[go: up one dir, main page]

EP0559942B1 - Steuerung für ein Elektrofilter - Google Patents

Steuerung für ein Elektrofilter Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0559942B1
EP0559942B1 EP19920104314 EP92104314A EP0559942B1 EP 0559942 B1 EP0559942 B1 EP 0559942B1 EP 19920104314 EP19920104314 EP 19920104314 EP 92104314 A EP92104314 A EP 92104314A EP 0559942 B1 EP0559942 B1 EP 0559942B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
breakdown
filter
control
time
control according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19920104314
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0559942A1 (de
Inventor
Norbert Dipl.-Ing. Grass
Gerhard Dipl.-Ing. Dönig
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Siemens Corp
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Siemens Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG, Siemens Corp filed Critical Siemens AG
Priority to EP19920104314 priority Critical patent/EP0559942B1/de
Priority to DK92104314T priority patent/DK0559942T3/da
Priority to DE59206952T priority patent/DE59206952D1/de
Publication of EP0559942A1 publication Critical patent/EP0559942A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0559942B1 publication Critical patent/EP0559942B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C—MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C3/00—Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect
    • B03C3/34—Constructional details or accessories or operation thereof
    • B03C3/66—Applications of electricity supply techniques
    • B03C3/68—Control systems therefor

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a control for an electrostatic filter, in which filter breakdowns are continuously evaluated on the basis of evaluation rules and on the basis of the evaluation results new, optimized control parameters, i.e. at least one breakdown waiting time and one deionization time for which the electrostatic filter is determined and given to the electrostatic filter.
  • a generic control is also known from EP 0 103 950 A2. With this control, the frequency of filter breakdowns is determined and control parameters are changed if the breakdown rate exceeds certain frequencies. The control of this font is already carrying out a certain self-optimization.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a further control for an electrostatic filter which optimizes and monitors itself.
  • the allocation to the breakdown types is preferably weighted, the sum of the weightings always giving the value 1. Furthermore, an incoming breakdown is advantageously assigned to at most two types of breakdown at the same time.
  • the incoming breakdown and a predeterminable number of immediately preceding breakdowns are preferably evaluated. In principle, however, it is also possible to work with a continuously acting forgetfulness factor.
  • Self-optimization is particularly optimal if the filter current is also optimized, and only after the deionization time has been optimized.
  • the filter current at which this filter voltage maximum is reached is then predefined as a filter current setpoint for the electrostatic filter.
  • control has an optimization unit designed as a neural network, the control shows self-learning behavior. This makes it possible to optimize not only the control parameters, but also the evaluation rules themselves.
  • the controller has a display device located in a control room, e.g. a monitor that is assigned can be displayed by means of the display device, process states, process data and / or the control parameters. This makes it possible to monitor the electrostatic filter and, if necessary, to take corrective action. It is also possible to manually enter new parameters into the control system and to observe their effects. As a result, the control can be optimized even further than the self-optimizing control itself can.
  • the controller is at least partially implemented in an independent subsystem of a networked automation system of a technical system, i.e. the self-optimizing controller is used as an independent subsystem of the automation system, the self-optimizing controller and the rest of the networked automation system have as little effect possible.
  • a networked automation system is described, for example, in the older DE application P 41 25 374.4.
  • FIG 1 there is the power supply device of an electrostatic filter, e.g. a power plant, from a power unit 1, by means of which the electrostatic filter (not shown for the sake of clarity) is supplied with electricity.
  • the power section 1 can be, for example, an intermediate circuit converter, as is generally known, e.g. from DE-OS 35 22 569 or DE-GM 90 03 125.
