QAME Form D

Department of Education
Region V
Division of Camarines Sur
Pasacao District
PASACAO CENTRAL SCHOOL
CAMARINES SUR DIVISION SCHOOL-BASED TRAINING FOR TEACHERS ON
MATATAG CURRICULUM GRADE 4

SESSION EVALUATION
(To be administered every after a session. To be accomplished online by every participant.)
Session Topic:
Session Facilitator: Date:
Directions: Rate the session and the facilitator using the rating scale. Put a check/tick
under the column of your response.
Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly
SESSION
Agree Disagree
In this session…

1. the topic was relevant to our work

2. the session was well-planned
3. the objectives of the session were achieved

4. the time allotment for the topic was adequate

5. the activities were appropriate for adult learners

6. time to start and to end was observed
7. the learning materials were adequate and relevant

8. the support materials were adequate

9. the participants were able to demonstrate their

learning

FACILITATOR
The facilitator…
1. exhibited full grasp of the topic

2. was sensitive to the participants’ mood

3. deepened learning by processing activities and asking

stimulating questions

4. maintained positive learning environment

5. expressed ideas clearly

6. used appropriate trainings aids

7. observed appropriate attire

8. was able to firm up attainment of objectives of the

session

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS: __________________________________________________
Name of Participant (Optional)

QAME Form F

1 | Page
 Department of Education
Region V
Division of Camarines Sur
Pasacao District
PASACAO CENTRAL SCHOOL

2023 SCHOOL-BASED IN-SERVICE TRAINING

PROGRAM EVALUATION
(To be administered at the end of the Program. To be accomplished online by every participant)
Name (Optional): ____________________________ Sex: Male _____ Female _____

Program Title: _____________________________________________________________ Date: _______________

Directions: Please assess the effectiveness of the training program according to the indicators
below. Put a tick/check (/) under the appropriate column.
After the conduct of the training program, I
believe that… Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
A. Program Management
1. the training program was delivered as
planned
2. the training program was managed
efficiently
3. the training program was well-structured
B. Attainment of Objectives
4. the program objectives were clearly
presented
5. the program and session objectives were
attained
C. Delivery of Content
6. program content was appropriate to
trainees’ roles and responsibilities
7. content delivered was based on
authoritative and reliable sources
8. the session activities were effective in
generating learning
9. adult learning methodologies were used
effectively
10. management of learning was effectively
structured
11. contribution of all trainees were
encouraged
12. trainees demonstrated a clear
understanding of the content delivered
D. Provision of Support Materials
13. the support materials provided were
appropriate to trainees’ needs
14. support materials were adequate and
were given on time
E. Program Management Team
15. Program Management Team members
were courteous

2 | Page
 16. Program Management Team was efficient
17. Program Management Team was
responsive to the needs of trainees
F. Venue and Accommodation
18. the venue was well lighted
19. The venue was well-ventilated
20. the venue was comfortable with sufficient
space for program activities
21. the venue had sanitary and hygienic
conditions with adequate comfort rooms
22. meals were nutritious and sufficient in
quantity and quality.
23. meals were generally well-prepared and
tasty
24. the accommodation was comfortable with
sanitary and hygienic conditions

Please provide your honest response to each of the following questions:

What do you consider your most significant learning from the program?

Briefly describe what you have learned and how it will help you with your work.

QAME Form E
3 | Page
 Department of Education
Region V
Division of Camarines Sur
Pasacao District
PASACAO CENTRAL SCHOOL

ON-SITE MONITORING AND EVALUATION

(To be accomplished by PSDS, CID or SGOD personnel)

BASIC INFORMATION
REGION V
DIVISION Camarines Sur
LEARNING SERVICE PROVIDER Deped
ACTIVITY/EVENT MONITORED SCHOOL-BASED TRAINING OF TAECHER FOR MATATAG
CURRICULUM GRADE 4
ADDRESS Sta. Rosa del Norte, Pasacao, Camarines Sur
INCLUSIVE DATES July 22-26, 2024
DATE MONITORED

No. of Trainers’ and No. of Participants

Subject Grade 4
Participants Trainers
Mathematics 6 1
English 6 1
Filipino 3 1
Science 2 1
EPP 2 1
AP 4 1
GMRC 2 1
MAPEH 1 1

