1
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
A universal lingua Franca in the modern world is the
status that English is enjoying. It is a language that is
used among people who speak various different languages. It
has singular importance and lofty status amidst the comity
of nations. It opens up vast vistas of knowledge in all
fields. It is the language of technology, business and
education. It is almost impossible to forge ahead with the
global world without English (Ellis, 2014:29).
The Philippines is a friendly country for English
speakers. It is the only country in the Asian region, aside
from Singapore, to mandate a fully bilingual public
education for all children beginning in grade school.
According to the 2010 Census of Population and Housing
conducted by the Philippine National Statistics Office, the
most recent source of national language statistics, 63.70
percent of Filipinos over the age of 5 reported an ability
to speak English. In comparison, 96.40 percent of Filipinos
reported speaking Tagalog. It is not merely an official
language but also a medium of instruction. The government
realizes very well that the link with the outer world and
2
access to higher studies would be impossible without it
(Burden, 2011:32).
As a consequence, most of schools and colleges even in
the rural areas are providing instruction in English.
Despite this positive practice, the standard of English is
declining day by day. There are various causes of this
deterioration, one of them is the inability of the students
to comprehend what the teachers deliver in the foreign
language. Practitioners and stake-holders have tried to deal
with the issue by adopting different measures.
Code-switching is an up-shot of bilingualism. It shows
mixture of two languages in interaction. For example,
teachers combine English and Filipino expression while
teaching English to their students (Cole, 2008:53).
Teacher delivers lesson using code switching, a popular
common strategy of teaching, when the students fail to grasp
the English course taught (Norrish, 2017:19).
Code switching is effective in teaching a foreign
language. Student find it easy to acquire a new language in
a comfortable environment, which prevents dropping out and
provide an avenue for continuous learning. Progress of
learning maybe slow but it is not disappointing for
learners. According to Omar (2012:75), use of bilingualism
has been found advantageous in learning English as foreign
3
language. It effectively functions in case of students who
are weak in the English conversation classroom.
Chi (2010:37) asserts that the bilingual teachers have
a lot importance in non-English speaking country. It
facilitates teachers in explaining the concepts more and
showcasing to the students the dynamics of the language
being taught.
But like any other model, using it properly in teaching
target language in class can be fruitful (Krashen, 2008:91)
for the learners of English as a foreign language. Teachers
need to know when to use code switching, finding the right
moment and situation when to expertly apply it to teaching
the English language.
Students of varying background encounter no problem in
understanding utterance in the Filipino language.
Translation of different terms abstraction in Filipino
removes the cobwebs of misapprehension from the minds of
English language learners. The teacher faces no hurdle in
bringing up the message of the course with the help of this
strategy (Gregorio and Gil, 2017:77).
There have been different reactions to using code
switching and whether students benefit from a teacher who
only speaks English or if code-switching into another
language is a useful resource in the learning of a second
4
language. Code-switching is a phenomenon that exists in
bilingual societies where people have the opportunity to use
two or more languages to communicate. Being able to peak
more than one language, bilinguals can code-switch and use
their languages as resources to find better ways to convey
meaning (Gardner-Chloros, 2009:97-113).
When learning a language, it is important not only to
learn isolated areas of a second language but to be able to
use those areas simultaneously when talking, reading,
writing or listening in your second language. English should
be used to increase the input and output of the target
language and that the use of the native language or mother
tongue should be avoided. However, when teachers’ code-
switching is planned ahead it can contribute to a more
efficient understanding of a specific topic or be a part of
the learning. One example could be when explaining a
grammatical function in native language, and then applying
that explanation to English writing. While focus on input
and output in the target language is an important aspect of
language acquisition, it has been pointed out that the use
of code-switching in the language classroom does not prevent
students from acquiring English. According to Cook,
(2011:405) it is important not to prevent students from
using their first language but to encourage them to use the
5
second language in as many situations as possible and to
find out when and why code-switching should occur.
The purpose of this study is to determine the
efficiency of using code switching in teaching English. It
is necessary to conduct this study to gain knowledge on the
effects of code switching to teaching and learning English
among Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in English
students of Samar College for the School Year 2018-2019.
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to determine the perceived efficiency
of using code switching in teaching English to Bachelor of
Secondary Education (BSED) Major in English students of
Samar College, City of Catbalogan, Samar during the School
Year 2018-2019.
Specifically, this study seeks answers to the following
questions:
1. What is the profile of the student-respondents in
terms of the following variates:
1.1 age and sex;
1.2 civil status;
1.3 gross monthly family income;
1.4 parents’ highest educational attainment;
1.5 parents’ occupation?
6
2. How often does the student-respondents’ English
instructor use code switching in class?
3. What is the student-respondents’ perceived
efficiency of using code switching in teaching English?
4. What is the student-respondents’ academic
performance in their major courses in terms of their average
grade in all the courses taken?
5. Is there a significant relationship between the
student-respondents’ perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English and each of their profile
variates?
6. Is there a significant relationship between the
student-respondents’ academic performance in their major
courses and each of their profile variates?
7. Is there a significant relationship between the
student-respondents’ academic performance in their major
courses and their English instructors’ frequency of using
code switching in class?
8. Is there a significant relationship between the
student-respondents’ perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English and their academic performance
in the major courses?
9. What implications may be derived based on the
findings of the study?
7
Hypotheses
Based on the foregoing specific questions, the
following null hypotheses will be tested in the conduct of
this study:
1. There is no significant relationship between the
student-respondents’ perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English and each of their profile
variates.
2. There is no significant relationship between the
student-respondents’ academic performance in their major
courses and each of their profile variates.
3. There is no significant relationship between the
student-respondents’ academic performance in their major
courses and their English instructors’ frequency of using
code switching in class.
4. There is no significant relationship between the
student-respondents’ perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English and their academic performance
in the major courses.
Theoretical Framework
This study is anchored on the following theories:
Piaget’s Constructivist Learning Theory, Schoenfeld’s
Absorption Theory of Learning and Fogatry’s Thematic
8
Instruction Theory.
Piaget’s Constructivist Learning Theory states that in
a constructivist classroom the focus tends to shift from the
teacher to the students. The classroom is no longer a place
where the teacher ("expert") pours knowledge into passive
students, who wait like empty vessels to be filled. In the
constructivist model, the students are urged to be actively
involved in their own process of learning. In the
constructivist classroom, both teacher and students think of
knowledge as a dynamic, ever-changing view of the world we
live in and the ability to successfully stretch and explore
that view - not as inert factoids to be memorized
(www.ucdoer.ie, September 18, 2018).
Key assumptions of this perspective include: (1) What
the student currently believes, whether correct or
incorrect, is important. (2) Despite having the same
learning experience, each individual will base their
learning on the understanding and meaning personal to them.
