[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views5 pages

BC Research

research sdfghjkuhygdtreszdxfcgv drgtfhyujhygfdszdfcgvbh trfyuioiujhygfdgvnhjk fgthyjuklokijhgbvhnjmkl fghjklkmnbvcvbnmjk,l.

Uploaded by

Himanshi Dugar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views5 pages

BC Research

research sdfghjkuhygdtreszdxfcgv drgtfhyujhygfdszdfcgvbh trfyuioiujhygfdgvnhjk fgthyjuklokijhgbvhnjmkl fghjklkmnbvcvbnmjk,l.

Uploaded by

Himanshi Dugar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE

AND PLANNING, GGSIPU

NAME- HIMANSHI Dugar


SEMESTER- III SEC -B
ROLL NO.-- 9
SUBJECT – BUILDING CONSTRUCTION(RESEARCH)
Research Study: Waterproofing Materials for RCC Roofs & Basements

1. Introduction
• Why Waterproofing?
RCC (Reinforced Cement Concrete) is porous → absorbs water → causes cracks,
leakage, corrosion of reinforcement, structural damage.
• Objectives of Study:
o Identify suitable materials for RCC roofs & basements.
o Compare traditional vs modern methods.
o Understand causes of failures & preventive measures.
• Methodology:
o Review of IS codes (IS 9918, IS 1346, IS 3067).
o Study of RDSO/IRICEN guidelines.
o Technical papers, industry manuals (Sika, Fosroc).
o Research on failures and new technologies.

2. Waterproofing for RCC Roofs


A) Traditional Systems (per IS Codes)
• Bituminous Felt / Mastic (IS 1346, IS 9918):
o Multi-ply layers of bitumen felts or glass-fibre reinforced bitumen.
o Pros: Cheap, codified method, easy to apply.
o Cons: Prone to aging, cracking, requires protection screed.
B) Modern Systems
• Liquid-applied Polyurethane (PU) Membranes
o Seamless, elastic, crack-bridging film.
o Available in UV-resistant (aliphatic) grade.
o Ideal for terraces, podiums, complex details.
• Cold-applied Bituminous Emulsions
o Used below screeds/tiles; cost-effective but not UV stable.
Roof Detailing Musts (IS 3067 & RDSO)
• Proper slope to drains.
• Correct detailing at parapets, scuppers, pipe junctions.
• Complete parapet/ancillary works before membrane.

3. Waterproofing for Basements


A) Pre-Applied Fully Bonded Sheet Membranes (Modern Best Practice)
• Installed before concrete pour, bonds permanently with concrete.
• Prevents lateral water migration even if punctured.
• Suitable for high groundwater & blindside construction.
B) Post-Applied Bituminous Membranes
• Torch-applied or self-adhesive sheets.
• Used in open-cut excavations with protection boards + drainage.
C) Crystalline/Integral Waterproofing
• Cementitious coating or admixture → grows crystals in pores.
• Self-seals micro-cracks; effective for remedial/negative side.
D) Liquid-Applied PU (Buried Applications)
• External basement walls (with protection + drainage boards).
Basement Detailing Essentials (BSI-125)
• Capillary break + footing drains.
• PVC/swellable water stops at joints.
• Protection boards & drainage composites against backfill.

4. Common Causes of Waterproofing Failure


(ResearchGate case studies)
• Cracks in concrete.
• Poor detailing at joints, honeycombing.
• Aging membranes.
• Lack of slope or drainage.
→ Prevention: QA checks, trained applicators, protection layers, flood tests.

5. Selection Matrix

Condition Roof (Preferred) Basement (Preferred) Why

Complex PU liquid Seamless + no lateral


Pre-applied bonded sheet
details/penetrations membrane leak path

High UV exposure Aliphatic PU — UV stable

Bituminous felt + Post-applied bituminous


Budget/economy Codified IS methods
screed sheet

Pre-applied bonded sheet Best hydrostatic


High groundwater —
+ water stops protection

Remedial works (no Crystalline coating Seals cracks from



access) (negative side) inside

6. QA / QC & Testing
• Substrate prep: Sound concrete, correct moisture.
• Thickness checks: Wet film (liquid membranes), lap peel (sheets).
• Flood test: 24–72 hours on roofs/rafts.
• Inspection of details: Parapets, scuppers, joints.

7. Recommendations
For Roofs
• Preferred: PU liquid-applied membrane (aliphatic for exposed, aromatic under
screed).
• Alternate (economy): Bituminous felt/mastic (per IS 1346 & IS 9918).
• Always ensure slope, drainage, parapet detailing.
For Basements
• Preferred: Pre-applied fully bonded sheet membranes (best for groundwater).
• Alternate: Post-applied bitumen membranes (open-cut).
• Use crystalline admixtures as redundancy/self-healing layer.
• Provide drainage, capillary breaks, sump pumps.

8. Key References
• IS 9918:1981 – In-situ waterproofing (bitumen + fibre).
• IS 1346:1991 – Application of bitumen felts.
• IS 3067:1988 – Code of practice for roof waterproofing details.
• RDSO/IRICEN Guidelines – Waterproofing in new/old construction.
• BSI-125 (Building Science Insight) – Basement moisture design.
• Sika & Fosroc – Technical manuals (modern systems).
• Research papers – Comparative analysis of materials, failure case studies, pre-
applied membrane reviews.

9. Conclusion
• Waterproofing is not just a material → it is a system combining correct product +
detailing + QA.
• For RCC Roofs → PU membranes (modern) or Bituminous felts (traditional).
• For Basements → Pre-applied fully bonded membranes (best practice) + waterstops
+ drainage.
• Failures occur mainly due to poor detailing, cracks, and workmanship → strict
QA/QC is critical.

You might also like