[go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu
Cattle management in Late Roman and Early AngloSaxon Britain: a butchery and biometrical investigation from Pakenham and West Stow, Suffolk Mauro Rizzetto, University of Sheffield –i Introduction Two samples of animal bones from the sites of Pakenham and West Stow (north-west Suffolk) have been analysed and compared. This pilot study aims to contribute to a better understanding of local developments in animal husbandry between the late Roman period and the earliest phase of Anglo-Saxon occupation. Icklingham West Stow Pakenham Sites and materials ❖ PAKENHAM early 1st c. AD ----------- Roman military fort late 1st – 4th c. AD ----- small market centre FAUNAL SAMPLE abandonment layers of a water tower pit, lower deposits from sunken-featured buildings n. 48 and 55, first half of 4th c. AD ❖ WEST STOW 450-475 AD 1st – 2nd c. AD ------------ Roman occupation 5th – 7th c. AD ----------- early Anglo-Saxon settlement FAUNAL SAMPLES lower deposits from sunken-featured buildings n. 52 and 61, early 6th c. AD From specialised butchery practices to generalised husbandry The cattle butchery evidence from the two sites differs in quantitative and qualitative terms. ❖ PAKENHAM ○ intensively butchered cattle bones, prevalence of chop marks ○ presence of specific patterns and standardised butchery practices: • scapulae with intensive butchery activity on specific parts • longitudinally split long bones specialised beef production ❖ WEST STOW ○ less intensively butchered cattle bones ○ gradually higher proportion of cut marks more generalised husbandry practices typical of small-scale subsistence economies PAKENHAM, first half 4th c. AD 100% 3% 80% WEST STOW, 450-475 AD WEST STOW, early 6th c. AD 6% 11% 18% 60% 13% cut marks 35% 40% chop marks 20% 0% West Stow, 450475 West Stow, early 6th c. Proportion of cattle butchered bones. Evidence for size diminution in cattle Measurements from post-cranial bones show that the cattle from early Anglo-Saxon West Stow was smaller than that from Pakenham. This could represent a genuine size diminution resulting from a relaxation of selective pressures, although smaller cattle had always existed aside improved animals during Roman times. The few sites available for comparison may suggest that the size decrease of cattle was not an isolated phenomenon. Conclusions saw marks 68% Cattle butchered bones. Proportions of cut marks, chop marks and saw marks. 73 8 PAKENHAM 6 68 4 63 2 mm 58 Frequency Pakenham, first half 4th c. 56% 25% 65% cut and chop marks 53 0 -.41 Icklingham, 2nd-4th c. Pakenham, Milton Keynes, West Stow, Mucking, 5th 3rd-4th c. 3rd-4th c. late 5th-early mid-7th c. (Beech 1990) 6th c. (this study) West Stow, Iron Age (Crabtree 1989) Means and ranges of values of the astragalus GL. ❖ The butchery evidence underlines the different scales and aims of husbandry practices at the two sites, and reflects the different functions and nature of their economies ❖ The size of cattle most likely decreased between the late Roman and the early Anglo-Saxon periods -.21 -.11 -.01 -.11 -.01 8 WEST STOW 6 48 -.31 4 2 0 -.41 -.31 -.21 Log10 Log ratio diagrams for all post-cranial measurements (long bones SD and SLC excluded). Red bars indicate the logarithmic means. Acknowledgements I am grateful to Jude Plouviez for her advice and help in finding the faunal assemblages for my MSc dissertation. I would also like to thank Pam Crabtree for her contribution in sorting out the material. The constant assistance of Umberto Albarella and the support of the Zooarchaeology team were essential for the accomplishment of this work.