CN116735842A - A rapid test and comparison method and system for similar paper objects - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to the technical field of paper monitoring and analysis, and more specifically, to a rapid testing and comparison method and system for similar paper objects. The solution includes selecting the paper to be detected and setting monitoring elements; setting the paper detection range in all types of paper to be detected; extracting the element content table online based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements; and monitoring 1,000 pieces of paper that are true The element content table of the monitored paper is used to form the authenticity judgment result of the currently tested paper; through the element content table of the monitored paper with 5000 pieces being true and 5000 pieces being false, a calculation method for the probability of misjudgment and the probability of missed judgment is formed; according to the probability of misjudgment and the probability of missed judgment Probability calculation method, online display of authenticity judgment results and corresponding probability of missed or wrong judgment. This solution enables rapid test comparison by analyzing the consistency of paper items.

Description

A rapid test and comparison method and system for similar paper objects

Technical field

The present invention relates to the technical field of paper monitoring and analysis, and more specifically, to a rapid testing and comparison method and system for similar paper objects.

Background technique

Paper is often used in people's daily life. The difference of paper is mainly distinguished by weight, whiteness, smoothness, bulk and stiffness. For different types of paper, it is necessary to look at the surface conditions, such as coating, Non-coated, etc., also depends on the bulk and smoothness of the paper. Each paper has its own special aspects. For some papers used in special occasions, it is necessary to distinguish and compare them.

Before the technology of the present invention, existing paper detection was mainly divided into two categories: 1. Paper and pulping detection: including color, thickness, smoothness, tearing, interlayer bonding strength, folding resistance, tensile force (tension ), stiffness, compression, bursting strength, beating degree, residual ink, and absorbency. 2. Corrugated cardboard and carton testing: including bursting strength, thickness, compression resistance, bending stiffness, tear strength, puncture strength, carton opening and closing force, short-distance compression, and vibration tests; these testing processes are long and cannot be Quickly identify classification and authenticity.

Contents of the invention

In view of the above problems, the present invention proposes a rapid test and comparison method and system for similar paper items, which realizes rapid test comparison by analyzing the consistency of paper items.

According to a first aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, a rapid testing and comparison method for similar paper objects is provided.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the method for rapid testing and comparison of similar paper objects includes:

Select the paper to be detected and set the monitoring element;

Set the paper detection range among all types of paper to be detected;

Online, extract an element content table based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements;

Through the element content table of 1,000 pieces of true monitoring paper, the authenticity judgment result of the currently tested paper is formed;

By monitoring the element content table of 5,000 pieces of paper that are true and 5,000 pieces that are false, a calculation method for the probability of false positives and false positives is formed;

Based on the calculation method for the probability of false positives and false positives, the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding probabilities of false positives and false positives are displayed online.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the selected paper to be detected is configured with monitoring elements, specifically including:

Determine the paper to be detected, select elements from 100 papers, and obtain a list of all existing elements;

Filter the element list to determine the element that satisfies the first calculation formula as the first element;

Screen the first elements and determine the elements that satisfy the second calculation formula as the second elements;

Screen the second elements and determine the elements that satisfy the third calculation formula as the third element;

using a third element as a monitoring element;

The first calculation formula is:

;

Among them, Ai is the element content of the i-th sheet of paper 10 days after leaving the factory, Bi is the element content of the i-th sheet of paper when it leaves the factory, and Y1 is the judgment margin of the first element;

The second calculation formula is:

C1<Bi<C2;

Among them, C1 is the first judgment margin, and C2 is the second judgment margin;

The third calculation formula is:

Max(Bi)-Min(Bi)< Y2;

Among them, Y2 is the judgment margin of the second element.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the paper detection range is set in all types of paper to be detected, specifically including:

Set monitoring types, which include additional monitoring and original paper monitoring;

When set to the additional monitoring, set an extra area for paper detection;

When set to the original paper monitoring, randomly select a part for online monitoring;

The paper detection range is determined according to the monitoring type.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the element content table is extracted online based on the paper detection range and the monitored elements, specifically including:

According to the paper detection range, collect paper through a preset collection device;

The corresponding monitoring elements are quickly collected from the collected paper, and the content of each monitoring element is formed and stored in the element content table.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the element content table of 1,000 pieces of true monitored paper is used to form the authenticity judgment result of the currently detected paper, which specifically includes:

