CA1109654A - Embossed dust mop having embossed, nonwoven fabric cleaning element - Google Patents
Embossed dust mop having embossed, nonwoven fabric cleaning elementInfo
- Publication number
- CA1109654A CA1109654A CA332,704A CA332704A CA1109654A CA 1109654 A CA1109654 A CA 1109654A CA 332704 A CA332704 A CA 332704A CA 1109654 A CA1109654 A CA 1109654A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- fabric
- embossed
- web
- dust
- macrofibers
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 64
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 16
- 239000004745 nonwoven fabric Substances 0.000 title abstract description 21
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 74
- 239000003658 microfiber Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 229920001410 Microfiber Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 238000004049 embossing Methods 0.000 claims description 33
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims description 26
- -1 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004952 Polyamide Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920002647 polyamide Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000005020 polyethylene terephthalate Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000012815 thermoplastic material Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920000297 Rayon Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000010425 asbestos Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920000139 polyethylene terephthalate Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002964 rayon Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052895 riebeckite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 125000000391 vinyl group Chemical group [H]C([*])=C([H])[H] 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920002554 vinyl polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920000178 Acrylic resin Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004925 Acrylic resin Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920000098 polyolefin Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000543 intermediate Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 229920000058 polyacrylate Polymers 0.000 claims 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 19
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 229910003460 diamond Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000010432 diamond Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920000742 Cotton Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920005830 Polyurethane Foam Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000004026 adhesive bonding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011496 polyurethane foam Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001169 thermoplastic Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004416 thermosoftening plastic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 240000007049 Juglans regia Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000009496 Juglans regia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920002292 Nylon 6 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000006229 carbon black Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003610 charcoal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002788 crimping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010410 dusting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001821 foam rubber Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229910000286 fullers earth Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002223 garnet Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012188 paraffin wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000008262 pumice Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010008 shearing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920002545 silicone oil Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009864 tensile test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000020234 walnut Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002759 woven fabric Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A47—FURNITURE; DOMESTIC ARTICLES OR APPLIANCES; COFFEE MILLS; SPICE MILLS; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
- A47L—DOMESTIC WASHING OR CLEANING; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
- A47L13/00—Implements for cleaning floors, carpets, furniture, walls, or wall coverings
- A47L13/10—Scrubbing; Scouring; Cleaning; Polishing
- A47L13/16—Cloths; Pads; Sponges
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D04—BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
- D04H—MAKING TEXTILE FABRICS, e.g. FROM FIBRES OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; FABRICS MADE BY SUCH PROCESSES OR APPARATUS, e.g. FELTS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; WADDING ; NON-WOVEN FABRICS FROM STAPLE FIBRES, FILAMENTS OR YARNS, BONDED WITH AT LEAST ONE WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DURING THEIR CONSOLIDATION
- D04H1/00—Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres
- D04H1/40—Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties
- D04H1/54—Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties by welding together the fibres, e.g. by partially melting or dissolving
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Cleaning Implements For Floors, Carpets, Furniture, Walls, And The Like (AREA)
- Treatment Of Fiber Materials (AREA)
- Nonwoven Fabrics (AREA)
Abstract
EMBOSSED DUST MOP HAVING EMBOSSED, NONWOVEN FABRIC CLEANING ELEMENT
ABSTRACT
An embossed nonwoven fabric comprised of a mat of microfibers which may include crimped macrofibers is useful for wiping dust from surfaces. The working face of the fabric is embossed to a limited degree to provide integration of the normally fragile nonwoven fabric web yet not interfere with its cleaning ability.
The areas on either side of the working face adjacent the side edges of the fabric preferably are more highly embossed to provide greater structural integrity sufficient to permit handling and installation of the fabric in certain dust mop frames having high shear or other holding means which could damage the fabric.
ABSTRACT
An embossed nonwoven fabric comprised of a mat of microfibers which may include crimped macrofibers is useful for wiping dust from surfaces. The working face of the fabric is embossed to a limited degree to provide integration of the normally fragile nonwoven fabric web yet not interfere with its cleaning ability.
The areas on either side of the working face adjacent the side edges of the fabric preferably are more highly embossed to provide greater structural integrity sufficient to permit handling and installation of the fabric in certain dust mop frames having high shear or other holding means which could damage the fabric.
Description
llQ~6~4 , EMBOSSED DUST MOP HAVING EMBOSSED, NONWOVEN FABRIC CLEANING ELEMENT
Dust removal from smooth hard surfaces such as floors is a continuing problem both for the homemaker and for professional building maintenance personnel. Such removal is generally accomplished by wiping the surface with a cleaning element such as a fabric which may be held in a frame. Early dust mop cleaning elements were made of fibers such as cotton which may be treated with an impreg-nant such as oil to give the fibers a higher capacity for collecting dust. Woven and nonwoven fabrics have been employed for this purpose as well as collections of loose fibers. Nonwoven fabrics are preferred because they are relatively inexpensive to produce. Dust collecting elements formed of nonwoven fabric are generally called ` "disposable" because they are discarded instead of being `~ 15 cleaned and reused.
Not all nonwoven fabrics are suitable candidates for use as dust collecting elements. Some fabrics will not attract dust particles because of their physical nature while others are highly attractive. Some nonwoven fabrics are too compacted or dense to provide sufficient openness for dust collection. Some fabrics are too weak to be employed and disintegrate as they are passed over the surfa~e~ being cleaned and thus may leaye unsightly ~- residues of the fabric itself.
It is generally recognized that most nonwoven .J
'`
`"~
6;~
fabrics cannot be employed per se as a dust collecting element without integration by embossing, adhesive bonding or other means to improve their structural integrity.
Without such integration, most nonwoven fabrics will disintegrate after only a short period of use as a dust collecting element.
lntegration by adhesive bonding is not preferred because it coats the fibers thereby interfering with their dust collecting ability. Certain embossing techniques are also undesirable because they either weaken the fabric or they consolidate it too much thereby reducing its dust collecting ability.
An improved disposable dust collecting fabric is _-:
provided by the present invention by an embossed nonwoven fabric comprised of a web of microfibers which may contain crimped macrofibers. The embossed dust collecting fabric of the invention has sufficient structural integrity to provide a commercially acceptable use life, yet it is sufficiently drapable, lofty and dust-attractive to be employed to remove dust from hard, smooth surfaces and other areas where conventional dust collecting fabrics are employed.
The working face of the nonwoven fabric is embossed to a limited degree to provide integration of the normally fragile nonwoven web yet not interfere with its dust collecting ability. The areas on either side of the working face adjacent the side edges of the fabric may be more highly embossed to provide greater structural . . :
., . . , -.. ..
integrity sufficient to permit handling and installation of the fabric in certain dust mop frames hav1ng high shear or other holding means which could damage the fabric.
Specifically the dust collecting fabric of the invention is characterlzed by being a disposable, drap-able embossed nonwoven web, at least about l millimeter thick in the unembossed state, comprising entangled, discontinuous m~crofibers being capable of self-fusion under localized pressure and having an average diameter of about lO microns or less, said fabric belng embossed to prov1de a uniform pattcrn of embossing llnes compris-ing about 2g to about 40% of its total surface area and to bond fibers at points where they touch one another without loss of individual fiber identity, said nonwoven web having an elongation value at maximum tensile breaking in the embossed state of at least about 25%.
The preferred dust collecting fabric of the invention is characterized by being an elongate dispos-able, drapable, embossed, binder-free nonwoven web at least about 2 millimeters thick in the unembossed state and comprising a homogeneous blend of ta) entangled, discontinuous microfibers having an average diameter of about lO microns or less; and (b) crimped macrofibers about 5 to about lO0 decitex, the weight ratio of said microfibers to said macrofibers in said web being about 3:7 to about 7:3, at least one of said macrofibers or said microfibers being capable of self-fusion under localized pressure, said fabric being embossed to provide ..
, ' ' .
(c) a first uniformly embossed area intermediate the side edges of said elongate web defining a dust collecting working face, said first embossed area characterized by having a uniform pattern of embossing comprising about 10%
to about 40% of the total surface area of said working face;
and (d) second uniformly embossed areas on either side of said first embossed area, each of said second areas being more highly embossed than said first area to provide a uniform pattern of embossing comprising about 25% to about 65% of the total area of said second areas, said embossing in said first and second areas-being sufficient to bond fibers at points where they touch one another without loss of individual fiber identity.
The invention is further illustrated by reference to the drawing, wherein;
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of an embossed dust collecting fabric made in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross sectional view of a segment of the fabric shown in FIG. 1 taken at line 2-2;
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a dust mop frame assembly having the fabric of FIG. 1 mounted for use; and FIG. 4 is a sectional view of the mop frame shown in FIG. 3 taken at line 4-4.
FIGS. 5-8 are top plan views o~ other embodiments of the embossed dust collection fabric made in accordance with the present invention showing variations in embossing patterns.
FIG, 1 of the drawing shows an embossed nonwoven fabric 10 made in accordance with the present invention comprised of a web formed of microfibers which preferably contains crimped macrofibers. The dust collecting area or working face 11 of fabric 10 is embossed to a limited degree to provide integration of the normally fragile nonwoven web to provide a pattern of continuous cross embossed lines 12 so that the web can withstand the forces normally associated with dusting operations. For this purpose, it has been found that sufficient integration of the web is obtained when the embossed areas are uniformly distributed over the working face in the form of lines which do not exceed about 7 mm in width and which embossed area comprises at least about 2 percent of the total surface area of working face 11. Embossing of working face 11 should not significantly interfere with its dust collecting ability. Appreciable reduction in dust collecting properties is noted when embossing exceeds about 40 percent of the total surface of working face 11.
The preferred degree of embossing comprises about 10%
to about 40% of the total surface of the working face.
The embossed lines of working face 11 may cross one another to define diamond shaped nonembossed dust collecting areas 13 which preferably are tapered or pointed at least in the direction of the main intended movement of the fabric in use so that the leading portion of each nonembossed area 13 is smaller than the body of the nonembossed area 13. Such tapering prolongs the life . , -.- .: - . .
.. . .
:- - .~ , ~ ' ' . ' ' ~ :
: "
6~
of the non~oven fabric in use.
The embossing lines may be continuous, define individual, separated geometric shapes such as squares or circles, or may be a pattern of discontinuous straight or 5 curved lines, such as straight lines (as shown in FIG. 6) or "J" shapes (as shown in FIGS. 7-8) and the like.
Embossing lines are sufficiently closely spaced to provide integration of the fibers of the web to prevent substantial fiber loss during use. For this purpose, the shapes or r 10 lines should preferably not be separated by more than about
Dust removal from smooth hard surfaces such as floors is a continuing problem both for the homemaker and for professional building maintenance personnel. Such removal is generally accomplished by wiping the surface with a cleaning element such as a fabric which may be held in a frame. Early dust mop cleaning elements were made of fibers such as cotton which may be treated with an impreg-nant such as oil to give the fibers a higher capacity for collecting dust. Woven and nonwoven fabrics have been employed for this purpose as well as collections of loose fibers. Nonwoven fabrics are preferred because they are relatively inexpensive to produce. Dust collecting elements formed of nonwoven fabric are generally called ` "disposable" because they are discarded instead of being `~ 15 cleaned and reused.