Please rate the conduct of the program delivery along the following areas.
Activities Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
A. Conduct of the Program Delivery (Daily Monitoring)
1. Operational concerns
/
▪ Activities start and end according to schedule
/
▪ Attendance is systematically monitored and should
reflect gender/sex
/
▪ Modifications in activities and schedule are consulted
with the participants and are given ahead of time
/
▪ Provision of the following consistently follows agreed
standards
- Food /
- Training Venue /
- Accommodation /
/
● Medical personnel and medical provisions for
emergencies e.g. common medicines, first aid kit, are
available
/
▪ Training/Learning materials are available and
adequate
4 | Page
 /
▪ Support materials and equipment are available and
serviceable
/
▪ Issues and possible courses of action are identified in
the briefing and debriefing sessions
/
▪ Ground rules were clear and compliance was
monitored
2. Sessions and Trainers
/
▪ The trainers used the approved resource package
(session guide, powerpoint presentation, video
presentations, etc.)
/
▪ Trainers and sessions are evaluated using standard
tools
/
▪ Participants were given competency assessment
before and after the session/s, if applicable
/
▪ The expected outputs are gathered and properly
accounted for
/
▪ Accomplished evaluation tools are collected from
participants immediately for processing and feedback
/
▪ Feedback is given as may be needed
B. Post Program Activities (At the end of the Program)
1. Certification of Participants
/
▪ Certification is conferred upon completion of the
program and upon satisfaction of requirements
▪ Certification is issued at the end of the program
2. Program Evaluation
/
▪ Program evaluation is administered immediately after
the last session
/
▪ Results of the evaluation is used and incorporated in
the End of the Program Report
/
▪ The participants were given assessed as regards their
learning (Rapid Competency Assessment)

CRITICAL INCIDENTS: If you have encountered any remarkable event/situation (either positive or
negative) that needs to be detailed here, please accomplish the STAR form. You may need extra sheets
to accomplish this.

Situation/Task- Describe the specific situation and/or task that needed to be accomplished.

Action – Describe how the person/s or the team responded to the situation or acted on the task at
hand.

Result – Describe the effect of the action or lack of action.

Comments and Suggestions: ________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

5 | Page
Name of Monitor: _________________________

Department of Education
Region V
Division of Camarines Sur
Pasacao District
PASACAO CENTRAL SCHOOL
CRITICAL INCIDENTS
(To be accomplished by school head, PSDS, CID or SGOD personnel

(This STAR form will be used to document critical incidents that are not captured in the QAME
Forms and may be accomplished as may be needed)
Title of Training: Mid-year In – service training: Empowering the 21st century
PCS Teachers Focusing on Literacy & Numeracy in the New Normal Education
DATE SITUATION/TASK ACTION RESULT

July No critical incidents took place - -

22,
2024

No critical incidents took place - -

July
23,
2024

No critical incidents took place - -

July
24,
2024

No critical incidents took place - -

July
25,
2024

July No critical incidents took place - -

26,
2024

6 | Page
Prepared by:

Proponent NOTED:

QAME Form G

Department of Education
Region V
Division of Camarines Sur
Pasacao District
PASACAO CENTRAL SCHOOL

PROGRAM COMPLETION REPORT

(To be accomplished by school L&D coordinator)
Program Title: Camarines Sur Division School-Based Training of Teachers
for the MATATAG Curriculum Grade 4

Facilitator(s):/ (Add names of the Facilitators/trainers and their positions)

Speakers: Salve R. Parfiles-Principal II
Rowena R. Cabilin -Principal I
Randy V. Ramos-Head Teacher I
Celedonio Llamado III- Head Teacher II
Jorie C. Regnim- Teacher In-Charge
Julie Ann Regaspi-Teacher In-Charge
Irene Caňo- Teacher In-Charge

Location and Pasacao Central School, Pasacao Camarines Sur

venue:
Duration: 5 days

Date: July 22-26, 2024

No of Males 5 Female 21 Total 26

Participants:

Note: The Following are the participants in all subject area:

