[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
127 views39 pages

OPCRF For SHs (2018-2019)

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 39

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Basic 1. 1. Performed 6.5% Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed Performed classroom
Education Instructional classroom classroom observations to classroom observations to classroom observations to classroom observations to observations
Services Leadership observations to teachers with focus on teachers with focus on teachers with focus on teachers with focus on
teachers with applied knowledge on applied knowledge on applied knowledge on applied knowledge on
focus on applied content within and across content within and across content within and across content within and across
knowledge on curriculum learning areas curriculum learning areas curriculum learning areas curriculum learning areas
content within
and across
curriculum
learning areas:
HT/MT – 10 Efficiency Submitted the monthly Submitted the monthly Submitted the monthly Submitted the monthly Submitted any one of
Principal – 15 supervisory reports and at supervisory reports and at supervisory reports and at supervisory reports and at the three (3) acceptable
least fifteen (15) least twelve (12) least ten (10) Observation least eight (8) Observation evidences
Observation Notes Form Observation Notes Form Notes Form (ONF) and the Notes Form (ONF) and the
(ONF) and the (ONF) and the corresponding COTs of corresponding COTs of
corresponding COTs of corresponding COTs of teachers within the rating teachers within the rating
teachers within the rating teachers within the rating period period
period period

2. Provided 6.5% Quality Consistently checked all Frequently checked all the Occasionally checked all Rarely checked all the No acceptable evidence
technical the teachers’ DLLs and teachers’ DLLs and DLPs the teachers’ DLLs and teachers’ DLLs and DLPs was shown
assistance in the DLPs and test papers per and test papers per DLPs and test papers per and test papers per
preparation of quarter/semester quarter/semester quarter/semester quarter/semester
DLLs and DLPs
and test papers
Efficiency Submitted at least ten (10) Submitted at least eight (8) Submitted at least six (6) Submitted four (4) or less No acceptable evidence
DLPs/DLLs with DLPs/DLLs with DLPs/DLLs with DLPs/DLLs with was shown
comments/suggestions comments/suggestions comments/suggestions comments/suggestions
concurred by the concurred by the concurred by the concurred by the
concerned teachers and at concerned teachers and at concerned teachers and at concerned teachers and at
least four (4) sample test least four (4) sample test least four (4) sample test least four (4) sample test
papers checked in different papers checked in different papers checked in different papers checked in different
grade levels per quarter grade levels per quarter grade levels per quarter grade levels per quarter

Timeliness DLPs/DLLs were checked DLPs/DLLs were checked DLPs/DLLs were checked DLPs/DLLs were irregularly No acceptable evidence
daily per record shown twice a week per record once in a week per record or as need arises per was shown
shown shown record shown

1
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
2

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

3. Monitored and 6.5% Quality Maintained functional Maintained functional Maintained functional Maintained functional Maintained functional
supported the computer units for computer units for computer units for computer units for computer units for
use of technology instruction and two (2) or instruction and at least one instruction or at least one instruction or with at least instruction or with at
in instruction by more than one set of (1) one set of school ICT (1) one set of school ICT any two (2) of the least one (1) of the
the teachers and school ICT instructional instructional equipment instructional equipment following school ICT following school ICT
learners during equipment (projector, (projector, laptop and (projector, laptop and instructional equipment instructional equipment
the school year laptop and white screen) white screen) used by white screen) used by used by teachers: used by teachers:
used by teachers teachers teachers projector, laptop and white projector, laptop and
screen white screen

Efficiency Submitted at least ten (10) Submitted at least eight (8) Submitted at least six (6) Submitted at least four (4) Submitted one (1) or
DLLs/DLPs utilizing ICT in DLLs/DLPs utilizing ICT in DLLs/DLPs utilizing ICT in DLLs/DLPs utilizing ICT in two (2) DLLs/DLPs
instruction and inventory instruction and inventory instruction and inventory instruction and inventory utilizing ICT in
of functional and non- of functional and non- of functional and non- of functional and non- instruction and
functional computer units functional computer units functional computer units functional computer units inventory of functional
signed by the ICT and signed by the ICT and signed by the ICT and signed by the ICT and and non-functional
School Property Custodian School Property Custodian School Property Custodian School Property Custodian computer units signed
by the ICT and School
Property Custodian

4. Initiated and 6.5% Quality At least three (3) At least two (2) At least one (1) At least one (1) At least one (1)
supported and instructional instructional instructional instructional instructional
effectively programs/projects were programs/projects were program/project was program/project was program/project was
implemented planned, implemented, planned, implemented, planned, implemented, planned, implemented, planned and approved
instructional monitored, evaluated, monitored, evaluated, monitored, evaluated, monitored, evaluated but for implementation
programs/project completed and completed and completed and not completed and
s to ensure documented documented documented documented
delivery of quality
instruction to
learners

2
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
3

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period: 4. Initiated and 6.5%
supported and
effectively
implemented TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
instructional
programs/project Performance Indicators Rating
s toObjectives
ensure Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs delivery of quality
Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
instruction to
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
learners
Efficiency Submitted at least one (1) Submitted at least one (1) Submitted at least one (1) Submitted at least one (1) Submitted at least one
approved program/project approved program/project approved program/project approved ongoing (1) approved
proposal and its proposal and its proposal and its program/project proposal program/project
corresponding corresponding corresponding with documentation proposal
accomplishment reports accomplishment reports accomplishment reports
received by higher official received by the superior/s
with acceptable
documentations

Timeliness Accomplishment/Completi Accomplishment/Completi Accomplishment/Completi Accomplishment/Completi No acceptable evidence


on Reports were accepted on Reports were accepted on Reports were accepted on Reports were accepted of accomplishment was
and signed by the superior and signed by the superior and signed by the superior and signed by the superior shown
within ten days (10) after within twenty days (20) within thirty days (30) after more than thirty days (30)
completion of the after completion of the completion of the after completion of the
program/project program/project program/project program/project

5. Rationalized 3.25% Quality Nationally-funded teachers Nationally-funded teachers Nationally-funded teachers Nationally-funded teachers Nationally-funded
the distribution were given equal loads or, were given equal loads or, were given equal loads or, were given equal loads or, teachers were given
of teaching loads in no case, beyond 10 in no case, beyond 20 in no case, beyond 30 in no case, beyond 40 loads regardless of the
and assignments minutes difference of minutes difference of minutes difference of minutes difference of number of hours
to ancillary actual teaching hours actual teaching hours actual teaching hours actual teaching hours differences and
services between and among the between and among the between and among the between and among the assignments
teachers teachers teachers teachers

Efficiency Submitted a copy of the SF- Submitted a copy of the SF- Submitted a copy of the SF- Submitted a copy of the SF- Submitted a copy of the
7 noted/signed by the 7 noted/signed by the 7 noted/signed by the 7 noted/signed by the SF-7 noted/signed by
concerned PSDS/EPS and concerned PSDS/EPS and concerned PSDS/EPS and concerned PSDS/EPS and the concerned
at least five (5) copies of at least four (4) copies of at least three (3) copies of at least five (2) copies of PSDS/EPS and at least
designations with the designations with the designations with the designations with the one (1) copy of
duties and responsibilities duties and responsibilities duties and responsibilities duties and responsibilities designation with the
indicated thereon. indicated thereon. indicated thereon. indicated thereon. duties and
responsibilities
indicated thereon.

3
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
4

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

6. Communicated 3.25% Quality Conducted at least three Conducted at least two (2) Conducted at least one (1) Conducted at least one (1) Conducted at least one
to stakeholders (3) or more General PTA General PTA General PTA General PTA (1) General PTA
the learner Meetings/Assemblies and Meeting/Assembly and Meeting/Assembly and Meeting/Assembly and Meeting/Assembly and
needs, progress four (4) parent-teacher four (4) parent-teacher four (4) parent-teacher three (3) parent-teacher two (2) parent-teacher
and conferences within the conferences within the conferences within the conferences within the conferences within the
achievements school year and utilized the school year and utilized the school year and utilized the school year and utilized the school year and utilized
school paper, the school school report card (SRC), school report card (SRC) as school report card (SRC) as the school report card
report card (SRC), bulletin bulletin boards and information dissemination information dissemination (SRC) as information
boards and tarpaulins as tarpaulins as information tools tools dissemination tools
information dissemination dissemination tools
tools

Efficiency Submitted minutes of all Submitted minutes of all Submitted minutes of all Submitted minutes of all Submitted minutes of
GPTA meetings and at least GPTA meetings and at least GPTA meetings and at least GPTA meetings and at least GPTA meetings and at
four (4) minutes of HRPTA three (3) minutes of HRPTA two (2) minutes of HRPTA one (1) minutes of HRPTA least one (1) minutes of
conferences within the conferences within the conferences within the conference within the HRPTA conference
school year signed and school year signed and school year signed and school year signed and within the school year
attested by GPTA and attested by GPTA and attested by GPTA and attested by GPTA and signed and attested by
HRPTA Presidents and at HRPTA Presidentsand at HRPTA Presidents and at HRPTA Presidents and at GPTA and HRPTA
least one (1) of the least one (1) of the least one (1) of the least one (1) of the Presidents
information dissemination information dissemination information dissemination information dissemination
tools tools tools tools

Timeliness Conducted the PTA Conducted the PTA Conducted the PTA Conducted the PTA Conducted the PTA
conferences on schedule conferences one (1) week conferences two (2) weeks conferences three (3) conferences a month or
per School Calendar for SY behind the schedule per behind the schedule per weeks behind the schedule more weeks behind the
2018-2019 School Calendar for SY School Calendar for SY per School Calendar for SY schedule per School
2018-2019 2018-2019 2018-2019 Calendar for SY 2018-
2019