(3) Understanding or constructing a meaning is an active and
continuous process. (4) Learning may involve some conceptual
changes. (5) When students construct a new meaning, they may
not believe it but may give it provisional acceptance or
even rejection. (6) Learning is an active, not a passive,
9
process and depends on the students taking responsibility to
learn (www.ucdoer.ie, September 18, 2018).
The main activity in a constructivist classroom is
solving problems. Students use inquiry methods to ask
questions, investigate a topic, and use a variety of
resources to find solutions and answers. As students explore
the topic, they draw conclusions, and, as exploration
continues, they revisit those conclusions. Exploration of
questions leads to more questions. Constructivist teachers
do not take the role of the "sage on the stage." Instead,
teachers act as a "guide on the side" providing students
with opportunities to test the adequacy of their current
understandings (www.ucdoer.ie, September 18, 2018).
This study is anchored to Schoenfeld’s Absorption
Theory of Learning. The theory views children as learners
who store knowledge as a result of memorization (Bezuk et
al., 2010:81). As a result of this theory, lengthy or
complex processes computations were used as a major form of
exercise. Bezuk et al. (2010:81) state that instruction
stressed ways to perform these processes accurately.
Reading, seeing, listening, and feeling are good
methods for absorbing information. However, this information
does not instantly become knowledge once we have absorbed it
as we have simply copied the information from one source,
10
such as a book, to another source, our brain. To help make
it part of one's knowledge base, one needs to take it
through a “learning cycle,” but not necessarily in this
order (Bezuk et al., 2010:81).
Finally, this study is also anchored to the Fogatry’s
Thematic Learning Theory. It is an instructional method of
teaching in which emphasis is given on choosing a specific
theme for teaching one or many concepts. Thematic Learning
takes place when different disciplines are all centered
towards one definite concept. This is a creative and
exciting form for learners, enabling them to notice the
inter-relatedness of various subjects. It is based on
integrating variety of information and using it to
demonstrate the topic. Pedagogy of thematic learning is
based on its exploration of broad areas in one theme
(www.k12academics.com, September 18, 2018).
Code switching utilized with thematic learning is based
on the idea that knowledge acquisition is efficient among
students when they learn in the context of a coherent and
holistic way and when they can associate whatever they learn
to their surrounding and real life examples. Thematic
instruction seeks to put the cognitive skills such as
reading, thinking, memorizing, and writing in the context of
a real life situation under the broad aim to allow creative
11
exploration. It is proved to be a powerful instructional
method for integrating various concepts in curriculum by
daily life examples and experiences. Thematic learning helps
in promoting learning with understanding and discourages
rote learning (www.k12academics.com, September 18, 2018).
All these concepts and their in-depth understanding are
prerequisites to better equip the teachers in utilizing code
switching and increasing information retention of students.
The theories and concepts presented and discussed herein
served as the framework in the development of the research
problem and sub-problems.
Conceptual Framework
Figure 1 shows the diagrammatic presentation of the
research process. The base of the scheme is research
environment and the respondents of the study. The research
environment is Samar College, City of Catbalogan, Samar,
while the respondents are the Bachelor of Secondary
Education (Major in English) students.
A single dimensional arrow connects it to the bigger
frame that contains the research process. It is shown that
the large box on the left which contains the student-
IMPROVED USAGE OF CODE SWITCHING IN CLASS
AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN MAJOR COURSES
AMONG BSED MAJOR IN ENGLISH STUDENTS
12
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS,
AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY
PERCEIVED
STUDENT- EFFICIENCY OF USING
RESPONDENTS’ CODE SWITCHING IN
PROFILE TEACHING ENGLISH
F VARIATES: F
E E
E age and sex E
D civil status D
B gross monthly ACADEMIC B
A family income PERFORMANCE IN A
C parents’ MAJOR COURSES C
K highest K
educational
attainment
parents’
occupation
ENGLISH
INSTRUCTORS’
FREQUENCY OF USING
CODE SWITCHING
IN STUDENT-
RESPONDENTS’CLASS
BSED (MAJOR IN ENGLISH)STUDENTS
SAMAR COLLEGE
Figure 1. The Conceptual Framework of the Study
respondents’ profile variates in terms of their age, sex,
average monthly family income, parents’ highest educational
13
attainment and parents’ occupation is connected by double-
headed arrow to the two boxes on the right.
The upper right box shows the student-respondents’
perceived efficiency of using code switching in teaching
English while the box in the middle contains their academic
performance in terms of their average grade on the major
courses they have taken. The double-headed arrows signify
that a correlational design will be applied to test the
relationship between the student-respondents’ profile
variates and their perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English as well as their academic
performance in the major courses. The same design will be
applied to test the relationship between the student-
respondents’ perceived efficiency of using code switching in
teaching English and their academic performance in the major
courses.
Moreover, the lowermost box on the right which contains
the English instructors’ frequency of using code switching
in student-respondents’ class is connected by a double-
headed arrow to the box which contains their academic
performance in their major courses. This implies that
correlational design will be applied to test the
relationship between the student-respondents’ academic
14
performance in their major courses and their English
instructors’ frequency of using code switching in class.
Furthermore, the whole research process is again
connected to another box that contains the findings and
recommendations of the said study. This box is connected to
two lateral boxes that serve as feedback mechanism.
Lastly, the box is joined to the upper most box that
represent the ultimate goal of the study, which is the
improved usage of code switching in class and academic
performance in major courses among BSED major in English
students of Samar College.
Significance of the Study
The findings of the study will be beneficial to the
following stakeholders: Bachelor of Secondary Education
(BSED) Major in English students, college instructors,
school administrators, parents, community and the future
researchers.
To the BSED Major in English Students. The findings of
the study will foster awareness among the BSED Major in
English students as regards to the efficiency of code
switching employed by their teacher in teaching their major
courses and its impact to their academic performance in the
major courses. Hence, they will able to assess the teaching
15
style which will be suitable and appropriate for them to
improve their academic performance in their major courses.
To the College Instructors. The findings of the study
will be beneficial to college instructors, particularly
those who handle English subject for the BSED Major in
English students, so that they will be aware on the impact
of using code switching in teaching major courses that they
employ to the academic performance of the students.
Moreover, they will be able to modify and improve their
teaching styles in order to enhance the language skills and
improve the academic performance in the major courses of the
students.
To the School Administrators. The findings of this
study will serve as inputs to school administrators in
improving the programs that focus on English subject and
enhancement intended for students. They will be guided in
planning related activities and seminars which will help
teachers to improve their teaching style employed in
teaching English, specifically proper way and timing of
using code switching that will help in the improvement of
the academic performance of students.
To the Parents. The findings of the study will serve as
an eye-opener to the parents of the BSED Major in English
students on the impact of the using code switching employed
16
by the instructors in teaching English subject to their
children’s academic performance in their major courses. This
will also serve as a guide in identifying the support that
their children need in order to improve their academic
performance, only if applicable and necessary for the
established purpose.
