephorus’ kat a genoB history revisited. Hermes 104: 497–498. Droysen, H. (ed.). 1879. Eutropi Breviarium ab Urbe Condita. Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Auctores Antiquissimi 2. Berlin. Drummond, A. 1989. Rome in the fifth century. CAH 2 VII.2: 113–171, 172–242. Drummond, A. 1995. Law, Politics and Power: Sallust and the Execution of the Catilinarian Conspirators. Stuttgart. Due, B. 1989. The Cyropaedia: Xenophon’s Aims and Methods. Aarhus. Dueck, D. 2000. Strabo of Amasia: A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome. London and New York. Dueck, D. 2005. Strabo’s use of poetry. In Dueck et al. 2005: 86–107. Dueck, D., Lindsay, H., and Pothecary, S. (eds.). 2005. Strabo’s Cultural Geography: The Making of a ‘‘kolossourgia.’’ Cambridge. Duff, J. W. and Duff, A. M. 1964. A Literary History of Rome in the Silver Age, 3rd edition. London. Duff, T. 1999. Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford. Duff, T. 2003. The Greek and Roman Historians. Bristol. Dufraigne, P. 1975. Aurelius Victor: Livre des Césars. Paris. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 598 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 598 Bibliography Dunkle, J. R. 1967. The Greek tyrant and Roman political invective of the late republic. TAPhA 98: 151–171. Dunkle, J. R. 1971. The rhetorical tyrant in Roman historiography: Sallust, Livy and Tacitus. CW 65: 12–20. Dupont, F. 1997. Recitatio and the reorganization of the space of public discourse. In Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 44–60. Duval, Y.-M. 2001. Jérôme et l’histoire de l’Église du IV e siècle. In Pouderon and Duval 2001: 381–408. Eadie, J. 1967. The Breviarium of Festus. London. Earl, D. C. 1961. The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge. East, W. G. 1966. An Historical Geography of Europe, 5th edition. London. Easterling, P. E. 1997. Constructing the heroic. In Pelling 1997c: 21–37. Eckstein, A. M. 1990. Josephus and Polybius: A reconsideration. ClAnt 9: 175–208. Eckstein, A. M. 1995a. Moral Vision in the Histories of Polybius. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Eckstein, A. M. 1995b. Glabrio and the Aetolians: A note on Deditio. TAPhA 125: 271–289. Eden, P. T. 1962. Caesar’s style: Inheritance vs. intelligence. Glotta 40: 74–117. Edmondson, J., Mason, S., and Rives, J. (eds.). 2005. Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome. Oxford. Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge. Egermann, F. 1972. Thukydides über die Art seiner Reden und über seine Darstellung der Kriegsgeschehnisse. Historia 21: 575–602. Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N., and Walter, U. (eds.). 2003. Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius. Gattungen, Autoren, Kontexte. Darmstadt. Ek, S. 1942. Herodotismen in der Archäologie des Dionys von Halikarnass. Lund. Elefante, M. (ed.). 1997. Velleius Paterculus, Ad M. Vinicium consulem libri duo. Zurich and New York. Elsner, J. 2000. The Itinerarium Burdigalense: Politics and salvation in the geography of Constantine’s empire. JRS 90: 181–195. Engel, R. 1977. Das Characterbild des Kaisers Vitellus bei Tacitus und sein historischer Kern. Athenaeum 55: 345–368. Engels, J. 1998. Die strabonische Kulturgeographie in der Tradition der antiken geographischen Schriften und ihre Bedeutung für die antike Kartographie. Orbis Terrarum 4: 63–114. Engels, J. 1999. Augusteische Oikumenegeographie und Universalhistorie im Werk Strabons von Amaseia. Stuttgart. Engels, J. 2005. Andres Endoxoi in Strabo’s Geography. In Dueck et al. 2005: 129–143. Englisch, B. 2002. Ordo orbis terrae: Die Weltsicht in den Mappae Mundi des frühen und hohen Mittelalters. Berlin. Enmann, A. 1884. Eine verlorene Geschichte der römischen Kaiser und das Buch De Viris Illustribus Urbis Romae. Philologus Supplementband IV, Heft 3: 337–501. Ensslin, W. 1949. Des Symmachus Historia Romana als Quelle für Jordanes. Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philologisch-historische Klasse, Heft 3 (1948). Munich. Erhardt, C. T. H. R. 1995. Speeches before battle? Historia 44: 120–121. Errington, R. M. 1969. Bias in Ptolemy’s history of Alexander. CQ 19: 233–242. Erskine, A. 1995. Culture and power in Ptolemaic Egypt: The Museum and the Library of Alexandria. G&R 42: 38–48. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 599 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 599 Evans, J. A. S. 1991. Herodotus, Explorer of the Past: Three Essays. Princeton. Famerie, É. 1998. Le latin et le grec d’Appien: Contribution à l’étude du lexique d’un historien grec de Rome. Geneva. Fantasia, U. 2004. akribe ia=akrib hB. LHG&L I: 36–66. Farrington, B. 1937. Diodorus Siculus: Universal Historian. Inaugural Lecture. Swansea (¼ B. Farrington, Head and Hand in Ancient Greece. London 1947. 55–87). Favrod, J. 1993. La Chronique de Marius d’Avenches (455–581). Lausanne. Fechner, D. 1986. Untersuchungen zu Cassius Dios Sicht der römischen Republik. Hildesheim. Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic. Oxford. Feeney, D. C. 1994. Beginning Sallust’s Catiline. Prudentia 26: 139–146. Feeney, D. C. 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome. Cambridge. Fehling, D. 1971. Die Quellenangaben bei Herodot. Studien zur Erzählkunst Herodots. Berlin. Fehling, D. 1989. Herodotus and his ‘‘Sources’’: Citation, Invention and Narrative Art. Trans. J. G. Howie. Leeds. Feldherr, A. 1999. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Feldman, L. 1984a. Flavius Josephus revisited. ANRW II.21.2: 763–862. Feldman, L. 1984b. Josephus and Modern Scholarship, 1937–1980. Berlin. Feldman, L. 1989. Josephus, the Bible, and History. Detroit and Leiden. Feldman, L. 1998a. Influences of the Greek tragedians on Josephus. In A. Ovadiah (ed.), The Howard Gilman International Conference, I: Hellenic and Jewish Arts. Tel Aviv. 51–80. Feldman, L. 1998b. Josephus’ Interpretation of the Bible. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Feldman, L. 1998c. Studies in Josephus’ Rewritten Bible. Leiden. Feldman, L. 2000. Judean Antiquities 1–4. Flavius Josephus: Translation and Commentary. Leiden. Feldman, L. and Levison, J. (eds.). 1996. Josephus’ Contra Apionem: Studies in its Character and Context with a Latin Concordance to the Portion Missing in Greek. Leiden. Ferguson, T. C. 2005. The Past is Prologue: The Revolution of Nicene Historiography. Leiden. Ferrary, J.-L. 1988. Philhellénisme et impérialisme: Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique. Rome. Ferri, R. 2004. Octavia: A Play Attributed to Seneca. Cambridge. Festugière, A. 1983. Sozomène: Histoire Ecclésiastique. Tome 1 (Books 1–2). Paris. Festugière, A. 1996. Sozomène: Histoire Ecclésiastique. Tome 2 (Books 3–4). Paris. Festy, M. 1999. Pseudo-Aurelius Victor: Abrégé des Césars. Paris. Festy, M. 2003. De l’Epitome de Caesaribus à la Chronique de Marcellin: l’Historia Romana de Symmaque le Jeune. Historia 52: 251–254. Finley, M. I. 1965. Myth, memory and history. H&T 4: 281–302. Expanded version in Finley 1975: 11–33. Finley, M. I. 1975. The Use and Abuse of History. London and New York. Fisher, N. R. E. 1992. Hybris: A Study in the Values of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greece. Warminster. Flach, D. 1973. Tacitus in der Tradition der antiken Geschischtsschreibung. Göttingen. Flach, D. 1998. Römische Geschichtsschreibung, 3rd edition. Darmstadt. Flashar, M. 1996. Die Sieger von Marathon Zwischen Mythisierung und Vorbildlichkeit. In H. Flashar, H.-J. Gehrke, and E. Heinrich (eds.), Retrospektive: Konzepte von Vergangenheit in der griechisch-römischen Antike. Munich. 63–86. Flierle, J. 1890. Uber Nachahmungen des Demosthenes, Thucydides und Xenophon in den Reden der Römischen Archäologie des Dionysius von Halikarnass. Leipzig. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 600 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 600 Bibliography Flower, H. I. 1995. Fabulae praetextae in context: When were plays on contemporary subjects performed in republican Rome? CQ 45: 170–190. Flower, M. A. 1994. Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century B C . Oxford. Flower, M. A. 1998. Simonides, Ephorus, and Herodotus on the battle of Thermopylae. CQ 48: 365–379. Floyd, D. 1990. The sources of Greek i stvr ‘‘judge, witness.’’ Glotta 68: 157–166. Fontaine, J. 1976. Unité et diversité du mélange des genres et des tons chez quelques écrivains latins de la fin du IV e siècle: Ausone, Ambroise, Ammien. In Alan Cameron and M. Fuhrmann (eds.), Christianisme et formes littéraires de l’antiquité tardive en occident. Vandoeuvres-Geneva. 425–482. Fontaine, J. 1992. Le style d’Ammien Marcellin et l’esthétique théodosienne. In den Boeft et al. 1992: 27–37. Fornara, C. W. 1971. Herodotus: An Interpretative Essay. Oxford. Fornara, C. W. 1983. The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Fornara, C. W. 1993. Thucydides’ birth date. In Rosen and Farrell 1993: 71–80. Forsythe, G. 1994. The Historian L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi and the Roman Annalistic Tradition. Lanham, Md. Forsythe, G. 1999. Livy and Early Rome: A Study in Historical Method and Judgment. Stuttgart. Forsythe, G. 2000. The Roman historians of the second century BC . In Bruun 2000: 1–11. Forsythe, G. 2002. Dating and arranging the Roman history of Valerius Antias. In V. Gorman and E. Robinson (eds.), Oikistes: Studies . . . A. J. Graham. Leiden. 99–112. Forsythe, G. 2004. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Foucault, M. 1970. The Order of Things. New York. Foucault, M. 1994. Réponse à une question. In M. Foucault, Dits et écrits. Tome I. Paris. 673–695. Originally published in Esprit 371. May 1968. 850–874. Fowler, R. L. 1996. Herodotos and his contemporaries. JHS 116: 62–87. Fowler, R. L. 2001. Early historie and literacy. In Luraghi 2001c: 95–115. Fox, M. 1993. History and rhetoric in Dionysius of Halicarnassus. JRS 83: 31–47. Fraenkel, E. 1922. Plautinisches im Plautus. Berlin. Frakes, R. M. 2000. Ammianus Marcellinus and his intended audience. In Carl Deroux (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History X. Brussels. 392–442. Francis, E. D. 1991. Brachylogia Laconica: Spartan speeches in Thucydides. BICS 38: 198–212. Frankfurter, D. 1998. Religion in Roman Egypt. Princeton. Fraser, J. 2005. The Roman Conquest of Scotland: The Battle of Mons Graupius A D 84. Edinburgh. Fraser, P. M. 1972. Ptolemaic Alexandria. 3 vols. Oxford. French, R. 1994. Ancient Natural History: Histories of Nature. London and New York. Freudenthal. J. 1874. Alexander Polyhistor und die von ihm erhaltenen Reste jüdischer und samaritanischer Geschichtswerk. Breslau. Frier, B. W. 1975. Licinius Macer and the consules suffecti of 444 BC . TAPhA 105: 79–97. Frier, B. W. 1979. Libri Annales Pontificum Maximorum: The Origins of the Annalistic Tradition. Rome. Reprinted with a new introduction. Ann Arbor. 1999. Fromentin, V. 1993. La définition de l’histoire comme ‘‘mélange’’ dans le prologue des Antiquités Romaines de Denys d’Halicarnasse. Pallas 39: 177–192. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 601 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 601 Fromentin, V. 2001. Denys d’Halicarnasse. Historien grec de Rome. In Histoire et historiographie dans l’Antiquité: actes du 11e colloque de la Villa Kérylos à Beaulieu-sur-Mer, les 13 et 14 octobre 2000. Paris. 123–142. Fuhrmann, M. 1960. Der Vierkaiserjahr bei Tacitus. Über den Aufbau der Historien Buch I–III. Philologus 104: 250–278. Gabba, E. 1955. Sulla ‘‘Storia Romana’’ di Cassio Dione. RSI 67.289–333. Gabba, E. 1956. Appiano e la storia delle guerre civili. Florence. Gabba, E. 1967. Appiani bellorum civilium liber primus, 2nd edition. Florence. Gabba, E. 1970. Appiani bellorum civilium liber quintus. Florence. Gabba, E. 1981. True history and false history in classical antiquity. JRS 71: 50–62. Gabba, E. 1991. Dionysius and The History of Archaic Rome. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Gabba, E. 1993. Roma nell’opera storiografica di Appiano. In G. Reggi (ed.), Storici latini e storici greci di età imperiale. Lugano. 103–115. Gabba, E. 2000. Roma arcaica: storia e storiografia. Rome. Galdi, M. 1922. L’Epitome nella letterature Latina. Naples. Galinsky, K. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton. Gallazzi, C. and Kramer, B. 1998. Artemidor im Zeichensaal: Eine Papyrusrolle mit Text, Landkarte und Skizzenbüchern aus späthellenistischer Zeit. APF 44: 189–208. Gallo, I. 1975–1980. Frammenti biografici da papiri. I. La biografia politica, II. La biografia dei filosofi. Rome. Galtier, F. 2001. La mort de Junius Blaesus ou l’illusion tragique (Tacite, Histoires III, 3.38–39). Latomus 60: 637–646. Gargola, D. J. 1997. Appian and the aftermath of the Gracchan reform. AJPh 118: 555–581. Garrity, T. F. 1998. Thucydides 1.22.1: Content and form in the speeches. AJPh 119: 361–384. Gehrke, H.-J. 2001. Myth, history and collective identity: Uses of the past in ancient Greece and beyond. In Luraghi 2001c: 286–313. Geiger, J. 1985. Nepos and Ancient Political Biography. Stuttgart. Gentili, B. and Cerri, G. 1988. History and Biography in Ancient Thought. Amsterdam. Gera, D. 1993. Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Style, Genre and Literary Technique. Oxford. Geus, K. 1999. Die Welt in antiken Karten und Globen. Die Alten Sprachen im Unterricht 46.4: 7–18, 23–28. Geus, K. 2002. Eratosthenes von Kyrene: Studien zur hellenistischen Kultur- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Munich. Geus, K. 2003. Space and geography. In A. Erskine (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World. Oxford and Malden, Mass. 232–245. Geus, K. 2004. Measuring the earth and the oikoumene: Zones, meridians, sphragides and some other geographical terms used by Eratosthenes of Cyrene. In Talbert and Brodersen 2004: 11–26. Giangiulio, M. 1989. Ricerche su Crotone arcaica. Pisa. Giangiulio, M. 1992. Per la tradizione antica di Ippi di Reggio (FGrHist 554). ASNP 22: 303–364. Giangiulio, M. 2001. Constructing the past. Colonial traditions and the writing of history: The case of Cyrene. In Luraghi 2001c: 116–137. Giardina, A. 1999. Esplosione di tardoantico. Studi storici 40: 157–180. Gibson, C. A. 2004. Learning Greek history in the ancient classroom: The evidence of the treatises on progymnasmata. CPh 99: 103–129. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 602 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 602 Bibliography Gildenhard, I. 2003. The ‘‘annalist’’ before the annalists. Ennius and his Annales. In Eigler et al. 2003: 93–114. Gill, C. 1983. The question of character-development: Plutarch and Tacitus. CQ 33: 469–487. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.). 1993. Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter and Austin, Tex. Gilliver, C. 1996. Mons Graupius and the role of auxiliaries in battle. G&R 43: 54–67. Ginsburg, J. 1981. Tradition and Theme in the Annals of Tacitus. New York. Ginsburg, J. 1989. Mythes, emblèmes, traces. Morphologie et histoire. Paris. Italian original, Turin 1986. Ginsburg, J. 1993. In maiores certamina: Past and present in the Annals. In Luce and Woodman 1993: 86–103. Ginzburg, C. 1989. Mythes, emblèmes, traces. Morphologie et histoire. Paris; Italian original, Turin 1986. Ginzburg, C. 2000. Rapporti di forza. Storia, retorica, prova. Milan. Giovannini, A. 1970. Philipp V., Perseus und die delphische Amphictyonie. In B. Laourdas and Ch. Makaronas (eds.), Ancient Macedonia: First International Symposium. Thessaloniki. 147–154. Gleason, M. 2001. Mutilated messengers: Body language in Josephus. In S. Goldhill (ed.), Being Greek Under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge. 50–85. Goffart, W. 1988. The Narrators of Barbarian History. Princeton. Golan, D. 1988. The fate of a court historian: Callisthenes. Athenaeum 66: 99–120. Goldberg, S. M. 1995. Epic in Republican Rome. New York and Oxford. Golden, M. 1997. Change or continuity? Children and childhood in Hellenistic historiography. In M. Golden and P. Toohey (eds.), Inventing Ancient Culture, Historicism, Periodization, and the Ancient World. London and New York. 176–191. Goldhill, S. 2000. Civic ideology and the problem of difference: The politics of Aeschylean tragedy once again. JHS 130: 34–56. Goldman, N. W. 1994. Reconstructing Roman clothing. In Sebesta and Bonfante 1994: 213–237. Goldmann, B. 1988. Einheitlichkeit und Eigenständigkeit der Historia Romana des Appian. Hildesheim. Goldstein, J. A. 1976. I Maccabees: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Garden City. Goldstein, J. A. 1983. II Maccabees: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Garden City. Goldsworthy, A. K. 1996. The Roman Army at War. Oxford. Gomme, A. W. 1937. The speeches in Thucydides. In Essays in Greek History and Literature. Oxford. 156–189. Goodman, M. 1987. The Ruling Class of Judaea: The Origins of the Jewish Revolt against Rome AD 66–70. Cambridge. Goodyear, F. R. D. 1972. The Annals of Tacitus I. Cambridge. Goodyear, F. R. D. 1981. The Annals of Tacitus II. Cambridge. Goodyear, F. R. D. 1982. Velleius Paterculus. In CHCL II.639–641. Goodyear, F. R. D. 1992. Papers on Latin Literature. London. Gotoff, H. 1984. Towards a practical criticism of Caesar’s prose style. ICS 9: 1–18. Gotter, U. 2003. Die Vergangenheit als Kampfplatz der Gegenwart. Catos (konter)revolutionäre Konstruktion des republikanischen Erinnerungsraumes. In Eigler et al. 2003: 115–134. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 603 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 603 Gouillart, C. (ed.). 1986. Tite-Live: Histoire Romaine Tome XXX, Livre XL. Paris. Goukowski, P. 1969. Clitarque seul? REA 71: 320–337. Goukowski, P. 1976. Diodore de Sicile: Bibliothèque historique Livre XVII. Paris. Gould, J. 1989. Herodotus. London and New York. Gowing, A. M. 1990a. Appian and Cassius’ speech before Philippi (Bella Civilia 4.90–100). Phoenix 44: 158–181. Gowing, A. M. 1990b. Dio’s name. CPh 85: 49–54. Gowing, A. M. 1992. The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor. Gowing, A. M. 2005. Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge. Gozzoli, S. 1970–1971. Una teoria antica sull’origine della storiografia greca. SCO 19–20: 158–211. Graf, F. 1993. Greek Mythology: An Introduction. Trans. T. Maier. Baltimore and London. Grafton, A. 1997. Fragmenta Historicorum Graecorum: Fragments of some lost enterprises. In G. Most (ed.), Collecting Fragments/Fragmente Sammeln. Göttingen. 