Basic 2. School 1. Monitored the 6.5% Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed No acceptable evidence
Education Leadership, updating and monitoring in the checking monitoring in the checking monitoring in the checking monitoring in the checking was shown
Services Management, upkeep of and updating of learners' and updating of learners' and updating of learners' and updating of learners'
and learners' records records and submission of records and submission of records and submission of records and submission of
Operations and facilitated required and accurate required and accurate required and accurate required and accurate
submission of school reports school reports school reports school reports
required school
reports

4
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
5

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:
Basic 2. School 1. Monitored the 6.5%
Education Leadership, updating and
Services Management, upkeep of
and learners' records TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Operations and facilitated
submission of Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs KRAs required school Timeline Weight
Objectives
Actual
*Score
reports per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Efficiency Submitted developed Submitted developed Submitted developed Submitted developed Submitted any
and/or adopted and/or adopted and/or adopted and/or adopted monitoring tool utilized
monitoring tool utilized monitoring tool utilized monitoring tool utilized by monitoring tool utilized in checking learners'
monthly in checking bimonthly in checking quarter in checking annually in checking records and documents
learners' records and learners' records and learners' records and learners' records and validated by division
documents concurred by documents concurred by documents concurred by documents concurred by personnel at the end of
teachers and validated by teachers and validated by teachers and validated by teachers and validated by the school year, and
division personnel at the division personnel at the division personnel at the division personnel at the checklist of school
end of the school year, and end of the school year, and end of the school year, and end of the school year, and reports submitted and
checklist of school reports checklist of school reports checklist of school reports checklist of school reports postmarked received by
submitted and postmarked submitted and postmarked submitted and postmarked submitted and postmarked the division office or by
received by the division received by the division received by the division received by the division other offices.
office or by other offices. office or by other offices. office or by other offices. office or by other offices.

Timeliness All reports were submitted All reports were submitted All reports were submitted All reports were submitted All reports were
at least seven (7) days at least five (5) days before on time late for one day to five (5) submitted late for more
before the due date. the due date. days than 5 days

2. Ensured 6.5% Quality Consistently ensured Frequently ensured Occasionally ensured Rarely ensured punctuality No acceptable evidence
punctuality and punctuality and daily punctuality and daily punctuality and daily and daily attendance of all was shown
attendance in attendance of all personnel attendance of all personnel attendance of all personnel personnel in school/classes
school and in in school/classes and in in school/classes and in in school/classes and in and in other activities
other curricular other activities other activities other activities
and co-curricular
activities in the
school, district,
division or higher Efficiency Submitted copy of the Submitted copy of the Submitted copy of the Submitted copy of the Submitted copy of the
levels signed monthly F-48 of the signed monthly F-48 of the signed monthly F-48 of the signed monthly F-48 of the signed monthly F-48 of
school head with school head, signed school head, signed school head and signed the school head
corresponding certificate monthly school calendar of monthly school calendar of monthly school calendar of
of appearance, signed activities and utilized a activities and utilized any activities or utilized any
monthly school calendar of developed attendance attendance monitoring attendance monitoring
activities and utilized a monitoring tools tools tools
developed attendance
monitoring tools

5
2. Ensured 6.5%
punctuality and OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
attendance in 6
school and in
other curricular
Name of Employee:and co-curricular Name of Rater:
activities in the
Position: school, district, Position:
division or higher
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
levels Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Timeliness All personnel (including the All personnel (including the All personnel (including the All personnel (including the All personnel (including
school head) promptly school head) promptly school head) promptly school head) promptly the school head)
reported to school daily reported to school daily reported to school daily reported to school daily promptly reported to
and attended required and attended required and attended required and attended required school daily and
curricular, co-curricular curricular, co-curricular curricular, co-curricular curricular, co-curricular attended required
and other activities in and other activities in and other activities in and other activities in curricular, co-curricular
higher levels with no higher levels with a higher levels with a higher levels with a and other activities in
unauthorized absences or monthly average of one to monthly average of 3-5 monthly average of 6-7 higher levels with a
late attendance two (1-2) instances of instances of unauthorized instances of unauthorized monthly average of
unauthorized absences or absences or late absences or late eight (8) or more
late attendance attendance attendance instances of
unauthorized absences
or late attendance

3. Monitored, 6.5% Quality Consistently utilized and Frequently utilized and Occasionally utilized and Rarely utilized and Hardly utilized and
accounted and liquidated the monthly liquidated the monthly liquidated the monthly liquidated the monthly liquidated the monthly
reported MOOE and other funds and MOOE and other funds and MOOE and other funds and MOOE and other funds and MOOE and other funds
utilization of with complete, accurate with complete, accurate with complete, accurate with complete, accurate and with complete,
school fund and signed financial and signed financial and signed financial and signed financial accurate and signed
reports on cash donations reports on cash donations reports on cash donations reports on cash donations financial reports on
including Brigada Eskwela, including Brigada Eskwela, including Brigada Eskwela, including Brigada Eskwela, cash donations
school produce, School school produce, School school produce, School school produce, School including Brigada
Program Financial Program Financial Program Financial Program Financial Eskwela, school
Assistance from Assistance from Assistance from Assistance from produce, School
LGUs/private sources, LGUs/private sources, LGUs/private sources, LGUs/private sources, Program Financial
HRPTA and GPTA at the HRPTA and GPTA at the HRPTA and GPTA at the HRPTA and GPTA at the Assistance from
end of the school year end of the school year end of the school year end of the school year LGUs/private sources,
HRPTA and GPTA at the
end of the school year

6
reported
utilization of
school fund OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
7

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Efficiency Submitted updated Submitted updated Submitted updated Submitted updated Submitted Summary
Summary of monthly Cash Summary of monthly Cash Summary of monthly Cash Summary of monthly Cash Cash Advances
Advances and Liquidation Advances and Liquidation Advances and Liquidation Advances and Liquidation
indicating % of cash indicating % of cash indicating % of cash indicating % of cash
utilization attested by utilization attested by utilization attested by utilization attested by
division office and at least division office and at least division office and at least division office and at least
four (4) signed financial three (3) signed financial two (2) signed financial one (1) signed financial
reports for the school year reports for the school year reports for the school year reports for the school year

Timeliness Liquidated the school Liquidated the school Liquidated the school Liquidated the school Failed to liquidate the
MOOE fifteen (15) days or MOOE ten to fourteen (10- MOOE five to nine (5-9) MOOE within four (4) days school MOOE for FY
more before the end of the 14) days before the end of days before the end of the before the end of the fiscal 2018 on time
fiscal year 2018 attested by the fiscal year 2018 fiscal year 2018 attested by year 2018 attested by the
the division office attested by the division the division office division office
office

4. Performed 6.5% Quality Produced a school Produced a school Produced a school Produced a school Produced a school
data-based strategic plan/SIP, AIP with strategic plan/SIP, AIP with strategic plan/SIP, AIP with strategic plan/SIP, AIP with strategic plan/SIP, AIP
strategic aligned APP through the aligned APP through the aligned APP through the aligned APP through the with aligned APP
planning and strategic planning process, strategic planning process, strategic planning process, strategic planning process through the strategic
implementation utilized a developed M&E utilized a developed M&E utilized a developed M&E and utilized a developed planning process and
of school PPAs for process and outcome for process and outcome for process and outcome M&E for process and utilized a developed
checkpoints, and checkpoints, and checkpoints, and outcome checkpoints and M&E for process and
completed all the target completed 75% of the completed 50% of the partially completed at least outcome checkpoints
PPAs for the current school target PPAs for the current target PPAs for the current one (1) target PPAs for the
year school year school year current school year

7
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
4. Performed 6.5% 8
data-based
Name of Employee:strategic
planning and Name of Rater:
Position: implementation Position:
of school PPAs
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Efficiency Submitted approved SIP, Submitted approved SIP, Submitted approved SIP, Submitted approved SIP, Submitted approved
AIP and APP with M&E and AIP and APP with M&E and AIP and APP with M&E AIP and APP with M&E and SIP, AIP and APP with
signed minutes of the signed minutes of the and accomplishment signed minutes of the M&E
strategic planning strategic planning reports with strategic planning
conference with conference with documentations of at least conference with
stakeholders and stakeholders and one (1) completed PPA stakeholders
accomplishment reports accomplishment reports
with documentations of all with documentations of at
completed PPAs least one (1) completed
PPA

Basic 3. Learning 1. Ensured quality 6.5% Quality Provided useful water, Provided useful water, Provided useful water and Provided useful water Provided useful water
Education Environment standards for electrical and internet electrical and internet electrical facilities and and/or electrical facilities or electrical facilities
Services facilities and facilities and maintained facilities and maintained maintained functional and maintained functional and maintained at least
ancillary services functional ancillary services functional ancillary services ancillary services such as ancillary services such as one (1) functional
given to the such as guidance and such as guidance and guidance and counselling guidance and counselling ancillary services
school counselling services, counselling services, services, canteen and and canteen services
canteen, medical, dental, canteen, medical and dental services
and library services. dental services

