[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views3 pages

Chapter10 Prob1

The document presents solutions to a first-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) using three numerical methods: Euler's explicit method, modified Euler method, and the classical fourth-order Runge-Kutta method, all with a step size of h = 0.7. It includes the MATLAB script for each method, the computed values of x and y, and the errors compared to the analytical solution. The results show the numerical solutions and their corresponding errors at specified points.

Uploaded by

skibidipapap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
55 views3 pages

Chapter10 Prob1

The document presents solutions to a first-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) using three numerical methods: Euler's explicit method, modified Euler method, and the classical fourth-order Runge-Kutta method, all with a step size of h = 0.7. It includes the MATLAB script for each method, the computed values of x and y, and the errors compared to the analytical solution. The results show the numerical solutions and their corresponding errors at specified points.

Uploaded by

skibidipapap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

1

10.1 Consider the following first-order ODE:


dy
------ = x 2 ⁄ y from x = 0 to x = 2.1 with y ( 0 ) = 2
dx
(a) Solve with Euler’s explicit method using h = 0.7 .
(b) Solve with the modified Euler method using h = 0.7 .
(c) Solve with the classical fourth-order Runge–Kutta method using h = 0.7 .
2x 3
The analytical solution of the ODE is y = -------- + 4 . In each part, calculate the error between the true
3
solution and the numerical solution at the points where the numerical solution is determined.
Solution
(a) The following script file solves the ODE with Euler’s explicit method using h = 0.7 .

% Solving the ODE with Euler’s explicit method.


clear,clc
dF=@ (x,y) x^2/y;
Fsol=@ (x) sqrt(2*x.^3/3+4);
h=0.7; N=3;
x(1) = 0; y(1) = 2;
for i = 1:N
x(i+1) = x(i) + h;
y(i+1) = y(i) + dF(x(i),y(i))*h;
end
x
y
ys=Fsol(x);
error=ys-y

When the program is executed, the following results are displayed in the Command Window:

x =
0 0.7000 1.4000 2.1000
y =
2.0000 2.0000 2.1715 2.8033

Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis
for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook
has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by
Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the
copyright owner is unlawful.
2

error =
0 0.0564 0.2429 0.3863

(b) The following script file solves the ODE with modified Euler method using h = 0.7 .

clear, clc
% Solving the ODE with the modified Euler’s method.
clear,clc
dF=@ (x,y) x^2/y;
Fsol=@ (x) sqrt(2*x.^3/3+4);
h=0.7; N=3;
x(1) = 0; y(1) = 2;
for i = 1:N
x(i+1) = x(i) + h;
K1=dF(x(i),y(i));
yEU=y(i) + K1*h;
K2=dF(x(i+1),yEU);
y(i+1) = y(i) + (K1+K2)/2*h;
end
x
y
ys=Fsol(x);
error=ys-y

When the program is executed, the following results are displayed in the Command Window:

x =
0 0.7000 1.4000 2.1000
y =
2.0000 2.0858 2.4728 3.2600
error =
0 -0.0294 -0.0584 -0.0704

Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis
for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook
has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by
Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the
copyright owner is unlawful.
3

(c) The following script file solves the ODE with classical fourth-order Runge–Kutta method using
h = 0.7 .

% Solving the ODE with the classical fourth-order Runge-Kutta method.


clear,clc
dF=@ (x,y) x^2/y;
Fsol=@ (x) sqrt(2*x.^3/3+4);
h=0.7; N=3;
x(1) = 0; y(1) = 2;
for i = 1:N
x(i+1) = x(i) + h;
K1= dF(x(i),y(i));
K2= dF(x(i)+0.5*h,y(i)+K1*h/2);
K3= dF(x(i)+0.5*h,y(i)+K2*h/2);
K4= dF(x(i+1),y(i)+K3*h);
y(i+1) = y(i) + (K1+2*K2+2*K3+K4)*h/6;
end
x
y
ys=Fsol(x);
error=ys-y

When the program is executed, the following results are displayed in the Command Window:

x =
0 0.7000 1.4000 2.1000
y =
2.0000 2.0564 2.4147 3.1902
error =
1.0e-03 *
0 -0.0492 -0.2704 -0.5559

Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis
for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook
has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by
Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the
copyright owner is unlawful.

You might also like