Innovations in Dewatering Sludges
Innovations in Dewatering Sludges
Innovations in Dewatering Sludges
before the cake form s , Wring alternating press High pressure and high shear Prefers high solids contents. Low through-
put or low cake solids contents
preventing, or minimizing, the layer(s) of
Electrodewatering filter press Electric field promoting electro-osmosis Electrical costs–but offset by high solids
impermeable cake from form i n g, and heating for moisture removal Semicontinuous (but automated)
shearing the sludge so the water to be High pressure without shearing
removed does not need to pass through T h e rmal filter press Heat and vacuum promoting moisture Electrical costs–but offset by high solid
removal. High pressure without shearing Semicontinuous (but automated)
the impermeable layer(s), and Centridry centrifuge Combined thermal drying and Energy costs–but offset by high solids
adding another driving force to help water dewatering Additional flowsheet unit operations vital
pass through the impermeable layer(s). V-fold belt-press filter Tolerates poor flocculation Low throughput
Pressure and shearing
Techniques to Improve Sludge Dewatering Simple, visual process
Conditioning and dewatering regimes Rotary press Tolerates poor flocculation Possibly low throughput
High pressure and shearing
focus on modifying the microbes, the Simple, visual process
bioflocs, and the flocs to be dewatered. Electrodewatering Electric field promoting electro-osmosis Still under development
Pressure filtration and electrodewatering belt-press filter and heating for moisture removal Electrical costs–to be offset by high
Pressure and shearing solids
most actively enhanced moisture reduction Impulse dewatering Combined heat and mechanical pres- Development stalled due to low
from sludges. The researchers also sure promoting moisture removal throughput
assessed combined novel conditioning
and novel dewatering techniques. Conclusion
A treatment plant's ability to dewater the sludge particles. Pressure filtration
Sludge that had been frozen and then
sludges depends on the specific dewater- and electrodewatering significantly
thawed appeared to have different bioflocs,
ing process used by the plant and its abil- enhanced moisture reduction, but may not
settled much more quickly than the non-
ity to impact the nature and structure of always be cost effective.
frozen sample. Once flocculated, this
thawed sludge settled to a smaller volume
and seemed to hold together better in a
simple slump test. It dewatered much bet- The research on which this report is based was funded in part by the U.S. Environmental
ter, with the initial dewatering being faster Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) through Cooperative Agreement No. CR-827345-01 with the
Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF). Unless an U.S. EPA logo appears on the
and achieving a higher solids content.
cover, this report is a publication of WERF, not U.S. EPA. Funds awarded under the agreement
Electrodewatering of the thawed sample
cited above were not used for editorial services, reproduction, printing, or distribution.
reached a significantly higher final solids
content than for the nonfrozen sample. For
equivalent power consumption, the thawed
CONTRACTOR PROJECT SUBCOMMITTEE
sample reached higher solids contents. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial John Novak, Ph.D., P.E., Chair
onset of the electro-osmotic effect in the Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia Virginia Tech
thawed sample was immediate, which PROJECT TEAM Stephen Constable, P.E.
appears to have reduced the initial power DuPont Company
Sarah A. Miller, Principal Investigator
consumption required to reach high solids B ruce A. Fi rth, Ph.D. Matt Higgins, Ph.D., P.E.
contents. CSIRO Bucknell Univers i t y
Freezing, howev e r, is expensive. The
Graeme J. Jameson, Ph.D. Sudhir Murthy, Ph.D., P.E.
challenge is to identify a more economical The University of Newcastle District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority
means than freezing for altering the dewa-
Yao-de Yan, Ph.D. Nish M. Vasavada, P.E.
terability of sludge.
Hunter Water Australia Invista 05/08
Water Environment Research Foundation 635 Slaters Lane, Suite 300 Alexandria VA 22314-1177