Urban Bridges-Latest Experiences in Andalusia: Alejandro CASTILLO Manuel Escamilla Gonzalo OSBORNE
Urban Bridges-Latest Experiences in Andalusia: Alejandro CASTILLO Manuel Escamilla Gonzalo OSBORNE
Urban Bridges-Latest Experiences in Andalusia: Alejandro CASTILLO Manuel Escamilla Gonzalo OSBORNE
Summary
Andalusia, the southern region of Spain, has an ancient history, magnificent monuments and a
prolific culture. This region has developed an ambitious infrastructure improving plan, concerning
every facility and mean of transport. Bridges have a preeminent role in all of these interventions,
and their design needs to deal, in a very conscious way, with a rich natural environment and with an
outstanding cultural heritage that configure the historic patrimony of the area. For all these reasons,
it is appealing to analyse how to develop a bridge project in such an attractive and, at the same time,
sensitive environment, especially in urban areas where the conjunction of nature and cultural
heritage takes place. The study of a few representative examples is tackled, focusing in the key
aspects involved in the achievement of a successful project, not only respecting the surrounding
conditions, but also increasing the objective and subjective value of the place.
Keywords: Andalusia, urban bridge, Maro, urban footbridges, cable-stayed, Dragon Bridge.
1. Introduction-Basis of design
Which must be the characteristics of an urban bridge? The answer to this question may lead to a
controversial discussion, in which many different and almost certainly opposite points of view
would arise. Probably, as Javier Manterola pointed out [1] it would be easier to achieve an
agreement about how an urban bridge
must not be, rather than how it should be.
Nowadays, the evolution of technologies
and the economic develop experimented
by many areas have supported the
proliferation of urban infrastructures, and
bridge design is immersed in a constant
worldwide contest to achieve the most
innovative and impressive piece.
Modern times have proportioned an
unknown formal freedom to the design
of bridges, especially patent in urban
areas, and as J. Schlaich wrote, not
always for the better [2].
With the technical advances in software
and hardware, sophisticated calculus can
Fig. 1: Maro Cable-Stayed Footbridge. ACL be carried out almost instantly, and this
is occasioning dissociation between
formal (conceptual) design and structural design. This phenomenon, when occurs, implies the
consideration of the outer (visible) shape as a totally independent matter, around which all the
project must revolve, considering it as the most important issue. Thus, a decontextualization of the
bridge itself in all ways is commonly taking place: structural behaviour, geotechnical conditions,
construction procedures or materials availability are subjects unfairly subdued or even forgotten
when the formal design is developed, and usually no changes can be further made to the predefined
outer shape of the bridge in order to optimize the strength features, the flux of forces or the
constructive feasibility of the bridge. In worst cases, this decontextualization affects even the
natural, social, urban and economic boundary conditions of the bridge, that is to say that the bridge
loses all of its meaning: in these cases, bridges are designed as isolated entities, and placed
wherever they first geometrically fit, with minor adjustments. Structural engineering is not (almost
not yet) a serial productive industry, but maybe all bridges would be this way soon available by
catalogue.
As discuss in [2] the extraordinary progress of the technical tools at disposal represent a unique
opportunity to develop creative designs, being honest with the cultural responsibility as structural
designers and urban dynamistic agents. The “ancient” ages, when the structural assessments
required all the engineers’ effort have passed by, almost in the predominating medium size bridges,
to which the technological advances have implanted, in Juan J. Arenas words [3], a radical
“democracy”. Structural engineering has experienced indeed a worldwide expansion, but generally
engineers are more concerned to demonstrate that everything is possible rather than logical.
These generic considerations can be applied to urban bridges in Andalusia. However, in this area
more than in others, the historic, social and natural environments acquire transcendental importance,
because of the antique and rich heritage left by three millenniums of history and the biodiversity of
the ecosystems. Such sensitive border conditions deserve an additional effort not only to be
respectful with them but also to enrich and provide the backbone of the urban sustainable
development. To achieve these goals, it is very important to get to know the chronicle and evolution
of the site and its surroundings, the history of the previous bridges built (if any), the character and
expectations of the society. Only this way leads to a successful design: planned from a holistic point
of view, the urban bridge is a very powerful generator of new opportunities, an equilibrator of
unequal areas. Otherwise, the structure could even be a disruption, a bizarre unwanted guest.
However, these conditions may not cause fear to err or shyness to the bridge designer; there is no
need for more monotonous or even copycat designs. The challenges described must be potent
motivators instead, leading to ambitious and courageous conceptual designs that would be
deserving of admiration for future generations. Learning lessons from existing masterpieces, being
respectful and understanding with the place, the society and their needs, knowing the state-of-the-
art and using out-to-date technical tools, there are no limits.
ACL Estructuras is a structural design company which is developing its work since 1997. In this
paper, diverse urban bridges designed by this firm in Andalusia are presented and analyzed, not
only to describe their features but also to discuss them and generate further debate.