CAGAYAN STATE UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE II
FIRST SEMESTER, AY 2025-2026
By: Pros. Angelique S. Lucero-Tungcul

COURSE DESCRIPTION The course is the continuation of Civil Procedure. It will deal with
the remedies after judgment, both before and after it becomes final. The course will also cover
provisional remedies, special civil actions, and The Rules on Expedited Procedure in the First
Level Courts.
LEARNING STRATEGIES
The method of instruction will not depart from the usual pedagogy in the law school which is
Socratic method. Thus, every meeting, the students should expect that they would undergo
rigorous recitation wherein their minds would be tested on the topic assigned. In this manner,
their critical thinking will be developed. There will be one to two (1-2) major quizzes in the five
(5) major topics in the course outline.
GRADING SYSTEM The final grade will be computed as follows:
Thirty percent (30%) will consist of class standing. Class standing is composed of recitations and
quizzes.
Thirty percent (30%) will consist of the midterm examination, and 40% will consist of the final
examination.

I. PRELIMINARIES
A. Jurisdiction.
1. Over the parties
a. How jurisdiction over the plaintiff is acquired.
b. How jurisdiction over the defendant is acquired
Cases:
i. Optima Realty Corporation v. Hertz Phil., Exclusive, Inc., G.R. No. 183035, January
9, 2013
ii. Afdal & Afdal v. Carlos, G.R. No. 173379, December 1, 2010
iii. Guy vs. Gacot, G.R. No. 206147, January 13, 2016
2. Over the subject matter
a. How jurisdiction is conferred and determined
Cases:
i. Fe V. Rapsing, et al. v. Hon. Judge Maximino R. Ables, et al., G.R. No. 171855,
October 15, 2012
ii. Mendoza V. Germino & Germino, G.R. No. 165676, November 22, 2010
iii. Remedios Antonino v. The Register of Deeds of Makati City, et al., G.R. No. 185663,
June 20, 2012
3. Over the Issues
Cases:
i. De Joya v. Marquez, et al., G.R. No. 163416, January 31, 2006
4. Over the Res
1|Page
5. Objections to jurisdiction over the subject matter
Cases:
i. Lamsis v. Dong-E, G.R. No. 173021, October 20, 2010

6. Effect of estoppel on objections to jurisdiction

Cases:
i. Tijam vs. Sibongjanoy, 23 SCRA 29
ii. Sps. Erorita vs. Sps. Dumlao, G.R. No. 195477, January 25, 2016
iii. Velasquez, Jr., vs. Lisondra Land, G.R. No. 231290, August 27, 2020

7. Error of jurisdiction as distinguished from error of judgment

Cases:
i. First Corporation v. Former Sixth Division of Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No.
171989, July 4, 2007
B. Jurisdiction of Courts
1. Supreme Court
2. Court of Appeals
3. Sandiganbayan
4. Regional Trial Courts
5. Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, Municipal
Circuit Trial Court
II. POST-JUDGMENT REMEDIES
A. Before Finality
1. Motion for New Trial or Reconsideration (Rule 37)
a. When to file
b. Grounds for new trial
c. Grounds for motion for reconsideration
d. Remedy when motion is denied
2. Appeal
a. Judgments and final orders subject to appeal
b. Matters not appealable
c. Modes of appeal
i. Ordinary appeal
ii. Petition for review
iii. Petition for review on certiorari
d. Period to appeal
e. Perfection of appeal
f. Appeal from judgments or final orders of the MTC
g. Appeal from judgments or final orders of the RTC

