[go: up one dir, main page]

EP2534341A1 - Verfahren zur automatisierten erkennung der aufnahme von mindestens einem fremdkörper durch einen gasturbinenmotor - Google Patents

Verfahren zur automatisierten erkennung der aufnahme von mindestens einem fremdkörper durch einen gasturbinenmotor

Info

Publication number
EP2534341A1
EP2534341A1 EP11707886A EP11707886A EP2534341A1 EP 2534341 A1 EP2534341 A1 EP 2534341A1 EP 11707886 A EP11707886 A EP 11707886A EP 11707886 A EP11707886 A EP 11707886A EP 2534341 A1 EP2534341 A1 EP 2534341A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
rotor
ingestion
standard
ing
impulse response
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP11707886A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2534341B1 (de
Inventor
Sébastien Bourget
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Safran Aircraft Engines SAS
Original Assignee
SNECMA Services SA
SNECMA SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by SNECMA Services SA, SNECMA SAS filed Critical SNECMA Services SA
Publication of EP2534341A1 publication Critical patent/EP2534341A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2534341B1 publication Critical patent/EP2534341B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D21/00Shutting-down of machines or engines, e.g. in emergency; Regulating, controlling, or safety means not otherwise provided for
    • F01D21/04Shutting-down of machines or engines, e.g. in emergency; Regulating, controlling, or safety means not otherwise provided for responsive to undesired position of rotor relative to stator or to breaking-off of a part of the rotor, e.g. indicating such position
    • F01D21/045Shutting-down of machines or engines, e.g. in emergency; Regulating, controlling, or safety means not otherwise provided for responsive to undesired position of rotor relative to stator or to breaking-off of a part of the rotor, e.g. indicating such position special arrangements in stators or in rotors dealing with breaking-off of part of rotor
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D21/00Shutting-down of machines or engines, e.g. in emergency; Regulating, controlling, or safety means not otherwise provided for
    • F01D21/003Arrangements for testing or measuring