To the Community. The findings of the study will
provide information to the public as well as the entire
service community as to the impact of the using code
switching employed by the instructors in teaching English
subject to the students’ academic performance in the major
subjects. In this manner, it will serve as a basis for them
to plan activities and programs intended to help improving
the academic performance of the students.
To the Future Researchers. The findings of this study
will serve as a rich source of literature for parallel study
or similar study that future researchers will undertake in
the future.
Scope and Delimitation
The purpose of this study is to determine the
efficiency of using code switching in the teaching English.
Particularly, the condition of BSED Major in English
students in Samar College who have experienced classes in
17
which instructors are using code switching as the teaching
method of explaining and expounding English and its related
fields. The level of and frequency, thereof, using code
switching in teaching English as to examination,
performance, interest and other outputs.
This study will be conducted during the School Year
2018-2019.
Definition of Terms
To provide a common frame of reference to the readers,
the following terms are herein defined conceptually and
operationally.
Academic Performance. Conceptually, this term refers
to the level or measure of knowledge or proficiency of
performance of a student in a subject taught in school
(www.merriam-webster.com, September 18, 2018).
Operationally, this term refers to the academic performance
in English earned by the English major BSED student in terms
of their final grade in English or other subject derive from
it.
Activity Undertaken. Conceptually, this term refers to
the summary of daily activities that a person enters upon
(www.thefreedictionary.com, September 18, 2018).
18
Operationally, this term refers to the rating measured by
the final grade earned by the students in English.
Classroom Practice. Conceptually, this term refers to
the effective classroom management providing an environment
for enhancing student growth, and increasing responsible and
motivated behavior (www.pbismissouri.org, September 18,
2018). Operationally, this term refers to the activities
undertaken by the respondent on a daily or routine basis.
Commutative Approach. Conceptually, this term refers to
a system that allows more proportional representation
(www.businessdictionary.com, September 18, 2018).
Operationally, this term refers to the activity implemented
by the teacher that is inclusive and allows wider scope.
Direct Method. Conceptually, this term refers to the
natural method used in teaching foreign languages, refrains
from using the learners' native language and uses only the
target language (www.teachingenglish.org, September 18,
2018). Operationally, this term refers to a teachers’
practice wherein the learner is immersed in the same way as
when a first language is learnt.
Code Switching. Conceptually, this term refers to the
practice of alternating between two or more languages or
varieties of language in conversation (www.merriam-
webster.com, September 18, 2018). Operationally, this term
19
refers to the conversation switching from English to
Filipino and/or Waray-waray of the teacher in teaching
English to English major BSED students.
Efficiency. Conceptually, this term refers to the ratio
of the useful work performed by a person or in a process to
the total energy expended or heat taken in (www.
dictionary.com, September 18, 2018). Operationally, this
term refers to the good use of code switching in teaching
and learning lessons in English.
Effect. Conceptually, this term refers to a change that
is a result or consequence of an action or other cause
(www.en.oxforddictionaries.com, September 18, 2018).
Operationally, this term refers to the result of using code
switching to teaching and learning English.
English. Conceptually, this term refers to a subject
that is a part of the school curriculum in the Philippines
where the students would learn all about the English
language (www.answers.com, September 18, 2018).
Operationally, this term refers to the subject that the
students learn as part of their curriculum.
Learning. Conceptually, these terms refer to the
acquisition of knowledge or skills through experience,
study, or by being taught (www.thelearnigncoach.com,
September 18, 2018). Operationally, this term refers to
20
the knowledge acquired through experience, study or being
taught of English subject among English major BSED
students.
Perception. Conceptually, this term refers to the
ability to see, hear, or become aware of something through
the senses (www.dictionary.com, September 18, 2018).
Operationally, this term refers to the English major BSED
students’ awareness on the teachers’ use of code switching
and how it affects their English learning process.
Teaching. Conceptually, this term refers to the process
of attending to people’s needs, experiences, feelings and
intervening so that they learn particular things, and go
beyond the given (www.infed.org, September 18, 2018).
Operationally, this term refers to the teachers’ use of code
switching in teaching or imparting English knowledge and
experience to students.
Problems . Conceptually, this term refers to a matter
or situation regarded as unwelcome or harmful and needing to
be dealt with and overcome (www.merriam-webster.com,
September 18, 2018). Operationally, this term refers to
the situation wherein the use of code switching may
interfere with learning that is considered detrimental in
the process.
21
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter presents the literature and studies
related to the current study of the researchers. The
researchers had reviewed these pieces and found it to be
relevant to the conduct of this research.
Related Literature
The researchers went through some related literature to
get ideas and insights, and are presented below. The
following literatures are found to be related to this
present study.
According to Ayeni (2011:143-149), teaching is a
continuous process that involves bringing about desirable
changes in learners through use of appropriate methods. It
is indicated that in order to bring desirable changes in
students, teaching methods used by educators should be best
for the subject matter.
Furthermore, Cooper et. al. (2011:313-327) sustained
that teaching methods work effectively mainly if they suit
learners’ needs since every learner interprets and responds
to questions in a unique way. As such, alignment of teaching
methods with students’ needs and preferred
22
learning influence students’ academic attainments.
Codeswitching, defined by Myers-Scotton (2013:93) as the
use of two or more languages in the same conversation, \=
sually within the same conversational turn, or even within
the same sentence of that turn, has been the subject of much
study for a long time and in different areas. For example,
one field of investigation focuses on the use of code
switching in the words of bilingual or multilingual speakers
in their everyday conversations.
Code-switching is used to create close relationships
between students and their teachers and that students find
classroom interaction more natural and easy when code-
switching is allowed. This comfortable atmosphere that code-
switching can contribute to is important in the teacher-
student relationship since it gives them an opportunity to
communicate in a more informal way where the risk of
misunderstandings due to secondary language learning
shortcomings can be avoided (Jingxia, 2010:21).
In formal situations, code-switching can be used to
make the teaching more effective. When a teacher explains
what is said in the curriculum or another academic text it
can be useful to translate or explain some concepts
further in the students’ primary language. Code switching
also leads to more efficient teaching for the simple reason
23
that the students understand faster and more thoroughly.
Hence, teachers’ code switching is an important tool for
explanations and instructions (Simon, 2011:317).
Grammar and vocabulary learning can also be facilitated
by code-switching Grammar instruction is the area that
contained the largest amount of code-switching.
When code-switching, teachers draw upon students’ primary
language grammar knowledge. It showed that explicit grammar
teaching could be conveyed more thoroughly in the students’
primary language; even students with a high secondary
language proficiency level absorbed information about
grammar better if it was in their primary language (Cook,
2011:413).