Take the element content table of 1000 pieces of true monitoring paper, and use the fourth calculation formula to calculate the maximum content and minimum content of the monitoring element;

The maximum content and minimum content of monitored elements are used as element judgment sets;

Perform quick content analysis according to the element content table and use the fifth calculation formula to make judgments. When all are satisfied, the corresponding paper is considered true; if it does not meet the fifth calculation formula, it is false;

The fourth calculation formula is:

;

Among them, E _j is the content of the jth element in the monitoring elements after the online test, Max () is a function of the maximum content of the extracted element in the 1000 pieces of monitoring paper that is true, and Min () is the value of the 1000 pieces of monitoring paper that is true. The function of extracting the minimum content of elements, F _{1_j} is the maximum content of monitored elements, and F _{2_j} is the minimum content of monitored elements;

The fifth calculation formula is:

;

Among them, G _1, G _2, G _{j, and} G _K are the element judgment sets of the constraints of the 1st, 2nd, j, and K elements in sequence, K is the total number of monitored elements, and E _1, E _2, E _{j, and} E _K are in sequence. It is the content of the 1st, 2nd, j, and K elements among the monitored elements described after online testing.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the element content table of monitored papers with 5,000 pieces being true and 5,000 pieces being false is used to form a calculation method for the probability of false positives and the probability of missing false positives, specifically including:

Extract 1,000 monitoring papers, of which 5,000 are true and 5,000 are false;

For the element content table corresponding to the paper found to be true outside the element judgment set, use the sixth calculation formula to determine the scope of the missed judgment;

For the situation where the fifth calculation formula is satisfied and the paper is false, the seventh calculation formula is used to calculate the probability of misjudgment;

According to the missed judgment range, use the eighth calculation formula to calculate the missed judgment probability;

The sixth calculation formula is:

;

Among them, h _j is the content of the jth element in the monitoring element corresponding to the true paper found outside the element judgment set, Max5() is the function of reading the maximum value of h _j of 5000 true papers, and Min5() is the read Take the function of the minimum h _j value of 5000 sheets of paper that is true, L _{1_j} is the upper limit of the missed judgment range, and L _{2_j} is the lower limit of the missed judgment range;

The seventh calculation formula is:

P=U÷5000

Among them, P is the probability of misjudgment, and U is the total number of papers that satisfy the fifth calculation formula and are false;

The eighth calculation formula is:

;

Among them, R is the total number of papers that do not satisfy the fifth calculation formula and are genuine, and q is the probability of missing a decision.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding probability of missed or incorrect judgments are displayed online based on the calculation method of the probability of false positives and the probability of false positives, specifically including:

Based on the authenticity judgment results obtained in real time;

When the authenticity judgment result is true, the probability of wrong judgment is also displayed on the screen;

When the authenticity judgment result is false, the probability of missed judgment is also displayed on the screen.

According to a second aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, a rapid testing and comparison system for similar paper objects is provided.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the rapid test comparison system for similar paper objects includes:

The monitoring content setting module is used to select the paper to be detected and set monitoring elements;

Monitoring position setting module is used to set the paper detection range in all types of paper to be detected;

A real-time monitoring module for extracting an element content table online based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements;

The consistency analysis module is used to form the authenticity judgment result of the currently tested paper through the element content table of 1000 true monitoring papers;

The quantitative analysis module is used to form a calculation method for the probability of false positives and false positives through the element content table of monitored papers with 5,000 pieces being true and 5,000 pieces being false;

The online display module is used to display the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding miss-judgement and wrong-judgement probabilities online based on the calculation method of false-judgement probability and missed-judgement probability.

According to a third aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium on which computer program instructions are stored, and when the computer program instructions are executed by a processor, the computer program instructions implement any one of the first aspects of the embodiment of the present invention. method described.

According to a fourth aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, an electronic device is provided, including a memory and a processor, the memory being used to store one or more computer program instructions, wherein the one or more computer program instructions are processed by the The processor is executed to implement the method described in any one of the first aspects of the embodiments of the present invention.

The technical solutions provided by the embodiments of the present invention may include the following beneficial effects:

In the solution of the present invention, online matching is performed by quickly judging the position and content of additional added elements in the paper.

In the solution of the present invention, a consistency index formed based on the judgment result is provided to determine whether the paper object is considered to be a counterfeit.

Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.

The technical solution of the present invention will be further described in detail below through the accompanying drawings and examples.

