[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views2 pages

Case 1

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2

CASE 1: RJN/629/2017

Classification: DTC
Applicant Name: Anuradha Nishad
Applicant Address: Mohla Police Station, Tahsil Mohla ward no. 04, District:
Rajnandgaon
Non-Applicant Name: Kamlesh Kumar
Non-Applicant Address: Mohla Police Station, Tahsil Mohla ward no.04,
District: Rajnandgaon
Complaint Short Brief: Being Tortured By Non-applicant for Dowry

Facts
 Applicant complain in the commission against her husband father in law
mother in law and sister in law for torturing her for dowry
 Her in laws abused, beaten and threatened to kill her for the dowry and
that her to accused her in false police case
 There were some witness Bishroo Nisad, Vishnu Nishad and others
 Complaint was being reported to the police station time to time but
inspector they don't want to register the Case in police station due to their
own negligence.
 Applicant requested to the commission to investigate the matter and tech
appropriate action.

Proceedings

 On Date 07/07/2017 a letter was sent to the superintendent of police


along with the copy of complaint and requesting them to send
investigation report within 60 days to the commission.
 Report from SP has been received from C-8 to C-11, in that given report
complaint of the applicant has been directed to sub divisional Officer
Ambagarh chowki .
 In the investigation on date 10/6/2017 her complain was registered on
Mohla thana crime number 59/2017.
 On date 28/6/2017 after preparing chalan number 56/2017 was presented
to JME court AMBARGARH CHAUKI.
 A copy of C-8 has been sent to applicant to overview and request to send
their opinion within 15 days to the commission
 Reply of the applicant has been received from C-13 to C-15, she said that
against her husband father and mother in law case was prepared but case
wasn't prepared against the main suspect of the case who was her sister in
law Jyoti and requesting to look into the matter and investigate.

JUDGEMENT

THE HONORABLE HUMAN RIGHT COMMISSION CONCLUDES THAT


REGARDING THE SAID INVESTIGATION REPORT FROM THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE WAS PRESENTED TO THE COURT
APPLICANT CAN GIVE HER OBJECTION/ STATEMENT AND CAN YOU
APPLICATION FOR MAKING ANY ADDITIONAL CHANGES LIKE
ADDING ANY ACCUSED BEFORE THE POOR.
THEREFORE AFTER SENDING THE COMPLAIN BY APPLICANT IN
THE COMMISSION THE FIRST INFORMATION LETTER WAS
REGISTERED ON TEN 6 2017 AND THE CASE OF PRESENTED IN THE
COURT AS A RESULT OF WHICH ACTION FIRST TAKEN ON THE
COMPLAINT ACCEPTING THE REPORT C15 OF THE SP .
THE COMPLAINT IS RESOLVED

You might also like