124–143. Grant, J. R. 1974. Towards knowing Thucydides. Phoenix 28: 81–94. Grant, M. 1956. Tacitus: The Annals of Imperial Rome. Harmondsworth. Grant, M. 1995. Greek and Roman Historians: Information and Misinformation. London and New York. Gray, R. 1993. Prophetic Figures in Late Second Temple Jewish Palestine, The Evidence from Josephus. New York. Gray, V. J. 1987. Mimesis in Greek historical theory. AJPh 108: 467–486. Gray, V. J. 1989. The Character of Xenophon’s Hellenica. London and Baltimore. Gray, V. J. 1990. The moral interpretation of the ‘‘second preface’’ to Arrian’s Anabasis. JHS 110: 180–186. Gray, V. J. 1991. Continuous history and Xenophon Hellenica 1–2.3.10. AJPh 112: 201–228. Gray, V. J. 2001: Herodotus’ literary and historical method: Arion’s story (I. 23–24). AJPh 122: 11–28. Gray, V. J. 2003. Interventions and citations in Xenophon, Hellenica and Anabasis. CQ 53: 111–123. Gray, V. J. 2004. Xenophon. In de Jong et al. 2004: 129–146, 391–402. Grayson, C. H. 1975. Did Xenophon intend to write history? In The Ancient Historian and His Materials. Essays . . . C. E. Stevens. Farnborough. 31–43. Greatrex, G. 2003. Recent work on Procopius and the composition of Wars VIII. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 27: 45–67. Green, A. 1984. Beneficent spirits and malevolent demons: The iconography of good and evil in ancient Assyria and Babylonia. Visible Religions 3: 80–105. Green, C. 1993. De Africa et eius incolis. AncW 24: 185–197. Green, P. 1974. Alexander of Macedon. Harmondsworth. Green, P. 1990. Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Revised edition 1993. Green, P. 2006. Diodorus Siculus, Bks XI–XII.37.1. Greek History 480–431 BC : The Alternative Version. Austin, Tex. Green, R. 1991. The Works of Ausonius. Oxford. Greenwood, E. 2006. Thucydides and the Shaping of History. London. Grenfell, B. and A. Hunt. 1904. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Vol. IV. London. Gribble, D. 1998. Narrator interventions in Thucydides. JHS 118: 41–67. Gries, K. 1949a. Constancy in Livy’s Latinity. New York. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 604 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 604 Bibliography Gries, K. 1949b. Livy’s use of dramatic speech. AJPh 70: 118–141. Griffin, J. 1978. The divine audience and the religion of the Iliad. CQ 28: 1–22 (shortened version in Griffin 1980: ch. 6). Griffin, J. 1980. Homer on Life and Death. Oxford. Griffin, J. 1985. Latin Poets and Roman Life. London and Chapel Hill. Griffin, J. 1986. Homeric words and speakers. JHS 106: 36–57. Griffin, J. 1998. The social function of Greek tragedy. CQ 28: 39–61. Griffin, J. 2006. Herodotus and tragedy. In Dewald and Marincola 2006: 46–59. Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds.). 1989. Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford. Grigolon, A. 2002. Senofonte e gli appunti di Tucidide. Aevum 76: 49–61. Gruen, E. S. 1972. Aratus and the Achaean alliance with Macedon. Historia 21: 609–625. Gruen, E. S. 1976. The origins of the Achaean War. JHS 96: 46–69. Gruen, E. S. 1984. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. 2 vols. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Gruen, E. S. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden. Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca and London. Gruen, E. S. 1998. Heritage and Hellenism: The Reinvention of Jewish Tradition. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Gruen, E. S. 2002. Diaspora: Jews amidst Greeks and Romans. Cambridge, Mass. Guarducci, M. 1930. Per la cronologia degli arconti della Beozia. RFIC 58: 321–325. Guha, R. 2005. On some aspects of the historiography of colonial India. In Desai and Nair 2005: 403–409 (¼ Subaltern Studies 1 [1982] 1–8). Gundel, H. 1963. Quinctius (27). RE XXIV.1: 1020–1023. Gunderson, E. 2000. The history of mind and the philosophy of history in Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. Ramus 29: 85–126. Habicht, C. 1961. Falsche Urkunden zur Geschichte Athens im Zeitalter der Perserkriege. Hermes 89: 1–35. Habicht, C. 1985. Pausanias und seine ‘‘Beschreibung Griechenlands.’’ Munich. Habicht, C. 1987. The role of Athens in the reorganization of the Delphic Amphictiony after 189 BC . Hesperia 56: 59–71. Habinek, T. 1989. Science and tradition in Aeneid 6. HSCPh 92: 223–255. Habinek, T. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton. Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.). 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge. Hadas-Lebel, M. 1993. Flavius Josephus, Eyewitness to Rome’s First-Century Conquest of Judea. New York. Trans. by R. Miller of 1989 French original. Hägg, T. 1987. Callirhoe and Parthenope: The beginnings of the historical novel. ClAnt 6: 184–204. Reprinted in Hägg, T., Parthenope: Studies in Ancient Greek Fiction. Copenhagen. 2004: 73–98. Hahn, I. 1968. Appian i Aleksandrija. VDI 103: 72–85 (with overly brief English résumé 85–86). Hahn, I. 1970. Appianus Tacticus. A.Ant.Hung. 18: 293–306. Hahn, I. 1982. Appian und seine Quellen. In Wirth 1982: 251–276. Hall, E. 1989. Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford. Hall, E. 1992. When is a myth not a myth? Bernal’s ‘‘ancient model.’’ Arethusa 25: 181–201. Hall, E. 1996. Aeschylus: Persians. Warminster. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 605 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 605 Hall, J. M. 1997. Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge. Hall, J. M. 2002. Hellenicity: Between Ethnicity and Culture. Chicago and London. Halliwell, S. 1990. Traditional Greek conceptions of character. In Pelling 1990c: 32–59. Hamilton, J. R. 1961. Cleitarchus and Aristobulus. Historia 10: 448–458. Hamilton, J. R. 1969. Plutarch: Alexander. A Commentary. Oxford. Hammond, M. 1932. The significance of the speech of Maecenas in Cassius Dio, Book LII. TAPhA 63: 88–102. Hammond, N. G. L. 1983. Three Historians of Alexander the Great: The So-Called Vulgate Authors, Diodorus, Justin and Curtius. Cambridge. Hammond, N. G. L. 1993. Sources for Alexander the Great: An Analysis of Plutarch’s Life and Arrian’s Anabasis Alexandrou. Cambridge. Hammond, N. G. L. 1999. The speeches in Arrian’s Anabasis and Indike. CQ 49: 238–253. Hammond, N. G. L. and Griffith, G. T. 1979. A History of Macedonia. Vol. II. 550–336 BC . Oxford. Hänger, C. 2001. Die Welt im Kopf. Göttingen. Haniszewski, K. et al. 2004. Origo Gentis Romanae: The Origin of the Roman Race. Canisius College Translated Texts. Buffalo, NY. Hansen, M. H. 1993. The battle exhortation in ancient historiography: Fact or fiction? Historia 42: 161–180. Hansen, M. H. 1998. The little grey horse: Henry V’s speech at Agincourt and the battle exhortation in ancient historiography. Histos 2. Electronic publication: www.dur.ac.uk/ Classics/histos/1998/hansen.html. Hansen, W. 1996. Phlegon of Tralles’ Book of Marvels. Exeter. Hansen, W. 2002. Ariadne’s Thread: A Guide to International Tales found in Classical Literature. Ithaca and London. Hanson, V. D. 1999. Historiographical survey. The status of ancient military history: Traditional work, recent research and on-going controversies. Journal of Military History 63: 379–413. Harding, H. F. 1973. The Speeches of Thucydides. With a General Introduction and Introductions for the Main Speeches and the Military Harangues. Lawrence, Kansas. Harding, P. 1994. Androtion and the Atthis. Oxford. Hardwick, L. 2000. Translating Words, Translating Cultures. London. Hardwick, M. 1989. Josephus as an Historical Source in Patristic Literature Through Eusebius. Atlanta. Harlow, M. 2005. Dress in the Historia Augusta: The role of dress in historical narrative. In Cleland, Harlow, and Llewellyn-Jones 2005: 143–153. Harrington, D. J., Perrot, C., and Bogaert, P. 1976. Pseudo-Philo: Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum. 2 vols. Paris. Harrison, T. 2000. Divinity and History: The Religion of Herodotus. Oxford. Harrison, T. (ed.). 2002. Greeks and Barbarians. New York. Harrison, T. 2003a. Herodotus and the Greek encounter with Egypt. In R. Matthews and C. Roemer (eds.), Ancient Perspectives on Egypt. London. 145–156. Harrison, T. 2003b. Herodotus and the origins of history. In Derow and Parker 2003: 237–255. Hartog, F. 1991. Rome et la Grèce. Les choix de Denys d’Halicarnasse. In Saı̈d 1991: 149–167. Hartog, F. 1998. Premières figures de l’historien en Grèce: historicité et histoire. In Loraux and Miralles 1998: 123–141. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 606 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 606 Bibliography Hartog, F. 2000. The invention of history: The pre-history of a concept. From Homer to Herodotus. H&T 39: 384–395. Hartog, F. 2001a. Le miroir d’Hérodote. Essai sur la représentation de l’autre. New edition, with preface, ‘‘Le vieil Hérodote: de l’épopée à l’histoire.’’ Paris. 9–35. Hartog, F. 2001b. Memories of Odysseus: Frontier Tales from Ancient Greece. Trans. J. Lloyd. Edinburgh. Hartog, F. 2003. Régimes d’historicité. Présentisme et expérience du temps. Paris. Hartog, F. 2005. Évidence de l’histoire. Ce que voient les historiens. Paris. Harvey, D. 2004. Herodotus Mythistoricus: Arion and the liar? (1.23–4). In V. Karageorghis and I. Taifacos (eds.), The World of Herodotus. Nicosia. 287–305. Hassinger, H. 1953. Geographische Grundlagen der Geschichte, 2nd edition. Freiburg. Hauben, H. 1987. Onesicritus and the Hellenistic archikybernesis. In Zu Alexander d. Gr.: Festschrift . . . G. Wirth. Amsterdam. I.569–593. Hausmann, H.-J. 1970. Itinerarium Alexandri. Diss., University of Cologne. Hawhee, D. 2004. Bodily Arts: Rhetoric and Athletics in Ancient Greece. Austin, Tex. Haynes, H. 2003. Tacitus on Imperial Rome: The History of Make-Believe. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Healy, J. F. 2000. Pliny the Elder on Science and Technology. Oxford. Heath, T. 1997. Aristarchos of Samos: The Ancient Copernicus. Oxford. Heather, P. and Moncur, D. 2001. Politics, Philosophy and Empire in the Fourth Century: Select Orations of Themistius. Liverpool. Heckel, W. 1992. The Marshals of Alexander’s Empire. London and New York. Heckel, W. 1994. Notes on Q. Curtius Rufus’ History of Alexander. Acta Classica 37: 67–78. Heckel, W. 2006. Who’s Who in the History of Alexander the Great. Malden, MA and Oxford. Hedrick, C. W., Jr. 1995. Thucydides and the beginnings of archaeology. In Small 1995: 45–88. Hegel, G. W. F. 1842. Vorlesungen über die Aesthetik, 2nd edition. 3 vols (Werke 13–15). Frankfurt am Main. 1970. Helck, W. 1956. Untersuchungen zu Manetho und den ägyptischen Königslisten. Berlin. Hellegouarc’h, J. 1964. Les buts de l’œuvre historique de Velleius Paterculus. Latomus 23: 669–684. Hellegouarc’h, J. (ed.). 1982. Velleius Paterculus, Historiae Romanae libri II. Paris. Hellegouarc’h, J. 1984. Etat présent des travaux sur l’‘‘Histoire Romaine’’ de Velléius Paterculus. ANRW II.32.1: 404–436. Helmreich, F. 1927. Die Reden bei Curtius. Rhetorische Studien 14. Paderborn. Henrichs, A. 1999. Demythologizing the past, mythicizing the present: Myth, history and the supernatural at the dawn of the Hellenistic period. In Buxton 1999: 223–248. Henry, W. P. 1966. Greek Historical Writing. Chicago. Herington, J. 1985. Poetry into Drama. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Herrmann, W. 1979. Die Historien des Coelius Antipater. Meisenheim. Herzog, R. and Schmidt, P. 1989. Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike, Vol. V. Munich. Herzog-Hauser, G. 1948. Tyche. RE VIIA.2: 1643–1689. Heubner, H. 1963. P. Cornelius Tacitus. Die Historien. Band I. Heidelberg. Heubner, H. 1972. P. Cornelius Tacitus: Die Historien. Kommentar Band III. Heidelberg. Hey, D. 1996. Oxford Companion to Local and Family History. New York and Oxford. Heyen, J. 1968. À propos de la conception historique d’Ammien Marcellin (Ut miles quondam et Graecus, 31, 16, 9). Latomus 27: 191–196. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 607 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 607 Higgins, W. E. 1977. Xenophon the Athenian. Albany, NY. Hignett, C. 1963. Xerxes’ Invasion of Greece. Oxford. Hirzel, R. 1882. Untersuchungen zu Cicero’s philosophischen Schriften. Leipzig. Högemann, P. 1985. Alexander der Grosse und Arabien. Zetemata 82. Munich. Hohti, P. 1976. The Interrelation of Speech and Action in the Histories of Herodotus. Helsinki. Hokwerda, H. (ed.). 2003. Constructions of the Greek Past. Groningen. Holford-Strevens, L. 1999. Sophocles at Rome. In J. Griffin (ed.), Sophocles Revisited. Oxford. 219–259. Holladay, C. 1983. Fragments from Hellenistic Jewish Authors. Volume I: Historians. Atlanta. Holzberg, N. 1995. The Ancient Novel: An Introduction. London and New York. Holzberg, N. 1996a. History: Ctesias. In Schmeling 1996: 629–632. Holzberg, N. 1996b. Utopias and fantastic travel: Euhemerus, Iambulus. In Schmeling 1996: 621–628. Hornblower, J. 1981. Hieronymus of Cardia. Oxford. Hornblower, S. 1994a. Thucydides, 2nd edition (1st edition, 1987). London. Hornblower, S. 1994b. Introduction. In Hornblower 1994a: 1–72. Hornblower, S. 1994c. Narratology and narrative techniques in Thucydides. In Hornblower 1994e: 131–166. Hornblower, S. 1994d. The sources and their uses. In CAH 2 VI.1–23. Hornblower, S. (ed.). 1994e. Greek Historiography. Oxford. Hornblower, S. 1995. The fourth-century and Hellenistic reception of Thucydides. JHS 115: 47–68. Horsfall, N. 1979. Stesichorus at Bovillae? JHS 99: 26–48. Horsfall, N. 1985. Illusion and reality in Latin topographical writing. G&R 32: 197–208. Horsfall, N. 1994. The prehistory of Latin poetry: Some problems of method. RFIC 122: 50–75. Horsfall, N. 2003. The Culture of the Roman Plebs. London. Hose, M. 1994. Erneuerung der Vergangenheit. Die Historiker im Imperium Romanum von Florus bis Cassius Dio. Stuttgart and Leipzig. Huart, P. 1973. Gnv mh chez Thucydide et ses contemporains (Sophocle–Euripide–Antiphon– Andocide–Aristophane). Contribution à l’histoire des idées à Athène dans la seconde moitié du V e siècle av. J.-C. Paris. Hübner, W. 2000a. Mythische Geographie. In Hübner 2000c: 19–32. Hübner, W. 2000b. Hipparch. In Hübner 2000c: 93–101. Hübner, W. (ed.). 2000c. Geographie und verwandte Wissenschaften. Stuttgart. Humm, M. 2000. Spazio e tempo civici: riforma delle tribù e riforma del calendario alla fine del IV secolo a.C. In Bruun 2000: 91–119. Humphreys, S. 1997. Fragments, fetishes and philosophies: Towards a history of Greek historiography after Thucydides. In Most 1997: 207–224. Hunt, D. and Drijvers, J. W. (eds.). 1999. The Late Roman World and its Historian: Interpreting Ammianus Marcellinus. London and New York. Hunt, E. D. 1982. Holy Land Pilgrimage in the Later Roman Empire AD 312–460. Oxford. Hunt, E. D. 2004. Holy Land itineraries: Mapping the Bible in late Roman Palestine. In Talbert and Brodersen 2004: 97–110. Hunt, P. 1998. Slaves, Warfare and Ideology in the Greek Historians. Cambridge. Hunter, V. J. 1973. Thucydides: The Artful Reporter. Toronto. Hutchinson, G. O. 1995. Latin Literature from Seneca to Juvenal. Oxford. Immerwahr, H. 1966. Form and Thought in Herodotus. Cleveland. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 608 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 608 Bibliography Inglebert, H. 1996. Les Romains chrétiens face à l’histoire de Rome. Paris. Inglebert, H. 2001. Interpretatio Christiana. Les mutations des savoirs (cosmographie, géographie, ethnographie, histoire) dans l’Antiquité chrétienne (30–630 après J.-C.). Paris. Inowlocki, S. 2006. Eusebius and the Jewish Authors: His Citation Technique in an Apologetic Context. Leiden. Jackson, J. 1931. Tacitus. Vol. II. LCL. London and New York. Jacob, C. 1986. Cartographie et rectification. In G. Maddoli (ed.), Strabone: Contributi allo studio della personalità e dell’opera, II. Perugia. 27–64. Jacob, C. 1990. La Description de la terre habitée de Denys d’Alexandrie ou la leçon de géographie. Paris. Jacob, C. 1991. Géographie et ethnographie en Grèce ancienne. Paris. Jacob, C. 1996a. Disegnare la terra. In S. Settis (ed.), I Greci. Storia, Cultura, Arte, Società, I: Noi e i Greci. Turin. 901–953. Jacob, C. 1996b. Lire pour écrire: navigations alexandrines. In Baratin and Jacob 1996: 47–83. Jacob, C. 1998. La bibliothèque, la carte et le traité: Les formes de l’accumulation du savoir à Alexandrie. In Argoud and Guillaumin 1998: 19–37. Jacobson, H. 1996. A Commentary on Pseudo-Philo’s Liber antiquitatum biblicarum. 2 vols. Leiden. Jacoby, F. 1909. Über die Entwicklung der griechischen Geschichtsschreibung und den Plan einer neuen Sammlung der griechischen Historikerfragmente. Klio 9: 80–123 (¼ Jacoby 1956: 16–60). Jacoby, F. 1913a. Herodotos. RE Suppl. II: 205–520. Jacoby, F. 1913b. Hippys. RE VII.2: 1927–1930. Jacoby, F. 1913c. Hellanikos. RE VII: 104–155. Jacoby, F. 1919. Kallisthenes. RE X.2: 1674–1707. Jacoby, F. 1921. Kleitarchos. RE XI.1: 622–654. Jacoby, F. 1922. Ktesias. RE 11: 2032–2073. Jacoby, F. 1926. Griechische Geschichtschreibung. Die Antike 2: 1–19 (¼ Jacoby 1956: 73–99). Jacoby, F. 1949. Atthis: The Local Chronicles of Ancient Athens. Oxford. Jacoby, F. 1956. Abhandlungen der griechsichen Geschichtschreibung. Ed. H. Bloch. Leiden. Jacquemin, A. 1998. Valère Maxime et Velleius Paterculus. In David 1998b: 147–156. Jaeger, M. 1997. Livy’s Written Rome. Ann Arbor. Jaeger, M. 1999. Guiding metaphor and narrative point of view in Livy. In Kraus 1999b: 169–195. Janni, P. 1984. La mappa e il periplo: Cartografia antica e spazio odologico. Rome. Jeffreys, E. 2003. The beginning of Byzantine chronography: John Malalas. In Marasco 2003b: 497–527. Jeffreys, E. with Croke, B. and Scott, R. (eds.). 1990. Studies in John Malalas. Sydney. Jeffreys, E., Jeffreys, M., and Scott, R. 1986. The Chronicle of John Malalas. Melbourne. Jenkins, K. 1999. Why History? London and New York. Johnson, J. (ed.) 1992. Life in a Multi-Cultural Society: Egypt from Cambyses to Constantine and Beyond. Chicago. Johnson, W. A. 2000. Toward a sociology of reading in classical antiquity. AJPh 21: 593–627. Jones, C. P. 1971. Plutarch and Rome. Oxford. Jones, C. P. 1986. Culture and Society in Lucian. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Jones, C. P. 1999. Kinship Diplomacy in the Ancient World. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Jones, H. L. 1917–1932. The Geography of Strabo. 8 vols. London and Cambridge, Mass. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 609 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 609 Jones, W. 1918–1935. Pausanias: Description of Greece. 5 vols. London and Cambridge, Mass. Jouanna, J. 1999. Hippocrates. Trans. M. B. DeBevoise. Baltimore and London. Jowett, B. 1881. Thucydides. Trans. B. Jowett. 2 vols. Oxford. Joyce, C. 1999. Was Hellanikos the First Chronicler of Athens? Histos 3. Electronic publication: www.dur.ac.uk/Classics/histos/1999/Joyce.html. Kaldellis, A. 1999. The historical and religious views of Agathias: A reinterpretation. Byzantion 69: 206–252. Kaldellis, A. 2004. Procopius of Caesarea: Tyranny, History and Philosophy at the End of Antiquity. Philadelphia. Kallet, L. 2001. Money and the Corrosion of Power in Thucydides: The Sicilian Expedition and its Aftermath. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Karageorghis, V. and Taifacos I. (eds.). 2004. The World of Herodotus. Nicosia. Kaster, R. A. 1995. Suetonius: de grammaticis et rhetoribus. Oxford. Kaster, R. A. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford. Kearns, E. 1989. The Heroes of Attica. BICS Supplement 57. London. Kebric, R. B. 1977. In the Shadow of Macedon: Duris of Samos. Wiesbaden. Keitel, E. 1987. Homeric antecedents to the cohortatio in the ancient historians. CW 80: 153–172. Keitel, E. 1991. The structure and function of speeches in Tacitus’ Histories I–III. ANRW II.33.4: 2772–2794. Keitel, E. 1992. Foedum Spectaculum and related motifs in Tacitus Histories II–III. RhM 135: 342–351. Keitel, E. 1993. Speech and narrative in Histories 4. In Luce and Woodman 1993: 39–58. Keitel, E. 2006. Sententia and structure in Tacitus Histories 1.1–49. Arethusa 39: 219–244. Kelly, G. A. J. 2007. The Allusive Historian Ammianus Marcellinus. Cambridge. Keyser, P. T. 2001. The geographical work of Dikaiarchos In W. W. Fortenbaugh and E. Schütrumpf (eds.), Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick and London. 353–372. Kidd, I. G. 1988–1999. Posidonius. 3 vols. in 4. Cambridge. (First volume with L. Edelstein, second edition, first ed. 1972.) Kidd, I. G. 1989. Posidonius as philosopher-historian. In Griffin and Barnes 1989: 38–50. Kierdorf, W. 1980. Catos Origines und die Anfänge der römischen Geschichtsschreibung. Chiron 10: 205–224. Kierdorf, W. 2003. Römische Geschichtsschreibung der republikanischen Zeit. Heidelberg. Kingsley, P. 1995. Meetings with Magi: Iranian themes among the Greeks, from Xanthus of Lydia to Plato’s Academy. JAS 3rd series 5: 173–209. Kirk, A. 1997. Some compositional conventions of Hellenistic wisdom texts and the juxtaposition of 4:1–13; 6:20b–49; and 7:1–10. Quarterly Journal of Biblical Literature 116.2: 235–257. Kirsten, E. 1984. Landschaft und Geschichte in der antiken Welt. Stuttgart. Koch, H. 2000. Hundert Jahre Curtius-Forschung (1899–1999): Eine Arbeitsbibliographie. St. Katharinen. Koenen, L. 2002. Die Apologie des Töpfers an König Amenophis oder das Töpferorakel. In Blasius and Schipper 2002: 139–187. König, E. R., Winckler, G., and Brodersen, K. (eds.). 1974–1996. C. Plinius Secundus der Älte: Naturkunde. 38 volumes. Düsseldorf. Kohns, H. P. 1975. Die Zeitkritik in den Romexkursen des Ammianus Marcellinus. Chiron 5: 485–491. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 610 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 610 Bibliography Kornemann, E. 1896. Die historische Schriftstellerei des C. Asinius Pollio. Jahrbücher für classische Philologie. Supplementband 22: 555–692. Kornemann, E. 1935. Die Alexandergeschichte des König Ptolemaios I. von Aegypten. Leipzig. Koselleck, R. 1979. Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main. (English version: Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge, Mass., and London. 1985.) Koselleck, R. 1989. Le futur passé. La sémantique des temps historiques. Paris. Kragelund, P. et al. 2002. Historical drama in ancient Rome: Republican flourishing and imperial decline? SO 77: 5–105. Kräner, F., Dittenberger, F., and Meusel, H. (eds.). 1959. C. Iulii Caesaris commentarii de bello ciuili, 12th edition. Hildesheim. Krapinger, G. 2002. V. Paterculus. DNP 12.1: 1169–1172. Kraus, C. S. 1994a. Livy: Ab Urbe Condita Book VI. Cambridge. Kraus, C. S. 1994b. No second Troy: Topoi and refoundation in Livy, Book V. TAPhA 124: 267–289. Kraus, C. S. 1999a. Jugurthine disorder. In Kraus 1999b: 217–247. Kraus, C. S. (ed.). 1999b. The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Mnemosyne Supplement 191. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne. Kraus, C. S. 2005. Hair, hegemony, and historiography: Caesar’s style and its earliest critics. In T. Reinhardt, M. Lapidge, and J. N. Adams (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose. Oxford. 97–115. Kraus, C. S. and Woodman, A. J. 1997. Latin Historians. Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics, no. 27. Oxford. Krentz, P. 1989. Xenophon Hellenika I–II.3.10. Warminster. Krentz, P. 1995. Xenophon Hellenika II.3.11–IV.2.8. Warminster. Krüger, K. W. 1858–1861. Qoykydidoy Jyggra wh. Ed. K. W. Krüger. 2 vols. Berlin. Kühner, R. and Gerth, B. 1898–1904. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. 2: Satzlehre, 3rd edition. 2 vols. Hannover and Leipzig. Kuhrt, A. 1987. Berossus’ Babyloniaka and Seleucid rule in Babylonia. In Kuhrt and SherwinWhite 1987: 32–56. Kuhrt, A. 2002. ‘‘Greeks’’ and ‘‘Greece’’ in Mesopotamian and Persian perspectives. J. L. Myres Memorial Lecture 21. Oxford. Kuhrt, A. and Sherwin-White, S. (eds.). 1987. Hellenism in the East. London. Kuntze, C. 1985. Zur Darstellung des Kaisers Tiberius und seiner Zeit bei Velleius Paterculus. Frankfurt. Kurz, G., Müller, D., and Nicolai, W. (eds.). 1981. Gnomosyne: menschliches Denken und Handeln in der frühgriechischen Literatur. Festschrift für Walter Marg zum 70. Geburtstag. Munich. Kytzler, B. 1988. Zum utopischen Roman der klassischen Antike. Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 1: 7–16. Labourt, J. 1953. Jérome: Correspondance Tome III. Paris. LaCapra, D. 2001. Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimore and London. Lachenaud, G. 2003. Dion Cassius plagiaire impénitent ou homme de culture? In Lachenaud and Longrée 2003: 97–108. Lachenaud, G. 2004. Promettre et écrire. Essais sur l’historiographie des Anciens. Rennes. Lachenaud, G. and Longrée, D. (eds.). 2003. Grecs et Romains aux prises avec l’histoire. Représentations, récits et idéologie. 2 vols. Rennes. Ladouceur, D. 1987. Josephus and Masada. In L. Feldman and G. Hata (eds.), Josephus, Judaism, and Christianity. Detroit. 95–113. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 611 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 611 Laffranque, M. 1968. L’œil et l’oreille. Polybe et les problèmes de l’information en Histoire à l’époque hellénistique. RPhilos. 158: 263–272. Laistner, H. 1947. The Greater Roman Historians. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Lambert, W. G. 1957. Ancestors, authors, and canonicity. JCS 11:1–14, 112. Lambert, W. G. and Millard, A. R. 1969. Atra-Hasis: The Babylonian Story of the Flood. Oxford. Lana, I. 1952. Velleio Patercolo o della propaganda. Turin. Landucci Gattinoni, F. 1997. Duride di Samo. Rome. Lane Fox, R. 1986. Theopompus of Chios and the Greek world. In J. Boardman (ed.), Chios. Oxford. 105–120. Lane Fox, R. 1997. The Itinerary of Alexander: Constantius to Julian. CQ 47: 239–252. Lane Fox, R. 2004a. Introduction. In Lane Fox 2004b: 1–46. Lane Fox, R. (ed.). 2004b. The Long March: Xenophon and the Ten Thousand. New Haven and London. Lang, M. 1984. Herodotean Narrative and Discourse. Cambridge, Mass. La Penna, A. 1968. Sallustio e la ‘‘rivoluzione’’ romana. Milan. La Penna, A. 1978. Aspetti del pensiero storico latino. Turin. Laqueur, R. 1913. Polybius. Leipzig. Laqueur, R. 1928. Manetho. RE 14.1: 1060–1101. Larsen, J. A. O. 1966. The Aetolians and the Cleomenic War. In L. Wallach (ed.), The Classical Tradition: Literary and Historical Studies in Honor of Harry Caplan. Ithaca. 43–57. Lasserre, F. 1966. Die Fragmente des Eudoxos von Knidos. Berlin and New York. Lasserre, F. 1976. L’historiographie grecque à l’époque archaı̈que. QS 4: 113–142. Lasserre, F. 1984. Histoire de première main dans la Géographie de Strabon. In Prontera 1984b: 9–26. Last, H. and Ogilvie, R. M. 1958. Claudius and Livy. Latomus 17: 476–487. Lateiner, D. 1986. The empirical element in the methods of early Greek medical writers and Herodotus: A shared epistemological response. Antichthon 20: 1–20. Lateiner, D. 1989. The Historical Method of Herodotus. Toronto. Lazenby, J. F. 1993. The Defence of Greece 490–479 B C . Warminster. Lazzarini, C. 1984. Historia/fabula: forme della costruzione poetica virgiliana nel commento di Servio all’ Eneide. MD 12: 117–144. Leclant, J. and Chamoux, F. (eds.). 2001. Histoire et historiographie dans l’Antiquité. Paris. Leeman, A. 1967. Formen sallustianischer Geschichtsschreibung. Gymnasium 74: 108–115. Leeman, A. D. 1963. Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians and Philosophers. 2 vols. Amsterdam. Leimbach, R. 1985. Militärische Musterrhetorik: eine Untersuchung zu den Feldherrnreden des Thukydides. Stuttgart. Lefkowitz, M. R. 1981. The Lives of the Greek Poets. Baltimore. Lehmann, G. A. 1976. Ein Historiker namens Kratippos. ZPE 23: 265–288. Lehnardt, A. 1999. Bibliographie zu den Jüdischen Schriften aus hellenistisch-römischer Zeit Jüdische Schriften aus hellenistisch-römischer Zeit 6.2. Gütersloh. Leigh, M. 2004. Comedy and the Rise of Rome. Oxford. Lendle, O. 1992. Einführung in die griechische Geschichtsschreibung. Von Hekataios bis Zosimos. Darmstadt. Lendon, J. E. 1999. The rhetoric of combat: Greek theory and Roman culture in Julius Caesar’s battle descriptions. ClAnt 18: 273–329. Lenfant, D. 1996. Ctésias et Hérodote, ou les réécritures de l’histoire dans la Perse achéménide. REG 109: 348–380. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 612 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 612 Bibliography Lenfant, D. 1999. Peut-on se fier aux ‘‘fragments’’ d’historiens? L’exemple des citations d’Hérodote. Ktèma 24: 103–121. Lenfant, D. 2001. La ‘‘décadence’’ du Grand Roi et les ambitions de Cyrus le Jeune: aux sources perses d’un mythe occidental? REG 114: 407–438. Lenfant, D. 2004. Ctésias: La Perse. L’Inde. Autres fragments. Paris. Lenski, N. 2002. Failure of Empire. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Leo, F. 1901. Die griechisch-römische Biographie nach ihrer literarischen Form. Leipzig. Leoni, T. 2000. Tito e l’incendio del tempio di Gierusalemme: repressione o clemenza disubbidita? Ostraka 9: 455–470. Leppin, H. 1996. Von Constantin dem Großen zuTheodosius II. Das christliche Kaisertum bei den Kirchenhistorikern Socrates, Sozomenus und Theodoret. Göttingen. Leppin, H. 2003. The church historians (I): Socrates, Sozomenus and Theodoretus. In Marasco 2003b: 219–254. Letta, C. 1979. La composizione dell’ opera di Cassio Dione: cronologia e sfondo storico-politico. In E. Gabba (ed.), Ricerche di storiografia greca di età romana. Pisa. 117–189. Levene, D. S. 1992. Sallust’s Jugurtha: an ‘‘historical fragment. JRS 82: 53–70. Levene, D. S. 1993. Religion in Livy. Leiden. Levene, D. S. 1997. Pity, fear and the historical audience: Tacitus on the fall of Vitellius. In Braund and Gill 1997: 128–149. Levene, D. S. 2000. Sallust’s Catiline and Cato the Censor. CQ 50: 170–191. Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.). 2002. Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne. Levi, M. A. 1977. Introduzione ad Alessandro Magno. Milan. Levick, B. 1976. Tiberius the Politician. London and Ithaca, NY. Lewis, D. M. 1987. The King’s dinner. In Achaemenid History 2: 79–87. Lewis, D. M. 1994. Sicily, 413–368 BC . In CAH 2 VI.120–155. Lewis, M. J. T. 2001. Surveying Instruments of Greece and Rome. Cambridge. Lewis, R. G. 1991a. Sulla’s autobiography: Scope and economy. Athenaeum 79: 509–519. Lewis, R. G. 1991b. Suetonius’ ‘‘Caesares’’ and their literary antecedents. ANRW II.33.5: 3623–3674. Lichtheim, M. 1980. Ancient Egyptian Literature. Vol. 3: The Late Period. Berkeley. Liebeschuetz, W. 1966. The theme of liberty in the Agricola of Tacitus. CQ 16: 126–139. Liebeschuetz, W. 2003. Pagan historiography and the decline of the empire. In Marasco 2003b: 177–218. Linderski, J. 1993. Roman religion in Livy. In Schuller 1993: 53–70. Lintott, A. W. 1997a. The theory of the mixed constitution at Rome. In Barnes and Griffin 1997: 70–85. Lintott, A. W. 1997b. Cassius Dio and the history of the late Roman republic. ANRW II.34.3: 2497–2523. Litchfield, H. W. 1914. National exempla virtutis in Roman literature. HSCPh 25: 1–71. Lloyd, A. B. 1975–1988. Herodotus, Book II: Introduction and Commentary. 3 vols. Leiden. Lloyd, A. B. 1988. Herodotus’ account of Pharaonic history. Historia 31: 25–53. Lloyd, G. E. R. 1990. Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge. Lloyd-Jones, H. 1971. The Justice of Zeus. Berkeley and Los Angeles. 2nd edition, 1983. Lombardo, M. 2005. Erodoto sulle Termopili: Leonida, Demarato e l’ideologia spartiata. In M. Giangiulio (ed.), Erodoto e il modello erodoteo. Formazione e trasmissione delle tradizioni storiche in Grecia. Trento. 173–192. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 613 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 613 Loraux, N. 1980. Thucydide n’est pas un collègue. QS 12: 55–81. Loraux, N. 1981. L’invention d’Athènes. Histoire de l’oraison funèbre dans la ‘‘cité classique.’’ Paris, The Hague, and New York. Loraux, N. 1986. The Invention of Athens. Trans. A. Sheridan. Cambridge, Mass. Loraux, N. 1989. Les expériences de Tirésias. Le féminin et l’homme grec. Paris. Loraux, N. 2000. Born of the Earth: Myth and Politics in Athens. Trans. S. Stewart. Ithaca and London. Loraux, N. and Miralles, C. (eds.). 1998. Figures de l’intellectuel en Grèce ancienne. Paris. Luce, T. J. 1958. Appian’s Exposition of the Roman Republican Constitution. Diss. Princeton. Luce, T. J. 1965. The dating of Livy’s first decade. TAPhA 96: 209–240. Luce, T. J. 1977. Livy: The Composition of his History. Princeton. Luce, T. J. 1993. Structure in Livy’s speeches. In Schuller 1993: 71–87. Luce, T. J. 1997. The Greek Historians. London and New York. Luce, T. J. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.). 1993. Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition. Princeton. Luraghi, N. 2001a. Introduction. In Luraghi 2001c: 1–15. Luraghi, N. 2001b. Local knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories. In Luraghi 2001c: 138–160. Luraghi, N. (ed.). 2001c. The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford. Luraghi, N. 2002. Antioco di Siracusa. In Vattuone 2002d: 55–89. Luraghi, N. 2003. Dionysios von Halikarnassos zwischen Griechen und Römern. In Eigler et al. 2003: 268–286. Luschnat, O. 1942. Die Feldherrnreden im Geschichtswerk des Thukydides. Philologus Suppl. 34.2. Leipzig. Luschnat, O. 1954–1955. Die Thukydidesscholien. Zu ihrer handschriftlichen Grundlage, Herkunft und Geschichte. Philologus 99: 14–58. Luschnat, O. 1970/1974. Thukydides der Historiker. RE Suppl. XII: 1085–1354; Suppl. XIV: 760–786. Macan, R. W. 1895. Herodotus: The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Books. 2 vols. London. Macleod, C. W. 1975. Rhetoric and history (Thucydides 6. 16–18). In Macleod 1983: 68–87. Macleod, C. W. 1978. Reason and necessity: Thucydides 3.9–14, 37–48. JHS 98: 64–78 (¼ Macleod 1983: 88–102). Macleod, C. W. 1979. Thucydides on faction (3.82–3). In Macleod 1983: 123–139. Macleod, C. W. 1983. Collected Essays. Oxford. MacMullen, R. 1964. Some pictures in Ammianus Marcellinus. Art Bulletin 46: 435–455. MacQueen, J. G. 1986. The Hittites and their Contemporaries in Asia Minor, 2nd edition. London. Mader, G. 2000. Josephus and the Politics of Historiography: Apologetic and ImpressionManagement in the Bellum Judaicum. Leiden. Magnani, S. 2002. Il viaggio di Pitea sull’Oceano. Bologne. Magnino, D. 1983. La composizione del terzo libro delle Guerre civili di Appiano. In Saggi di Letteratura e storiographica antiche. Biblioteca di Athenaeum 2. Como. Magnino, D. 1984. Appiani Bellorum civilium liber tertius. Pavia. Magnino, D. 1993. Le ‘‘guerre civili’’ di Appiano. ANRW II.34.1: 523–554. Magnino, D. 1998. Appiani bellorum civilium liber quartus. Biblioteca Athenaeum 37. Como. Malcovati, E. 1942. I Breviari del IV secolo. Annali della Facoltà di Lettre, Filosofia e Magistero della Università di Cagliari 12: 23–42. Malitz, J. 1983. Die Historien des Posidonios. Zetemata 79. Munich. Malkin, I. (ed.). 2001. Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Leeds. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 614 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 614 Bibliography Manganaro, S. 1974. Una biblioteca storica del ginnasio di Tauromenion e il P.Oxy. 1241. PP 158: 388–409. Manitius, M. 1911. Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters. Vol. I. Munich. Manni, E. 1957. Da Ippi a Diodoro. Kokalos 3: 136–155. Manolaraki, E. 2005. A picture worth a thousand words: Revisiting Bedriacum (Tacitus Histories 2.70). CPh 100: 243–267. Manuwald, B. 1979. Cassius Dio und Augustus. Wiesbaden. Marasco, G. 2003a. The church historians (II): Philostorgius and Gelasius of Cyzicus. In Marasco 2003b: 257–288. Marasco, G. (ed). 2003b. Greek and Roman Historiography in Late Antiquity. Leiden. Maraval, P. 2004. Socrate de Constantinople: Histoire Ecclésiastique. Tome I (Book 1). Paris. Maraval, P. 2005. Socrate de Constantinople: Histoire Ecclésiastique. Tome II (Books 2–3). Paris. Marcotte, D. 1998. La climatologie d’Ératosthène à Poséidonios: Genèse d’une science humaine. In Argoud and Guillaumin 1998: 263–277. Marincola, J. 1987. Herodotean narrative and the narrator’s presence. In Boedeker 1987: 121–137. Marincola, J. 1989a. Some suggestions on the proem and ‘‘second preface’’ of Arrian’s Anabasis. JHS 109: 186–189. Marincola, J. 1989b. Thucydides 1.22.2. CPh 84: 216–223. Marincola, J. 1997. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge. Marincola, J. 1999. Genre, convention and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography. In Kraus 1999b: 281–324. Marincola, J. 2001. Greek Historians. Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics, no. 31. Oxford. Marincola, J. 2003. Beyond pity and fear: The emotions of history. AncSoc 33: 285–315. Marincola, J. 2005. Concluding narratives: Looking to the end in classical historiography. PLLS 12: 285–320. Marincola, J. 2007. Historiography. In A. Erskine (ed.), A Companion to Ancient History. Oxford and Malden, Mass. Marrou, H. I. 1956. A History of Education in Antiquity. Trans. George Lamb. New York and London. Martin, A. et al. 2006. Théodoret de Cyr: Histoire Ecclésiastique. Vol. 1. Paris. Martin, J. C. 2003. Isidori Hispalensis Chronica. Turnhout. Martin, R. H. 1967. The speech of Curtius Montanus: Tacitus, Histories IV, 42. JRS 57: 109–114. Martin, R. H. 1981. Tacitus. London and Berkeley. Martin, R. H. 2000. History. In P. France (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Literature in English Translation. Oxford. 535–539. Martin, R. H. and Woodman, A. J. 1989. Tacitus: Annals Book IV. Cambridge. Martin, R. P. 1989. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca and London. Mason, S. (ed.). 1998. Understanding Josephus: Seven Perspectives. Sheffield. Mason, S. 2001. The Life of Josephus. Flavius Josephus: Translation and Commentary, Vol. 9. Leiden. Mason, S. 2003a. Josephus and the New Testament, 2nd edition. Peabody, Mass. 1st edition, 1992. Mason, S. 2003b. Contradiction or counterpoint? Josephus and historical method. Revue of Rabbinic Judaism 6.2–3: 145–188. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 615 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 615 Mastrocinque, A. 1988. Lucio Giunio Bruto: Ricerche di storia, religione e diritto sulle origini della repubblica romana. Trento. Mathisen, R. W. and Schanzer, D. (eds.). 2001. Society and Culture in Late Antique Gaul: Revisiting the Sources. London. Matthews, J. F. 1989. The Roman Empire of Ammianus. London and Baltimore. Matthews, J. F. 1997. Gibbon and the later Roman empire: Causes and circumstances. In R. McKitterick and R. Quinault (eds.), Edward Gibbon and Empire. Cambridge. 12–33. Mauersberger, A. 1956. Polybios-Lexicon. Vol. 1. Berlin. Maxwell, G. 1990. A Battle Lost: Romans and Caledonians at Mons Graupius. Edinburgh. May, J. M. 1996. Cicero and the beasts. Syllecta Classica 7: 143–153. Mazzarino, S. 1965–1966. Il pensiero storico classico, 2nd edition. 3 vols. Rome and Bari. McCarthy, K. 2000. Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton. McDonald, A. H. 1957. The style of Livy. JRS 47: 155–172. McGowan, A. 1994. Eating people: Accusations of cannibalism against Christians in the second century. JECS 2.3: 413–442. McGushin, P. 1992. Sallust. The Histories Books I–II. Oxford. McGushin, P. 1994. Sallust. The Histories Books III–V. Oxford. McKechnie, P. 1981. Cassius Dio’s speech of Agrippa: A realistic alternative to imperial government? G&R 28: 150–155. McLaren, J. 1991. Power and Politics in Palestine: The Jews and the Governing of their Land 100 BC– AD 70. Sheffield. McLaren, J. 1998. Turbulent Times? Josephus and Scholarship on Judaea in the First Century C E . Sheffield. Mehl, A. 2001. Römische Geschichtsschreibung: Grundlagen und Entwicklungen: eine Einführung. Stuttgart. Mehl, A. 2004. Herodotus and Xanthus of Sardis compared. In Karageorghis and Taifacos 2004: 337–349. Meier, C. 1987. Historical answers to historical questions: The origins of history. In Boedeker 1987: 41–57. Meier, C. 1993. The Political Art of Greek Tragedy. Cambridge. German original 1988. Meier, M. 2004. Prokop, Agathias, die Pest und das ‘‘Ende’’ der antiken Historiographie: Naturkatastrophen und Geschichtsschreibung in der ausgehenden Spätantike. Historische Zeitschrift 278: 281–310. Meijering, R. 1987. Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia. Groningen. Meister, K. 1973/1974. Absurde Polemik bei Diodor. Helikon 13–14: 454–459. Meister, K. 1975. Historische Kritik bei Polybios. Wiesbaden. Meister, K. 1990. Die griechische Geschichtsschreibung:von den Anfängen bis zum Ende des Hellenismus. Stuttgart. Meister, K. 1992. La storiografia greca. Dalle origini alla fine dell’Ellenismo. Trans. M. Tosti Croce. Rome and Bari. (Italian translation of Meister 1990.) Meister, K. 1998. Hippys. DNP 5: 612. Mellor, R. 1993. Tacitus. London and New York. Mellor, R. 1999. The Roman Historians. London and New York. Mendell, C. W. 1917. Latin Sentence Connection. New Haven. Mendels, D. 1984–1986. Did Polybius have ‘‘another view’’ of the Aetolian League? AncSoc 15–17: 63–73. Mendelssohn, L. and Viereck, P. 1905. Appiani historia romana. Vol. 2. Leipzig. Merkelbach, R. 1977. Die Quellen des Griechischen Alexanderroman. Munich. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 616 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 616 Bibliography Meyer, E. 1909. Theopomps Hellenika. Halle. Meyer, E. 1986–1989. Pausanias: Reisen in Griechenland, 3rd edition. Ed. F. Eckstein. Zurich. Meyer, P. 1891. De Maecenatis oratione a Dione ficta. Diss. Berlin. Michalowski, P. 1999. Commemoration, writing, and genre in ancient Mesopotamia. In Kraus 1999b: 69–90. Mierow, C. 1960. The Gothic History of Jordanes. New York. Reprint of 1915 ed. Miles, G. B. 1995. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca and London. Millar, F. 1964. A Study of Cassius Dio. Oxford. Millar, F. 1969. P. Herennius Dexippus: The Greek world and the third-century invasions. JRS 59: 12–29. Millar, F. 1993. The Roman Near East, 31 BC–AD 337. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Millar, F. 2002. Rome, the Greek World, and the East. Vol. I: The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution. Ed. H. Cotton and G. Rodgers. Chapel Hill and London. Millar, F. 2005. Last year in Jerusalem: Monuments of the Jewish War in Rome. In Edmondson et al. 2005: 101–128. Miller, N. P. 1961–1962. Virgil and Tacitus. PVS 1: 25–34. Miller, N. P. 1964. Dramatic speech in Tacitus. AJPh 85: 279–296. Miller, N. P. 1968. Tiberius speaks. AJPh 89: 1–19. Miller, N. P. 1975. Dramatic speech in the Roman historians. G&R 22: 45–57. Miller, N. P. and Jones, P. V. 1978. Critical appreciations III: Tacitus, Histories 3.38–39. G&R 25: 70–80. Mills, S. 1997. Theseus, Tragedy and the Athenian Empire. Oxford. Milner, N. 1996. Vegetius: Epitome of Military Science, 2nd edition. Liverpool. Mink, L. 1987. Historical Understanding. Ed. B. Fay, E. Golob, and R. Vann. Ithaca. Mioni, E. 1949. Polibio. Padua. Misch, G. 1950. A History of Autobiography in Antiquity. 2 vols. Trans. G. Misch and E. W. Dickes. London. (Translation of first German edition. Leipzig. 1907.) Mittmann-Richert, U. 2000. Einführung zu den historischen und legendarischen Erzählungen. Jüdische Schriften aus hellenistisch-römischer Zeit 6.1. Gütersloh. Moggi, M. 1972. Autori greci di Persikà, I: Dionisio di Mileto. ASNP 2: 433–468. Moggi, M. 1977. Autori greci di Persikà, II: Carone di Lampsaco. ASNP 7: 1–26. Moles, J. L. 1983. The date and purpose of the fourth kingship oration of Dio Chrysostom. ClAnt 2: 251–278. Moles, J. L. 1985. The interpretation of the ‘‘Second Preface’’ in Arrian’s Anabasis. JHS 105: 162–168. Moles, J. L. 1989. Review of Geiger 1985. CR 39: 229–233. Moles, J. L. 1993. Truth and untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides. In Gill and Wiseman 1993: 88–121. Moles, J. L. 1998. Cry freedom: Tacitus Annals 4.32–35. Histos 2. Electronic publication: www.dur.ac.uk/Classics/histos/1998/moles.html. Möller, A. 2000. Naukratis: Trade in Archaic Greece. Oxford. Möller, A. 2001. The beginning of chronography: Hellanicus’ Hiereiai. In Luraghi 2001c: 241–262. Molyneux, J. H. 1992. Simonides: A Historical Study. Wauconda, Ill. Momigliano, A. 1931. Studi sulla storiografia greca del IV secolo a.C. I: Teopompo. RFIC n.s. 9: 230–242, 335–353 (¼ Momigliano 1966a: I.367–92). Momigliano, A. 1950. Ancient history and the antiquarian. JWI 13: 285–315 (¼ Momigliano 1955a: 67–106). Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 617 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 617 Momigliano, A. 1954. An unsolved problem of historical forgery: The ‘‘Scriptores Historiae Augustae.’’ JWCI 17: 22–46 (¼ Momigliano 1960: 105–144). Momigliano, A. 1955a. Contributo alla storia degli studi classici. Rome. Momigliano, A. 1955b. Cassiodorus and Italian culture of his time. Papers of the British Academy 41: 207–245 (¼ Momigliano 1960: 191–229 ¼ Momigliano 1966: 181–210). Momigliano, A. 1957. Perizonius, Niebuhr and the character of early Roman tradition. JRS 47: 104–114 (¼ Momigliano 1960: 69–88). Momigliano, A. 1958a. L’eredità della filologia antica e il metodo storico. RSI 70: 442–458 (¼ Momigliano 1960: 463–480). Momigliano, A. 1958b. Some observations on the ‘‘Origo Gentis Romanae.’’ JRS 48: 56–73 (¼ Momigliano 1960: 145–176). Momigliano, A. 1959. Atene nel III sec.a.C. e la scoperta di Roma nelle Storie di Timeo di Tauromenio. RSI 71: 529–556 (¼ Momigliano 1966a: I.23–52 ¼ Momigliano 1977: 37–66 [in English]). Momigliano, A. 1960. Secondo contributo alla storia degli studi classici. Rome. Momigliano, A. 1961–1962. Storiografia su tradizione scritta e storiografia su tradizione orale. Atti della Academia delle Scienze di Torino 96: 186–197 (¼ Momigliano 1966a: I.13–22). Momigliano, A. 1963a. Pagan and Christian historiography in the fourth century AD . In Momigliano 1963b: 79–99 (¼ Momigliano 1966a: I.87–109). Momigliano, A. (ed.). 1963b. The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century. Oxford. Momigliano, A. 1966a. Terzo contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. 2 vols. Rome. Momigliano, A. 1966b. Studies in Historiography. London and New York. Momigliano, A. 1969a. Quarto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Rome. Momigliano, A. 1969b. L’età del trapasso fra storiografia antica e storiografia medievale (320–550 d.C.). RSI 81: 286–303 (¼ Momigliano 1975a: 49–71). Momigliano, A. 1971a. The Development of Greek Biography. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Reprinted with 1971b as a revised edition, Cambridge, Mass., and London. 1993. Momigliano, A. 1971b. Second thoughts on Greek biography. Medelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Afd. Letterkunde, N.R. 34.7: 245–257. Momigliano, A. 1974. The lonely historian Ammianus Marcellinus. ASNP 4: 1393–1407 (¼ Momigliano 1977: 127–140 ¼ Momigliano 1980: I.143–157). Momigliano, A. 1975a. Quinto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Rome. Momigliano, A. 1975b. Alien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization. Cambridge. Momigliano, A. 1975c. The fault of the Greeks. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 104.2: 9–19 (¼ Momigliano 1977: 9–23 ¼ Momigliano 1980: II.509–523). Momigliano, A. 1975d. Storiografia greca. RSI 87: 17–46 (¼ Momigliano 1980: I.33–67. English version in H&T 17 [1978] 1–28). Momigliano, A. 1977. Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography. Middletown, Conn., and Oxford. Momigliano, A. 1978. The historians of the classical world and their audience: Some suggestions. ANSP 3rd ser., 8: 59–75 (¼ Momigliano 1980: I.361–376). Momigliano, A. 1980. Sesto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Rome. Momigliano, A. 1982a. The origins of universal history. ASNP 3rd ser., 12: 533–560 (¼ Momigliano 1984: 77–103 ¼ Momigliano 1987b: 31–57). Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 618 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 618 Bibliography Momigliano, A. 1982b. How to reconcile Greek and Trojans. Medelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Afd. Letterkunde, N.R. 45.9: 231–254 (¼ Momigliano 1984: 437–462 ¼ Momigliano 1987b: 264–288). Momigliano, A. 1983. The introduction of the teaching of history as an academic subject and its implications. Minerva 21: 1–15 (¼ Momigliano 1987a: 161–178). Momigliano, A. 1984. Settimo contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Rome. Momigliano, A. 1985. History between medicine and rhetoric. ASNP 3rd ser., 15: 767–780 (¼ Momigliano 1987a: 13–25). Momigliano, A. 1987a. Ottavo contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Rome. Momigliano, A. 1987b. On Pagans, Jews, and Christians. Middletown, Conn. Momigliano, A. 1987c. What Josephus did not see. In Momigliano 1987b: 108–119. Italian version in Momigliano 1984: 9–21. Momigliano, A. 1989. The origins of Rome. CAH 2 7.2: 52–112. Momigliano, A. 1990. The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Sather Classical Lectures 54. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Mommsen, T. (ed.). 1882. Iordanis Romana et Getica. In Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Auctores Antiquissimi 5.1. Berlin. Moore, P. 1995. Quintus Curtius Rufus’ Historiae Alexandri Magni: A Study in Rhetorical Historiography. Unpublished DPhil thesis. Oxford. Morello, R. 2003. Place and road: Neglected aspects of Livy 9, 1–19. In C. Deroux (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History XL. 290–306. Morgan, J. R. 1993. Make-believe and make believe: The fictionality of the Greek novels. In Gill and Wiseman 1993: 175–229. Morgan, J. R. 1997. On the fringes of the canon: Work on the fragments of ancient Greek fiction 1936–1994. ANRW II.34.4: 3293–3390. Morgan, J. R. 2004. Chariton. In I. J. F. de Jong, R. Nünlist, and A. Bowie (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative I. Leiden and Boston. 479–487. Morgan, J. R. and Stoneman, R. 1994. Greek Fiction: The Greek Novel in Context. London and New York. Morgan, L. 2000. The autopsy of C. Asinius Pollio. JRS 90: 51–69. Morgan, M. G. 1992. The smell of victory: Vitellius at Bedriacum, Tacitus Histories 2.70. CPh 87: 14–29. Morgan, M. G. 2005. 69 A D : The Year of the Four Emperors. New York and Oxford. Morony, M. G. 1989. Teleology and the significance of change. In F. M. Clover and R. S. Humphreys (eds.), Tradition and Innovation in Late Antiquity. Madison. 21–26. Mosshammer, A. A. 1979. The Chronicle of Eusebius and Greek Chronographic Tradition. Lewisburg, Pa., and London. Most, G. W. (ed.). 1997. Collecting Fragments/Fragmente Sammeln. Göttingen. Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A. J. (eds.). 1986. Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Cambridge. Moyer, I. 2002. Herodotus and an Egyptian mirage: The genealogies of the Theban priests. JHS 122: 70–90. Muccioli, F. 2002. La letteratura storiografica tra Filisto e Timeo. In Vattuone 2002d: 137–176. Mueller, H.-F. 2002. Roman Religion in Valerius Maximus. London and New York. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 619 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 619 Müller, C. W. 1992. Das Schatzhaus des Rhampsinit oder die Überlistung des Todes. Zu Herodots ägyptischer Reise und die Authentizität seiner Quellenangaben. In C. W. Müller, K. Sier, and. J. Werner (eds.), Zum Umgang mit fremden Sprachen in der griechisch-römischen Antike. Stuttgart and Wiesbaden. 37–62. Müller, D. 1981. Herodot – Vater des Empirismus? Mensch und Erkenntnis im Denken Herodots. In Kurz, Müller, and Nicolai 1981: 299–318. Müller, F. 1926. De ‘‘historiae’’ vocabulo atque notione. Mnemosyne 54: 234–257. Müller, K. and Schönfeld, H. 1954. Geschichte Alexanders des Grossen. Munich. Muhlberger, S. 1990. The Fifth Century Chroniclers. Leeds. Munslow, A. 1997. Deconstructing History. London and New York. Munslow, A. 2000. The Routledge Companion to Historical Studies. London and New York. Munson, R. V. 1993. Herodotus’ use of prospective sentences and the story of Rhampsinitus and the thief in the Histories. AJPh 114: 27–44. Munson, R. V. 2001. Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus. Ann Arbor. Murison, C. 1992. Suetonius: Galba, Otho, Vitellius. London. Murphy, T. 2004. Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia. Oxford. Murray, G. 1946. Theopompus, or the cynic as historian. In G. Murray, Greek Studies. Oxford. 149–170. Murray, O. 1968. Review of Strasburger 1966. CR 18: 218–221. Murray, O. 1970. Hecataeus of Abdera and pharaonic kingship. JEA 56: 141–171. Murray, O. 1972. Herodotus and Hellenistic culture. CQ 22: 200–213. Murray, O. 1988–1989. Omero e l’etnografia. Kokalos 34–35: 1–13. Murray, O. 1996. Histoire. In J. Brunschwig, G. Lloyd, and P. Pellerin (eds.), Le savoir grec: Dictionnaire critique. Paris. 368–378 [¼ Murray 2003: 177–186]. Murray, O. 2001. Herodotus and oral history. In Luraghi 2001c: 16–44. With a postscript ‘‘Herodotus and oral history reconsidered.’’ 314–325. Murray, O. 2003. History. In J. Brunschwig, G. Lloyd, and P. Pellerin (eds.), The Greek Pursuit of Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass. 177–186. Translation of Murray 1996. Murray, W. M. and Petsas, P. M. 1989. Octavian’s Campsite Memorial for the Actian War. Philadelphia. Musti, D. 1970. Tendenze nella storiografia romana e greca su Roma arcaica: Studi su Livio e Dionigi d’Alicarnasso. Rome. Musti, D. 1972. Polibio negli studi dell’ultimo ventennio (1950–1970). ANRW I.2, 1114–1181. Musti, D. 1973. Società antica. Bari. Musti, D. 1978. Polibio e l’imperialismo romano. Naples. Musti, D. 1988. Strabone e la Magna Grecia. Città e popoli dell’Italia antica. Padua. Musti, D. 1989. Storia greca. Rome and Bari. Musti, D. (ed.). 2003. Polibio. Storie. Libri XII–XVIII. Vol. 5. Milan. Myres, J. L. 1953. Geographical History in Greek Lands. Oxford. Naas, V. 2002. Le Project encyclopédique de Pline l’Ancien. Paris and Rome. Nachtergael, G. 1977. Les Galates en Grèce et les Sôtéria de Delphes. Brussels. Nadon, C. 2001. Xenophon’s Prince. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Neitzel, H. 1993. Prinzessin und Meisterdieb bei Herodot (2.121e). WJA 19: 215–238. Nenci, G. 1955. Il motivo dell’autopsia nella storiografia greca. SCO 3: 14–46. Nesselrath, H.-G. 1995–1996. Herodot und der griechische Mythos. Poetica 27–28: 274–296. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 620 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 620 Bibliography Nestle, W. 1940. Vom Mythos zum Logos: Die Selbstentfaltung des griechischen Denkens von Homer bis auf die Sophistik und Sokrates. Stuttgart. Newbold, R. 1981–1982. Perception and sensory awareness among Latin writers in late antiquity. CM 33: 169–190. Nı́ Mheallaigh, K. 2007. Lucian’s Self-Conscious Fiction. Cambridge. Nickau, K. 1990. Mythos und Logos bei Herodot. In W. Ax (ed.), Memoria Rerum Veterum. Festschrift . . . C. J. Classen. Palingenesia 32. Stuttgart. 