  • the power section 1 is controlled via a control device 2, which controls the power section 1 on the basis of the specifications of the further control levels 3 to 5.
  • the technical limits of power unit 1 are of course taken into account when driving power unit 1.
  • the control device 2 receives its setpoints from the monitoring unit 3.
  • the setpoints are, for example, the current setpoint I * for the filter current I F and an enable signal.
  • the control device 2 reports to the monitoring unit 3 if it cannot control the power section 1 in accordance with requirements, for example because a wire break has occurred or because one of the semiconductor power elements of the power section 1 is defective.
  • the filter voltage U F is continuously evaluated in the monitoring unit 3, and certain filter states, for example filter breakdown, short circuit or other errors, are inferred therefrom. Furthermore, the monitoring unit 3 records a filter characteristic from time to time, for example every minute, the meaning and purpose of which will be explained later in connection with FIG. 6.
  • the monitoring unit 3 receives data both from the optimization unit 4 and from the user interface 5.
  • the user interface 5 provides the monitoring unit 3 with, for example, the operating mode (pulse operation, DC voltage operation, mixed operation, etc.) and the time interval in which a filter characteristic curve is recorded again and again shall be.
  • the further parameters are initially specified by the user interface 5 to the optimization unit 4, which is typically a fuzzy control unit.
  • the optimization unit 4 specifies to the monitoring unit 3 the further control parameters which the monitoring unit 3 requires to control the control device.
  • the control parameters will be explained in more detail later in FIG. 2.
  • the optimization unit 4 automatically evaluates these messages on the basis of empirical values, determines new, optimized control parameters on the basis of the evaluation results and specifies these parameters to the monitoring unit 3.
  • the control parameters are now explained in more detail below in connection with FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 2 shows the current I F flowing in the electrostatic filter and the time t to the right.
  • a filter breakdown occurs at time T 1 . If the filter breakdown has not gone out by itself by the time T 2 , the monitoring unit 3 blocks the control of the power section 1 via the release line 6. The power section 1 consequently no longer feeds energy into the electrostatic filter. The current I F in the electrostatic precipitator suddenly drops to zero due to a lack of further energy supply.
  • the monitoring unit 3 releases the control device 2 again via the release line 6 and also gives the control device 2 the value I O as the new current setpoint.
  • the filter current I F is then continuously increased to the value I *, which is reached at time T 4 , unless a new breakdown takes place beforehand.
  • Typical control parameters for the power supply device of the electrostatic filter are now the breakdown waiting time t DS , the deionization time t E and the desired filter current I *.
  • the breakdown waiting time t DS is given by the difference between the times T 2 and T 1 .
  • the deionization time t E is given by the difference between the times T 3 and T 2 .
  • Further possible control parameters are the rise time, ie the difference between the times T 4 and T 3 as well the current reduction after a breakdown, i.e. the difference between I O and I DS .
  • the data of, for example, the last 100 copies are kept constantly available.
  • the optimization unit 4 first optimizes the breakdown waiting time t DS .
  • the optimization of the breakdown waiting time t DS is based on the fact of experience that self-extinguishing filter breakthroughs generally have a certain minimum duration on the one hand, but on the other hand no longer extinguish themselves above a certain maximum duration.
  • the relative frequency of self-extinguishing filter breakdowns as a function of the extinguishing time t L is consequently calculated from the data stored in the optimization unit 4. Then we try to find a suitable distribution curve, For example, to fit a parabola or a Gaussian curve into the H values, as is shown schematically in FIG. In FIG 3, a parabola was fitted into the H values.
  • the determination of the optimized breakdown waiting time t DS can also be carried out more easily. In this case it simply becomes the mean t L ⁇ the extinguishing times t L are determined and multiplied by a suitable factor F.