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted


documentations, logbooks documentations, logbooks documentations, logbooks documentations, logbooks documentations,
in the guidance office and in the guidance office and in the guidance office and in the guidance office and logbooks in the
library, list/documents of library, list/documents of library, list/documents of library, list/documents of guidance office and
assistance given as assistance given as assistance given as assistance given as library, list/documents
acceptable evidences of acceptable evidences of acceptable evidences of acceptable evidences of of assistance given as
utilization of all facilities utilization of at least two utilization of at least two utilization of at least one acceptable evidences of
and availment of all school (2) facilities and availment (2) facilities and availment (1) facility and availment of utilization of at least
ancillary services of at least three (3) school of at least two (2) school at least one (1) school one (1) facility or
ancillary services ancillary services ancillary services availment of at least
one (1) school ancillary
services

8
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
9

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

2. Provided a 6.5% Quality Institutionalized classroom Institutionalized classroom Institutionalized classroom Institutionalized classroom Institutionalized
conducive, child- structuring in all grade structuring in all grade structuring in all grade structuring in all grade classroom structuring in
friendly and safe levels and conducted at levels and conducted at levels and conducted at levels and conducted at all grade levels and
learning least one (1) training/drills least one (1) training/drills least one (1) training/drills least one (1) training/drills conducted at least one
environment for on disaster preparedness on disaster preparedness on disaster preparedness on disaster preparedness (1) training/drills on
learners and one (1) on drugs and and one (1) on drugs and and one (1) on drugs and and one (1) on drugs and disaster preparedness
smoke-free education and smoke-free education and smoke-free education and smoke-free education and or one (1) on drugs and
other related campaigns other related campaigns other related campaigns other related campaigns smoke-free education
with no record of child with no record of child with no record of child with no record of child and other related
abuse, drug-related cases, abuse and drug-related abuse and drug-related abuse and drug-related campaigns
arson, theft, learner cases and at least three (3) cases and at least two (2) cases and at least one (1)
truancy, and misbehaviors other indicators other indicators other indicator

Efficiency Submitted documentations Submitted documentations Submitted documentations Submitted documentations Submitted
of at least 85% structured of at least 75% structured of at least 50% structured of at least 25% structured documentations of at
classrooms out of the total classrooms out of the total classrooms out of the total classrooms out of the total least 10% structured
functional classrooms and functional classrooms and functional classrooms and functional classrooms and classrooms out of the
at least one (1) at least one (1) at least one (1) at least one (1) total functional
documentation on documentation on documentation on documentation on classrooms and at least
trainings or drills trainings or drills trainings or drills trainings or drills one (1) documentation
conducted and student's conducted and student's conducted and student's conducted and student's on trainings or drills
logbook logbook logbook logbook conducted and
student's logbook

3. Established 6.5% Quality Consistently set and Frequently set and Occasionally set and Rarely set and No acceptable evidence
functional implemented school implemented school implemented school implemented school was shown
governance policies through functional policies through functional policies through functional policies through functional
structures and school organizations and school organizations and school organizations and school organizations and
operationalized committees committees committees committees
school policies

9
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
10

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:
3. Established 6.5%
functional TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
governance
structures and Performance Indicators Rating
operationalized Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives
school policies Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Efficiency Submitted signed minutes Submitted signed minutes Submitted signed minutes Submitted signed minutes No acceptable evidence
of meetings about the of meetings about the of meetings about the of meetings about the was shown
school policies contained in school policies contained in school policies contained in school policies contained in
a student handbook which a student handbook which a student handbook which a student handbook which
was widely distributed to was widely distributed to was widely distributed to was widely distributed to
learners and learners and learners and learners and
accomplishment reports of accomplishment reports of accomplishment reports of accomplishment reports of
at least four (4) school at least three (3) school at least two (2) school at least one (1) school
organizations (BAC, organizations (BAC, organizations (BAC, organization (BAC,
SPG/SSG, School SPG/SSG, School SPG/SSG, School SPG/SSG, School
Publication Board, DRRRM Publication Board, DRRRM Publication Board, DRRRM Publication Board, DRRRM
Committee, SGC, GPTA, Committee, SGC, GPTA, Committee, SGC, GPTA, Committee, SGC, GPTA,
etc..) etc..) etc..) etc..)

Basic 4. Human 1. Provided 6.5% Quality Conducted need-based Conducted need-based Conducted need-based Conducted need-based No acceptable evidence
Education Resource opportunities for School Learning Action Cell School Learning Action Cell School Learning Action Cell School Learning Action Cell was shown
Services Management professional (SLAC) and at least three (SLAC) and at least two (2) (SLAC) and at least one (2) (SLAC)
and growth and (3) school-based INSETs school-based INSETs school-based INSETs
Development devlopment to all (including TIP and (including TIP and (including TIP and
personnel Coaching/Mentoring Coaching/Mentoring Coaching/Mentoring
Program) Program) Program)

Efficiency Submitted approved SLAC Submitted approved SLAC Submitted approved SLAC Submitted approved SLAC No acceptable evidence
and training proposals and and training proposals and and training proposals and and training proposals and was shown
signed completion reports signed completion reports signed completion reports signed SLAC completion
of at least three (3) of at least two (2) of at least one (1) program reports
programs (including SLAC) programs (including SLAC) (including SLAC) with
with documentations with documentations documentations

Timeliness The trainings/sessions The trainings/sessions The trainings/sessions The trainings/sessions No acceptable evidence
were conducted for an were conducted for an were conducted for an were conducted for an was shown
aggregate of more than aggregate of 10-15 days aggregate of 5-9 days aggregate of 1-4 days
fifteen (15) days

10
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
11

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

2. Performed 6.5% Quality Consistently Performed Frequently Performed Occasionally Performed Rarely Performed RPMS
RPMS Processes RPMS Processes among RPMS Processes among RPMS Processes among Processes among school
among school school personnel school personnel school personnel personnel
personnel

Efficiency Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed
Performance Commitment Performance Commitment Performance Commitment Performance Commitment Performance
Forms, Performance Forms, Performance Forms, Performance Forms, Performance Commitment Forms,
Monitoring and Coaching Monitoring and Coaching Monitoring and Coaching Monitoring and Coaching Performance
Form (PMCF), Mid-Year Form (PMCF), Mid-Year Form (PMCF), Mid-Year Form (PMCF), Mid-Year Monitoring and
Review Form (MRF), Review Form (MRF), Review Form (MRF), Review Form (MRF), Coaching Form (PMCF),
Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Mid-Year Review Form
Rating and Development Rating and Development Rating and Development Rating and Development (MRF), Performance
Plans of at least ten (10) or Plans of at least eight (8) Plans of at least six (6) Plans of at least four (4) Evaluation Rating and
more personnel for the personnel for the rating personnel for the rating personnel for the rating Development Plans of
rating period period period period at least two (2) or less
personnel for the rating
period

Timeliness Summary list and signed Summary list and signed Summary list and signed Summary list and signed Summary list and
IPCRF/OPCRF were IPCRF/OPCRF were IPCRF/OPCRF were IPCRF/OPCRF were signed IPCRF/OPCRF
submitted fifteen (15) days submitted ten (10) days submitted five (5) days submitted on time for were submitted late
before the due date for before the due date for before the due date for submission
submission submission submission

11
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
12

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

3. Provided 6.5% Quality Consistently conducted Consistently conducted Consistently conducted Consistently conducted No acceptable evidence
school-wide SAT- school-wide SAT-based school-wide SAT-based school-wide SAT-based school-wide SAT-based was shown
based training and other training and other training and other training and other
development activities for employee activities for employee activities for employee activities for employee
programs and development such as cross development such as cross development such as cross development such as cross
activities to posting, benchmarking, posting, benchmarking, posting, benchmarking, posting, benchmarking,
personnel coaching/counselling, coaching/counselling, coaching/counselling, coaching/counselling,
mentoring, developmental mentoring, developmental mentoring, developmental mentoring, developmental
career move, assignment career move, assignment career move, assignment career move, assignment
to task/forces or to task/forces or to task/forces or to task/forces or
committees/special committees/special committees/special committees/special
projects, job projects, job projects, job projects, job
enhancement/redesign, enhancement/redesign, enhancement/redesign, enhancement/redesign,
etc.. etc.. etc.. etc..

Efficiency Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed No acceptable evidence
result/reports of one (1) result/reports of one (1) result/reports of one (1) result/reports of one (1) was shown
school-wide SAT training school-wide SAT training school-wide SAT training school-wide SAT training
and at least five (5) other and at least four (4) other and at least three (3) other and at least one (1) or two
developmental activities developmental activities developmental activities (2) other developmental
with documentations with documentations with documentations activities with
documentations

Basic 5. Parent 1. Established 6.5% Quality Consistently engaged the Frequently engaged the Occasionally engaged the Rarely engaged the No acceptable evidence
Education Involvement school, family and stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders in the was shown
Services and community formulation and formulation and formulation and formulation and
Community partnership for implementation of school implementation of school implementation of school implementation of school
Partnership performance policies and organized policies and organized policies and organized policies and organized
programs with programs with programs with programs with
stakeholders for academic stakeholders for academic stakeholders for academic stakeholders for academic
and other purposes and other purposes and other purposes and other purposes

12
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
13

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Basic 5. Parent 1. Established 6.5% Date of Review
Education Involvement school, family and
Rating Period:
Services and community
Community partnership for
Partnership performance
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Efficiency Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed No acceptable evidence
mobilization/partnership mobilization/partnership mobilization/partnership mobilization/partnership was shown
plan (included in the AIP) plan (included in the AIP) plan (included in the AIP) plan (included in the AIP)
and accomplishment and accomplishment and accomplishment and accomplishment
reports of at least two (2) reports of at least one (1) reports of at least one (1) reports of at least one (1)
programs with program with stakeholders program with stakeholders program with stakeholders
stakeholders organized for organized for academic organized for academic organized for academic
academic purposes and at purpose and at least two purpose and at least one purpose or one (1)
least one (1) programs for (2) programs for other (1) program for other program for other
other purposes purposes purposes purposes