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a device and method for detecting an impact on a blade of a gas turbine engine, in particular on a fan blade.
  • a gas turbine engine when mounted on an aircraft is susceptible to damage by objects being sucked up by the engine during use. These objects can come in various forms, for example, birds, stones or ice.
  • Patent application FR2840358 A1 of SNECMA discloses a system for detecting rotor damage of an aircraft engine comprising means for measuring vibration and rotor speed during a given flight.
  • a system for detecting rotor damage of an aircraft engine comprising means for measuring vibration and rotor speed during a given flight.
  • such a system does not have the precision required to detect the ingestion of a foreign body.
  • ROLLS-ROYCE patent application EP 1312766 A2 discloses an impact detection method on a rotor blade in which the speed drop of the rotor is measured to emit an alarm. Such detection has the disadvantage of being poorly discriminating. Indeed, in case of pumping the motor, the rotor speed drops and an alarm is issued when no body has been ingested. To eliminate this drawback, patent application EP 1312766 A2 teaches adding sensors to measure the torsion angle of the motor and thus improve the accuracy of the method. Such a method, with many sensors, is not satisfactory and does not allow to accurately and reliably detect ingestion of a foreign body.
  • the invention relates to a method for automatically detecting the ingestion of at least one foreign body by a gas turbine engine comprising a rotor, a method according to which:
  • the rotor speed signal is filtered so as to separate its static component from its dynamic component
  • the filtered dynamic component is compared with a standard resonant wave of the rotor in order to obtain an ingestion indicator; standard resonance corresponding to the vibratory impulse response of a rotor;
  • the ingestion indicator obtained is compared with a detection threshold
  • a signal for detecting ingestion of a foreign body is emitted when the ingestion indicator is greater than the detection threshold.
  • the vibratory response of a rotor constitutes its signature following an impact, that is to say, following a pulse.
  • standard resonant wave is meant the vibratory impulse response measured on a rotor following the ingestion of a body by said rotor.
  • the transient dynamic component of the rotor speed is compared to its signature to detect ingestion.
  • the method according to the invention is more discriminating than the method according to the prior art based solely on amplitude thresholding of the dynamic component of the rotor speed (t), a dynamic component of high amplitude may have several causes.
  • the invention it is possible to ignore vibrations of large amplitude (eg pumping) when the shape of the dynamic component of the rotor speed R (t) does not correspond to that of a standard resonant wave.
  • this method is implemented without adding a sensor and without any structural modification.
  • the standard resonant wave of the rotor corresponds to the impulse response of the first mode of torsion of the rotor.
  • the search in the filtered dynamic component of the impulse response of the first mode of torsion of the rotor, whose characteristics are known elsewhere, makes it possible to obtain an ingestion rate which makes it possible to qualify a vibration.
  • the impulse response of the first mode of torsion is present only after a transient excitation in torsion of the rotor, which is typical of an ingestion of foreign body. In this way, ingestion is detected reliably and accurately.
  • a convolution product is made between the filtered dynamic component and the standard resonant wave to obtain the ingestion indicator.
  • the standard resonant wave is measured directly on the rotor of the engine on which the detection method is implemented.
  • the standard resonance wave is theoretically defined as a function of the characteristics of the impulse response of the first mode of torsion of the rotor (frequency, damping, etc.).
  • the rotor is a low pressure rotor of a gas turbine engine
  • the filtered dynamic component is compared to a standard resonant wave of the low pressure rotor to obtain an ingestion indicator, the resonance wave standard corresponding to the vibratory impulse response of a low pressure rotor.
  • FIG. 2 represents the dynamic component of the low-pressure rotor speed of FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 represents a standard resonance wave of the low-pressure rotor
  • FIG. 4 represents the ingestion indicator corresponding to a measurement of resemblance between the dynamic component of the rotor speed and a standard resonant wave of said rotor.
  • the invention relates to a method for accurately detecting ingestion of a foreign body by a dual-body gas turbine engine comprising a low-pressure rotor shaft and a high-pressure rotor shaft, a fan being secured to the low rotor. pressure.
  • the rotational speed (t) of the low-pressure rotor is measured over time by means of a voice wheel, known as such to those skilled in the art, arranged to measure the angular velocity of the low pressure rotor shaft. It goes without saying that the low-pressure rotor speed could also be measured by other means, in particular by accelerometers arranged in the engine.
  • the low-pressure rotor R (t) regime measured by the phonic wheel has a static component Rs and a dynamic component Rd (t) and decomposes in the following form:
  • the low pressure rotor R (t) regime is filtered to retain only the dynamic component Rd (t) of the signal, for example, by means of bandpass filtering centered on the frequency of the standard resonance wave.
  • the Applicant has noticed that when a body strikes the blower after ingestion, the low pressure rotor, connected to the blower, responds by vibrating in its first mode of torsion, in the manner of a bell, by emitting a resonance wave whose frequency and shape is specific to the rotor.