  • weighting functions G F , G R and G Z shown in FIG. 4 instead of the weighting functions G F , G R and G Z shown in FIG. 4, other weighting functions can of course also be used be used. It should only be ensured that the sum of the selected weighting functions is always 1 and that the weighting functions G F and G Z do not overlap, or in other words that t 3 is always greater than or at most equal to t 2 .
  • the number of copies to be saved can be specified as required. The number can be 50, for example, but can also be 500.
  • the optimization unit 4 calculates the quotient of the number N R of representative punches and the number N F of secondary breakdowns.
  • N F ⁇ G F
  • the deionization time t E is optimal when the ratio of representative carbon to secondary carbon has a value that can be selected by the user, for example 10. If the ratio is greater than 10, the deionization time t E is too long and must therefore be reduced. Conversely, the deionization time t E must be increased if too many follow-throughs occur.
  • the deionization time t E is optimized in the following way.
  • a correction factor k E for the deionization time is calculated from the quotient of representative breakthroughs to follow-through breakthroughs based on a predetermined function curve.
  • k E must be zero if the ratio of representative breakdowns to random breakdowns is reached.
  • the correction factor k E must be greater than zero if the ratio is undershot and less than zero if the ratio is exceeded.
  • a correction factor k I for the filter current setpoint I * then results from the ratio of N R to N Z.
  • the slopes of the correction functions k E or k I can of course also run differently than shown in FIG. 5. In particular, they can be steeper or flatter if this is required for reasons of stability, and in particular the correction functions k E and k I can also be different from one another.
  • the new, optimized control parameters t DS , t E and I * determined in this way are specified by the optimization unit 4 of the monitoring unit 3.
  • the monitoring unit 3 therefore controls the electrostatic precipitator with these optimized control parameters t DS , t E and I * until the operating behavior of the electrostatic filter changes and a new correction of the control parameters t DS , t E and I * is necessary.
  • the optimization unit 4 triggers the recording of a filter characteristic by the monitoring unit 3.
  • the monitoring unit 3 receives then a filter characteristic of the filter voltage U F ie, as a function of the filter current I F is determined.
  • the monitoring unit 3 is used as the setpoint I * for the filter current I F the maximum current I max , minus a safety discount of, for example, 5%, is predetermined and the filter current I F is optimized as described above.
  • the monitoring unit 3 is given the setpoint I * for the filter current I F as the current at which the voltage maximum U max is reached.
  • the optimization of the filter current described above is omitted.
  • the optimization of the filter current would be pointless in this case, since above the voltage maximum U max a back spray would occur, which would greatly reduce the efficiency of the electrostatic filter.
  • control device 2 the monitoring device 3, the optimization unit 4 and the user interface 5 can of course also be implemented in the form of a computer program, a hardware configuration is not necessary.
  • present invention can of course also be used with pulsed electrostatic filters. In this case, the pulse height and duration as well as the pulse repetition frequency are available for optimization in addition to the breakdown waiting time t DS and deionization time t E.
  • the optimization unit can of course not only understand the human, fuzzy logic, so it is not just a fuzzy control unit, but can also be designed as a neural network with self-learning behavior. This makes it possible not only to optimize the control parameters, but also the evaluation rules themselves.
  • This self-learning behavior is generally known as "supervised learning by back propagation" of a neural network.
  • the neural network can be formed in a manner known per se.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Electrostatic Separation (AREA)
EP19920104314 1992-03-12 1992-03-12 Steuerung für ein Elektrofilter Expired - Lifetime EP0559942B1 (de)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19920104314 EP0559942B1 (de) 1992-03-12 1992-03-12 Steuerung für ein Elektrofilter
DK92104314T DK0559942T3 (da) 1992-03-12 1992-03-12
DE59206952T DE59206952D1 (de) 1992-03-12 1992-03-12 Steuerung für ein Elektrofilter