2. Obtained 6.5% Quality Consistently engaged the Frequently engaged the Occasionally engaged the Rarely engaged the Engaged the
resources from stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders during
stakeholders for continuous physical continuous physical continuous physical continuous physical brigada eskwela only
continuous improvement of the school improvement of the school improvement of the school improvement of the school
school physical
improvements
Small - 9 tchrs &
below; Medium Efficiency Submitted list of generated Submitted list of generated Submitted list of generated Submitted list of generated Submitted signed Form
(elem) - 10-29, resources (in cash or in resources (in cash or in resources (in cash or in resources (in cash or in 1.1 list of the total
(sec) - 10-25; kind) for the school year kind) for the school year kind) for the school year kind) for the school year generated resources of
Large (elem) - 30- and signed Form 1.1 total and signed Form 1.1 total and signed Form 1.1 total and signed Form 1.1 total the school during
50, (sec) 26-50; generated resources of the generated resources of the generated resources of the generated resources of the Brigada Eskwela per
Mega 51 & above school during Brigada school during Brigada school during Brigada school during Brigada category: Small - 69,000
Eskwela per category: Eskwela per category: Eskwela per category: Eskwela per category: & below; Medium -
Small - 500,000 and above; Small - 300,000-499,999; Small - 100,000-299,999; Small - 70,000-99,999; 99,999 & below; Large -
Medium - 800,000; Large Medium - 500,000- Medium - 300,000- Medium - 100,000- 299,999 & below; Mega
(elem) - 1,000,000 & 799,999; Large (elem) - 499,999; Large (elem) - 299,999; Large (elem) - (elem) -499,999 &
above, (sec.) - 1,500,000 & 8,000,000-999,999, (sec.) - 500,000-799,999, (sec.) - 300,000-499,999, (sec.) - below (sec.) - 799,999 &
above; Mega (elem) 1,000,000-1,499,999; 500,000-999,999; Mega 500,000-499,999; Mega below
-1,500,000 & above, (sec.) Mega (elem) -1,000,000- (elem) -800,000-999,999 (elem) -500,000-799,999
- 2,000,000 & above 1,499,999 (sec.) - (sec.) - 1,000,000- (sec.) - 800,000-999,999
1,500,000-1,999,999 1,499,999

13
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
14

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

3. Conducted 6.5% Quality Conducted at least one (1) Proposed one (1)
outreach community outreach community outreach
programs, project Conducted at least three Conducted at least two (2) Conducted at least one (1) program or activity in program or activity in
or activities in the (3) or more community community outreach community outreach coordination with coordination with and
school outreach programs or programs or activities in program or activity in approval of the local chief approved by the local
community activities in coordination coordination with and coordination with and executive chief executive
with and approval of the approval of the local chief approval of the local chief
local chief executive with executive with executive with
documentations and documentations and documentations and
certification from the certification from the certification from the
barangay barangay barangay

Efficiency Submitted accomplishment Submitted accomplishment Submitted accomplishment Submitted accomplishment Submitted approved
reports of all outreach reports of two (2) outreach reports of at least one (1) reports of at least one (1) outreach program
programs with acceptable programs with acceptable outreach programs with outreach programs proposal
documentations documentations acceptable
documentations

4. Strengthened 6.5% Quality At least two (2) or more At least one (1) or more At least one (1) approved At least one (1) program or At least one (1)
school- approved programs or approved program or program or project was project proposed by the program or project
community projects were initiated and project was initiated and initiated but not yet SGC, GPTA or other school- proposed by the SGC,
participation implemented by the SGC, implemented by the SGC, completed by the SGC, community organizations GPTA or other school-
through GPTA or other school- GPTA or other school- GPTA or other school- was approved for community
stakeholder- community organizations community organizations community organizations implementation organizations was
initiated submitted for approval
programs and
projects

Efficiency Submitted approved Submitted approved Submitted approved Submitted approved Submitted proposal of
proposal and proposal and proposal and proposal of at least one (1) at least one (1) program
accomplishment reports accomplishment reports accomplishment or status program or project or project
with documentations of at with documentations of at reports with
least two (2) completed least one (1) completed documentations of at least
programs or projects program or project one (1) ongoing program
or project

14
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
15

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Basic 6. Plus Factor Performed any of 2.5% Quality Performed any of the tasks Performed any of the tasks Performed any of the tasks Performed any of the tasks Performed any of the
Education the following: 1. in the National and in the Regional level with in the Division level with in the District level with tasks in the school level
Services Facilitator/Resou International level with acceptable evidence and acceptable evidence and acceptable evidence and with acceptable
rce Speaker in acceptable evidence and documentations documentations documentations evidence and
trainings; 2. Acted documentations documentations
as one of the
writers of
instructional
materials/module
s/manuals 3.
Acted as winning
trainer/coach of
individual/group
contestant; 4.
Acted as member
of selection
board/grievance
committee/inves
tigation
committee; 5.
Conducted at
least one (1)
relevant research
in any discipline
within the rating
period

OVERALL RATING
FOR
*To get the Score, the rating is miltiplied by the weight assigned ACCOMPLISHMEN
TS

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

15
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
16

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Basic 1. 1. Performed 6.5% Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed Performed classroom
Education Instructional classroom classroom observations to classroom observations to classroom observations to classroom observations to observations
Services Leadership observations to teachers with focus on teachers with focus on teachers with focus on teachers with focus on
teachers with applied knowledge on applied knowledge on applied knowledge on applied knowledge on
focus on applied content within and across content within and across content within and across content within and across
knowledge on curriculum learning areas curriculum learning areas curriculum learning areas curriculum learning areas
content within
and across
curriculum
learning areas:
HT/MT – 10 Efficiency Submitted the monthly Submitted the monthly Submitted the monthly Submitted the monthly Submitted any one of
Principal – 15 supervisory reports and at supervisory reports and at supervisory reports and at supervisory reports and at the three (3) acceptable ### ###
least fifteen (15) least twelve (12) least ten (10) Observation least eight (8) Observation evidences
Observation Notes Form Observation Notes Form Notes Form (ONF) and the Notes Form (ONF) and the
(ONF) and the (ONF) and the corresponding COTs of corresponding COTs of
corresponding COTs of corresponding COTs of teachers within the rating teachers within the rating
teachers within the rating teachers within the rating period period
period period

2. Provided 6.5% Quality Consistently checked all Frequently checked all the Occasionally checked all Rarely checked all the No acceptable evidence
technical the teachers’ DLLs and teachers’ DLLs and DLPs the teachers’ DLLs and teachers’ DLLs and DLPs was shown
assistance in the DLPs and test papers per and test papers per DLPs and test papers per and test papers per
preparation of quarter/semester quarter/semester quarter/semester quarter/semester
DLLs and DLPs
and test papers
Efficiency Submitted at least ten (10) Submitted at least eight (8) Submitted at least six (6) Submitted four (4) or less No acceptable evidence
DLPs/DLLs with DLPs/DLLs with DLPs/DLLs with DLPs/DLLs with was shown
comments/suggestions comments/suggestions comments/suggestions comments/suggestions
concurred by the concurred by the concurred by the concurred by the
concerned teachers and at concerned teachers and at concerned teachers and at concerned teachers and at
least four (4) sample test least four (4) sample test least four (4) sample test least four (4) sample test
papers checked in different papers checked in different papers checked in different papers checked in different
grade levels per quarter grade levels per quarter grade levels per quarter grade levels per quarter ### ###

Timeliness DLPs/DLLs were checked DLPs/DLLs were checked DLPs/DLLs were checked DLPs/DLLs were irregularly No acceptable evidence
daily per record shown twice a week per record once in a week per record or as need arises per was shown
shown shown record shown
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
17

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

3. Monitored and 6.5% Quality Maintained functional Maintained functional Maintained functional Maintained functional Maintained functional
supported the computer units for computer units for computer units for computer units for computer units for
use of technology instruction and two (2) or instruction and at least one instruction or at least one instruction or with at least instruction or with at
in instruction by more than one set of (1) one set of school ICT (1) one set of school ICT any two (2) of the least one (1) of the
the teachers and school ICT instructional instructional equipment instructional equipment following school ICT following school ICT
learners during equipment (projector, (projector, laptop and (projector, laptop and instructional equipment instructional equipment
the school year laptop and white screen) white screen) used by white screen) used by used by teachers: used by teachers:
used by teachers teachers teachers projector, laptop and white projector, laptop and
screen white screen

Efficiency Submitted at least ten (10) Submitted at least eight (8) Submitted at least six (6) Submitted at least four (4) Submitted one (1) or
DLLs/DLPs utilizing ICT in DLLs/DLPs utilizing ICT in DLLs/DLPs utilizing ICT in DLLs/DLPs utilizing ICT in two (2) DLLs/DLPs ### ###
instruction and inventory instruction and inventory instruction and inventory instruction and inventory utilizing ICT in
of functional and non- of functional and non- of functional and non- of functional and non- instruction and
functional computer units functional computer units functional computer units functional computer units inventory of functional
signed by the ICT and signed by the ICT and signed by the ICT and signed by the ICT and and non-functional
School Property Custodian School Property Custodian School Property Custodian School Property Custodian computer units signed
by the ICT and School
Property Custodian

