TUTORIAL SHEET 7
TUTORIAL SHEET 7
TUTORIAL SHEET 7
In 1985, Coca-Cola embarked on a daring venture: changing the formula of its iconic beverage. Facing
pressure from competitor Pepsi, the company aimed to revitalize its brand with "New Coke," a sweeter
version backed by extensive taste tests. However, this calculated risk backfired spectacularly.
The launch triggered a consumer uprising, fueled by nostalgia and a deep emotional attachment to the
original taste. Protests, boycotts, and a flood of complaints overwhelmed the company. Coca-Cola had
underestimated the power of consumer loyalty and the brand's cultural significance.
Within 79 days, the company made a humbling retreat, reintroducing the original formula as "Coca-
Cola Classic." This move was met with widespread relief and a surge in sales, underscoring the
enduring appeal of the classic taste.
The "New Coke" debacle serves as a cautionary tale in marketing history. It demonstrates the dangers of
underestimating the emotional connection consumers have with established brands. It also highlights
the importance of thorough market research and understanding that taste is not the only factor driving
consumer choices.
Despite the initial setback, the New Coke saga ultimately benefited Coca-Cola. It reinforced the brand's
iconic status, generated unprecedented publicity, and even led to increased sales of both the classic and
new versions. The company learned a valuable lesson about the power of consumer sentiment and the
importance of respecting brand heritage.
Fresh graduates Kendal and Omar, armed with top honors in Civil Engineering from the University
of Technology, Jamaica, were eager to embark on their careers at Brown’s Construction Engineering
Co. Limited. This well-established firm boasted a diverse clientele with a wide array of construction
needs, offering a stimulating environment for the budding engineers.
From the outset, Kendal and Omar were entrusted with significant responsibilities, requiring them to
make decisions that could considerably impact the company's success. Their supervisors, Ramon and
Jesse, emphasized the importance of adhering to company policies and procedures when making
decisions related to awarded contracts.
Recently, the company secured two major contracts: one for a hotel construction in Thailand and
another for the prestigious new Jamaican Parliament Building at the National Heroes Park.
At a subsequent meeting to discuss these projects, Kendal and Omar were surprised to be assigned
the Thailand project. Despite their eagerness, they were apprehensive due to their lack of experience
in overseas projects, coupled with the scarcity of information in the company manual on handling
such ventures. The second project, meanwhile, was assigned to Denvan, Oswald, and Floyd.
Sara, the project manager responsible for final approvals, raised concerns about the Thailand project.
She deemed it too risky due to insufficient information and even recommended its rejection. A
decision was needed by the end of the meeting, but discussions were proving inconclusive. The team
was at a crossroads.
Adding to the complexity, the company's attorneys, Theo and Oliver, reported health issues they
attributed to poor air quality in the office building. They urged Ramon and Jesse to address the
matter, creating yet another challenge for the company to navigate.
The situation at Brown’s Construction is ripe with dilemmas, demanding decisive action and
effective communication. How will the team resolve the project allocation issue? What steps will
they take to ensure employee well-being? The path forward is uncertain, but the decisions made will
undoubtedly shape the company's future.
c) Claudia, a client, stated, "Every decision can be organized on a scale according to the
availability of information and the possibility of failure." Explain the meaning of this
statement, including the different positions on this scale. Identify where Sara's stance on the
Thailand project falls on this scale.
2
Revised Aug. 2024 - TC
d) Recommend a decision-making model for Denvan, Oswald, and Floyd to manage the local
project and justify your choice.
e) If the Thailand project is accepted, suggest a suitable decision-making model for Kendal and
Omar and explain why it would be beneficial in their situation.
f) Considering Sara's concerns about the Thailand project, which personal decision-making
style would you advise her to employ in reaching a final decision?
g) Analyze the potential consequences for Brown's Construction if the Thailand project is not
accepted.
Review/Discussion Questions
1. Explain the difference between programmed and nonprogrammed decisions and the decision
characteristics of risk, uncertainty, and ambiguity.
2. Describe the classical, administrative, and political models of decision-making and their
applications
4. With the use of examples, distinguish the different types of personal decision-making styles.
2. Gerald's Groceries and Marty's Market decided to merge their operations. This would be
considered a nonprogrammed decision.
4. The administrative model of decision making describes how managers actually make
decisions in difficult situations.
5. Goals often are vague, conflicting, and lack consensus among managers, according to the
administrative model of decision making.
6. The political model consists of vague problems and goals, limited information about
alternatives and their outcomes, and a satisficing choice for resolving problems using
intuition.
7. Nonprogrammed decisions require six steps, however, programmed decisions being
structured and well understood require only one step.
Multiple Choice
Select the correct options by circling the corresponding letter a, b, c or d
a. Programmed Decisions involve situations that have occurred often enough to enable decision
rules to be developed and applied in the future.
b. Programmed decisions are made in response to recurring organizational problems.
c. The decision to reorder paper and other office supplies when inventories drop to a certain level
is a programmed decision.
d. Programmed decisions involve strategic planning, because uncertainty is great and decisions are
complex.
For questions 2 to 5, select from the list below. Insert the letter for the option with the correct answer in
the space provided. Each option may be used once, more than once, or none at all.
a. Uncertainty
b. Risk
c. Certainty
d. Ambiguity
2. This means that all the information the decision maker needs is fully available. _____
3. Managers have information on operating conditions, resource costs or constraints, and each course
of action and possible outcome. _____
4. Enough information is available to allow the probability of a successful outcome for each
alternative to be estimated. _____
5. This measure captures the possibility that future events will render the alternative unsuccessful.
_____
a) Managers may have to make assumptions from which to forge the decision even though
it will be wrong if the assumptions are incorrect.
b) Statistical analysis might be used to calculate the probabilities of success or failure.
c) It means that the goals to be achieved or the problem to be solved is unclear, alternatives
are difficult to define, and information about outcomes is unavailable.
d) Few decisions are ambiguous in the real world.
4
Revised Aug. 2024 - TC
7. The approach managers use to make decisions usually falls into one of three types. Which of the
following is NOT one?
i. Strategic Goals
ii. Manager’s personal preference
iii. Whether the decision is programmed or nonprogrammed
iv. The extent to which it the decision is characterized by certainty or risk
a) i, ii
b) ii, iii
c) i, iii
d) ii, iv
9. _____ means that people have limits, or boundaries, on how rational they can be, while _________
means that decision makers choose the first solution alternative that satisfies minimal decision
criteria.
10. Decisions are complex and involve many people, information is often ambiguous, and disagreement
and conflict over problems and solutions are normal. This statement relates to what model?
a) Administrative
b) Political
c) Classical
d) Behavioral
11. means that the goals to be achieved or the problem to be solved is unclear, alternatives are
difficult to define, and information about outcomes is unavailable.
13. A normative decision-making model defines how a manager _______ make decisions.
14. is the willingness to undertake risk with the opportunity of gaining an increased payoff.
15. The stage involves the use of managerial, administrative, and persuasive abilities
to ensure that the chosen alternative is carried out.
5
Revised Aug. 2024 - TC