Not all nonwoven fabrics are suitable candidates for use as dust collecting elements. Some fabrics will not attract dust particles because of their physical nature while others are highly attractive. Some nonwoven fabrics are too compacted or dense to provide sufficient openness for dust collection. Some fabrics are too weak to be employed and disintegrate as they are passed over the surfa~e~ being cleaned and thus may leaye unsightly ~- residues of the fabric itself.
It is generally recognized that most nonwoven .J
'`
`"~
6;~
fabrics cannot be employed per se as a dust collecting element without integration by embossing, adhesive bonding or other means to improve their structural integrity.
Without such integration, most nonwoven fabrics will disintegrate after only a short period of use as a dust collecting element.
lntegration by adhesive bonding is not preferred because it coats the fibers thereby interfering with their dust collecting ability. Certain embossing techniques are also undesirable because they either weaken the fabric or they consolidate it too much thereby reducing its dust collecting ability.
An improved disposable dust collecting fabric is _-:
provided by the present invention by an embossed nonwoven fabric comprised of a web of microfibers which may contain crimped macrofibers. The embossed dust collecting fabric of the invention has sufficient structural integrity to provide a commercially acceptable use life, yet it is sufficiently drapable, lofty and dust-attractive to be employed to remove dust from hard, smooth surfaces and other areas where conventional dust collecting fabrics are employed.
The working face of the nonwoven fabric is embossed to a limited degree to provide integration of the normally fragile nonwoven web yet not interfere with its dust collecting ability. The areas on either side of the working face adjacent the side edges of the fabric may be more highly embossed to provide greater structural . . :
., . . , -.. ..
integrity sufficient to permit handling and installation of the fabric in certain dust mop frames hav1ng high shear or other holding means which could damage the fabric.
Specifically the dust collecting fabric of the invention is characterlzed by being a disposable, drap-able embossed nonwoven web, at least about l millimeter thick in the unembossed state, comprising entangled, discontinuous m~crofibers being capable of self-fusion under localized pressure and having an average diameter of about lO microns or less, said fabric belng embossed to prov1de a uniform pattcrn of embossing llnes compris-ing about 2g to about 40% of its total surface area and to bond fibers at points where they touch one another without loss of individual fiber identity, said nonwoven web having an elongation value at maximum tensile breaking in the embossed state of at least about 25%.
The preferred dust collecting fabric of the invention is characterized by being an elongate dispos-able, drapable, embossed, binder-free nonwoven web at least about 2 millimeters thick in the unembossed state and comprising a homogeneous blend of ta) entangled, discontinuous microfibers having an average diameter of about lO microns or less; and (b) crimped macrofibers about 5 to about lO0 decitex, the weight ratio of said microfibers to said macrofibers in said web being about 3:7 to about 7:3, at least one of said macrofibers or said microfibers being capable of self-fusion under localized pressure, said fabric being embossed to provide ..
, ' ' .
(c) a first uniformly embossed area intermediate the side edges of said elongate web defining a dust collecting working face, said first embossed area characterized by having a uniform pattern of embossing comprising about 10%
to about 40% of the total surface area of said working face;
and (d) second uniformly embossed areas on either side of said first embossed area, each of said second areas being more highly embossed than said first area to provide a uniform pattern of embossing comprising about 25% to about 65% of the total area of said second areas, said embossing in said first and second areas-being sufficient to bond fibers at points where they touch one another without loss of individual fiber identity.
The invention is further illustrated by reference to the drawing, wherein;
FIG. 1 is a top plan view of an embossed dust collecting fabric made in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross sectional view of a segment of the fabric shown in FIG. 1 taken at line 2-2;
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a dust mop frame assembly having the fabric of FIG. 1 mounted for use; and FIG. 4 is a sectional view of the mop frame shown in FIG. 3 taken at line 4-4.
FIGS. 5-8 are top plan views o~ other embodiments of the embossed dust collection fabric made in accordance with the present invention showing variations in embossing patterns.
FIG, 1 of the drawing shows an embossed nonwoven fabric 10 made in accordance with the present invention comprised of a web formed of microfibers which preferably contains crimped macrofibers. The dust collecting area or working face 11 of fabric 10 is embossed to a limited degree to provide integration of the normally fragile nonwoven web to provide a pattern of continuous cross embossed lines 12 so that the web can withstand the forces normally associated with dusting operations. For this purpose, it has been found that sufficient integration of the web is obtained when the embossed areas are uniformly distributed over the working face in the form of lines which do not exceed about 7 mm in width and which embossed area comprises at least about 2 percent of the total surface area of working face 11. Embossing of working face 11 should not significantly interfere with its dust collecting ability. Appreciable reduction in dust collecting properties is noted when embossing exceeds about 40 percent of the total surface of working face 11.
The preferred degree of embossing comprises about 10%
to about 40% of the total surface of the working face.
The embossed lines of working face 11 may cross one another to define diamond shaped nonembossed dust collecting areas 13 which preferably are tapered or pointed at least in the direction of the main intended movement of the fabric in use so that the leading portion of each nonembossed area 13 is smaller than the body of the nonembossed area 13. Such tapering prolongs the life . , -.- .: - . .
.. . .
:- - .~ , ~ ' ' . ' ' ~ :
: "
6~
of the non~oven fabric in use.
The embossing lines may be continuous, define individual, separated geometric shapes such as squares or circles, or may be a pattern of discontinuous straight or 5 curved lines, such as straight lines (as shown in FIG. 6) or "J" shapes (as shown in FIGS. 7-8) and the like.
Embossing lines are sufficiently closely spaced to provide integration of the fibers of the web to prevent substantial fiber loss during use. For this purpose, the shapes or r 10 lines should preferably not be separated by more than about
2 cm and should not be aligned so as to provide a straight unembossed zone, which could provide a zone of weakness where the fabric could fail.
If needed, the fabric 10 may be more highly 15 embossed on either side of working face 11 to provide highly embossed areas 14. Areas 14 may be more highly embossed to provide additional structural integrity to the fabric to make it capable of withstanding the forces encountered at the more high stress areas in use such as 20 at the point of attachment where the fabric is fastened into certain types of mop frames. The embossed pattern in areas 14 may be in a continuous crossed arrangement as shown in FIG. 1, or a discontinuous arrangement, but are generally to a greater extent than working face 11, 25 comprising up to about 65 percent of the total area of each of the more highly embossed areas 14. Mop frames with fabric attachment means that apply less shearing action to the edge of the dust cloth may not require more : .
SG5~
highly embossed side areas. One example of such an embossed pattern is shown in FIG. 8.
Any of a wide variety of embossing methods known in the art may be employed to provide the embossed patterns described above. For example, conventional heat and pressure may be used to impart the desired embossed patterns in the web. Other useful methods include impulse sealing with pressure which is similar to conventional heat and pressure but somewhat more refined in that the web is rapidly heated and cooled under pressure thereby minimizing any potential undesirable heat transfer, ultrasonic welding with pressure, rotary pressure emboss-inq under ambient temoerature~ i.e., without heating, for example between appropriately shaped hard nip rolls, and the like. The latter method is the preferred method.
Embossing methods using excessive pressure or excessive heat and pressure are to be avoided because such methods produce webs which have very little stretchiness or a low elongation value. Such webs will readily fail cohesively in use or as installation on the mop frame is attempted, with rapid wide-spread splitting of the fabric along the embossing lines.
Many different embossing patterns are possible and useful. The embossed lines in the working face of the fabric of the invention may define shapes which may include triangles, diamond shapes, squares, rectangles, polygons, pear-shaped areas, ovals, or may be in the form of a pattern of discontinuous lines which may be g65~
straight or curved, and the like.
The nonwoven web employed to produce the embossed fabric of the present invention is formed of entangled, discontinuous thermoplastic microfibers having an average ~--diameter of about 10 microns or less which preferably may contain up to 70% by weight thermoplastic macrofibers of about 5 to about 100 decitex to provide additional loft to enhance entry of dust.
The weight ratio of microfibers to macrofibers in a preferred web is 3:7 to 7:3 to obtain a preferred balance of strength and loft in the resultant embossed web for use as a dust collecting element. The amount of macrofibers, however, should not be so great as to weaken the web. The tensile strength and the tear strength of the web decreases significantly when the macrofiber content exceeds 50 percent of the total fiber weight.
Wh;le m;crofiber webs containing macrofibers are preferred for use as dust collecting elements, webs containing 100% microfibers are also useful, particularly when embossed with patterns such as are shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, but not when extremely highly embossed. A too highly embossed 100% microfiber web is characterized by having a low elongation value (i.e., less than about 25%) and thus would be subject to rapid cohesive failure as discussed above.
The microfibers should be capable of self-fusion under application of localized pressure to permit inte-gration upon embossing. Preferably, both the macrofibers - -- . ~ - . , ' 9 ~ 6~
and the microfibers are capable of self-fusing.
The microfibers can be formed of any of a variety of fiber-forming thermoplastic materials including, for example, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene, polyamides, and other polymers known in the art. The preferred thermoplastic material for forming the microfibers if polypropylene.
The nonwoven webs may be prepared with micro-fibers which have been melt-blown (prepared by extruding molten fiber-forming material), solution-blown (prepared by extruding a solvent solution of fiber-forming material), or other means.
The macrofibers are crimped to provide loft in the resultant nonwoven web. Crimped fibers will have a continuous, wavy, curly or jagged character throughout their length. Crimping may be in a planar or three dimensional configuration. The number of crimps, i.e., complete waves or cycles, per unit fiber length may vary rather widely in the macrofibers useful in the invention.
The macrofibers useful in the practice of the invention typically have more than about one-half crimp per centi-meter and preferably have at least two crimps per centi-meter. The amplitude or depth of the crimp fiber may also vary considerably for the crimped macrofibers useful in the present invention. Although amplitude and crimp are difficult to uniformly characterize in numerical values because of the random nature of many fibers, an indication of amplitude is given percent crimp. That quantity is - ~ :, ,. . ~,:
~l~g6~
- l o -defined as the difference between the uncrimped length7 measured in the fully extended state, and the crimped length, measured by saspending the fiber sample with a weight attached to one end equal to two milligrams per decitex of fiber, divided by the crimped length and multiplied by 100. Macrofibers used in the present invention will generally exhibit an average percent crimp of at least about 15 percent, preferably at least about 25 percent.
The macrofibers, as a minimum, should have an average length sufficient to include at least one crimp and preferably at least three or four crimps. For ease of handling in preparing the web, when fully extended, the macrofibers typically average between about 2 and 15 centimeters in length, preferably between 2 and 10 centimeters.
The macrofibers may be formed of any of a wide variety of synthetic thermoplastic materials. The preferred macrofibers are crimped staple fibers formed of polyester, acrylic resin, polyolefin, polyamide, rayon, polyacetate, and the like. Such staple fibers are readily commercially available.
The thickness of the web, before embossing, should be at least 1 millimeter in order to obtain sufficient strength in the fabric and for the fabric to be adequately embossed. Preferably, the thickness should be at least 2 millimeters. The thickness will typically be less than 30 millimeters because, beyond this, the web '. ` - '.,- .' ~ . .