Another area where the effects of code-switching have
been studied is that of vocabulary learning where Lin’s
(2013:205-207) findings indicate that code-switching seems
to increase the amount of cognitive processing made by
students. A larger cognitive effort is required to process
words when there is both an explanation in the students’
secondary language and a translation into the students’
primary language, which could mean that the students will
learn new vocabulary more thoroughly.
The main argument for avoiding code-switching is that
the students miss out on input in the target language and
24
are deprived of genuine secondary language interaction. In
groups with more than one primary language, the teachers
should ideally be able to relate to all languages. Since
this is not possible, code-switching should be avoided and
the target language be used consistently instead. One method
that avoids the primary language is the teaching method
Communicative Language Teaching. It focuses on target
language communication rather than teaching the linguistic
systems of a language. Through participation in
communicative activities the secondary language learners are
using the target language and the purpose is to use the
target language in order to acquire it. Consequently, code-
switching should be kept to a minimum in the L2 classroom
3(Song and Andrews, 2009:36).
Students tended to accept their teachers’
code-switching regardless of what and how often they code-
switched. The key to the students’ acceptance seemed to be
confidence in their teacher. The students thought that the
medium of teaching chosen by their teacher fulfilled a
purpose and served to help them to meet different needs
(Song and Andrews, 2009:204).
According to Turnbull (2016:13), teachers should begin
the school year in teaching secondary language with a
positive attitude and stick to it. He recommends different
25
ways to maximize secondary language use including taking
into account the students interests when creating the tasks
and using strategies adapted to the students’ different
learning styles. Helping students understand the L2 could be
done through the use of strategies such as repetition,
intonation, visuals, realia, miming, and modeling. According
to Turnbull, through strategic teaching teachers could also
help students to use functional language, do selective
listening and accomplish communicative and experiential
tasks.
Crichton (2009:44) investigated how the teachers who
made extensive use of the secondary language teaching,
adapted their secondary language to make it comprehensible
to the learners and stimulated the learners’ responses.
Results from class observations and student interviews
showed that success in using the target language depended on
teachers’ and students’ active use of strategies. Students
contributed actively by consciously paying attention and
listening to the way teachers used the language to convey
meaning. Teachers created a warm atmosphere by focusing on
meaning. They encouraged output, interaction, and taught
their students how to use functional language to express
their interests, ask for clarification, and show surprise.
26
She also observed that teachers believed that learning the
target language could be enjoyable for both of them.
Although there are many factors affecting the
belongingness to a group or a community, such as ethnicity,
religion, or social status, this study’s concern is to
determine the attitude towards the linguistic aspect among
people from the selected criteria representing these
communities. This aspect has not been studied in the
Philippines very much (Reigh, 2014).
As a whole, using code switching serves as an avenue
for teachers in expressing their ideas more and giving more
concrete example. Though teachers have to be aware of not
using it too much to the point of sacrificing the quality of
the subject or the true objective of studying it in the
first place.
Related Studies
The following items are some of the related studies
which were thoroughly reviewed by the researcher that were
found to be relevant to this study. Similarities and
differences to this study are hereby presented.
Bista (2010) conducted a study entitled “Factors of
Code Switching among Bilingual English Students in the
University Classroom: A Survey”. This study proposes to
27
identify and evaluate the factors that affect code switching
in the university classroom among 15 bilingual international
students. The findings from the study conducted in a
southern American university revealed that the primary
factor of code switching in international classroom is
incompetence in the second language. Other noted factors
were: to maintain privacy; to make it easier to speak in
their own language than to speak in English; to avoid
misunderstanding; being unfamiliar with similar words in
English. However, code switching can be a useful strategy in
classroom interaction if the aim is to make meaning clear
and to transfer the knowledge to students in an efficient
way.
The study of Bista bears resemblance with the present
study since both studies deals with the efficiency of code
switching in teaching English. The difference of the present
study with the cited study is more on finding common factors
that brought about the use of code switching in the
classroom, while the present study is focused on the
perceived efficiency of using code switching in teaching
English. The cited study had intermediate students as
respondents while the present study has English major BSED
students as respondents. The locate of the study for the
cited is in Arkansas while the current study is at a
28
particular private school in the City of Catbalogan,
Province of Samar.
Bailey (2011) conducted a study entitled “Code
Switching in the Foreign Language Classroom: Students’
Attitudes and Perceptions and the Factors Impacting Them”.
The aim of the thesis was to assess the students’
perceptions of and attitude toward code switching by both
students and teachers in foreign language classes and to
determine whether there were certain factors that influenced
these perceptions and attitudes. The results show that
language anxiety and perceived language competence play a
significant role in impacting students’ perceptions of and
attitude toward code switching in the foreign language
classroom. Motivation to learn the language did not impact
many of the dependent variables. The results are presented
and discussed, as are avenues for future research.
The study of Bailey bears resemblance with the present
study since both studies deals with the efficiency of code
switching in teaching English. The difference of the present
study with the cited study is more on finding common factors
that brought about the use of code switching in the
classroom as well as finding the students’ attitudes and
perceptions of code switching occurrences in the classroom,
while the present study is focused on the perceived
29
efficiency of using code switching in teaching English. The
cited study had intermediate students as respondents while
the present study has English major BSED students as
respondents. The locate of the study for the cited is in
France while the current study is at a particular private
school in the City of Catbalogan, Province of Samar.
Johansson (2013) conducted a study entitled “Code
Switching in the English Classroom”. The results showed that
the teachers generally tried to code-switch as little as
possible but that they did code-switch in some of those
situations where the students preferred either a combination
of Swedish and English or only Swedish. Two of these
situations were grammar instructions, where a majority of
the students preferred a combination of English and Swedish,
and one-to-one situations, where a majority of the students
preferred Swedish. A clear majority of the students (87
percent) wanted their teacher to make them speak more
English.
The study of Johansson bears resemblance with the
present study since both studies deals with the efficiency
of code switching in teaching English. The difference of the
present study with the cited study is more on comparing
classroom situation of using a full English instruction
versus to a classroom set-up of dwelling into code switching
30
instruction, while the present study is focused on the
perceived efficiency of using code switching in teaching
English. The cited study had intermediate students as
respondents while the present study has English major BSED
students as respondents. The locate of the study for the
cited is in Sweden while the current study is at a
particular private school in the City of Catbalogan,
Province of Samar.
Malik (2014) conducted a study entitled “Code Switching
as an Effective Technique of Teaching English at the
Intermediate Level in Pakistan”. The findings of the study
illustrated that code switching is also an effective method
of teaching English, especially to students of Intermediate
classes. Major motives of this technique are to inspire and
arouse the interest of the students towards learning of
English. It facilitates their comprehension and serves as an
impetus to the learning success. The study has corroborated
through the quantitative paradigm that code-switching is a
useful teaching strategy particularly for teaching language
learners belonging to the backward rural areas of our
country. The study investigated 200 low English Proficient
learners of various colleges of Khushab. It was brought out
that the students showed keen interest in language
acquisition, which bears ample testimony to its being an
31
efficacious and gainful strategy for low English Proficient
learners.