Out of 26 participants, we achieved 100% attendance for all five

Summary of days of the seminar.
Attendance
Executive From July 22 to 26, 2024, Pasacao 1 District conducted a
Summary comprehensive five-day training program focused on the effective
implementation of the MATATAG curriculum for Grade 4. This
initiative was designed to equip teachers with the necessary skills

7 | Page
 and knowledge to deliver the new curriculum efficiently.
The program was attended by all Grade 4 teachers. The
training featured a mix of interactive sessions, hands-on activities,
and collaborative planning exercises. These activities were
designed to deepen the participants' understanding of the
curriculum framework and its practical applications in the
classroom.
Program
Objectives
Objective 1: Discuss the features of the MATATAG curriculum in
Grade 4
Objective 2: Providing a concrete understanding of the elements of
the curriculum guide, pedagogy, instructional plan and
assessment related to the learning area
Objective 3: Enhance teachers' competencies in implementing the
MATATAG curriculum
Objective 4: Ensure improved learning outcomes through its
effective implementation.

Program
Schedule/
Matrix/Des

8 | Page
 Key Results
▪ The participants were upgraded and informed of innovation in teaching
and the use of technology
▪ Technology-based materials were produced

▪ The participants were upgraded by the MATATAG Curriculum

▪ The participants were enhanced in strategies for teaching

▪ The participants learned different ways and means in teaching

language and Math through games, music, movements and arts.

PowerPoint Presentations, books, Google search/ internet, shared videos

Resources from seminars and training, other workshop materials
Materials

M&E Analysis (Based on the results of the End-of-Program Evaluation) Analysis

should include:
● Results from the participants’ evaluation of the program

● Results from the facilitators review of the program

● Results from the program managers review of the program

● Strengths and areas for improvement should be identified in

this section
(Include as Attachment 3 a copy of the M&E Results)

The program was successfully conducted the facilitators were expert

in their own field, and the participant’s evaluation in all aspect was
also excellent only the venue should be given attention to make it
more suited for a training

Training Matrix: was relevant and timely and very suited to the needs of the
teacher and learners.

Training Team: Were excellent and experts in their own field

Training venue: The training venue was air-conditioned and

conducive to participants learning tasks

Food: was good and just enough for the participant’s hungry
stomach

9 | Page
 General Comments In this section make any general comments about the program and
and Issues identify any issues encountered in relation to:
Encountered
General Comments:
 Positive Engagement: The training was well received, with
participants actively engaging in discussions and workshops.
Teachers appreciated the interactive sessions and the
practical examples provided.
 Enhanced Understanding: There was a noticeable
improvement in teachers' understanding of the MATATAG
curriculum, including its features and implementation
strategies.

Issues Encountered:
 Resource Availability: Some teachers reported a lack of
access to sufficient materials and equipment necessary for
the effective implementation of the MATATAG curriculum.
 Time Constraints: Limited time for hands-on practice and
in-depth exploration of each curriculum component led to
some teachers feeling unprepared for full implementation.
 Technical Challenges: There were occasional issues with
technology integration, such as connectivity problems or
insufficient familiarity with digital tools, which hindered
smooth execution of certain training activities.

Recommendations Enhance Resource Provision: Ensure that all teachers have access
to the necessary materials and equipment for implementing the
MATATAG curriculum. Consider creating a resource allocation plan
and providing additional support for schools with limited resources.
Extend Training Duration: Allocate more time for hands-on
practice and in-depth exploration of curriculum components. This will
allow teachers to better grasp the implementation strategies and
address any challenges more effectively.
Improve Technical Support: Provide technical training and support
for integrating digital tools into the curriculum. Address connectivity
issues and ensure that all educators are comfortable using the
technology required for effective curriculum delivery.

Financial and Report (Attach breakdown of board and lodging, honoraria, training
materials, administrative cost, profit margin)

Program Report Attachments

Attachment 1: List of Participants

10 | Page
11 | Page
Attachment 2: Attendance Sheets (arranged chronologically)

12 | Page
Attachment 3: M&E Results

Attachment 4: Breakdown of expenditures

Attachment 5: Photo Documentation

DAY 1 July 22, 2024

"Kickstarting our journey towards

educational excellence! Today's
orientation session set the stage for
understanding the key features and
objectives of the MATATAG curriculum.
Excited to empower our teachers with
the knowledge and skills to enhance
learning outcomes for our Grade 4
students. #MATATAGCurriculum
#TeacherTraining
#EducationalExcellence"

