Cayetano Vs Monsod

CAYETANO v MONSOD
FACTS:
In 1991, Christian Monsod was appointed by President Corazon Aquino as the Chairman
of the Commission on Elections. His appointment was affirmed by the Commission on
Appointments. Monsod’s appointment was opposed by Renato Cayetano on the ground
that he does not qualify for he failed to meet the Constitutional requirement which
provides that the chairman of the COMELEC should have been engaged in the practice
law for at least ten years.
Monsod’s track record as a lawyer:
1. Passed the bar in 1960 with a rating of 86.55%.

2. Immediately after passing, worked in his father’s law firm for one year.
3. Thereafter, until 1970, he went abroad where he had a degree in economics and
held various positions in various foreign corporations.
4. In 1970, he returned to the Philippines and held executive jobs for various local
corporations until 1986.
5. In 1986, he became a member of the Constitutional Commission.
ISSUE:
1. Whether or not Monsod qualifies as chairman of the COMELEC.
2. What constitutes practice of law?
RATIO DECIDENDI:
The petition is DISMISSED.
1. Yes. Atty. Monsod’s past work experiences as a lawyer-economist, a lawyer-manager,

a lawyer-entrepreneur of industry, a lawyer-negotiator of contracts, and a lawyer-
legislator of both the rich and the poor — verily more than satisfy the constitutional
requirement — that he has been engaged in the practice of law for at least ten years.
The Commission on the basis of evidence submitted during the public hearings on
Monsod’s confirmation, implicitly determined that he possessed the necessary
qualifications as required by law. The judgment rendered by the Commission in the
exercise of such an acknowledged power is beyond judicial interference except only
upon a clear showing of a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of
jurisdiction. (Art. VIII, Sec. 1 Constitution). Thus, only where such grave abuse of
discretion is clearly shown shall the Court interfere with the Commission’s judgment. In
the instant case, there is no occasion for the exercise of the Court’s corrective power,
since no abuse, much less a grave abuse of discretion, that would amount to lack or
excess of jurisdiction and would warrant the issuance of the writs prayed, for has been
clearly shown.
2. Practice of law means any activity, in or out of court, which requires the application
of law, legal procedure, knowledge, training and experience. “To engage in the practice
of law is to perform those acts which are characteristics of the profession. Generally, to
practice law is to give notice or render any kind of service, which device or service
requires the use in any degree of legal knowledge or skill.
As noted by various authorities, the practice of law is not limited to court appearances.
The members of the bench and bar and the informed laymen such as businessmen,
know that in most developed societies today, substantially more legal work is
transacted in law offices than in the courtrooms. General practitioners of law who do
both litigation and non-litigation work also know that in most cases they find
themselves spending more time doing what is loosely described as business counseling
than in trying cases. In the course of a working day the average general practitioner
wig engage in a number of legal tasks, each involving different legal doctrines, legal
skills, legal processes, legal institutions, clients, and other interested parties. Even the
increasing numbers of lawyers in specialized practice wig usually perform at least some
legal services outside their specialty. By no means will most of this work involve
litigation, unless the lawyer is one of the relatively rare types — a litigator who
specializes in this work to the exclusion of much else. Instead, the work will require the
lawyer to have mastered the full range of traditional lawyer skills of client counseling,
advice-giving, document drafting, and negotiation.
FALLO:

Cayetano Vs Monsod

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cayetano Vs Monsod

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cayetano Vs Monsod

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CAYETANO v MONSOD

Monsod’s track record as a lawyer:

1. Passed the bar in 1960 with a rating of 86.55%.

The petition is DISMISSED.

1. Yes. Atty. Monsod’s past work experiences as a lawyer-economist, a lawyer-manager,

You might also like