4. Initiated and 6.5% Quality At least three (3) At least two (2) At least one (1) At least one (1) At least one (1)
supported and instructional instructional instructional instructional instructional
effectively programs/projects were programs/projects were program/project was program/project was program/project was
implemented planned, implemented, planned, implemented, planned, implemented, planned, implemented, planned and approved
instructional monitored, evaluated, monitored, evaluated, monitored, evaluated, monitored, evaluated but for implementation
programs/project completed and completed and completed and not completed and
s to ensure documented documented documented documented
delivery of quality
instruction to
learners

### ###
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
18

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period: 4. Initiated and 6.5%
supported and
effectively
implemented TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
instructional
programs/project Performance Indicators Rating
s toObjectives
ensure Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs delivery of quality
Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
instruction to
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
learners
Efficiency Submitted at least one (1) Submitted at least one (1) Submitted at least one (1) Submitted at least one (1) Submitted at least one
approved program/project approved program/project approved program/project approved ongoing (1) approved
proposal and its proposal and its proposal and its program/project proposal program/project
corresponding corresponding corresponding with documentation proposal
accomplishment reports accomplishment reports accomplishment reports
received by higher official received by the superior/s ### ###
with acceptable
documentations

Timeliness Accomplishment/Completi Accomplishment/Completi Accomplishment/Completi Accomplishment/Completi No acceptable evidence


on Reports were accepted on Reports were accepted on Reports were accepted on Reports were accepted of accomplishment was
and signed by the superior and signed by the superior and signed by the superior and signed by the superior shown
within ten days (10) after within twenty days (20) within thirty days (30) after more than thirty days (30)
completion of the after completion of the completion of the after completion of the
program/project program/project program/project program/project

5. Rationalized 3.25% Quality Nationally-funded teachers Nationally-funded teachers Nationally-funded teachers Nationally-funded teachers Nationally-funded
the distribution were given equal loads or, were given equal loads or, were given equal loads or, were given equal loads or, teachers were given
of teaching loads in no case, beyond 10 in no case, beyond 20 in no case, beyond 30 in no case, beyond 40 loads regardless of the
and assignments minutes difference of minutes difference of minutes difference of minutes difference of number of hours
to ancillary actual teaching hours actual teaching hours actual teaching hours actual teaching hours differences and
services between and among the between and among the between and among the between and among the assignments
teachers teachers teachers teachers

Efficiency Submitted a copy of the SF- Submitted a copy of the SF- Submitted a copy of the SF- Submitted a copy of the SF- Submitted a copy of the ### ###
7 noted/signed by the 7 noted/signed by the 7 noted/signed by the 7 noted/signed by the SF-7 noted/signed by
concerned PSDS/EPS and concerned PSDS/EPS and concerned PSDS/EPS and concerned PSDS/EPS and the concerned
at least five (5) copies of at least four (4) copies of at least three (3) copies of at least five (2) copies of PSDS/EPS and at least
designations with the designations with the designations with the designations with the one (1) copy of
duties and responsibilities duties and responsibilities duties and responsibilities duties and responsibilities designation with the
indicated thereon. indicated thereon. indicated thereon. indicated thereon. duties and
responsibilities
indicated thereon.
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
19

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

6. Communicated 3.25% Quality Conducted at least three Conducted at least two (2) Conducted at least one (1) Conducted at least one (1) Conducted at least one
to stakeholders (3) or more General PTA General PTA General PTA General PTA (1) General PTA
the learner Meetings/Assemblies and Meeting/Assembly and Meeting/Assembly and Meeting/Assembly and Meeting/Assembly and
needs, progress four (4) parent-teacher four (4) parent-teacher four (4) parent-teacher three (3) parent-teacher two (2) parent-teacher
and conferences within the conferences within the conferences within the conferences within the conferences within the
achievements school year and utilized the school year and utilized the school year and utilized the school year and utilized the school year and utilized
school paper, the school school report card (SRC), school report card (SRC) as school report card (SRC) as the school report card
report card (SRC), bulletin bulletin boards and information dissemination information dissemination (SRC) as information
boards and tarpaulins as tarpaulins as information tools tools dissemination tools
information dissemination dissemination tools
tools

Efficiency Submitted minutes of all Submitted minutes of all Submitted minutes of all Submitted minutes of all Submitted minutes of
GPTA meetings and at least GPTA meetings and at least GPTA meetings and at least GPTA meetings and at least GPTA meetings and at
four (4) minutes of HRPTA three (3) minutes of HRPTA two (2) minutes of HRPTA one (1) minutes of HRPTA least one (1) minutes of
conferences within the conferences within the conferences within the conference within the HRPTA conference
school year signed and school year signed and school year signed and school year signed and within the school year
attested by GPTA and attested by GPTA and attested by GPTA and attested by GPTA and signed and attested by ### ###
HRPTA Presidents and at HRPTA Presidentsand at HRPTA Presidents and at HRPTA Presidents and at GPTA and HRPTA
least one (1) of the least one (1) of the least one (1) of the least one (1) of the Presidents
information dissemination information dissemination information dissemination information dissemination
tools tools tools tools

Timeliness Conducted the PTA Conducted the PTA Conducted the PTA Conducted the PTA Conducted the PTA
conferences on schedule conferences one (1) week conferences two (2) weeks conferences three (3) conferences a month or
per School Calendar for SY behind the schedule per behind the schedule per weeks behind the schedule more weeks behind the
2018-2019 School Calendar for SY School Calendar for SY per School Calendar for SY schedule per School
2018-2019 2018-2019 2018-2019 Calendar for SY 2018-
2019

Basic 2. School 1. Monitored the 6.5% Quality Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally performed Rarely performed No acceptable evidence
Education Leadership, updating and monitoring in the checking monitoring in the checking monitoring in the checking monitoring in the checking was shown
Services Management, upkeep of and updating of learners' and updating of learners' and updating of learners' and updating of learners'
and learners' records records and submission of records and submission of records and submission of records and submission of
Operations and facilitated required and accurate required and accurate required and accurate required and accurate
submission of school reports school reports school reports school reports
required school
reports
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
20

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:
Basic 2. School 1. Monitored the 6.5%
Education Leadership, updating and
Services Management, upkeep of
and learners' records TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Operations and facilitated
submission of Performance Indicators Rating
MFOs KRAs required school Timeline Weight
Objectives
Actual
*Score
reports per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Efficiency Submitted developed Submitted developed Submitted developed Submitted developed Submitted any
and/or adopted and/or adopted and/or adopted and/or adopted monitoring tool utilized
monitoring tool utilized monitoring tool utilized monitoring tool utilized by monitoring tool utilized in checking learners'
monthly in checking bimonthly in checking quarter in checking annually in checking records and documents
learners' records and learners' records and learners' records and learners' records and validated by division
documents concurred by documents concurred by documents concurred by documents concurred by personnel at the end of
teachers and validated by teachers and validated by teachers and validated by teachers and validated by the school year, and
division personnel at the division personnel at the division personnel at the division personnel at the checklist of school
end of the school year, and end of the school year, and end of the school year, and end of the school year, and reports submitted and
checklist of school reports checklist of school reports checklist of school reports checklist of school reports postmarked received by ### ###
submitted and postmarked submitted and postmarked submitted and postmarked submitted and postmarked the division office or by
received by the division received by the division received by the division received by the division other offices.
office or by other offices. office or by other offices. office or by other offices. office or by other offices.

Timeliness All reports were submitted All reports were submitted All reports were submitted All reports were submitted All reports were
at least seven (7) days at least five (5) days before on time late for one day to five (5) submitted late for more
before the due date. the due date. days than 5 days

2. Ensured 6.5% Quality Consistently ensured Frequently ensured Occasionally ensured Rarely ensured punctuality No acceptable evidence
punctuality and punctuality and daily punctuality and daily punctuality and daily and daily attendance of all was shown
attendance in attendance of all personnel attendance of all personnel attendance of all personnel personnel in school/classes
school and in in school/classes and in in school/classes and in in school/classes and in and in other activities
other curricular other activities other activities other activities
and co-curricular
activities in the
school, district,
division or higher Efficiency Submitted copy of the Submitted copy of the Submitted copy of the Submitted copy of the Submitted copy of the
levels signed monthly F-48 of the signed monthly F-48 of the signed monthly F-48 of the signed monthly F-48 of the signed monthly F-48 of
school head with school head, signed school head, signed school head and signed the school head
corresponding certificate monthly school calendar of monthly school calendar of monthly school calendar of
of appearance, signed activities and utilized a activities and utilized any activities or utilized any
monthly school calendar of developed attendance attendance monitoring attendance monitoring
activities and utilized a monitoring tools tools tools
developed attendance
monitoring tools
### ###
2. Ensured 6.5%
punctuality and OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
attendance in 21
school and in
other curricular
Name of Employee:and co-curricular Name of Rater:
activities in the
Position: school, district, Position:
division or higher
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
levels Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results ### ###
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Timeliness All personnel (including the All personnel (including the All personnel (including the All personnel (including the All personnel (including
school head) promptly school head) promptly school head) promptly school head) promptly the school head)
reported to school daily reported to school daily reported to school daily reported to school daily promptly reported to
and attended required and attended required and attended required and attended required school daily and
curricular, co-curricular curricular, co-curricular curricular, co-curricular curricular, co-curricular attended required
and other activities in and other activities in and other activities in and other activities in curricular, co-curricular
higher levels with no higher levels with a higher levels with a higher levels with a and other activities in
unauthorized absences or monthly average of one to monthly average of 3-5 monthly average of 6-7 higher levels with a
late attendance two (1-2) instances of instances of unauthorized instances of unauthorized monthly average of
unauthorized absences or absences or late absences or late eight (8) or more
late attendance attendance attendance instances of
unauthorized absences
or late attendance