2|Page
 h. Appeal from judgments or final orders of the CA
i. Appeal from judgments or final orders of the CTA
j. Appeal from the judgment of Sandiganbayan
k. Review of final judgments or final orders of quasi-judicial bodies
B. After finality
1. Relief from judgment
a. Grounds
b. Time to file
c. Contents of petition
2. Annulment of judgment
a. Grounds
Cases:
i. Pinausukan Seafood House-Roxas Blvd, Inc. v. Far East Bank and Trust
Co., et al., G.R. No. 159926, January 20, 2014
ii. Leticia Diona, etc. v. Romeo Balangue, et al., G.R. No. 173559, January
7, 2013
b. Period to file action
c. Effects of judgment of annulment
d. Collateral attack of judgment
II. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES
A. Nature and Purpose
B. Jurisdiction over Provisional Remedies
C. Kinds of Provisional Remedies
1. Attachment (Rule 57)
a. Nature
b. Purpose
c. Cases where preliminary attachment may be availed (Sec. 1, d. e. Rule
57)
d. Formalities
e. Procedure
f. Prior and contemporaneous service of summons and exceptions
g. Implementation of attachment
h. Remedy of third party
i. Discharge of attachment and its grounds
Cases:
i. Davao Light v. CA, 204 SCRA 343
ii. Equitable v. Special Steel, G.R. No. 175 C. 350, June 13, 2012

3|Page
 iii. Peroxide Philippines Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 92813, July 31, 1991
iv. Security Pacific Assurance Corp. v. Tri- Infante, 468 SCRA 526
2. Preliminary Injunction (Rule 58)
a. Concept and purpose
b. Kinds of preliminary injunction
c. Who may grant preliminary injunction
d. Grounds for the issuance
e. Rule on prior and contemporary summons
f. Temporary restraining order
g. No injunction rule
h. Procedure
Cases:
i. Miriam College Foundation, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 127930, December 15, 2000
ii. Executive secretary, Forerunner Multi Resources, Inc., G.R. No. 199324,
January 7, 2013
iii. TML Gasket Industries, Inc. v. BPI Family Savings Bank, Inc., G.R. No. 188768,
January 7, 2013
iv. Manila International Airport Authority v. Rivera Village, 471 SCRA 358
v. Spouses Nicasio Marquez and Anita J. Marquez v. Spouses Carlito Alindog and
Carmen Alindog, G.R. No. 184045, January 22, 2014
vi. Bacolod City Water District v. Labayen, G.R. No. 157494, December 10, 2004
vii. Strategic Alliance Development Corp. v. Star Infrastructure Corp., G.R. No.
187872, April 11, 2011
viii. Australian Professional, Inc. v. Municipality of Padre Garcia, 668 SCRA 253
3. Receivership (Rule 59)
a. Nature and purpose
b. Who may grant receivership
c. Ground for the appointment of receiver
d. Procedure
e. Termination
4. Replevin (Rule 60)
a. Nature and purpose
b. Replevin vs Attachment
c. Procedure
d. Property in custodia legis
e. Procedure for implementation
5. Support Pendente Lite
a. Nature of Support
4|Page
 b. Who is entitled
c. Procedure
d. Support pendente lite in criminal cases
IV. SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS
A. Preliminaries
1. Ordinary Civil actions vs. Special Civil Actions
2. How initiated
3. Jurisdiction over special civil actions
B. Kinds
1. Interpleader (Rule 62)
a. Nature and concept
b. Requisites
c. Which court has jurisdiction
d. Procedure
Cases:
i. Ocampo v. Tirona, G.R. No. 147382, April 6, 2005
ii. Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation v. Metro Container Corp., G.R. No.
127913, September 13, 2001
iii. Wack-Wack Golf v. Won, 70 SCRA 165
iv. Ramos v. Ramos, 399 SCRA 43
2. Declaratory Relief (Rule 63)
a. Nature and concept
b. Purpose
c. Types of remedies under Rule 63
i. Reformation of an instrument
ii. Consolidation of ownership
iii. Quieting of title
d. Requisites for declaratory relief
e. Subject matter of petition
f. Which court has jurisdiction
g. Procedure
Cases:
i. Province of Camarines Sur v. Court of Appeals, 600 SCRA 569
ii. Almeda v. Bathala Marketing Industries, 542 SCRA 470
iii. Allied Broadcasting Corporation v. Republic G.R. No. 91500, October 18,
1990
iv. Jumamil v. Café, G.R. No. 144570, September 21, 2005

