This document contains summaries of 5 legal cases in India. Case 1 involves negligence by a hospital that resulted in a patient's death. Case 2 deals with a police complaint of harassment. Case 3 is about sexual harassment and abuse of female workers. Case 4 addresses a dispute over property registration. Case 5 is a complaint about a widow's pension being transferred to her son's loan without her consent.
This document contains summaries of 5 legal cases in India. Case 1 involves negligence by a hospital that resulted in a patient's death. Case 2 deals with a police complaint of harassment. Case 3 is about sexual harassment and abuse of female workers. Case 4 addresses a dispute over property registration. Case 5 is a complaint about a widow's pension being transferred to her son's loan without her consent.
This document contains summaries of 5 legal cases in India. Case 1 involves negligence by a hospital that resulted in a patient's death. Case 2 deals with a police complaint of harassment. Case 3 is about sexual harassment and abuse of female workers. Case 4 addresses a dispute over property registration. Case 5 is a complaint about a widow's pension being transferred to her son's loan without her consent.
This document contains summaries of 5 legal cases in India. Case 1 involves negligence by a hospital that resulted in a patient's death. Case 2 deals with a police complaint of harassment. Case 3 is about sexual harassment and abuse of female workers. Case 4 addresses a dispute over property registration. Case 5 is a complaint about a widow's pension being transferred to her son's loan without her consent.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 6
CASE LAWS
CASE – I REGISTRATION NO. – RJN/102/09
REGISTRATION DATE - 01/11/2009
PLAINTIFF’S NAME – Smt. Aashadevi Netam
PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS- G-2, New Civil Line , Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
DEFENDANT’S NAME – Hospital Supritendent
DEFENDANT’S ADDRESS – District Hospital, Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
BRIEF SUMMARY OF CASE- Negligence on the part of district hospital.
(complaint related to health department)
STATEMENT OF FACTS -
The plaintiff filed a complaint in the commission complaining about the
negligence done by the doctors of the city hospital. Plaintiff’s son was admitted in the hospital on 11/09/09. But instead of recovering plaintiff’s sons’s condition kept worsening. No emergency facilities or I.C.U. was made available to him. Also he was not referred to a better hospital by the doctors. And due to negligence of hospital staff in his treatement and lack of care plaintiff’s son died on 13/09/09. Also plaintiff made a complaint against the education department of not sanctioning the claim of exgresia.
It was held under Section 38 and Section 40 that there was negligence on in the treatement by the hospital and plaintiff was entitled to compensation. CASE – II REGISTRATION NO. – 1472/2015/RYP/POC
REGISTRATION DATE - 04/11/2015
PLAINTIFF’S NAME – Vibha Soni d/o Mr. Nand Kumar Soni
PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS - Indra Chowk, Sanjay Nagar, Police station
Tilakpara , Raipur (C.G.)
DEFENDANT’S NAME – Sub inspector , Anuradha Rao.
DEFENDANT’S ADDRESS – Police station Tilakpara , Raipur (C.G.)
BRIEF SUMMARY OF CASE- Complaint to take action against Sub inspector,
Anuradha Rao. (other police related complaints )
STATEMENT OF FACTS - Plaintiff was being molested and tortured by her
in laws force dowry since the start of her marriage . She was forced to give her gifted gold and silver jewellery to her sister-in-law and brother-in-law. She filed complaint against all this in women police station where sub inspector Anuradha Rao forced her to take back her complaint and not to take any action against her complaint.
It was held that since this complaint was already filed in National Womens Commission and then in Human Rights Commission , the complaint was dismissed. CASE – III REGISTRATION NO. – 434/2016
REGISTRATION DATE - 04/04/2016
PLAINTIFF’S NAME – Mrs. Sarojini Bhargav
PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS - Women Welfare Association, (C.G)
DEFENDANT’S NAME – K.M. Babu and Ors.
DEFENDANT’S ADDRESS – Opp. Government college, Kosabadi,Korba
BRIEF SUMMARY OF CASE- Appropriate action against Jitendra Sahu and
K.M. Babu. ( atrocities against women )
STATEMENT OF FACTS – The complaint has been filed against South Indian Mr. K.M. Babu s/o K.M. Mannulal and Mr. Jitendra Sahu s/o Mr. Babul lal Sahu as they used to molest innocent female workers by blackmailing them and sexually harassing them. They used to put false complaint against women workers and in exchange of taking back their complaint used to molest them , blackmail them and forced them to have sexual relations with them. Mr. K.M. Babu married some women, used them and then abandoned them. Mr. Jitendra Sahu used to deal in drugs and search for innocent women who can be their target.
It was held that since the complaint was addressed to CM and not to the Commission, the complaint has been dismissed and no action could be taken against both the men by this commission. CASE – IV REGISTRATION NO. – 382/2016/KNK/RDC
REGISTRATION DATE - 21/03/2016
PLAINTIFF’S NAME – Chintaran Devangan s/o Devlal Devangan
PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS - Village Charama ,Tehsil Charama, district North
BRIEF SUMMARY OF CASE- Already decided case was opened. ( complaint
related to revenue department )
STATEMENT OF FACTS - Plaintiff Chintaram and Shankarlal Devangan
have complained to the commission that two women had filed a case against them for seizing property. The case which was filed by womens on 29/04/13 in front of Tehsildar was dismissed as plaintiff presented all the necessary documents in court in front of Tehsildar. But Rama Bai and Lata Bai again filed a case dated 10/05/15 against plaintiff and his brother for registration of the same property. Plaintiff is suffering financially due to the reopening of case.
It was held that according to plaintiff the case is filed under court of Tehsildar. The Commission cannot interfere in the procedure of court. Hence the complaint is dismissed. CASE – V REGISTRATION NO. – GRB/21/2012/PC
REGISTRATION DATE - 24/08/2012
PLAINTIFF’S NAME – Subhasdra Bai Nagesh w/o late Mr.Babulal Nagesh
Kumar
PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS - Village Thirliguda ,post Khoksara, district
Gariyaband (C.G)
DEFENDANT’S NAME – Branch Manager
DEFENDANT’S ADDRESS – Dena Bank Devbhog Gariyaband (C.G.)
BRIEF SUMMARY – Demand of pension ariers from Dena Bank.
STATEMENT OF FACTS – Plaintiff Subhadra Bai Nagesh w/o late Mr.
Babulal Nagesh complained to the commission that her husband died on 01/01/11 and plaintiff started receiving the pension after his death. After one year the pension arier of plaintiff’s husband was transferred to loan of plaintiff’s son which he took for buying tractor. The complaint was presented to the Commission and since it was a violation of human right, Commission asked Dena Bank Devbhog their statement.
Dena Bank provided their statement under Section – 11 stated that the tractor loan was taken by plaintiff and her son jointly. Plaintiff’s statement that she had no idea of her son’s loan is wrong.
It was held that accepting Section – 11 and the statement of defendant
