JOSE RIZAL UNIVERSITY

(TALINO TALENTO TATAG TAOS-PUSO)

College of Law
Course Syllabus in Civil Procedure I
1st Semester, AY 2024-2025

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

A detailed study of the on Civil Procedure as amended by A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC (2019
Amended Rules on Civil Procedure) including pertinent special laws, SC Circulars, and SC
Decisions.

COURSE GOALS:

1. Prepare JRU Law Students for the Bar Examination and practice of legal profession.

2. Equip JRU Law Students with knowledge and comprehension of Civil Procedure,
pertinent SC Circulars and SC Decisions with full understanding of the application of
the Rules on Civil Procedure and doctrines laid down in SC Decisions.

3. JRU Law School Graduates and Lawyers equipped with analytical and logical thinking,
and effective written and oral communication and being able to translate them into
responsive legal reasoning and strategies.

4. JRU Law School Graduates and Lawyers who exercise ethical professional
responsibilities.

COURSE REQUIREMENTS:

1. Class Recitation.
2. Case Digest (to be submitted every meeting)
3. Quizes
4. Periodic Examinations
5. Class Attendance

GRADING OF STUDENTS:

Periodic Examination : 40% Computation of Final Grade:

Class Recitation : 25% Prelims Grade x 30%
Case Digest : 20% Midterm Grade x 30%
Class Attendance : 15% Finalsterm Grade x 40%
 100% 100%

SCOPE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 2:

APPELLATE PRACTICE and PROCEDURE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, COURT OF TAX

APPEAL and THE SUPREME COURT.

I. PRELIMINARY PERIOD

A. APPEALS; GENERAL PRINCIPLES

1. Nature and purpose of Appeal

Cases:

 Gregorio De Leon/GDL Marketing vs. Herculs Ages Industrial Corp.

GR 183239, June 2, 2014
 Catholic Bishop of Balanga vs CA, 332 Phil 206 {1996}

2. Nature of Right to Appeal

Cases:

 Board Walk Business Ventures Inc. vs. Elvira Villareal et al.

GR 181182, April 10, 2017
 SPS. Lebin vs Mirasol, GR 114255, September 7, 2011
 Gonzales vs. Pe, GR 167398 August 9, 2011

3. When to Appeal

Cases:
 Neypes vs CA, GR 141524, (2005)
 Rolex Rodriguez vs PP, GR 192799, October 24, 2012
 Mario Magat Sr. vs. Tantrade Corp. and Pablo Borja
GR No. 205483, August 27, 2017

4. Judgments and Final Orders Subject to Appeal

Cases:
 Republic vs Ortigas & Co. GR NO. 171496, September 3, 2014
 Togonon Holdings & Development Corp. vs. Escano
GR NO. 190994, September 7, 2011
 Angelina Pahila-Garrido vs. Eliza Tortogo et al,
GR NO. 156358, September 17, 2011
 5. Matters Not Appealable (Rule 41 Sec 1)

Cases:
 Heirs of Timbang-Dimaampao vs Atty. Abdullah Alug
GR No. 198223 February 18, 2015
 SPS. Roberto and Beatriz Garcia vs. SPS. Arnel and Cricela Soriano
GR 219431 August 24, 2020
 Pillars Property Development Corporation vs. Century Communities
Corp. GR. 201021 March 14, 2019

6. Doctrine of Finality and Immutability of Judgment

Cases:
 Roberto A. Torres et al vs Antonia Aruego,
GR. No. 201271, September 20, 2017
 Blas Britania vs. Hon. Lilia Mercedes Encarnacion A. Gepty and
Melba Panganiban, G.R. No. 246995, January 20, 2020
 Marilyn B. Montehermoso et al vs Romeo Baluto et al
GR No. 246553 December 2, 2020

B. Post-Judgment Remedies Other Than Appeal

1. Petition for Relief from Judgment (Rule 38)

2. Annulment of Judgment by the Court of Appeals (Rule 47)
3. Collateral Attack on Judgment when Proper
4. Special Civil Action of Certiorari (Rule 65)