83–100. Nicolai, R. 1992. La storiografia nell’educazione antica. Pisa. Nicolai, R. 1997. Pater semper incertus: Appunti su Ecateo. QUCC n.s. 56: 143–164. Nicolai, R. 1998. I discorsi di Tucidide: analisi storico-politica, paradigmaticità, integrazione nella diegesi, verosimiglianza. Storiografia 2: 288–294. Nicolai, R. 1999. Polibio interprete di Tucidide: la teoria dei discorsi. SemRom 2: 281–301. Nicolai, R. 2001a. Opus oratorium maxime: Cicerone tra storia e oratoria. In E. Narducci (ed.), Cicerone prospettiva 2000, Atti del I Symposium Ciceronianum Arpinas. Florence. 105–125. Nicolai, R. 2001b. Thucydides’ Archaeology between epic and oral traditions. In Luraghi 2001c: 263–285. Nicolai, R. 2002. Unam ex tam multis perscribere orationem: Riflessioni sui discorsi nelle monografie di Sallustio. In G. Marinangeli (ed.), Atti del primo convegno nazionale Sallustiano L’Aquila 28–29 Settembre 2001. L’Aquila. 43–67. Nicolai, R. 2003a. La poesia epica come documento. L’esegesi di Omero da Ecateo a Tucidide. In Biraschi et al. 2003: 81–109 Nicolai, R. 2003b. Review of Pani 2001. Athenaeum 91: 681–694. Nicolai, R. 2004. Studi su Isocrate. La comunicazione letteraria nel IV secolo a.C. e i nuovi generi della prosa. Rome. Nicolai, R. Forthcoming. Thucydides continued. In A. Rengakos and A. Tsakmakis (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Thucydides. Leiden. Nicolet, C. 1988. L’Inventaire du Monde: Géographie et politique aux origines de l’empire Romaine. Paris. Nicolet, C. 1991. Space, Geography and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Translation of Nicolet 1988. Ann Arbor. Niese, B. 1885–1895. Flavii Josephi Opera. 7 vols. Berlin. Niese, B. 1889. Flavii Iosephi Opera. 5 vols. Berlin. Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. 1978. A Commentary on Horace, Odes 2. Oxford. Nissen, H. 1863. Kritische Untersuchungen über die Quellen der vierten und fünften Dekade des Livius. Berlin. Nixon, C. E. V. 1971. An Historiographical Study of the ‘‘Caesares’’ of Sextus Aurelius Victor. Diss. University of Michigan. Nixon, C. E. V. 1990. The use of the past by the Gallic panegyrists. In G. Clarke et al. (eds.), Reading the Past in Late Antiquity. Canberra. 1–36. Nixon, C. E. V. and Saylor Rodgers, B. 1994. In Praise of Later Roman Emperors. The Panegyrici Latini: Introduction, Translation, and Historical Commentary. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Oxford. Nodet, E. 1992–. Les antiquités juives. 5 vols. to date. Paris. Norden, E. 1923. Die germanische Urgeschichte in Tacitus Germania. Leipzig. Novick, P. 1988. That Noble Dream: The ‘‘Objectivity Question’’ and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge. O’Gorman, E. 1993. No place like Rome: Identity and difference in the Germania of Tacitus. Ramus 22: 135–154. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 621 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 621 O’Gorman, E. 2000. Irony and Misreading in the Annals of Tacitus. Cambridge. Ogilvie, R. M. 1958. Livy, Licinius Macer and the libri lintei. JRS 48: 40–48. Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford. Reprinted with additions and corrections, 1970. Ogilvie, R. M. and Drummond, A. 1989. The sources for early Roman history. CAH 2 VII.2: 1–29. Ogilvie, R. M. and Richmond, I. 1967. Cornelii Taciti De Vita Agricolae. Oxford. Ogilvie, R. M. with Saddington, D. B. and Keppie, L. J. F. 1991. An interim report on Tacitus’ Agricola. ANRW II.33.3: 1714–1740. Olrik, A. 1992. Principles of Oral Narrative Research. Trans. K. Wolf and J. Jensen. Bloomington, Ind. Olshausen, E. 1991. Einführung in die Historische Geographie der Alten Welt. Darmstadt. Oniga, R. 1995. Sallustio e l’Etnografia. Pisa. Opelt, I. 1962. Epitome. RAC 5: 944–973. Osborne, R. G. 2002. Archaic Greek history. In Bakker et al. 2002: 497–520. Pack, R. 1953. The Roman digressions of Ammianus Marcellinus. TAPhA 84: 181–189. Page, D. L. 1973. Stesichorus: The Geryoneis. JHS 93: 138–154. Pallottino, M. 1981. Genti e culture dell’Italia preromana. Rome. Palm, J. 1955. Über Sprache und Stil des Diodoros von Sizilien. Ein Beitrag zur Beleuchtung der hellenistischen Prosa. Lund. Pani, M. 2001. Le ragioni della storiografia in Grecia e a Roma. Una introduzione. Bari. Parente, F. and Sievers, J. (ed.). 1994. Josephus and the History of the Greco-Roman Period: Essays in Memory of Morton Smith. Leiden. Pareti, L. 1959. L’opera e l’età di Hippys di Regio. Rivista di cultura classica e medievale 1: 106–112. Parker, V. 2004 [2006]. The historian Ephorus: His selection of sources. Antichthon 38: 29–50. Parmeggiani, G. 2003. L’ heurein senza saphes: Tucidide e la conoscenza del passato. AncSoc 33: 235–283. Parry, A. 1957. Logos and Ergon in Thucydides. Diss. Harvard. Reprinted, New York. 1981. Paschoud, F. 1971–2000. Zosime: Histoire Nouvelle. 5 vols. Paris. Paschoud, F. 1998. Note sur les relations de trois historiens des IV e et V e siècles: Sulpicius Alexander, Rénatus Profuturus Frigéridus, et Olympiodore. Antiquité Tardive 6: 313–316. Paschoud, F. 2001. Histoire Auguste. Tome V, 2ème partie. Paris. Paschoud, F. 2004 [2005]. Ammien 31,16,9: une recusatio? REL 82: 238–248. Paschoud, F. 2005. Biographie und Panegyrik: wie spricht man vom lebenden Kaiser? In K. Voessing (ed.), Biographie und Prosopographie. Stuttgart. 103–118. Paton, W. R. 1927. Polybius: The Histories. 6 vols. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Paul, G. M. 1982. Urbs capta: Sketch of a literary motif. Phoenix 36: 144–155. Peake, S. 1994. A note on the dating of the Social War. LCM 19: 130–132. Pearson, L. 1939. Early Ionian Historians. Oxford. Pearson, L. 1942. The Local Historians of Attica. APA Monographs 11. Lancaster, Pa. Pearson, L. 1954–1955. The diary and the letters of Alexander the Great. Historia 3: 129–145. Pearson, L. 1960. The Lost Histories of Alexander the Great. New York. Pearson, L. 1962. The pseudo-history of Messenia and its authors. Historia 11: 397–426. Pearson, L. 1986. The speeches in Timaeus’ history. AJPh 107: 350–68. Pearson, L. 1987. The Greek Historians of the West: Timaeus and his Predecessors. Atlanta. Pédech, P. (ed.). 1961. Polybe. Histoires. Livre XII. Paris. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 622 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 622 Bibliography Pédech, P. 1964. La méthode historique de Polybe. Paris. Pédech, P. 1970. Un historien nommé Cratippe. REA 72: 31–45. Pédech, P. 1976. La géographie des Grecs. Paris. Pédech, P. 1980. Géographes grecs et géographes romains. In R. Chevallier (ed.), Colloque Histoire et Historiographie Clio. Paris. 23–35. Pédech, P. 1984. Historiens Compagnons d’Alexandre. Paris. Pédech, P. 1989. Trois historiens méconnus: Théopompe, Duris, Phylarque. Paris. Pelling, C. B. R. 1979. Plutarch’s method of work in the Roman Lives. JHS 99: 74–96 (revised version in Pelling 2002: 1–22). Pelling, C. B. R. 1980. Plutarch’s Adaptation of his Source Material. JHS 100: 127–140 (revised version in Pelling 2002: 91–115). Pelling, C. B. R. 1988. Plutarch: Antony. Cambridge. Pelling, C. B. R. 1990a. Childhood and personality in Greek biography. In Pelling 1990c: 213–244. Revised version in Pelling 2002: 301–338. Pelling, C. B. R. 1990b. Truth and fiction in Plutarch’s Lives. In D. A. Russell (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford. 19–52 (revised version in Pelling 2002: 143–170). Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.). 1990c. Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford. Pelling, C. B. R. 1993. Tacitus and Germanicus. In Luce and Woodman 1993: 59–85. Pelling, C. B. R. 1996. The triumviral period. In CAH X2 : 1–69. Pelling, C. B. R. 1997a. Aeschylus’ Persae and History. In Pelling 1997c: 1–19. Pelling, C. B. R. 1997b. East is east and west is west – Or are they? National stereotypes in Herodotus. Histos 1. Electronic publication: www.dur.ac.uk/Classics/histos/1997/ pelling.html. Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.) 1997c. Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford. Pelling, C. B. R. 1999a. Epilogue. In Kraus 1999b. 325–360. Pelling, C. B. R. 1999b. Making myth look like history: Plutarch’s Theseus–Romulus. In A. Pérez Jimenez, J. Garcia López, and R. Ma. Aguilar (eds.), Plutarco, Platón y Aristóteles. Madrid. 1999. 431–443. Expanded version in Pelling 2002: 171–195. Pelling, C. B. R. 2000. Literary Texts and the Greek Historians. London and New York. Pelling, C. B. R. 2002. Plutarch and History. London and Swansea. Pelling, C. 2006. Speech and narrative in the Histories. In Dewald and Marincola 2006: 103–121. Pembroke, S. 1967. Women in charge: The function of alternatives in early Greek tradition and the ancient idea of matriarchy. JWCI 30: 1–35. Peretti, A. 1979. Il Periplo di Scilace: Studio sul primo portolano del Mediterraneo. Pisa. Pérez Jiménez, A. and Cruz Andreotti, G. (eds.). 1998. Los limites de la tierra: Fantası́a y realitad del espacio geográfico en las culturas mediterráneas. Madrid. Perry, B. E. 1967. The Ancient Romances: A Literary-Historical Account of their Origins. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Peter, H. 1897. Die geschichtliche Literatur über die römische Kaiserzeit bis Theodosius I und ihre Quellen. 2 vols. Leipzig. Petroviç, A. 2004. Akoe e autopsia: Zu den Quellen Herodots für die Thermopylen-Epigramme (Hdt. 7.228). In A. Hornhung, C. Jäkel, und W. Schubert (eds.), Studia Humanitatis ac Litterarum Trifolio dedicata. Festschrift für Eckhard Christmann, Wilfried Edelmaier und Rudolf Kettermann. Frankfurt am Main. 255–273. Petzold, K.-E. 1969. Studien zur Methode des Polybios und zu ihrer historischen Auswertung. Munich. Petzold, K.-E. 1993. Zur Geschichte der römischen Annalistik. In Schuller 1993: 151–188. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 623 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 623 Pfanner, M. 1983. Der Titusbogen. Mainz. Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford. Pichlmayr, F. and Gruendel, R. 1970. Aurelius Victor: De Caesaribus, 2nd edition. Leipzig. Pierart, M. 1983. L’historien ancien face aux mythes et aux légendes. LEC 51: 47–62, 105–115. Pierce, E. D. 1922. A Roman Man of Letters: Gaius Asinius Pollio. Diss. Columbia University. New York. Pighi, G. B. 1936. I discorsi nelle Storie d’Ammiano Marcellino. Milan. Pina Polo, F. 2004. Die nützliche Erinnerung: Geschichtsschreibung, mos maiorum und die römische Identität. Historia 53: 147–172. Pitta, S. 2000. Denys d’Halicarnasse: historien de l’Italie. Pallas 53. Toulouse. Pitta, S. 2002. Fragments d’historiens grecs. Autour de Denys d’Halicarnasse. Rome. Placanica, A. 1997. Vittore da Tunnuna, Chronica. Chiesa e impero nell’età di Giustiniano. Florence. Plant, I. 1988. A note on Thucydides I 22, 1: h jympasa gn vmh ¼ General Sense? Athenaeum 66: 201–202. Plezia, M. 1972. Der Titel und der Zweck von Kallisthenes’ Alexandergeschichte. Eos 60: 263–268. Pocock, J. 2003. Barbarism and Religion III: The First Decline and Fall. Cambridge. Podossinov, A. V. 2000. Die geographische Karte im Dienste des antiken Staates? In M. Dreher (ed.), Bürgersinn und staatliche Macht in Antike und Gegenwart. Constance. 225–240. Podossinov, A. V. 2003. Die antiken Geographen über sich selbst und ihre Schriften. In M. Horster and C. Reitz (eds.), Antike Fachschriftsteller: Literarischer Diskurs und sozialer Kontext. Stuttgart. 88–104. Pohlenz, M. 1937. Herodot: der erste Geschichtsschreiber des Abendlandes. Leipzig. Pollitt, J. J. 1986. Art in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge. Pomian, K. 1984. L’ordre du temps. Paris. Porciani, L. 1997. La forma proemiale. Storiografia e pubblico nel mondo antico. Pisa. Porciani, L. 1999. Come si scrivono i discorsi. Su Tucidide I 22,1 an . . . m alista ei peÐin. QS 49: 103–135. Porciani, L. 2001a. Prime forme della storiografia greca. Prospettiva locale e generale nella narrazione storica. Stuttgart. Porciani, L. 2001b. Lo storico nel mondo antico: storia e retorica. In M. Bettalli (ed.), Introduzione alla storiografia greca. Rome. 21–36. Porod, R. 1985. Der Literat Curtius. Tradition und Neugestaltung: Zur Frage der Eigenständigkeit des Schrifstellers Curtius. Diss. Graz. Pöschl, V. 1956. Die römische Auffassung von der Geschichte. Gymnasium 63: 190–206. Possanza, M. 2004. Translating the Heavens. New York. Potter, D. S. 1990. Prophecy and History in the Crisis of the Roman Empire: A Historical Commentary on the Thirteenth Sibylline Oracle. Oxford. Potter, D. S. 1994. Prophets and Emperors: Human and Divine Authority from Augustus to Theodosius. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Potter, D. S. 1997. Review of Elefante 1997. BMCR 97.9.19. Potts, D. T. 1990. The Arabian Gulf in Antiquity. 2 vols. Oxford. Pouderon, B. and Duval, Y.-M. (eds.). 2001. L’historiographie de l’Église des premiers siècles. Paris. Pouilloux, J. 1949. o epik ewaloB oboloB. BCH 73: 177–200. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 624 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 624 Bibliography Pownall, F. 2004. Lessons from the Past: The Moral Use of History in the Fourth Century. Ann Arbor. Prandi, L. 1985. Callistene: uno storico tra Aristotele e i re macedonici. Milan. Prandi, L. 1996. Fortuna e realtà dell’opera di Clitarco. Historia Einzelschriften 104. Stuttgart. Pratt, M. L. 1992. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London and New York. Press, G. A. 1982. The Development of the Idea of History in Antiquity. Kingston and Montreal. Pretagostini, R. 2000. Spunti per una riflessione sulla letteratura ellenistica. In R. Pretagostini, (ed.), La letteratura ellenistica. Problemi e prospettive di ricerca. Atti del Colloquio Internazionale, Università di Roma ‘‘Tor Vergata,’’ 29–30 aprile 1997. Rome. 3–19. Price, J. J. 1992. Jerusalem Under Siege: The Collapse of the Jewish State, 66–70 C E . Leiden. Price, J. J. 1996. The attempts on Cicero’s life: A note on Appian BC 2.11. In R. Katzoff, Y. Petroff, and D. Schaps (eds.), Classical Studies in Honor of David Sohlberg. Ramat Gan. 245–250. Price, J. J. 2001. Thucydides and Internal War. Cambridge. Prince, G. 1982. Narratology: The Form and Functioning of Narrative. Berlin. Pritchard, J. B. 1969. Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, 3rd edition. Princeton. Pritchett, W. K. 1974. The Greek State at War: Volume II. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Pritchett, W. K. 1975. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: On Thucydides Berkeley. Pritchett, W. K. 1993. The Liar School of Herodotus. Amsterdam. Pritchett, W. K. 1994. The general’s exhortation in Greek warfare. In Essays in Greek History. Amsterdam. 27–109. Pritchett, W. K. 2002. Ancient Greek Battle-Speeches and a Palfrey. Amsterdam. Prontera, F. 1984a. Prima di Strabone: Materiali per uno studio della geografia antica come genere letterario. In Prontera 1984b: 187–256. Prontera, F. (ed.). 1984b. Strabone. Contributi allo studio della personalità e dell’opere, I. Perugia. Prontera, F. 2001. Karte. RAC 20: 187–229. Prontera, F. (ed.). 2003. Tabula Peutingeriana: Le antiche vie del mondo. Florence. Purcell, N. 2003. Becoming historical: The Roman case. In Braund and Gill 2003: 12–40. Quint, D. 1994. Epic and Empire. Princeton. Raaflaub, K. 2002a. Philosophy, science, politics: Herodotus and the intellectual trends of his time. In Bakker et al. 2002: 149–186. Raaflaub, K. 2002b. Herodot und Thukydides. Persisches Imperialismus im Lichte der athenischen Sizilienpolitik. In L. M. Günter and N. Ehrhardt (eds.), Widerstand – Anpassung – Integration. Festschrift . . . J. Deininger. Stuttgart. 11–40. Rackham, H. and Jones, W. H. S. 1938–1963. Pliny: Natural History. 10 vols. London and Cambridge, Mass. Radke, G. 1948. Trophonios. RE VIIA: 678–695. Radt, S. 1994. Tragikerfragmente in Strabons Beschreibung Griechenlands. In A. M. Biraschi (ed.), Strabone e la Grecia. Naples. 61–92. Radt, S. 2002–2005. Strabons Geographika. 5 vols. Göttingen. Rahlfs, A. 1935. Septuaginta. 2 vols. Stuttgart. Rajak, T. 1984. A Roman charter for the Jews? JRS 74: 107–123. Rajak, T. 2001a. Josephus and the ‘‘Archaeology’’ of the Jews. In Rajak 2001b: 241–255. Rajak, T. 2001b. The Jewish Dialogue with Greece and Rome. Leiden. Rajak, T. 2002. Josephus: The Historian and his Society, 2nd edition. London. First edition 1983. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 625 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 625 Ramsay, G. 1904. The Annals of Tacitus Books I–VI. London. Ramsay, J. T. 1984. Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. Atlanta. Ratti, S. 2003. L’historiographie latine tardive, IIIe ---IV e siècle. État des recherches 1987–2002. Pallas 63: 209–232. Rawson, E. 1972. Cicero the historian and Cicero the antiquarian. JRS 62: 33–45 (¼ Rawson 1991: 58–79). Rawson, E. 1976. The first Latin annalists. Latomus 35: 689–717 (¼ Rawson 1991: 245–271). Rawson, E. 1979. L. Cornelius Sisenna and the early first century BC . CQ 29: 327–346 (¼ Rawson 1991: 363–388). Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. London and Baltimore. Rawson, E. 1989. Roman tradition and the Greek world. CAH 2 VIII: 422–476. Rawson, E. 1991. Roman Culture and Society: Collected Papers. Oxford. Reardon, B. P. 1989. Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Reardon, B. P. 1991. The Form of Greek Romance. Princeton. Rees, R. 1999. Ammianus Satiricus. In Hunt and Drijvers 1999: 141–155. Reeve, M. D. 2004. Vegetii Epitoma Rei Militaris. Oxford. Reinhold, M. 1988. From Republic to Principate: A Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History, Books 49–52. Atlanta. Rengstorf, K. 1968–1983. A Complete Concordance to Flavius Josephus, 4 vols. and Namenwörterbuch. Leiden. Reynolds, L. D. (ed.). 1983. Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford. Reynolds, L. D. and Wilson, N. G. 1991. Scribes and Scholars, 3rd edition. Oxford. Rhodes, P. J. 1981. A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia. Oxford. Rhodes, P. J. 1983. ‘‘Alles eitel gold’’? The Sixth and Fifth Centuries in Fourth-Century Athens. In M. Piérart (ed.), Aristote et Athènes/Aristoteles and Athens. Paris. 