, ~
~, , ' . . ... , ' ' - -. :: -.
.... .
6s~
becomes too bulky and is difficult ~o install in commercially available mop frames? although such webs are useful for collecting dusts The nonwoYen webs useful for preparing the embossed nonwoven fabric of the present inventiQn and which contain macrofibers are prepared by introducing the crimped macrofibers into a stream of microfibers during the microfiber web formati:on process, A Preferred method of producing this nonwoven web is disclosed in United States Patent No. 47118,531, Nonwoven webs which contain only microfibers are similarly made ~ith the exception that no macrofibers are used.
One example of prepari-ng a preferred nonwoven web suited for embossing to produce the embossed non~oven fabric of the present invention involves simultaneously preparing melt blown microfi-bers whtle introducing macrofibers into the stream of freshly blown microfibers and depositing the collection of fibers on a suitable carrier. The microfibers may be produced using conventional equipment. The macrofibers may first be prepared as a web, for example, by using a garnet machine or a "~ando-Webberl' web-forming machine, The macrofiber web is then fed into the device which separates the macrofibers from the web and introduces them into the air stream which is employed to attenuate the microfibers to form the composite nonwoven web.
. ~ . ~ .
- . . , l~S654 The web may also include other additives to improve its appearance, strength and/or performance. For example, impregnants may be added which improVe the dust collecting ability and/or leave a slight residue to improve the surface being treatedt Examples of such impregnants include oils such as hydrocarbon or silicone oil and paraffin wax.
Webs which are useful in the present invention may be selected on the basis of certain physical properties.
Useful webs will be sufficiently strong to resist failure or pulling apart when mounted in a mop frame and used. For this purpose it is preferred that the web, in the unembossed state, have an average specific strength of at least about 0.3 (most preferably 0.6) as determined by averaging the specific strength in the longitudinal direction and in the transverse direction. Specific strength is the force required to pull a web apart divided by the weight of the web. A web which has been embossed should preferablY
have a specific strength of at least about 0.80, most preferably at least about 1.00.
The specific strength of a nonwoven web may be determined by weighing a 2.5 cm by 18 cm sample of the web, placing the narrow ends of the sample between 2.5 cm wide jaws of an "Instron" tensile testing machine, with the jaws 10 cm apart, and pulling on the sample at a rate of 30 cm per minute until the sample breaks. The maximum - 1 3 'li~!S654 force in grams required to break the sample divided by the ~eight of the samPle in milligrams is the specific strength. Samples should be cut in both the transverse and longitudinal directions and the average determine~, S The embossed nonwoven webs of the present invention should also have a moderate degree of stretchiness which permits at least slight stretching of the fabric without failure. For this purpose, the embossed nonwoven webs should have an elongation value in both the machine di-rection and the transverse direction at maximum tensile breaking strength of at least 25%?
preferably at least 30%.
Elongation values are determined during the test for specific strength by measuring the distance the sample is stretched prior to its breaking at maximum tensile strength. In evaluating the examples hereinafter described, it was observed that the elongation value in the machine direction consistently fell below the elongation value in the trans~erse direction. Therefore7 the elongatiQn Yalues repQrted herein with respect to the examples only reflect the lower value of that in the machine direction.
Webs which are useful in the present invention should not have appreciable drag ~r resistance when moved over the surface of the floor. Therefore, the useful webs of the present inYention in the unembosse~ state preferably will have a dynamic coefficient of friction of less than about 1-3, Preferably less than about l,Q~
The dynamic coefficient friction may be -.. . ~ ~.
, - 14 - ~ ~ g 6~ ~
determined by positioning a 15 cm by 15 cm segment of the web under a 13 cm by 13 cm sled composed of a polyurethane foam adhered to a wooden block, placing a 454 gram weight on top of the sled to provide a total weight of 570 grams and pulling the sled at the rate of 50 cm per minute along a 60 cm section of vinyl or asbestos tile previously coated with three applications of commerically available floor polish (e.g., sold under the trade designation "Step Ahead"~ by the S.C. Johnson Company), with the web sample between the tile surface and the polyurethane foam layer, and measuring the force required to pull. The dynamic coefficient friction is this force in grams divided by the total weight of the sled and any additional weight thereon.
Webs which are useful in the present invention will also be resistant to tearing. For this purpose, useful webs in the unembossed state preferably will have a tear strength of at least about 60 grams as determined by employing a Standard Elmendorf Model No. 60-100 Tearing Tester, using a 6.5 cm by 28 cm web sample. The tear strength in both the longitudinal and transverse direction of the web is measured and averaged.
Nonwoven webs which are useful in the present invention in the unembossed state preferably will have a loft or openness of at least about 30 cubic centimeters per gram. The loft may be determined by weighing a 10 by 20 centimeter section of the web, placing a 10 centi-meter by 20 centimeter 0.3 millimeter thick aluminum plate exactly over the sample to avoid discontinuities in .
. . . - . . . .. ..
- 15 - 11~9i65~
the web sample and measuring the thiçkness in centimeters at several points on the plate. The loft is a thickness in centimeters (less the thickness of the plate) times the area of the web in cm2 divided by the weight of the 5 web in grams.
FI~S. 3 and 4 show an example of a commercially available dust mop frame 30 sold under the trade desig-nation "Velmop"~. Such dust mop frames typically include an elongate flat-faced pad 31 which is preferably 10 compressible (e.g., formed of foam rubber) mounted on a rigid back-up frame 32 to hold pad 31 in a planar config-uration and holding means 33 to permit attachment of the ends 39 of a dust mop cleaning fabric 10, with the working face 11 of fabric 10 disposed on the flat face of pad 31.
15 The mop frame may also include a universal joint 34 and a handle holder 35 into which a suitable handle 36 may be fitted. Holding means 33 in this case is provided by hinged projecting element 38 which frictionally engages sidewall 40 to hold fabric ends 39 therebetween. Many 20 other dust mop frames are also known and commercially available, and that shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 is merely provided as an illustrative example.
/
EXAMPLES
The invention is further illustrated by the 25 following examples, wherein all parts are by weight, unless otherwise specified.
A web, approximately 0.4 to 0.5 cm thick, before ,, i-~: , . ,- : :. ';, ';' ' '.'''~'' "' '"' '` .,, ' "- :' . ~
- 16 ~ 36~4 embossing, having a loft of 80-110 cm3 per gram and a weight of 50 grams per square meter, was prepared by the method described in aforementioned of equal parts of 13 decitex, 3.4 cm polyethylene tere-phthalate macrofibers having 50% crimp and 0.2 to 4.3 micrometer diameter (average 1.2 micrometer) blown polypropylene microfibers. This web was embossed at ambient temperature sequentially between two sets of 25 cm diameter steel rolls. One set of rolls provided the embossed pattern on the working face while the other provided the more highly embossed pattern adjacent the edges. The working face was embossed with a diamond pattern, wherein each of the diamond shapes had a minor axis of 1.5 cm and a major axis of 4 cm to provide a pattern similar to that shown in FIG. 1.
The more highly embossed side edges of the web were embossed with a crosshatched pattern as shown in FIG. 1 of the drawing to provide square shapes 1.3 cm on edge with 0.24 cm wide embossed lines.
The embossing pressure ranged from about 60 kg per cm2 to about 260 kg per cm2 for the diamond-shaped pattern providing the embossed working face and about 270 to 600 kg per cm2 for the more highly reinforced embossed pattern side edge portions. The web speed through the embossing rolls was approximately 4.5 meters per minute.
A 0.4 to 0.5 cm thick web, before embossing, with a loft of 70 to 80 cm3 per gram and a web weight of ',: .
~: . , .- . , -6~4 55 grams per meter was prepared of equal parts of the blown microfibers described in Example 1 and 53 decitex7 5.5 cm polyethylene terephthalate macrofibers having 51%
crimp. The web was embossed to provide a pattern substantially as shown in FIG. 1 of the drawing to provide a nonwoven dust fabric.
A 0.6 to 0.7 cm web, before embossing, having a loft of 140-160 cm3 per gram and a web weight of 45 grams per meter was prepared of equal parts of 17 decitex, 3.8 cm nylon 6:6 having 45% crimp and 0.2 to 7,0 micrometer diameter (averaging 1.5 micrometers) polypropylene blown microfibers.
Other embossed nonwoven fabrics were prepared of the webs described in Table I below.
-- 1 8 - ~L1$~6~i4 .
., 4-~ o s ~o V~ ~ ~ ~U 3X cy ~ 0 L~ O
a 0~ O
O ~ Z O C~ O
S_ ~ O L O
~ . ' ' ~ ~ ' ' .~
O I 1. I C~l I C~l I U'~ I N I I C
V~
.0 ~ ~ .
C ~ , ... ~ .
S O ~ I~ ~ . 'D ~ ~ ~t _ . ~ ~ O
If needed, the fabric 10 may be more highly 15 embossed on either side of working face 11 to provide highly embossed areas 14. Areas 14 may be more highly embossed to provide additional structural integrity to the fabric to make it capable of withstanding the forces encountered at the more high stress areas in use such as 20 at the point of attachment where the fabric is fastened into certain types of mop frames. The embossed pattern in areas 14 may be in a continuous crossed arrangement as shown in FIG. 1, or a discontinuous arrangement, but are generally to a greater extent than working face 11, 25 comprising up to about 65 percent of the total area of each of the more highly embossed areas 14. Mop frames with fabric attachment means that apply less shearing action to the edge of the dust cloth may not require more : .
SG5~
highly embossed side areas. One example of such an embossed pattern is shown in FIG. 8.
Any of a wide variety of embossing methods known in the art may be employed to provide the embossed patterns described above. For example, conventional heat and pressure may be used to impart the desired embossed patterns in the web. Other useful methods include impulse sealing with pressure which is similar to conventional heat and pressure but somewhat more refined in that the web is rapidly heated and cooled under pressure thereby minimizing any potential undesirable heat transfer, ultrasonic welding with pressure, rotary pressure emboss-inq under ambient temoerature~ i.e., without heating, for example between appropriately shaped hard nip rolls, and the like. The latter method is the preferred method.
Embossing methods using excessive pressure or excessive heat and pressure are to be avoided because such methods produce webs which have very little stretchiness or a low elongation value. Such webs will readily fail cohesively in use or as installation on the mop frame is attempted, with rapid wide-spread splitting of the fabric along the embossing lines.
Many different embossing patterns are possible and useful. The embossed lines in the working face of the fabric of the invention may define shapes which may include triangles, diamond shapes, squares, rectangles, polygons, pear-shaped areas, ovals, or may be in the form of a pattern of discontinuous lines which may be g65~
straight or curved, and the like.
The nonwoven web employed to produce the embossed fabric of the present invention is formed of entangled, discontinuous thermoplastic microfibers having an average ~--diameter of about 10 microns or less which preferably may contain up to 70% by weight thermoplastic macrofibers of about 5 to about 100 decitex to provide additional loft to enhance entry of dust.
The weight ratio of microfibers to macrofibers in a preferred web is 3:7 to 7:3 to obtain a preferred balance of strength and loft in the resultant embossed web for use as a dust collecting element. The amount of macrofibers, however, should not be so great as to weaken the web. The tensile strength and the tear strength of the web decreases significantly when the macrofiber content exceeds 50 percent of the total fiber weight.