Description of drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can also be obtained based on these drawings without exerting creative efforts.

Figure 1 is a flow chart of a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 2 is a flow chart of setting monitoring elements for selected paper to be tested in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 3 is a flow chart for setting the paper detection range in all types of paper to be detected in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 4 is a flow chart of extracting an element content table online based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper materials according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 5 is a flow chart for forming the authenticity judgment result of the current detected paper through monitoring the element content table of 1000 true papers in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper materials according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 6 is a flowchart of a method for calculating the probability of misjudgment and omission by monitoring the element content table of 5,000 pieces of paper as true and 5,000 as false in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention. picture.

Figure 7 is a flow chart for online display of authenticity judgment results and the corresponding missed and wrong judgment probabilities based on the calculation method of the probability of false positives and the probability of false positives in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention. .

Figure 8 is a structural diagram of a rapid testing and comparison system for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Figure 9 is a structural diagram of an electronic device in one embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed ways

Some of the processes described in the specification and claims of the present invention and the above-mentioned drawings contain multiple operations that appear in a specific order, but it should be clearly understood that these operations may not be performed in the order in which they appear herein. Execution or parallel execution, the sequence numbers of operations, such as 101, 102, etc., are only used to distinguish different operations. The sequence numbers themselves do not represent any execution order. Additionally, these processes may include more or fewer operations, and the operations may be performed sequentially or in parallel. It should be noted that the descriptions such as "first" and "second" in this article are used to distinguish different messages, devices, modules, etc., and do not represent the order, nor do they limit "first" and "second" are different types.

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without making creative efforts fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Paper is often used in people's daily life. The difference of paper is mainly distinguished by weight, whiteness, smoothness, bulk and stiffness. For different types of paper, it is necessary to look at the surface conditions, such as coating, Non-coated, etc., also depends on the bulk and smoothness of the paper. Each paper has its own special aspects. For some papers used in special occasions, it is necessary to distinguish and compare them.

Before the technology of the present invention, existing paper detection was mainly divided into two categories: 1. Paper and pulping detection: including color, thickness, smoothness, tearing, interlayer bonding strength, folding resistance, tensile force (tension ), stiffness, compression, bursting strength, beating degree, residual ink, and absorbency. 2. Corrugated cardboard and carton testing: including bursting strength, thickness, compression resistance, bending stiffness, tear strength, puncture strength, carton opening and closing force, short-distance compression, and vibration tests; these testing processes are long and cannot be Quickly identify classification and authenticity.

In the embodiment of the present invention, a method and system for rapid testing and comparison of similar paper objects are provided. This solution enables rapid test comparison by analyzing the consistency of paper items.

According to a first aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, a rapid testing and comparison method for similar paper objects is provided.

Figure 1 is a flow chart of a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the method for rapid testing and comparison of similar paper objects includes:

S101. Select the paper to be detected and set the monitoring element;

S102. Set the paper detection range in all types of paper to be detected;

S103. Extract an element content table online based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements;

S104. Through the element content table of 1000 pieces of true monitoring paper, form the authenticity judgment result of the current detection paper;

S105. Through the element content table of 5,000 pieces of monitoring paper that are true and 5,000 pieces that are false, form a calculation method for the probability of false positives and false positives;

S106. Based on the calculation method for the probability of false positives and false positives, display the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding probabilities of false positives and false positives online.

In the embodiment of the present invention, the monitoring elements are first set, and based on this, the monitoring position is set, online real-time monitoring and consistency analysis are performed, quantification is performed in case of inconsistency, and online display is finally completed.

Figure 2 is a flow chart of setting monitoring elements for selected paper to be tested in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in Figure 2, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the selected paper to be detected is set with monitoring elements, specifically including:

S201. Determine the paper to be detected, select elements from 100 pieces of paper, and obtain a list of all existing elements;

S202. Screen the element list and determine the elements that satisfy the first calculation formula as the first element;

S203. Screen the first elements and determine the elements that satisfy the second calculation formula as the second elements;

S204. Screen the second elements, determine the elements that satisfy the third calculation formula, and use them as the third elements;

using a third element as a monitoring element;

The first calculation formula is:

;

Among them, Ai is the element content of the i-th sheet of paper 10 days after leaving the factory, Bi is the element content of the i-th sheet of paper when it leaves the factory, and Y1 is the judgment margin of the first element;

The second calculation formula is:

C1<Bi<C2;

Among them, C1 is the first judgment margin, and C2 is the second judgment margin;

The third calculation formula is:

Max(Bi)-Min(Bi)< Y2;

Among them, Y2 is the judgment margin of the second element.