  • This vibratory response following a brief shock is the impulse response of the first mode of torsion of the low pressure rotor. Thanks to this characteristic response, it is possible to discriminate the vibratory disturbances resulting from the body ingestions of disturbances resulting from noise or external phenomena, and this, well, that their influences on the low-pressure rotor regime (t) are almost identical from a total point of view.
  • the dynamic component Rd (t) of the low pressure rotor speed signal R (t) is thus generally in the following form:
  • C (t) .cos (w x (t) * t + ⁇ I>) is the perturbation due to the vibratory response of the low-pressure rotor following ingestion. This perturbation depends on an amplitude parameter C (t), a phase parameter ⁇ and a pulse parameter w T corresponding to the first torsion mode of the low pressure rotor.
  • the low pressure rotor has several low frequency twist modes. When ingesting foreign bodies, only the first mode of torsion will respond significantly. The impulse response of the latter will therefore be a signature characteristic of ingestion. Following ingestion, C (t) will vary strongly in one form:
  • C (t) C.exp (-t / x T ) This is the amplitude of the disturbance and is a function of the "severity" of the ingestion, the amplitude of the disturbance being very small compared to the value of the static regime Rs.
  • the damping parameter ⁇ ⁇ is a function of the damping of the first mode of torsion of the low pressure rotor and the natural frequency of this mode.
  • the dynamic component Rd (t) of the low-pressure rotor strongly resembles the impulse response of the first torsion mode e (t) of the low-pressure rotor, shown in FIG. Figure 3.
  • the impulse response of the first rotor twist mode e (t) is compared with the dynamic response Rd (t) of the low-pressure rotor R (t) to determine whether a body has been ingested by the engine.
  • the filtered dynamic component is compared with a standard resonance wave e (t) of the low-pressure rotor in order to obtain an ingestion indicator T ING corresponding to a measurement of resemblance between the standard resonant wave e (t) and the dynamic component Rd (t) of the measured speed signal.
  • T ING an ingestion indicator
  • this wave corresponds to the impulse response of the first mode of torsion of the rotor.
  • the first mode of torsion of the rotor is a "specific" mode, the characteristics (frequency, damping) of the first mode of torsion being measured directly on the low pressure rotor on which will be implemented the detection of ingestion, the detection being then carried out "Custom-made” with the standard resonance wave the vibratory impulse response first mode of torsion of the rotor.
  • the setting of the detection method with a specific mode makes it possible to implement an accurate detection adapted to said low pressure rotor. Indeed, each rotor has an impulse response of its first mode of torsion of its own. In other words, different rotor models have different impulse responses.
  • the impulse response of the first mode of torsion of the rotor is determined analytically by calculation.
  • the standard resonance wave e (t) corresponds to the sum of a plurality of torsion modes of the same low-pressure rotor, preferably the first 2 or 3 modes of torsion of a low rotor. pressure.
  • a standard resonant wave e (t) comprising several torsion modes makes it possible to increase the reliability of the detection and its accuracy.
  • a convolution product is produced between the dynamic response of the low pressure rotor d (t) and the standard wave e (t) to obtain a ingestion indicator T ING .
  • the comparison algorithms are set to take into account distortions of the standard resonance wave (delay, noise, etc.).
  • the ingestion indicator T ING shown in FIG. 4, makes it possible to qualify the suspicious oscillation 2 detected in the measurement of the low-pressure rotor R (t) regime. The more the dynamic response of the low pressure rotor Rd (t) resembles the theoretical impulse response characteristic of a shock response (here, ingestion of a foreign body), plus the value of the ingestion indicator T ING will be high.
  • the value of the detection S is determined so as not to generate an alarm for T ING indicator values corresponding to the normal operation of the engine and which can be described as noise.
  • This detection threshold is thus obtained by applying a margin to the average level of the "noise” Sb.
  • This margin is a function of the characteristics of the signal "noise” as well as the desired level of detection reliability. With reference to FIG. 4, a margin of 70% separates the detection threshold from the average noise level.
  • This method is very selective because the ingestion indicator T ING for a noise signal (excluding ingestion) is low since, in the absence of ingestion, the impulse response of the first mode of torsion is not present. in the signal.
  • the noise signal does not resemble the impulse response of the first mode of torsion.
  • the alarm generated can be directed directly to the pilot of the aircraft, on which the engine is mounted, to be consulted in real time, or stored in a memory to be consulted. subsequently, for example, for an inspection of the engine, be transmitted in real time to the maintenance services of the airline to allow it to anticipate and organize, at the next stopover, a detailed inspection impacted engine and all necessary maintenance actions.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
  • Testing Of Engines (AREA)
EP11707886.5A 2010-02-08 2011-02-02 Verfahren zur automatisierten erkennung der aufnahme von mindestens einem fremdkörper durch einen gasturbinenmotor Active EP2534341B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1050870A FR2956159B1 (fr) 2010-02-08 2010-02-08 Methode de detection automatisee de l'ingestion d'au moins un corps etranger par un moteur a turbine a gaz
PCT/FR2011/050205 WO2011095737A1 (fr) 2010-02-08 2011-02-02 Méthode de détection automatisée de l'ingestion d'au moins un corps étranger par un moteur à turbine à gaz

