Nicoletta Righini

Nutritional ecology seeks to explain, in an ecological and evolutionary context, how individuals choose, acquire, and process food to satisfy their nutritional requirements. Historically, studies of primate feeding ecology have focused on characterizing diets in terms of the botanical composition of the plants consumed. Further, dietary studies have demonstrated how patch and food choice in relation to time spent foraging and feeding are influenced by the spatial and temporal distribution of resources and by social factors such as feeding competition, dominance, or partner preferences. From a nutritional perspective, several theories including energy and protein-to-fiber maximization, nutrient mixing, and toxin avoidance, have been proposed to explain the food choices of non-human primates. However, more recently, analytical frameworks such as nutritional geometry have been incorporated into primatology to explore, using a multivariate approach, the synergistic effects of multiple nutrients, secondary metabolites, and energy requirements on primate food choice. Dietary strategies associated with nutrient balancing highlight the tradeoffs that primates face in bypassing or selecting particular feeding sites and food items. In this Special Issue, the authors bring together a set of studies focusing on the nutritional ecology of a diverse set of primate taxa characterized by marked differences in dietary emphasis. The authors present, compare, and discuss the diversity of strategies used by primates in diet selection, and how species differences in ecology, physiology, anatomy, and phylogeny can affect patterns of nutrient choice and nutrient balancing. The use of a nutritionally explicit analytical framework is fundamental to identify the nutritional requirements of different individuals of a given species, and through its application, direct conservation efforts can be applied to regenerate and protect specific foods and food patches that offer the opportunity of a nutritionally balanced diet.

Insects are known to be able to regulate food ingestion according to its nutrient composition rather than its energetic content. Several studies have found that individuals can feed selectively when given the opportunity, and balance the intake of different nutrients so as to optimize fitness. However, there are cases in which individuals do not strictly adopt this pattern of optimal nutrient balancing. This study examined the periodicity of feeding on different food substrates and also water by adult individuals of Anastrepha serpentina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) over a 38-day observation period analyzing daily feeding patterns, feeding time, and sequences of feeding events. Two artificial food substrates, one rich in protein (hydrolyzed yeast) and one rich in carbohydrates (sucrose), and one natural diet (open sapodilla fruit) were offered alone or paired (sucrose vs. open fruit or sucrose vs. yeast) to newly emerged individuals during 38 days or until death. Water was also provided in all cases. Our results provide new and interesting insights on long-term individual dietary preferences and feeding periodicity in a tropical fruit fly, including water consumption. In general, flies exhibited different feeding patterns according to the diet, but preferred to feed on sucrose when offered a choice of sucrose and yeast. This preference was evident from the outset of the trial. When sucrose was offered together with an open fruit, the latter was preferred. However, there were conspicuous individual differences in temporal feeding patterns among flies fed the same diet, including variability in the number of consecutive days some individuals did not consume any food or water (up to five days in some cases). Individuals fed with sucrose only exhibited the lowest survival and those fed with sucrose-open fruit the highest. We discuss these feeding choices and their possible causes, including individual differences in the gut microbiota and nutritional reserves of newly emerged flies.

Animals may face periods of nutritional stress due to short-term food shortage and/or low energy consumption associated with seasonal fluctuations in resource availability. We tested the hypothesis that periods of restricted macronutrient and energy intake result in energy deficits and physiological stress in wild black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) inhabiting seasonal tropical semi-deciduous forests. We conducted full-day follows of focal animals recording feeding rates, time spent feeding, and total amount of food ingested. We carried out nutritional analysis of foods collected from feeding trees and calculated the daily nutrient and energy intake of each focal individual. Fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (fGCM) of focal animals were used as an indicator of physiological stress. We found that fluctuations in daily energy intake across seasons did not have significant effects on fGCM of individuals. However, protein intake was negatively associated with fGCM, highlighting the interplay among macronutrients, metabolism, and the endocrine system. Fecal glucocorticoid metabolites were also positively related to fruit availability, but this relationship was most likely due to social stress associated with intergroup encounters and resource defense that occurred when preferred trees were fruiting. Behavioral strategies such as dietary shifts and nutrient mixing, and metabolic adaptations such as low energy expenditure allowed individuals to fulfill their minimum energy requirements even during periods of decreased resource availability and intake. The present study suggests that seasonal variations in food, macronutrient, and energy acquisition may have limited physiological costs for animals that exploit different types of plant resources such as howler monkeys.

We provide an extensive review on current knowledge and future research paths on the topic of resource allocation and compensation during development in holometabolous insects, emphasizing the role of resource management during development, and how compensatory mechanisms may be acting to reme-diate nutritional deficiencies carried over from earlier stages of development. We first review resource allocation in ''open " and ''closed " developmental stages and then move on to the topic of modelling resource allocation and its trade-offs. In doing so, we review novel methodological developments such as response-surface methods and mixture experiments as well as nutritional geometry. We also dwell on the fascinating topic of compensatory physiology and behavior. We finish by discussing future research paths, among them the emerging field of nutrigenomics and gut microbiome, which will shed light into the yet poorly understood role of the symbiotic microbiota in nutrient compensation or assimilation.

Gut microbiome richness and diversity indices with low and high confidence intervals (LCI, HCI) at 9500 reads for each individual howler. Averages are also provided for each howler social group and habitat. Numbers in parentheses after each individual’s code indicate the number of samples that were pooled. Two captive samples are not listed due to fewer than 9500 total reads.

Nicoletta Righini, Paul A. Garber

Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign


Recent models of nutritional ecology suggest that macro- and micronutrient balancing represent important factors in evaluating dietary patterns and foraging strategies in primates. During a 15-month field study of black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) in Campeche, Mexico, we investigated diet, bout duration, and sequential use of feeding sites to determine if patch choice was consistent with nutrient balancing and resource mixing hypotheses. Full day focal follows of one individual/day were conducted to record all feeding activities and social interactions. The number and type of feeding patches visited in a day and the total time spent feeding in each patch were recorded. Results indicate that mean bout length differed according to patch type: individuals fed significantly longer in unripe (17.5±3.9 min) and ripe (13.5±1.5 min) fruit patches than in mature leaf (4.9±0.6 min), young leaf (7.4±0.9 min), and flower (9.3±1.6 min) patches (n=327 feeding bouts). However, in the majority of the cases (65%) howlers did not leave patches due to satiation. Rather, we found that resource mixing (switching between different food types) accounted for 32.6% of cases. Social factors (e.g. aggression, displacements, intergroup encounters) accounted for only 3.4% of the patch-leaving cases. Phytochemical analyses of foods consumed by the howlers lend support that resource mixing is a significant factor in interpreting diet selection in primates and the strategies adopted to meet their nutritional requirements.


Keywords: foraging strategies, nutritional ecology, patch choice, Alouatta pigra
"

Sexual conflict is increasingly recognized as a major force for evolutionary change and holds great potential for delineating variation in primate behavior and morphology. The goals of this review are to highlight the rapidly rising field of sexual conflict and the ongoing shift in our understanding of interactions between the sexes. We discuss the evidence for sexual conflict within the Order Primates, and assess how studies of primates have illuminated and can continue to increase our understanding of sexual conflict and sexual selection. Finally, we introduce a framework for understanding the behavioral, anatomical, and genetic expression of sexual conflict across primate mating systems and suggest directions for future research.