II. APPEALS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE:

1. Modes of Appeal (Notice of Appeal, Records on Appeal, Petition for Review)

Cases:
 Heirs of Arturo Garcia vs Municipality of Iba, Zambales
GR No 162217, July 22, 2015
 Marilou Punongbayan-Visitacion vs PP, GR No. 194214, Jan, 10, 2018
 Elizabeth Brual vs. Jorge Brual Contreras et al. GR. No. 205451, March 7,
2022

2. Issues Raised On Appeal

Cases:
 China Trust (Phil) Commercial Bank vs. Philip Turner
GR No. 191458, July 3, 2017
 Richard Wahing et al vs. SPS Amador and Esing Daguio,
 GR No. 219755, April 18, 2022

3. How To Appeal and When Appeal is Perfected

a. File the appropriate Mode of Appeal

b. Pay Appellate Fees

Cases:
 National Transmission Corp. vs. Heirs of Teodulo Ebesa
GR 186102, February 24, 2016
 SPS Edmond Lee and Helen Huang vs Land Bank of the Philippines
GR 218867, February 17, 2016
 Ligaya Ang vs. CA and Warren T. Gutierrez GR NO. 238203, Sept. 3, 2020
 Felicitas Aguilar Bollozos vs. Heirs of Luisa Abrio Vda. De Aguilar
GR NO. 194310, March 29, 2022

4. Residual Jurisdiction

Cases:
 Jorgenetics Swine Improvement Corp. vs Thick and Thin Agri Products Inc.
GR NO. 201044 and 222691, May 5, 2021
 Fernandez vs. CA G.R. NO 131094, May 16, 2005

5. Appeals on the Judgment and Order of Various Courts

a. Appeal From the Judgment of Municipal Trial Courts (Rule 40)

a.1. Where to Appeal
a.2. When to Appeal
a.3. How to Appeal
a.4. Duty of the Clerk of Court
a.5. Procedure in the Regional Trial Court
a.6. Appeal from Order Dismissing the Case without Trial; lack of
Jurisdiction

Cases:
 Manalang vs. Bacani G.R. No. 156995, January 12, 2015
 Wilfredo De Vera et al vs. SPS Eugenio Santiago Jr. And Esperanza
Santiago et al, GR NO. 179457 June 22, 2015

b. Appeal from the Decision and Final Order of the Regional Trial Court (Rule 41)
 Cases:
 East West Banking Corp. vs. Ian Y. Cruz et al GR NO. 221641, July 12, 2021
 Sioland Development Corp. vs. Fair Distribution Center
GR NO. 199539, August 9, 2003
 Jose “Pepe” Sanico vs PP and Jennifer Son-Tenio
G.R. No. 198753, March 25, 2015
* Bureau of Customs vs Bush Boake Allen (Phil.) Inc.
GR NO. 208465 April 28, 2021

c. Petition for Review From the Judgment of the Regional Trial Court (Rule 42)

c.1. How Appeal is Taken

c.2. Forms and Contents
c.3. Failure to Comply with Requirements
c.4. Perfection of Appeal

Cases:
 Maravilla vs. Rios GR No. 196875, August 19, 2015
 Kenneth Duremdes vs Caroline Jorilla et al GR No. 234491
 Nora Alvarez and Edgar Alvarez vs Former 12th Division of the CA
GR NO. 1924

d. Appeal from Court of Tax Appeals and Other Quasi Judicial Agencies to the
Court of Appeals (Rule 43)

d.1. Scope

Cases:
 Tze Sun Wong vs. Kenny Wong, GR NO. 180364, December 3, 2014
 Adelaida Yatco vs. Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon et al
GR No. 244775, July 6, 2020

d.2. Contents of Petition

d.3. Action on Petition
d.4. Effect of Appeal
d.5. Period to Appeal

Cases:
 Galindez vs Firmalan GR No. 187186, June 6, 2018
 Atty. Riza Fernandez vs Willie Fernando Maaliw,
GR NO. 248852, March 9, 2022
 DORELCO Employees Union ALU-TUCP vs Don Orestes Romualdez Electric
Cooperative Inc. GR No. 240130, March 15, 2021
  Ruben Oliveros and Homer Henry Sanchez vs. CA et al
GR. No. 240084, September 16, 2020

e. Procedure in the Court of Appeals; Ordinary Appealed Cases (Rule 44)

e.1. Dispensing with Complete Records (Section 6)