The study of Malik bears resemblance with the present
study since both studies deals with the efficiency of code
switching in teaching English. The difference of the present
study with the cited study is more on establishing code
switching as an effective technique compared to the direct
traditional method, while the present study is focused on
the perceived efficiency of using code switching in teaching
English. The cited study had intermediate students as
respondents while the present study has English major BSED
students as respondents. The locate of the study for the
cited is in Pakistan while the current study is at a
particular private school in the City of Catbalogan,
Province of Samar.
Ebid (2017) conducted a study entitled “Code Switching
and Attitudinal Perception”. One of the results of
globalization is that individuals are now more likely using
multiple codes to communicate, often switching between them.
The purpose of this study is to examine the attitude toward
codeswitching (CS) in Egypt as there has limited research
conducted in the region, especially codeswitching between
the Egyptian colloquial and English. Attitude toward CS was
determined using a convenience sample of 40 participants in
32
an Egyptian university community. Half of the participants
were Egyptians who had attended international schools prior
to university and the other half were international students
studying Arabic. Questionnaires, verbal guise tests and
follow-up interviews were conducted to assess the listener’s
attitude
toward the speaker. Also examined was if the gender of the
speaker affected the attitude of the listener. Results
showed that both groups of participants viewed code-
switching favorably although they both felt it compromised
Arabic. The male who did not code-switch in the verbal
guise test was rated the most negatively by both groups. The
results did not support the expectations from previous
research that code switching would be viewed more
negatively. This study provides additional insights about
the attitude toward code-switching and supports the
suggestion that a code-switched variety of Arabic and
English is becoming a widely-accepted variety which thus
could be added for describing the intermediate varieties
between the high and low varieties of Arabic.
The study of Ebid bears resemblance with the present
study since both studies deals with the efficiency of code
switching in teaching English. The difference of the present
study with the cited study is more on students’ attitudes
33
and perceptions of code switching occurrences in the
classroom, while the present study is focused on the
perceived efficiency of using code switching in teaching
English. The cited study had university students as
respondents while the present study has English major BSED
students as respondents. The locate of the study for the
cited is in Cairo, Egypt while the current study is at a
particular private school in the City of Catbalogan,
Province of Samar.
The different research literature and studies cited
proved to be useful to the present study in terms of
determining the efficiency of using code switching in
teaching English among Bachelor of Secondary Education
(BSED) Major in English students of Samar College. The
reviewed related studies had contributed much for the
formulation of problems, conceptualization and development
of the study.
34
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
This chapter describes and discusses the research
design and methodology that will be employed in the study.
This chapter includes the research deign, locale of the
study, instrumentation and validation of the instruments,
sampling procedure, data gathering procedure, and
statistical methods that will be used in interpreting the
data.
Research Design
This research study will employ descriptive-correlation
design. In particular, the researchers will determine the
determine the perceived efficiency of using code switching
in teaching English to Bachelor of Secondary Education
(BSED) Major in English students of Samar College. This
study will make use of the questionnaire which will be the
main instrument in the conduct of the study and the official
records of the student-respondents for the documentary
analysis that will be obtained from the Registrar’s Office
of Samar College.
Correlation analysis will be used to determine the
relationship between the student-respondents’ profile
35
variates and their perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English as well as their academic
performance in the major courses. The same design will also
be applied to determine the relationship between the
student-respondents’ perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English and their academic performance
in the major courses. Moreover, correlational design will be
applied to determine the relationship between the student-
respondents’ academic performance in their major courses and
their English instructors’ frequency of using code switching
in class.
Locale of the Study
This research will be conducted in the College of
Education of Samar College, City of Catbalogan, Samar as
shown in Figure 2.
Samar College has opened its doors in July 1, 1949
styling itself under the name of its famous predecessors –
Samar Junior College. It is a private and non-sectarian
educational institution which is located in Mabini Avenue,
Catbalogan City, Samar. It is accessible through many public
transport lines passing directly in front the school (Samar
College Faculty Manual: 1).
This institution caters the following levels of
36
Figure 2. The Map Showing the Locale of the Study
37
education: pre-school, primary, junior high school, senior
high school, undergraduate, and graduate studies.
The College of Education is the biggest department in
the tertiary level and it is headed by its dean, Dr. Nimfa
T. Torremoro.
Instrumentation
To obtain the needed data and other information for the
use in this study, the researcher will employ the survey
questionnaire to the student-respondents as well as
documentary analysis of their official record.
Questionnaire. The questionnaire as the primary tool in
data gathering is a researcher-made instrument. This
instrument intended for student respondents contains two
parts.
Part I of the student-respondent’s questionnaire is
intended to gather information about the demographic profile
of the student-respondents as to their age, sex, civil
status, gross monthly family income, parents’ highest
educational attainment, and parents’ occupation.
Part II, on the other hand, is designed to gather the
data with regards to the student-respondents’ perceived
efficiency of using code switching in teaching English. It
consists of twenty specific items which will require the
38
student-respondents to answer using the 5-point scale where
5 is Strongly Agree (SA), 4- Agree (A), 3- Neutral (N), 2-
Disagree (D), and 1- Strongly Disagree (SD).
Moreover, the questionnaire will be submitted to the
adviser and panel members during the pre-oral defense for
further revision and improvement.
Furthermore, important documents of the student-
respondents will be carefully analyzed and collected as part
of this study. Such documents are mostly in the student-
respondents’ official records to gather their average grade
in all the major courses taken.
Validation of the Instrument
Before the administration of the questionnaire to the
student-respondents, the instruments will undergo expert
validation to determine its validity and reliability.
The research adviser and panel members will do expert
validation in the following manner: first, draft of the
questionnaires will be given to the research adviser and
panel members during the pre-oral defense for checking
purposes, comments, and suggestions; second, the researchers
will consider the corrections and suggestions that will be
made by the panel members and research adviser; and lastly,
the questionnaire will be considered to the final revision
39
and reproduced according to the required number needed for
the data collection.
Sampling Procedure
This set of investigation about the perceived
efficiency of using code switching in teaching will involve
the Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in English
students who are enrolled in the College of Education of
Samar College during the School Year 2018-2019, as the
student-respondents.
To get the total number of student-respondents for the
study, the researchers will use the Slovin’s formula by
Bolaños (2010:2). The formula is as follow:
n = N/(1 + Ne2)
where:
n = refers to the sample size
N = refers to the population
e = refers to the margin of error
Moreover, the researchers will utilize 0.05 margin of
error.
