8000 [Snyk] Upgrade @kubernetes/client-node from 0.16.3 to 0.17.0 by snyk-bot · Pull Request #1276 · secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

@snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade @kubernetes/client-node from 0.16.3 to 0.17.0.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago, on 2022-06-27.
Release notes
Package name: @kubernetes/client-node
  • 0.17.0 - 2022-06-27

    …cret

    Support to refresh the tokens correctly when client-secret is set empty

  • 0.16.3 - 2022-02-09

    Changes relative to 0.15.x

    • Support for Kubernetes 1.22.x
    • Bug fix to support IntOrString types
    • Add List method to generic types API
    • Bug fix in Azure Auth
from @kubernetes/client-node GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: @kubernetes/client-node

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@github-actions
Copy link
github-actions bot commented Jul 19, 2022

MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
✅ GIT git_diff yes no 0.17s
✅ JSON eslint-plugin-jsonc 2 0 1.6s
✅ JSON jsonlint 2 0 0.68s
✅ JSON prettier 2 0 0.86s
✅ JSON v8r 2 0 4.86s
✅ SPELL misspell 2 0 0.05s

See errors details in artifact MegaLinter reports on CI Job page
Set VALIDATE_ALL_CODEBASE: true in mega-linter.yml to validate all sources, not only the diff

@J12934 J12934 merged commit 86935c2 into main Aug 9, 2022
@J12934 J12934 deleted the snyk-upgrade-13547e543833281fbcba496c293680ae branch August 9, 2022 11:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

5123
None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

0