Cases:
* Aida P. Banez vs. Gabriel B. Banez, Gr. No. 132592 & 133628, Jan. 23,
2002

e.2. Appellant’s Brief; Effect of Failure to file Brief

e.3. Contents of Appellant’s Brief

Cases:
 Delos Santos vs. Lucenio, GR No. 215659, March 15, 2018
 Liao Senho vs. Philippine Savings Bank, GR No. 219810, May 12, 2021
 PP vs. Jovencio Allan Ciudadano, GR No. 248182, September 7, 2022

e.4. Time for Filing Memoranda in Special Cases (Section 10)

Cases:
 National Power Corp. vs CA et al, GR No. 137034, February 23, 2004
 Romulo B. Estrella vs SM Prime Holding et al;
GR No. 257814 & GR No. 257944, February 20, 2023

f. Appeal by Certiorari to the Supreme Court (Rule 45)

f.1 Filing of Petition with the Supreme Court (Section 1)

Cases:
 Doris Marie Lopez vs. Aniceto Saludo, G.R. No. 233775, September 15, 2021
 Charlo Idul vs. Alster International Shipping Inc. et al; GR No. 209907; 6/23/2021

f.2. Contents of Petition (Section 4)

Cases:
 Mendoza vs. Palugod, G.R. No. 220517, June 20, 2018
 Kensonic Inc. vs. UNI-Line Multi Resources GR No. 211820-21, June 6, 2018
 Tagle vs. Equitable PCI Bank, GR no. 172299, April 22, 2008

f.3. Dismissal or Denial of Petition (Section 5)

Case:
 AAA 255299 vs. XXX255299, GR No. 255299, March 8, 2023

f.4. Review discretionary (Section 6)

 Cases:
 Deepak Kumar vs. PP GR 247661; June 15, 2020
 Inter-Island Information Systems Inc. vs CA and Cham Q, Ibay
GR No. 187323, June 23, 2021

g. Original Cases Filed Before The CA (certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and quo
warranto) {Rule 46}

Case:
 China Banking Corporation vs Padilla, GR No. 143490, February 2, 2007

h. Annulment of Judgment (Rule 47)

h.1. Coverage

h.2. Grounds for Annulment of Judgment (Section 2)

Cases:
 Arrieta vs. Arrieta, G.r. No. 234808, November 19, 2018
 Esperanza P. Gaoiran vs Ca, Branch 12 RTC Ilocos Norte
GR No. 215925, March 7, 2022
 Channel Shane Tomas vs. Rachel Trono and Republic, GR No. 241031, 3/15/21

h.3. Period to file

h.4. Requisites/Contents of Petition
h.5. Effect of Non-Compliance
h.6. action by the court (Section 5)

Cases:
 Ma. Luisa Annabelle A. Torres et al vs Republic and Register of Deeds of Davao
City, GR. No. 247490, March 2, 2022
 Mercedita Coombs vs. Victoria Castaneda et al, GR No. 192353, March 15, 2017

h.7. Suspension of Prescriptive Period (Section 8)

Case:

 Alberto T. Lasala vs. National Food Authority, GR No. 171582, August 19, 2015

i. Preliminary Conference (Rule 48)

j. Oral Argument (Rule 49)

k. Dismissal of Appeal (Rule 50)

 k.1. Grounds for Dismissal

Cases:
 Philippine Bank of Communications vs. Hon. CA et al, GR No. 218901, 2/15/2017
 Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corp. vs Royal Ferry Services Inc.
GR No. 188146,Feb. 2017

k.2. Dismissal of Improper Appeal

Cases:
 Norma Baleares and Heirs of Santos Baleares vs. Felipe Espanto et al
GR No. 247844, July 26, 2023
 Sugar Regulatory Administration vs. Central Azucarera de Bais, Inc.
GR No. 253821, March 6, 2023
 Emiliano Samson vs. SPS Jose and Guillermina Gabor, Tanay Rural Bank
GR No. 182970, July 23, 2014

k.3. Withdrawal of Appeal

Case:
 Pioneer Insurance and Surety Corp. vs De Dios Transportation
GR No. 147010, February 18, 2003

l. Judgment (Rule 51)

l.1. When Case deemed submitted for judgment (Section 1)