5|Page
 v. Bayan Telecommunications v. Republic, 513 SCRA 560
vi. Salvacion v. Central Bank, G.R. No. 94723, August 21, 1997
vii. Dionisio Manaquil, et al. v. Roberto Moico, G.R. No. 80076, November 20,
2012
viii. Spouses Santiago v. Villamor, G.R. No. 168499, November 26, 2012
ix. Phil-Ville Development and Housing Corporation v. Bonifacio, 651 SCRA
327
3. Review of Judgment and Final Order or Resolutions of COMELEC AND COA (Rule 64)
a. Preliminaries
b. Who has jurisdiction
c. Period to file
d. What rule is applicable
Cases:
i. Aratuc v. COMELEC, 88 SCRA 251
ii. Lokin, Jr. v. COMELEC, 621 SCRA 385
iii. Reyna v. COA, 642 SCRA 210
4. Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus (Rule 65)
a. Certiorari
i. Nature and purpose
ii. Certiorari v appeal
iii. Requisites
iv. Expanded scope of certiorari
v. Need for motion for reconsideration
vi. Formalities and procedure
Cases:
i. Angara v. Fedman, G.R. No. 156822, October 18, 2004
ii. Tan v. Antazo, G.R. No. 187208, February 23, 2011
iii. Land Bank of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals, 456 Phil 755
iv. Ruben C. Magtoto and Artemia Magtoto v. CA, et al., G.R. No. 175792,
November 21,2012
v. Galang v. Geronimo, G.R. No. 192793, February 22, 2011
vi. Spouses Nicasio Marquez and Anita J. Marquez v. Spouses Carlito
vii. Alindog and Carmen Alindog, G.R. No. 184045, January 22, 2014
viii. Ralph P. Tua v. Hon. Cesar Mangrobang, et al., G.R. No. 170701, January 2,
2014
b. Prohibition
a. Purpose and function
b. Requisites for issuance
6|Page
 c. Prohibition vs. certiorari
d. Formalities and procedure

Cases:
i. Ongsuko v. Malones, G.R. No. 182065, October 27, 2009
c. Mandamus
a. Nature and purpose
b. Requisites for issuance
c. Ministerial act vs. Discretionary act
Cases:
i. Spouses Augusto Dacudao and Ofelia Dacudao V. Secretary of Justice Raul
Gonzales, G.R. No. 188056, January 8, 2013
ii. Special People, Inc. Foundation, etc. v. Nestor M. Canda, G.R. No. 160932,
January 14, 2013
iii. Barrazona v. RTC of Baguio Branch 61, 486 SCRA 555
iv. Tang V. Subic Bay Distribution, G.R. No. e. 162575, December 15, 2010
v. Juliano-Llave v. Republic, 646 SCRA 637
5. Quo Warranto (Rule 66)
a. Nature and purpose
b. Quo warranto vs. mandamus
c. Who may bring the action and against whom
d. Jurisdiction and venue
e. Formalities and procedure
Cases:
i. Tecson v. COMELEC, 424 SCRA 277
ii. Divinagracia Consolidated Broadcasting System, G.R. No. 162272, April 7,
2009
iii. Fermin v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 179695, December 18, 2008
iv. Republic vs. Sereno, G.R. No. 237428, May 11, 2018
6. Expropriation (Rule 67)
a. Constitutional underpinnings
b. Concept of "public use"
c. Meaning of just compensation
d. Who may exercise
e. Stages in expropriation
f. Formalities and procedure
Cases:

7|Page
 i. ATO v. Gopuco, Jr. 462 SCRA 544
ii. National Power Corporation v. Joson, 206 SCRA 520
iii. City of Manila v, Alegar Corporation, G.R. No. 187604, June 25, 2012
iv. City of Iloilo v. Contreras Besana, 612 SCRA 458
v. Republic v. Rural Bank of Kabacan, Inc., 664 SCRA 223
vi. National Power Corporation v. De la Cruz, 514 SCRA 56
vii. Yujuico v. Atienza, Jr. 472 SCRA 463
7. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage (Rule 68)
a. Preliminaries
b. Judicial foreclosure vs. extra-judicial foreclosure
c. Court with jurisdiction
d. Formalities and procedure
e. Right of redemption
f. Recovery of deficiency
Cases:
i. Spouses Rosales v. Spouses Alfonso, G.R. No. 137792, August 12, 2003
ii. Tiglao vs. Botones, 90 Phil. 275
iii. Carpo vs. Chua, 471 SCRA 471
8. Partition (Rule 69)
a. Preliminaries
b. Court with jurisdiction
c. Stages of partition
d. Formalities and procedure
Cases:
i. Cano Vda. De Viray v. Spouses Usi, G.R. No. 192486 November 21, 2012
ii. Figuracion-Gerilla v. Vda De Figuracion, 499 SCRA 484
iii. Sepulveda v. Pelaez, G.R. No. 152195, January 31, 2005
iv. Lacbayan v. Samoy, 645 SCRA 677
v. Heirs of Restar v. Heirs of Cichon, 475 SCRA 731
9. Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer
a. Actions to recover possession of real property
b. Forcible entry
i. Elements
ii. Jurisdictional facts
iii. Meaning of prior physical possession
c. Unlawful Detainer

8|Page
 i. Elements
ii. Jurisdictional facts
iii. Demand in unlawful detainer
d. Procedure
Cases:
i. Nunez vs. SLTEAS Phoenix Solutions, G.R. No. 180542, April 12, 2010
ii. Dela Cruz v. CA, G.R. No. 139442, December 6, 2006
iii. Sarmiento v. Manalite Home Owner's Association, G.R. No. 182953, October 11,
2010
iv. Juanita Ermitano, etc. v. Lailanie Paglas, G.R. No. 174436, January 23, 2013
v. Delos Reyes v. Spouses Odenes, G.R. No. 178096, March 23, 2011
vi. Rural Bank of Sta. Ignacia v. Dimatulac, G.R. No. 142015, April 29, 2003
vii. Herminia Acbang v. Hon. Jimmy Luczon, Jr. et al., G.R. No. 164264, January 15,
2014
10. Contempt (Rule 71)
a. Meaning of contempt of court
b. Kinds of contempt
i. Direct
ii. Indirect
e. Grounds
f. Penalties
g. Remedies
h. Formalities and procedure
Cases:
i. Lorenzo Shipping v. Distribution Association, 656 SCRA 331
ii. Siy v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158971, August 25, 2005
iii. Rivulet Agro-Industrial Corporation v. Anthony Parungao, et al., G.R. No. 197507,
January 14, 2013
iv. Regalado v. Go, 514 SCRA 616
vi. Encinas v. National Bookstore, G.R. No. 162704, July 28, 2005
vii. Re: Letter dated 21 Feb. 2005 of Atty. Noel Sorredo, A.M. No. 05-3- 04-SC July 22,
2005
viii. Cruz v. Gigoyon, 658 SCRA 254
ix. SBMA v. Rodriguez, 619 SCRA 176
x. Robosa v. NLRC, G.R. No. 176085, February 8, 2012
xi. Land Bank of the Philippines v. Listana, 408 SCRA 328
V. THE RULES ON EXPIDITED PROCEDURE IN THE FIRST LEVEL COURTS
A. Applicability
9|Page
 1. Civil Cases
i. Summary Procedure
ii. Small Claims
2. Criminal Cases
3. Prohibited motions
4. Summary Procedure
i. Civil Cases
ii. Criminal Cases
5. Rules on Small Claims

10 | P a g e