[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views10 pages

6-Coding Modulation Tradeoff

Uploaded by

rztcb2
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views10 pages

6-Coding Modulation Tradeoff

Uploaded by

rztcb2
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Recap

I We have discussed various modulation schemes, including PSK,


QAM etc - pack many bits into symbols.
I We have also discussed various coding schemes, including CC, BC
etc - introduce redundant bits for protection.
0
10

−1
10
I Comparisons: 1) using BPSK −2
10
modulation - 1 bit/symbol 2) BPSK

Bit error probability


−3
10
using 1/2 rate CC and QPSK −4
10

- 1 bit/symbol. −5
10
1/2 CC QPSK

I Coding versus Modulation −6


10

Trade-off (CMT). −7
10

−8
10
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Eb/N0 (dB)

Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 1 / 10


Typical Trade-offs

Design Goals of Communications System


1. maximize transmission rate R
2. minimize bit error probability Pb
3. minimize transmission power P
4. minimize transmission bandwidth W
5. minimize system/algorithm complexity O
Clearly design goals 1 and 2 are conflict with design goals 3 and 4.

To analysis various trade-offs, we will investigate the


I error probability plane

I bandwidth efficiency plane

Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 2 / 10


Error Probability Plane - MFSK
0
10

−1
10 c 2
k = 1,2,3,4,5
−2
d
Bit Error Probability 10

−3
10 a

−4
1
10

−5
10 b
−6
10
e 3 f
−7
10

−8
10
−5 0 5 10 15 20
E /N (dB)
b 0

I k % W % Pb &, k % W % Eb /N0 &


I a-b, Pb ⇔ Eb /N0 (W fixed); c-d, Pb ⇔ W (Eb /N0 fixed);
e-f, W ⇔ Eb /N0 (Pb fixed)
Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 3 / 10
Error Probability Plane - MPSK
0
10
2
−1
c
10

−2
a
10
1
d
Bit error probability

−3
10

−4 b
10
k = 1,2 3 4 5
−5
10

−6
e f
10
3
−7
10

−8
10
−5 0 5 10 15 20 25
E /N (dB)
b 0

I k % W & Pb %, k % W & Eb /N0 %


I a-b, Pb ⇔ Eb /N0 (W fixed); c-d, Pb ⇔ W (Eb /N0 fixed);
e-f, W ⇔ Eb /N0 (Pb fixed)
Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 4 / 10
Shannon Limit
AWGN channel capacity C [bits/s] is a function of the average received
signal power to noise power ratio S/N and the system bandwidth W
 
S
C = W log2 1 + (1)
N

By normalising the channel capacity w.r.t. the system bandwidth


   
C S Eb R
= log2 1 + = log2 1 + = x log2 (1 + x)1/x (2)
W N0 W N0 W

where x = Eb R/N0 W , we have the Shannon limit when R = C ,

Eb Eb 1
1= log2 (1 + x)1/x ⇒ = = 0.693 (−1.6dB) (3)
N0 N0 log2 e

Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 5 / 10


Bandwidth Efficiency

I Suppose we have k bits per symbol (k = log2 M), then the bit
rate R is k times faster than the symbol rate Rs , i.e. R = kRs .
I The bandwidth efficiency [bits/s/Hz] is

η = R/W = kRs /W , (4)

where we have linearly increasing relation between k and η.

Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 6 / 10


Bandwidth Efficiency Plane - I
R/W [bits/s/Hz]
16
Capacity
Region boundary Region
R>C 8
R<C
M=256

M=64
2 Bandwidth
4 limited
M=16 region
M=8
3 1
Shannon 2
M=4
limit
M=2
Eb /N0 (dB)
-20 -1 6 12 18 24 30 36

Scale M=4
Decreasing Pb
1
change 2 M=2

M=8
1 Power limited region
4 M=16

Coherent MPSK
Legend (Pe = 10−5 ) Noncoherent MFSK
Coherent QAM

Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 7 / 10


Bandwidth Efficiency Plane - II
Observation
I for MPSK, W = 1/Ts = Rs , η = log2 M,
M % η % Eb /N0 % - bandwidth efficient, power inefficient
I for MFSK, W = M/Ts = MRs , η = log2 M/M,
M % η & Eb /N0 & - bandwidth inefficient, power efficient
I line 1, Pb ⇔ Eb /N0 (R/W fixed)
I line 2, Pb ⇔ R/W (Eb /N0 fixed)
I line 3, R/W ⇔ Eb /N0 (Pb fixed)

I a large increase in Eb /N0 is required to achieve gain in R/W -


bandwidth-limited region
I a large reduction in R/W is required to achieve gain in Eb /N0 -
power-limited region

Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 8 / 10


Analogies Between Two Planes

Pb R/W

G : S/N
C : R/W
G : R/W G : S/N
C : S/N C : R/W

Eb /N0 Eb /N0
G : R/W C : S/N
I Error probability plane ⇒ power-limited system.
I Bandwidth efficiency plane ⇒ bandwidth-limited system.

Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 9 / 10


Summary

I There are various design trade-offs in communications systems.


I These trade-offs can be illustrated by the error probability plane
for both the MFSK and the MPSK.
I These trade-offs can also be illustrated by the bandwidth efficiency
plane for both the MFSK and the MPSK.
I These two planes exhibit strong analogies between each other.

Dr Rong ZHANG (Soton) ELEC3203: DCT October 17, 2014 10 / 10

You might also like