In the embodiment of the present invention, the selection process of monitoring elements mainly includes three constraints, which are: 1) the degree of attenuation of the selected elements over time is not high; 2) the element content error is small under different manufacturing processes; 3) the element content The content itself is relatively easy to monitor; based on the above needs, a specific screening process and method for monitoring elements has been set up to achieve rapid screening of only monitoring elements.

Figure 3 is a flow chart for setting the paper detection range in all types of paper to be detected in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in Figure 3, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the paper detection range is set in all types of paper to be detected, specifically including:

S301. Set monitoring types, which include additional monitoring and original paper monitoring;

S302. When set to the additional monitoring, set an extra area for paper detection;

S303. When set to monitor the original paper, randomly select a part for online monitoring;

S304. Determine the paper detection range according to the monitoring type.

In the embodiment of the present invention, the screening of monitoring locations is divided into two types. One type is to separately set up a redundant area on the paper for paper detection, and the other type is to directly cut the paper and randomly select a part for online monitoring. .

Figure 4 is a flow chart of extracting an element content table online based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper materials according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in Figure 4, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the online method extracts an element content table based on the paper detection range and the monitored elements, which specifically includes:

S401. Collect paper through a preset collection device according to the paper detection range;

S402. Quickly collect corresponding monitoring elements on the collected paper, form the content of each monitoring element, and store it in the element content table.

In the embodiment of the present invention, after determining the monitoring area, the paper within the corresponding monitoring paper range is quickly extracted, and the corresponding monitoring elements are quickly collected and analyzed to form a corresponding element content table.

Figure 5 is a flow chart for forming the authenticity judgment result of the current detected paper through monitoring the element content table of 1000 true papers in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper materials according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in Figure 5, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the element content table of 1000 true monitored papers is used to form the authenticity judgment result of the currently detected paper, which specifically includes:

S501. Get the element content table of 1000 pieces of true monitoring paper, and use the fourth calculation formula to calculate the maximum content and minimum content of the monitoring element;

S502. Use the maximum content and minimum content of the monitored elements as element judgment sets;

S503. Perform rapid content analysis based on the element content table and use the fifth calculation formula to make judgments. When all are satisfied, the corresponding paper is considered true; if it does not meet the fifth calculation formula, it is false;

The fourth calculation formula is:

;

Among them, E _j is the content of the jth element in the monitoring elements after the online test, Max () is a function of the maximum content of the extracted element in the 1000 pieces of monitoring paper that is true, and Min () is the value of the 1000 pieces of monitoring paper that is true. The function of extracting the minimum content of elements, F _{1_j} is the maximum content of monitored elements, and F _{2_j} is the minimum content of monitored elements;

The fifth calculation formula is:

;

Among them, G _1, G _2, G _{j, and} G _K are the element judgment sets of the constraints of the 1st, 2nd, j, and K elements in sequence, K is the total number of monitored elements, and E _1, E _2, E _{j, and} E _K are in sequence. It is the content of the 1st, 2nd, j, and K elements among the monitored elements described after online testing.

In the embodiment of the present invention, take 1000 true element content tables of monitoring papers, use the fourth calculation formula to calculate the maximum content and minimum content of the monitoring elements, and use the maximum content and minimum content of the monitoring elements as the element judgment set; because the monitoring elements There is more than one, so during this process, multiple constrained element judgment sets will be generated. The range of each constrained element judgment set is the range between the maximum content and the minimum content of the corresponding monitored element; according to the elements The content table performs rapid content analysis and uses the fifth calculation formula to make judgments. When all are satisfied, the corresponding paper is considered true; if it does not meet the fifth calculation formula, it is false.

Figure 6 is a flowchart of a method for calculating the probability of misjudgment and omission by monitoring the element content table of 5,000 pieces of paper as true and 5,000 as false in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention. picture.