Wh;le m;crofiber webs containing macrofibers are preferred for use as dust collecting elements, webs containing 100% microfibers are also useful, particularly when embossed with patterns such as are shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, but not when extremely highly embossed. A too highly embossed 100% microfiber web is characterized by having a low elongation value (i.e., less than about 25%) and thus would be subject to rapid cohesive failure as discussed above.
The microfibers should be capable of self-fusion under application of localized pressure to permit inte-gration upon embossing. Preferably, both the macrofibers - -- . ~ - . , ' 9 ~ 6~
and the microfibers are capable of self-fusing.
The microfibers can be formed of any of a variety of fiber-forming thermoplastic materials including, for example, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene, polyamides, and other polymers known in the art. The preferred thermoplastic material for forming the microfibers if polypropylene.
The nonwoven webs may be prepared with micro-fibers which have been melt-blown (prepared by extruding molten fiber-forming material), solution-blown (prepared by extruding a solvent solution of fiber-forming material), or other means.
The macrofibers are crimped to provide loft in the resultant nonwoven web. Crimped fibers will have a continuous, wavy, curly or jagged character throughout their length. Crimping may be in a planar or three dimensional configuration. The number of crimps, i.e., complete waves or cycles, per unit fiber length may vary rather widely in the macrofibers useful in the invention.
The macrofibers useful in the practice of the invention typically have more than about one-half crimp per centi-meter and preferably have at least two crimps per centi-meter. The amplitude or depth of the crimp fiber may also vary considerably for the crimped macrofibers useful in the present invention. Although amplitude and crimp are difficult to uniformly characterize in numerical values because of the random nature of many fibers, an indication of amplitude is given percent crimp. That quantity is - ~ :, ,. . ~,:
~l~g6~
- l o -defined as the difference between the uncrimped length7 measured in the fully extended state, and the crimped length, measured by saspending the fiber sample with a weight attached to one end equal to two milligrams per decitex of fiber, divided by the crimped length and multiplied by 100. Macrofibers used in the present invention will generally exhibit an average percent crimp of at least about 15 percent, preferably at least about 25 percent.
The macrofibers, as a minimum, should have an average length sufficient to include at least one crimp and preferably at least three or four crimps. For ease of handling in preparing the web, when fully extended, the macrofibers typically average between about 2 and 15 centimeters in length, preferably between 2 and 10 centimeters.
The macrofibers may be formed of any of a wide variety of synthetic thermoplastic materials. The preferred macrofibers are crimped staple fibers formed of polyester, acrylic resin, polyolefin, polyamide, rayon, polyacetate, and the like. Such staple fibers are readily commercially available.
The thickness of the web, before embossing, should be at least 1 millimeter in order to obtain sufficient strength in the fabric and for the fabric to be adequately embossed. Preferably, the thickness should be at least 2 millimeters. The thickness will typically be less than 30 millimeters because, beyond this, the web '. ` - '.,- .' ~ . .
, ~
~, , ' . . ... , ' ' - -. :: -.
.... .
6s~
becomes too bulky and is difficult ~o install in commercially available mop frames? although such webs are useful for collecting dusts The nonwoYen webs useful for preparing the embossed nonwoven fabric of the present inventiQn and which contain macrofibers are prepared by introducing the crimped macrofibers into a stream of microfibers during the microfiber web formati:on process, A Preferred method of producing this nonwoven web is disclosed in United States Patent No. 47118,531, Nonwoven webs which contain only microfibers are similarly made ~ith the exception that no macrofibers are used.
One example of prepari-ng a preferred nonwoven web suited for embossing to produce the embossed non~oven fabric of the present invention involves simultaneously preparing melt blown microfi-bers whtle introducing macrofibers into the stream of freshly blown microfibers and depositing the collection of fibers on a suitable carrier. The microfibers may be produced using conventional equipment. The macrofibers may first be prepared as a web, for example, by using a garnet machine or a "~ando-Webberl' web-forming machine, The macrofiber web is then fed into the device which separates the macrofibers from the web and introduces them into the air stream which is employed to attenuate the microfibers to form the composite nonwoven web.
. ~ . ~ .
- . . , l~S654 The web may also include other additives to improve its appearance, strength and/or performance. For example, impregnants may be added which improVe the dust collecting ability and/or leave a slight residue to improve the surface being treatedt Examples of such impregnants include oils such as hydrocarbon or silicone oil and paraffin wax.
Webs which are useful in the present invention may be selected on the basis of certain physical properties.
Useful webs will be sufficiently strong to resist failure or pulling apart when mounted in a mop frame and used. For this purpose it is preferred that the web, in the unembossed state, have an average specific strength of at least about 0.3 (most preferably 0.6) as determined by averaging the specific strength in the longitudinal direction and in the transverse direction. Specific strength is the force required to pull a web apart divided by the weight of the web. A web which has been embossed should preferablY
have a specific strength of at least about 0.80, most preferably at least about 1.00.
The specific strength of a nonwoven web may be determined by weighing a 2.5 cm by 18 cm sample of the web, placing the narrow ends of the sample between 2.5 cm wide jaws of an "Instron" tensile testing machine, with the jaws 10 cm apart, and pulling on the sample at a rate of 30 cm per minute until the sample breaks. The maximum - 1 3 'li~!S654 force in grams required to break the sample divided by the ~eight of the samPle in milligrams is the specific strength. Samples should be cut in both the transverse and longitudinal directions and the average determine~, S The embossed nonwoven webs of the present invention should also have a moderate degree of stretchiness which permits at least slight stretching of the fabric without failure. For this purpose, the embossed nonwoven webs should have an elongation value in both the machine di-rection and the transverse direction at maximum tensile breaking strength of at least 25%?
preferably at least 30%.
Elongation values are determined during the test for specific strength by measuring the distance the sample is stretched prior to its breaking at maximum tensile strength. In evaluating the examples hereinafter described, it was observed that the elongation value in the machine direction consistently fell below the elongation value in the trans~erse direction. Therefore7 the elongatiQn Yalues repQrted herein with respect to the examples only reflect the lower value of that in the machine direction.
Webs which are useful in the present invention should not have appreciable drag ~r resistance when moved over the surface of the floor. Therefore, the useful webs of the present inYention in the unembosse~ state preferably will have a dynamic coefficient of friction of less than about 1-3, Preferably less than about l,Q~
The dynamic coefficient friction may be -.. . ~ ~.
, - 14 - ~ ~ g 6~ ~
determined by positioning a 15 cm by 15 cm segment of the web under a 13 cm by 13 cm sled composed of a polyurethane foam adhered to a wooden block, placing a 454 gram weight on top of the sled to provide a total weight of 570 grams and pulling the sled at the rate of 50 cm per minute along a 60 cm section of vinyl or asbestos tile previously coated with three applications of commerically available floor polish (e.g., sold under the trade designation "Step Ahead"~ by the S.C. Johnson Company), with the web sample between the tile surface and the polyurethane foam layer, and measuring the force required to pull. The dynamic coefficient friction is this force in grams divided by the total weight of the sled and any additional weight thereon.
Webs which are useful in the present invention will also be resistant to tearing. For this purpose, useful webs in the unembossed state preferably will have a tear strength of at least about 60 grams as determined by employing a Standard Elmendorf Model No. 60-100 Tearing Tester, using a 6.5 cm by 28 cm web sample. The tear strength in both the longitudinal and transverse direction of the web is measured and averaged.
Nonwoven webs which are useful in the present invention in the unembossed state preferably will have a loft or openness of at least about 30 cubic centimeters per gram. The loft may be determined by weighing a 10 by 20 centimeter section of the web, placing a 10 centi-meter by 20 centimeter 0.3 millimeter thick aluminum plate exactly over the sample to avoid discontinuities in .
. . . - . . . .. ..
- 15 - 11~9i65~
the web sample and measuring the thiçkness in centimeters at several points on the plate. The loft is a thickness in centimeters (less the thickness of the plate) times the area of the web in cm2 divided by the weight of the 5 web in grams.
FI~S. 3 and 4 show an example of a commercially available dust mop frame 30 sold under the trade desig-nation "Velmop"~. Such dust mop frames typically include an elongate flat-faced pad 31 which is preferably 10 compressible (e.g., formed of foam rubber) mounted on a rigid back-up frame 32 to hold pad 31 in a planar config-uration and holding means 33 to permit attachment of the ends 39 of a dust mop cleaning fabric 10, with the working face 11 of fabric 10 disposed on the flat face of pad 31.
15 The mop frame may also include a universal joint 34 and a handle holder 35 into which a suitable handle 36 may be fitted. Holding means 33 in this case is provided by hinged projecting element 38 which frictionally engages sidewall 40 to hold fabric ends 39 therebetween. Many 20 other dust mop frames are also known and commercially available, and that shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 is merely provided as an illustrative example.
/
EXAMPLES
The invention is further illustrated by the 25 following examples, wherein all parts are by weight, unless otherwise specified.
A web, approximately 0.4 to 0.5 cm thick, before ,, i-~: , . ,- : :. ';, ';' ' '.'''~'' "' '"' '` .,, ' "- :' . ~
- 16 ~ 36~4 embossing, having a loft of 80-110 cm3 per gram and a weight of 50 grams per square meter, was prepared by the method described in aforementioned of equal parts of 13 decitex, 3.4 cm polyethylene tere-phthalate macrofibers having 50% crimp and 0.2 to 4.3 micrometer diameter (average 1.2 micrometer) blown polypropylene microfibers. This web was embossed at ambient temperature sequentially between two sets of 25 cm diameter steel rolls. One set of rolls provided the embossed pattern on the working face while the other provided the more highly embossed pattern adjacent the edges. The working face was embossed with a diamond pattern, wherein each of the diamond shapes had a minor axis of 1.5 cm and a major axis of 4 cm to provide a pattern similar to that shown in FIG. 1.
The more highly embossed side edges of the web were embossed with a crosshatched pattern as shown in FIG. 1 of the drawing to provide square shapes 1.3 cm on edge with 0.24 cm wide embossed lines.
The embossing pressure ranged from about 60 kg per cm2 to about 260 kg per cm2 for the diamond-shaped pattern providing the embossed working face and about 270 to 600 kg per cm2 for the more highly reinforced embossed pattern side edge portions. The web speed through the embossing rolls was approximately 4.5 meters per minute.
A 0.4 to 0.5 cm thick web, before embossing, with a loft of 70 to 80 cm3 per gram and a web weight of ',: .
~: . , .- . , -6~4 55 grams per meter was prepared of equal parts of the blown microfibers described in Example 1 and 53 decitex7 5.5 cm polyethylene terephthalate macrofibers having 51%
crimp. The web was embossed to provide a pattern substantially as shown in FIG. 1 of the drawing to provide a nonwoven dust fabric.
A 0.6 to 0.7 cm web, before embossing, having a loft of 140-160 cm3 per gram and a web weight of 45 grams per meter was prepared of equal parts of 17 decitex, 3.8 cm nylon 6:6 having 45% crimp and 0.2 to 7,0 micrometer diameter (averaging 1.5 micrometers) polypropylene blown microfibers.