Case:
 Francisco A.G. De Liano et al and San Miguel Corporation vs Hon. CA and
Benjamin Tango, GR No. 142316, November 22, 2001

l.2. Disposition of a case (Section 4)

Case:
 Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Dalauta GR No. 190004, August 8, 2017

l.3. Form of Decision (Section 5)

Case/s:
 Heirs of Batori vs. Register of Deeds of Benguet, GR No. 212611, February 11,
2019

l.4. Harmless Error (Section 6)

 l.5. Questions that may be decided (Section 8)

Cases:
 Loyola vs CA, GR No. 188658, January 11, 2017
 Trinidad Diaz-Enriquez vs. Director of Lands, CA et al; GR No. 168065, 9/6/2017
 Eduardo Santos vs. Republic, GR No. 221277, March 18, 2021

m. Motion for Reconsideration (Rule 52)

m.1. Second Motion for Reconsideration (Section 2)

Case:
 Laya Jr. vs. Philippine Veterans Bank, et al. GR No. 205813 January 10, 2018

m.2. Resolution of Motion (Section 3)

Case:
 SPS Eloisa Clarito Abayon and Regino Abayon vs. Bank of the Philippine Islands
GR No. 249684, March 29, 2023

n. New Trial (Rule 53)

n.1. Period for Filing ; ground (Section 1)

Cases:
 Sioland Development Corp. vs. Fair Distribution Center Corp.
GR. 199539, August 9, 2023

o. Internal Business (Rule 56)

p. Publication of Judgments and Final Resolutions (Rule 57)
q. Procedure in the Supreme Court (Rule 58)

q.1. Original Cases Cognizable by the Supreme Court (Section 1)

Case:
 Julio Purcon Jr. vs. MRM Philippines Inc. et al, GR No. 182718, 9/26/2008

q.2. Mode of Appeal (Section 3)

Case:
 PP vs. Orlando Constantino, GR No. 251636, February 14, 2023

q.3. Grounds for Dismissal of Appeal (Section 3)

 Case:
 Philippine Bank of Communications vs. Hon. CA et al GR No. 218901, 2/15/2017

MID TERM PERIOD

III. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES

 Nature of Provisional Remedy

 Purpose of Provisional Remedies

a. Preliminary Attachment (Rule 57)

a.1. Grounds of Issuance of Writ of Attachment (section 1)

a.2. Issuance and Contents of Order of Attachment (Section 2)
a.3. Affidavit and Bonds Required (Section 3)
a.4. Manner of Attaching Property (Section 5)
a.5. Rule on Prior or Contemporaneous Service of Summons (Section 5)
a.6. Manner of Attaching Real and Personal Property (Section 7)
a.7. When property attached is claimed by Third Person (Section 7)
a.8. Discharge of Attachment and Counterbond (Section 12)
a.9. Satisfaction of Judgment Out of Property Attached (Section 15)
a.10. Procedure for Claim of Damages on account of
improper attachment (Section 20)

Cases:
 Lorenzo Shipping Corp. vs. Florencio Villarin et al., GR No. 175727, 3/6/2019
 Lim vs. Lazaro, GR No. 185734, July 3, 2013
 Tsumishi Heavy Industries (Cebu) Inc., vs. MIS Maritime Corp.
GR No. 193572, April 4, 2018
 Gil Chua vs. China Banking Corp. GR. No. 202004, November 4, 2020
 COCA-COLA FEMSA Philippines vs. Pacific Sugar Holdings,
GR No. 241333, June 27, 2022
 Ignacio Dumaran vs Teresa Llamedo, GR No. 217583, August 4, 2021

b. Preliminary Injunction (Rule 58)

b.1. Preliminary Injunction; Defined (Section 1)

b.2. Grounds for Issuance of Preliminary Injunction (Section 3)
b.3. Kinds of Injunction; Who issued; Duration
b.4. When Writ may be issued
b.5. Grounds for objection to or for the Dissolution of Injunction or Restraining
Order (Section 6)

b.6. Statutes prohibiting courts from issuing TRO other than the SC; effect of
 Morales Ruling