3. Monitored, 6.5% Quality Consistently utilized and Frequently utilized and Occasionally utilized and Rarely utilized and Hardly utilized and
accounted and liquidated the monthly liquidated the monthly liquidated the monthly liquidated the monthly liquidated the monthly
reported MOOE and other funds and MOOE and other funds and MOOE and other funds and MOOE and other funds and MOOE and other funds
utilization of with complete, accurate with complete, accurate with complete, accurate with complete, accurate and with complete,
school fund and signed financial and signed financial and signed financial and signed financial accurate and signed
reports on cash donations reports on cash donations reports on cash donations reports on cash donations financial reports on
including Brigada Eskwela, including Brigada Eskwela, including Brigada Eskwela, including Brigada Eskwela, cash donations
school produce, School school produce, School school produce, School school produce, School including Brigada
Program Financial Program Financial Program Financial Program Financial Eskwela, school
Assistance from Assistance from Assistance from Assistance from produce, School
LGUs/private sources, LGUs/private sources, LGUs/private sources, LGUs/private sources, Program Financial
HRPTA and GPTA at the HRPTA and GPTA at the HRPTA and GPTA at the HRPTA and GPTA at the Assistance from
end of the school year end of the school year end of the school year end of the school year LGUs/private sources,
HRPTA and GPTA at the
end of the school year

### ###
reported
utilization of
school fund OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
22

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
### ###
Efficiency Submitted updated Submitted updated Submitted updated Submitted updated Submitted Summary
Summary of monthly Cash Summary of monthly Cash Summary of monthly Cash Summary of monthly Cash Cash Advances
Advances and Liquidation Advances and Liquidation Advances and Liquidation Advances and Liquidation
indicating % of cash indicating % of cash indicating % of cash indicating % of cash
utilization attested by utilization attested by utilization attested by utilization attested by
division office and at least division office and at least division office and at least division office and at least
four (4) signed financial three (3) signed financial two (2) signed financial one (1) signed financial
reports for the school year reports for the school year reports for the school year reports for the school year

Timeliness Liquidated the school Liquidated the school Liquidated the school Liquidated the school Failed to liquidate the
MOOE fifteen (15) days or MOOE ten to fourteen (10- MOOE five to nine (5-9) MOOE within four (4) days school MOOE for FY
more before the end of the 14) days before the end of days before the end of the before the end of the fiscal 2018 on time
fiscal year 2018 attested by the fiscal year 2018 fiscal year 2018 attested by year 2018 attested by the
the division office attested by the division the division office division office
office

4. Performed 6.5% Quality Produced a school Produced a school Produced a school Produced a school Produced a school
data-based strategic plan/SIP, AIP with strategic plan/SIP, AIP with strategic plan/SIP, AIP with strategic plan/SIP, AIP with strategic plan/SIP, AIP
strategic aligned APP through the aligned APP through the aligned APP through the aligned APP through the with aligned APP
planning and strategic planning process, strategic planning process, strategic planning process, strategic planning process through the strategic
implementation utilized a developed M&E utilized a developed M&E utilized a developed M&E and utilized a developed planning process and
of school PPAs for process and outcome for process and outcome for process and outcome M&E for process and utilized a developed
checkpoints, and checkpoints, and checkpoints, and outcome checkpoints and M&E for process and
completed all the target completed 75% of the completed 50% of the partially completed at least outcome checkpoints
PPAs for the current school target PPAs for the current target PPAs for the current one (1) target PPAs for the
year school year school year current school year

### ###
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
4. Performed 6.5% 23
data-based
Name of Employee:strategic
planning and Name of Rater:
Position: implementation Position:
of school PPAs
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.
### ###
Efficiency Submitted approved SIP, Submitted approved SIP, Submitted approved SIP, Submitted approved SIP, Submitted approved
AIP and APP with M&E and AIP and APP with M&E and AIP and APP with M&E AIP and APP with M&E and SIP, AIP and APP with
signed minutes of the signed minutes of the and accomplishment signed minutes of the M&E
strategic planning strategic planning reports with strategic planning
conference with conference with documentations of at least conference with
stakeholders and stakeholders and one (1) completed PPA stakeholders
accomplishment reports accomplishment reports
with documentations of all with documentations of at
completed PPAs least one (1) completed
PPA

Basic 3. Learning 1. Ensured quality 6.5% Quality Provided useful water, Provided useful water, Provided useful water and Provided useful water Provided useful water
Education Environment standards for electrical and internet electrical and internet electrical facilities and and/or electrical facilities or electrical facilities
Services facilities and facilities and maintained facilities and maintained maintained functional and maintained functional and maintained at least
ancillary services functional ancillary services functional ancillary services ancillary services such as ancillary services such as one (1) functional
given to the such as guidance and such as guidance and guidance and counselling guidance and counselling ancillary services
school counselling services, counselling services, services, canteen and and canteen services
canteen, medical, dental, canteen, medical and dental services
and library services. dental services

Efficiency Submitted
documentations, logbooks
Submitted
documentations, logbooks
Submitted
documentations, logbooks
Submitted
documentations, logbooks
Submitted
documentations,
### ###
in the guidance office and in the guidance office and in the guidance office and in the guidance office and logbooks in the
library, list/documents of library, list/documents of library, list/documents of library, list/documents of guidance office and
assistance given as assistance given as assistance given as assistance given as library, list/documents
acceptable evidences of acceptable evidences of acceptable evidences of acceptable evidences of of assistance given as
utilization of all facilities utilization of at least two utilization of at least two utilization of at least one acceptable evidences of
and availment of all school (2) facilities and availment (2) facilities and availment (1) facility and availment of utilization of at least
ancillary services of at least three (3) school of at least two (2) school at least one (1) school one (1) facility or
ancillary services ancillary services ancillary services availment of at least
one (1) school ancillary
services
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
24

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

2. Provided a 6.5% Quality Institutionalized classroom Institutionalized classroom Institutionalized classroom Institutionalized classroom Institutionalized
conducive, child- structuring in all grade structuring in all grade structuring in all grade structuring in all grade classroom structuring in
friendly and safe levels and conducted at levels and conducted at levels and conducted at levels and conducted at all grade levels and
learning least one (1) training/drills least one (1) training/drills least one (1) training/drills least one (1) training/drills conducted at least one
environment for on disaster preparedness on disaster preparedness on disaster preparedness on disaster preparedness (1) training/drills on
learners and one (1) on drugs and and one (1) on drugs and and one (1) on drugs and and one (1) on drugs and disaster preparedness
smoke-free education and smoke-free education and smoke-free education and smoke-free education and or one (1) on drugs and
other related campaigns other related campaigns other related campaigns other related campaigns smoke-free education
with no record of child with no record of child with no record of child with no record of child and other related
abuse, drug-related cases, abuse and drug-related abuse and drug-related abuse and drug-related campaigns
arson, theft, learner cases and at least three (3) cases and at least two (2) cases and at least one (1)
truancy, and misbehaviors other indicators other indicators other indicator

### ###
Efficiency Submitted documentations Submitted documentations Submitted documentations Submitted documentations Submitted
of at least 85% structured of at least 75% structured of at least 50% structured of at least 25% structured documentations of at
classrooms out of the total classrooms out of the total classrooms out of the total classrooms out of the total least 10% structured
functional classrooms and functional classrooms and functional classrooms and functional classrooms and classrooms out of the
at least one (1) at least one (1) at least one (1) at least one (1) total functional
documentation on documentation on documentation on documentation on classrooms and at least
trainings or drills trainings or drills trainings or drills trainings or drills one (1) documentation
conducted and student's conducted and student's conducted and student's conducted and student's on trainings or drills
logbook logbook logbook logbook conducted and
student's logbook

3. Established 6.5% Quality Consistently set and Frequently set and Occasionally set and Rarely set and No acceptable evidence
functional implemented school implemented school implemented school implemented school was shown
governance policies through functional policies through functional policies through functional policies through functional
structures and school organizations and school organizations and school organizations and school organizations and
operationalized committees committees committees committees
school policies

### ###
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
25

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:
3. Established 6.5%
functional TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
governance
structures and Performance Indicators Rating
operationalized Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives
school policies Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Efficiency Submitted signed minutes Submitted signed minutes Submitted signed minutes Submitted signed minutes No acceptable evidence
of meetings about the of meetings about the of meetings about the of meetings about the was shown
school policies contained in school policies contained in school policies contained in school policies contained in
a student handbook which a student handbook which a student handbook which a student handbook which
was widely distributed to was widely distributed to was widely distributed to was widely distributed to
learners and learners and learners and learners and
accomplishment reports of accomplishment reports of accomplishment reports of accomplishment reports of ### ###
at least four (4) school at least three (3) school at least two (2) school at least one (1) school
organizations (BAC, organizations (BAC, organizations (BAC, organization (BAC,
SPG/SSG, School SPG/SSG, School SPG/SSG, School SPG/SSG, School
Publication Board, DRRRM Publication Board, DRRRM Publication Board, DRRRM Publication Board, DRRRM
Committee, SGC, GPTA, Committee, SGC, GPTA, Committee, SGC, GPTA, Committee, SGC, GPTA,
etc..) etc..) etc..) etc..)