Data Gathering Procedure
The first step in data gathering procedure will be
securing a letter of approval from the Senior Vice-President
of Academic Programs and the Dean of the College
40
of Education to conduct the study.
After the approval of the final copy of the
questionnaire, it will be reproduced according to the number
required in this study. The next procedure will be for the
researchers to personally administer the questionnaire to
the student-respondents to ensure a hundred percent
retrieval of the accomplished questionnaires.
Upon the approval of the Dean of the College of
Education and the School’s Registrar, the researchers will
also employ documentary analysis using the official school
records of the student-respondents. This will enable the
researchers to compute for the student-respondents’ average
grade in all the major courses they have taken.
The data will be collected, tabulated, analyzed, and
interpreted with the aid of statistical tools.
Statistical Treatment of Data
The data about the perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English and academic performance that
will be gathered from the student-respondents through the
use of questionnaire and data analysis will be carefully
tallied, tabulated, analyzed, interpreted, and subjected
to appropriate statistical treatment. The following
statistical techniques will be used in this study:
41
Frequency Count. This statistical tool will be used in
reporting the number of student-respondents of the same age,
sex, civil status, gross monthly family income, parents’
highest educational attainment, parents’ occupation, and
academic performance in terms of their average grade in all
the major courses taken.
Percentage Distribution. This will be employed in the
analysis and interpretation of the data on the age, sex,
civil status, gross monthly family income, parents’ highest
educational attainment, parents’ occupation, and academic
performance in terms of the average grade in all the major
courses taken of the student-respondents.
Mean. This statistical tool will be used in reporting
the student-respondents’ average age, gross monthly family
income, and academic performance in terms of their average
grade in all the major courses taken.
Standard Deviation. This tool will be employed in the
analysis and interpretation of the data on the student-
respondents’ average age, gross monthly family income, and
academic performance in terms of their average grade in all
the major courses taken. This is the formula for standard
deviation is presented below (www.libweb.surrey.ac.uk,
October 9, 2017):
42
∑ ( x−x̅ )2
s=
√ n−1
where x represents each value in the population
x-bar is the mean value of the sample
Σ is the summation (or total)
n-1 is the number of sample minus 1.
Weighted Mean. This tool will be used to quantify the
responses of the student-respondents to the questionnaire
relative to their perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English.
The formula to be used is given below (www.statis
ticshowto.com, October 9, 2017):
Σwx
weighted mean =
Σw
where:
Σ = the sum of
w = the weights
x = the value
In interpreting the weighted mean, the following
substantial values will be used:
Range Value/ Description Interpretation
4.51 -5.00 Strongly Agree
3.51 -4.50 Agree
2.51 -3.50 Neutral
1.51 -2.50 Disagree
1.00 -1.50 Strongly Disagree
43
Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient
(Pearson’s r). This tool will be used to determine the
degree of relationship between the student-respondents’
profile variates and their perceived efficiency of using
code switching in teaching English as well as their academic
performance in terms of their average grade on all the major
courses taken.
This tool will also be used to determine the degree of
relationship between the student-respondents’ academic
performance and their perceived efficiency of using code
switching in teaching English as well as their English
instructors’ frequency of using code switching in class. The
formula (Broto, 2007:62) is as follows:
nΣxy−ΣxΣy
r= 2 2
2 2
√(nΣ x −( Σx ) )(nΣ y −( Σy ) )
where:
r = Pearson-Product Moment Correlation Coefficient
n = sample size
Σxy = the sum of the product of x and y
ΣxΣy = the product of Σx and Σy
Σ x 2 = sum of squares of x
Σ y 2 = um of squares of y
In the evaluation of the computed r-value, the
following scale will be used:
44
Value Degree of Correlation
0.00 to 0.20 Negligible Correlation
0.21 to 0.40 Low/Slight Correlation
0.41 to 0.70 Moderate Correlation
0.71 to 0.90 High Correlation
1.00 Perfect Correlation
The researchers will make use of 0.05 level of
significance in determining the direction of the hypothesis.
The data analysis will be facilitated useing Microsoft Excel
Data Analysis and Statistical Package for Social sciences
(SPSS).
45
B I B L I O G R A P H Y
A.BOOKS
Asmah, H. O. The Linguistic Scenery in Malaysia. Kuala
Lumpur, ML: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka, 2012.
46
Bezuk, N. S., Cathcart, W. G., Vance, J. H., and Pothier, Y.
M. Learning Mathematics in Elementary and Middle Schools.
Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall, 2010.
Ellis, R. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford,
UK: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Gardner-Chloros, P. Sociolinguistic Factors in Code
Switching. In Barbara E. Bullock & Almeida J. T. The
Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code Switching.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Krashen, S. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language
Learning. Great Britain: Prentice-Hall, 2008.
Myers-Scotton, C. Social Motivations for Codeswitching:
Evidence from Africa. Oxoford: Claredon Press, 2013.
Simon, Diana-Lee. Towards a New Understanding of
Codeswitching in the Foreign Language Classroom. In
Rodolfo Jacobson (ed.), Codeswitching
Worldwide II. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Song, Y., and Andrews, S. The L1 in L2 Learning: Teachers’
Beliefs and Practices. München: LINCOM, 2009.
B. PERIODICALS, ARTICLES, JOURNALS AND MAGAZINES
Ayeni, A. J. “Teachers Professional Development and Quality
Assurance in Nigerian Secondary Schools.” World Journal of
Education, Volume 1, Number 2, 2011.
Cook, V. “Using the First Language in the Classroom.”
Canadian Modern Language Review, Volume 57, Number 3,
2011.
Cooper, S. T., and Cohn, E. “Estimation of a Frontier
Production Function for the South Carolina Educational
Process.” Economics of Education Review, Volume 16, Number
3, 2011.
47
Crichton, H. “Value Added’ Modern Languages Teaching in the
Classroom: An Investigation into How Teachers’ Use of
Classroom Target Language Can Aid Pupils’ Communication
Skills.” Language Learning Journal, Volume 37, 2009.
Gregorio, S. and Gil, G. “Teacher’s and Learner’s Use of
Code-Switching in English as a Foreign Language Classroom:
A Qualitative Study.” 2017.
Jingxia, L. “Teachers’ Code-Switching to the L1 in the EFL
Classroom.” The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, Volume
3, 2010.
Lin, A. “Classroom Code-Switching: Three Decades of
Research.” Applied Linguistic Review, Volume 4, Number 1,
2013.
Norrish, J. “English or English? Attitudes, Local Varieties
and English Language Teaching.” TESL-EL, Volume 3, Number
1, 2007.
Turnbull, M. “Employons le français en français de base.”
The Canadian Modern Language Review, Volume 62, 2016.
C. UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS
Bailey, A. A., “Code Switching in the Foreign Language
Classroom: Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions and the
Factors Impacting Them,” unpublished Master’s Thesis,
University of Toledo, France, 2011.
Bista, K., “Factors of Code Switching among Bilingual
English Students in the University Classroom,” unpublished
Master’s Thesis, Arkansas State University,
Arkansas, 2010.
Ebid, H., “Code Switching and Attitudinal Perception,”
unpublished Master’s Thesis, The American University of
Cairo, Cairo Egypt, 2017.
48
Johansson, S., “Code Switching in the English Classroom,”
unpublished Master’s Thesis, Karlstads University, Sweden,
2013.
Malik, M. Y., “Code Switching as an Effective Technique of
Teaching English at the Intermediate Level in Pakistan,”
unpublished Master’s Thesis, Pakistan, 2014.
Reigh, E., “Language Attitutdes in an Egyptian Discourse
Community,” unpublished Master’s Thesis, The American
University of Cairo, Cairo Egypt, 2014.
D. ELECTRONIC AND OTHER SOURCES
Burden, P. (2011). The Language Teacher. Retrieved on
September 18, 2018 from
http://www.jaltpublication.org/tlt/articles/2001/04/burden
.
Chi, W. C. (2010). The Importance of Bilingual Teachers to
Chinese-Oriented AMEP Learners. Retrieved on September 18,
2018 from http://www.necltr.mq.edu.au/conference2000.
Constructivism and Social Constructivism in the Classroom.
Retrieved September 18, 2018 from
http://www.ucdoer.ie/index.php/Education_Theory/Constructi
vism_and_Social_Constructivism_in_the_Classroom.
Cole, S. (2008). The Use of II in Communicative English
Classrooms. Retrieved on September 18, 2018 from
http://www.jalt-publications.org/tlt/files/98/dec/cole.ht
Educational Theories. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from
http://www.k12academics.com/education-heory#.VkJO3tKrTDd.
49
A P P E N D I C E S
50
APPENDIX A
APPROVAL LETTER FOR RESEARCH TITLE
SAMAR COLLEGE
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Catbalogan City
DR. PEDRITO G. PADILLA
SVP for Academic Programs
Samar College
Sir:
The undersigned BSED students had the honor to submit
the following titles for our thesis proposal for the
completion of Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in
English, preferably number 1.
1. EFFICIENCY OF USING CODE SWITCHING IN TEACHING
ENGLISH TO BACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (BSED)
MAJOR IN ENGLISH STUDENTS OF SAMAR COLLEGE
2. PERCEPTION ON THE EFFICIENCY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION
OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM AMONG GRADE 12
STUDENTS OF SAMAR COLLEGE
3. READINESS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW GE
COURSES AMONG THE COLLEGE INSTRUCTORS OF SAMAR
COLLEGE
Anticipating for your favorable action on this matter.
Respectfully yours,
(SGD.) CHRISTINA CASSANDRA T. ARAZA
(SGD.) KHRISTINE ANN C. CRISANTO
(SGD.) JAYDELLE D. DELOS SANTOS
(SGD.) CLARA M. DOROJA
(SGD.) ARIANE O. MACAWILE
(SGD.) MARY ROSE B. OREO
Approved by:
(SGD.) PEDRITO G. PADILLA, Ph.D.
SVP for Academic Programs
51
APPENDIX B
LETTER TO THE SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
SAMAR COLLEGE
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Catbalogan City
DR. PEDRITO G. PADILLA
SVP for Academic Programs
Samar College
Sir:
The names below are researchers that will conduct a
research entitled “EFFICIENCY OF USING CODE SWITCHING IN
TEACHING ENGLISH TO BACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (BSED)
MAJOR IN ENGLISH STUDENTS OF SAMAR COLLEGE” as part of the
requirements for the course, Bachelor of Secondary
Education.
In this regard, the researchers would like to seek
permission from your office to allow them to field their
questionnaire to the selected BSED students of your school.
Your kind and favorable consideration and preferential
attention to this request are highly appreciated for the
good of the service.
Respectfully yours,
(SGD.) CHRISTINA CASSANDRA T. ARAZA
(SGD.) KHRISTINE ANN C. CRISANTO
(SGD.) JAYDELLE D. DELOS SANTOS
(SGD.) CLARA M. DOROJA
(SGD.) ARIANE O. MACAWILE
(SGD.) MARY ROSE B. OREO
Approved by:
PEDRITO G. PADILLA, Ph.D.
SVP for Academic Programs
52
APPENDIX C
LETTER TO THE DEAN
SAMAR COLLEGE
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Catbalogan City
Dr. NIMFA T. TORREMORO
Dean, College of Education
Samar College
Catbalogan City
Madame:
The names below are researchers that will conduct a
research entitled “EFFICIENCY OF USING CODE SWITCHING IN
TEACHING ENGLISH TO BACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (BSED)
MAJOR IN ENGLISH STUDENTS OF SAMAR COLLEGE” as part of the
requirements for the course, Bachelor of Secondary
Education.
In this regard, the researchers would like to seek
permission from your office to allow them to field their
questionnaire to the selected BSED students of your
department.
Your kind and favorable consideration and preferential
attention to this request are highly appreciated for the
good of the service.
Respectfully yours,
(SGD.) CHRISTINA CASSANDRA T. ARAZA
(SGD.) KHRISTINE ANN C. CRISANTO
(SGD.) JAYDELLE D. DELOS SANTOS
(SGD.) CLARA M. DOROJA
(SGD.) ARIANE O. MACAWILE
(SGD.) MARY ROSE B. OREO
Approved by:
NIMFA T. TORREMORO, Ph.D.
Dean, College of Education
53
APPENDIX D
COVER LETTER FOR THE RESPONDENTS
SAMAR COLLEGE
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Catbalogan City
Dear Respondent:
Good day!
The undersigned researchers are conducting a study
entitled, “EFFICIENCY OF USING CODE SWITCHING IN TEACHING
ENGLISH TO BACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (BSED) MAJOR IN
ENGLISH STUDENTS OF SAMAR COLLEGE”, as a requirement for the
degree Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in English.
Along this line, they would like to request for your
support and cooperation by answering the attached
questionnaire.
Rest assured that all the pieces of information you
provide in their study will be treated with utmost
confidentiality and that these will solely be used for
research purposes and would be presented without any
reference to a particular person.
Thank you.
Respectfully yours,
(SGD.) CHRISTINA CASSANDRA T. ARAZA
(SGD.) KHRISTINE ANN C. CRISANTO
(SGD.) JAYDELLE D. DELOS SANTOS
(SGD.) CLARA M. DOROJA
(SGD.) ARIANE O. MACAWILE
(SGD.) MARY ROSE B. OREO
APPENDIX E
54
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE STUDENT-RESPONDENTS
PART I. STUDENT-RESPONDENTS’ PROFILE
Directions: The following block of questions asks you about
your personal information. Please answer the following
questions by putting a check (✔) mark in the appropriate
space or providing the information being asked.