Cases:
 Banco Filipino Savings Bank vs. Bangko Sentral Ng Pilipinas and Monetary Board
GR No. 200642, April 26, 2021
 Republic vs. Principalia Management and Personnel Consultants Inc.
GR No. 198426, September 2, 2015
 Sumifru (Phil) Corp. vs. SPS Cereno, GR No. 218236, February 7, 2018
 Dynamic Builders and Construction Co. (Phil) Inc. vs Presbitero, Jr.
GR No. 174202, April 7, 2015
 Morales vs. CA GR 217126-27, November 10, 2015
 Bank of the Philippine Islands vs. Hon. Judge Agapito Hortanosas, Silverio
Bombon et al, GR No. 157163, June 25, 2014
 Armed Forces of the Philippines vs. Erlinda Amogo et al.,
GR. 213753, 11/10/2020
 SPS. Prudente Soller et al. Vs. Hon. Secretary Rogelio Singson et al.,
GR No. 215547, February 3, 2020

c. Receivership (Rule 59)

c.1. Cases when receiver may be appointed (Section 1)

c.2. Requisites
c.3. Requirements before issuance of an Order
c.4. General Powers of Receiver
c.5. Two Kinds of Bonds
c.6. Termination of receivership; compensation of receiver (Section 8)

Cases:
 Tantano vs. Espina-Caboverde, 702 SCRA 508
 Chavez vs CA, 610 SCRA 399
 San Miguel Properties Inc. vs. BF Homes, Inc. GR 169343, August 5, 2015
 Traders Royal Bank vs. Intermediate Appellate Court and Heirs of
the Late Jose C. Tayengco, GR No. 111357, June 17, 1997
 Republic vs. Saludares, Gr No. 111174, March 9, 2000

d. Replevin (Rule 60)

d.1. Application (Section 1)

d.2. Requisites/Affidavit and Bond (Section 2)
d.3. Duty of the Sheriff (Section 3)
Case:
* Terlyngrace Rivera vs. Florencio Vargas, GR. 165895, June 5, 2009

d.4. Return of the property; Counterbond (Section 4)

 d.5. Judgment (Section 9)
d.6. Recovery against Sureties (Section 10)
Cases:
 Twin Ace Holding vs. Rufina and Company, GR No. 160191, June 8, 2006
 William Angidan Sy vs. Alvin Tomlin, GR No. 205998, April 24, 2017
 Dagudag vs. Paderanga AM-RTJ No. 06-2015
 Central Visayas Finance Corp. Vs. SPS Eliezer and Leila Adlawan,
GR No. 212674, March 25, 2019.

e. Support Pendente Lite (Rule 61)

e.1. Application (Section 1)

e.2. Comment, Hearing and Order (Section 2,3, and 4)

Case/s:
 Ma. Carminia C. Calderon vs. Jose Antonio F. Roxas and CA,
G.R. NO.185595, January 9, 2013

e.3. Enforcement of the Order (Section 5)

Case/s:
 Susan Lim-Lua vs. Danilo Y. Lua, GR No. 175279-80, June 5, 2013
 Ma. Belen Mangonon vs. CA et al., GR 125041, June 30, 2006

f. Provisional Remedy in Special Laws:

f.1. Human Security Act (RA 9372 2007)

- Sections 26, 27, 28, 34, 39 and 40
f.2. RA 9262 (VAWC)
- Sections 8, 37 and 40
Case:
 Jay Sabado vs. Tina Marie L. Sabado, GR No. 214270, 5/12/2021
f.3. Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act (Ra 10142)
- Chapter 3, Section 76
- Chapter IV, Section 83
f.4. Precautionary Hold Departure Order
f.5. Alternative Dispute Resolution Act (RA 9285)
f.6. Custody of Minors (A.M. 03-04-04-SC
f.7. Writ of Amparo (A.M. No. 07-09—12-SC)
- Section 14 (a), (b) and (d)

f.8. Writ of Habeas Data (A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC)