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2534341A1 true EP2534341A1 (de) 2012-12-19
EP2534341B1 EP2534341B1 (de) 2013-11-13

Family

ID=42697390

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11707886.5A Active EP2534341B1 (de) 2010-02-08 2011-02-02 Verfahren zur automatisierten erkennung der aufnahme von mindestens einem fremdkörper durch einen gasturbinenmotor

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US9366154B2 (de)
EP (1) EP2534341B1 (de)
JP (1) JP5698766B2 (de)
CN (1) CN103026006B (de)
BR (1) BR112012019559A2 (de)
CA (1) CA2788901C (de)
FR (1) FR2956159B1 (de)
RU (1) RU2551252C2 (de)
WO (1) WO2011095737A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2968038B1 (fr) * 2010-11-26 2012-12-28 Snecma Systeme de detection d'un evenement fugace sur une roue aubagee de moteur d'aeronef
EP2594912A1 (de) * 2011-11-21 2013-05-22 Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Detektionssystem zur Detektion von Schäden an rotierenden Komponenten eines Flugzeugs und Verfahren zum Betrieb solch eines Detektionssystems
FR2986269B1 (fr) 2012-01-30 2015-08-07 Snecma Systeme de detection d'un impact sur une roue aubagee de moteur d'aeronef
FR2988130B1 (fr) * 2012-03-13 2014-05-09 Snecma Systeme de detection de defaut sur une roue aubagee de moteur d'aeronef
US10228304B2 (en) * 2016-01-18 2019-03-12 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Shaft shear detection through shaft oscillation
RU2680770C1 (ru) * 2018-06-25 2019-02-26 Акционерное общество "Научно-исследовательский и конструкторский институт центробежных и роторных компрессоров им. В.Б. Шнеппа" Способ обнаружения попадания несжимаемых объектов в проточную часть турбокомпрессора и система для его реализации

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB8707187D0 (en) * 1987-03-25 1987-04-29 Hughes Ltd Stewart Monitoring of foreign object in engines
US6098022A (en) 1997-10-17 2000-08-01 Test Devices, Inc. Detecting anomalies in rotating components
EP1082690A1 (de) * 1999-03-30 2001-03-14 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Ableitung von zeitgemittelten momenten
US6499350B1 (en) * 2000-04-04 2002-12-31 Swantech, L.L.C. Turbine engine foreign object damage detection system
US6668655B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2003-12-30 Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation Acoustic monitoring of foreign objects in combustion turbines during operation
GB0126706D0 (en) * 2001-11-07 2002-01-02 Rolls Royce Plc An apparatus and method for detecting an impact on a rotor blade
FR2840358B1 (fr) * 2002-05-28 2006-09-15 Snecma Moteurs Procede et systeme de detection d'endommagement de rotor d'un moteur d'aeronef
EP1574674A1 (de) * 2004-03-03 2005-09-14 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Detektierung von Verunreinigungen an Turbinenbauteilen
JP2006138756A (ja) * 2004-11-12 2006-06-01 Fanuc Ltd 衝撃検知装置
DE102005020900B3 (de) * 2005-05-04 2006-11-02 Siemens Ag Verfahren und System zur Diagnose von mechanischen, elektromechanischen oder fluidischen Komponenten
US8818683B2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2014-08-26 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for operating a gas turbine engine
RU2348911C1 (ru) * 2007-06-21 2009-03-10 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Центральный институт авиационного моторостроения имени П.И. Баранова" Способ диагностики газотурбинных двигателей при попадании посторонних предметов на их вход
RU2367811C2 (ru) * 2007-07-30 2009-09-20 Алексей Александрович Комов Способ регулирования величины обратной тяги газотурбинных двигателей на пробеге четырехдвигательного самолета при использовании реверса тяги двух внутренних двигателей
JP2009278757A (ja) * 2008-05-14 2009-11-26 Toshiba Corp 回転電機又は回転機械のリプレイス情報収集方法及び収集システム
FR2937079B1 (fr) * 2008-10-10 2011-08-26 Snecma Procede et systeme de surveillance d'un turboreacteur
US7855469B2 (en) * 2009-10-02 2010-12-21 General Electric Company Condition monitoring system for wind turbine generator and method for operating wind turbine generator

