Imd 213 Catalouging Process
Imd 213 Catalouging Process
Imd 213 Catalouging Process
“Cataloguing Process”
By:
Intan Nurhazwani Binti Johari (2019249266)
Class: KIM1103F
Prepared for:
Submission date:
28 November 202
IMD213: ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT
“Cataloguing Process”
Prepared by:
INTAN NURHAZWANI BINTI JOHARI
(2019249266)
GROUP
KIM1103F
Main objective of descriptive cataloging is to enable user to find or identify the books
that they need by the tittle of the books, author of the books, or by the variant title which is
make the process easier than finding books on the rack without using the technology. This
method has been approved by the ACCR where they provide rules for the standard form
include the name, author that provide access for the descriptive cataloging. The purpose of
descriptive cataloging is to involves the standard set of rules for the description such as title,
author, publication record, describe the spatial scope of the task, add bibliographic notes as
required, and add access points for related individuals or organisations.
Tool that been used in descriptive cataloging is Resource Description & Access
(RDA) which is a series of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and
Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) based cataloguing instructions to create
a description and name and title access points describing a resource. Resource Description
& Access (RDA) provides libraries with the ability to dramatically alter how bibliographic data
is produced and used.
Resource Description & Access (RDA) appear from the International Conference on
the Principles & Future Development of AACR held in Toronto in 1997. It is collectively
published in the by the American Library Association, the Canadian Federation of Library
Associations, and the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) in
the United Kingdom. RDA Steering Committee (RSC) has been moving to an international
governance system since 2015, and is scheduled to be in effect in 2019.
1
Resource Description & Access (RDA) goes beyond previous cataloguing codes in that it
offers advice on digital resource cataloguing and puts more focus on helping consumers
search, locate, pick, and obtain the data they want.
SUBJECT HEADING
Subject heading is the topic heading is a particular term or expression used to find
and arrange books and papers by subject. Topic headings can be a perfect way to identify
topics that are specifically relevant to the topic. Topic headings can also be found on the title
of a book that gives material to the publisher, or at or at the bottom of the page of an online
book or post. If copied exactly as written, the subject heading can be used to scan for similar
books or papers.
The objective of subject heading is to identify the related information on a given topic
or subject. Other than that, the objectives of subject heading is to help the inquirer to find
details on the relevant topic and All of these purposes presume that a match can be made
between the searcher's language and the indexer's language for the subject or definition in
question. The purpose of using the subject heading in the cataloguing record is to provide
the individual looking for items in the library with a means of seeking information about the
problems discussed by those items.
The sources associated with the headings are then listed in categories, followed by
subsections of the subject headings, which may include any or more of the elements
referred to above of these components is included heading, class number and scope notes.
In heading, ay consist of one word or several and concept are usually called in the singular
and in the plural, although variations can be made. While class numbers is a numbers of
2
subject that have approved by the The Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) which
are usually the most common feature of the subject. For example, code QD419–QD419.7 is
for Chemistry subject and for full example of Subject Heading is on below:
In a conclusion, subject heading could give benefits for the cataloguer. It is a very
effective mechanism for information retrieval, even with its inherent difficulties associated
with having to accept pre-coordinated sentences that are often difficult to recall. Additional
complexities of vocabulary dilemmas, the uniformity of headings, the need for certificates
and inverted headings remain, among others, but it is still an incredibly practical method for
serious scholars, particularly when opposed to time-consuming and tedious keyword
searching. Librarians worldwide should make an attempt to advocate its use.
3
CLASSIFICATION
Collections of libraries of any size are arranged according to some system and are
commonly referred to as grouping. Classification is the art of bringing objects together and
distinguishing the reverse. Classification is more than about choosing the right notation or
category; it's about partnership. It includes a logical structure of topics and subtopics from
the general to the unique, which can be converted into a linear arrangement of materials in
the library.
Objective of classification to show the books looks together. In the order most
suitable for the reader and the librarians, the grouping arranges books. Readers should find
all the books and librarians should find the records with a minimum of time and resources.
All the works on the same subject are collected in the classification. Other than that, this
helps in bibliographic research. Bibliographic research is important because it assists in the
collection of bibliographies, catalogues and catalogues in the union.
The importance of classification to make sure that the references are in the correct
replacement. Documents should be substituted in their correct positions once they are
removed from the shelf. It is critical, after they have been returned from use, that library
classification enables correct replacement of records. A mechanized structure would be
needed to make this arrangement permanent. Classification of libraries provides tools to
articulate and conserve knowledge and adjusting the physical format of such products if
appropriate.
The Library of Congress (LC) was founded in 1800. There was 740, a room in the
Capitol and a librarian to supervise the archive in the Library of Congress. Its early
classification scheme was ordered by accession numbers by scale sub. The collection had
gone up to more than 3,000 volumes by 1812, and a better classification system was
4
needed. More libraries have adopted Library of Congress Classification (LCC) for both
subject cataloguing and shelf listing in recent decades, since the Library of Congress
electronically published the documents in its online catalogue.
The Library of Congress Classification (LCC) schedules were separately created and
added to the Library of Congress by a committee of topic experts based upon a "literary
warrant" of the content. Each schedule stands by itself because of its inherent peculiarities
and certain variations from discipline to discipline. In main classes, the whole area of
knowledge is classified into 21 major classes, each marked with one alphabet capital letter.
The letters I, O W, X, Y were not allocated but could be used for future growth. The letters
In sub classes, With the exception of E and F, each major class will also be split into
subclasses covering main class disciplines or major divisions. Most subclasses are
referenced by a combination of two letters or even three letters. But in divisions, the fact
each subclass will be subdivided into subclass components to define shape, place, time &
subtopics. The numbers 1-9999, others with decimal extension denote these. There may be
also a cutter number for certain subtopics. Below is the example of classification number:
The Library of Congress Classification (LCC) is well known and used by influential
US and international libraries for many years. Over the past century, Library of Congress
Classification (LCC)'s function has been increased from a tool to find library collections on
racks to an internet searching tool and most recently, to arrange and provide access to
electronic and networking tools. In the current context, the role of Library of Congress
Classification (LCC) as a mechanism for information organization is still to be completely
5
utilised. As a method for organising web services, Library of Congress Classification (LCC)
has great potential. It will support browsing and search limitation or extension.
In a range of different applications outside its familiar position as a shelf locating unit,
Library of Congress Classification (LCC) with its well-defined divisions, advanced
hierarchies, world widely usage and mapping for other topic schemes such as Library of
Congress Subject Heading (LCSH) promises. The scheme seems to be a classic example of
a scheme which has been popular for many years and has the fantastic future of the library
of Congress, the world's largest and most important library.
6
REFERENCE
Mason M. K. (2020, November 16) How Useful are Library of Congress Subject Headings?.
Retrieved from http://www.moyak.com/papers/library-congress-subject-headings.html