- Section 6.e.
 f.9. Environmental Cases A.M. 09-6-8-SC
- Sections 8, 9
- Rule 13 Section 1 and 2

Final Examination Period

IV. SPECIAL CIVIL ACTION

 Nature of Special Civil Action

 Distinction between Ordinary Civil Action and Special Civil Actions
 Special Civil Action initiated by a Complaint
- Interpleader (Rule 62)
- Expropriation (Rule 67)
- Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage (REM) (Rule 68)
- Partition (Rule 69)
- Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer (Rule 70)
 Special Civil Actions initiated by a Petition
- Declaratory Relief (Rule 63)
- Review of Adjudication of COMELEC (Rule 64)
- Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus (Rule 65)
- Quo Warranto (Rule 66)
- Contempt (Rule 71)
 Special Civil Action with two (2) stages
- Expropriation
- Partition

a. Interpleader (Rule 62)

a.1. When proper (Section 1)

Case:
 Trifon Tumaodos vs. San Miguel Yamamura Packaging Corp.
GR No. 241865, February 19, 2020
a.2. Order (Section 2)
a.3. Summons and Pleadings (Sections 3, 4, and 5)
a.4. Determination (Section 6)
Cases:
 Arreza vs. Tirona, GR No. 133113, August 30, 2001
 Bureau of Internal Revenue vs. Tico Insurance Co. Inc.
GR No. 204226, April 18, 2022

b. Declaratory Relief (Rule 63)

 b.1. Requisites of Declaratory Relief
Cases:
 Honesto Ferrer Jr. et al. vs. Mayor Sulpicio S. Roco Jr.
GR No. 174129, July 5, 2010
 Republic vs. Pryce Corp. Inc. GR No. 243133, March 8, 2023
 Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. vs. SPS. Julio and Juliette Uy
GR No. 212002, July 28, 2021

c. Review of Judgment and Final Orders of COMELEC and Commission on Audit (COA) (Rule
64)
c.1. Scope (Section 1)
c.2. Certiorari under Rule 65 as Mode of Review (Section 2)
c.3. Time to file Petition (Section 3)
c.4. Form and Contents of Petition (Section 5)
c.5. Effect of filing of Petition (Section 8)

Case:
 Raoul Villarete vs. Commission on Audit, GR No. 243818, 4/26/2022

d. Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus (Rule 65)

d.1. Requisites of Certiorari (Section 1)
d.2. Distinction between Certiorari under Rule 45 and Certiorari under Rule 65
Cases:
 Anito Santos vs. Atty. Kissack B. Gabaen et al
GR No. 195638, March 22, 2022
 Confederation for Unity, Recognition and Advancement of Government
Employees (COURAGE) et al vs. Hon. Florencio Abad et al
GR No. 200418, November 10, 2020
 Heirs of Eliza Zoleta vs. Land Bank of the Philippines et al
GR No. 205128, August 9, 2017

d.4. Prohibition
Cases:
 P/S Ins. Samson Belmonte et al vs. Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for
the Military et al, GR No. 197665, {2016}
 Southern Luzon Drug Corp. vs. DSWD et al, GR No. 199669, 4/25/2017

d.5. Mandamus
Cases:
 Lord Allan Jay Velasco vs. Hon. Speaker Feliciano Belmonte
 GR No. 211140, July 12, 2016
 City of Davao vs Robert Olanolan, Gr No. 181149, April 17, 2017
 Knights of Columbus vs. DMCI Project Developers Inc, City of Manila et al
GR No. 213948, April 18, 2017

e. Quo Warranto (Rule 66)

Cases:
 Hon. Luis Mario General vs. Hon. Alejandro Urro
GR No. 191560, March 29, 2011

