Joseph Porter
Harvard Divinity School, New Testament and Early Christianity, Graduate Student
Rawls famously argues that the parties in the original position would agree upon the two principles of justice. Among other things, these principles guarantee equal political liberty-that is, democracy-as a requirement of justice. We... more
Rawls famously argues that the parties in the original position would agree upon the two principles of justice. Among other things, these principles guarantee equal political liberty-that is, democracy-as a requirement of justice. We argue on the contrary that the parties have reason to reject this requirement. As we show, by Rawls' own lights, the parties would be greatly concerned to mitigate existential risk. But it is doubtful whether democracy always minimizes such risk. Indeed, no one currently knows which political systems would. Consequently, the parties-and we ourselves-have reason to reject democracy as a requirement of justice in favor of political experimentalism, a general approach to political justice which rules in at least some non-democratic political systems which might minimize existential risk.