Other embossed nonwoven fabrics were prepared of the webs described in Table I below.
-- 1 8 - ~L1$~6~i4 .
., 4-~ o s ~o V~ ~ ~ ~U 3X cy ~ 0 L~ O
a 0~ O
O ~ Z O C~ O
S_ ~ O L O
~ . ' ' ~ ~ ' ' .~
O I 1. I C~l I C~l I U'~ I N I I C
V~
.0 ~ ~ .
C ~ , ... ~ .
S O ~ I~ ~ . 'D ~ ~ ~t _ . ~ ~ O
3-1:: ~>~
O~
._a~ a~ a~
Ll~ ~ ~ .
_ ~ ~ Q ~ n s ~ O = = = = = = _ ~ O = = ~ v~
~0 .~ ~ ~0 ~0 0 ~0 ~
X I~ r~ I~ I~ I~ I~ ~ I~ I~ r~ I~ L~ _ ._ _ _ . ~ O C O
O(-) nc~ ~
C
s ~ o ~o~ ~===_===='~= s~lSa s ~ ~ ' ~ aCI-C
~ oc ~ a) u ~
~ S '~
_ N O O O _ a~ O
~ E o In o Lr~ ~ o In O O O O O ~--3 ~ Ln _ ~ _ _ Ln C~ u ~ s c ~
~ ~J O O O ~ ~ s o 3 Ln u~ Ln o o---. c~
X O ~ u~~D r~ oo o~ o ~ . . .
~Z ______ _c~
::', : ' `,:
-.. : ,` :
- 19- ~ 5~
e ~ ~
C E
E
a~ , , , , , , , ~, , , , o IIII I II~IIII
~1 C~
E _ _ _ ~ . _ ~ o. _ ~ _ ~ o ~ . _ ~ _ _ ~o _ C~ ~t 1`
cn C
CU
C ~ CV
o ~ ~
>.
J ~ o ~> o CQ ~ Q . CL
C~ C~o o ~ o ._ ~ ~:
L~ ISI1~~ N d- N O 1~ I r_ 1~ 1~ 1~
c~J~ o _ _ -- ~-N ~ _ 1~
C
~ ~ D _
O~
._a~ a~ a~
Ll~ ~ ~ .
_ ~ ~ Q ~ n s ~ O = = = = = = _ ~ O = = ~ v~
~0 .~ ~ ~0 ~0 0 ~0 ~
X I~ r~ I~ I~ I~ I~ ~ I~ I~ r~ I~ L~ _ ._ _ _ . ~ O C O
O(-) nc~ ~
C
s ~ o ~o~ ~===_===='~= s~lSa s ~ ~ ' ~ aCI-C
~ oc ~ a) u ~
~ S '~
_ N O O O _ a~ O
~ E o In o Lr~ ~ o In O O O O O ~--3 ~ Ln _ ~ _ _ Ln C~ u ~ s c ~
~ ~J O O O ~ ~ s o 3 Ln u~ Ln o o---. c~
X O ~ u~~D r~ oo o~ o ~ . . .
~Z ______ _c~
::', : ' `,:
-.. : ,` :
- 19- ~ 5~
e ~ ~
C E
E
a~ , , , , , , , ~, , , , o IIII I II~IIII
~1 C~
E _ _ _ ~ . _ ~ o. _ ~ _ ~ o ~ . _ ~ _ _ ~o _ C~ ~t 1`
cn C
CU
C ~ CV
o ~ ~
>.
J ~ o ~> o CQ ~ Q . CL
C~ C~o o ~ o ._ ~ ~:
L~ ISI1~~ N d- N O 1~ I r_ 1~ 1~ 1~
c~J~ o _ _ -- ~-N ~ _ 1~
C
~ ~ D _
4-O ~ _ O o o o ~ LLJ ~ = >~ ~ ~ O ~ = = =
:~ ~ Z ~- Z ~ C- Z
Cl~
.. _ Oo o oo oooooo al c~ u7 U~ O~ U~ U~ OLO ~ ~ u~
3 ~ _ . u~ _ ~ C O O o oo ~
3 u~ n o X O ~ I~ 00 c~ O _ c~ O 1~ .
11.1 Z -- . -- -- C~ l C~lC~J CN C~J N C~J _ ,~
'`: : :
,`.'' ~ :
6~4 - 20 ~
' a~
.~
o o o E E E
C o o o E
~ ~n V> V~
~ ., ~ ~
~ ~ ,a a s I ~ ~ I L I I I I 1 1 ~ ~
C I I O I L I I I L I I g g ~ O
~ 7 n~
E ~ d- o _ _ _ ~ _ 1~ r~ ~ o o s . ..
_ I N
aJ
~1 o ~> ~ a~
~ C~
L~ ~ o ~._ t =. _ = =. =. _ = _ = =: =, =
CC 4- ~ .
S C~
$ 1~ r~ :~ ~ 1~ 1~ r~ 1~ 1~ 1~
._ _ _ I _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I
_ a~
~ ,_ ~o ~ c~
~ ~ = O ~ = _ = = = = = O
~ n. z c~ z~
S
._ _ Cl N O O O O O O O O O O O ~ 1$1 3 U~ Lr) O O O O O O O O Lt~ ~) N
x o~ O~ O _ c~ O
I~J Z N C~l t~ ~ ~) ~ ~) ~ ~ ~r) t~ ~ el-' ,': ,-': .
:' ' '' ' ~
,.
6~4 Table II reYeals the physical properties of certain webs in the unembossed state.
Table III compares the physical properties of certain unembossed webs with those after embossing.
It should be noted that the unembossed areas in the dust collecting working face of the nonwoven fabric of the invention will have substantially the same or slightly less loft and thickness as existed in the unembossed web before embossing. The unembossed areas in the more highly embossed side edge portions of the web may be, however, somewhat more compacted since this part-of the web is not customarily employed for dust removal. This fact is reflected in Table III below. In that regard, compare the loft values for web Example 1, before embossing, with a diamond pattern and with a crosshatched square pattern.
: `
-E
I
I. . ... .. ~ .. . . . . . .
I
I
I
E
~Od ~Lf ~ 00 d _ O C~ ~) ~) d' N 1--_~~ u~ o o~ ~ ~ ~ ~o oo a~ oo -a' I
o _ HCJ~ ~
~_ O ~
LLI _ ~
~ L~ ~ .
cr~ :~
e~
o a~
~ . , ............. I
~ _ r _ O C:~ O O _ _ _ _ _ O O O
. I
a V~ I
.
I
I a~
I
Io==========_===
Z
I
x ¦ ~ et ~ ~ I~ oo ~ o -- N
IJJ 2 ~ ~ C~l C`J ~J ~ N ~ ~) ~ ~ ~ ~) ' ~ ~ , '', , ' ' ' , ~ ' ::
:
- 23- l~L~S6C~
o _ ._ ~C5~ ~ I ~ I ~ I O I ~ I
. o o o o o o ~
1~ r-- ._ 0~ 3 O O E
v) O
v) ~n O E u~ ~ c~l r-- N ~ i r~ i N C~l r _ E
4--~ ~ O O O C~.l O ~ N 01~ O ('~ J 1 O E a) ~D ~ 1~ 00 u~ O~ Lt~ N ~? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ aJ
E O LO O O O O O ~ ~ cn ~ ) r-~) ~ ~
S C~ O C~ J O ~ ~ .l r--~D 3 _ ~) ~ r- ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~_ r _~
_ _ E
LL~ . U~
~: ~ O
_ ~ v ~_ c a~ o ._ O c~ ~_ 1~ o 1:~1 ~ ~I ~J In r~ oO I . I ~ ~o 00 0 v~
~s O
O s O E
L~l o c _ ~ C`J r~ N a~ 00 0 _ C~J1~ 1 0 1 ~ C~l ~r) o ,- c I~ co ~ e~ 0~ C5~ a) _ IX~ o ~ C~ O LO
a~ oo o r- O O O _ _ _ _ _ ~r--.
Q~
v~ a~
c E
" ~ V) E
a~ ~ aJ ~ ~ ~ ~u c o~ c ~:n c ~:n c o~ C
r s ~ LIJ ~ L~lc_~ ~ ~) LLJ ~ 1~1 u~
~ ~ I I I I I c~
a~ ~ t~ ~ r--r,n v o a) E v~ . . . . . ~t E O~_ O o O O ~ ~ ~ O
~_) Z Z Z Z 1~ 11_ 1~ 1~ 1~ E
l~J
. .
~ X O -- -- -- L-~ ~ ~ ~ 00 00 c~ ~ CO .
3 1~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r7 ~ _ :', : . ' : :, - ~' $~
C
o .
~_ ~ O o ~n ~ I
_~ ~D O ~ Ln o ~ o o o U~
a~
~ ~ ~ O 1~ ~ o~
_ C~l ~ ~ , o o o ~ ~ o O ~ ~) N ~ ~) ~n F ~ O O
_ O C~.l C~l 1.
o ~_ ~_ ~_ _~
LLI ~ a~ o _ O ~_ c~~_ _ ~ ~ o 1-- ~ t-) ~ ~ ~ <~ -- ~
O ~ ~
~_ _ ~a ~ ~ C
~ ~ ~ O
-- ~ F
a~ a~
I
al ns Vl 0 o ~ u~ ~ a~
:1 t!~ O ~a ~ ~ O ~ ~ O
r~ . I
a~ x o oo o o cr~ o 3 1~ Z ~) ~) ~) ~ d' - ~
': . .::: : : :
:
, ~,.
6~
Evaluation of Dust Mop Efficiency The embossed nonwoven fabrics of the present invention were evaluated as dust collection fabrics against a competitive nonwoven dust collection fabric sold under the trade designation "Masslinn"~ which consisted of hydrocarbon oil impregnated nonwoven rayon fabric. The evaluation consisted of mounting a 20 by 58 cm segment of the test dust collection fabric in a dust mop frame having a flat-faced pad. The dust mop was then employed to clean a vinyl asbestos test floor polished with four coats of commercial floor polish (sold under the trade designation "Step Ahead"~ by the 5. C. Johnson Co.) and covered with a weighed quantity of a synthetic dirt composition consisting of the following ingredients:
Percent Ingredient by Wei~ht walnut sawdust 25.0 carbon black 1.0 charcoal (6-14 mesh) 15,0 A1203 (60-80 grit) 6.0 A1203 (100-50 grit) 6.0 Flint (180/00) 23.0 pumice 12.0 Fullers earth 12.0 The test floor had a total area of approximately 37 square meters divided into eight approximately equal rectangular areas of 4.6 square meters each. The test floor was first precleaned with a conventional cotton ., ' ~: ' ::
string type dust mop until no more than 0.2 grams of dirt was removed from the 37 square meter area. Then 1 gram of synthetic soil was uniformly scattered over one 4.6 square meter rectangular test area. The test mop was weighed before the cleaning and reweighed after to determine the amount of synthetic dirt held in the fabric after use. The amount of synthetic dirt pushed to the end of the 4.6 square meter test floor was also collected and recorded, after one pass over the 4.6 square meter area. The sum of the amount of dirt held and pushed was designated as the total dirt removed from the floor. The dust mop efficiency was obtained by multiplying the total removed dirt times 100 and dividing by the total amount of synthetic dirt initially applied to the test floor.