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19920104314 EP0559942B1 (de) 1992-03-12 1992-03-12 Steuerung für ein Elektrofilter

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0559942A1 EP0559942A1 (de) 1993-09-15
EP0559942B1 true EP0559942B1 (de) 1996-08-21

Family

ID=8209428

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19920104314 Expired - Lifetime EP0559942B1 (de) 1992-03-12 1992-03-12 Steuerung für ein Elektrofilter

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0559942B1 (da)
DE (1) DE59206952D1 (da)
DK (1) DK0559942T3 (da)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105170333B (zh) * 2015-09-06 2018-01-30 江苏科技大学 静电除尘用电源的模糊预测控制系统及方法

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4311491A (en) * 1980-08-18 1982-01-19 Research Cottrell, Inc. Electrostatic precipitator control for high resistivity particulate
DE3364432D1 (en) * 1982-07-28 1986-08-14 Smidth & Co As F L Method of protecting a thyristor switch of a pulse generator for an electrostatic precipitator
DE3522569A1 (de) * 1985-06-24 1987-01-02 Metallgesellschaft Ag Stromversorgung fuer ein elektrofilter
US4811197A (en) * 1987-09-02 1989-03-07 Environmental Elements Corp. Electrostatic dust collector system
DE9003125U1 (de) * 1990-03-16 1990-05-23 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Stromzwischenkreisumrichter zur Stromversorgung eines Elektrofilters

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0559942A1 (de) 1993-09-15
DK0559942T3 (da) 1997-02-10
DE59206952D1 (de) 1996-09-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP4000018B1 (de) Vorausschauende wartung für eine vorrichtung in der lebensmittelindustrie mithilfe eines digitalen zwillings und optimierte produktionsplanung
DE19712767A1 (de) Verfahren zum Abschätzen der Ausfallsrate von Komponenten technischer Einrichtungen
DE2751743A1 (de) Verfahren und regeleinrichtung zum zumessen stroemender medien
EP1599842A2 (de) Risikominimierung und wartungsoptimierung durch ermittlung von schädigungsanteilen aus betriebsdaten
EP3536950A1 (de) Verfahren und system zum warten einer windenergieanlage aus einer gruppe von windenergieanlagen
EP3056957B1 (de) Diagnoseeinrichtung und -verfahren zur Überwachung des Betriebs eines Regelkreises
WO2001059535A1 (de) Verfahren zum betrieb einer technischen anlage
DE2457304A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur ueberwachung eines bearbeitungsvorgangs mittels funkenerosion
EP1277095B1 (de) System und verfahren zur überwachung einer einrichtung zum messen, steuern und regeln
EP0559942B1 (de) Steuerung für ein Elektrofilter
EP1344001A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum betrieb einer mehrere komponenten umfassenden technischen anlage, insbesondere einer verbrennungsanlage zum erzeugen von elektrischer energie
EP0038505B1 (de) Verfahren zum selbsttätigen Führen der Spannung eines Elektro-Filters an der Durchschlagsgrenze
DE2545974B2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern des Bearbeitungsprozesses einer Erosionsanlage auf optimalen Betriebszustand
DE3832037C2 (da)
EP1431927A1 (de) Verfahren zur Schätzung der Restlebensdauer einer Vorrichtung
EP4018276B1 (de) Erweiterte trendanzeige von prozessdaten und sekundäralarmen
DE549974C (de) Elektrische UEbertragungsanlage mit einer Mehrzahl von Verstaerkern
DE3908879C2 (de) Echtzeit-Computersystem
DE3423830A1 (de) Schaltung zur beschraenkung der maximalen gesamtleistung mehrerer elektrischer verbraucher
AT527297B1 (de) Diagnoseverfahren zum Erkennen von Störungen eines Brennstoffzellenstapels
DE2906460A1 (de) Verfahren und schaltungsanordnung zur steuerung der automatischen lastbeschraenkung elektrischer energiesysteme
EP1046918A2 (de) Verfahren und Schaltungsanordnung zur Sicherheitsüberprüfung einer elektrostatischen Sprühanlage
EP3772713B1 (de) Verfahren zum betrieb eines systems mit optimaler verfügbarkeit und system mit optimaler verfügbarkeit
EP2192667A2 (de) Energieeinspeisevorrichtung
EP3511564B1 (de) Verfahren und system zum steuern einer windenergieanlage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE DK FR GB IT NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19931005

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19941223

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE DK FR GB IT NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59206952

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19960926

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 19961122

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050312

PGRI Patent reinstated in contracting state [announced from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Effective date: 20080301

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20100324

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20100303

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20110315

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20110308

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20110321

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20110310

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 59206952

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R409

Ref document number: 59206952

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20111001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R409

Ref document number: 59206952

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111001

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110312

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 59206952

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 59206952

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EUP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20120311

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20120313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20120311

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20110520

Year of fee payment: 20