As shown in Figure 6, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the element content table of monitored papers with 5,000 pieces being true and 5,000 pieces being false is used to form a calculation method for the probability of false positives and the probability of missing false positives, specifically including :

S601. Extract 1,000 monitoring papers, of which 5,000 are true and 5,000 are false;

S602. For the element content table corresponding to the paper found to be true outside the element judgment set, use the sixth calculation formula to determine the scope of the missed judgment;

S603. Use the seventh calculation formula to calculate the probability of misjudgment when the fifth calculation formula is satisfied and the paper is false;

S604. According to the missed judgment range, use the eighth calculation formula to calculate the probability of missed judgment;

The sixth calculation formula is:

;

Among them, h _j is the content of the jth element in the monitoring element corresponding to the true paper found outside the element judgment set, Max5() is the function of reading the maximum value of h _j of 5000 true papers, and Min5() is the read Take the function of the minimum h _j value of 5000 sheets of paper that is true, L _{1_j} is the upper limit of the missed judgment range, and L _{2_j} is the lower limit of the missed judgment range;

The seventh calculation formula is:

P=U÷5000;

Among them, P is the probability of misjudgment, and U is the total number of papers that satisfy the fifth calculation formula and are false;

The eighth calculation formula is:

;

Among them, R is the total number of papers that do not satisfy the fifth calculation formula and are genuine, and q is the probability of missing a decision.

In the embodiment of the present invention, an additional 1,000 pieces of monitoring paper are extracted, of which 5,000 are true and 5,000 are false. These are used to set the analysis principles for missed and wrong judgments; the elements found outside the set are judged to be true. For the element content table corresponding to the paper, the sixth calculation formula is used to determine the range of missed judgments; for the fifth calculation formula and the paper is false, the seventh calculation formula is used to calculate the probability of false positives; based on the range of missed judgments, the eighth calculation formula is used Calculate the probability of missing a decision.

Figure 7 is a flow chart for online display of authenticity judgment results and the corresponding missed and wrong judgment probabilities based on the calculation method of the probability of false positives and the probability of false positives in a rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention. .

As shown in Figure 7, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding missed and wrong judgment probabilities are displayed online based on the calculation method of the probability of false positive and false positive, specifically including:

S701. Judgment results based on authenticity obtained in real time;

S702. When the authenticity judgment result is true, display the probability of wrong judgment at the same time on the screen;

S703. When the authenticity judgment result is false, display the probability of missed judgment at the same time on the screen.

In the embodiment of the present invention, based on the authenticity judgment results obtained in real time, combined with the probability of false determination and the probability of missed determination, an additional display is performed on a piece of paper after rapid judgment. The final display effect includes whether the current paper is authentic. , if it is true, it displays the corresponding probability of misjudgment, if it is false, it displays the probability of possible misjudgment.

According to a second aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, a rapid testing and comparison system for similar paper objects is provided.

Figure 8 is a structural diagram of a rapid testing and comparison system for similar paper objects according to an embodiment of the present invention.

In one or more embodiments, preferably, the rapid test comparison system for similar paper objects includes:

Monitoring content setting module 801 is used to select the paper to be detected and set monitoring elements;

Monitoring position setting module 802 is used to set the paper detection range in all types of paper to be detected;

The real-time monitoring module 803 is used to extract an element content table online based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements;

The consistency analysis module 804 is used to form the authenticity judgment result of the currently detected paper through the element content table of 1,000 true monitoring papers;

The quantitative analysis module 805 is used to form a calculation method of the probability of false positive and false positive through the element content table of monitoring paper with 5000 pieces being true and 5000 pieces being false;

The online display module 806 is used to display the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding miss-judgement and wrong-judgement probabilities online based on the calculation method for the probability of false positive and false positive.

In the embodiment of the present invention, through a series of modular designs, a system suitable for different structures is implemented. The system can achieve closed-loop, reliable, and efficient execution through collection, analysis, and control.

According to a third aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium on which computer program instructions are stored, and when the computer program instructions are executed by a processor, the computer program instructions implement any one of the first aspects of the embodiment of the present invention. method described.

According to a fourth aspect of embodiments of the present invention, an electronic device is provided. Figure 9 is a structural diagram of an electronic device in one embodiment of the present invention. The electronic equipment shown in Figure 9 is a universal rapid test and comparison device for similar paper materials. The electronic device may be a smartphone, tablet computer, or other device. As shown, electronic device 900 includes processor 901 and memory 902. Among them, the processor 901 is electrically connected to the memory 902. The processor 901 is the control center of the terminal 900. It uses various interfaces and lines to connect various parts of the entire terminal. It executes various functions of the terminal by running or calling computer programs stored in the memory 902 and calling data stored in the memory 902. functions and process data to monitor the terminal as a whole.

