John-Paul Lotz

Ancient Ignatius of Antioch and the Parting of the Ways: Early Jewish-Christian Relations. By Thomas A. Robinson. (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers. 2009- Pp- xiv, 285. $27.95 paperback. ISBN 978-1-598-56323-8.) Catholic and Protestant scholars have debated the seven letters of St. Ignatius of Antioch since the Reformation. After all, Ignatius is an early witness to the threefold ministry of bishops, elders, and deacons, and a vital theological link between the New Testament period and the so-called earlyCatholicism of the second century. In the last half of the nineteenth century, the Zahn-Lightfoot consensus resolved many of the historical ambiguities surrounding the Syrian bishop (although by no means all); however, this was challenged in the twentieth century by new concerns no longer focused on the authenticity of Ignatius's writings but rather on the authenticity of their claims. Was Ignatius really a celebrated bishop carried off to martyrdom for his faithful leadership of the Church in Antioch, or was he somehow a tragic figure who was psychologically suspect and writing apologetically to defend the discord over which he presided (or possibly caused) while shoring up his legacy through voluntary martyrdom? The debated figure of Ignatius also features largely in another debate: the parting of the ways between Jews and Christians in antiquity. It is into this matrix of unresolved issues that Thomas A. Robinson steps with remarkable confidence and clarity. Whereas modern scholars have tended to view Ignatius as an eccentric and unrepresentative figure in early Christianity, and other scholars have begun to blur the alleged boundaries between "Judaisms and Christianities" in the age before Constantine, Robinson has edged carefully but decisively in the opposite direction. Methodologically, Robinson provides an historical overview of key features in the debate: the demographics and history of Antioch, the question of proselytes and God-fearers on the boundaries of Judaism, and the motive for Ignatius's letters to the seven churches. In each case, supported by a comprehensive engagement with modern scholarship, Robinson disentangles key suppositions and hypotheses that undergird much of modern scholarship's deconstruction and reconstruction of the two issues. In chapter 1 key demographic and historical presuppositions are ferreted out of the sparse but available evidence on Antioch, arriving at an account that affirms the privileged, but politically contingent, place of Jews in Antioch. By the time of Ignatius, this position was likely more fragile than at other times, due to the war with Rome. The ambiguous position of the Jewish community in Antioch must have been a feature in anxiety over boundaries following the war and the rise of an increasingly gentile-Jewish Christianity. …

... 16 The standard collections include: H. Mattingly and R. Carson, Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum, 6 vols. ... Citing history as his precedent, Plutarch noted the example of Solon as a personality worthy of imitation by anyone beginning public life as a politician. ...

This paper was given at SBL in 2008 and assesses the value of interpreting vocabulary used by Ignatius of Antioch in light of archeological and numismatic evidence related to the Imperial Cult in Asia Minor in the 1st and 2nd centuries CE.

Theories about the authenticity of the middle recension of Ignatius 7 letters have recently focused on questions of pseudepigraphy relating to alleged anacronisms of theology, gaps in the sources, or problems with the manuscript tradition. With internal and external historical evidence failing to offer definitive persuasions to either side of the debate,  a look at the internal narrative construction of the letters may shed further light on the question of the authenticity of the corpus.  An evaluation of the internal coherency of the letters and their inter-textual relation to each other may reveal aspects that would have been difficult for a forger to construct.  In particular, the 20 names that are named by Ignatius will be evaluated and compared to see if any of these help us with the corpus’ inter-textual setting. This short paper will seek to introduce questions as to why Ignatius might have been motivated to list the names of so many degrees of persons- bishops, presbyters, deacons, messengers, widows, hosts, friends.  It will also seek to make some connection between the letter (letters?) of Polycarp and the names that it also bears witness to with the Ignatian corpus and context  The role of regional memories surrounding the martyr shrines of Polycarp in Smyrna and of Ignatius in Rome will be briefly brought into purview in order to demonstrate the role of witnesses as an early Christian ‘signature’ on the traumatic events its collective memory.