53–64. Rhodes, P. J. 1985. The Athenian Empire. Oxford. Rhodes, P. J. 1990. The Atthidographers. In Verdin et al. 1990: 73–81. Rhodes, P. J. 1994. In defence of the Greek historians. G&R 41: 156–171. Rhodes, P. J. 2003. Nothing to do with democracy: Athenian drama and the polis. JHS 133: 104–119. Rich, J. W. 1990. Cassius Dio: The Augustan Settlement (Roman History 53–55.9). Warminster. Rich, J. W. 1997. Structuring Roman history: The consular year and the Roman historical tradition. Histos 1. Electronic publication: www.dur.ac.uk/Classics/histos/1997/rich1.html. Richard, J.-C. 2002. Les Origines du Peuple Romain. Paris. Richardson, S. 1990. The Homeric Narrator. Nashville. Richer, N. 1994. Aspects des funérailles à Sparte. Cahiers du Centre G. Glotz 5: 51–96. Richter, B. 1992. Vitellius: Ein Zerrbild des Geschichtsschreibung. Frankfurt. Richter, W. 1977. Caesar als Darsteller seinen Taten. Heidelberg. Ricoeur, P. 1983–1985. Temps et récit. 3 vols. Paris. Ridgway, D. 1988. The Etruscans. CAH 2 IV: 634–675. Ridgway, D. 1992. The First Western Greeks. Cambridge. Ridgway, D. 1996. Greek Letters at Osteria dell’Osa. Opuscula Romana 20: 87–97. Riecks, R. 1975. Eine tragische Erzählung bei Herodot (Hist. I 34–45). Poetics 7: 23–48. Riggsby, A. 2006. Caesar in Gaul and Rome: War in Words. Austin, Tex. Rihll, T. E. 1999. Greek Science. Oxford. Rispoli, G. 1988. Lo spazio del verisimile. Il racconto, la storia e il mito. Naples. Ritter, H. 1982. Dictionary of Concepts in History. Westport, Conn. Rives, J. 1995. Human sacrifice among pagans and Christians. JRS 85: 65–85. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 626 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 626 Bibliography Rives, J. 1999. Tacitus: Germania. Oxford. Rives, J. 2005. Flavian religious policy and the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple. In Edmondson et al. 2005: 145–166. Roberto, U. 2000. Sulla tradizione storiografica di Candido Isaurico. Mediterraneo Antico 3: 685–727. Roberto, U. (ed.). 2005. Ioannis Antiocheni Fragmenta ex Historia chronica, introduzione, edizione critica e traduzione. Berlin and New York. Roberts, C. H. 1954. The Codex. PBA 40: 169–204. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D. (eds.). 1997. Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton. Roberts, M. 1988. The revolt of Boudicca (Tacitus Annals 14.29–39) and the assertion of Libertas in Neronian Rome. AJPh 109: 118–132. Rohde, E. 1914. Der griechische Roman und seine Vorläufer, 3rd edition. Leipzig. Rohrbacher, D. 2002. The Historians of Late Antiquity. London and New York. Roisman, J. 1984. Ptolemy and his rivals in his history of Alexander. CQ 34: 373–385. Roisman, J. 2005. The Rhetoric of Manhood: Masculinity in the Attic Orators. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Rolfe, J. C. 1946. Quintus Curtius: History of Alexander. 2 vols. London and Cambridge, Mass. Romaine, S. 1994. Language in Society. Oxford. Romer, F. E. 1998. Pomponius Mela’s Description of the World. Ann Arbor. Romilly, J. de, Weil, R., and Bodin, L. 1953–1972. Thucydide: La guerre du Péloponnèse. 6 vols. Paris. Romm, J. S. 1992. The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought: Geography, Exploration and Fiction. Princeton. Romm, J. S. 1998. Herodotus. New Haven. Rood, T. C. B. 1998. Thucydides: Narrative and Explanation. Oxford. Rood, T. C. B. 2004. Xenophon and Diodorus: Continuing Thucydides. In Tuplin 2004: 341–395. Roques, D. 2004. L’historiographie protobyzantine (IV e ---VIIe siècle) et les fragments des historiens grecs de Rome. Ktèma 29: 231–252. Rosellini, M. 2004. Iulius Valerius: Res gestae Alexandri Macedonis, 2nd edition. Munich. Rosen, K. 1982. Ammianus Marcellinus. Darmstadt. Rosen, K. 1992. Wege und Irrwege der römischen Gothenpolitik in Ammians 31. Buch. In den Boeft et al. 1992: 85–90. Rosen, R. M. and Farrell, J. (eds.). 1993. Nomodeiktes: Greek studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald. Ann Arbor. Rossbach, O. (ed.). 1959. Periochae Omnium Librorum, Fragmenta Oxyrhynchi Reperta, Iulii Obsequentis Prodigiorum Liber (T. Livi ab Urbe Condita Libri, Vol. IV). Stuttgart. Rossi, A. F. 1999–2000. The camp of Pompey. CJ 95: 239–256. Rossi, L. E. 1978. I poemi omerici come testimonianza di poesia orale. In R. Bianchi Bandinelli (ed.), Storia e civiltà dei Greci I.1. Milan. 73–147. Rossi, L. E. 2000. L’unità dell’opera letteraria: gli antichi e noi. In G. Arrighetti and M. Tulli (eds.), Letteratura e riflessione sulla letteratura nella cultura classica, Atti del Convegno, Pisa 7–9. 6. 1999. Pisa. 17–29. Rowe, G. O. 1967. Dramatic structures in Caesar’s Bellum Ciuile. TAPhA 98: 398–414. Rubincam, C. I. R. 1989. Cross-references in the Bibliotheke Historike of Diodorus. Phoenix 42: 39–61. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 627 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 627 Rubincam, C. I. R. 1991. Casualty figures in the battle descriptions of Thucydides. TAPhA 121: 181–198. Rubincam, C. I. R. 1998. Did Diodorus take over cross-references in his sources? AJPh 119: 67–87. Rudd, N. 1992. Stratagems of vanity: Cicero, ad Familiares 5.12 and Pliny’s letters. In T. Woodman and J. Powell (eds.), Author and Audience in Latin Literature. Cambridge. 18–32. Ruggini, L. 1961. L’Epitoma rerum gestarum Alexandri Magni et il Liber de Morte Testamentoque Eius. Athenaeum 39: 285–337. Ruschenbusch, E. 1966. Solonos Nomoi. Historia Einzelschrift 9. Wiesbaden. Russell, D. A. 1963. Plutarch’s life of Coriolanus. JRS 53: 21–28 (¼ Scardigli 1995: 357–372). Russell, D. A. 1979. De imitatione. In D. West and A. J. Woodman (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge. 1–16. Russell, D. A. 2002. Quintilian: The Orator’s Education. 5 vols. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Rusten, J. S. 1989. Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War, Book II. Cambridge. Rutherford, R. B. 1982. Tragic form and feeling in the Iliad. JHS 102: 145–160. Reprinted in D. L. Cairns (ed.), Oxford Readings in Homer’s Iliad. Oxford. 2001. 260–293. Rutherford, R. B. 1994. Learning from history: Categories and case-histories. In R. Osborne and S. Hornblower (eds.), Ritual Finance Politics: Athenian Democratic Accounts presented to David Lewis. Oxford. 53–68. Ruzicka, S. 1998. Epaminondas and the genesis of the Social War. CPh 93: 60–69. Ryberg, I. S. 1942. Tacitus’ art of innuendo. TAPhA 73: 383–404. Sabattini, C. 1989. Leptine di Siracusa. Potere e consenso all’epoca di Dionisio I. RSA 19: 7–65. Sabattini, C. 1991. Una testimonianza dimenticata su Filisto di Siracusa (Dio Chrys. 73.2). RFIC 119: 306–318. Sabbah, G. 1978. La méthode d’Ammien Marcellin: Recherches sur la construction du discours historique dans les Res Gestae. Paris. Sabbah, G. 2003. Ammianus Marcellinus. In Marasco 2003b: 43–84. Sacks, K. S. 1975. Polybius’ other view of Aetolia. JHS 95: 92–106. Sacks, K. S. 1981. Polybius on the Writing of History. University of California Publications in Classical Studies 24. Berkeley. Sacks, K. 1986. Rhetoric and speeches in Hellenistic historiography. Athenaeum 64: 383–395. Sacks, K. S. 1990. Diodorus Siculus and the First Century. Princeton. Sacks, K. S. 1994. Diodorus and his sources: Conformity and creativity. In Hornblower 1994e: 213–232. Sahlins, M. 1981. Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities. Ann Arbor. Sahlins, M. 1985. Islands in History. Chicago. Sahlins, M. 1991. The return of the event, again. In Biersack 1991: 37–99. Saı̈d, S. 1991. Hellenismos. Quelques jalons pour une histoire de l’identité grecque. Actes du colloque de Strasbourg . . . 1989. Leiden. Saı̈d, S. and Rossellini, M. 1978. Usages des femmes et autres nomoi chez les ‘‘sauvages’’ d’Herodote. ASNP, 3rd ser., 8: 949–1005. Salemme, C. 1987. Tecnica della comparazione e prestito stilistico in Ammiano Marcellino 28, 4. Civiltà Classica e Cristiana 8: 353–78. Sallmann, K. G. 1971. Die Geographie des älteren Plinius in ihrem Verhältnis zu Varro: Versuch einer Quellenanalyse. Berlin and New York. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 628 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 628 Bibliography Salmon, P. 1961. Chariton d’Aphrodisias et la révolte égyptienne de 360 avant J.-C. CdE 36: 365–376. Salway, B. 2001. Travel, Itineraria, and Tabellaria. In Adams and Laurence 2001: 22–66. Salway, B. 2004. Sea and river travel in the Roman itinerary literature. In Talbert and Brodersen 2004: 43–96. Sammartano, R. 1998. Origines gentium Siciliae. Ellanico, Antioco, Tucidide. Rome. Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. 1987. Decadence in the empire or decadence in the sources? From source to synthesis. In H. Sancisi-Weerdenberg (ed.), Achaemenid History 1: Sources, Structures and Synthesis. Proceedings of the Groningen 1983 Achaemenid History Workshop. 33–45. Sanders, E. 1992. Judaism: Practice and Belief 63 BCE –66 CE . London and Philadelphia. Sanders, L. J. 1987. Dionysius I of Syracuse and Greek Tyranny. London, New York, and Sydney. Sanders, L. J. 1995. Theopompus and the Dionysian empire. EMC n.s. 14: 337–353. Sandys, J. E. 1921. A History of Classical Scholarship. 3rd edition. 3 vols. Cambridge. Santini, C. 1995. I frammenti di L. Cassio Emina. Introduzione, testo, tradizione e commento. Pisa. Santoro L’Hoir, F. 1994/5. Tacitus and women’s usurpation of power. CW 88: 5–25. Sauge, A. 1992. De l’épopée à l’histoire. Fondement de la notion d’historié. Frankfurt am Main. Savage, J. J. 1938–1939. Germanicus and Aeneas. CJ 34: 237–238. Savage, J. J. 1942–1943. Germanicus and Aeneas again. CJ 38: 166–167. Savagner, A. 1842/2002. Jornandès [sic]: De la Succession des royaumes et des temps. Paris. Savagner, A. and Fougères, R. 2002. Jordanes: Histoire de Rome de Romulus à Justinien. Clermont-Ferrand. Scanlon, T. F. 1987. Spes Frustrata: A Reading of Sallust. Heidelberg. Scanlon, T. F. 1989. Textual geography in Sallust’s The War With Jugurtha. Ramus 17: 138–175. Scanlon, T. F. 1998. Reflexivity and irony in the proem of Sallust’s ‘‘Historiae.’’ In C. Deroux (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 9: 186–224. Scardigli, B. (ed.). 1995. Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford. Schachter, A. 1996. Reconstructing Thespiae. In La montagne des Muses: Etudes publiées par A. Hurst et A. Schachter. Recherches et Rencontres 7.99–126. Schadewaldt, W. 1934. Die Anfänge der Geschichtsschreibung bei den Griechen. In Hellas und Hesperien. Gesammelte Schriften zur Antike und zur neueren Literatur, 2nd edition. 2 vols. Stuttgart. I.559–580. Schäfer, C. 2002. Eumenes Von Cardia. Frankfurt. Scheiber, A. 1965. Zu den Antiken Zusammenhangen der Aggada. A.Ant.Hung. 13: 267–272. Scheid, J. 1995. Graeco ritu: A typically Roman way of honouring the gods. HSCPh 98: 15–31. Scheller, P. 1911. De hellenistica historiae conscribendae arte. Diss. Leipzig. Schellhase, K. C. 1976. Tacitus in Renaissance Political Thought. Chicago. Schepens, G. 1970. Éphore sur la valeur de l’autopsie (FGrHist 70 F 110 ¼ Polybe XII 27.7). AncSoc 1: 163–182. Schepens, G. 1974. The bipartite and tripartite divisions of history in Polybius XII 25 & 27. AncSoc 5: 297–307. Schepens, G. 1975a. Some aspects of source-theory in Greek historiography. AncSoc 6: 257–273. argeia in Polybios’ Geschichtstheorie. RSA 5: 185–200. Schepens, G. 1975b. EmwasiB und en Schepens, G. 1977a. Historiographical problems in Ephorus. In Historiographia Antiqua. Commentationes Lovanienses editae in honorem W. Peremans septuagenarii. Leuven. 95–118. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 629 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 629 Schepens, G. 1977b. Ephoros, Niebuhr und die Geschichte der historischen Kritik. Historia 26: 503–506. Schepens, G. 1980. L’ ‘‘autopsie’’ dans la méthode des historiens grecs du V e siècle avant J.-C. Verhand. Kon. Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België. Klasse der Letteren 93. Brussels. Schepens, G. 1990. Polemic and methodology in Polybius’ Book XII. In Verdin et al. 1990: 39–61. Schepens, G. 1991– . Die Fragmente der Griechischen Historiker Continued, Part IVA: Biography. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne. Schepens, G. 1993. L’apogée de l’archè spartiate comme époque historique dans l’historiographie du début du IV e siècle av. J.-C. AncSoc 24: 169–204. Schepens, G. 1994. Politics and belief in Timaeus of Tauromenium. AncSoc 25: 249–278. Schepens, G. 1997. Jacoby’s FGrHist: Problems, methods, prospects. In Most 1997: 144–172. Schepens, G. 1998. Prolegomena. In G. Schepens (ed.), Die Fragmente der Griechischen Historiker Continued, Part IV: Biography and Antiquarian Literature. IV.A.1: Biography. The Pre-Hellenistic Period. Leiden, New York, and Cologne. VII–XXI. Schepens, G. 2001a. Ancient Greek city histories: Self-definition through history writing. In K. Demoen (ed.), The Greek City from Antiquity to the Present: Ideological Construct, Literary Representation. Leuven, Paris, Sterling, Virginia. 3–25. Schepens, G. 2001b. Who wrote the Hellenica Oxyrhynchia? The need for a methodological code. Sileno 27: 201–224. Schepens, G. 2001c. Arete versus hegemonia. Theopompus on problems of the Spartan empire. In Storiografia locale e storiografia universale: forme di acquisizione del sapere storico nella cultura antica. Atti del Congresso, Bologna, 16–18 dicembre 1999. Como. 529–565. Italian translation in G. Davverio Rocchi and M. Cavalli (eds.), Il Peloponneso di Senofonte. Milan. 1–40. Schepens, G. 2003. L’apport des documents dans la méthode historique d’Ephore. In Biraschi et al. 2003: 331–365. Schepens, G. 2004. Arete e hegemonia. I profili storici di Lisandro e di Agesilao nelle Elleniche di Teopompo. In G. Davverio Rocchi and M. Cavalli (eds.), Il Peloponneso di Senofonte. Milan. 1–40. Italian version of ‘‘Arete versus hegemonia: Theopompus on problems of the Spartan empire.’’ In Storiografia locale e storiografia universale. Como. 2001. 529–565. Schepens, G. 2006a. Travelling Greek historians. In M. G. Angeli Bertinelli and A. Donati (eds.), Le vie della storia. Migrazioni di popoli, viaggi di individui, circolazione di idee nel Mediterraneo antico. Atti del II Incontro Internazionale di Storia Antica. Serta Antiqua et Mediaevalia, vol. 9. Rome. 81–102. Schepens, G. 2006b. Storiografia e letteratura antiquaria. Le scelte di Felix Jacoby. In: C. Ampolo (ed.), Aspetti dell’opera di Felix Jacoby. Seminari Arnaldo Momigliano, Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa 18–19 dicembre 2002. Pisa. 149–171. Schepens, G. 2006c. Tucidide in controluce: ‘‘La guerra del Peloponneso’’ nella storiografia greca del IV secolo a.C. In L. Santi Amantini (ed.), Vincitori e vinti: il dopoguerra nel mondo greco. Situazioni politiche, propaganda, interpretazioni storiografiche. Rapporti interstatali nell’Antichità. Rome 2006. Schepens, G. Forthcoming. Storiografia e letteratura antiquaria: Le scelte di Felix Jacoby. In Aspetti dell’opera di Felix Jacoby, Atti del Convegno, Pisa 20–21 dicembre 2002. Schepens, G. and Bollansée, J. 2004. Myths of the origins of peoples and the birth of universal history. In J. M. Candau Morón, F. J. González Ponce, and G. Cruz Andreotti (eds.), Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 630 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 630 Bibliography Historia y mito. El pasado legendario como fuente de autoridad. Actas del Simposio Internacional, Sevilla, Valverde del Camino y Huelva 22–25 abril 2003. Malaga. 57–75. Schepens, G. and Bollansée, J. (eds.). 2005. The Shadow of Polybius: Intertextuality as a Research Tool in Greek Historiography. Proceedings of the International Colloquium, Leuven, September 22–23, 2001. Leuven, Paris, and Dudley, Mass. Schepens, G. and Delcroix, K. 1996. Ancient paradoxography: Origin, evolution, production and reception. In O. Pecere and A. Stramaglia (eds.), La letteratura di consumo nel mondo greco-latino. Cassino. 375–460. Schindler, C. 2000. Geographische Lehrdichtung. In Hübner 2000c: 163–183. Schlesinger, A. 1967. Livy: Summaries, Vol. XIV. Cambridge, Mass., and London. Schlumberger, J. 1974. Die Epitome de Caesaribus. Munich. Schmeling, G. (ed.). 1996. The Novel in the Ancient World. Leiden and Boston. Schmidt, M. G. 1989. Cassius Dio, Buch LXX. Bemerkungen zur Rechnik des Epitomators Ioannes Xiphilinos. Chiron 19: 55–59. Schmidt, M. G. 1997. Die ‘‘zeitgeschichtlichen’’ Bücher im Werk des Cassius Dio – von Commodus zu Severus Alexander. ANRW II.34.3: 2591–2649. Schmidt, M. G. 1999. Politische und persönliche Motivationen in Dios Zeitgeschichte. In Zimmermann 1999b: 93–117. Schmidt, P. 1978. Aurelius Victor und die Corpus Aurelianum. RE Suppl. XV: 1583–1676. Schmitzer, U. 2000. Velleius Paterculus und das Interesse an der Geschichte im Zeitalter des Tiberius. Heidelberg. Schnabel, P. 1924. Berossos und die babylonisch-hellenistische Literatur. Berlin. Schneider, B. 1955. Zum Krater des Aristonothos. Röm. Mitt. 62: 78–106. Schnorr von Karlsfeld, H. 1888. Über die Reden und Briefe bei Sallust. Diss. Munich. Scholten, J. B. 2000. The Politics of Plunder: Aitolians and Their Koinon in the Early Hellenistic Era, 279–217 BC . Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Scholz, P. 2003. Sullas Commentarii. In Eigler et al. 2003: 172–195. Schreckenberg, H. 1968. Bibliographie zu Flavius Josephus. Leiden. Schreckenberg, H. 1972. Die Flavius-Josephus Tradition in Antike und Mittelalter. Leiden. Schreckenberg, H. 1977. Rezeptionsgeschichtliche und textkritische Untersuchungen zu Flavius Josephus. Leiden. Schreckenberg, H. 1979. Bibliographie zu Flavius Josephus: Supplementband mit Gesamtregister. Leiden. Schreckenberg, H. 1984. Josephus und die christliche Wirkungsgeschichte seines ‘‘Bellum Judaicum.’’ ANRW II.21.2: 1106–1217. Schreckenberg, H. 1987. The works of Josephus and the early Christian Church. In L. Feldman and G. Hata (eds.), Josephus, Judaism, and Christianity. Detroit. 315–324. Schuller, W. (ed.). 1993. Livius: Aspekte seines Werkes. Constance. Schultze, C. E. 1980. Dionysius of Halicarnassus as a Historian: An Investigation of his Aims and Methods in the Antiquitates Romanae. DPhil thesis. Oxford. Schultze, C. E. 1986. Dionysius of Halicarnassus and his audience. In Moxon et al. 1986: 121–141. Schultze, C. E. 1995. Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Roman chronology. PCPhS 41: 192–214. Schultze, C. E. 2000. Authority, originality and competence in the Roman Archaeology of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Histos 4. Electronic publication: www.dur.ac.uk/Classics/ histos/2000/schultze1.html. Schwartz, E. 1895. Aristobulos. RE II.1.911–918 (¼ Schwartz 1957: 119–129). Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 631 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 631 Schwartz, E. 1899. Cassius (40). RE III.2: 1684–1722 (¼ Schwartz 1957: 394–450). Schwartz, E. 1905. Diodoros. RE V: 663–704 (¼ Schwartz 1957: 663–704). Schwartz, E. 1907. Ephoros. RE VI: 1–16 (¼ Schwartz 1957: 3–26). Schwartz, E. 1919. Das Geschichtswerk des Thukydides. Bonn. Schwartz, E. 1926. Review of Taeger 1925. Gnomon 2: 65–82. Schwartz, E. 1928. Geschichtsschreibung und Geschichte bei den Hellenen. Reprinted in Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin 1938. I: 67–87. Schwartz, E. 1957. Griechische Geschichtsschreiber. Leipzig. Schwartz, S. 1990. Josephus and Judaean Politics. Leiden. Schwyzer, E. and Debrunner, A. 1950. Griechische Grammatik auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechischer Grammatik. 2: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. Munich. Sciarrino, E. 2004. Putting Cato the Censor’s Origines in its place. ClAnt 23: 323–357. Seaford, R. 1996. Euripides: Bacchae. Warminster. Seaford, R. 2000. The social function of Attic tragedy: A response to Jasper Griffin. CQ 50: 30–44. Sebesta, J. L. and Bonfante, L. 1994. The World of Roman Costume. Madison, Wisc. Seeck, O. 1893. Ammianus (4) Marcellinus. RE I.1845–1852. Seel, O. 1972. Eine römische Weltgeschichte. Nuremberg. Segal, E. 1987. Roman Laughter, 2nd edition. New York and Oxford. Sehlmeyer, M. 2004. Origo Gentis Romanae: Die Ursprünge des römischen Volkes. Darmstadt. Seibert, J. 1969. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte Ptolemaios’ I. Munich. Semple, E. C. 1931. The Geography of the Mediterranean Region: Its Relation to Ancient History. New York. Seyfarth, W. 1969. Vom Geschichtsscreiber und seinem Publikum im Spätantike Rom. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universität Rostock 18: 449–455. Seyfarth, W. 1978. Ammianus Marcellinus: Rerum Gestarum Libri Qui Supersunt. 2 vols. Leipzig. Shaw, B. 1984. Bandits in the Roman empire. Past and Present 105: 3–52. Shaw, B. 1993. Tyrants, bandits, and kings: Personal power in Josephus. Journal of Jewish Studies 44: 176–204. Shaw, B. 1995. Josephus: Roman power and responses to it. Athenaeum 83: 357–390. Shipley, F. W. 1924. Velleius Paterculus. Compendium of Roman history; Res gestae divi Augusti. London and Cambridge, Mass. Shotter, D. 1993. Suetonius: The Lives of Galba, Otho, Vitellius. Warminster. Shrimpton, G. S. 1991. Theopompus the Historian. Montreal and London. Shrimpton, G. S. 1997. History and Memory in Ancient Greece. Montreal, Kingston, and London. Shrimpton, G. S. 2003. Herodotus’ intellectual context – a review article. AHB 17: 149–157. Sickinger, J. P. 1999. Public Records and Archives in Classical Athens. Chapel Hill and London. Siegert, F. et al. 2001. Flavius Josephus: Aus meinem Leben/Vita. Kritische Ausgabe, Übersetzung, und Kommentar. Münster. Sinclair, P. 1991. Rhetorical generalizations in Annales 1–6. A review of the problem of innuendo and Tacitus’ integrity. ANRW II.33.4: 2795–2831. Sklenár, R. 1998. La République des Signes: Caesar, Cato, and the language of Sallustian morality. TAPhA 128: 205–220. Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford. Small, D. B. (ed.). 1995. Methods in the Mediterranean: Historical and Archaeological Views on Texts and Archaeology. Leiden. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 632 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 632 Bibliography Smarczyk, B. 2006. Thucydides and epigraphy. In A. Rengakos and A. Tsakmakis (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Thucydides. Leiden and Boston. 495–522. Smith, C. F. 1921–1930. Thucydides. 4 vols. Revised edition. Loeb Classical Library. London and Cambridge, Mass. Smith, P. J. 1994. A note on Ammianus and Juvenal. LCM 19: 23–24. Smith, R. R. R. 1988. Simulacra Gentium: The Ethne from the Sebasteion at Aphrodisias. JRS 78: 50–77. Sofman, A. S. and Tsibukidis, D. I. 1987. Nearchus and Alexander. AncW 16: 71–77. Solmsen, F. 1971. Thucydides’ treatment of words and concepts. Hermes 99: 385–408. Sommerstein, A. 1996. Aeschylean Tragedy. Bari. Sörbom, G. 1935. Variatio sermonis Tacitei. Uppsala. Sordi, M. 1958a. La lega tessala fino ad Alessandro magno. Rome. Sordi, M. 1958b. La Terza Guerra Sacra. RFIC n.s. 36: 134–166. Sordi, M. 1969. Diodori Siculi Bibliothecae Liber Sextus Decimus. Florence. Sordi, M. (ed.). 1988. Geografia e storiografia nel mondo classico. Milan. Sordi, M. 1990. Filisto e la propaganda dionisiana. In Verdin et al. 1990: 159–171. Sordi, M. 2002. Scritti di storia romana. Milan. Sotiroudis, P. 1989. Untersuchungen zum Geschichtswerk des Johannes von Antiocheia. Thessaloniki. Spada, S. 2002. La storiografia occidentale di età ellenistica. In Vattuone 2002d: 233–273. Späth, T. 1998. Salluste ‘‘Bellum Catilinae’’: un texte tragique de l’historiographie? Pallas 49: 173–195. Spencer, D. 2003. The Roman Alexander: Reading a Cultural Myth. Exeter. St. Joseph, J. J. 1978. The camp at Durno, Aberdeenshire, and the site of Mons Graupius. Britannia 9: 271–287. Stadter, P. (ed.) 1973. The Speeches in Thucydides. Chapel Hill and London. Stadter, P. A. 1980. Arrian of Nicomedia. Chapel Hill. Stadter, P. A. 1989. A Commentary on Plutarch’s Pericles. Chapel Hill. Stadter, P. A. (ed.). 1992. Plutarch and the Historical Tradition. London and New York. Stadter, P. A. 2005. Revisiting Plutarch’s Lives of the Caesars. In A. Pérez Jiménez and F. Titchener (eds.), Valori letterari delle opere di Plutarco. Studi . . . Italo Gallo. Málaga and Logan, Utah. 419–436. Stadter, P. A. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.). 2002. Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 A D ). Leuven. Stahl, H.-P. 1966. Thukydides: Die Stellung des Menschen im geschichtlichen Prozess. Munich. English translation: Thucydides: Man’s Place in History. London and Swansea. 2003. Stahl, H.-P. 1975. Learning through suffering? Croesus’ conversations in the History of Herodotus. YCS 24: 1–36. Starks, J. 2000. Nullus me est hodie Poenus Poenior: Balanced ethnic humor in Plautus’ Poenulus. Helios 27: 163–186. Starr, C. G. 1968. The Awakening of the Greek Historical Spirit. New York. Starr, R. J. 1981. The scope and genre of Velleius’ history. CQ 31: 162–174. Steidle, W. 1983. Beobachtungen zu Appians EMFYLIA. Hermes 111: 402–430. Steidle, W. 1988. Beobachtungen zum Geschichtswerk des Cassius Dio. WJA 14: 203–224. Stephens, S. A. and Winkler, J. J. 1995. Ancient Greek Novels: The Fragments. Princeton. Stergiopoulos, C. D. 1949. Strabon et la division administrative de la Crète. Rev. Arch. 31–32: 985–992. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 633 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 633 Sterling, G. E. 1992/2006. Historiography and Self-Definition: Josephos, Luke-Acts and Apologetic Historiography. Leiden. Stevenson, R. B. 1987. Lies and invention in Deinon’s Persica. Achaemenid History 2: 27–35. Stevenson, R. B. 1997. Persica: Greek Writing about Persia in the Fourth Century B C . Edinburgh. Stewart, J. J. 2003. Some connections between the speech of Calgacus and the Laus Caesaris. AHB 17: 1–4. Stoian, I. 1967. À propos de la conception historique d’Ammien Marcellin (Ut miles quondam et Graecus). Latomus 26: 73–81. Stone, S. 1994. The toga: From national to ceremonial costume. In Sebesta and Bonfante 1994: 13–45. Stoneman, R. 1991. The Greek Alexander Romance. Harmondsworth. Stramaglia, A. 1999. Res inauditae, incredulae: Storie di fantasmi nel mondo greco-latino. Bari. Strasburger, H. 1934. Ptolemaios und Alexander. Leipzig. Strasburger, H. 1939. Onesikritos. RE XVIII: 460–467. Strasburger, H. 1952. Alexanders Zug durch die gedrosische Wüste. Hermes 80: 456–493. Strasburger, H. 1965. Poseidonios on problems of the Roman empire. JRS 55: 40–53. Strasburger, H. 1972. Homer und die Geschichtsschreibung. SB Heidelberg Akademie der Wissenschaften. Phil.-hist. Klass. 1972.1 (¼ Strasburger 1982: 1057–1097). Strasburger, H. 1975. Die Wesensbestimmung der Geschichte durch die antike Geschichtsschreibung. SB Wissenschaflichen Gesellschaft . . . Frankfurt am Main. 3rd edition. Wiesbaden (¼ Strasburger 1982: I.963–1016). Strasburger, H. 1977. Umblick in Trümmerfeld der antiken Geschichtsschreibung. In Historiographia Antiqua. Commentationes Lovanienses editae in honorem W. Peremans septuagenarii. Leuven. 3–52. Strasburger, H. 1982. Studien zur Alten Geschichte. 2 vols. Hildesheim and New York. Strasburger, H. 1997. Umblick im Trümmerfeld der griechischen Geschichtsschreibung. In Historiographia Antiqua. Commentationes Lovanienses editae in honorem W. Peremans septuagenarii. Leuven. 3–52. Strauss, L. 1939. The spirit of Sparta or the taste of Xenophon. Social Research 6: 502–536. Strauss, L. 1947. On Tyranny. Ithaca. Strauss, L. 1964. The City and Man. Chicago and London. Stroud, R. 1968. Drakon’s Law on Homicide. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Stroud, R. 1978. State documents in archaic Athens: From Solon to Salamis. In Athens Comes of Age. Princeton. 20–42. Stroud, R. 1979. The Axones and Kyrbeis of Drakon and Solon. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Stückelberger, A. et al. 2005–. Klaudios Ptolemaios: Handbuch der Geographie. 2 vols. Basel. Stylianou, P. J. 1998. A Historical Commentary on Diodorus Siculus Book 15. Oxford. Suerbaum, W. (ed.). 2002. Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike, 1: Die archaische Literatur. Von den Anfängen bis Sullas Tod. Vorliterarische Periode und 240 bis 78 v.Chr. Munich. Sullivan, D. 1976. Innuendo and the ‘‘weighted alternative’’ in Tacitus. CJ 71: 312–326. Sumner, G. V. 1970. The truth about Velleius Paterculus: Prolegomena. HSCPh 74: 257–297. Sunseri, G. B. 1997. Poesia e storiografia in Eforo di Cuma. QS 46: 143–167. Swain, S. C. R. 1989a. Plutarch: Chance, providence, and history. AJPh 110: 272–302. Swain, S. C. R. 1989b. Plutarch’s de Fortuna Romanorum. CQ 39: 504–516. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 634 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 634 Bibliography Swain, S. C. R. 1996. Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, AD 50–250. Oxford. Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford. Syme, R. 1958a. Tacitus. 2 vols. Oxford. Syme, R. 1958b. The senator as historian. In Histoire et historiens dans l’antiquité. Vandoeuvres-Genève. 185–201 (¼ Syme 1970: 1–10). Syme, R. 1964/2002. Sallust. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Syme, R. 1968. Ammianus and the Historia Augusta. Oxford. Syme, R. 1970. Ten Studies in Tacitus. Oxford. Syme, R. 1978. Mendacity in Velleius. AJPh 99: 45–63. Szegedy-Maszak, A. 1981. The Nomoi of Theophrastus. New York. Tabacco, R. 1998. I breviari storici del IV secolo. In I. Lana and E. V. Maltese (eds.), Storia della Civiltà Letteraria Greca e Latina. Turin. III: 490–498. Taeger, F. 1925. Thukydides. Stuttgart. Taiphakos, I. G. 1980. Cicero and the Sicilian historiography: Timaeus. Ciceroniana 4: 177–189. Talbert, R. J. A. 1988. Plutarch on Sparta. Harmondsworth. Talbert, R. J. A. 2004. Cartography and taste in Peutinger’s Roman map. In Talbert and Brodersen 2004: 113–141. Talbert, R. and Brodersen, K. (eds.). 2004. Space in the Roman World. Münster, New Brunswick, and London. Tarn, W. W. 1948. Alexander the Great. 2 vols. Cambridge. Tarn, W. W. 1949. Arrian. Oxford Classical Dictionary, 1st edition. 101. Tatum, J. 1989. Xenophon’s Imperial Fiction. Princeton. Taub, L. 2003. Ancient Meteorology. London and New York. Teixidor, J. 1989. À propos d’une inscription araméene de Failaka. In T. Fahd (ed.), L’Arabie préislamique et son environnement historique et culturel. Leiden. 169–171. Thackeray, H., Marcus, R., Wilgren, A., and Feldman, L. (eds,). 1927–1965. Josephus. 13 vols. Loeb Classical Library. London and Cambridge, Mass. Thelamon, F. 2001. Écrire l’histoire de l’église: d’Eusèbe de Césarée à Rufin d’Aquilée. In Pouderon and Duval 2001: 207–235. Thissen, H.-J. 2002. Das Lamm des Bokchoris. In Blasius and Schipper 2002: 115–136. Thomas, P. (ed.). 1966. Anonymous: Epitoma Rerum Gestarum Alexandri et Liber de Morte Eius. Leipzig. Thomas, Richard. 1982. Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographical Tradition. Cambridge. Thomas, Rosalind. 1989. Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens. Cambridge. Thomas, Rosalind. 1993. Performance and written publication in Herodotus and the Sophistic generation. In W. Kullmann and J. Althoff (eds.), Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur. Tübingen. 225–244. Thomas, Rosalind. 1997. Ethnography, proof and argument in Herodotus’ Histories. PCPhS 43: 128–148. Thomas, Rosalind. 2000. Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge. Thompson, E. A. 1947. The Historical Work of Ammianus Marcellinus. Cambridge. Thompson, W. E. 1985. Fragments of the preserved historians – especially Polybius. In The Greek Historians: Literature and History. Studies . . . A. E. Raubitschek. Saratoga, Cal. 119–139. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 635 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 635 Thomson, R. W. 1976. Agathangelos: History of the Armenians. Albany, NY. Thomson, R. W. 1978. Moses Khorenars’i: History of the Armenians. Cambridge, Mass. Thomson, R. W. 1982. Elishe: History of Vardan and the Armenian War. Cambridge, Mass. Thomson, R. W. 1991. The History of Lazar P’arpec’i. Atlanta. Thomson, R. W. with Howard-Johnston, J. 1999. The Armenian History attributed to Sebeos. Liverpool. Thurn, H. 2000. Ioannis Malalae Chronographia. Berlin and New York. Timpe, D. 1970/1. Le Origini di Catone e la storiografia latina. Atti e Memorie dell’ Accademia Patavina di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, Classe di Sc. mor. 5–33. Timpe, D. 1972. Fabius Pictor und die Anf änge der römischen Historiographie. ANRW I.2: 928–969. Timpe, D. 1979. Erwägungen zur jüngeren Annalistik. A&A 25: 97–119. Timpe, D. 1987. Geschichtsschreibung und Opposition. In A. Giovannini and D. van Berchem (eds.), Opposition et résistances à l’empire d’Auguste à Trajan. Vandœuvres-Genève. 65–95. Timpe, D. 1988. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit als Basis der frührömischen Überlieferung. In J. von Ungern-Sternberg and H. Reinau (eds.), Vergangenheit in mündlicher Überlieferung. Stuttgart. 266–286. Timpe, D. 2003. Erinnerung als Lebensmacht und Geschichte als Literatur: Bilanz und Ausblick. In Eigler et al. 2003: 287–316. Tod, M. N. 1948. A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions. Vol. II, From 403 to 323 BC . Oxford. Toher, M. 1987. On the terminal date of Nicolaus’ history. AHB 1: 135–138. Tompkins, D. 1972. Stylistic characterization in Thucydides: Nicias and Alcibiades. YCS 22: 181–214. Toner, J. P. 2002. Rethinking Roman History. Cambridge. Tonnet, H. 1988. Recherches sur Arrien: Sa personnalité et ses écrits atticistes. 2 vols. Amsterdam. Too, Y. L. 1998. The Idea of Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford. Torelli, M. 1989. Archaic Rome between Latium and Etruria. CAH 2 VII.2: 30–51. Tränkle, H. 1977. Livius und Polybios. Basel. Treu, K. 1984. Roman und Geschichtsschreibung. Klio 66: 456–459. Trombley, F. R. and Watt, J. W. 2000. The Chronicle of Pseudo-Joshua the Stylite. Liverpool. Tsakmakis, A. 1995. Thucydides and Herodotus: Remarks on the attitude of the historian regarding literature. SCI 14: 17–32. Tsakmakis, A. 1996. Thukykides VI 54, 1 und Herodot. Philologus 140: 201–213. Tully, J. (ed.). 1988. Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Princeton. Tuplin, C. J. 1993. The Failings of Empire: A Reading of Xenophon Hellenica 2.3.11–7.5.27. Historia Einzelschriften 76. Stuttgart. Tuplin, C. J. (ed.). 2004. Xenophon and his World. Stuttgart. Ullmann, L. and Price, J. 2002. Drama and history in Josephus’ Bellum Judaicum. SCI 21: 97–111. Ullmann, R. 1927. La technique des discours dans Salluste, Tite-Live et Tacite. Oslo. Urbainczyk, T. 1997. Socrates of Constantinople: Historian of Church and State. Ann Arbor. Usher, S. 1969. The Historians of Greece and Rome. London. Usher, S. 1982. The style of Dionysius of Halicarnassus in the ‘‘Antiquitates Romanae.’’ ANRW II.30.1: 817–838. Utard, R. 2004. Le discours indirect chez les historiens latins: écriture ou oralité? Histoire d’un style. Louvain, Paris, and Dudley, Mass. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 636 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 636 Bibliography VanderLeest, J. 1988. Appian and the Writing of the Roman History. Diss. University of Toronto. VanderLeest, J. 1989. Appian’s references to his own time. AHB 3: 131–133. van Deun, P. 2003. The church historians after Eusebius. In Marasco 2003b: 151–176. van Dijk, J. 1962. Die Inschriftenfunde. Vorläufiger Bericht über die von dem deutschen arachäologischer Institut und der deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft aus Mitteln der deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft unternommen Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka 18: 39–62. van Nuffelen, P. 2004. Un héritage de paix et de piété: Étude sur les histories ecclésiastiques de Socrate et de Sozomène. Louvain. van Paasen, C. 1957. The Classical Tradition of Geography. Groningen. Vannicelli, P. 1987. L’economia delle Storie di Eforo. RFIC 115: 165–191. Vannicelli, P. 1993. Erodoto e la storia dell’alto e medio arcaismo (Sparta, Tessaglia, Cirene). Rome. Vannicelli, P. 2001. Herodotus’ Egypt and the foundations of universal history. In Luraghi 2001c: 211–240. Vanotti, G. 2002. Ippi di Reggio. In Vattuone 2002d: 33–54. Vansina, J. 1985. Oral Tradition as History. Madison, Wisc. Vasaly, A. 1993. Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Vasunia, P. 2001. The Gift of the Nile: Hellenizing Egypt from Aeschylus to Alexander. Berkeley and Los Angeles. Vattuone, R. 1978. Logoi e storia in Tucidide. Contributo allo studio della spedizione ateniese in Sicilia del 415 a.C. Bologna. Vattuone, R. 1983. Timeo e la ‘‘puerizia’’ di Agatocle. Florence. Vattuone, R. 1991. Sapienza d’Occidente. Il pensiero storico di Timeo di Tauromenio. Bologna. Vattuone, R. 1998. Le dimensioni ‘‘universali’’ della storiografia greca fra Erodoto e Teopompo. In L. Aigner-Foresti (ed.), L’ecumenismo politico nella coscienza dell’ Occidente, Bergamo 18–21 Settembre 1995. Rome. 57–96. Vattuone, R. 2000. Eforo e Filisto (apud Plut. Dio 36.3). In Suggraphē: Materiali e appunti per lo studio della storia e della letteratura antica. Como. 65–71. Vattuone, R. 2001. Tradizioni locali e prospettive universali nella storiografia greca d’occidente. In Storiografia locale e storiografia universale. Forme di acquisizione del sapere storico nella cultura antica. Como. 263–285. Vattuone, R. 2002a. Introduzione. In Vattuone 2002d: 11–29. Vattuone, R. 2002b. Timeo di Tauromenio. In Vattuone 2002d: 177–232. Vattuone, R. 2002c. La necessità del tiranno. Tendenze della storiografia greca di IV sec. a.C. sulla dinastia dionigiana. In La Sicilia dei due Dionisı̂. Rome. 533–553. Vattuone, R. (ed.). 2002d. Storici greci d’Occidente. Bologna. Vattuone, R. 2005. Fra Timoleonte e Agatocle. Note di storia e storiografia ellenistica. In C. Bearzot and F. Landucci (eds.), Diodoro e l’altra Grecia: Macedonia, Occidente, Ellenismo nella Biblioteca storica. Milan. 283–325. Veh, O. 1989. Appians römische Geschichte II: Die Burgerkriege. Notes and introduction by K. Brodersen. Bibliothek der griechischen Literatur XXVII. Stuttgart. Venuti, L. 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London and New York. Verbrugghe, G. P. 1982. L. Cincius Alimentus: His place in Roman historiography. Philologus 126: 316–323. Verbrugghe, G. P. 1989. On the meaning of Annales, on the meaning of annalist. Philologus 133: 192–230. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 637 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 637 Vercruysse, M. 1984. Het thema van de waarheidsverdraaiing in de Griekse geschiedschrijving. Een onderzoek van Polybius en zijn voorgangers. Brussels. Vercruysse, M. 1990. À la recherche du mensonge et de la vérité: la fonction des passages méthodologiques chez Polybe. In Verdin, Schepens, and de Keyser 1990: 17–38. Verdin, H. 1971. De historisch-kritische methode van Herodotus. Verhand. Kon. Vlaamse Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren 33, 1971, nr. 69. Brussels. Verdin, H. 1974. La fonction de l’histoire selon Denys d’Halicarnasse. Anc.Soc. 5: 289–307. Verdin, H. 1977. Les remarques critiques d’Hérodote et de Thucydide sur la poésie en tant que source historique. In Historiographia Antiqua. Commentationes Lovanienses editae in honorem W. Peremans septuagenarii. Leuven. 53–76. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and de Keyser E. (eds.). 1990. Purposes of History: Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd Centuries BC . Leuven. Vertsetis, A. V. 1989. ElegxoB tvn Ð plhroworivn Ð to Ðy Diod vroy gi a t o symmaxik o p olemo (358/7–356/5 P.X.). Parnassos 31.1: 119–129. Veyne, P. 1971. Comment on écrit l’histoire. Essai d’épistémologie. Paris. Veyne, P. 1984. Writing History: Essay on Epistemology. Manchester and Middletown, Conn. Trans. of Veyne 1971. Veyne, P. 1983. Les Grecs ont-ils cru à leurs mythes? Paris. Veyne, P. 1988. Did the Greeks Believe in their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination. Trans. P. Wissing. Chicago. Vidal-Naquet, P. 1960. Temps des dieux et temps des hommes. In Le chasseur noir. Formes de pensée et formes de société dans le monde grec. Paris 1981. 69–94. Vidal-Naquet, P. 2000. Raison et déraison dans l’histoire. In D. Roussel (ed.), Thucydide: La Guerre du Péloponnèse, 2nd edition. Paris. 5–31. Visotzky, B. 1983. Most tender and fairest of women: A study in the transmission of Aggada. HTR 76: 403–418. Visser, E. 1997. Homers Katalog der Schiffe. Stuttgart. von Albrecht, M. 1997. A History of Roman Literature: From Livius Andronicus to Boethius. Vol. 1. Leiden. von Fritz, K. 1940. Atthidographers and Exegetae. TAPhA 71: 91–126. von Fritz, K. 1954. The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity: A Critical Analysis of Polybius’ Political Ideas. New York. von Fritz, K. 1967. Die griechische Geschichtsschreibung. Von den Anfängen bis Thukydides. 2 vols. Berlin and New York. von Kittel, H. et al. (eds.). 2004–. Übersetzung-Translation-Traduction: An International Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. Vols. 1–. Berlin and New York. von Leyden, W. M. 1949–1950. Spatium historicum: The historical past as viewed by Hecataeus, Herodotus and Thucydides. Durham University Journal 11: 89–104. von Scala, R. 1890. Die Studien des Polybios. Stuttgart. von Soden, W. 1960. Zweisprachigkeit in der geistigen Kultur Babyloniens. Vienna. Vout, C. 1996. The myth of the toga: Understanding the history of Roman dress. G&R 43: 204–220. Vretska, K. 1937. Der Aufbau des Bellum Catilinae. Hermes 72: 202–222. Wacholder, B. Z. 1974. Eupolemus: A Study of Judaeo-Greek Literature. Cincinnati. Waddell, W. G. 1940. Manetho. LCL. Cambridge, Mass. Wade-Gery, H. T. 1933. Classical epigrams and epitaphs: A study of the Kimonian Age. JHS 53: 71–104. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 638 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 638 Bibliography Wagener, C. 1886. Festi Breviarium Rerum Gestarum Populi Romani. Leipzig. Walbank, F. W. 1938. FillipoB tragvidoymenoB: A Polybian experiment. JHS 58: 55–68 (¼ Walbank 1985: 210–223). Walbank, F. W. 1955. Tragic History: A Reconsideration. BICS 2: 4–14. Walbank, F. W. 1960. History and tragedy. Historia 9: 216–34 (¼ Walbank 1985: 224–241). Walbank, F. W. 1962. Polemic in Polybius. JRS 52: 1–12 (¼ Walbank 1985: 262–79). Walbank, F. W. 1965. Speeches in Greek Historians (3rd Myres Memorial Lecture). Oxford (¼ Walbank 1985: 242–261). Walbank, F. W. 1968–1969. The historians of Greek Sicily. Kokalos 14–15: 476–497. Walbank, F. W. 1970. Polybius and Macedonia. In B. Laourdas and Ch. Makaronas (eds.), Ancient Macedonia: First International Symposium. Thessaloniki. 291–307. Walbank, F. W. 1972. Polybius. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London. Walbank, F. W. 1985. Selected Papers: Studies in Greek and Roman History and Historiography. Cambridge. Walbank, F. W. 1989–1990. Timaeus’ views on the past. SCI 10: 41–54. Walbank, F. W. 1994. Supernatural paraphernalia in Polybius’ Histories. In Worthington 1994: 28–42 (¼ Walbank 2002: 245–257). Walbank, F. W. 2002. Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic World: Essays and Reflections. Cambridge. Walbank, F. W. 2005. The two-way shadow: Polybius among the fragments. In Schepens and Bollansée 2005: 1–18. Walker, A. D. 1993. Enargeia and the spectator in Greek historiography. TAPhA 123: 353–377. Walker, B. 1968. The Annals of Tacitus: A Study in the Writing of History, 2nd edition. Manchester. Walker, H. J. 1995. Theseus and Athens. New York and Oxford. Wallace, R. W. 1985. The Areopagos Council, to 307 BC . Baltimore and London. Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1983. Suetonius: The Scholar and His Caesars. London and New Haven. Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1998. To be Roman, go Greek. In M. Austin et al. (eds.), Modus Operandi: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey Rickman. BICS Supplement 71. London. 79–81. Wallraff, M. 1997. Der Kirchenhistoriker Sokrates. Untersuchungen zu Geschichtsdarstellung, Methode und Person. Göttingen. Walsh, P. G. 1961. Livy: The Composition of his History. Cambridge. Walsh, P. G. 1964. Livy: His Historical Aims and Methods. Cambridge. Walsh, P. G. 1996. Livy: Book XL. Warminster. Walt, S. 1997. Der Historiker C. Licinius Macer: Einleitung, Fragmente, Kommentar. Stuttgart and Leipzig. Walter, K. 1987. Jüdisch-hellenistische Literatur vor Philon von Alexandrien (unter Ausschluß Historiker). ANRW II.20.1, 67–120. Walter, U. 2003. Opfer ihrer Ungleichzeitigkeit: Die Gesamtgeschichten im ersten Jahrhundert v.Chr. und die fortdauernde Attraktivität des annalistischen Schemas. In Eigler et al. 2003: 136–156. Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und res publica. Zur Geschichtskultur der römischen Republik. Frankfurt. Wardman, A. E. 1960. Myth in Greek historiography. Historia 9: 403–413. Warnecke, H. 1999. Die (Alt-) Historische Geographie als eigenständige (Altertums-) wissenschaftliche Disziplin. Orbis Terrarum 5: 225–230. Watson, J. S. 1852. Sallust, Florus, and Velleius Paterculus. London. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 639 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 639 Watt, W. S. 1998. Vellei Paterculi Historiarum ad M. Vinicium Consulem Libri Duo. Stuttgart. Webb, R. 1997. Imagination and the arousal of the emotions in Greco-Roman rhetoric. In Braund and Gill 1997: 112–127. Weber, G. 2000. Kaiser, Träume und Visionen in Prinzipat und Spätantike. Stuttgart. We˛cowski, M. 2004. The hedgehog and the fox: Form and meaning in the prologue of Herodotus. JHS 124: 143–164. Weinreich, O. 1942. Antiphanes und Münchhausen. Sitz. der Akad. der Wiss. in Wien 220. Abh. 4. Weiss, H. 1942. Kausalität und Zufall in der Philosophie des Aristoteles. Bern. Welles, C. B. 1963. The Reliability of Ptolemy as an Historian. In Miscellanea di studi alessandrini in memoria di A. Rostagni. Turin. 101–116. Wellesley, K. 1972. Cornelius Tacitus: The Histories Book III. Sydney. Wellesley, K. 2000. The Year of the Four Emperors, 3rd edition. London and New York. West, M. L. 1966. Hesiod: Theogony. Oxford. West, M. L. 1985. The Hesiodic catalogue of women: its nature, structure, and origins. Oxford. West, M. L. 2003. Greek Epic Fragments. Cambridge, Mass., and London. West, S. R. 1985. Herodotus’ epigraphical interests. CQ n.s. 35: 278–305. West, S. R. 1999. Sophocles’ Antigone and Herodotus book three. In J. Griffin (ed.), Sophocles Revisited. Oxford. 109–136. Westlake, H. D. 1953/4. The Sicilian books of Theopompus’ Philippica. Historia 2: 288–307. Whealey, A. 2003. Josephus on Jesus: The Testimonium Flavianum Controversy from Late Antiquity to Modern Times. New York. Whitby, Michael. 1988. The Emperor Maurice and his Historian. Oxford. Whitby, Michael. 1992. Greek historical writing after Procopius: Variety and vitality. In A. Cameron and L. Conrad (eds.), The Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East I: Problems in the Literary Source Material. Princeton. 25–80. Whitby, Michael. 2000. The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus. Liverpool. Whitby, Michael. 2003. The church historians and Chalcedon. In Marasco 2003b: 449–495. Whitby, Michael and Whitby, Mary. 1986. The History of Theophylact Simocatta. Oxford. Whitby, Michael and Whitby, Mary. 1989. Chronicon Paschale 284–628 A D . Liverpool. White, H. 1913. Appian’s Roman History. Vols. 3–4. London and Cambridge, Mass. White, H. 1987. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore and London. Whitehead, D. 1980. The tribes of the Thirty Tyrants. JHS 100: 208–213. Whitehead, D. 2000. Hypereides: The Forensic Speeches. Oxford. Whitmarsh, T. 2005. The Greek novel: title and genre. AJPh 126: 587–611. Whitmarsh, T. 2007. This in-between book: Language, politics and genre in Tacitus’ Agricola. In B. McGing and J. Mossman (eds.), Biographical Limits. London and Swansea. Whittaker, C. R. 1969–1970. Herodian. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.. and London. Wiedemann, T. 1993. Sallust’s Jugurtha: Concord, discord and the digressions. G&R 40: 48–57. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1884. Hippys von Rhegion. Hermes 19: 442–452. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1893. Aristoteles und Athen. 2 vols. Berlin. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1907. Die Autobiographie im Altertum. Internationale Wochenschrift für Wissenschaft, Kunst und Technik 1: 1105–1114. Reprinted in Kleine Schriften VI (Berlin and Amsterdam, 1972): 120–127. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1908. Greek Historical Writing and Apollo: Two Lectures delivered before the University of Oxford, June 3 and 4, 1908. Oxford. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 640 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban 640 Bibliography Wilcken, U. 1894. Hypomnematismoi. Philologus 53: 84–126. Will, W. 1991. Die griechische Geschichtsschreibung des 4. Jahrhunderts. In J. M. Alonso-Núñez (ed.), Geschichtsbild und Geschichtsdenken im Altertum. Wege der Forschung 631. Darmstadt. 113–135. Wills, L. M. 1995. The Jewish Novel in the Ancient World. Ithaca and London. Wills, L. M. 2002. Ancient Jewish Novels: An Anthology. New York and Oxford. Wilson, J. 1982. What does Thucydides claim for his speeches? Phoenix 36: 95–103. Wilson, P. 1996. Tragic rhetoric: The use of tragedy and the tragic in the fourth century. In M. S. Silk (ed.), Tragedy and the Tragic. Oxford. 310–331. Winkler, G. 2000. Geographie bei den Römern: Mela, Seneca, Plinius. In Hübner 2000c: 141–161. Winton, R. I. 1999. Thucydides, I. 22. 1. Athenaeum 87: 527–533. Wirszubski, Ch. 1968. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge. Wirth, G. 1959. Ptolemaios als Geschichtsschreiber. RE XXIII.2.2467–2484. Wirth, G. 1967. Flavii Arriani Quae Extant Omnia I. Alexandri Anabasis. Leipzig. Wirth, G. (ed.). 1982. Romanitas-Christianitas: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte und Literatur der römischen Kaiserzeit. Berlin. Wirth, G. 1988. Nearch, Alexander und die Diadochen. Tyche 3: 241–259. Wiseman, T. P. 1979. Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. Leicester and Totowa, NJ. Wiseman, T. P. 1991. Flavius Josephus, Death of an Emperor. Exeter. Wiseman, T. P. 1993. Lying historians: Seven types of mendacity. In Gill and Wiseman 1993: 122–146. Wiseman, T. P. 1994. Historiography and Imagination: Eight Essays on Roman Culture. Exeter. Wiseman, T. P. 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge. Wiseman, T. P. 1998. Roman Drama and Roman History. Exeter. Wiseman, T. P. 2000. Liber: Myth, drama and ideology in republican Rome. In Bruun 2000: 265–299. Wiseman, T. P. 2004. The Myths of Rome. Exeter. Wiseman, T. P. 2005. Origines ludorum. In K. Welch and T. Hillard (eds.), Roman Crossings: Theory and Practice in the Roman Republic. London. 49–58. Witakowski, W. 1996. Pseudo-Dionysius of Tel-Mahre, Chronicle. Part III. Liverpool. Wölfflin, E. 1872. Antiochos von Syrakus und Coelius Antipater. Winterthur, Westfehling. Wölfflin, E. 1902. Epitome. ALLG 12: 333–344. Wolfson, S. 1999. The Battle of Mons Graupius: Some Problems of Text, Tactics and Topography. London. Womersley, D. (ed.). 1994. Edward Gibbon: The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. 3 vols. London and New York. Wood, N. 1995. Sallust’s theorem: A comment on ‘‘fear’’ in western political thought. History of Political Thought 16: 174–189. Woodhead, A. G. 1960. Thucydides’ portrait of Cleon. Mnemosyne 13: 289–317. Woodhouse, W. J. 1897. Aetolia, Its Geography, Topography, and Antiquities. Oxford. Woodman, A. J. 1975a. Velleius Paterculus. In T. A. Dorey (ed.), Empire and Aftermath: Silver Latin II. London. 1–25. Woodman, A. J. 1975b. Questions of date, genre, and style in Velleius: Some literary answers. CQ 25: 272–306. Woodman, A. J. 1977. Velleius Paterculus: The Tiberian Narrative (2.94–131). Cambridge. Marincola: Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography 1405102162_5_endmatter Page Proof page 641 23.2.2007 12:11pm Compositor Name: PDjeapradaban Bibliography 641 Woodman, A. J. 1979. Self-imitation and the substance of history: Tacitus Annals 1.61–5 and Histories 2.70, 5.14–15. In A. J. Woodman and J. Powell (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge. 143–155. Reprinted in Woodman 1998. 70–85. Woodman, A. J. 1983. Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). Cambridge. Woodman, A. J. 1988. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. London, Sydney, and Portland. Woodman, A. J. 1993. Amateur dramatics at the court of Nero: Annals 15.48–74. In Luce and Woodman 1993: 104–128 (¼ Woodman 1998: 190–217). Woodman, A. J. 1998. Tacitus Reviewed. Oxford. Woodman, A. J. 2003. Poems to historians. In Braund and Gill 2003: 191–216. Woodman, A. J. 2004. Tacitus: The Annals. Indianapolis and Cambridge, Mass. Woodman, A. J. and Martin, R. H. 1996. The Annals of Tacitus, Book 3. Cambridge. Woolf, G. 1994. Becoming Roman, staying Greek. PCPhS 40: 116–143. Wooten, C. 1974. The speeches in Polybius: An insight into the nature of Hellenistic oratory. AJPh 95: 235–251. Worthington, I. (ed.) 1994. Ventures into Greek History. Oxford. Wuensch, R. 1903. Ioannis Lydi De Magistratibus Populi Romani Libri Tres. Stuttgart. Yadin, Y. 1966. Masada: Herod’s Fortress and the Zealots’ Last Stand. Trans. M. Pearlman. New York. Yadin, Y. et al. 1989–. Masada I–VI: The Yigael Yadin Excavations 1963–1965 Final Reports. Jerusalem. Yardley, J. 1984. Quintus Curtius Rufus: The History of Alexander. Harmondsworth. Yavetz, Z. 1975. Reflection on Titus and Josephus. GRBS 16: 411–432. Young, D. C. 1984. The Olympic Myth of Greek Amateur Athletics. Chicago. Zambrini, A. 2004. Commento ai libri V–VII dell’Anabasi di Alessandro. In F. Sisti and A. Zambrini (eds.), Arriano: L’Anabasi di Alessandro. Vol. 2. Milan. Zangara, A. Forthcoming. Expérience et représentation dans l’historiographie à l’époque hellénistique et romaine. Paris. Zauzich, K. T. 1983. Das Lamm des Bokchoris. Papyrus Erzerhog Rainer (P. Rainer Cent.) 1: 165–174. Zecchini, G. 1991. Teoria e prassi del viaggio in Polibio. In G. Camassa and S. Fasce (eds.), Idea e realtà del viaggio: il viaggio nel mondo antico. Genoa. 111–141. Zecchini, G. 1993. Ricerche di storiografia latina tardoantica. Rome. Zevi, F. 1995. Demarato e i re ‘‘corinzi’’ di Roma. In A. Storchi Marino (ed.), L’incidenza dell’antico: studi in memoria di Ettore Lepore, I. Naples. 291–314. Ziegler, K. 1952. Polybius. RE XVI.2: 1440–1578. Zimmermann, M. 1999a. Enkomion und Historiographie: Entwicklungslinien der kaiserzeitlichen Geschichtsschreibung vom 1. bis zum frühen 3. Jh. n. Chr. In Zimmermann 1999b: 17–56. Zimmermann, M. (ed.) 1999b. Geschichtsschreibung und politischer Wandel im 3. Jh. n. Chr. Stuttgart. Zorzetti, N. 1990. The Carmina Convivalia. In O. Murray (ed.), Sympotica: A Symposium on the Symposion. Oxford. 289–307. Zuntz, G. 1955. The Political Plays of Euripides. Manchester. Zwierlein, O. 2003. Die Wölflin und die Zwillinge in der römische Historiographie. Paderborn.

RELATED PAPERS

RELATED TOPICS

Log In

'The Imperial Republic of Velleius Paterculus'

'The Imperial Republic of Velleius Paterculus'

Related Papers

RELATED PAPERS

RELATED TOPICS