In this embodiment, the processor 901 in the electronic device 900 will follow the following steps to load instructions corresponding to the processes of one or more computer programs into the memory 902, and the processor 901 will run the instructions stored in the memory 902. The computer program in the software can realize various functions: select the paper to be detected and set monitoring elements; set the paper detection range in all types of paper to be detected; extract the element content online based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements. table; through the element content table of the monitored paper with 1,000 pieces being true, the authenticity judgment result of the currently tested paper is formed; through the element content table of the monitored paper with 5,000 pieces being true and 5,000 pieces being false, the calculation method of the probability of false positive and false positive is formed ; Based on the calculation method of the probability of false positives and false positives, the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding probabilities of false positives and false positives are displayed online.

Memory 902 may be used to store computer programs and data. The computer program stored in memory 902 contains instructions that can be executed in the processor. Computer programs can be composed of various functional modules. The processor 901 executes various functional applications and data processing by calling computer programs stored in the memory 902 .

The technical solutions provided by the embodiments of the present invention may include the following beneficial effects:

In the solution of the present invention, online matching is performed by quickly judging the position and content of additional added elements in the paper.

In the solution of the present invention, a consistency index formed based on the judgment result is provided to determine whether the paper object is considered to be a counterfeit.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments of the present invention may be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Thus, the invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, magnetic disk storage, optical storage, etc.) embodying computer-usable program code therein.

The present invention is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each process and/or block in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of processes and/or blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing device to produce a machine, such that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device produce a use A device for realizing the functions specified in a process or processes in a flowchart and/or a block or blocks in a block diagram.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that causes a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to operate in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including the instruction means, the instructions The device implements the functions specified in a process or processes in the flowchart and/or in a block or blocks in the block diagram.

These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device, causing a series of operating steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable device to produce computer-implemented processing, thereby executing on the computer or other programmable device. Instructions provide steps for implementing the functions specified in a process or processes of a flowchart diagram and/or a block or blocks of a block diagram.

Obviously, those skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In this way, if these modifications and variations of the present invention fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention and equivalent technologies, the present invention is also intended to include these modifications and variations.

Claims (10)