Basic 4. Human 1. Provided 6.5% Quality Conducted need-based Conducted need-based Conducted need-based Conducted need-based No acceptable evidence
Education Resource opportunities for School Learning Action Cell School Learning Action Cell School Learning Action Cell School Learning Action Cell was shown
Services Management professional (SLAC) and at least three (SLAC) and at least two (2) (SLAC) and at least one (2) (SLAC)
and growth and (3) school-based INSETs school-based INSETs school-based INSETs
Development devlopment to all (including TIP and (including TIP and (including TIP and
personnel Coaching/Mentoring Coaching/Mentoring Coaching/Mentoring
Program) Program) Program)

Efficiency Submitted approved SLAC Submitted approved SLAC Submitted approved SLAC Submitted approved SLAC No acceptable evidence
and training proposals and and training proposals and and training proposals and and training proposals and was shown
signed completion reports
of at least three (3)
signed completion reports
of at least two (2)
signed completion reports
of at least one (1) program
signed SLAC completion
reports
### ###
programs (including SLAC) programs (including SLAC) (including SLAC) with
with documentations with documentations documentations

Timeliness The trainings/sessions The trainings/sessions The trainings/sessions The trainings/sessions No acceptable evidence
were conducted for an were conducted for an were conducted for an were conducted for an was shown
aggregate of more than aggregate of 10-15 days aggregate of 5-9 days aggregate of 1-4 days
fifteen (15) days
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
26

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

2. Performed 6.5% Quality Consistently Performed Frequently Performed Occasionally Performed Rarely Performed RPMS
RPMS Processes RPMS Processes among RPMS Processes among RPMS Processes among Processes among school
among school school personnel school personnel school personnel personnel
personnel

Efficiency Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed
Performance Commitment Performance Commitment Performance Commitment Performance Commitment Performance
Forms, Performance Forms, Performance Forms, Performance Forms, Performance Commitment Forms,
Monitoring and Coaching Monitoring and Coaching Monitoring and Coaching Monitoring and Coaching Performance
Form (PMCF), Mid-Year Form (PMCF), Mid-Year Form (PMCF), Mid-Year Form (PMCF), Mid-Year Monitoring and
Review Form (MRF), Review Form (MRF), Review Form (MRF), Review Form (MRF), Coaching Form (PMCF),
Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Performance Evaluation Mid-Year Review Form
Rating and Development Rating and Development Rating and Development Rating and Development (MRF), Performance
Plans of at least ten (10) or Plans of at least eight (8) Plans of at least six (6) Plans of at least four (4) Evaluation Rating and
more personnel for the personnel for the rating personnel for the rating personnel for the rating Development Plans of ### ###
rating period period period period at least two (2) or less
personnel for the rating
period

Timeliness Summary list and signed Summary list and signed Summary list and signed Summary list and signed Summary list and
IPCRF/OPCRF were IPCRF/OPCRF were IPCRF/OPCRF were IPCRF/OPCRF were signed IPCRF/OPCRF
submitted fifteen (15) days submitted ten (10) days submitted five (5) days submitted on time for were submitted late
before the due date for before the due date for before the due date for submission
submission submission submission
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
27

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

3. Provided 6.5% Quality Consistently conducted Consistently conducted Consistently conducted Consistently conducted No acceptable evidence
school-wide SAT- school-wide SAT-based school-wide SAT-based school-wide SAT-based school-wide SAT-based was shown
based training and other training and other training and other training and other
development activities for employee activities for employee activities for employee activities for employee
programs and development such as cross development such as cross development such as cross development such as cross
activities to posting, benchmarking, posting, benchmarking, posting, benchmarking, posting, benchmarking,
personnel coaching/counselling, coaching/counselling, coaching/counselling, coaching/counselling,
mentoring, developmental mentoring, developmental mentoring, developmental mentoring, developmental
career move, assignment career move, assignment career move, assignment career move, assignment
to task/forces or to task/forces or to task/forces or to task/forces or
committees/special committees/special committees/special committees/special
projects, job projects, job projects, job projects, job
enhancement/redesign, enhancement/redesign, enhancement/redesign, enhancement/redesign,
etc.. etc.. etc.. etc..

### ###

Efficiency Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed No acceptable evidence
result/reports of one (1) result/reports of one (1) result/reports of one (1) result/reports of one (1) was shown
school-wide SAT training school-wide SAT training school-wide SAT training school-wide SAT training
and at least five (5) other and at least four (4) other and at least three (3) other and at least one (1) or two
developmental activities developmental activities developmental activities (2) other developmental
with documentations with documentations with documentations activities with
documentations

Basic 5. Parent 1. Established 6.5% Quality Consistently engaged the Frequently engaged the Occasionally engaged the Rarely engaged the No acceptable evidence
Education Involvement school, family and stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders in the was shown
Services and community formulation and formulation and formulation and formulation and
Community partnership for implementation of school implementation of school implementation of school implementation of school
Partnership performance policies and organized policies and organized policies and organized policies and organized
programs with programs with programs with programs with
stakeholders for academic stakeholders for academic stakeholders for academic stakeholders for academic
and other purposes and other purposes and other purposes and other purposes

### ###
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
28

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Basic 5. Parent 1. Established 6.5% Date of Review
Education Involvement school, family and
Rating Period:
Services and community
Community partnership for
Partnership performance
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Efficiency Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed Submitted signed No acceptable evidence
mobilization/partnership mobilization/partnership mobilization/partnership mobilization/partnership was shown ### ###
plan (included in the AIP) plan (included in the AIP) plan (included in the AIP) plan (included in the AIP)
and accomplishment and accomplishment and accomplishment and accomplishment
reports of at least two (2) reports of at least one (1) reports of at least one (1) reports of at least one (1)
programs with program with stakeholders program with stakeholders program with stakeholders
stakeholders organized for organized for academic organized for academic organized for academic
academic purposes and at purpose and at least two purpose and at least one purpose or one (1)
least one (1) programs for (2) programs for other (1) program for other program for other
other purposes purposes purposes purposes

2. Obtained 6.5% Quality Consistently engaged the Frequently engaged the Occasionally engaged the Rarely engaged the Engaged the
resources from stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders in the stakeholders during
stakeholders for continuous physical continuous physical continuous physical continuous physical brigada eskwela only
continuous improvement of the school improvement of the school improvement of the school improvement of the school
school physical
improvements
Small - 9 tchrs &
below; Medium Efficiency Submitted list of generated Submitted list of generated Submitted list of generated Submitted list of generated Submitted signed Form
(elem) - 10-29, resources (in cash or in resources (in cash or in resources (in cash or in resources (in cash or in 1.1 list of the total
(sec) - 10-25; kind) for the school year kind) for the school year kind) for the school year kind) for the school year generated resources of
Large (elem) - 30- and signed Form 1.1 total and signed Form 1.1 total and signed Form 1.1 total and signed Form 1.1 total the school during
50, (sec) 26-50; generated resources of the generated resources of the generated resources of the generated resources of the Brigada Eskwela per
Mega 51 & above school during Brigada school during Brigada school during Brigada school during Brigada category: Small - 69,000
Eskwela per category: Eskwela per category: Eskwela per category: Eskwela per category: & below; Medium - ### ###
Small - 500,000 and above; Small - 300,000-499,999; Small - 100,000-299,999; Small - 70,000-99,999; 99,999 & below; Large -
Medium - 800,000; Large Medium - 500,000- Medium - 300,000- Medium - 100,000- 299,999 & below; Mega
(elem) - 1,000,000 & 799,999; Large (elem) - 499,999; Large (elem) - 299,999; Large (elem) - (elem) -499,999 &
above, (sec.) - 1,500,000 & 8,000,000-999,999, (sec.) - 500,000-799,999, (sec.) - 300,000-499,999, (sec.) - below (sec.) - 799,999 &
above; Mega (elem) 1,000,000-1,499,999; 500,000-999,999; Mega 500,000-499,999; Mega below
-1,500,000 & above, (sec.) Mega (elem) -1,000,000- (elem) -800,000-999,999 (elem) -500,000-799,999
- 2,000,000 & above 1,499,999 (sec.) - (sec.) - 1,000,000- (sec.) - 800,000-999,999
1,500,000-1,999,999 1,499,999
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
29

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

3. Conducted 6.5% Quality Conducted at least one (1) Proposed one (1)
outreach community outreach community outreach
programs, project Conducted at least three Conducted at least two (2) Conducted at least one (1) program or activity in program or activity in
or activities in the (3) or more community community outreach community outreach coordination with coordination with and
school outreach programs or programs or activities in program or activity in approval of the local chief approved by the local
community activities in coordination coordination with and coordination with and executive chief executive
with and approval of the approval of the local chief approval of the local chief
local chief executive with executive with executive with
documentations and documentations and documentations and
certification from the certification from the certification from the
barangay barangay barangay ### ###

Efficiency Submitted accomplishment Submitted accomplishment Submitted accomplishment Submitted accomplishment Submitted approved
reports of all outreach reports of two (2) outreach reports of at least one (1) reports of at least one (1) outreach program
programs with acceptable programs with acceptable outreach programs with outreach programs proposal
documentations documentations acceptable
documentations

4. Strengthened 6.5% Quality At least two (2) or more At least one (1) or more At least one (1) approved At least one (1) program or At least one (1)
school- approved programs or approved program or program or project was project proposed by the program or project
community projects were initiated and project was initiated and initiated but not yet SGC, GPTA or other school- proposed by the SGC,
participation implemented by the SGC, implemented by the SGC, completed by the SGC, community organizations GPTA or other school-
through GPTA or other school- GPTA or other school- GPTA or other school- was approved for community
stakeholder- community organizations community organizations community organizations implementation organizations was
initiated submitted for approval
programs and
projects

Efficiency Submitted approved Submitted approved Submitted approved Submitted approved Submitted proposal of
proposal and proposal and proposal and proposal of at least one (1) at least one (1) program
accomplishment reports accomplishment reports accomplishment or status program or project or project
with documentations of at with documentations of at reports with
least two (2) completed least one (1) completed documentations of at least
programs or projects program or project one (1) ongoing program
or project
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
30

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
*Score
QET (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave.