13 | Page
DAY 2 July 23, 2024

We began our journey with

insightful guidance from our
PSDS, followed by engaging
sessions led by our expert
speakers. Excited to empower
teachers with the knowledge
and skills to enhance learning
outcomes for our Grade 4
students.
#MATATAGCurriculum
#TeacherTraining
#EducationalExcellence

DAY 3 July 24, 2024

Today embarks on sessions 6, 7A, and 7B,

covering the MATATAG Curriculum
Instructional Design, Pedagogy, and
Assessment, with a comprehensive
walkthrough led by our esteemed
speaker, Rowena R. Cabilin, Principal I
Quitang Elementary School. The day set
the stage for understanding the key
features and objectives of the MATATAG
curriculum. Excited to empower our
teachers with the knowledge and skills to
enhance learning outcomes for our
Grade 4 students.

14 | Page
DAY 4 July 25, 2024

"The fourth day of our MATATAG curriculum training featured exciting activities and valuable insights
from our great speakers Ma'am Jorie C. Regnim, Julie Ann B. Regaspi, and Celedonio Llamado. Their
expertise and dynamic sessions energized our teachers, further enhancing their competencies in
implementing the curriculum. #MATATAGCurriculum #TeacherTraining #EducationalExcellence"

DAY 5 July 26, 2024

"The most awaited moment of our training! Day 5 began with outstanding demonstration teachings by
eight teachers across all subjects, showcasing their mastery and innovative approaches. The
afternoon was filled with pride and accomplishment as we awarded certificates to all participants.
#MATATAGCurriculum #TeacherTraining #EducationalExcellence #CertificateAwarding"
15 | Page
QAME Analysis Form 1

Department of Education
Region V
Division of Camarines Sur
Pasacao District
PASACAO CENTRAL SCHOOL

ANALYSIS OF THE ONSITE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS

(To be accomplished by school QATAME Associate)

Title of the Training Program: Camarines Sur Division School-Based Training for Teachers on
the MATATAG Curriculum for Grade 4
Date: July 22-26, 2024

Venue: Pasacao Central School Proponent:

NAME OF THE MONITOR:

PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation

Learning Area: MATATAG Curriculum Class: 1
Day: 1 to 5 Participation/Retrieval Rate: 100 %

Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the
participants, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the sessions? Of the facilitators? Identify the factors that
helped in these areas, if possible.