 Republic vs. Ma. Lourdes P.A. Sereno, GR No. 237428, 5/16/2018

f. Expropriation (Rule 67)

f.1. Complaint; contents (Section 1)

f.2. Entry of Plaintiff upon depositing value of the land with authorized government
depository (Section 2)
f.3. Defenses and objection (Section 3)
f.4. Order of Expropriation (Section 4)
f.5. Ascertainment of compensation (Section 5)
f.6. Proceedings by Commissioner, Report, judgment and action on Commissioners’
Report (Section 6, 7, & 8)
f.7. Right of plaintiff after judgment and payment (Section 10)
f.8. Entry Not Delayed by Appeal (Section 11)

Cases:
 Heirs of Suguiton vs. City of Mandaluyong, GR No. 135087, 3/14/2000
 Heirs of Raisa Dimao vs. National Grid Corp of the Philippines
GR No. 254020, March 1, 2023
 Republic vs. Estate of Juan Maria Posadas III et al., GR 214310, 2/24/2020
 Heirs of Jose Mariano and Helen Mariano et al vs City of Naga
GR No. 197743, October 18, 2022
 SPS Herbert Buot and Ophelia Completo vs. National Transmission Corp.
GR No. 240720, November 17, 2021

g. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage (Rule 68)

g.1 A.M. 99-10-05-0 (December 14, 1999) Procedure in Extrajudicial

Foreclosure of Mortgage
 g.2. Complaint, forms and contents (Section 1)
g.3. Judgment on foreclosure for payment or sale (Section 2)
g.4. Sale of Mortgaged Property; effect (Section 3)
g.5. Deficiency judgment (Section 6)
g.6. Registration

Cases:
 Asset Pool A (SPV-AMC) Inc. vs. SPS Buenafrido and Felisa Borris
GR No. 203194, April 26, 2021
 The Commoner Lending Corp. vs SPS Voltaire and Edna Villanueva
GR No. 235260, August 27, 2020
 Bank of Philippine Islands vs. LCL Capital Inc., GR No. 243396, 9/14/21

h. Partition (Rule 69)

h.1. Complaint (Section 1)

h.2. Order for partition and partition by agreement (Section 2)
h.3. Referral to Commissioners, oath and duties of commissioners (Section 3 & 4)
h.4. Power of guardian (Section 9)
h.5. Judgment and its effect (Section 11)
h.6. Partition of personal property (Section 13)

Cases:
 Mario T. De Vera et al vs Virgilio Manzanero et al, GR No. 232437, 6/30/2021
 Guillermo Silva vs. Conchita S. Lo, GR No. 206667, June 23, 2021
 Vilma Quintos et al vs. Pelagia Nicolas et al, GR No. 210252, 6/16/2014

i. Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer (Rule 70)

i.1. Who may institute proceedings and when (Section 1)

i.2. Lessor to proceed against lessee only after demand (Section 2)
i.3. Summary Nature of the proceedings and prohibited pleadings (Section 3 & 13)
i.4. Immediate Execution of Judgment (Section 19)

Cases:
 Pinausukan Seahouse, Roxas Blvd. Inc. vs. Far East Bank now Bank of the
Philippine Island, G.R. No. 159926, January 20, 2014
 Gorgonio P. Palajos vs. Jose Manalo E. Abad Gr No. 205832, 3/7/2022
 Marvin Galacgac vs. Reynaldo Bautista, GR No. 221384
 Joseph Regalado vs. Emma Dela Rama Vda Dela Pena,
GR No. 202448, December 13, 2017
 Ma. Victoria A. Reyes vs. Isabel Mendoza Manalo et al,
 GR No. 237201, September 22, 2020

j. Contempt (Rule 71)

j.1. Direct contempt punished summarily (Section 1)

j.2. Remedy (Section 2)
j.3. Indirect Contempt to be punished after charge and hearing (Section 3)
j.4. Punishment for indirect contempt (Section 7)
j.5. Contempt against quasi-judicial entities (Section 12)

Cases:
 Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corp. vs. Commissioner Napoleon Morales et al.
GR 203867, April 26, 2023
 Castillejos Consumers Association Inc. vs. Jose S. Dominguez et al
GR No. 189949, March 25, 2015
 Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. vs Federico Serra et al
GR 216124, July 19,2017

V. FINAL EXAMINATION

END OF SEMESTER

Prepared by:

(Ret.) Judge ELENITA C. DIMAGUILA