[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views2 pages

Write Up With Tables

The study utilized hierarchical multiple regression to evaluate the predictive power of General Self-Efficacy (GSE) on cognitive ability, specifically Number Fluency (NF), while controlling for age and gender. The results indicated that age was a significant predictor of NF scores, while GSE did not contribute additional explanatory power after accounting for age and gender. Consequently, the hypotheses regarding GSE's predictive ability were rejected, but the hypothesis concerning age's influence was supported.

Uploaded by

jelena.ryan245
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views2 pages

Write Up With Tables

The study utilized hierarchical multiple regression to evaluate the predictive power of General Self-Efficacy (GSE) on cognitive ability, specifically Number Fluency (NF), while controlling for age and gender. The results indicated that age was a significant predictor of NF scores, while GSE did not contribute additional explanatory power after accounting for age and gender. Consequently, the hypotheses regarding GSE's predictive ability were rejected, but the hypothesis concerning age's influence was supported.

Uploaded by

jelena.ryan245
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to assess the ability of GSE to predict levels of

cognitive ability measured by Number fluency (NF) test after controlling for the influence of age and

gender. Preliminary analyses were conducted to ensure no violation of the assumptions of

normality, linearity, multicollinearity and homoscedasticity (Appendix C).

Age and gender were entered at Step 1, explaining 10% of the variance in NF test scores.

After entry of the GSE scale at Step 2, the total variance explained by the model as a whole was 11%,

F (3, 147) = 5.78, p < .001. This additional variable did not explain any additional variance in NF test

scores after controlling for age and gender, R squared change = .00, F change (1, 147) = .42, p = .52.

In the final model, only two predictor variables were statistically significant with the age

recording a higher semi-partial correlation value (sr = -.24, p < .00) than gender (sr = .23, p < .00).

Therefore, H10 and H20 can be rejected and their alternatives accepted. However, H30 cannot be

rejected.

Model Summaryc
Std. Error Change Statistics
R Adjusted of the R Square F Sig. F
Model R Square R Square Estimate Change Change df1 df2 Change
a
1 .32 .10 .09 8.30 .10 8.49 2.0 148.00 <.001
b
2 .32 .11 .09 8.31 .00 .42 1.0 147.00 .52
a. Predictors: (Constant), Age in years, Male (ref Female)
b. Predictors: (Constant), Age in years, Male (ref Female), Total GSE score
c. Dependent Variable: Number Fluency correct

ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 1168.72 2 584.36 8.49 <.001b
Residual 10183.70 148 68.81
Total 11352.42 150
2 Regression 1197.46 3 399.15 5.78 <.001c
Residual 10154.96 147 69.08
Total 11352.42 150
a. Dependent Variable: Number Fluency correct
b. Predictors: (Constant), Age in years, Male (ref Female)
c. Predictors: (Constant), Age in years, Male (ref Female), Total GSE score
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity
Coefficients Coefficients Correlations Statistics
Std. Zero-
Model B Error Beta t Sig. order Partial Part Tolerance VIF
1 (Constant) 24.73 1.61 15.32 <.001
Male (ref 4.40 1.46 .24 3.01 .00 .22 .24 .23 1.00 1.00
Female)
Age in -.11 .04 -.23 -2.98 .00 -.22 -.24 -.23 1.00 1.00
years
2 (Constant) 21.85 4.74 4.61 <.001
Male (ref 4.34 1.47 .23 2.96 .00 .22 .24 .23 .99 1.01
Female)
Age in -.11 .04 -.24 -3.04 .00 -.22 -.24 -.24 .98 1.02
years
Total GSE .10 .15 .05 .65 .52 .04 .05 .05 .98 1.02
score
a. Dependent Variable: Number Fluency correct

You might also like