Overall Strong Points Factors that helped

Rating (This may be done
through a Focus-Group
Discussion)
Session The General 4 Sessions provide a Well-prepared materials,
1 Shape of thorough overview of the clear presentation of
MATATAG MATATAG curriculum, information, and
Curriculum covering its core features structured agenda.
and structure effectively.
Session 21st Century 4 Sessions effectively Clear alignment with
2 Skills in the integrate 21st-century curriculum objectives,
MATATAG skills such as critical use of relevant examples,
Curriculum thinking, collaboration, and and practical
digital literacy into the applications.
MATATAG curriculum.
Session Walkthrough 4 The sessions promote Introduce more complex
3 of (learning creativity and critical challenges and encourage
Area) Shaping thinking by allowing collaborative problem-
Paper for students to explore solving to further
learning area different shapes, enhance critical thinking.
group structures, and designs.
16 | Page
Session Per area 4 Facilitators provide helpful Personalized assistance,
4 learning guidance and feedback, encouragement, and
Group supporting students as constructive feedback.
they work through the
paper shaping activities.
Session Curriculum 4 teachers understand the comprehensive training,
5 Standards and unpacking of Learning clear guidelines,
unpacking/ Competencies (LCs), it collaborative planning,
Clustering of leads to a clearer ongoing support, and
LCs instructional focus, more practical examples.
targeted teaching
strategies, and ultimately,
improved student
outcomes.
Session MATATAG 4 One of the strong points of the effectiveness of the
6 Curriculum: the MATATAG Curriculum's MATATAG Curriculum's
Instructional Instructional Design Instructional Design
Design Framework is its learner- Framework include clear
Framework centered approach, which objectives, adequate
tailors’ instruction to teacher training, robust
individual needs resources, alignment with
student needs, and
continuous assessment
and feedback.
Session Pedagogy and 4 Integrate diverse teaching Effective pedagogy and
7A Assessment methods with ongoing, assessment are supported
formative assessments that by clear goals, targeted
align with learning training, suitable
objectives and student assessment tools, and
needs. regular feedback.
Session Walkthrough 4 Resources are directly Keeping resources
7B of learning aligned with curriculum current and relevant to
Resources goals and learning maintain their usefulness
objectives. and effectiveness.
Session Integrating 4 ability to evaluate students' providing clear rubrics,
8 21st Century critical thinking, creativity, incorporating peer and
Skills in collaboration, and self-assessment, and
Classroom communication skills offering ongoing feedback.
based through real-world,
assessment problem-solving tasks that
reflect practical
applications of their
learning.
Session Classroom 4 Facilitators are Incorporating feedback
9 Practices knowledgeable and skilled from participants allows
Inclusion for in delivering content facilitators to adjust and
SNED effectively and addressing improve their approach.
participants' queries.
Session Collaborative 4 Encourages active A well-organized agenda
10 Expertise participation and helps manage time
collaboration among effectively and ensures all
attendees, fostering a key topics are covered.
deeper understanding of
the content.
17 | Page
Session Class 4 They skilfully manage Regular feedback from
11 Observation in group dynamics and participants allows
the Context of facilitate productive facilitators to make real-
MATATAG discussions and teamwork. time adjustments and
Curriculum improvements.
Session Management 4 Facilitators adapt their Facilitators use clear,
12 of School- approach based on group concise communication to
Based PDP needs and feedback, ensure understanding
ensuring sessions are and foster collaboration.
relevant and engaging.
Session Facilitation 4 Sessions are presented in Creating an inclusive and
13 Skills an engaging manner, supportive atmosphere
keeping participants encourages active
interested and involved. participation and
learning.

1. In which area should the session and the facilitator improve on?

Areas for Factors that Recommended

Improvement may have Steps to Address
contributed the Issue/s.
(This may be Indicate whether
done through a action can be an
Focus-Group immediate or
Discussion) long-term
solution
Session 5 Curriculum Ensure that Improve the Include more
Standards sessions clarity and hands-on
and provide a more accessibility of activities and real-
unpacking thorough and curriculum life scenarios in
/ detailed standards to sessions to
Clustering unpacking of make it easier for demonstrate how
of LCs LCs to help educators to to integrate LCs
educators fully understand and into lesson plans
understand and implement them and classroom
apply them in effectively. activities.
their teaching.

Session Manageme provide clearer Offer clearer Provide more

12 Cont. nt of explanations of guidance on actionable
School- how each interpreting and strategies and
Based PDP component applying practical exercises
integrates into curriculum
overall teaching standards
objectives.

18 | Page
 2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe
these incidents in the table below:

Critical Incident (Refer to Identify deviation Proposed Course/s of

the STAR form, 5Ws H) from Standard/s, Action to Address the
applicable Deviation
None

PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Training Management

Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following
questions:
1. What are the strong points and areas for improvement of the daily operations of the
training program? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible and give
suggestions.

Overall Strong Points Areas for Improvement and

Rating Suggestions
Day 1 4 The training program has a Maintain the structured schedule
clear and organized but remain flexible to adjust for
schedule, ensuring that all unforeseen delays or additional
key topics are covered discussions.
within the allotted time.
Day 2 4 the programs include Continue using diverse interactive
interactive and engaging techniques and seek regular
activities that keep feedback from participants to
participants involved and ensure engagement remains high.
facilitate learning.
Day 3 4 Adequate and relevant Regularly update and review
resources are provided, resources to ensure they remain
supporting the learning current and relevant.
objectives and enhancing
the training experience.
Day 4 4 Improve the system for Implement more frequent and
collecting and integrating structured feedback sessions and
participant feedback to ensure that feedback is actively
better address their needs used to adjust the training
and preferences. program.
DAY 5 4 Ensure a consistent level of Provide ongoing training and
facilitation quality across support for facilitators to ensure
all sessions to maintain a consistency and share best
high standard of training. practices among the team.