1. Name (Optional): ____________________________
2. Age: _______
3. Sex: ( ) Male ( ) Female
4. Civil Status:
( ) Single
( ) Married
( ) Separated
( ) Annulled
( ) Widow/Widower
5. Gross Monthly Family Income:
( ) P 50,000 and above
( ) P 40,000 – P 49,999
( ) P 30,000 – P 39,999
( ) P 20,000 – P 29,999
( ) P 10,000 – P 19,999
( ) below P 10,000
6. Parents’ Highest Educational Attainment:
Father: Mother:
( ) No Schooling ( )
( ) Elementary Level ( )
( ) Elementary Graduate ( )
( ) High School Level ( )
( ) High School Graduate ( )
( ) College Level ( )
( ) College Graduate ( )
( ) MA/MS/MAT/MAEd Units ( )
( ) MA/MS/MAT/MAEd Graduate ( )
( ) Ph.D./Ed.D./D.A. Units ( )
( ) Ph.D./Ed.D./D.A. Graduate ( )
55
7. Parents’ Occupation:
Father: Mother:
( ) Government Employee ( )
( ) Private Employee ( )
( ) Self-Employed ( )
( ) Unemployed/Homemaker ( )
8. How often does your teacher use code switching in
class?
( ) Less 20% of the class hours
( ) More than 90% of the class hours
( ) between 20-40% of the class hours
( ) between 40-60% of the class hours
( ) between 60-80% of the class hours
( ) More than 80% of the class hours
PART II. STUDENT-RESPONDENTS’ PERCEPTION
Directions: Below are statements in which these would gather
data about your perceptions on the efficiency of code
switching to teaching English. There are no correct or
incorrect responses. No one else is to see these results
unless you decided to share them.
Read each item carefully. Please choose the one most
appropriate response to each statement. Put a check ( ✓) on
the appropriate column that best fits your immediate
reaction using the scale below.
5 - Strongly Agree
4 - Agree
3 - Neutral
2 - Disagree
1 - Strongly Disagree
Thank you for your cooperation. Please begin the
assessment process.
5 4 3 2 1
Statement
(SA) (A) (N) (D) (SD)
1. Code switching is efficient when
teacher explain words.
2. Code switching is efficient when
teacher explain sentences.
3. Code switching is efficient when
teacher cannot express themselves
56
clearly.
4. Code switching is efficient when
teacher wants to give more
examples.
5. Code switching is efficient when
teacher wants to make the lesson
more personal.
6. Code switching is efficient when
teacher wants to make the class
less boring.
7. Code switching is more effective
to teachers than to teach only in
English.
8. Code switching, when done by the
teachers, have a positive
impression.
9. Code switching, when done by the
students, have a positive
impression.
10. Code switching helps in improving
my class performance.
11. Code switching helps in improving
my class participation.
12. Code switching helps in expanding
the lesson.
13. Code switching is the key stage
for the development of my
bilingual competence.
14. Code switching is relevant in
foriegn language development.
15. Code switching is needed for
professional knowledge.
16. Code switching is needed for
professional competence.
17. Code switching is needed for
English knowledge.
18. Code switching is needed for
English language competence.
19. Code switching is needed for
personal development.
20. Code switching is needed for
professional development.
57
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION! GOD BLESS!
58
C U R R I C U L U M V I T A E
59
Personal Background
Name : CHRISTINA CASSANDRA T. ARAZA
Sex : Female
Civil Status : Married
Birthdate : September 15, 1991
Birthplace : Catbalogan City, Samar
Address : Catbalogan City, Samar
Parents
Father : Miguel C. Tafalla
Mother : Brenda B. Tafalla
Educational Background
Elementary : Catbalogan 1 Central Elem. School
Year : 2003
Secondary : Samar College
Year : 2007
Tertiary : Samar College
Year : 2015 – present
Course : Bachelor of Secondary Education
(Major in English)
60
Personal Background
Name : KHRISTINE ANN C. CRISANTO
Sex : Female
Civil Status : Single
Birthdate : May 12, 1998
Birthplace : Zumarraga, Samar
Address : Zumarraga, Samar
Parents
Father : Ricky P. Crisanto
Mother : Sarah C. Crisanto
Educational Background
Elementary : Bioso Elementary School
Year : 2011
Secondary : Bioso Integrated School
Year : 2015
Tertiary : Samar College
Year : 2015 – present
Course : Bachelor of Secondary Education
(Major in English)
61
Personal Background
Name : JAYDELLE D. DELOS SANTOS
Sex : Male
Civil Status : Single
Birthdate : October 25, 1999
Birthplace : Dolores, Eastern Samar
Address : Catbalogan City, Samar
Parents
Father : Jason U. Delos Santos
Mother : Daisylyn D. Delos Santos
Educational Background
Elementary : Catbalogan IV Central Elementary School
Year : 2011
Secondary : Samar College
Year : 2015
Tertiary : Samar College
Year : 2015 – present
Course : Bachelor of Secondary Education
(Major in English)
62
Personal Background
Name : CLARA M. DOROJA
Sex : Female
Civil Status : Single
Birthdate : June 5, 1998
Birthplace : San Sebastian, Samar
Address : San Sebastian, Samar
Parents
Father : Claro M. Doroja
Mother : Maria M. Doroja
Educational Background
Elementary : San Sebastian Central Elem. School
Year : 2011
Secondary : San Sebastian National High School
Year : 2015
Tertiary : Samar College
Year : 2015 – present
Course : Bachelor of Secondary Education
(Major in English)
63
Personal Background
Name : ARIANE O. MACAWILE
Sex : Female
Civil Status : Single
Birthdate : September 14, 1998
Birthplace : Paranas, Samar
Address : Paranas, Samar
Parents
Father : Alger P. Macawile
Mother : Maria O. Macawile
Educational Background
Elementary : Bagacay Elementary School
Year : 2011
Secondary : Bagacay National High School
Year : 2015
Tertiary : Samar College
Year : 2015 – present
Course : Bachelor of Secondary Education
(Major in English)
64
Personal Background
Name : MARY ROSE B. OREO
Sex : Female
Civil Status : Single
Birthdate : November 22, 1996
Birthplace : Zumarraga, Samar
Address : Zumarraga, Samar
Parents
Father : Virgillio B Oreo Sr.
Mother : Elmira B. Oreo
Educational Background
Elementary : Bioso Elementary School
Year : 2009
Secondary : Bioso Integrated School
Year : 2013
Tertiary : Samar College
Year : 2015 – present
Course : Bachelor of Secondary Education
(Major in English)