The mop was used again to clean a larger test floor area of the same floor type (but with only naturally occurring dust thereon) and reweighed after each 175 square meter cleaning pass to determine the use life of the fabric.
The amount of naturally occurring dirt pushed and collected was also recorded for each 175 square meter area. The mop was then carefully shaken until successive weight readings differed by less than 0.02 grams and the steps described above were repeated, adding a 1 gram sample of synthetic oil to the next 4.6 square meter test floor area, using the mop to clean the smaller test floor, as described above, and then using the mop to clean the larger test floor, and the cycle repeated until less than 0.15 grams of synthetic soil was picked up by the mop, or until the mop was used to clean more than 915 ., . ~
- 27 - ~1~$~
square meters of test floor. At this point, the mop was turned over, if it could be used on both sides, reweighed and the steps repeated until the mop again picked up less than 0.15 grams of dirt. If the mop was used on 2365 square meters without reaching this minimum usefulness, the test was also terminated.
The results of this test using the fabric of Example 1 and a Masslinn "control" fabric are shown in Table IV below.
.. - ~ ..., . ~ . , - . :: ' "' ~ i' .
- 28 ~ 6 ~ 4 TABLE IV
Dirt Dirt Area Cleaned Held Pushed (sq. meters) Dust MoP (9 ) (9 ) Efficiençy 55 INITIAL Control 0.49 0.29 0.78 Ex. No. 1 0.28 0.20 0.48 185 Control 0.21 0.23 0.44 Ex. No. 1 0.33 0.25 0.58 365 Control 0.22 0.26 0.48 Ex. No. 1 0.23 0.26 0.49 550 Control 0.20 0.32 0.52 Ex. No. 1 0.31 0.34 0.65 730 Control 0.10* 0.26 0.36 Ex. No. 1 0.45 0.27 0.72 CONTROL) 0.42 0.29 0.71 915 Control 0.19 0.32 0.51 910 Ex. No. 1 0.45 0.30 0.75 Ex 1) 0.42 0.20 0.62 1095 Control 0.08* 0.20 0.28 Ex. No. 1 0.47 0.42 0.89 1275 Control Ex. No. 1 0.38 0.21 0.59 25 1460 Control Ex. No. 1 0.37 0.21 0.58 1640 Control Ex. No. 1 0.32 0.24 0.56 1820 Control Ex. No. 1 0.33 0.30 0.63 2000 Control Ex. No. 1 0.27 0.31 1z58 2185 Control Ex. No. 1 0.37 0.57 0.94 35 2365 Control Ex. No. 1 0.35 0.23 0.58 * Test terminated . : ~ ., - ;
- .-: .
6~
As can be seen from the results in Table IV, embossed nonwoven fabrics in accordance with the present invention are useful for cleaning more than twice the area of a commercially available nonwoven fabric dust mop.
Additional cleaning tests as described herein-above immediately preceding Table IV were performed employing nonwoven fabrics of Examples 23-28 which were embossed with a pattern as shown in FIGURE 7. The results of such tests are set forth in Table V.
TABLE V
Dirt Dirt Area Cleaned Held Pushed Total (sq. meters) Ex. (9.) (9.) EfficiencY
Initial 5 23 0.08 0.19 0.27 24 0.02 0.26 0.28 27 0.36 0.16 0.52 28 0.37 0.20 0.57 185 23 0.20 0.26 0.46 24 0.18 0.37 0.55 27 0.19 0.26 0.45 28 0.23 0.28 0.51 365 23 0.18 0.21 0.39 24 0.25 0.16 0.41 27 0.20 0.25 0.45 28 0.22 0.16 0.48 550 23 0.19 0.10 0.29 24 0.13 0.19 0.32 27 0.20 0.28 0.45 28 0.2 0.31 0.57 730 23 0.31 0.15 0.46 24 0.17 0.28 0.45 27 0.20 0.31 0.51 28 0.18 0.24 0.42 910 23 0.16 0.20 0.36 24 0.22 0.18 0.40 27 0.23 0.29 0.62 28 0.22 0.32 0.54 ' ,..
TABLE V continued Dirt Dirt Area Cleaned Held Pushed Total (sq. meters) Ex. (9-) (9 ) Efficiency 1090 23 0.17 0.31 0.48 24 0.25 0.15 0.40 27 0.19 0.32 0.51 28 0.19 0.17 0.36 1095 NEW SIDE 23 0.21 0.13 0.34 24 0.17 0.19 0.36 27 0.31 0.30 0.61 28 0.21 0.20 0.41 1275 23 0.31 0.09 0.40 24 0.21 0.25 0.46 27 0.29 0.28 0.57 28 0.18 0.27 - 0.45 1460 23 0.23 0.29 0.52 24 0.20 0.18 0.38 27 0.25 0.28 0.53 28 0.13 0.27 0.40 1640 23 0.29 0.08 0.37 24 ~.19 0.18 0.37 27 0.22 0.32 0.54 1820 23 0.24 0.18 0.42 24 0.20 0.72 0.42 27 0.26 0.22 0.48 2000 23 0.24 0.21 0.45 24 0.25 0.22 0.47 27 0.24 0.32 0.56 2185 23 0.23 0.17 0.40 24 0.19 0.15 0.34 27 0.26 0.40 0.66 -, : -,
:~ ~ Z ~- Z ~ C- Z
Cl~
.. _ Oo o oo oooooo al c~ u7 U~ O~ U~ U~ OLO ~ ~ u~
3 ~ _ . u~ _ ~ C O O o oo ~
3 u~ n o X O ~ I~ 00 c~ O _ c~ O 1~ .
11.1 Z -- . -- -- C~ l C~lC~J CN C~J N C~J _ ,~
'`: : :
,`.'' ~ :
6~4 - 20 ~
' a~
.~
o o o E E E
C o o o E
~ ~n V> V~
~ ., ~ ~
~ ~ ,a a s I ~ ~ I L I I I I 1 1 ~ ~
C I I O I L I I I L I I g g ~ O
~ 7 n~
E ~ d- o _ _ _ ~ _ 1~ r~ ~ o o s . ..
_ I N
aJ
~1 o ~> ~ a~
~ C~
L~ ~ o ~._ t =. _ = =. =. _ = _ = =: =, =
CC 4- ~ .
S C~
$ 1~ r~ :~ ~ 1~ 1~ r~ 1~ 1~ 1~
._ _ _ I _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I
_ a~
~ ,_ ~o ~ c~
~ ~ = O ~ = _ = = = = = O
~ n. z c~ z~
S
._ _ Cl N O O O O O O O O O O O ~ 1$1 3 U~ Lr) O O O O O O O O Lt~ ~) N
x o~ O~ O _ c~ O
I~J Z N C~l t~ ~ ~) ~ ~) ~ ~ ~r) t~ ~ el-' ,': ,-': .
:' ' '' ' ~
,.
6~4 Table II reYeals the physical properties of certain webs in the unembossed state.
Table III compares the physical properties of certain unembossed webs with those after embossing.
It should be noted that the unembossed areas in the dust collecting working face of the nonwoven fabric of the invention will have substantially the same or slightly less loft and thickness as existed in the unembossed web before embossing. The unembossed areas in the more highly embossed side edge portions of the web may be, however, somewhat more compacted since this part-of the web is not customarily employed for dust removal. This fact is reflected in Table III below. In that regard, compare the loft values for web Example 1, before embossing, with a diamond pattern and with a crosshatched square pattern.
: `
-E
I
I. . ... .. ~ .. . . . . . .
I
I
I
E
~Od ~Lf ~ 00 d _ O C~ ~) ~) d' N 1--_~~ u~ o o~ ~ ~ ~ ~o oo a~ oo -a' I
o _ HCJ~ ~
~_ O ~
LLI _ ~
~ L~ ~ .
cr~ :~
e~
o a~
~ . , ............. I
~ _ r _ O C:~ O O _ _ _ _ _ O O O
. I
a V~ I
.
I
I a~
I
Io==========_===
Z
I
x ¦ ~ et ~ ~ I~ oo ~ o -- N
IJJ 2 ~ ~ C~l C`J ~J ~ N ~ ~) ~ ~ ~ ~) ' ~ ~ , '', , ' ' ' , ~ ' ::
:
- 23- l~L~S6C~
o _ ._ ~C5~ ~ I ~ I ~ I O I ~ I
. o o o o o o ~
1~ r-- ._ 0~ 3 O O E
v) O
v) ~n O E u~ ~ c~l r-- N ~ i r~ i N C~l r _ E
4--~ ~ O O O C~.l O ~ N 01~ O ('~ J 1 O E a) ~D ~ 1~ 00 u~ O~ Lt~ N ~? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ aJ
E O LO O O O O O ~ ~ cn ~ ) r-~) ~ ~
S C~ O C~ J O ~ ~ .l r--~D 3 _ ~) ~ r- ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~_ r _~
_ _ E
LL~ . U~
~: ~ O
_ ~ v ~_ c a~ o ._ O c~ ~_ 1~ o 1:~1 ~ ~I ~J In r~ oO I . I ~ ~o 00 0 v~
~s O
O s O E
L~l o c _ ~ C`J r~ N a~ 00 0 _ C~J1~ 1 0 1 ~ C~l ~r) o ,- c I~ co ~ e~ 0~ C5~ a) _ IX~ o ~ C~ O LO
a~ oo o r- O O O _ _ _ _ _ ~r--.
Q~
v~ a~
c E
" ~ V) E
a~ ~ aJ ~ ~ ~ ~u c o~ c ~:n c ~:n c o~ C
r s ~ LIJ ~ L~lc_~ ~ ~) LLJ ~ 1~1 u~
~ ~ I I I I I c~
a~ ~ t~ ~ r--r,n v o a) E v~ . . . . . ~t E O~_ O o O O ~ ~ ~ O
~_) Z Z Z Z 1~ 11_ 1~ 1~ 1~ E
l~J
. .
~ X O -- -- -- L-~ ~ ~ ~ 00 00 c~ ~ CO .
3 1~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r7 ~ _ :', : . ' : :, - ~' $~
C
o .
~_ ~ O o ~n ~ I
_~ ~D O ~ Ln o ~ o o o U~
a~
~ ~ ~ O 1~ ~ o~
_ C~l ~ ~ , o o o ~ ~ o O ~ ~) N ~ ~) ~n F ~ O O
_ O C~.l C~l 1.
o ~_ ~_ ~_ _~
LLI ~ a~ o _ O ~_ c~~_ _ ~ ~ o 1-- ~ t-) ~ ~ ~ <~ -- ~
O ~ ~
~_ _ ~a ~ ~ C
~ ~ ~ O
-- ~ F
a~ a~
I
al ns Vl 0 o ~ u~ ~ a~
:1 t!~ O ~a ~ ~ O ~ ~ O
r~ . I
a~ x o oo o o cr~ o 3 1~ Z ~) ~) ~) ~ d' - ~
': . .::: : : :
:
, ~,.