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these
incidents in the table below:

19 | Page
Critical Incident (Refer Identify deviation from Proposed Course/s of Action
to the STAR form) Standard/s to Address the Deviation
None

IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be used for Debriefing as Feedback to the Learning Area
Focal Person/Program Management Team for information and immediate action.

PART III. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE POST-PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

Based on the results of the Post Program Evaluation, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the training program? Identify the factors that helped in
these areas, if possible. In which areas should the training program be improved? Identify
the factors that contributed to these areas, if possible.

Factors that have Suggestions for

helped/contributed to the Improvement
strong points/areas for
improvement
Strong Points
The training program has Maintain the structured
well-defined objectives and a approach but allow for
structured format, ensuring flexibility to adapt to
that key topics are covered participant needs.
systematically.
Areas for Improvement The lack of a reliable internet Develop a contingency plan
connection hinders the ability for internet outages,
to send and receive including alternative
evaluations and feedback methods for communication
efficiently. and data submission.

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these
incidents in the table below:

Critical Incident (Refer Identify deviation from Proposed Course/s of

to the STAR form) Standard/s Action to Address the
Deviation
None -
-

Prepared by:

20 | Page NOTED:
 APPROVED:

CECILIA ANDREA C. APOLINARIO, PH. D.

Public Schools District Supervisor

Department of Education
Region V
Division of Camarines Sur
Pasacao District
PASACAO CENTRAL SCHOOL

PROCESS OBSERVATION TOOL

(To be accomplished by someone identified by the Program Management)
GENERAL INFORMATION
PROGRAM/ ACTIVITY PARTICIPANTS
MONITORED
WORKSHOP OFFICER IN-CHARGE

21 | Page
MANAGER/
FACILITATORS
VENUE Pasacao Central School NUMBER OF
WORKSHOPS
INCLUSIVE DATES July 22-26, 2026 NUMBER OF
PARTICIPANTS
DATE OBSERVED NUMBER OF
TRAINERS

SESSION: __________________________Faci/RP:________________________

1. Session CONTENT Strongly Disagree Agree Strongly Agree

Disagree
▪ Objectives were presented
✔
▪ Activities were congruent to
✔
objectives
▪ Substantial input was given
✔

▪ Key messages were clear

✔

▪ Objectives were achieved

✔

2. Session PROCESS How was the session conducted?

▪ Methodology was appropriate for
✔
adult learners
▪ Participants were engaged
✔

▪ Stimulating questions were asked

✔

▪ Workshop output was processed

✔
(if any)
3. Session ATMOSPHERE What was the general environment in the group?
Informal << >> Formal

✔
(This refers to participants) Low energy << >> High Energy

✔
Hostile << >> Supportive

✔
Inhibited/Tense << >> Open/Relaxed
✔
4. PARTICIPATION of Trainees How engaged were participants in the session?
Only the Few people talked Most people
facilitator talked
22 | Page
 speaker talked
✔
Group was << >> Group was
apathetic involved
✔
Group was << >> Group was united
divided
✔

TIME I See… (specific person I Hear… (verbatim) I Think…

interaction) (informed
interpretation/
analysis)

I see some participants I hear some whispers, which were I think that
chatting with each other, related to the topics being teachers
which may indicate they discussed. It may be helpful to engage
have valuable insights to encourage participants to openly more
share. It would be share their thoughts and effectively
beneficial to create questions to ensure everyone can with the
structured opportunities benefit from these insights. great
for them to contribute speakers.
their ideas and discuss
them more formally."

Session Remarks/Observations:

The Pasacao 1 District Camarines Sur School-Based Training for Teachers on MATATAG
Curriculum for Grade 4 was successfully conducted.

Name of Monitor (Last Name, First Name):

Region: V Division/Office: CAMARINES SUR

Department of Education
Region V
Division of Camarines Sur
Pasacao 1 District

SBTT FINANCIAL REPORT

S/Y 2024-2025

23 | Page
Program Name: Camarines Sur Division School-Based Training for Teachers on MATATAG
Curriculum for Grade 4

No. of Participants

Budget from School MOOE:

Expenses:

Bond Paper, Ink, Certificates

Token

FOODS:

Day 1- Day 5 P

TOTAL EXPENSES: P

Prepared by:

NOTED:

24 | Page