1. A rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects, characterized in that the method includes: Select the paper to be detected and set the monitoring element; Set the paper detection range among all types of paper to be detected; Online, extract an element content table based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements; Through the element content table of 1,000 pieces of true monitoring paper, the authenticity judgment result of the currently tested paper is formed; By monitoring the element content table of 5,000 pieces of paper that are true and 5,000 pieces that are false, a calculation method for the probability of false positives and false positives is formed; Based on the calculation method for the probability of false positives and false positives, the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding probabilities of false positives and false positives are displayed online. 2. A method for rapid testing and comparison of similar paper objects as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the selected paper to be detected is configured with monitoring elements, specifically including: Determine the paper to be detected, select elements from 100 papers, and obtain a list of all existing elements; Filter the element list to determine the element that satisfies the first calculation formula as the first element; Screen the first elements and determine the elements that satisfy the second calculation formula as the second elements; Screen the second elements and determine the elements that satisfy the third calculation formula as the third elements; using a third element as a monitoring element; The first calculation formula is: ; Among them, Ai is the element content of the i-th sheet of paper 10 days after leaving the factory, Bi is the element content of the i-th sheet of paper when it leaves the factory, and Y1 is the judgment margin of the first element; The second calculation formula is: C1<Bi<C2; Among them, C1 is the first judgment margin, and C2 is the second judgment margin; The third calculation formula is: Max(Bi)-Min(Bi)< Y2; Among them, Y2 is the judgment margin of the second element. 3. A method for rapid testing and comparison of similar paper objects according to claim 1, characterized in that the paper detection range is set in all types of paper to be detected, specifically including: Set monitoring types, which include additional monitoring and original paper monitoring; When set to the additional monitoring, set an extra area for paper detection; When set to the original paper monitoring, randomly select a part for online monitoring; The paper detection range is determined according to the monitoring type. 4. A rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects according to claim 1, characterized in that the online element content table is extracted according to the paper detection range and the monitoring elements, specifically including: According to the paper detection range, collect paper through a preset collection device; The corresponding monitoring elements are quickly collected from the collected paper, and the content of each monitoring element is formed and stored in the element content table. 5. A method for rapid testing and comparison of similar paper objects as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the element content table of 1000 true monitoring papers is used to form the authenticity judgment result of the currently detected paper, which specifically includes: Take the element content table of 1000 pieces of true monitoring paper, and use the fourth calculation formula to calculate the maximum content and minimum content of the monitoring element; The maximum content and minimum content of monitored elements are used as element judgment sets; Perform quick content analysis according to the element content table and use the fifth calculation formula to make judgments. When all are satisfied, the corresponding paper is considered true; if it does not meet the fifth calculation formula, it is false; The fourth calculation formula is: ; Among them, E _j is the content of the jth element in the monitoring elements after the online test, Max () is a function of the maximum content of the extracted element in the 1000 pieces of monitoring paper that is true, and Min () is the value of the 1000 pieces of monitoring paper that is true. The function of extracting the minimum content of elements, F _{1_j} is the maximum content of monitored elements, and F _{2_j} is the minimum content of monitored elements; The fifth calculation formula is: ; Among them, G _1, G _2, G _{j, and} G _K are the element judgment sets of the constraints of the 1st, 2nd, j, and K elements in sequence, K is the total number of monitored elements, and E _1, E _2, E _{j, and} E _K are in sequence. It is the content of the 1st, 2nd, j, and K elements among the monitored elements described after online testing. 6. A method for rapid testing and comparison of similar paper objects according to claim 5, characterized in that the element content table of monitoring papers with 5000 pieces being true and 5000 pieces being false is used to form the probability of false positives and the probability of missed decisions. calculation methods, specifically including: Extract 1,000 monitoring papers, of which 5,000 are true and 5,000 are false; For the element content table corresponding to the paper found to be true outside the element judgment set, use the sixth calculation formula to determine the scope of the missed judgment; For the situation where the fifth calculation formula is satisfied and the paper is false, the seventh calculation formula is used to calculate the probability of misjudgment; According to the missed judgment range, use the eighth calculation formula to calculate the missed judgment probability; The sixth calculation formula is: ; Among them, h _j is the content of the jth element in the monitoring element corresponding to the true paper found outside the element judgment set, Max5() is the function of reading the maximum value of h _j of 5000 true papers, and Min5() is the read Take the function of the minimum h _j value of 5000 sheets of paper that is true, L _{1_j} is the upper limit of the missed judgment range, and L _{2_j} is the lower limit of the missed judgment range; The seventh calculation formula is: P=U÷5000 Among them, P is the probability of misjudgment, and U is the total number of papers that satisfy the fifth calculation formula and are false; The eighth calculation formula is: ; Among them, R is the total number of papers that do not satisfy the fifth calculation formula and are genuine, and q is the probability of missing a decision. 7. A rapid test and comparison method for similar paper objects as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that, based on the calculation method of the probability of false determination and the probability of missed determination, the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding missed or incorrect determinations are displayed online. Judgment probability, specifically including: Based on the authenticity judgment results obtained in real time; When the authenticity judgment result is true, the probability of wrong judgment is also displayed on the screen; When the authenticity judgment result is false, the probability of missed judgment is also displayed on the screen. 8. A rapid test and comparison system for similar paper objects, characterized in that the system is used to implement the method according to any one of claims 1-7, and the system includes: The monitoring content setting module is used to select the paper to be detected and set monitoring elements; Monitoring position setting module is used to set the paper detection range in all types of paper to be detected; A real-time monitoring module for extracting an element content table online based on the paper detection range and the monitoring elements; The consistency analysis module is used to form the authenticity judgment result of the currently tested paper through the element content table of 1000 true monitoring papers; The quantitative analysis module is used to form a calculation method for the probability of false positives and false positives through the element content table of monitored papers with 5,000 pieces being true and 5,000 pieces being false; The online display module is used to display the authenticity judgment results and the corresponding miss-judgement and wrong-judgement probabilities online based on the calculation method of false-judgement probability and missed-judgement probability. 9. A computer-readable storage medium on which computer program instructions are stored, characterized in that, when executed by a processor, the computer program instructions implement the method according to any one of claims 1-7. 10. An electronic device, comprising a memory and a processor, characterized in that the memory is used to store one or more computer program instructions, wherein the one or more computer program instructions are executed by the processor to implement The method according to any one of claims 1-7.