Basic 6. Plus Factor Performed any of 2.5% Quality Performed any of the tasks Performed any of the tasks Performed any of the tasks Performed any of the tasks Performed any of the
Education the following: 1. in the National and in the Regional level with in the Division level with in the District level with tasks in the school level
Services Facilitator/Resou International level with acceptable evidence and acceptable evidence and acceptable evidence and with acceptable
rce Speaker in acceptable evidence and documentations documentations documentations evidence and
trainings; 2. Acted documentations documentations
as one of the
writers of
instructional
materials/module
s/manuals 3.
Acted as winning
trainer/coach of
individual/group
contestant; 4.
Acted as member
of selection
board/grievance ### ###
committee/inves
tigation
committee; 5.
Conducted at
least one (1)
relevant research
in any discipline
within the rating
period

OVERALL RATING
FOR
*To get the Score, the rating is miltiplied by the weight assigned ACCOMPLISHMEN
TS ###

Ratee Rater Approving Authority


MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV)
KRA 1
1. Performed classroom observations to teachers with focus on applied Classroom Observation Tools (COTs) rating sheets and/or inter-observer agreement
knowledge on content within and across curriculum learning areas: form; Signed Instructional Supervisory Plans and Reports approved by the Chief of
HT/MT – 10 the CID or PSDS/EPS; Observation Notes Form
Principal – 15

2. Checked all the teachers’ DLLs and DLPs Record of checked DLPs/DLLs with notations/comments/suggestions for the current
school year; Sample Test Papers; Record of checked DLLs/DLPs

3. Monitored and supported the use of technology in instruction by the DLLs/DLPs; Updated Inventory of Supplies and Equipment and Status attested by
teachers and learners during the school year school personnel

4. Initiated/Supported and effectively implemented instructional Signed Accomplishment/Completion Reports, documentations/pictures with
programs/projects to ensure delivery of quality instruction to learners captions

5. Rationalized the distribution of teaching loads and assignments to Updated Form 7 , Designation orders specifying duties and responsibilities
ancillary services

6. Communicated to stakeholders on learner needs, progress and Minutes GPTA meetings and HRPTA conferences signed and attested by GPTA and
achievements HRPTA Presidents, school paper, school report card (SRC), bulletin boards and
tarpaulins as information dissemination tools

KRA 2
1. Monitored the updating and upkeep of learners' records and Monitoring Tools, Checklist/Record of School Reports submitted
facilitated submission of required school reports

2. Ensured punctuality and attendance in school and in other curricular F-48, Monthly Calendar of Activities, Certtificate of Appearances
and co-curricular activities in the school, district, division or higher
levels
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV)

3. Monitored, accounted and reported utilization of school fund Summary of Monthly Cash Advances and Liquidation indicating percentage of
Liquidation attested by the division office, Financial Reports, Percentage of School
MOOE Liquidated on time for the fiscal year

4. Performed data-based strategic planning and implementation of Approved SIP, AIP and APP with M&E, signed Minutes of the Strategic Planning
school PPAs Conference, Accomplishment Reports with documentations

KRA 3
1. Ensured quality standards for facilities and ancillary services given to Documentations, Logbooks/logsheets, List of Medical Supplies distributed/availed
the school by learners and teachers

2. Provided a conducive, child-friendly and safe learning environment Documentations, Student's Logbook
for learners

3. Established functional governance structures and operationalized Minutes of meetings, hard copy of student handbook, signed accomplishment
school policies reports

KRA 4
1. Provided opportunities for professional growth and devlopment to SLAC/Training proposals and completion reports approved and signed by higher
all personnel official/s, documentations

2. Performed RPMS Processes among school personnel OPCRF/IPCRF, PMCF, MRF, SAT-IDP

3. Provided school-wide SAT-based development programs and E-SAT, Reports of training and other activities on employee development with
activities to personnel documentations

KRA 5
1. Established school, family and community partnership for AIP, signed Stakeholders/Parnership Plan, Accomplishment Reports with
performance documentations
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV)

2. Obtained resources from stakeholders for continuous school List of Donations, signed Brigada Eskwela Reports with documentations, Form 1.1
physical improvements

3. Conducted at least one outreach program/project or activity within Signed Accomplishment Report with documentations, Approved Program Proposal
the rating period

4. Strengthened school-community participation through stakeholder- Approved Proposals; Accomplishment Reports; Documentations
initiated programs and projects

KRA 6
Plus Factor Certificates, documentations
Weight

6.5

6.5

6.5

6.5

6.5
Weight

6.5

6.5

6.5

6.5

6.5

6.5

6.5

6.5
Weight

6.5

6.5

2.5
100
SCHOOL HEAD MONITORING AND EVALUATION REPORT
Name of School Head: _____________________ Position:______________ School:____________________ Quarter: _______ Calendar Year: _________

IV. RECORDS MANAGEMENT III. PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL GROWTH/PLUS FACTOR


No. of
Status of Source of
Submission/Liquidation Accuracy or Initial of Description Fund
Trainings/Researc Level Remarks
Data h or Awards
Reports Safekeepi Validating
Updated Data Available in
ng Facility Supervisor/Perso
School No. of Frequency Trainings
nnel
BD OT L No error W/ Errors Trainer/Facilitator
SIP Research
AIP Awards/Recognition
SRC
Plantilla of Position
EBEIS Issues/Challenges/Concerns Interventions/Action Taken Recommendations
SF 4
SF 6
SF 7
SF 10
Monthly Supervisory Plans OTHER M&E TOOLS
Monthly Supervisory Reports
SOB Updated EBEIS
APP SF 7
Liquidation Reports
IPCRF of Personnel (Commitment) By:
IPCRF of Personnel (Evaluation)
OPCRF of SH (Commitment)
OPCRF of SH (Evaluation) (Name of School Head)
SF CR1

Validated by:

TOTAL 0 0 0
Issues/Challenges/Concerns Interventions/Action Taken Recommendations

(Name of PSDS/Area Supervisor)

MCT/2018
SCHOOL HEAD MONITORING AND EVALUATION REPORT
Name of School Head: _____________________ Position: ________________ School: ________________________ Quarter: __________ Calendar Year: _______

I. INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP
A. Performance Indicators C. Punctuality and Attendance
No. of
Average Final Required
No. of No. of % of Rating (for Learners Level
No. of % of under No. of Days No. of Days No. of Days Roles in the
Grade Level Students/Lea Promotees/G Promotees/G No. of Failures % of Failures the AREAS (School,
Dropouts Dropouts Remedial for the Absent Tardy Activity
rners raduates raduates Quarter/Year District, etc.)
Ins./Interven Quarter
)
tion
Kinder #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Daily Attendace
Grade 1/7 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! General PTA Assembly
Grade 2/8 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Quarterly PTA Meeting
Grade 3/9 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! School Activities
Grade/4/10 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Community Activities
Grade 5/11 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Outreach Program
Grade 6/12 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Trainings/Seminars/Conferences
Total 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 Total 0 0 0

Issues/Challenges/Concerns Interventions/Actions Taken: Recommendations Issues/Challenges/Concerns Interventions/Actions Taken Recommendations

B. Instructional Supervision and Leadership II. SCHOOL LEADERSHIP, MGT. AND OPERATIONS

No. of
Teachers Average No. Average No. of Presence of No. of School No. of Target Actual
No. of Non- Average no. Remedial validated No./Ratio Accomplish % of
No. of with 200 of Number of No. of Home Curricular/Co Classes
Checking of of Teachers Classes teaching for the ments for Accomplish Num. or %
Grade Level Teachers per minutes or Observations DLLs/DLPs Visitations -curricular conducted AREAS Status
DLL/DLP for who Use ICT Conducted load Quarter/Yea the ment/Utiliza Gap
Grade Level below actual Conducted Checked by Conducted activities outside the
teaching by Quarter Quarter the Quarter in Instruction for the distribution conducted school r and Quarter/Yea tion
Quarter chart Allocation r
loads

Kinder No. of PPA per AIP #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


Grade 1/7 No. of Instructional Program #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Grade 2/8 No. of School-Based INSET #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Grade 3/9 Conflict Management #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
No. of organization of Functional
Grade/4/10 School Committees #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Grade 5/11 TIP/LAC #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Grade 6/12 No. of Structured Classrooms #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
MOOE #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Class Size

Issues/Challenges/Concerns Interventions/Actions Taken: Recommendations Issues/Challenges/Concerns Interventions/Actions Taken Recommendations

By: Validated:
MCT/2018
(Name of School Head) (Name of PSDS/Area Supervisor)

MCT/2018

You might also like