6~
Evaluation of Dust Mop Efficiency The embossed nonwoven fabrics of the present invention were evaluated as dust collection fabrics against a competitive nonwoven dust collection fabric sold under the trade designation "Masslinn"~ which consisted of hydrocarbon oil impregnated nonwoven rayon fabric. The evaluation consisted of mounting a 20 by 58 cm segment of the test dust collection fabric in a dust mop frame having a flat-faced pad. The dust mop was then employed to clean a vinyl asbestos test floor polished with four coats of commercial floor polish (sold under the trade designation "Step Ahead"~ by the 5. C. Johnson Co.) and covered with a weighed quantity of a synthetic dirt composition consisting of the following ingredients:
Percent Ingredient by Wei~ht walnut sawdust 25.0 carbon black 1.0 charcoal (6-14 mesh) 15,0 A1203 (60-80 grit) 6.0 A1203 (100-50 grit) 6.0 Flint (180/00) 23.0 pumice 12.0 Fullers earth 12.0 The test floor had a total area of approximately 37 square meters divided into eight approximately equal rectangular areas of 4.6 square meters each. The test floor was first precleaned with a conventional cotton ., ' ~: ' ::
string type dust mop until no more than 0.2 grams of dirt was removed from the 37 square meter area. Then 1 gram of synthetic soil was uniformly scattered over one 4.6 square meter rectangular test area. The test mop was weighed before the cleaning and reweighed after to determine the amount of synthetic dirt held in the fabric after use. The amount of synthetic dirt pushed to the end of the 4.6 square meter test floor was also collected and recorded, after one pass over the 4.6 square meter area. The sum of the amount of dirt held and pushed was designated as the total dirt removed from the floor. The dust mop efficiency was obtained by multiplying the total removed dirt times 100 and dividing by the total amount of synthetic dirt initially applied to the test floor.
The mop was used again to clean a larger test floor area of the same floor type (but with only naturally occurring dust thereon) and reweighed after each 175 square meter cleaning pass to determine the use life of the fabric.
The amount of naturally occurring dirt pushed and collected was also recorded for each 175 square meter area. The mop was then carefully shaken until successive weight readings differed by less than 0.02 grams and the steps described above were repeated, adding a 1 gram sample of synthetic oil to the next 4.6 square meter test floor area, using the mop to clean the smaller test floor, as described above, and then using the mop to clean the larger test floor, and the cycle repeated until less than 0.15 grams of synthetic soil was picked up by the mop, or until the mop was used to clean more than 915 ., . ~
- 27 - ~1~$~
square meters of test floor. At this point, the mop was turned over, if it could be used on both sides, reweighed and the steps repeated until the mop again picked up less than 0.15 grams of dirt. If the mop was used on 2365 square meters without reaching this minimum usefulness, the test was also terminated.
The results of this test using the fabric of Example 1 and a Masslinn "control" fabric are shown in Table IV below.
.. - ~ ..., . ~ . , - . :: ' "' ~ i' .
- 28 ~ 6 ~ 4 TABLE IV
Dirt Dirt Area Cleaned Held Pushed (sq. meters) Dust MoP (9 ) (9 ) Efficiençy 55 INITIAL Control 0.49 0.29 0.78 Ex. No. 1 0.28 0.20 0.48 185 Control 0.21 0.23 0.44 Ex. No. 1 0.33 0.25 0.58 365 Control 0.22 0.26 0.48 Ex. No. 1 0.23 0.26 0.49 550 Control 0.20 0.32 0.52 Ex. No. 1 0.31 0.34 0.65 730 Control 0.10* 0.26 0.36 Ex. No. 1 0.45 0.27 0.72 CONTROL) 0.42 0.29 0.71 915 Control 0.19 0.32 0.51 910 Ex. No. 1 0.45 0.30 0.75 Ex 1) 0.42 0.20 0.62 1095 Control 0.08* 0.20 0.28 Ex. No. 1 0.47 0.42 0.89 1275 Control Ex. No. 1 0.38 0.21 0.59 25 1460 Control Ex. No. 1 0.37 0.21 0.58 1640 Control Ex. No. 1 0.32 0.24 0.56 1820 Control Ex. No. 1 0.33 0.30 0.63 2000 Control Ex. No. 1 0.27 0.31 1z58 2185 Control Ex. No. 1 0.37 0.57 0.94 35 2365 Control Ex. No. 1 0.35 0.23 0.58 * Test terminated . : ~ ., - ;
- .-: .
6~
As can be seen from the results in Table IV, embossed nonwoven fabrics in accordance with the present invention are useful for cleaning more than twice the area of a commercially available nonwoven fabric dust mop.
Additional cleaning tests as described herein-above immediately preceding Table IV were performed employing nonwoven fabrics of Examples 23-28 which were embossed with a pattern as shown in FIGURE 7. The results of such tests are set forth in Table V.
TABLE V
Dirt Dirt Area Cleaned Held Pushed Total (sq. meters) Ex. (9.) (9.) EfficiencY
Initial 5 23 0.08 0.19 0.27 24 0.02 0.26 0.28 27 0.36 0.16 0.52 28 0.37 0.20 0.57 185 23 0.20 0.26 0.46 24 0.18 0.37 0.55 27 0.19 0.26 0.45 28 0.23 0.28 0.51 365 23 0.18 0.21 0.39 24 0.25 0.16 0.41 27 0.20 0.25 0.45 28 0.22 0.16 0.48 550 23 0.19 0.10 0.29 24 0.13 0.19 0.32 27 0.20 0.28 0.45 28 0.2 0.31 0.57 730 23 0.31 0.15 0.46 24 0.17 0.28 0.45 27 0.20 0.31 0.51 28 0.18 0.24 0.42 910 23 0.16 0.20 0.36 24 0.22 0.18 0.40 27 0.23 0.29 0.62 28 0.22 0.32 0.54 ' ,..
TABLE V continued Dirt Dirt Area Cleaned Held Pushed Total (sq. meters) Ex. (9-) (9 ) Efficiency 1090 23 0.17 0.31 0.48 24 0.25 0.15 0.40 27 0.19 0.32 0.51 28 0.19 0.17 0.36 1095 NEW SIDE 23 0.21 0.13 0.34 24 0.17 0.19 0.36 27 0.31 0.30 0.61 28 0.21 0.20 0.41 1275 23 0.31 0.09 0.40 24 0.21 0.25 0.46 27 0.29 0.28 0.57 28 0.18 0.27 - 0.45 1460 23 0.23 0.29 0.52 24 0.20 0.18 0.38 27 0.25 0.28 0.53 28 0.13 0.27 0.40 1640 23 0.29 0.08 0.37 24 ~.19 0.18 0.37 27 0.22 0.32 0.54 1820 23 0.24 0.18 0.42 24 0.20 0.72 0.42 27 0.26 0.22 0.48 2000 23 0.24 0.21 0.45 24 0.25 0.22 0.47 27 0.24 0.32 0.56 2185 23 0.23 0.17 0.40 24 0.19 0.15 0.34 27 0.26 0.40 0.66 -, : -,
Claims (12)
AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED
IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Fabric especially suited for use as a dust cloth or as a dust mop cleaning element, said fabric comprising a disposable, drapable, embossed nonwoven web, said web being at least about 1 millimeter thick in the unembossed state and comprising entangled, discontinuous microfibers being capable of self-fusion under localized pressure and having an average diameter of about 10 microns or less, said fabric being embossed to provide a uniform pattern of embossing lines comprising about 2% to about 40% of its total surface area and to bond fibers at points where they touch one another without loss of individual fiber identity, said nonwoven web having an elongation value at maximum tensile breaking in the embossed state of at least about 25%.
2. The fabric of claim 1 wherein said embossed nonwoven web has a specific strength of at least about 0.80, and said nonwoven web in the unembossed state has a tear strength of at least about 60 grams, a loft of at least about 30 cubic cm per gram and a dynamic coefficient of friction with respect to polished vinyl or asbestos tile less than about 1.3.
3. The fabric of claim 1 wherein said nonwoven web is binder free.
4. The fabric of claim 1 wherein said nonwoven web comprises up to about 70 by weight crimped macrofibers fibers of about 5 to about 100 decitex per 100 parts total weight of microfibers and macrofibers.
5. The fabric of claim 1 wherein said nonwoven web is more highly embossed adjacent its side edges to provide in said more highly embossed areas a uniform pattern of embossing comprising from about 3% to about 65% of the total area therein.
6. Fabric especially suited for use as a dust cloth or as a dust mop cleaning element, said fabric comprising an elongate disposable, drapable, embossed, binder-free nonwoven web, said web being at least about 2 millimeters thick in the unembossed state and comprising a homogeneous blend of:
(a) entangled, discontinuous microfibers having an average diameter of about 10 microns or less; and (b) crimped macrofibers about 5 to about 100 decitex, the weight ratio of said microfibers to said macrofibers in said web being about 3:7 to about 7:3, at least one of said macrofibers or said microfibers being capable of self-fusion under localized pressure, said fabric being embossed to provide (c) a first uniformly embossed area inter-mediate the side edges of said elongate web defining a dust collecting working face, said first embossed area characterized by having a uniform pattern of embossing comprising about 10% to about 40% of the total surface area of said working face; and (d) second uniformly embossed areas on either side of said first embossed area, each of said second areas being more highly embossed than said first area to provide a uniform pattern of embossing comprising about 25% to about 65% of the total area of said second areas, said embossing in said first and second areas being sufficient to bond fibers at points where they touch one another without loss of individual fiber identity.
(a) entangled, discontinuous microfibers having an average diameter of about 10 microns or less; and (b) crimped macrofibers about 5 to about 100 decitex, the weight ratio of said microfibers to said macrofibers in said web being about 3:7 to about 7:3, at least one of said macrofibers or said microfibers being capable of self-fusion under localized pressure, said fabric being embossed to provide (c) a first uniformly embossed area inter-mediate the side edges of said elongate web defining a dust collecting working face, said first embossed area characterized by having a uniform pattern of embossing comprising about 10% to about 40% of the total surface area of said working face; and (d) second uniformly embossed areas on either side of said first embossed area, each of said second areas being more highly embossed than said first area to provide a uniform pattern of embossing comprising about 25% to about 65% of the total area of said second areas, said embossing in said first and second areas being sufficient to bond fibers at points where they touch one another without loss of individual fiber identity.
7. The fabric of claim 6 wherein said crimped macrofibers are on the order of about 5 to about 100 decitex, exhibit an average percent crimp of at least about 15% and are between about 2 and 15 cm in length.
8. The fabric of claim 6 wherein said macro-fibers are formed of a thermoplastic material selected from the group consisting of polyester, acrylic resin, polyolefin, polyamide, rayon and polyacrylate.
9. The fabric of claim 6 wherein said web, before embossing has a thickness between about 1 and about 30 millimeters.
10. The fabric of claim 6 wherein said micro-fibers are formed of a material selected from the group consisting of polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate and polyamides.
11. The fabric of claim 6 wherein said web, in the unembossed state, has a specific strength of at least about 0.3, a dynamic coefficient friction of less than 1.3, a tear strength of at least 60 grams and a loft of at least 30 centimeters per gram.