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2011095737A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2013519031A (ja) 2013-05-23
RU2012138447A (ru) 2014-03-20
US20120303330A1 (en) 2012-11-29
EP2534341B1 (de) 2013-11-13
FR2956159A1 (fr) 2011-08-12
BR112012019559A2 (pt) 2018-03-27
CA2788901C (fr) 2017-01-03
FR2956159B1 (fr) 2012-02-10
JP5698766B2 (ja) 2015-04-08
CN103026006B (zh) 2015-04-01
CN103026006A (zh) 2013-04-03
RU2551252C2 (ru) 2015-05-20
CA2788901A1 (fr) 2011-08-11
WO2011095737A1 (fr) 2011-08-11
US9366154B2 (en) 2016-06-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2534341B1 (de) Verfahren zur automatisierten erkennung der aufnahme von mindestens einem fremdkörper durch einen gasturbinenmotor
CA2623617C (fr) Procede de detection d'un endommagement d'un roulement de palier d'un moteur
EP2496921B1 (de) Verfahren zur feststellung von schäden an mindestens einem motorrollenlager
EP2588718B1 (de) Übergeschwindigkeitsdetektion einer freien arbeitsturbine mittels eines drehmomentmessers
CA2738893C (fr) Procede et systeme de surveillance d'un turboreacteur
CA2328398C (fr) Detection de l'endommagement de pieces d'un moteur
EP2507598B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung von drehschwingungen einer radialwellen eines turbomotors
FR2968038A1 (fr) Systeme de detection d'un evenement fugace sur une roue aubagee de moteur d'aeronef
FR2986269A1 (fr) Systeme de detection d'un impact sur une roue aubagee de moteur d'aeronef
FR2934246A1 (fr) Aeronef comprenant au moins un moteur a rotors contrarotatifs
EP4058772B1 (de) Verfahren zur überwachung der torsion einer rotierenden welle an einer turbomaschine eines flugzeugs
FR2978210A1 (fr) Procede d'alimentation d'un film fluide d'amortissement d'un palier de guidage d'un arbre de turbomachine
EP2303695B1 (de) Luftfahrzeug mit durch synchrophasing gesteuertem triebwerk
WO2016198794A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détermination de la vibration d'aubes de rotor
EP3578929B1 (de) Verfahren und system zur bestimmung der winkelposition der laufradschaufeln eines schaufelrads eines turbotriebwerks
EP3752811B1 (de) Verfahren und system zur erkennung von schäden an den beweglichen schaufeln eines flugzeuges
FR3030625B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de determination de la vibration de pieces rotatives de turbomachine
FR3098587A1 (fr) Procédé et système de détection des circuits ouverts des accéléromètres par le bruit de phase
FR3077881A1 (fr) Procede et systeme de detection d'un endommagement d'aubes mobiles d'un aeronef

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120904

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130730

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 640674

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20131215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011003747

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140109

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20131113

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 640674

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20131113

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140313

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140213

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011003747

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SNECMA

Effective date: 20140228

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140814

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140228

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011003747

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140814

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140202

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20150126

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20150123

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160203

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131113

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240123

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240123

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240123

Year of fee payment: 14