12. A dust mop having a handle attached to a mop frame which includes a back-up pad having an elongate flat face upon which a fabric dust mop cleaning element is positioned and fastening means for holding said fabric dust mop cleaning element in place on said back-up pad, the improvement comprising employing the fabric of claim 1 as said fabric dust mop cleaning element, said fabric being dimensioned to position said dust collecting working face intermediate the side edges of the elongate flat face of said back-up pad flat face.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US93525578A | 1978-08-21 | 1978-08-21 | |
US935,255 | 1986-11-26 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1109654A true CA1109654A (en) | 1981-09-29 |
Family
ID=25466796
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA332,704A Expired CA1109654A (en) | 1978-08-21 | 1979-07-27 | Embossed dust mop having embossed, nonwoven fabric cleaning element |
Country Status (12)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPS5530498A (en) |
AU (1) | AU529056B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR7905341A (en) |
CA (1) | CA1109654A (en) |
CH (1) | CH644005A5 (en) |
DE (2) | DE7923939U1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES483470A1 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2434224A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2031039B (en) |
HK (1) | HK11385A (en) |
IT (1) | IT1120523B (en) |
MX (1) | MX150913A (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4441228A (en) * | 1982-11-12 | 1984-04-10 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Dust mop |
US5887311A (en) * | 1994-10-26 | 1999-03-30 | Henkel-Ecolab Gmbh & Co. Ohg | Flat mop head for cleaning floors |
USD528729S1 (en) | 2005-05-10 | 2006-09-19 | Rubbermaid Commerical Products Llc | Cart |
USD547017S1 (en) | 2005-05-10 | 2007-07-17 | Rubbermaid Commercial Products Llc | Mop handle |
USD548913S1 (en) | 2005-05-10 | 2007-08-14 | Rubbermaid Commercial Products Llc | Mop bucket and wringer |
USD549414S1 (en) | 2005-01-31 | 2007-08-21 | Rubbermaid Commercial Products Llc | Mop frame |
USD549912S1 (en) | 2007-01-12 | 2007-08-28 | Rubbermaid Commercial Products Llc | Mop |
Families Citing this family (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3194778A (en) * | 1962-06-13 | 1965-07-13 | Dow Chemical Co | Vinylidene chloride polymer-diolefin, low alkyl alkacrylate copolymer blend having improved low temperature properties |
US4426417A (en) * | 1983-03-28 | 1984-01-17 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Nonwoven wiper |
DE3505973C2 (en) * | 1985-02-21 | 1994-02-24 | Coronet Werke Gmbh | Cleaning device for floors or the like |
US4686132A (en) * | 1985-04-02 | 1987-08-11 | Japan Vilene Co., Ltd. | Cleaning web for fixing rolls on copy machines |
US4894280A (en) * | 1987-12-21 | 1990-01-16 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Flexible, tear resistant composite sheet material and a method for producing the same |
ES2041012T3 (en) * | 1988-11-22 | 1993-11-01 | Scot Young Research Limited | CLEANING DEVICES. |
DE4129123A1 (en) * | 1991-09-02 | 1993-03-04 | Henkel Kgaa | METHOD FOR CLEANING HARD SURFACES, IN PARTICULAR IN CLEANROOMS |
DE4403550C1 (en) * | 1994-02-04 | 1995-09-07 | Vileda Gmbh | Cleaning appts. for hard and carpeted floors |
DE4422373A1 (en) * | 1994-06-27 | 1996-01-04 | Henkel Ecolab Gmbh & Co Ohg | Mop cover for a floor mopping device |
FR2723525B1 (en) * | 1994-08-12 | 1996-10-31 | Elysees Balzac Financiere | BODY OF ALVEOLAR MATERIAL, COMBINATION OF CLEANING AND / OR SCOURING, PROCESSES FOR THEIR PREPARATION |
DE19510824C1 (en) * | 1994-10-26 | 1996-05-23 | Henkel Ecolab Gmbh & Co Ohg | Flat mop cover for floor cleaning |
US5962112A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1999-10-05 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Wipers comprising point unbonded webs |
JPH10251954A (en) * | 1997-03-07 | 1998-09-22 | Uni Charm Corp | Wiping sheet and its production |
CN1264278A (en) | 1997-05-23 | 2000-08-23 | 普罗格特-甘布尔公司 | Three-D structures useful as cleaning sheets |
JP2000345454A (en) * | 1999-06-04 | 2000-12-12 | Kao Corp | Nonwoven fabric |
US20030171051A1 (en) * | 2002-03-08 | 2003-09-11 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Wipe |
FR2845696B1 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2005-05-13 | Elysees Balzac Financiere | MICROFIBREUX NON-FABRICS, COMPLEXES INCORPORATING THEM, PREPARATIONS |
JP3868892B2 (en) | 2002-11-19 | 2007-01-17 | 花王株式会社 | Absorbent article surface sheet |
US7191486B1 (en) | 2003-08-12 | 2007-03-20 | Butler Home Products, Llc | Cleaning pad |
US7578023B2 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2009-08-25 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Applicator pad |
PL1835836T3 (en) | 2005-01-11 | 2012-07-31 | Ecolab Inc | Flat mop device |
US20070130713A1 (en) * | 2005-12-14 | 2007-06-14 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Cleaning wipe with textured surface |
US7690069B2 (en) | 2005-12-14 | 2010-04-06 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Cleaning tool with attachment projections providing additional cleaning functionalities |
SE0802264A1 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-04-24 | Vikan Ab | Mop |
US9096961B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2015-08-04 | Providencia Usa, Inc. | Nonwoven wipe with bonding pattern |
ES2805798T3 (en) | 2014-04-11 | 2021-02-15 | Hydroflex Group GmbH | Flat mop, in particular single-use flat mop |
US10828209B2 (en) | 2015-12-16 | 2020-11-10 | Avintiv Specialty Materials Inc. | Soft nonwoven fabric and method of manufacturing thereof |
DE102016001807A1 (en) * | 2016-02-17 | 2017-08-17 | Carl Freudenberg Kg | Nonwoven fabric with embossed net pattern |
JP6416963B2 (en) * | 2017-03-28 | 2018-10-31 | 大王製紙株式会社 | Cleaning sheet and method for manufacturing cleaning sheet |
CN108265393A (en) * | 2018-01-05 | 2018-07-10 | 江苏盛纺纳米材料科技股份有限公司 | The preparation method of 6 excipient embossed nonwoven materials |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NO763476L (en) * | 1975-10-17 | 1977-04-19 | Ici Ltd | |
CA1097046A (en) * | 1977-10-17 | 1981-03-10 | Gary H. Meitner | Microfiber oil and water wipe |
-
1979
- 1979-07-27 CA CA332,704A patent/CA1109654A/en not_active Expired
- 1979-08-17 ES ES483470A patent/ES483470A1/en not_active Expired
- 1979-08-20 MX MX178988A patent/MX150913A/en unknown
- 1979-08-20 GB GB7928958A patent/GB2031039B/en not_active Expired
- 1979-08-20 CH CH759079A patent/CH644005A5/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1979-08-20 DE DE19797923939U patent/DE7923939U1/en not_active Expired
- 1979-08-20 DE DE19792934009 patent/DE2934009A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1979-08-20 FR FR7920932A patent/FR2434224A1/en active Granted
- 1979-08-20 BR BR7905341A patent/BR7905341A/en unknown
- 1979-08-20 IT IT50063/79A patent/IT1120523B/en active
- 1979-08-20 JP JP10510079A patent/JPS5530498A/en active Pending
- 1979-08-20 AU AU50094/79A patent/AU529056B2/en not_active Ceased
-
1985
- 1985-02-07 HK HK113/85A patent/HK11385A/en unknown
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4441228A (en) * | 1982-11-12 | 1984-04-10 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Dust mop |
US5887311A (en) * | 1994-10-26 | 1999-03-30 | Henkel-Ecolab Gmbh & Co. Ohg | Flat mop head for cleaning floors |
USD549414S1 (en) | 2005-01-31 | 2007-08-21 | Rubbermaid Commercial Products Llc | Mop frame |
USD528729S1 (en) | 2005-05-10 | 2006-09-19 | Rubbermaid Commerical Products Llc | Cart |
USD547017S1 (en) | 2005-05-10 | 2007-07-17 | Rubbermaid Commercial Products Llc | Mop handle |
USD548913S1 (en) | 2005-05-10 | 2007-08-14 | Rubbermaid Commercial Products Llc | Mop bucket and wringer |
USD549912S1 (en) | 2007-01-12 | 2007-08-28 | Rubbermaid Commercial Products Llc | Mop |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FR2434224B1 (en) | 1983-11-25 |
DE2934009A1 (en) | 1980-03-06 |
AU529056B2 (en) | 1983-05-26 |
ES483470A1 (en) | 1980-10-01 |
FR2434224A1 (en) | 1980-03-21 |
BR7905341A (en) | 1980-05-13 |
IT7950063A0 (en) | 1979-08-20 |
CH644005A5 (en) | 1984-07-13 |
IT1120523B (en) | 1986-03-26 |
GB2031039A (en) | 1980-04-16 |
DE7923939U1 (en) | 1980-01-10 |
GB2031039B (en) | 1983-01-12 |
AU5009479A (en) | 1980-02-28 |
MX150913A (en) | 1984-08-16 |
JPS5530498A (en) | 1980-03-04 |
HK11385A (en) | 1985-02-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1109654A (en) | Embossed dust mop having embossed, nonwoven fabric cleaning element | |
EP0639235B1 (en) | Stitchbonded absorbent articles | |
EP1212972B1 (en) | Cleaning sheet for cleaning a piled surface | |
US4623575A (en) | Lightly entangled and dry printed nonwoven fabrics and methods for producing the same | |
EP0682721B1 (en) | Stitchbonded articles and method of making same | |
AU674869B2 (en) | Entangled continuous filament nonwoven scouring articles and methods of making same | |
EP0127851B1 (en) | Nonwoven fabric and process for producing thereof | |
EP0399495B1 (en) | Nonwoven wiper and process of making same | |
US20030008108A1 (en) | Three-dimensional structures useful as cleaning sheets | |
US3976525A (en) | Method of making a needled scouring pad | |
AU727701B2 (en) | Cleaning sheet | |
JP2004533895A (en) | Cleaning sheet containing double denier fiber | |
MXPA01010254A (en) | Microcreped wipers. | |
US4810568A (en) | Reinforced fabric laminate and method for making same | |
EP1294847A1 (en) | Cleaning sheet | |
CA1143930A (en) | Nonwoven fabric and method for producing the same | |
CA2439211A1 (en) | Double-sided cleaning implement | |
AU2001248672B2 (en) | Knitted microfiber cleaning cloth | |
EP0120564B1 (en) | Reinforced fabric laminate | |
AU2001248672A1 (en) | Knitted microfiber cleaning cloth | |
JP2004016559A (en) | Sheet for cleaning | |
JPH0144822B2 (en) | ||
JP2003135351A (en) | Cleaning sheet | |
AU2002254017A1 (en) | Double-sided cleaning implement |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKEX | Expiry |